In this episode of the Joe Rooz Show, Joe navigates through a series of technical difficulties while sharing his weekend plans and reflecting on a busy week. He discusses his craving for a cigar and his love for bourbon, particularly highlighting his favorite brands and the perfect pairings. Joe also touches on the challenges of maintaining a quality broadcast amidst internet issues and encourages listeners to support the show through various means, including donations and purchasing merchandise.
Joe delves into the political landscape, discussing the implications of executive orders signed with an auto pen during the Biden administration and the potential constitutional crisis it poses. He also covers the judicial challenges faced by the Trump administration, highlighting the ongoing legal battles and the impact of judicial overreach on executive decisions. The episode wraps up with discussions on various topics, including the Biden administration's DEI policies, the controversial MAID program in Canada, and a humorous segment on a kindergartner bringing booze-infused jello shots to school.
Joe's GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/raise-funds-to-cover-mortgage-escrow-shortage
FOLLOW US ON:
RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/joerooz
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@joerooz
TWITCH: https://twitch.tv/joerooz
X: https://x.com/joerooz
Facebook: https://facebook.com/joeroozpodcast
Minds: https://minds.com/joerooz
GETTR: https://gettr.com/joerooz
Special thanks to:
Executive Producer Wayne Rankin
Executive Producer Rosanna Rankin
Executive Producer Carolina Jimenez
Executive Producer Marisa Lee
Executive Producer Angela Wetuski
Sponsored by:
Podhome https://Podhome.fm
TNE Energy
(00:01:20) Introduction and Weekend Plans
(00:06:26) Technical Issues and Housekeeping
(00:15:11) Interview with Orlando Owen
(00:16:47) The Autopen Scandal and Biden's Health
(00:28:55) Executive Orders and Legal Challenges
(00:49:36) Judicial Overreach and Tariff Wins
(01:08:42) Biden's Health and Public Appearances
(01:25:09) Canada's Euthanasia Program
(01:33:32) Texas Digital ID Law
(01:35:16) Kindergartner's Booze Incident
- Wayne Rankin
- Rosanna Rankin
[00:01:21]
Unknown:
Alright. Hey, folks. This is Joe Roos, bringing you the best quality talk radio that we could muster without all the bluster. And broadcasting live tonight from the pimple on the backside of Texas, it's the Joe Russo. Had a little problem there with the camera. It wasn't turning on. You caught me in mid frustration. I was like As always, like I always say, it wouldn't be a show of mine without some kind of a technical problem. But, we're here and we're live and it's Friday. It is finally, finally Friday. Hope you guys have some great plans for the weekend. I know that, I'm probably just gonna be hanging around here.
Messing around in the studio a little bit. Getting some stuff done. And I have to start setting up a few things for, the Saturday spotlight. So if I do that later on tonight and get that thing ready for you for tomorrow. And then, of course, Sunday, still debating on whether or not we're gonna do that special Sunday show that we've been kinda kicking the ideas around for. But, we'll see. We'll see how it all goes. But, looking forward to a great weekend, looking forward to some time to relax a little bit and, you know, just kinda decompress. It's been one of those crazy, crazy weeks. It was a short week for me for regular work, because, you know, it was a holiday on Monday.
So well, not really for me, but from most of the folks that I work with, it's been a short week. I worked every day this week, but, it's been a busy week even though there was a holiday involved. I had a lot of work to do, so I'm really looking forward to just a nice quiet evening here at home. Maybe maybe even have a little bourbon later on tonight. We'll see. We shall certainly see. I'll tell you what I've been really craving. I've been craving, of all things, I've been craving a cigar. I haven't had a cigar since, oh, I wanna say this is what? This is May?
So maybe the last time I had a cigar was in December or January. So, that's one of the great things about cigars as opposed to cigarettes. You know, they're they're not like something that you need to have, all the time. You know? So you you can go a while without it. And I have a a packed humidor out there in the other room, and, I got loads of some really nice Rocky Patel, Fumas. And also, I have a number of, some Avo Heritage cigars, which are just unbelievable cigars. I love them. I get the I get the little Toro's, so, it's a nice even smoke. It tastes really nice, especially when you mix it with a good bourbon. And, probably for for the Avo, I would I would probably go with, like, a 1792 small batch, or I'd go with, an Elijah Craig small batch, anything like that.
Beautiful and perfect for it. You could probably do a Maker's Maker's Mark. Not so sure about the others. But, but definitely, you know, the seventeen ninety two, that's it's like my that's my my go to stuff. I love the $17.92 bourbons. I'll tell you one funny story. I I purchased, I purchased the full proof seventeen ninety two, which is like a 25 proof or something like that. And, when I opened that thing up, man, I I got heartburn just from smelling it. That's how strong it was. But, but once you once you get past the first one or two, it's it's it's super nice. And what I like to do is I I I have a specific, bourbon glass that I use, you know, the little bowl with the handle at the bottom, with the base. And, you know, I I I have a couple of drinks out of that first just to kinda get the full full flavor, the full effect of it. And then, and then I do it, I do it just, on the rocks straight up. No mixing. Nothing like that because I don't know. I I don't like the idea of mixing bourbon. I I think that, you know, bourbon is is perfect the way it is. It is like, it's it's like it's like the nectar of the gods.
You know what I'm saying? And, the, it it's just a it's I love it. So it's good stuff. And I'm I'm looking at my, my feed up there on the screen there, and I see it's all messed up. It's all pixelated. So I don't know what is going on with my Internet connection these days, but I'm gonna have to make a couple of phone calls maybe over the weekend and do that, because that's that's just not good. Not good. Alright. Well, with all of that done, again, hope you guys have a great weekend, and I'm looking forward to, kinda just relaxing. So I hope you are too.
Maybe you can have a cookout. I don't know. We'll see. But, in the meantime, how about we do some housekeeping here before we get into the news of the day? And let me just check this here really quickly. Let's see. Alright. That is not a problem. Got it taken care of. Alright. But, again, in the meantime, my feed is just in really bad shape up there, so it looks terrible. So I apologize, to everybody that's that's watching right now. Let me fix this too. I'm getting problems here as well. Just yeah. Like I said, it's it's the Joe Roo Show and nothing short of problems. Alright. Well, as I was saying, some housekeeping stuff. Alright. So, folks, just head over to our website, joe roos dot com. It's right there up on your screen, and open up that web form that you see up there on the contact section. Send us over any questions, comments, cares, or concerns that you might have. Also, don't forget to send over any, any any, any suggestions, any, ideas that you might have, for a show. I'm always open to get suggestions from folks. And then, also, don't forget to look for the support page. Now we really do need your financial support. As you can see, our Internet stuff needs to be upgraded very, very badly.
It's just absolutely terrible. The, the quality of the video is just terrible, especially on a bigger screen. I'm just really disappointed. I mean, it looks good here in front of me. You know, the monitor I have in front of me, it looks looks fine, but I wish I could turn the camera around without messing up the whole thing to show it to you. This is irritating me. So this is a value for value podcast. So if you would, just, look for that support button. And if you could help us out with a donation, we'd really appreciate that. Any amount will would be fantastic to receive from you guys.
But you could also do, donation in cryptocurrencies. You could do a donation in satoshis, which is like a micropayment of Bitcoin. It's really pennies on the dollar, so it's really not a bank breaker for anybody. At least I don't think so. I hope not. And then you also have, our Texacoin, barcode QR code, sorry, that's up there on the screen. You can easily scan that. You can send us some Texacoin, which we would love to get. Texacoin is a it's an up and coming crypto, so you might wanna check that out. I purchased it not too long ago at, like, 40¢ a coin. It's a it's like a dollar something now per coin. So, it's not a bad little investment, and, you know, you never know. You don't wanna miss the boat like you you may have done with Bitcoin. You know, Bitcoin started out at, like, like a dollar or something a a coin, and now it's a hundred thousand dollars for a coin. So, just gotta get on these things. It's it's not terribly expensive to get into it. Just try it out and see how it goes.
Also, you could join up one of our producer tiers. We have an associate producer tier for $17.76 a month. It's a $17.76 a month. We also have a producer's tier for $18.36 a month. And, of course, we also have our executive producer tiers. There are two of them. One is $25 a month and one is $50 a month. Now, all the tiers get the shout out on every show. They get included in all the show notes. And, any emails or anything that we send out, any post we make, all get the shout out for it. At the executive producer level, at the $25 level, you get also, in addition to the shout outs and inclusions, you also get to book thirty minutes on the show with us to do a live segment with us. That's a lot of fun. We look forward to doing that, whenever the opportunity arises itself. And so, you know, please check it out. It'd be a lot of fun.
Also, at the $50, executive producer tier, you get the, you get the shout outs. You get all of the, the perks of booking the show with us. And on top of that, we'll also send you a free Joe Russo podcast, whatever you wanna call it, t shirt, and, which are currently in the process of being printed. I should be getting the first couple of them, probably this week. And if you wanna check it out for yourself, you can just hit that little shop button that's right down there on your screen if you're watching on Rumble. Or you can go to our website and and click the shop button on our website, and you'll see our t shirts. We have a couple up there right now. We have, we have kind of a humorous one, which kind of stems back to a comment that I made, early early on in the shows, when I when we first started doing the show, back in November, talking about having rabies. So I have a shirt up there that says, I have rabies. So you could pick up that shirt if you'd like for for, I think, it's $28.
And then also you have the, the Joe Roos, podcast t shirt, which is available up there as well for about $28. So, you could you could purchase those right out right there. Or if you wanna get it for free, you could always join up at the executive producer fifty dollar level per month. Alright. Now another way you can help us out is by heading over to our affiliate with the Alex Jones store. Just head over to the alexjonesstore.com/joe, and you can purchase, any variety of great vitamin supplements and apparel from, the Alex Jones store. And that's great because every purchase that you make, 10% if you use our link, 10% of that comes right back here to the podcast and, helps us pay the bills, helps us, do the upgrades that we need to do, obviously. I'm keep on looking up at that screen. It's driving me crazy.
Every penny helps. So anytime you can make a purchase through that, like I said, 10% of it, comes right back here to the podcast. And, you know, like, I wouldn't tell you to try it if I didn't try it and use it myself. Now I I love to take the ultimate turmeric, with the black pepper and ginger root, which is fantastic for especially for me for arthritis. Also, I take the, the Ultimate Irish Sea Moss, which is fantastic as well. I mean, you need that. That's loaded with iodine, which your body absolutely needs. So you need to get that as well. You also need to try out the Ultra the I'm sorry.
The ultra methylene blue. Right? Is it or is it blue methylene? Ultra methylene blue. Alright. That stuff is amazing. That's I I've been taking it now for about a month, a little bit over a month. I got my second bottle. It just came, a couple days ago. And, I'll tell you, it it's stuff's really good. Now last night, which we we did it on the show, we we we took our our our dose yesterday because, I purposely didn't wanna do it in the morning. I wanted to do it with you guys on the show this way you guys could see it and that I actually take this stuff. So it it's it's a great product. You need to try it out. You know, for me, what it really does, it just it it gives me it gives me a steady energy throughout the course of the day, helps me get through the work that I have to do.
Also, it it kinda it kinda makes you feel, like, kinda mellow, kinda calm, like, it takes a lot to get you ruffled. Like, ordinarily, you know, all the little technical issues that I've been having here today, so far, I would have probably just shut the shut the stream off and said, you know what? Just forget it. I'll pick it up fresh on Monday. But, nah, we're gonna get through it. We'll work through it. Even though that's really irritating the crap out of me looking up at that screen over there. I might just turn it off. I don't know. But, hopefully, it's not too bad on your end. So if it is, just drop a comment. Let me know. Alright.
What else we got? So alexjonesstore.com/joe. Get yourself some apparel. Get yourself some, some great vitamins and supplements. Try them out. You're gonna really like them. Alright. Well, we're at that point already where we're gonna say goodbye to all of our connected streams. I believe we're on Facebook for the first time. So, streaming on Facebook live on our on one of our pages. So so hopefully, if you're there, great to see you. If not, we'll see you soon, I guess. But, in the meantime, we're gonna say goodbye to the folks that are watching on Facebook, x, Twitch, and YouTube, and we are going to continue to stream exclusively on Rumble. So if you don't have Rumble, go to your app store on your phone, download the app. It's free. Sign up. Get an account. It's free. And, follow us at joe roost. It's free. Alright. So with all of that said, I guess we'll, say goodbye for now, and we will see you either on Rumble or we'll see you on Monday. Guys, have a great night.
Alright. Well, let's give some folks a chance to switch over, if anybody does. And then, while we're waiting for them, I'll get the next thing queued up here. Alright. Well, there's a lot of stuff to talk about, stuff that we were gonna talk about yesterday. Oh, that reminds me. I completely I wanted to mention it earlier, and it slipped my mind to do it. Now it just came to me right now. So last night, we had a two hour conversation with Orlando Owen, who is a, a masculinity coach, I guess, you could say, or a, an emotional liberation speaker.
And we had a great conversation. It was not really anything that I expected. I I don't really generally go into, segments with guests with any kind of real expectation, but I I had checked out some of his videos on YouTube. And, of course, like I said yesterday, they were all in German, so I I really didn't understand it. But, you know, you gotta get the idea of where it was going, and and I was not expecting, the guy that I spoke to yesterday, man. He it was a lot of fun. I really enjoyed that, and I'm looking forward to to hooking up with him again and having another conversation. We are so aligned in so many different ways that I didn't didn't think it was gonna be. But, hopefully, you know, we'll be able to get together again, and we'll see what happens. But, if, you know, I hope so hopefully, you you guys saw it. If you didn't see it, you can always go back into the show archives, check it out. Also, I'm gonna be running it, Saturday as a Saturday, spotlight.
So, it should be it should be a lot of fun to watch that again and see, and see how many more folks join in on it. Alright. Well, with all that said, how about we get to some of the news?
[00:16:45] Unknown:
Alright.
[00:16:48] Unknown:
Now, the, the last time we got we we we actually sat down and spoke about things going on in the news, it was Wednesday. No. I'm sorry. Correction. It was Monday. We were talking about this whole thing, this whole scandal now with, with the autopen. The autopen's back in the news. The autopen's not gonna go anywhere anywhere anytime soon. At least I don't think so, and it shouldn't because of the implications behind it. But, there's also another aspect to this whole story, and that is the cover up that took place, of the, of the health and the the the the cognitive abilities of of, Joe Biden.
Now, and we had talked about a a number of things that that had taken place in there. And, during that period of time let me turn that off, that little banner down there. We had talked about, just how this, there was this this basically, this this little pullet bureau that was kind of running things, almost, like a committee, which is completely unconstitutional. They're using the auto pen for just about every signature on every document that had to be signed. We also talked about how, and and we reminded ourselves of, speaker Johnson, in his meeting with the president when, he was talking about the the shutting down of the LNG, the liquid natural gas in, in Louisiana, which, of course, was detrimental to the economy of Louisiana.
And, Joe Biden had no clue whatsoever that he signed that. In fact, what he did say was that, you know, that they didn't shut it down. They didn't shut it off. They were, they were going to, study the effects of LNG. Well, that's not what he signed, and, that's not what was put in front of him, but he didn't understand or know what he signed, if he even did sign it at all. So that poses a lot of problems, especially, you know, with the man that that is in charge of of our nuclear capabilities, not knowing what exactly it is that he's doing. Now, thank God nothing happened to that extent, and thank God that he's not in office now even though they were pushing him to run again for another four years, which would have been absolutely insane. The man is 82 now. He he would have been what? 86?
So, you know, this is a scandal that that is going to go down in history as probably the greatest scandal in in, modern American history, at the presidential level. I mean, this is this is worse, like like we said yes, Monday, this is worse than Watergate. Worse than Watergate. Now, the House Oversight Committee, chairman James Comer, called on, the presidential physician, doctor Kevin O'Connor. And now and doctor O'Connor, he served as the president's personal physician at the White House, for the four years that he was there. And, o Comer told O'Connor that, he needs to, he he's gonna need to come and, testify before Congress.
And, at this point, they they gave him a deadline to do that, and he hasn't done that. And, and and the reason why they wanna talk to him is because, he's the one who basically certified that Joe that Joe Biden was was physically fit, mentally fit, and capable of performing the duties of the president of The United States, when obviously he wasn't. And it was obvious not just to you know, it was obvious to everybody. And it wasn't just just because of his debate performance, if you remember that that, that that disaster.
People on the right had been talking about it for a long time. For at least three of the four years, they had been talking about his decline. And, of course, you know, you the more the more we talked about it, the more, you know, we were shouted down. We were told, you know, that we're just we're what was it? It was, we're ageists. Alright? We're discriminating against him because of his age. We were told that, that, you know, we're, providing deep fakes and cheap fakes. I think they even used, yeah, there was a number of different things that they've used to describe, the the the the commentary on the president.
Now, I think it's important that Congress sits down and talks with doctor O'Connor since he is the the he was the, physician to the president. So, basically, what we've done is is, today, they've reached the deadline for O'Connor to contact the committee, and for the, trans they would they would have a transcribed interview, and, that's gonna take place, June 25. Now O'Connor did reach out to the to the committee, and he is going to be testifying. And, but if he didn't, it would have been a subpoena. And I don't think James Comer is kidding around with this either. And, it's it's let me see. Do I have?
So yeah. So so so here's, here's doctor O'Connor and the the message here says, you know, breaking sources say, doctor Kevin O'Connor, the personal physician who attested annually to the fitness of for office of Joe Biden has contacted the GOP oversight, through an attorney to discuss a transcript interview ahead of today's close of business deadline, which was today, under the threat of subpoena. O'Connor was the law was the last of five target witnesses to respond. Now here is, here is, James Comer on this particular matter.
[00:22:57] Unknown:
We're starting with the staffers who are operating the auto pin. We're gonna bring the physician, doctor O'Connor in because he definitely was not telling the truth about Joe Biden's health. We're gonna have Ronnie Jackson there to counsel us on a lot of questions. We're very fortunate to have a member of congress that was the the the previous White House position. So I think we're gonna be ready to go. And and, again Yeah. Even the liberal media, Sean, wants to know the answers to these questions. No one's attacking me, for wanting to, conduct this investigation. Everyone wants to know the truth, and, hopefully, we'll be able to find the
[00:23:35] Unknown:
truth. Now, Comer so that's interesting. Alright. So now now Comer, also went on to, to, Mark Varney's show on, on Fox. And, he had to say this is what he had to say on on Varney.
[00:23:59] Unknown:
The House Oversight Committee, Congressman James Comer joins me now. Congressman, we just got this coming at us. A new watchdog report from ProEnergy Group, just found, quote, no evidence that Biden knew of crucial climate executive orders. They're now demanding answers on who signed with the auto pen. What happens if Biden really didn't know? Are those orders null and void?
[00:24:27] Unknown:
I think they would be null and void. Look. At the end of the day, there's more evidence coming out by the second that would prove that Joe Biden, wasn't the one making decisions during the last one hundred days of his administration, perhaps the last six months or even the last year. This is when the most activity occurred Yeah. From the executive order standpoint throughout the whole Biden administration. We don't believe that that a lot of these executive orders are legal if for no other reason Joe Biden did not sign them himself. You have to physically sign anything pertaining to the law, whether it be a pardon or whether it be an executive order. What we wanna know is who gave the authority to these four staffers that we're bringing in.
These are the staffers that we've identified as the ones who actually put the documents in the auto pen and press the power button to sign Joe Biden's name. We wanna know who told them to do that, and we're gonna follow the trail just like we followed the money in the Biden influence fell family investigation. We're gonna follow the trail as to who was using the autopat.
[00:25:34] Unknown:
That's the problem with the autopat, isn't it? You don't know who authorized its use, and you we can't we you have to find out. The whole question is who actually wielded presidential power because it probably wasn't president Biden. That's the nitty that's the crux of this matter, isn't it?
[00:25:54] Unknown:
That is. And and look. That's what Jake Tapper is saying. That's what he wrote his book about. That's what all of his interviews about his book is is saying that Joe Biden wasn't the one calling the shots. That's a constitutional crisis. But more important to to today, to this very moment, many of those executive orders that were signed with the autopid are are what we call Trump proofing, the the Trump administration. This is when they knew that Donald Trump was likely gonna be the next president of The United States, so they started taking action, through executive orders signed with an auto pen at a time when Joe Biden wasn't anywhere near the White House, to to make it difficult for Donald Trump to, reform energy permitting, to make it difficult for Trump to re make the federal employees return back to work, to make it difficult for him to eliminate the the US Department of Education.
These are things Trump's battling in court as a result of whoever made the decision to use the auto pin to sign these executive orders. We think this will have huge legal impacts if we can prove what Jake Tapper and many of us believe it wasn't Joe Biden. Colson, I've gotta get to this one. Is it possible
[00:27:06] Unknown:
that you will hold televised hearings with Jill Biden, Hunter Biden, KJP? Is that possible down the road?
[00:27:15] Unknown:
I guess anything's possible. I think it's a pretty pretty well known, fact that I would prefer to have depositions and transcribed interviews where we release the transcript, possibly even release the video. As you know, Stewart, a lot of these committee hearings, never turned out the way that that we hope. They're more entertainment than than subsidy. True. So we'll do whatever, but I'm you know, I'll consult with my members of the committee. They're gonna be active in the process. We're gonna ask a lot of questions to a lot of people and try to get the answer that I believe the answers that I believe most Americans wanna know. Got it. Congressman James Comer, thanks very much for being with us this morning.
[00:27:53] Unknown:
Alright, folks. So having a bit of a problem here, technically. My camera went out, so I don't think yeah. So we're gonna have to do a reset. Alright, folks? So just, bear with me a second here. Alright. I think we're back. Alright. I think we're back. Right? Alright. There we go. I'm sorry, folks. I don't know what the hell is going on with my setup here, the last few days. This is just absolutely unacceptable here. Yeah. This is camera problems, Internet problems. You saw what I don't know if you saw what happened yesterday with, with our guest. We just we had to do another reset. So anyway so, what that clip was basically about was, not only about the cognitive decline of the president, or and the use of the auto pen, but, you know, there's a number of executive orders. There was a flurry in the last hundred days of the previous administration. There was a flurry of activity, between the presidential pardons, the executive orders that were signed, and all of them were signed by the auto pen, which, representative Comer brings up a very good point. If this is all being done by auto pen and Joe Biden had no idea what was being done, legally speaking, are these orders and and, and these pardons that were issued, in effect, or are they null and void?
And remember, this is the amount of activity that took place at that time. That was the most activity that took place in the Biden administration, in in in in over the last over the last six months of his of his administration. Now if the if if he was unaware that those executive orders were being, signed or even what they contained or what they were all about, then they're not then then I can't see how they could have any kind of legal standing. Now the left loves to throw around that that term constitutional crisis, and they use it in the in the in the regard of the, administration deep deporting illegal aliens. Well, that's not a constitutional crisis, folks. This is a constitutional crisis.
This is extremely dangerous. And there are so many people that are involved with this, so many people that are complicit with this. I have a clip here of, where is it? Here we go. Carolyn Levitt came out at a at a press conference at the White House and totally, completely smoked the former first lady, doctor Jill Biden because of her cover up. I mean, you think about it. This this is the woman that that's married to the president, knows about the cognitive decline, knows about his oldest health issues, and yet still trotted him out there, still pushed him and egged him on to to, to to, to run again for for reelection.
And, I mean, anybody that anybody that was paying attention would be able to see that that Joe Biden was not all there. Here's what, Carolyn Levitt had to say. Short clip.
[00:32:10] Unknown:
I think, frankly, the former first lady should certainly speak up about what she saw in regards to her husband and when she saw it and what she knew. Because I think anybody looking again at the videos and photo evidence of Joe Biden with your own eyes and a little bit of common sense can see this was a clear cover up. And Joe, Jill Biden was certainly complicit in that cover up. There are docu there's documentation video evidence of her clearly shielding her husband away from the cameras. They were just on The View last week. She was saying everything is fine. She's still lying to the American people. She still thinks the American public are so stupid that they're gonna believe her lies. And frankly, it's insulting and she needs to answer for it.
[00:32:51] Unknown:
She does absolutely agree with that. She does need to answer for this. She does need to to and and and she's gonna be subpoenaed if she has well, I think she responded already to the to their request to come into, to talk. But, she's gonna have to sit down and explain this. You know, I also remember there was, there was a video that went around, of her at a at a a cabinet meeting, and she was actually seemed to be leading the cabinet meeting. Well, where was Joe? Taking a nap? Probably. And if you saw the if you saw the episode of, of The View that she was that that that she was on, with Joe Biden, the cohost, Alisa, Alisa Farah Griffin asked Biden for his response to to the books, deeply sourced from Democrats that claimed that in his final year, there was a dramatic decline in his cognitive ability.
And and and Biden, of course, was Biden. The that garbled response saying, you know, they're wrong. There's nothing to sustain that, number one. And then he said, number two, think of what we left with. We left with circumstance, and there's a quote. We left with a circumstance where we had an insurrection when I started. What does that have to do with his cognitive decline? He went on to say, not since the civil war, we had circumstance where we're in a position with, well and then he went on to the pandemic because people's incompetence in the last outfit end up with over a million people dying. There's also a situation we found ourselves unable to deal with a lot of just basic issues, which I won't go into it for the interest of time.
And then he then he just trailed off, and then Jill Biden then Jill jumped in because it was obvious to everybody on the panel that her husband was lost. He wasn't making any sense. I mean, even the hosts of The View looked like they were disturbed by this. So there there needs to be a reckoning on this. There needs to be the investigations and, you know, and honestly, this is elder abuse. If nothing else, this is elder abuse. Now am I hopeful that anything's gonna come of this? Yeah. I have a lot of hope that something's gonna come of this, but do I really think there is?
Not with Pam Bondi involved. Not with Pam Bondi involved at all. And speaking of, of of things along those lines, we also remember that, was it last week? Jim Comey, the the outgoing or former the former director of the FBI, you know, I if you remember this, he went out, took a walk on a beach and miraculously came across this this shell formation that says eighty six forty seven. Now, we all know what that means. You know, 86 is a is a common reference to, to assassination, to killing somebody. Actually, something I learned recently about that, it was, the 86 is, you know, you you take them eight miles out of town, you bury them six feet under. That's the 86.
And then 47 is the is is Donald Trump, the forty seventh president of The United States. And, his quote was, you know, interesting shell form interesting shell formation on my beach walk today. And of course, you know, he's come out since then, and he blamed his wife, he's blamed everybody under the sun, but doesn't take any responsibility for it himself. But, the problem with that is is that you have somebody who is a a is a very well known public figure in James Comey. Unfortunately, for us, he is. And, especially the the the the left lunatics that, you know, have embraced this culture of it's okay to talk about assassinating a sitting president.
I mean, God forbid that, you know, Republicans or conservatives talked about that, you know, with a a sitting Democrat, but it's okay for them to talk about it, you know, with, with a Republican in office, especially Donald Trump. So, you know, the concern here is, of course, you know, being such a public figure and seeing and having the platform that he has, and trying to publish a and trying to, you know, sell books, you know, his his his voice carries. His voice has some sway to it, you know, and, people are gonna listen to him, especially those lunatics on the left that that believe in this stuff, that believe in it's okay to kill a president or try to kill a president or talk about killing the president. So, Kash Patel, the the current director of the FBI, sat down with Brett Baer, and, basically, you know, he he had a warning. He he put out a warning about this, about these kind of posts. And he said that, you know, that there are copycats actually popping up all across the country because of what James Comey posted.
Because of that 8647 post. Now of course, like I said, you know, he blamed his wife. He you know, with the whole thing. So, Comey this this is what he said, quote. This is what Comey said. We were walking down the beach when we went we went to the beach to we were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week, and and we were walking back toward the road, and we saw in the sand someone had someone had arranged shells with numbers. And Patrice, my wife said, why would someone put an address in the sand? And I said, I don't know. And we stood over it and I said, I think it's some kind of a political message. Really?
And then, of course, the backlash grew stronger when Comey blamed his wife. She said, quote, you know, when I was a server, she did a lot of work in restaurants meant, you know, meant to remove an item from a menu when you ran out of agreed, ingredients. And I said, well, to me, she said, you know, when I was a server, she did a lot of work in restaurants, meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of it meant to move it meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients. Gonna 86 it. And I said, well, to me, as a kid, it always meant to leave a place, to ditch a place. And she said, well, that's very clever. You should take a picture of that. And I did, and I posted on my Instagram and, and thought nothing more of it until I heard, through her that people were saying that it was a call for some sort of assassination, which is crazy.
Secret Service agents interviewed Comey, but nothing came of it. And then, let's, actually, you know what? Let's go to to, Director Patel, and let's let's hear him talk about it.
[00:40:16] Unknown:
James Comey. If he wants to come after me, no problem. I've been living rent free in that guy's head for years, and that's just a bonus. Do you know how many copycats we've had to investigate as a result of that beachside venture from the former director? Is that right? Do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists? Because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of The United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it. That's what I'm having to deal with every single day. And that's what I'm having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement. The 86
[00:41:10] Unknown:
I think we got frozen again. This is gonna be a wonderful wonderful wonderful wonderful. Well, anyway, so not only that, but also, Dan Bongino, also took to, to Fox and Friends. And, he basically he slammed the FBI direct the former FBI director. He called him a big child explaining that the eighty six forty seven post had now, you know, of course, like Cash Patel just said, spawned copycats, with the FBI. Now he has to take time and investigate. And all the while, James Comey is, you know, running around the country promoting his book and trying to make sales off his book. And, you know, and and he continues with with the ridiculous comments and remarks.
But, that wasn't all that that Bongino said. And like I said, we, you know, we're talking about Pam Bondi and our lack of faith in in what she's doing. But, here's here's Bongino on Fox and Friends talking about, James Comey and some Epstein stuff.
[00:42:13] Unknown:
As of Jim Comey because he cannot control himself and his emotions. He is a child. He is a big child. And let me tell you one more thing. Look at Jim Comey. We want you to Jim Comey taking a shot at the president. Oh, look at me. I'm such a victim. The president's going after me. He's making a ton of money on this book. The only person that got prosecuted was the president,
[00:42:33] Unknown:
Jim Comey. We're finding stuff even now. Wait till you read the stuff that's coming out of my head. But does he still but does he still have loyalists in the building? Because when I hear the FBI director saying, you guys are finding boxes that are hidden. Okay. How does that happen in the bureau?
[00:42:50] Unknown:
Well, we were there a couple of weeks, and, luckily, there were a lot of people up there who grabbed us by the arm the minute we came in and said, thank you for being here. You know, we need to talk. There are people there who are really horrified at what happened. And there was a room, and we found stuff, a lot of stuff. A hidden room. I wouldn't call it hidden, but hidden from us at least and not mentioned to us. And then we found stuff in there. And a lot of it's from the Comey era, and we are working our our our damndest right now to declassify. And just so you know, because I I get the public. I totally understand people saying, well, do it now. There the process is not all the information is ours to declassify. Some is other intelligence agencies. It's not we we literally can't do it. Once that gets done and that gets out there and you read some of the stuff we found that, by the way, was not processed through the normal procedure, digitizing it, putting in FBI records. We found it in bags hiding under Jim Comey's FBI. You're gonna be The shells on the beach. Can you not talk to social
[00:43:53] Unknown:
Now listen, you know, Bongino's I have a lot of respect for Dan Bongino. Alright? I'm I'm gonna say that. I wanna trust him. I wanna believe what he's saying. I I really do. And, you know, I'm hoping that because, you know, he's he's alluding to the fact that there are there are records. There's a lot of records and, that people are gonna be shocked at what they see of what comes out of those records. I'm hoping that this isn't just, you know, trying to to put a good face on having sanitized records or or the fact that there really aren't any records left. Because, I mean, realistically speaking, you know, if if an administration is on the way out and they know that there's gonna be some accountability held for for not following through on an investigation or or or such, You know, they're gonna do what they can to get rid of the evidence. They can do what they can to hide stuff. And like like you heard Bongino say, you know, there there was a room that wasn't even known to them that they finally came across that had all of this material in there. But, you know, how much of it hasn't already been altered and changed and and and, like you said, sanitized, before they got to it?
So now they have to go through all of these things and they have to, you you know, figure out what they can release. And you heard them say too that it's not a matter of just being able to put it out there, that has to go through declassification. There's other intelligence agencies involved in this, and it's gonna take time. And, you know, you wanna give them the time to do it, but at the same time, you know, I think the American people are starting to get little frustrated with this. And, you know, they wanna see they wanna see some action on it. You know, you have the midterm elections are coming up. And, right now, you know, it's it it really does look like I saw a poll, I forgot the I forgot the, the the pollster, but it was showing that, that Democrats are are actually leading Republicans right now, in the midterms, like, fifty one forty something.
So, you know, that that's I mean, you really can't always go by the polls, you know, polls change. We talked about that many, many times. Polls do change, and it also depends on the sampling, and it depends you know, there's a lot of there's a lot of factors involved with it. But, you know, the way things look, I mean, people are getting impatient, and the last thing you want right now is to have Republicans sit sit on their hands, stay home, not go out and vote in the midterms, and then give control of the House over to the Democrats, because once that happens, you know it's gonna happen. It's gonna be investigation after investigation, it's gonna be charges, and it's gonna be impeachments, it's gonna be all that stuff for the next two years, and nothing is gonna get accomplished again.
So I'm hoping that within the next couple of weeks, month, two months, we'll start seeing some action on these things. I mean, it's it's getting frustrating. I have really no confidence whatsoever in in Pam Bondi. To me, she just she's just auditioning for her for her, next job as a host of of a talk show or a news show on on, on Fox. And, you know, I'm hoping that, I'm hoping that Cash Patel and and and Bongino are able to to to do what they said they're going to do when they get there. Well, they're there. Let's get to it. Let's do it. Again, I like I look, I've I've done law enforcement work, I've done investigations work, I know things take time, you know, but even I'm getting frustrated with it.
It's time it's it's time to to to do some it's time to to take some action on this. We wanna see some law enforcement you know, we wanna see some some subpoenas going out, at least subpoenas, or somebody being brought in for questioning, something. But unfortunately, we haven't seen any of that yet, in this matter. And look, the the guys at the FBI, they're doing a great job. I think they're doing a great job since, Cash Patel took over and and and Bongino's there. I think they're doing a fantastic job. You know, I like the fact that they're keeping us informed, but also at the same time, I think a lot of that, that in that informed, that information that they're sending out to us is just to keep us, you know, distracted on the hook.
Waiting, you know, to to to take our our focus off of the other things that they promised that were gonna take place that haven't taken place yet. So we'll see. We'll see. Now, just shifting gears here for a little bit. Remember, Donald Trump has been, well, basically, every move that the administration makes, they've been hit with injunctions. They've been hit with, stays. They've been hit with all kinds of, legal shenanigans, really, to to to to slow down the whole process of deportations and tariffs. The latest thing was that, the the some some lower court determined that, that that Donald Trump doesn't have the authority to to, impose tariffs, which is not is not really true.
But, of late and I know, of course, it was also the, you know, all the injunctions on the, deportation of of, illegal aliens and and and whatnot. It was just one thing after another after another, and it's gonna be this is what it's gonna be the entire four years. It's gonna be one thing after another as far as, you know, rogue judges getting in the way and, trying to slow down everything and and trying trying to really, protect criminals over the American people. You know, this whole thing that they have due process, they were they're entitled to due process. No. You know, we've said it many times, Due process is only, applicable to US resident US citizens.
You have to be a citizen of The United States. You have to be, you know, to to to in order to get those constitutional protections. If you're here illegally, you're not entitled to those. Well, the latest the latest round of, of legal battles here was, over these tariffs and, on Thursday, that would be yesterday, the US appeals court, reinstated, Trump tariffs during the appeal and, and which which is a great thing. So the, it was the it was the whole panel too. The full 11 member panel voted to to stay the ruling from the court of international trade allowing tariffs to remain in place for now for now.
So, Caroline Levitt went to the podium, and, she, she had a couple of things to say. Let's let's take a listen to Caroline. Where is she? Here she is.
[00:51:24] Unknown:
Hi. Let's go to the White House Briefing Room. How are you? Wow. A packed room today. Yes, ma'am.
[00:51:29] Unknown:
Last night, the Trump administration faced another example of judicial overreach. Using his full and proper legal authority, president Trump imposed universal tariffs and reciprocal tariffs on Liberation Day to address the extraordinary threat to our national security and economy posed by large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits. The United States has run a trade deficit of goods every year since 1975. In deficit of goods every year since 1975. In 2024, our trade deficit in goods exceeded $1,000,000,000,000. Everybody agrees this is President Trump is delivering on his promise to fix this problem, and he has taken a long overdue and much needed bold stance for American workers after decades of our manufacturing base being hollowed out.
The president's rationale for imposing these powerful tariffs was legally sound and grounded in common sense. President Trump correctly believes that America cannot function safely long term if we are unable to scale advanced domestic manufacturing capacity, have our own secure critical supply chains, and our defense industrial base is dependent on foreign adversaries. Three judge judges of the US Court of International Trade disagreed and brazenly abused their judicial power to use the authority of president Trump to stop him from carrying out the mandate that the American people gave him. These judges failed to acknowledge that the president of The United States has core foreign affairs powers and authority given to him by Congress to protect The United States economy and national security.
Congress had created the National Emergency Act to provide the congressional framework to strike down improper IEPI use. And any questions over whether president Trump improperly imposed these IEPI tariffs were were already adjudicated in Congress following Liberation Day. Congress firmly rejected an effort led by senator Rand Paul and Democrats to terminate the president's reciprocal tariffs. The courts should have no role here. There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision making process. America cannot function if president Trump or any other president for that matter has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges.
[00:53:50] Unknown:
And then she went on and,
[00:53:52] Unknown:
she, continued on about the judges. I think this this might not be the this might be the same clip. I don't think so though. Let me see. Let's double check. Junctions. To paint the picture for the American people at home. This is not these are not just talking points. These are real judges in the court of law who are trying to block the president's power and the policies that he was elected to enact. For example, a court ordered the Trump administration to return already deported terrorist aliens back to The United States. A court has ruled the Trump administration can't even temporarily pause our refugee programs. Courts prohibited the Trump administration from eliminating federal funding for child transgender surgery and mutilation, a practice Ridiculous. Courts prohibited the removal of transgender women from women's prisons despite potential physical harm to real women in those prisons, biological women. A Northern District Of California Judge issued an absurd ruling that the president cannot fire people within the executive branch without congress passing a bill. Even though congress has expressly authorized the president through the office of personnel management to authorize reductions in force across agencies.
A court also ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of already fired employees in several cases. A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from defunding the Department of Education, another signature campaign promise that this president has the power to implement. Courts ordered the Trump administration could not eliminate funding for illegal DEI programs, hence the word illegal. These are illegal programs to begin with, and now the courts are trying to say this president can't roll them back. And a district court judge prohibited the president from issuing any categorical funding freezes. And And then another court ordered on top of that the administration makes $2,000,000,000 of payments in thirty six hours. These are just a few of the ridiculous orders that we have seen from lower district court judges every day, and we hope that the Supreme Court will weigh in and reign them in. What White House adviser Stephen Miller says it's judicial tiering. Some people are calling it a judicial coup. You're saying you're responding to each and every one of these actions, efforts by these judges to delay or thwart the implementation of the agenda. But is there going to be anything more than that, or is it just going to let this operation continue even though it could delay everything for years until the presidency is over? The administration is operating under the directive given to the prep from the president that we need to comply with the court's orders. He's made that very clear, but we're gonna fight them in court and we're gonna win on the merits of these cases because we know we are acting within the president's legal and executive authorities.
And thanks for being here. Gabe.
[00:56:30] Unknown:
So, everything that she just said, I mean, if you listen to that and that's just a sample. That's not all of the all of the all of all of these, illegal court orders that have been thrown at this administration to slow them down. Basically, what they're doing, this is how the left because they're all left judges. These are all Biden appointed judges or Obama appointed judges that are that are stepping in and getting in the way. This is what a judicial coup looks like. This is the judicial branch usurping the authority of the executive branch. The executive branch has broad, sweeping powers.
The executive branch is he's the chief executive officer of this country. He has the authority to do and enforce the law. So these judges and all this is, this is just very, very simply obstructionism. This is just the left doing what they do best using the courts to try to stop this administration from pursuing the waste, fraud, and abuse that has been rampant across both parties over many, many, many, many years. This is the judicial branch trying to basically tell the American people that your voice doesn't matter. Everything that this president is doing is something that I voted for, and I'm sure that I'm not the only one who says that.
77,000,000 people voted for president Trump on his platform of what he exactly said he was going to do, And he is doing exactly what he said he's going to do. He's he's he's made his promises and he's in the process of keeping those promises. But the left, through the courts, is not letting him do that. It's slow I mean, ultimately, he's gonna win these things in court because he has standing. He has constitutional standing. The Supreme Court will eventually side with him on these things, but this whole matter is just to be a headache, to waste taxpayer money on these frivolous lawsuits.
It's also to to demoralize the base, it's to demoralize the administration, it's to try to get this administration to stop what they're doing and just saying, you know, to hell with it, you know, we'll just leave it as it is, which is not gonna happen. I mean, I might be wrong, but, you know, I'm no expert in these things, but that's just what I see. It's my opinion. So the, the the young lady in the in the audience that was asking a question about Stephen Miller, so this is this is what she was talking about here. This is Stephen Miller on, CNN.
[00:59:46] Unknown:
Last few weeks. Yet, even just yesterday, we saw whenever a judge rules against this administration, you say they're going rogue. Do you think a judge should just rubber stamp what your White House does? If not, what checks and balances do you think should be in place for this White House?
[01:00:03] Unknown:
The it is not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch. Just think about the premise baked into your question respectfully, Pam. You're saying that when the American people elect the president of The United States Of America I'm not saying that. The the the well, it's the implication. Who is the sole head of the executive branch? Said Let me let me finish. Let me finish. I I will answer the question happily. But look. When you have these kinds of lazy assumptions built into questions, it makes it hard to have a constructive dialogue. Lazy assumption. I said you all had to win. Meaning b, you said no. You said you said is it my expectation? I'm speaking with someone else. You said is it my expectation? It's not just you. It's the whole media. In other words, when you see your sentence like so on. It is a completely clear question. You say drugs No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. It is the white house. Gladly answer it when you say, do we think district court judges should rubber stamp each action? There is a premise that is built into that that is absurd. The president is the sole head of the executive branch. He's the only officer in the entire government that's elected by the entire American people. Democracy cannot function. In fact, democracy does not exist at all. If each action the president takes, foreign policy, diplomatic, military, national security, has to be individually approved by 700 district court judges, That's democracy. So there's 15 communist crazy judges on the court that each of them as a team working together can block and freeze each and every executive action. Joe Biden was allowed by that same court system Some of them are Trump judges now. Are they foreigners? Why did Trump put these crazy communist judges as you call them on the bench? You heard you heard you heard president Trump himself say that the Federal Society and Leonard Leo has created a broken system for judicial vetting.
And God knows this time around, we are not gonna be using support Hickey and E. Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court? What it means is simply this and nothing more. We're not gonna be using the federal society to make judicial nominations at all going forward.
[01:02:10] Unknown:
So the administration is, well, you you heard it yourself, folks. You heard it. You have rogue judges, whether they are Republican appointed or Democrat appointed, trying to run the country from the bench. And I understand where she was going with that saying, you know, you know, president Trump, you know, appointed some of these judges and some of them, you know, you know, are we calling them yeah. Yeah. Basically, you know, because of the vetting process that the Federalist Society, did on behalf of those judges, you know, they they they they snuck through some of these, radical left leaning judges under the guise of that they are, you know, right leaning.
So I I understand where they were going with that, you know, but I'm pretty sure you did too. But the point of it is is that you you cannot have the judicial branch dictating what the executive branch can do as far as or or or or at least restrict what the executive branch can do when he's functioning within the confines and the, of of his executive authority as outlined in the constitution. That's why there was a separation of powers. That's why there are these checks and balances. You know, it's absolutely ridiculous to think that judges can tell the tell one branch of government, no, you can't do this, you can't do that, at at the district level and have it affect the entire country.
And I want I would like to know, you know, where the hell is Mike Johnson on this? Because I remember just a few weeks ago, he was talking about defunding and shutting down these district courts if necessary to to to stop this behavior, which is fully within the cons within the cons the constitution, constitutional authority of the Congress. District courts are not a requirement according to the constitution. They are funded and put in place by the Congress, and the Congress can take them away. And that's exactly what they should do. Strip them down, take them down, reorganize them with people that are going to be constitutionalists.
And I'm not saying that that will rubber stamp everything the administration does, but at least at least look at it through the lens of the Constitution. And I'm I'm not even talking about the district level because the district level, whether it's right or left, should have no business whatsoever putting any kind of injunction on anything that reaches nationwide. Well, with all of that said, some some some wins for the for the administration. So you have the tariff win. You have the, the Supreme Court limits judicial authority to block infrastructure projects over environmental concerns. So on Thursday, in a in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court limited the judicial authority, of course, to block infrastructure projects.
The NEPA does not allow courts under the guise of judicial review of agency compliance with NEPA to delay or block agency projects based on environmental effects or of other projects separate from the project at hand. Justice, Kavanaugh wrote in an opinion that, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, Samuelito, Amy Comey, Barrett also, joined. And, Neil Gorsuch did not participate in the case. Sonia my Sonia Sotomayor filed a separate concurring opinion, and Alega Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also joined in on that. So another another win for this administration. So basically, what they're saying is that, you know, the the judiciary can't stop, infrastructure projects because there's a concern over some kind of environmental impact.
And then, today, let's see the a a federal appeals appeals a federal appeals court has blocked a lower court order striking down president Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs at the request of the White House. The move follows a decision from panel of US Court International Trade this week that struck down most of the president's Liberation Day tariffs. So basically, what this is is that, on appeal, the administration won the appeal and the tariffs are gonna go back into place. So and that is that's great. And we already heard the we already heard the audio on that.
Another another win for the for the, administration here. The, Supreme Court says that, yes. Yes. Yes. Donald Trump can end legal protections for a million immigrants. Where is this? The Supreme Court on Friday, that would be today, with a two word statement is, is granted approved suspension of a lower court ruling that barred president Donald Trump from moving forward on his plan to halt the temporary legal protections offered by Joe Biden to about a million aliens in the country. The ruling lifted a lower court order that demanded those those protections remain in place, follows a decision by the court early to let the Trump administration to revoke temporary protections for about 350,000 Venezuelan migrants in a separate dispute.
This move allows the Trump administration to advance its efforts to fulfill his campaign promise of deporting millions of illegal aliens allowed to America by the open borders action of the Biden administration. Alright. So that's great. It's another win for the administration. Again, Supreme Court lets Trump revoke temporary legal status of 500,000 immigrants, and, the only dissension on that was from Ketanji Brown Jackson, a real genius, and, Sotomayor, they were the dissents. And just with the way they word these things, it's like, you know, they're defending the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are are pending.
Not my problem. You shouldn't be here legally. Let's see what else we got here. A couple little quick stories here. Hey. Did you hear Jen Psaki, came back? And, she tried to she tried to get a show on prime time show, but you know what? She got crushed by Paw Patrol, Seinfeld, reruns. So she lost her show already. That's gone. This was interesting. This I wanted to bring this up here too. So, so a whistleblower from the Biden administration, says that Biden admin forgave loans based on race, excluding white farmers. And I don't know. Something just happened.
Yeah. You know what? I'm the whole the whole my whole thing here just blinked out on me. So I'm I'm starting to wonder if perhaps it's time to, say goodnight and, not take a chance of crashing everything here. But, let me let me see if I could just run through this really, really quickly. So, so yeah. So Joe Biden, his administration here, the US Department of Agriculture, under Joe Biden, was actively operating a policy of forgiving loans to farmers based on their race according to whistleblower. The previous Biden administration, the previous administration allegedly targeted white US farmers by issuing loan program that paid off everyone and anyone who wasn't a white male, says NewsNation. Let's take a look.
If it'll let me.
[01:11:25] Unknown:
President Trump is not quiet about his criticism of the Biden administration. In fact, he's usually quite the opposite. There is arguably, however, nothing quite as harsh as Trump's anger over Biden's DEI policies. Well, in a NewsNation exclusive, senior national correspondent Brian Anjan spoke to a manager at the Federal Farm Bureau who is blowing the whistle. He says a Biden era law appears to be helping all farmers, but in reality is only helping some. And he showed us the documents to prove
[01:11:58] Unknown:
it. When former president Joe Biden left Washington DC, he was leaving behind a DEI secret involving American farmers and $800,000,000 in taxpayer money. And the United States Department of Agriculture whistleblower
[01:12:13] Unknown:
is now sounding the alarm. It was to pay off anyone who wasn't a white male's loan. That was the only qualification
[01:12:24] Unknown:
for this loan forgiveness. And what was the reaction?
[01:12:29] Unknown:
So it was really silent. They were trying to keep this hushed because of the obvious implications of, race based loan forgiveness.
[01:12:40] Unknown:
Race based loan forgiveness, it's in black and white, buried in the American Rescue Plan Act. The United States Secretary Of Agriculture shall provide a payment in an amount up to 120% of the outstanding indebtedness of each socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher. The act explicitly lays out who's considered socially disadvantaged. So just to be clear, if you were American Indian, Alaskan native, Asian black, African American, native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic or Latino, and you were in that group, you were told you didn't have to pay your bills,
[01:13:16] Unknown:
essentially? Yes. That's correct. And that your loan would be forgiven up to a 20%
[01:13:21] Unknown:
of the loan value. To me, it was just it was,
[01:13:26] Unknown:
combating racism with more racism. I I didn't I I I couldn't believe that it was happening today's age. James Dunlap owns a small family farm in Baker City, Oregon. He works two other jobs to keep his farm afloat but did not qualify for the loan forgiveness
[01:13:41] Unknown:
because he's white. I knew what they were saying was that minority farmers were going to have their loans forgiven for no reason other than they decided to, they being the government. So And and how much money they had had nothing to do with it? As far as I understand, not at all. It wasn't about hardship. It wasn't about financial situations at all. It was purely what box you checked
[01:14:04] Unknown:
under that ethnicity line on your application. If you checked a nonwhite box, you got the free money no matter how rich you were. James and other white farmers sued the Biden administration and were successful. The loan forgiveness for any farmer who's not white was stopped. The judge writing in his decision, it was an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone. And James and other white farmers will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of his race. That harm he has shown is irreparable.
But this is where things get interesting. The Biden administration was not ready to give up. They passed the inflation reduction act to help farmers who couldn't pay their loans. It was supposed to help all farmers, but NewsNation has learned all farmers were not told about it. NewsNation obtaining a copy of this email that was sent out to share information about new payments and or loan modifications that may assist you. But here's the catch. Our whistleblower says it was only sent to the minority farmers AKA the socially disadvantaged group, and he says USDA workers were even instructed to tell that group to stop paying their loans because they would still be forgiven.
The whistleblower says none of the white farmers he works with received the email. They got
[01:15:23] Unknown:
nothing. You know, it might not meet the legal definition of fraud, but it isn't right. It's discriminating. It's discriminatory. It's unethical, and the people who push it are still in charge of the agency. They're still in charge? Yes. At our national office, they're they're still Trump hasn't got rid of them.
[01:15:44] Unknown:
We reached out to the United States department department of agriculture. They did not respond to our specific questions or our questions about what the whistleblower said that some of these DEI policies still remain, in effect and in some of the documentation. But they did send us this statement, Elizabeth. I wanna read you in part. It says, it is absurd that while the Biden administration was driving up inflation, American taxpayers were forced to fund billions in woke DEI initiatives. No one should be shocked that Biden weaponized bipartisan farm programs to discriminate and provide tax payer dollars to one group based on race and not on merit. On day one, secretary Rollins issued a memo to rescind all DEI programs. Instead, USDA is reprioritizing unity, equality, meritocracy, and colorblind policies. And the USDA says they are also reviewing, the Inflation Reduction Act funding to ensure that that money is now going out to all farmers equally instead of just one specific group. All of this. Brian Enton, thank you so much.
[01:16:49] Unknown:
So how surprised are you by that? Shouldn't be by shouldn't be much. There there's there's an actual war against white people. That the previous administration well, actually, it's I think it started more under the Obama administration. Got a reprieve. Well, the first two Obama administrations, because I really think that Obama was the one behind the string behind the scenes in the Biden administration. But it started during the Obama administration, got kind of a reprieve a little bit during the first Trump administration, and came in with a vengeance in this in the second, third Obama administration, the o Biden administration, and continues on. And it's not just at the government levels, also at the at at at the social level.
You know, you see all these, all these videos of these, minority groups. I hate I hate using that because it's just it it's such a I don't like it. Never did. But you see all these, you know, these minority groups, you know, whether it's, black, Hispanic, whatever it might be, you know, just assaulting elderly white people. You see them I I saw a video today of of someone being thrown off a bus. I mean, physically, an older lady getting picked up by a young black male thrown off a bus because she was white. Or the, you know, the the you know, those sucker punches, you know, the you know, you see them whether you're not expecting it, you're just walking down the street and all of a sudden, you know, somebody passing, they just they just sucker punch you right in the face, knock you out, and then kick you, stomp on you, beat you, you know that's all this.
That's all of this. Well, Joe Biden's back in the, in in the in the public eye again. You know, he's, since since his cancer diagnosis and since the release of this book that has come out about, about his decline, you know, that, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson put out. I think it was May 20 or something like that. So here's, here here's Joe, speaking for the first time since his, since his diagnosis.
[01:19:50] Unknown:
Well, the prognosis is good. You know? We're working on everything. It's moving along.
[01:19:56] Unknown:
So I feel good. Have you decided on your treatment options?
[01:19:59] Unknown:
Yeah. We have. And and we're we're we're under underway, and everybody's all the folks are very optimistic.
[01:20:06] Unknown:
And so you've started treatment? Oh, yeah. Okay. What is can you would you be willing to share what exactly that entails?
[01:20:12] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm it's it's all a matter of taking a pill, one particular pill. And for the next six weeks, and then another one. The expectation is we're gonna be able to beat this. There's no it's not in any organ.
[01:20:25] Unknown:
It's, my bones are strong. I haven't penetrated, so I'm feeling good. Sir, why would you say everybody expect sorry. I've done it all because I'm loyal. I do it every damn year, from the very beginning. You'll never forget where I came from. That's why. I feel like everybody didn't know what to expect of you today. And then you get here and you're speaking powerfully. You look good. You're confident. What do you say to all those people? Don't don't count you out.
[01:20:49] Unknown:
Well, I said lots of luck in their senior year.
[01:20:54] Unknown:
Thanks, everybody. What is this what is this been like for your family? Obviously, this is also an emotional time. This is the ten year anniversary of your son, Beau's passing. You received this diagnosis just two weeks before that.
[01:21:06] Unknown:
Well, we're all optimistic about the diagnosis. Matter of fact, the leading one of the leading surgeons in the in the world is working with me, and, he had diagnosed the same exact thing thirty two years ago. He's alive and well, doing very well. So we're we're optimistic. We're optimistic.
[01:21:23] Unknown:
And there's also been a lot of, discussion recently about your mental mental and physical capabilities
[01:21:28] Unknown:
while you were in office. You can see that. I'm mentally incompetent, and I can't walk, and I can beat the hell out of both of them. Well, do you wanna reply to any of those,
[01:21:37] Unknown:
reports and also to the fact that there are some Democrats who are now questioning whether you should have run for reelection in the first place? Why didn't they run against me then?
[01:21:47] Unknown:
Because I'd have beaten them. Do you have any regrets? No. I don't have any regrets. Look, there's a
[01:21:53] Unknown:
we have a there's a lot going on, and, I think we're in a really difficult moment, not only in American history, but in world history. I think we're one of those inflection points in history where the decisions we make in the next, little bit are gonna determine what things look like in the next twenty years. I've been talking about that for a long time. And, I'm very proud. I put my record as president against any president at all. I noticed that 12 of the 10 lady presidential historians rated me, pretty good up in that list, and the guy I ran against, I rated him the last.
[01:22:31] Unknown:
So, we'll see. Sir, you had to Watch me. You have your grandson with you today. What's it mean to have your family
[01:22:41] Unknown:
son, Beau's son. And, Beau started coming here with me about the same age. And, so it's, you know, and he he wanted to be where his dad had been and what he's doing. He just graduated from high school. He's gone off to college in the fall, and, I'm really proud of him. And he's, he is the son of his father. So Do you have anything to say to the press secretary?
[01:23:07] Unknown:
Okay. We, heard for the first time there from former president Biden.
[01:23:13] Unknown:
Thank god, former president. Not even former former vice president. Well, you know what I mean. Well, I don't know about you. You hear that one reporter say, you know, he looked good, he looked like he was strong, he sounded strong, and and so on and so on. I don't necessarily see that, but, you know, politics aside, you of course, you wanna see him recover from from the cancer and, you know, I may not agree with him or like him, but you don't wanna see him, you know, with cancer or sick or anything like that. But, you know, I'm just curious though, it's like when he said, that that he could he would, how did he put it? He said he would he'd fight them.
You know, he said he I could beat the hell out of both of them. I was wondering, I who's what's he talking about? Is he talking about, Jake Tapper and, and Alex Thompson, or who's he talking about? He beat the hell out of both of them. He likes to fight, you know, fighting Joe Biden. You know, that's that's that's probably, you know, what you'd call him, but he he remember he he he challenged Donald Trump to, to, to to a fight, to a fist fight, and then he, he challenged somebody in in an audience at one of the campaign events, to to go out back to push ups or something like that. Reminds me of that character from Seinfeld.
I I don't I don't know if you remember. It was, oh, who what was? I can't remember it. Maybe I have on early onset. I don't know. But, you know, it it's Joe Biden, man. He he's this guy just won't go away. He won't go away. But, anyway, he's back in the news, and he had another event later on that he started shouting out again. I I didn't even bother pulling that clip out, and it was just not even worth it. But, here's here's something that's quite interesting too that I found, Canada. There's something about the left that is just constantly, the the the it the left is the party of death.
Alright? They fight for abortion. They they've you know, even late term abortion, they it's just everything about them is just, you know, death. And Canada is is is an extremely liberal country, and they have, they have a a a a system up there called Maid, m a I d, which is medical assistance in dying. Alright? So basically, it's it's doctor assisted suicide. So if you are a drain on society or if you are sick and you and you don't want to continue on, you know, being a drain on your on your family, I'm not I'm not saying that if if you're sick and you're you are draining if you shouldn't be and you should never feel like you are but, but liberal policies make you feel like that and make you think that way.
Well, up there in Canada, Rebel Health, reported Rebel News, I should say, reported this. Documents show that that Health Canada has been funding a university research project concerning youth views on euthanasia that included a brief discussion as to whether children with severe autism would be allowed to qualify for death under the nation's medical assistance in dying program. So Canada is considering euthanasia for autistic children. So I guess if you give them too many vaccines, then, you know, a lethal injection is is the answer to that. Right?
A draft reply from the, from Health Canada employee asked about euthanasia for autistic children said, your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with made legislation. The documents which were made public by Rebel News show that Health Canada has given some, $549,608. I wonder how much of that is American taxpayer money, towards a four year research project with Canada's Dalhousie University to study youth views on end of life care, palliative care, and MAID, medical assistance in dying. The internal documents come from a 02/2024 come from 02/2024 and concern email chains, which can be which, which which you can view that are regarding talking regarding talk of allowing MAID for minors.
One email exchange shows a health Canada official named Heather Davids, who was the indigenous end of care end of life care team asking two top level bureaucrats in Canada's MAID Unit named Ian Giles and Richard Martin, quote, how should the department respond to public correspondence about whether severe autism meets the eligibility criteria for MAID? And the response was, your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with MAID legislation. Now, of course, you know, the the draft reply that that we just read to you, you know, it doesn't endorse the practice of MAID for autistic children, but activists have, for a long time, been been pushing for the expansion of MADE, their euthanasia program, specifically for the practice to allow the killing of so called mature minors for those people that are suffering from mental illness.
The expansion for euthanasia, and and it actually is is supposed to be, become law in 02/1927. So, you know, it's it's two years away. The most recent data show that MAID is the sixth highest cause of death in Canada. Government assisted suicide, sixth highest cause of death in Canada. Canada reporting that, Health Canada reported in 02/2022 that thirteen thousand two hundred forty one Canadians died by made lethal injections. Folks, that's thirteen thousand people. And that number, figures out to four point one percent of all deaths in the country that year. Thirty one point two percent a thirty one point two percent increase from 02/2021, which was the first year that euthanasia was available to those, that were not terminally ill.
You know, liberalism is a is a disgusting thing. It is the it's it's just a culture of death. That's all it is. Death, destruction, chaos, confusion. That's why I really think that that that liberalism is is liberalism is on the way out, you know. I I don't I I there's there's a trend now, right now, where, you know, the the younger generation coming up right now is coming up more conservative than they are liberal, and I think that's a great thing, and I hope that it continues on and we have to foster that. Because conservatism gives is is the party of life, is the party of individual responsibility. It's not the the village responsibility to to to raise somebody or to grow somebody. It's your responsibility.
That was the whole point of of self government, by the way. You know, it wasn't it wasn't that, you know, yeah. In in some respects, yes. It was that it was, you know, we were gonna govern ourselves and we're gonna make laws that that were applicable for us and and what we wanted. But it was also when I say self government, they're talking about you controlling yourself. Because when you control yourself, you don't need the government to control you for you. And if you look at the left, and left can't control themselves. The left is a party of of pornography, abortion, euthanasia, sexual deviance. I I mean, you can go down the list.
But that's what it is, and that's what it is. Gotta pray for Canada. And and you know what? This nonsense with with Canada becoming the fifty first state, no. We don't want that. I don't want that. I don't wanna see that happen. You know, it it's fun it's it's funny to joke around with it. It's funny to to to throw it up as as like a little bit of a shit stir, you know, it that's that's one thing, but to really consider that and to do it, no. Why? Because because Canada is an extremely liberal country, and then what what would happen? Then you get, of course, you get two more liberal senators in in the senate, and, depending on population, how many extra seats in the house, which would probably mostly be liberal, it it would it it just wouldn't work.
You know, no matter what the media tells you, no matter what the left tells you, America is not really a liberal country. It's it's center right. So we don't wanna tip that. We wanna continue going right. We wanna continue going conservative. Let's see. Texas mandates digital ID to access App Store apps. Apple and Google are now the bouncers at the front door of the Internet checking IDs for every app downloaded. Texas has moved to the forefront of national campaign to regulate children's access to digital platforms by mandating that Apple and Google verify the ages of all users on their app stores.
Under a new law signed by governor Greg Abbott set to take effect 01/01/2026, those 18 will be required to obtain parental consent before downloading apps or making in app purchases. The measure has been pitched to, as a way to protect minors, but privacy advocates warn it could come at the expense of everyone's digital freedom. And that's not necessarily, you know, wrong either. Because, you know, now, in order for you to prove that you're 18 or over, you're gonna have to upload all of your information, like your driver's license, probably a state ID, something like that, that has all of your personal information on it. No. I'm I'm not against some kind of measures to protect minors from things like pornography and and and worse.
I don't know if there is worse, but I have I don't have a problem with that at all. But what I do have a problem with is companies like Apple and Google and all of these other, you know, tech agents, tech companies and such, having unfettered access to your personal information. So this is something I'm gonna keep an eye on. I'm gonna watch. I'm gonna, you know, study up more about it. But just throwing it out there so you guys know that this is what's coming down. Alright. And then, you know, our last our last little thing for tonight is, just something I saw that just made me scratch my head and, you know, I I did a show back in New York with with some friends back in 2016, '17, around there, and, you know, we had the, the idiot of the week.
And, this this one this one would qualify for that, you know, and, this one here is, let's see. A kindergartner brings booze infused jello shots for his classmates. The school has launched an investigation after a kindergartner brought booze infused jello shots and gave them out to their classmates. Classmates were were checked out by medical expert to make sure they were alright. So basically, this happened in Pennsylvania, and this, kindergart kindergartner was a student at, at a school in the Greater Johnstown School District, and, it's not clear how much alcohol the students ingested or whether the child child knew that they brought alcoholic drinks to school.
Not to be actually vocalized a question that a lot of people were asking, is yo mom and dad, where where are you at on this one? You know?
[01:36:36] Unknown:
I
[01:36:38] Unknown:
mean, where are the parents on this? How how did the parents let this happen? Who packed the lunch? Do you know you know what I mean? Like, when my kids were young, you know, their mom and I were very, very careful about, you know, sending them what what we sent them to school with. We were on top of that. I mean, how does that happen? How does how does mom or dad or both let them walk out of the house with that thing? I mean, who packs the lunch? Who packs the kids school bag? Especially in kindergarten. Especially in kindergarten.
You know, I I don't know, but this is idiots. Absolute idiots. But I digress. Alright, folks. Well, I think that's it for tonight. You know? Sorry again for all the issues we're we're having here. I'm gonna work on this over the weekend, see what the problem is. It might be the camera. I don't know. This is a new camera that we're playing with here. So ever since we hooked this thing up, it's been giving us problems all around. So, we might have to go back to the other one and we'll see what happens. But, I will you know, like I said, I'll work on it over the weekend and hopefully we'll get it all straightened out for Monday. But in the meantime, folks, I hope you guys have a great weekend. I really look forward to, being with you guys either Sunday or Monday. So shout outs to our executive producers, Wayne and Rosanna Rankin. Shout out to our producer, anonymous Angela. Thank you guys for everything that you do. Thank you all for paying for spending the week with us and for sticking with us through all the problems we've been having tonight.
Hey, listen. Don't forget. Check out the social medias and, you know, just have a great weekend. Enjoy it. Relax. Forget about the world for a couple of days. Alright? Alright, folks. Have a great night. Make Texas independent again. Go podcasting. Keep a steady stride, and we'll see you on Sunday or Monday. Alright, folks. Good night. Goodbye.
Alright. Hey, folks. This is Joe Roos, bringing you the best quality talk radio that we could muster without all the bluster. And broadcasting live tonight from the pimple on the backside of Texas, it's the Joe Russo. Had a little problem there with the camera. It wasn't turning on. You caught me in mid frustration. I was like As always, like I always say, it wouldn't be a show of mine without some kind of a technical problem. But, we're here and we're live and it's Friday. It is finally, finally Friday. Hope you guys have some great plans for the weekend. I know that, I'm probably just gonna be hanging around here.
Messing around in the studio a little bit. Getting some stuff done. And I have to start setting up a few things for, the Saturday spotlight. So if I do that later on tonight and get that thing ready for you for tomorrow. And then, of course, Sunday, still debating on whether or not we're gonna do that special Sunday show that we've been kinda kicking the ideas around for. But, we'll see. We'll see how it all goes. But, looking forward to a great weekend, looking forward to some time to relax a little bit and, you know, just kinda decompress. It's been one of those crazy, crazy weeks. It was a short week for me for regular work, because, you know, it was a holiday on Monday.
So well, not really for me, but from most of the folks that I work with, it's been a short week. I worked every day this week, but, it's been a busy week even though there was a holiday involved. I had a lot of work to do, so I'm really looking forward to just a nice quiet evening here at home. Maybe maybe even have a little bourbon later on tonight. We'll see. We shall certainly see. I'll tell you what I've been really craving. I've been craving, of all things, I've been craving a cigar. I haven't had a cigar since, oh, I wanna say this is what? This is May?
So maybe the last time I had a cigar was in December or January. So, that's one of the great things about cigars as opposed to cigarettes. You know, they're they're not like something that you need to have, all the time. You know? So you you can go a while without it. And I have a a packed humidor out there in the other room, and, I got loads of some really nice Rocky Patel, Fumas. And also, I have a number of, some Avo Heritage cigars, which are just unbelievable cigars. I love them. I get the I get the little Toro's, so, it's a nice even smoke. It tastes really nice, especially when you mix it with a good bourbon. And, probably for for the Avo, I would I would probably go with, like, a 1792 small batch, or I'd go with, an Elijah Craig small batch, anything like that.
Beautiful and perfect for it. You could probably do a Maker's Maker's Mark. Not so sure about the others. But, but definitely, you know, the seventeen ninety two, that's it's like my that's my my go to stuff. I love the $17.92 bourbons. I'll tell you one funny story. I I purchased, I purchased the full proof seventeen ninety two, which is like a 25 proof or something like that. And, when I opened that thing up, man, I I got heartburn just from smelling it. That's how strong it was. But, but once you once you get past the first one or two, it's it's it's super nice. And what I like to do is I I I have a specific, bourbon glass that I use, you know, the little bowl with the handle at the bottom, with the base. And, you know, I I I have a couple of drinks out of that first just to kinda get the full full flavor, the full effect of it. And then, and then I do it, I do it just, on the rocks straight up. No mixing. Nothing like that because I don't know. I I don't like the idea of mixing bourbon. I I think that, you know, bourbon is is perfect the way it is. It is like, it's it's like it's like the nectar of the gods.
You know what I'm saying? And, the, it it's just a it's I love it. So it's good stuff. And I'm I'm looking at my, my feed up there on the screen there, and I see it's all messed up. It's all pixelated. So I don't know what is going on with my Internet connection these days, but I'm gonna have to make a couple of phone calls maybe over the weekend and do that, because that's that's just not good. Not good. Alright. Well, with all of that done, again, hope you guys have a great weekend, and I'm looking forward to, kinda just relaxing. So I hope you are too.
Maybe you can have a cookout. I don't know. We'll see. But, in the meantime, how about we do some housekeeping here before we get into the news of the day? And let me just check this here really quickly. Let's see. Alright. That is not a problem. Got it taken care of. Alright. But, again, in the meantime, my feed is just in really bad shape up there, so it looks terrible. So I apologize, to everybody that's that's watching right now. Let me fix this too. I'm getting problems here as well. Just yeah. Like I said, it's it's the Joe Roo Show and nothing short of problems. Alright. Well, as I was saying, some housekeeping stuff. Alright. So, folks, just head over to our website, joe roos dot com. It's right there up on your screen, and open up that web form that you see up there on the contact section. Send us over any questions, comments, cares, or concerns that you might have. Also, don't forget to send over any, any any, any suggestions, any, ideas that you might have, for a show. I'm always open to get suggestions from folks. And then, also, don't forget to look for the support page. Now we really do need your financial support. As you can see, our Internet stuff needs to be upgraded very, very badly.
It's just absolutely terrible. The, the quality of the video is just terrible, especially on a bigger screen. I'm just really disappointed. I mean, it looks good here in front of me. You know, the monitor I have in front of me, it looks looks fine, but I wish I could turn the camera around without messing up the whole thing to show it to you. This is irritating me. So this is a value for value podcast. So if you would, just, look for that support button. And if you could help us out with a donation, we'd really appreciate that. Any amount will would be fantastic to receive from you guys.
But you could also do, donation in cryptocurrencies. You could do a donation in satoshis, which is like a micropayment of Bitcoin. It's really pennies on the dollar, so it's really not a bank breaker for anybody. At least I don't think so. I hope not. And then you also have, our Texacoin, barcode QR code, sorry, that's up there on the screen. You can easily scan that. You can send us some Texacoin, which we would love to get. Texacoin is a it's an up and coming crypto, so you might wanna check that out. I purchased it not too long ago at, like, 40¢ a coin. It's a it's like a dollar something now per coin. So, it's not a bad little investment, and, you know, you never know. You don't wanna miss the boat like you you may have done with Bitcoin. You know, Bitcoin started out at, like, like a dollar or something a a coin, and now it's a hundred thousand dollars for a coin. So, just gotta get on these things. It's it's not terribly expensive to get into it. Just try it out and see how it goes.
Also, you could join up one of our producer tiers. We have an associate producer tier for $17.76 a month. It's a $17.76 a month. We also have a producer's tier for $18.36 a month. And, of course, we also have our executive producer tiers. There are two of them. One is $25 a month and one is $50 a month. Now, all the tiers get the shout out on every show. They get included in all the show notes. And, any emails or anything that we send out, any post we make, all get the shout out for it. At the executive producer level, at the $25 level, you get also, in addition to the shout outs and inclusions, you also get to book thirty minutes on the show with us to do a live segment with us. That's a lot of fun. We look forward to doing that, whenever the opportunity arises itself. And so, you know, please check it out. It'd be a lot of fun.
Also, at the $50, executive producer tier, you get the, you get the shout outs. You get all of the, the perks of booking the show with us. And on top of that, we'll also send you a free Joe Russo podcast, whatever you wanna call it, t shirt, and, which are currently in the process of being printed. I should be getting the first couple of them, probably this week. And if you wanna check it out for yourself, you can just hit that little shop button that's right down there on your screen if you're watching on Rumble. Or you can go to our website and and click the shop button on our website, and you'll see our t shirts. We have a couple up there right now. We have, we have kind of a humorous one, which kind of stems back to a comment that I made, early early on in the shows, when I when we first started doing the show, back in November, talking about having rabies. So I have a shirt up there that says, I have rabies. So you could pick up that shirt if you'd like for for, I think, it's $28.
And then also you have the, the Joe Roos, podcast t shirt, which is available up there as well for about $28. So, you could you could purchase those right out right there. Or if you wanna get it for free, you could always join up at the executive producer fifty dollar level per month. Alright. Now another way you can help us out is by heading over to our affiliate with the Alex Jones store. Just head over to the alexjonesstore.com/joe, and you can purchase, any variety of great vitamin supplements and apparel from, the Alex Jones store. And that's great because every purchase that you make, 10% if you use our link, 10% of that comes right back here to the podcast and, helps us pay the bills, helps us, do the upgrades that we need to do, obviously. I'm keep on looking up at that screen. It's driving me crazy.
Every penny helps. So anytime you can make a purchase through that, like I said, 10% of it, comes right back here to the podcast. And, you know, like, I wouldn't tell you to try it if I didn't try it and use it myself. Now I I love to take the ultimate turmeric, with the black pepper and ginger root, which is fantastic for especially for me for arthritis. Also, I take the, the Ultimate Irish Sea Moss, which is fantastic as well. I mean, you need that. That's loaded with iodine, which your body absolutely needs. So you need to get that as well. You also need to try out the Ultra the I'm sorry.
The ultra methylene blue. Right? Is it or is it blue methylene? Ultra methylene blue. Alright. That stuff is amazing. That's I I've been taking it now for about a month, a little bit over a month. I got my second bottle. It just came, a couple days ago. And, I'll tell you, it it's stuff's really good. Now last night, which we we did it on the show, we we we took our our our dose yesterday because, I purposely didn't wanna do it in the morning. I wanted to do it with you guys on the show this way you guys could see it and that I actually take this stuff. So it it's it's a great product. You need to try it out. You know, for me, what it really does, it just it it gives me it gives me a steady energy throughout the course of the day, helps me get through the work that I have to do.
Also, it it kinda it kinda makes you feel, like, kinda mellow, kinda calm, like, it takes a lot to get you ruffled. Like, ordinarily, you know, all the little technical issues that I've been having here today, so far, I would have probably just shut the shut the stream off and said, you know what? Just forget it. I'll pick it up fresh on Monday. But, nah, we're gonna get through it. We'll work through it. Even though that's really irritating the crap out of me looking up at that screen over there. I might just turn it off. I don't know. But, hopefully, it's not too bad on your end. So if it is, just drop a comment. Let me know. Alright.
What else we got? So alexjonesstore.com/joe. Get yourself some apparel. Get yourself some, some great vitamins and supplements. Try them out. You're gonna really like them. Alright. Well, we're at that point already where we're gonna say goodbye to all of our connected streams. I believe we're on Facebook for the first time. So, streaming on Facebook live on our on one of our pages. So so hopefully, if you're there, great to see you. If not, we'll see you soon, I guess. But, in the meantime, we're gonna say goodbye to the folks that are watching on Facebook, x, Twitch, and YouTube, and we are going to continue to stream exclusively on Rumble. So if you don't have Rumble, go to your app store on your phone, download the app. It's free. Sign up. Get an account. It's free. And, follow us at joe roost. It's free. Alright. So with all of that said, I guess we'll, say goodbye for now, and we will see you either on Rumble or we'll see you on Monday. Guys, have a great night.
Alright. Well, let's give some folks a chance to switch over, if anybody does. And then, while we're waiting for them, I'll get the next thing queued up here. Alright. Well, there's a lot of stuff to talk about, stuff that we were gonna talk about yesterday. Oh, that reminds me. I completely I wanted to mention it earlier, and it slipped my mind to do it. Now it just came to me right now. So last night, we had a two hour conversation with Orlando Owen, who is a, a masculinity coach, I guess, you could say, or a, an emotional liberation speaker.
And we had a great conversation. It was not really anything that I expected. I I don't really generally go into, segments with guests with any kind of real expectation, but I I had checked out some of his videos on YouTube. And, of course, like I said yesterday, they were all in German, so I I really didn't understand it. But, you know, you gotta get the idea of where it was going, and and I was not expecting, the guy that I spoke to yesterday, man. He it was a lot of fun. I really enjoyed that, and I'm looking forward to to hooking up with him again and having another conversation. We are so aligned in so many different ways that I didn't didn't think it was gonna be. But, hopefully, you know, we'll be able to get together again, and we'll see what happens. But, if, you know, I hope so hopefully, you you guys saw it. If you didn't see it, you can always go back into the show archives, check it out. Also, I'm gonna be running it, Saturday as a Saturday, spotlight.
So, it should be it should be a lot of fun to watch that again and see, and see how many more folks join in on it. Alright. Well, with all that said, how about we get to some of the news?
[00:16:45] Unknown:
Alright.
[00:16:48] Unknown:
Now, the, the last time we got we we we actually sat down and spoke about things going on in the news, it was Wednesday. No. I'm sorry. Correction. It was Monday. We were talking about this whole thing, this whole scandal now with, with the autopen. The autopen's back in the news. The autopen's not gonna go anywhere anywhere anytime soon. At least I don't think so, and it shouldn't because of the implications behind it. But, there's also another aspect to this whole story, and that is the cover up that took place, of the, of the health and the the the the cognitive abilities of of, Joe Biden.
Now, and we had talked about a a number of things that that had taken place in there. And, during that period of time let me turn that off, that little banner down there. We had talked about, just how this, there was this this basically, this this little pullet bureau that was kind of running things, almost, like a committee, which is completely unconstitutional. They're using the auto pen for just about every signature on every document that had to be signed. We also talked about how, and and we reminded ourselves of, speaker Johnson, in his meeting with the president when, he was talking about the the shutting down of the LNG, the liquid natural gas in, in Louisiana, which, of course, was detrimental to the economy of Louisiana.
And, Joe Biden had no clue whatsoever that he signed that. In fact, what he did say was that, you know, that they didn't shut it down. They didn't shut it off. They were, they were going to, study the effects of LNG. Well, that's not what he signed, and, that's not what was put in front of him, but he didn't understand or know what he signed, if he even did sign it at all. So that poses a lot of problems, especially, you know, with the man that that is in charge of of our nuclear capabilities, not knowing what exactly it is that he's doing. Now, thank God nothing happened to that extent, and thank God that he's not in office now even though they were pushing him to run again for another four years, which would have been absolutely insane. The man is 82 now. He he would have been what? 86?
So, you know, this is a scandal that that is going to go down in history as probably the greatest scandal in in, modern American history, at the presidential level. I mean, this is this is worse, like like we said yes, Monday, this is worse than Watergate. Worse than Watergate. Now, the House Oversight Committee, chairman James Comer, called on, the presidential physician, doctor Kevin O'Connor. And now and doctor O'Connor, he served as the president's personal physician at the White House, for the four years that he was there. And, o Comer told O'Connor that, he needs to, he he's gonna need to come and, testify before Congress.
And, at this point, they they gave him a deadline to do that, and he hasn't done that. And, and and the reason why they wanna talk to him is because, he's the one who basically certified that Joe that Joe Biden was was physically fit, mentally fit, and capable of performing the duties of the president of The United States, when obviously he wasn't. And it was obvious not just to you know, it was obvious to everybody. And it wasn't just just because of his debate performance, if you remember that that, that that disaster.
People on the right had been talking about it for a long time. For at least three of the four years, they had been talking about his decline. And, of course, you know, you the more the more we talked about it, the more, you know, we were shouted down. We were told, you know, that we're just we're what was it? It was, we're ageists. Alright? We're discriminating against him because of his age. We were told that, that, you know, we're, providing deep fakes and cheap fakes. I think they even used, yeah, there was a number of different things that they've used to describe, the the the the commentary on the president.
Now, I think it's important that Congress sits down and talks with doctor O'Connor since he is the the he was the, physician to the president. So, basically, what we've done is is, today, they've reached the deadline for O'Connor to contact the committee, and for the, trans they would they would have a transcribed interview, and, that's gonna take place, June 25. Now O'Connor did reach out to the to the committee, and he is going to be testifying. And, but if he didn't, it would have been a subpoena. And I don't think James Comer is kidding around with this either. And, it's it's let me see. Do I have?
So yeah. So so so here's, here's doctor O'Connor and the the message here says, you know, breaking sources say, doctor Kevin O'Connor, the personal physician who attested annually to the fitness of for office of Joe Biden has contacted the GOP oversight, through an attorney to discuss a transcript interview ahead of today's close of business deadline, which was today, under the threat of subpoena. O'Connor was the law was the last of five target witnesses to respond. Now here is, here is, James Comer on this particular matter.
[00:22:57] Unknown:
We're starting with the staffers who are operating the auto pin. We're gonna bring the physician, doctor O'Connor in because he definitely was not telling the truth about Joe Biden's health. We're gonna have Ronnie Jackson there to counsel us on a lot of questions. We're very fortunate to have a member of congress that was the the the previous White House position. So I think we're gonna be ready to go. And and, again Yeah. Even the liberal media, Sean, wants to know the answers to these questions. No one's attacking me, for wanting to, conduct this investigation. Everyone wants to know the truth, and, hopefully, we'll be able to find the
[00:23:35] Unknown:
truth. Now, Comer so that's interesting. Alright. So now now Comer, also went on to, to, Mark Varney's show on, on Fox. And, he had to say this is what he had to say on on Varney.
[00:23:59] Unknown:
The House Oversight Committee, Congressman James Comer joins me now. Congressman, we just got this coming at us. A new watchdog report from ProEnergy Group, just found, quote, no evidence that Biden knew of crucial climate executive orders. They're now demanding answers on who signed with the auto pen. What happens if Biden really didn't know? Are those orders null and void?
[00:24:27] Unknown:
I think they would be null and void. Look. At the end of the day, there's more evidence coming out by the second that would prove that Joe Biden, wasn't the one making decisions during the last one hundred days of his administration, perhaps the last six months or even the last year. This is when the most activity occurred Yeah. From the executive order standpoint throughout the whole Biden administration. We don't believe that that a lot of these executive orders are legal if for no other reason Joe Biden did not sign them himself. You have to physically sign anything pertaining to the law, whether it be a pardon or whether it be an executive order. What we wanna know is who gave the authority to these four staffers that we're bringing in.
These are the staffers that we've identified as the ones who actually put the documents in the auto pen and press the power button to sign Joe Biden's name. We wanna know who told them to do that, and we're gonna follow the trail just like we followed the money in the Biden influence fell family investigation. We're gonna follow the trail as to who was using the autopat.
[00:25:34] Unknown:
That's the problem with the autopat, isn't it? You don't know who authorized its use, and you we can't we you have to find out. The whole question is who actually wielded presidential power because it probably wasn't president Biden. That's the nitty that's the crux of this matter, isn't it?
[00:25:54] Unknown:
That is. And and look. That's what Jake Tapper is saying. That's what he wrote his book about. That's what all of his interviews about his book is is saying that Joe Biden wasn't the one calling the shots. That's a constitutional crisis. But more important to to today, to this very moment, many of those executive orders that were signed with the autopid are are what we call Trump proofing, the the Trump administration. This is when they knew that Donald Trump was likely gonna be the next president of The United States, so they started taking action, through executive orders signed with an auto pen at a time when Joe Biden wasn't anywhere near the White House, to to make it difficult for Donald Trump to, reform energy permitting, to make it difficult for Trump to re make the federal employees return back to work, to make it difficult for him to eliminate the the US Department of Education.
These are things Trump's battling in court as a result of whoever made the decision to use the auto pin to sign these executive orders. We think this will have huge legal impacts if we can prove what Jake Tapper and many of us believe it wasn't Joe Biden. Colson, I've gotta get to this one. Is it possible
[00:27:06] Unknown:
that you will hold televised hearings with Jill Biden, Hunter Biden, KJP? Is that possible down the road?
[00:27:15] Unknown:
I guess anything's possible. I think it's a pretty pretty well known, fact that I would prefer to have depositions and transcribed interviews where we release the transcript, possibly even release the video. As you know, Stewart, a lot of these committee hearings, never turned out the way that that we hope. They're more entertainment than than subsidy. True. So we'll do whatever, but I'm you know, I'll consult with my members of the committee. They're gonna be active in the process. We're gonna ask a lot of questions to a lot of people and try to get the answer that I believe the answers that I believe most Americans wanna know. Got it. Congressman James Comer, thanks very much for being with us this morning.
[00:27:53] Unknown:
Alright, folks. So having a bit of a problem here, technically. My camera went out, so I don't think yeah. So we're gonna have to do a reset. Alright, folks? So just, bear with me a second here. Alright. I think we're back. Alright. I think we're back. Right? Alright. There we go. I'm sorry, folks. I don't know what the hell is going on with my setup here, the last few days. This is just absolutely unacceptable here. Yeah. This is camera problems, Internet problems. You saw what I don't know if you saw what happened yesterday with, with our guest. We just we had to do another reset. So anyway so, what that clip was basically about was, not only about the cognitive decline of the president, or and the use of the auto pen, but, you know, there's a number of executive orders. There was a flurry in the last hundred days of the previous administration. There was a flurry of activity, between the presidential pardons, the executive orders that were signed, and all of them were signed by the auto pen, which, representative Comer brings up a very good point. If this is all being done by auto pen and Joe Biden had no idea what was being done, legally speaking, are these orders and and, and these pardons that were issued, in effect, or are they null and void?
And remember, this is the amount of activity that took place at that time. That was the most activity that took place in the Biden administration, in in in in over the last over the last six months of his of his administration. Now if the if if he was unaware that those executive orders were being, signed or even what they contained or what they were all about, then they're not then then I can't see how they could have any kind of legal standing. Now the left loves to throw around that that term constitutional crisis, and they use it in the in the in the regard of the, administration deep deporting illegal aliens. Well, that's not a constitutional crisis, folks. This is a constitutional crisis.
This is extremely dangerous. And there are so many people that are involved with this, so many people that are complicit with this. I have a clip here of, where is it? Here we go. Carolyn Levitt came out at a at a press conference at the White House and totally, completely smoked the former first lady, doctor Jill Biden because of her cover up. I mean, you think about it. This this is the woman that that's married to the president, knows about the cognitive decline, knows about his oldest health issues, and yet still trotted him out there, still pushed him and egged him on to to, to to, to run again for for reelection.
And, I mean, anybody that anybody that was paying attention would be able to see that that Joe Biden was not all there. Here's what, Carolyn Levitt had to say. Short clip.
[00:32:10] Unknown:
I think, frankly, the former first lady should certainly speak up about what she saw in regards to her husband and when she saw it and what she knew. Because I think anybody looking again at the videos and photo evidence of Joe Biden with your own eyes and a little bit of common sense can see this was a clear cover up. And Joe, Jill Biden was certainly complicit in that cover up. There are docu there's documentation video evidence of her clearly shielding her husband away from the cameras. They were just on The View last week. She was saying everything is fine. She's still lying to the American people. She still thinks the American public are so stupid that they're gonna believe her lies. And frankly, it's insulting and she needs to answer for it.
[00:32:51] Unknown:
She does absolutely agree with that. She does need to answer for this. She does need to to and and and she's gonna be subpoenaed if she has well, I think she responded already to the to their request to come into, to talk. But, she's gonna have to sit down and explain this. You know, I also remember there was, there was a video that went around, of her at a at a a cabinet meeting, and she was actually seemed to be leading the cabinet meeting. Well, where was Joe? Taking a nap? Probably. And if you saw the if you saw the episode of, of The View that she was that that that she was on, with Joe Biden, the cohost, Alisa, Alisa Farah Griffin asked Biden for his response to to the books, deeply sourced from Democrats that claimed that in his final year, there was a dramatic decline in his cognitive ability.
And and and Biden, of course, was Biden. The that garbled response saying, you know, they're wrong. There's nothing to sustain that, number one. And then he said, number two, think of what we left with. We left with circumstance, and there's a quote. We left with a circumstance where we had an insurrection when I started. What does that have to do with his cognitive decline? He went on to say, not since the civil war, we had circumstance where we're in a position with, well and then he went on to the pandemic because people's incompetence in the last outfit end up with over a million people dying. There's also a situation we found ourselves unable to deal with a lot of just basic issues, which I won't go into it for the interest of time.
And then he then he just trailed off, and then Jill Biden then Jill jumped in because it was obvious to everybody on the panel that her husband was lost. He wasn't making any sense. I mean, even the hosts of The View looked like they were disturbed by this. So there there needs to be a reckoning on this. There needs to be the investigations and, you know, and honestly, this is elder abuse. If nothing else, this is elder abuse. Now am I hopeful that anything's gonna come of this? Yeah. I have a lot of hope that something's gonna come of this, but do I really think there is?
Not with Pam Bondi involved. Not with Pam Bondi involved at all. And speaking of, of of things along those lines, we also remember that, was it last week? Jim Comey, the the outgoing or former the former director of the FBI, you know, I if you remember this, he went out, took a walk on a beach and miraculously came across this this shell formation that says eighty six forty seven. Now, we all know what that means. You know, 86 is a is a common reference to, to assassination, to killing somebody. Actually, something I learned recently about that, it was, the 86 is, you know, you you take them eight miles out of town, you bury them six feet under. That's the 86.
And then 47 is the is is Donald Trump, the forty seventh president of The United States. And, his quote was, you know, interesting shell form interesting shell formation on my beach walk today. And of course, you know, he's come out since then, and he blamed his wife, he's blamed everybody under the sun, but doesn't take any responsibility for it himself. But, the problem with that is is that you have somebody who is a a is a very well known public figure in James Comey. Unfortunately, for us, he is. And, especially the the the the left lunatics that, you know, have embraced this culture of it's okay to talk about assassinating a sitting president.
I mean, God forbid that, you know, Republicans or conservatives talked about that, you know, with a a sitting Democrat, but it's okay for them to talk about it, you know, with, with a Republican in office, especially Donald Trump. So, you know, the concern here is, of course, you know, being such a public figure and seeing and having the platform that he has, and trying to publish a and trying to, you know, sell books, you know, his his his voice carries. His voice has some sway to it, you know, and, people are gonna listen to him, especially those lunatics on the left that that believe in this stuff, that believe in it's okay to kill a president or try to kill a president or talk about killing the president. So, Kash Patel, the the current director of the FBI, sat down with Brett Baer, and, basically, you know, he he had a warning. He he put out a warning about this, about these kind of posts. And he said that, you know, that there are copycats actually popping up all across the country because of what James Comey posted.
Because of that 8647 post. Now of course, like I said, you know, he blamed his wife. He you know, with the whole thing. So, Comey this this is what he said, quote. This is what Comey said. We were walking down the beach when we went we went to the beach to we were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week, and and we were walking back toward the road, and we saw in the sand someone had someone had arranged shells with numbers. And Patrice, my wife said, why would someone put an address in the sand? And I said, I don't know. And we stood over it and I said, I think it's some kind of a political message. Really?
And then, of course, the backlash grew stronger when Comey blamed his wife. She said, quote, you know, when I was a server, she did a lot of work in restaurants meant, you know, meant to remove an item from a menu when you ran out of agreed, ingredients. And I said, well, to me, she said, you know, when I was a server, she did a lot of work in restaurants, meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of it meant to move it meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients. Gonna 86 it. And I said, well, to me, as a kid, it always meant to leave a place, to ditch a place. And she said, well, that's very clever. You should take a picture of that. And I did, and I posted on my Instagram and, and thought nothing more of it until I heard, through her that people were saying that it was a call for some sort of assassination, which is crazy.
Secret Service agents interviewed Comey, but nothing came of it. And then, let's, actually, you know what? Let's go to to, Director Patel, and let's let's hear him talk about it.
[00:40:16] Unknown:
James Comey. If he wants to come after me, no problem. I've been living rent free in that guy's head for years, and that's just a bonus. Do you know how many copycats we've had to investigate as a result of that beachside venture from the former director? Is that right? Do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists? Because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of The United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it. That's what I'm having to deal with every single day. And that's what I'm having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement. The 86
[00:41:10] Unknown:
I think we got frozen again. This is gonna be a wonderful wonderful wonderful wonderful. Well, anyway, so not only that, but also, Dan Bongino, also took to, to Fox and Friends. And, he basically he slammed the FBI direct the former FBI director. He called him a big child explaining that the eighty six forty seven post had now, you know, of course, like Cash Patel just said, spawned copycats, with the FBI. Now he has to take time and investigate. And all the while, James Comey is, you know, running around the country promoting his book and trying to make sales off his book. And, you know, and and he continues with with the ridiculous comments and remarks.
But, that wasn't all that that Bongino said. And like I said, we, you know, we're talking about Pam Bondi and our lack of faith in in what she's doing. But, here's here's Bongino on Fox and Friends talking about, James Comey and some Epstein stuff.
[00:42:13] Unknown:
As of Jim Comey because he cannot control himself and his emotions. He is a child. He is a big child. And let me tell you one more thing. Look at Jim Comey. We want you to Jim Comey taking a shot at the president. Oh, look at me. I'm such a victim. The president's going after me. He's making a ton of money on this book. The only person that got prosecuted was the president,
[00:42:33] Unknown:
Jim Comey. We're finding stuff even now. Wait till you read the stuff that's coming out of my head. But does he still but does he still have loyalists in the building? Because when I hear the FBI director saying, you guys are finding boxes that are hidden. Okay. How does that happen in the bureau?
[00:42:50] Unknown:
Well, we were there a couple of weeks, and, luckily, there were a lot of people up there who grabbed us by the arm the minute we came in and said, thank you for being here. You know, we need to talk. There are people there who are really horrified at what happened. And there was a room, and we found stuff, a lot of stuff. A hidden room. I wouldn't call it hidden, but hidden from us at least and not mentioned to us. And then we found stuff in there. And a lot of it's from the Comey era, and we are working our our our damndest right now to declassify. And just so you know, because I I get the public. I totally understand people saying, well, do it now. There the process is not all the information is ours to declassify. Some is other intelligence agencies. It's not we we literally can't do it. Once that gets done and that gets out there and you read some of the stuff we found that, by the way, was not processed through the normal procedure, digitizing it, putting in FBI records. We found it in bags hiding under Jim Comey's FBI. You're gonna be The shells on the beach. Can you not talk to social
[00:43:53] Unknown:
Now listen, you know, Bongino's I have a lot of respect for Dan Bongino. Alright? I'm I'm gonna say that. I wanna trust him. I wanna believe what he's saying. I I really do. And, you know, I'm hoping that because, you know, he's he's alluding to the fact that there are there are records. There's a lot of records and, that people are gonna be shocked at what they see of what comes out of those records. I'm hoping that this isn't just, you know, trying to to put a good face on having sanitized records or or the fact that there really aren't any records left. Because, I mean, realistically speaking, you know, if if an administration is on the way out and they know that there's gonna be some accountability held for for not following through on an investigation or or or such, You know, they're gonna do what they can to get rid of the evidence. They can do what they can to hide stuff. And like like you heard Bongino say, you know, there there was a room that wasn't even known to them that they finally came across that had all of this material in there. But, you know, how much of it hasn't already been altered and changed and and and, like you said, sanitized, before they got to it?
So now they have to go through all of these things and they have to, you you know, figure out what they can release. And you heard them say too that it's not a matter of just being able to put it out there, that has to go through declassification. There's other intelligence agencies involved in this, and it's gonna take time. And, you know, you wanna give them the time to do it, but at the same time, you know, I think the American people are starting to get little frustrated with this. And, you know, they wanna see they wanna see some action on it. You know, you have the midterm elections are coming up. And, right now, you know, it's it it really does look like I saw a poll, I forgot the I forgot the, the the pollster, but it was showing that, that Democrats are are actually leading Republicans right now, in the midterms, like, fifty one forty something.
So, you know, that that's I mean, you really can't always go by the polls, you know, polls change. We talked about that many, many times. Polls do change, and it also depends on the sampling, and it depends you know, there's a lot of there's a lot of factors involved with it. But, you know, the way things look, I mean, people are getting impatient, and the last thing you want right now is to have Republicans sit sit on their hands, stay home, not go out and vote in the midterms, and then give control of the House over to the Democrats, because once that happens, you know it's gonna happen. It's gonna be investigation after investigation, it's gonna be charges, and it's gonna be impeachments, it's gonna be all that stuff for the next two years, and nothing is gonna get accomplished again.
So I'm hoping that within the next couple of weeks, month, two months, we'll start seeing some action on these things. I mean, it's it's getting frustrating. I have really no confidence whatsoever in in Pam Bondi. To me, she just she's just auditioning for her for her, next job as a host of of a talk show or a news show on on, on Fox. And, you know, I'm hoping that, I'm hoping that Cash Patel and and and Bongino are able to to to do what they said they're going to do when they get there. Well, they're there. Let's get to it. Let's do it. Again, I like I look, I've I've done law enforcement work, I've done investigations work, I know things take time, you know, but even I'm getting frustrated with it.
It's time it's it's time to to to do some it's time to to take some action on this. We wanna see some law enforcement you know, we wanna see some some subpoenas going out, at least subpoenas, or somebody being brought in for questioning, something. But unfortunately, we haven't seen any of that yet, in this matter. And look, the the guys at the FBI, they're doing a great job. I think they're doing a great job since, Cash Patel took over and and and Bongino's there. I think they're doing a fantastic job. You know, I like the fact that they're keeping us informed, but also at the same time, I think a lot of that, that in that informed, that information that they're sending out to us is just to keep us, you know, distracted on the hook.
Waiting, you know, to to to take our our focus off of the other things that they promised that were gonna take place that haven't taken place yet. So we'll see. We'll see. Now, just shifting gears here for a little bit. Remember, Donald Trump has been, well, basically, every move that the administration makes, they've been hit with injunctions. They've been hit with, stays. They've been hit with all kinds of, legal shenanigans, really, to to to to slow down the whole process of deportations and tariffs. The latest thing was that, the the some some lower court determined that, that that Donald Trump doesn't have the authority to to, impose tariffs, which is not is not really true.
But, of late and I know, of course, it was also the, you know, all the injunctions on the, deportation of of, illegal aliens and and and whatnot. It was just one thing after another after another, and it's gonna be this is what it's gonna be the entire four years. It's gonna be one thing after another as far as, you know, rogue judges getting in the way and, trying to slow down everything and and trying trying to really, protect criminals over the American people. You know, this whole thing that they have due process, they were they're entitled to due process. No. You know, we've said it many times, Due process is only, applicable to US resident US citizens.
You have to be a citizen of The United States. You have to be, you know, to to to in order to get those constitutional protections. If you're here illegally, you're not entitled to those. Well, the latest the latest round of, of legal battles here was, over these tariffs and, on Thursday, that would be yesterday, the US appeals court, reinstated, Trump tariffs during the appeal and, and which which is a great thing. So the, it was the it was the whole panel too. The full 11 member panel voted to to stay the ruling from the court of international trade allowing tariffs to remain in place for now for now.
So, Caroline Levitt went to the podium, and, she, she had a couple of things to say. Let's let's take a listen to Caroline. Where is she? Here she is.
[00:51:24] Unknown:
Hi. Let's go to the White House Briefing Room. How are you? Wow. A packed room today. Yes, ma'am.
[00:51:29] Unknown:
Last night, the Trump administration faced another example of judicial overreach. Using his full and proper legal authority, president Trump imposed universal tariffs and reciprocal tariffs on Liberation Day to address the extraordinary threat to our national security and economy posed by large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits. The United States has run a trade deficit of goods every year since 1975. In deficit of goods every year since 1975. In 2024, our trade deficit in goods exceeded $1,000,000,000,000. Everybody agrees this is President Trump is delivering on his promise to fix this problem, and he has taken a long overdue and much needed bold stance for American workers after decades of our manufacturing base being hollowed out.
The president's rationale for imposing these powerful tariffs was legally sound and grounded in common sense. President Trump correctly believes that America cannot function safely long term if we are unable to scale advanced domestic manufacturing capacity, have our own secure critical supply chains, and our defense industrial base is dependent on foreign adversaries. Three judge judges of the US Court of International Trade disagreed and brazenly abused their judicial power to use the authority of president Trump to stop him from carrying out the mandate that the American people gave him. These judges failed to acknowledge that the president of The United States has core foreign affairs powers and authority given to him by Congress to protect The United States economy and national security.
Congress had created the National Emergency Act to provide the congressional framework to strike down improper IEPI use. And any questions over whether president Trump improperly imposed these IEPI tariffs were were already adjudicated in Congress following Liberation Day. Congress firmly rejected an effort led by senator Rand Paul and Democrats to terminate the president's reciprocal tariffs. The courts should have no role here. There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision making process. America cannot function if president Trump or any other president for that matter has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges.
[00:53:50] Unknown:
And then she went on and,
[00:53:52] Unknown:
she, continued on about the judges. I think this this might not be the this might be the same clip. I don't think so though. Let me see. Let's double check. Junctions. To paint the picture for the American people at home. This is not these are not just talking points. These are real judges in the court of law who are trying to block the president's power and the policies that he was elected to enact. For example, a court ordered the Trump administration to return already deported terrorist aliens back to The United States. A court has ruled the Trump administration can't even temporarily pause our refugee programs. Courts prohibited the Trump administration from eliminating federal funding for child transgender surgery and mutilation, a practice Ridiculous. Courts prohibited the removal of transgender women from women's prisons despite potential physical harm to real women in those prisons, biological women. A Northern District Of California Judge issued an absurd ruling that the president cannot fire people within the executive branch without congress passing a bill. Even though congress has expressly authorized the president through the office of personnel management to authorize reductions in force across agencies.
A court also ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of already fired employees in several cases. A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from defunding the Department of Education, another signature campaign promise that this president has the power to implement. Courts ordered the Trump administration could not eliminate funding for illegal DEI programs, hence the word illegal. These are illegal programs to begin with, and now the courts are trying to say this president can't roll them back. And a district court judge prohibited the president from issuing any categorical funding freezes. And And then another court ordered on top of that the administration makes $2,000,000,000 of payments in thirty six hours. These are just a few of the ridiculous orders that we have seen from lower district court judges every day, and we hope that the Supreme Court will weigh in and reign them in. What White House adviser Stephen Miller says it's judicial tiering. Some people are calling it a judicial coup. You're saying you're responding to each and every one of these actions, efforts by these judges to delay or thwart the implementation of the agenda. But is there going to be anything more than that, or is it just going to let this operation continue even though it could delay everything for years until the presidency is over? The administration is operating under the directive given to the prep from the president that we need to comply with the court's orders. He's made that very clear, but we're gonna fight them in court and we're gonna win on the merits of these cases because we know we are acting within the president's legal and executive authorities.
And thanks for being here. Gabe.
[00:56:30] Unknown:
So, everything that she just said, I mean, if you listen to that and that's just a sample. That's not all of the all of the all of all of these, illegal court orders that have been thrown at this administration to slow them down. Basically, what they're doing, this is how the left because they're all left judges. These are all Biden appointed judges or Obama appointed judges that are that are stepping in and getting in the way. This is what a judicial coup looks like. This is the judicial branch usurping the authority of the executive branch. The executive branch has broad, sweeping powers.
The executive branch is he's the chief executive officer of this country. He has the authority to do and enforce the law. So these judges and all this is, this is just very, very simply obstructionism. This is just the left doing what they do best using the courts to try to stop this administration from pursuing the waste, fraud, and abuse that has been rampant across both parties over many, many, many, many years. This is the judicial branch trying to basically tell the American people that your voice doesn't matter. Everything that this president is doing is something that I voted for, and I'm sure that I'm not the only one who says that.
77,000,000 people voted for president Trump on his platform of what he exactly said he was going to do, And he is doing exactly what he said he's going to do. He's he's he's made his promises and he's in the process of keeping those promises. But the left, through the courts, is not letting him do that. It's slow I mean, ultimately, he's gonna win these things in court because he has standing. He has constitutional standing. The Supreme Court will eventually side with him on these things, but this whole matter is just to be a headache, to waste taxpayer money on these frivolous lawsuits.
It's also to to demoralize the base, it's to demoralize the administration, it's to try to get this administration to stop what they're doing and just saying, you know, to hell with it, you know, we'll just leave it as it is, which is not gonna happen. I mean, I might be wrong, but, you know, I'm no expert in these things, but that's just what I see. It's my opinion. So the, the the young lady in the in the audience that was asking a question about Stephen Miller, so this is this is what she was talking about here. This is Stephen Miller on, CNN.
[00:59:46] Unknown:
Last few weeks. Yet, even just yesterday, we saw whenever a judge rules against this administration, you say they're going rogue. Do you think a judge should just rubber stamp what your White House does? If not, what checks and balances do you think should be in place for this White House?
[01:00:03] Unknown:
The it is not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch. Just think about the premise baked into your question respectfully, Pam. You're saying that when the American people elect the president of The United States Of America I'm not saying that. The the the well, it's the implication. Who is the sole head of the executive branch? Said Let me let me finish. Let me finish. I I will answer the question happily. But look. When you have these kinds of lazy assumptions built into questions, it makes it hard to have a constructive dialogue. Lazy assumption. I said you all had to win. Meaning b, you said no. You said you said is it my expectation? I'm speaking with someone else. You said is it my expectation? It's not just you. It's the whole media. In other words, when you see your sentence like so on. It is a completely clear question. You say drugs No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. It is the white house. Gladly answer it when you say, do we think district court judges should rubber stamp each action? There is a premise that is built into that that is absurd. The president is the sole head of the executive branch. He's the only officer in the entire government that's elected by the entire American people. Democracy cannot function. In fact, democracy does not exist at all. If each action the president takes, foreign policy, diplomatic, military, national security, has to be individually approved by 700 district court judges, That's democracy. So there's 15 communist crazy judges on the court that each of them as a team working together can block and freeze each and every executive action. Joe Biden was allowed by that same court system Some of them are Trump judges now. Are they foreigners? Why did Trump put these crazy communist judges as you call them on the bench? You heard you heard you heard president Trump himself say that the Federal Society and Leonard Leo has created a broken system for judicial vetting.
And God knows this time around, we are not gonna be using support Hickey and E. Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court? What it means is simply this and nothing more. We're not gonna be using the federal society to make judicial nominations at all going forward.
[01:02:10] Unknown:
So the administration is, well, you you heard it yourself, folks. You heard it. You have rogue judges, whether they are Republican appointed or Democrat appointed, trying to run the country from the bench. And I understand where she was going with that saying, you know, you know, president Trump, you know, appointed some of these judges and some of them, you know, you know, are we calling them yeah. Yeah. Basically, you know, because of the vetting process that the Federalist Society, did on behalf of those judges, you know, they they they they snuck through some of these, radical left leaning judges under the guise of that they are, you know, right leaning.
So I I understand where they were going with that, you know, but I'm pretty sure you did too. But the point of it is is that you you cannot have the judicial branch dictating what the executive branch can do as far as or or or or at least restrict what the executive branch can do when he's functioning within the confines and the, of of his executive authority as outlined in the constitution. That's why there was a separation of powers. That's why there are these checks and balances. You know, it's absolutely ridiculous to think that judges can tell the tell one branch of government, no, you can't do this, you can't do that, at at the district level and have it affect the entire country.
And I want I would like to know, you know, where the hell is Mike Johnson on this? Because I remember just a few weeks ago, he was talking about defunding and shutting down these district courts if necessary to to to stop this behavior, which is fully within the cons within the cons the constitution, constitutional authority of the Congress. District courts are not a requirement according to the constitution. They are funded and put in place by the Congress, and the Congress can take them away. And that's exactly what they should do. Strip them down, take them down, reorganize them with people that are going to be constitutionalists.
And I'm not saying that that will rubber stamp everything the administration does, but at least at least look at it through the lens of the Constitution. And I'm I'm not even talking about the district level because the district level, whether it's right or left, should have no business whatsoever putting any kind of injunction on anything that reaches nationwide. Well, with all of that said, some some some wins for the for the administration. So you have the tariff win. You have the, the Supreme Court limits judicial authority to block infrastructure projects over environmental concerns. So on Thursday, in a in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court limited the judicial authority, of course, to block infrastructure projects.
The NEPA does not allow courts under the guise of judicial review of agency compliance with NEPA to delay or block agency projects based on environmental effects or of other projects separate from the project at hand. Justice, Kavanaugh wrote in an opinion that, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, Samuelito, Amy Comey, Barrett also, joined. And, Neil Gorsuch did not participate in the case. Sonia my Sonia Sotomayor filed a separate concurring opinion, and Alega Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also joined in on that. So another another win for this administration. So basically, what they're saying is that, you know, the the judiciary can't stop, infrastructure projects because there's a concern over some kind of environmental impact.
And then, today, let's see the a a federal appeals appeals a federal appeals court has blocked a lower court order striking down president Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs at the request of the White House. The move follows a decision from panel of US Court International Trade this week that struck down most of the president's Liberation Day tariffs. So basically, what this is is that, on appeal, the administration won the appeal and the tariffs are gonna go back into place. So and that is that's great. And we already heard the we already heard the audio on that.
Another another win for the for the, administration here. The, Supreme Court says that, yes. Yes. Yes. Donald Trump can end legal protections for a million immigrants. Where is this? The Supreme Court on Friday, that would be today, with a two word statement is, is granted approved suspension of a lower court ruling that barred president Donald Trump from moving forward on his plan to halt the temporary legal protections offered by Joe Biden to about a million aliens in the country. The ruling lifted a lower court order that demanded those those protections remain in place, follows a decision by the court early to let the Trump administration to revoke temporary protections for about 350,000 Venezuelan migrants in a separate dispute.
This move allows the Trump administration to advance its efforts to fulfill his campaign promise of deporting millions of illegal aliens allowed to America by the open borders action of the Biden administration. Alright. So that's great. It's another win for the administration. Again, Supreme Court lets Trump revoke temporary legal status of 500,000 immigrants, and, the only dissension on that was from Ketanji Brown Jackson, a real genius, and, Sotomayor, they were the dissents. And just with the way they word these things, it's like, you know, they're defending the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are are pending.
Not my problem. You shouldn't be here legally. Let's see what else we got here. A couple little quick stories here. Hey. Did you hear Jen Psaki, came back? And, she tried to she tried to get a show on prime time show, but you know what? She got crushed by Paw Patrol, Seinfeld, reruns. So she lost her show already. That's gone. This was interesting. This I wanted to bring this up here too. So, so a whistleblower from the Biden administration, says that Biden admin forgave loans based on race, excluding white farmers. And I don't know. Something just happened.
Yeah. You know what? I'm the whole the whole my whole thing here just blinked out on me. So I'm I'm starting to wonder if perhaps it's time to, say goodnight and, not take a chance of crashing everything here. But, let me let me see if I could just run through this really, really quickly. So, so yeah. So Joe Biden, his administration here, the US Department of Agriculture, under Joe Biden, was actively operating a policy of forgiving loans to farmers based on their race according to whistleblower. The previous Biden administration, the previous administration allegedly targeted white US farmers by issuing loan program that paid off everyone and anyone who wasn't a white male, says NewsNation. Let's take a look.
If it'll let me.
[01:11:25] Unknown:
President Trump is not quiet about his criticism of the Biden administration. In fact, he's usually quite the opposite. There is arguably, however, nothing quite as harsh as Trump's anger over Biden's DEI policies. Well, in a NewsNation exclusive, senior national correspondent Brian Anjan spoke to a manager at the Federal Farm Bureau who is blowing the whistle. He says a Biden era law appears to be helping all farmers, but in reality is only helping some. And he showed us the documents to prove
[01:11:58] Unknown:
it. When former president Joe Biden left Washington DC, he was leaving behind a DEI secret involving American farmers and $800,000,000 in taxpayer money. And the United States Department of Agriculture whistleblower
[01:12:13] Unknown:
is now sounding the alarm. It was to pay off anyone who wasn't a white male's loan. That was the only qualification
[01:12:24] Unknown:
for this loan forgiveness. And what was the reaction?
[01:12:29] Unknown:
So it was really silent. They were trying to keep this hushed because of the obvious implications of, race based loan forgiveness.
[01:12:40] Unknown:
Race based loan forgiveness, it's in black and white, buried in the American Rescue Plan Act. The United States Secretary Of Agriculture shall provide a payment in an amount up to 120% of the outstanding indebtedness of each socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher. The act explicitly lays out who's considered socially disadvantaged. So just to be clear, if you were American Indian, Alaskan native, Asian black, African American, native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic or Latino, and you were in that group, you were told you didn't have to pay your bills,
[01:13:16] Unknown:
essentially? Yes. That's correct. And that your loan would be forgiven up to a 20%
[01:13:21] Unknown:
of the loan value. To me, it was just it was,
[01:13:26] Unknown:
combating racism with more racism. I I didn't I I I couldn't believe that it was happening today's age. James Dunlap owns a small family farm in Baker City, Oregon. He works two other jobs to keep his farm afloat but did not qualify for the loan forgiveness
[01:13:41] Unknown:
because he's white. I knew what they were saying was that minority farmers were going to have their loans forgiven for no reason other than they decided to, they being the government. So And and how much money they had had nothing to do with it? As far as I understand, not at all. It wasn't about hardship. It wasn't about financial situations at all. It was purely what box you checked
[01:14:04] Unknown:
under that ethnicity line on your application. If you checked a nonwhite box, you got the free money no matter how rich you were. James and other white farmers sued the Biden administration and were successful. The loan forgiveness for any farmer who's not white was stopped. The judge writing in his decision, it was an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone. And James and other white farmers will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of his race. That harm he has shown is irreparable.
But this is where things get interesting. The Biden administration was not ready to give up. They passed the inflation reduction act to help farmers who couldn't pay their loans. It was supposed to help all farmers, but NewsNation has learned all farmers were not told about it. NewsNation obtaining a copy of this email that was sent out to share information about new payments and or loan modifications that may assist you. But here's the catch. Our whistleblower says it was only sent to the minority farmers AKA the socially disadvantaged group, and he says USDA workers were even instructed to tell that group to stop paying their loans because they would still be forgiven.
The whistleblower says none of the white farmers he works with received the email. They got
[01:15:23] Unknown:
nothing. You know, it might not meet the legal definition of fraud, but it isn't right. It's discriminating. It's discriminatory. It's unethical, and the people who push it are still in charge of the agency. They're still in charge? Yes. At our national office, they're they're still Trump hasn't got rid of them.
[01:15:44] Unknown:
We reached out to the United States department department of agriculture. They did not respond to our specific questions or our questions about what the whistleblower said that some of these DEI policies still remain, in effect and in some of the documentation. But they did send us this statement, Elizabeth. I wanna read you in part. It says, it is absurd that while the Biden administration was driving up inflation, American taxpayers were forced to fund billions in woke DEI initiatives. No one should be shocked that Biden weaponized bipartisan farm programs to discriminate and provide tax payer dollars to one group based on race and not on merit. On day one, secretary Rollins issued a memo to rescind all DEI programs. Instead, USDA is reprioritizing unity, equality, meritocracy, and colorblind policies. And the USDA says they are also reviewing, the Inflation Reduction Act funding to ensure that that money is now going out to all farmers equally instead of just one specific group. All of this. Brian Enton, thank you so much.
[01:16:49] Unknown:
So how surprised are you by that? Shouldn't be by shouldn't be much. There there's there's an actual war against white people. That the previous administration well, actually, it's I think it started more under the Obama administration. Got a reprieve. Well, the first two Obama administrations, because I really think that Obama was the one behind the string behind the scenes in the Biden administration. But it started during the Obama administration, got kind of a reprieve a little bit during the first Trump administration, and came in with a vengeance in this in the second, third Obama administration, the o Biden administration, and continues on. And it's not just at the government levels, also at the at at at the social level.
You know, you see all these, all these videos of these, minority groups. I hate I hate using that because it's just it it's such a I don't like it. Never did. But you see all these, you know, these minority groups, you know, whether it's, black, Hispanic, whatever it might be, you know, just assaulting elderly white people. You see them I I saw a video today of of someone being thrown off a bus. I mean, physically, an older lady getting picked up by a young black male thrown off a bus because she was white. Or the, you know, the the you know, those sucker punches, you know, the you know, you see them whether you're not expecting it, you're just walking down the street and all of a sudden, you know, somebody passing, they just they just sucker punch you right in the face, knock you out, and then kick you, stomp on you, beat you, you know that's all this.
That's all of this. Well, Joe Biden's back in the, in in the in the public eye again. You know, he's, since since his cancer diagnosis and since the release of this book that has come out about, about his decline, you know, that, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson put out. I think it was May 20 or something like that. So here's, here here's Joe, speaking for the first time since his, since his diagnosis.
[01:19:50] Unknown:
Well, the prognosis is good. You know? We're working on everything. It's moving along.
[01:19:56] Unknown:
So I feel good. Have you decided on your treatment options?
[01:19:59] Unknown:
Yeah. We have. And and we're we're we're under underway, and everybody's all the folks are very optimistic.
[01:20:06] Unknown:
And so you've started treatment? Oh, yeah. Okay. What is can you would you be willing to share what exactly that entails?
[01:20:12] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm it's it's all a matter of taking a pill, one particular pill. And for the next six weeks, and then another one. The expectation is we're gonna be able to beat this. There's no it's not in any organ.
[01:20:25] Unknown:
It's, my bones are strong. I haven't penetrated, so I'm feeling good. Sir, why would you say everybody expect sorry. I've done it all because I'm loyal. I do it every damn year, from the very beginning. You'll never forget where I came from. That's why. I feel like everybody didn't know what to expect of you today. And then you get here and you're speaking powerfully. You look good. You're confident. What do you say to all those people? Don't don't count you out.
[01:20:49] Unknown:
Well, I said lots of luck in their senior year.
[01:20:54] Unknown:
Thanks, everybody. What is this what is this been like for your family? Obviously, this is also an emotional time. This is the ten year anniversary of your son, Beau's passing. You received this diagnosis just two weeks before that.
[01:21:06] Unknown:
Well, we're all optimistic about the diagnosis. Matter of fact, the leading one of the leading surgeons in the in the world is working with me, and, he had diagnosed the same exact thing thirty two years ago. He's alive and well, doing very well. So we're we're optimistic. We're optimistic.
[01:21:23] Unknown:
And there's also been a lot of, discussion recently about your mental mental and physical capabilities
[01:21:28] Unknown:
while you were in office. You can see that. I'm mentally incompetent, and I can't walk, and I can beat the hell out of both of them. Well, do you wanna reply to any of those,
[01:21:37] Unknown:
reports and also to the fact that there are some Democrats who are now questioning whether you should have run for reelection in the first place? Why didn't they run against me then?
[01:21:47] Unknown:
Because I'd have beaten them. Do you have any regrets? No. I don't have any regrets. Look, there's a
[01:21:53] Unknown:
we have a there's a lot going on, and, I think we're in a really difficult moment, not only in American history, but in world history. I think we're one of those inflection points in history where the decisions we make in the next, little bit are gonna determine what things look like in the next twenty years. I've been talking about that for a long time. And, I'm very proud. I put my record as president against any president at all. I noticed that 12 of the 10 lady presidential historians rated me, pretty good up in that list, and the guy I ran against, I rated him the last.
[01:22:31] Unknown:
So, we'll see. Sir, you had to Watch me. You have your grandson with you today. What's it mean to have your family
[01:22:41] Unknown:
son, Beau's son. And, Beau started coming here with me about the same age. And, so it's, you know, and he he wanted to be where his dad had been and what he's doing. He just graduated from high school. He's gone off to college in the fall, and, I'm really proud of him. And he's, he is the son of his father. So Do you have anything to say to the press secretary?
[01:23:07] Unknown:
Okay. We, heard for the first time there from former president Biden.
[01:23:13] Unknown:
Thank god, former president. Not even former former vice president. Well, you know what I mean. Well, I don't know about you. You hear that one reporter say, you know, he looked good, he looked like he was strong, he sounded strong, and and so on and so on. I don't necessarily see that, but, you know, politics aside, you of course, you wanna see him recover from from the cancer and, you know, I may not agree with him or like him, but you don't wanna see him, you know, with cancer or sick or anything like that. But, you know, I'm just curious though, it's like when he said, that that he could he would, how did he put it? He said he would he'd fight them.
You know, he said he I could beat the hell out of both of them. I was wondering, I who's what's he talking about? Is he talking about, Jake Tapper and, and Alex Thompson, or who's he talking about? He beat the hell out of both of them. He likes to fight, you know, fighting Joe Biden. You know, that's that's that's probably, you know, what you'd call him, but he he remember he he he challenged Donald Trump to, to, to to a fight, to a fist fight, and then he, he challenged somebody in in an audience at one of the campaign events, to to go out back to push ups or something like that. Reminds me of that character from Seinfeld.
I I don't I don't know if you remember. It was, oh, who what was? I can't remember it. Maybe I have on early onset. I don't know. But, you know, it it's Joe Biden, man. He he's this guy just won't go away. He won't go away. But, anyway, he's back in the news, and he had another event later on that he started shouting out again. I I didn't even bother pulling that clip out, and it was just not even worth it. But, here's here's something that's quite interesting too that I found, Canada. There's something about the left that is just constantly, the the the it the left is the party of death.
Alright? They fight for abortion. They they've you know, even late term abortion, they it's just everything about them is just, you know, death. And Canada is is is an extremely liberal country, and they have, they have a a a a system up there called Maid, m a I d, which is medical assistance in dying. Alright? So basically, it's it's doctor assisted suicide. So if you are a drain on society or if you are sick and you and you don't want to continue on, you know, being a drain on your on your family, I'm not I'm not saying that if if you're sick and you're you are draining if you shouldn't be and you should never feel like you are but, but liberal policies make you feel like that and make you think that way.
Well, up there in Canada, Rebel Health, reported Rebel News, I should say, reported this. Documents show that that Health Canada has been funding a university research project concerning youth views on euthanasia that included a brief discussion as to whether children with severe autism would be allowed to qualify for death under the nation's medical assistance in dying program. So Canada is considering euthanasia for autistic children. So I guess if you give them too many vaccines, then, you know, a lethal injection is is the answer to that. Right?
A draft reply from the, from Health Canada employee asked about euthanasia for autistic children said, your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with made legislation. The documents which were made public by Rebel News show that Health Canada has given some, $549,608. I wonder how much of that is American taxpayer money, towards a four year research project with Canada's Dalhousie University to study youth views on end of life care, palliative care, and MAID, medical assistance in dying. The internal documents come from a 02/2024 come from 02/2024 and concern email chains, which can be which, which which you can view that are regarding talking regarding talk of allowing MAID for minors.
One email exchange shows a health Canada official named Heather Davids, who was the indigenous end of care end of life care team asking two top level bureaucrats in Canada's MAID Unit named Ian Giles and Richard Martin, quote, how should the department respond to public correspondence about whether severe autism meets the eligibility criteria for MAID? And the response was, your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with MAID legislation. Now, of course, you know, the the draft reply that that we just read to you, you know, it doesn't endorse the practice of MAID for autistic children, but activists have, for a long time, been been pushing for the expansion of MADE, their euthanasia program, specifically for the practice to allow the killing of so called mature minors for those people that are suffering from mental illness.
The expansion for euthanasia, and and it actually is is supposed to be, become law in 02/1927. So, you know, it's it's two years away. The most recent data show that MAID is the sixth highest cause of death in Canada. Government assisted suicide, sixth highest cause of death in Canada. Canada reporting that, Health Canada reported in 02/2022 that thirteen thousand two hundred forty one Canadians died by made lethal injections. Folks, that's thirteen thousand people. And that number, figures out to four point one percent of all deaths in the country that year. Thirty one point two percent a thirty one point two percent increase from 02/2021, which was the first year that euthanasia was available to those, that were not terminally ill.
You know, liberalism is a is a disgusting thing. It is the it's it's just a culture of death. That's all it is. Death, destruction, chaos, confusion. That's why I really think that that that liberalism is is liberalism is on the way out, you know. I I don't I I there's there's a trend now, right now, where, you know, the the younger generation coming up right now is coming up more conservative than they are liberal, and I think that's a great thing, and I hope that it continues on and we have to foster that. Because conservatism gives is is the party of life, is the party of individual responsibility. It's not the the village responsibility to to to raise somebody or to grow somebody. It's your responsibility.
That was the whole point of of self government, by the way. You know, it wasn't it wasn't that, you know, yeah. In in some respects, yes. It was that it was, you know, we were gonna govern ourselves and we're gonna make laws that that were applicable for us and and what we wanted. But it was also when I say self government, they're talking about you controlling yourself. Because when you control yourself, you don't need the government to control you for you. And if you look at the left, and left can't control themselves. The left is a party of of pornography, abortion, euthanasia, sexual deviance. I I mean, you can go down the list.
But that's what it is, and that's what it is. Gotta pray for Canada. And and you know what? This nonsense with with Canada becoming the fifty first state, no. We don't want that. I don't want that. I don't wanna see that happen. You know, it it's fun it's it's funny to joke around with it. It's funny to to to throw it up as as like a little bit of a shit stir, you know, it that's that's one thing, but to really consider that and to do it, no. Why? Because because Canada is an extremely liberal country, and then what what would happen? Then you get, of course, you get two more liberal senators in in the senate, and, depending on population, how many extra seats in the house, which would probably mostly be liberal, it it would it it just wouldn't work.
You know, no matter what the media tells you, no matter what the left tells you, America is not really a liberal country. It's it's center right. So we don't wanna tip that. We wanna continue going right. We wanna continue going conservative. Let's see. Texas mandates digital ID to access App Store apps. Apple and Google are now the bouncers at the front door of the Internet checking IDs for every app downloaded. Texas has moved to the forefront of national campaign to regulate children's access to digital platforms by mandating that Apple and Google verify the ages of all users on their app stores.
Under a new law signed by governor Greg Abbott set to take effect 01/01/2026, those 18 will be required to obtain parental consent before downloading apps or making in app purchases. The measure has been pitched to, as a way to protect minors, but privacy advocates warn it could come at the expense of everyone's digital freedom. And that's not necessarily, you know, wrong either. Because, you know, now, in order for you to prove that you're 18 or over, you're gonna have to upload all of your information, like your driver's license, probably a state ID, something like that, that has all of your personal information on it. No. I'm I'm not against some kind of measures to protect minors from things like pornography and and and worse.
I don't know if there is worse, but I have I don't have a problem with that at all. But what I do have a problem with is companies like Apple and Google and all of these other, you know, tech agents, tech companies and such, having unfettered access to your personal information. So this is something I'm gonna keep an eye on. I'm gonna watch. I'm gonna, you know, study up more about it. But just throwing it out there so you guys know that this is what's coming down. Alright. And then, you know, our last our last little thing for tonight is, just something I saw that just made me scratch my head and, you know, I I did a show back in New York with with some friends back in 2016, '17, around there, and, you know, we had the, the idiot of the week.
And, this this one this one would qualify for that, you know, and, this one here is, let's see. A kindergartner brings booze infused jello shots for his classmates. The school has launched an investigation after a kindergartner brought booze infused jello shots and gave them out to their classmates. Classmates were were checked out by medical expert to make sure they were alright. So basically, this happened in Pennsylvania, and this, kindergart kindergartner was a student at, at a school in the Greater Johnstown School District, and, it's not clear how much alcohol the students ingested or whether the child child knew that they brought alcoholic drinks to school.
Not to be actually vocalized a question that a lot of people were asking, is yo mom and dad, where where are you at on this one? You know?
[01:36:36] Unknown:
I
[01:36:38] Unknown:
mean, where are the parents on this? How how did the parents let this happen? Who packed the lunch? Do you know you know what I mean? Like, when my kids were young, you know, their mom and I were very, very careful about, you know, sending them what what we sent them to school with. We were on top of that. I mean, how does that happen? How does how does mom or dad or both let them walk out of the house with that thing? I mean, who packs the lunch? Who packs the kids school bag? Especially in kindergarten. Especially in kindergarten.
You know, I I don't know, but this is idiots. Absolute idiots. But I digress. Alright, folks. Well, I think that's it for tonight. You know? Sorry again for all the issues we're we're having here. I'm gonna work on this over the weekend, see what the problem is. It might be the camera. I don't know. This is a new camera that we're playing with here. So ever since we hooked this thing up, it's been giving us problems all around. So, we might have to go back to the other one and we'll see what happens. But, I will you know, like I said, I'll work on it over the weekend and hopefully we'll get it all straightened out for Monday. But in the meantime, folks, I hope you guys have a great weekend. I really look forward to, being with you guys either Sunday or Monday. So shout outs to our executive producers, Wayne and Rosanna Rankin. Shout out to our producer, anonymous Angela. Thank you guys for everything that you do. Thank you all for paying for spending the week with us and for sticking with us through all the problems we've been having tonight.
Hey, listen. Don't forget. Check out the social medias and, you know, just have a great weekend. Enjoy it. Relax. Forget about the world for a couple of days. Alright? Alright, folks. Have a great night. Make Texas independent again. Go podcasting. Keep a steady stride, and we'll see you on Sunday or Monday. Alright, folks. Good night. Goodbye.
Introduction and Weekend Plans
Technical Issues and Housekeeping
Interview with Orlando Owen
The Autopen Scandal and Biden's Health
Executive Orders and Legal Challenges
Judicial Overreach and Tariff Wins
Biden's Health and Public Appearances
Canada's Euthanasia Program
Texas Digital ID Law
Kindergartner's Booze Incident
