In this episode of the No Pill Podcast, we delve into the origins of vaccination, focusing on the smallpox vaccine and its creator, Edward Jenner. We begin with a discussion on current events, including a humorous take on the ever-changing weather in Oklahoma and a thank you to a generous listener. We then explore the alarming news from NASA about a potential asteroid impact in 2032, highlighting the ongoing efforts in planetary defense.
Our main topic takes us back to the 18th century, examining the controversial beginnings of the smallpox vaccine. We challenge the traditional narrative of Edward Jenner as a medical hero, presenting an alternative view from Dr. Walter Hadwin, who criticized Jenner's methods and the efficacy of the vaccine. This historical critique is juxtaposed with modern vaccine debates, drawing parallels between past and present vaccine controversies.
We also touch on the broader implications of fear as a tool for compliance, both in historical and contemporary contexts, and discuss the role of government and media in promoting vaccination. The episode concludes with a reflection on the importance of questioning official narratives and the enduring relevance of vaccine skepticism.
[00:00:47]
Andrew Hoffman:
Hello, everybody. This is Andrew Hoffman. You're listening to episode three of the No Pill Podcast. Thinking about calling this one the original Fauci, going all the way back to smallpox and Edward Jenner. So hopefully, you enjoy. We'll start off with some smorgasbord of current event stuff and then get into the the main topic there. Well, let's see. It is mid to late February here in Piedmont, Oklahoma, and it is cold. But, the nice thing about Oklahoma, it's about zero degrees right now, and it's supposed to be 70 degrees warmer within a week. So looking forward to that. Right off the top here, I'd like to say thank you to Russell.
He goes by RD in the Revelations Radio News Telegram group. Reached out and said, hey. How do I get you some value? And sent it via PayPal. So thank you very much, Russell. That was very generous of you. Not sure how much value I'm providing yet, but I can say that donation is definitely motivating to to keep going. So thank you very much. If you feel similarly led to contribute, project rocks eighty six. That's [email protected] is the email address that my, PayPal account is tied to. Just do friends and family and then, none of us pay any fees. So [email protected]. I did also attempt to set everything up, kind of from since I was starting from scratch with the value for value. I have not heard from from Tom in the revelations radio news chat as to whether I was successful or not. So if you are into that sort of thing, you can kinda mess around and see if that is working or not. Send me a couple Satoshis my way, and I'll I will let you know if I get them. Thanks to everyone out there.
Let's start out tonight by talking about my favorite thing in the world, news from NASA about space and things that are coming to to kill us all. This was posted on on the X machine. New NASA has increased the chance of a major asteroid smashes into Earth in 2032, now giving it a 3.1 chance up from 2.6% last week. I've already predicted this is gonna even out at at 3.3% chance, if you know what I mean. NASA says the odds the asteroid hits Earth is one in thirty two. It is big enough to wipe out an entire city. The large cities with the highest risk are Bogota, Abid Abidjan, Lagos, Cardam, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Dhaka.
According to experts, the 177 foot diameter asteroid would release eight megatons of energy on impact, 500 times the energy released by the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. NASA has successfully tested asteroid deflection technologies. Well, you bet they have. China will also be testing its own technology on a small asteroid in 2027. This is not a crisis at this point in time. This is not the dinosaur killer. This is not the planet killer. This is at most dangerous for a city, said head of the European Space Agency's planetary defense office, Richard Moisel.
Am I the only one who didn't know that, there was a European Space Agency planetary defense office? Well, I I'm sure I was the only one. So, yes, this is this is totally not, NASA and the European Space Agency trying to justify their budgets in existence. This is something very real that you should be 3.1% worried about coming up in 2032. You know? Coming up at 2032, we gotta give you an update every week, though. And this is and it seems like every I I don't wanna say every couple weeks, but fairly often, there's an asteroid and it's, oh, don't worry. It's not gonna hit us, but, oh, it's closer than we thought, and just goes on and on. So this is you know, if you follow Revelation's radio news, I was very skeptical, especially of the NASA mission, you know, where they went out to the asteroid, scooped rocks off, brought it back, you know, livestreamed the the impact on the asteroid, brought stuff back, landed it at one of their facilities in Utah, and then spent millions of dollars trying to open the container. This was this was something that actually happened. So I'm not gonna bother throwing that one in the show notes, but this this newest one, the twenty thirty two asteroid will will be in the show notes.
So along with that, we've got, we've got some other disease news, but we'll save that for a little bit later. Let's start out with the clip here from someone who used to play quite a bit on Revelations Radio News. Goes by What's Her Face. She's been away for years, back now, was taking care of a a preemie baby that she had, and sounds like everything's going well there. So congratulations to her, and she's
[00:06:30] Unknown:
back with some commentary on current events. Trump has won the American presidential election, and the tide is finally turning here in the upside down. In just a few short months, we've gone from the grim prospect of more deadly vaccines, microchips implanted in our brains, AI robots taking over our jobs, and digital currency further restricting our freedoms to the much more hopeful prospect of more deadly vaccines, microchips implanted in our brains, AI robots taking over our jobs, and digital currency further restricting our freedoms, but while wearing red hats. Conservatives have entered a brand new era. They're no longer the boring fundamentalists lecturing us about how to live our lives. They're pro gay marriage, anti life, and huge proponents of divorce. They wanna legalize drugs and popularize porn. The moral majority is out, relativism is in, which is important for the cause because as Andrew Tate said in regard to Elon Musk's thirteenth child conceived via whoremongering, if all your children are from one woman, you are not a conqueror. I guess we finally forgotten about all those monogamous Christian colonialists who conquered the entire continent. The only thing separating the left and the right at this point is the human imagination and the Gulf Of Mexico.
Or, sorry, the Gulf Of America. I'm so sorry. And with just a few more years and a few more concessions, I predict the two opposing parties will finally come together in unity, marching the city streets hand in hand for precisely the fifteen minutes it takes to reach the bounds of their given district to achieve one common goal, the complete and total fulfillment
[00:08:08] Andrew Hoffman:
of the new world order. What do you people think out there? Is she being a little harsh? Should we be a little happier about Trump and Elon, everything that's going on? Yeah. I don't know. I I tend to be slightly more positive than she is, but it is hard to hard to ignore the fact that there's the vaccines, digital currencies, all the financial stuff is still is still very new world work new world order y. So this is it's not all fixed, to put it that way. I did see reference online that Elon Musk had a child that died of SIDS. I wasn't aware of that. I'm not a % sure it's true.
Didn't verify it. But if that is the case, that is something that should wake someone up if they're not not a New World Order puppet or controlled through blackmail or other means. Having a kid die and figuring out eventually that it was the vaccines that did it should shake you a little bit. So that's how that's how anti vaxxers are born right there. So I think there is a lot of stuff changing, lot of stuff happening, but there is an element of the agenda of marching is marching forward, and we're just we're being thrown a few concessions here and there. It's like, okay. We'll get rid of the woke stuff. Okay. We'll trample in. Okay.
You get all these sort of important, but not crucially important concessions and the overall agenda, the overall, you know, friends of Epstein, servants of Satan agenda keeps marching forward. So along those lines, back in the Revelations Radio News days, we talked a lot about, first, the original COVID virus in virus in quotes, being a bioweapon and then the COVID vaccine being a bioweapon. Initially, I think I was I was pretty convinced that the that it was an artificial kind of bioweapon y type deal. And, eventually, I kinda came to the conclusion that COVID itself, there there wasn't a lot going on. You know? When you take away the way people were treated, thrown on a ventilator, given remdesivir, you know, poisoned any any number of ways, not to mention just constant fear propaganda being being pumped at you twenty four seven, that there wasn't really a whole lot going on there. The vaccine, though, definitely a lot of damage from the vaccine.
That would still kinda put that in in the bioweapon camp. So I've got a a couple clips related to that. The first one, doctor Andrew Kaufman, no relation, is saying that the COVID virus was not a bioweapon. And then in the second, the well known doctor Peter McCullough saying the COVID vaccine is a bioweapon and has those hallmarks. So let's listen to those, and we'll go from there. If there was a release of a real biological
[00:11:15] Unknown:
weapon, if such a thing were possible to make, I would expect there to be real devastation, but there wasn't real devastation. There was just the appearance of devastation, like changing the numbers of flu deaths to COVID deaths or recategorizing heart attacks to COVID or dementia to COVID or car accidents to COVID. That's what we saw. We did see also hospital and nursing home protocols in various discrete locations killing people, but nowhere was there evidence
[00:11:43] Unknown:
of any kind of biological weapon of any kind. As a doctor, I have never seen something so injurious to the human body. It invades the brain. It invades the heart. It causes brain and heart damage. It invades the bone marrow. It stimulates antibodies to actually start to attack our own platelets and our other cells in our body. It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen like we've never seen. Data from, University of Pittsburgh suggesting it causes cancer. Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting and potentially causes cancer in a single protein.
It's a weapon. In fact, there are three papers, one by Farkas, published in Military Medicine and Thubay Yen, published in preprint. They've actually concluded it is a bioweapon. It is a bioweapon according to strict military criteria. It's a bioweapon.
[00:12:45] Andrew Hoffman:
So my point is not so much to to get into the weeds, how much of COVID was planned and the vaccine bioweapon, and was that planned before, and all that stuff. I've I've talked a lot about that in the past. But I wanna emphasize the fact that fear is the bioweapon. Right? Fear is what drives the vaccine uptake. Fear is what drove the the measures, you know, the complying with the measures drove the compliance, drove the shutting down of businesses, shifting everything to Amazon. The whole operation relied on fear to make it happen. And this is true both of everything that happened during COVID, but it's also true of kind of the everyday vaccines. And this is something that goes on and on and off. Just randomly look it up, and there's gonna be a story about some outbreak or other. Right? Recently, it was, measles.
Measles outbreak in Texas. Oh, no. For the cases there, forty fifty eight cases, thirteen of the patients have been hospitalized. Four of the cases are vaccinated. Rest are unvaccinated or their vaccination status is unknown. In other words, they are recent arrivals in the country is what I would take from that. But the I mean, it's it's the measles. Right? So that which if you've got the MMR vaccine, measles is supposed to be the scary one. So this is yeah. I mean, you don't want measles. You don't want people dying of measles. Right? That's what the that's what they say. You can pull these stories anywhere. RFK Jr is gonna your child's gonna die for measles if the if RFK Jr gets gets confirmed. This is it's an ongoing thing, and I I kinda wanted to trace this back a little bit. Let's start with, nope. Actually, let's let's go back further. So this is from Robert f Kennedy junior himself on children's health defense.
MMR vaccines poison pill, months after puberty, reduced testosterone and sperm counts. 04/04/2019. Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry's orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking so 2019 straight fear campaign around measles. Boy, it's back again in 2025. Surprise, surprise. By seeking to impose further mandating of Merck's measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarfed the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck's fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine.
Instead of punishing Merck for its chicanery, legislatures are rewarding the company by making it impossible to refuse Merck's profitable vaccine, subjecting a generation of American children to the risk of complications from mumps infection at an age that nature never intended. When younger children experience bumps, the virus is relatively harmless. Infected children often exhibit no symptoms whatsoever. When mumps strikes adolescents or adults, on the other hand, the infection can cause far more serious adverse effects, including inflammation of various organs, brain, pancreas, ovaries, and testicles, as well as damage to male fertility, which as as a side note, all these vaccines damage male or female fertility or both.
It just it it's not a coincidence. Back to the article. Inflammation of one or both testicles, a condition called orchitis, occurs in approximately one in three postpebral men who get mumps and can contribute to sperm defects and subfertility as well as impairing the function of cells that produce testosterone. An estimated thirty to eighty seven percent of men with bilateral orchitis induced by mumps experience full blown infertility. Thirty to eighty seven percent. It's a large range, but it's a large percentage regardless. A major cause for concern given the significant declines in male fertility observed over the past several decades.
Thus, it appears that Merck's vaccine, instead of protecting children, not only delays onset of disease to later age cohorts, but also has the potential to cause serious and permanent injury. Alright. And he goes through some of the, well, let's go ahead and read it here. Merck and mumps vaccines. Let's take a quick, quick history of mumps and MMR vaccination in The United States. The Food and Drug Administration licensed Merck's initial mumps only vaccine in 1967. In 1971, Merck introduced its first combination MMR vaccine followed by the MMR two vaccine in 1978, which repurposed the rubella component and the MMR plus varicella ProQuad vaccine in 02/2005.
Since the initial 1967 vaccine, Merck has enjoyed a unique monopoly position in The US market for mumps in MMR vaccines with combined sales of MMR two and ProQuad bringing in over $720,000,000 in 2014 alone. Merck consistently places in the top five pharmaceutical companies globally in The and the market valued its stocks at a seven year high as of late twenty eighteen. In order to score the lucrative MMR monopoly, Merck needed to satisfy the FDA that all three components of the combination vaccine could achieve 95 efficacy, but the most portion was bedeviling.
In fact, as alleged in a lawsuit filed by two senior Merck scientists in 2010 under the False Claims Act, the company has known since the late nineteen nineties that the mumps component of the MMR is far less than ninety five percent effective. A 02/2005 study published in vaccine estimated the effectiveness of mumps vaccination be closer to sixty nine percent, and the authors noted that the results were consistent with other studies. The two whistleblowers assert in the lawsuit, which is reportedly headed to trial sometime this year, that Merck has willfully and illegally maintained its monopoly through ongoing manipulation and by representing to the public and government agencies a falsely inflated efficacy rate for its mumps vaccine.
Specifically, the two scientists claim that Merck executives ordered them to use rig methodologies, including taking antibodies from rabbits and adding them to human blood vials in order to goal regulators into assuming an antibody response robust and durable enough to merit licensing. When those enhanced tactics did not achieve Merck's fabricated ninety five percent efficacy rate that whistleblower's alleged, the company resorted to simply falsifying the test data and engaging in other fraudulent activities. Alright. So that's the rest of that article will be in the show notes on on the critiquing eugenics substack.
And I'll play a clip from this other article. They've got a kinda mechanical AI voice reading it, which is probably better than me. So we'll go ahead and and play that. And, this comes from the article, no proof MMR vaccine is safer than measles, mumps, or rubella infection. So there's no proof that the vaccine is safer than actually getting any of those or all of those three infections.
[00:20:35] Unknown:
The rate of disability or death among healthy children from any of those three diseases is incredibly rare. PIC wrote: For children 10 at normal risk, I. E, with normal levels of vitamin A and infected after birth, the pre vaccine annual risk of death or permanent disability from measles, mumps, and rubella respectively was one in one million, one in one point six million, and one in two point one million. Therefore, the cumulative annual risk of a fatal or permanently disabling case of any of those diseases was about one in five hundred thousand, and the risk over a ten year span was one in fifty thousand. In other words, clinical trials would need at least 50,000 subjects to detect one case of death or disability from a measles, mumps, or rubella infection.
Meanwhile, no safety studies on the MMR vaccine have been done that looked for possible genetic mutations, impaired fertility, or cancer, according to the product's package insert. Also, seizures from the MMR vaccine occur five times more often than measles related seizures. Doctor. Liz Mumper, a pediatrician, praised PIC for releasing the collection of data on measles, mumps and rubella, and on the MMR vaccine. Most parents have not had access to the information contained in the thoughtful analysis done by physicians for informed consent. Parents should recognize that the risk of bad outcomes from a measles infection, if their child lives in a developed country with clean water and is not immune deficient, is extraordinarily rare, as PIC reports.
Unfortunately, she added, recent US media reports sensationalized the risks of measles. What's typically missing from measles media reports? PIC's statement on measles cited numerous facts commonly overlooked in many media reports on measles outbreaks, including: The US Measles mortality rate dropped dramatically before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. Immunity from the MMR vaccine wanes so that by age 15, roughly sixty percent of vaccinated children are susceptible to subclinical measles virus infections. Studies have suggested a link between a naturally acquired measles infection and a reduced risk of Hodgkin's and non Hodgkin's lymphomas.
Studies also suggested a link between a naturally acquired measles infection and a lower risk of asthma, eczema, and hay fever. Malnutrition, particularly vitamin a deficiency, is a primary cause of over one hundred thousand measles deaths in underdeveloped countries. Mumper said that the risk of bad outcomes from a measles infection drastically declined with improved public health and better nutrition long before MMR vaccines were available. The risk of bad outcomes has always been more for children in developing countries who are more likely to have nutritional deficiencies including vitamin a and lack access to clean water, Mumper added.
[00:23:30] Andrew Hoffman:
So we've started with the COVID vaccine kinda working our way backwards there. We've got the MMR vaccine, probably the most infamous vaccine out there. Ask anyone with a kid with autism if if they had an MMR vaccine. And it's it's still a conspiracy theory, still, you know, fake news that it can cause any of those issues that that were talked about, seizures, you know, just some some normal normal seizures after after vaccine. Normal, just they just happen to have autism. Nothing to do with the vaccine. And, you know, if the if it were just an issue of, well, it doesn't really work or the diseases it's to prevent aren't really that serious, I mean, it's bad enough. Right? But it's vaccination, it gets a whole lot darker from there. So I wanna share just to and it was in the form of a tweet, but you'll hear at the end there that there's links.
This is a real person, with the an actual case before the vaccine injury court, and she she tells us the story there. It says that I want to share the story of our daughter, Caroline Charlie Baker. Charlie was born on 05/06/2017 after an unremarkable pregnancy. She was delivered via c section weighing six pounds eight ounces. We declined the hep b vaccine at the hospital, preferring to have our own pediatrician administer it. At 18 old, she re received the Recombivax hep b vaccine. She had been thriving, nursing while gaining weight, and was such a content little girl. But twenty two hours later, everything changed. Charlie suffered a sudden cardiac arrest while nursing.
She just stopped. I was at Panera with a colleague, both of us certified registered nurse with neonatal and pediatric experience. By some miracle, we were able to resuscitate her, but she suffered a severe anoxic brain injury leading to a two month stay at Children's Hospital of Detroit, where I was employed as a staff nurse anesthesiologist at the time. She had a million dollar workup, but not one doctor would acknowledge that the vaccine could have caused her cardiac arrest. Genetic testing for her, my husband, and me all came back negative. At two months old, as she was prepared to be discharged, doctors wanted to give her more vaccines.
I didn't know what I know now, but I knew enough to insist that she'd be on a cardiac monitor during them. She received the HIV and Prevnar, and immediately after, she went into bradycardia and apnea. At that moment, my husband and I knew the vaccines had caused this. A neonatologist even admitted the quiet part out loud, saying she routinely tells residents to put the crash cart next to NICU isolates when babies receive vaccines. Charlie died suddenly at four months and two days old in the middle of the night. We have a case in the vaccine injury compensation program or VICP, but special master Nora Beth Dorsey has already indicated that she will rule against us. She, like so many others, is captured by the pharmaceutical industry.
Since losing Charlie, we have both been we have been blessed with two boys, her little brothers, both completely unvaccinated and 100% healthy. While their friends and classmates struggle with asthma, food allergies, autism, chronic ear infections, and other now common childhood, quote, illnesses, my boys have had none of these issues. They're thriving, strong, and healthy in a way that is impossible to ignore. Our case, Baker et al versus secretary of health and human services, and, you know, we had a link to the special master Nora Beth Dorsey. When we file VICP cases with the vaccine injury court cases, we are actually suing the secretary of HHS, and now that position belongs to RFK Jr.
This is our hail Mary. We want some form of justice for our little girl, Sarah Baker. And he's got a picture of her her little baby there. So that's, you know, 2017 is way before any COVID vaccines. That's the recombovax, hep b vaccine started all that, and then she was finished off when she took other vaccines. So this is and then that's a case that's a losing case in the vaccine court with the mother, as a medical professional with all of that, you know, time in the hospital, all that documentation that's still losing case in vaccine injury court. And that that shows you, you know, because there have been cases that have gone through successfully, but, I mean, how many haven't? How many have just been ignored? The pediatrician just says, no. There is no way the vaccine had anything to do with that, and the parent doesn't know any better. You know? Obviously, they don't know any better initially or they wouldn't have gotten the vaccine. So this is it's a it's a huge story. It's been swept under the rug for for an incredibly long time, and the brazenness and the speed speed with which the COVID vaccine was rolled out to everyone, including little kids, kind of, I think, woke people up.
And and, hopefully, more and more people are getting past the well, the COVID vaccine is bad, but that's because the other vaccines are are tested and good, and this is something new and different. Well, not not exactly. So let's in the comments for that tweet, there was a a reply that said, you know, basically, sorry for your loss. My friend wrote this, and it was a link to vaccine.guide. So that's the URL. You you don't even need to go to the show notes to find this one, vaccine dot guide, and it is such a great resource. You can download the entire guide, but it is so well organized, every category.
I'll just read through some of the categories here. So it's got the the text of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated liability for childhood vaccine manufacturers. It's kept the federal vaccine injury compensation program or VACP, which has paid out nearly $5,000,000,000 to those who've been injured or killed by vaccines. And it's got the VAERS, the vaccine adverse event reporting system, which was created to collect data regarding the safety of vaccines administered to the public. Then it has vaccine schedule and inserts. This is all, you know, CDC information, but it's it's highlights some of the important parts of it there.
Vaccine ingredients, excipients, and contaminants. This one looks is crazy. So you click on that. It's got, an overview, CDC vaccine ingredient and excipient list, vaccine ingredients and mediums defined, health risk assessment of toxicity. And then in the aborted fetal cell DNA category, the MRC five human lung fibroblast cells, the WI 38 human lung fibroblast cells, spontaneous integration of human DNA fragments into host genomes. So every one of these things goes to research papers on these subjects, if it's not just like an ingredients list. And then, new human diploid cell line, WAVAX two and its suitability as a candidate for vaccine production.
Then it talks has a whole section on aluminum adjuvants, guide to aluminum vaccines, all the research that's been done there. Fetal bovine serum. Yes. That's in vaccines. It it's amazing that the same the same people can be hardcore pro vaccine. They probably have no that are, you know, animal rights folks. You know, back when I was a kid, the the animal rights people were like the liberal anti vaccine people, but not not anymore, you know, all in. But the way they get fetal bovine serum is they kill the mother cow and then get the serum from the unborn baby cow, and that's what goes into into vaccines.
There's other contaminations, glyphosate, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, thimerosal, and mercury. So this just that one section just on the contaminants, excipients, which I think is another term for adjuvants, but so that's just in in that one section, asymptomatic transmission and shedding, which vaccines make the body susceptible to infection with the disease they aim to prevent and potentially infect others, And then effectiveness, outbreaks, herd immunity, how vaccines are measured for effectiveness via antibody production, and is this an accurate measure of protection?
Spoiler alert. No. It is not. Are vaccines as effective as they are widely claimed to be, and can they provide herd immunity? No. They cannot. Goes on and on. Necessity of vaccination, adverse reactions and events. And finally, misconduct and financial incentives. So each one of those I mean, you could spend all day in there. So vaccine.guide, even if you're not a show notes person, bookmark that page. It will it will come in handy. So if you made it to this point in the episode, I I think that that's some value just with that, vaccine.guide.
So now let's let's see. We've got we've got lots of stuff here. So I wanted to go back to, you know, the the original vaccine, which if you listen to virtually anyone, everyone agrees the original vaccine is the smallpox vaccine by Edward Jenner. And first, let's let's take a look at, kind of the CDC version. They put out very, you know, very strenuous, academic articles like this one, the fragrance of the heifer's breath. Alright? So it's, smallpox was the most terrible of all the ministers of death, wrote English historian Thomas Macaulay. In the seventeenth century, the smallpox was always present, unlike the plague which visited on occasion.
Before this time, the disease did not pose a serious threat to the English or other nations in Europe, perhaps because, as scant available records suggest, less virulent forms of of the disease were endemic. In the account of Queen Mary's death 1694, Macaulay spoke of smallpox as indiscriminate and pernicious, attacking royalty and the poor alike, turning the babe into a changeling at which the mother shuddered and making the eyes and cheeks of the betrothed maiden objects of horror to the lover. Let's we'll skip down. Talks about how poets talked about smallpox. You know, it's very academic paper, CDC.
So we'll skip down to the Edward Jenner part. Alright. Or just before that, the roots of smallpox in antiquity have been argued as have efforts to control it. The practice of variolation, inoculation with a small amount of material from a a pustule or scab of a smallpox patient had long been known in Asia and was introduced to Europe and North America in the early seventeen hundreds. But it was not widely practiced because of the risk for disease or death to the inoculated person and the risk for creating new outbreaks. Yeah.
That was that was the reason. Then Edward Jenner, seventeen forty nine to 1823 came along. An alert physician, he observed that someone in his community, mostly farmers and milkmaids frequently exposed to cowpox, did not come down with smallpox. Bucking anecdotal evidence was in standard variolation. He went out on a limb. The first experiment of on the 05/14/1796 was made upon a lad of the name of Phipps. In his arm, a little vaccine virus was inserted, taken from the hand of a young woman who had been accidentally infected by a cow. On his being inoculated, some months afterwards, it proved that he was secure. As soon as I could again furnish myself with virus from the cow, I made an arrangement for a series of inoculations.
Jenner wrote his observations and his inquiry into the causes and effects of variola variola vaccinee, a disease discovered in some of the Western counties of England, particularly Gloucestershire and known by the name of cowpox. He submitted this small but potent study for publication in the philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, of which he was a member recognized for his con contributions to the field of natural history, aka he was not a doctor. The manuscript was rejected, so he published it himself. An early practitioner of one medicine generally referred to this cowpox material as vaccine from the Latin vaca or cow, acknowledging the essential link between human and animal health.
There you go. World Health Organization One Health initiative there. Eventually, the procedure of injecting the vaccine was generally referred to as vaccination. Luis Pasteur later insisted that all inoculations designed to protect against disease be called vaccinations in honor of Jenner and named his own discovery discovery rabies vaccine, though it had no connection with cows. Alright. So there you go. Edward Jenner, what a big hero. Now that CDC's history of smallpox, you know, oh, look. It was there's clearly smallpox on the mummy. You know, I'm sure they they know. Some of the same Edward Jenner propaganda. And then global smallpox eradication program in 1959, the World Health Organization started a plan to rid the world of smallpox.
Unfortunately, this global eradication campaign suffered from a lack of funds, personnel, and commitment from countries, and the shortage of vaccine donations. Despite their best efforts, smallpox was still widespread in 1966, causing regular outbreaks across South America, Africa, and Asia. The intensified eradication program began in 1967 with the promise to renewed efforts. Laboratories in many countries where smallpox occurred regularly were able to produce more higher quality freeze dried vaccine. Other factors that played an important role in the success of the intensified efforts included the development of the bifurcated needle, the establishment of the case surveillance system, and mass vaccination campaigns.
Okay. Yeah. Sure. That's so they they finally got it figured out. So we we had the vaccine, you know, Edward Jenner days, 1796. But then it, you know, took till 1967, and we got it figured out then. Right? So that's the official story on it. Now let's let's look at the the unofficial story. Let's let's see if there's anyone challenging old Edward Jenner back in the day. So this is this is from over a hundred and twenty five years ago. This is a critique of the safe and effective smallpox vaccine by doctor Walter Hadwin, which I'm sure you haven't heard of. I had certainly never heard of him.
And I put this down. This is a post I made on my, critiquing eugenics substack back in January nineteenth of twenty twenty two. So kind of drawing some comparisons between the COVID nineteen vaccines and the original original vaccines. Alright. So I'll read through this here. There are many metaphors and descriptions for the experience of all of us go through when we first start to question the mainstream version of either current or historical events, taking the red pill, going down the rabbit hole, waking up, etcetera. The COVID nineteen scandemic is causing a number of people to question official narratives for the first time.
That is probably because their lives are being heavily impacted by those narratives, by the contradictions, statistical manipulation, absurd absurd fear porn propaganda, tyrannical lockdown rules, and rank hypocrisy of politicians and public health officials. The COVID nineteen vaccines and vaccine mandates have been two of the most hotly contested issues that the and the discoveries being made about them have been have led many people to make mandatory vaccines their line in the sand. I can see why they have done so. Like them, I am opposed to COVID nineteen vaccine mandates, and like them, I very much appreciate the detailed research and analysis of the available data that has been done by Steve Kirsch, Ryan Christian, and many, many others.
However, I think it is very important that we do not allow pharma and the feds to attempt to limit our criticism only to vaccine mandates and only to COVID nineteen vaccines. If we can plan and contest this vaccine and this mandate alone, we leave the door open for future better vaccines and justifiable mandates when Bill Gates' pandemic two point o bioterrorism edition comes around. I believe the entire history of vaccines deserves critical examination. For the purposes of this post though, I will focus on only one, smallpox vaccine. Alright. This comes from a speech given by Walter Hadwin, a physician in Gloucester, England.
Hadwin had run a foul of the city's mandatory small mandatory smallpox vaccine policy by refusing to allow his own children to be vaccinated in the midst of the Gloucester smallpox epidemic. As As you read this, look for parallels between the smallpox vaccine of the eighteen hundreds and the modern vaccines of today. In his speech, Hadwin presented the Edward Jenner vaccine origin story in a much different light than the version we get in their high school high school biology textbooks today, or as we just found out from the current CDC website there. Alright. According to Hadwin, Jenner never passed a medical examination in his life. Although after twenty years of practicing medicine and conducting research, he purchased a medical degree from a Scottish university that he had never attended.
And and you thought today's remote learning was bogus. The whole milkmaids don't get smallpox claim was a superstition among milkmaids based on an experiment wrongly credited to Jenner that had been performed twenty years earlier by a farmer named Benjamin Jeste. Local doctors did not take Jenner or the milkmaids seriously. They saw that the milkmaids did in fact get still get smallpox. The belief that exposure to cowpox protected against smallpox was based in large part on the fact fact that both had the word pox in their names. For the record, cowpox has very different symptoms from smallpox.
The study that Jenner did for his cowpox vaccine against smallpox consisted of a trial group of one one lone boy named James Phipps. Somehow, the lab managed to survive having cow lymph scraped into him by Jenner. Weeks later, he again managed to survive by not developing smallpox after Jenner scraped smallpox infected tissue into him. Of course, Jenner had no control group, yet he thought this study of Phipps combined with anecdotal accounts he had heard of people who had had cowpox in the past and not later developed smallpox was sufficient evidence for him to write up his findings and present a paper to the Royal Society. It was rejected. The dilemma Jenner faced was that there were many people who had both cowpox and smallpox. Based on that fact, Jenner invented a novel idea that there are two kinds of pox.
One is the genuine kind and the other spurious. And those who have had cowpox and yet still have smallpox afterwards have had the spurious variety. Those who had had cowpox and did not have smallpox afterwards were those who had had the genuine disease. Not all participants in Jenner's other experiments were as fortunate as James Phipps had been. Jenner inoculated a boy named John Baker with horse grease, direct from the horse's heels. He later intended to inoculate him with smallpox in order to see what it would take whether it would take, but the poor boy died in the workhouse directly afterwards from a contagious fever contact contracted from the inoculation.
Far from being discouraged by Baker's death and abandoning his horse grease theory, however, Jenner instead took some of the horse grease cowpox and inoculated six children. And without waiting to see the results or to to prove whether it would take or not, he rushed to London to get his paper printed. And in that paper, he had the audacity to assert that it was not necessary to wait to see the result because the proofs he already had were so conclusive. And and time experiments had told such an extraordinary tale, although he had completed but one experiment in his life, and that did not prove it at all. That boy, James Phipps, was hawked around about the country as a proof of the value of vaccination, but he had not been inoculated with horse grease cowpox at all, but with spontaneous cowpox, which Jenner now declared in the second paper was absolutely useless and unprotected against the disease.
There was considerable resistance to the idea of injecting horse grease into children, So Jenner went back to his original hypothesis that inoculation with cowpox would prevent smallpox even though he had already he already knew this to be false. To help promote his new slash old theory, he he invented a new name for cowpox, calling cowpox smallpox of the cow or variola vacciae, but you may search in vain for any attempt on upon his part to prove it. Well, Jenner deserves much, and then this is back to to my writing there. While Jenner deserves much blame for his role in developing the scourge of vaccination, we can't ignore the parts both the government and the news media played in promoting Jenner and the smallpox vaccine.
Jenner may not have been a real doctor, but he was persuasive enough to convince politicians, including the king and queen of England, that his research was worth funding. Once Jenner had political support, the country's real doctors quickly lost their previous well founded skepticism and jumped on board. Does Hadwin's description of the way the smallpox vaccine was promoted and argued against remind you of any current events? He said, in eighteen o eight, the whole of the London Doctor signed a testimonial and declared that this discovery was such that persons once vaccinated were forever protected against smallpox.
They very soon began to talk about compulsion. In 1853, they managed to pass that compulsory vaccination act, which we are here to protest against tonight. I think one of the most serious complaints against this whole system is they dare not trust it to its own merits. Do people want smallpox? If the system is any good, it will speak for itself. If it is bad, they have no right to enforce it. You may ask, why was compulsion necessary? The reason was simply this, the people were beginning to find out it was no good. They're beginning to clamor again for inoculation and the working classes who reason more by hard facts of experience than by medical doc dogmas found that it was not the slightest use for protecting people against smallpox.
In 1811, there had occurred a notable instant instance of failure. Lord Robert Grubbsner, ten years of age, had who had been vaccinated by Jenner himself, was now taking a smallpox and lay hovering between life and death. Jenner sat beside the bedside of his illustrious patient. When at last, the boy began to turn and get and get better. Jenner turned to the father with, what a lucky job he was vaccinated. If he'd not been, he surely would have died. Thus, Jenner started the glorious doctrine of mitigation, which has been handed handed down as the heirloom of the medical vaccineist ever since.
Okay. So the COVID vaccine, it wasn't supposed to prevent transmission, but we never said that. It's just gonna it it makes it so it's not so COVID's not serious. So you won't die from COVID. You won't be hospitalized. Okay. Because all of it back 1811 there. There's no record of whether or not lord Robert Groszner took to social media to thank Jenner and the vaccine for his survival of smallpox and to encourage his followers to take smallpox seriously and get vaccinated. For those of you keeping track at home, bear in mind that the smallpox vaccine at first promised lifetime immunity from smallpox. But when people begin getting smallpox anyway, the narrative shifted to the vaccine mitigating symptoms.
Later, it again shifted to a new claim. The vaccine protected against death from death from smallpox. But we are told that and this is back to Hadwin. We are told that children don't die. Well, that may be all very well. We will see whether whether they die or not. Let's turn to Germany, for instance. During that epidemic I spoke of just now, there were two thousand one hundred forty cases of children 10 who had smallpox, and seven hundred thirty six of them died. There were fifteen hundred and three cases vaccinated under five, and there were five hundred and seventy three deaths. You may say, then why is it they don't die in this country?
Let's turn to the molars orphanage in Bristol. In 1872, there were seven hundred forty children all vaccinated. Of course, you gotta vaccinate the orphans. Right? Two hundred ninety two cases of smallpox amongst them, and there were seventeen deaths. But I can give you the reason perhaps why the children don't die, why vaccinated children don't die from smallpox so much as we should expect. In 1886, for instance, there were two hundred seventy five cases of smallpox deaths altogether throughout England and Wales. There is only one vaccinated child that died from smallpox under 10 years of age, but there were ninety three children that died from chickenpox.
And the registrar general and commented upon the fact declared that nearly, if if not all, those cases should have been registered as smallpox because chickenpox never kills. And doctor Ogle, the chief in the registrar general's department, told the Royal Commission as a witness before it that he had never known chickenpox to kill a child in his life. Why would they not been registered as smallpox? In 1893, the last published returns we have, there were a hundred and twenty seven children who reported to have died from chickenpox.
So that perhaps that will explain why the children don't die. So in late eighteen hundreds and they're just oh, well, if you're vaccinated, then you don't have smallpox. You have chickenpox, and that's that's what killed you. As the failure of the smallpox vaccine became more and more apparent, did government and and doctors admit they were wrong? Of course not. On the contrary, they declared it was time for boosters or revaccination as they called it. Repeat inoculations in the eighteen hundreds. Hadwin gives the gives the example of the British army.
Then look at our revaccinated army. From 1860 to 1888, we had no less than three thousand nine hundred fifty three cases of smallpox in the British army, and three hundred ninety one of them died. If revaccination won't protect the soldier, how is it going to protect the nurse? In Egypt in 1889, they died at the rate of seventeen hundred fifty per million people from smallpox. But as a matter of fact, the government do not believe in revaccination. The other day when the epidemic broke out in London, a regimen of soldiers soldiers that was stationed at Saint John's would near and so terrified were the government with regard to the matter that an urgent order came down from the horse guards sending the regiment right away to the other end of England, lest the revaccinated soldiers should catch smallpox.
I heard an amusing incident the other day about a magistrate who had some of those ignorant fanatics like some of you before him. He told the defendants that they ought to be ashamed of themselves letting their children go unvaccinated and added, why should I let my children go unprotected from this dire disease on any account? A short time afterwards, illness came into his house, and the doctor told him that a servant had the smallpox. Then no sooner did the old gentleman hear that. Then his courage oozed out his fingertips, and he set for the nearest fires for the nearest fire escape in order that the children might be taken away through the window so as to avoid passing the door of the infected chamber.
Then there are those doctors who tell us that not only have they been revaccinated, but but that that if a smallpox epidemic occurred, they would be done again, which shows that they have not much faith in revaccination. At Burke Hampstead, sir Ashley Cooper, who's been sitting on the bench, declared in a speech on the subject that he'd been vaccinated no less than seven times and was such was his wonderful faith in the operation that he declared with the courage of a Roman gladiator. If an epidemic occurred, I would go and be vaccinated again. Why, if they had tattooed the old gentleman from head to foot, he would still be crying, do pray give me more vaccination.
As you may have guessed, smallpox vaccine was quite unsafe in addition to being totally ineffective. As with SIDS or MIS c today, miss c, the deaths were often blamed on something other than the vaccine. Back to Hadwin. What about syphilis? It is a very strange thing that up to 1853, when the compulsory vaccination act was passed, the annual annual deaths from syphilis of children under one year old did not exceed three hundred eighty. The very next year, the number had jumped up nearly double to five hundred ninety one. And syphilis in infants under one year of age has gone on increasing every year since 1883, when the number of deaths reach eight eighteen hundred and thirteen.
It has increased fourfold in infants since the passing of the compulsory vaccination act, and yet in adults, it has remained almost stationary. Surely, this speaks for itself. These deaths have only begun to decline since in proportion to the number of vaccinations to birth have declined. Therefore, we have not merely children dying primarily from vaccination, but from a concurrent disease. Even the despicable practice of blaming vaccine induced brains falling on parents for shaking their baby is not entirely new. Had recounts a similar type of event in which government officials blame the parents for something caused by a government mandated vaccine. I must mention to you the case of Emily Maud, child of Leeds. The child who was vaccinated died, and a coroner's jury having held an inquest, it was brought in conclusively that she died from syphilis as the result of vaccination.
A a certificate to the effect went up to the government who sent an inspector down to investigate the case. He took photographs of the teeth of the other children, declared they were syphilitic, and reported that it was not the vaccine lymph which produces syphilis, but that the fault lay with the mother herself. At last, the Royal Commission heard of the case and sent down independent investigators who found that there was not a vestige of syphilis in the remaining children and that the charge against the mother was false. It is a terrible thing I say that not only have you to stand the chance of losing the child who is dear to you, but you have to have to stand the chance of the powerful machinery of government being turned on in order to take away the character of your wife.
Alright. So almost everyone is has heard of Edward Jenner yet virtually no one has heard of Walter Hadwin. Many have heard of James Phipps, the successful Jenner test subject. Virtually none of us, however, have heard of John Baker or lord Robert Grovsner and still less the more indirect gender victims like Emily Monchott. Will we likewise will we likewise forget the victims of Fauci and Pfizer? I pray we won't. We must never forget Maddie de Guerre, Ernesto Ramirez junior, Amber Suarez, and many other innocent people around the world who have already been grievously injured or killed by the COVID nineteen vaccines. I say already because there are many more sacrificial lambs still to come.
Yes. The COVID nineteen scandemic and the COVID nineteen vaccine propaganda are absurd and blatantly false. However, is the entire narrative really more bogus than the science of the smallpox vaccine? Will we allow COVID nineteen vaccines and boosters to be administered and sometimes mandated for the next one hundred plus years? Will we allow the history books to remember Fauci and Gates as fondly as they remember Edward Jenner? Will we allow the mRNA vaccine platform discovery to be celebrated and off limits to criticism as the cow lips, scrapers, and jabbers? I will give doctor Hadwin the last word.
Then when you go before the bench, the magistrates tell you they're only administrators of the law, which have been the plea of the greatest persecutors of every age. Remember that the vaccination act does not deal with the drunkard. It is the best classes of the country, the earnest, honest people, the Sunday school teachers who love their children in their homes. The Scotch covenanters, Anne Askew, John Wycliffe, and the apostles of old were told that their persecutors were only the administrators of the law, but they defied the law and the proudest privileges and blessings we possess have been won for us by the lawbreakers of this country.
It is not a question merely of the health, but the very lives of the children which are at stake in this matter. And I believe the present century shall not close until we have placed our foot upon the dragon's neck and plunge the sword of liberties through its heart. They tell us we are trying to rise rouse the country with a crazy cry, the craze the cry of liberty of conscience, and we are not ashamed of that cry. It is that crazy cry which snapped the shackles of despotism in the past. That crazy cry is spreading at the present time throughout the length and breadth of the country. We are told that the intelligent port portion of the population is against us.
That's false. That crazy crisis is sending higher and higher into a raging and tremendous storm. That liberty, which has been won by the blood of our forefathers for the theological conscience, is the liberty we demand for the scientific conscience. Already, it is thundering at the door of the House of Commons, and it shall be heard. Yes. We are going forward with the crazy cry of liberty and conscience upon our unfurled banner, and we never intend to rest until we get it. That all come from the case against vaccination by Walter Hadwin. So got a link to his speech there if you wanna see it.
That about wraps it up. I I gotta admit I'm I'm pretty tired of these things. It's much shorter than Revelations Radio News, but when I have to talk the whole time, it it is a lot more work. So I appreciate all of you sticking with me through that long read. And if you made it to this point, especially thank you very much. This has been episode three of the No Pill podcast, the original fountain talking about Edward Jenner. Hope you enjoyed it, and I look forward to speaking with you all again soon. Reach out to me via email or through the Revelations Radio News Telegram channel.
Look forward to speaking to you soon. Thank you. And please do remember, it's okay to be an anti vaxxer.
Hello, everybody. This is Andrew Hoffman. You're listening to episode three of the No Pill Podcast. Thinking about calling this one the original Fauci, going all the way back to smallpox and Edward Jenner. So hopefully, you enjoy. We'll start off with some smorgasbord of current event stuff and then get into the the main topic there. Well, let's see. It is mid to late February here in Piedmont, Oklahoma, and it is cold. But, the nice thing about Oklahoma, it's about zero degrees right now, and it's supposed to be 70 degrees warmer within a week. So looking forward to that. Right off the top here, I'd like to say thank you to Russell.
He goes by RD in the Revelations Radio News Telegram group. Reached out and said, hey. How do I get you some value? And sent it via PayPal. So thank you very much, Russell. That was very generous of you. Not sure how much value I'm providing yet, but I can say that donation is definitely motivating to to keep going. So thank you very much. If you feel similarly led to contribute, project rocks eighty six. That's [email protected] is the email address that my, PayPal account is tied to. Just do friends and family and then, none of us pay any fees. So [email protected]. I did also attempt to set everything up, kind of from since I was starting from scratch with the value for value. I have not heard from from Tom in the revelations radio news chat as to whether I was successful or not. So if you are into that sort of thing, you can kinda mess around and see if that is working or not. Send me a couple Satoshis my way, and I'll I will let you know if I get them. Thanks to everyone out there.
Let's start out tonight by talking about my favorite thing in the world, news from NASA about space and things that are coming to to kill us all. This was posted on on the X machine. New NASA has increased the chance of a major asteroid smashes into Earth in 2032, now giving it a 3.1 chance up from 2.6% last week. I've already predicted this is gonna even out at at 3.3% chance, if you know what I mean. NASA says the odds the asteroid hits Earth is one in thirty two. It is big enough to wipe out an entire city. The large cities with the highest risk are Bogota, Abid Abidjan, Lagos, Cardam, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Dhaka.
According to experts, the 177 foot diameter asteroid would release eight megatons of energy on impact, 500 times the energy released by the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. NASA has successfully tested asteroid deflection technologies. Well, you bet they have. China will also be testing its own technology on a small asteroid in 2027. This is not a crisis at this point in time. This is not the dinosaur killer. This is not the planet killer. This is at most dangerous for a city, said head of the European Space Agency's planetary defense office, Richard Moisel.
Am I the only one who didn't know that, there was a European Space Agency planetary defense office? Well, I I'm sure I was the only one. So, yes, this is this is totally not, NASA and the European Space Agency trying to justify their budgets in existence. This is something very real that you should be 3.1% worried about coming up in 2032. You know? Coming up at 2032, we gotta give you an update every week, though. And this is and it seems like every I I don't wanna say every couple weeks, but fairly often, there's an asteroid and it's, oh, don't worry. It's not gonna hit us, but, oh, it's closer than we thought, and just goes on and on. So this is you know, if you follow Revelation's radio news, I was very skeptical, especially of the NASA mission, you know, where they went out to the asteroid, scooped rocks off, brought it back, you know, livestreamed the the impact on the asteroid, brought stuff back, landed it at one of their facilities in Utah, and then spent millions of dollars trying to open the container. This was this was something that actually happened. So I'm not gonna bother throwing that one in the show notes, but this this newest one, the twenty thirty two asteroid will will be in the show notes.
So along with that, we've got, we've got some other disease news, but we'll save that for a little bit later. Let's start out with the clip here from someone who used to play quite a bit on Revelations Radio News. Goes by What's Her Face. She's been away for years, back now, was taking care of a a preemie baby that she had, and sounds like everything's going well there. So congratulations to her, and she's
[00:06:30] Unknown:
back with some commentary on current events. Trump has won the American presidential election, and the tide is finally turning here in the upside down. In just a few short months, we've gone from the grim prospect of more deadly vaccines, microchips implanted in our brains, AI robots taking over our jobs, and digital currency further restricting our freedoms to the much more hopeful prospect of more deadly vaccines, microchips implanted in our brains, AI robots taking over our jobs, and digital currency further restricting our freedoms, but while wearing red hats. Conservatives have entered a brand new era. They're no longer the boring fundamentalists lecturing us about how to live our lives. They're pro gay marriage, anti life, and huge proponents of divorce. They wanna legalize drugs and popularize porn. The moral majority is out, relativism is in, which is important for the cause because as Andrew Tate said in regard to Elon Musk's thirteenth child conceived via whoremongering, if all your children are from one woman, you are not a conqueror. I guess we finally forgotten about all those monogamous Christian colonialists who conquered the entire continent. The only thing separating the left and the right at this point is the human imagination and the Gulf Of Mexico.
Or, sorry, the Gulf Of America. I'm so sorry. And with just a few more years and a few more concessions, I predict the two opposing parties will finally come together in unity, marching the city streets hand in hand for precisely the fifteen minutes it takes to reach the bounds of their given district to achieve one common goal, the complete and total fulfillment
[00:08:08] Andrew Hoffman:
of the new world order. What do you people think out there? Is she being a little harsh? Should we be a little happier about Trump and Elon, everything that's going on? Yeah. I don't know. I I tend to be slightly more positive than she is, but it is hard to hard to ignore the fact that there's the vaccines, digital currencies, all the financial stuff is still is still very new world work new world order y. So this is it's not all fixed, to put it that way. I did see reference online that Elon Musk had a child that died of SIDS. I wasn't aware of that. I'm not a % sure it's true.
Didn't verify it. But if that is the case, that is something that should wake someone up if they're not not a New World Order puppet or controlled through blackmail or other means. Having a kid die and figuring out eventually that it was the vaccines that did it should shake you a little bit. So that's how that's how anti vaxxers are born right there. So I think there is a lot of stuff changing, lot of stuff happening, but there is an element of the agenda of marching is marching forward, and we're just we're being thrown a few concessions here and there. It's like, okay. We'll get rid of the woke stuff. Okay. We'll trample in. Okay.
You get all these sort of important, but not crucially important concessions and the overall agenda, the overall, you know, friends of Epstein, servants of Satan agenda keeps marching forward. So along those lines, back in the Revelations Radio News days, we talked a lot about, first, the original COVID virus in virus in quotes, being a bioweapon and then the COVID vaccine being a bioweapon. Initially, I think I was I was pretty convinced that the that it was an artificial kind of bioweapon y type deal. And, eventually, I kinda came to the conclusion that COVID itself, there there wasn't a lot going on. You know? When you take away the way people were treated, thrown on a ventilator, given remdesivir, you know, poisoned any any number of ways, not to mention just constant fear propaganda being being pumped at you twenty four seven, that there wasn't really a whole lot going on there. The vaccine, though, definitely a lot of damage from the vaccine.
That would still kinda put that in in the bioweapon camp. So I've got a a couple clips related to that. The first one, doctor Andrew Kaufman, no relation, is saying that the COVID virus was not a bioweapon. And then in the second, the well known doctor Peter McCullough saying the COVID vaccine is a bioweapon and has those hallmarks. So let's listen to those, and we'll go from there. If there was a release of a real biological
[00:11:15] Unknown:
weapon, if such a thing were possible to make, I would expect there to be real devastation, but there wasn't real devastation. There was just the appearance of devastation, like changing the numbers of flu deaths to COVID deaths or recategorizing heart attacks to COVID or dementia to COVID or car accidents to COVID. That's what we saw. We did see also hospital and nursing home protocols in various discrete locations killing people, but nowhere was there evidence
[00:11:43] Unknown:
of any kind of biological weapon of any kind. As a doctor, I have never seen something so injurious to the human body. It invades the brain. It invades the heart. It causes brain and heart damage. It invades the bone marrow. It stimulates antibodies to actually start to attack our own platelets and our other cells in our body. It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we've never seen like we've never seen. Data from, University of Pittsburgh suggesting it causes cancer. Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting and potentially causes cancer in a single protein.
It's a weapon. In fact, there are three papers, one by Farkas, published in Military Medicine and Thubay Yen, published in preprint. They've actually concluded it is a bioweapon. It is a bioweapon according to strict military criteria. It's a bioweapon.
[00:12:45] Andrew Hoffman:
So my point is not so much to to get into the weeds, how much of COVID was planned and the vaccine bioweapon, and was that planned before, and all that stuff. I've I've talked a lot about that in the past. But I wanna emphasize the fact that fear is the bioweapon. Right? Fear is what drives the vaccine uptake. Fear is what drove the the measures, you know, the complying with the measures drove the compliance, drove the shutting down of businesses, shifting everything to Amazon. The whole operation relied on fear to make it happen. And this is true both of everything that happened during COVID, but it's also true of kind of the everyday vaccines. And this is something that goes on and on and off. Just randomly look it up, and there's gonna be a story about some outbreak or other. Right? Recently, it was, measles.
Measles outbreak in Texas. Oh, no. For the cases there, forty fifty eight cases, thirteen of the patients have been hospitalized. Four of the cases are vaccinated. Rest are unvaccinated or their vaccination status is unknown. In other words, they are recent arrivals in the country is what I would take from that. But the I mean, it's it's the measles. Right? So that which if you've got the MMR vaccine, measles is supposed to be the scary one. So this is yeah. I mean, you don't want measles. You don't want people dying of measles. Right? That's what the that's what they say. You can pull these stories anywhere. RFK Jr is gonna your child's gonna die for measles if the if RFK Jr gets gets confirmed. This is it's an ongoing thing, and I I kinda wanted to trace this back a little bit. Let's start with, nope. Actually, let's let's go back further. So this is from Robert f Kennedy junior himself on children's health defense.
MMR vaccines poison pill, months after puberty, reduced testosterone and sperm counts. 04/04/2019. Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry's orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking so 2019 straight fear campaign around measles. Boy, it's back again in 2025. Surprise, surprise. By seeking to impose further mandating of Merck's measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarfed the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck's fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine.
Instead of punishing Merck for its chicanery, legislatures are rewarding the company by making it impossible to refuse Merck's profitable vaccine, subjecting a generation of American children to the risk of complications from mumps infection at an age that nature never intended. When younger children experience bumps, the virus is relatively harmless. Infected children often exhibit no symptoms whatsoever. When mumps strikes adolescents or adults, on the other hand, the infection can cause far more serious adverse effects, including inflammation of various organs, brain, pancreas, ovaries, and testicles, as well as damage to male fertility, which as as a side note, all these vaccines damage male or female fertility or both.
It just it it's not a coincidence. Back to the article. Inflammation of one or both testicles, a condition called orchitis, occurs in approximately one in three postpebral men who get mumps and can contribute to sperm defects and subfertility as well as impairing the function of cells that produce testosterone. An estimated thirty to eighty seven percent of men with bilateral orchitis induced by mumps experience full blown infertility. Thirty to eighty seven percent. It's a large range, but it's a large percentage regardless. A major cause for concern given the significant declines in male fertility observed over the past several decades.
Thus, it appears that Merck's vaccine, instead of protecting children, not only delays onset of disease to later age cohorts, but also has the potential to cause serious and permanent injury. Alright. And he goes through some of the, well, let's go ahead and read it here. Merck and mumps vaccines. Let's take a quick, quick history of mumps and MMR vaccination in The United States. The Food and Drug Administration licensed Merck's initial mumps only vaccine in 1967. In 1971, Merck introduced its first combination MMR vaccine followed by the MMR two vaccine in 1978, which repurposed the rubella component and the MMR plus varicella ProQuad vaccine in 02/2005.
Since the initial 1967 vaccine, Merck has enjoyed a unique monopoly position in The US market for mumps in MMR vaccines with combined sales of MMR two and ProQuad bringing in over $720,000,000 in 2014 alone. Merck consistently places in the top five pharmaceutical companies globally in The and the market valued its stocks at a seven year high as of late twenty eighteen. In order to score the lucrative MMR monopoly, Merck needed to satisfy the FDA that all three components of the combination vaccine could achieve 95 efficacy, but the most portion was bedeviling.
In fact, as alleged in a lawsuit filed by two senior Merck scientists in 2010 under the False Claims Act, the company has known since the late nineteen nineties that the mumps component of the MMR is far less than ninety five percent effective. A 02/2005 study published in vaccine estimated the effectiveness of mumps vaccination be closer to sixty nine percent, and the authors noted that the results were consistent with other studies. The two whistleblowers assert in the lawsuit, which is reportedly headed to trial sometime this year, that Merck has willfully and illegally maintained its monopoly through ongoing manipulation and by representing to the public and government agencies a falsely inflated efficacy rate for its mumps vaccine.
Specifically, the two scientists claim that Merck executives ordered them to use rig methodologies, including taking antibodies from rabbits and adding them to human blood vials in order to goal regulators into assuming an antibody response robust and durable enough to merit licensing. When those enhanced tactics did not achieve Merck's fabricated ninety five percent efficacy rate that whistleblower's alleged, the company resorted to simply falsifying the test data and engaging in other fraudulent activities. Alright. So that's the rest of that article will be in the show notes on on the critiquing eugenics substack.
And I'll play a clip from this other article. They've got a kinda mechanical AI voice reading it, which is probably better than me. So we'll go ahead and and play that. And, this comes from the article, no proof MMR vaccine is safer than measles, mumps, or rubella infection. So there's no proof that the vaccine is safer than actually getting any of those or all of those three infections.
[00:20:35] Unknown:
The rate of disability or death among healthy children from any of those three diseases is incredibly rare. PIC wrote: For children 10 at normal risk, I. E, with normal levels of vitamin A and infected after birth, the pre vaccine annual risk of death or permanent disability from measles, mumps, and rubella respectively was one in one million, one in one point six million, and one in two point one million. Therefore, the cumulative annual risk of a fatal or permanently disabling case of any of those diseases was about one in five hundred thousand, and the risk over a ten year span was one in fifty thousand. In other words, clinical trials would need at least 50,000 subjects to detect one case of death or disability from a measles, mumps, or rubella infection.
Meanwhile, no safety studies on the MMR vaccine have been done that looked for possible genetic mutations, impaired fertility, or cancer, according to the product's package insert. Also, seizures from the MMR vaccine occur five times more often than measles related seizures. Doctor. Liz Mumper, a pediatrician, praised PIC for releasing the collection of data on measles, mumps and rubella, and on the MMR vaccine. Most parents have not had access to the information contained in the thoughtful analysis done by physicians for informed consent. Parents should recognize that the risk of bad outcomes from a measles infection, if their child lives in a developed country with clean water and is not immune deficient, is extraordinarily rare, as PIC reports.
Unfortunately, she added, recent US media reports sensationalized the risks of measles. What's typically missing from measles media reports? PIC's statement on measles cited numerous facts commonly overlooked in many media reports on measles outbreaks, including: The US Measles mortality rate dropped dramatically before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. Immunity from the MMR vaccine wanes so that by age 15, roughly sixty percent of vaccinated children are susceptible to subclinical measles virus infections. Studies have suggested a link between a naturally acquired measles infection and a reduced risk of Hodgkin's and non Hodgkin's lymphomas.
Studies also suggested a link between a naturally acquired measles infection and a lower risk of asthma, eczema, and hay fever. Malnutrition, particularly vitamin a deficiency, is a primary cause of over one hundred thousand measles deaths in underdeveloped countries. Mumper said that the risk of bad outcomes from a measles infection drastically declined with improved public health and better nutrition long before MMR vaccines were available. The risk of bad outcomes has always been more for children in developing countries who are more likely to have nutritional deficiencies including vitamin a and lack access to clean water, Mumper added.
[00:23:30] Andrew Hoffman:
So we've started with the COVID vaccine kinda working our way backwards there. We've got the MMR vaccine, probably the most infamous vaccine out there. Ask anyone with a kid with autism if if they had an MMR vaccine. And it's it's still a conspiracy theory, still, you know, fake news that it can cause any of those issues that that were talked about, seizures, you know, just some some normal normal seizures after after vaccine. Normal, just they just happen to have autism. Nothing to do with the vaccine. And, you know, if the if it were just an issue of, well, it doesn't really work or the diseases it's to prevent aren't really that serious, I mean, it's bad enough. Right? But it's vaccination, it gets a whole lot darker from there. So I wanna share just to and it was in the form of a tweet, but you'll hear at the end there that there's links.
This is a real person, with the an actual case before the vaccine injury court, and she she tells us the story there. It says that I want to share the story of our daughter, Caroline Charlie Baker. Charlie was born on 05/06/2017 after an unremarkable pregnancy. She was delivered via c section weighing six pounds eight ounces. We declined the hep b vaccine at the hospital, preferring to have our own pediatrician administer it. At 18 old, she re received the Recombivax hep b vaccine. She had been thriving, nursing while gaining weight, and was such a content little girl. But twenty two hours later, everything changed. Charlie suffered a sudden cardiac arrest while nursing.
She just stopped. I was at Panera with a colleague, both of us certified registered nurse with neonatal and pediatric experience. By some miracle, we were able to resuscitate her, but she suffered a severe anoxic brain injury leading to a two month stay at Children's Hospital of Detroit, where I was employed as a staff nurse anesthesiologist at the time. She had a million dollar workup, but not one doctor would acknowledge that the vaccine could have caused her cardiac arrest. Genetic testing for her, my husband, and me all came back negative. At two months old, as she was prepared to be discharged, doctors wanted to give her more vaccines.
I didn't know what I know now, but I knew enough to insist that she'd be on a cardiac monitor during them. She received the HIV and Prevnar, and immediately after, she went into bradycardia and apnea. At that moment, my husband and I knew the vaccines had caused this. A neonatologist even admitted the quiet part out loud, saying she routinely tells residents to put the crash cart next to NICU isolates when babies receive vaccines. Charlie died suddenly at four months and two days old in the middle of the night. We have a case in the vaccine injury compensation program or VICP, but special master Nora Beth Dorsey has already indicated that she will rule against us. She, like so many others, is captured by the pharmaceutical industry.
Since losing Charlie, we have both been we have been blessed with two boys, her little brothers, both completely unvaccinated and 100% healthy. While their friends and classmates struggle with asthma, food allergies, autism, chronic ear infections, and other now common childhood, quote, illnesses, my boys have had none of these issues. They're thriving, strong, and healthy in a way that is impossible to ignore. Our case, Baker et al versus secretary of health and human services, and, you know, we had a link to the special master Nora Beth Dorsey. When we file VICP cases with the vaccine injury court cases, we are actually suing the secretary of HHS, and now that position belongs to RFK Jr.
This is our hail Mary. We want some form of justice for our little girl, Sarah Baker. And he's got a picture of her her little baby there. So that's, you know, 2017 is way before any COVID vaccines. That's the recombovax, hep b vaccine started all that, and then she was finished off when she took other vaccines. So this is and then that's a case that's a losing case in the vaccine court with the mother, as a medical professional with all of that, you know, time in the hospital, all that documentation that's still losing case in vaccine injury court. And that that shows you, you know, because there have been cases that have gone through successfully, but, I mean, how many haven't? How many have just been ignored? The pediatrician just says, no. There is no way the vaccine had anything to do with that, and the parent doesn't know any better. You know? Obviously, they don't know any better initially or they wouldn't have gotten the vaccine. So this is it's a it's a huge story. It's been swept under the rug for for an incredibly long time, and the brazenness and the speed speed with which the COVID vaccine was rolled out to everyone, including little kids, kind of, I think, woke people up.
And and, hopefully, more and more people are getting past the well, the COVID vaccine is bad, but that's because the other vaccines are are tested and good, and this is something new and different. Well, not not exactly. So let's in the comments for that tweet, there was a a reply that said, you know, basically, sorry for your loss. My friend wrote this, and it was a link to vaccine.guide. So that's the URL. You you don't even need to go to the show notes to find this one, vaccine dot guide, and it is such a great resource. You can download the entire guide, but it is so well organized, every category.
I'll just read through some of the categories here. So it's got the the text of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated liability for childhood vaccine manufacturers. It's kept the federal vaccine injury compensation program or VACP, which has paid out nearly $5,000,000,000 to those who've been injured or killed by vaccines. And it's got the VAERS, the vaccine adverse event reporting system, which was created to collect data regarding the safety of vaccines administered to the public. Then it has vaccine schedule and inserts. This is all, you know, CDC information, but it's it's highlights some of the important parts of it there.
Vaccine ingredients, excipients, and contaminants. This one looks is crazy. So you click on that. It's got, an overview, CDC vaccine ingredient and excipient list, vaccine ingredients and mediums defined, health risk assessment of toxicity. And then in the aborted fetal cell DNA category, the MRC five human lung fibroblast cells, the WI 38 human lung fibroblast cells, spontaneous integration of human DNA fragments into host genomes. So every one of these things goes to research papers on these subjects, if it's not just like an ingredients list. And then, new human diploid cell line, WAVAX two and its suitability as a candidate for vaccine production.
Then it talks has a whole section on aluminum adjuvants, guide to aluminum vaccines, all the research that's been done there. Fetal bovine serum. Yes. That's in vaccines. It it's amazing that the same the same people can be hardcore pro vaccine. They probably have no that are, you know, animal rights folks. You know, back when I was a kid, the the animal rights people were like the liberal anti vaccine people, but not not anymore, you know, all in. But the way they get fetal bovine serum is they kill the mother cow and then get the serum from the unborn baby cow, and that's what goes into into vaccines.
There's other contaminations, glyphosate, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, thimerosal, and mercury. So this just that one section just on the contaminants, excipients, which I think is another term for adjuvants, but so that's just in in that one section, asymptomatic transmission and shedding, which vaccines make the body susceptible to infection with the disease they aim to prevent and potentially infect others, And then effectiveness, outbreaks, herd immunity, how vaccines are measured for effectiveness via antibody production, and is this an accurate measure of protection?
Spoiler alert. No. It is not. Are vaccines as effective as they are widely claimed to be, and can they provide herd immunity? No. They cannot. Goes on and on. Necessity of vaccination, adverse reactions and events. And finally, misconduct and financial incentives. So each one of those I mean, you could spend all day in there. So vaccine.guide, even if you're not a show notes person, bookmark that page. It will it will come in handy. So if you made it to this point in the episode, I I think that that's some value just with that, vaccine.guide.
So now let's let's see. We've got we've got lots of stuff here. So I wanted to go back to, you know, the the original vaccine, which if you listen to virtually anyone, everyone agrees the original vaccine is the smallpox vaccine by Edward Jenner. And first, let's let's take a look at, kind of the CDC version. They put out very, you know, very strenuous, academic articles like this one, the fragrance of the heifer's breath. Alright? So it's, smallpox was the most terrible of all the ministers of death, wrote English historian Thomas Macaulay. In the seventeenth century, the smallpox was always present, unlike the plague which visited on occasion.
Before this time, the disease did not pose a serious threat to the English or other nations in Europe, perhaps because, as scant available records suggest, less virulent forms of of the disease were endemic. In the account of Queen Mary's death 1694, Macaulay spoke of smallpox as indiscriminate and pernicious, attacking royalty and the poor alike, turning the babe into a changeling at which the mother shuddered and making the eyes and cheeks of the betrothed maiden objects of horror to the lover. Let's we'll skip down. Talks about how poets talked about smallpox. You know, it's very academic paper, CDC.
So we'll skip down to the Edward Jenner part. Alright. Or just before that, the roots of smallpox in antiquity have been argued as have efforts to control it. The practice of variolation, inoculation with a small amount of material from a a pustule or scab of a smallpox patient had long been known in Asia and was introduced to Europe and North America in the early seventeen hundreds. But it was not widely practiced because of the risk for disease or death to the inoculated person and the risk for creating new outbreaks. Yeah.
That was that was the reason. Then Edward Jenner, seventeen forty nine to 1823 came along. An alert physician, he observed that someone in his community, mostly farmers and milkmaids frequently exposed to cowpox, did not come down with smallpox. Bucking anecdotal evidence was in standard variolation. He went out on a limb. The first experiment of on the 05/14/1796 was made upon a lad of the name of Phipps. In his arm, a little vaccine virus was inserted, taken from the hand of a young woman who had been accidentally infected by a cow. On his being inoculated, some months afterwards, it proved that he was secure. As soon as I could again furnish myself with virus from the cow, I made an arrangement for a series of inoculations.
Jenner wrote his observations and his inquiry into the causes and effects of variola variola vaccinee, a disease discovered in some of the Western counties of England, particularly Gloucestershire and known by the name of cowpox. He submitted this small but potent study for publication in the philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, of which he was a member recognized for his con contributions to the field of natural history, aka he was not a doctor. The manuscript was rejected, so he published it himself. An early practitioner of one medicine generally referred to this cowpox material as vaccine from the Latin vaca or cow, acknowledging the essential link between human and animal health.
There you go. World Health Organization One Health initiative there. Eventually, the procedure of injecting the vaccine was generally referred to as vaccination. Luis Pasteur later insisted that all inoculations designed to protect against disease be called vaccinations in honor of Jenner and named his own discovery discovery rabies vaccine, though it had no connection with cows. Alright. So there you go. Edward Jenner, what a big hero. Now that CDC's history of smallpox, you know, oh, look. It was there's clearly smallpox on the mummy. You know, I'm sure they they know. Some of the same Edward Jenner propaganda. And then global smallpox eradication program in 1959, the World Health Organization started a plan to rid the world of smallpox.
Unfortunately, this global eradication campaign suffered from a lack of funds, personnel, and commitment from countries, and the shortage of vaccine donations. Despite their best efforts, smallpox was still widespread in 1966, causing regular outbreaks across South America, Africa, and Asia. The intensified eradication program began in 1967 with the promise to renewed efforts. Laboratories in many countries where smallpox occurred regularly were able to produce more higher quality freeze dried vaccine. Other factors that played an important role in the success of the intensified efforts included the development of the bifurcated needle, the establishment of the case surveillance system, and mass vaccination campaigns.
Okay. Yeah. Sure. That's so they they finally got it figured out. So we we had the vaccine, you know, Edward Jenner days, 1796. But then it, you know, took till 1967, and we got it figured out then. Right? So that's the official story on it. Now let's let's look at the the unofficial story. Let's let's see if there's anyone challenging old Edward Jenner back in the day. So this is this is from over a hundred and twenty five years ago. This is a critique of the safe and effective smallpox vaccine by doctor Walter Hadwin, which I'm sure you haven't heard of. I had certainly never heard of him.
And I put this down. This is a post I made on my, critiquing eugenics substack back in January nineteenth of twenty twenty two. So kind of drawing some comparisons between the COVID nineteen vaccines and the original original vaccines. Alright. So I'll read through this here. There are many metaphors and descriptions for the experience of all of us go through when we first start to question the mainstream version of either current or historical events, taking the red pill, going down the rabbit hole, waking up, etcetera. The COVID nineteen scandemic is causing a number of people to question official narratives for the first time.
That is probably because their lives are being heavily impacted by those narratives, by the contradictions, statistical manipulation, absurd absurd fear porn propaganda, tyrannical lockdown rules, and rank hypocrisy of politicians and public health officials. The COVID nineteen vaccines and vaccine mandates have been two of the most hotly contested issues that the and the discoveries being made about them have been have led many people to make mandatory vaccines their line in the sand. I can see why they have done so. Like them, I am opposed to COVID nineteen vaccine mandates, and like them, I very much appreciate the detailed research and analysis of the available data that has been done by Steve Kirsch, Ryan Christian, and many, many others.
However, I think it is very important that we do not allow pharma and the feds to attempt to limit our criticism only to vaccine mandates and only to COVID nineteen vaccines. If we can plan and contest this vaccine and this mandate alone, we leave the door open for future better vaccines and justifiable mandates when Bill Gates' pandemic two point o bioterrorism edition comes around. I believe the entire history of vaccines deserves critical examination. For the purposes of this post though, I will focus on only one, smallpox vaccine. Alright. This comes from a speech given by Walter Hadwin, a physician in Gloucester, England.
Hadwin had run a foul of the city's mandatory small mandatory smallpox vaccine policy by refusing to allow his own children to be vaccinated in the midst of the Gloucester smallpox epidemic. As As you read this, look for parallels between the smallpox vaccine of the eighteen hundreds and the modern vaccines of today. In his speech, Hadwin presented the Edward Jenner vaccine origin story in a much different light than the version we get in their high school high school biology textbooks today, or as we just found out from the current CDC website there. Alright. According to Hadwin, Jenner never passed a medical examination in his life. Although after twenty years of practicing medicine and conducting research, he purchased a medical degree from a Scottish university that he had never attended.
And and you thought today's remote learning was bogus. The whole milkmaids don't get smallpox claim was a superstition among milkmaids based on an experiment wrongly credited to Jenner that had been performed twenty years earlier by a farmer named Benjamin Jeste. Local doctors did not take Jenner or the milkmaids seriously. They saw that the milkmaids did in fact get still get smallpox. The belief that exposure to cowpox protected against smallpox was based in large part on the fact fact that both had the word pox in their names. For the record, cowpox has very different symptoms from smallpox.
The study that Jenner did for his cowpox vaccine against smallpox consisted of a trial group of one one lone boy named James Phipps. Somehow, the lab managed to survive having cow lymph scraped into him by Jenner. Weeks later, he again managed to survive by not developing smallpox after Jenner scraped smallpox infected tissue into him. Of course, Jenner had no control group, yet he thought this study of Phipps combined with anecdotal accounts he had heard of people who had had cowpox in the past and not later developed smallpox was sufficient evidence for him to write up his findings and present a paper to the Royal Society. It was rejected. The dilemma Jenner faced was that there were many people who had both cowpox and smallpox. Based on that fact, Jenner invented a novel idea that there are two kinds of pox.
One is the genuine kind and the other spurious. And those who have had cowpox and yet still have smallpox afterwards have had the spurious variety. Those who had had cowpox and did not have smallpox afterwards were those who had had the genuine disease. Not all participants in Jenner's other experiments were as fortunate as James Phipps had been. Jenner inoculated a boy named John Baker with horse grease, direct from the horse's heels. He later intended to inoculate him with smallpox in order to see what it would take whether it would take, but the poor boy died in the workhouse directly afterwards from a contagious fever contact contracted from the inoculation.
Far from being discouraged by Baker's death and abandoning his horse grease theory, however, Jenner instead took some of the horse grease cowpox and inoculated six children. And without waiting to see the results or to to prove whether it would take or not, he rushed to London to get his paper printed. And in that paper, he had the audacity to assert that it was not necessary to wait to see the result because the proofs he already had were so conclusive. And and time experiments had told such an extraordinary tale, although he had completed but one experiment in his life, and that did not prove it at all. That boy, James Phipps, was hawked around about the country as a proof of the value of vaccination, but he had not been inoculated with horse grease cowpox at all, but with spontaneous cowpox, which Jenner now declared in the second paper was absolutely useless and unprotected against the disease.
There was considerable resistance to the idea of injecting horse grease into children, So Jenner went back to his original hypothesis that inoculation with cowpox would prevent smallpox even though he had already he already knew this to be false. To help promote his new slash old theory, he he invented a new name for cowpox, calling cowpox smallpox of the cow or variola vacciae, but you may search in vain for any attempt on upon his part to prove it. Well, Jenner deserves much, and then this is back to to my writing there. While Jenner deserves much blame for his role in developing the scourge of vaccination, we can't ignore the parts both the government and the news media played in promoting Jenner and the smallpox vaccine.
Jenner may not have been a real doctor, but he was persuasive enough to convince politicians, including the king and queen of England, that his research was worth funding. Once Jenner had political support, the country's real doctors quickly lost their previous well founded skepticism and jumped on board. Does Hadwin's description of the way the smallpox vaccine was promoted and argued against remind you of any current events? He said, in eighteen o eight, the whole of the London Doctor signed a testimonial and declared that this discovery was such that persons once vaccinated were forever protected against smallpox.
They very soon began to talk about compulsion. In 1853, they managed to pass that compulsory vaccination act, which we are here to protest against tonight. I think one of the most serious complaints against this whole system is they dare not trust it to its own merits. Do people want smallpox? If the system is any good, it will speak for itself. If it is bad, they have no right to enforce it. You may ask, why was compulsion necessary? The reason was simply this, the people were beginning to find out it was no good. They're beginning to clamor again for inoculation and the working classes who reason more by hard facts of experience than by medical doc dogmas found that it was not the slightest use for protecting people against smallpox.
In 1811, there had occurred a notable instant instance of failure. Lord Robert Grubbsner, ten years of age, had who had been vaccinated by Jenner himself, was now taking a smallpox and lay hovering between life and death. Jenner sat beside the bedside of his illustrious patient. When at last, the boy began to turn and get and get better. Jenner turned to the father with, what a lucky job he was vaccinated. If he'd not been, he surely would have died. Thus, Jenner started the glorious doctrine of mitigation, which has been handed handed down as the heirloom of the medical vaccineist ever since.
Okay. So the COVID vaccine, it wasn't supposed to prevent transmission, but we never said that. It's just gonna it it makes it so it's not so COVID's not serious. So you won't die from COVID. You won't be hospitalized. Okay. Because all of it back 1811 there. There's no record of whether or not lord Robert Groszner took to social media to thank Jenner and the vaccine for his survival of smallpox and to encourage his followers to take smallpox seriously and get vaccinated. For those of you keeping track at home, bear in mind that the smallpox vaccine at first promised lifetime immunity from smallpox. But when people begin getting smallpox anyway, the narrative shifted to the vaccine mitigating symptoms.
Later, it again shifted to a new claim. The vaccine protected against death from death from smallpox. But we are told that and this is back to Hadwin. We are told that children don't die. Well, that may be all very well. We will see whether whether they die or not. Let's turn to Germany, for instance. During that epidemic I spoke of just now, there were two thousand one hundred forty cases of children 10 who had smallpox, and seven hundred thirty six of them died. There were fifteen hundred and three cases vaccinated under five, and there were five hundred and seventy three deaths. You may say, then why is it they don't die in this country?
Let's turn to the molars orphanage in Bristol. In 1872, there were seven hundred forty children all vaccinated. Of course, you gotta vaccinate the orphans. Right? Two hundred ninety two cases of smallpox amongst them, and there were seventeen deaths. But I can give you the reason perhaps why the children don't die, why vaccinated children don't die from smallpox so much as we should expect. In 1886, for instance, there were two hundred seventy five cases of smallpox deaths altogether throughout England and Wales. There is only one vaccinated child that died from smallpox under 10 years of age, but there were ninety three children that died from chickenpox.
And the registrar general and commented upon the fact declared that nearly, if if not all, those cases should have been registered as smallpox because chickenpox never kills. And doctor Ogle, the chief in the registrar general's department, told the Royal Commission as a witness before it that he had never known chickenpox to kill a child in his life. Why would they not been registered as smallpox? In 1893, the last published returns we have, there were a hundred and twenty seven children who reported to have died from chickenpox.
So that perhaps that will explain why the children don't die. So in late eighteen hundreds and they're just oh, well, if you're vaccinated, then you don't have smallpox. You have chickenpox, and that's that's what killed you. As the failure of the smallpox vaccine became more and more apparent, did government and and doctors admit they were wrong? Of course not. On the contrary, they declared it was time for boosters or revaccination as they called it. Repeat inoculations in the eighteen hundreds. Hadwin gives the gives the example of the British army.
Then look at our revaccinated army. From 1860 to 1888, we had no less than three thousand nine hundred fifty three cases of smallpox in the British army, and three hundred ninety one of them died. If revaccination won't protect the soldier, how is it going to protect the nurse? In Egypt in 1889, they died at the rate of seventeen hundred fifty per million people from smallpox. But as a matter of fact, the government do not believe in revaccination. The other day when the epidemic broke out in London, a regimen of soldiers soldiers that was stationed at Saint John's would near and so terrified were the government with regard to the matter that an urgent order came down from the horse guards sending the regiment right away to the other end of England, lest the revaccinated soldiers should catch smallpox.
I heard an amusing incident the other day about a magistrate who had some of those ignorant fanatics like some of you before him. He told the defendants that they ought to be ashamed of themselves letting their children go unvaccinated and added, why should I let my children go unprotected from this dire disease on any account? A short time afterwards, illness came into his house, and the doctor told him that a servant had the smallpox. Then no sooner did the old gentleman hear that. Then his courage oozed out his fingertips, and he set for the nearest fires for the nearest fire escape in order that the children might be taken away through the window so as to avoid passing the door of the infected chamber.
Then there are those doctors who tell us that not only have they been revaccinated, but but that that if a smallpox epidemic occurred, they would be done again, which shows that they have not much faith in revaccination. At Burke Hampstead, sir Ashley Cooper, who's been sitting on the bench, declared in a speech on the subject that he'd been vaccinated no less than seven times and was such was his wonderful faith in the operation that he declared with the courage of a Roman gladiator. If an epidemic occurred, I would go and be vaccinated again. Why, if they had tattooed the old gentleman from head to foot, he would still be crying, do pray give me more vaccination.
As you may have guessed, smallpox vaccine was quite unsafe in addition to being totally ineffective. As with SIDS or MIS c today, miss c, the deaths were often blamed on something other than the vaccine. Back to Hadwin. What about syphilis? It is a very strange thing that up to 1853, when the compulsory vaccination act was passed, the annual annual deaths from syphilis of children under one year old did not exceed three hundred eighty. The very next year, the number had jumped up nearly double to five hundred ninety one. And syphilis in infants under one year of age has gone on increasing every year since 1883, when the number of deaths reach eight eighteen hundred and thirteen.
It has increased fourfold in infants since the passing of the compulsory vaccination act, and yet in adults, it has remained almost stationary. Surely, this speaks for itself. These deaths have only begun to decline since in proportion to the number of vaccinations to birth have declined. Therefore, we have not merely children dying primarily from vaccination, but from a concurrent disease. Even the despicable practice of blaming vaccine induced brains falling on parents for shaking their baby is not entirely new. Had recounts a similar type of event in which government officials blame the parents for something caused by a government mandated vaccine. I must mention to you the case of Emily Maud, child of Leeds. The child who was vaccinated died, and a coroner's jury having held an inquest, it was brought in conclusively that she died from syphilis as the result of vaccination.
A a certificate to the effect went up to the government who sent an inspector down to investigate the case. He took photographs of the teeth of the other children, declared they were syphilitic, and reported that it was not the vaccine lymph which produces syphilis, but that the fault lay with the mother herself. At last, the Royal Commission heard of the case and sent down independent investigators who found that there was not a vestige of syphilis in the remaining children and that the charge against the mother was false. It is a terrible thing I say that not only have you to stand the chance of losing the child who is dear to you, but you have to have to stand the chance of the powerful machinery of government being turned on in order to take away the character of your wife.
Alright. So almost everyone is has heard of Edward Jenner yet virtually no one has heard of Walter Hadwin. Many have heard of James Phipps, the successful Jenner test subject. Virtually none of us, however, have heard of John Baker or lord Robert Grovsner and still less the more indirect gender victims like Emily Monchott. Will we likewise will we likewise forget the victims of Fauci and Pfizer? I pray we won't. We must never forget Maddie de Guerre, Ernesto Ramirez junior, Amber Suarez, and many other innocent people around the world who have already been grievously injured or killed by the COVID nineteen vaccines. I say already because there are many more sacrificial lambs still to come.
Yes. The COVID nineteen scandemic and the COVID nineteen vaccine propaganda are absurd and blatantly false. However, is the entire narrative really more bogus than the science of the smallpox vaccine? Will we allow COVID nineteen vaccines and boosters to be administered and sometimes mandated for the next one hundred plus years? Will we allow the history books to remember Fauci and Gates as fondly as they remember Edward Jenner? Will we allow the mRNA vaccine platform discovery to be celebrated and off limits to criticism as the cow lips, scrapers, and jabbers? I will give doctor Hadwin the last word.
Then when you go before the bench, the magistrates tell you they're only administrators of the law, which have been the plea of the greatest persecutors of every age. Remember that the vaccination act does not deal with the drunkard. It is the best classes of the country, the earnest, honest people, the Sunday school teachers who love their children in their homes. The Scotch covenanters, Anne Askew, John Wycliffe, and the apostles of old were told that their persecutors were only the administrators of the law, but they defied the law and the proudest privileges and blessings we possess have been won for us by the lawbreakers of this country.
It is not a question merely of the health, but the very lives of the children which are at stake in this matter. And I believe the present century shall not close until we have placed our foot upon the dragon's neck and plunge the sword of liberties through its heart. They tell us we are trying to rise rouse the country with a crazy cry, the craze the cry of liberty of conscience, and we are not ashamed of that cry. It is that crazy cry which snapped the shackles of despotism in the past. That crazy cry is spreading at the present time throughout the length and breadth of the country. We are told that the intelligent port portion of the population is against us.
That's false. That crazy crisis is sending higher and higher into a raging and tremendous storm. That liberty, which has been won by the blood of our forefathers for the theological conscience, is the liberty we demand for the scientific conscience. Already, it is thundering at the door of the House of Commons, and it shall be heard. Yes. We are going forward with the crazy cry of liberty and conscience upon our unfurled banner, and we never intend to rest until we get it. That all come from the case against vaccination by Walter Hadwin. So got a link to his speech there if you wanna see it.
That about wraps it up. I I gotta admit I'm I'm pretty tired of these things. It's much shorter than Revelations Radio News, but when I have to talk the whole time, it it is a lot more work. So I appreciate all of you sticking with me through that long read. And if you made it to this point, especially thank you very much. This has been episode three of the No Pill podcast, the original fountain talking about Edward Jenner. Hope you enjoyed it, and I look forward to speaking with you all again soon. Reach out to me via email or through the Revelations Radio News Telegram channel.
Look forward to speaking to you soon. Thank you. And please do remember, it's okay to be an anti vaxxer.
Introduction and Episode Overview
Current Events and Weather in Oklahoma
NASA's Asteroid Warning and Space News
Commentary on Political Climate and Media
COVID-19: Bioweapon Theories and Vaccine Impact
Measles and MMR Vaccine Controversies
Personal Stories of Vaccine Injury
Vaccine Ingredients and Safety Concerns
The History of Vaccination: Edward Jenner and Smallpox
Critique of Historical Vaccine Practices
Conclusion and Final Thoughts
