In this episode of the No Pill podcast, we delve into the concept of "algocracy," or rule by algorithms and AI, and its implications on our daily lives. We begin by examining the propaganda surrounding food systems and the push towards plant-based diets, highlighting the misleading labels on grass-fed beef and the hidden realities of the beef industry. The discussion shifts to Tesla's Hollywood Diner, which claims to source all its ingredients locally, raising questions about the feasibility and authenticity of such claims in the context of global supply chains and government subsidies.
We also explore the burgeoning AI industry, with significant investments being made in data centers and AI technologies, and the geopolitical race against China in AI development. The episode touches on the controversial legacy of Jeffrey Epstein, the potential vaccine injuries affecting public figures like Donald Trump, and the broader implications of regulatory capture in the medical industry. We conclude with a reflection on the pursuit of satisfaction and meaning beyond worldly success, featuring insights from professional golfer Scottie Scheffler and his caddy Ted Scott.
[00:00:48]
Andrew Hoffman:
Hello, everybody. Welcome to another edition of the No Pill podcast. This is episode 17, beef tallowalgocracy. Okay. Remember, algocracy is rule by algorithm slash AI type deal, so the title makes sense pretty quickly. No no long suspense on that one. So let's, we'll get right into it. I apologize for the delay. I will talk a little more about that at the end, but let's get into into the show here. So first of all, we're gonna start out with some some just kinda cartoon level propaganda, from this time from Tedros, but I could play clips from Klaus Schwab or Joe Biden or Bill Gates. You know, just kind of the the cartoon level obvious evil propaganda.
So we'll we'll play the Tedros clip here first telling you what you should and should not be eating.
[00:01:53] Unknown:
Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet. Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and account for almost one third of the global burden of disease. Transforming food systems is therefore essential by shifting towards healthier, diversified, and more plant based diets. If food systems delivered healthy diets for all, we could save eight million lives per year. WHO is committed to supporting countries to develop and implement policies to improve diets and fight climate change. I'm therefore very pleased that over 130 countries have signed the COP twenty eight UAE declaration on climate and health.
Together, we can protect and promote the health of both people and planet.
[00:02:54] Andrew Hoffman:
So there's, you know, one of a million examples of the cartoon level eat z bugs propaganda, and it's it's obvious. Right? I mean, it's obvious these people hate you, want you dead, are telling you the exact opposite of what you should be doing. But once we peel you know, I mean, get there are people, I guess, that buy into that and, oh, let's eat, stuff covered in glyphosate all the time. And and I'm sure Bill Gates makes better meat than, you know, cows that have been around for thousands of years. You know, I'm sure that's healthier for me, the Impossible Burger, all all that junk.
But it gets trickier when it's something that should be healthy, that's not this cartoon level propaganda. It's like, okay, well, you know, let's get some grass fed beef from the grocery store, and that should be healthy to eat. Right? I mean, that that sounds pretty healthy. Or how about organic grass fed beef? USDA organic grass fed beef. What what could be wrong? Alright. So so let's take a look. This is from doctor Eric Berg. Doctor. Eric Berg on X. Grass fed beef is a scam. Don't trust the label. There's a massive loophole behind it. Let's break it down. And I'll just read through the thread here. In 2016, the USDA dropped its official definition of grass fed.
Since then, companies can use the label even if the cow spent its final three to six months, which is a pretty long time, eating grains, GMO byproducts, and synthetic additives. Most people have no idea. Why does it matter? This is important because the final stage of a cow's life has the biggest impact on your health. In the last three to six months, cows are moved to feedlots and fat and fast. They're fed DDGS, which stands for dried distillers grain with solubles. A cheap industrial byproduct from ethanol production. It's not food. It's waste.
And he I won't play the the video, but he goes through more detailed explanation of it. Yes. It's an ethanol derivative and so they take inedible corn, break it down into ethanol for, you know, to dilute your gasoline, and then the leftover is this inedible corn, which is then fed to cows, just loaded with glyphosate. It only costs them $150 per metric ton. Metric ton, dollars 150. 50. And why is it so cheap? Oh, government subsidies. Alright. So along with that, to speed up the growth even more, feedlot cattle are given, moninsin, an antibiotic that boosts weight, synthetic vitamins and minerals, limestone to aid digestion, beta agonists, which are drugs that force muscle growth, and these drugs mimic adrenaline and may affect you too when you're eating that supposed organic grass fed beef.
Research has linked beta agonists to increased anxiety in humans who consume meat with residues, and here's something you don't most don't know. Even grass fed cows may receive the anti may receive antibiotics unless the label clearly states no antibiotics ever. Now, let's look at how they're raised. And this this doesn't even get into the vaccine issue, which is a big issue becoming an even bigger issue with with cows. Alright. Get back into it. A full grown cow weighing 1,500 pounds is often confined to 24 square feet. That's one sixth the size of a parking space.
Six cows packed into the space you'd park a single car for months. Why? To keep them sedentary while they gain fat. So what about cows in supposedly open feedlots? In open feedlots, cows get just 150 square feet, slightly more space, just more sun. The goal stays the same, minimal movement, maximum fat gain. Sick animals produce tender, marbled meat, and that's what sells, but the deception goes even further. Many people think their beef is local, but country of origin labeling laws were were repealed. Imported beef can be processed in The US and labeled product of USA, even if the animal was raised overseas.
So what can you do? Which, you know, product of USA. If you're buying beef and it says product of USA, would you not think the beef came from The USA? Of course you would, then you're supposed to. But it doesn't mean that at all. So look for this exact label. This is his advice, 100% grass fed, not just grass fed, not grass finished, not natural. 100% grass fed means the cow stayed on pasture and was never sent to a feedlot or finished on grain. Yes. It costs more, but here's what you're supporting. Healthier animals, more nutrients, ethical, pasture raised farms, real transparency.
The beef industry runs on loopholes and vague labels, but once you understand the system, you can choose better. Support the farmers doing it right. Buy honest food. Labels don't tell the whole story. If you've been paying more for grass fed beef thinking it was clean, you've likely been misled. Okay. So good thread there. And it's I would say, you know, the 100% grass fed, if you're still buying meat from a grocery store, that's good. But if you're, I mean, if you're in a place like Oklahoma or Texas or what have you, you can actually buy you can go visit the ranch you're buying from and you can ask them what they do with the with the calves, you know, what they do with the beef.
So you can find places, if the beef initiative is a good website to look at, we've actually got a couple other stores from them here in a minute. But, beefinitiative, I think, .org is their website and will show you kind of places to order beef. So, you can actually have the best of both worlds where it is, grain finished, but instead of that ethanol, GMO junk, they use organic grains. So, you still get the fattier, tastier, more tender meat along with not, you know, lack of poison. So that is something that's out there too, in addition to the pure grass fed option.
So just some some information there. But this this is the story that kinda inspired me on on this episode, and it seems like kind of a throwaway deal. You know, it it's we'll put it into the very much not unmitigated good news category. So Tesla, which I have never been a fan of Tesla at all, you know, Elon Musk deal, they opened a Hollywood Diner. Tesla's Hollywood Diner just rewrote the fast food rule book, all local, all real. Okay? This comes from, beefnews.org, and it's just a glowing so let me just read it, all the positive stuff, and then we'll we'll see if there might be some some holes we can poke in this.
Tesla's Hollywood Diner flips fast food on its head. Brant beef from Calpella, Straus and Valley Ford Dairy, Santa Monica Market produce, even Tejas choppy wheat tortillas, all sourced inside a regional radius. This isn't hype. It's a prototype for national scale, traceable local food systems, and no other chain has even tried. Beneath the neon and robot servers at 7001 Santa Monica Boulevard, Tesla quietly delivered something groundbreaking, a national brand menu sourced entirely from local world producers. No factory farms. No global supply chains. While most, media zeroed in on drive in screens and Cybertruck trays, the real story is hidden in the ingredient list, and it's a model worth watching.
The one third pound Brant beef burgers and beef tallow fries come from Brant beef, a single family ranch in Calpala, California known for premium Holstein cattle and whole carcass traceability. Wagyu beef chili is supplied by RC Provisions, a Los Angeles legacy meat house serving regional delis and restaurants for over fifty years. Cheddar cheese is sourced from new school American developed by Tesla Diner's, chef Eric Greenspan using real cream and butter, no phosphates or fillers. Milk, yogurt, and soft serve come from Straus Family Creamery and Valley Ford Creamery, both multigenerational family run dairies in Marin and Sonoma Counties.
Fruits and vegetables are sourced directly from the Santa Monica Farmers Market, while tortillas are made with drought tolerant wheat from the Tejaapi Grain Project. Everything is being sourced within one Tesla charge, which is close indeed. Alright. So that that's all good. But then, you know, okay. We've got the Optimus robot serving popcorn, and it says no ESG, no greenwashing, just real food from real producers. Okay. Well, it's not greenwashing exactly, and it is real food, but why do we have to, you know, why do we have to have Tesla be the, supposedly, the only, the only company getting any press about doing it. We'll put it that way.
So all this stuff, it's very doable. You can have real food from, you know, locally sourced. And if people knew where their food came from in general, they would be more likely to to want to pay for for those things. But the whole system, food, it costs more money to ship food from farther away. So food is produced locally, it should be cheaper than food produced further away, all things being equal. All things are not equal because of government subsidies on, well, let's see, crops like corn and soybeans. So everything all these, you know, oh, it's for renewable fuels, you know, the ethanol production. So you've got field after field after field, all GMO soybeans, GMO corn, and it's like, well, you know, don't worry about it. You won't be eating a lot of that. But, well, the glyphosate's gotta go somewhere. It goes into the groundwater, and it's just a a full scale poisoning operation.
And then so they're they're gonna give you farm to table real food, what everyone wants. Right? But to get it, it's gotta be this futuristic thing. We got the robots. We got the Tesla charging stations. We got your plugged in, track trace database, 20 you know, the whole time you're there. And so it's well, we we can't have, you know, farm to table real food without technocracy. And it kinda hit me that this is what everything's been pointing towards. Right? So we're you've got the obvious cartoon level propaganda that was designed for people to reject it. Like, no one actually is like, you know that Klaus Schwab?
He really knows what he's talking about. We should do what he says. Eat, you know, own nothing and be happy. That's what it that's what I wanna do. So you've you've got that level, and then people run what they think is the the opposite. But, really, it's Elon Musk and Donald Trump over here saying, okay. We're we're not gonna totally insult you, but, you know, you're you're not gonna ask any more questions about Epstein. You're definitely not gonna question space and space travel and what have you. It's, you know, Elon can do that, but but the common folk can't.
And we're we're gonna stick brain chips in you. We're gonna, you know, use robots and automation and AI and everything else. So this is, you know, it it's a different, more appealing path right into technocracy, right into algocracy. So let's let's take a look, what I'm talking about. We've got well, let's let's hear Elon talking about, the new amazing Grok, Grok4, so the AI chatbot Grok4. Four will see what what he's, what he's promoting here.
[00:16:57] Unknown:
Like, Grok four is postgraduate, like, PhD level in everything. Better than pH but, like, most PhDs would fail. So it's better that said I mean, at least with respect to academic questions, it I wanna just emphasize this point. With respect to academic questions, GROC four is better than PhD level in every subject, no exceptions. Now this doesn't mean that it's it it you know, at times it may lack common sense, and it has not yet invented new technologies or discovered new physics, but that is just a matter of time. Mhmm. If it I I I think it may discover new technologies, as soon as later this year, and I I would be shocked if it is not done so next year.
So I would expect Grok to, yeah, literally discover new new technologies that are actually useful no later than next year and maybe end of this year. And it might discover new physics next year. And within two years, I'd say almost certainly. Like so just let that sink in.
[00:18:11] Andrew Hoffman:
Yeah. I had to leave that little evil laugh there at the end from Elon. So okay. New technologies that are usable by the end of this year and new physics, what, you know, what new physics needs to be invented is kind of an interesting interesting question, within two years. I will not hold my breath on either one of those things, but it is interesting in in the context of what Elon said. Elon Musk says it could take eight Starship launches to fuel up a single moon trip. Well, that's interesting. So we've got these giant, you know, eight Starship launches to fuel up a Delivering astronauts to the moon is no easy feat, and it requires a disgusting amount of rocket fuel to pull it off.
With its fuel tanks filled to the brim, NASA's Saturn five rocket weighed in at 6,500,000 pounds during the Apollo missions almost half a century ago. It managed to burn up 20 tons of rocket fuel every second. Okay. That's that's interesting. Fast forward several decades, and SpaceX's Elon Musk is trying to achieve similar greatness with his space company Starship rocket. This time, it's gonna take a lot of refueling to get there. SpaceX competitor Blue Origin recently griped that SpaceX might need as many as 16 launches to get to the moon. But 16 flights is extremely unlikely, Musk shot back in a Wednesday tweet. Starship payload to orbit is about 150 tons, so a max of eight to fill 1,200 ton tanks of Lunar Starship.
Alright. Without flaps and heat shields, Starship is much lighter. Must continue. Lunar landing legs don't add much. One six gravity may only need half full, I. E. Four tanker flights. Okay. And even if it did take 16 launches, Musk said that wouldn't be a problem. Okay. Alright. So, you know, hey, don't don't worry about it. Not a big deal, but, so we're still trying to figure out how to get to the moon in 2025, but they totally did back in 1969. Makes makes total sense. Alright. Just a little aside, maybe maybe that's kind of the new physics. If you guys remember back I don't know what episode it was, but one of my earlier episodes, the the very angry, Asian man who who proclaimed that everything was fake and that the the basically, the physics does not add up, both for space travel, satellites, all of it. And one of the things he pointed to is the amount of lift, force, etcetera needed to get to the moon with how far away the moon, supposedly is. It just the equation just doesn't work, and it didn't work in 1969.
It didn't work in the seventies, and it still doesn't work in 2025. So we'll just, let's just focus on going to Mars. We got more more excuses, more ready and believable excuses on why we we won't get to Mars and then get back to the moon. So let's let's kinda get back to this thing. So Trump or sorry. Elon's talking about Grok four, his little AI chatbot, inventing new physics. And AI is, you know, it's still everywhere. Kinda behind the scenes, there are some serious problems going on. But let's just talk about the, from a financial economic perspective, what is going on with AI. So let's play a couple of clips that I I stole from the No Agenda podcast, and they clipped them from CNN, of all places, talking about Trump going to Pennsylvania, meeting with a bunch of CEOs, and investing in not just AI data centers, but, there's another kind of crucial element going on, that I think is is more of, the real reason for all this stuff.
[00:22:43] Unknown:
New today in our tech lead, president Trump unveiled a $90,000,000,000 investment package in artificial intelligence and energy before an audience of officials. Lawmakers lawmakers and more than 60 industry CEOs, let's bring in CNN's Elena Treen who's there in Pittsburgh, Elena. What does this investment entail?
[00:23:00] Unknown:
Yeah. Look. I mean, you saw some big numbers from a lot of these different companies. Just for example, Blackstone, they are investing $15,000,000,000, in building up some data centers for artificial intelligence here in Pennsylvania. FirstEnergy, said that they are investing $15,000,000,000 as well to expand power distribution. But, look, I think the key thing here is what this investment means as it relates to Donald Trump because he often doesn't travel, for things like this. Today was different. The reason he came all the way out to Pittsburgh is not only because there are, you know, 60 CEOs and executives of some of the largest tech and energy companies who were in this room and at that round table behind me where he was participating in, but also because he cares deeply about artificial intelligence and specifically wanting to win the arms race with China when it comes to AI. And he talked a lot about that, when he was speaking with these different, leaders here. And and just to give you some of the CEOs who were actually, up here on that stage earlier today, it included, some of the CEOs of Amazon Web Services, of, BlackRock, Palantir, and then some of the investments we also saw from companies were Meta, and Google. So really just a lot of heavy hitters who were here to invest in Pennsylvania and specifically, like I said, data centers for artificial intelligence, but also energy to help power them with really the goal being that they need to expand it significantly here in The United States. And, Elena, this this all comes on the heels of four different AI companies signing
[00:24:30] Unknown:
hefty contracts worth worth up to $200,000,000 each with the Pentagon. What's the White House saying about that?
[00:24:36] Unknown:
Yeah. I mean and these were major major federal contracts that were given out. So OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Elon Musk's new AI company, XAI, have all won contracts of up to $200,000,000 each. That's a huge number, to help the defense department in expanding and building up their artificial intelligence systems as well. Now, of course, we've heard from the White House that this is all about national security, about this is making sure, that the defense department and the Pentagon is in line where it needs to be keeping up with this changing technological environment.
But but very interesting to hear, you know, some of the different groups that got these and really particularly OpenAI having the $200,000,000 contract, on its own, really significant investment in this and really showing where the administration believes or just how much they believe, how important this is to making sure the defense department is where it needs to be when it comes to keeping up with AI and also, again, trying to beat China as being the dominant superpower when it comes to artificial intelligence, Jake?
[00:25:38] Andrew Hoffman:
I think the fact that they're focusing on Pennsylvania and and Pittsburgh in particular is not definitely not an accident. When you think of Pittsburgh, you what do you think of? The steel city. Right? American steel, American manufacturing, industrial base, all the stuff that got hollowed out and shipped overseas and globalized. And what's coming in now? Well, it's sort of manufacturing, but not really. I mean, it's not making anything real, but it is it is producing it it requires a lot of energy, a lot of electricity, and is very expensive.
And I think when you look at why they're doing it from from Trump's perspective, this is a feature, not a bug. The CNN report says, oh, Trump cares deeply about AI. I don't think Trump cares anything about AI, but he cares about the fact that China is their energy usage keeps going straight up, and The US' energy usage is flat. And there's many ways to, you know, to determine what's going on economically and what have you. But, you know, if you look since electricity is was invented, using a lot of electricity is generally a good sign for your your country. Places like North Korea where the lights are mainly off, not so good.
So I think this is a it's a gambit to, to spend a lot of money, inject stuff into the economy. And there there are definitely true believers in AI. I don't know. I have a hard time believing that that Trump would fall into that category. But there's they're definitely out there. But the reasons they're hyping up for AI and for, basically, you know, why they're spending the money are are bogus. And they even they snuck some bogus stuff into that report. So this is $90,000,000,000. Right? $90,000,000,000. That's what they said right at the beginning of the report, $90,000,000,000.
And then they focus on four $200,000,000 contracts with the Pentagon. Well, that's that's like 1% of what we're talking about. And that's oh, these are major contracts. Yeah. $200,000,000 contracts. They're it's nothing. But it is something to be, you know, to talked about, and and who knows? Maybe they're the Palantir stuff they're using, to determine who, has a bad enough Hamask score to deserve death over in Israel, you know, I'm I'm sure that that can all be turned around and pointed at us or pointed in other countries. All that is a legitimate issue, partially because it's so wildly wildly bogus and inaccurate. You know, you're making literal life and death decisions based on stuff that is just is just as error prone as AI is. You know, you can ask ask a question, and it hallucinates.
Stuff just doesn't make sense. And and you hear Elon saying, oh, it's gonna be inventing new physics within a couple years. So this is I think, the the power usage and I'll I'll throw a graph in there in the the substack for you to take a look at because Elon Musk, retweeted this, and it's just showing just power usage. And I think, you know, from their perspective, they're being, like, the Trump Elon crowd. If you want America to do well, which I think it at some level, Trump does and at some level, Elon probably does too. They feel like they can do be a better job of of being the the right kind of billionaire, you know, control freak autocrats, that would it would be better for the country if they're in charge.
So they think, okay, more power is better. AI it's it's great. I mean, those data centers do use a ton of energy, which as, Dvorak and Adam Curry pointed out on on the last show, this whole, you know, technology's chips get smaller and smaller. It should use less and less energy. Why is this using more and more energy? It it intuitively doesn't make sense, and it's going against the direction of technological advancement that's been happening for the last, you know, number of decades. Why do these AI data centers need so much energy? It's crazy.
Through my job, I I've run into a couple of these proposed projects, and there's one, you know, kind of a medium sized data center, and it's like, well, you know, it's gonna be out here outside this town of 55,000 people. And, yeah, it's gonna use more electricity than the entire town of 55,000 people. So any time you build one of these things, you've got to build whatever substation power generation goes with it. So it's and Oklahoma, like, I would say, kinda like Texas, there is a ton of solar and and wind stuff going on in Oklahoma, but at least there's also oil and gas. It's you know, the governor says we'll take more of everything.
And so there's there's gonna be stuff that gets built all over the country, not just Pennsylvania, but I think it was symbolic of, okay, manufacturing. It might have left Pittsburgh, but it's coming back to, it's coming back to Pittsburgh. America's coming back. But again, just like with the real food Tesla diner thing, yes, energy and assorted manufacturing is coming back, but it's gonna be automate it's gonna be automated. We're not talking about tons and tons of jobs. We're talking about, you know, unless you're an electrician, it's gonna be plenty of electrician jobs, but and plenty of, security guard jobs.
But there's you know, it's it's sort of better, but also we're we're not going back to where America actually made a lot of stuff. It's this this kind of brave new world of, oh, it's gonna be AI, and everything's automated. And and, yeah, don't worry about it. Don't worry about that you're not able to think or find your way around or all the negative health impacts that this all this stuff is having on you. Don't worry about any of that because it's just the AI will figure it out, and and everything will be fine. And I definitely think everything will not be fine, but let's let's move on here.
Oh, one final point. They use China this is the new Cold War, the AI war with with China, the AI development race. And interesting, China's the point is like, well, you can do all the things to your AI, but it uses a lot less computational power. And, again, I think they're kind of missing the point there. But this will be this will be the excuse just like the Soviet Union was the excuse of spending billions of dollars on arms and, you know, missiles and supposed nuclear weapons, all that stuff. Now China will be the excuse for all that same stuff, you know, all the all the weapons, but also, that's why we gotta spend the money on AI.
That's why we gotta build these huge data centers. You know, all the environmental crowd that was against a lot of this stuff going back, all of a sudden, it's okay because it's it's coming from coming from Tesla, coming from kinda trendier sources. So it's you know, we got Elon trying to jump back and forth between both side you know, left or right winging the the bird of New World Order bird, but pushing technocracy from both sides. So let's take a look. Let's, I don't know how to do a well, let's, the the story that I missed for the most part, not doing episodes, was really that Jeffrey Epstein and related stuff. So we've got the we've got Epstein, and then we've got the, you know, Trump's comments supposedly trying to tell people not to look into it, which just made people freak out about it more.
We got mainstream media covering Epstein for for the most part for the first time, which is interesting. Maybe accidental, maybe maybe on purpose. But I thought this, this Greg Rees this came out a few weeks ago. Greg Rees, the final act of Jeffrey Epstein. Let's go ahead and play that, and then we'll kinda I'll try and tie it back around before we move on to a new subject here.
[00:35:54] Unknown:
Donald Trump has been friends with Jeffrey Epstein for years. In 02/2002, he told New York Magazine that he's known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it. Jeffrey enjoys his social life. Close quote. Jeffrey Epstein claimed he introduced Donald Trump to Melania. Epstein is known for grooming beautiful women for powerful men. On 07/06/2019, Epstein was arrested. Two weeks later, he was murdered in his jail cell, all during president Trump's first term. Shortly after Trump began his second term, political agents and useful idiots posed for the cameras with DOJ binders as if justice was coming, and nothing followed until this week when we were told that the DOJ and the FBI concluded that Epstein had no client list and died by suicide.
While this isn't fooling the awakening masses, political agents and useful idiots began doing their best to defend Trump and steer everyone towards immigration, where the solution will obviously be the digital ID for every US citizen. The overwhelming majority of US government representatives are the recipients of hundreds of millions of dollars paid out by APEC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were clearly part of a sexual blackmail operation run by the Mossad and the CIA to further own the American government. This is why our government officials are all on board with the genocide being committed by The US and Israel.
[00:37:46] Unknown:
Do you think that there can be a two state solution that creates an independent I don't know. I'd ask Mimi that question. You have the greatest man in the world to answer that age old question, two state. Go ahead. You give him your honest answer.
[00:38:00] Unknown:
I think, Palestinian should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers should threaten us. That means that certain powers, like overall security, will always remain in our hands. Now that is a fact, and no one in Israel will, agree to anything else because we don't commit suicide. We want life. We cherish life for ourselves, for our neighbors, and I think we can work out a piece between us and the entire Middle East with president Trump's leadership. And by working together, I think we can establish a very, very broad piece that will include all our neighbors.
[00:38:42] Unknown:
When Pam Bondi was asked about all this, Trump couldn't help but interrupt her and show frustration
[00:38:48] Unknown:
that anyone was concerned about his old friend of fifteen years. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for a American or foreign intelligence agency. The former labor secretary who was, Miami US attorney, Alex Costa. He allegedly said that he did work for intelligence agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did? And also, could you say why there's a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of the day? Yeah. Sure. If I could Can I just interrupt a little second?
[00:39:19] Unknown:
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking we have Texas. We have this. We have all of the things that and are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable. Do you wanna waste the time? And do you feel like answering? I I don't mind answering, but I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems, like a desecration, but you go ahead. And Pam Bondi suggested
[00:39:56] Unknown:
that the child porn they have in evidence was Epstein's personal collection that he downloaded from the Internet and nothing at all to do with blackmail.
[00:40:06] Unknown:
Sure. Sure. First, to back up on that, in February, I did an interview on Fox, and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said, I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well. That's what I meant by that. Also, to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Child porn is what they were. Never gonna be released. Never gonna see the light of day. To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that.
[00:40:50] Andrew Hoffman:
I mean, there's there's a lot of stuff with the Epstein thing, and there's a lot of stuff stuff already known. At at some level, my instinct is there is no truth in a government file on any subject, much less Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein. And there's really no truth in a government file in government files on Jeffrey Epstein after it's been, you know, sitting around in the government getting changed, scrubbed, all sorts of different items, you know, for the past however many years. So this is is it as simple as, you know, Trump was involved, and that's why he doesn't want the stuff to come out.
That's certainly possible, but I I think it goes way, way beyond that. And it's it's being used distraction might be the wrong word, but it's everything is it feels very scripted. This is at some level, you are supposed to obsess on some things about Epstein, not others. You know, as as far as him being an agent, I I've seen no evidence to that effect. Well, did you look? You know, this is like the COVID vaccine test where it's like, well, we didn't see any evidence of that. Yeah. Because you you threw it out whenever it happened. Right? You know? There's someone dies in the trial or has a severe adverse event, let's just kick them out of the trial. Oh, they're they're throw them in the unvaxxed category.
So this is, you know, it's very fishy. And would Trump have made it this far if he did not have levers to control him? I don't think so. And I I've, you know, I've kinda hoped so at certain points, but I've never really thought that. And this goes back to the you know, when he originally ran. And the Epstein stuff, it's not just the sexual blackmail operation. And the the idea that after, I think at this point, dozens of people reporting that everything was being recorded, and he had these massive, you know, vaults of videotapes of compromising material, from all the different sites. It wasn't just one Epstein Island site, New York, New Mexico.
I mean, it goes on and on and on. And that, oh, it's just because he downloaded some child porn from the Internet? Like, no one no one believes that. And I I think we're on a we're on a different part of the cartoon level propaganda right we talked at the at the very beginning you've got the Tedros Klaus Schwab kind of environmentalist cartoon level propaganda. This is the cartoon level propaganda for for Q, right, for QAnon, for the trust the plan folks. And, again, most of us are not supposed to believe that. There's some true believers, but we're at least supposed to get upset about it and pay attention to that.
There's been some other stuff going on too. This could be, you know, I mean, there's a I don't I don't wanna jump too far off topic, but, I mean, Trump is a Trump, in total, great distraction. And he I think he he either knows that he's supposed to be a great distraction or that's just his media strategy is make everything about you all the time. Doesn't matter good, bad, or indifferent as long as they're talking about you. You know, all publicity is good publicity. That's definitely the Trump MO. So we've got, you know, but there there's some serious blowback, serious issues, and I think some interesting hints that, you know, for better or worse, it is most definitely not Trump in charge. Like, he's not the evil evil dictator in charge, and he's also not the, knight on a white horse that's gonna solve everything single handedly in charge. And this goes back to the COVID vax.
And if this was Revelation's radio news day, as most people probably have some some memory of this. So Trump, you know, was he was promoting the vaxx, but he he got COVID. They gave him remdesivir. It wasn't looking good. Then all of a sudden, he he got better, gets out of the hospital, okay, you know, we're we're good to go. And I at that time, I hypothesized that, they made him a a deal. And and since that time, not that by any means Trump was perfect up until that time, but he's been much worse since that point. So it was like, oh, do you want you want some more of the poison remdesivir, or you wanna actually, get better and and get out of here? And what what are you gonna do to to earn that? And I think part of the deal was, you're going to promote that vaccine, you're going to take the vaccine, the vaccine's going to be the best thing ever, and you're never going to stop with that.
And, so he takes the vaccine, oh, it's great, it's wonderful, I can't believe you people don't like it. It saved millions and millions of lives. This was an issue for him running up to this election. This was, you know, Alex Jones proclaimed he would no longer support Trump if Trump didn't apologize for the vaccine. We'd see how that turned out. But, an interesting little little piece of news just kinda glossed over. Trump's got this this little you know, it's a benign condition where your heart can't where the blood can't get returned to your heart. And, you know, it's it kinda sounds a little bit like a a vaccine side effect, but let's just let's kinda ignore that. Well, not everybody ignored it. Toby Rogers, one of my my favorite follows on on x, tweeted, now that real Donald Trump is also vaccine injured, can we pull the effing COVID shots or still not?
So and, someone kinda questioned him on it. Well, how do you know it's vaccine injury? And he pointed to this post, don't be fooled by semantics. This comes from the ethical skeptic, chronic venous insufficiency, which is what they say Trump has, and post thrombotic syndrome, PTS, both involve the same sequelae. They're using one variation in terminology a to avoid admitting to the other b, because post thrombotic syndrome is a vax is a known vaccine side effect of the COVID vaccine. So chronic venous insufficiency is a general term for anything that makes it hard for blood to flow back up to the heart.
Post thrombotic syndrome, or PTS, is a specific type of CVI that happens after you've had a deep vein thrombosis, DVT, from the mRNA vaccine, which is a blood clot in a deep vein in your leg. Even after the clot goes away, it leaves behind scarring and damage in the vein, which causes ongoing CVI, what he has. About twenty to fifty percent of people who've had a a deep vein thrombosis will develop post thrombotic syndrome usually within one to two years. Alright. So it definitely appears likely that Donald Trump is is COVID vaccine injured.
And he could I don't know. I think there's been some some downfall in his his mental acuity. I think there's been some signs signs of that. But when you got him up there against Biden, he looks pretty good compared to Biden. And I I don't think the COVID vaccine was all I agree for Biden either. And now, you know, Biden's got cancer. So this is kinda going on and on all over the place. You know? This celebrity dying, that celebrity dying. Well, let's kinda mix it in. You know, this one's not as obviously a COVID vaccine death, so we'll we'll kind of focus on that one.
It just kind of keeps happening at what seems like a a faster pace there. But let's, very well known Deion Sanders. I mean, when I was a kid, Deion Sanders, pro baseball player and pro football player, one of the fastest humans in the world. And in the last few years, he's gone he's got back into coaching, and he's had a crazy number of health problems. He's had blood clotting issues, which resulted, I believe, in amputation of either his toes or part of his foot or something pretty bad, you know, where he couldn't even walk. So this guy that could run, you know, faster than anyone one now can can barely walk and walks with a limp even even still.
And then, leading into this season, he had cancer. So now, you know, I mean, they give him the the cancer treatment and, oh, you're cancer free. Okay. Yeah. Cancer free. Just like everybody gets cancer free for a while, and then we'll see if it comes back. Hopefully, not for for Dion. But, Mofax of the late great Mofax with Adam Curry podcast still posting on social media. And he posted a very interesting, video along with the question, is Deion Sanders vaccine injured? And let's play this clip from, this is not while Deion Sanders was at Colorado. This was back COVID era vaccine rollout and the college he was at then put out these videos of Dion promoting, the vaccine. So let's let's play that real quick.
[00:51:46] Unknown:
Walmart being here today is an urgent reminder of the importance of all eligible people, 12 and up, to get vaccinated, man. And Walmart is equipped to give that message to over 5,000 Walmart and Sam's Club locations, giving free vaccinations. Did I say free? Free vaccinations. People, it ain't no excuse. One of the reasons this is very important because first and foremost, we we we wanna preserve life. Everybody talking about what they would do, what they're not gonna do, what they don't trust, what they do trust. We trust a lot of things, but we need to trust the right thing. One thing about this vaccination, it preserves life. I want a chance to win. I want a chance to dominate. I want a chance to take this university yet and these young men and women to another level. How am I gonna do that if I'm not here?
So having this vaccination is something that I've done quite a long time ago, but we're our goal is to have a hundred percent of these jokers fully vaccinated before the season start, before the kickoff September 5. We want a hundred percent of all these young men and women vaccinated, not just the persons on the team. I mean, the equipment team, the trainers, the support staff, and as many other students as possible. That's our goal. Life is everything. You can't win it, man. Think about that. Tomorrow, Walmart will be on campus again with a a vaccination clinic to the campus and community from nine to four at the College of Science, Engineering, and Technology. Hey. You can't beat that. They're coming to our crib to help us.
[00:53:27] Andrew Hoffman:
Walmart, they come into our crib to help us. Yeah. Indeed. Indeed, Dion. Thanks for pushing the vaxx. And it it would be interesting if you could get get him off the record what he really thinks, has happened to him and if it has anything to do with those decisions. Who knows? It sure seems like people are very unwilling to to reconsider when when they've been all in on that level of of deception there. So, the COVID vaccine was not the first way, they started giving us cancer. Cancer was around way before the COVID vaccine. But it's not certainly not the only vaccine to give not just people, but also pets cancer. So that's, you know, this might be an easier way to reach people.
In some ways, people have been trained to kinda desensitized to the suffering of other people, but a lot of people really love their pets. So if, you know, if hey. If pet cancer due to vaccination wakes somebody up to vaccines in in general, I think that's great. So let's play a couple of clips. We got children's health defense did in a couple different interviews with, what are they called, homeopathic veterinarians. So veterinarians that are kinda looking at different ways of doing things as opposed to the old, let's shoot them up with vaccines.
In this first clip, kind of an interesting story just, on how we how did we go from the rabies vaccine is good for life, you get it one time, you're good to go, to, annual boosters? And the answer is is very simple. But if you think there was some science behind that, you will be sorely disappointed.
[00:55:41] Unknown:
And this marketing person said, let's do annual shots. You know? I mean, you know, the vaccine inserts didn't say anything contrary to that. So and then pretty soon, the vaccine inserts started saying annual boosters are recommended. And, you know, it was it was not based on any science at all. I mean, even less science than, you know, what vaccines, which we can't talk about. Right. So so that went on and on. And then in the nineties, in current vet therapy, Ron Schultz and, another author, I forget his name, but they they had a section of the book where they said annual vaccinations are not necessary and they're harmful. This was in their nineties, and there's still vets today doing annual vaccinations and sending those postcards out. They are. And they're Yeah. Not only that, but, so I also have a brick and mortar grooming
[00:56:32] Unknown:
shop, all natural groom shop, boarding day care that I bought into. And I couldn't believe, you know, they have to make sure they get all their vaccinations or whatever. So, of course, we're, like, the only one in town that's like, no. We don't require all that. Yeah. And they're like, oh, thank god. But what was amazing is that when I took over, all the dogs were vaccinated, and all the dogs were still getting all of the diseases or issues of viruses that Yeah. They were vaccinated for. So I was, like Yeah. Started questioning that. And they couldn't figure out why their dog was so sick. Right. So not only did they have the virus, their own immune system couldn't help them because it had already been complicated by
[00:57:13] Unknown:
Exactly. Yeah. Other ingredients.
[00:57:16] Andrew Hoffman:
So annual pet vaccines and and boosters, that idea came from marketing. Works so well they started putting it on the the vaccine in inserts. Yeah. Give them every year. Why not? And since the nineties, when someone actually looked at it, they said, no. This is doing way more harm than good. Not only is it not necessary, it's doing a lot of harm. Oh, and what are we? Thirty years later, and they're still doing it. And there's the gal I I kinda cut it off early, but she talks about a boarding, location, pet boarding, where most of them required all the vaccines. And that's true. I mean, we've we had to find someone to to house it, because you can't just drop them off at a a boarding place if they're not if they're not vaccinated. So interesting
[00:58:15] Unknown:
situation with with pets. And let's play this other clip. I'd say about seventy percent of what I see is vaccine injury. If if I gave you a brand new little puppy today, would you give that puppy any vaccines? You personally? Probably no. The dog has been vaccinated, and they know that that dog is injured. Is there something that can be done to help these dogs? Is there a detox method? Is there something that people can do to make their dogs better? As a homeopath,
[00:58:42] Unknown:
I'm absolutely able to help. But, yeah, this is what I do all the time, and almost everything is vaccine injury. I tell people they're, like, four main causes of disease. There's, vaccines, the major part, the flea and tick products, another poison we're putting in the animals. Pharmaceuticals, also bad, and emotions can cause problems as well.
[00:59:04] Andrew Hoffman:
I think it's pretty safe to say that if we got rid of vaccines, ate real food, and did not have environmental toxins, that we would we would cut down on a whole lot of cancer. He's certainly easier said than done. But, another factor I mean, the the cancer scam is just at some levels, it's just genius. So, let's play this clip on mammography and cancer.
[00:59:36] Unknown:
This here is why I never have and never will get a mammogram.
[00:59:40] Unknown:
Ada has come out about mammography, getting a mammogram that shows that for every 10,000 people that you give a mammogram to, eight people will die that would have never had breast cancer from breast cancer. Now you can justify using a mammogram and say, well, hundreds of people will be saved by getting mammograms. There is a ton of data that actually shows there's a fifty two percent overdiagnosis when using mammography. That means that we are treating a great deal of people that would have never died of breast cancer in the first place just by doing the mammogram. Why are we getting mammograms and telling women to get mammograms on a yearly basis, especially if they have dense breast tissue when the radiation from the mammogram can actually cause breast cancer.
And they've done long term studies on this. I actually read a Cochrane review, which, is the most prestigious research I've seen that exists. It's a huge meta analysis of multiple, multiple studies and basically said, in a study of node positive cancers that were saved within screen prescreens versus controls, screen would be a mammogram. There was a zero net effectiveness rating. So just keep that in mind. Ultrasound and thermogram should be the standard.
[01:00:57] Andrew Hoffman:
So if the pesticides and the vaccines and everything else don't get you, They'll tell you, well, you know, it's brush cancer is very common. You need to get a mammogram without mentioning the mammogram can give you cancer. I mean, how many women would keep getting mammograms if they knew the actual statistics that was just gone over? And if you look at, like he said at the end there, a net effectiveness rating of zero. In other words, no benefit whatsoever, only the downside of you know, for those 10 people where it gives you cancer. And yet it still just marches on. This is you know? What? You're crazy. You don't wanna get a mammogram?
What? And this is that's just one example of our medical system, and it if you think they're not evil enough to hide cures for cancer, this is a Megyn Kelly clip with doctor Patrick Soon Shiong. And I'm not gonna get into the specifics of what he's talking about. In general, I kind of agree with what he's saying. Like, I think we're treating cancer all wrong like he says. But just listen to his experience with the FDA when he's like, hey. I think I've got a much better way of treating cancer than what we currently do. Listen to what they made him do.
[01:02:34] Unknown:
Mhmm. When you I heard you discussing this protocol and how many people it's helped already. You mentioned, for example, Harry Reid, who had a very bad diagnosis, and he came to you. And you gave him this, the bio strike, however we wanna refer to it, and extended his life, we believe, by a couple of years. I mean, it's not it's not gonna help anybody live forever. But when you might otherwise be facing the end, this drug actually seems to have a proven record, you say, of extending one's life by years.
[01:03:10] Unknown:
Well, it's so when Syngery came to see me, he really was completed all his standard of care and had failed his standard of care and then came to see me. So what we needed to do in 02/2015, I went to the FDA and said, listen. I have this hypothesis that what we're doing is completely wrong. When we give chemotherapy, we wipe out all the natural killer cells and t cells. When we give radiation, we wipe out all the natural killer cells and t cells. And I would like to try this in patients before they get these horrible treatments, I. E. At the time of diagnosis.
And they said no, and it's appropriate. You need to try this first in patients who are at the end stage of their life. So we did this in triple negative breast cancer patients, Merkel cell cancer patients, pancreatic cancer patients, glioblastoma patients, bladder cancer patients, all who had failed all standards of care, but by the time they came to see us, their immune system was completely collapsed. So we had to start from a deep hole, but able to get them out of the hole and then get them into positions of complete remission. So let me give you some examples. We got complete remissions on patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, fifth line, and he lived for six years and didn't die of his cancer.
Complete remission on a patient with bladder cancer, and they're still alive now, 10 or 11 years old. Complete remissions on triple negative breast cancer. We have metastatic pancreatic cancer, patient who was free of disease after five years, and she's still alive. We just published that six years out. Wow. So the proof of principle has gone beyond the proof of principle. We then got this approved despite despite, and we'll talk about that, the problems that they put me through from 2021 to 2024. And after 700,000 pages of response, we got it approved late twenty twenty four.
Now that this administration is here, we literally have the opportunity to really understand that we are on the precipice of treating sepsis. I just saw the results yesterday of a patient that we treated just last month with this valley fever, with an inflamed lung on the ventilator for for for a time a month, and with the last rites, we cleared up this lung completely. We have then patients now that we have for bladder cancer and for pancreatic cancer ongoing and for lung cancer. So my frustration is how do I get this, insight out into, both the scientific and medical community and, most important, the rigorgy committees so they can understand what's at hand and what's in at our fingertips.
[01:06:21] Andrew Hoffman:
With the amount of regulatory capture, you know, FDA, CDC, it goes on and on every area of medicine, especially cancer and vaccines, and those are obviously related. But the the answer is not to reform the regulatory agencies. I I think that's impossible. There's no way you're gonna come up with I don't know. What are you gonna do? Pay these bureaucrats, like, a million dollars a year and and hope you don't get outbid by the pharma companies? I just don't see how that's gonna work out. But what you could do is just eliminate all the regulatory agencies. They're not doing any good. They're doing way more harm than good.
And just make it known that it's the wild, wild west out there. People can sell whatever snake oil, bogus treatments they want to. You know, doctors, you don't have to go through ten years of brainwashing to practice medicine. Just deregulate everything and make people start to think for themselves. Insurance companies because that's insurance companies, which are really the banks, they manipulate everything all the way down. Hospitals, individual doctors, that's where the control mechanism is in cahoots with the government. The Obamacare, worst of both worlds, giant banks, plus big government everywhere.
And, you know, the only solution is to get rid of all of it, and then you gotta have do your own research. Who do you trust? Do you trust that doctor Patrick Soon Shiong guy? Or or do you trust the, the ones who said get all your shots and and get a mammogram? You know, make your own your own decisions there. But there's that would and as brutal as it sounds, it should just go to a cap a pure capitalism system would be way better because then you would be motivated to provide something that worked cheaply, that the market could afford instead of all these exact 180 degree incentives that that's how the system works now.
And we've talked about many different aspects of it. But, obviously, you know, canter's a a big part of it. Don't wanna end all on on that negative negative talk there, but we we've got some happy stuff coming up at the end. So that's, and I'll I'll lead into it here in a minute. But I do want to explain the the absence there. You could tell I've had definitely prepped stuff, but, had not just not sat down to do a show. And, fortunately, hopefully, it doesn't involve cancer. But, but my wife has been having some fairly serious health issues, and has some major surgery coming up, in early August. So I'm not sure if there's gonna be either I'll try and get an episode out early next week. But if it doesn't happen, we'll have, guests' family coming to to help take care of the kids so that I can keep working, which I'd I very much appreciate.
And, our kids, especially the youngest, the Down syndrome girly, there's gotta be someone that is able to be up and around and and keeping an eye on her. She does not not do well if you just kinda leave her to her own devices. So, please pray for pray for my wife, Lori, to have a good recovery from that surgery and just just better health in general. And, yeah, we'll I don't don't wanna get into too many details, but, major, but won't know for sure until after the surgery, but hopefully not not cancer. But, still still scary, and she had had some scary, trips to the ER here in the last few weeks. So been preoccupied with that.
Again, I apologize for the delay. But before the end of the show, I want to play, a couple of clips, and this I kinda doubt in this niche audience that we have here that there's too many golf fans. But recently, The Open Championship, formerly known as the British Open, in the lead up to it, they interview the top players, and the top player in the world is a guy from Texas named Scottie Scheffler, and he had some interesting comments about golf. You know, he he loves golf. His whole life has been spent getting really good at golf. And but he says that's not what not what ultimately satisfies him. You know? And he he's talked previously about his relationship with Jesus Christ.
And, so this part of that clip is in here, but even even more insightful, these clips, come mainly from his caddy, Ted Scott, who's been a caddy for a long time. He was a caddy for Bubba Watson when Bubba Watson won the Masters. And he does a a series that he just calls Sunday sermon. And so the first one I'll play is from the open championship week, which was a couple weeks ago. And then this, the last one I'll play that I'll end on, it'll be the the Ted Scott's words of wisdom to end the episode, come from this last week. So so both very good. And he is, you know, I mean, you could tell from listening to him just very humble, thoughtful guy.
And if you look back at Scottie Scheffler's career, this guy was always super talented, but up until Ted Scott started being his caddy, would he had the reputation of never quite being able to pull out the win in a golf tournament. He'd always be right there and just just not quite get it done. And since Ted Scott has has been there, I mean, he's become the number one player in the world by a pretty wide margin and won four major championships, including two this year and plus two other, you know, two masters. So it's his career has has gone in an amazing direction, but he had very interesting things to say, and then Ted Scott comments on on that and just kind of this the reality of, you know, success from a worldly perspective and why that doesn't actually satisfy us. So some words of wisdom, two clips from Ted Scott to close us out.
[01:14:11] Unknown:
Work so hard for something that's so fleeting.
[01:14:15] Unknown:
Good morning. Sunday sermon here in Portrush. Right over these rocks is Portrush Golf Club. Man, what an awesome place. You know, Wednesday, Scotty had a press conference, and it caused a ton of chatter. A lot of people sent me his interview. A lot of people had questions. A lot of people agreed. Some people disagreed. You hear people in the locker room talking about it, media, social media. You know, it it's really created a buzz, but why? Well, it's because something we all ponder. What is the meaning? What's the point? You know, why are we doing this? Why am I doing that? Why do I have this job? Why do I live here? It's something that I think many of us ponder in this vast, beautiful world.
You know, I look out over this ocean here, and I just see an incredible beauty and majesty. And it's so vast and so grand, and I realize how small I am and why sometimes success feels so insignificant. So, yeah, I ponder that same question. In 02/2014, Bubba Watson called me two weeks after he won the masters. Didn't say hello. He just said, what's the point? I believe it was that same year that Tom Brady won his third Super Bowl, and he said, is this it? Is this all there is? The same time, Tom, Jim Carrey was the highest paid actor, getting about 15,000,000 a movie back then. And he was saying the same thing. Is this it? I started paying attention after Bubba asked me that question. And since then, that's all I've heard from great famous athletic people and actors and people that I've gotten to be around. They're all saying the same thing. Maybe they don't say it in public, but they're all saying it in private. They're all not quite satisfied. So where do we get our satisfaction?
Well, first of all, why does Scottie Scheffler have a burning desire to win tournaments? Well, the Bible says that God gives you the desires of your heart. And I believe that people like Xander Schauffele and Scottie Scheffler, who I'm posting their little interviews and their clips after this, I believe God gave them a burning desire in their heart to to be good at golf from a very young age. Bible also says that God gives you talents, and he gave them the talent. So it's like, okay. So I have this burning desire to compete. I have this talent. But why? What's the purpose? What's the point? Well, I think the point is a couple things. One, if you really wanna enjoy something, you have to be grateful.
Just stop for a second and say, man, I am so thankful that I get to do this. I'm so grateful that I get to compete, that I get to live out my dream. But more importantly, I think it's how are you gonna use that to bless other people. And, you know, one of the cool things about being a golfer is you're an entertainer. You're blessing people. Someone asked me just this week, they said, hey. Do you think that these guys really look back and appreciate how well they entertain us? And I said, they probably don't think of it that way, but I thought that was a cool perspective from a fan. But more importantly, you know, we we should be glorifying God with our gifts. We should be grateful, and we should be using our gifts and showcasing our gifts and giving him all the glory. Just saying, Lord, thank you. Win or lose, I am so grateful that I get to do this, that I get to do my job and that I get to go compete.
And whatever your job is, you know, joy doesn't come from circumstances. That's the whole point of what these guys are talking about. Circumstances, even winning, doesn't create true deep meaningful joy. Joy comes from a grateful heart, and joy comes from knowing that all good things come from God. And when you walk to serve him and you walk to serve others as Jesus Christ came and died on this earth. He he came here before he died, not to be served, but to serve. He came to serve men. That's where fulfillment is. So find a way in your job to serve others, find a way to be grateful, and watch these two interviews right after this. I hope this makes you think. I hope this makes you ponder. This is a really important thing in your life to find deep meaning and satisfaction. Have a blessed Sunday.
Now where are they?
[01:18:13] Unknown:
My parents house probably in a bank vault I think that's where some of the like one of the trophies was you know when they travel including the gold medal I actually have no idea where that is to be completely honest it's great to know why don't you
[01:18:28] Unknown:
Work so hard for something that's so fleeting. I mean it really is. Like the feeling of winning just doesn't last that long. You know, when I when I sit back at the end of the year and, you know, I kinda try to reflect on things, like having that sense of accomplishment from winning the masters tournament, from winning the PGA championship, I have a deep sense of gratitude and appreciation for it. But it's just hard to explain how it doesn't it just doesn't satisfy is is how I would describe it. It's an unsatisfying venture. And so, I guess, what I what I'm trying to say is this is not this is not the place to look for your satisfaction. This is something that's where you can have a great appreciation for and a great, like, a great amount of thankfulness for being able to do this. And it's I mean, like I said, it's it's literally one of the most fun things that I can do in my entire life. I love being able to come out here and play golf and compete. But at the end of the day, it's just not what satisfies me.
[01:19:23] Unknown:
Good morning. Sunday sermon. I was just thinking about how often we pass people at work or in a store or walk with them daily and don't really dig into their lives and ask what's going on. And, one of the things that I'm trying to do better in my life is to engage with people, to put my phone down and just ask questions, ask great questions because oftentimes we just say, how are you doing? And people say, good, busy, but we really don't dig into each other's lives. And, in my experience, everyone is going through something. Every one of us. We're all dealing with something, you know, something deep, something that we probably need some help with, that we need to talk about, that we need to be encouraged.
And so this week, I dare you to go and find someone. Just pick somebody, anybody, and look them in the eyes and ask them how they're doing. And when they say good, been busy, dig deeper. I bet you'll find some stuff that they really need to be encouraged about. You'll find some that they're going through some things. And also, you're gonna find out that they're like you. You might be the one that actually needs to talk to them, and they might just be the great listener. God will orchestrate that. So hope this encourages you to engage more in others and, just be a blessing to those around you. Have a great Sunday.
Hello, everybody. Welcome to another edition of the No Pill podcast. This is episode 17, beef tallowalgocracy. Okay. Remember, algocracy is rule by algorithm slash AI type deal, so the title makes sense pretty quickly. No no long suspense on that one. So let's, we'll get right into it. I apologize for the delay. I will talk a little more about that at the end, but let's get into into the show here. So first of all, we're gonna start out with some some just kinda cartoon level propaganda, from this time from Tedros, but I could play clips from Klaus Schwab or Joe Biden or Bill Gates. You know, just kind of the the cartoon level obvious evil propaganda.
So we'll we'll play the Tedros clip here first telling you what you should and should not be eating.
[00:01:53] Unknown:
Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet. Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and account for almost one third of the global burden of disease. Transforming food systems is therefore essential by shifting towards healthier, diversified, and more plant based diets. If food systems delivered healthy diets for all, we could save eight million lives per year. WHO is committed to supporting countries to develop and implement policies to improve diets and fight climate change. I'm therefore very pleased that over 130 countries have signed the COP twenty eight UAE declaration on climate and health.
Together, we can protect and promote the health of both people and planet.
[00:02:54] Andrew Hoffman:
So there's, you know, one of a million examples of the cartoon level eat z bugs propaganda, and it's it's obvious. Right? I mean, it's obvious these people hate you, want you dead, are telling you the exact opposite of what you should be doing. But once we peel you know, I mean, get there are people, I guess, that buy into that and, oh, let's eat, stuff covered in glyphosate all the time. And and I'm sure Bill Gates makes better meat than, you know, cows that have been around for thousands of years. You know, I'm sure that's healthier for me, the Impossible Burger, all all that junk.
But it gets trickier when it's something that should be healthy, that's not this cartoon level propaganda. It's like, okay, well, you know, let's get some grass fed beef from the grocery store, and that should be healthy to eat. Right? I mean, that that sounds pretty healthy. Or how about organic grass fed beef? USDA organic grass fed beef. What what could be wrong? Alright. So so let's take a look. This is from doctor Eric Berg. Doctor. Eric Berg on X. Grass fed beef is a scam. Don't trust the label. There's a massive loophole behind it. Let's break it down. And I'll just read through the thread here. In 2016, the USDA dropped its official definition of grass fed.
Since then, companies can use the label even if the cow spent its final three to six months, which is a pretty long time, eating grains, GMO byproducts, and synthetic additives. Most people have no idea. Why does it matter? This is important because the final stage of a cow's life has the biggest impact on your health. In the last three to six months, cows are moved to feedlots and fat and fast. They're fed DDGS, which stands for dried distillers grain with solubles. A cheap industrial byproduct from ethanol production. It's not food. It's waste.
And he I won't play the the video, but he goes through more detailed explanation of it. Yes. It's an ethanol derivative and so they take inedible corn, break it down into ethanol for, you know, to dilute your gasoline, and then the leftover is this inedible corn, which is then fed to cows, just loaded with glyphosate. It only costs them $150 per metric ton. Metric ton, dollars 150. 50. And why is it so cheap? Oh, government subsidies. Alright. So along with that, to speed up the growth even more, feedlot cattle are given, moninsin, an antibiotic that boosts weight, synthetic vitamins and minerals, limestone to aid digestion, beta agonists, which are drugs that force muscle growth, and these drugs mimic adrenaline and may affect you too when you're eating that supposed organic grass fed beef.
Research has linked beta agonists to increased anxiety in humans who consume meat with residues, and here's something you don't most don't know. Even grass fed cows may receive the anti may receive antibiotics unless the label clearly states no antibiotics ever. Now, let's look at how they're raised. And this this doesn't even get into the vaccine issue, which is a big issue becoming an even bigger issue with with cows. Alright. Get back into it. A full grown cow weighing 1,500 pounds is often confined to 24 square feet. That's one sixth the size of a parking space.
Six cows packed into the space you'd park a single car for months. Why? To keep them sedentary while they gain fat. So what about cows in supposedly open feedlots? In open feedlots, cows get just 150 square feet, slightly more space, just more sun. The goal stays the same, minimal movement, maximum fat gain. Sick animals produce tender, marbled meat, and that's what sells, but the deception goes even further. Many people think their beef is local, but country of origin labeling laws were were repealed. Imported beef can be processed in The US and labeled product of USA, even if the animal was raised overseas.
So what can you do? Which, you know, product of USA. If you're buying beef and it says product of USA, would you not think the beef came from The USA? Of course you would, then you're supposed to. But it doesn't mean that at all. So look for this exact label. This is his advice, 100% grass fed, not just grass fed, not grass finished, not natural. 100% grass fed means the cow stayed on pasture and was never sent to a feedlot or finished on grain. Yes. It costs more, but here's what you're supporting. Healthier animals, more nutrients, ethical, pasture raised farms, real transparency.
The beef industry runs on loopholes and vague labels, but once you understand the system, you can choose better. Support the farmers doing it right. Buy honest food. Labels don't tell the whole story. If you've been paying more for grass fed beef thinking it was clean, you've likely been misled. Okay. So good thread there. And it's I would say, you know, the 100% grass fed, if you're still buying meat from a grocery store, that's good. But if you're, I mean, if you're in a place like Oklahoma or Texas or what have you, you can actually buy you can go visit the ranch you're buying from and you can ask them what they do with the with the calves, you know, what they do with the beef.
So you can find places, if the beef initiative is a good website to look at, we've actually got a couple other stores from them here in a minute. But, beefinitiative, I think, .org is their website and will show you kind of places to order beef. So, you can actually have the best of both worlds where it is, grain finished, but instead of that ethanol, GMO junk, they use organic grains. So, you still get the fattier, tastier, more tender meat along with not, you know, lack of poison. So that is something that's out there too, in addition to the pure grass fed option.
So just some some information there. But this this is the story that kinda inspired me on on this episode, and it seems like kind of a throwaway deal. You know, it it's we'll put it into the very much not unmitigated good news category. So Tesla, which I have never been a fan of Tesla at all, you know, Elon Musk deal, they opened a Hollywood Diner. Tesla's Hollywood Diner just rewrote the fast food rule book, all local, all real. Okay? This comes from, beefnews.org, and it's just a glowing so let me just read it, all the positive stuff, and then we'll we'll see if there might be some some holes we can poke in this.
Tesla's Hollywood Diner flips fast food on its head. Brant beef from Calpella, Straus and Valley Ford Dairy, Santa Monica Market produce, even Tejas choppy wheat tortillas, all sourced inside a regional radius. This isn't hype. It's a prototype for national scale, traceable local food systems, and no other chain has even tried. Beneath the neon and robot servers at 7001 Santa Monica Boulevard, Tesla quietly delivered something groundbreaking, a national brand menu sourced entirely from local world producers. No factory farms. No global supply chains. While most, media zeroed in on drive in screens and Cybertruck trays, the real story is hidden in the ingredient list, and it's a model worth watching.
The one third pound Brant beef burgers and beef tallow fries come from Brant beef, a single family ranch in Calpala, California known for premium Holstein cattle and whole carcass traceability. Wagyu beef chili is supplied by RC Provisions, a Los Angeles legacy meat house serving regional delis and restaurants for over fifty years. Cheddar cheese is sourced from new school American developed by Tesla Diner's, chef Eric Greenspan using real cream and butter, no phosphates or fillers. Milk, yogurt, and soft serve come from Straus Family Creamery and Valley Ford Creamery, both multigenerational family run dairies in Marin and Sonoma Counties.
Fruits and vegetables are sourced directly from the Santa Monica Farmers Market, while tortillas are made with drought tolerant wheat from the Tejaapi Grain Project. Everything is being sourced within one Tesla charge, which is close indeed. Alright. So that that's all good. But then, you know, okay. We've got the Optimus robot serving popcorn, and it says no ESG, no greenwashing, just real food from real producers. Okay. Well, it's not greenwashing exactly, and it is real food, but why do we have to, you know, why do we have to have Tesla be the, supposedly, the only, the only company getting any press about doing it. We'll put it that way.
So all this stuff, it's very doable. You can have real food from, you know, locally sourced. And if people knew where their food came from in general, they would be more likely to to want to pay for for those things. But the whole system, food, it costs more money to ship food from farther away. So food is produced locally, it should be cheaper than food produced further away, all things being equal. All things are not equal because of government subsidies on, well, let's see, crops like corn and soybeans. So everything all these, you know, oh, it's for renewable fuels, you know, the ethanol production. So you've got field after field after field, all GMO soybeans, GMO corn, and it's like, well, you know, don't worry about it. You won't be eating a lot of that. But, well, the glyphosate's gotta go somewhere. It goes into the groundwater, and it's just a a full scale poisoning operation.
And then so they're they're gonna give you farm to table real food, what everyone wants. Right? But to get it, it's gotta be this futuristic thing. We got the robots. We got the Tesla charging stations. We got your plugged in, track trace database, 20 you know, the whole time you're there. And so it's well, we we can't have, you know, farm to table real food without technocracy. And it kinda hit me that this is what everything's been pointing towards. Right? So we're you've got the obvious cartoon level propaganda that was designed for people to reject it. Like, no one actually is like, you know that Klaus Schwab?
He really knows what he's talking about. We should do what he says. Eat, you know, own nothing and be happy. That's what it that's what I wanna do. So you've you've got that level, and then people run what they think is the the opposite. But, really, it's Elon Musk and Donald Trump over here saying, okay. We're we're not gonna totally insult you, but, you know, you're you're not gonna ask any more questions about Epstein. You're definitely not gonna question space and space travel and what have you. It's, you know, Elon can do that, but but the common folk can't.
And we're we're gonna stick brain chips in you. We're gonna, you know, use robots and automation and AI and everything else. So this is, you know, it it's a different, more appealing path right into technocracy, right into algocracy. So let's let's take a look, what I'm talking about. We've got well, let's let's hear Elon talking about, the new amazing Grok, Grok4, so the AI chatbot Grok4. Four will see what what he's, what he's promoting here.
[00:16:57] Unknown:
Like, Grok four is postgraduate, like, PhD level in everything. Better than pH but, like, most PhDs would fail. So it's better that said I mean, at least with respect to academic questions, it I wanna just emphasize this point. With respect to academic questions, GROC four is better than PhD level in every subject, no exceptions. Now this doesn't mean that it's it it you know, at times it may lack common sense, and it has not yet invented new technologies or discovered new physics, but that is just a matter of time. Mhmm. If it I I I think it may discover new technologies, as soon as later this year, and I I would be shocked if it is not done so next year.
So I would expect Grok to, yeah, literally discover new new technologies that are actually useful no later than next year and maybe end of this year. And it might discover new physics next year. And within two years, I'd say almost certainly. Like so just let that sink in.
[00:18:11] Andrew Hoffman:
Yeah. I had to leave that little evil laugh there at the end from Elon. So okay. New technologies that are usable by the end of this year and new physics, what, you know, what new physics needs to be invented is kind of an interesting interesting question, within two years. I will not hold my breath on either one of those things, but it is interesting in in the context of what Elon said. Elon Musk says it could take eight Starship launches to fuel up a single moon trip. Well, that's interesting. So we've got these giant, you know, eight Starship launches to fuel up a Delivering astronauts to the moon is no easy feat, and it requires a disgusting amount of rocket fuel to pull it off.
With its fuel tanks filled to the brim, NASA's Saturn five rocket weighed in at 6,500,000 pounds during the Apollo missions almost half a century ago. It managed to burn up 20 tons of rocket fuel every second. Okay. That's that's interesting. Fast forward several decades, and SpaceX's Elon Musk is trying to achieve similar greatness with his space company Starship rocket. This time, it's gonna take a lot of refueling to get there. SpaceX competitor Blue Origin recently griped that SpaceX might need as many as 16 launches to get to the moon. But 16 flights is extremely unlikely, Musk shot back in a Wednesday tweet. Starship payload to orbit is about 150 tons, so a max of eight to fill 1,200 ton tanks of Lunar Starship.
Alright. Without flaps and heat shields, Starship is much lighter. Must continue. Lunar landing legs don't add much. One six gravity may only need half full, I. E. Four tanker flights. Okay. And even if it did take 16 launches, Musk said that wouldn't be a problem. Okay. Alright. So, you know, hey, don't don't worry about it. Not a big deal, but, so we're still trying to figure out how to get to the moon in 2025, but they totally did back in 1969. Makes makes total sense. Alright. Just a little aside, maybe maybe that's kind of the new physics. If you guys remember back I don't know what episode it was, but one of my earlier episodes, the the very angry, Asian man who who proclaimed that everything was fake and that the the basically, the physics does not add up, both for space travel, satellites, all of it. And one of the things he pointed to is the amount of lift, force, etcetera needed to get to the moon with how far away the moon, supposedly is. It just the equation just doesn't work, and it didn't work in 1969.
It didn't work in the seventies, and it still doesn't work in 2025. So we'll just, let's just focus on going to Mars. We got more more excuses, more ready and believable excuses on why we we won't get to Mars and then get back to the moon. So let's let's kinda get back to this thing. So Trump or sorry. Elon's talking about Grok four, his little AI chatbot, inventing new physics. And AI is, you know, it's still everywhere. Kinda behind the scenes, there are some serious problems going on. But let's just talk about the, from a financial economic perspective, what is going on with AI. So let's play a couple of clips that I I stole from the No Agenda podcast, and they clipped them from CNN, of all places, talking about Trump going to Pennsylvania, meeting with a bunch of CEOs, and investing in not just AI data centers, but, there's another kind of crucial element going on, that I think is is more of, the real reason for all this stuff.
[00:22:43] Unknown:
New today in our tech lead, president Trump unveiled a $90,000,000,000 investment package in artificial intelligence and energy before an audience of officials. Lawmakers lawmakers and more than 60 industry CEOs, let's bring in CNN's Elena Treen who's there in Pittsburgh, Elena. What does this investment entail?
[00:23:00] Unknown:
Yeah. Look. I mean, you saw some big numbers from a lot of these different companies. Just for example, Blackstone, they are investing $15,000,000,000, in building up some data centers for artificial intelligence here in Pennsylvania. FirstEnergy, said that they are investing $15,000,000,000 as well to expand power distribution. But, look, I think the key thing here is what this investment means as it relates to Donald Trump because he often doesn't travel, for things like this. Today was different. The reason he came all the way out to Pittsburgh is not only because there are, you know, 60 CEOs and executives of some of the largest tech and energy companies who were in this room and at that round table behind me where he was participating in, but also because he cares deeply about artificial intelligence and specifically wanting to win the arms race with China when it comes to AI. And he talked a lot about that, when he was speaking with these different, leaders here. And and just to give you some of the CEOs who were actually, up here on that stage earlier today, it included, some of the CEOs of Amazon Web Services, of, BlackRock, Palantir, and then some of the investments we also saw from companies were Meta, and Google. So really just a lot of heavy hitters who were here to invest in Pennsylvania and specifically, like I said, data centers for artificial intelligence, but also energy to help power them with really the goal being that they need to expand it significantly here in The United States. And, Elena, this this all comes on the heels of four different AI companies signing
[00:24:30] Unknown:
hefty contracts worth worth up to $200,000,000 each with the Pentagon. What's the White House saying about that?
[00:24:36] Unknown:
Yeah. I mean and these were major major federal contracts that were given out. So OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Elon Musk's new AI company, XAI, have all won contracts of up to $200,000,000 each. That's a huge number, to help the defense department in expanding and building up their artificial intelligence systems as well. Now, of course, we've heard from the White House that this is all about national security, about this is making sure, that the defense department and the Pentagon is in line where it needs to be keeping up with this changing technological environment.
But but very interesting to hear, you know, some of the different groups that got these and really particularly OpenAI having the $200,000,000 contract, on its own, really significant investment in this and really showing where the administration believes or just how much they believe, how important this is to making sure the defense department is where it needs to be when it comes to keeping up with AI and also, again, trying to beat China as being the dominant superpower when it comes to artificial intelligence, Jake?
[00:25:38] Andrew Hoffman:
I think the fact that they're focusing on Pennsylvania and and Pittsburgh in particular is not definitely not an accident. When you think of Pittsburgh, you what do you think of? The steel city. Right? American steel, American manufacturing, industrial base, all the stuff that got hollowed out and shipped overseas and globalized. And what's coming in now? Well, it's sort of manufacturing, but not really. I mean, it's not making anything real, but it is it is producing it it requires a lot of energy, a lot of electricity, and is very expensive.
And I think when you look at why they're doing it from from Trump's perspective, this is a feature, not a bug. The CNN report says, oh, Trump cares deeply about AI. I don't think Trump cares anything about AI, but he cares about the fact that China is their energy usage keeps going straight up, and The US' energy usage is flat. And there's many ways to, you know, to determine what's going on economically and what have you. But, you know, if you look since electricity is was invented, using a lot of electricity is generally a good sign for your your country. Places like North Korea where the lights are mainly off, not so good.
So I think this is a it's a gambit to, to spend a lot of money, inject stuff into the economy. And there there are definitely true believers in AI. I don't know. I have a hard time believing that that Trump would fall into that category. But there's they're definitely out there. But the reasons they're hyping up for AI and for, basically, you know, why they're spending the money are are bogus. And they even they snuck some bogus stuff into that report. So this is $90,000,000,000. Right? $90,000,000,000. That's what they said right at the beginning of the report, $90,000,000,000.
And then they focus on four $200,000,000 contracts with the Pentagon. Well, that's that's like 1% of what we're talking about. And that's oh, these are major contracts. Yeah. $200,000,000 contracts. They're it's nothing. But it is something to be, you know, to talked about, and and who knows? Maybe they're the Palantir stuff they're using, to determine who, has a bad enough Hamask score to deserve death over in Israel, you know, I'm I'm sure that that can all be turned around and pointed at us or pointed in other countries. All that is a legitimate issue, partially because it's so wildly wildly bogus and inaccurate. You know, you're making literal life and death decisions based on stuff that is just is just as error prone as AI is. You know, you can ask ask a question, and it hallucinates.
Stuff just doesn't make sense. And and you hear Elon saying, oh, it's gonna be inventing new physics within a couple years. So this is I think, the the power usage and I'll I'll throw a graph in there in the the substack for you to take a look at because Elon Musk, retweeted this, and it's just showing just power usage. And I think, you know, from their perspective, they're being, like, the Trump Elon crowd. If you want America to do well, which I think it at some level, Trump does and at some level, Elon probably does too. They feel like they can do be a better job of of being the the right kind of billionaire, you know, control freak autocrats, that would it would be better for the country if they're in charge.
So they think, okay, more power is better. AI it's it's great. I mean, those data centers do use a ton of energy, which as, Dvorak and Adam Curry pointed out on on the last show, this whole, you know, technology's chips get smaller and smaller. It should use less and less energy. Why is this using more and more energy? It it intuitively doesn't make sense, and it's going against the direction of technological advancement that's been happening for the last, you know, number of decades. Why do these AI data centers need so much energy? It's crazy.
Through my job, I I've run into a couple of these proposed projects, and there's one, you know, kind of a medium sized data center, and it's like, well, you know, it's gonna be out here outside this town of 55,000 people. And, yeah, it's gonna use more electricity than the entire town of 55,000 people. So any time you build one of these things, you've got to build whatever substation power generation goes with it. So it's and Oklahoma, like, I would say, kinda like Texas, there is a ton of solar and and wind stuff going on in Oklahoma, but at least there's also oil and gas. It's you know, the governor says we'll take more of everything.
And so there's there's gonna be stuff that gets built all over the country, not just Pennsylvania, but I think it was symbolic of, okay, manufacturing. It might have left Pittsburgh, but it's coming back to, it's coming back to Pittsburgh. America's coming back. But again, just like with the real food Tesla diner thing, yes, energy and assorted manufacturing is coming back, but it's gonna be automate it's gonna be automated. We're not talking about tons and tons of jobs. We're talking about, you know, unless you're an electrician, it's gonna be plenty of electrician jobs, but and plenty of, security guard jobs.
But there's you know, it's it's sort of better, but also we're we're not going back to where America actually made a lot of stuff. It's this this kind of brave new world of, oh, it's gonna be AI, and everything's automated. And and, yeah, don't worry about it. Don't worry about that you're not able to think or find your way around or all the negative health impacts that this all this stuff is having on you. Don't worry about any of that because it's just the AI will figure it out, and and everything will be fine. And I definitely think everything will not be fine, but let's let's move on here.
Oh, one final point. They use China this is the new Cold War, the AI war with with China, the AI development race. And interesting, China's the point is like, well, you can do all the things to your AI, but it uses a lot less computational power. And, again, I think they're kind of missing the point there. But this will be this will be the excuse just like the Soviet Union was the excuse of spending billions of dollars on arms and, you know, missiles and supposed nuclear weapons, all that stuff. Now China will be the excuse for all that same stuff, you know, all the all the weapons, but also, that's why we gotta spend the money on AI.
That's why we gotta build these huge data centers. You know, all the environmental crowd that was against a lot of this stuff going back, all of a sudden, it's okay because it's it's coming from coming from Tesla, coming from kinda trendier sources. So it's you know, we got Elon trying to jump back and forth between both side you know, left or right winging the the bird of New World Order bird, but pushing technocracy from both sides. So let's take a look. Let's, I don't know how to do a well, let's, the the story that I missed for the most part, not doing episodes, was really that Jeffrey Epstein and related stuff. So we've got the we've got Epstein, and then we've got the, you know, Trump's comments supposedly trying to tell people not to look into it, which just made people freak out about it more.
We got mainstream media covering Epstein for for the most part for the first time, which is interesting. Maybe accidental, maybe maybe on purpose. But I thought this, this Greg Rees this came out a few weeks ago. Greg Rees, the final act of Jeffrey Epstein. Let's go ahead and play that, and then we'll kinda I'll try and tie it back around before we move on to a new subject here.
[00:35:54] Unknown:
Donald Trump has been friends with Jeffrey Epstein for years. In 02/2002, he told New York Magazine that he's known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it. Jeffrey enjoys his social life. Close quote. Jeffrey Epstein claimed he introduced Donald Trump to Melania. Epstein is known for grooming beautiful women for powerful men. On 07/06/2019, Epstein was arrested. Two weeks later, he was murdered in his jail cell, all during president Trump's first term. Shortly after Trump began his second term, political agents and useful idiots posed for the cameras with DOJ binders as if justice was coming, and nothing followed until this week when we were told that the DOJ and the FBI concluded that Epstein had no client list and died by suicide.
While this isn't fooling the awakening masses, political agents and useful idiots began doing their best to defend Trump and steer everyone towards immigration, where the solution will obviously be the digital ID for every US citizen. The overwhelming majority of US government representatives are the recipients of hundreds of millions of dollars paid out by APEC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were clearly part of a sexual blackmail operation run by the Mossad and the CIA to further own the American government. This is why our government officials are all on board with the genocide being committed by The US and Israel.
[00:37:46] Unknown:
Do you think that there can be a two state solution that creates an independent I don't know. I'd ask Mimi that question. You have the greatest man in the world to answer that age old question, two state. Go ahead. You give him your honest answer.
[00:38:00] Unknown:
I think, Palestinian should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers should threaten us. That means that certain powers, like overall security, will always remain in our hands. Now that is a fact, and no one in Israel will, agree to anything else because we don't commit suicide. We want life. We cherish life for ourselves, for our neighbors, and I think we can work out a piece between us and the entire Middle East with president Trump's leadership. And by working together, I think we can establish a very, very broad piece that will include all our neighbors.
[00:38:42] Unknown:
When Pam Bondi was asked about all this, Trump couldn't help but interrupt her and show frustration
[00:38:48] Unknown:
that anyone was concerned about his old friend of fifteen years. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for a American or foreign intelligence agency. The former labor secretary who was, Miami US attorney, Alex Costa. He allegedly said that he did work for intelligence agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did? And also, could you say why there's a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of the day? Yeah. Sure. If I could Can I just interrupt a little second?
[00:39:19] Unknown:
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking we have Texas. We have this. We have all of the things that and are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable. Do you wanna waste the time? And do you feel like answering? I I don't mind answering, but I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems, like a desecration, but you go ahead. And Pam Bondi suggested
[00:39:56] Unknown:
that the child porn they have in evidence was Epstein's personal collection that he downloaded from the Internet and nothing at all to do with blackmail.
[00:40:06] Unknown:
Sure. Sure. First, to back up on that, in February, I did an interview on Fox, and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said, I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well. That's what I meant by that. Also, to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Child porn is what they were. Never gonna be released. Never gonna see the light of day. To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that.
[00:40:50] Andrew Hoffman:
I mean, there's there's a lot of stuff with the Epstein thing, and there's a lot of stuff stuff already known. At at some level, my instinct is there is no truth in a government file on any subject, much less Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein. And there's really no truth in a government file in government files on Jeffrey Epstein after it's been, you know, sitting around in the government getting changed, scrubbed, all sorts of different items, you know, for the past however many years. So this is is it as simple as, you know, Trump was involved, and that's why he doesn't want the stuff to come out.
That's certainly possible, but I I think it goes way, way beyond that. And it's it's being used distraction might be the wrong word, but it's everything is it feels very scripted. This is at some level, you are supposed to obsess on some things about Epstein, not others. You know, as as far as him being an agent, I I've seen no evidence to that effect. Well, did you look? You know, this is like the COVID vaccine test where it's like, well, we didn't see any evidence of that. Yeah. Because you you threw it out whenever it happened. Right? You know? There's someone dies in the trial or has a severe adverse event, let's just kick them out of the trial. Oh, they're they're throw them in the unvaxxed category.
So this is, you know, it's very fishy. And would Trump have made it this far if he did not have levers to control him? I don't think so. And I I've, you know, I've kinda hoped so at certain points, but I've never really thought that. And this goes back to the you know, when he originally ran. And the Epstein stuff, it's not just the sexual blackmail operation. And the the idea that after, I think at this point, dozens of people reporting that everything was being recorded, and he had these massive, you know, vaults of videotapes of compromising material, from all the different sites. It wasn't just one Epstein Island site, New York, New Mexico.
I mean, it goes on and on and on. And that, oh, it's just because he downloaded some child porn from the Internet? Like, no one no one believes that. And I I think we're on a we're on a different part of the cartoon level propaganda right we talked at the at the very beginning you've got the Tedros Klaus Schwab kind of environmentalist cartoon level propaganda. This is the cartoon level propaganda for for Q, right, for QAnon, for the trust the plan folks. And, again, most of us are not supposed to believe that. There's some true believers, but we're at least supposed to get upset about it and pay attention to that.
There's been some other stuff going on too. This could be, you know, I mean, there's a I don't I don't wanna jump too far off topic, but, I mean, Trump is a Trump, in total, great distraction. And he I think he he either knows that he's supposed to be a great distraction or that's just his media strategy is make everything about you all the time. Doesn't matter good, bad, or indifferent as long as they're talking about you. You know, all publicity is good publicity. That's definitely the Trump MO. So we've got, you know, but there there's some serious blowback, serious issues, and I think some interesting hints that, you know, for better or worse, it is most definitely not Trump in charge. Like, he's not the evil evil dictator in charge, and he's also not the, knight on a white horse that's gonna solve everything single handedly in charge. And this goes back to the COVID vax.
And if this was Revelation's radio news day, as most people probably have some some memory of this. So Trump, you know, was he was promoting the vaxx, but he he got COVID. They gave him remdesivir. It wasn't looking good. Then all of a sudden, he he got better, gets out of the hospital, okay, you know, we're we're good to go. And I at that time, I hypothesized that, they made him a a deal. And and since that time, not that by any means Trump was perfect up until that time, but he's been much worse since that point. So it was like, oh, do you want you want some more of the poison remdesivir, or you wanna actually, get better and and get out of here? And what what are you gonna do to to earn that? And I think part of the deal was, you're going to promote that vaccine, you're going to take the vaccine, the vaccine's going to be the best thing ever, and you're never going to stop with that.
And, so he takes the vaccine, oh, it's great, it's wonderful, I can't believe you people don't like it. It saved millions and millions of lives. This was an issue for him running up to this election. This was, you know, Alex Jones proclaimed he would no longer support Trump if Trump didn't apologize for the vaccine. We'd see how that turned out. But, an interesting little little piece of news just kinda glossed over. Trump's got this this little you know, it's a benign condition where your heart can't where the blood can't get returned to your heart. And, you know, it's it kinda sounds a little bit like a a vaccine side effect, but let's just let's kinda ignore that. Well, not everybody ignored it. Toby Rogers, one of my my favorite follows on on x, tweeted, now that real Donald Trump is also vaccine injured, can we pull the effing COVID shots or still not?
So and, someone kinda questioned him on it. Well, how do you know it's vaccine injury? And he pointed to this post, don't be fooled by semantics. This comes from the ethical skeptic, chronic venous insufficiency, which is what they say Trump has, and post thrombotic syndrome, PTS, both involve the same sequelae. They're using one variation in terminology a to avoid admitting to the other b, because post thrombotic syndrome is a vax is a known vaccine side effect of the COVID vaccine. So chronic venous insufficiency is a general term for anything that makes it hard for blood to flow back up to the heart.
Post thrombotic syndrome, or PTS, is a specific type of CVI that happens after you've had a deep vein thrombosis, DVT, from the mRNA vaccine, which is a blood clot in a deep vein in your leg. Even after the clot goes away, it leaves behind scarring and damage in the vein, which causes ongoing CVI, what he has. About twenty to fifty percent of people who've had a a deep vein thrombosis will develop post thrombotic syndrome usually within one to two years. Alright. So it definitely appears likely that Donald Trump is is COVID vaccine injured.
And he could I don't know. I think there's been some some downfall in his his mental acuity. I think there's been some signs signs of that. But when you got him up there against Biden, he looks pretty good compared to Biden. And I I don't think the COVID vaccine was all I agree for Biden either. And now, you know, Biden's got cancer. So this is kinda going on and on all over the place. You know? This celebrity dying, that celebrity dying. Well, let's kinda mix it in. You know, this one's not as obviously a COVID vaccine death, so we'll we'll kind of focus on that one.
It just kind of keeps happening at what seems like a a faster pace there. But let's, very well known Deion Sanders. I mean, when I was a kid, Deion Sanders, pro baseball player and pro football player, one of the fastest humans in the world. And in the last few years, he's gone he's got back into coaching, and he's had a crazy number of health problems. He's had blood clotting issues, which resulted, I believe, in amputation of either his toes or part of his foot or something pretty bad, you know, where he couldn't even walk. So this guy that could run, you know, faster than anyone one now can can barely walk and walks with a limp even even still.
And then, leading into this season, he had cancer. So now, you know, I mean, they give him the the cancer treatment and, oh, you're cancer free. Okay. Yeah. Cancer free. Just like everybody gets cancer free for a while, and then we'll see if it comes back. Hopefully, not for for Dion. But, Mofax of the late great Mofax with Adam Curry podcast still posting on social media. And he posted a very interesting, video along with the question, is Deion Sanders vaccine injured? And let's play this clip from, this is not while Deion Sanders was at Colorado. This was back COVID era vaccine rollout and the college he was at then put out these videos of Dion promoting, the vaccine. So let's let's play that real quick.
[00:51:46] Unknown:
Walmart being here today is an urgent reminder of the importance of all eligible people, 12 and up, to get vaccinated, man. And Walmart is equipped to give that message to over 5,000 Walmart and Sam's Club locations, giving free vaccinations. Did I say free? Free vaccinations. People, it ain't no excuse. One of the reasons this is very important because first and foremost, we we we wanna preserve life. Everybody talking about what they would do, what they're not gonna do, what they don't trust, what they do trust. We trust a lot of things, but we need to trust the right thing. One thing about this vaccination, it preserves life. I want a chance to win. I want a chance to dominate. I want a chance to take this university yet and these young men and women to another level. How am I gonna do that if I'm not here?
So having this vaccination is something that I've done quite a long time ago, but we're our goal is to have a hundred percent of these jokers fully vaccinated before the season start, before the kickoff September 5. We want a hundred percent of all these young men and women vaccinated, not just the persons on the team. I mean, the equipment team, the trainers, the support staff, and as many other students as possible. That's our goal. Life is everything. You can't win it, man. Think about that. Tomorrow, Walmart will be on campus again with a a vaccination clinic to the campus and community from nine to four at the College of Science, Engineering, and Technology. Hey. You can't beat that. They're coming to our crib to help us.
[00:53:27] Andrew Hoffman:
Walmart, they come into our crib to help us. Yeah. Indeed. Indeed, Dion. Thanks for pushing the vaxx. And it it would be interesting if you could get get him off the record what he really thinks, has happened to him and if it has anything to do with those decisions. Who knows? It sure seems like people are very unwilling to to reconsider when when they've been all in on that level of of deception there. So, the COVID vaccine was not the first way, they started giving us cancer. Cancer was around way before the COVID vaccine. But it's not certainly not the only vaccine to give not just people, but also pets cancer. So that's, you know, this might be an easier way to reach people.
In some ways, people have been trained to kinda desensitized to the suffering of other people, but a lot of people really love their pets. So if, you know, if hey. If pet cancer due to vaccination wakes somebody up to vaccines in in general, I think that's great. So let's play a couple of clips. We got children's health defense did in a couple different interviews with, what are they called, homeopathic veterinarians. So veterinarians that are kinda looking at different ways of doing things as opposed to the old, let's shoot them up with vaccines.
In this first clip, kind of an interesting story just, on how we how did we go from the rabies vaccine is good for life, you get it one time, you're good to go, to, annual boosters? And the answer is is very simple. But if you think there was some science behind that, you will be sorely disappointed.
[00:55:41] Unknown:
And this marketing person said, let's do annual shots. You know? I mean, you know, the vaccine inserts didn't say anything contrary to that. So and then pretty soon, the vaccine inserts started saying annual boosters are recommended. And, you know, it was it was not based on any science at all. I mean, even less science than, you know, what vaccines, which we can't talk about. Right. So so that went on and on. And then in the nineties, in current vet therapy, Ron Schultz and, another author, I forget his name, but they they had a section of the book where they said annual vaccinations are not necessary and they're harmful. This was in their nineties, and there's still vets today doing annual vaccinations and sending those postcards out. They are. And they're Yeah. Not only that, but, so I also have a brick and mortar grooming
[00:56:32] Unknown:
shop, all natural groom shop, boarding day care that I bought into. And I couldn't believe, you know, they have to make sure they get all their vaccinations or whatever. So, of course, we're, like, the only one in town that's like, no. We don't require all that. Yeah. And they're like, oh, thank god. But what was amazing is that when I took over, all the dogs were vaccinated, and all the dogs were still getting all of the diseases or issues of viruses that Yeah. They were vaccinated for. So I was, like Yeah. Started questioning that. And they couldn't figure out why their dog was so sick. Right. So not only did they have the virus, their own immune system couldn't help them because it had already been complicated by
[00:57:13] Unknown:
Exactly. Yeah. Other ingredients.
[00:57:16] Andrew Hoffman:
So annual pet vaccines and and boosters, that idea came from marketing. Works so well they started putting it on the the vaccine in inserts. Yeah. Give them every year. Why not? And since the nineties, when someone actually looked at it, they said, no. This is doing way more harm than good. Not only is it not necessary, it's doing a lot of harm. Oh, and what are we? Thirty years later, and they're still doing it. And there's the gal I I kinda cut it off early, but she talks about a boarding, location, pet boarding, where most of them required all the vaccines. And that's true. I mean, we've we had to find someone to to house it, because you can't just drop them off at a a boarding place if they're not if they're not vaccinated. So interesting
[00:58:15] Unknown:
situation with with pets. And let's play this other clip. I'd say about seventy percent of what I see is vaccine injury. If if I gave you a brand new little puppy today, would you give that puppy any vaccines? You personally? Probably no. The dog has been vaccinated, and they know that that dog is injured. Is there something that can be done to help these dogs? Is there a detox method? Is there something that people can do to make their dogs better? As a homeopath,
[00:58:42] Unknown:
I'm absolutely able to help. But, yeah, this is what I do all the time, and almost everything is vaccine injury. I tell people they're, like, four main causes of disease. There's, vaccines, the major part, the flea and tick products, another poison we're putting in the animals. Pharmaceuticals, also bad, and emotions can cause problems as well.
[00:59:04] Andrew Hoffman:
I think it's pretty safe to say that if we got rid of vaccines, ate real food, and did not have environmental toxins, that we would we would cut down on a whole lot of cancer. He's certainly easier said than done. But, another factor I mean, the the cancer scam is just at some levels, it's just genius. So, let's play this clip on mammography and cancer.
[00:59:36] Unknown:
This here is why I never have and never will get a mammogram.
[00:59:40] Unknown:
Ada has come out about mammography, getting a mammogram that shows that for every 10,000 people that you give a mammogram to, eight people will die that would have never had breast cancer from breast cancer. Now you can justify using a mammogram and say, well, hundreds of people will be saved by getting mammograms. There is a ton of data that actually shows there's a fifty two percent overdiagnosis when using mammography. That means that we are treating a great deal of people that would have never died of breast cancer in the first place just by doing the mammogram. Why are we getting mammograms and telling women to get mammograms on a yearly basis, especially if they have dense breast tissue when the radiation from the mammogram can actually cause breast cancer.
And they've done long term studies on this. I actually read a Cochrane review, which, is the most prestigious research I've seen that exists. It's a huge meta analysis of multiple, multiple studies and basically said, in a study of node positive cancers that were saved within screen prescreens versus controls, screen would be a mammogram. There was a zero net effectiveness rating. So just keep that in mind. Ultrasound and thermogram should be the standard.
[01:00:57] Andrew Hoffman:
So if the pesticides and the vaccines and everything else don't get you, They'll tell you, well, you know, it's brush cancer is very common. You need to get a mammogram without mentioning the mammogram can give you cancer. I mean, how many women would keep getting mammograms if they knew the actual statistics that was just gone over? And if you look at, like he said at the end there, a net effectiveness rating of zero. In other words, no benefit whatsoever, only the downside of you know, for those 10 people where it gives you cancer. And yet it still just marches on. This is you know? What? You're crazy. You don't wanna get a mammogram?
What? And this is that's just one example of our medical system, and it if you think they're not evil enough to hide cures for cancer, this is a Megyn Kelly clip with doctor Patrick Soon Shiong. And I'm not gonna get into the specifics of what he's talking about. In general, I kind of agree with what he's saying. Like, I think we're treating cancer all wrong like he says. But just listen to his experience with the FDA when he's like, hey. I think I've got a much better way of treating cancer than what we currently do. Listen to what they made him do.
[01:02:34] Unknown:
Mhmm. When you I heard you discussing this protocol and how many people it's helped already. You mentioned, for example, Harry Reid, who had a very bad diagnosis, and he came to you. And you gave him this, the bio strike, however we wanna refer to it, and extended his life, we believe, by a couple of years. I mean, it's not it's not gonna help anybody live forever. But when you might otherwise be facing the end, this drug actually seems to have a proven record, you say, of extending one's life by years.
[01:03:10] Unknown:
Well, it's so when Syngery came to see me, he really was completed all his standard of care and had failed his standard of care and then came to see me. So what we needed to do in 02/2015, I went to the FDA and said, listen. I have this hypothesis that what we're doing is completely wrong. When we give chemotherapy, we wipe out all the natural killer cells and t cells. When we give radiation, we wipe out all the natural killer cells and t cells. And I would like to try this in patients before they get these horrible treatments, I. E. At the time of diagnosis.
And they said no, and it's appropriate. You need to try this first in patients who are at the end stage of their life. So we did this in triple negative breast cancer patients, Merkel cell cancer patients, pancreatic cancer patients, glioblastoma patients, bladder cancer patients, all who had failed all standards of care, but by the time they came to see us, their immune system was completely collapsed. So we had to start from a deep hole, but able to get them out of the hole and then get them into positions of complete remission. So let me give you some examples. We got complete remissions on patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, fifth line, and he lived for six years and didn't die of his cancer.
Complete remission on a patient with bladder cancer, and they're still alive now, 10 or 11 years old. Complete remissions on triple negative breast cancer. We have metastatic pancreatic cancer, patient who was free of disease after five years, and she's still alive. We just published that six years out. Wow. So the proof of principle has gone beyond the proof of principle. We then got this approved despite despite, and we'll talk about that, the problems that they put me through from 2021 to 2024. And after 700,000 pages of response, we got it approved late twenty twenty four.
Now that this administration is here, we literally have the opportunity to really understand that we are on the precipice of treating sepsis. I just saw the results yesterday of a patient that we treated just last month with this valley fever, with an inflamed lung on the ventilator for for for a time a month, and with the last rites, we cleared up this lung completely. We have then patients now that we have for bladder cancer and for pancreatic cancer ongoing and for lung cancer. So my frustration is how do I get this, insight out into, both the scientific and medical community and, most important, the rigorgy committees so they can understand what's at hand and what's in at our fingertips.
[01:06:21] Andrew Hoffman:
With the amount of regulatory capture, you know, FDA, CDC, it goes on and on every area of medicine, especially cancer and vaccines, and those are obviously related. But the the answer is not to reform the regulatory agencies. I I think that's impossible. There's no way you're gonna come up with I don't know. What are you gonna do? Pay these bureaucrats, like, a million dollars a year and and hope you don't get outbid by the pharma companies? I just don't see how that's gonna work out. But what you could do is just eliminate all the regulatory agencies. They're not doing any good. They're doing way more harm than good.
And just make it known that it's the wild, wild west out there. People can sell whatever snake oil, bogus treatments they want to. You know, doctors, you don't have to go through ten years of brainwashing to practice medicine. Just deregulate everything and make people start to think for themselves. Insurance companies because that's insurance companies, which are really the banks, they manipulate everything all the way down. Hospitals, individual doctors, that's where the control mechanism is in cahoots with the government. The Obamacare, worst of both worlds, giant banks, plus big government everywhere.
And, you know, the only solution is to get rid of all of it, and then you gotta have do your own research. Who do you trust? Do you trust that doctor Patrick Soon Shiong guy? Or or do you trust the, the ones who said get all your shots and and get a mammogram? You know, make your own your own decisions there. But there's that would and as brutal as it sounds, it should just go to a cap a pure capitalism system would be way better because then you would be motivated to provide something that worked cheaply, that the market could afford instead of all these exact 180 degree incentives that that's how the system works now.
And we've talked about many different aspects of it. But, obviously, you know, canter's a a big part of it. Don't wanna end all on on that negative negative talk there, but we we've got some happy stuff coming up at the end. So that's, and I'll I'll lead into it here in a minute. But I do want to explain the the absence there. You could tell I've had definitely prepped stuff, but, had not just not sat down to do a show. And, fortunately, hopefully, it doesn't involve cancer. But, but my wife has been having some fairly serious health issues, and has some major surgery coming up, in early August. So I'm not sure if there's gonna be either I'll try and get an episode out early next week. But if it doesn't happen, we'll have, guests' family coming to to help take care of the kids so that I can keep working, which I'd I very much appreciate.
And, our kids, especially the youngest, the Down syndrome girly, there's gotta be someone that is able to be up and around and and keeping an eye on her. She does not not do well if you just kinda leave her to her own devices. So, please pray for pray for my wife, Lori, to have a good recovery from that surgery and just just better health in general. And, yeah, we'll I don't don't wanna get into too many details, but, major, but won't know for sure until after the surgery, but hopefully not not cancer. But, still still scary, and she had had some scary, trips to the ER here in the last few weeks. So been preoccupied with that.
Again, I apologize for the delay. But before the end of the show, I want to play, a couple of clips, and this I kinda doubt in this niche audience that we have here that there's too many golf fans. But recently, The Open Championship, formerly known as the British Open, in the lead up to it, they interview the top players, and the top player in the world is a guy from Texas named Scottie Scheffler, and he had some interesting comments about golf. You know, he he loves golf. His whole life has been spent getting really good at golf. And but he says that's not what not what ultimately satisfies him. You know? And he he's talked previously about his relationship with Jesus Christ.
And, so this part of that clip is in here, but even even more insightful, these clips, come mainly from his caddy, Ted Scott, who's been a caddy for a long time. He was a caddy for Bubba Watson when Bubba Watson won the Masters. And he does a a series that he just calls Sunday sermon. And so the first one I'll play is from the open championship week, which was a couple weeks ago. And then this, the last one I'll play that I'll end on, it'll be the the Ted Scott's words of wisdom to end the episode, come from this last week. So so both very good. And he is, you know, I mean, you could tell from listening to him just very humble, thoughtful guy.
And if you look back at Scottie Scheffler's career, this guy was always super talented, but up until Ted Scott started being his caddy, would he had the reputation of never quite being able to pull out the win in a golf tournament. He'd always be right there and just just not quite get it done. And since Ted Scott has has been there, I mean, he's become the number one player in the world by a pretty wide margin and won four major championships, including two this year and plus two other, you know, two masters. So it's his career has has gone in an amazing direction, but he had very interesting things to say, and then Ted Scott comments on on that and just kind of this the reality of, you know, success from a worldly perspective and why that doesn't actually satisfy us. So some words of wisdom, two clips from Ted Scott to close us out.
[01:14:11] Unknown:
Work so hard for something that's so fleeting.
[01:14:15] Unknown:
Good morning. Sunday sermon here in Portrush. Right over these rocks is Portrush Golf Club. Man, what an awesome place. You know, Wednesday, Scotty had a press conference, and it caused a ton of chatter. A lot of people sent me his interview. A lot of people had questions. A lot of people agreed. Some people disagreed. You hear people in the locker room talking about it, media, social media. You know, it it's really created a buzz, but why? Well, it's because something we all ponder. What is the meaning? What's the point? You know, why are we doing this? Why am I doing that? Why do I have this job? Why do I live here? It's something that I think many of us ponder in this vast, beautiful world.
You know, I look out over this ocean here, and I just see an incredible beauty and majesty. And it's so vast and so grand, and I realize how small I am and why sometimes success feels so insignificant. So, yeah, I ponder that same question. In 02/2014, Bubba Watson called me two weeks after he won the masters. Didn't say hello. He just said, what's the point? I believe it was that same year that Tom Brady won his third Super Bowl, and he said, is this it? Is this all there is? The same time, Tom, Jim Carrey was the highest paid actor, getting about 15,000,000 a movie back then. And he was saying the same thing. Is this it? I started paying attention after Bubba asked me that question. And since then, that's all I've heard from great famous athletic people and actors and people that I've gotten to be around. They're all saying the same thing. Maybe they don't say it in public, but they're all saying it in private. They're all not quite satisfied. So where do we get our satisfaction?
Well, first of all, why does Scottie Scheffler have a burning desire to win tournaments? Well, the Bible says that God gives you the desires of your heart. And I believe that people like Xander Schauffele and Scottie Scheffler, who I'm posting their little interviews and their clips after this, I believe God gave them a burning desire in their heart to to be good at golf from a very young age. Bible also says that God gives you talents, and he gave them the talent. So it's like, okay. So I have this burning desire to compete. I have this talent. But why? What's the purpose? What's the point? Well, I think the point is a couple things. One, if you really wanna enjoy something, you have to be grateful.
Just stop for a second and say, man, I am so thankful that I get to do this. I'm so grateful that I get to compete, that I get to live out my dream. But more importantly, I think it's how are you gonna use that to bless other people. And, you know, one of the cool things about being a golfer is you're an entertainer. You're blessing people. Someone asked me just this week, they said, hey. Do you think that these guys really look back and appreciate how well they entertain us? And I said, they probably don't think of it that way, but I thought that was a cool perspective from a fan. But more importantly, you know, we we should be glorifying God with our gifts. We should be grateful, and we should be using our gifts and showcasing our gifts and giving him all the glory. Just saying, Lord, thank you. Win or lose, I am so grateful that I get to do this, that I get to do my job and that I get to go compete.
And whatever your job is, you know, joy doesn't come from circumstances. That's the whole point of what these guys are talking about. Circumstances, even winning, doesn't create true deep meaningful joy. Joy comes from a grateful heart, and joy comes from knowing that all good things come from God. And when you walk to serve him and you walk to serve others as Jesus Christ came and died on this earth. He he came here before he died, not to be served, but to serve. He came to serve men. That's where fulfillment is. So find a way in your job to serve others, find a way to be grateful, and watch these two interviews right after this. I hope this makes you think. I hope this makes you ponder. This is a really important thing in your life to find deep meaning and satisfaction. Have a blessed Sunday.
Now where are they?
[01:18:13] Unknown:
My parents house probably in a bank vault I think that's where some of the like one of the trophies was you know when they travel including the gold medal I actually have no idea where that is to be completely honest it's great to know why don't you
[01:18:28] Unknown:
Work so hard for something that's so fleeting. I mean it really is. Like the feeling of winning just doesn't last that long. You know, when I when I sit back at the end of the year and, you know, I kinda try to reflect on things, like having that sense of accomplishment from winning the masters tournament, from winning the PGA championship, I have a deep sense of gratitude and appreciation for it. But it's just hard to explain how it doesn't it just doesn't satisfy is is how I would describe it. It's an unsatisfying venture. And so, I guess, what I what I'm trying to say is this is not this is not the place to look for your satisfaction. This is something that's where you can have a great appreciation for and a great, like, a great amount of thankfulness for being able to do this. And it's I mean, like I said, it's it's literally one of the most fun things that I can do in my entire life. I love being able to come out here and play golf and compete. But at the end of the day, it's just not what satisfies me.
[01:19:23] Unknown:
Good morning. Sunday sermon. I was just thinking about how often we pass people at work or in a store or walk with them daily and don't really dig into their lives and ask what's going on. And, one of the things that I'm trying to do better in my life is to engage with people, to put my phone down and just ask questions, ask great questions because oftentimes we just say, how are you doing? And people say, good, busy, but we really don't dig into each other's lives. And, in my experience, everyone is going through something. Every one of us. We're all dealing with something, you know, something deep, something that we probably need some help with, that we need to talk about, that we need to be encouraged.
And so this week, I dare you to go and find someone. Just pick somebody, anybody, and look them in the eyes and ask them how they're doing. And when they say good, been busy, dig deeper. I bet you'll find some stuff that they really need to be encouraged about. You'll find some that they're going through some things. And also, you're gonna find out that they're like you. You might be the one that actually needs to talk to them, and they might just be the great listener. God will orchestrate that. So hope this encourages you to engage more in others and, just be a blessing to those around you. Have a great Sunday.
Introduction and Episode Overview
Cartoon Level Propaganda and Food Systems
The Grass-Fed Beef Scam
Tesla's Hollywood Diner and Local Food Sourcing
Elon Musk's AI Ambitions
AI Investments and Economic Implications
Jeffrey Epstein and Political Distractions
Vaccine Injuries and Public Figures
Pet Vaccines and Health Concerns
Cancer Treatments and Medical System Critique
Personal Update and Listener Engagement
Finding Meaning Beyond Success
