Paul English Live

Share on social media:

Broadcasts live every Thursday at 8:00p.m. uk time on Radio Soapbox: http://radiosoapbox.com

In this episode, we delve into the complex legal status of Germany, exploring its historical and current geopolitical intricacies. Our guest, Thomas Anderson, provides insights into the legal ambiguities surrounding Germany's status post-World War II, discussing the implications of the Basic Law and the absence of a formal constitution. We explore the historical context of Germany's division and reunification, and the geopolitical maneuvers that have shaped its current state.

We also discuss the broader implications of framing in political discourse, examining how terms like "anti-vaxxer" and "climate change denier" are used to manipulate public perception and stifle dissent. The conversation touches on the environmental debate, critiquing the push for electric cars and the ecological impact of battery production.

Our discussion extends to the cultural and racial dynamics within Europe, questioning the impact of multicultural policies and the erosion of national identities. We explore the historical and ongoing challenges faced by Germany and other European nations in maintaining their cultural heritage amidst globalist pressures.

Join us as we navigate these complex topics, offering a critical perspective on the narratives shaping our world today.

[00:00:11] Unknown:

South Wales coalfield will be turning out best Welsh for a few 100 years yet.  

[00:00:30] Unknown:

It's character's changing   as it turns confidently   to a benign head.  

[00:01:45] Unknown:

And,   hello.   Good afternoon.   Good morning. Good evening. Good middle of the night and all that kind of stuff.   And, welcome to the show. Oh, I and we've got something rolling around 5 times here. Where does that go? There we go. Go away.   Welcome to   Hello. Oh, just a minute. I've got the echo from hell here. Good morning, good evening, good What's going on? Just a minute.   Oh, there we go. That's what it was. It was a monitor coming back at me,   and, it wouldn't be this show if we didn't have something like that at the beginning. I just found out where it was, so it means my brain's working. You're listening to Paul English live. This is show number 60. We're here on WBN   324,   and we're also on Radio Soapbox. We're on Rumble. We're here for the next couple of hours. Welcome to the show.  

We're getting towards the end of British summertime here. It's a special sort of British type of summertime.   Our clocks go backwards this coming Saturday,   and generally the mental condition of the country goes even further backwards when that  

[00:03:37] Unknown:

that   happens.  

[00:03:47] Unknown:

And we have a kind of change in the rhythm of the show. We've been a little group ensemble for the past few weeks. But tonight, we have a returning guest.   He'll be up shortly after a bit of blather from yours truly.   Yes. The drum roll of the ending. Hi. Welcome back everyone. Hope you've had a cracking week. I've had,   a cracking week, I guess. Something like that.   This is as I said there, Paul English live,   edition   60, episode 60, issue 60, whatever word you wanna use. Show number 60.   And before we plow into all of it, I have to play this extremely important message.  

[00:05:19] Unknown:

Thank you for listening to WBN 324 Talk Radio. We now need to advise you that all shows that air on our network are strictly over 18 years old. Thank you for listening to WBN 324 talk radio.  

[00:05:33] Unknown:

Yeah. Thank you for listening to WBN 324 radio. As I said, we're here for the next couple of hours, 8 PM to 10 PM in the UK. We tend to overrun on Rumble for those of you that can't get enough.   We're also on Radio Soapbox. We're on FreeFall Radio South Africa,   and, we're on Global Voice Network.   And, most of the crew is here already, and our guest is lined up. Although, I'm keeping him in a little box over there quietly at the moment. He's hearing everything that we're saying,   but I just wanted to welcome you all to the show.   And, been a fun time over here with all sorts of little things going   on, but mainly, of course, we're we're desperately excited about next week's budget over here in Britain. We just can't wait. We're expecting genius moves from our brilliant and amazing government.  

So that's what we've got to look forward to and as I may have mentioned last week,   what I'll be doing next week, I've been scribbling and knocking it together. Hopefully get it finished over the weekend. But is another little spiel from the, political party that does not exist   with our shadow budget, if that's the right phrase, or a counter budget, or something of that sort, because   I think there's a budget that everybody wants to hear, but you never hear it, do you? You know the one I'm talking about.   During the week I've been mentioning it to people,   saying, oh, the budget. In fact, I was speaking to an elderly lady only the other day. She said, there'll be nothing in it for us, will there? I said, no. You weren't you weren't expecting there to be anything in it for you, were you? She said, no.  

And then, I got an earful about the, the heating allowance for the elderly. We've mentioned it here before. Those of you who are not in the UK, just to let you know,   there used to be a thing. I say used to be, there still should be,   An allowance for the elderly and the people not so well off to pay their winter   heating bills. It was like a fuel allowance. I think it came in at under about £400.   Anyway, the the genius government that we have at the moment, the latest bunch of actors,   have received orders that that's got to be taken away,   from the elderly. So they're going to suffer, and there have been these horrific sort of pronouncements in the news. Probably a bit of psyops. It's difficult to tell with any of this as many of you know. Can you trust the mainstream media on anything?  

Not much. Can you trust them to lie?   Absolutely.   Even whether they know that they're doing it or not, and,   so there's a lot of discord about that, understandably. It's not particularly a particularly nice thing that's been happening.   So, we'll probably report on that a little bit more, because I'd imagine that that will come up or will be some kind of probably some concessions maybe in the wonderful budget next week. I don't know even who's delivering it. It's usually some economic oath that they put in who talks nonsense for 15 or 20 minutes, and then all the political analysts and all the, talking heads have an absolute field day for the next week banging on about this, that, and the other. All of it, complete piffle, won't make any difference at all. Just like every other budget you've ever heard in   your life. How about that?  

In media news over here,   there's a gentleman over here who, has been running a show for for many   years, called Richie Allen.   And,   Shelley Tasker, who's a friend of mine,   she she let me know a few days ago. And, Richie Allen's been going for about 10 years. He's not everybody's cup of tea, and not everything that he says is my cup of tea, and, I think he kinda knows that. With regards we could say that really about everybody, you know. There's bits of what people say that we like.   Although, of course, I know you like everything that I say. No, it's absolutely not true. But,   he's been behind the mic 4 days a week for just about 10 years. I think it was a 10 year anniversary, and I think he's,   well, I don't know the full story of it. But he's going away, I think, ostensibly to recharge his batteries whether he comes back   to do his 4 days a week drive time show. So that's what we call it over here. I don't know what you guys call it in the states, but drive time on the radio,   clock is 5 PM to 7 PM,   and he's done a very lively show with some cracking shows and things that I wasn't particularly fond of and this that and the other, but, you know, as I said, we can say that about everybody.  

Anyway, as far as we're aware, he's hanging up his mic for a while, maybe for a long while, he'll still be carrying on with the Sunday morning show, which I think is merry melodies or I don't know what it's called. I've I've probably mullered that. But he does a musical show on the Sunday mornings, which I don't really catch.   But anyway, good luck to him because anybody, no matter what you might think about the overall content, anybody that's contributing into this space,   we need as many of them as we can get.   Even the people that you disagree with, we need lots of those too because it it's all grist for the mill.  

Anyway, without, without further ado, there's more items to bring up, and we'll we'll jump into those as we see fit. But I'd just like to welcome in the regular crew.   And, Patrick, have you have you managed to get back,   behind a proper microphone now? Are you back at base? I think so.   Oh, you are. Oh, you sound delightful.   Yeah. Absolutely.   Yeah. That was good. Yeah. That was great. You had a good week?  

[00:10:44] Unknown:

Quite quite a good week. Yes. I think so.   It's a   rather, overcast day here, but, good good weather nonetheless. And, most of the leaves have fallen off. There's some few  

[00:10:55] Unknown:

clingers left, but, Clingers? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We've  

[00:11:01] Unknown:

got a lot of, leaves to rake   at the moment.   Wow. But really good weather and good  

[00:11:08] Unknown:

Bendigo of myself. Oh, well, that's good. I'm trying to ignore the leaves. My, my shed, sorry, my highly sophisticated professional studio here, which is my converted garage, is sited underneath a very large,   chestnut tree.   And, the leaves now are Well, there's a lot of them.   And they've got a bit damp because we had some rain about 2 or 3 days ago. But the previous week, maybe this for the past 2 or 3 weeks, maybe I've only got one story to tell. But we've had a few fires in the garden on a Sunday. They've been absolutely fantastic.   I just realized how pleasant it is to not watch any electronic devices and just sit out in the open air, and it was pretty mild, and just burn a fire burning things. It's very primeval, isn't it? And, the crackle of the twigs, the leaves, the smoke, the stink on your jumper, it's great. I love it. It's fantastic. So we've been doing a bit of that.  

And yeah, I suppose we've got a few clingers too.   I've probably got a few clingers around here. So,   they'll they'll probably fall in the next few days. So great. Good to good to have you here, Patrick, as always. And, Paul,   welcome back. Are you with us, Paul?  

[00:12:17] Unknown:

Yeah. I'm in and out here in here and fro here and  

[00:12:21] Unknown:

there. Wow. You sound quite relaxed. You sound really relaxed. Should should I get relaxed like you and we should drop the volume down?  

[00:12:29] Unknown:

I'm always quite relaxed when this show is on. I know. Now you you don't you have some  

[00:12:35] Unknown:

don't you have some interesting domestic challenges of your own right now? Or is it or is it too difficult to talk about?  

[00:12:43] Unknown:

You could say that. Yes.  

[00:12:47] Unknown:

I did. Talking into it further, you could say that. Yes. Aw. I was hoping to catch up. I wanted to get all the lowdown on the whole thing and what's going on. So   so are you gonna you don't want to say a word. Is it secret squirrel all this?  

[00:13:01] Unknown:

No. No. Actually, no. I'm just,   I'm in the process of moving. So I'm in the process of packing, cleaning, sorting, organizing, and all that stuff.   And I'm also in the process of, trying to get a vehicle running   Right. So I can actually shuttle stuff from here to there.   And it's it's been fun. It's been challenging, and it's been fun.  

[00:13:26] Unknown:

Yeah. So you're moving and you've got to move, what, by the end of this month. Is that right?  

[00:13:31] Unknown:

Yep.  

[00:13:32] Unknown:

Yep.  

[00:13:33] Unknown:

Yep. Right. By Where are you moving? Montana? This month. And   and,   just to, you know, to add insult to injury,   oh, about a week ago, actually, a week ago yesterday,   there was a fraud alert on my debit card, which my bank promptly used to cancel my debit card and reissue me a new one, which I have not gotten yet. So   at the time when I need access to money at a moment's notice,   I'm waiting for a card in the mail.   Oh, wow.   That I must be I am living. I am literally living a very real world example of what is wrong   with central bank digital currency.  



[00:14:15] Unknown:

Now you're talking my language, Paul. That's great. That's really good.  

[00:14:19] Unknown:

That's excellent. Go and get withdraw a bunch of cash   from your account.  

[00:14:24] Unknown:

Yeah. A bunch. A bunch of cash.   And and look at the clingers. This is interesting today, Patrick. A bunch of cash. So go get a bunch of cash.   And,   yeah. Can you still get bunches of cash over there? You can, surely. Oh, yeah. Oh, good. Yeah. Cool. I can.   But  

[00:14:41] Unknown:

there's but there's a lot of stuff that I need to do that I cannot do with cash. How do you set up, like, a,   Internet server,   in another country   Yes. Or in the cloud somewhere without being able to pay the bill   to set up the account.  

[00:15:00] Unknown:

Is that important?  

[00:15:01] Unknown:

Never have friends come in.  

[00:15:03] Unknown:

Yeah. Oh, yeah. Have you got friends, Paul? Paul, have you got friends?   One could never be too sure. I had some ones. I had some ones. They were great. They were really good. I must get some back. That would be good. My my my my other question for you with regards to the fact that, obviously, you're in logistical upheaval mode   and enjoying   have you found anything   so far that you haven't seen for years as you gather all your stuff up? Other things. Actually, I have yes. I have found a couple of things. Yes.  

[00:15:35] Unknown:

Yeah?   Thing things I was actually looking for.  

[00:15:39] Unknown:

Oh, really? Well, that's a bonus. That's good. Oh, yeah. Yeah? Yeah. Good. Schools,  

[00:15:44] Unknown:

books,   all kinds of things. Fantastic. Oh, that's great. Well, I actually found a computer that I've been missing for God knows how long. What? You oh, right.  

[00:15:57] Unknown:

Oh, yeah. Because you're not short of computers. I mean, you are short of computers. You probably haven't got enough, have you? You need more computers.  

[00:16:03] Unknown:

Well, well, this was this was a this was a computer that I wanted to use as a Linux server because I wanted to set up a firewall and hide everything that I do in the house, like, particularly with live streams and radio programs and stuff like that behind a firewall.   Because,   because the the one machine that I use for hosting,   radio programs   gets literally 100 of thousands of DOS attack hits over the Internet every week.   And if the machine was less capable than it is, it would take it down.   There would be a denial of service and   show it off air.  

So that's always fun. Isn't I want to Isn't that fun? I want to hide that behind a firewall. Something   simple and stupid to take the brunt of the attacks so the machine can just sit back and idle going.  

[00:16:54] Unknown:

Wow.   Hey. So does that mean when we do the show   on October 31st, because that is the last it's a week today.   The last show of this month happens to fall on the last day of the month. Will you be with us next Thursday? Or are you gonna be up to your eyes in boxes and packing crates and shouting at a removal men?   What's gonna be going on?  

[00:17:16] Unknown:

You might probably won't be here. What we gonna do?   I don't know. I don't have a clue. I'm worried already. Maybe I can dial in by telephone.  

[00:17:26] Unknown:

Maybe. I think it would be a little unfair. Although,   if you were to do that and you're all stressed out and shouting, that would make for good radio, wouldn't it? We'd quite like that. Oh, yes. It would. That would be great. Absolutely would. Yeah. That would be must hear radio. And now that you've just reminded me that I have exactly  

[00:17:42] Unknown:

7 days to have all this done, thank you very much. Now you just,   you you just put the stress level right back  

[00:17:51] Unknown:

where I was before the show started. Well, you know, I'm here to help. I'm glad to be of any assistance I can be, Paul. Maybe that's a blessing in disguise, you know. It's given you a keen little edge. You're all motivated now because you've seen the the big task before you. I dread to even think about what I would do if we had to move from here. I'm shuddering thinking about it. You get so entrenched in a place. I shouldn't go on about this, should I? I'm sure you've got all this stuff coming up. Anyway, maybe by the time you get to your destination, you'll be lighter. You'll be you'll be you'll have a lot less stuff in your life, and that's always   generally a pretty good thing. Unless, of course, it's stuff that you really loved, and then you you weep forever. You guys should never have thrown that away.  

Uh-huh. Yeah. Sorry. Blokes are hoarders. Are you a hoarder, Patrick? Are you a Patrick, are you a hoarder?  

[00:18:37] Unknown:

Yeah. I'm looking over at a pile of junk cluttered in front of a room on the floor. So, yeah, I'm a little bit of a hoarder. Not big not a big hoarder.  

[00:18:45] Unknown:

Glad. I'm glad to hear. I'm glad I'm not the only one. I'm not the only one. Quick shout out to everybody in the Rumble chat. Hi, everybody there. Already very lively. Lots of text messages flowing through, which I haven't had the chance to even look at yet. I was just glad to,   stop off the sound coming back to Rumble. That's that's what I cocked up there at the beginning. So, I don't know why. I normally have Rumble completely muted, but it decided to make a din. So that was a little bit confusing. But, yeah, shout out to everybody in the Rumble chat. If you're listening on the radio wherever you may be, WBN, Soapbox, or whatever,   and you want to type things because, you know, you've just got the urge, if you head on over to the Rumble room, you'll be able to get stuck, and you need a Rumble account, of course, but they're free.  

You get a link to that over at paulenglishlive.com.   So, yeah. And we'll be going through some comments once I can get my eyeballs working properly. And speaking of eyeballs,   I mentioned that interview, didn't I, last week with doctor Jack Crews, the 4 and a quarter hour interview. I did mention it. I've mentioned it probably the last couple of weeks, I think.   Anyway, if any of you have seen it or heard me talking about it, he,   during the interview, he wears these orange glasses.   And I want you to know that mine are on me right now. That's probably why I'm gonna end up pressing all the wrong buttons, but,   they cut out all the nasties from computer screens, and particularly from phones. It turns out   that phones are the big they're the big baddies in all   this because they, they use this blue light thing, the blue light technology,   and it gives you a dopamine hit. And it literally makes you addicted, almost like physiologically, to looking at your screen. How about that? Isn't that interesting? And, apparently, the phones are the worst culprit,   which shouldn't really surprise us, I guess, because, you know, they are the most ubiquitous piece of technology.  

So I guess we're gonna have to get used to the idea of the next generation literally having a bent neck and being dopamine junkies unless they get these orange glasses. Haven't  

[00:20:42] Unknown:

haven't you seen haven't you seen like a sea of people?   You know, being a people watcher, you've probably seen this.   A sea of people   all with the bent neck just lazily   swiping up with their finger completely   oblivious   to everything going on around them. All they're worried about is scrolling to the next or scrolling to the next story, the next   Yeah. Theme, the next,   post, the next update.  

[00:21:13] Unknown:

The next hit.   Yeah.  

[00:21:15] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. I know. And then you add headphones to that, and it's even they're even more oblivious.   Oh. You you even talk tried talking to them. They can't even hear you at that point.  

[00:21:26] Unknown:

I know. Right. It's not good.  

[00:21:29] Unknown:

It's not good. The light though, can't you just, change the color settings on your phone   to to be  

[00:21:35] Unknown:

phones, you can't do that, but I have I have decreased the, blue light in both of my monitors   for my computer by 40%.   So everything that I'm looking at looks kinda brown, but I don't care.  

[00:21:49] Unknown:

There's an autumnal. You've got an autumnal computer experience going on, haven't you? No. It's fantastic. Well well, you know, it's it's it's about that time of year. Right? It is.   It is.   I was,   I did a little funny thing with mine today. I was down at, I was down visiting my wife in the hospital today. And, she's on a ward with all these really delightful elderly lady,   patients there.   Most of whom I may have mentioned are in there because they walk into things   or they fall over.   Note to everybody, don't fall over when you get old.   It's really brought it home to me. You go   you go very dark colour very very quickly and it's a big problem. So,   most of them are in there for that. But I had my orange glasses. I was going around and letting them try them on today.  

I think I sold 2 pairs or maybe I actually,   foolishly decided to give them away as a gift. I might order some pairs for them. Oh, these are very nice. I said, yeah, they are. It makes everything look like summer, so it's kind of cheers you up. Not that they're necessarily needed in the open air. They allow ultraviolet light through, which you need,   but they block all the blue light, which is also what you need. So there we go. If you value your eyes, and maybe we all ought to be doing that considering the amount of screen time we've got,   They're probably a worthwhile investment. They probably are.  



[00:23:14] Unknown:

Do you know what I'm sitting underneath   right now?  

[00:23:18] Unknown:

What what are you sitting underneath, Paul, right now? I don't know. How many guesses are you? My head. Yep. 3 feet above my head. An angle on a string.  

[00:23:26] Unknown:

No. No. No. No. No. 3 feet above my head is a 150   watt   infrared   heat lamp.   Just 150 watts. It's just like a little warm, you know, and I am I'm literally bathed in red light right now.  

[00:23:43] Unknown:

Fantastic. Oh, good.  

[00:23:45] Unknown:

Well, speaking of lights and spotlights and things like that,   as I probably mentioned to you chaps before, we have a returning guest this evening, mister mister  

[00:23:56] Unknown:

mister  

[00:23:59] Unknown:

As you can see, we've had our eye on you for some time now, mister Anderson. Anderson. Mister Anderson.   Mister Anderson.   Mister Anderson.   Mister Anderson.  

[00:24:15] Unknown:

Mister Anderson.  

[00:24:18] Unknown:

Mister Anderson.   And, I'd like you to know that our guest this evening is mister Anderson. And if I can just unmute him right now, he's gonna join us.   Oh, I can't where have he gone? There he is.   Well, that that buggered up my intro, didn't it? Look at that. Buggered it up. Where have he gone?   Mister Anderson.   I can't seem to add him to the chat. That's very strange. He's actually in the studio, but he he he can't be added. I thought I'd done that right now. Kick from the studio, banned from the studio, and I don't want to kick him all, but I can't seem to add add him in. Mister Anderson, if you can hear   us, could you, mister Anderson, if you could, maybe leave the room and come back in because for some let me just try and do this for some strange reason. I'm gonna have to restart the session here.  

Here we go. That was   you know what? That was going so well up until that point, wasn't it? Wasn't that going well? It really was. Oh, yes. It was. It was. It was really good.   Here we go.   There we go. I'm here.   Mister There he is. Anderson.   Hi. So, everybody,   welcome to the this is, this week's guest, Thomas Anderson.   Some of you may have tuned in for the shows we did, quite a while back now. In fact, I checked, maybe I don't know, quite a few months ago.   But, Thomas, it's good to have you back from your adventures in the matrix. How are you doing, sir?  

[00:25:44] Unknown:

I'm fine. Hello, mister English. Nice to be back. It's great. That's good.  

[00:25:49] Unknown:

And, we've had a few little chats in the run up to today's   show, and,   we, I've loosely termed the fact that we were going to talk about today   the legal status of, of Germany or the lawful status of Germany or the unlawful status of Germany, because it's something that you've just written something about recently,   about the actual   lawful, legal, illegal, unlawful status that Germany currently finds itself in.   So we're all ears   and ready to pitch in.  

[00:26:21] Unknown:

Perhaps we perhaps we should mention also the second topic we would like to talk about that that was framing.   The the, let's say, the the linguistic   weapon of mass destruction framing.  

[00:26:35] Unknown:

Framing.   So by framing, you mean   the misunderstanding   of words, that kind of thing?  

[00:26:43] Unknown:

I don't I don't mean the misunderstanding.   I mean the misuse, the the,   misuse   of of words   artificially created   to,   simply calm down people and and   so they keep their mouth shut.  

[00:27:00] Unknown:

Yes.   Like what? Give me one word that you're thinking of.  

[00:27:06] Unknown:

Like like, for example,   anti vaxxer   or a climate change denier or or or even better, climate denier.  

[00:27:15] Unknown:

Yes. Climate deniers are quite   quite fun, aren't they really?   As Oh, now we've got a little echo. Let me just see where it's coming from. Just hold on.   Where is that coming from?   Don't know where it's coming from. Never mind.   Yeah. Climate denier is   a ridiculous phrase, really. It's,   it's like denying that we've actually got weather. Is that what you're saying?  

[00:27:42] Unknown:

Yeah. Everybody who who's called a climate denier is is, of course,   most of the time, someone who   keeps telling the truth about certain topics. For for example, that there is a climate change, but it's not man made, and and and if he's speaking   these words, he is already   within the scope of   intelligence services, etcetera.  

[00:28:05] Unknown:

Yes.   Yes. Well, I'm not a climate denier.   Climate what's the other one? A climate change denier?   Do you want to hear what Al Gore has to say about this? You ready for a laugh to start off with? This is Al Gore. This is the man who invented the Internet. You remember Al Gore?  

[00:28:25] Unknown:

Listen to this. The climate crisis is a fossil fuel crisis, and the fossil fuel industry   is the wealthiest and most powerful industry in the history of the world. They   fight ferociously   to stop anything   that would in any way reduce the consumption   of fossil fuels.   And the they've proven they're way better at capturing politicians than capturing emissions. We need systemic   change. And, luckily, we now have the alternatives   that are better, cleaner, cheaper.   And so what we need are policies to accelerate   this transition, and that means we've got to to counter   the information warfare. I use the term, loosely. I I know. But it's kind of an information war being waged by the fossil fuel industry,   against the efforts to make these changes that are essential to safeguard the future of humanity. Do you think,  

[00:29:20] Unknown:

he he is right? Yeah. Well, in a way, he's   sort of right, but there's a little bar He he  

[00:29:30] Unknown:

well, he he's surely right. What what he makes of that is a completely different thing. But but, generally, he's speaking about   he's speaking about completely right. Fossil fuel is a problem,   not because it's it's not fossil, not not because it's not ending and there's no peak oil, but it's a never ending resource.   Nobody's talking about that, but but that's not the point.   We could have much cleaner energy,   and and the people tell us, yeah, buy yourself an electric car that that's totally clean. No. It's not.   The the ecological   footprint of a of a Tesla is is devastating,   and and it's much, much worse than than than the normal diesel or or petrol car.  

So when we are speaking about really clean energy, we might   need to speak about electric energy. Yes. But when we then take a look at history, then we find Nikola Tesla who had a car in in 1918, I I think it was,   an electric car working with electricity,   but without a battery.   He simply had an antenna on this car. He he drove at a speed of a 140   miles. That's   quite fast. Yes. And,   he didn't have to refuel it because it it ran from free energy.   So when we want to talk about clean energy, we should reduce   the topic of batteries because batteries   are big   problem. Because they're they're really   there there's a lot of waste because of all these batteries. They have to be exchanged after a certain   couple of years,   because they don't work anymore. And and,   of course that makes sense for the economy because you have to buy for it. And that's the point.  

The people,   they want the people to go to some kind of petrol station, or battery refill station,   or battery recharging station or battery exchange station. Wha whatever. They they they want the customers to come back and bring back their money again, again, again, again. No.   We we we shouldn't have that. When when we talk about   clean energy, and, which we should talk about free energy.   And there is free energy, but but we don't have the access to it.  

[00:31:44] Unknown:

Well, we're we're kind of denied. I mean, it's interesting. So   a climate   change denier is someone that stands in the way, you see, of this drive for electric cars.   Yet, as you've rightfully pointed out,   the,   the ecological   damage created by the manufacturer of these cars,   just in the manufacturing process alone, dwarfs   the so called harm that's attributed to the current combustion engines.   And I I heard something the other day. Lithium, of course, which is this   prime ingredient currently for   the battery technology of the day,   is the demand for it between now and   2,040. Over the next 15 years, it is expected to increase   40 fold.  

That's, what's that? 4000%   increase in the demand for lithium if these   complete   stupid people like Al Gore are allowed to continue to run around   with these stupid ideas that nobody wants.   I mean, I remember when Tesla's came out. Initially, they appeared to be very attractive, but you have to let you have to let the dust settle. And they're not electric cars. They're battery cars would be a much better way of   describing them because without the batteries, they're no good. And we've mentioned here before,   I think they're lethal in so many ways, and I think this must be part of the plan. They've designed they're designed to be lethal, particularly like in very simple accident situations,   which turn out to be hellishly difficult   to suppress. For example, if you were to inadvertently   drive your car into a river.  

This is very very bad. What with the doors all operating electrically, you're probably not going to get out unless you're armed with one of these pneumatic jackhammer things that can smash this bulletproof resistant glass. You're gonna drown in there. And the other I mean, there was a horrific thing that was reported,   I think it was last week. You know, someone in one of these Toyotas. Is that a Prius or something like that? A kind of hybrid car? They'd been struck by another car on the M6 over here. There'd been an absolute inferno, and everybody in, in this Prius that had been hit by the other car,   with the exception of one small child, poor bugger, who's 7. He lost his entire family. They were killed almost instantly because the inferno that that sprang up. These things are ridiculous. I'm not saying, of course, that,   fires in car accidents don't happen at all. There's that there's that horrific car what was it? The one in America where it was basically sort of like the Pinto.  

The Pinto was the great bomb on wheels, wasn't it? But these things are ludicrous.   And so   but this fits their model, doesn't it? Already, there will be futures and options market traders looking at lithium and taking positions on it. And they will now be in support   of the presence of electric cars because they will be financially exposed,   as it were, to the lithium market seeking to gain great gain from it with a technology that frankly is just crap.   I mean, it's absolutely crap, and we need to let everybody know just how crap it is. And people should not be buying these bloody things because, frankly, they're just crap,   aren't they?  



[00:34:58] Unknown:

Yeah. Hey, Paul.   Yeah. Paul. I do I just I just wanted to go on record as saying that the the whole thing about,   a   massive,   massive,   massive   lithium deposit being discovered   in the Appalachian   Mountains that just got   torn   to   bits Yeah.   By a hurricane.   Oh, that's complete conspiracy theory.  

[00:35:28] Unknown:

I think it's just a bad it's just one of those funny coincidences,   Paul, in history, you know, like like 911 and the Titanic and,   you know, there's not You mean the Olympic?   I mean the Olympic. Yeah.   But that's that's another story. I I like being surrounded by clever dicks. You're absolutely right.   We'll have to get John Hamer on here. By the way,   there's someone that we've not introduced yet because I didn't see that he was there. But, Eric,   I see that you're muted,   but you're also in the studio. Can you hear me? Good sir. And could you there. Eric, welcome to the show. How are you?  

[00:36:03] Unknown:

I'm very well. Thank you. And how are you?  

[00:36:06] Unknown:

We're fine. We're fine. You're in the same studio as our guest of honor this evening, mister Anderson. Excellent. So Thomas is in there with you.  

[00:36:15] Unknown:

Hello.   And, no. I've had a I've had a week of this, that, and the other, and too much this and that. But apart from that, I'm alright. You know? And,   how's your you've been talking about your Klingons with your with your leaves and things. Your leaves falling off the trees and things like that?   I think it was Patrick that's got Yes. Yeah, clingers, they're called. Yeah. Mhmm. Clingers, are they? Because, I I was going to say that it's too dirty to mention on the show, so I won't mention it. Alright. No worries at all. Star Trek,   Star Trek toilet paper that guarantees to get all the Klingons out. So there we go.  

But I won't decide not to mention it because it's too rude, you see. And   and, how's things with you, Patrick? Is, is it is winter started yet, or is it still autumn, or what's happened?  

[00:37:04] Unknown:

It's getting cold. We had some cold weather yesterday morning.   Not quite long, John, weather yet, but, getting there. Soon enough, I'll have to have a fire in the fireplace fire in the fireplace.  

[00:37:15] Unknown:

Oh, that's nice. They're trying to ban us having fires over here.   They're trying to stop you,   burning wood and things like that because of all this eco rubbish.   Yeah. Cool. I think they're gonna try,   well, I kinda think they're gonna try and chop down trees to stop us burning because,  

[00:37:33] Unknown:

what's happening And we won't have any wood to burn.  

[00:37:36] Unknown:

Correct. See? Think of their logic. But near where I'm,   I live, I'm gonna take a photograph of it.   There's these battery storage areas. There's a field.   I don't know if you got them in the states yet, where they're gonna have these, like, huge batteries about the size of a, shipping container.   And it's to store   energy for something that comes from solar or windmills or some ridiculous thing.   And we got a field full of them near where I live. Has anybody else noticed that in chat or where   you are in America  

[00:38:11] Unknown:

or in Germany? We   have we have places like that where they'll just take a farmer field and   just throw in these ugly looking solar panels all over the place and and say it's rolled for the green it's green thing. You know? It's like, well, you've taken away all the greenery by doing that. There's nothing left to look at that's any good.   It's what they're ugly. These things  

[00:38:34] Unknown:

these things are a mystery because there's no sun or solar panels or windmills nearby. So where the power is coming from, I do not know.   But they're gray, a sort of a miserable gray color.   And,   there's this huge well, it wasn't that huge, but it's a large large field full of them.   They look pretty creepy. They're they're not nice. I'll tell you that. Have you seen any of them down your throat?   Have you got any down where you are, Paul?  

[00:39:03] Unknown:

I'm not aware of them. No. What what what which bit particularly?   The windmills   or what?  

[00:39:11] Unknown:

Well, no. There's no windmills or solar panels as far as I know around here. But these are the storage in batteries.  

[00:39:18] Unknown:

No. We don't have any of that. We've just got we've got £14,100,000,000   worth of wind farms stuck   in the middle of the sea. Well, when I say the middle, it's about 2 miles out. They're hideous and useless.   And,   they're hideous and useless. That's all you can really say for them, really.   Thomas,   in in Germany,   you guys, a few years ago, were sort of keen on, on wind power. Is that still the case over there?  

[00:39:46] Unknown:

Unfortunately, yes.   We start to get   to the point where where there's no land left to to place any windmill. And,   on top comes the the first windmills now in the age of, let's say, around 18, 20, 22 years.   And and that's the end of their lifetime. And   the this   there's a very big problem of recycling,   because nobody wants   to have those old rotor blades because nobody knows what to do with them.   The best solution   the   extremely intelligent   engineers   came up with is burning them. And and there's a company in the near of Bremen in the north of Germany who burns   those blades,   and they have a capacity of around 4,000   tons. I think I remember it right. 4,000 tons a year.  

And the actual amount of waste is now,   I think, a little bit less than 20,000 tons.   And it's getting more every month.   So we are running into a very big problem there. There is, of course, a technology which which would be able to to do all that, but but there's no financing for for this thing. What technology would that be, Thomas?   That would be,   I I hope I can find the right the the correct English term. It's it's,   the cam camocatalytical   cracking or something like that.  

[00:41:17] Unknown:

That sounded right. It's,  

[00:41:21] Unknown:

you heat it up   under a vacuum   and then you oil it.   And it's basically like a like a refinery.   So you you can   make gas oil out of this   trash, out of the old rotor blades.  

[00:41:39] Unknown:

Oh, wow. Well, that's good. I mean, the one that I'm particularly keen on   is, and I still don't understand why we don't have this, is well, I do actually.   It's because,   like you were mentioning earlier, it's a regular theme, but we we need to keep repeating it.   Because free energy would mean that they can't put a petrol pump attendant between you and driving your car, because they can't administer the fuel to you because you can just go to it direct. It's not very attractive to them. But the fuel that I'm particularly keen on is water,   particularly,   through electrolysis and splitting it into hydrogen. So the fuel I'm particularly keen on is hydrogen   that you can get from water. And if anybody's looked   around on planet Earth, or plain Earth for people that don't do the globe thing,   there's quite a bit of water down here. I've noticed this quite a bit.  

And it would seem to me I mean, I've mentioned   well, I've thought for years, you know, you think, well, if I get some money, I'm gonna buy really this is the car that I wanna get. That's the kind of the boys' thing. I'm kind of past all that, or at least I think I am. Maybe if I had a huge wad in my pocket, I might go, yes, I do need to buy a Ferrari and be one of those middle aged old farts   pounding around in it pretending that I'm 25 again, which would be a bit stupid.   But you do see that sort of thing going on. But I'd be very keen on getting an old Volvo that's all mechanical, mechanical window winders, and having somebody convert the diesel   to just run on   water.  

Now   now doesn't that sort of help Al Gore out in the World Economic Forum and all these people? I mean, it seems to me that that would answer all their problems, or am I just being childish, simplistic, naive, and stupid all at the same time?  

[00:43:26] Unknown:

Maybe. Maybe.   Well, we we listen to Al Gore. You put some audio in from from El Gorr. And, basically, what he said there,   all is correct. I I I'm with that in every single word.   However,   El Gorr is the one who who brought up this,   CO   2 hoax and   and and and told the world that CO 2 is very bad for us   and that produces a lot of heat on on this planet, and we are now close to the cooking.   And,   we we have to cool down somehow.   We have to get rid of CO 2. Well,   that's that's nonsense.   The world is running on CO 2. The the plants need it. And and and when when the plants are happy, we are happy because the plants produce more oxygen for us.  

[00:44:10] Unknown:

Yeah. There's a thing, you know, called I haven't got a website here, but there's anybody could look it up called the CO 2 Coalition,   the Carbon   dioxide Coalition.   It seems as though I mean, they're right in what they're saying. But,   they're a bit tame in the way that they they put their arguments forward. They're a bit too reasonable for my taste. But they're they're saying exactly that. There is no carbon dioxide crisis. Actually, there's not enough carbon dioxide is what I hear from many scientists. We're actually We've got the lightest load of carbon dioxide we've had for a long time.   And, you know, the the only thing is, when he talks about when he said in that clip about a fossil fuel crisis,   well,   it's probably not fossils.  

That's my take. So what is it? Abiotic oil theory is the one that I would subscribe to. It's like a natural   sap that the Earth is producing all the time. There's just   colossal quantities of oil. And apparently, these oil wells, when they go back to them, they've all replenished   abiotic fluid, I think it's called, or something like that.   So, and I I understand that the Rockefellers were involved in coining the phrase or trying to get this word fossil fuel, coming back to your thing about words,   which is a key thing here. We come we come on to words quite regularly here because they're the key sort of starting point of all the tomfoolery and the deception.   But Rockefeller said, call it fossil fuels because that was the idea of of creating the idea that it would run out. And therefore, you had to go to standard oil because they were organized, and they were gonna, you know, provide you with all the oil that you needed. Now oil is needed in   manufacturing,   and it's great stuff. Engineers need oil for machine parts and all that kind of stuff, but as a fuel?  

I don't think so. I don't think we really need it as a fuel, and there have been so many other fuels that are better than that. I mean, Ford fueled all his cars on hemp. He grew hemp and and distilled it, didn't he, into some kind of a whatever it was, and actually ran them on hemp fuel, made them out of hemp.   So   all the answers to all their questions have already been discovered, and they killed them off then. So I think we can say safely that this has nothing to do about following the science,   because there's a complete lack of it. And, you know, it's difficult for Al Gore really to,   to be taken too seriously,   particularly given as he was the man that invented the Internet, you know, which is really quite a thing.  

And yet since then, his track record's pretty poor. He seems to get everything wrong.   I mean, we've always viewed Germany, or I have anyway, as being sort of kind of very keen on advanced environmental   fuel systems, that kind of thing. Of course,   you've got this   actually, that's what another thing I was just thinking in terms of just the the state of Germany right now. What's situation with the car manufacturers?   Because is it Volkswagen that are about to lay off,   supposedly,   a large part of the workforce or the the demand for their cars is nose diving or something to that effect? What's the what's the sort of story and mood over there in Germany with regards to Volkswagen, etcetera?  

[00:47:06] Unknown:

Well, in Germany, they had, of course, the the big marketing campaigns for the electric cars,   and,   the government   brought out some some   premiums.   When you buy an electric car, you get 4,000 cash, 10,000 cash, whatever. Mhmm. And,   that didn't have the success they they expected.   So the the sales numbers are are not as good as expected, and there are a lot   of brand new cars   somewhere parked   in in wherever in Germany,   brand new cars with which nobody wants to have and nobody wants to buy. And so they are in a in a kind of crisis because of that. And and, of course,   the the manufacturing,   facilities,   have to,   let's say, slow down   massively   or even shut down.  

Yeah. Now coming back to to Al Gore,   we we talked about c o 2. Perhaps for for the for the listeners,   it it it might be interesting that when when that it hears certain numbers, which   you mentioned that that some people say there there's not enough c o 2.   When you take a look at very old scientific books,   encyclopedia,   lexica, whatever whatever,   when you go back to to 1800   and what let's say 1880,   you find the same numbers as as as you will find them today in in in real scientific papers.   The the amount of c o two in our atmosphere is   0.004%.  



[00:48:40] Unknown:

That's too much.  

[00:48:44] Unknown:

And and out of these 0.004%,   we are responsible   if if you take those 0.004%   as a 100%, we are responsible for 3%.   So   when we reduce those   3% we are responsible for by 10%, we are talking about   0.00000.   I don't know how many zeros there are, but but we are talking about a very small part.   And,   when when they sometimes   come up with   a number   that they say that CO2 has risen from 0.003   to 0.004   or   perhaps became less, whatever.   These two numbers   are still on the papers. And when you read it right, it's simply the difference be   between the percentage in volume and between the percentage in weight.  

The percentage in weight is 0.004.   The percentage in volume is 0.003.   So if somebody uses these numbers, if he if he even knows them, then that's already a good thing. But if he uses this those numbers, he uses them mostly in the wrong way.   And, those numbers are still the same. It it has nothing nothing has changed.   The numbers are the same as a 100 years ago and and as a 1000 years ago.  

[00:50:10] Unknown:

I mean, another thing that hasn't changed is that the   certain members of the scientific community are easily bought off to come out with this guff to support this non idea. Are they not? We've had it for a long time. You get it in the weather circles, they just talk bilge all the time.   And just going back to this sort of use of words and trigger words and misunderstanding   and how people sort of glom on to these things.   If we go back to the sort of COVID thing,   of course, we're all aware that vast swathes of people blithely just went along with what they were told by the talking heads from supposedly the all knowing government, you know, that's the way they perceived it,   and did terrible things to themselves and their relatives   by getting jabbed and God knows what else that happened to them.  

So you think, well, that's just a disease   that infects   the plebs, oslot, the peasants. Right? But it's not.   The the middle management of this country   is also infused with the same stupidity, particularly when it comes to this climate stuff. They blithely follow along. I saw something   recently, some local council, I can't remember where it was, here in the UK. The guy, maybe it's down in Cornwall or Dorset or somewhere like that,   was saying that they were planning to become the first zero emissions or 0, you know, 0 rated pollutant free county in England   by 2,030.  

And you look at the guy that's saying this, and you're just thinking,   can you think? And the answer has to be no.   The answer has to be no. These people cannot think. It seems to me there's a thinking crisis first before there's anything else because this seems to apply to every field of endeavor.   We've got people   who have lost   touch with their own ability to decide things.   Then no one's doing it. It's actually got to such a compliant state   of,   pathetic obedience   to nonsense ideas.   And you know, I don't know whether it's evil. We we we throw that word around and it and it is evil in terms of of what's taking place. But maybe what's more scary is an attack of the stupid.   It's stupidity,   that seems to be the growing disease. It's the number one. There's too much stupidity in the world, not too much carbon dioxide.  

And we need something to reduce the amount of stupidity.   Then we might be able to, you know, assist people to actually see what is actually occurring, as opposed to what they're realising, or dreaming, or envisioning, you know. And I guess the governments have to,   whether they do it knowingly or not, they're continually in the drama production business,   are they not? They have to create   these stories, these anxiety   stories all the time,   which work to keep the people distracted,   depressed as it were, or a lack of aliveness,   concerned and anxious about their futures, because the planet the planet the planet or the plane the plane the plane, you know.  

What's gonna go on? We need the government to save us. They're continually   in this process of creating a demand   for their caring services.   We're going to look after   you. And it's, you know, it's that old thing, with friends like like this, who needs enemies?   So I mean all these things are intertwined. So they're just as stupid,   as everybody else. It's just that, I guess, because they have the media behind them,   which is definitely the case, they're able to convince huge numbers of people that, well, everybody agrees with this chap, you know. Is there obviously is too much carbon dioxide. People just assume that that's the case   because they've got out of the habit of actually questioning things   themselves   directly. Unlike   all the reprobates here, and most of the reprobates in Rumble, and all you reprobates out there listening on WBN and elsewhere.  

Most of you are asking questions.  

[00:53:54] Unknown:

Have you heard of Technocracy   Incorporated?   Sorry. I just No. Technocracy Incorporated. No, Patrick. What is Yeah. It was a What is that? It was a movement in the the twenties and the thirties to basically make it so that instead of politicians, we had scientists   guiding everybody  

[00:54:11] Unknown:

and governments.  

[00:54:12] Unknown:

But it's, it's,   the guy who's helped start it was, working for one of these big oil companies and coined the term fossil fuels.   And, I was   also,   Elon Musk's grandfather   was part of the movement   up in Canada.  

[00:54:31] Unknown:

Right. So Now I had heard that. Tidbit. Alright. That's a good tidbit.   Yeah. I mean, how do you find people of integrity   to sit in these power centres,   who have not been corrupted by,   money or, in most cases, now something far worse?   They they are corrupted   by many of them by something far worse,   that's been going on with you only have to look at the calibre of the individuals that come forward and end up in these positions of so called political power.   To know, I would say this of just about every nation,   that none of them are the best that that nation could provide. Not one of them.  

None of them.   And yet, here we are being governed by these people.   Are there I mean, in in Germany,   Thomas, are there   are there organisations and movements   thoroughly against electric cars? And are there organisation movements trying to propose something   like water cars?   And if there are, have they been shot yet? You know?  

[00:55:35] Unknown:

I I know personally a guy who who who has managed to drive his car on water.   Of course, you there there's   no financial success, no no economical success with him.   Of course, there's no no official   government entity   taking care of that. They all want to to go the the way you mentioned before with with which would be hydrogen,   because hydrogen again would be,   a way to get the people going to some kind of petrol station,   or or hydrogen station   in in this case and and to somehow refuel their car. I'm still of the opinion   that that if we   want to talk about clean energy, we should talk about free energy. And and and when we talk about free energy, why not electric energy? When when we can get this electric energy with an antenna into our car, oh, great. Nice.  

Nice idea. And it was there already with Nikola Tesla in in 1918.   So we could have that anytime. It's it's old school technology.   It's nothing new.  

[00:56:42] Unknown:

Well, Eric Eric was on here the other week. He's on here right now. And Eric was up with,   in fact, I mentioned this to you, Thomas,   before it happened. We had some Italian electric vegetable farmers over here, didn't we, Eric, that you were up with a couple of weeks ago? That's right. That's right. Yes. We had lectured cucumbers a lot. Yeah. Yep.   And they're doing exactly what you're saying, except for transportation. And I think you know about this, don't you,   mister Anderson? They,   they're using it to grow   vegetables way beyond their natural size.  

Enormous vegetables, which some of the English are very interested in large vegetables.   We ought to be. We've been electing them for 1000 of years as to governors, but,   that's what's been going on. I've got a close affinity with a very large stupid vegetable.   Yes. And,   but yeah. So I I that's a similar thing. They they're talking about using, I don't know, steel antennas and copper wires in the ground, and it's quite precise to get it going.   But, I mean, the Tesla story I'm familiar with is the one   the journalist that interviewed him, I think it's about 1934,   something like that. Early thirties,   and he he he he drew up in a packard, or they he had a packard that had been converted   to basically suck the energy out of the ether   and just run around forever on it. So, I mean,   why don't we do that? Of course, they would probably tell us, oh, there's going to be an energy in the atmosphere crisis.  

There'll be one of those. There'll always be a crisis because they'll look for where they can create the fiction that there is one. Because that's what they always do, it seems to   me. That there is one. Because that's what they always do, it seems to me. Yeah. It's all gone. That's basically the point. Yeah. We we are all   still online. But  

[00:58:27] Unknown:

we we talk so much that we didn't find a way to answer.  

[00:58:32] Unknown:

I'll be quiet now. Go on. Say a few things then. That's fine. Okay.  

[00:58:36] Unknown:

Yeah. But well well, I I I guess,   when you you talked about a problem,   the problem of stupidity.   I'm with you. That stupidity is a big problem. But,   when we take a look at at the corona   or COVID   pandemic, pandemic, whatever, scandemic, you call it,   we have a lot of very intelligent people,   who   got their   vaccination,   who thought it was a good thing.   Yeah. Some of them, meanwhile,   have changed their opinion and say, well, it might be that I did something wrong, or,   maybe it was not such a good thing.   But but still, they are very intelligent.   And,   however,   they came to a different conclusion than than   you came to 1 and and and and Icloud came to. So   we decided it it was not a good thing. They decided it was a good thing.  

And I think that the   scientific method of framing,   has   a very,   big   importance,   when when when we look at such situations.   Yes. When when for example, when we take the word anti vaxxer,   this word was used for for all those people who were telling the other ones, don't get the jab. Don't don't take it. Don't take it. Don't take it.   This word was used to to calm them down, to to let them   keep their mouth shut   because they they should be afraid of of losing   their their   financial,   situation,   their financial advantages, their their economical situation should be at risk.   They should have a lot of disadvantages   when when you were named,   with this word. And and   the the people who were named act anti anti vaxxers,   they were afraid.  

It's simply true.   So they kept their mouth shut.   It would work. It worked great.   And on the other side, the people who use these words   and and probably,   read those words on the newspapers   and entered this frame set and and and   and then carried on using these words and and talk to the friendly ad that what he's an anti vaxxer too. He's an anti vaxxer.   When you are using such,   frame sets, you're automatically   doomed to use the arguments   given   to this frameset.   So when you when you talk about anti vaxes,   you automatically   enter a world of arguments   which was set up   by your enemies.  

And,   for example, when you talk about anti vaxxers, you   automatically   deny   that those people might not be against vaccination   but only be against this vaccination.   Maybe they are not generally against vaccinations.   Maybe they they perhaps like the idea of of of the,   let's say, the the mechanical   the the   medical   background of of the topic of vaccination. That means you get   an old type of   virus   or   other thing.   You make it,   inactive,   and you introduce this particle to your body so that your immune system,   starts to to learn how this particle looks like and then can later on,   react faster   on on an infection with this illness.  

That that sounds logic to me.   So I would call myself not an anti vaxxer,   but I would call myself an anti m   mRNA   vaxxer,   if if you might use this new word. Yes.   And and and I'm also against,   all these very modern   vaccinations,   which contain   aluminum,   quicksilver,   mercury,   and and and other very poisonous parts.   I'm against this.   But   the reason why they're using the simple word anti vaxxer or in German, it would be   There there are many, many different words   to,   disinform people and to to keep them away and and to to push those   thinking people into a certain not very pleasant corner,   to to get their business running and and,   do whatever they want to do with the people. Yeah. So framesets,   like anti Vexa or antisemite,   or or climate change denier   are used   to to somehow ensure that their business is running, their c o two certificates are sold well,   and and and they can do whatever they want up there in the government area.  



[01:03:35] Unknown:

Yep. I agree with all of that. It's absolutely the case. There'll be some new words coming along to describe the next sort of crisis that they're creating, the next story lines. It's just it's like a story line production system.   Anyway,   just hold whatever thoughts you've got at the moment.   We've just gone past the top of the hour, so it's time for a song. You're listening to Paul English live here on WBN 324, another assorted networks.   We have an appropriate song here regarding an old form of energy, and we'll be back after this.  

[01:04:18] Unknown:

Hey. I'm just an old chunk of coal,   but I'm gonna be a diamond   someday.   I'm gonna grow and glow till I'm so blue, pure   perfect.   I'm gonna put a smile on everybody's   face.   I'm gonna kneel and pray   every day,   unless I should be coming on the way.   I'm just an old chump of coal   now,   find a better way to talk.   I'm gonna spit   and polish my rough edge   self.   Can I get rid of every single flaw?   I'm gonna be the world's   best friend.   I'm gonna go around shakin' everybody's   hand.   Hey. I'm gonna be the cotton   picking rage   of the age.   I'm gonna be   a diamond   someday.  

Now I'm just an old chunk of coal,   but I'm gonna be   a diamond   someday.   Every day   unless I should be complaining   along the way.   Hey, I'm just an old chunk of coal   now,  

[01:07:37] Unknown:

34 radio.  

[01:07:41] Unknown:

Attention all listeners. Are you seeking uninterrupted   access to WBN 324   talk radio despite incoming censorship hurdles?   Well, it's a breeze. Just grab and download opera browser, then type in wbn324.zil,   and stay tuned for unfiltered discussions around the clock. That's wbn324.zil.  

[01:08:04] Unknown:

The views, opinions, and content of the show host and their guests appearing on the World Broadcasting Network   are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of its owners,   partners, and other hosts or this network.   Thank you for listening to WBN 324 Talk Radio.  

[01:08:21] Unknown:

And welcome back to, well, slightly less than hour 2. It's just gone 7 minutes past 9 here in the UK, 7 minutes past 4,   US Eastern Time. You're listening to Paul English Live here on WBN 324. We're here every Thursday, 3 till 5 US Eastern,   8 till 10   UK time,   and we'll be sticking to that. I don't know what happens with the clock changes   actually, with WBN. I think it might affect the US Eastern Time because I think the base time for WBN is UK GMT or whatever it's currently is or British summertime or British wintertime or bafflingly   complicated stuff.  

Of course, it's all a bit of a nonsense anyway,   isn't it, mister Anderson? Because the second,   is is not what it used to be. That's I remember that big discussion we had about the length of the second some time ago.  

[01:09:12] Unknown:

Yeah. It's already   half a year   ago. I don't remember it right. It is. Right.   Yeah.   I think when you're interested or when the listeners are interested in in   the Earth's original   second length,   then they should listen to to   I think it's online on Rumble, the old archive sessions.  

[01:09:35] Unknown:

Yes. If you've got a few seconds there to find out what it is about the second, then it's worth a second listening. I did quite well there, didn't I? Oh.   You see what I did there? I did that. I just did that. Just my  

[01:09:48] Unknown:

go on. Yes. We can. Perhaps we can. Let's Perhaps perhaps we can go on to our next topic, our first topic, actually. That will be the legal status of Germany.  

[01:09:59] Unknown:

Yes, please. Let's go on to that. Okay.  

[01:10:02] Unknown:

Okay.   Perhaps,   I I   should introduce the topic generally.   The legal status of a country,   should be a real easy thing to talk about. There should be a country. There should be borders.   There should be a constitution.   There could be,   some some laws, and there should be   a high court.   All these, let's say,   quite simple tasks for for for a real country.   In Germany, we have a slightly different situation. And meanwhile, since already decades,   many countries in the European Union   are in the same   confusing   state of   of of legal issues.   I would like to to to to introduce you to to the legal status of Germany, because I am German.  

So I know those things well.   I know that I hope that there are some listeners still online from the Alex Jones show.   Perhaps there is someone among them   who might know something about France or Spain or Italy   because   the legal situation there is a little bit different than Germany.   However, they have the same problem.   The problem here is   there is no country   called Germany.   When we take a look at the map of Europe, we see a very big portion of Central Europe, which is called Germany.   But, of course,   Germany is is not the real legal name. The legal name today would be Federal Republic of Germany.   This is what they are telling you.  

And   in 1990,   the situation was slightly different. There, we had 2 German countries. The one was called for Republic   of Germany, and the other one, the eastern part, the so called eastern part was called German Democratic Republic.   We all, the the oldest among us,   remember it very well. There was the so called Iron Curtain,   the border between Eastern Germany and and Western Germany.   The the Soviet Union on on the on the right side, on the eastern side, and and the the US,   biased   bloc on the western side. Yeah.   After the war, in 1945,   we had   still the the so called Deutsches Reich,   the the German Empire,   in the borders of   1973.  

No. No. 1937.   Sorry. 1937,   which   which included   not only the western part, the western Germany part, and and the so called eastern German part, but also the the part which is,   since then governed by Poland,   which should be called eastern Germany.   The the so called Eastern German part, which we used to to use the name for the the German Democratic Republic, was in that time called Middle Germany because it was the middle, the center part of Germany. Right.   So in 19 in 1948,   the German the Federal Republic of German Germany was created,   by the Western bloc, and the German Democratic   Republic was created by the Eastern bloc. The German Democratic Republic   got a constitution,   and   the Federal Republic of Germany got a basic law. In German, it's the word is Grundgesetz.  

The Grundgesetz,   the basic law, is is not called a constitution, and it is not a constitution. Although many Germans still believe today that they have a constitution,   and this constitution is called basic law. But when they would read this basic law in the last article, the article a   146,   this phrase is stated that that this basic law loses   its its validation,   at the at the same moment when the German people   give will give themselves a constitution.   So we have to ask ourselves,   this,   question that this is a rather simple question. Why is the basic law not a constitution? Why is the basic law a basic law? Why is it called a basic law? This leads back to the,   the,   It it's called, the   the rules of war.  

I don't know the English term for for this, law. It it's it's   was decided how to to do war.   May you shoot an enemy when he has no uniform?   If you don't wear a uniform, may you shoot a a foreign soldier?   And   and and all these   very   simple situations of of war were discussed within this law. And and there was also a phrase, what do you do when you when you occupy   a country, a foreign country?   Then you have to take care for people who live there, and you have to take care that that law and order is is kept up on a daily basis.   And because the country is occupied, there is no constitution,   so you have to give them a Basic Law.  

This is the reason why the German Grundgesetz Basic Law is called Basic Law, because Germany   was and is an occupied country with a Basic Law. We don't have a constitution.   And for the people who might now say why Germany is is not an occupied country anymore,   please take a look at Germany. We have   US American troops. We have British troops. We have French French troops,   and we have already some other troops there or still some other troops there. So, basically, Germany is an occupied country, and we are not sovereign.   And   and some German politicians   in in the past spoke that out very clearly that   that sovereignty   was never   a goal   or   a target   idea for for this, Federal Republic of Germany.  

So coming back to the real point, the the legal situation of Germany. Of course, the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany on the western part of the German Empire, and the creation of the German Democratic   Republic,   of Germany in the middle part of the German Empire,   and the Polish   government,   for the eastern part of Germany was legally correct. It is an occupied country. The the the Polish government got the the duty   to govern,   this this eastern part for whatever   time.  

[01:16:57] Unknown:

Mhmm.  

[01:16:58] Unknown:

And,   the   German Democratic Republic got their constitution, so so they were a real country with a constitution.   And this this, let's say,   provisional,   economical   area of Federal Republic of Germany   existed legally under this basic law, and and everything was okay.   Now in   1990,   we had this so called reunification   of 2 German states, and everyone   celebrated this as the final   reunion   of all Germans   in one German country.   By that, they forgot the eastern part.   By that, they   forgot that there might be some some legal problems with with the details in it. What they try to sell us   legally today is that on the 3rd October in 1990,   the day,   of of this this contract,   the German Democratic Republic,   a state with a constitution and a territory,   joined the scope of application of the basic law of the Federal Republic of Germany on the basis of article 23.  

This article 23 in the German Basic Law used to state that this Basic Law,   is valid in German countries like Luxembourg,   Saxony   Lower Saxony and and,   Bavaria, etcetera. So they they   named the the former western   part of Germany,   where this basic law applies to, and   the the eastern part of Germany   could join this scope of of an application of the this basic law whenever they want to do so.   And on   this,   3rd October, this German Democratic Republic with a constitution and territory   joined the scope of this article 23.   The problem is that this article 23   was deleted   from the German Basic Law 2 weeks before this 3rd October 1990.  

Now you may ask,   that that that sounds a bit like a problem when when an article is deleted and and later it is used   to to let another country join this basic law. And and how does this all fit together?   When you do a simple research   with Google for the Grundgesetz, for the basic law, and article 23, you will find the the old version   before 1990,   and you will find   that it   was deleted or it it was deleted.   It is already difficult to find this word,   because it was exchanged   to another article   that has the same number but a completely different content   to confuse the people reading it.  

The thing is that on the,   conference   in in Paris in on 17th   September in 1990,   the foreign ministers   of Russia   and the United States and France and Britain   met to discuss   the situation   and and the future of Germany.   And on this   conference,   James Baker, who was foreign minister of the United States and high commissioner of the expeditionary   supreme headquarters of the the, allied forces of World War 2,   used his powers as being this high commissioner   to simply tell the German government that he hereby deletes article 23 of the Basic Law.   Nobody will tell you this in open public in Germany. Nobody,   will will give you any access to any written source about this.  

However,   in the German Basic Law   printed in 1990, you will find on the last pages   the list of changes to the Basic Law. And there, you will find that article 23 was deleted on the 23rd   September   1990.   There's no reason,   written on on these last pages. They're they're simply written. It it was deleted.   Nothing else.   And   2 years later, the same Grundgesetz, the same basic law printed 2 years later, doesn't mention the deletion, but mentions   another article 23, which talks about the United Nations,   the European Union, and and coming together, etcetera.   So it's it's it's very confusing when we are talking about these these legal details, but but the simple fact is the article   23   on which the German Democratic Republic joined   the the Federal Republic of Germany on the 3rd October 1990   wasn't there anymore.  

So this contract   basically,   is not valid.   The second point now even gets   it's getting more confusing.   On this same   17th   of September in 1990, on the same conference in Paris,   Eduard Shevardnadze,   at that time, foreign minister of,   the union.   Yeah.   He he also,   being a high commissioner of of the allied forces of World War 2, and and he   used his power   to take the,   the printed original constitution of the German Democratic Republic.   He stood up   and ripped this piece of paper into 2 pieces.   Thereby,   the constitution of the German Democratic Republic   was deleted.  

It was destroyed.   So   we have a situation   where on 17th   September   1990,   a German Democratic Republic   ceased to exist because   the constitution was destroyed.   On the same day,   the article 23 of the German Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany was deleted, which means   the Basic Law doesn't apply to any area   because this article   where where where where it was written, where it applies to on on to which areas was deleted.   So something   the the the Federal Republic of Germany,   which has basic law, which doesn't apply to any area,   something which doesn't have an area,   gave an article which was deleted   to a country which doesn't exist anymore because the constitution was destroyed. And then 2 weeks later, they put all this together   And do what?  

It it's it's a situation of of only thin air.   Everything   what is sold to us as history   as being a valid contract   is a lie.   And when you're talking about this in in Germany,   you are called, of course, very you are named very bad words, like like Schrobler or Reichsburger   or whatever,   or extreme   far right wing extremists,   and and   and you name it. Very bad. Nazi, of course. Yeah. Very bad.   But it it's a very simple question, and everybody who is interested   of   the Federal Republic of Germany doesn't have an area of existence.   The German Democratic Republic,   which joined the Federal Republic of Germany,   ceased to exist in 1990,   and,   the still   Polish governed area of former Eastern Germany,   are also out there. So when you take another deep look   at the the basic law, you will find another article. I I think it was in article 116,   who is German.  

And there it is written, still now today, that German is whoever   is born   or has found shelter   in the area of Germany in the borders of the,   twin of of the   31st   December   of 1937.   This this these are the borders of the German   Empire.   This is the the definition   of being German today.   This includes   Yeah. The western part, middle part, and eastern part on the Polish government.   So, basically, when we are talking about Germans, we are talking about 50%   Polish   people today.   50% of Poland is is German.   This this is what is written in the German basic law today,   which, anyway, doesn't apply to any area. But but, however, it's written there.  

So all these legal problems,   which you are not allowed to   to pose any question in Germany,   are there. They are there. Easy to find. Everybody can can read this,   for themselves.   And we have to ask ourselves,   what do we live in here today?   Now, what is the problem with with Germany?   Maybe,   this may be the same the problem in in, France or Spain or Italy,   because there's another point of of importance.   When we look back in history, when you look old videos, you will find that German police   used to have green uniforms.   That that might  

[01:27:08] Unknown:

Or in the 19 thirties?  

[01:27:11] Unknown:

No. In   the 19 sixties, seventies, eighties.   Right. Just simply look back, they had green uniforms.   Suddenly, in shortly after 1990,   they switched to black uniforms.   Okay. Another question of color is,   in the former years, before 1990,   the   oh, it is red  

[01:27:39] Unknown:

after 1990. You kinda broke up there. What was red? You just broke up at that point. What was red?  

[01:27:45] Unknown:

The passport.   Right. The German passport used to be green, and it is now red. The same applies   to Italian passports, Spanish passports, and French passports.   They are all red today. So what what is the matter of importance here?   Here? Some people might think this is all simply a question of design.   When you take a look at at the uniforms,   green uniforms   mean this is   terrestrial   forces that is like police or   or whatever land forces you have. It's it's green uniforms.   When you're talking about black uniforms, you're talking about private entities.   Right. So why do the why does   why does the police now in Germany has black uniforms   since then?  

When you're talking about passport colors,   I learned that whenever you have a red passport,   you are,   you have a passport of a private entity, of a company.   Whenever you have a green passport or a provisional   country. Whenever you have a green passport,   you have a country, a real country, but it is not, sovereign.   And whenever you have a black passport,   you have a passport of a sovereign country.   So now take a look at the passport colors worldwide, and you will find lots of red passports everywhere.  

[01:29:13] Unknown:

Oh, above blue. Maybe I'm sorry.   Ours ours in the United States is a dark blue.  

[01:29:19] Unknown:

Is that any significant   I I I am I am not I am not a professional within the these color questions. I I Sure. I know that Russia  

[01:29:28] Unknown:

Russia has red Russia has a red passport   Current. Yeah.  

[01:29:34] Unknown:

It's I think it's probably very important. I know that,   when we joined the European   Union,   the passports here changed. They became red.   However,   after the glorious Brexit of 2016,   is it? Whenever it was,   they became black,   and I have now got a black passport. This is because they used to be black   prior   to the European Union debacle   and now they're back to being black. And at the time, we were told over here, it's because so many British people wanted them to be black.   Well, me being an obstreperous British type, I wanted it to be black too, without fully knowing exactly what it means. Maybe it means that the passport is controlled by a private force.   But then, I've kind of thought that about most of the nation anyway, for most of its history. It just masquerades as a government, and it really is a private force in many ways.  

So what color passports do you what color passport do you have right now then?   You mean me, Thomas? Yes. I mean you personally. Yeah.  

[01:30:45] Unknown:

It's a German passport. It's red. Okay.  

[01:30:49] Unknown:

Wow. So I have a question for you, Thomas. And now   Yeah. So I I I just wanted to mention that the the Soviet the supreme Soviet,   they disbanded   and they abolished themselves in 1991, and I think it was December.   Now what is the significance of that with Germany,   melding together into this,   you know,   constitutionalist   conglomerate?  

[01:31:14] Unknown:

Well,   I I come to this   just in a second.   I would love to add something about the passports.   When you take a look at your passport, it's also of importance how your name is written.   If if your name is written in in capital letters only,   that it's different. It makes a difference to to those passports   where the name is written with capital   starting letters and and then in small letters   for the rest of the name. For example, the the the Swiss passports,   I have I have looked at them.   They start with a capital letter for for the first letter in your name and then go on in small letters.   The principle the legal principle behind this is an old legal Roman principle called Capitis diminutio Maxima.  

That that means   when you write your name in only small letters, in small letters only,   you are   a a human being with full rights.   When you start writing your name with a capital letter and then go on in small letters,   you have,   not every rights of a human. You are not fully enriated, but you you have given up some,   rights. For example, you are   a citizen of   a country,   and therefore, you have to pay taxes.   So   you you gave away some some of your freedoms.   When you write your name in capital letters only, you are not a human being, but you are a company.  

[01:32:54] Unknown:

I've  

[01:32:55] Unknown:

heard that before. So when you now all caps. Now when you now when you now take a look at your passport,   Paul,   how how is the the the black British passport now? Is is your   name written in capital letters only or in small letters?  

[01:33:11] Unknown:

I well, I could go and grab it. It's about 10 yards away. You I think I know where it is. I've just moved it off of this desk about a week ago in a great tidy up. Carry on talking. I'll be back in half a minute.  

[01:33:22] Unknown:

Okay.   So now now we could, come back to the to the Russian situation.   The Russians   basically   offered in   1989   to the German government to give back   every   occupied   German area to the German government without any condition.   So we are talking about East Pressure that is now   Kaliningrad,   formerly named   Konigsberg,   and they wanted to give everything back to Germany,   also the the Polish government part, the the the eastern part of Germany,   to to the Germans.   And the former government,   ruled by Helmut Kohl at that time as the chancellor of Germany,   denied that.  

They told the Russians, no, we don't want that.   Of course, they didn't ask the Germans.   They simply said that.   And the Russians didn't understand that, and the Russians   then,   began to,   discuss with the German government,   what to do with Germany and how to leave,   the German Democratic Republic. There were a lot of   Soviet soldiers   stationed there in in in,   the German Democratic Republic,   and when they all had to go back to the Soviet Union,   there could there was a foreseeable problem with jobs and and how to earn money, where to live, where's the houses,   how to buy food, etcetera.  

So there was a German,   a lawyer   in in southern Germany   who who got the the order to go to Moscow and discuss with the Russian government,   the contract   of,   this,   pulling back the the the Russian forces from from eastern Germany.   He got back after several weeks or even months of discussion   and had a very, very long and detailed contract,   which he gave then to Helmut Kohl,   the time German chancellor,   and said, here this is the contract. We decided   that it would be good that the German government   should pay   8,500,000,000   mark to the the Soviet   Union   to ensure that the apartments will be built, that there will be jobs for the returning officers, etcetera etcetera.  

Hemud Kohl took this contract   and said, well, thank you. From here on, I take over.   And then,   the lawyers was was sent back to his office in in Southern Germany   and, did nothing and then heard nothing.   And several weeks later, Helmut Kohl came back from from Moscow where he met with Gorbachev,   with a with a stack of paper and gave this to his lawyer and said, okay. Now we are ready. Please please make everything ready for signature.   And the lawyer took a look,   at this contract and and told mister Kohl, this is not my contract.   Yes. That's right.  

He got us an answer.   So, within this new contract,   suddenly,   the number changed from 8,500,000,000   to 85,000,000,000,   which should be paid.   And,   the   the outcome of of this situation was   the 85,000,000,000   were   taken from the German pension funds,   which at that time used to have   a buffer zone of of, let's say, one and a half years.   Even if there would be no tax money at all, the German pensions would still have been paid for 1.5   years   without any tax being paid by by the people.   Now this this zone of of,   paying,   I think it's 3 or 4 weeks at the moment.   So the the pension funds   pension funds of Germany were were plundered,   basically.  

They were completely robbed and ripped off of of every capital there. These 85,000,000,000   were paid on Swiss accounts,   and from these Swiss accounts,   8,500,000,000.   The original amount from the old contract was sent to the Soviet Union. The rest of the money disappeared.   At the same time, Helmut Kohl got a contract as being a very nicely paid,   external   consultant   to the,   Credit Suisse,   the the Swiss bank where the money was paid to.   And at the same time, Gorbachev   bought his first castle in Saint Petersburg.   I don't know what else they bought, and I have no idea where the money went to. And,   I don't know if if they both   have taken 40,000,000,000   each. No idea.  

The simple fact is the money is gone, and I'd have no idea where.  

[01:38:48] Unknown:

Rate reset.  

[01:38:50] Unknown:

I mean, great rate reset. Yeah.   At the same time,   in in the same,   time frame starting in   1984,   another very interesting situation happened.   As you may remember,   the German   the Eastern German Railway and the German Democratic Republic,   was called Reichsparn.   Reichsparn,   the empire   train or rail empire railway, translated,   is the original   company from the German Empire.   This is the only,   state owned company   which did not die in 1945,   but which was still kept alive   and used to serve as the the railway company of of German Democratic   Republic.  

In the Federal Republic of Germany, we had the Deutsche Bundesbahn.   So a complete new company,   new trains, new new structures, etcetera.   The members   and the employees of the German Reichswan,   didn't have passports   of the German Democratic Republic, and they didn't have passports of the Federal Republic Germany. They only had   the the so called Dienstausweiss,   that is,   an employee's passport of this German Empire Railway Company.   So they were not members of the German Democratic Republic. They were simply employees of the German Reichsbank.   Okay.  

The   the head of the,   how do you call it, the union   of of this company,   was Wolfgang Gerhard Gunther Ebel,   at that time. And he wondered   why he didn't have that eastern, you know, East German passport   and why he had certain rights and and special duties and why he could enter West Berlin without any problem at any time.   And then he found out, the legal situation   of Eastern Germany, the legal situation of Western Germany, and also the legal situation of the,   the German Empire. And he found out and he read that   the   whatever the German Empire might want to do legally   had to be done within a certain time frame of 40 years.  

And those 40 years expired   40 years after 1945, that is in 1985.   So in 1984,   he got to know this. He learned about this,   and he said, wait wait wait wait we must do something.   He was he was a German. He felt German,   and he,   he had no idea what to do, basically. But but he was very, very brave.   And he he went to the American Embassy in in,   Berlin   and told them,   according to the international law, the German   country, the German Empire has to act legally   to ensure that   that Germany somehow exists,   in the future. And therefore,   I want to   claim,   that I I want to be the part the one who who now finally   claims here something for for the German empire.  

He expected to be arrested once, but he wasn't arrested. In in fact, he was invited to Washington,   and he was made the   provisional,   German Reichskanzler   at that time by the Americans.   Nobody talked about that at that time, of course. This was top secret. He had his office in in West Berlin in the shadow of the walls. These words are very important for a later point of time.   Just near the Berlin Wall, he has a very small office. I visit him. I visited him at that time in that office, and I talked to him.   He was a very nice man, very interesting man to talk to. And in 1987,   he held an official   and public speech in front of the Berlin Reichstag, the the government building in Berlin,   with the press being on-site,   where he told   the world about the legal status of Federal Republic of Germany and German Democratic Republic of Germany,   and that we would have a reunification   and a destruction of the wall in less than 7 trimesters.  

That will be in 1990.   Of course, nobody in the German mainstream press talked about this speech,   and it was   mentioned nowhere.   But fact is,   in   I I think it was   several months later, Ronald Reagan visited,   Berlin   and held his speech there on on the,   I think it was in front of the the Brandenburg tour   and and mentioned   that there was hope   to see in Berlin in the shadows of the wall.   Nobody know nobody knew at that time what he was talking about exactly in detail. He mentioned this small office, this man,   because   the American government   under Ronald Reagan and also the Soviet government, they both wanted to have a real   united   Germany,   a strong force in Central Europe   to be,   in the middle of the Eastern Bloc and the Western Bloc.  

They wanted if they wanted this Germany to be neutral   and strong and powerful.   What what happened later, we all know,   is that that this,   contract of reunification   was signed, and and the 2 German states,   were were joined together in in a situation of of mostly thin air.   And and, also, the the   the   American,   foreign minister and also the Soviet foreign minister   made everything   to ensure that both the Federal Republic of Germany and the the German Democratic Republic   cannot exist anymore.   But   it still exists today.   So we have to again ask ourselves some questions.  

What happened   that the powerful,   American government and the powerful Soviet government   didn't get through with their plans?   And somehow,   this Germany   of of thin air still exists   under an acting government, which does everything to to ruin the German people down to the roots.  

[01:45:51] Unknown:

Yes.   I'm back, by the way.   I caught most of what you were saying. I was just looking for my passport. So I've been looking for my passport. And,  

[01:46:01] Unknown:

and just have the name written then? I well, I've cancelled my holiday,  

[01:46:05] Unknown:

because I can't find the passport. So I'm I'm going nowhere.   This is this is what comes when you tidy things up. I suspect it's all in caps. But because I don't have it in my hand, I can't confirm it. They've always used to be all in caps. I just think the colour had changed,   but I can't confirm either way. So if anybody's got a black passport, which are the new ones since   2018, I think it took them a couple of years to sort things out.   Please let us know if you can grab a hold of 1 as it is. I'm just I'm here in Britain forever. No. I'll find the damn thing somewhere. Also,   mister Anderson, a question for you here from XO,   who asks if you think   that the Western intelligence mob,   engineered the fall of the Berlin Wall to bring about this situation, or do you think it was just   a naturally occurring event, whatever we might mean by the word natural, which sounds wholly unnatural the way you're describing it? Yeah. The the older the older ones among the listeners may remember very well  

[01:47:01] Unknown:

the the demonstrations of of the people,   in in Germany. They they shouted, we are the people. We are. We all   saw it on television. There were demonstrations   with with hundreds of thousands of people,   and   it it it looked very natural. And we all thought it was natural,   but we were fooled, definitely fooled.   Because this former,   Gerhard Gunther Ibel, the former provisional Reichskanzner,   held his public speech in   1987 claiming that in in in 1990, we will have the fall of the Berlin Wall. He predicted it. He he said it before it would it would happen.   And everything what was told to us on television, on radio   in 1990   about the spontaneous   demonstrations   of 100 of thousands of people in Germany and the Czech Republic   is nonsense.  

It's it's the same color revolution which we can see after that in in other countries   where the people, 100 of 1000,   are somehow spontaneously   carried in in hundreds of buses   to to the capital city to   the police does nothing against them.   And,   the same surprises we have in 1990,   the fall of the so called fall of the Berlin Wall and the surprising   open,   of of the the borders of the German Democratic Republic,   where somehow,   accidentally,   nobody knows exactly why, some officer came to the idea   to open the borders   just like that,   where where they formally used to shoot every   single person who even dared to set a foot,   over this border. What's the what's the deal with that? Yeah. I remember David Hasselhoff,  

[01:49:01] Unknown:

you know,   at that event when they're all doing that and then just, you know, gloating over the fact that, oh, the it's so it's over. No more wall. You know?   Tear down the wall. And you're we had, Ronald Reagan, you know, the famous speech. To mister Gorbachev,   tear down this wall,   and then it happens. I mean, it's not Are you suggesting political theater?  

[01:49:25] Unknown:

Is that what you're implying?  

[01:49:27] Unknown:

Yeah. Hey, by the way, I was looking at my pa I was looking at my passport. My name is all caps in it, And I also have a Russian visa and, both the English and the Cyrillic is in all caps.  

[01:49:40] Unknown:

So all caps. Doesn't that have to be kept a corporation  

[01:49:43] Unknown:

like the straw man saying? Yeah. Yeah. That your legal Yeah. The legal fiction that they've embossed upon your forehead or wherever they maybe your backside or something   in their system.   Yes.  

[01:49:55] Unknown:

That would And another interesting and that just a second. Another interesting thing about your passport is   please try to find out where this   small chip   is built in in your passport.  

[01:50:08] Unknown:

Oh, I find that every time. I I I break mine. That's I broke mine. I get I get hold of my nail and I crack it every time I get a passport or another. I just crack them because I want to cause trouble if I ever go anywhere. But I've got no desire to go anywhere because I'm a parochial Englishman now. I'm doomed. I'm just gonna stay here.  

[01:50:26] Unknown:

So tell us where was the chip?  

[01:50:29] Unknown:

I think it used to be on the back page.   Let me just have a look at the latest one here. It used to be on the back page somewhere underneath or very near the photograph   that they used to put on the inside back cover of the thing.  

[01:50:41] Unknown:

Somewhere on the covers And and and inside. German passports Yeah. The German passports is exactly on the throat on your on your picture.  

[01:50:50] Unknown:

Oh, really?   Yeah.  

[01:50:53] Unknown:

This is where the frequencies come in.   And when you now a little when you now read a little bit about things like Voodoo and and and other stuff,   where you can do things with some small   pictures or   small things with the people.   Yeah. You know what why this chip is exactly on, above of your throat. So when you do the voodoo that you do so good,  

[01:51:20] Unknown:

that's what you're saying. Right?   That would make sense. It's all I mean, there seems to be these occult principles that are embedded into all these. The whole bewilderment, of course, with,   what is it? It's the Chicago style book, isn't it? That determines things like I mean,   you have your name. I think you're supposed to write your name all in lowercase,   supposed. I don't know what I'm saying. But that's I'm only partially educate on this because it drives me crazy all this stuff for the simple reason that I don't know whether I want to devote a considerable   amount of my time understanding a scam that I'm not interested in in the first place,   but maybe I ought to.  

I think the view of people that do that is that somehow you can get yourself out of it. But I tend to view I mean, it may be possible. Maybe a few rare individuals have got the stamina to actually sort of pound away at this thing.   But I'm always, you know, in my own thinking, I keep feeling that, well,   they're basically doing this so they don't have to apply direct force. If you get close enough to them, they will. They will apply direct force.   History seems to be littered with that.   But, the the question a question for you, mister Anderson, is so   are you actually a German then?  



[01:52:37] Unknown:

Well, I was born in the area of the German Empire. Therefore, I am a German by definition.   I am also, unfortunately,   still a citizen of this,   German demo of this Federal Republic of Germany, the so called country which which doesn't have an area of application.   So I am both   a citizen of the area formerly known as the German Empire and   also a citizen of the federal republic of Germany, which is a matter of paper   only.  

[01:53:11] Unknown:

Right.   A question here,   mister Anderson.   Thomas,   what is the nationality   on your passport?   I think it says German. The US passport says   United States of America, all in caps. What does it say on yours? Have you lost yours too?  

[01:53:30] Unknown:

No. No. You're you're right. This is another very interesting thing.   The nationality is is is really written they they use the word German.   Well,   German is not a country.   And and as you say it very right,   in in in all the other passports, the nationality,   the question   upon,   the nationality   needs an answer   like,   Great Republic of France or or,   Republic of Spain or   United Kingdom, whatever, but but not Spanish   or Italian.   This is not a nationality.  

[01:54:12] Unknown:

Well, no. Well, it's certainly not a a a a space. It's certainly not an area of territory   named after the tribe that has settled it and turned it into a nation.   So you don't you don't have a nation   listed on your passport. It's not on there.  

[01:54:29] Unknown:

And even more interesting is that,   Wolfgang Schoebler, at that time, 1990s, he was finance minister of Germany.   He, by the way, also said that that sovereignty   was never a goal, a name for for for the government   and was never planned.   He   applied to the United Nations, and he enlisted   the country of the Federal Republic of Germany, not under the German name that is Unsruh Beg Gutschland, but under the simple word Germany.  

[01:55:03] Unknown:

Right.  

[01:55:05] Unknown:

So so that this is another legal issue.   He cannot simply,   he cannot enlist a country   under a name which is which is not even a country.  

[01:55:16] Unknown:

So no one so are you saying that no one's been to Germany for a long time because it doesn't exist?  

[01:55:23] Unknown:

Well, the   they they can go to Germany,   to an area which they call Germany. But when you're talking about a legal issue, a legal matter of of of law and and a matter of contracts,   the so called state Germany cannot   underwrite any contract. There has to be a legal form, and the legal form used to be Federal Republic of Germany or German Democratic Republic.   They had the legal status of being able to sign something.   But but,   Germany   is not and and has never been a country. German Empire, yes, could be. Or Kingdom or Kaiserach.  

[01:56:07] Unknown:

That this everything was legal. If we if we go back to the 19th century,  

[01:56:11] Unknown:

is this when the word Germany was first applied to   this part of the world? I of course, we don't know precisely what part we're talking about. We've got a rough idea, but not a precise idea. When did the word Germany come into common? Because obviously, we're familiar with things like, as you were saying, Bavaria,   Saxony,   etcetera,   you know, Prussia.   Like, exactly. And these things came together in a certain time.   So I'm just wondering when the word Germany was was actually used. Apparently,   we fought the Germans in 1914, or there was a World War 1, and Germany or the nation state participated in that pointless exercise,   as did everybody else. Astonishing.  



[01:56:53] Unknown:

Yeah.   Astonishingly,   in in   in 1809   71,   This is the last year that that I know of that the German Empire has a correct legal status   and also the United States of America. Because in in 1871,   it started to become a cut a company.   So that this,   in America, we have the same problem. The United States of America all written in in all capital letters is a different thing than the United States of America starting with a capital letter and then being written in small letters.   The the the second one is a republic. The first one is a company.   Of course, it sounds very, very similar. Does it? But when when   when we are talking about law   and and and legal things, we have to take care of of of these   such small details, like like capital letters and small letters. Like like, is there a period and comma? Or  

[01:57:56] Unknown:

I I wanna mention as a Catholic, I know that the papal states were out of existence by 18 70.   More you know, and that became Vatican City states.  

[01:58:07] Unknown:

Just a little tidbit of info because It's as if these are the early the early groundworks, the foundational groundworks for the situation, obviously, that we find ourselves in today.   Globalism stroke corporatism.   The other another question, you mentioned this maybe on a previous show or maybe in a private conversation that we've had   about   the   that particular area of the world that we're going to call Germany   being like an epicentre   throughout history of trade.   And,   I mean, I've always had in my mind that, you know, one of the challenges for the German people here in England or Britain,   we're surrounded by water. So we've been left alone to stew in our own juices and do all sorts of things.  

But you guys over there, and gals,   you've continually   been in the process of either defining, redefining, or readjusting   whatever you think your borders are. You're surrounded by,   really oceans of other,   at times, possibly, and history would show this, hostile other tribes   that have wanted to move in and acquire   what your hard work has produced. I mean, this I'm not speaking out of line with that. It does feel that that is the case. Certainly, you know, the people of Britain have always had   a really healthy respect for German engineering, etcetera. I know these are the cliches, but it's true. Well known all throughout the world. Absolutely. It's just true,   and we like that sort of thing. But I think,   historically,   I mean,   you must have it's almost as if you're fighting permanent border wars right up to now with this paperwork situation.  

Anyway, you can answer that after the break because that's the that's the wind down music. You've been listening to Paul English live here on WBN for the last couple of hours,   and, we've been talking about the actual status of Germany. We're gonna carry on talking about that after the break over on Rumble. We'll also be continuing on Radio Soapbox for another hour. We will end definitely,   on the hour, 11 PM here in the UK, 6 PM US Eastern.   My guest,   our guest has been, mister Thomas Anderson and hopefully he's gonna hang around. He needs to because we're gonna play his song that's coming up straight out of this break and then we will resume the conversation, everybody. So if you need to get yourself a glass of schnapps or go and check your own passport, now's a good time to do that sort of thing. We'll be back after this little lot.   Well,   that was, root beer rag   by by the wise guys. Where on earth did you get that from, mister Anderson?  



[02:03:52] Unknown:

That's marvelous. Visited the concert. Yeah. Yeah? It's it's absolutely fabulous. It it always leaves me speechless with an open mouth because they they speak so fast, and and they sing so fast. It is it's it's very, very fun to see them singing this song. And also the other songs, I I like them very much.  

[02:04:11] Unknown:

Yes. Exo writes, Beach Boys before LSD.   And, it's quite   then he says, my LSD references always fall flat here. Well, not that one. That one really went home. Thanks for that one. I love that. That goes down as possibly one of the most interesting songs any any guest has ever contributed here. Not that we allowed them to contribute too much. Actually, that's not true. When when we have them, we do. But I like that a lot. That was a a very wise   choice by the wise guys. I like that a lot. Anyway, where were we? They sounded as though they were as that that was the sound of my confusion, actually. That really expressed my confusion as well.   Can I just ask you a question about the   a status that I've read with regards to Germany?  

That it is, in fact,   how do you say in German? An A G, an AG, as we would say,   a limited company or a corporation, and that there is paperwork filed to that effect. We we certainly have have information regarding   all of the so called power centers over here, governments, police, and etcetera, as being basically limited companies or corporations.   And is that something that's applicable, do you think, to Germany?  

[02:05:23] Unknown:

Yeah. We we used to have official offices in Germany   just to up to the year 1990.   We had a co a so called Arbeitsamt,   and amp means an official office, an office for work, office   for postal services,   an office for whatever you can think of. And after 1990, it it very fast,   came to the point that we all those offices stopped to exist and and then were renamed   into agencies.   Now we have a job agency,   we we have all kinds of other agencies.   So the official status is gone. They are all only companies anymore.   And every company   and every agency, the the job   finance agency, and also the the Bundeskannuller, the the chancellor of Germany,   as   being an   economical   entity   is enlisted   in the United States in Delaware,   has this   UAN number, I think it is called,   which which every company   must have.  

And and so whatever   federal entity there is in the Federal Republic of Germany,   they are all enlisted as company in Delaware in the United States.  

[02:06:43] Unknown:

Nice. I'm I'm reassured and happy for you. I'm sure it's a good arrangement, and it's all done in best, honorable intentions, even though you didn't know about that.  

[02:06:51] Unknown:

Yeah. That's Biden's home state,   by the way. Delaware.  

[02:06:56] Unknown:

Yeah. Where you But that's is Delaware is set up as a place specifically for a lot of corporation formations,   isn't it?   Typically, yes. They do it for tax reasons. That's that's at least what I've heard. That's the cover story. They probably do it for other reasons as well. No doubt that they're all true.   So   how are you going to reform Germany then,   mister Anderson?   Well, I I What can we do to help? Who is it? What can we do to help? We'd like to help. We had so much trouble between the two countries during the last century.   All of it really not wanted by any of the people on the ground. That's my considered opinion. But much of it, all of it wanted by,   our unwanted and unwarranted rulers,   bringing about this state of turmoil,   in the last century particularly,   for   when thoroughly examined totally groundless reasons other than greed, the lust for power, and making sure that the other guy didn't get it.  

How are we to get how how are we to help you? How how are we to Because the other role that you've been given, it seems to me, or that   your undefined,   borderless,   paperless,   so called nation called Germany has been given, is that and this has been a thing within the media for years over here.   Germany's rolled out in the media,   to suit,   whatever purposes are required and demanded by the narrative at that time. So if you are to be the the the dominant power of Europe, you will be portrayed as that. This is a bad thing.   If they want to portray you as the industrial powerhouse of Europe because this is good for markets, you'll be portrayed as that.  

How   how do you see see it going forward? I think this is why the whole thing has been placed upon you in terms of the centre of the European Union,   which, of course, is darkly,   deeply, and sickly ironic in the sense that the word union,   in my mind, is really, you know, associated with communism   and globalism.   And yet the history of the conflict, the big one in the middle of the, you know, the the first third of the last century,   that that massive war that started in 1914   and ended in 1945   with a big long halftime period in the middle, which was just as ruinous for your country in many ways.   Your country was fighting against that,   and yet they've burdened you, it seems to me. Maybe burden's the wrong way. But they've had their cheeky little joke   and placed you at the center of the European Communist Union because that's all we can really say that it is.  

Is there are there and I know obviously, like we've mentioned before, anybody   over there and even over here that expresses any desire for the   restoration of their nations, and I'm one of those people,   were obviously Nazis. I mean, I'm not a real one because I'm I'm not a German but you really could be one if you wanted to be,   couldn't you?   I'm not asking you to be one. I view that they all disappeared in 1945.   Of course, that's a bit of a stretch because they didn't all die at that. But in terms of it being, you know, an edifice of power, apparently, that came to an end   in 1945.  

But,  

[02:10:13] Unknown:

I I've been learning some interesting things about the prehistory to the the rise of the Third Reich   in the the Pan German and the Pan Germanic movement   of, I think it was his name was George   von   Schoenerueur.   I I don't know how to say that exactly, but and then, also have I I I'm itching to ask you this question,   Thomas. Have you heard of   Karl Lueger   of the, Yes. Mhmm.   Okay. From Vienna. What do you know from Vienna. Yeah. That was a very popular movement up until 1910 when he died,   and he was considered one of one of Adolf Hitler's main,   you know, like, he looked up to him very much.  

And   probably   the fact that,   his party, I think, in the 18 seventies or 18 eighties, was called the anti Semitic party,   and it involved the pan Germanic movement, but also a lot of Catholics because   Carl Carl Lugar was also a Catholic   at that point   and up until his death and he created also he's part of the Christian Socialists which to me   hearing it now it seems like a contradiction because the church is against socialism and all this but   at the time, he was seen as a hero   to the people. And and Austria, particularly Vienna, tripled in size by the time of his death from the time he started.   So what what could you tell us about him?  



[02:11:52] Unknown:

Unfortunately, not much.   Basically, you you repeated everything I know. Yeah. I know. I I find very little. I   I think I I have some books about him, but I I I think I may have   I may have read them, but but I I don't recall it now.   A lot of people in in in that time in Germany   had   certain and and different ideas about the future of Germany. And and and we talked about already that in in 1871,   the last   really   legal,   basic situation   was left,   for for the   any and and the United States that that everything, is a is a company, not a state.   Right.  



[02:12:47] Unknown:

Yeah. So we had the civil war. That was the biggest war we had here. It's a 1000000000 people died or more,   and the South lost, and the North won.   Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans.  

[02:12:59] Unknown:

I I don't remember it right when the last German Kaiser,   signed his   stepping down   signature there. But I remember   that signing this document   with   a a wrong   form of his name   made this document   illegal.   So, basically,   Germany   the area called Germany   has never left   the legal status of being a Kaiserreich,   an empire with a Kaiser top.   And everything since then is not legally correct   and and should be reversed. And I know that in in the background, behind the curtain,   there are people who are working on this.   I also heard   that,   basically, the the future of Europe   has long been decided,   2 or 3 years ago,   in a secret no. In in several secret meetings,   which lasted over many months   in   a closed hotel in Moscow   where where they all met, the Americans,   the Russians, the French, the the the British, the Germans,   but but not the governments, but the real important people.  

And and they decided how to go on in in Europe with   the   political situation and with the borders.   What I heard there is that the borders will be reshaped,   and what we know as Federal Republic of Germany   will cease to exist,   and that there will be huge changes   to Europe within   a very foreseeable future,   not not many years, but less than 10.   And what we see now in in the actual political theater,   which we call reality,   is is is really only theater   to,   somehow create a story line which the general public can   hopefully follow.   So we are talking about,   big geopolitical   changes,   changing of borders.  

And when we talk about such changes,   normally, there should be a war, which might then,   help the people   to accept these huge changes   of borders.   Because without a war,   which   then,   of course, attacks several countries,   which after that might change their border lines,   without a war, the people won't   accept and and and won't believe   what is happening there.   So   I think Yeah. That we are facing this situation in in the short future,   and   there was, of course, always   it comes always together with with the risk for life and and loss and   and destruction,   but it seems to be already decided   as far as I am informed.  

And,   unfortunately  

[02:16:29] Unknown:

deciding it are good guys or bad guys?  

[02:16:35] Unknown:

Actually, I think it doesn't matter.   Yeah?   I I I think if if those people have decided it,   I think it will happen.   Because   when I look back in history,   what what seems to be a political movement   has, in fact, always been a decision of some people behind the curtain.   And what seems to be a spontaneous   wave of demonstrations   of the people, for example, via Zentes Volk, we are the people in in former Eastern Germany,   is not at all a spontaneous movement, but it's well very well planned.   Okay. Far far in at once.  

[02:17:17] Unknown:

Like So I'll give you an example, Thomas. Like, in Canada, we had the COVID restrictions where they started enforcing a vaccine passport to get in and out of Canada,   and they protest to the point where they had to come up with this Ukrainian Russian war in order to distract people from the the protest of it.   Now I would consider that something that was planned to happen because   they could have easily just stopped it and said, okay. We're done with the COVID restrictions.   But that brought it to that point. It's like they almost wanted it to happen. They they that because that's something you could easily foresee. Well, you gotta get jabbed in order to   cross a border. That's that's like a a point that you draw a line at because of the fact that the jabs, you know, cause can cause death,   at at least in the in the minds of most common people   that that see it as as something that you're all you're forcing us to take this medicine that we don't want, and you're sticking it in our arms in the form of needle.  

You know, that that's got a very,   traumatic   yeah. It's just a very traumatic thing if you think about it.  

[02:18:26] Unknown:

Yeah. That that that comes together with the experience that that many of us have have made.   There are people who got the vaccination   not because they wanted to protect themselves against,   a possible,   infection,   but simply to to get their freedom to go to the cinema, to go to the restaurant.   Preach. Yeah. Yeah.   Yeah.  

[02:18:49] Unknown:

Well, the the people still   making extremely poor decisions based on   their requirement to go on holiday,   their requirement to, you know, pass certain   standards for boosters and this that and the other.   It's as if they   some people, it appears, are unreachable with the truth.   Maybe because they're not really looking for it or they're just very happy with their lot up to a point. I mean, people can, all of us can be talked in and out of all sorts of ludicrous positions if we allow ourselves to get sucked into   company that that can work on you. It's extremely subtle. And what you were saying there, Thomas, about   all of these events being planned,   much as it kind of discourages me, and it always has to sort of look at that,   it's hard to come up with,   a sort of viewpoint that goes against that.  

When I when we started this show over a year ago,   or certainly the 1st 3 or 4 months, one of the topics I was looking at,   was the French Revolution. I was basically looking at the book   by Nestor Webster, which I would still remind everybody if you haven't read it, it's definitely worth your while.   And the French Revolution   is almost like a blueprint for many of the others. Of course, it's running   slightly after,   the American Revolution,   when the Brits were soundly kicked out, or were they?   Because,   who are the Brits? Certainly not the people of the nations.   It's these corporations   of the city of London, and it's not to Child. Sorry. Yeah. It's the corporation types. It's   we call it globalism now, but as, you know, as your books no doubt cover in great detail and many books available over here,   this is an arrangement of long standing, you know, 1000 of years old, that there's always been power groups,   muscling continually to extend their dominion and control over the plebs, as they would see us. And it it's unlikely that we would ever be able to persuade them to change their behavior.  

It seems to me, you know, we're not going to be able to do that. So when these decisions are made at a high level, the main problem or one of them is that so many people are in an unconscious state compliant with it.   Maybe there's never ever been a natural revolution. Certainly people used to think that the French one was, but if you read Webster's book, and this will be applicable to all of them, it's simply not true.   It's simply not the case that the peasants rose up and wanted to get rid of all the middle class.   They weren't looking to do anything of the sort. It was a very harmonious  

[02:21:37] Unknown:

nation until someone decided it wasn't going to be one anymore. And it it affected America too because we were ruled by the French monarch,   the Bourbon Monarch. You know, the white you know, his color was banner was white. You know, the white supremacy here in America. Yeah. It was the the Bourbons.  

[02:21:55] Unknown:

And it's all intertwined. You know?   It's all connected. All of these   revolutions have been going on for 100 of years.   I mean, I've mentioned it before. There's a book called The Nameless War by Archibald Moll Ramsey   or booklet. It's about a 115   pages long, and I'm mentioning it here again for those who haven't read it or are not aware of it. The Nameless War, you'll probably find it in a free PDF, still just. You might as well get it now before they get rid of it.   And   he opens up with the English the so called English Civil War.   Yet again, it was arranged   by other forces. Nearly always, the force involved is the force of finance and financial dominion. In fact, it's always that, as far as I certainly over the last 5 or 600 years and no doubt in prior times,   battles ensued because people wanted somebody else's stuff or they didn't want them to get powerful enough to come and seize their stuff. There's a permanent paranoia,   within   leadership circles about these sorts of things. I mean, I don't know if I mentioned I mentioned this here the other week. I've just finished reading the Goebbels book,   by the way, by David Irving. I know I'd mentioned it to you,   Thomas, in passing, and I've also mentioned it to Patrick just outside of the show.  

And again, I'm going to recommend it to you if you are a reader. And if you're not a reader, I would strongly urge you to become one because it's probably the best hours you can spend, I think, under your own steam,   driving your mind through certain things. The Goebbels book is was truly a surprise to me.   I've not read a book like it,   ever. I don't think. It's a big thing to say. Not because of what's in it,   but because of how it's put together. I've mentioned   David Irving, the man who wrote it and writes it quite brilliantly,   was able to do so because he's the only person I'm aware of. I mean, maybe there's more since then, who found and then read the 75,000   pages of Goebbels diary.  



[02:23:58] Unknown:

And And he knew German. That's and he knew German.  

[02:24:02] Unknown:

Yeah. And he knew German.   In fact, I was watching an interview with him,   the other day. Our first 5 minutes,   I've got it somewhere to watch. I downloaded it to keep it, actually. Someone put a clip up in in the Telegram group for the show. So whoever it was, thank you very much for that.   I'd not seen this before. He did a lengthy recording about his life about   2,010,   2012,   when he was fully lucid and and with it. He's obviously an unwell   chap now.   But   he was talking about when he came to Germany to work in the steel works. And he applied to Krups, the great war manufacturer, and they turned him down. He was he's talking about this. He was a bit cross, I think. He ended up going to another armaments. I can't remember the name of the other company, but they did take him on. And he said the 1st year or 18 months of that were the was the loneliest time of his life and it really came across. He said, you're in a foreign country, you do speak the language just. You're getting by. He went there to really learn the language,   in an intimate way. And so he's in a a very unique position. I think there's a comment as well made by mister Hitler at one point that he said something along the lines of, maybe it would take a British historian to come along and write the true story of this. How prescient was that? Because that's really what he did. But,   it's it's an astonishing book. It it really is quite a thing, particularly the,   I don't know if I mentioned this last week, but the   the physical condition of mister Hitler after   the after the,   attempt on his life   in 1944, July 44,   he was never the same man after that. This comes across quite clearly in Goebbels diaries   that he he'd lost more than half a step after that. It's not surprising really. He I think he was shaking for 10 days afterwards.  

Several people got killed in that. And what came out again about this sort of pre planned thing is that,   the the leadership   of that nation at that time was not unified.   There was a lot of internal wars and just as there are all the time in all of these things,   these are an internal warring sorts of structures. And no doubt that's what's going on as well right now with all this sort of toing and froing, including possibly,   Thomas, this meeting that you just mentioned in Moscow a few years back where they've decided to plan everything out. I mean, I could sort of pointlessly say, well, we weren't invited, so it doesn't count. But,   historically, what counts is force.  

And they will apply know the hotel name. Yeah. I'd love to know the name of the hotel in Moscow. We could go there for a holiday, couldn't we? Yeah. Exactly. Well, I can. I haven't got a passport. But if I had a passport, I might want to go there. You know, well, I'll find it somewhere in the that great I'll have to renew mine sooner or later here. Yeah. It's been a while.   Yeah. Quite. And while I'm just talking about mister Irving briefly, because I'd like to,   there was an article,   recently by Henry Mackow or or Henry Mackow. I don't I call him Henry Mackow anyway. Called, this was October 17th, The Crucifixion of David Irving.   I disagree with half of what he says in this article and I'm not gonna go through the whole thing. I'd recommend it for you. You'll find it at henrymackow.com,   if you want to go and read these things. He he puts some good stuff together. I'll take truth wherever I can find it and it's down to you and all of us as readers   to to make our own discernment as we go through things and compile   things.  

But there's a wonderful line here. He says, whether you agree with him or not,   David Irving is a prodigy. His memory is encyclopedic.   It it really is. Apparently, when they locked him up in Austria, he wrote a book in his head.   He wrote the whole book in his head. He was in solitary confinement, a room 6 foot by 6 foot for, I don't know how long, 18 months or something.   And he wrote a he wrote a book there. It's quite an amazing,   prolific skill that he's got because the books, if you've seen them,   are   huge. And I I mean, 10 or 15 years ago, even though I was aware of this topic, I was never really attracted to reading them.  

And,   in a way, I don't mind because they're they've been quite a revelation to me now. To to people who've been reading his stuff for years, it'll sound pathetic. They go, well, you should have been you should have been reading that stuff a long time ago. But it's it's different. It's not quite what I expected   and I think it's the relentless reference to source material   that builds up a,   a more human picture of how human beings are are really operating under stress and pressure. I mean basically, the whole of Goebbels diaries are basically,   everybody   on all sides in that conflict lying their asses off about everything all the time for propaganda and morale boosting   or morale reducing, I. E. Toward the enemy purposes.  

Understandable. But it seems to me, we mentioned it here before, those techniques   have been applied to all of us in civilian times, certainly after World War 1. I know over here, they many of the things they've learned to coerce,   cajole, threaten,   and deceive people have been harnessed and brought into civilian life, you know, courtesy of the advertising industry and so on and so forth.   All of these things to keep us lot   in check, you know, because we're  

[02:29:26] Unknown:

we're an unruly bunch. Yes. When can we get your book? When can we get that, audiobook?  

[02:29:33] Unknown:

What? The one of, Admiral  

[02:29:36] Unknown:

Dombey? No. That you that you that you read for David Irving.  

[02:29:40] Unknown:

Where can you get it? Audiobook.  

[02:29:42] Unknown:

Where? It's already available,  

[02:29:46] Unknown:

yes. Oh.   Oh. Yes. It is. Sorry. I just Okay. Yeah. That that was the one I did a few months back is,   Nuremberg, The Final Battle, which is also amazing. It's also amazing.   The Goebbels one is so personal because of all   these I mean, I've got to say, his wife, Magda, at the end, it's just,   I can't describe it. You have to read it. It's why I don't know whether an audio book of that book would necessarily work. It it's   it's such a a huge book in many ways.   570 pages or something is the main narrative.   There's such a   a huge array of characters all the way through it. And it's effectively 20 years of his diary from the mid twenties through to obviously, the mid forties, when he when he departed, and his attitude and the way some of the things he did are quite amazing, others are appalling.  

He really was a dark person in many ways, and yet his passion in other ways is exemplary. It's, you know, no one is kind of ticking all the boxes.   It's such an intimate,   understanding of those personalities. It really is. It's obviously, you know, you could say it's like a Greek tragedy, but it's a German tragedy, and it's a world tragedy,   as we all know. So many were right up to really the content of this show,   with the fact that Germany has never been   allowed to be itself   since 1945,   which is really, Thomas, you know, in part, I think, what you're addressing here in this show.  

[02:31:17] Unknown:

Yeah. I think we talked about that in in one of the earlier sessions.   The reason why,   it it seems to be that in modern history, it's it's always about Germans and and other people.   And today, what what we see now   is we also talked about this in in in private conversations   that,   we seem to face   a worldwide,   fight against the whites.   When you take such words   and tell them in public,   most of the people turn away from you and then say, he he's a ridiculous person.   He's talking about   a a a worldwide fight to to   exterminate all the white people.   That that that really sounds   unprofessional,   even for myself.  

But what I learned in the last years,   and and what we see now in the politics in the United States,   in Germany,   is exactly this.   The whites   are,   get get smaller by day by day in number.   Yep. Their rights are reduced to the max.   And,   whoever wants to be here is paid to be here and gets everything.   And who is   here and who was born here gets less and less and and has to pay more and more.  

[02:32:53] Unknown:

It's exactly the same here.   It's probably the same in France.   It's probably the same in Holland.   It's probably the same now in all of the European   nations, if they can be called that. Maybe   the Italians And even and those are also about to find out that we're in a in a parallel type of situation to Germany, that we've all been, you know, denuded of our territories   on paper.  

[02:33:17] Unknown:

Yeah. But but not only Europe. It's also the United States.   Take a look at them.   Take a look at, San Francisco or Los Angeles 20 years ago,   that that used to be very modern, very clean, and very   nice cities.   When you go there today, you will find open fires on every street,   some small tents on every street,   some some white people living there,   because they lost nearly everything,   and and it's not very nice anymore. It's not safe anymore. It's not calm anymore. It's it's simply dirty and ugly, and  

[02:33:57] Unknown:

it's going down day by day. I know. It's interesting you bring this up because I was looking at some things I'd written in other Telegram groups about a year ago, and I wanted to just   this is an appropriate   point to maybe mention them. I was in an exchange with some English people regarding   who is English. It's something it's a topic I haven't mentioned recently, but regular listeners know I keep coming back to this, or who is a German.   And,   during part of the exchange,   I mentioned   I gave my definition of a nation,   which I've, you know, it's not mine. It's actually it's just the standard one, which is you know, a tribe of people of the same race   with a shared and received   history, culture, and language. And somebody wrote to me or responded and said,   says who?  

They quoted what I said, it says who? And my response was, well the dictionary   says this. So I use a Chambers dictionary, but you'll find the older dictionaries, I've mentioned this before, are better   because they're accurate. It's before   the the manglemen of words, coming back to where we started off about an hour and a half ago, Thomas, where the before the full Marxist manglemen of words had begun,   and you have to really get to grips with with these things. So I want to use words accurately, otherwise, it's not possible to discuss any point as self evident really.   And I was just trying to I was very civil with this stuff. There's no point not being because you just need to do that. And a couple of people later on wrote some things down. I want to read you just this brief one.  

Because I was talking about who qualifies to be English and someone had written, what about 5th generation immigrants who consider themselves English?   They have no other home and no other memories or experiences.   I think it would be cruel to send them to a place they do not know and cannot identify with.   What about vast numbers of mixed heritage children?   Easy categories aren't possible anymore. Well they are for me.   And another comment was,   if I can just find it as another one,   which of course I can't,   but it's and then I just wanted to make that point. It's   I was talking with someone the other day. If if if you're with polite company in Germany or I'm with polite company in England,   is it possible to bring this topic up without people wanting to jump on your head?  

It's so delicate a thing because people react emotionally so badly,   and they've been conditioned,   in error, in my view,   to consider this there's this thing called the human race.   And the reason why I think it's in error is it does a disservice to everyone. They they obviously want to defend their position because they don't want to be accused of being racists.   They don't want it. It's absolutely it's the worst thing ever. You you're going to be   expelled from society if you are perceived to be that. So people are very guarded in their language and can barely talk about it. They just can't even find the words. They've been demonized to such a degree.   But the the countervailing   arguments are never presented.  

The full picture of the discussion never comes out. It gets stuck right at the beginning on this emotionalism,   as if you're an evil person. Whereas, in fact, when I would suggest,   when people work it through, what they will see is that it's the most respectful   policy for all people.   Not because I say so, but because nature has dictated it thus and has shown it to be thus. Of course, then what happens is they go, oh, no. You can't have that because this is about white supremacism   and all this   kind of stuff. I have no idea what that means, except I've mentioned before that for me, because I am a white man   or or working as hard as I can to be one,   the white people are of supreme importance to me, just as I would imagine. I mean, I could be wrong,   that Chinese,   people find other Chinese people of supreme importance to them. Who's going to be the carrier   and the inter who are you going to interact with on the levels of your culture, your history?  

The things that whilst you're down here do define you. They were the cards that you were dealt. And also,   considerable gifts have been bequeathed to us by our forefathers.   Yet in the case of Germany, you are now being denied them. In the case of England, we are being denied them by what could only be really determined is as a class of rulers   who are not actually representing us at all and have no intention of ever doing that, whilst pretending that that's that's what they're doing all the time.   So, you know,   that international communism, now known as globalism,   has worked to tunnel out the nations and to portray nations as the most evil things ever because look at all the warfare,   without pointing out that they were behind creating all that warfare in the first place, to begin the sort of breakup of nations so that it can be more easily managed in their global   camp.  

Nothing new in what I've said. I just think it needs to be said every now and again.  

[02:39:16] Unknown:

Yeah. Regarding the definition of who is British or who is German,   and regarding the fact that that there are so many migrants,   not only let let's call them fresh migrants who came in just months or a few years ago,   but but migrants who came here   decades ago,   2nd, 3rd, or even 4th generation   Mhmm.   And the people of India,   1000 of years ago had the same problem, and they found a solution. They have a caste system.   Mhmm. Yeah. The this yeah. They are very strict in that, and and the reason for the caste system is is simply to   to to keep the groups   away from each other and and to keep them  

[02:40:04] Unknown:

separate. And I think there's an element in the caste system of usury that goes on where you're using the lower castes in order to prop up the Brahmin type people.   I think the real   crux of the matter is each culture has its own language   and a 5th generation   Englishman, so to speak, you know, someone that's been living there for 5 generations is gonna have more to relate with another Englishman whether they're white skinned or, you know, black.   You're you're gonna be able to communicate a lot better than you would with someone who speaks German, for instance.   So there there is a certain amount of cultural   assimilation that goes on whether, you know, I'm speaking as an American because we're kind of mutts here.  

We have, you know, multi racial, whatever you want to call it, heritage, like French, German,   is typical where I'm at.   But,   yeah, it it's it's it's it's something else. I   we we have in many I'm near Minneapolis.   So and, you know, we had the George Floyd riots not that long ago.   And a lot of it is just because, you know, it's it's easy to whip up people who don't speak the same language, who don't who don't have the same culture,   and get them to say, well, look at these people. These people have more than you do.   Go go and blame them. Burn down their businesses because they're the ones that are oppressing you. And the people doing the finger pointing end up being the ones that have the real power of the media and and,   the able to influence the culture   one way or the other.  

So it's   it's a real tough subject because   you do have race   in the sense of ethnicity   and you're gonna have to deal with people that come in from another culture   one way or the other. And then it's like, what do you do with them? Do you ship them all back in small boats like they came, or what are you what are you gonna do? That's   that's where we're at right now.  

[02:42:07] Unknown:

Well, we we often told that that   race is only a color,   and and,   the the children at school are taught that that race is only a question of of optics,   and the the the human being inside is is this   the real important thing.   That that sounds, of of course, very good, and it sounds right.   Also, when I speak those words now, it it sounds right to me. But,   we have a very interesting person in our modern history.   His name is Benjamin Disraeli.   And there is a citation of him,   where he's saying, racism   is everything,   or race is everything.  



[02:42:53] Unknown:

Well, I believe that to be the case   because   and I think nature demonstrates it. So I don't see any future for,   a race mixed population,   because I've got no evidence to suggest that one of those has ever produced anything, and I don't think it ever can because   it's like taking   different operating systems,   mixing them all together on a network, and expecting it to work out. You might be able to bumble along a bit,   but it's very difficult for   moments of excellence, this is my view, I could, you know, someone might have some things to completely disprove this, I'm totally up to it, to arise. I don't think it happens.   Culture   culture comes out of race. It didn't come out of anything else. It's not because of geography or anything like that. You put people in different parts of the world, they will respond in different ways. But when you're unified,   and you're talking with people who are literally using the same operating system as you,   everything becomes   much more practically   useful and you're able to make much wiser decisions because you know how you operate.  

You know how your fellows, your kith and kin operate,   and   tribal wisdom builds up because of that.   Now the argument on the other side is, well, if we actually pull everybody together and live in a multicultural world, which is what globalism is all about, then all those differences will be forgotten   and it's gonna be great. But you're gonna end up, in my view, in a sea of mediocrity   and I don't think there's ever been a multicultural   society. I don't think I live in one now. What I think I live in   is pools of water and oil moving around rather with a lot of civility to hold it together, which is exhausting,   and is not a good use of your time down here. And of course, the view from the other side is, oh, well, because you're thinking like that, you hate everybody else. It's on the contrary.  

It's because it's out of a respect for the actual   true natural diversity of the races   that I think that that's the only way to go. Not because I'm thinking it, but because nature has done it that way. It's a sort of an arrogance to say   the creator that created this place got it wrong. No.   You're getting it wrong. You're a little man,   and you just think you know better, and you don't.  

[02:45:17] Unknown:

This is again a matter of of frame sets being used. When you're talking about multicultural,   societies   Yep. I think it sounds nice.   I like different cultures. I like the influence of of different cultures. I like watching them. I like seeing them. I like experiencing them. And and   when you when we go to a very simple example, let's say I like fruits.   I like apples. I like bananas. I like   potatoes. I I like   strawberries. I like,   blueberries.   And and it's it's a multi,   multi how do you call it? Culinary society, let's say. Yeah. Yeah. When I now mix them when I now mix them all together,   I don't have those experiences anymore. You lose the flavor. Something different.  

Yeah. And the We we lose the flavor. We lose the form   yeah.   Yeah. And the banana is not a banana because it's it's grown in in an area where apple tree grow, but then   then it's still an apple. And  

[02:46:26] Unknown:

and See how awkward we become? We've become I mean, it's understandable. I we're we're kind of walking on eggshells to even discuss it. I'm it's the communications   challenge is unbelievable   with this.   Why is it? Because people have lost contact.   It's not just language. We've been if if I think about what this nation was like   where I live in the 19 sixties, this sort of conversation would just never end. Didn't need to.   No no one goes around thinking you know, you see these phrases like, I looked around the room and it was all horribly white. What does that mean? That's ridiculous. No, Paul. We have airplanes nowadays and mass transit. That's part of the issue.  

[02:47:07] Unknown:

You have to admit   that it's a lot easier to get on a plane in the middle of the night than go to another country. So   this is this is one of the the so called modern problems that we have to face with this whole multicultural   thing.   Because it's just so easy. You'd gas up a plane, load it with a bunch of people from another country, and move them someplace else.  

[02:47:30] Unknown:

But why are they allowed in? I mean, this this sentence just did. Because they can.   You see, no one's against the idea of people from different races being in a place and getting on.   But what if you look at what actually happens? Forget all the nice ideas on paper.   What actually happens is, in my view, it goes pear shaped pretty quickly. I've mentioned here,   because I know of it and I've mentioned Ezra Pound before in his work regarding the Byzantine Empire.   The longest lasting empire we know of. Now people go, empires are terrible things.   Well, they're where most of the art and the writing and the great well, it springs out of some kind of concentrated energy, a bit like the growth of a of a young child into, you know, adolescent years and all that kind of stuff. Empires are kind of a sign of decline, aren't they? In a way But the well, they get that way. Yeah. They're gonna go pear shape. But   but they   did not allow aliens to participate in the power structure of the civilization. You weren't allowed in. For example,   we have people coming here and they get the vote.  

Why?   That doesn't mean I hate them because I don't want them to have the vote.   If this is not my home, I mean it's not as if I own it. I know there are people on the planet who think they do own it. They're all gonna die too and find out that that was a little horseshit as well.   But whilst you're a steward here, there are certain values that you want to adhere to. I believe, that's my conviction. Why? Because I see more goodness   and less grief coming out of going along with the laws of nature than I do trusting   supposedly   clever men   who think they know better and who clearly don't.  

Self evidently from history do not know better, couldn't.   These people don't even know what they are just like the rest of us. We've got human beings running around on the earth with all this clever stuff   perceived to themselves,   but they don't know what they are. They don't know what they no matter what religions profess, they don't know what happens when they die.   They don't know this stuff. It's just a claim. There's a mystery down here which is a delight. There's a reason for that, it seems to me.   You know, my take is that we're kind of in a polishing process. You ask me in a year's time, I'll have a different view. I'll use different language to describe it because this is a journey that there are there are no ends. The ends don't justify the means because there aren't any ends. It never ends. It just So it's like, how do you want the journey to go?  

How do we really want it to go?   And if we look at, say, the history of Europe with all the wars from the French Revolution,   and Napoleon particularly, and the parallels I mentioned before between what Napoleon was doing to defend   his people   and what mister Hitler was doing to defend his. That's the way I view it. Some people would argue differently, say I'm mad. But that's the way I view it. I was taught the opposite as a young child at school.   But when you inquire into the accounts of the other side, you get a much fuller picture. This doesn't mean to say that what I've just said is completely accurate. I accept the one thing I've learned is that this is a process and you're always coming across new things which readjust your perception as you go through.   But there's a there's a drive to do that. Why? Why is there a drive to do that? Because we're all mad and we're all warlike. No, we're not. We don't want any of that. We simply don't want to lose those things that we love.  

The things that we cherish, the things that we care for, that we try to steward   and we say,   look, these different people got these different qualities and characteristics. We should be saying, isn't that cool? Isn't that neat? And then people will say, yeah but you in the West have got all this stuff. I completely accept. It is totally true   that the corporations of the West,   which don't represent, in my view, the great bulk of the people of the West, are sick things.   Well, I I played a quote on here a couple of months back from the,   First Lady of Sierra Leone.  

I should keep these things in permanent sort of clip thing to keep playing them through because they're worth repeating. She was talking about the the investment in Sierra Leone by foreign corporations,   which are primarily American, British, and Chinese.   They own most of Sierra Leone.   And she said, they will take out of the ground   some stuff,   lithium possibly, I don't know if they got it there, but they'll take some stuff out of the ground that they need, some mineral or whatever. They'll take a $100,000,000   of it out of the ground,   and they will give to Sierra Leone   a $1,000,000.  



[02:51:58] Unknown:

That's it. Yeah. It's ridiculous.  

[02:52:00] Unknown:

It's well, it's warfare.   It's abuse.   It's theft. It's warfare. And if it's not direct overt military warfare, it's gonna result in it at some point when those corporations decide to pull out and have to get everybody out because they've plundered it as far as they can go. And and again, stepping back   is this orientation towards the financial system   has created   all of these sort of aberrations. I feel they're aberrations in human behavior, which don't build wealth.   They just build people who've got purchasing tokens and want more than you. And when they've got those,   history tends to show that they've got the power, like we've mentioned before, you know. And,   I know I always come back to this, but that's that's as good as my logic gets these days, and it hadn't changed for quite a while.  

I still view that as the epicenter. And I'm really going back even to that conflict, so called World War 2.   I put the economic,   bias in there very high up on my list. You know, the fact that your country, Thomas,  

[02:53:00] Unknown:

under, of course, what we are supposed to perceive is dubious leadership, and they were evil and all this kind of stuff. Right? Which I don't buy into. An excuse excuse to with, you know, tax them to death. Yeah. That's that's all it is. It's like Michael Hudson and and, you know, his book, forgive them their debts. Yeah. We need that we need that type of mentality where where you can forgive a a whole nation because they sanction whole nations.  

[02:53:25] Unknown:

They have no like our state department here is West Africa. You're right. And I would suggest in our culture as Northern Europeans, so we got these different tribes forming nations, Germans, and Dutchmen, and Englishmen, and Spaniards, and so on and so forth.   We have a I would say I could be wrong, but I think the normal grassroots people have a proclivity   to forgiving situations, because   instinctively, we know it's for the health of the village, which it is.   But the predator   patrician class,   the creditor class, the usury class doesn't have that as a component in their makeup at all.   And so we live in a completely   false world where they're controlling all the information to sustain   their ability to feed off of us,   which now includes the removal of nations. They don't want that because you get all passionate about defending your nation and you're more troublesome.  

All of it so all the good things that they say it's about, it's not about that at all in my view. It's not about it's not there's not a goodness to come out of this. And I think you can see that by looking at the source of characters that we are exposed   to, like the Klaus Schwab's of this world, like Bill Gates, who's not even a man.   But these characters and figures that they furnish us with,   who are just   ludicrously   tiresome,   you know,   but pretty scary people. They're scary people because we can't you can't sit down. Why do you be kind with your money? What? Why do you be kind? And I'm just gonna go back to that thing I mentioned right at the beginning of the show with the heating bills over here.   What is that all about?  

It's oh, we haven't got enough money. What are you talking about? You've just sent £3,000,000,000  

[02:55:02] Unknown:

to Ukraine. It's like Germany and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. That's a heating bill, you know, right there. They just blew it up. And then and then and then the people that rely on that in Germany for heating their homes have nothing to heat their homes with. No. They do. Pipeline.  

[02:55:16] Unknown:

Thomas, you've not got a word in Edgeways recently because we're blabbing so much. Well, I am. And we're coming up towards the end of the show. We're gonna close out in about 3 minutes because I've got a song to play out from Leo Cottky, which I'm gonna play out at the end of the show. Anything you'd like oh, we'd like to have you back, you know. I'd like to have you back. I think the more often you're on, maybe we can we can develop this out more fully. And maybe I need more than 1 show a week to cover stuff like this because it's it touches on so many things.  

[02:55:42] Unknown:

How how many people are online still on on Rumble now?  

[02:55:46] Unknown:

60 odd. All   chattering. I am sorry for ignoring you guys over well, I haven't. I've I've caught a little bit of it. But,   you know, so I'll read that. The latest comment is problem I haven't even   read this. Problem is, Paul, the banker class seem to be the influence   the influences   of imported cultures, yes, by some weird osmosis.   Materialism and self obsession is their reason for being in many cases. I agree.   It's an impoverished   philosophy they've got considering how much gear they've got.   And of course, this seems to be it. The more gear, that's prosperity. No, it isn't. The wealth is in the goodness of people and in your relationships with them.   How could it be anywhere else? They go, oh, we're gonna dominate all these people and we're gonna kill them. What are you on?  

I really do think they've they're going to have a lot to answer for, and of course, they would laugh that off. I don't expect to have any, you know, serious impact on them at all. But,   yeah. We've just got about we've got about a minute and a half,   left,   Thomas. So if you want to say any final words here,   yeah.  

[02:56:49] Unknown:

Anything? Well, I I just I I just wonder if there was   a a short question perhaps,  

[02:56:55] Unknown:

which we can There probably is. I don't know. Short questions.   There probably is in there but there's a lot to read. You'll never get through that in 95 seconds. I can tell you.   Listen, it's been fantastic having you back. It's great. And the song was just outstanding. I don't know what we're gonna say about that. That was just absolutely fantastic song. Excellent.   Yeah. Root Beer Rag. I'm letting you all know again. Root Beer Rag by wise guys. That'll probably pop up on this show again at some point.   Fantastic stuff. So you've been listening to Paul English Live for the last couple of hours, nearly 3 hours. Thanks very much for being with us and everybody in Rumble. We'll be back again at the same time next week.  

Till then, stay safe and sound. Paul, it's We'll see you then. Oh, it's music's coming now.   Oop. Oop. Thanks, Thomas. What did you wanna say, Paul?  

[02:57:43] Unknown:

Here it goes.  

[02:57:46] Unknown:

Help. Help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.  

[02:57:52] Unknown:

We're being repressed.   So we'll see you bloody peasants next week. And remember, bloody peasants are where it's at. Fantastic, Thomas. I'll speak to you maybe tomorrow or something. We'll see you all next week. Bye now. Bye, everyone. Thank you. Bye bye. Bye.