In this episode, Joe addresses technical difficulties with the video feed, urging listeners to report any issues and promising to continue with audio streaming if necessary. The episode covers a range of topics, including the controversy surrounding the so-called "Signal Gate," where a reporter was mistakenly added to a government messaging group. Joe emphasizes that no classified information was shared, and the administration is investigating the mishap. He also previews upcoming guests, including Douglas Robbins and Dr. Emily Trunnell from PETA, and encourages listener engagement through the show's website and support page.
Joe also discusses recent developments in international politics, particularly Russia's growing leverage in Ukraine, as reported by US intelligence. He highlights the success of a recent military operation against Houthi terrorists, attributing it to President Trump's decisive actions. The episode touches on economic news, such as significant investments in the US under Trump's administration, and energy policies aimed at boosting American production. Joe criticizes the media's focus on sensational stories and underscores the importance of focusing on substantial achievements. The episode concludes with a call for support and a reminder of the show's commitment to delivering unfiltered political talk.
You can support Joe and the show by:
Sending a boost (or stream sats) with a modern podcast app
Making a donation on our website
Sharing this show with your family, friends and followers on your social media.
Using our affiliate link at https://thealexjonesstore.com/joe
Checking out our Merch Shop at https://www.stickermule.com/rooz
FOLLOW US ON RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/joerooz
and on YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/@JoeRussiello
To be a guest on the show, visit https://www.podmatch.com/member/joe
(00:01:41) Introduction and Technical Issues
(00:03:54) Upcoming Guests and Show Announcements
(00:05:04) Discussion on Animal Testing and PETA
(00:07:39) Support and Donations for the Show
(00:13:12) Russia-Ukraine Conflict Update
(00:15:09) Signal Gate Controversy
(00:34:46) Press Conference and Media Criticism
(00:46:00) Judge Boseberg and Legal Challenges
(00:57:00) Investment and Economic Growth
(01:10:44) Political Commentary and Censorship
(01:17:05) Energy Policies and Economic Impact
- Wayne Rankin
- Rosanna Rankin
[00:00:05]
Unknown:
This podcast is hosted on Podhome.fm, an intelligent podcasting platform that you can use to host unlimited shows and episodes and have unlimited downloads. Pod home comes with many intelligent features like Pod home AI, which automatically creates transcripts, chapters, suggests titles, show notes, detects people, and creates clips. You can use Pothome AI unlimited for all your episodes and all your shows. Go check it out and start your free seven day trial at pothome.fm.
[00:00:45] Unknown:
Tune in for a podcast where the conversation flows freely and where you can truly expect anything and everything. This is the podcast.
[00:01:09] Unknown:
Welcome to the podcast where every episode promises an unfiltered dive into the eclectic, the profound, and political correctness takes a back seat.
[00:01:36] Unknown:
Alright. Hey folks. This is Joe Rusciello and it is great to be with you once again. And we are broadcasting to you live tonight from the asylum studios, from the pimple on the backside of Texas. The beautiful city of Eagle Pass, and we're gonna do our very best to bring you the best quality political talk radio we could muster without all the bluster. This is the podcast. Alright. I'm telling you, I am loving the new intro. The new music, I think that's great. Love it. It is fantastic, as they say. But folks, it is great, again, another night to be here with you guys and, to just, you know, talk about stuff going on in the world around us.
And, I'm not sure what is the situation right now with the video. But, on my feed here, I'm showing a four zero four error saying the page is not available. So I'm not sure what's going on with that. So, I don't know. I don't know what we should do here at this point. So I think I'm just gonna close this thing out here, and, pretend that we're, we're not doing anything. What do you think? Think that might work? Think that might help? I don't know. Let me know. And if you are watching, and I hope you are, and you, if you if you're not seeing anything on the video feed, please let me know. Drop me a a message in the live chat. And, because if that's the case, if, if if you're having some Internet issues and you're not seeing any of this, then, let me know. I'm just gonna shut it off, and I'll just stream the live audio, which is fine.
Totally fine. But, lot of stuff to talk about tonight. Lot of stuff we wanna get into. Last night, we spent quite a bit of time talking about, what what the media is now calling signal gate. And, we're gonna get into that in just a few moments. But, you know, as always, first and foremost, you wanna get through some of the housekeeping stuff that we normally do. So, just wanted you head on over to our website, joeroos.com. That's joeroos.com. And, we can definitely put that up on the screen, for folks that might be confused. Joeroos.com.
Yep. There we go. Okay. So this is definitely, I think, a rumble issue because, my even even the, the studio is acting kinda weird. But, anyway, we'll we'll do the best we can, so just, hang with us, bear with us. Anyway, so we are here, and, what did I say? Oh, yeah. We're at the Joe Ruse. Joe Ruse dot com. Just head over to JoeRoos.com, open up the contact form, send over any questions, comments, cares, concerns you might have, any issues, any thoughts, any projections, anything that you wanted us to, take a look at and potentially address.
Any guests you might have in mind. Yeah. Would whatever it is. Now, also, before I forget, don't speaking of guests, tomorrow night, we have, Douglas Robbins, who's gonna be with us, on the show. We're starting early tomorrow. We're starting at 6PM central time. That's 7PM eastern time. So, make sure that you make that adjustment, and, hopefully, we'll get to see you there. Looking forward to talking to to, to Doug, and, we had a great chat last week. We're looking forward to, being able to talk to him again. But, but he'll be with us tomorrow night, so make sure that you are, tuning in early, 6PM central time, seven PM eastern.
Alright. So, and then, next week, we have, doctor Emily Trunnell from, the, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, PETA, is gonna be with us, and, we're interested in that conversation. It's gonna be, a good one. We're gonna be talking about all the testing that gets done on these, on these animals that we that we love so much, that the NIH spends billions and billions of your tax dollars, doing that if we even scratch the surface as to some of the horrible things that they do to these poor animals, you would, be quite quite disturbed. I've been doing some research on this. It is terrible.
But, again, I am not a I'm not a, a quote unquote bleeding heart liberal on these things, these political matters, but we have we all love our animals. We love our pets. And, I have my two beautiful little babies right here with me in the studio tonight. So, you know, you wanna make sure that you love them and take care of them. So looking forward to that conversation with, doctor Trunnell, and, hope you guys are too. Now, also don't forget to head over to our support page and click that support button. If you could help us out with a donation in any amount, we would appreciate that. Or you could donate three t's, your time, your talent, or your treasure. If you'd like to make a donation of your time, we would love that. Anything you could do to help us out in preparation for the show would be fantastic.
Maybe you can help us promote the show, write the show, put the show notes together, you know, whatever it whatever it takes to to get this thing going. Or, you know, perhaps, you know, your talent. Maybe you're great at working, audio files. Maybe you're great at video files and figuring out what's wrong with Internet stuff, why we are still, on a 404 here on my end at least. So, again, let me check the chat. Anybody? No? Nothing? Okay. Let's see. So, then you so your talent so you could help us out with all that kind of stuff, or if you'd like to donate your treasure, we would appreciate that immensely. We need that more than anything else, to be quite honest with you. We wanna make sure we're able to keep everything, flowing and going over here. So, how do you do that? Well, you could do a one time donation in any amount, and we would appreciate that, or you could, join up with one of our producer tiers. Now you could join up with the, the associate producer tier for $17.76 a month. We would appreciate that. And with that, you get the, you get the benefit of having your name shout out across all of the platforms that we're on. You get your name included in all of our show notes. You get your you get your name included in all the emails and stuff that we send out.
But that's for a $17.76 recurring monthly donation. And then we have $4.18 36 a month. As a monthly recurring donation, we have our producers club. So it's a little bit of a promotion. So it it that that'll work. And then we also have our executive producer for $25 a month or more. And with that, you get a little bit extra. You get the, of course, the shout outs. You get all that stuff. And then, on top of that, you also get the, opportunity to join us on the show, for a segment and, and and get your, get your opinion out there. So I think that's pretty cool, and I like the idea of that, and we're looking forward to it. So, just head over to our website, joeroos.com/support, and you can, get yourself all set up with that. And if you like to do cryptos, you also have our wallet up there. You could check that out as well.
And, you can donate your Satoshis. Now SATs are just micropayments of Bitcoin, and, you could just very easily just click that button and, and and set it up on, on our website. Really simple to do. And if using one of the modern podcast apps like Podcast Guru or Fountain.fm, True Fans F m, you could also very easily make your donation through there as well. Alright. Also, don't forget, if you're listening on the audio and you wanna check out the video stuff, just head over to, your app store, download the Rumble app. It is absolutely free to download. And, you could very easily, follow the show right there by looking for Joe Ruse. And then, of course, you have the, you can go to the website, jo, rumble.com/joeruse, and you can find us over there as well. I am really messing all this up over here because I am too busy, distracted by the fact that there's no video, at at least showing on my end, so I don't know if I'm actually speaking to anybody. And the fact that all of our numbers here are dropping very quickly makes me think that we are not.
So, we'll we'll continue. We'll continue on here. Let me shut that banner off because it's getting to be a distraction. Alright. Now, as usual, at this particular point, we wanna say our farewells to the folks on YouTube and on x and on Twitch, which we recently started to, broadcast on. So, so you guys, if you wanna continue to watch the show, just head on over to rumble.com/joeroos or download the app and find us on there as well. Alright. So, in, just, about two minutes here, about less than two minutes, we will say goodbye, and hopefully, we'll catch you on the other side on Rumble. So that's rumble.com/jaroos or download the app in your app store and follow us there. And don't forget to like, subscribe, and share it with your friends, your family, and your followers.
Alright, folks. We'll talk to you a little bit soon. Bye. Alright. So now that it's it's just us here on, on, on Rumble, I hope, anyway. We're gonna try to sign in here again and see what the deal is. See if anything pops up. It's, it's showing that we're live, but it's not showing any video. So I'm not sure what the problem here is tonight, folks. Don't know. Alright. And nobody's leaving any messages in the chat, so I don't know if you're seeing anything. Let me try let me try my my my phone here. Let's see if we're on there. I hate doing this stuff while we're on the air, and I can't There we go.
Alright. Let me try the app. Having all kinds of problems here tonight. I I do apologize, folks. But the, the show will go on. Just just give me a moment here. Yeah. Nothing showing. That's weird. Very strange. But, again, if you're not seeing this, please let me know. Drop me a message in the chat, and, I'll see what we can do on the other end of it. But I see myself, but not coming up on the other monitors. Alright. Well, let's, let's get down to it. We do have some we do have some things to talk about. We have some, we have some news here that we wanna we wanna get over and get through. So, Russia winning in Ukraine, continually gain continually gaining leverage, says The US intel community.
Currently, Moscow has seized the upper hand in the war over the past year, and the fresh assessment warns the fresh assessment warns and is on a path to accrue greater leverage as peace talks with Washington are underway. Even though Russian president Vladimir Putin will be unable to achieve the total victory he envisioned when initiating a large scale invasion in February 2022, Russia retains momentum as a grinding war of attrition plays to Russia's military advantages. Alright. So, what I'm looking at here right now is I'm looking at an article, that was published up on, on Infowars, from Zero Hedge that, that basically says, the US government and its 2025 annual threat assessment of the US intelligence community, which was just released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in conjunction with top officials, at Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday, has admitted that Ukraine's battlefield prospects are fading amid the onslaught of superior Russian forces. Currently, Moscow has seized the upper hand in the war over the past year. The fresh assessment warns and is on a path to accrue greater leverage as peace talks with Washington are underway.
Now, let's see. This should come as no surprise to any objective observer. However, what is surprising is the huge amount of Russian losses estimated by US intelligence. While there is no way of verifying such information, the report claims that there are over seven hundred and fifty thousand dead and wounded on the Russian side. Alright. So, this this was a a report that went out on Tuesday, and, that's also when the Democrats decided they were going to take advantage of the moment. And, what did I do? The Russians were gonna take the the Democrats were gonna take advantage of the moment and, kinda kinda jump on this, signal gate that we were talking about yesterday.
Now, folks, this is moving very, very quickly. Alright? It's a lot of lot of things took place today, a lot of discussion, a lot of more questions, hearings opening up on the Hill about this particular, situation. Now, let me see. Where do I start with this? Good grief. I am completely thrown out of whack with all this. So, yesterday, now if you remember correctly, yesterday we talked about it at at length. The majority of the show actually we talked about it. The backstory is this, so, the federal government allows the use of an app called Signal, which is a, an encrypted app that is used, across all of the federal government, computers and and cell phones and and, electronic devices. It was approved for use under the Biden administration.
It is one of the most encrypted, one of the safer, apps to use for these, for for for the government. Alright. Now there was a planned strike against the Houthis that was going to take place, and, there was a group of 19, intelligence officials that were included in this group chat that was apparently set up by Mark Ratcliffe. Included in that was a man by the name of, Jonathan Goldberg. Now, Goldberg is the editor in chief. I'm sorry. I said Jonathan is Jeffrey. Jeffrey Goldberg. So Jeffrey Goldberg was inadvertently included in the group, apparently.
Alright. Now, it is under investigation. They're still trying to find out what happened. But again, mister Waltz has taken the responsibility for it as he has said today that he is the one who actually set up the group. So, so it evidently, it just all falls on him at this particular point. However, there are a lot of questions about this. Why exactly did, Jeffrey Goldberg get included to it? How did that happen? Walt has said repeatedly that he doesn't know the gentleman. He hasn't spoken to him, and I use the word gentleman lightly because this guy is a piece of crap. Goldberg is is the one who stoked the Russia Russia Russia, scenario back in 02/2016.
He's also the one who, who, under the the, Bush administration, let or or fed information through the vice president at the time, Dick Cheney, about weapons of mass destruction, and he actually pushed this narrative about weapons of mass destruction, which, of course, led us getting into the Gulf War. And, this guy is just he he's also the one in, in 2020 that, that claimed that, president Trump made comments about, the fallen soldiers at the cemetery up in in France, say calling them, suckers and losers, which, of course, was ridiculous and not even and and very, very quickly debunked.
So this is that guy. Alright. He has been wrong on everything. But here he is, now, and and somehow, someway he gets included in this group chat. And, of course, you know, he, he tried to he tried to play the the part of, I'm sorry about that background noise. It I'm not sure why that's coming through, but just having a really rough night here at the show, folks. I mean, this is really terrible. Oh my gosh. Nights like this, I just wanna just throw everything out the window, you know, but we're not gonna do that. So, so Goldberg gets into this group and, originally, he wasn't going to publish any of the information that came that that he came across.
Now, honestly, if you were included in the group like this and you realize that you weren't supposed to be there, wouldn't you have said something? I I I would have. At least I I think I would. And you would hope that that, that that that's journalistic integrity would would allow that to take place in in in this guy Goldberg, but, of course, he has no integrity because he's a he's a hack. So the narrative kinda quickly changed. The Hill said yesterday, Gabbard Ratcliffe content signal chat did not include classified information. He's saying that it was classified information, that it was, it was war plans that, were being discussed in this group chat.
And, very very quickly those that that story has changed. Alright. The The Atlantic published an article about this and I'm all over the place because my notes are out of whack. Everything's out of whack. This is not a good night. So, the the Atlantic has this article up. It says, here are the attack plans that Trump's advisers shared on signal. Alright? Now let me pull let me pull some of this up here. Again, one man show, so you're gonna have to bear with me on this. Alright. So the signal chat. Now, this is this is from the Atlantic article published by, Jeffrey Goldberg and, cowritten by, Shane Harris.
Alright. Now you would think that, the original position that he had was he wasn't gonna publish his stuff because he could get in trouble for it because it was highly it was classified information. And then very quickly, the the the whole story changes. And now, today, he published the chat. Okay. So about that signal chat, on Monday shortly after we published a story about a massive Trump administration security breach, a reporter at that asked the secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, why he shared plans about a forthcoming attack on Yemen on the signal messaging app, And he answered, nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about it. Donald Trump, of course, said the same thing. It wasn't classified information.
And, according to The Atlantic, these statements present us with a dilemma. The initial story about the signal shot, the Houthi PC Small Group as it was named by Waltz, was, we withheld specific information related to the weapons, the timing of the attacks that we found in certain texts. As a general rule, we don't publicize or or publish information about military operations, and that information could possibly jeopardize the lives of US personnel. That's why we chose to characterize the nature of the information being shared, not specific details of the attack. The statements by Hegseth, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, and Trump, combined with the assertions made by numerous administration officials that that we are lying about the content of the civil text have led us to believe that people should see the text in order to reach their own conclusions, which is great. We should reach our own conclusions. We should see these things. Alright. So that's fantastic. And then and then they went ahead and they, published published this. And I'm going to, I'm gonna show you that here in just a second. We're gonna do a, a screen share.
Okay. So here are the here are the attack plans. Alright. Now I wish I could see this myself because I can't. So, Hegseth here, this is the these are the texts. Actually, let me go here. Okay. So here's the group. Alright. The Houthi PC small group, 19 members. Michael Waltz added you to the group. Alright. So, team establishing a prince a principals group for coordination on Houthis, particularly over the next seventy two hours. My deputy, Alex Wong, is pulling together a Tiger team at deputies and so on. And this is everybody checking in.
And then, we're gonna just kinda scroll down through here, and I'm gonna show you what the, the contention is. I like what, I like what, our vice president has to say, just hate bailing Europe out again. Okay. So now here here's the information. Time the time now, weather is confirmed favorable, just confirmed with CENTCOM. We are go for mission launch. Twelve fifteen, f eighteen's launch, first strike package, Tiger based f 18, so on and so forth. You can see these here for yourself. Okay? Now on an app like Signal, which is very similar to, like, which is very similar to a, like, WhatsApp or a Telegram or anything like that, you know, you can adjust and change certain information. So it goes by phone number.
Now, what I found interesting, and I don't think anybody else has pointed it out yet, If you scroll down here, where it says where it shows you the 19 members. Right? It says right there. JG. That's the person that's screenshotting this. Michael Waltz, Scott B. There's two Susie Wiles. Unless that's a page break, but I think that's two Susie Wiles. How come nobody caught this? Now, I was listening to another show, earlier, Joe Paggs, and he brought up a good point that, you know, in order in order to have your name and your initials put up here in the in in in the chat like this, you have to be in that person's phone in their contacts. Now unless Michael Walt is lying about his relationship with Jeffrey Goldberg, Or when he said that he was the one who initiated the group, I mean, did he appoint somebody to do it? Or did he actually physically put the group together?
Well, that's what they're looking at right now. But now, here's the other interesting thing. Everybody's pointing fingers at Pete Hegseth. Now, you know that they've had it out for Pete Hegseth since his name was first put forward for, for, the Secretary of Defense. So they're they're they're were they're looking for his head basically. Since before he even set foot into the office. From the day he was mentioned until today. They have been looking for something to get Pete Hegseth out. So right now, all the focus is on Pete Hegseth. But the big question here is, at least I think so anyway, is how come nobody's asking any questions about Jeffrey Goldberg?
Why would he why would you go from saying, I'm not gonna publicize this information to publish to publishing the information that quick. Especially if you know that it's not especially if well, if you're making the if you're making the assertion that that this stuff is classified information, why would you then turn around and then publish it? Knowing that you can get in all kinds of troubles because you know that it's not classified information. Every member in that group that was questioned about this said the same thing, this is not classified information. And there's nothing in here that would even indicate that it's class there there's nothing specific.
There are no there's no specific information being provided. There are no names. There's no specific locations. There's no, nothing that would specifically identify troop movements, specific locations. None of that. And this is an app that is allowed to be used by the federal government. It is installed by federal government IT department on all of their devices. Why is nobody questioning Jeffrey Goldberg about how he got into the group? Why is everybody pointing fingers at Hegseth and and Mike Waltz? Now, of course, Michael Waltz, he he is he's in charge, and he said that he took that he took ownership of this as he said that he he created the group. But was he the one who actually put somebody in the group that wasn't supposed to be there? Or could it be that there's the person that was maybe delegated to putting this group together, added that particular person, Jeffrey Goldberg, to that group specifically to hurt the administration.
But see, folks, this is absolutely nothing. This is this is a big what are the words they use? They they call it a nothing burger. This is nothing. There really is no issue with this. None of this information was classified. This was this was an app that's used, that's authorized to be used by the government. They're allowed to use it. There and it's there for these types of communications. This wasn't even really a a war plan. This wasn't even an an attack plan as as the Atlantic changed it to. This this was this was just the leadership of the intelligence community sharing information. That's really all it was.
There's nothing in there that's damning. There's nothing in there that's that's that's, classified or I mean, sensitive. Yeah. Maybe sensitive, but that's really all there is to it. Now, earlier today, Caroline Levitt, they had the, the usual press conference at the White House, and, she addressed this. This is, Caroline Levitt, two minutes fifteen second clip. Let's go.
[00:30:52] Unknown:
Unfortunately, all of this good is happening for our country. This administration is working hard on behalf of the American public every day, but the mainstream media continues to be focused on a sensationalized story from the failing Atlantic magazine that is falling apart by the hour. Here are the facts. The National Security Advisor has taken responsibility for this matter. And the National Security Council immediately said, alongside the White House counsel's office, that they are looking into how a reporter's number was inadvertently added to this messaging thread. We have said all along that no classified material was sent on this messaging thread. There were no locations, no sources, or methods revealed, and there were certainly no war plans discussed.
The Atlantic has even admitted this themselves. Their release of these internal messages validates the truth, which we have been saying all along. If this story proves anything, it proves that Democrats and their propagandists in the mainstream media know how to fabricate, orchestrate, and disseminate a misinformation campaign quite well. And there's arguably no one in the media who loves manufacturing and pushing hoaxes more than Jeffrey Goldberg. Goldberg is an anti Trump hater. He is a registered Democrat. Goldberg's wife is also a registered Democrat and a big Democrat donor who used to work under who? Hillary Clinton.
This is the same Jeffrey Goldberg who infamously lied about weapons of mass destruction to get us into the Iraq war, which cost trillions of dollars and thousands of American soldiers? And how else has Goldberg discredited himself by absurdly claiming that president Trump was Vladimir Putin during the 2016 campaign by peddling the Russia Russia Russia hoax that tried to hijack president Trump's first term, by inventing the suckers and losers hoax to help Joe Biden in the twenty twenty election, by peddling a hoax about president Trump involving gold star families to help Kamala Harris in the twenty twenty fourth election, which our campaign at the time vigorously denied. Jeffrey Goldberg didn't care.
There's more, but we don't have all day, and we can now add this signal hoax to this very long list.
[00:33:15] Unknown:
You see what I'm saying? I mean, the the the press conference was was, like, twenty five minutes long, so we're not gonna play that that whole thing. But this is, you know, this is the mainstream media that continues to be focused on taking down this administration in any way they can. And again, and like and like we said, and like I said earlier, they eat The Atlantic even admitted that this information wasn't classified information. Sensitive, yes. I agree with that. Sensitive, yes. But they even validate what the what what Tulsi Gabbard has been saying, what Mike Waltz has been saying, and Pete Hexyth have been saying, that this is nonce not classified information.
She went on to say, in, in clip two. Let's play that.
[00:34:17] Unknown:
The real story here is the overwhelming success of president Trump's decisive military action against Houthi terrorists. On March 15, President Trump ordered a series of military operations against the terrorist Houthis to defend US shipping assets in the Red Sea, restore freedom of navigation for international shipping, and defend The United States from enemy threats. United States forces successfully struck dozens of targets across Houthi controlled territory. And as a result of these actions, several Houthi leaders were killed, including the Houthi drone chief, his deputy, and several of their drone experts and other key leaders. We also destroyed command and controlled facilities, weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapon storage locations.
And it's important to remember why this powerful action took place in the first place. Because of Joe Biden's incompetence and pathetic weakness on the world stage for years, the Houthi terrorists grew emboldened. Immediately after taking office in 2021, Joe Biden removed the Iran backed Houthis from the foreign terrorist organization and specifically designated global terrorist list. Did anybody in this room ask the Biden administration at the time why they made such a stupid mistake. This reckless action undid the designation put in place by president Trump during his first term, and what followed was predictable and devastating.
The Houthis targeted US military ships and aircraft, hit commercial ships, including US flagged vessels, threatened our personnel overseas, and attacked our allies in the region. This resulted in more than a year of US flagged commercial ships being prevented from safely sailing through the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, and the Gulf Of Aden. This had a massive negative impact on global trade of the economic security of The United States. Joe Binder Biden was the commander in chief, and he sat on his hands while The United States Of America was bullied and embarrassed by terrorists. President Trump and his team are putting a stop to these threats in restoring American strength around the world.
The Trump peace through strength approach means no terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the waterways of the world.
[00:36:44] Unknown:
Alright. I think we froze. There we go. Alright. So there you have that. Alright. And then she went on, to take some questions.
[00:36:54] Unknown:
The president's, view on all of this remains the same today as it did yesterday. And I think it speaks volumes about the leadership of this president that he went directly to all of you, members of the press corps. He was asked, do you want someone else to go out and do a briefing? And he said, no. I will tackle this story. I will discuss it. The people need to hear from me about this situation, and so his thoughts on this remained the same today. He has, it it placed great trust in his national security team. And as for the usage of signal, as the president said yesterday, as the CIA director has testified under oath, this is an approved app. It's an encrypted app. The Department of Defense, the Department of State, the CIA has it loaded onto government phones because it is the most secure and efficient way to communicate. As for, again, the original situation in this messaging thread, the National Security Council, the White House counsel's office continues to look in to how this mistake, which the National Security Advisor has owned occurred, and the president has ensured they are doing that.
[00:37:54] Unknown:
And that's important. That's important to understand that that that Mike Walz took ownership of this. He's the one who set up the group, and he is the one, that that took responsibility for it, and it is being investigated. It is being looked at. And I'm curious. I would like to know how Jeffrey Goldberg got included in that group. A a person who's known to be, adversarial to the Trump administration. Alright? Let's, let's go to, clip four. Clip four. Alright. We seem to be having problems with, with, with Rumble. Alright. So clip four was, that there there was no classified information that was discussed, and the Secretary of Defense, the CIA director, and the national national, intelligence director, and, the director of the FBI all testified under oath. She also went on to say that, that it's important, that the American public outcry got information
[00:39:09] Unknown:
transmitted. There were no more plans discussed. Why did the Atlantic downgrade their allegation about war plans to attack plans? They're now playing word games because they know this was sensational spin from a reporter who is well known for doing this. We have said all along no war plans were discussed. No classified, material was sent. You have the secretary of defense saying that. You have the director of the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the FBI director, all testifying to that under oath, and they should be trusted with that.
[00:39:40] Unknown:
Americans can make the decision for themselves. So whether it's the you you said it's you said it's not war plans. Would you characterize these as military
[00:39:49] Unknown:
plans, military operation plans? I would characterize this messaging thread as a policy discussion, a sensitive policy discussion surely amongst high level cabinet officials and senior staff. And I'm so glad, Peter, that you said the American public can decide for themselves because I think the American public should decide them for themselves based on the outcome of this operation. And what happened in this operation, terrorists that were allowed to run wild by the Biden administration were killed because of the direction and the determination of this president and his team. And this message also shows this messaging thread also proved, that president Trump has an incredibly dynamic team who is working incredibly hard flying all over the world to secure world peace and to fix up the foreign policy crises that the previous administration left for this team to inherit. Spot
[00:40:40] Unknown:
on. Absolutely spot on. Perfect. Perfect response. Absolutely perfect response. The previous administration started that's the whole thing. They they don't wanna focus on what what president Trump's foreign policy is is, is is accomplishing. They wanna they wanna focus on this on this really non issue. And it's I again, I say I say it's a non issue because as you've heard repeatedly over and over and over again, there was no classified information contained in that text. You saw it yourself. I just showed it to you. She went on to say this.
[00:41:31] Unknown:
Safe. Again, first of all, Signal has been an approved app for government use. It's an encrypted app. And as I said, it's the most, safe and efficient way of communicating, especially when people can't be in a skiff or inside a room physically together. I think as the president said yesterday, he wishes that everybody could be in the room, and it's our goal to ensure that, everybody can be. But, again, no classified information was discussed in this chat, and anytime classified information is discussed amongst high level officials across this administration, secure, lines of communication are used.
[00:42:06] Unknown:
Right. And and then, JD Vance took to Twitter and, he posted this right here. It's very clear that Goldberg oversold what he had, but one thing in particular really stands out. Remember, when he was attacking Ratcliffe for blowing the cover for a CIA agent, turns out Ratcliffe was simply naming his chief of staff. And then here, as you could see, they changed it from, war plans to attack plans. The Atlantic has already abandoned their bullshit war plan narrative and releasing the full chat. They concede that they lied to perpetuate yet another hoax on the American people, as posted by, Taylor Budowicz.
And you can see some of the responses. Goldberg is trash. Democrats manufacture crises to install hate and fear in their voters. Jeffrey Goldberg has made it clear, made made a career out of being a liar and a gas lighter. He lost all credibility. Nobody should give him any benefit of the doubt, and so on and so forth. Then, Pete Hegseth checked in. Now I'm gonna apologize for the audio if it even plays. I'm gonna apologize for the audio now because, he's standing on a tarmac, and, again, it's a lot of plane noise behind him. But, it's two clips, for about two minutes total, but this is what, what the the secretary of defense had to say.
[00:43:34] Unknown:
Nobody's texting war plans. I noticed this morning, out came something that doesn't look like war plans.
[00:43:42] Unknown:
And as a matter of fact, they even changed the title to attack plans
[00:43:46] Unknown:
because they know it's not war plans. There's no units, no locations, no routes, no flight paths, no sources, no methods, no classified information. You know who sees war plans? I see them every single day. I looked at them this morning. I looked at attack plans this morning. You know who does attack plans and war plans? Men like that admiral right there, Paparo, for the Indo Pacific, or Eric Kurilla, our general in CENTCOM. They do attack plans and war top of that, everybody's seen it now, team update is to provide updates in real time. General updates in real time, keep everybody informed. That's what I did.
That's my job. The war fighters will take the fight to the enemy, and I love what they do. And with president Trump's leadership, our enemies are on notice. We will have peace through strength, and we'll keep putting our troops first. We also have seen it on full display in what's been done to the Houthi terrorists, and what they're trying to do, close freedom of navigation. You see, under the Biden administration, we let our troops and our ships in
[00:45:07] Unknown:
both warships and commercial ships get shot at to no consequence.
[00:45:11] Unknown:
What does that look like? That looks like weakness. And what president Trump has said is peace through strength is back. We will reestablish deterrence. That's not acceptable. And our ongoing campaign against the Houthis has been devastatingly effective.
[00:45:32] Unknown:
Alright. So but if if, of course and it was very well said by the by the secretary of defense, by by Pete Hegseth. And I'm gonna tell you right now, they they are trying to get him out. That for whatever reason that they have against Pete Hegseth, this is the whole thing. They're trying to get him out. And, honestly, guys, I think I think that there's something much more, that there's something deeper here. Because, you'll never guess. Because of course this is gonna go to trial. Right? They're gonna have some kind of an investigation. It's gonna go before a court. And and who do you think was appointed the judge in this particular matter?
If you said Judge Boseberg, you would be correct. Judge Boseberg, the same judge who is, who put a restraining order against the administration for deporting, the, TDA and the MS thirteen, gang members, was assigned the case. Gee. I wonder how that happened. What a stroke of luck that was. Right? The more I look at this, the more I think about it, the more I kinda kick this thing around in my brain, this just stinks. It really does. It it really does. Well, earlier today, John Ratcliffe, and Tulsi Gabbard were, up before the hill, on the hill, talking to, Congress about, this particular situation.
And, here is, here is the, director of the Central Intelligence Agency Agency, John Ratcliffe.
[00:47:34] Unknown:
You know, there's so much talk about an article and about, things that were said and that could have happened instead of a focus on what did happen. So my responsibility as CIA director, one of its responsibilities is to kill terrorists. And that's exactly what I did along with president Trump's excellent national national security team. That's what we should be focused on. With regard to that article, I also would appreciate the opportunity, to relay the fact that yesterday, I spent four hours answering questions from senators as a result of that article that were intimating that I transmitted classified information because there were hidden messages.
Those messages were revealed today and revealed that I did not transmit classified information and that the reporter who I don't know, I think intentionally intended it to indicate that. That reporter also indicated, that I had released the name of an undercover CIA operative in that signal check. In fact, I had released the name of my chief of staff who is not operating undercover. That was deliberately false and misleading, and, I appreciate the opportunity to reflect that my answers haven't changed. I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information. It was permissible to do so. I didn't transfer any classified information.
And and at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success, is what everyone should be focused on here because that's what did happen, not what possibly could have happened.
[00:49:15] Unknown:
And then, let's see. Tulsi Gabbard also at the same hearing. And, this is great. This is this is great. I didn't I didn't edit this in any way. This this is how I found the clip, but I wanted to bring it to you because it is perfect. This is how you do it. This is how you answer those questions. This is this is how you do it.
[00:49:39] Unknown:
Were there any names in the signal chat? No. Any targets? No. Any locations? No. Was there a unit name or a location of that unit? There was not. Were there any routes described in the signal chat? No. Wouldn't an operational plan contain that type of information? Every operational plan I've ever seen has contained that information. Thank you. Shifting to the real threats to America, the Southern border.
[00:50:12] Unknown:
I didn't do that. That that was how I found the clip. Okay? And I'll be honest with you too, when I when I found the clip, I wasn't expecting that. So it kinda it kinda jumped out at me and and like spooked me out really quick. You know, I'll be honest with you. But, but again, just to reiterate, no specific information was given in those messages. And again, we showed them to you, they were there, the information that was there was what was shown, there there was nothing specific, this is nothing. The bigger question is is why was Jeffrey Goldberg in that group?
Why has nobody been questioning him? Why is nobody coming down on the Atlantic? Why? Why not? Everyone's throwing questions at at at, the, the intelligence department heads. Communicating in a chat group on an app that is authorized to be used. No classified information was was in there. Nothing that would violate any of the, of of the classification rules. Nothing. Let me pull this up here. Pete Pete Hegseth again on, on on Twitter or x rather. So let me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so called war plans, and those plans include no names, no targets, no locations, no units, no routes, no sources, no methods, and no classified information. Those are some really shitty war plans.
The only the this only proves one thing. Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an attack plan as he now calls it, not even close. As I type this, my team and I are traveling the Indo Pacom region, meeting with commanders, the guys who make real war plans and talking to troops. We'll continue to do our job while the media does what it does best, pedal hoaxes. Gabbard. Just, director Gabbard. I'm Sorry. I meant to share that. Here we go.
[00:53:03] Unknown:
Nation. And and at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success, is what everyone should be focused on here.
[00:53:15] Unknown:
Exactly. That's the point. That's where the focus should be. The they don't wanna focus on that. They wanna take this little itty bitty mess up, this little screw up and ex and try to blow this thing up. Now, I and I I agree with the fact of, you know, you you don't wanna give them any ammunition. You don't wanna give the left. You don't wanna give the media any ammunition against you. But, you know, it's gonna happen from time to time. The thing is about this, they got in front of it, they took care of it, it's being investigated, they took ownership of it, and it's not something that's gonna happen again. Could it have been worse? Sure. Absolutely could have been worse, but it wasn't.
The result of that text group message is what their is what they really should be talking about, the success of this military operation. Because that's what did happen, not what possibly could have happened. Thank you, director Ratcliffe. Okay. Sorry. I'm having a little I don't know what is going on tonight with with, with Rumble here. That was a very, very short short clip. Anyway. So, as you see, this is a big nothing. And to be quite honest with you, I really don't wanna even talk about it anymore. You know, I'm sure it's gonna be creeping itself around as more information comes out, and as as things develop, and, you know, other information comes about. But the reality of it is, as, the the the mission the overall mission was a success.
The administration took ownership of this, and and they're taking the necessary steps to ensure that it doesn't happen again. And, you know, it's just move on. Let's move on. It's time to it's time to move on. We have to keep redirecting it right back to the main issue that the the the overall operation was a success, and, the the the Houthi leadership and military had has suffered ex had suffered losses, and, we're moving on. Correcting the the mistakes, correcting all of the the the poor judgment of the previous administration. And as I said earlier, let's take a look at this.
Let's talk about the judge. Now it's gonna be presiding over the signal chat lawsuit. The judge who's trying to prevent the deportation of foreign terrorists is going to preside over the recent lawsuit over the signal chat used by government officials. James Bober Boseberg, who thinks he's the head of the Department of Homeland Security and overseer of all federal immigration policy will handle the case. It's a terrible joke and another headache for the Trump administration. So there's all the information right there. Jeff Carlson, at some point, we're gonna discover that the true organization of all this was to prevent the the Trump administration from using signal because the intelligence community can't monitor their communications.
I don't think that's necessarily true. I mean, they they they're the ones who actually installed the informate the the software on the computer, so I'm sure they have ways to, to get to the information there. But that's what I said before. Judge Boseberg. Alright. What else we got here?
[00:57:13] Unknown:
Yep.
[00:57:16] Unknown:
We already talk we already covered that, so we can get rid of that one. Let's go on to some some other news. Which what do you say? Close that. Close that. Just got a couple more things, and then we're gonna we're gonna wrap it up for tonight. So, the president has been talking a lot about investments of late, and, some very interesting, developments have have come about. Investment commitments in The US have, approached near, near $3,000,000,000,000 since the president, was inaugurated, since Trump took office. From investing.com, the list of companies and countries investing in The US as part of president Donald Trump's push to restore manufacturing continues to grow. On Monday, the Trump administration added Hyundai, to the list with the conglomerate planning to announce a $20,000,000,000 US investment. The South Korean company's reported plan includes the construction of a $5,000,000,000 steel plant in Louisiana.
The onshoring operation from Hyundai is expected to create 1,500 jobs. And, you know, that's actually about, you know, the 3,000,000,000,000 is about 10 of The US GDP. Think about that. So, here's a list of companies and countries investing in The US based on the size of their commitments. The UAE, One Point One Point Four Trillion. Saudi Arabia, Six Hundred Billion. Apple, Five Hundred Billion. Nvidia, A Hundred Billion. And so on, hundred billion, hundred billion, 50 5 billion. 20 7 20 20. One and one. This is great news. This is this is rebuilding the economy, and I and I see what he's doing.
You know, he's trying to make America a manufacturing hub again, like we used to be. It used to be that America made the best products that you can get, lasted a lifetime, but then then then there was that big shift away, and we became more of a a consuming, a consumer society as opposed to a manufacturing society. And, and that's what he's doing. He's bringing it all back. He's bringing all of that back to The United States, and that's it's brilliant. You get this, plus you get the tariff situation. Oh, look. Look. I love the idea of tariffs, and I I think that reciprocal tariffs that, as as what he's he's imposing on these other countries, are are great. It's a great idea. Why not?
Let them pay. And and what is it doing? The result of that is is that companies that are overseas that don't wanna pay the tariffs are now moving their businesses here to The United States. They're manufacturing here to The to to The States. So that's huge. And they're doing that to avoid paying the tariffs, which just increases our ability to manufacture and and will enable The United States to become competitive again in manufacturing. And I think it's great. It's brilliant. They're protecting and bringing back American auto jobs, Hyundai, Stellantis, Volkswagen, Honda, Nissan, Rolls Royce, all bringing all bringing back to The United States.
And again, they're doing it to avoid the tariffs. Fine. That's great. But they're bringing business here, they're bringing jobs here, they're bringing investment here, they're bringing money back to The United States. That's what we want. Let's see what else. Alright. Let's go back to Judge Boseberg for a second. I I I'm sorry I have my tabs out of sequence. But, let's go back to Judge Boseberg for a second here, because, the populist the populist times, has this piece of activist judge Boseberg allows trend diagua gang members to challenge alien enemies act deportations. Liberal judge James Boseberg has ruled that illegal immigrants belonging to
[01:01:44] Unknown:
Let's put that
[01:01:45] Unknown:
up. Liberal judge James Boseberg has ruled that illegal immigrants belonging to the violent Venezuelan trendy Aragua gang can challenge their deportation under the seventeen ninety eight Alien Enemies Act. Trump administration had requested the activist judge to vacate his restraining order that barred the removal of Venezuelan gangbangers under the wartime security law. Legal challenge stemmed from deportation of 261 illegal aliens, including, TDA gang members to El Salvador. The law allows the president to summarily remove natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of a hostile nation or government during a declared war or when the adversary has perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of The United States or during an invasion of a or predatory incursion.
Now, Trump has repeatedly described the flocking of the of unvetted, undocumented foreign nationals, some with terrorist and gang ties, as an invasion justifying the invocation of the national security measure. Trump administration has already declared Mexican cartels that are responsible for trafficking immigrants across the border as terrorist groups. Although although judge Boseberg did not challenge the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, he ruled that the violent Venezuela those Venezuelan illegal immigrants had grounds to challenge the national security law individually. Well, this is, Stephen Miller had this to stay on Twitter. He said flagrantly unconstitutional.
Kyle Becker posted, Judge Bozberg thinks he's thinks he's the actual president of The United States. Unelected judges do not get a veto over national security matters. This is unconstitutional. And then, and then, congressman Brandon Gill on, on Fox Business had this to say.
[01:03:24] Unknown:
Judge Bozberg's ruling was unconstitutional and lawless. He is usurping the power of the president, acting as commander in chief, to conduct our foreign policy and to repel an invasion. These are powers that are nonjusticable, meaning powers that are not subject to judicial review. The court has no jurisdiction. This is a lawless ruling, and we're not going to allow, activist judges to usurp the president's power and abuse their authority. So I filed articles of impeachment last week, and I'm I'm pushing forward, hard on them.
[01:03:59] Unknown:
And that's the right thing to do. Even though, the chief justice of the Supreme Court has come out and said, oh, no. You you need to go through the appellate process. That's that's the best way to do it. And he's just protecting his partners. That's all. Pam Bondi notified judge Boseberg in a court filing that that he will get no more information on the removal of terrorists in The United States. So this is invoking the state secrets rule. And then, of course, you have all of these, the these these nut jobs, these, like, Patricia Millet.
[01:04:34] Unknown:
There were no procedures in place to notify people. Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemy Act than has happened here. If the government says there's we don't have to give process for that, then y'all could have put me up on Saturday and throw me on a plane. Thinking I'm a I'm a member of Trendaragua and given me no chance to protest it. If your argument is he didn't have to do that, it's an intrusion on the president's war powers, the courts are paralyzed to do anything, then that's a misreading of precedent. It's a misreading of the text of the Alien Enemies Act.
And that can't be an unlawful intrusion on the president's powers. We just can't. The president has has to comply with the constitution and laws like everybody else.
[01:05:31] Unknown:
And that's exactly what he's doing. He is he's in he's using the article two powers that that he has. And then on the twenty fourth, congressman Jim Jordan announced the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing to grill Judge Boseberg, next week,
[01:05:49] Unknown:
over his activist injunctions. Frankly, there's the broader issue of all these judges' injunctions and then decisions like Judge Boseberg, what he's what he's trying to do and how that case is working. We're gonna have hearings on all of that because particularly when you look at judge Boseberg, it starts to look like this is getting totally political from this guy, particularly when you remember he's also the judge who was part of the whole Trump Russia FISA court granting those warrants that allowed the Comey FBI to spy on president Trump's campaign.
[01:06:20] Unknown:
So we're gonna look at that issue as well. But, hopefully, we can get that bill passed next week on the house floor, move it to the senate, hopefully get it to the president's desk. What do you think you're what do you think you're gonna find here? It seems to me like it's pretty black and white. You know, you go, you find the judge that's gonna rule in your favor, and it's been going on for twenty plus years.
[01:06:39] Unknown:
Yeah. That's why we wanna limit it to just that jurisdiction, just the parties of the case so it doesn't have nationwide implications. But, yeah, there's the way the left operates. They go to these judges and they go after president Trump, as the speaker indicated, disproportionately more there than elsewhere. But with judge Boseberg, think about this. I mean, I think the president with his order on these gang members sending him back or sending him to El Salvador, I think, constitutionally is on solid ground. Article two, section one, first sentence, executive power shall be vested in a president of The United States. Statutorily, the Alien Enemies Act, predatory incursion.
That's certainly what this was. Gang members coming here illegally doing terrible things. And then finally, you got this judge saying this crazy decision, turn the plane around, Bring the bad guys back to America. That makes no sense. So when you look at all that coupled with this judge's history with the FISA court, with the sentence he gave to, to Klein Smith, the lawyer, Kevin Klein Smith, who altered the document in front of the FISA court, it really starts to look like judge Boseberg is operating purely political against the president. And that's what we wanna have hearings on, this broad issue and some of what judge Boseberg is doing. And so we're gonna start those next week, and we think senator Grassley is gonna do the same.
[01:08:02] Unknown:
I'm looking forward to those hearings. I don't know about you. I am absolutely looking forward to them because I wanna hear this. This this this this you know, you would talk about constitutional crises. This this is potentially constitutional crisis. This is the judicial branch usurping the authority of the executive branch. And this is exactly what the separation of powers was intended to do. It it to, for. It it's to keep each each branch in check. Yes. Absolutely. But it also specifically lays out the responsibilities of each of the branches. And the the judicial branch cannot step on the feet of the executive branch, and just like the legislative branch can't step on the feet of the judicial branch, and so on and so forth. But the legislative branch controls the purse. The legislative branch can cut off the funding to the judicial branch, at least the circuit courts, and close down those districts.
So ultimately, the people are in charge. And I'm I'm glad to see because I thus, Mike Johnson came out and said, earlier today that, they were they were considering pulling the funding from from these, the these, these districts, so they can operate. And I think that's finally somebody's somebody stepped up and said it. You know, the Republican party has always been so, you know, light handed when it comes to to to exercising their authority, especially when they have control of the house and the senate and the White House. So this is great news. This is this is just fantastic. And I and I'm hope you know, I I you know, you don't you don't wanna see the problems like this in the country. Absolutely not. You don't wanna see that stuff. But you do wanna see you you do wanna see the branches of government functioning the way they were intended to, and and you're starting to see that now. And it and and and I know it's a shock to a lot of people.
But you're getting a crash course in civics right here, right now. I mean, you know, shame on us as a country that, you know, since the nineteen seventies, we haven't been teaching American civics, and how our government is supposed to operate constitutionally. And that's because I think if we did that, then you wouldn't have all these, the these, you know, shock and surprise reactions from people over watching the different branches of government interact the way they're supposed to be. I think this is great. This is great civics lesson. Alright. So, we'll move on to this, and we'll wrap this up at this point. So, so how many of you remember, this this wonderful moment from, the, racist congresswoman from, Dallas?
If it plays. Oh, well. Yeah. I don't know what is going on with with with the Rumble studio tonight. This is just ridiculous. Nothing's playing. Anyway, so the, the racist from, Dallas, Jasmine Crockett, she referred to the governor of the state of Texas, as as Hot Wheels, and, she's appropriately gotten some blowback on that. And, Greg Abbott, basically, let me see if I can play it this way. Let's try this.
[01:12:08] Unknown:
And, because we in these hot ass Texas streets, honey, Y'all know we got governor Hot Wheels down there. Come on now. And and the only thing hot about him is that he is a hot ass mess, honey. So, so yes. Yes. Yes. That's your that's your,
[01:12:31] Unknown:
your elected representative right there, referring to the sitting governor of her state as Hot Wheels. Now, governor Abbott, has, responded to that. Well, actually, let's go to, send well, since I can't show it for some reason through the through the rumble studio. I'm having a bad night here. Jasmine Crockett said this, I wasn't thinking about the governor's condition. I was thinking about the planes, trains, and automobiles he used to transfer migrants into communities led by black mayors deliberately stoking tension and fear among the most vulnerable. Literally, the next line I said was that he was a hot mess, a hot ass mess, Referencing his terrible policies. At no point did I mention or allude to his condition, so I am even more appalled at the very people who unequivocally support Trump, a man known for racially insensitive nicknames and mocking those with disabilities, are now outraged.
Now, of course, she's going to, you know, play the victim. Right? Because that's what she does the best. She plays the victim. So, governor Abbott, came back with, where is it? Texas governor Abbott fired back a Democratic representative, Jasmine Crockett, after she went after him for being in a wheelchair, citing that the Democrats have nothing to sell but hate. He said he went on to say, it's another day and another disaster by the Democrats. The reality is they have no vision, no policy. They have nothing to sell but hate, and Americans are not buying it. It's one reason why Texas is going to remain red.
And, I I agree with that. I I think that's the case too. I I think that Americans as a whole, our, as a whole are tired of the race baiting. They're tired of the name calling. They're tired of the, just just the overall the the woke hyper progressive direction that the left is going, and and I think people had enough of that have enough Have had enough of it and, are looking for something different, looking for something change some kind of a change, and they're looking for adults to be in charge. This woman is she's ghetto trash.
Exactly. This is exactly what she is. I mean, she also went after Marjorie Taylor Greene at a at a, during an oversight committee meeting. I think it was last year or something that, she she said, that Marjorie Taylor Greene was, is is a bad built bleach blonde butch body, you know, in the middle of a hearing. I mean, which is totally uncalled for and and just lacks any kind of decorum. So, what I'm hoping to see, is, what representative Randy Weber out of Texas, is in the process of doing, and he's introducing a resolution to censure Crockett on immediately.
So, that is what I'm hoping for. I'm hoping not only that my hoping that that, that, that that they do censure her. I'm hoping that they do eventually come around to expelling her from Congress because her her her her, her demeanor and, and and and her remarks are, quote, as what the resolution says, unbecoming a member of Congress and discriminatory in nature. And, of course, you know, we're also keeping an eye on things too because, don't forget her birthday is coming up March 29. And if you remember, she, she called for, violence against, Elon Musk and Tesla, for a global day of action on her birthday. So, so we're looking forward to, seeing how all of this here plays out.
But she, she definitely needs to be disciplined in the Congress for her to the things that she has said and done, and, I'm looking forward to that happening. Alright. Let's see what else we got, and then we're gonna wrap this this whole thing up here. Let's, take a look. We already covered that, and we covered that already.
[01:17:06] Unknown:
Yeah. So good thing for egg lovers.
[01:17:13] Unknown:
Let's see. Yeah. We could we could play that. Let's do that.
[01:17:29] Unknown:
As soon as I get it. There we go. So good thing for egg lovers, egg prices have definitely turned a corner. President Trump touting that his administration has been able to bring down the egg cost of eggs with large egg prices on average down 59% since February 28, and that's according to USDA data.
[01:17:47] Unknown:
So egg price is down 59%. That's great. That's always good news. We also had had this clip that I wanted to play for you. This is, this is, secretary Wright, talking about, unleashing American energy. He said, in an interview on Fox Business. Let's, let's get to that.
[01:18:10] Unknown:
Well, US natural gas production is at an all time high today. So gas production's already growing. I was down a few weeks ago at a brand new liquefied natural gas export terminal in Louisiana coming online. We've approved four more within the first hundred days of the Trump admin
[01:18:28] Unknown:
Oops. Sorry. Administration
[01:18:30] Unknown:
that'll be under construction soon. So, boy, our capacity to export is growing rapidly. We have pipeline exports to Mexico. Our crude exports are at all time highs and will continue to grow. So I think we're in a good position, but I think six months from now, twelve months from now, even a better position. And we have a lot of states in our country that don't have the advantage of low cost American energy, and that's because they made political choices for expensive energy. I don't think the citizens of those states realize that if you're paying very high prices, it's because the politicians in your state or surrounding states chose expensive energy policies. Yeah. So we're gonna do everything we can to get low cost energy to them as well. Well
[01:19:14] Unknown:
Alright. That's always good news. Unleashing American energy is always a great thing. Alright. I think, I think that's gonna be it for us,
[01:19:24] Unknown:
here for tonight. What US natural gas production, is it an
[01:19:28] Unknown:
Just one disaster after another tonight. So I I think let's pull the plug before it gets worse. What a shit show tonight was. Alright, folks. Well, I just wanna say again, say thank you to everybody for, tuning in and putting up with the bullshit tonight. Really sorry about all the technical issues that we've been having. I I would like to blame Rumble exclusively for that, but I can't, because a lot of it's my messing around with stuff here while we're doing the show, and I shouldn't be doing that. So, alright. So anyway, tomorrow, don't forget, we're starting early 06:00. Tomorrow, we're gonna have Doug Robbins, with us on the show, and we're looking forward to having a nice little talk with him.
Very, very good guy. I'm I'm sure you're gonna like the conversation we're gonna have. And, hopefully, we'll, well, everything will be worked out tomorrow. We won't have any of these issues. We'll actually be able to get through the show and have video and try to figure out what the problem here is, with, with with everything that's going on with with the studio platform tonight. Alright, folks. Again, don't forget, website, joeroos.com. That's joeroos.com. And, head over to the contact section, open that thing up, and send us over any questions, comments, cares, or concerns that you have. Also, don't forget to check out the, the, the donation tab. If you could help us out, we would really appreciate with really appreciate any help that you could, send our way, whether it's a one time donation or if it's a, or joining up with one of our producer tiers, we would really appreciate it. And speaking of our producers, you wanna give our shout out as always to our executive producers, Wayne and Rosanna Rankin. Thank you so much, guys for your support. I really do appreciate you. And, I'm looking forward to, to, trying to right this ship for tomorrow.
Alright, folks. Don't forget. Make Texas independent again. Go podcasting. Keep a steady stride, and have a great night. We'll see you tomorrow. Good night, folks.
This podcast is hosted on Podhome.fm, an intelligent podcasting platform that you can use to host unlimited shows and episodes and have unlimited downloads. Pod home comes with many intelligent features like Pod home AI, which automatically creates transcripts, chapters, suggests titles, show notes, detects people, and creates clips. You can use Pothome AI unlimited for all your episodes and all your shows. Go check it out and start your free seven day trial at pothome.fm.
[00:00:45] Unknown:
Tune in for a podcast where the conversation flows freely and where you can truly expect anything and everything. This is the podcast.
[00:01:09] Unknown:
Welcome to the podcast where every episode promises an unfiltered dive into the eclectic, the profound, and political correctness takes a back seat.
[00:01:36] Unknown:
Alright. Hey folks. This is Joe Rusciello and it is great to be with you once again. And we are broadcasting to you live tonight from the asylum studios, from the pimple on the backside of Texas. The beautiful city of Eagle Pass, and we're gonna do our very best to bring you the best quality political talk radio we could muster without all the bluster. This is the podcast. Alright. I'm telling you, I am loving the new intro. The new music, I think that's great. Love it. It is fantastic, as they say. But folks, it is great, again, another night to be here with you guys and, to just, you know, talk about stuff going on in the world around us.
And, I'm not sure what is the situation right now with the video. But, on my feed here, I'm showing a four zero four error saying the page is not available. So I'm not sure what's going on with that. So, I don't know. I don't know what we should do here at this point. So I think I'm just gonna close this thing out here, and, pretend that we're, we're not doing anything. What do you think? Think that might work? Think that might help? I don't know. Let me know. And if you are watching, and I hope you are, and you, if you if you're not seeing anything on the video feed, please let me know. Drop me a a message in the live chat. And, because if that's the case, if, if if you're having some Internet issues and you're not seeing any of this, then, let me know. I'm just gonna shut it off, and I'll just stream the live audio, which is fine.
Totally fine. But, lot of stuff to talk about tonight. Lot of stuff we wanna get into. Last night, we spent quite a bit of time talking about, what what the media is now calling signal gate. And, we're gonna get into that in just a few moments. But, you know, as always, first and foremost, you wanna get through some of the housekeeping stuff that we normally do. So, just wanted you head on over to our website, joeroos.com. That's joeroos.com. And, we can definitely put that up on the screen, for folks that might be confused. Joeroos.com.
Yep. There we go. Okay. So this is definitely, I think, a rumble issue because, my even even the, the studio is acting kinda weird. But, anyway, we'll we'll do the best we can, so just, hang with us, bear with us. Anyway, so we are here, and, what did I say? Oh, yeah. We're at the Joe Ruse. Joe Ruse dot com. Just head over to JoeRoos.com, open up the contact form, send over any questions, comments, cares, concerns you might have, any issues, any thoughts, any projections, anything that you wanted us to, take a look at and potentially address.
Any guests you might have in mind. Yeah. Would whatever it is. Now, also, before I forget, don't speaking of guests, tomorrow night, we have, Douglas Robbins, who's gonna be with us, on the show. We're starting early tomorrow. We're starting at 6PM central time. That's 7PM eastern time. So, make sure that you make that adjustment, and, hopefully, we'll get to see you there. Looking forward to talking to to, to Doug, and, we had a great chat last week. We're looking forward to, being able to talk to him again. But, but he'll be with us tomorrow night, so make sure that you are, tuning in early, 6PM central time, seven PM eastern.
Alright. So, and then, next week, we have, doctor Emily Trunnell from, the, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, PETA, is gonna be with us, and, we're interested in that conversation. It's gonna be, a good one. We're gonna be talking about all the testing that gets done on these, on these animals that we that we love so much, that the NIH spends billions and billions of your tax dollars, doing that if we even scratch the surface as to some of the horrible things that they do to these poor animals, you would, be quite quite disturbed. I've been doing some research on this. It is terrible.
But, again, I am not a I'm not a, a quote unquote bleeding heart liberal on these things, these political matters, but we have we all love our animals. We love our pets. And, I have my two beautiful little babies right here with me in the studio tonight. So, you know, you wanna make sure that you love them and take care of them. So looking forward to that conversation with, doctor Trunnell, and, hope you guys are too. Now, also don't forget to head over to our support page and click that support button. If you could help us out with a donation in any amount, we would appreciate that. Or you could donate three t's, your time, your talent, or your treasure. If you'd like to make a donation of your time, we would love that. Anything you could do to help us out in preparation for the show would be fantastic.
Maybe you can help us promote the show, write the show, put the show notes together, you know, whatever it whatever it takes to to get this thing going. Or, you know, perhaps, you know, your talent. Maybe you're great at working, audio files. Maybe you're great at video files and figuring out what's wrong with Internet stuff, why we are still, on a 404 here on my end at least. So, again, let me check the chat. Anybody? No? Nothing? Okay. Let's see. So, then you so your talent so you could help us out with all that kind of stuff, or if you'd like to donate your treasure, we would appreciate that immensely. We need that more than anything else, to be quite honest with you. We wanna make sure we're able to keep everything, flowing and going over here. So, how do you do that? Well, you could do a one time donation in any amount, and we would appreciate that, or you could, join up with one of our producer tiers. Now you could join up with the, the associate producer tier for $17.76 a month. We would appreciate that. And with that, you get the, you get the benefit of having your name shout out across all of the platforms that we're on. You get your name included in all of our show notes. You get your you get your name included in all the emails and stuff that we send out.
But that's for a $17.76 recurring monthly donation. And then we have $4.18 36 a month. As a monthly recurring donation, we have our producers club. So it's a little bit of a promotion. So it it that that'll work. And then we also have our executive producer for $25 a month or more. And with that, you get a little bit extra. You get the, of course, the shout outs. You get all that stuff. And then, on top of that, you also get the, opportunity to join us on the show, for a segment and, and and get your, get your opinion out there. So I think that's pretty cool, and I like the idea of that, and we're looking forward to it. So, just head over to our website, joeroos.com/support, and you can, get yourself all set up with that. And if you like to do cryptos, you also have our wallet up there. You could check that out as well.
And, you can donate your Satoshis. Now SATs are just micropayments of Bitcoin, and, you could just very easily just click that button and, and and set it up on, on our website. Really simple to do. And if using one of the modern podcast apps like Podcast Guru or Fountain.fm, True Fans F m, you could also very easily make your donation through there as well. Alright. Also, don't forget, if you're listening on the audio and you wanna check out the video stuff, just head over to, your app store, download the Rumble app. It is absolutely free to download. And, you could very easily, follow the show right there by looking for Joe Ruse. And then, of course, you have the, you can go to the website, jo, rumble.com/joeruse, and you can find us over there as well. I am really messing all this up over here because I am too busy, distracted by the fact that there's no video, at at least showing on my end, so I don't know if I'm actually speaking to anybody. And the fact that all of our numbers here are dropping very quickly makes me think that we are not.
So, we'll we'll continue. We'll continue on here. Let me shut that banner off because it's getting to be a distraction. Alright. Now, as usual, at this particular point, we wanna say our farewells to the folks on YouTube and on x and on Twitch, which we recently started to, broadcast on. So, so you guys, if you wanna continue to watch the show, just head on over to rumble.com/joeroos or download the app and find us on there as well. Alright. So, in, just, about two minutes here, about less than two minutes, we will say goodbye, and hopefully, we'll catch you on the other side on Rumble. So that's rumble.com/jaroos or download the app in your app store and follow us there. And don't forget to like, subscribe, and share it with your friends, your family, and your followers.
Alright, folks. We'll talk to you a little bit soon. Bye. Alright. So now that it's it's just us here on, on, on Rumble, I hope, anyway. We're gonna try to sign in here again and see what the deal is. See if anything pops up. It's, it's showing that we're live, but it's not showing any video. So I'm not sure what the problem here is tonight, folks. Don't know. Alright. And nobody's leaving any messages in the chat, so I don't know if you're seeing anything. Let me try let me try my my my phone here. Let's see if we're on there. I hate doing this stuff while we're on the air, and I can't There we go.
Alright. Let me try the app. Having all kinds of problems here tonight. I I do apologize, folks. But the, the show will go on. Just just give me a moment here. Yeah. Nothing showing. That's weird. Very strange. But, again, if you're not seeing this, please let me know. Drop me a message in the chat, and, I'll see what we can do on the other end of it. But I see myself, but not coming up on the other monitors. Alright. Well, let's, let's get down to it. We do have some we do have some things to talk about. We have some, we have some news here that we wanna we wanna get over and get through. So, Russia winning in Ukraine, continually gain continually gaining leverage, says The US intel community.
Currently, Moscow has seized the upper hand in the war over the past year, and the fresh assessment warns the fresh assessment warns and is on a path to accrue greater leverage as peace talks with Washington are underway. Even though Russian president Vladimir Putin will be unable to achieve the total victory he envisioned when initiating a large scale invasion in February 2022, Russia retains momentum as a grinding war of attrition plays to Russia's military advantages. Alright. So, what I'm looking at here right now is I'm looking at an article, that was published up on, on Infowars, from Zero Hedge that, that basically says, the US government and its 2025 annual threat assessment of the US intelligence community, which was just released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in conjunction with top officials, at Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday, has admitted that Ukraine's battlefield prospects are fading amid the onslaught of superior Russian forces. Currently, Moscow has seized the upper hand in the war over the past year. The fresh assessment warns and is on a path to accrue greater leverage as peace talks with Washington are underway.
Now, let's see. This should come as no surprise to any objective observer. However, what is surprising is the huge amount of Russian losses estimated by US intelligence. While there is no way of verifying such information, the report claims that there are over seven hundred and fifty thousand dead and wounded on the Russian side. Alright. So, this this was a a report that went out on Tuesday, and, that's also when the Democrats decided they were going to take advantage of the moment. And, what did I do? The Russians were gonna take the the Democrats were gonna take advantage of the moment and, kinda kinda jump on this, signal gate that we were talking about yesterday.
Now, folks, this is moving very, very quickly. Alright? It's a lot of lot of things took place today, a lot of discussion, a lot of more questions, hearings opening up on the Hill about this particular, situation. Now, let me see. Where do I start with this? Good grief. I am completely thrown out of whack with all this. So, yesterday, now if you remember correctly, yesterday we talked about it at at length. The majority of the show actually we talked about it. The backstory is this, so, the federal government allows the use of an app called Signal, which is a, an encrypted app that is used, across all of the federal government, computers and and cell phones and and, electronic devices. It was approved for use under the Biden administration.
It is one of the most encrypted, one of the safer, apps to use for these, for for for the government. Alright. Now there was a planned strike against the Houthis that was going to take place, and, there was a group of 19, intelligence officials that were included in this group chat that was apparently set up by Mark Ratcliffe. Included in that was a man by the name of, Jonathan Goldberg. Now, Goldberg is the editor in chief. I'm sorry. I said Jonathan is Jeffrey. Jeffrey Goldberg. So Jeffrey Goldberg was inadvertently included in the group, apparently.
Alright. Now, it is under investigation. They're still trying to find out what happened. But again, mister Waltz has taken the responsibility for it as he has said today that he is the one who actually set up the group. So, so it evidently, it just all falls on him at this particular point. However, there are a lot of questions about this. Why exactly did, Jeffrey Goldberg get included to it? How did that happen? Walt has said repeatedly that he doesn't know the gentleman. He hasn't spoken to him, and I use the word gentleman lightly because this guy is a piece of crap. Goldberg is is the one who stoked the Russia Russia Russia, scenario back in 02/2016.
He's also the one who, who, under the the, Bush administration, let or or fed information through the vice president at the time, Dick Cheney, about weapons of mass destruction, and he actually pushed this narrative about weapons of mass destruction, which, of course, led us getting into the Gulf War. And, this guy is just he he's also the one in, in 2020 that, that claimed that, president Trump made comments about, the fallen soldiers at the cemetery up in in France, say calling them, suckers and losers, which, of course, was ridiculous and not even and and very, very quickly debunked.
So this is that guy. Alright. He has been wrong on everything. But here he is, now, and and somehow, someway he gets included in this group chat. And, of course, you know, he, he tried to he tried to play the the part of, I'm sorry about that background noise. It I'm not sure why that's coming through, but just having a really rough night here at the show, folks. I mean, this is really terrible. Oh my gosh. Nights like this, I just wanna just throw everything out the window, you know, but we're not gonna do that. So, so Goldberg gets into this group and, originally, he wasn't going to publish any of the information that came that that he came across.
Now, honestly, if you were included in the group like this and you realize that you weren't supposed to be there, wouldn't you have said something? I I I would have. At least I I think I would. And you would hope that that, that that that's journalistic integrity would would allow that to take place in in in this guy Goldberg, but, of course, he has no integrity because he's a he's a hack. So the narrative kinda quickly changed. The Hill said yesterday, Gabbard Ratcliffe content signal chat did not include classified information. He's saying that it was classified information, that it was, it was war plans that, were being discussed in this group chat.
And, very very quickly those that that story has changed. Alright. The The Atlantic published an article about this and I'm all over the place because my notes are out of whack. Everything's out of whack. This is not a good night. So, the the Atlantic has this article up. It says, here are the attack plans that Trump's advisers shared on signal. Alright? Now let me pull let me pull some of this up here. Again, one man show, so you're gonna have to bear with me on this. Alright. So the signal chat. Now, this is this is from the Atlantic article published by, Jeffrey Goldberg and, cowritten by, Shane Harris.
Alright. Now you would think that, the original position that he had was he wasn't gonna publish his stuff because he could get in trouble for it because it was highly it was classified information. And then very quickly, the the the whole story changes. And now, today, he published the chat. Okay. So about that signal chat, on Monday shortly after we published a story about a massive Trump administration security breach, a reporter at that asked the secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, why he shared plans about a forthcoming attack on Yemen on the signal messaging app, And he answered, nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about it. Donald Trump, of course, said the same thing. It wasn't classified information.
And, according to The Atlantic, these statements present us with a dilemma. The initial story about the signal shot, the Houthi PC Small Group as it was named by Waltz, was, we withheld specific information related to the weapons, the timing of the attacks that we found in certain texts. As a general rule, we don't publicize or or publish information about military operations, and that information could possibly jeopardize the lives of US personnel. That's why we chose to characterize the nature of the information being shared, not specific details of the attack. The statements by Hegseth, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, and Trump, combined with the assertions made by numerous administration officials that that we are lying about the content of the civil text have led us to believe that people should see the text in order to reach their own conclusions, which is great. We should reach our own conclusions. We should see these things. Alright. So that's fantastic. And then and then they went ahead and they, published published this. And I'm going to, I'm gonna show you that here in just a second. We're gonna do a, a screen share.
Okay. So here are the here are the attack plans. Alright. Now I wish I could see this myself because I can't. So, Hegseth here, this is the these are the texts. Actually, let me go here. Okay. So here's the group. Alright. The Houthi PC small group, 19 members. Michael Waltz added you to the group. Alright. So, team establishing a prince a principals group for coordination on Houthis, particularly over the next seventy two hours. My deputy, Alex Wong, is pulling together a Tiger team at deputies and so on. And this is everybody checking in.
And then, we're gonna just kinda scroll down through here, and I'm gonna show you what the, the contention is. I like what, I like what, our vice president has to say, just hate bailing Europe out again. Okay. So now here here's the information. Time the time now, weather is confirmed favorable, just confirmed with CENTCOM. We are go for mission launch. Twelve fifteen, f eighteen's launch, first strike package, Tiger based f 18, so on and so forth. You can see these here for yourself. Okay? Now on an app like Signal, which is very similar to, like, which is very similar to a, like, WhatsApp or a Telegram or anything like that, you know, you can adjust and change certain information. So it goes by phone number.
Now, what I found interesting, and I don't think anybody else has pointed it out yet, If you scroll down here, where it says where it shows you the 19 members. Right? It says right there. JG. That's the person that's screenshotting this. Michael Waltz, Scott B. There's two Susie Wiles. Unless that's a page break, but I think that's two Susie Wiles. How come nobody caught this? Now, I was listening to another show, earlier, Joe Paggs, and he brought up a good point that, you know, in order in order to have your name and your initials put up here in the in in in the chat like this, you have to be in that person's phone in their contacts. Now unless Michael Walt is lying about his relationship with Jeffrey Goldberg, Or when he said that he was the one who initiated the group, I mean, did he appoint somebody to do it? Or did he actually physically put the group together?
Well, that's what they're looking at right now. But now, here's the other interesting thing. Everybody's pointing fingers at Pete Hegseth. Now, you know that they've had it out for Pete Hegseth since his name was first put forward for, for, the Secretary of Defense. So they're they're they're were they're looking for his head basically. Since before he even set foot into the office. From the day he was mentioned until today. They have been looking for something to get Pete Hegseth out. So right now, all the focus is on Pete Hegseth. But the big question here is, at least I think so anyway, is how come nobody's asking any questions about Jeffrey Goldberg?
Why would he why would you go from saying, I'm not gonna publicize this information to publish to publishing the information that quick. Especially if you know that it's not especially if well, if you're making the if you're making the assertion that that this stuff is classified information, why would you then turn around and then publish it? Knowing that you can get in all kinds of troubles because you know that it's not classified information. Every member in that group that was questioned about this said the same thing, this is not classified information. And there's nothing in here that would even indicate that it's class there there's nothing specific.
There are no there's no specific information being provided. There are no names. There's no specific locations. There's no, nothing that would specifically identify troop movements, specific locations. None of that. And this is an app that is allowed to be used by the federal government. It is installed by federal government IT department on all of their devices. Why is nobody questioning Jeffrey Goldberg about how he got into the group? Why is everybody pointing fingers at Hegseth and and Mike Waltz? Now, of course, Michael Waltz, he he is he's in charge, and he said that he took that he took ownership of this as he said that he he created the group. But was he the one who actually put somebody in the group that wasn't supposed to be there? Or could it be that there's the person that was maybe delegated to putting this group together, added that particular person, Jeffrey Goldberg, to that group specifically to hurt the administration.
But see, folks, this is absolutely nothing. This is this is a big what are the words they use? They they call it a nothing burger. This is nothing. There really is no issue with this. None of this information was classified. This was this was an app that's used, that's authorized to be used by the government. They're allowed to use it. There and it's there for these types of communications. This wasn't even really a a war plan. This wasn't even an an attack plan as as the Atlantic changed it to. This this was this was just the leadership of the intelligence community sharing information. That's really all it was.
There's nothing in there that's damning. There's nothing in there that's that's that's, classified or I mean, sensitive. Yeah. Maybe sensitive, but that's really all there is to it. Now, earlier today, Caroline Levitt, they had the, the usual press conference at the White House, and, she addressed this. This is, Caroline Levitt, two minutes fifteen second clip. Let's go.
[00:30:52] Unknown:
Unfortunately, all of this good is happening for our country. This administration is working hard on behalf of the American public every day, but the mainstream media continues to be focused on a sensationalized story from the failing Atlantic magazine that is falling apart by the hour. Here are the facts. The National Security Advisor has taken responsibility for this matter. And the National Security Council immediately said, alongside the White House counsel's office, that they are looking into how a reporter's number was inadvertently added to this messaging thread. We have said all along that no classified material was sent on this messaging thread. There were no locations, no sources, or methods revealed, and there were certainly no war plans discussed.
The Atlantic has even admitted this themselves. Their release of these internal messages validates the truth, which we have been saying all along. If this story proves anything, it proves that Democrats and their propagandists in the mainstream media know how to fabricate, orchestrate, and disseminate a misinformation campaign quite well. And there's arguably no one in the media who loves manufacturing and pushing hoaxes more than Jeffrey Goldberg. Goldberg is an anti Trump hater. He is a registered Democrat. Goldberg's wife is also a registered Democrat and a big Democrat donor who used to work under who? Hillary Clinton.
This is the same Jeffrey Goldberg who infamously lied about weapons of mass destruction to get us into the Iraq war, which cost trillions of dollars and thousands of American soldiers? And how else has Goldberg discredited himself by absurdly claiming that president Trump was Vladimir Putin during the 2016 campaign by peddling the Russia Russia Russia hoax that tried to hijack president Trump's first term, by inventing the suckers and losers hoax to help Joe Biden in the twenty twenty election, by peddling a hoax about president Trump involving gold star families to help Kamala Harris in the twenty twenty fourth election, which our campaign at the time vigorously denied. Jeffrey Goldberg didn't care.
There's more, but we don't have all day, and we can now add this signal hoax to this very long list.
[00:33:15] Unknown:
You see what I'm saying? I mean, the the the press conference was was, like, twenty five minutes long, so we're not gonna play that that whole thing. But this is, you know, this is the mainstream media that continues to be focused on taking down this administration in any way they can. And again, and like and like we said, and like I said earlier, they eat The Atlantic even admitted that this information wasn't classified information. Sensitive, yes. I agree with that. Sensitive, yes. But they even validate what the what what Tulsi Gabbard has been saying, what Mike Waltz has been saying, and Pete Hexyth have been saying, that this is nonce not classified information.
She went on to say, in, in clip two. Let's play that.
[00:34:17] Unknown:
The real story here is the overwhelming success of president Trump's decisive military action against Houthi terrorists. On March 15, President Trump ordered a series of military operations against the terrorist Houthis to defend US shipping assets in the Red Sea, restore freedom of navigation for international shipping, and defend The United States from enemy threats. United States forces successfully struck dozens of targets across Houthi controlled territory. And as a result of these actions, several Houthi leaders were killed, including the Houthi drone chief, his deputy, and several of their drone experts and other key leaders. We also destroyed command and controlled facilities, weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapon storage locations.
And it's important to remember why this powerful action took place in the first place. Because of Joe Biden's incompetence and pathetic weakness on the world stage for years, the Houthi terrorists grew emboldened. Immediately after taking office in 2021, Joe Biden removed the Iran backed Houthis from the foreign terrorist organization and specifically designated global terrorist list. Did anybody in this room ask the Biden administration at the time why they made such a stupid mistake. This reckless action undid the designation put in place by president Trump during his first term, and what followed was predictable and devastating.
The Houthis targeted US military ships and aircraft, hit commercial ships, including US flagged vessels, threatened our personnel overseas, and attacked our allies in the region. This resulted in more than a year of US flagged commercial ships being prevented from safely sailing through the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, and the Gulf Of Aden. This had a massive negative impact on global trade of the economic security of The United States. Joe Binder Biden was the commander in chief, and he sat on his hands while The United States Of America was bullied and embarrassed by terrorists. President Trump and his team are putting a stop to these threats in restoring American strength around the world.
The Trump peace through strength approach means no terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the waterways of the world.
[00:36:44] Unknown:
Alright. I think we froze. There we go. Alright. So there you have that. Alright. And then she went on, to take some questions.
[00:36:54] Unknown:
The president's, view on all of this remains the same today as it did yesterday. And I think it speaks volumes about the leadership of this president that he went directly to all of you, members of the press corps. He was asked, do you want someone else to go out and do a briefing? And he said, no. I will tackle this story. I will discuss it. The people need to hear from me about this situation, and so his thoughts on this remained the same today. He has, it it placed great trust in his national security team. And as for the usage of signal, as the president said yesterday, as the CIA director has testified under oath, this is an approved app. It's an encrypted app. The Department of Defense, the Department of State, the CIA has it loaded onto government phones because it is the most secure and efficient way to communicate. As for, again, the original situation in this messaging thread, the National Security Council, the White House counsel's office continues to look in to how this mistake, which the National Security Advisor has owned occurred, and the president has ensured they are doing that.
[00:37:54] Unknown:
And that's important. That's important to understand that that that Mike Walz took ownership of this. He's the one who set up the group, and he is the one, that that took responsibility for it, and it is being investigated. It is being looked at. And I'm curious. I would like to know how Jeffrey Goldberg got included in that group. A a person who's known to be, adversarial to the Trump administration. Alright? Let's, let's go to, clip four. Clip four. Alright. We seem to be having problems with, with, with Rumble. Alright. So clip four was, that there there was no classified information that was discussed, and the Secretary of Defense, the CIA director, and the national national, intelligence director, and, the director of the FBI all testified under oath. She also went on to say that, that it's important, that the American public outcry got information
[00:39:09] Unknown:
transmitted. There were no more plans discussed. Why did the Atlantic downgrade their allegation about war plans to attack plans? They're now playing word games because they know this was sensational spin from a reporter who is well known for doing this. We have said all along no war plans were discussed. No classified, material was sent. You have the secretary of defense saying that. You have the director of the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the FBI director, all testifying to that under oath, and they should be trusted with that.
[00:39:40] Unknown:
Americans can make the decision for themselves. So whether it's the you you said it's you said it's not war plans. Would you characterize these as military
[00:39:49] Unknown:
plans, military operation plans? I would characterize this messaging thread as a policy discussion, a sensitive policy discussion surely amongst high level cabinet officials and senior staff. And I'm so glad, Peter, that you said the American public can decide for themselves because I think the American public should decide them for themselves based on the outcome of this operation. And what happened in this operation, terrorists that were allowed to run wild by the Biden administration were killed because of the direction and the determination of this president and his team. And this message also shows this messaging thread also proved, that president Trump has an incredibly dynamic team who is working incredibly hard flying all over the world to secure world peace and to fix up the foreign policy crises that the previous administration left for this team to inherit. Spot
[00:40:40] Unknown:
on. Absolutely spot on. Perfect. Perfect response. Absolutely perfect response. The previous administration started that's the whole thing. They they don't wanna focus on what what president Trump's foreign policy is is, is is accomplishing. They wanna they wanna focus on this on this really non issue. And it's I again, I say I say it's a non issue because as you've heard repeatedly over and over and over again, there was no classified information contained in that text. You saw it yourself. I just showed it to you. She went on to say this.
[00:41:31] Unknown:
Safe. Again, first of all, Signal has been an approved app for government use. It's an encrypted app. And as I said, it's the most, safe and efficient way of communicating, especially when people can't be in a skiff or inside a room physically together. I think as the president said yesterday, he wishes that everybody could be in the room, and it's our goal to ensure that, everybody can be. But, again, no classified information was discussed in this chat, and anytime classified information is discussed amongst high level officials across this administration, secure, lines of communication are used.
[00:42:06] Unknown:
Right. And and then, JD Vance took to Twitter and, he posted this right here. It's very clear that Goldberg oversold what he had, but one thing in particular really stands out. Remember, when he was attacking Ratcliffe for blowing the cover for a CIA agent, turns out Ratcliffe was simply naming his chief of staff. And then here, as you could see, they changed it from, war plans to attack plans. The Atlantic has already abandoned their bullshit war plan narrative and releasing the full chat. They concede that they lied to perpetuate yet another hoax on the American people, as posted by, Taylor Budowicz.
And you can see some of the responses. Goldberg is trash. Democrats manufacture crises to install hate and fear in their voters. Jeffrey Goldberg has made it clear, made made a career out of being a liar and a gas lighter. He lost all credibility. Nobody should give him any benefit of the doubt, and so on and so forth. Then, Pete Hegseth checked in. Now I'm gonna apologize for the audio if it even plays. I'm gonna apologize for the audio now because, he's standing on a tarmac, and, again, it's a lot of plane noise behind him. But, it's two clips, for about two minutes total, but this is what, what the the secretary of defense had to say.
[00:43:34] Unknown:
Nobody's texting war plans. I noticed this morning, out came something that doesn't look like war plans.
[00:43:42] Unknown:
And as a matter of fact, they even changed the title to attack plans
[00:43:46] Unknown:
because they know it's not war plans. There's no units, no locations, no routes, no flight paths, no sources, no methods, no classified information. You know who sees war plans? I see them every single day. I looked at them this morning. I looked at attack plans this morning. You know who does attack plans and war plans? Men like that admiral right there, Paparo, for the Indo Pacific, or Eric Kurilla, our general in CENTCOM. They do attack plans and war top of that, everybody's seen it now, team update is to provide updates in real time. General updates in real time, keep everybody informed. That's what I did.
That's my job. The war fighters will take the fight to the enemy, and I love what they do. And with president Trump's leadership, our enemies are on notice. We will have peace through strength, and we'll keep putting our troops first. We also have seen it on full display in what's been done to the Houthi terrorists, and what they're trying to do, close freedom of navigation. You see, under the Biden administration, we let our troops and our ships in
[00:45:07] Unknown:
both warships and commercial ships get shot at to no consequence.
[00:45:11] Unknown:
What does that look like? That looks like weakness. And what president Trump has said is peace through strength is back. We will reestablish deterrence. That's not acceptable. And our ongoing campaign against the Houthis has been devastatingly effective.
[00:45:32] Unknown:
Alright. So but if if, of course and it was very well said by the by the secretary of defense, by by Pete Hegseth. And I'm gonna tell you right now, they they are trying to get him out. That for whatever reason that they have against Pete Hegseth, this is the whole thing. They're trying to get him out. And, honestly, guys, I think I think that there's something much more, that there's something deeper here. Because, you'll never guess. Because of course this is gonna go to trial. Right? They're gonna have some kind of an investigation. It's gonna go before a court. And and who do you think was appointed the judge in this particular matter?
If you said Judge Boseberg, you would be correct. Judge Boseberg, the same judge who is, who put a restraining order against the administration for deporting, the, TDA and the MS thirteen, gang members, was assigned the case. Gee. I wonder how that happened. What a stroke of luck that was. Right? The more I look at this, the more I think about it, the more I kinda kick this thing around in my brain, this just stinks. It really does. It it really does. Well, earlier today, John Ratcliffe, and Tulsi Gabbard were, up before the hill, on the hill, talking to, Congress about, this particular situation.
And, here is, here is the, director of the Central Intelligence Agency Agency, John Ratcliffe.
[00:47:34] Unknown:
You know, there's so much talk about an article and about, things that were said and that could have happened instead of a focus on what did happen. So my responsibility as CIA director, one of its responsibilities is to kill terrorists. And that's exactly what I did along with president Trump's excellent national national security team. That's what we should be focused on. With regard to that article, I also would appreciate the opportunity, to relay the fact that yesterday, I spent four hours answering questions from senators as a result of that article that were intimating that I transmitted classified information because there were hidden messages.
Those messages were revealed today and revealed that I did not transmit classified information and that the reporter who I don't know, I think intentionally intended it to indicate that. That reporter also indicated, that I had released the name of an undercover CIA operative in that signal check. In fact, I had released the name of my chief of staff who is not operating undercover. That was deliberately false and misleading, and, I appreciate the opportunity to reflect that my answers haven't changed. I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information. It was permissible to do so. I didn't transfer any classified information.
And and at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success, is what everyone should be focused on here because that's what did happen, not what possibly could have happened.
[00:49:15] Unknown:
And then, let's see. Tulsi Gabbard also at the same hearing. And, this is great. This is this is great. I didn't I didn't edit this in any way. This this is how I found the clip, but I wanted to bring it to you because it is perfect. This is how you do it. This is how you answer those questions. This is this is how you do it.
[00:49:39] Unknown:
Were there any names in the signal chat? No. Any targets? No. Any locations? No. Was there a unit name or a location of that unit? There was not. Were there any routes described in the signal chat? No. Wouldn't an operational plan contain that type of information? Every operational plan I've ever seen has contained that information. Thank you. Shifting to the real threats to America, the Southern border.
[00:50:12] Unknown:
I didn't do that. That that was how I found the clip. Okay? And I'll be honest with you too, when I when I found the clip, I wasn't expecting that. So it kinda it kinda jumped out at me and and like spooked me out really quick. You know, I'll be honest with you. But, but again, just to reiterate, no specific information was given in those messages. And again, we showed them to you, they were there, the information that was there was what was shown, there there was nothing specific, this is nothing. The bigger question is is why was Jeffrey Goldberg in that group?
Why has nobody been questioning him? Why is nobody coming down on the Atlantic? Why? Why not? Everyone's throwing questions at at at, the, the intelligence department heads. Communicating in a chat group on an app that is authorized to be used. No classified information was was in there. Nothing that would violate any of the, of of the classification rules. Nothing. Let me pull this up here. Pete Pete Hegseth again on, on on Twitter or x rather. So let me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so called war plans, and those plans include no names, no targets, no locations, no units, no routes, no sources, no methods, and no classified information. Those are some really shitty war plans.
The only the this only proves one thing. Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an attack plan as he now calls it, not even close. As I type this, my team and I are traveling the Indo Pacom region, meeting with commanders, the guys who make real war plans and talking to troops. We'll continue to do our job while the media does what it does best, pedal hoaxes. Gabbard. Just, director Gabbard. I'm Sorry. I meant to share that. Here we go.
[00:53:03] Unknown:
Nation. And and at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success, is what everyone should be focused on here.
[00:53:15] Unknown:
Exactly. That's the point. That's where the focus should be. The they don't wanna focus on that. They wanna take this little itty bitty mess up, this little screw up and ex and try to blow this thing up. Now, I and I I agree with the fact of, you know, you you don't wanna give them any ammunition. You don't wanna give the left. You don't wanna give the media any ammunition against you. But, you know, it's gonna happen from time to time. The thing is about this, they got in front of it, they took care of it, it's being investigated, they took ownership of it, and it's not something that's gonna happen again. Could it have been worse? Sure. Absolutely could have been worse, but it wasn't.
The result of that text group message is what their is what they really should be talking about, the success of this military operation. Because that's what did happen, not what possibly could have happened. Thank you, director Ratcliffe. Okay. Sorry. I'm having a little I don't know what is going on tonight with with, with Rumble here. That was a very, very short short clip. Anyway. So, as you see, this is a big nothing. And to be quite honest with you, I really don't wanna even talk about it anymore. You know, I'm sure it's gonna be creeping itself around as more information comes out, and as as things develop, and, you know, other information comes about. But the reality of it is, as, the the the mission the overall mission was a success.
The administration took ownership of this, and and they're taking the necessary steps to ensure that it doesn't happen again. And, you know, it's just move on. Let's move on. It's time to it's time to move on. We have to keep redirecting it right back to the main issue that the the the overall operation was a success, and, the the the Houthi leadership and military had has suffered ex had suffered losses, and, we're moving on. Correcting the the mistakes, correcting all of the the the poor judgment of the previous administration. And as I said earlier, let's take a look at this.
Let's talk about the judge. Now it's gonna be presiding over the signal chat lawsuit. The judge who's trying to prevent the deportation of foreign terrorists is going to preside over the recent lawsuit over the signal chat used by government officials. James Bober Boseberg, who thinks he's the head of the Department of Homeland Security and overseer of all federal immigration policy will handle the case. It's a terrible joke and another headache for the Trump administration. So there's all the information right there. Jeff Carlson, at some point, we're gonna discover that the true organization of all this was to prevent the the Trump administration from using signal because the intelligence community can't monitor their communications.
I don't think that's necessarily true. I mean, they they they're the ones who actually installed the informate the the software on the computer, so I'm sure they have ways to, to get to the information there. But that's what I said before. Judge Boseberg. Alright. What else we got here?
[00:57:13] Unknown:
Yep.
[00:57:16] Unknown:
We already talk we already covered that, so we can get rid of that one. Let's go on to some some other news. Which what do you say? Close that. Close that. Just got a couple more things, and then we're gonna we're gonna wrap it up for tonight. So, the president has been talking a lot about investments of late, and, some very interesting, developments have have come about. Investment commitments in The US have, approached near, near $3,000,000,000,000 since the president, was inaugurated, since Trump took office. From investing.com, the list of companies and countries investing in The US as part of president Donald Trump's push to restore manufacturing continues to grow. On Monday, the Trump administration added Hyundai, to the list with the conglomerate planning to announce a $20,000,000,000 US investment. The South Korean company's reported plan includes the construction of a $5,000,000,000 steel plant in Louisiana.
The onshoring operation from Hyundai is expected to create 1,500 jobs. And, you know, that's actually about, you know, the 3,000,000,000,000 is about 10 of The US GDP. Think about that. So, here's a list of companies and countries investing in The US based on the size of their commitments. The UAE, One Point One Point Four Trillion. Saudi Arabia, Six Hundred Billion. Apple, Five Hundred Billion. Nvidia, A Hundred Billion. And so on, hundred billion, hundred billion, 50 5 billion. 20 7 20 20. One and one. This is great news. This is this is rebuilding the economy, and I and I see what he's doing.
You know, he's trying to make America a manufacturing hub again, like we used to be. It used to be that America made the best products that you can get, lasted a lifetime, but then then then there was that big shift away, and we became more of a a consuming, a consumer society as opposed to a manufacturing society. And, and that's what he's doing. He's bringing it all back. He's bringing all of that back to The United States, and that's it's brilliant. You get this, plus you get the tariff situation. Oh, look. Look. I love the idea of tariffs, and I I think that reciprocal tariffs that, as as what he's he's imposing on these other countries, are are great. It's a great idea. Why not?
Let them pay. And and what is it doing? The result of that is is that companies that are overseas that don't wanna pay the tariffs are now moving their businesses here to The United States. They're manufacturing here to The to to The States. So that's huge. And they're doing that to avoid paying the tariffs, which just increases our ability to manufacture and and will enable The United States to become competitive again in manufacturing. And I think it's great. It's brilliant. They're protecting and bringing back American auto jobs, Hyundai, Stellantis, Volkswagen, Honda, Nissan, Rolls Royce, all bringing all bringing back to The United States.
And again, they're doing it to avoid the tariffs. Fine. That's great. But they're bringing business here, they're bringing jobs here, they're bringing investment here, they're bringing money back to The United States. That's what we want. Let's see what else. Alright. Let's go back to Judge Boseberg for a second. I I I'm sorry I have my tabs out of sequence. But, let's go back to Judge Boseberg for a second here, because, the populist the populist times, has this piece of activist judge Boseberg allows trend diagua gang members to challenge alien enemies act deportations. Liberal judge James Boseberg has ruled that illegal immigrants belonging to
[01:01:44] Unknown:
Let's put that
[01:01:45] Unknown:
up. Liberal judge James Boseberg has ruled that illegal immigrants belonging to the violent Venezuelan trendy Aragua gang can challenge their deportation under the seventeen ninety eight Alien Enemies Act. Trump administration had requested the activist judge to vacate his restraining order that barred the removal of Venezuelan gangbangers under the wartime security law. Legal challenge stemmed from deportation of 261 illegal aliens, including, TDA gang members to El Salvador. The law allows the president to summarily remove natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of a hostile nation or government during a declared war or when the adversary has perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of The United States or during an invasion of a or predatory incursion.
Now, Trump has repeatedly described the flocking of the of unvetted, undocumented foreign nationals, some with terrorist and gang ties, as an invasion justifying the invocation of the national security measure. Trump administration has already declared Mexican cartels that are responsible for trafficking immigrants across the border as terrorist groups. Although although judge Boseberg did not challenge the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, he ruled that the violent Venezuela those Venezuelan illegal immigrants had grounds to challenge the national security law individually. Well, this is, Stephen Miller had this to stay on Twitter. He said flagrantly unconstitutional.
Kyle Becker posted, Judge Bozberg thinks he's thinks he's the actual president of The United States. Unelected judges do not get a veto over national security matters. This is unconstitutional. And then, and then, congressman Brandon Gill on, on Fox Business had this to say.
[01:03:24] Unknown:
Judge Bozberg's ruling was unconstitutional and lawless. He is usurping the power of the president, acting as commander in chief, to conduct our foreign policy and to repel an invasion. These are powers that are nonjusticable, meaning powers that are not subject to judicial review. The court has no jurisdiction. This is a lawless ruling, and we're not going to allow, activist judges to usurp the president's power and abuse their authority. So I filed articles of impeachment last week, and I'm I'm pushing forward, hard on them.
[01:03:59] Unknown:
And that's the right thing to do. Even though, the chief justice of the Supreme Court has come out and said, oh, no. You you need to go through the appellate process. That's that's the best way to do it. And he's just protecting his partners. That's all. Pam Bondi notified judge Boseberg in a court filing that that he will get no more information on the removal of terrorists in The United States. So this is invoking the state secrets rule. And then, of course, you have all of these, the these these nut jobs, these, like, Patricia Millet.
[01:04:34] Unknown:
There were no procedures in place to notify people. Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemy Act than has happened here. If the government says there's we don't have to give process for that, then y'all could have put me up on Saturday and throw me on a plane. Thinking I'm a I'm a member of Trendaragua and given me no chance to protest it. If your argument is he didn't have to do that, it's an intrusion on the president's war powers, the courts are paralyzed to do anything, then that's a misreading of precedent. It's a misreading of the text of the Alien Enemies Act.
And that can't be an unlawful intrusion on the president's powers. We just can't. The president has has to comply with the constitution and laws like everybody else.
[01:05:31] Unknown:
And that's exactly what he's doing. He is he's in he's using the article two powers that that he has. And then on the twenty fourth, congressman Jim Jordan announced the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing to grill Judge Boseberg, next week,
[01:05:49] Unknown:
over his activist injunctions. Frankly, there's the broader issue of all these judges' injunctions and then decisions like Judge Boseberg, what he's what he's trying to do and how that case is working. We're gonna have hearings on all of that because particularly when you look at judge Boseberg, it starts to look like this is getting totally political from this guy, particularly when you remember he's also the judge who was part of the whole Trump Russia FISA court granting those warrants that allowed the Comey FBI to spy on president Trump's campaign.
[01:06:20] Unknown:
So we're gonna look at that issue as well. But, hopefully, we can get that bill passed next week on the house floor, move it to the senate, hopefully get it to the president's desk. What do you think you're what do you think you're gonna find here? It seems to me like it's pretty black and white. You know, you go, you find the judge that's gonna rule in your favor, and it's been going on for twenty plus years.
[01:06:39] Unknown:
Yeah. That's why we wanna limit it to just that jurisdiction, just the parties of the case so it doesn't have nationwide implications. But, yeah, there's the way the left operates. They go to these judges and they go after president Trump, as the speaker indicated, disproportionately more there than elsewhere. But with judge Boseberg, think about this. I mean, I think the president with his order on these gang members sending him back or sending him to El Salvador, I think, constitutionally is on solid ground. Article two, section one, first sentence, executive power shall be vested in a president of The United States. Statutorily, the Alien Enemies Act, predatory incursion.
That's certainly what this was. Gang members coming here illegally doing terrible things. And then finally, you got this judge saying this crazy decision, turn the plane around, Bring the bad guys back to America. That makes no sense. So when you look at all that coupled with this judge's history with the FISA court, with the sentence he gave to, to Klein Smith, the lawyer, Kevin Klein Smith, who altered the document in front of the FISA court, it really starts to look like judge Boseberg is operating purely political against the president. And that's what we wanna have hearings on, this broad issue and some of what judge Boseberg is doing. And so we're gonna start those next week, and we think senator Grassley is gonna do the same.
[01:08:02] Unknown:
I'm looking forward to those hearings. I don't know about you. I am absolutely looking forward to them because I wanna hear this. This this this this you know, you would talk about constitutional crises. This this is potentially constitutional crisis. This is the judicial branch usurping the authority of the executive branch. And this is exactly what the separation of powers was intended to do. It it to, for. It it's to keep each each branch in check. Yes. Absolutely. But it also specifically lays out the responsibilities of each of the branches. And the the judicial branch cannot step on the feet of the executive branch, and just like the legislative branch can't step on the feet of the judicial branch, and so on and so forth. But the legislative branch controls the purse. The legislative branch can cut off the funding to the judicial branch, at least the circuit courts, and close down those districts.
So ultimately, the people are in charge. And I'm I'm glad to see because I thus, Mike Johnson came out and said, earlier today that, they were they were considering pulling the funding from from these, the these, these districts, so they can operate. And I think that's finally somebody's somebody stepped up and said it. You know, the Republican party has always been so, you know, light handed when it comes to to to exercising their authority, especially when they have control of the house and the senate and the White House. So this is great news. This is this is just fantastic. And I and I'm hope you know, I I you know, you don't you don't wanna see the problems like this in the country. Absolutely not. You don't wanna see that stuff. But you do wanna see you you do wanna see the branches of government functioning the way they were intended to, and and you're starting to see that now. And it and and and I know it's a shock to a lot of people.
But you're getting a crash course in civics right here, right now. I mean, you know, shame on us as a country that, you know, since the nineteen seventies, we haven't been teaching American civics, and how our government is supposed to operate constitutionally. And that's because I think if we did that, then you wouldn't have all these, the these, you know, shock and surprise reactions from people over watching the different branches of government interact the way they're supposed to be. I think this is great. This is great civics lesson. Alright. So, we'll move on to this, and we'll wrap this up at this point. So, so how many of you remember, this this wonderful moment from, the, racist congresswoman from, Dallas?
If it plays. Oh, well. Yeah. I don't know what is going on with with with the Rumble studio tonight. This is just ridiculous. Nothing's playing. Anyway, so the, the racist from, Dallas, Jasmine Crockett, she referred to the governor of the state of Texas, as as Hot Wheels, and, she's appropriately gotten some blowback on that. And, Greg Abbott, basically, let me see if I can play it this way. Let's try this.
[01:12:08] Unknown:
And, because we in these hot ass Texas streets, honey, Y'all know we got governor Hot Wheels down there. Come on now. And and the only thing hot about him is that he is a hot ass mess, honey. So, so yes. Yes. Yes. That's your that's your,
[01:12:31] Unknown:
your elected representative right there, referring to the sitting governor of her state as Hot Wheels. Now, governor Abbott, has, responded to that. Well, actually, let's go to, send well, since I can't show it for some reason through the through the rumble studio. I'm having a bad night here. Jasmine Crockett said this, I wasn't thinking about the governor's condition. I was thinking about the planes, trains, and automobiles he used to transfer migrants into communities led by black mayors deliberately stoking tension and fear among the most vulnerable. Literally, the next line I said was that he was a hot mess, a hot ass mess, Referencing his terrible policies. At no point did I mention or allude to his condition, so I am even more appalled at the very people who unequivocally support Trump, a man known for racially insensitive nicknames and mocking those with disabilities, are now outraged.
Now, of course, she's going to, you know, play the victim. Right? Because that's what she does the best. She plays the victim. So, governor Abbott, came back with, where is it? Texas governor Abbott fired back a Democratic representative, Jasmine Crockett, after she went after him for being in a wheelchair, citing that the Democrats have nothing to sell but hate. He said he went on to say, it's another day and another disaster by the Democrats. The reality is they have no vision, no policy. They have nothing to sell but hate, and Americans are not buying it. It's one reason why Texas is going to remain red.
And, I I agree with that. I I think that's the case too. I I think that Americans as a whole, our, as a whole are tired of the race baiting. They're tired of the name calling. They're tired of the, just just the overall the the woke hyper progressive direction that the left is going, and and I think people had enough of that have enough Have had enough of it and, are looking for something different, looking for something change some kind of a change, and they're looking for adults to be in charge. This woman is she's ghetto trash.
Exactly. This is exactly what she is. I mean, she also went after Marjorie Taylor Greene at a at a, during an oversight committee meeting. I think it was last year or something that, she she said, that Marjorie Taylor Greene was, is is a bad built bleach blonde butch body, you know, in the middle of a hearing. I mean, which is totally uncalled for and and just lacks any kind of decorum. So, what I'm hoping to see, is, what representative Randy Weber out of Texas, is in the process of doing, and he's introducing a resolution to censure Crockett on immediately.
So, that is what I'm hoping for. I'm hoping not only that my hoping that that, that, that that they do censure her. I'm hoping that they do eventually come around to expelling her from Congress because her her her her, her demeanor and, and and and her remarks are, quote, as what the resolution says, unbecoming a member of Congress and discriminatory in nature. And, of course, you know, we're also keeping an eye on things too because, don't forget her birthday is coming up March 29. And if you remember, she, she called for, violence against, Elon Musk and Tesla, for a global day of action on her birthday. So, so we're looking forward to, seeing how all of this here plays out.
But she, she definitely needs to be disciplined in the Congress for her to the things that she has said and done, and, I'm looking forward to that happening. Alright. Let's see what else we got, and then we're gonna wrap this this whole thing up here. Let's, take a look. We already covered that, and we covered that already.
[01:17:06] Unknown:
Yeah. So good thing for egg lovers.
[01:17:13] Unknown:
Let's see. Yeah. We could we could play that. Let's do that.
[01:17:29] Unknown:
As soon as I get it. There we go. So good thing for egg lovers, egg prices have definitely turned a corner. President Trump touting that his administration has been able to bring down the egg cost of eggs with large egg prices on average down 59% since February 28, and that's according to USDA data.
[01:17:47] Unknown:
So egg price is down 59%. That's great. That's always good news. We also had had this clip that I wanted to play for you. This is, this is, secretary Wright, talking about, unleashing American energy. He said, in an interview on Fox Business. Let's, let's get to that.
[01:18:10] Unknown:
Well, US natural gas production is at an all time high today. So gas production's already growing. I was down a few weeks ago at a brand new liquefied natural gas export terminal in Louisiana coming online. We've approved four more within the first hundred days of the Trump admin
[01:18:28] Unknown:
Oops. Sorry. Administration
[01:18:30] Unknown:
that'll be under construction soon. So, boy, our capacity to export is growing rapidly. We have pipeline exports to Mexico. Our crude exports are at all time highs and will continue to grow. So I think we're in a good position, but I think six months from now, twelve months from now, even a better position. And we have a lot of states in our country that don't have the advantage of low cost American energy, and that's because they made political choices for expensive energy. I don't think the citizens of those states realize that if you're paying very high prices, it's because the politicians in your state or surrounding states chose expensive energy policies. Yeah. So we're gonna do everything we can to get low cost energy to them as well. Well
[01:19:14] Unknown:
Alright. That's always good news. Unleashing American energy is always a great thing. Alright. I think, I think that's gonna be it for us,
[01:19:24] Unknown:
here for tonight. What US natural gas production, is it an
[01:19:28] Unknown:
Just one disaster after another tonight. So I I think let's pull the plug before it gets worse. What a shit show tonight was. Alright, folks. Well, I just wanna say again, say thank you to everybody for, tuning in and putting up with the bullshit tonight. Really sorry about all the technical issues that we've been having. I I would like to blame Rumble exclusively for that, but I can't, because a lot of it's my messing around with stuff here while we're doing the show, and I shouldn't be doing that. So, alright. So anyway, tomorrow, don't forget, we're starting early 06:00. Tomorrow, we're gonna have Doug Robbins, with us on the show, and we're looking forward to having a nice little talk with him.
Very, very good guy. I'm I'm sure you're gonna like the conversation we're gonna have. And, hopefully, we'll, well, everything will be worked out tomorrow. We won't have any of these issues. We'll actually be able to get through the show and have video and try to figure out what the problem here is, with, with with everything that's going on with with the studio platform tonight. Alright, folks. Again, don't forget, website, joeroos.com. That's joeroos.com. And, head over to the contact section, open that thing up, and send us over any questions, comments, cares, or concerns that you have. Also, don't forget to check out the, the, the donation tab. If you could help us out, we would really appreciate with really appreciate any help that you could, send our way, whether it's a one time donation or if it's a, or joining up with one of our producer tiers, we would really appreciate it. And speaking of our producers, you wanna give our shout out as always to our executive producers, Wayne and Rosanna Rankin. Thank you so much, guys for your support. I really do appreciate you. And, I'm looking forward to, to, trying to right this ship for tomorrow.
Alright, folks. Don't forget. Make Texas independent again. Go podcasting. Keep a steady stride, and have a great night. We'll see you tomorrow. Good night, folks.
Introduction and Technical Issues
Upcoming Guests and Show Announcements
Discussion on Animal Testing and PETA
Support and Donations for the Show
Russia-Ukraine Conflict Update
Signal Gate Controversy
Press Conference and Media Criticism
Judge Boseberg and Legal Challenges
Investment and Economic Growth
Political Commentary and Censorship
Energy Policies and Economic Impact
