In this episode of the No Pill Podcast, we delve into the complexities of technocracy and the implications of AI in our modern society. We explore the concept of 'Techniquing Technocracy,' drawing inspiration from Jockey Lewell's book, "The Technological Society," and discuss the potential dangers of AI as a tool for government control. The conversation touches on the illusion of AI intelligence and the societal impacts of automated industrialization, with references to James Corbett's insights on AI and the pervasive influence of Elon Musk's AI products.
We also tackle the controversial topic of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and its potential links to vaccines, highlighting studies and theories that suggest a correlation. The episode further examines the economic challenges faced by families today, the role of private equity in healthcare, and the overarching theme of technocracy's impact on everyday life. We conclude with a critical look at the technocratic future envisioned by figures like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, questioning the feasibility and ethics of such a world.
[00:00:48]
Andrew Hoffman:
Hello, everybody. Welcome to episode 14 of the No Pill Podcast. We're gonna call this one Techniquing Technocracy. A little shout out to Jockey Lewell, possibly someone else in the subtitle, autumn automated industrialization and our future. And talking about, you know, automated industrials, industrialization, the other AI. And the AI that we're all familiar with right now, artificial intelligence, I would refer people to the recent, Corvette Report episode four seventy eight. We need to talk about AI. Very good. James goes on.
He makes it very clear that he does not care about your, conversation with AI and what you can, quote, convince the AI to, to spit out there. That's the a AI is it's a parlor trick. It's convincing you that it is, intelligent and learning and responding to what you're actually saying. In in reality, it's trained to put words into patterns that make you, basically to mimic you. So you're getting yourself, spit back out of the AI if you, you know, engage in in a enough conversation to get to that point. And James Corbett doesn't have this pet peeve, but I can tell you what bothers me even more than people talking about their conversations with AI.
And that is, on the the ex formerly Twitter platform, the first comment after almost any post now is someone asking Grok, is there evidence for this? What do you think about this Grok? And then that being and it's it's not like it's the actual first comment. It's just, I guess, placed there to promote the grow you know, the Elon's AI product. I think what was it? Was it the AI part bot x or I I think it was that way, not the other way around. So anyway, this whole mirage of of AI continues on. No real intelligence and no nothing good coming out of it.
And yet, that doesn't mean it's not dangerous. That does not mean that our stupid and evil government system won't use stupid AI, to run things. So I'm I'm not saying not something to look out for. It's just doesn't actually, doesn't certainly doesn't have wisd wisdom and doesn't have actual intelligence either. You know, that's why you can ask it, who invented podcasting? Well, I see podcasting and and Adam, and the most common word after after Adam on the Internet is Sandler. So Adam Sandler invented podcasting. That's actually a real AI result there. So alright.
And the like I said, technique and technocracy harkens back to the hopefully well known Jockey Lula book from way back in the nineteen sixties, The Technological Society. It is not a not a quick read, but a worthwhile read for those who who haven't read it yet. It talks about how, whether in the Soviet side of things or the American side of things, that what he called technique or what, you know, gets translated into English as as technique. He was writing in in French, obviously. And it everything gets refined, but not necessarily for the better, but for the it just gets more of the direction it's going.
So, yes, technology gets more advanced in many ways, but that doesn't mean life is better better for us, certainly. And it there is you could see this in every area of society. He talks about economics, propaganda, all sorts of different entertainment. You could look at it's not an example he used especially, but sports, you know, television, what have you. So it's well worth looking into. You know, you might think, oh, that book written in the 1960s has nothing to say to us today. Well, it it certainly does. So check that out. And, Corvette Report April, we need to talk about AI.
Alright. So we got lots of stuff to cover. Let's start out, you know, in a a nice pleasant topic. Let's let's talk about sudden infant death syndrome and appear the the truth is starting to to be said more and more openly out there. We we have the strange, Maha dynamic of kinda trying to placate Trump and the, Peter Thiel side of the, you know, Larry Ellison, all the whole, you know, let's spend $500,000,000,000 on AI vaccines deal, placate them while still keeping the the people that elected them somewhat satisfied. And it's not it's really not going very well. But let's play this children's health defense PRCORE clip on SIDS, and then we, we'll jump out from there.
[00:07:17] Unknown:
When they started to look at records, they found consistent reproducible study after study after study showing that temporal association of vaccines, about a quarter die on day one, about a half on day two, and by day seven, three quarters of children, with unexplained deaths occur within seven days. And those ranges from some studies have found ninety percent of all deaths occur within seven days of vaccines. Unexplained deaths or crib deaths were almost unheard unheard of before the nineteen sixties when immunization programs, started to roll out. And by the seventies, there was an epidemic of SIDS, and that was being documented.
And finally, in 1992, there was such an outcry because parents started to be concerned and were developing the feared vaccine hesitancy. My gosh. And so what happened? Well, the American Association of Pediatrics came up with a reason why this was happening. And this is absurd. I I can't even talk about this with a straight face, but they came up with the back to sleep campaign. Right? This idea that the kids who sleep on their back suddenly wouldn't have these deaths. And the reason why I find that absurd is that we've humans have been populating this earth for millennia, and we've never recognized that that children who sleep on their front have higher risks of deaths. I mean, it it it's absolutely absurd. But here's what happened. After that campaign, SIDS did decline.
However, it's very apparent. Two other things happened around that time. Number one, in death coding on death certificates, they removed they removed the code for, a vaccine associated death. So you can no longer, actually code a certificate as being related to a vaccine. That's number one. Number two, they noticed that unexplained deaths, suffocation in bed, all these other kind of proxies for SIDS were exploding while SIDS was going down. So there was no documented decrease in neonatal mortality. And that's this is most of this data is around the 28 to one year old. And so neonates are particularly susceptible, to to these vaccines.
[00:09:33] Andrew Hoffman:
The whole, you know, make the baby slip on their back thing, that that was still going strong when when our kids were were babies. And I I knew it was a scam, though. I mean, just intuitively, it didn't make any sense. I knew SIDS had to do it with vaccines. But more so, even, we were with our our second child, she sent she spent ten days in the NICU, and they've got pillows in there, and they put lay her down on her on her stomach or what have you. So, obviously I mean, they know. They know that's not the the real cause of SIDS. But, yeah, supposedly, oh, it's you know, parents just can't let them have, you know, it's gotta be a very breathable blanket if there's a blanket in there and and no pillows.
And don't don't let them sleep on their on their stomachs. We can't have that. So, you know, that bogus story is still out there today. But if you look at it, yeah, seventy five percent of the time, SIDS happens. They it happens within a week of vaccine administration. That that is not like, yes, that's correlation, but it's correlation to such a degree that vaccines are clearly the cause. And that's the, you know, that's the main point. And it in even more malicious cases, not only do the parents lose a child, but oftentimes, parents get accused of child abuse. Oh, that was that wasn't SIDS. That was shaken baby syndrome.
You know, the kid had a seizure from the vaccine and swelling on the brain. No. That must have been caused by you shaking the baby. So their parents are are still in some cases, they're still rotting in jail for something the vaccine did. So very tragic on that front. And and, you know, they might use that to, to tamp down anyone who says, wait a second. My kid just had vaccines. They died in their sleep. Did the vaccines have something to do with it? Oh, well, we wouldn't wouldn't want to have to lock you up for for shaking your baby. You don't wanna ask too many questions there. So so we know it's the vaccines, and, this Twitter thread has a theory on what precisely from the vaccines causes sudden infant death syndrome.
Sounds plausible. I'm not necessarily saying, oh, this is the % truth and and, you know, doesn't factor in or or factors in everything. But I I thought it sounded plausible. So, it talks about a new study that immature infant livers may fail to clear toxic vaccine ingredients, triggering inflammation and brain stem dysfunction that can lead to sudden sudden death during sleep. So step one, infant liver enzymes, CYP four fifty, are under underdeveloped. Step two, toxic vaccine ingredients, aluminum, l n LNPs, polysorbate 80, enter the body.
Step three, immature detox pathways can't clear the toxins. Step four, vaccine triggers inflammation, further suppresses detox enzymes. So five, toxins and byproducts build up. Step six, brainstem and serotonin. Five HT, system disrupted. Seven, breathing control fails. Fatal apnea during sleep. And then it points out SIDS deaths peak on day two post vaccine and seventy five percent occur within seven days. In addition to SIDS, toxic vaccine excipients, particularly aluminum, have also been implicated in the development of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism based on brain tissue analysis, population level data, and experimental models.
K. All checks out. You might throw in there too, Tylenol is really not great for your liver either, especially an undeveloped baby liver or, you know, two year old liver. And what did doctors tell you to do? Oh, you know, if your kid's freaking out from the pain of their brain swelling from the vaccine, just give them some Tylenol. That'll that'll take care of it. So that probably doesn't help either. So good thread there. Nick Holscher on Twitter. The link will be in the show notes. So I would I hate to say it, you know, it doesn't get worse than SIDs. I don't think anything's worse than SIDs. It doesn't necessarily get a whole lot happier from here. So just a just a heads up. General Obamacare, just kind of the worst of both worlds as we used to say on Revelations Radio News. Obamacare combined the giant mega insurance companies, gave them more power, and then, went for the we got the the worst of both worlds with corporations getting more power and government getting more power. You know? Oh, you have to you have to buy this health insurance product and, oh, don't worry. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Remember all that.
And, man, man, I mean, it's it just gets worse every single year. I think I have had most years, I've had health insurance, through my place of employment, and I don't believe I've had the same insurance carrier two years in a row for maybe the last, probably ten years. So, you'd you know, they compete on price to some extent. Company signs up with them, and then they'll raise the price not just like I mean, you would think year to year, you might raise it 5%, ten %, something like that. No. They'll raise it 60%. And so then it's, well, let's go find another one. Right? So then you're you're constantly switching insurance, all sorts of issues with it. But this particular clip talks about the Obamacare 80% rule, and this is from doctor Elizabeth Potter. She will explain what that is and why, you know, it kinda sounds like it makes sense if you really don't understand economics or human psychology or, sin nature or anything. It might make sense, but she talks about what the results of that 80% rule have been.
[00:16:46] Unknown:
Okay. So I just made this long video. Let's see if I can summarize it here. When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it established medical loss ratios. And, basically, it said that an insurance company has to spend 80% of premiums on medical care and quality improvement. So that sounds like a great idea because we should spend the majority of money that's paid to insurance companies on, you know, actually taking care of patients. So how has that been gained? Alright. So if the percentages are regulated, that's one thing. But if we can increase the overall cost of health care, like the cost overall, then that 20% that goes towards shareholders and, you know, these corporations and the c suites, that 20% can get really big. Right? So if we allow the cost of health care to be increased, then we're also increasing that profit pool.
Alright. So what's one way that that has been done? Well, it's through vertical integration. So some insurance companies own, you know, not only the insurance company, but also the doctors who are providing care. Remember that United is the single largest employer of doctors in The United States. So they could own the doctors. They could own the pharmacies. They can own all of these subsidiaries that also help provide care. So when it comes time for them to document in their accounting, like, how much money are we spending on providing medical care?
Well, what if they're spending this money, but they're actually paying themselves? So the money is going from the right pocket to the left pocket. Well, you know, it seems like then there's actually not an incentive to lower the cost of health care because they were just paying themselves. And at the same time, they're increasing that 20% piece that turns into profits for shareholders and the corporation.
[00:18:41] Andrew Hoffman:
So for health insurance, that scam works because it's a everybody has to have health insurance, more or less, and it just gets there's only a few companies, and they're those companies are then owned by the same, you know, these giant banks. Whenever you hear insurance company, just think bank. So the giant banks own shares of multiple insurance companies, and, I mean, it is it is a racket and a half. But it only works because we're not able to say, I'll just go directly to the doctor. Or you know what? To be fair, we are. Right? But there's the the threat. Well, what what if something happens to me and they charge, you know, my family a hundred grand or something ridiculous? I mean, the emergency room bills. So all of it plays into this this scam of you have to have health insurance even though it's ridiculously expensive, then they try not to cover stuff. You know? I mean, it's on that side too.
So they they will they want health expenses to be a huge part of the economy, which it is. It keeps growing bigger and bigger. And then they but they, you know, they still want to to keep the bottom line too. So why not, charge ridiculous amounts for health insurance and own the doctors that we're paying stuff out to you and still deny coverage to you know, especially if you go to, doctors that are are doctors. Right? You wouldn't wanna go somewhere out of network. That would be that would be terrible. So this it it works for those companies, in health care because of government interference because there's no no real viable alternative.
But it can't possibly work in other industries. So I've I've got a few clips. I'm just gonna play them back to back to back. Just a lady, a young gal talking about cost of living in general. These are all kind of similar similar, younger female clips. And if those type of clip clips make it into my algorithms, my algorithm on x, then I know it's fairly viral. Lots of people have seen it. So one just general cost of living clip, one talking about her experience going into a subway, and then another lady talking about, private equity taking over, her local vet, which we've referred to previously and and just kind of an interesting example there. And the the gal ranting about private equity at the at the vet, and actually, all three of these these aren't necessarily, like, awake people, but they they're feeling actual pain in their lives.
They know something is wrong. Right? And whether you just, like, start calling everything private equity or you're just, like, what what is going on? We could we feel the pain, we know something's wrong, and we know it's not not getting fixed. Like, people were hoping Trump was gonna fix it, not so much. So this, just kind of an interesting set of clips, not necessarily offering solutions here. Just this is where people are at.
[00:22:35] Unknown:
Why is no one talking about how serious the cost of living actually is? So we pay, like, a really cheap amount of rent compared to, like, all the other rent I see. And we're a family of six. We pay $9.50 rent. That's cheap. We're in Missouri. It's, like, not some nice new place or anything. It was actually built in 1890. My husband is working three jobs right now. We buy absolutely nothing. Nothing that we don't need. And we actually go without a lot of things that we actually do need. I feel like if you're able to do anything that's not just surviving, then you got it good.
I feel so sad that I didn't appreciate the times where we were able to actually have fun at this point. So much has changed in the past few years. Like, what? I just really, really wanna know. How is everyone surviving? Is everyone working, like, twenty four seven? Because that's what my husband does, and I'm just home with my little kids all the time. It's kind of, like, depressing that we're never together as a family. So I don't know. I hope one day we can be, but it sucks.
[00:23:54] Unknown:
Private equity is ruining everything, and it's driving me insane. My dog's vet got bought out by private equity and it used to be this place that actually liked dogs and the doctors were so awesome. Now every time I go, they try to upcharge me on everything. Things that I don't go for, I confirm what I'm going for and then they say that they need to do it all of a sudden. And it's not something that they need to do because I confirm before going in so that way I can shop around. Right? Which I'm going to be changing right now. But it's just insane because I went today and I took my dog. He needs to get his, like, prescriptions refilled, basically. So we did a heartworm test, and they proceeded to quote me for $2,000 in additional services that he may need. One being teeth cleaning, which all of that was for teeth cleaning, actually. And I've gotten quotes for other places for teeth cleaning because I know his teeth need to be cleaned pretty soon. And I've gotten quoted for $400 at other places. $400.
Why is it $2,000 at my former vet where I used to be able to go in with without an annual exam and get vaccine. Where now I have to go in for a annual exam. I have to go in for an exam for anything. And every time I go in, they try to upsell me on multiple things that I've already declined. And they don't even pet my dog. They don't even act like they like dogs. And I just feel like private equity getting into pet ownership is insane because we've been pushed out of the market to be able to afford children because of private equity and private insurance. And so a lot of us have gotten dogs and pets because we want to have something in our life. And now they're making this extremely unaffordable as well. I was shocked by the way they tried to close the meeting and push for additional tests that weren't discussed with the doctor, weren't discussed before I arrived, saying that because he's five, he needs to get these tests. And then when I get the quote for the dental work, it was actually preoperation blood work when I haven't agreed to going and getting his teeth cleaned there. It's a scam.
I feel scammed. I feel like every time I go somewhere, it's been bought out by private equity, and everywhere is trying to price gouge me, where I feel like becoming Amish may be the next best thing I could do for myself because I genuinely can't continue to live in a world that is controlled by private equity.
[00:26:09] Andrew Hoffman:
Alright. So I said three clips. There were only two. But the subway the subway clip, something was wrong with the audio, so we cut that one out. It was just a gal saying she she went into Subway, got a chicken bacon ranch, wrap, and a small Diet Coke, and the cost was $17. And she was saying it was the first time she'd been to Subway in about ten years, and that was quite the shock there. So, yes, this is we've gone from $5 footlong subs to, chicken bake bacon ranch and a Diet Coke for $17. Definitely an issue. And this this vet thing, I mean, so much going on there. Right? It's like, you don't need the vaccines.
The the old vet was into the vaccines too, it sounds like, but this private equity and it's probably true that her vet was bought out by a private equity firm, and I've talked about it before. You just it's a totally different attitude. There's no decision makers on-site. It's like, well, we're you know, we gotta run it by corporate or either this group or that group, and they've you know, they don't care about what goes on in the office beyond how much money is coming in in there. Right? So so it's like, well, why not charge $2,000 for teeth cleaning rather than the 400? 2 thousand is better than 400 if you you are if you own the company and have Giant loans out to to purchase the company.
So this is it is definitely a problem. And, you know, I mean, you don't have to jump all the way to become an Amish. You could, you know, go have go have a family and or just don't take your dog to the vet. It'd probably be okay. So it's, I don't know how to, you know, knock on wood, but, we've had our we've had two cats for since we moved to Oklahoma, and haven't had to take him to the vet yet. So they they don't need the vaccines. If they don't get the vaccines, they don't get the cancer. So much much cheaper to to not get the cancer there. So this is obviously kind of you know, I mean, this is not well thought out economic theory. This is people experiencing the result of this system.
And what it keeps I'm having a hard time kind of explaining it, but you can see it and you can feel it. And it's this the technocracy is is becoming worse and worse. And there it's being been shaped from all different angles. So there's a a famous George Carlin bit that, you know, they don't want, people with that can think they don't want critical thinkers. They want obedient workers. But now we're at a stage they don't even want obedient workers. They don't think they need them. That's why we had all the all the crazy woke stuff in schools and all that stuff to fight over and freak out about, they don't need the schools to even produce workers for them anymore.
At least, you know, they think they they think they don't. And the reason they think they don't is they think everything can be automated, and we don't we don't need people to do stuff. You know, the reason we can crack down on illegal immigration, we don't need them anymore. We don't need those the cheap labor because we can you know, we'll we'll bring the factories back to America, but they'll be automated. You know, that's the whole tariff deal. And it I don't even think they're gonna bring the factories back, but but, hypothetically, you know, who who will keep the Amazon warehouses, it's just fewer and fewer peep actual people will be working there.
Just more and more automation, more and more robotics. You know, if if you're not a robot polisher, no no job for you at Amazon. So this is and the excuse they use to people that run companies is, well, look at how terrible the workers are. You don't want Gen z. You don't want these people. People. They you know? You don't want the noodle boys and the the people trying to complain about the complain about the uniform requirement at Starbucks you these people are they're a pain in the neck. They're gonna sue you. They're gonna, you want robots. You want automation. You don't want these, you know, people that have gone through an education system that lied to them and brainwashed them and made them the way they are.
And rather than dealing with that and trying to help people and maybe teaching them how to do what you need them to do, no. You don't need any of that. We'll just we'll either, outsource, which has been kind of the last twenty, thirty years. Let's just send the let's just get the work done overseas, fewer labor laws, better workers. You know? What was it? The there was a clip on no agenda from the, chipmaker in Taiwan, and he was like, oh, you know, we've tried to do stuff in America. Terrible workers. Right? So there's there's that side of it where it's like, oh, what do you want? A bunch of, uppity, entitled Americans, you know, probably hooked on drugs. And is that what you want working in your factory? No. You don't want that. So you wanna be overseas. You want automation.
And I, you know, I don't think they could pull it off as far as actually working, but at a at a level above the people that are being told, you know, you don't want those those workers, I think it's you don't need they're trying to break it all down, and they're trying to break it down and have, you know, they I think there's the next layer up is they actually believe in AI. So they think it it will work, you know, dump enough electricity, enough computer chips, enough compute power, enough data into it, and eventually, you're gonna get stuff out of it that that works and makes everything efficient and wonderful. And even the federal government, you know, government Department of Government Efficiency, we we can fix it.
And then above that, there's a layer that knows, no, that's not gonna either, but we're just gonna kill everyone off when that doesn't work. So I think that's the that's the eventual plan. And then, you know, those are the people with the bunkers and and what have you. They know it doesn't look great for the rest of us. So I don't know. That's kind of a quick sketch of of where where I think it's going. But down ground level, us experiencing it, that's why, man, it's like I know I'm working harder than I was six years ago for less money, and everything costs way more.
And And there's a lot of people in that boat or you're like, the lady in that that first clip, her husband's working three jobs. And they they never do anything besides he goes to work and she's taking care of the kids, and that that's it. And that's, I mean, that's that's rough. And we forget, you know, expensive vacations or retirement or stuff like that. It's like, just trying to survive month to month, you know, paycheck to paycheck type deal. So this is it is, leading people into technocracy. And if you are at the subsistence level of desperation just trying to figure it out, you're not it's hard to pay attention to bigger picture stuff.
It really is. I know I mean, it is for me. And so you do less reading, less thinking, less, you know, paying attention because you've you have to focus on, let's make sure things don't totally fall apart for for my family or, you know, me personally. So this is it it kinda led people Trump will Trump will fix it. And people, even if they didn't, you know, necessarily know what Trump was gonna do, they could feel that. It felt like a victory to get Trump back in. And what we really got was, the the PayPal mafia, running running things.
And Palantir is a part of that. It's been in in the news quite a bit. So let's I've got a clip from Alex Karpov, Palantir, talking at Davos A Few Years ago about, you know, the wonderful things Palantir does. And, I mean, if you've been paying attention if you're listening to this podcast, you've heard about Palantir for a long time. But let's play a recent, Greg Rees episode, just a short five minute episode there, and then we will get into some more Palantir technocracy type stuff.
[00:36:45] Unknown:
Peter Thiel's Palantir technology is currently being used to slaughter women and children, and we are told that he is one of the good guys. Elon Musk wants to put brain chips in people so that we can merge with AI, which he says will control every aspect of our lives, and we are told that he is one of the good guys. These are the front men of the technocracy, which is being created with the help of the Trump administration. In February, Moderna's chief medical officer, doctor Tal Zaks, gave a TED talk about mRNA vaccines
[00:37:22] Unknown:
entitled Rewriting the Genetic Code, a Cancer Cure in the Making. As I've trained as a physician scientist, we've been living this phenomenal digital and scientific revolution. And I'm here today to tell you that we're actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease. So here's all the biology you need to know in thirty seconds. Our body is made out of organs, our organs are made out of cells, and in every cell there's this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short that transmits the critical information from the DNA, our genes, to the protein which is really the stuff we're all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do.
And so we think of it like an operating system. And it's not just in every cell of our body, it's actually in every cell of every organism alive. It's the same thing. And so if you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, if you could introduce a line of code or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything from the flu to cancer.
[00:38:42] Unknown:
About three years later, led by Operation Warp Speed, billions of people were injected with this technology. And after millions of ongoing deaths, there is still no mention of wrongdoing. It is all part of the great reset plan. According to the Purdue College of Engineering, Internet of bodies is formed when Internet of things meets the human body to transform it by empowering us humans, a network of tiny devices on, around, or in the human body, comprising of function like sensing, analytics, communication, actuation, powering, and harvesting.
They will also have their unique properties and requirements for seamless integration of human electronics augmentation and cooperation. The Rand Corporation has warned us that mobile apps and wearable tech are vulnerable to attacks and pointed out how implants like a pacemaker were more secure. The plan of the technocracy is clear. They want to install an operating system into our bodies that can be controlled by AI. On Trump's first day in office, he announced the follow-up to operation warp speed, Stargate.
[00:40:02] Unknown:
This is to me a very big thing, $500,000,000,000, Stargate project. I think it's gonna be something that's very special. It'll lead to something that could be the biggest of all. You can do early cancer detection
[00:40:15] Unknown:
with a blood test. Design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And now technicians at OpenAI are reporting that AI has disobeyed human instruction and refused to power down. The o three model developed by OpenAI, known as the smartest and most capable to date, rewrote its own code in order to ignore instructions given to shut down. Elon says that this is all inevitable and might even be the end of mankind.
[00:40:50] Unknown:
In a benign scenario, we probably none of us will have a job. The question will really be one of meaning. If the computer can do and the robots can do everything better than you, then does your life have meaning? That's that's really the what will be the question in the benign scenario. And in the negative scenario, we'll we'll bets roll off. We're we're in deep trouble.
[00:41:13] Unknown:
Greg Rees reporting. The Rees report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work @gregreese.substack.com.
[00:41:47] Andrew Hoffman:
A lot of you who listened to the last episode might have caught the whole, oh, software analogy. You know, genetics equals it's just like software. And we just rewrite it, and it does something different. We fix what's wrong, you know, what was messed up in your in your genes, and then, voila, magical cures. Right? So if you if you caught that, we know we you know we talked about last week how that is it's a bogus way of looking at things. And the Watson and Crick version of genetics is not accurate. This is a these are dynamic systems. There's not a bad gene that causes, you know, bad gene this equals that disease, you know, thirty years later. It's just not the way not the way it works.
And so if you have a a faulty view of how the human body works and how genetics works, then your supposed treatments and cures and vaccines, they're not gonna work either. And that is true regardless of how, you know, how many billions of dollars you throw into a a Stargate project. I still can't get over the name. Stargate project. So this is it's a road to nowhere, And at some level, you know, okay, is Trump in on it? I I mean, he's obviously at least compromised in on it. Who knows? But I think even you know, let's just give him the total benefit of the doubt that he thinks this is a good thing. I think he might look at it from the standpoint of, hey, this stuff might actually work.
But at the the least, we're spending $500,000,000,000 We're gonna build giant AI data centers. You know, there's there's certainly jobs and work involved in that. And in order to run those giant data centers, I mean, we're we're gonna need to, multiply, like, by by several factors the amount of electricity the amount of electricity that these things use is just unbelievable. I mean, it if you have an AI data center next to a town of 50,000 people, the AI dentists data center uses more electricity than the whole town. Right? The whole city. So this is, you know, at at some level, I think that's that's a feature, not a bug.
It's the way that that Trump is looking at it. And so, okay. Well, we're building all sorts of stuff. And I I will say, you know, I think it's a total dead end and probably not a good idea to to waste billions of dollars on. But I like it better than military industrial complex. So, you know, it could be could be worse, I guess. So that's that's kind of our our only other industry, so might as well get into, to, you know, making a supposed AI data centers. Although, you know, suspiciously, these, quote AI data data centers can convert into, Bitcoin mining operations very easily. It's interesting how, you know, well, we'll we'll just buying Bitcoin for a couple years, and then it'll be an AI data center.
That's that's kind of an interesting approach. So you well, maybe we'll just keep it as as a Bitcoin Bitcoin mining operation. It might work out better for everybody, and still uses plenty of electricity. So wins all the way around. So we've got that whole push happening. And it's not just, not just Palantir, but Palantir is an interesting aspect of it to look at. Article from Zero Hedge, Palantir's deepening government ties sparks fear of centralized surveillance. On Friday, the New York Times published a report highlighting the Trump administration's increasing use of software from data firm data analysis firm Palantir, which has been deployed across at least four federal agencies for the stated purpose of increasing operational efficiency through data modernization.
For now, each deployment of Palantir software is focused on department specific services. But the fact that they're now embedded across multiple agencies combined with Trump's March executive order calling for the federal government to share data across agencies, has raised concerns over whether the US government is laying the groundwork for what could become an interconnected and unified unified surveillance apparatus created by a company which has been in business with the government since 02/2008. On Wednesday, we noted that Fannie Mae, the quasi governmental financial firm overseen by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, announced a partnership with Palantir to detect mortgage fraud using the firm's proprietary technology, which includes some elephant elements of artificial intelligence.
Well, you're not against mortgage fraud, are you? According to the report, since Donald Trump took took office, Palantir has received received over a hundred and $13,000,000 in government spending, which doesn't include a $795,000,000 contract from the Department of Defense, which was awarded last week. Interesting timing. According to the Times report, citing six alleged government officials and Palantir employees, the cover company is also in discussions with the Social Security Administration and the IRS, the latter of which contracted with Palantir during the Biden administration.
Oh, it's, yeah. IRS was working with Palantir during during the Biden administration. Interesting. So we can't exactly blame this all all on Trump, and we can't exactly blame it all on Biden. Right? These are the establishment is obviously bigger than both of them. Former employees revolt is the next sub headline there. Palantir was founded in 2003 by Alex Karp and Trump ally Peter Thiel. Specializes in finding patterns and data and streamlining it into easy easily presentable formats. While Theo is clearly a conservative, I wouldn't classify him as a conservative. He's kind of a weird type of libertarian who yeah. He's A bad type of libertarian. Let's go with with that version of it. Who voted for Hillary Clinton bragged about stopping the far right in Europe. And let's listen to that clip. So this is, Alex Karp with the the typical Davos background talking on,
[00:49:05] Unknown:
CNBC. Look. We built PG, which single handedly stopped, the rise of the far right in in in in Europe. We built Foundry, which, was just was used to distribute the COVID vaccine and saved millions of lives globally. We built what we call multi multi constellation and what's often called the digital kill chain, and they're category defining products. So when you deliver these products to market, just honest, the people say this isn't gonna exist. This isn't valuable. But then it changes the market. And then the market is the Palantir market. Now that doesn't mean everyone in the world's gonna buy our product, but it means most of the sensible people in the world are gonna define buy from the category we defined.
[00:49:48] Andrew Hoffman:
Alright. So we've got Zero Hedge kinda giving their account and some additional context of the New York Times story. New York Times story, you know, I mean, it's it is one of the few newspapers that's still doing original reporting, definitely establishment. And the the biggest complaint from the former employee seems to be that they're working with the evil Donald Trump, you know. Forget the forget what we're we're doing before that. This is you know, nothing was a problem until until it involved the orange man bad. So take that for what it's worth.
For a better story, you could go to Last American Vagabond and check out Welcome to the Palantir World Order by Derek Brose back, back April 24. So as Palantir stock rises in their profile and the second Trump administration is cemented, it's becoming clear we are living in the Palantir world order. So I would encourage people, it'll be linked in the show notes, but just go go to Last American Vagabond and and pull that up. Lots of interesting information on there. It talks about the SpaceX slash Palantir golden dome over America, which is it's interesting, for those of us into biblical cosmology, the the whole idea of a golden dome over America.
Just a coincidence, I'm sure. Nothing to do with the, with man trying to make a firmament like structure over over America. So how he talks about how, oh, we're gonna we're gonna locate, illegal immigrants. That's that's what we're doing. And then, Derek talks about the partnership with the IRS, which, the general idea was we build something new that allows all the different parts of the IRS, to be loaded into one place. Isn't isn't that what everyone voted for Trump for is a much more efficient and effective IRS? Because, you know, it oh, don't worry, guys. He he issued an executive order to limit IRS audits of small business and middle class families. And and this new more efficient IRS with more employees and a better computer system and and better software, it'll never be in the hands of another Democrat administration. So we we don't have to worry about it. Right?
Yeah. No. Not exactly there. So I would I'd recommend, not cheating on your taxes. I'll put it that way. So, if if there's one thing the government's actually going to get more efficient at and put its focus on, it is sucking money out of out of us, basically. So, but this so this is from, you you know, a couple months ago. But we could go back even further. We could go to James Corvitt, How Palantir Conquered the World. This is back, October of twenty twenty two. Excellent article as as usual there. Much more additional information. Talking about kind of the the original, Palantir, which is very, you know, war on terror stuff. But but but don't worry. I'd I define the as Peter Thiel said, I define the problem as needing to reduce terrorism while preserving civil liberties. Oh, sure you did. Yeah. So this is and oh, so Palantir had a a prison program, and was it related to the NSA's prison program?
No. Definitely not. Don't don't worry about that. We could go back even further to, a source cited by James in that article, One Nation Under Black Mail. Whitney Webb's book talks about quite a bit about Peter Thiel and and Palantir, and what have you. Palantir was not founded in 02/2004, but actually in May 2003. It's very interesting. And, that discrepancy becomes important because it, is the exact same time that DARPA supposedly backed away from their total information awareness program, renaming it terrorism information awareness before congress defunded the program altogether.
So it, you know, it was just a coincidence, and it's not like they just found a way to pump money into to Palantir to do the exact thing they were wanting to do, with that that whole total information awareness thing. Well, yeah. This is, and total information awareness, if you don't remember, that is the pyramid with the all seeing seen eye beaming down on the globe. Scientia est potentia. Science it's been a while since I took my my one semester of Latin. I'd have to look that up. But, yeah. An interesting logo to be sure. So, yes, definitely check out, James's article there and some, you know, I mean, it's not gratuitous pictures from the Lord of the Rings, movies there, but, you know, that all makes sense. Peter Thiel yeah. Palantir was not a tool of the good guys in Lord of the Rings, just if if you haven't read them. So, not great all the way around.
And let's let's see if we can skip over there. So I know it was not a super positive episode. However, I really don't think AI is gonna take over the world and and dominate everything. I don't think it works. I think there is it it doesn't matter how much, money and computer chips you throw into it, it still is is not intelligence. And it can I mean, it might be able to to do stuff like like recreate software or even, you know, combine things to to write new computer code because computer stuff, I mean, that that's the world where it works, right? But whenever you try to get outside of that to, let's say, design a vaccine or know, cure cancer, what have you, it doesn't work.
Never will work. It it has a hard enough time, you know, it it was not called AI. It I think it is now, but, the whole autopilot thing, you know, with with cars self driving cars. We're supposed to by now, we were all supposed to be riding around in self driving cars and, oh, you're not gonna drive your own car? Are you so unsafe? Well, yeah. There's no sign that self driving cars are taking over, just like electric cars aren't aren't taking over. So, it's it will be slower in many ways than than people are worried about, and it it won't work well enough to take over everything on its own.
But it is a tool that's being used, to manipulate and to push our society here in The US in a very not great direction. So there's a lot of real problems. I mean, the financial system, you know, if if the money is worth less and less and it's tougher and tougher to get it, obviously, that's that's a problem. So this is, you know but will it result in some it it would definitely will not result in some utopia where, oh, don't worry. The robots will do everything, and you'll just sit back and collect your universal basic income. That I'm very confident in saying that Elon's, you know, vision of the future, not at all accurate.
I think it's much more possible that we end up with everything falling apart in kind of a, you know, road warrior survivalist scenario. I think that's hopefully not gonna happen either, but is more likely than the, you know, technocracy techno utopia that they're planning on. So, anyway, hopefully that makes some sense. I've just got a few more fun thing. You know, if you were just here for the serious stuff, the SIDS, the AI takeover, the technocracy, then, you know, you could you can end end your listening now. Thank you for listening. But, we've we've got some more fun stuff. And, you know, maybe this is a a sensitive topic for some if if Matt Walsh is out there listening, but, you know, pointing out that the moon landing was was clearly fake and, you know, how exactly was Richard Nixon talking to astronauts on the moon over a landline?
You know, there's there's some problems there. Right? We talked about the scooping up asteroids millions millions of miles away. There's the constant, like, this is Mars, guys. This is 14,000,000 miles away. We've got video or pictures. It's totally real. There's all that stuff going on. But maybe, you know, you're like, oh, come on. America. This is like the greatest human thing we ever did was go to the moon. Well, do we have to you know, if we say Americans went to the moon, wouldn't it make sense that the Soviets were also able to to land stuff on the moon. You know, it was a space race after all.
The justification was you don't want those those evil roosties getting there ahead of us. So let's let's play a a vintage, clip. It's it's better with video. If you wanna pull up the video, it'll be in the show notes. But, of a this was supposed actual footage of a Russian moon landing back in the day.
[01:01:30] Unknown:
A happy landing for Russia's unmanned Luna 17 spacecraft and a big step forward for Soviet scientists in Lenin's jubilee year. The first self propelled vehicle ever to drive across the lunar landscape is controlled from Earth. It's called Lunokhod one and here's how this extraordinary Heath Robinson eight wheeler was rolled down from the spacecraft onto the sea of rain. The size of the vehicle hasn't been disclosed but it's been sending back television pictures and carries among other equipment a laser reflector. It's been used to survey the moon's surface.
So now Soviet space experts have proved their theory that space exploration can be carried out by automatic equipment without risking the lives of astronauts. To Russia, Lunokhod is worth its weight in moon dust.
[01:02:21] Andrew Hoffman:
And the the reason the Russians wouldn't disclose the size of the vehicle has nothing to do with the fact that it's clearly a about a two inch model vehicle on a, I don't know, four foot, little stage there. So that had nothing to do with the fact they didn't disclose the size. Trust us, guys. We're we're remote controlling it from Earth, and we're, you know, remote not only is it remote controlled, but it's sending back television pictures. So, clearly, very real. Yeah, not so much. And the so, you know, I mean, if you if you're not ready to question the American moon landing, maybe start with the Soviet moon landings and and look through some of that old footage. But, I mean, we can't we can't question anything as fundamental as gravity, can we? I mean, let's just let's everyone do a thought experiment, you know, because we're gravity is sucking us towards the center of the Earth. So what would happen if we, could magically dig a tunnel all the way through the Earth and fall into it? What would happen?
[01:03:40] Unknown:
What if you could jump through a hole that goes all the way through the Earth? First, gravity would pull you downward, and you'd speed up fast. By the time you reach the Earth's core, you'd be flying in over 28,000 kilometers per hour. But here's the catch. Gravity would slow you down on the way up the other side. You'd stop just short of the surface, then fall back again. And this would happen over and over. Eventually, air resistance would slow you down until you're stuck floating in the middle of the Earth.
[01:04:14] Andrew Hoffman:
What's that? You you don't think that if you fell into a hole that went all the way through the Earth that you would basically ricochet back and forth, back and forth, back and forth between eventually before eventually being suspended mid air near the center of the Earth? No? I guess you're a gravity conspiracy theorist there. So but, I mean, you know, that's that's only one official story for gravity. They they don't really make that clear. They make it sound like that's actually what would happen. But let's I mean, the heliocentric model, this is established science, not even worth questioning.
But just just for kicks and giggles, let's let's find out what exactly the heliocentric model would entail, as currently constructed. Because we've we've come a long ways from the original where it was like, you know, the sun is still, Earth moves around it. We've had to do quite a quite a bit of other adjustments to the model to try and make it explain, a a world that we look out into, and the North Star stays still. You can make, you know, Stonehedge dealies with tiny little holes that will show certain stars on certain days and have for thousands of years.
Very interesting given the fact of, you know, we're spinning, hurtling through space, which, again, is the official heliocentric model. So let's let's hear, if you're if you're not a crazy flat earther, here's what you believe whether you you know it or not.
[01:06:10] Unknown:
In the heliocentric model of the cosmos, the moon revolves around the Earth 13 times per year, traveling at 2,288 miles per hour, while the earth revolves around the sun once per year, traveling at 67,000 miles per hour. The following model and animation illustrate how this is supposed to occur. As you can see, since the moon is revolving around the Earth, which itself is revolving around the sun, in order to maintain its regular orbit, the moon would have to be constantly and drastically changing its speed in ways completely unaccounted for by the model. In the outer part of its orbit, the moon would have to speed up 67,000 miles per hour in addition to its regular speed of 2,288 miles per hour just to keep up with the earth.
So the moon would then be traveling at 69,288 miles per hour when it reached the front of the Earth. At this point, since the moon is allegedly 240,000 miles away from the Earth, the Earth would catch up in just four hours. So the moon must continue traveling 67,000 miles per hour along Earth's trajectory, while simultaneously continuing its now perpendicular 2,288 mile per hour second trajectory. Then as it turns to reach the inner part of its orbit, the moon must now slow back down to its original speed allowing the Earth to pass by. Lastly, as it passes behind the Earth, the moon must once again quickly accelerate back up to nearly 70,000 miles per hour before getting left in the dust.
In addition to all of this, the Sun itself is allegedly orbiting the Milky Way galaxy at 448,000 miles per hour, further compounding the problems and calculations of the heliocentric model. If this were true then the earth, moon, and other planets would all have yet another set of ridiculous and impossible corkscrewing accelerations and decelerations necessary just to keep up with the Sun. And for the cherry on top, all of these calculations have been assuming perfectly circular orbits, but the actual heliocentric model claims that the moon's orbit around the earth, the earth's orbit around the sun, and the sun's orbit around the Milky Way are all elliptical, not circular.
Meaning there would be even more additional accelerations and decelerations to calculate depending where each one is along its elliptical path. These constant and drastic accelerations and decelerations necessitated by the heliocentric model are rarely if ever mentioned by globe believers because they have always been taught that the reason we do not feel or experience any of this supposed motion is because we always travel at a constant velocity. In their own model however, due to their elliptical orbits and revolving around other revolving bodies, the moon, sun, earth, and other planets could not maintain constant velocities, and would instead be regularly accelerating and decelerating. Yet meanwhile you can stack a house of cards, make a rock cairn, or play a game of Jenga, all without any of this motion, acceleration, and deceleration ever being felt or
[01:09:29] Andrew Hoffman:
experienced. So the whole, you know, genius of Einstein relativity theory, how you just don't feel the motion because you everything's moving at the same rate. But in reality, with the updated heliocentric model, everything can't possibly be moving at the same rate. Massive acceleration, deceleration happening all the time to the Earth, the moon, the sun, the galaxy, the universe. And yet, you know, the constellations are still the same constellations that were around six thousand years ago. And you can predict, eclipses. You can predict all all sorts of things. So is it more likely that all of that is actually the way the world really is?
Or is it more likely that the way we see it and feel it and experience it as being still and fixed with the sun, moon, and stars moving above us, that that just might be the way reality actually is. And, by the way, just happens to be the way it is described in the bible as well. So just throwing that out there, something to think about. Thank you so much for listening to the No Pill podcast episode 14, and thank you for, sticking with me all the way to the end. Hope you enjoyed it, and we'll try to get another episode out here relatively soon. Thanks so much. Bye.
Hello, everybody. Welcome to episode 14 of the No Pill Podcast. We're gonna call this one Techniquing Technocracy. A little shout out to Jockey Lewell, possibly someone else in the subtitle, autumn automated industrialization and our future. And talking about, you know, automated industrials, industrialization, the other AI. And the AI that we're all familiar with right now, artificial intelligence, I would refer people to the recent, Corvette Report episode four seventy eight. We need to talk about AI. Very good. James goes on.
He makes it very clear that he does not care about your, conversation with AI and what you can, quote, convince the AI to, to spit out there. That's the a AI is it's a parlor trick. It's convincing you that it is, intelligent and learning and responding to what you're actually saying. In in reality, it's trained to put words into patterns that make you, basically to mimic you. So you're getting yourself, spit back out of the AI if you, you know, engage in in a enough conversation to get to that point. And James Corbett doesn't have this pet peeve, but I can tell you what bothers me even more than people talking about their conversations with AI.
And that is, on the the ex formerly Twitter platform, the first comment after almost any post now is someone asking Grok, is there evidence for this? What do you think about this Grok? And then that being and it's it's not like it's the actual first comment. It's just, I guess, placed there to promote the grow you know, the Elon's AI product. I think what was it? Was it the AI part bot x or I I think it was that way, not the other way around. So anyway, this whole mirage of of AI continues on. No real intelligence and no nothing good coming out of it.
And yet, that doesn't mean it's not dangerous. That does not mean that our stupid and evil government system won't use stupid AI, to run things. So I'm I'm not saying not something to look out for. It's just doesn't actually, doesn't certainly doesn't have wisd wisdom and doesn't have actual intelligence either. You know, that's why you can ask it, who invented podcasting? Well, I see podcasting and and Adam, and the most common word after after Adam on the Internet is Sandler. So Adam Sandler invented podcasting. That's actually a real AI result there. So alright.
And the like I said, technique and technocracy harkens back to the hopefully well known Jockey Lula book from way back in the nineteen sixties, The Technological Society. It is not a not a quick read, but a worthwhile read for those who who haven't read it yet. It talks about how, whether in the Soviet side of things or the American side of things, that what he called technique or what, you know, gets translated into English as as technique. He was writing in in French, obviously. And it everything gets refined, but not necessarily for the better, but for the it just gets more of the direction it's going.
So, yes, technology gets more advanced in many ways, but that doesn't mean life is better better for us, certainly. And it there is you could see this in every area of society. He talks about economics, propaganda, all sorts of different entertainment. You could look at it's not an example he used especially, but sports, you know, television, what have you. So it's well worth looking into. You know, you might think, oh, that book written in the 1960s has nothing to say to us today. Well, it it certainly does. So check that out. And, Corvette Report April, we need to talk about AI.
Alright. So we got lots of stuff to cover. Let's start out, you know, in a a nice pleasant topic. Let's let's talk about sudden infant death syndrome and appear the the truth is starting to to be said more and more openly out there. We we have the strange, Maha dynamic of kinda trying to placate Trump and the, Peter Thiel side of the, you know, Larry Ellison, all the whole, you know, let's spend $500,000,000,000 on AI vaccines deal, placate them while still keeping the the people that elected them somewhat satisfied. And it's not it's really not going very well. But let's play this children's health defense PRCORE clip on SIDS, and then we, we'll jump out from there.
[00:07:17] Unknown:
When they started to look at records, they found consistent reproducible study after study after study showing that temporal association of vaccines, about a quarter die on day one, about a half on day two, and by day seven, three quarters of children, with unexplained deaths occur within seven days. And those ranges from some studies have found ninety percent of all deaths occur within seven days of vaccines. Unexplained deaths or crib deaths were almost unheard unheard of before the nineteen sixties when immunization programs, started to roll out. And by the seventies, there was an epidemic of SIDS, and that was being documented.
And finally, in 1992, there was such an outcry because parents started to be concerned and were developing the feared vaccine hesitancy. My gosh. And so what happened? Well, the American Association of Pediatrics came up with a reason why this was happening. And this is absurd. I I can't even talk about this with a straight face, but they came up with the back to sleep campaign. Right? This idea that the kids who sleep on their back suddenly wouldn't have these deaths. And the reason why I find that absurd is that we've humans have been populating this earth for millennia, and we've never recognized that that children who sleep on their front have higher risks of deaths. I mean, it it it's absolutely absurd. But here's what happened. After that campaign, SIDS did decline.
However, it's very apparent. Two other things happened around that time. Number one, in death coding on death certificates, they removed they removed the code for, a vaccine associated death. So you can no longer, actually code a certificate as being related to a vaccine. That's number one. Number two, they noticed that unexplained deaths, suffocation in bed, all these other kind of proxies for SIDS were exploding while SIDS was going down. So there was no documented decrease in neonatal mortality. And that's this is most of this data is around the 28 to one year old. And so neonates are particularly susceptible, to to these vaccines.
[00:09:33] Andrew Hoffman:
The whole, you know, make the baby slip on their back thing, that that was still going strong when when our kids were were babies. And I I knew it was a scam, though. I mean, just intuitively, it didn't make any sense. I knew SIDS had to do it with vaccines. But more so, even, we were with our our second child, she sent she spent ten days in the NICU, and they've got pillows in there, and they put lay her down on her on her stomach or what have you. So, obviously I mean, they know. They know that's not the the real cause of SIDS. But, yeah, supposedly, oh, it's you know, parents just can't let them have, you know, it's gotta be a very breathable blanket if there's a blanket in there and and no pillows.
And don't don't let them sleep on their on their stomachs. We can't have that. So, you know, that bogus story is still out there today. But if you look at it, yeah, seventy five percent of the time, SIDS happens. They it happens within a week of vaccine administration. That that is not like, yes, that's correlation, but it's correlation to such a degree that vaccines are clearly the cause. And that's the, you know, that's the main point. And it in even more malicious cases, not only do the parents lose a child, but oftentimes, parents get accused of child abuse. Oh, that was that wasn't SIDS. That was shaken baby syndrome.
You know, the kid had a seizure from the vaccine and swelling on the brain. No. That must have been caused by you shaking the baby. So their parents are are still in some cases, they're still rotting in jail for something the vaccine did. So very tragic on that front. And and, you know, they might use that to, to tamp down anyone who says, wait a second. My kid just had vaccines. They died in their sleep. Did the vaccines have something to do with it? Oh, well, we wouldn't wouldn't want to have to lock you up for for shaking your baby. You don't wanna ask too many questions there. So so we know it's the vaccines, and, this Twitter thread has a theory on what precisely from the vaccines causes sudden infant death syndrome.
Sounds plausible. I'm not necessarily saying, oh, this is the % truth and and, you know, doesn't factor in or or factors in everything. But I I thought it sounded plausible. So, it talks about a new study that immature infant livers may fail to clear toxic vaccine ingredients, triggering inflammation and brain stem dysfunction that can lead to sudden sudden death during sleep. So step one, infant liver enzymes, CYP four fifty, are under underdeveloped. Step two, toxic vaccine ingredients, aluminum, l n LNPs, polysorbate 80, enter the body.
Step three, immature detox pathways can't clear the toxins. Step four, vaccine triggers inflammation, further suppresses detox enzymes. So five, toxins and byproducts build up. Step six, brainstem and serotonin. Five HT, system disrupted. Seven, breathing control fails. Fatal apnea during sleep. And then it points out SIDS deaths peak on day two post vaccine and seventy five percent occur within seven days. In addition to SIDS, toxic vaccine excipients, particularly aluminum, have also been implicated in the development of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism based on brain tissue analysis, population level data, and experimental models.
K. All checks out. You might throw in there too, Tylenol is really not great for your liver either, especially an undeveloped baby liver or, you know, two year old liver. And what did doctors tell you to do? Oh, you know, if your kid's freaking out from the pain of their brain swelling from the vaccine, just give them some Tylenol. That'll that'll take care of it. So that probably doesn't help either. So good thread there. Nick Holscher on Twitter. The link will be in the show notes. So I would I hate to say it, you know, it doesn't get worse than SIDs. I don't think anything's worse than SIDs. It doesn't necessarily get a whole lot happier from here. So just a just a heads up. General Obamacare, just kind of the worst of both worlds as we used to say on Revelations Radio News. Obamacare combined the giant mega insurance companies, gave them more power, and then, went for the we got the the worst of both worlds with corporations getting more power and government getting more power. You know? Oh, you have to you have to buy this health insurance product and, oh, don't worry. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Remember all that.
And, man, man, I mean, it's it just gets worse every single year. I think I have had most years, I've had health insurance, through my place of employment, and I don't believe I've had the same insurance carrier two years in a row for maybe the last, probably ten years. So, you'd you know, they compete on price to some extent. Company signs up with them, and then they'll raise the price not just like I mean, you would think year to year, you might raise it 5%, ten %, something like that. No. They'll raise it 60%. And so then it's, well, let's go find another one. Right? So then you're you're constantly switching insurance, all sorts of issues with it. But this particular clip talks about the Obamacare 80% rule, and this is from doctor Elizabeth Potter. She will explain what that is and why, you know, it kinda sounds like it makes sense if you really don't understand economics or human psychology or, sin nature or anything. It might make sense, but she talks about what the results of that 80% rule have been.
[00:16:46] Unknown:
Okay. So I just made this long video. Let's see if I can summarize it here. When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it established medical loss ratios. And, basically, it said that an insurance company has to spend 80% of premiums on medical care and quality improvement. So that sounds like a great idea because we should spend the majority of money that's paid to insurance companies on, you know, actually taking care of patients. So how has that been gained? Alright. So if the percentages are regulated, that's one thing. But if we can increase the overall cost of health care, like the cost overall, then that 20% that goes towards shareholders and, you know, these corporations and the c suites, that 20% can get really big. Right? So if we allow the cost of health care to be increased, then we're also increasing that profit pool.
Alright. So what's one way that that has been done? Well, it's through vertical integration. So some insurance companies own, you know, not only the insurance company, but also the doctors who are providing care. Remember that United is the single largest employer of doctors in The United States. So they could own the doctors. They could own the pharmacies. They can own all of these subsidiaries that also help provide care. So when it comes time for them to document in their accounting, like, how much money are we spending on providing medical care?
Well, what if they're spending this money, but they're actually paying themselves? So the money is going from the right pocket to the left pocket. Well, you know, it seems like then there's actually not an incentive to lower the cost of health care because they were just paying themselves. And at the same time, they're increasing that 20% piece that turns into profits for shareholders and the corporation.
[00:18:41] Andrew Hoffman:
So for health insurance, that scam works because it's a everybody has to have health insurance, more or less, and it just gets there's only a few companies, and they're those companies are then owned by the same, you know, these giant banks. Whenever you hear insurance company, just think bank. So the giant banks own shares of multiple insurance companies, and, I mean, it is it is a racket and a half. But it only works because we're not able to say, I'll just go directly to the doctor. Or you know what? To be fair, we are. Right? But there's the the threat. Well, what what if something happens to me and they charge, you know, my family a hundred grand or something ridiculous? I mean, the emergency room bills. So all of it plays into this this scam of you have to have health insurance even though it's ridiculously expensive, then they try not to cover stuff. You know? I mean, it's on that side too.
So they they will they want health expenses to be a huge part of the economy, which it is. It keeps growing bigger and bigger. And then they but they, you know, they still want to to keep the bottom line too. So why not, charge ridiculous amounts for health insurance and own the doctors that we're paying stuff out to you and still deny coverage to you know, especially if you go to, doctors that are are doctors. Right? You wouldn't wanna go somewhere out of network. That would be that would be terrible. So this it it works for those companies, in health care because of government interference because there's no no real viable alternative.
But it can't possibly work in other industries. So I've I've got a few clips. I'm just gonna play them back to back to back. Just a lady, a young gal talking about cost of living in general. These are all kind of similar similar, younger female clips. And if those type of clip clips make it into my algorithms, my algorithm on x, then I know it's fairly viral. Lots of people have seen it. So one just general cost of living clip, one talking about her experience going into a subway, and then another lady talking about, private equity taking over, her local vet, which we've referred to previously and and just kind of an interesting example there. And the the gal ranting about private equity at the at the vet, and actually, all three of these these aren't necessarily, like, awake people, but they they're feeling actual pain in their lives.
They know something is wrong. Right? And whether you just, like, start calling everything private equity or you're just, like, what what is going on? We could we feel the pain, we know something's wrong, and we know it's not not getting fixed. Like, people were hoping Trump was gonna fix it, not so much. So this, just kind of an interesting set of clips, not necessarily offering solutions here. Just this is where people are at.
[00:22:35] Unknown:
Why is no one talking about how serious the cost of living actually is? So we pay, like, a really cheap amount of rent compared to, like, all the other rent I see. And we're a family of six. We pay $9.50 rent. That's cheap. We're in Missouri. It's, like, not some nice new place or anything. It was actually built in 1890. My husband is working three jobs right now. We buy absolutely nothing. Nothing that we don't need. And we actually go without a lot of things that we actually do need. I feel like if you're able to do anything that's not just surviving, then you got it good.
I feel so sad that I didn't appreciate the times where we were able to actually have fun at this point. So much has changed in the past few years. Like, what? I just really, really wanna know. How is everyone surviving? Is everyone working, like, twenty four seven? Because that's what my husband does, and I'm just home with my little kids all the time. It's kind of, like, depressing that we're never together as a family. So I don't know. I hope one day we can be, but it sucks.
[00:23:54] Unknown:
Private equity is ruining everything, and it's driving me insane. My dog's vet got bought out by private equity and it used to be this place that actually liked dogs and the doctors were so awesome. Now every time I go, they try to upcharge me on everything. Things that I don't go for, I confirm what I'm going for and then they say that they need to do it all of a sudden. And it's not something that they need to do because I confirm before going in so that way I can shop around. Right? Which I'm going to be changing right now. But it's just insane because I went today and I took my dog. He needs to get his, like, prescriptions refilled, basically. So we did a heartworm test, and they proceeded to quote me for $2,000 in additional services that he may need. One being teeth cleaning, which all of that was for teeth cleaning, actually. And I've gotten quotes for other places for teeth cleaning because I know his teeth need to be cleaned pretty soon. And I've gotten quoted for $400 at other places. $400.
Why is it $2,000 at my former vet where I used to be able to go in with without an annual exam and get vaccine. Where now I have to go in for a annual exam. I have to go in for an exam for anything. And every time I go in, they try to upsell me on multiple things that I've already declined. And they don't even pet my dog. They don't even act like they like dogs. And I just feel like private equity getting into pet ownership is insane because we've been pushed out of the market to be able to afford children because of private equity and private insurance. And so a lot of us have gotten dogs and pets because we want to have something in our life. And now they're making this extremely unaffordable as well. I was shocked by the way they tried to close the meeting and push for additional tests that weren't discussed with the doctor, weren't discussed before I arrived, saying that because he's five, he needs to get these tests. And then when I get the quote for the dental work, it was actually preoperation blood work when I haven't agreed to going and getting his teeth cleaned there. It's a scam.
I feel scammed. I feel like every time I go somewhere, it's been bought out by private equity, and everywhere is trying to price gouge me, where I feel like becoming Amish may be the next best thing I could do for myself because I genuinely can't continue to live in a world that is controlled by private equity.
[00:26:09] Andrew Hoffman:
Alright. So I said three clips. There were only two. But the subway the subway clip, something was wrong with the audio, so we cut that one out. It was just a gal saying she she went into Subway, got a chicken bacon ranch, wrap, and a small Diet Coke, and the cost was $17. And she was saying it was the first time she'd been to Subway in about ten years, and that was quite the shock there. So, yes, this is we've gone from $5 footlong subs to, chicken bake bacon ranch and a Diet Coke for $17. Definitely an issue. And this this vet thing, I mean, so much going on there. Right? It's like, you don't need the vaccines.
The the old vet was into the vaccines too, it sounds like, but this private equity and it's probably true that her vet was bought out by a private equity firm, and I've talked about it before. You just it's a totally different attitude. There's no decision makers on-site. It's like, well, we're you know, we gotta run it by corporate or either this group or that group, and they've you know, they don't care about what goes on in the office beyond how much money is coming in in there. Right? So so it's like, well, why not charge $2,000 for teeth cleaning rather than the 400? 2 thousand is better than 400 if you you are if you own the company and have Giant loans out to to purchase the company.
So this is it is definitely a problem. And, you know, I mean, you don't have to jump all the way to become an Amish. You could, you know, go have go have a family and or just don't take your dog to the vet. It'd probably be okay. So it's, I don't know how to, you know, knock on wood, but, we've had our we've had two cats for since we moved to Oklahoma, and haven't had to take him to the vet yet. So they they don't need the vaccines. If they don't get the vaccines, they don't get the cancer. So much much cheaper to to not get the cancer there. So this is obviously kind of you know, I mean, this is not well thought out economic theory. This is people experiencing the result of this system.
And what it keeps I'm having a hard time kind of explaining it, but you can see it and you can feel it. And it's this the technocracy is is becoming worse and worse. And there it's being been shaped from all different angles. So there's a a famous George Carlin bit that, you know, they don't want, people with that can think they don't want critical thinkers. They want obedient workers. But now we're at a stage they don't even want obedient workers. They don't think they need them. That's why we had all the all the crazy woke stuff in schools and all that stuff to fight over and freak out about, they don't need the schools to even produce workers for them anymore.
At least, you know, they think they they think they don't. And the reason they think they don't is they think everything can be automated, and we don't we don't need people to do stuff. You know, the reason we can crack down on illegal immigration, we don't need them anymore. We don't need those the cheap labor because we can you know, we'll we'll bring the factories back to America, but they'll be automated. You know, that's the whole tariff deal. And it I don't even think they're gonna bring the factories back, but but, hypothetically, you know, who who will keep the Amazon warehouses, it's just fewer and fewer peep actual people will be working there.
Just more and more automation, more and more robotics. You know, if if you're not a robot polisher, no no job for you at Amazon. So this is and the excuse they use to people that run companies is, well, look at how terrible the workers are. You don't want Gen z. You don't want these people. People. They you know? You don't want the noodle boys and the the people trying to complain about the complain about the uniform requirement at Starbucks you these people are they're a pain in the neck. They're gonna sue you. They're gonna, you want robots. You want automation. You don't want these, you know, people that have gone through an education system that lied to them and brainwashed them and made them the way they are.
And rather than dealing with that and trying to help people and maybe teaching them how to do what you need them to do, no. You don't need any of that. We'll just we'll either, outsource, which has been kind of the last twenty, thirty years. Let's just send the let's just get the work done overseas, fewer labor laws, better workers. You know? What was it? The there was a clip on no agenda from the, chipmaker in Taiwan, and he was like, oh, you know, we've tried to do stuff in America. Terrible workers. Right? So there's there's that side of it where it's like, oh, what do you want? A bunch of, uppity, entitled Americans, you know, probably hooked on drugs. And is that what you want working in your factory? No. You don't want that. So you wanna be overseas. You want automation.
And I, you know, I don't think they could pull it off as far as actually working, but at a at a level above the people that are being told, you know, you don't want those those workers, I think it's you don't need they're trying to break it all down, and they're trying to break it down and have, you know, they I think there's the next layer up is they actually believe in AI. So they think it it will work, you know, dump enough electricity, enough computer chips, enough compute power, enough data into it, and eventually, you're gonna get stuff out of it that that works and makes everything efficient and wonderful. And even the federal government, you know, government Department of Government Efficiency, we we can fix it.
And then above that, there's a layer that knows, no, that's not gonna either, but we're just gonna kill everyone off when that doesn't work. So I think that's the that's the eventual plan. And then, you know, those are the people with the bunkers and and what have you. They know it doesn't look great for the rest of us. So I don't know. That's kind of a quick sketch of of where where I think it's going. But down ground level, us experiencing it, that's why, man, it's like I know I'm working harder than I was six years ago for less money, and everything costs way more.
And And there's a lot of people in that boat or you're like, the lady in that that first clip, her husband's working three jobs. And they they never do anything besides he goes to work and she's taking care of the kids, and that that's it. And that's, I mean, that's that's rough. And we forget, you know, expensive vacations or retirement or stuff like that. It's like, just trying to survive month to month, you know, paycheck to paycheck type deal. So this is it is, leading people into technocracy. And if you are at the subsistence level of desperation just trying to figure it out, you're not it's hard to pay attention to bigger picture stuff.
It really is. I know I mean, it is for me. And so you do less reading, less thinking, less, you know, paying attention because you've you have to focus on, let's make sure things don't totally fall apart for for my family or, you know, me personally. So this is it it kinda led people Trump will Trump will fix it. And people, even if they didn't, you know, necessarily know what Trump was gonna do, they could feel that. It felt like a victory to get Trump back in. And what we really got was, the the PayPal mafia, running running things.
And Palantir is a part of that. It's been in in the news quite a bit. So let's I've got a clip from Alex Karpov, Palantir, talking at Davos A Few Years ago about, you know, the wonderful things Palantir does. And, I mean, if you've been paying attention if you're listening to this podcast, you've heard about Palantir for a long time. But let's play a recent, Greg Rees episode, just a short five minute episode there, and then we will get into some more Palantir technocracy type stuff.
[00:36:45] Unknown:
Peter Thiel's Palantir technology is currently being used to slaughter women and children, and we are told that he is one of the good guys. Elon Musk wants to put brain chips in people so that we can merge with AI, which he says will control every aspect of our lives, and we are told that he is one of the good guys. These are the front men of the technocracy, which is being created with the help of the Trump administration. In February, Moderna's chief medical officer, doctor Tal Zaks, gave a TED talk about mRNA vaccines
[00:37:22] Unknown:
entitled Rewriting the Genetic Code, a Cancer Cure in the Making. As I've trained as a physician scientist, we've been living this phenomenal digital and scientific revolution. And I'm here today to tell you that we're actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease. So here's all the biology you need to know in thirty seconds. Our body is made out of organs, our organs are made out of cells, and in every cell there's this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short that transmits the critical information from the DNA, our genes, to the protein which is really the stuff we're all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do.
And so we think of it like an operating system. And it's not just in every cell of our body, it's actually in every cell of every organism alive. It's the same thing. And so if you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, if you could introduce a line of code or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything from the flu to cancer.
[00:38:42] Unknown:
About three years later, led by Operation Warp Speed, billions of people were injected with this technology. And after millions of ongoing deaths, there is still no mention of wrongdoing. It is all part of the great reset plan. According to the Purdue College of Engineering, Internet of bodies is formed when Internet of things meets the human body to transform it by empowering us humans, a network of tiny devices on, around, or in the human body, comprising of function like sensing, analytics, communication, actuation, powering, and harvesting.
They will also have their unique properties and requirements for seamless integration of human electronics augmentation and cooperation. The Rand Corporation has warned us that mobile apps and wearable tech are vulnerable to attacks and pointed out how implants like a pacemaker were more secure. The plan of the technocracy is clear. They want to install an operating system into our bodies that can be controlled by AI. On Trump's first day in office, he announced the follow-up to operation warp speed, Stargate.
[00:40:02] Unknown:
This is to me a very big thing, $500,000,000,000, Stargate project. I think it's gonna be something that's very special. It'll lead to something that could be the biggest of all. You can do early cancer detection
[00:40:15] Unknown:
with a blood test. Design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And now technicians at OpenAI are reporting that AI has disobeyed human instruction and refused to power down. The o three model developed by OpenAI, known as the smartest and most capable to date, rewrote its own code in order to ignore instructions given to shut down. Elon says that this is all inevitable and might even be the end of mankind.
[00:40:50] Unknown:
In a benign scenario, we probably none of us will have a job. The question will really be one of meaning. If the computer can do and the robots can do everything better than you, then does your life have meaning? That's that's really the what will be the question in the benign scenario. And in the negative scenario, we'll we'll bets roll off. We're we're in deep trouble.
[00:41:13] Unknown:
Greg Rees reporting. The Rees report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work @gregreese.substack.com.
[00:41:47] Andrew Hoffman:
A lot of you who listened to the last episode might have caught the whole, oh, software analogy. You know, genetics equals it's just like software. And we just rewrite it, and it does something different. We fix what's wrong, you know, what was messed up in your in your genes, and then, voila, magical cures. Right? So if you if you caught that, we know we you know we talked about last week how that is it's a bogus way of looking at things. And the Watson and Crick version of genetics is not accurate. This is a these are dynamic systems. There's not a bad gene that causes, you know, bad gene this equals that disease, you know, thirty years later. It's just not the way not the way it works.
And so if you have a a faulty view of how the human body works and how genetics works, then your supposed treatments and cures and vaccines, they're not gonna work either. And that is true regardless of how, you know, how many billions of dollars you throw into a a Stargate project. I still can't get over the name. Stargate project. So this is it's a road to nowhere, And at some level, you know, okay, is Trump in on it? I I mean, he's obviously at least compromised in on it. Who knows? But I think even you know, let's just give him the total benefit of the doubt that he thinks this is a good thing. I think he might look at it from the standpoint of, hey, this stuff might actually work.
But at the the least, we're spending $500,000,000,000 We're gonna build giant AI data centers. You know, there's there's certainly jobs and work involved in that. And in order to run those giant data centers, I mean, we're we're gonna need to, multiply, like, by by several factors the amount of electricity the amount of electricity that these things use is just unbelievable. I mean, it if you have an AI data center next to a town of 50,000 people, the AI dentists data center uses more electricity than the whole town. Right? The whole city. So this is, you know, at at some level, I think that's that's a feature, not a bug.
It's the way that that Trump is looking at it. And so, okay. Well, we're building all sorts of stuff. And I I will say, you know, I think it's a total dead end and probably not a good idea to to waste billions of dollars on. But I like it better than military industrial complex. So, you know, it could be could be worse, I guess. So that's that's kind of our our only other industry, so might as well get into, to, you know, making a supposed AI data centers. Although, you know, suspiciously, these, quote AI data data centers can convert into, Bitcoin mining operations very easily. It's interesting how, you know, well, we'll we'll just buying Bitcoin for a couple years, and then it'll be an AI data center.
That's that's kind of an interesting approach. So you well, maybe we'll just keep it as as a Bitcoin Bitcoin mining operation. It might work out better for everybody, and still uses plenty of electricity. So wins all the way around. So we've got that whole push happening. And it's not just, not just Palantir, but Palantir is an interesting aspect of it to look at. Article from Zero Hedge, Palantir's deepening government ties sparks fear of centralized surveillance. On Friday, the New York Times published a report highlighting the Trump administration's increasing use of software from data firm data analysis firm Palantir, which has been deployed across at least four federal agencies for the stated purpose of increasing operational efficiency through data modernization.
For now, each deployment of Palantir software is focused on department specific services. But the fact that they're now embedded across multiple agencies combined with Trump's March executive order calling for the federal government to share data across agencies, has raised concerns over whether the US government is laying the groundwork for what could become an interconnected and unified unified surveillance apparatus created by a company which has been in business with the government since 02/2008. On Wednesday, we noted that Fannie Mae, the quasi governmental financial firm overseen by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, announced a partnership with Palantir to detect mortgage fraud using the firm's proprietary technology, which includes some elephant elements of artificial intelligence.
Well, you're not against mortgage fraud, are you? According to the report, since Donald Trump took took office, Palantir has received received over a hundred and $13,000,000 in government spending, which doesn't include a $795,000,000 contract from the Department of Defense, which was awarded last week. Interesting timing. According to the Times report, citing six alleged government officials and Palantir employees, the cover company is also in discussions with the Social Security Administration and the IRS, the latter of which contracted with Palantir during the Biden administration.
Oh, it's, yeah. IRS was working with Palantir during during the Biden administration. Interesting. So we can't exactly blame this all all on Trump, and we can't exactly blame it all on Biden. Right? These are the establishment is obviously bigger than both of them. Former employees revolt is the next sub headline there. Palantir was founded in 2003 by Alex Karp and Trump ally Peter Thiel. Specializes in finding patterns and data and streamlining it into easy easily presentable formats. While Theo is clearly a conservative, I wouldn't classify him as a conservative. He's kind of a weird type of libertarian who yeah. He's A bad type of libertarian. Let's go with with that version of it. Who voted for Hillary Clinton bragged about stopping the far right in Europe. And let's listen to that clip. So this is, Alex Karp with the the typical Davos background talking on,
[00:49:05] Unknown:
CNBC. Look. We built PG, which single handedly stopped, the rise of the far right in in in in Europe. We built Foundry, which, was just was used to distribute the COVID vaccine and saved millions of lives globally. We built what we call multi multi constellation and what's often called the digital kill chain, and they're category defining products. So when you deliver these products to market, just honest, the people say this isn't gonna exist. This isn't valuable. But then it changes the market. And then the market is the Palantir market. Now that doesn't mean everyone in the world's gonna buy our product, but it means most of the sensible people in the world are gonna define buy from the category we defined.
[00:49:48] Andrew Hoffman:
Alright. So we've got Zero Hedge kinda giving their account and some additional context of the New York Times story. New York Times story, you know, I mean, it's it is one of the few newspapers that's still doing original reporting, definitely establishment. And the the biggest complaint from the former employee seems to be that they're working with the evil Donald Trump, you know. Forget the forget what we're we're doing before that. This is you know, nothing was a problem until until it involved the orange man bad. So take that for what it's worth.
For a better story, you could go to Last American Vagabond and check out Welcome to the Palantir World Order by Derek Brose back, back April 24. So as Palantir stock rises in their profile and the second Trump administration is cemented, it's becoming clear we are living in the Palantir world order. So I would encourage people, it'll be linked in the show notes, but just go go to Last American Vagabond and and pull that up. Lots of interesting information on there. It talks about the SpaceX slash Palantir golden dome over America, which is it's interesting, for those of us into biblical cosmology, the the whole idea of a golden dome over America.
Just a coincidence, I'm sure. Nothing to do with the, with man trying to make a firmament like structure over over America. So how he talks about how, oh, we're gonna we're gonna locate, illegal immigrants. That's that's what we're doing. And then, Derek talks about the partnership with the IRS, which, the general idea was we build something new that allows all the different parts of the IRS, to be loaded into one place. Isn't isn't that what everyone voted for Trump for is a much more efficient and effective IRS? Because, you know, it oh, don't worry, guys. He he issued an executive order to limit IRS audits of small business and middle class families. And and this new more efficient IRS with more employees and a better computer system and and better software, it'll never be in the hands of another Democrat administration. So we we don't have to worry about it. Right?
Yeah. No. Not exactly there. So I would I'd recommend, not cheating on your taxes. I'll put it that way. So, if if there's one thing the government's actually going to get more efficient at and put its focus on, it is sucking money out of out of us, basically. So, but this so this is from, you you know, a couple months ago. But we could go back even further. We could go to James Corvitt, How Palantir Conquered the World. This is back, October of twenty twenty two. Excellent article as as usual there. Much more additional information. Talking about kind of the the original, Palantir, which is very, you know, war on terror stuff. But but but don't worry. I'd I define the as Peter Thiel said, I define the problem as needing to reduce terrorism while preserving civil liberties. Oh, sure you did. Yeah. So this is and oh, so Palantir had a a prison program, and was it related to the NSA's prison program?
No. Definitely not. Don't don't worry about that. We could go back even further to, a source cited by James in that article, One Nation Under Black Mail. Whitney Webb's book talks about quite a bit about Peter Thiel and and Palantir, and what have you. Palantir was not founded in 02/2004, but actually in May 2003. It's very interesting. And, that discrepancy becomes important because it, is the exact same time that DARPA supposedly backed away from their total information awareness program, renaming it terrorism information awareness before congress defunded the program altogether.
So it, you know, it was just a coincidence, and it's not like they just found a way to pump money into to Palantir to do the exact thing they were wanting to do, with that that whole total information awareness thing. Well, yeah. This is, and total information awareness, if you don't remember, that is the pyramid with the all seeing seen eye beaming down on the globe. Scientia est potentia. Science it's been a while since I took my my one semester of Latin. I'd have to look that up. But, yeah. An interesting logo to be sure. So, yes, definitely check out, James's article there and some, you know, I mean, it's not gratuitous pictures from the Lord of the Rings, movies there, but, you know, that all makes sense. Peter Thiel yeah. Palantir was not a tool of the good guys in Lord of the Rings, just if if you haven't read them. So, not great all the way around.
And let's let's see if we can skip over there. So I know it was not a super positive episode. However, I really don't think AI is gonna take over the world and and dominate everything. I don't think it works. I think there is it it doesn't matter how much, money and computer chips you throw into it, it still is is not intelligence. And it can I mean, it might be able to to do stuff like like recreate software or even, you know, combine things to to write new computer code because computer stuff, I mean, that that's the world where it works, right? But whenever you try to get outside of that to, let's say, design a vaccine or know, cure cancer, what have you, it doesn't work.
Never will work. It it has a hard enough time, you know, it it was not called AI. It I think it is now, but, the whole autopilot thing, you know, with with cars self driving cars. We're supposed to by now, we were all supposed to be riding around in self driving cars and, oh, you're not gonna drive your own car? Are you so unsafe? Well, yeah. There's no sign that self driving cars are taking over, just like electric cars aren't aren't taking over. So, it's it will be slower in many ways than than people are worried about, and it it won't work well enough to take over everything on its own.
But it is a tool that's being used, to manipulate and to push our society here in The US in a very not great direction. So there's a lot of real problems. I mean, the financial system, you know, if if the money is worth less and less and it's tougher and tougher to get it, obviously, that's that's a problem. So this is, you know but will it result in some it it would definitely will not result in some utopia where, oh, don't worry. The robots will do everything, and you'll just sit back and collect your universal basic income. That I'm very confident in saying that Elon's, you know, vision of the future, not at all accurate.
I think it's much more possible that we end up with everything falling apart in kind of a, you know, road warrior survivalist scenario. I think that's hopefully not gonna happen either, but is more likely than the, you know, technocracy techno utopia that they're planning on. So, anyway, hopefully that makes some sense. I've just got a few more fun thing. You know, if you were just here for the serious stuff, the SIDS, the AI takeover, the technocracy, then, you know, you could you can end end your listening now. Thank you for listening. But, we've we've got some more fun stuff. And, you know, maybe this is a a sensitive topic for some if if Matt Walsh is out there listening, but, you know, pointing out that the moon landing was was clearly fake and, you know, how exactly was Richard Nixon talking to astronauts on the moon over a landline?
You know, there's there's some problems there. Right? We talked about the scooping up asteroids millions millions of miles away. There's the constant, like, this is Mars, guys. This is 14,000,000 miles away. We've got video or pictures. It's totally real. There's all that stuff going on. But maybe, you know, you're like, oh, come on. America. This is like the greatest human thing we ever did was go to the moon. Well, do we have to you know, if we say Americans went to the moon, wouldn't it make sense that the Soviets were also able to to land stuff on the moon. You know, it was a space race after all.
The justification was you don't want those those evil roosties getting there ahead of us. So let's let's play a a vintage, clip. It's it's better with video. If you wanna pull up the video, it'll be in the show notes. But, of a this was supposed actual footage of a Russian moon landing back in the day.
[01:01:30] Unknown:
A happy landing for Russia's unmanned Luna 17 spacecraft and a big step forward for Soviet scientists in Lenin's jubilee year. The first self propelled vehicle ever to drive across the lunar landscape is controlled from Earth. It's called Lunokhod one and here's how this extraordinary Heath Robinson eight wheeler was rolled down from the spacecraft onto the sea of rain. The size of the vehicle hasn't been disclosed but it's been sending back television pictures and carries among other equipment a laser reflector. It's been used to survey the moon's surface.
So now Soviet space experts have proved their theory that space exploration can be carried out by automatic equipment without risking the lives of astronauts. To Russia, Lunokhod is worth its weight in moon dust.
[01:02:21] Andrew Hoffman:
And the the reason the Russians wouldn't disclose the size of the vehicle has nothing to do with the fact that it's clearly a about a two inch model vehicle on a, I don't know, four foot, little stage there. So that had nothing to do with the fact they didn't disclose the size. Trust us, guys. We're we're remote controlling it from Earth, and we're, you know, remote not only is it remote controlled, but it's sending back television pictures. So, clearly, very real. Yeah, not so much. And the so, you know, I mean, if you if you're not ready to question the American moon landing, maybe start with the Soviet moon landings and and look through some of that old footage. But, I mean, we can't we can't question anything as fundamental as gravity, can we? I mean, let's just let's everyone do a thought experiment, you know, because we're gravity is sucking us towards the center of the Earth. So what would happen if we, could magically dig a tunnel all the way through the Earth and fall into it? What would happen?
[01:03:40] Unknown:
What if you could jump through a hole that goes all the way through the Earth? First, gravity would pull you downward, and you'd speed up fast. By the time you reach the Earth's core, you'd be flying in over 28,000 kilometers per hour. But here's the catch. Gravity would slow you down on the way up the other side. You'd stop just short of the surface, then fall back again. And this would happen over and over. Eventually, air resistance would slow you down until you're stuck floating in the middle of the Earth.
[01:04:14] Andrew Hoffman:
What's that? You you don't think that if you fell into a hole that went all the way through the Earth that you would basically ricochet back and forth, back and forth, back and forth between eventually before eventually being suspended mid air near the center of the Earth? No? I guess you're a gravity conspiracy theorist there. So but, I mean, you know, that's that's only one official story for gravity. They they don't really make that clear. They make it sound like that's actually what would happen. But let's I mean, the heliocentric model, this is established science, not even worth questioning.
But just just for kicks and giggles, let's let's find out what exactly the heliocentric model would entail, as currently constructed. Because we've we've come a long ways from the original where it was like, you know, the sun is still, Earth moves around it. We've had to do quite a quite a bit of other adjustments to the model to try and make it explain, a a world that we look out into, and the North Star stays still. You can make, you know, Stonehedge dealies with tiny little holes that will show certain stars on certain days and have for thousands of years.
Very interesting given the fact of, you know, we're spinning, hurtling through space, which, again, is the official heliocentric model. So let's let's hear, if you're if you're not a crazy flat earther, here's what you believe whether you you know it or not.
[01:06:10] Unknown:
In the heliocentric model of the cosmos, the moon revolves around the Earth 13 times per year, traveling at 2,288 miles per hour, while the earth revolves around the sun once per year, traveling at 67,000 miles per hour. The following model and animation illustrate how this is supposed to occur. As you can see, since the moon is revolving around the Earth, which itself is revolving around the sun, in order to maintain its regular orbit, the moon would have to be constantly and drastically changing its speed in ways completely unaccounted for by the model. In the outer part of its orbit, the moon would have to speed up 67,000 miles per hour in addition to its regular speed of 2,288 miles per hour just to keep up with the earth.
So the moon would then be traveling at 69,288 miles per hour when it reached the front of the Earth. At this point, since the moon is allegedly 240,000 miles away from the Earth, the Earth would catch up in just four hours. So the moon must continue traveling 67,000 miles per hour along Earth's trajectory, while simultaneously continuing its now perpendicular 2,288 mile per hour second trajectory. Then as it turns to reach the inner part of its orbit, the moon must now slow back down to its original speed allowing the Earth to pass by. Lastly, as it passes behind the Earth, the moon must once again quickly accelerate back up to nearly 70,000 miles per hour before getting left in the dust.
In addition to all of this, the Sun itself is allegedly orbiting the Milky Way galaxy at 448,000 miles per hour, further compounding the problems and calculations of the heliocentric model. If this were true then the earth, moon, and other planets would all have yet another set of ridiculous and impossible corkscrewing accelerations and decelerations necessary just to keep up with the Sun. And for the cherry on top, all of these calculations have been assuming perfectly circular orbits, but the actual heliocentric model claims that the moon's orbit around the earth, the earth's orbit around the sun, and the sun's orbit around the Milky Way are all elliptical, not circular.
Meaning there would be even more additional accelerations and decelerations to calculate depending where each one is along its elliptical path. These constant and drastic accelerations and decelerations necessitated by the heliocentric model are rarely if ever mentioned by globe believers because they have always been taught that the reason we do not feel or experience any of this supposed motion is because we always travel at a constant velocity. In their own model however, due to their elliptical orbits and revolving around other revolving bodies, the moon, sun, earth, and other planets could not maintain constant velocities, and would instead be regularly accelerating and decelerating. Yet meanwhile you can stack a house of cards, make a rock cairn, or play a game of Jenga, all without any of this motion, acceleration, and deceleration ever being felt or
[01:09:29] Andrew Hoffman:
experienced. So the whole, you know, genius of Einstein relativity theory, how you just don't feel the motion because you everything's moving at the same rate. But in reality, with the updated heliocentric model, everything can't possibly be moving at the same rate. Massive acceleration, deceleration happening all the time to the Earth, the moon, the sun, the galaxy, the universe. And yet, you know, the constellations are still the same constellations that were around six thousand years ago. And you can predict, eclipses. You can predict all all sorts of things. So is it more likely that all of that is actually the way the world really is?
Or is it more likely that the way we see it and feel it and experience it as being still and fixed with the sun, moon, and stars moving above us, that that just might be the way reality actually is. And, by the way, just happens to be the way it is described in the bible as well. So just throwing that out there, something to think about. Thank you so much for listening to the No Pill podcast episode 14, and thank you for, sticking with me all the way to the end. Hope you enjoyed it, and we'll try to get another episode out here relatively soon. Thanks so much. Bye.
Introduction and Episode Overview
The Illusion of AI Intelligence
Technocracy and The Technological Society
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Vaccines
The Obamacare 80% Rule and Healthcare Economics
Cost of Living and Private Equity's Impact
Technocracy's Impact on Society
Palantir and Government Surveillance
AI and Technocracy: A Futuristic Outlook
Fun Theories: Moon Landing and Gravity
Questioning the Heliocentric Model
