- The 10 Golden Rules of the Red Pill: A Critical Analysis
- Red Pill Ideologies, Rules, and Misconceptions
- Navigating the Manosphere: From Blue to Red to Black Pill
- Red Pill Realities: Self-Improvement and Relationship Dynamics
- The Truth Behind Feminist Red Pill Beliefs
Deliberating Dogface Dudes #3 - The Red Pill Prescription #3DDebates
Streamed live on July 30, 2024https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_dtN4fHMgk
We start by breaking down the various 'pills' that define different ideologies within the manosphere, from the blue pill to the black pill. We discuss the spectrum of beliefs, from those who are unaware of societal issues affecting men to those who believe in genetic determinism and hypergamy.
We also explore the 10 golden rules of the red pill, analyzing each rule's implications and discussing their relevance and validity. From the importance of self-improvement to the pitfalls of hookup culture.
We also touch on the criticisms and misconceptions surrounding the red pill community, including accusations of misogyny and racism. Finally, we offer our own perspectives on how to navigate relationships and self-improvement in a more balanced and positive way. Join us for a thought-provoking discussion that aims to shed light on a complex and often polarizing topic.
(00:00:08) Zoomer tells us about Pills
(00:04:45) Deliberating Dog Face Dudes
(00:06:00) Matrix and Manosphere
(00:07:11) Red Pill Golden Rules
(00:18:03) Rule 1: Never Take Care of Another Man's Seed
(00:23:04) Rule 2: Never Finance a Woman's Lifestyle
(00:29:26) Rule 3: Don't Let Her Looks Turn You Into a Sucker
(00:36:04) Rule 4: Pay Attention to Her Actions, Not Her Words
(00:41:25) Rule 5: Never Marry or Move In Without Knowing Her for 1-2 Years
(00:46:01) Rule 6: Never Be Responsible for Her Problems
(00:53:46) Rule 7: Never Fight or Argue with a Woman
(01:01:04) Rule 8: Don't Be Manipulated by Sex
(01:03:57) Rule 9: Don't Confuse Lust for Love
(01:10:00) Rule 10: Never Beg for Female Attention or Validation
(01:25:00) Shocking Beliefs of the Red Pill Community
(01:33:34) Belief 1: Female Supremacy Movement Exists
(01:36:27) Belief 2: Women Are Illogical and Manipulative
(01:40:12) Belief 3: Women Are Hypergamous
(01:51:00) Belief 4: Women Need Men More Than Men Need Women
(01:54:04) Belief 5: Women Are Depreciating Assets
(01:57:03) Belief 6: 20% of Men Have Sex with 80% of Women
(02:03:00) Belief 7: White Men Are Not Privileged
(02:11:58) Positive Affirmations and Closing Thoughts
- John Roeland
https://serve.podhome.fm/deliberatingdogfacedudes
https://serve.podhome.fm/episodepage/deliberatingdogfacedudes/3
A peasant, broky, Wagy, Pion. Oh, it's massaging. It's toxic mask. You're a beta. I'm 4 time kickboxing world champion. Pull up in the Bugatti Sheeran. Sparkling water only.
[00:00:22] Unknown:
You're scared of bubbles. Pussy. But more on that later. At this point in time, there are so many different pills and ways to define them. It's all so goofy, all these Internet terms, but, I'll just formulate them in a way that, that I feel like is most that's most intuitive or easy to understand. So we have a spectrum. At one poll, you have the blue pill. At the other poll, you have the black pill. Nobody really claims the blue pill. It's just sort of a name for people who are unaware of what's going on or who are in denial of what's going on. They deny that there is a problem with men or with society in the first place. Everything's going good. Then going down a little bit, you have people that acknowledge there is a problem, understand what's going on, but they favor explanations or solutions to this problem that are still counter to the red bill.
It's important to mention that the red bill is largely a a very right wing ideology. At least according to the way politics have organized themselves right now, if you ask somebody if they're red pill and they say yes, there's pretty much no shot. They're they're going to be, culturally liberal. Next up, we have the red pill, which is so massive and hard to define, but I'll just do it anyways. It's, it's the acknowledgment of all these problems, but also the belief that you can fix them. And, it advocates for things like embracing your masculinity. People in the red pill believe, modern men are not masculine and modern women are way too masculine. I'm still looking at it through the lens of gender dynamics because that's how it started, but the red pill has ascended that. Anyways, let's go down to the black pill. The black pill hasn't really gotten as large as the red pill, and it's still limited to topics of dating pretty much for the most part. The black pill also acknowledges all these problems, whatever, but it is the mindset that it's pretty much over for a lot of men who are average or below average.
It's this heavy focus on genetic determinism and the way you look, having the biggest impact on your dating life, and it also extends to your life in general. The red pill and the black pill both agree on this idea of hypergamy, which is pretty much where women date up. They want the top 20% of men pretty much exclusively because they face the burdens of reproduction so they're more selective. But one of the biggest differences is that people who subscribe to the red pill would say that any man could get to the top 20% if they put in enough effort, enough work into themselves.
While the black bill would say it's not possible for everyone, it's a largely genetic distinction. Now it's obvious that by definition, not every man could get into the top 20% technically, but I think the red pill says there's there's so little competition, and so little people who will genuinely work hard for a long amount of time that allows you to get into this top 20%. So that brings the question which pill is right. And, I don't know. I'm actually ashamed. I know what any of this is. But in my opinion, nobody on the Internet is going to be able to accurately prescribe why you're unable to get bitches. That's gonna take some introspection on your part. Okay? It could be for so many reasons, intrinsic or extrinsic, in your control, out of your control. It's probably a combination of all sorts of things. The way the black pill focuses on looks and the belief that looks are very important is low key what a lot of people intrinsically think anyway.
When you see a hot person and a ugly person together, you're kinda like, wait. This doesn't add up. What's going on here? And it makes sense, you know. Studies show that people judge each other within 1 tenth of a second. When you see somebody, you have judged them within 1 tenth of a second.
[00:04:45] John Roeland:
Alright.
[00:04:48] John Roeland:
What's up, Benjamin? What's up, Alan?
[00:04:51] John Roeland:
Oh, welcome back to deliberating dog face dudes.
[00:04:58] John Roeland:
Good good to be here.
[00:04:59] allen marcus:
Feeling feisty tonight. Feisty. Gonna argue some points tonight.
[00:05:05] John Roeland:
That was a interesting little interesting little video. Lindsay, I would, happen to agree, or at least, too dominant in this culture. I would have to say that, that was kinda interesting. I hadn't really thought of it in that particular context where I I do agree that we're in a feminine society. I hadn't really thought of it that in that overall context, but that was interesting.
[00:05:39] allen marcus:
So he's describing pills. There's this idea that a lot of young people want to categorize things. So when we get the Matrix movie and they have the scene where it's like, we'll take the red pill, you see reality. Take the blue pill, you stay asleep, and you're just kind of naive. And you go about your business, and you don't really have to know what's going on. But once you take the red pill, you can't unsee these things. So the manosphere, they were already describing things that they were noticing amongst themselves, and they were playing the field. They were going on dates. They were hooking up with women. They were trying different pickup lines. They were trying to figure out, well, what's going on with technology now?
A little bit has changed where women have phones, and they're using dating apps, and they're going to clubs. And the things have shifted. They've changed with technology. So recognize recognizing that technology has changed changed the dating field in some ways, and then describing the sit situation as having taken the red pill, now you can't unsee that. So having this information, what it is, it's information, statistics, maybe some some numbers, more or less anecdotal evidence. But the an anecdotal evidence was reproduced over and over and over and again by these guys who say, well, now let's begin to formalize this information into books and and things after posting blogs and forums.
They'd they'd receive the comments, they'd rewrite the stuff, and they'd publish books. So that is then been distilled down to viral Facebook posts of which we have tonight, the 10 golden rules of the red pill.
[00:07:24] John Roeland:
I just wanted to know at what point in this process that they personally call you.
[00:07:29] allen marcus:
The women
[00:07:30] John Roeland:
on the phone? No. The the the during the book process and, the making the rules and all that kind. Where where where is it that they call you stands in that?
[00:07:42] allen marcus:
Who's the you? Am I the me? Art Marcus. They call me up on the phone. Marcus.com. Yeah. I've got a website. I say, hey. We're talking about these issues, and they call me up and say, hey. I've got a book.
[00:07:55] John Roeland:
Okay. What what part in the process does that happen? I'm I was just curious because I noticed you left that part out, and that seems to be an integral part of the of the process.
[00:08:06] allen marcus:
Yeah. So a specific Reddit poster, an infamous Reddit poster did make contact with me. We do have a copy of his book, and we're working with him to decide how we're going to proceed with,
[00:08:21] John Roeland:
an interview or live stream never even heard of me, so it's not we. Maybe he knows John. I don't know. The guy that I don't
[00:08:28] allen marcus:
Well, he saw my website. It's the, website.
[00:08:33] John Roeland:
I I just wanna say, in looking at this You can't do it. This topic or this genre, I guess it's my one thought is, is, hasn't it always been this way? So I think that points to your comment, Marcus, that it's the technology that's really playing it out in this way where it's so defined and it's, you know, there's communities based around it. And but, I mean, thinking back in time, women were always looking at what they considered valuable in a man, and more attractive women are gonna end up with more attractive men. And but that doesn't leave the less attractive people, you know, or the lower classes for lack of a better term or the working class with nothing.
It just leaves them with a different a different group of people. So maybe, I guess, the question is where did we go to where everyone wants the top, everyone wants the number 10 or, you know, the 10 woman instead of just being comfortable with who you are and where you land in that hierarchy. And, you know, it seems to me that that issue would be from the beginning of humanity. And so the way that it's being defined now, like, you're a loser if you can't get a 10, that has to do, I think, with technology and culture and where we are now. So just a little comment.
[00:10:12] John Roeland:
I I I wouldn't disagree. The whole problem is is that whole thing that, Marcus was talking about, they really kinda lump numerous things together. It's not just one thing. So, specifically, with the technology aspect of it, what the what the problem is is, before the technology, you know, you could isolate people and and that's just the way it was. You had certain groups. And and you had a friend group and and that was from your little city or your region. You might go visit a group over here, like, where I'm from. When I went to high school, it was Groton, and maybe you went and hooked up with the people over in Webster.
You know? But, that was, like, exotic and shit. You know? And it and it was stories about how bad the cops and guys in Webster were and how awesome the girls in Webster were. You know? And that's just, the small town nonsense. But what the problem with the technology is is now and this really kind of goes both ways a little bit, but things just operate differently for men than women. But women who normally would not have had gotten the chance to throw themselves or present themselves to a lot of these men, where there might have been 1 or 2 guys in their town or area that was where this top echelon. And those guys were taken up by a group, so then it was already understood. Well, now all the girls get to splash themselves to all the guy all of them upper echelon guys or high value guys across the entire board.
So at some point in time, they don't even pay attention to anything below that because now that they have a a wide variety of good ones, you know, the tens, well, why would you go for less? Well, you know, if you can shoot it. And that the fact is is while a lot of today's younger girls don't understand the difference between attention for just sexual purposes and attention for, greater purposes. And they will take the sexual purposes and think that that that makes them valuable because, somebody's just willing to have sex with them and continue on with that until it's too late a lot of times it seems. But that the technology's really spiked that just because of availability.
[00:12:51] allen marcus:
When you're talking about availability, I'm thinking more in terms of the availability of information. So with the red pill communities forming on different message boards using the Internet to connect with other men and to share this information, that would have taken years years years to hear your uncle and your dad talk about behind your back. So this is information that a lot of men who we might assume were born from, into a single parent family, so they only had a mother at home. They didn't have male influence. A lot of these guys would never encounter this information unless they specifically went to these forums.
So with that said, the viral posts of these red pill golden rules found their virility in the fact that literally they were potent. They were powerful, and they empowered men. So they were spread everywhere, and the guys began to talk about it and to share those rules and kind of compare notes and make their own lists. So this note with 10 red pill golden rules in no particular order from an anonymous collective who gave us 10 sentences that are deemed 10 golden rules. Do we wanna get into the first one right away? Let's do it. So these are in these are in no particular order. This is from a viral Facebook post. Don't know who the author is.
We'll start with number 1. Never take care of another man's seed. Put another way, if the child is not your son or daughter Marcus. One at a time, Marcus. The son is if the child is not your son or daughter, don't take care of that child.
[00:14:40] John Roeland:
I guess I'll start. That's hot steamy shit. If you're, dating a woman, you know, I mean, don't get me wrong. I mean, I understand that baked into this is the concept that you're supposed to be trying trying to find a girl with a low body count, preferably a virgin, you know, from the way this and I I again, even what I was saying before, this isn't my ideas, but this is what they're saying. So I understand that. I ideas, but this is what they're saying. So I understand that that's kind of baked into that cake, I guess. So but if you're so so I mean, if the number one rule is never date a single mother, okay, but that's not what you're saying. Never take care of another man's seed. That's that's some hot steamy shit. If you're if you if that woman is somebody you find a future with and a potential future with, and she happens to have a kid, which I'm not saying be captain save a hole and all that. But if you find a woman that you think is, worth a potential future, then certainly if she has a child, then that child you are taking on that responsibility.
I mean, you're not his dad, you're not his parent, that should be recognized and understood. But to to say, oh, I'm not gonna take care of your kid, screw your kid. I'm just gonna I'm just gonna have sex with you. That's some real scummy scumminess right out the gate.
[00:16:16] John Roeland:
Yeah. I agree with you, Ben, as a person that is a stepfather myself. I think that this points to what I've come to understand about this movement is if the red pill really means going down the rabbit hole that these guys didn't go all the way, or they've stopped at a certain plateau of the rabbit hole, which is all focused on validation from women, relationships, valuing some relationship with a woman, you know, really putting an emphasis on your masculinity and proving that you're a man and somehow, like, not taking care of someone else's kid makes you more manly. For me, personally, I've always valued children and raising children and the importance of that. And as a person who does want to see the world be a better place, I think more, you know, men should be able to step up into that role. Now in my situation, the the my my son's father is totally involved. And in that case, I've even chosen to kind of take a step back and be a little more hands off because I'm understanding my role there as his stepdad, You know, another voice to talk to, but I'm not the ultimate one making decisions for what happens with him.
And, so yeah. I just think it points to the values of this movement, which may not be held by everybody in the movement, but it's all about status and proving that you're a masculine guy and, you know, kind of that Andrew Tate shtick. So, yeah, for me personally, I think this is is pretty bad.
[00:18:03] allen marcus:
As a hard and fast rule to say never take care of another man's seed, period, doesn't take into account well, what if she's widowed? What if the father has died? There's other there's other considerations. This might also bring to mind the obsession they have with paternity tests. So if she says she's pregnant, get a paternity test, find out who the actual father is, this type of thing. It might point to a greater issue of men being afraid of the the children issue. It's a very immature position to hold, to be so hard and fast about, you know, I'm never taking care of another woman's kids. If she has children, I I won't even date her.
In in this world where children are the reason men and women come together at some point being completely just fidgety and uncomfortable with children in any form, that's gonna be a red flag to women. So that's not a good look for a man coming into a conversation. It's hard and fast rule. There's gotta be some nuance and some reflection to say, well, at that's at what stage of your life? You're a young man. You don't wanna take care of children, surely, but the red pill and these concepts are for men at every stage of life and all ages. Right?
[00:19:27] John Roeland:
Well, another point to add to that is the awareness that those children in those situations, single single parent homes where their mom is the only one there, those are the ones that get preyed on by by predators. So I think, again, these guys, you know, are they're just focusing this philosophy on relationships and feeling dominant and feeling like a player, And, they're not really looking at the actual issues, the actual truth of what's going on in the world and, you know, playing a part in, you know, trying to trying to I mean, you know, you can't do much to prevent human trafficking, but you could take care of a kid and make sure that that kid is safe.
And, you know, to me that's that's playing a part.
[00:20:21] John Roeland:
Yeah. It's the flavor of the never take care of another man's seat. If if you differentiated never date single mothers. I can handle that. That doesn't have this overtone of you're gonna have sex with the woman and not take care of some responsibilities. So you're you're just kind of a douche. Like, that's that's just all there is to it. I mean so I mean, honestly, if you were just like, I won't raise other men's kids, blah blah blah, you know, you're kind of a dickhead, but whatever. You aren't. I I find this scummy or where you're like, yeah, well, I'll go get the milk, but, I'm not gonna take care of the cow.
You know, nor the nor feed the cow's calf that brought the milk or anything like that. It just seems real real scummy. I mean, the the interesting part about this list overall is that back end of the list gets pretty reasonable. And the front end of the list, like, to put this as number 1, like, myself as a man, like, even to refer to a kid as another man's seed. I I I'm with John, like, I've helped babysit, raise, been around all kinds of kids that aren't mine, aren't women's that are dating. The general rule, in my opinion, is if there's a kid around, you treat that kid like you you basically treat all kids the same. You don't your kid's your kid, obviously. But if there's kid around and they need something, you take care of it. It's just how it is.
A kids can't kids can't take care of themselves. This is your this is your responsibility as an adult. So I I don't even understand this number 1.
[00:22:08] allen marcus:
And it can get real disgusting if men are shaming other men who are seeing a woman, and then they learn that, well, she had prior children To say that that man needs to dump that woman because don't take care of another man's seed, bro, is oh, that's gonna be real hard. Real hard.
[00:22:32] John Roeland:
James Maiden used to hell.
[00:22:37] allen marcus:
That might this this rule kind of connects this idea of bet, they call them beta bucks. Basically, the the men went on alpha, but they're beta, so they'll be good providers. So then to be placed into this bucket of beta bucks where, well, you're getting a woman, but she's only interested in you because you're gonna pay for her children. Kinda gets into number 2, which is never finance a woman's lifestyle at all, I guess. Don't pay her money.
[00:23:08] John Roeland:
Like yeah. That that would have to be fleshed out a little bit to for me to really woman that, might just be, woman that might just be financially needy where she is. We've all met girls that have 3, 4 kids with, different dudes. They get, you know, they need somebody to support them or take care of them, help them. I understand not trying to telling guys don't try and be that dude who just goes and deals with that kind of thing just to get his his peepee touched. I I understand that. But that's a whole lot different than I mean, I never finance a woman's lifestyle. My wife is a homemaker. How the fuck is she supposed to make it without me financing it? I don't I don't know what to what degree does this happen? I don't understand. Like, if you're looking for a traditional relationship, my wife is entirely financially dependent on me.
And and I am entirely dependent on her for quite for things. So there's a an exchange in the relationship. I don't understand. Honestly, traditionally, that is the man's place to rather rather finance her life's I don't again, this just seems like a get the get the milk, but don't take care of the cow scenario number 1 and number 2. It seems like that's like, when those are your too hard fat, your too hard rules that you can boil things down to, it really just seems to me like you you just want, number 1, if she's a good woman, she's not gonna deal with your ass. And why should she?
You know, like, you basically are looking for free hookers from the way it's from the way it sounds at that point. So I I don't I don't see where these are these are great for any young man to maybe with some type of more nuance, it could somehow be something reasonable, but just as this, no.
[00:25:27] John Roeland:
Yeah. You took the words out of my mouth, Ben, in terms of it sounding almost like you're you're talking about an escort or something like that. Like like, if you see a woman who is willing to go out with you because you have money and you can pay for a trip to Vegas or or whatever it is, then if that's the kind of woman you're going after, then there is a part of it that involves you having money and you being able to provide her with, you know, the lifestyle. But, yeah, if if you're looking for a woman to settle down with, then that implies some type of economic partnership, you know, whether it's the man providing completely for the woman or both people working together to create a lifestyle and sustain a lifestyle.
So, yeah, it just again, sounds like this is directed for hookup culture for guys that are trying to get laid and be players. And I I I did wanna point out again, like, Ben, you said Captain Save A Ho. That comes from a a Bay Area rap artist, e 40. Back in the mid nineties, they came out with the song Captain Save Oh. And it's I mean, it's to me, it's the beginning of all of this. This is, you know, pimp culture, the game, being a player, never you know, the woman pays you. You don't pay the woman. So, and going along those lines in some of the research I did, Patrice O'Neil, the comedian, he, in the early 2000, was one of the, one of the yeah. Rest in peace. He was one of the first people talking about this stuff on Opie and Anthony and, I forget the other guy. Something Lycus, Tom Lycus, and Patrice O'Neil would go go on there. And, the one thing I heard him say was, I'm just tired of in this society that men are are looked down upon for being men, but women are praised for being whatever they want. And so, apparently, that had some influence on, the growth of this this philosophy.
[00:27:49] John Roeland:
Well, I I can totally understand that. What I don't, our society never tends to go back to reasonable. It's like, oh, here's something really stupid. I'm gonna go ahead and react to it with something equally as stupid. I I I can totally see what you're saying.
[00:28:05] allen marcus:
Well, someone has to pay bills somehow, some of the time. And if you're broadcasting to everyone that you're a cheapskate, then word's gonna get around. Your reputation is not paying for anything ever. You're not gonna get a second date on that. And then does the corollary apply as well, like, never let a woman finance a man's lifestyle? At some point, the money conversation is gonna come into play where you're gonna wanna do things together. Money's gonna have to be discussed at some point. But to make it a a focus of a hard and fast rule to say never finance a woman, I it's not making much sense.
[00:28:53] John Roeland:
Yeah. See, I knew that we'd be able to do other ones. These are very succinct, and they didn't they they don't require as much nuance to as last week's discussion, I knew we'd be able to get other things in. Go ahead with number number 4. I don't know. Or number 3.
[00:29:08] allen marcus:
Number 3.
[00:29:09] John Roeland:
I think we're all kinda on the same page. And, Jared, what's up?
[00:29:17] allen marcus:
Number 3 of the 10 golden rules of the red pill, don't let her looks turn you into a sucker.
[00:29:27] John Roeland:
So this is the first reasonable rule that we have and that I would, I would agree with. Hard not to agree with this. Don't let somebody's looks. But in that, I would also put that they already have this whole baked into it that the only valuable women are these women that are, physically tens or nines or whatever number they think that they're you know, I assume that they're shooting for the top 20%, the same as they're claiming women are doing. So you're already putting, hyper emphasis on the looks. That's already got you choosing, now instead of choosing a woman based on your compatibility and your, what you want.
Like, there's that old song, you know, if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, you know, about don't make a pretty woman. You're like, well, like, that that there's a lot of things you can say. Are you just looking at her as a showpiece? Because I don't care honestly what anybody would rate my wife as numerically as, physically attractiveness on like you looked at a picture of her because that's what you're talking about with physical attraction. Like, that's just a picture. The the fact is that I've dated 10 that girls that are flat tens, and most of them are horribly needy. They have no understanding that anybody else is in the relationship besides them.
There's nothing enjoyable about them. I my wife's my best friend, my partner. I I truly enjoy being around her. When she's not around, I fret and I'm miserable. Not because I can't function, but because I feel like there's a piece of me and it's like, I don't inter rely on her to do my things, but when I'm not with her, I I don't like it. I mean, I'm not a little kid who can't get by without it. Christy and I spent, you know, just the other just this last weekend, we were apart for, like, 3 days. And, when we moved here, I spent heck the year we moved here we moved here. I think I only seen her maybe a third of the year, because we were busy. But I would definitely prefer my life is greater and richer and more enjoyable when she's in it. That's a fact. That's why I married her. And, isolate yourself down to something based off of physical appearance, which is a fleeting thing at best.
At best, that's you're you're already putting yourself on a on a real dumb level. So that's I think that's already kind of baked into this because you're looking for the high the higher value women. But I I do agree with the sentiment. Don't don't let people's looks turn you into a sucker. I in fact, I have a a rule where especially with politicians, if they're attractive, they are probably extra evil. Yeah. Like cause they're gonna get away with more shit.
[00:32:46] John Roeland:
Alla Gavin Newsom. Not that I think he's attractive, but, I would say a much better way to word this would be, treat women with the same respect despite their looks. Now it doesn't mean how don't have any discrimination, and it doesn't mean you have to, you know, pay as much time or attention to each woman. But to be respectful, kind, hello, well mannered, is gonna go a long way with everybody in life. And it's gonna help you to not turn into a sucker just because this girl is really hot and, kinda make yourself look like a fool or, you know, trying too hard. Right?
And, also, I've had many situations where, I ended up falling for women who I wasn't really that attracted to in the beginning. But by getting to know them more and knowing their personality, they became more and more attractive. So you're kind of, yeah. Again, this is obviously aimed at, you know, you're just going for these hot women, and you got to act cool even though they're really hot, you know, but, yeah, there's something deeper to it.
[00:34:06] allen marcus:
Might be a fear of Medusa. If it literally reads, don't let her looks turn you into a sucker, is this a concern about making eye contact? If you can't even make eye contact with a woman, feel calm. How are you gonna get even closer and approach her and have a conversation with her? If you're so befuddled by her looks maxing and her glow ups, There's more there's more problems in your own life you'll need to address. There's also the idea of ugly ducklings for men and for women at some point out of high school, out of college, getting through the stress eating and the baby fat and and finally having in the adult ability to feed yourself well and work out and exercise and buy clothing.
At some point, that's the goal is to look your best, to feel your best, to dress your best. Not everyone is dressed their best at a grocery store. If they're running errands, this type of thing, you haven't seen her at her best. So how would you even know what she looks like? More questions and answers here.
[00:35:24] John Roeland:
Yeah. That again, that's your first reasonable rule. Don't let looks make you treat a girl different just because she's like, what you what you find attractive doesn't mean that you need to start acting different, doesn't mean that you need to, be different. Don't let her do things you wouldn't normally let a girl do. Like, you should, no matter what they look like, that's not that shouldn't even be one of the particular factors that you're looking at with the idea that obviously you need to be attracted to a partner. But don't let that that should not be your big a big consideration for you.
[00:36:04] allen marcus:
Does that bring us to 4? Pay attention to her actions, not her words. Actions speak louder than words.
[00:36:17] John Roeland:
This is, honestly, I I feel like this should have been like number 1 in large capital letters, and it it needs to apply for interactions with human beings. I I think that this is in today's society where we all are in this emperor wears no clothes world where we all need to pretend things for other people's benefits. I I I I think that this is just such a rule that people need to like, write that shit on your hand. Like, people should be keeping this in mind all the time. So can can I I can't agree more in a dating scenario 100%.
I think you could couple it with number 3, where just because she's good looking and you think that she's super hot or whatever, you know, don't let her start don't let her do things that you would not. Don't let her do things that you wouldn't do if the chick acts out of line. Just don't date that chick. And, you know, again, this just is a good one period for all of society to start really buckling down on. Write it down on your hands, people. Hi. Also, if you want free cat, you can't have this one. You can have Yeah. This,
[00:37:52] John Roeland:
this one kinda doesn't seem to fit with the list. Pay attention to her actions, not her words. If you're so focused on looks and, I don't know. It almost seems like this one, you're now looking for an honest woman, by by looking at her actions, a woman of integrity, all of a sudden, that's important. Obviously, this is an important rule for life in general. Pay attention to people's actions, not their words. But, yeah, I guess I'm just a little thrown off of how it fits in with this with this list. Right? Like, what's she gonna say to you? If she's gonna say, like, she wants to get laid, then, she probably wants to. You know, she's probably not gonna say that unless she's interested in you. So if you're in the hookup world, the actions and words would seem to be probably in line, I would think. And so yeah. I guess I guess, again, I'm just kinda thrown off on this one in in terms of this list.
[00:39:09] allen marcus:
You touched on the the integrity. I suppose there's an aspect of accountability. Is she doing what she's saying she's doing? And, also, it implies demand. Is he doing what he says he's doing? So to make the declaration, you know, pay attention to her actions, not her words, Seems to stem from a distrust of women to say that they're going to say one thing and then do another thing. So keep your guard up and always be expecting her words and actions not to match up, which then already puts a wall between you and her, not not allowing for sort of connection and intimacy that might otherwise happen.
So so far with these golden rules, they seem to be easily misinterpreted and could actually backfire and cause the man to be forever alone if he's not, you know, considering that there's nuance to this and there's a misunderstanding.
[00:40:08] John Roeland:
You you kinda cleared that up for me a little bit, Alan, because I I have had situations where, been in a relationship with a woman and, all of a sudden, she's losing interest, and I can tell she's losing interest by her actions. And then when I say, hey. Like, it seems like there's something wrong. No. There's nothing wrong with me. There must be something wrong with you. But, again, I understand. Pay attention to her actions, not her words. And I'm like, okay. I'm out because, you know, after 3 or 4 times of doing this, like, I'm not gonna keep going along and thinking everything's cool even though, obviously, you don't want anything to do with me. So you you you kinda helped it make a little more sense there, and I could see where some men could act like suckers in that situation and keep trying, keep trying, keep trying.
And I think my personal take on that is that women don't want to be the one to end it. They don't want to be, the one to hurt your feelings. So they kind of act that way so you'll break up with them. That that's been my experience.
[00:41:25] allen marcus:
And that gets us into number 5, kinda get in into a trap where they can't break up with you if you're signed a lease together. 5 says never marry or move in with a girl unless you've known her for, they say, 1 to 2 years.
[00:41:45] John Roeland:
Also an agreeable rule. I don't know that I would just put that for rules for dating. I would tell my daughters the same thing. I have 3 daughters. You know? If you are gonna considering making the leap to a more substantial permanent relationship, Don't start involving yourself in things where you're getting financially tied, where you're possibly having kids, where you're doing all these things that you should be doing with somebody in a long term relationship with somebody you're not sure yet you even wanna do that with. Like, that's that's just good dating advice, period. I mean, I don't know that that's really even fits into this.
They they're they're really kind of all over the place with it the way that mentality is. But that that one, I I can't disagree with. But again, I would give the same advice to my daughters. Don't don't go running off and get married to some dude you met 2 weeks ago. In 6 months, you might realize you hate that guy. Like, you can't stand him. Like, it doesn't make sense. So I think I think that's probably just good and good advice for a dating person.
[00:43:02] John Roeland:
Yeah. I agree. I don't really have much to add on that. That's, generally good advice for people in general. And, again, it's encouraging more of, taking your time with somebody and developing, an yeah, not much to add. Culture. So, yeah, not much to add.
[00:43:30] allen marcus:
So 5 connects with number 2, saying never finance a woman's lifestyle. No. Don't pay her rent. Don't give her a place to live. This sort of, stinginess is not a good look for guys To say never marry or move in or become roommates, never say never. I mean, there's plenty of romantic comedy movies that have been real enjoyable when 2 people move in together, and they experience all the, the feelings of dirty laundry and dirty dishes, and someone's gotta be an adult in that situation. Maybe you do wanna, you know, get a Airbnb for a month and see how it goes. Maybe you wanna force the issue along a little bit and and see who's who's really serious about it. But to say never do that?
[00:44:19] John Roeland:
Well, this this rule wouldn't apply for a Jack Tripper.
[00:44:24] John Roeland:
Well, and to to, statistically, if you, in a long term relationship, want it to work longer, statistically, I believe it's something like 12 to 14% greater chance if you wait until after you're married to live together that I think it's something between 12 14% greater chance of that than extending as opposed to if you live together then get married. For whatever reason, statistically, it doesn't and it's a substantial jump. If you, again, are trying to be in a long term relationship, that you want to be permanent. And, apparently not living with that person ahead of time and taking your time instead to choose wisely, that's, apparently the move.
Surprise, surprise.
[00:45:27] allen marcus:
Number 6 reads, never be responsible for her economic problems, social problems, or family problems.
[00:45:42] John Roeland:
I mean, he didn't you cover that with, number 2, kinda never finance a woman's lifestyle, never be responsible a bit redundant? The social and family problems. I I absolutely understand, especially in today's world where things have gone absolutely nutty. That, there's so much heavy drama and and it's allowed. So I do understand where the distaste for such things is. Here's the problem. When you're dating a woman in a true organized family structure, there's always a man that's the head of things. And so if you're looking at a traditional type relationship, if you're not, it connects all that.
But in a traditional type relationship, obviously, the her father is gonna be the man of her life up until you replace that. So there's a mechanism built into that that makes it so you need to prove yourself as a man up against somebody else, up against somebody who has already proven himself as a man. And when she goes to make that move to put herself in your care, then she's gonna have to look at you as the best better replacement for that. Or else you're not gonna have a very good relationship if that's the traditional type relationship that you want. So this is really a catch 22 where I just don't really necessarily agree with it. I mean, I I do agree to some extent this would require a lot of nuance and understanding that well, but I wouldn't date a girl that's I would I I would go to her family and say, listen.
These are the rules. This is how you're gonna act when we're around or else we won't be around. You're not gonna do this crazy ass shit that you guys are doing. We're not our lives are not gonna include this crazed drama you people are doing. So, you know, that would be definitely taking charge, definitely doing something. I'm not saying that you should get involved in all the her her brother does this and blah blah, and you're out in the middle of the night doing crazy shit with her brother trying to get him out of trouble and shit like that. I get that.
But to say that you're not supposed to somehow become the head of her family, I I don't now we're back to just we're just trying to get a piece of a piece of ass as far as I can tell from this kind of thing. If you're not gonna take responsibility as a man, how is she gonna look at you as as the man?
[00:49:01] John Roeland:
Yeah. I would say this would be worded better. Be aware of her social or family problems. If you don't want to be responsible or involved in that, then she's probably not the right one for you. You know, like, if, you know, some girl you're dating has some drama with some ex boyfriend or, you know, you know, it's like, do that's gonna show you a lot about where she's at with her relationships, and it's gonna give you a a measuring stick as to whether or not you would want to be involved with someone like that. But once you are with somebody, their family problems, their social problems do become yours because you're gonna talk to your partner about what's going on, and you're gonna give them advice.
And, you know, you can't ultimately be responsible for it. But as men, we are protectors, so there may be situations where you do have to step in and say something to somebody. But in general, you're gonna be a person that's encouraging your partner in how to deal with it or it being a sounding board for them to talk about their problems. So it does become part of your responsibility if you're in a meaningful relationship. And again, if this person has a lot of social drama or family issues that you don't think are healthy, then it's more of a indicator that that's probably not the right person for you.
[00:50:40] allen marcus:
So we've read through up to number 6, and we're reading a lot of nevers and don'ts. These are almost the thou shall nots. They're not quite the 10 commandments. They're not biblical. They're not religious. They're just rules that someone posted on a Facebook group and other people shared it, and they argued back and forth. This don't be the problem solver also has a corollary of, if she's interested in you because you're a puzzle that she can solve and she can be your therapist and she can save you. It's like if you're the, adopted puppy that she's gonna take into her house, be aware of that too. But I don't know if that's quite stated in this golden rule.
The the bigger question at this point, 6 rules in, what are you supposed to do and what are you offering the woman? If you're not supposed to open your checkbook and pay for dinner, what are you supposed to do? How are you supposed to once you've gone on a date with a woman, let her know that you have things and skills and and opportunities to entice her with, reasons for her to wanna stay with you. If you're stingy with your time, your attention, your talent, your treasures, and she's not giving anything up either, then it doesn't sound like a relationship at all.
So how can these be rules of a red pill if red pill is strategies for maintaining or for navigating through relationships? This seems to be more black pill doomers sort of saying, well, men and women are gonna be at war. They've always been at war. There's no reason to even communicate with them because you can't trust them. You can't spend money on them. You can't live with them. You can't do anything with them. This is just instilling more more fear to even enter a dating pool, it seems.
[00:52:58] John Roeland:
Yeah. I would agree. This seems more black pilled if you were gonna call it that kind of a thing, very anti dating. It's it's That's interesting. And also that was when Brian and I first looked at this, that was, the first thing Brian said and also came to my mind that every one of these is a negative. Right? That's that's real interesting. Why why except for the pay attention to her actions, not her words is the only one that does literally doesn't say don't or never. Right? Every other one's either says never or don't. So that that's real interesting for a a list of rules to do, which rules are usually in this kind of scenario. It's things to do, and all these are nevers and don'ts.
[00:53:46] allen marcus:
Which brings us right to number 7, which says to never fight or argue with a woman. I don't know if this means verbally or physically, but probably both.
[00:54:01] John Roeland:
Well, I mean, obviously, it's at least verbally because argue, I don't think includes physical usually. I've chewed on this one a bit. I I don't understand how you can have a relationship without having some kind of altercations. You know, you're gonna have fights. It's, I I try to keep my harshest. You know, the one thing I would say is is that, to keep in mind as a man is is that, women are like oil. And, you know, the women are the oil in the situation. And just like an oil, once you've scorched it, it doesn't come back. You know, a woman's scorn doesn't doesn't return.
And so she might stay with you, but it's never gonna be the same relationship that it was. She's never gonna you're never gonna attain the same, virtue in her eyes. You've already you've already burned her. So when you when you are having disagreements, where when you're ready to go scorched earth with a man, don't ever do that with somebody you're dating unless you just want it to be fucking over because it's never gonna be good again even if you do fix it. Don't ever go scorched earth unless you're ready to just completely be done with the so I I I definitely would say that, but I don't know how you could have a complex relationship with somebody and then start spending extended durations of time with them and not at some point have a fight, have an argument, something along that nature. Right? You'd have to be a very passive person, I think, or extraordinarily controlled.
[00:56:05] John Roeland:
Yeah. This one seems to kinda fall back into the dating realm and the hookup realm where, you know, if you were to fight or argue with a woman, that would imply that you have some type of emotional attachment to her or that you care. And this is kind of telling you to just kind of, you know, have attitude of not letting anything bother you, not care about anything, and, not engaging with the woman if she's wanting to engage with you about some issue she has with you. This reminds me of my dad when I was a kid. I would just be amazed at how much because my mom was just a a ranter, you know. And I won't say verbally abusive, but, you know, she was definitely, like, the dominant personality.
And she would, you know, snap at my dad, and he was just always super calm about it. Never really talked back. And then when me and my sister got to the age where we started talking back, then I started noticing my dad talking back a little bit more. But, it took for me to get a a quite a bit older to to be better about not engaging in our arguments, you know, or, like, knowing when to knowing when to bow out. And like you said, Ben, like, going full scorched earth. But, yeah. This is, this is not advice for people who are actually trying to have a relationship, because having a relationship with somebody is going to involve having differences and either working through those or finding that you can't work through them.
It's a huge part of any relationship, and especially for me as I've gotten older and the relationship I'm in now that we've had plenty of arguments and disagreements, but, ultimately, they've made us stronger.
[00:58:07] allen marcus:
Yeah. Like, what you're saying, maybe we would rephrase this to say, fight for the relationship as opposed to fighting against the relationship. If you take the rule as never fight or argue with a woman ever, then are you in a place of avoidance and constantly avoiding certain conversations? That's gonna be real annoying to her when you're not answering her text because you think it's gonna lead to an argument. You're not even engaging with her. But then also, where's your frame, man? Like, where's your frame, bro? Why why why is there even an argument being brought up? Have you shown a chink in your armor that she can just poke at? Is this a a a shit test? And that's another topic.
But I think this is where this idea comes from is, like, no pushback. Where are your boundaries? These are things that are gonna occur in relationships. We know where are the boundaries. So if she's combative and you don't fight back, has she just walked over you? Have you just proven that you're a weak man? Is that the reason for the argument? If we're going back to this other rule here, pay attention to her actions, not her words, is she using fighting words but then giving you hugs? Is is that not in alignment here? Is she confused? Are you now confused?
Well, someone has to lead. And if the argument is over the fact that the man hasn't led, then that itself might lead to a disagreement or an argument because you're expecting her to make a decision. So in an egalitarian way where, you know, her vote is 50 50% and your vote is 50%, well, you're always gonna be in a tie. So someone has to be the tiebreaker. And if the man is afraid of being the tiebreaker and making a decision, then what again is the man offering to the woman in the first place?
[01:00:23] John Roeland:
Very simple list. And hail, William. Very, very simple list. It seems like, you know, the thing that you wanna hear things you hear bandied about is the red pill geysers in cells, you know, sitting in their parents' basement. And you could see where, maturity wise, a lot of these just don't even make sense. And there's some of this just doesn't seem like it should go together. Like, it it it really doesn't make sense.
[01:01:05] allen marcus:
Number 8, don't be manipulated by sex. They use a 3 in replace of the e because sex is a scary thing.
[01:01:19] John Roeland:
Solid rule to teach young men. 100%. Solid rule. That's, you know, just, in general, if you in in this whole dating scenario, if you want to be a highly desirable man that is gonna have the best chance to get a very good quality woman that you're gonna be happy with, the first thing to do is make yourself as a man. So that includes not chasing after, when when I was young the way we call it chasing after tail. The guys that chase the tail, they didn't that's all that they did. They they got enough money to go out and and and get laid and do things like that. The dudes that were trying to make something of themselves that eventually had a wife and had a real good life, those guys weren't chasing it. Those they were chasing being a impressive man.
And when you become an impressive man, impressive women are interested. So
[01:02:37] John Roeland:
it's a good one. Yeah. I mean, I think, again, it's interesting for this list because part of this list seems like you're manipulating for sex. So how are you exactly being manipulated by sex? If you're following all these rules, then hope then, you know, in theory, she's not manipulating you for money. If she if she was, again, we're getting borderline escort area, which I do think some women operate that way. I've known of women who operated that way. They wanted to take the trip somewhere or but again, those men are, I guess, these guys would call them simps that they're gonna they're gonna pay money and flash their money. They have the money, and that's gonna allow them to hook up with, you know, hot chicks, hot young chicks.
So, yeah, I just kind of wonder what they mean by being manipulated by sex. What's what's she manipulating you into? Yeah. This list is confusing.
[01:03:58] allen marcus:
Number 9 says don't confuse lust for love.
[01:04:07] John Roeland:
I noticed you skipped, number 8 there, Marcus, but I don't know that you had anything to add to what was said. Is that was that the case?
[01:04:16] allen marcus:
Yeah. Don't be manipulated by sex. I don't think this list is going to lead to sex. So by number 8, you're probably not gonna have to worry about the manipulation from sex.
[01:04:33] John Roeland:
Alright. Number 9, just a a good rule to teach young people. Again, very similar to, like, number 4. You know, pay attention to actions. Now where's this is something I teach my daughter also? Like, listen. I understand that you're young and, you know, for boys, you just got your testosterone. And the world never talks about what a beast testosterone is. Just an absolute monster beast to the point where, there's actual stories of, people, girls that are trying to make the transition into boys. And, they have rage issues and all kinds of things that they didn't even understand and want to get actually physically violent. You know, testosterone is a hell of a drug.
And I understand that that just just got unleashed in your body and you wanna get it all out through your penis. I get it.
[01:05:33] John Roeland:
They
[01:05:39] John Roeland:
just because you have that feeling, that doesn't mean love. Just because she makes you gives you them butterflies in those gig you know? And but again, I would say the same thing to my daughter. You know? It it just because he makes you feel oh, doesn't mean that you're that you're in love. Just because today, things are awesome. This, I think, kinda ties into the don't move in with somebody, or marry them for 1 to 2 years because that first, especially when you're young, you got a lot of hormones to work out. A lot.
And for that first 6 months, you could hell not even know each other's name. You're so busy just bumping uglies. So a 100% don't confuse lust for love. That's, that's just a good one to pass down to young young people, period.
[01:06:38] John Roeland:
Yeah. I think, the general sentiment of it makes sense. I would say that lust and love are kind of at 2 different ends of the relationship spectrum. So if you're involved in the hookup culture and you're hooking up with someone right away, you definitely shouldn't think that that's love. Hopefully, these guys are aware enough to know that that that in the beginning, it's it is lust. You don't know if you love somebody till you have spent some time with them and, you know, shared shared your perspectives of the world and see if you're compatible with this person. So, yeah, I guess for a young person coming up.
But, again, this list seems to be aimed at the guy who's playing the field and and, being a player. So it should be pretty obvious that lust is this thing you're doing here. And then if something builds from that with this woman, which, again, the odds are it probably won't, if you jump into the the lust right away. But, yeah, love is is a different thing.
[01:07:57] allen marcus:
So don't confuse lust for love connects 3 to say don't let her looks turn you into a sucker. So depending on your feelings of lust and infatuation, if you're chasing after this person because you're so infatuated with her, that's that's gonna be confused with the testosterone, all the other hormones. The the feeling of just wanting to be so attracted to another person itself can be a drug. So when you do talk with her and then explain to her the situation, you're you're you would be saying, you are just the most beautiful woman in the world. I am so, lustful for you. I put you on this pedestal. You are a goddess.
I think there's other sort of red pill rules against putting the pussy on the pedestal, combining with lust and and love and the manipulation of sex. It it seems to be repeating the same point, but said another more specific way. Yeah. I would I would agree with the point, certainly. I'm not disagreeing with it. And the confusion over what you even want in a relationship at this point is tied into all the other rules of this situation where it's not clear what this is leading towards. So if these are the 10 golden rules, meaning the only rules you follow in your dating and mating, it it doesn't seem to be productive. It doesn't seem to lead anywhere. It doesn't seem to lead to sex or a relationship or marriage or a second date. This is just a way to get ghosted and probably good for the person ghosting you if this is the person's credo and manifesto and the words they live by.
So we'll move on to number 10 then. Number 10 is a little bit longer. There's a lot of words here, and it's all in caps. So I might have to shout it to you. Never beg for female attention or validation. Never seek female companionship for happiness. Never attach yourself to a person or a business or an organization. Always attach yourself to your mission and purpose in life. Do I do a 10 hut or a soldier? What's what what do the marines say? Semper Fi or chest bump? Hooah. That's what it is. The hooah. Okay. Again,
[01:10:35] John Roeland:
just good rule of life. It's it's it's a very confused list. Good rule of life though. Definitely don't beg for anyone's attention or validation. And it's really amazing because if you chase after it, you'll never get it. And as soon as you stop chasing after it's when you get it. And that the and and you actually go to try to make yourself a more impressive person. When again, getting back to if you want to be want the high quality woman, the high value woman, which I don't put the the because I also noticed that in all those lists, attractiveness is the very first thing and that would be my very last.
I absolutely, am, about the, you know, just the basic, the the loving mother goddess body as opposed to the young woman body. I understand that visually, the young woman body is the attractive one, and it's not the one I would seek, not the one I go to. I mean, I'm an older person that's, you know, had children, but the loving mother, somebody that's gonna take care and nurture and understand. That's the person I'm interested in spending my time with. So the the don't, seek after, that's when you will start getting because you are self validating.
You're you're becoming something you're impressed with. And that's when other people, they're like, well, why are you so impressed with yourself? What you got going on over here? Maybe I want a piece of that. That's when that that's when they start coming poking. So never seek any companionship or happiness. Again, self validation, self this is this is just good stuff. I'm not sure how this really necessarily is just like a dating thing. I don't see how this fits in with trying to get just get laid or to try and develop relationships. It doesn't. Never attach yourself to a person or business or organization.
Absolutely agree. Until it comes time to have a wife. Because you should not like Christie, just like with her inner social circles and even her family. Everybody is aware that there's only certain things you can do before you trigger I'm coming. And it's not gonna be good when I get there. And everybody knows who she's with. There is definitely an attachment. But for the most part, your purpose in in life, the thing that you wanna be, your self validation, that is the thing, and the rest of that becomes derivative of it. So I mean, this almost seems like like like they're like this weird mix of hookup or relationship or or whatever they got going on with, like, something off of a gym wall that's very inspiring at the end. I don't it's weird.
[01:13:48] John Roeland:
This reminds me of what we used to call the no game game, which is you don't you're not trying to have game, and by not trying, then you do have game. It's kinda. Actually, there's a movie called the Dow of Steve, which is all about this. It's this heavyset guy, works works in childcare. It's not based on me. But, like, it's basically like the DAO of Steve. Like, all Steves have this this sense about them, and the opposite of a Steve is a Stew. And, yeah. And he just he just does you know, acts like he doesn't care, and so then he hooks up with all these different women. And, anyway. But I find it interesting that they and I'll say the last line, yes.
Always attach yourself to improving yourself, self improvement, and then that will lead to your mission and purpose in life. The the person or business or organization part, it's a little confusing to me because what if you start a business or you start an organization? So maybe they are differing there. Like, don't attach yourself to someone else's movement or organization. But I think that that doesn't isn't very clear how that relates to relationships. But, yeah. So I just think that, yeah, it's you, again, treat everybody with the same level of respect, same manners, have a standard way that you approach people, be yourself, improve yourself, and, yeah, that's I mean, ultimately, I think that's what this is saying. So I won't say I don't agree with it. I I'm just not clear on not attaching yourself to a business or an organization.
I mean, maybe they're just pushing you to be an entrepreneur and do your own thing, which I think that would be a positive message as well.
[01:15:57] allen marcus:
Yeah. This number 10 of the 10 golden rules of the red pill viral Facebook post, they're fitting 4 in here, so you kind of have to address them 1 at a time. The never join a organization. Well, if you're telling someone to never volunteer, then you'll never have that opportunity to meet like minded people who are positively doing something in the community. That could be a very Again, what do you do, and, Again, what do you do, and do you have any maxims to follow? Is there any instructive behavior to do? This is very destructive and very in a self enclosing and restrictive sort of rule set to make you fear going out into the world at all if the assumption is that every female with companionship and happiness issues is going to just be a complete, manipulation with her sex and her feminine wiles, and then you're gonna be introduced to her economic problems, her credit card debt, her notch on her bedpost, and all these things.
If this is I think maybe I figured it out. This itself is the shit test to other men to say, stay out of the dating pool so that leaves more women to us at this point. Is that sort of the thinking here?
[01:17:37] John Roeland:
Yeah. I'm not, you know, again, this is a boiled down thing that I'm sure there's supposed to be more nuance. Unfortunately, I'm not real. I'm a little scared of the nuance. We Mark Allen Marcus there did receive a book from one of these more well known figures in this community that, his posts were the ones that were getting picked up and reposted. And, he's decided to boil his wisdoms down and write a book. And I in a spider meeting, Jim's received the book, well well made book. So this guy ain't fucking around. I mean, it's high quality. The things that he was saying in there, pretty hard to stomach, pretty hard to listen to.
Had a whole chapter about, taking advantage of the Ukrainian refugee. You know, basically, war war you you could you could boil that down to just war refugee women that are extraordinarily needy and using them for, gratuitous sex without having to give up much. As I, woof, That's, you're you're pandering to some bad people. Like, that's some not at all manly behavior. I I and I can understand that, the community from the other side, the way they paint the community is they call them incels and voluntarily celibate, guys that just live in their parents' basement and, can't get their can't get their peepees touched because they're just horrible people.
And and this does not does nothing to dissuade that. That book does. Like, oh, oh, okay. I see. So I I don't even yikes. This is, again, this is part of was part of the impetus to starting the show is, young men need to understand that there is a much you know, I don't agree with the the feminist vibe today. I don't agree with the the way things are being ran today. Going into that is absolutely not the answer. Treating women like trash and, becoming, you know, a player or whatever, and having women doing all the things that make you less of a man does not penalize them. I tell you that. This is no different than, taking and cutting off your own hand to to spite your enemy. Like, I taught you a lesson.
Like, don't don't become less of a man. That that's just ridiculous.
[01:20:48] John Roeland:
Yeah. Ben, you made a comment earlier, and my wife was mentioning this as I was kind of going over some of the ideas in the philosophy. But she was saying if this is a reaction to feminism or this idea that there's this, you know, women wanting to take over the world, that it's a total swing back of the pendulum to the opposite extreme, in some cases where, you know, the men are now going back to, you know, trying to say that they're so much more dominant and they don't need women. And so it's kind of like they've become what they hate, which tends to happen a lot in these dialectics. So just wanted to make that comment.
[01:21:37] allen marcus:
Yeah. I agree with those comments. If the manosphere is a place that, however, it's encountered seems to lead towards kind of a black pill humor and shock value and to kind of, in a way, troll what they would consider to be weak blue pilled men to sort of say, we are so red pill. We've moved to the black pill and and and transcended all all needs for relationship and women and just any traditional thing that man has ever needed to sort of say we are so far above that that we can mock it and criticize it endlessly, then that just turns into a male circle jerk, which are actual subreddits where people go and they'll discuss these issues.
But from such, I wouldn't say hateful way, but really from a, I don't care about anything sort of nihilistic way where everything is fodder for humor and antagonization and not taking anything seriously. So to step into the manosphere and see that's the level of maturity, those are the leaders of the pack, the the heads of the class, the the graduating class that, you know, the freshmen are looking up to to get up to speed, and then they encounter all kinds of black pill humor and nihilism, then they go and they misrepresent it in a way that they haven't fully understood, which then paints it as a picture of toxicity. It's difficult to argue to say that these male spaces are not toxic or are not growing fruit that any woman would ever wanna even taste.
I think that's where the the pushback from sane, rational, intelligent people who have been in successful marriages needs to come from. A lot of the lonely men epidemics, the involuntary celibates, the needs, the not in employment, education, or training. There there are so many banners and umbrellas and filters and pipelines to lead men to online communities that try and keep them contained there without ever growing or solving their problems. So to then sell solutions in the terms of mentorship groups or coaching or books, that's where a lot of pushback comes from all sides to say, we see this as a grip. And then they'll point to Andrew Tate specifically and say, see, he's the guy. He's the grifter.
He's the guy that's painting a broad stroke in terms of what a male red pill influencer looks like. So then the target's on his back. But is he even genuine? Is he just to control the opposition? So then the other questions begin to raise. Well, what is the purpose of the propaganda and banning certain forums, promoting others? This gets into, like, conspiracy theory, and that might lead us to another article where a a woman discovered the red pill and was shocked by what she found.
[01:25:14] John Roeland:
Yeah. Go ahead and let's hit hit us with that. You're you're on mute.
[01:25:40] allen marcus:
Yes.
[01:25:43] John Roeland:
There you go, guys. Here it is.
[01:25:49] allen marcus:
So this article, kind of a clickbait title of the 7 most shocking beliefs of the red pill community, from a woman who did her research, read about it, and summarized it into 7 bullet points, but doesn't seem to really argue it. The first one reads a female supremacy movement exists. Her immediate response is an emoji of Chris Rock kinda doing the what face.
[01:26:25] John Roeland:
Interesting.
[01:26:27] John Roeland:
I would absolutely agree. Female supreme I believe we live in a feminine society, at least the western world. We've lived in a feminist society for a very long time. And I I I watching a lot of these debates and, you know, doing some research and whatnot, I've noticed a lot of people are just not intellectually evolved enough to even be in the debate in the debate world. And one of the things you have to do is is separate the the sex of the person from, you know, they're like, oh, it's a patriarch. You look, a man's in charge. A man can be in charge and it still be feminine. A woman can be charged and it still be in charge and it still be masculine. I mean, through most of most of our adult lives, England, the queen was the monarch. There wasn't a monarch here.
There's all kinds of women in government. It's it's the flavor of society, and we live in a highly feminine society. And as far as dating goes, where this gets in is the understanding and and part of these things I agree with. You know? Well, pre no fault divorce. I agree with quite a few of these things. But I as far as dating goes, women absolutely have all the control. 100%. If she she gets to choose, the she's the gatekeeper of the sex. If she changes her mind later, that can cause issues. She can go back and just retroactively through guilt say that she doesn't want it, and now the guy's in trouble.
If children are produced like the state where I'm from, I was a single dad to my to my youngest 2 kids, and horrible choices on my part. But, right out right out the gate, the state actually gave custody to her, and she didn't exercise it. So for 2 years, I raised the kids, and then she shows up one day and decides she's gonna be mom for this week, you know, after a couple years, and raises a fit. And she's able to just take the kids and the cops came and helped her take them because in the state law, if you're unmarried, the woman automatically has custody. And this is, this is over and over. If, she decides to leave you, she can take all your stuff.
She's gonna control whether you see the kid or not. Child support payments and your child visitation are 2 entirely separate issues. So there's all kinds of different gatekeeper situations. We are absolutely in a in a female supremacy, era. And the feminists are absolutely female supremacists. A 100% to try and state it any other way gets into the liberal changing definitions of words. So that way, they can't, it it it suits their needs at that point. And now we're just having, an extraordinarily dishonest conversation because they're they're purposely using a a a twisted definition.
So this this a 100%, I mean, I think the red pill is a shitty answer to this, but this is the the reason for the red pill. Like, I I this is exactly the reaction that those dumb women like that would would put to. Like, you can you can bet this person that wrote the article is horrible.
[01:30:24] John Roeland:
I would say that, yes, there is a female supremacy movement, but it exists under the umbrella of a different type of supremacy movement. And the female aspect of it is a psyop, which, obviously, you know, what people believe in tends to become the reality, at least from what we experienced. So there are women who attach to this idea of, needing to be able to be firemen and needing to be able to do what men do and that that somehow is based on equal rights. However, now that has shifted, and now we've got men going in and saying, I get to go in because I identify as a woman, and I get to be, in your in your movement. So to me, the again, going all the way with the red pill would lead you deeper than the female male dialectic.
It's a huge part of the overall plan, but the, you know, the people running the show aren't trying to, you know, put a woman at the top. Right? I mean, that's not their ultimate goal. They'll use women and they'll use this movement to achieve their ends, but there's a deeper a deeper psyop at play that I think the red pill movement, doesn't go far enough to to realize.
[01:32:04] allen marcus:
This list kind of points towards where culture is realizing that men have organized and made lists and codified what they call red pill ideas. So then she's reacting to that with shock and disbelief to say, I can't believe this information is being spread around as she seems to profit from spreading the information without, denying it or rebutting it or even making a point other than, look, here's what I found. Let's be shocked together.
[01:32:48] John Roeland:
And to be clear, I'm, I I agree with John. I just wasn't gonna bring that into the dating context. The, that this is all derivative of a different control mechanism. We actually have a a a fairly long research for the last couple years that, we've been doing on that, tying it back to the Theosophical Society and then even further, 100%. So I agree with what John's saying there completely. That's derivative.
[01:33:25] allen marcus:
Think the Occult roots of feminism is a book that this author might need to read first and then determine if she wants to rewrite some of our articles. Can move to point number 2. Women are illogical and manipulative.
[01:33:43] John Roeland:
I mean, you know, it's a little on the nose with it, but, yeah, that's, you know, that's how that's to say that and not, like, she's saying it She knows that that's true. But to say it to like, in such a derogatory way Say the quiet part out loud. So so when when in the number one, at the end of it, there was a thing where it said soft power. So there's gotta be an understanding that women can't rely on actual force. So manipulation is debt is always been their their version of force. You can't say you don't get to have any kind of power. Like, when you can't, in a situation, use the brute power, then manipulation is gonna become your power. You you can't leave them powerless. So, yes, they are manipulative, but that's just the nature of it because they don't have the the musculature to be the brute force.
And then illogical, it depends on on the women and it depends on the time. Men tend to be more logic thinking. Women tend to be more feeling thinking. It's it's a fact. That doesn't mean that the one is evil, but for those reasons, I don't think women should typically be in charge. There are exceptions, but typically because women are typically logical and they do tend to rely on feelings more. But I I I don't know why she's saying this, like, it's untrue or, like, it's offensive. I guess it's just weird.
[01:35:40] allen marcus:
Right. So the two points she's, brought to light as a revelation of the shocking beliefs of a hidden underground, you know, red pill community, some on some dark web somewhere. You know, she's she's sharing reactions of women in general at their collective worst. So she's speaking in terms of all women and then saying at their worst, this is what the red pill community believes, but doesn't disprove it or show herself at her best. So it's a clickbait. We're shocked. Can't believe anybody believes this thing. But then through her text, you explain her point, she's not arguing against herself. She's getting into maybe solipsism here.
But, you know, answering with emojis is a very powerful form of soft power. Maybe? I can't believe I just said that. I have to end every statement with a question mark and an uptick. Not all women are like that.
[01:36:54] John Roeland:
Yeah. I mean, again, like you said, Alan, she's pointing toward the worst possible belief. It's almost like she's playing into the dialectic, you know, like, can you believe men think women are illogical and manipulative when in reality, that's just, you know, what we all we all know to a certain extent. Men are more logical, think more linearly, a little bit more organized in their thinking. And, you know, women do, like you said, Ben, they tend to get emotional and, get caught up in that emotion and maybe allow it to not not allow them to, make a firm decision. Sometimes they need to, you know, be shown like, hey, what about this, this, and this?
And that's how men and women ultimately support each other. Again, there's a balance there. So, manipulative. I mean, anybody can be manipulative, but be wary of that in general. I guess yeah. I guess we're talking about it from her perspective. So I've got I'm kinda thrown off with, like, the last list in this one, but, yeah, I'll I'll I'll move on from there.
[01:38:17] John Roeland:
Well, I mean, manipulative. Like, let's say a woman's got her a a blown out tire, and she can't change it. She doesn't even have the physical strength to to break this rusty ass lug nut. She has to get somebody else to do it. This is gonna require manipulation. Whether that's a very small manipulation or it's gonna require larger manipulation, What we're talking about is that that's almost like again, it's like saying that they can't have power. And and, absolutely, women are the more manipulative because women tend to when you when you look at the way the world works, women tend to be more of the micromanage. They're gonna have somebody else do something and get them to do the way they want it. They're gonna try and promote their idea to get other people to do it because they don't usually have as much I was gonna say,
[01:39:20] John Roeland:
I was gonna say, I work in childcare and was around these kindergartners today. And and you can see in I mean, not all of the girls, but there's a little group of girls, and they just constantly stir up stuff. Everything is much more about verb words and, getting someone to do what you want and play with me and not her. The boys don't tend to do that as much. They're more e they're more it's easier for them to just follow a leader and follow the play, without having to be in control. I mean, that's just a a, anecdotal observation, but that's pretty common if you look at, like, 5 year old kids.
[01:40:13] allen marcus:
This whole shocking belief of the red pill community, Seven items really pack a punch, and each item could be a separate episode. Let's see what number 3 brings. Oh, women are hypergamous.
[01:40:31] John Roeland:
Absolutely. Women are hypergamous. But I'm gonna, again, put this into, are you wanting women to compete with us in the because, I mean, I'm maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm making an missus you know, misstep in assuming that they want the traditional more traditional women because that's what I've seen them mostly asking for. And if you're asking for a more traditional woman, then in a man's marketplace, you gain more value and more worth through placing yourself, like you wanna become a manager at work. You obviously have more value in work than the the janitor or the the tire guy if you're a mechanic or whatever.
Well, if a woman's value in that system is based off of her partner, so she doesn't actually get to go out and develop her own worth, well, then how the fuck is she supposed to not be hypergamous? Like, that's like saying you have no no drive to become something more or become something impressive, become a leader in the community and things like that. Now when the hypergamy reaches a a a level where they're willing to leave a good relationship in order to go, you know, to where it's just complete gold digging where, like, you get, like, the old man with the, you know, 18 year old girl and things like that where that that level of hypergamy, then it gets wonky. But that's anything. You can't get you can't take anything to an extreme and expect it to work well.
But to say that this doesn't exist is just idiocy. But then to say that it shouldn't exist also is just foolishness in my opinion.
[01:42:36] allen marcus:
She's just shocked that men are even talking about this aspect of, I guess, the sisterhood of the the hidden pants or what was it called? There's a there's a set of admission that there's a group of women who are a corollary or equal and opposite to red pill. I don't know what that is. If there is one thing, this idea of hypergamy where you kinda climb this marriage ladder so that you it's assuming that women start out poor and impoverished and the lowest cast in society. And that by meeting men and marrying up and, you know, upgrading herself to get better clothes, to attract better men, at some point says that, well, she's gonna she's gonna leave you. It's this is kind of acknowledging that, not denying it ever happens.
But then she's surprised that conservative upbringing and strong male figures, so having a father and and brothers in the family that she admires is something that men should look for. She was shocked that men would look for women who have this sort of conservative family values quality in them. I don't know how that applies to hypergamy, but she's she's mentioning that.
[01:43:54] John Roeland:
My my mom always says that her mom, my grandmother used to say, you can marry you could love a rich man just as much as a poor man. However, most of the women in my family, dated people from pretty much where they were class wise. My grandmother was one of the Rosie the Riveters, so she worked. She was a working woman, and all of her daughters were working women. So, I think, interestingly, does hypergamy just apply to financial status, or does it also apply to they're looking for the top 20% in physicality and looks?
[01:44:42] allen marcus:
Every aspect of of Yeah. All in.
[01:44:45] John Roeland:
Okay. Because I I definitely could see that, especially, you know, when you're younger, that it didn't matter if a guy was doing anything with his life as long as he was good looking and, you know, kinda had that confidence and that swagger then, that he had more women interested in him. So, but yeah. I mean I mean, is it is it so surprising that someone would be looking to marry into a family that is, you know, doing as well or better than them. I mean, that's pretty much just the way society is set up. But I don't know that women are necessarily really out there seeking that.
But I'm not one of those men, so maybe I wouldn't know.
[01:45:37] John Roeland:
Yeah. I I think it's not as much of a consideration anymore. You know, we've had too many, you know, over halfway there. Oh, living out of prairie or shit like that where it's at at at one point in time, there was recognition that it also the change in that is our welfare system. So our welfare system has made it so there's never a dire consequence. And given the the lack of a dire consequence with it, I I think that's really taken away the bite of this, where at one point in time, I think this was a heavy consideration. Why would a woman who is gonna have a hard time supporting herself and and bringing in an income, especially if she's had children in a time when there wasn't daycare and things like that.
Why would she attach herself to a guy that very potentially could leave her high and dry as far as food, shelter, things like that? That wouldn't even make sense. So at some point in time, that being real flighty and running off just because somebody catches your fancy and you wanna hump them for 5 minutes, like, I think that that probably was, you know, a more emphasis of not doing that was definitely put on at some point in time. But I think, again, our our welfare state that we have that does its very best to make sure there's no consequences for bad choices has really taken that away a lot. And I think that today, maybe there's less consideration.
But, also, that's assuming that the woman has no ambition. And so then finding a dude with no ambitions, also not a problem. They are on the same level where hypergamy kind of it has baked into it in ambition, so she's gonna need an ambitious guy.
[01:47:42] allen marcus:
So that's kind of the red pill answer to women's hypergamy and wanting to marry up and marry a a better man. If every day she wakes up next to a man who's visibly improved from the day before, then she's already kind of marrying up, and she's marrying a new man each day if the man is constantly improving. So she's probably saying that because men seem to settle in their own situation, becoming couch potatoes, retired to their man cave, never improve, then she's looking for the guy who's going to get her to the next stage of life. So it might be an unevenly yoked sort of situation. We're talking about dowries in chat. That's an interesting thing. You kept saying dower dire dire and I was like diary, dowery, dire consequences.
[01:48:33] John Roeland:
That's what I'm talking about. This was always kind of a thing. Yeah. You know? This was, baked into the I into the way people thought when they were gonna marry. So this this isn't a just today thing.
[01:48:48] John Roeland:
Yeah. And I would think it would be encouraged even more by the girl's parents for encouraging her to find someone that can take care of her financially. And, so, yeah, I agree with you, Ben. It's it's kinda built in.
[01:49:08] John Roeland:
Well and the fact is is when you're young, you don't make good choices. And when, again, full of hormones and the things that are gonna become important to you later in life, they don't they they don't settle in and tell later in life for some reason. You know? I again, I've got 3 daughters. Each of them are, adults. And you betcha. When they like, my oldest daughter, she's married, has a kid, you know, cup 2 kids. You know? She's a manager at the bank, has a nice little house, all that. When she was 15, she was dead set for fucking this gothic boy, and she was gonna kill herself, but he was gonna leave him because, you know, he was just so You know?
If they're gonna make adult decisions at that point in time where it's gonna be life for the rest of their life, the parents really should be pushing and helping instead of just letting them do what makes them happy. Because, obviously, that happiness is only gonna last a very short time. You know? Oh, Billy was so great for 3 days.
[01:50:24] allen marcus:
We're not seeing a whole lot of talk about what role parents are gonna play in the stating and mating game. A lot of the red pill philosophy and the reaction to it, it seems to place the individual as, separate atoms apart from everything else, not understanding that there are social systems in place and all your actions have reactions and everything is connected to to everything else. The the spiritual aspect has not really been addressed at all in any of these points that either people have brought up tonight.
[01:51:00] John Roeland:
Yeah. Good point, Marcus. Yeah. That's the spiritual spirituality is completely lacking from this, and it it just points to a very mechanistic world view, and that these guys took data and, kind of looking, you know, looking at it rationally, but, you know, that's not how the world works. If you look at something completely intellectually, you're missing a huge aspect of what's going on. So
[01:51:30] allen marcus:
So then number 4 reads that women need men more than men need women, and this woman has got her champagne, and she is laughing and laughing and laughing at the statement.
[01:51:44] John Roeland:
Yeah. The, this is a a real dumb girl thing that, is in today's world where these women have lived inside of a world that men made. And then and because they don't ever look at the into the dirty undercurrents to see what's making that work, they don't, they think that they can survive without men. And the flip side, obviously, men can't procreate without women. So it's a real interdependent system, but absolutely, like, these women are are are just absolutely foolish. They don't stop think that literally 99.9999 to the point where it only because it's a percentage does it not say 100 percent of men are are linemen are that run your electrical and bring the power to you are men.
The, you know, the people doing the super heavy dirty jobs, carrying carrying, you know, steel beams and riveting them together and doing all those super horrible dirty things, you know, because this woman's rich and and doesn't even look at those type of people and doesn't realize they exist. She she can, in her brain, somehow think that that she doesn't need them because she doesn't acknowledge them. It just tells you how how worthless she is as a as a human being. We're very codependent on each other. But absolutely, the the world does not function without men.
Women aren't out throwing chain on an oil rig. Women aren't, running your electrical. Women aren't doing any of those things nor should they. They don't have the physicality for it. They aren't stupid enough to do it. Like, men have this stupidity when it comes to physical danger. Like, we think it's great. Like, oh, fuck. Yeah. Let me go do that thing where I'm gonna almost die. Like, men are all about that. Women, they're they're they're not dumb like that.
[01:53:59] allen marcus:
She says that women are the gatekeepers of sex while men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Point number 5 seems to suggest that women's gates get rusty over time, saying that women are depreciating assets.
[01:54:19] John Roeland:
Again, I guess, this is what she is claiming that the red pill community is saying. She's trying to, make the red pill community look as terrible as possible and not get into any of the, you know, positive things that they may be helping men with. This is just making it seem like the red pill community just they all hate women, and they don't need women. And it's, you know, kind of more focused on MGTOW. But, yeah, I mean, I didn't hear that in the last list we read.
[01:55:02] John Roeland:
I mean, MGTOW is not red pill, is it? Because MGTOW, aren't they supposed to just not isn't that more black pill where you just don't talk to women at all? Well, I would think that
[01:55:14] John Roeland:
the idea that men don't need women is a big part of MGTOW. But, yeah, I I did hear that it was considered part of the red pill community where it's, you know, men kind of saying that they don't need women as much as they think, and they need to maintain that attitude. And then that would be separate from incel. Again, I don't really understand all all of this completely. But to me, this article, what this lady is doing is just focusing on the most negative aspects of it to make them look like complete degenerate, which I'm not saying they don't, but I haven't heard any of them say that women are depreciating assets in any of the of the content that I looked at. So
[01:55:58] allen marcus:
There is the aspect of sexual market value that we briefly mentioned in past episodes. The idea that men age, like, I think wine, they would say, and then women just age like milk and go sour. They they have an expiration date, this type of thing. It's probably dishonest to not address the issue of the biological imperative and the biological clock and the eggs and the, you know, have children while you're young and able and don't wait till you're on your dying death bed. Just say, you know, I can't die until I have a child. That's kinda where they get into with this depreciating asset thing, presumably, but I don't think this female author from a feminist perspective is addressing the red pill topics in good faith. She seems to be mocking them and thinking that this is somehow self evident humor and that anyone could just read the point in bold, women are capuchin assets, and then just laugh laugh it off and not address it directly?
[01:57:04] John Roeland:
I noticed that the last on the last one, there's a quote, but it doesn't say who wrote the quote. Sure. Yeah. I mean, again, that, yeah. I mean, it is it is like you said, it is an interesting thing to talk about important thing to talk about that women do have a clock in terms of how long they can have children and that that clock is gonna run shorter than a man's. But, I don't know how that applies to what the red pill community is doing.
[01:57:39] John Roeland:
Oh, in the in the just specifically dating terms, they're absolutely a depreciating asset. I mean, they have their bodies a depreciating asset. So if you're looking at it in dating terms, as a young person who's getting ready to start a family, she's more fertile. She's more able to have children, things like that. All these things that a young man are important to a young man. Now if now when you're single, that's the only time that your age is a depreciation depreciating asset though. In on the other side of it, and this is where this lady is just bitter and old and has 12 cats and nobody's gonna ever love her, and she's real sad about it.
The when you're in a marriage, on the flip side, you're a rising asset. I would never trade this Christie for 20 year old Christie. Because this Christie is very enjoyable to be around. She is she thinks she's intelligent. She knows what she wants in the world. She's a realized woman. And that in a marriage, as you become older and you choose to be and you want to spend your time with the loving mother and not with, running around, She's absolutely gained, value. But in a single situation, that's where, yeah, there's just no getting around it that unless what what exactly are you bringing to it then?
Because if it's outside of you're gonna be the provider, you what? Are you giving your your sex and which, again, depreciates with age and and and what? Like so that there's just no recognition in the of, their actual value in the difference between dating and in a relationship people.
[01:59:54] allen marcus:
She's gonna mention more numbers and the quantification that the red pill seems to put on everything to have sort of spreadsheets of what the best pickup lines were, what the best outcomes were. They're sort of doing running statistics. There's this, idea that somehow 20% of the top men are having sex with 80% of all women. And this is shocking.
[02:00:30] John Roeland:
I would say up to maybe early twenties, mid twenties, that's probably holds true. At some point in time, the that kinda settles down and people wanna have partner, and I would say that balances out. Obviously, 20% of men have adult men, what most people are getting married at some point in time. So, obviously, most dudes don't die a virgin.
[02:01:05] allen marcus:
I think this is topic of the alpha male. So they're addressing this idea that there's a part of the population which is considered the alpha male, and those alpha males are the top male, and they just get sex so easily with 80% of the women that everybody else who isn't included in that is somehow left out,
[02:01:25] John Roeland:
and they're frustrated about that. So they talk about it a lot. So you're talking about the free sex. We're not talking about sex eventually and having a partner. We're just talking about free sex. Hookup culture, that sort of thing. The 80 20 rule kind of applies to I can agree with this and, and the hookup culture that probably 20% of men get the vast vast majority of the hookups. I I could agree with that.
[02:01:52] John Roeland:
Yeah. I would agree that that's probably true. I read I mean, the stuff I was looking at earlier was more thinking that they were talking about in terms of the scale of where you land in terms of your looks. But, yeah, I mean, in the in the hookup world, the guys that are good looking, the Chads, they're gonna they're gonna have more success.
[02:02:24] allen marcus:
I don't know if it's 20, 80. That seems like a big number. They kinda make that number up, and then they use that in their sales technique to say, well, you know, as a top 20% of men, I can offer classes to the rest of the 80% and increase your odds of sex being in your favor. So listen to me, this type of thing. The 80 20 rule, again, I don't know where that number comes from. It's just something that keeps showing up, and people keep repeating it as if it's true. It doesn't make it true. Don't think so.
[02:03:00] John Roeland:
I mean, at the end of the night when you're at the bar, which is what we're talking about with hookup culture, people going out and getting drunk and just pushing their sexual organs against each other. At the end of the night, yeah, the ones you wanted to go home with the most might have went home with somebody else. You're still going home with somebody. Like, well, not all dudes. All chicks so can.
[02:03:26] allen marcus:
She seems to connect this alpha male thing with white male privilege. So point number 7, she's she's saying that red pill men have the belief that white men are not privilege, spelling privilege incorrectly.
[02:03:49] John Roeland:
Well, it also says occur, whatever occur means. Occur?
[02:03:56] John Roeland:
That's what Cardi b says. Occur?
[02:04:00] allen marcus:
That's that's something that would be on the leak. Yeah. That's Cardi b.
[02:04:04] John Roeland:
She yeah. She's a rapper. She doesn't she doesn't talk very well. O'Kuhr?
[02:04:10] John Roeland:
I I'm not a 100% sure how this exactly ties to the other thing
[02:04:15] allen marcus:
a 100%. I mean, the the point to Andrew Tate and say, he's the top red pill guy. He's a white guy. From what? Teaches men that that white men are actually the opposite of privilege, that somehow white men are suppressed because of, diversity and inclusion hiring practices. To say that now white men are actually oppressed. A lot of red pill guys will say, you know, I'm a white guy. I'm oppressed. Here's how I was oppressed. She's reacting to that to say, get a load of this. These white guys don't think they have any privilege. And then the reaction is, okay. Alright.
[02:04:56] John Roeland:
Well, the assumption is too is that red pillars red pillars are all white guys. Right? So there's that assumption baked in there as well. I would say that this just shows you again that this all ties into a bigger, a bigger dialectic that's going on where they're, you know, pitting people against each other, men against women, ethnicities against each other, classes against each other, take your pick. So, not surprised that she tied it in. Obviously, a liberal leaning perspective. And, Yeah. You gotta always play that race card.
[02:05:43] John Roeland:
I don't know if I'd call that dude white. I don't even know what he is.
[02:05:48] John Roeland:
He he's mixed. He's definitely mixed, but they but a lot of people would call him white.
[02:05:54] allen marcus:
And they would say he's privileged, and then the red pill men who would gather to say, you know, just because I'm a white guy doesn't mean I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth, doesn't mean I have a trust fund or a family wealth or, being at a family business, meaning this sort of nepotism. To say that white men have different challenges in their life is a more nuanced statement. But for this idea to be reduced to the shock of finding out that a community of men who are probably assumed to be white, that's a huge assumption, and for this feminist to make it a big point in her clickbait, 7 most shocking beliefs of the red pill community as her big zinger at the end to say like, hey, girls.
These guys think they're privileged or not. Get a load of that. Okay. Right.
[02:07:00] John Roeland:
I mean, white privilege period is just a dumb fucking, dumb fucking thing. I mean, absolutely, you get advantages depending on what community you're in. And if you're black, you get advantages depending on what community and who you're dealing with. And if you're Indian, if you're Chinese, you know, if, it it wait. I dated a Russian chick. If she went into the Russian grocery store, she paid a different price than I would have. Like a 100%. It's just how it works. If people, when dealing inside their own communities, usually get treated a little different than people from outside their communities, usually get treated a little different than people from outside their communities.
And that's just the world. Like, there's not any specific I get to walk into anywhere, and I'm a white guy, and I don't, I suddenly have a different set of rules or laws that apply to me.
[02:07:59] allen marcus:
She's sort of, warning women that red pill is going to be the pipeline of the gateway to lead them to radical right wing isms or white pride or white nationalism or maybe Christian nationalism or something. So she's sort of having these baked in assumptions. And on top of that, she's bringing up the race card. So she's bringing up the race card. Usually in the hookup culture these days?
[02:08:28] John Roeland:
Because that's where I'm having an issue. Because during this entire red pill thing, most of the things that they were trying to promote wouldn't draw a traditional type wife in any way. So, obviously, these people aren't holding Christian values or anything. They aren't right wing. They're not trying to be traditional. They're just trying to be fuck boys or something.
[02:08:52] allen marcus:
Well, part of the white privilege in her mind perhaps might be that being white means you're born into an American Christian nation, these types of things. So she's operating on a whole collection of assumptions from her feminist perspective while trying to critique the worst aspects of red pillism without even addressing those issues. But basically, at the end, pulling out the race card saying this is this is racism.
[02:09:22] John Roeland:
This is sexism. None of the rest of that card is the race card.
[02:09:28] allen marcus:
So maybe that's how she shuts down the debate altogether to say, can't even debate these guys. I can't even believe they didn't bring these points up.
[02:09:38] John Roeland:
I'm shocked shocked that time. Also also, didn't you mention, Marcus, that, the individual who reached out to you was dealing with sense censorship. Right. Of his ideas. So again, this article, you know, goes to to promote that. The idea that this these these thoughts are dangerous, and these ideas are dangerous, and they're spreading, and then they're gonna lead to this. And Well, does that then prove
[02:10:05] allen marcus:
the point of the soft power of feminism being able to silence men's communities? There's also the aspect of men's rights activists. If we're trying to then categorize and figure out what is the Venn diagram, If there's an entire, you know, species of men, the male species, and their literature and their wisdom, I don't know that that's necessarily the manosphere, but it's implied that the manosphere covers everything masculine, male, and men. So then within that, there'll be pop up communities that might be focused on men's rights.
So those are the men who have been married, have been divorced, are paying alimony, are trying to fight for custody. That's a certain area of the manosphere that has its own suppression and pushback and censorship. The MGTOW community is sort of its own little thing. So with what I'm saying here, I'm describing this splintered aspect of unity in men, but then it's splintered off from the female, the the woman. And then to continue to post articles from a feminist perspective is to antagonize men proactively assuming that all red pill men want to use women for just one thing, milk them, and then leave them because the milk's gonna get sour because women age, and that's a frightening thing that men haven't dealt with.
It points to a lot of immaturity and a lack of spirituality and coming to terms with this is life, and we're living it, and how do we best live it. So last week, we did talk about wanting to write in the positive, in the affirmative, maxims, truisms, principles, and things that would strengthen men and sharpen iron with men. Do you guys have thoughts on how we could rewrite some of these things into the positive, into the affirmative, into, actionable, directive for a hoo sort of military recruitment scenario?
[02:12:32] John Roeland:
Well, I I I definitely, number 1 would always be become your own man. And it's only through becoming your own man that you're gonna attract a woman that you truly want, and that is gonna be, because you have just as becoming your own man become worthy of that woman. She's gonna be a worthy woman. That's the only time that you're gonna get that worthy woman. So the the women that you're even able to acquire up until that point are definitely not gonna be worth it because you're not worth it. You want to have a a strong, woman become a strong man.
And, this is where I really have a departure from the MGTOW. To me, that is just a bunch of basement incels crying because they never could become a good enough a strong enough man to, have the relationship that they're crying around that they want. And, they these people can look at me and act like Christy just fucking fell out of the fucking sky and became a, you know, like like, I picked her off of a tree or something. And she was the only one that existed. But if y'all think that the person that I am didn't help set that situation up, then you're fucking nuts. And then that just tells me that you're not willing to become the man that you need to be to be worthy of that woman.
So that's number 1. And from there, the rest of it gets real fucking easy. We don't even need to make a list. You become that dude. It'll all fall into place.
[02:14:22] John Roeland:
Yeah. I agree. Anything that's focused on self worth, improving yourself, not being so obsessed with, attention from women, that that's not the ultimate goal of life. Those parts of it are there is some truth to that. It's just being it's just being applied to hookup culture, so it ends up being less meaningful. But those rules in general, don't don't get over, you know, overly reactive because you see a beautiful woman. You know, that's just like telling a guy not to catcall a woman. Right? I mean, it's the same kind of mentality. Be respectful. And so, obviously, that all starts with self respect.
So anything in in there that promotes that, I think, is worth keeping. The fact that it's all being framed in in the hookup perspective, I I think is interesting. They showed that picture of that one woman who she was from the show Flavor of Love. It's interesting to think how much that those types of reality shows all played a a hand in this this, way of thinking, you know, where you're competing for a woman and, you know, like which one, you know, which man is the most desirable or which woman is the most desirable or there was one where there was one woman and she was going for men and women.
You know? So, I mean, obviously, this stuff is just being we're being bombarded with it in very inverted ways, and there are some real lessons to be learned there. Like, the whole idea of the red pill being going down the rabbit hole, like, that's valuable. Like, to seek truth, to seek understanding of what's going on in the world, that's valuable, but, interesting that it got, attached to to this perspective. I did wanna add, I have to do give a shout out to Mark Passio and his presentation, the unholy feminine. It's long it's a long presentation. He put it out in 2016, 17, and it really delves into a lot of this stuff. And, honestly, for me, looking at the red pill stuff now where I haven't really looked at it that much, like that directly, I can see a lot of the things that he's talking about and how it's playing out now where it really is, they've created a war a war between the sexes and that it's, you know, a depopulation agenda on some level. And, yeah. So it's a long presentation, you know, and it it because it's a presentation, you don't get all the name called you know, you don't get called names.
But, yeah, it it is it is pretty interesting just to look at the occult influence on this and the social social engineering behind it.
[02:17:27] allen marcus:
You mentioned the inversion. I think what we were most appalled by is the fact that so much of these lists contains the thou shall nots. They were inverted. They were not in the affirmative. They were not in the positive. So a simple thing to do immediately is to begin to think in terms of what you want and beginning to attract that which you want. So when you fill your life up with quality women, sisters, aunts, anyone, just talking to all women, treating them as human beings, and then asking them just be honest with them and say, you know, I'm a single guy.
Got any advice from me. What can I do to improve? Talking with them, engaging with them, working with them, not working against them. So attracting what you want and then attracting more of what you want would go into having the mission. So if you know that you want to eventually have a relationship with someone, and you probably do begin to work towards that goal. So much of the red pill stuff sort of gets you going in circles. It sort of gets you to, you know, go through and evaluate yourself on a a qualitative way to, like, rate yourself, or then causes you to doubt yourself. So then it you you you begin to see the areas where you're lacking in confidence, confidence, where you're lacking in skill, and then it causes you to need to seek out help from guys who don't care.
Men don't care about other men. So it's like they're not going to treat your problems with any sort of concern because guys don't open up to other guys. So that's the other problem in the community where they're always focusing on success with women. I don't see a lot of red pill topics talking about how do we, as men, have a sort of chivalry or a code or helping each other out? If the best advice that was offered tonight was just to tell another man not to be a better, cock and raise another man's seed. That's not a that's not a positive thing. That's not an affirmative thing, and that doesn't move you forward in life to anywhere you wanna be.
It's sort of the doom pill nihilist perspective to say we live in a fallen world. You know, it this is you know, Lucifer rules the air and Satan rules the earth, and we're in the end times apocalypse. So why even try to start a family? Why even try to do anything if the presidency is doomed and we can't even have a fair Olympics and everything is terrible. Well, there's already men who are starting a parallel economy. There's already men who are going their own way in the best possible way to do their own thing. Instead of standing up to authority, they're saying, I'm the authority.
They're not an obstacle. I'm moving forward. These are the thoughts I'm having in closing.
[02:20:40] John Roeland:
It just dawned on me that, my favorite movie probably is Fight Club, and I I saw a little clip of it on one of the videos I was watching earlier. And in that, it's definitely, I don't think we need another woman is what we need in our life. Right? And they, you know, they kind of run around and, you know, take down take down or start the revolution, and the woman in it is just a mess. But, yeah, I I'm really, appreciative of, doing this with you guys. I'm learning a lot, you know, in closing. I I kind of had a a sense of what the red pill was, but not on this level. So definitely learning a lot. I like the idea of thinking about ways that we can kind of pick out the positive aspects of all of these things and then apply it to to what we think would work because, obviously, there is a need for some, some nuanced messaging, you know, not so extreme, not either side of the pole. So, yeah, I appreciate you guys for helping us to to sharpen the sword once again.
[02:21:51] John Roeland:
Yeah. This is this is absolutely been a wonderful experiment, and I I'm so glad that we did it and that you guys agreed to join me on it. I this is, this has just been absolutely awesome. I think, Ryan up here, this this pretty much sums it up. Don't spend your time chasing butterflies, plant, build a beautiful garden. That's you know, metaphorically, that sums it up. You you want that you want that traditional life where, you know, you have this wife that says wonderful comfort and you have this nice home and stuff. You gotta build that. You you've gotta make that. And then those things come to you.
We have too much, the the the cart chase you know, the cart before the horse going on with society. They're also worried about the prize, and they don't want to worry about their responsibility, in order to achieve that. And I definitely believe that there's gonna be a meaningful change made in the world. These, knee jerk reactions where we go from one horrible extreme to the other is absolutely not the way. And I believe a 100% in this, debate form is the way to do it because this is where you can have a more, involved in nuanced discussion.
I think that we're gonna end up running when we, try to debate against the more, this feminist side as opposed to the red pill side, which we will try to do both, I think we're gonna have a lot less luck with the feminist and and honestly, even the more educated debaters. I've been watching some of the actual debates from, like, intellectual world. And in baked into those are these extreme liberal presuppositions. Like one of them that I was just watching, the debate wasn't whether, conservative ideology or liberal ideology was most beneficial or anything like that. It was, should conservative ideology because it's so harmful and contains so much misinformation be made, be banned, due to misinformation.
So and the the conservative the team taking the conservative side already baked in those all those presuppositions where it's like, hold the back the fuck up. Hold on. He you you've already give you've already, started this fight on a winning side. Like, I can't even win the fight here. Like, you're just basically asking me to say, yeah. We're evil, but we still need representation. Like, that's the only thing you've left me fucking room for here. So I but, I really am looking forward to getting into this with some of the other folks and after we go through this period of feeling this out and developing our own positions and getting those out there.
I'm just I it's been a long time since I've been super I love spiders. Everybody check out weaving spiders every Saturday. I love spiders. That is that is my time, but that's almost like, my my friend's social time. I've really been looking forward to doing this as a project, and I feel like it's gonna really have a lot of meaningful impact as we get going. So I I I I thank you guys, and this has just been awesome.
[02:25:44] John Roeland:
Thanks, everybody. I'm gonna get ready to hit the button. Any more last words?
[02:25:50] allen marcus:
Yeah. Our goal will be to make this audio available in most convenient way. So alanmarcus.com
[02:26:07] John Roeland:
Alright. Everybody have a good night. Thanks for keeping the chat lively. That was great. Peace.
Zoomer tells us about Pills
Deliberating Dog Face Dudes
Matrix and Manosphere
Red Pill Golden Rules
Rule 1: Never Take Care of Another Man's Seed
Rule 2: Never Finance a Woman's Lifestyle
Rule 3: Don't Let Her Looks Turn You Into a Sucker
Rule 4: Pay Attention to Her Actions, Not Her Words
Rule 5: Never Marry or Move In Without Knowing Her for 1-2 Years
Rule 6: Never Be Responsible for Her Problems
Rule 7: Never Fight or Argue with a Woman
Rule 8: Don't Be Manipulated by Sex
Rule 9: Don't Confuse Lust for Love
Rule 10: Never Beg for Female Attention or Validation
Shocking Beliefs of the Red Pill Community
Belief 1: Female Supremacy Movement Exists
Belief 2: Women Are Illogical and Manipulative
Belief 3: Women Are Hypergamous
Belief 4: Women Need Men More Than Men Need Women
Belief 5: Women Are Depreciating Assets
Belief 6: 20% of Men Have Sex with 80% of Women
Belief 7: White Men Are Not Privileged
Positive Affirmations and Closing Thoughts