Paul English Live

Share on social media:

Broadcasts live every Thursday at 8:00p.m. uk time on Radio Soapbox: http://radiosoapbox.com

It's the 4th of July 2024 and we're here to discuss the UK General election plus the 4th if July in the US. We explore the freedom of the American people, and the voting process. The conversation covers the current UK election, the role of AI in politics, and the potential outcomes of the election. We also touch on the influence of the media, the importance of local governance, and the need for a return to traditional values. Join us for a lively discussion on these pressing issues and more.

[00:01:28] Unknown:

Well, hello.   Hello. It's the 4th July,   isn't it? It's the 4th July   2024   and everybody on both sides of the Atlantic is very giddy and excited and full of optimism, and all that kind of stuff. And if you believe that,   you've not come to the right place, he said, choking on his own words.   This is Paul English live. We're here on WN 324 for the next couple of hours, maybe a bit longer elsewhere. I'll fill you in as we go.   And, well, let's start the show. Here we go. I press this button here, and I think about the elections and the freedom of the American people.   How interesting.  

And I can see all over the place that people have been out busily voting and doing whatever you do in America. We're gonna find out about everything over the next few hours. Actually, we're probably gonna find out about very little indeed that we don't already know.   And, I should be joined by a couple of American reprobates.   Patrick's on hand. He's gonna be joining us soon. He's just rustling up a cup of coffee. It's a little bit earlier in the day for him,   But, we're into the evening, and we're full of excitement as we get adorned with a new government.   Yeah. We're gonna be joined by a few people tonight. I was just saying something there, but I think I'd sat on the mute button. That make that was probably better, actually.  

Yeah. Hi everyone and welcome back. It's, Thursday. It's that time of the week again.   It's a very special Thursday for all of us on both sides of the Atlantic.   In America, the Americans are celebrating the 4th July which is when they gave us British a right old bloody nose and sent us home packing in 17/76   and jolly well good done to them and all that kind of stuff. And now apparently they're free.   We're free as well, apparently, to cast votes in elections.   And some of you reprobates may have well been out doing that filthy terrible habit. I hope not, but I don't mind if you have because you can call in and tell us about your sordid experience about which lame fisted, lame brained idiot you've, you voted for because,   I don't think I'm saying anything untoward there, am I? I think that's really what we're faced with.  

In this mo these most arduous of times,   we have to also deal with these mediocre,   ambitious fools,   that sit in front of us and just talk complete garbage.   After   20 or 30 years of listening to it,   I'm a little bit tired of the whole thing. I don't know how you are,   how you feel about it, but, I'd like to think that you might let us know.   So 1 of the little blurbs that I put out for this show,   I'll tell you about who the who the chap is, by the way, in the picture. That's all that's quite interesting and weird as well. We've got we've got an image   of, he's called AI Steve. That might give you a clue. Right?  

I actually got quite encouraged by AI Steve.   But,   and he's down the road, is AI Steve. He he really is, and he really exists. I don't know if you can actually cast a vote for him, but we'll we'll look at that a little bit later.   But,   yes. It's it's giddy times here in the UK.   Now, whilst we're on air,   here on WBN for the next couple of hours, which we are, we're gonna close out at round well, we will close out at 10 PM UK time on WBN,   which is 5 PM US Eastern,   which is a pity in a way because   the, polling results, the first polling results are due to be released. I just got a message from my good friend, Andy Hitchcock, a few minutes here before we went live.   He won't be joining us because he doesn't want to get involved in all this sorted stuff, and who can disagree. But,   he was letting me know that the exit polls or whatever it is will be published on the BBC website about 10 o'clock. I suspect we probably will still be on air then. We're we're likely to overrun our 2 hour slot on WBN.  

So if we're if it's a fantastic show, even if it's a terrible show actually, and you want to carry on listening,   you can do so by getting across to paulenglishlive.com.   If you go to paulenglishlive.com,   you can find links into Rumble,   which so far, touchwood this week,   I've had nobody in the chat telling me that the sound's bad, and I actually, I don't know why I'm apologizing for last week. That was a rumble issue.   So, those of you tuned in last week for the first 15, 20 minutes, there was all sorts of   and stuff like that.  

So,   that that's kind of what we were doing, and,   but, I understand the sound's okay today. So that's pretty cool, isn't it?   Anyway, so I'd like to hear from you tonight. If you can muster up the courage, you can certainly type in the Rumble chat, and if that's how you're most comfortable communicating,   I've got my eyes stuck on it right now, and I think I can still read even after 3 vodkas.   But,   that's that's 1 way to do it, and everybody's quite comfortable with that. But I would also like to hear from you, possibly, if you can do it. So   you can call into the show. Basically, you do it over the Internet with this thing.  

We have a studio, a little online audio studio.   If you go to paulenglishlivedot   comforward/callc   a   double l, and that's a bit of a mouthful,   you also see a link to this on the paulenglishlive.com   homepage.   You'll come through to an online studio,   and, you can pitch in. Now now why might you want to pitch in? I don't know why you might, but I hope you get the urge.   Because I'd like to hear what policies   you,   yes, you, dear listener,   what you would insist upon, what you would enforce,   what you would compel everybody to obey   as and when and should you become boss of the UK,   which, of course, we all know is highly likely for all of us to do that. Now I was just interested to know what kind of quirky they can be very eccentric policies. They don't have to be anything normal. I mean, there's nothing normal about the policies that the the mainstream parties are selling. I mean, have we ever heard of these policies ever before? Like, yeah, like forever.  

Like, you know,   we're going to lower income tax. Oh, great. That's worth voting for people.   We're going to reapportion   income tax. Oh, brilliant. All of these things are going to solve our problems.   As many of you here who might tune in regularly know, it's not so much that I'm cynical and I suspect it's not even that you're cynical. It's just that you're informed,   and you should by now probably   know. Most people do know   that,   the real power in the nation does not lie with politicians.   They are the actors. They are the actors,   and that's what we, that's what we're always looking for, isn't it? Good actors to help us along, chug along, and keep lying to us, and keep everything going tickety boo.  

Anyway,   we may be joined by more people here in the main studio as we go along but right now I'm gonna bring I think I'm gonna bring Patrick on. Patrick, are you are you there? Have you got your coffee in   hand? No. He's not. How about that? Coffee's taking some time. Okay. Not to worry.   So exit polls.   Is anybody   alright. Oh, gosh. Look at that. You shocked me, Patrick. How are you this fine afternoon? And how's the coffee?  

[00:10:20] Unknown:

Quite quite well. Oh, very good.   Espresso. Yes.  

[00:10:24] Unknown:

Good stuff. I was I was speaking to a,   a fellow cheese head   yesterday.   By the way, if you don't know what a cheese head is, it's somebody who lives in Wisconsin. Isn't that right, Patrick? Yep. Yep.   So I was speaking to, author, Tom Goodrich, yesterday. Many people will know of him if you pardon?   He's a cheese head? Yeah. He's he's I don't know how far he is from you, but he's been in cheese land. I said, how's it going in cheese land yesterday?   And, so we ended up having a quick chat.   Tom is the author   of many a splendid history book with what you would call   an alternative view. Hang on. I'm just choking here.  

And,   so I was having I hadn't spoken to him for a few months, but I just got some time yesterday. I had a fantastic chat with him. He's the author of   some tremendous books. I mean, really outstanding. The 1, of course Hellstorm?   Yeah. That's right. That's the 1 I was gonna mention. Hellstorm is   yeah. Hellstorm is an unbelievably   as he knows, I sort of teased him about this, but it's meant in good it's it's a terrible book. It's absolutely terrible and horrible,   and, but I mean it. It's not a terribly written book. It's just about terrible, horrible things,   and it's extremely powerful. And I recorded the audio book for that about   I can't believe this. I think it's about 7 years ago, 2017   or something like that.  

And, I just got chance to talk to him yesterday, Patrick. So I don't know how long he's he's been in Wisconsin, I think, for about a year,   and,   interestingly, he likes cheese. So I thought, well, you've moved to the right place. Right? Wow. Yeah. He's he's he's in the perfect place. Yeah. I mean, I think if I if I do move to America, I'm probably gonna end up becoming your neighbor as well because I quite like cheese too. But sadly, he was also informing   me that since he's got there, he's not eaten any cheese, and I thought there's something obviously seriously wrong with him.   So I don't know whether we need to have a whip round and buy him a few   blocks of good old cheese. Of course, I've never eaten   American dairy cheese. I mean, we're all familiar with a sort of sloppy goo squirty cheese that you guys do, you know, which I don't mind. I know it's ersatz to a degree, but as things go, it's really rather fantastic,   I think, at times.  

But,   yes. I had a good chat with Tom yesterday. Tom, of course, is suitably giddy about the 4th July.   Not not. He wasn't he wasn't overly excited about it either.   So,   anyway, what's what's the mood like in America? I'm sure you can't possibly think about the UK election. You must be just,   have you sent any fireworks off yet? What happens? What's gonna happen today? Because it's early in the day for you, isn't it really? Just gone lunchtime or 2 o'clock in the afternoon.  

[00:13:12] Unknown:

The sky is threatening to rain. So for fireworks, it's not the best   outlook at the moment but Right. It's a new moon. So Yeah. For fireworks, a new moon is perfect because you get this nice dark sky that you can look at the fireworks. Yeah. A lot more they're a lot more vibrant that way. So, yeah. Definitely,   mood is good because everybody has a day off of work that,   you know, is smart.   And,   yeah, everybody's in a good mood, I'd assume, and the traffic is crazy. You don't go to the   stores around this time because especially around here, all the people come up from the twin cities to go to their cabins.  

[00:13:51] Unknown:

Mhmm. And  

[00:13:52] Unknown:

various places because we have lots of lakes and resorts   in this area of Northwestern Wisconsin.   Yep. So it yeah. It's good mood.  

[00:14:01] Unknown:

Very very, happy mood. Fantastic. So will will there be a lot of fireworks in your state? Is it still a a strong tradition out there? I'm just trying to find out really. Yeah. There'll be there'll be fireworks.  

[00:14:14] Unknown:

People usually buy   fireworks and   light them off at at their houses or there are few towns in our area that do a 4th July show   Yep. Where they they'll go around the lake typically in a park   and sit around and,   you know, watch the fireworks   as they go off. So, yeah, neighboring town here, Siren has fireworks,   few others.   Wow. I'm sure all over the country, people will be lighting them off. They're doing it last night already.   Yeah.   That's good. Yeah.  

[00:14:47] Unknown:

It's good. Well, it's it's more exciting than what's going on here. I mean, I don't know. That probably, if we were to if we were to tune in to the news channels, and we're not going to do anything quite so foolish as that, We will be met by an array of apoplectic,   political pundits.   Actually, it used to be a lot more fun in the past. They used to have a thing called the swingometer over   here, and,   all that kind of stuff. They used to have a swing o meter. I've just found what I was looking for as well,   and the swing o meter would tell you which seats were going here, there, and everywhere. I've it's like watching paint dry. I mean, it's just absolutely beyond it's ridiculous. It's ridiculously dull,   and   so everybody here who's in the UK that's listening to the show, I I I don't know what you'll what's going on with you, but I can't imagine it's too much   in terms of excitement   and in terms of, you know, what we're going to achieve. And,   I did hear a great term though the other day.  

Some guy was on some news thing,   and I've got a I've got a little 3 minute clip to play here about the artificial intelligence thing in a second. I was just looking it up, but,   1 of the candidates here, Patrick, there won't be a quiz about this afterwards,   is a chap called sir I don't know how that happens, by the way. It's all very odd. Sir Kia   Starmour, and, not to be confused with Kia the car manufacturer,   nor to be confused with IKEA   the great,   furnishing retailer.   Although many of their wardrobes are actually much more exciting and interesting   than Sir Keir Starmer. Anyway, 1 of these pundits called him. They said, yeah, when Labour get in. So the expectation over here is that the Labour Party, which have been out of power for 14 years,   are gonna absolutely   roll it through tonight. They're just gonna hammer all comers, and they're just gonna get the most colossal majority, which is actually an extremely worrying thought.  

It really is. I mean, they've got Yes. We've got a lot of goofballs in the conservative part, but I think when it comes to goofiness and dumb woke policies,   Labour possibly are gonna end up being in a league of their own, and they're just passing the baton on.   And as I've said here before and as many people know, it doesn't matter which party you vote for. The problem is the government always gets in, and they're taking their orders from elsewhere. Anyway, 1 of these political guys, I think it was on Sky News, another reputable news outlet,   was calling it Starmageddon,   which I actually quite liked, really. I thought, well, that's that's good. I I go for little jingoistic words like little things like that, you know. So so if if Labour roll through tonight with this, everybody, it will be known as Stormageddon, and we're gonna be wiped out by his,   woke policies.  

This is the guy who said he would   rather spend more time in Europe with the globalists   than he would actually looking after this nation. And I think in that regard, you could at least,   you know, give him a few points for being honest because that's what they all would rather do. In fact, that's what they all do do. It's just that he said it, I suppose.   Not that that's anything really to recommend him by. But,   yes.  

[00:17:58] Unknown:

So it's for remember Starmer from Beargate back during the COVID lock downs. Do you remember this incident?   Where he was caught drinking beer and partying it up with people?   It was James Delingpole's son caught him on camera doing this.  

[00:18:13] Unknown:

Really?   Oh, that's good old James. Good old James Delingpole's son. I remember it now. Yeah. He slept off to the pub, didn't he? He slept off to the pub. And,   this is the guy who   did nothing about the Jimmy Savile problem,   and he could have done because he was high up in the legal profession at the time. In fact, I forgot what his official post was. But it came across his desk. He could've I can't do anything, he said. Well, probably because he was ordered not to do anything. Of course, that puts him in the same camp as,   as the BBC, who also did nothing as well, you know. So,   anyway, speaking of interesting candidates,   I'm gonna play you a clip here from NBC News.  

Okay. Let me just unmute the tab here. Hopefully, this is on YouTube. So hopefully, this will play okay.   This, the title is Meet the AI candidate,   Steve,   who's running for the UK parliament.  

[00:19:05] Unknown:

Alright. Here we go. Let's see what Steve is like. Many times have you heard this 1? A politician wanting to reinvent   politics.  

[00:19:13] Unknown:

Hi. I'm AI Steve, standing to be MP for Brighton and Hove. But what happens when the candidate  

[00:19:19] Unknown:

is the actual invention?   Meet Steve,   that is   AI Steve,   an avatar on the ballot, a UK first.  

[00:19:28] Unknown:

You're actively dangerous. Dangerous?  

[00:19:31] Unknown:

You think the public can't be trusted? It may feel like something out of that dystopian Black Mirror episode   where a comedian uses a computer generated avatar to cause electoral chaos.   But now it's happening in real life,   sort of, with AI Steve running as an independent.   AI Steve, was Brexit a good idea?   Brexit is a complex issue with varied opinions. He can dodge a question like a real politician,   but AI Steve will do   The human version of Steve says he's an eco friendly capitalist with a conscience   who is fed up with traditional politics.   But he promises he'll follow AI Steve's guidance if elected.  



[00:20:21] Unknown:

Politics is all about human interaction, Steve. We're using AI to involve more humans in political decisions. That's not AI taking over parliament or taking over government. It's the opposite. Is AI empowering me as a politician   to be directly connected on a daily basis with my constituents?  

[00:20:38] Unknown:

AI Steve, he says, is his copilot   who can have up to 10, 000 conversations   at once.   Constituents will vote on every policy issue, and human volunteers will weed out extremism.  

[00:20:51] Unknown:

Well, it's the 1st MP ever does what it's told. I don't know if you have any politicians in America to what they told. We don't hear. The current local MP from the Green Party is stepping down, leaving room for a slew of candidates from many parties.  

[00:21:05] Unknown:

Across the country, conservatives are trailing ahead of the July 4th elections   with the UK's Labour Party expected to win big after 14 years in opposition.   Experts are increasingly worried about AI undermining elections.  

[00:21:20] Unknown:

Make it look like anyone is saying anything at any point in time. From deep fake videos  

[00:21:26] Unknown:

to robo voice calls. A magician   using artificial intelligence to make robo calls pretending to be   the president. Mister Filodar Madre. Former Pakistani leader Imran Khan used AI to voice campaign speeches from prison. And in the US, a candidate running for mayor of Wyoming's capital says he'll govern by AI bot, calling himself merely a puppet.   Real Steve believes his AI alter ego can bolster democracy   if done properly.  

[00:21:57] Unknown:

He's always available, and he's handled 2, 500 calls in the last 3 days. I couldn't do that. So we need to actually fix our broken politics and do something about it. So at least I'm trying.  

[00:22:08] Unknown:

AI Steve was designed by Neural Voice. It's an AI voice company, and we need to point out the real Steve is a minority shareholder in the company.   Since the website went live on Monday, he says the top 3 issues have been Israel's war with Hamas, garbage collection,   and cycling lanes.   Tom?  

[00:22:28] Unknown:

Thanks for watching.  

[00:22:32] Unknown:

AI Steve.   Is everybody excited about that? So AI Steve, by the way, if you're on Rumble and you're looking at that picture, there he is. That's him.   There's AI Steve. He's down in Brighton.   Well, he's not. Actually, he's on the interwebs, isn't he? He's an ethereal being. He's a virtual being. But the idea that he answered 2, 600,   calls   is quite impressive. I actually suddenly thought, maybe   maybe this is the solution.   I mean, if we're going to be covered by automatons, why do we have a real 1 actually doing it? Is that first time you've heard that, Patrick?  

[00:23:08] Unknown:

Yeah.   He's gonna weed out extremism. That's that's wonderful.  

[00:23:14] Unknown:

Yeah. That would probably include the show then, I suppose.   I feel a bit extremist,   you know.  

[00:23:20] Unknown:

So Next thing, they'll be weeding out extreme mists.  

[00:23:24] Unknown:

Absolutely. I think he's quite dashing, actually. He's quite nice. He's,   he's got, you know, a good grey sideburns. He seems reasonably articulate. He does look a little bit like his creator. He's like a more romanticized   version of Steve Endicott,   who's created him. And I was I was thinking, could I get him to come on the show? He'd be so busy tonight.   So if he really is on the ballot, and I don't know whether that's true or not, I don't think that would actually pass electoral law. No. But maybe it does. I mean, we used to have a party over here called the Raving Monster Looney Party whose policies, I think, in comparison to what we've got today are probably pretty sensible, to be quite honest. Have you heard did you ever hear of them, the raving monster loony? Yeah. Monster Loony party. No. That's right. It's like Monty Python and the silly party and the sensible party. That's right.   Actually, I I would have probably voted for either the Sillies or the Sensibles if they'd been on the ballot.  

Just yeah. But there was a guy called Screaming Lord Such. I don't think that was his I don't think he was baptised that, Patrick.   Screaming Lord Such. He was the leader of the raving monster Luna Party,   loony party, and, he lost his deposit something like 38 times.   But he was always good always good for a bit of PR on the TV. He had a lot he had a sort of top hat   and had some extremely I think his policies probably would be fantastic these days. I don't even know what they were,   but they certainly wouldn't be dull.   And I just wonder anybody out there listening   on the on the Rumble chat, if you remember,   do you remember,   Screaming Lord such and the Raving Monster Luna Party? Looney Party. I hope you do.  

So, yeah, he's unfortunately, he shuffled off this mortal coil, so we can't vote for him anymore.   So, yeah. I don't think you have that kind of eccentric approach to politics over in the in the US, do you?  

[00:25:10] Unknown:

Oh, we probably do, but it's it's a local thing if it is.   We don't we don't normally get, 3rd parties. It's it's usually the mono party of of the,   you know, Republicans versus Democrats. And that's a Yes.   Yeah. Especially when it comes to things like the presidential elections where it's all done by it's not a popular vote. People think that it might, you know, be that we vote vote for the president. Well, what we are actually doing is voting for who's going to be the delegate or who's which party is going to decide which delegate   chooses the president.  

And it's called the electoral college. It's been around for   too long, in my opinion.   But,   yeah. That's how we do it. And that keeps it so that we have   Tweedledee and Tweedledum,   you know, running for president.   And that's the way our our controllers, the money bosses, like it. So   Cool. So be it.  

[00:26:07] Unknown:

Can't wait. Well, you've only got a few months to go before your,   embarrassing   pantomime act,   starts running on November 5th. I've mentioned this before,   but yours is on November 5th, isn't it, this year, which,   Yeah. I remember.   Yeah. Well, you know, we've got the Guy Fawkes thing here. They're they're swapping all the dates around and everything.   Well, they're not really doing that. But, of course, I I'm still slightly puzzled as to why they called   the UK election on this day. Maybe it's because   they don't want Americans to pay any attention to it. I mean, I would have thought your attention  

[00:26:42] Unknown:

Probably.  

[00:26:43] Unknown:

You know? Yeah. Most Americans probably have no idea that it's even going on. No. It's only the little old UK with all those silly people on it, and I don't blame them, to be quite honest. I'd probably feel the same way.   So, yeah,   who knows why? Who knows why the 5th July.   Looks to me like we've been joined by another, 1 of your compatriots. I think we have. Although, he's currently on mute. Paul, are you there? And are you   are you listening like a surreptitious   spy? Or are you ready to communicate and say things? I don't really know.  

[00:27:17] Unknown:

Help me, shy.  

[00:27:18] Unknown:

Paul, are you there?  

[00:27:22] Unknown:

He's very shy. 1 more thing here. Push another button. There we go.  

[00:27:27] Unknown:

Hey, Paul. Paul b,   welcome to the show. How are you this fine afternoon? And have you got your fireworks ready for later on in your day?  

[00:27:38] Unknown:

No.   Actually,   I find that,   cough fingers   most of the time.  

[00:27:45] Unknown:

I'm I'm I apologize that I'm late to the I should think so. Is that right? What do you think you're doing? Outright?  

[00:27:52] Unknown:

Yeah. And, actually, the Global Voice Network stream only came up, like, 10 minutes ago.   And, and it was actually   until I worked out a problem, it was actually grabbing a feed from 1 of the people in in PPN Radio Ranch. So  

[00:28:08] Unknown:

so I've been yeah. It's it's been fun. Everything is working swimmingly now. Cool. Even though I most of the No. That's great, Paul. Well, that And it's good to have you here. I was It's good to have you here. It's great. So welcome to the show. It's good to have you here. That  

[00:28:24] Unknown:

that well, thank you. That that AI story, that was amazing. I mean, I was trying to do the switch over, but with the with the 40 or 50 second delay between   between us and Rumble,   I I didn't wanna change it. I was   I was positively  

[00:28:41] Unknown:

enthralled by that story. Yeah. I'm just gonna in Rumble, I'm gonna paste the link to the YouTube thing that I that I just put in. So if you want wanna go and have a look, maybe, hey, you know, if there's any listeners down in Brighton who still haven't cast their vote, maybe you want to, you know, put your trousers on and leg it down to the polling station, see if he's on the on the ballot. I don't really know.   I have no idea, but I   I just thought,   you know, at first, I was all snotty about it, because everybody goes, AI, AI, AI. It's just going it's non stop.   AI is going to change the world. And of course,   left in the hands of the incumbents,   it will probably   change it more rapidly in the wrong direction than they're currently going. However,   the idea of actually having an AI politician,   means that we might actually get a politician that even has a personality.  

It's just absolutely   it's it's bizarre, but I can't think of a politician that could answer 2, 600 phone calls. In fact, I can't think of a politician that can talk properly. Well, there's a few, Andrew Bridgeman can, and a few others.   And I'm not really laying it on thick here. No. I I I'm really not. It's not that they can't communicate in public. They're trained to do all that kind of stuff, but the,   okay. Well, I've got a comment in here from,   Grissel, good name, Grissel   0088.   Hi, Grissel.   He said he is on the ballot for sure. Well, that's fantastic. If anybody gets more information about AI Steve, would you let us know?   I should have maybe I could get him on the show later on. We could just end up doing a show where we talk to an AI bot.  

I don't know how much appeal that would have.   Maybe you could sort of mimic the idea over there, Paul, and get somebody,   can you get can you have an AI party? You might as well. American independence party. Look. There you go. See, I'm good at the acronym stuff. So you get the American independence party going, and then you have all these AI candidates. They'd completely they'd outperform  

[00:30:36] Unknown:

all your current law. I would have thought by country mile. You can talk you can talk to AI Steve. Go to   aidashsteve.co.uk   Yeah. And talk to Steve. Is that what you've just been doing now, Patrick? Gone off I just looked it up. Yeah. You mentioned it. I I I put it in yes, you can.  

[00:30:54] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[00:30:55] Unknown:

Yeah. We should actually see if he if he'll join us on the show.  

[00:31:00] Unknown:

Yeah. I know.   I just didn't I mean, I only I only spotted it yesterday morning and I've just not had enough time to do it. And I thought, oh, cool. When we were knocking this picture together, I thought, I like it, you know, he's quite nice, isn't he? I'm just being pathetic by the way, you know, I just thought I wouldn't take any too many cynical tablets today. He's he's smartly turned out   and he's a complete lump of software.   And so there we go. I mean, Ether writes, artificial intelligence is an oxymoron.   It is. I agree with you. It shall not work either, in my opinion. Completely concur.  

Unfortunately, it's in the hands of people that wanna sell it, you know, all that kind of stuff. And I get do you see a lot of the fear porn about AI is going to do this and AI is going to do that? I mean, yet again, it's 1 of these, let's suppose, let's assume that it's a technological advance.   Let's just assume that for now and go along with it.   Yet again, it's a tool that's only gonna sit in the hands of the select few   on a large scale. Oh, that was interesting.   And,   you know, we we will get access to it at that kind of level. Not that I'm looking for it. And I think I said something last week. There was there is a letter or some kind of communication that's been floating around,   which is,   I saw this woman write. She said, I don't want AI to do all the songs and all the lyrics and write books and read things to me. I don't either. What I need it to do is to do the washing up, go shopping for me, keep the house clean. You know. We do need it to do that, don't we? But, that would mean robots and then, of course, then we're into sci fi when the robots rebel and kill us, you know. But maybe that that should be more fun than what we've got at the moment because it's pretty dull around here with all these maniacs running around talking rubbish, you know. So,   was that was that the link to the site there, Patrick, that you just flashed through? I think it was.  

Okay.   If I can get my wits about me, I'll paste it into the Rumble chat, or if   or maybe you could. No. I'll I'll do that. I'll paste it. I'll do that right now. Okay. Cool. I got it. That's fantastic.   Yeah. So, no. That would be great.   And just I'm going to keep on doing this for a little bit. I'll just I mean, if we get no response on it, it's okay. But if you wanna call in and say something because it's political night. Right? This is this is the 1 time every 5 years, apparently,   dear people of England, Scotland, Ireland, well, not Ireland, but Northern Ireland and Wales,   where you can have your say.  

You can cast a vote and change the future direction of this nation. Don't you know? It says so in the small print somewhere.   So if you want to go off here on this show, it'd be great. Any policies you've got? Any ideas?   Probably people know what my policies are. I kind of,   you know, communicated them in that little blurb I did a few weeks back, that we've really got to shut the bank down. I mean, I'm being serious now, but I don't wanna be so serious all the time. But, if you've got any policy ideas,   there's so many interesting things   that could be suggested that never come up. That it's such a narrow band that they talk about, and all they talk about is really the economy.  

That's all all variations of it. Housing, this, that, and the other. And,   as we know,   as I would suggest strongly, let me put it that way, he said diplomatically,   it's almost irrelevant talking about it because they won't talk about the bank.   They've had some of the political leaders, of course, of these parties on telly   over here recently.   And,   but they haven't had the governor of the Bank of England,   nor have they had all the stockholders of the Bank of England. Why is there not? Why aren't they on?   I was thinking about the other day. I thought, I want to show with them on during general election, you know. What are you going to let the politicians do, oh, big money boss types? What are you gonna let them do?   Of course, I'm living in La la land here, but   were I prime minister, that's 1 of my, that would be 1 of my orders.  

I would make it almost a law that bank the the heads of the Bank of England England would have to enter into a public communications   campaign to inform everybody England about who owns the bank, what they're doing, and they need to make that those operations transparent, so that we can all see   in real terms just what little power the politicians have without the say so of the bank, which I would imagine is almost total. They're just, you know, that's that's kind of the way. I know I'm a bit like a broken record with this. Well,  

[00:35:19] Unknown:

did the king   bring the bank into existence? How did that work in the creation of the Bank of England? Because I know here the Federal Reserve Act passed by Congress is what   put the the Federal Reserve,   in control of of the money printing power.   How did it Yeah. Work?  

[00:35:39] Unknown:

It's a sim it was a similar sort of basically, it's you would call it like the moneyed class. Right? The patrician class is what they were called back in Greece and Rome. Okay?   That group of individuals,   big the biggest merchants going, as it were,   gathered themselves together and began to work on,   the seniorage   laws. This was in the mid 1600s. So the Bank of England comes about in 1694,   but there was an ongoing several decades of campaigning   and skullduggery   taking place.   Courtesy of a woman whose name escapes me, and if I had the link on the, but she was a bit of a tarch. Right? She she went around   and was, compromising   many of the ministers in all sorts of obvious ways that you could probably think of. Right? Even back then, nothing really changes. Right? Like Judith from the Bible. Exactly.  

Like a naughty modern day Judith from the Bible, and she was seducing them.   And they were, you know, she was giving them certain favors and they were yielding up their integrity, as it were, and didn't mind at the time. But,   the the   the law, the power to coin   or to mint coins, this is where it, you know, because obviously we had physical coins   and notes to some degree, but physical coins   of gold, silver, and other and then base metals like copper and other things as well.   The right to actually mint them, the power for that rested in the monarch.   It was   the monarch's   power to do that by which they would charge a fee for the minting of coins from the Royal Mint   and by which they raised revenue for the court and the operations and management of the country. Of course, this is   pre the wonderful gifts of democracy and the party political system. That was rolling through in the 1600 as well and building up a head of steam by then. But   that's they managed to, and I can't really go through it. It's detailed, and it's probably too detailed really for this show, and I don't have it in  

[00:37:44] Unknown:

front of me, so I'd need some notes to go through that. But,  

[00:37:47] Unknown:

they managed to effectively   chip away at this power and convince them.   Just like they convinced,   your representatives,   with the arrival of the Federal Reserve.   So your the pitch that you guys received was we need a flexible money supply to cope,   with the variations in the economy. Oh, it's jolly good. Of course, this is complete crap. You don't need anything of the sort. Or if you do, you certainly don't need it in private hands. And they convinced   or persuaded,   or corrupted,   or blackmailed, or bribed, or threatened, and probably a combination of all of those things,   the leading people of the day.  

And they got hold of the seigniorage power.   The power to coin the money,   and   that was the beginning of the end of fiscal independence for the English, and for the Scots,   and for the Welsh, and for the people of Northern Ireland. For the people of these islands,   that was the beginning of the real control grid, which we've endured ever since. Of course, it didn't have all the power that it has today. Right at the beginning, back in 16/94,   it didn't have all of that. But once it got its foot in the door, it became impossible to sort of get it out, or as let's put it this way, to press,   it has proved   not possible,   to do it. And of course, part of the reason for that is that most people don't even know this. It's certainly not taught in English or British schools. I can tell you that.  

And I didn't see   any political leader being asked about this. And I'm going to go back to that clip again, which I listened to again, the 1 from Liz Truss. And I think repetition is the base of radio, so you may have heard me say this before, but we need to keep on reminding ourselves.   Liz Truss, this woman who only sat in there for 49 days,   the shortest serving   prime minister ever. So at least, I guess, she's notable for that. But she pointed out that the governor of the Bank of England cannot be sacked, but the prime minister can.   Therefore, question, who has the most power? Well, it ain't the prime minister.  

And,   that's, you know, that's basically sack him?   Can she sack him? No. She got no power over it because it's The king. The king. You said No. The king of him.   Charles the third. The current 1 at the moment. Yeah. No. No. They've never been they have they sort of we're not supposed to pry too deeply, but they can't do that.   I mean, although there's a thing where the monarch used to visit the city of London.   Now that hasn't happened   since Charles   the third's reign began in earnest, and it's all been so exciting and brilliant and wonderful. It's just complete nonevent, of course, which is designed to be.   But his mother, Queen Elizabeth the second,   did go to the city of London on several occasions,   and the monarch is instructed   to go dressed as a commoner.  

It's very   that that sending you signals about who's in charge. She cannot go   wearing her crown,   which she used to get very upset about because I I understood she used to wear it all day long. Look at me. I'm the queen. No, she didn't, of course. Yeah. But she wasn't allowed to wear a robe. There were there couldn't be any courtiers. There's no trumpets. There's no fanfare. There's no royal carriage with magnificent horses and all that kind of stuff. There's none of the the the monarch has arrived type thing. She had to go, I think, a knock on her door or something like that. It's a bit like they have in the Houses of Parliament over here when it when they start the new session. And, she would walk behind the mayor of the city of London,   and that's kind of telling you who's boss. She,   has effectively been put in a position, or the arrangement is such.  

And I guess it's a bit like a good cop bad cop thing,   you know.   All these little sort of walls   around the power center so that you can't really get to it. And the queen or the monarch now forms part of that wall. So she can't   sack them.   And,   I think we go back   to we go back to that quote from Disraeli.   Or actually, is it Disraeli?   Or he's a character in Disraeli's   novel, Coningsby, I think it is.   I've forgotten the name of the banker, but he's got a banker in there, which loosely is based on, Rothschild at the time,   Nathaniel Rothschild,   the guy that profited a great deal from the Battle of Waterloo.  

And,   he's basically saying the world is governed by persons   that nobody knows about. That's the gist of the quote from the novel, and   it's not changed since then, of course.   So the money power is it. As you know, I bang on about this.   I was actually,   the weekend just gone. Eric von Essex. Hi, Eric. I can see you lingering and lurking in the, in the chat room, and you're feel free to join us on the call connection if you get the urge. I had a good little show with, Eric invited me on to his show on Sunday just gone, and we had a good chat for a couple of hours really about this,   and about the history of of elections and,   and the money power.  

And, of course, it's the same in your neck of the woods too. But you've got the 4th July and lots of fireworks today to distract you from this extremely important piece of information.   Yes.  

[00:43:04] Unknown:

I'm I'm I have a book from the   regarding   the minting of coins   from the 16th century.   And Yeah.   Basically, you have to be very careful   who handles the money. Even back then, they're saying you have to know how to assay   gold and silver for their purity.   You have to watch carefully the people who make the plates for the for the,   stampers and all this stuff because just a little bit of   funny business and you're you're losing tons of money. And   it's it's the people   people in charge of those things, the mints   that that,   really do have the power, like you say. And by the way, I I got some feedback that radio soapbox isn't   blasting any audio at the moment. It's silent.  



[00:43:52] Unknown:

Oh, really? Let me go and have a look. Thanks for that. You're absolutely right. Don't know why.   Let me just have a look now. There we are. We got some audio.   Don't know why that happened. I forgot to check that 1. I've got about 16 things to check at the beginning, and it should work automatically. Thanks for the, the heads up on that. So,   if, you've been listening on Radio Soapbox for the last 43 minutes, you obviously haven't.   I'm just checking the history. Oh, no. It I I ran for a while and then fell off. Okay. That's a bit strange, but never mind. Thanks for that, Patrick. What fun.   I love the technical stuff. But yeah. Anyway, going back to the monetary stuff,   which I really can never go. I mean, there's a book called   I've got it on my shelf. Good I think it's called Good Money,   and it's about button makers in England. I don't know if you're aware of this. It's by somebody called something Sefton. I think he's an American researcher,   but he wrote about,   button makers in England in the 1700   who,   because of their skill in making buttons, also managed to sort of translate that over into making lots of local currencies.  

There was a reason for this. The probably the Royal Mint was suffering at times or was not being particularly effective in getting coinage distributed. And so to stimulate   exchange, that's what they did. These ideas, of course, are just not taught, not known,   and it was highly effective as   are all these examples that we touch upon from here quite regularly   about what happens when the money power is devolved, you could say, down to a local level.   And I guess what we're involved with with an election   is confirming the centralization   of power,   when in fact,   if we apply the buy their fruits, shall ye know them,   policy, which we should,   there's very little to recommend   an ever enlarging central government unless, of course, you're a communist.  

And, I would suggest that basically communism   communism is the goal. That's really what wokeism is all about. It's what globalism is all about. And I think democracy, this little   pantomime that's taking place today,   where everybody's being g'd up for it, and it's all going to make a difference,   Democracy is effectively slow burn communism. That's what it is. It's a way to sort of introduce it,   and to build it up and, you know,   slowly, it morphs into ever more centralised   control. And people now view   the government as daddy. You know, this has been going on for a long time.   And, I guess, what are the left about? We want more power in the government to help poor people, and they fail to realise that the more power you put into government, the less help, effective and intelligent help you get, because it's not designed to do that. So yeah.  

Got a little comment here from XO.   In the thing, he says, if you're from my area of West Yorkshire, well, I may have been. I don't know what your area of West Yorkshire, but I was from West Yorkshire.   He says, we have a group who clipped coins. Our local pub is called The Coiners. Yep. Coin clipping.   I think that refers back to what you were just talking about then, Patrick.   Yeah. You know, about these people   clipping the coins, which is,  

[00:47:06] Unknown:

Clipping the coins, mixing metals that, you know, make making alloys that,   Mhmm. Take away the gold and the silver and put in more base metals. And then take the gold and silver and hide it away. That kind of thing. There are all sorts of clever ways of of doing that if you're not careful.   Yeah. And the mon the Monarch   back then, they they advised the Monarch to be especially cautious of people   working in the mints because that's what they do. There's the temptation to   to,   scrounge and   and clip and   do all those nasty things that people do to,   cheat.  

You think? Really? Are you are you suggesting that bankers are not necessarily honorable people historically, Patrick? Is that what you're kind of implying? Is that what you think? No. Just people in general, I suppose. It's like how how do you keep how do you keep track of it? Like, what's the best method? You know? Because if it because if it's decentralized to a point,   yes, I guess. But at the same   time,   you have to be smart enough to   notice that is going on locally if you have a local currency.   Because there's all the logistics of things if you're gonna   decentralize things like you say.  

Mhmm. Or or if you have a benevolent monarch, which I think   could be possible.  

[00:48:27] Unknown:

I think it's been happened in the past. But It has happened in the past. Yeah. It has happened in the I think it happened in the past when there were obviously   a lot fewer of us around.   And the reason I mentioned that is that, therefore, the lines of communication   between the king and a peasant,   even though it probably didn't take place much if at all,   were considerably shorter.   When England only had a couple of 1000000 people in   it. Although they didn't have Tintanet and all this kind of stuff.   There was a very strong solid sort of local   base for all people.  

And anybody that was found clipping coins would have been dealt with probably in a very rough way, and rightfully so. So you could see sort of thievery and interference with with local coinage   very rapidly, and people would sniff out that someone's clipping coins or passing duds or this, that, and the other, and they would be able to get on top of it. I mean, not instantly. And, of course, gangs,   would evolve all sorts of techniques for doing it.   I mean, now that now that they've got all this control with AI,   and now that we're going to make AI Steve the central banker,   seriously, that would be better than what we've got. Can't we let AI Steve run it, please?  

You could say,   of course, they do say this. Oh, we're going to protect you, you know, from all the monetary crime.   But this is really   an unbelievable laugh on their part because   they're at the epicenter of it. You know, as we've mentioned here before,   the,   the dynamic of a protection racket is in all things governmental.   We're here to protect you. We're gonna protect your health. Really? Yeah. We're gonna sort out the economy. Are you? Are you? We're gonna make sure that other nations,   are put off going to war with us. Are you sure about that? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna do all that kind of stuff. And, of course, the reverse ends up becoming true.   They get so much power,   in that central thing, and of course, that's now all corrupted so that we are we're voting for everybody's voting for these horrible actors, and they're very dull.  

When I was on with Eric, by the way, on Friday,   no, not on Friday. I was on with him on Sunday, but on Friday, he and I think I mentioned this a bit earlier in the show.   They've been having the leading candidates over here, you know, rock up   on a thing called question time with   some BBC BINT called Fiona Bruce, and she's armed to the teeth with all these pre vetted questions that they're gonna grill them with.   And, on Friday, they had,   somebody from the Green party on,   for the first 30 minutes. And then they had Nigel Farage or Nigel Faraj. I think I mentioned him last week. Perform.   Yeah. That's right.  

And,   not that I'm not a supporter of him.   He's out there to make it interesting.   He's actually the only 1 that you would listen to simply because he can sort of talk in an engaging way and knows how to address a crowd and comes across reasonably human.   Stop laughing out there.   Okay. But he does, in comparison to the others. This is not necessarily saying much. But he's been kind of thrown in to make it actually interesting. It's not   interesting,   and maybe their political party's got a chance of success.   But,   his 30 minute stint was very revealing in the sense that   the audience   was completely preloaded   with lefty   woke,   types.  

And all they wanted to talk to him about   was how his party attracts racists.   Why is it that your party attracts racists?   Why are you a racist? Why is this a racist thing? There was no real talk about anything much that was sensible,   and he couldn't get away from it. And   I was reading in The Independent, 1 of the quality newspapers over here. Well, that's what they call it anyway.   They said that,   during his 30 minute stint,   he didn't get 1 round of applause for anything he said.   Now that's by   that was organised.   He was brought in   to be effectively sort of, you know, hung out in public and meant to look a bit of an idiot. He he didn't do that. And I have to say, irrespective of whether you like him or not, and I suspect most people listening to this show are not particularly big fans, even though he's got a massive presence certainly, you know, having hobnobbed with Trump in the States and this, that, and the other.  

He did make a very a very good point about migration,   which they didn't no 1 came back to him on this point. And and so therefore, these conversations, this point he was raising,   I think is definitely 1 that needs to be pursued. What he said was   because you had a lot of there are a lot of these emoting type women in the audience that want to care for everybody in the world. Right? Now, I don't knock that as a drive or a feeling,   but it's got to be tempered with sort of   logic   and   and   a calculator   to see just how many how many people do you think we can actually help and where? This is the big question. Where do you think we can help them? And 1 of the things that Faraj was saying, he said, look,   he said, we've had an immigration policy for a long time.  

I'm with Enoch Powell, by the way, on this. The the immigration policy is completely wrong, and it's, it doesn't achieve anything. It's designed to well, it has been designed to bring us to this idiotic situation that we're now in,   where most actual indigenous people of these islands   have been bullied into being fearful about speaking out about it, because they see the sorts of things that come down from the courts.   Think of e g Sam Melia   putting up a sticker saying it's okay to be white. But what Farage pointed out, he said, look,   we used to run an immigration policy. This is up until the arrival of a chap called Tony Blair, if he is a chap. He used to be called Miranda apparently at university because he's, you know, this way and that. And,   he said, we used to have a a net migration policy of about 10, 000 a year.  

Then,   with the arrival of the Blair   government,   new Labour,   which was effectively   Labour taking on board the policies of the Conservative Party at the prehistoric socialist institution, which is what they'd become,   and were riven by all this sort   of militant trade union   infighting, and all sorts of other things that that, you know, could be rehandled another way, but by then it descended into a bit of a farce.   So they took their policies on,   got elected, and they immediately   started to allow it to rise. And Faraj pointed this out. But the question   never came up   to the you see, they're asking him questions, but really I think in these in an instance like this, these people that were trying to ask these preloaded questions   weren't grilled and they need to be grilled. You know, 1 of the questions is, okay,   you think people should come here, how many?  

So they'll give you a figure. Oh, I don't know, because it's been a million or something in the last year or something ludicrous.   The last 3 or 4 years is just absolutely   nuts. It's   but it never works in principle. And yet again, it's the same thing that we were talking about, you know, with regards to the money.   Once they got their foot in the door,   how do you get it? You've got to get it out. You should never let it in the first place, but people get complacent.   They lose sight of things. They sort of drift off. They do all this kind of stuff, you know.   So I think a question to these people that think,   it's racist   to run an immigration policy and any anybody can come here. The actual key question should be how many?  

Because   whatever figure they say, I would say it's not high enough.   Because   they're not it's to try and illustrate a point. If 10, 000 can come,   why are you denying the other 8, 000, 000 that want to come?   Why did you allow this 10, 000 to come and not that 8, 000, 000? Let's get 8, 000, 000 people a week arriving in Britain. Would that do it? In other words, you've got to exaggerate this   possibly with the hope and it's a it's a tenuous hope at that.   That the penny might drop with these people, that the resources of any nation   are not limitless   and that what they're suggesting doesn't solve   the problem that they say they want to solve, which is the plight of these people.  

So you know, we've had all these people running away from war zones. Okay. How do how are they supposed to get back? Paul, yes, sorry.  

[00:57:13] Unknown:

If if we wanna help the plight of these people,   let's quit spending a bunch of money   on,   hammer screwdrivers and toilet seats   and funneling money into black budgets and actually   work with these countries.   Give them give them the technologies that they need to to get their own energy, to grow their own food, to have clean water,   to have a a solid workable education system   instead of   opening   our doors   and importing them in here   to put the strain on this country until the point that it becomes a third world world country.   Yep. Let's just use the resources of this country and fix theirs.  



[00:58:01] Unknown:

You and your pestilogical,   Paul. You'd never make a politician, would you? I'm   I'm sorry. I'm it's like this this damn soapbox. It's I know. Well, it's right. It's right. Listen, a fantastic little comment here in the in the rumble chat,   from XO. Thank you for this. Apparently, this is with regards to Britain, the unit Britain,   the United Kingdom.   Apparently, 1 in 32 people in this country have arrived here in the last 2 years.   That means if our population is 64, 000, 000 and it's greater than that, that means   2, 000, 000. That means 2, 000, 000 people have arrived here. And guess what?  

They've got the vote,   haven't they?   They've got the vote.   I've banged on here before about the Byzantine   solution.   Byzantium,   the longest lasting,   civilized empire we know of about 1300 years.   Spluttered out about 700 years ago, 6 or 700 years ago. Okay?   Went on for a long time.   Why?   Because as Ezra Pound discovered,   and as he championed rightfully and accurately because this makes me a right wing extremist for saying this, but this is, you know, that old western logic running around again, causing trouble.   Aliens were banned from occupying any positions of power in banking,   law,   education,   and government.  

They were banned. They were barred. They couldn't get in. That's why it lasted so long because a civilization is a reflection of race.   Not because I say so, but because it is.   So   we're looking at what's happening to Western Europe, we're looking at what's happening to you in North America,   and we're looking at what happens to people in Australia,   and it's the same pattern everywhere as people here probably know.   Huge numbers of people are being enabled to come here.   They're not and this is a point that Faraj make and so this doesn't mean I support him. It's just that you must identify truth when anybody says it, whether it actually leads to anything or not, you know, is is debatable. But   he was saying, the people that are coming here right now wouldn't have even qualified   as migrants or refugees   20, 30 years ago,   which means that someone, uh-huh,   has been adjusting   the laxity laws to allow ever more people in. Why?  

Well,   many people here will be familiar with this,   document written in the 19 twenties called the Kuttenhove, Calurgy Plan,   which sprang up on the Internet about 4 or 5 years ago, maybe it's longer than that,   by Count   von   who was race mixed himself,   who wrote this basically, kind of the agenda   for the annihilation   of,   racial   homogeneity   in the European   countries.   Why?   I I would suggest that most of their arguments,   which are, we've got to be nice to people, are just a cover for,   we don't care how nice we are to other people as long as we're really really nasty towards the white Western Christian Europeans,   because that's what's happening.  

And your logic, I'd stand by that completely. There's so many,   you know, this other argument, which I'm I've mentioned before, I'm gonna say I say it again.   The Western nations are stealing   the best of these people.   They're stealing them.   And what is irritating, and therefore it becomes a media issue, in the end, what we're talking about here is the media challenge.   I'm I'm saying a few things here which many people will be familiar with, and you may be familiar with even more and better and more effective arguments on this. But the main problem we have   is, we can't get them out to a sufficiently large enough   audience   and repeat it for a long enough period for it to sink in. It doesn't sink in.  

And what I was really interested in with the Farage   thing on Friday just gone,   was the emotional condition of the people in the audience that were asking   these insane questions. And of course, if I told them that they were insane,   they'd want to kind of kill you emotionally, because   there's something really complex taking place or it appears to be complicated.   These people want to come across as saints,   and when people like you and I suggest a pragmatic way of dealing with this,   which is maybe not the,   all singing and dancing version that they've got, where we've apparently got limitless resources and everybody's gonna happy, and you must get on with everybody, even though we know historically that this is almost impossible to do, and it's very dangerous.   It might get them to think about things, but they're not even aware of these of these ideas.  

Anyway, look, we've been going for an hour.   I've had a request for a song and we are going to play, but we're not going to play it right now because I wanted to play something I've played before because I think it's appropriate. I was thinking about this today,   and this is a Van Morrison track,   which I've played here before. It's called   Western Man   and it really does sum up our plight   and what's going on today. So we're gonna take a 4 or 5 minute 3 and a half minute break. You're listening to Paul English Live here on WBN 324.   We're here every Thursday for a couple of hours, 3 PM to 5 PM US Eastern, 8 PM to 10 PM   in the UK. I'm here with Paul   and Patrick, and we'll be back after this brief and really rather wonderful song. And if you've got time to, listen to the lyrics or even look them up, please do. Western Man by Van Morrison.  



[01:03:36] Unknown:

Western   man has no plan   since he became   complacent.   Stop believing in himself.   Let others steal his rewards   while he was dreaming.   While he was dreaming,   others were scheming,   doing deals   behind his back.   Now this young man is adrift   and under   attack.   What happened in between?   Now there's no other bite of the cherry   unless he's prepared to fight.   Start on and you've got the freedom.   You've got   freedom.   The horse has bolted   from the stables.   The lunatics have taken over   the farm.   Your tickets have taken over the main house.   Clandestine   meetings in the forest.  

Going back   to the way it was,   now it just seems, ain't impossible.   Well, some man   has no plan.   And stole that wine   while he was dreaming.   Now there's no other bite,   no other bite of the cherry.   Unless he's prepared to fight,   start on.   You've had the freedom.   Mars has bolted   from the stables.   The lunatics have taken   over the farm.   Cat tickers have taken   over the main building.   The governors have gone   over the wall.   Palestine   meetings and the forest   not going back,   not going back to the way it was.   Western man   has no plan   since he became   complacent,   stop believing in himself,   and let others   While he was dreaming.  

While he was dreaming.   While he was dreaming.   Others were scheming.   Scheming while he was dreaming.   Others were scheming,   while he was dreaming.   Others were scheming   while he was  

[01:07:03] Unknown:

34 radio.  

[01:07:07] Unknown:

Attention all listeners. Are you seeking uninterrupted access to WBN 324 talk radio despite incoming censorship hurdles?   Well, it's a breeze. Just grab and download opera browser, then type in wbn324dot   zil,   and stay tuned for unfiltered discussions around the clock. That's wbn324.zil.  

[01:07:30] Unknown:

The views, opinions, and content of the show host and their guests appearing on the World Broadcasting Network   are their own and do not necessarily   reflect those of its owners,   partners, and other hosts or this network.   Thank you for listening to WBN 324   Talk Radio.  

[01:07:47] Unknown:

Yeah. Thanks for listening to the show, everyone. Welcome back. It's the 4th July. We're here in the UK. We're having a   wonderful general election. It's taking place right now. It's so very, very exciting, but we are trying to rip it to pieces because that's all it's really fit for.   I've got, Patrick and Paul here with me in the studio. But we also have been joined on the call line by   Eric. Eric, can you hear me? And are you in the are you in the calling studio?  

[01:08:12] Unknown:

Yes. I'm in the call in studio. Can you hear me loud and clear? You sound absolutely marvelous. Yeah. You sound marvelous. It's absolutely wonderful. Thank you. Well, you know, I've been taking my hands on tablets today. So, you know   Good. But, I saw a a labor thing posted up there. It says labor for change. Does that   mean cross dressing? Because,   Blair was caught in a public lavatory, wasn't he, with another bloke, and he's, known as Miranda at,   University.   So would it be compulsory for us to wear, you know, ladies' stuff? I I don't know.  

[01:08:46] Unknown:

Well, you're saying that in jest, but now I'm getting really worried, Eric, because,   you might end up being a prophet,   which would be a terrible thing, wouldn't it? If that's 1 of your prophecies. This is gonna be a very, very bad thing. Of course.  

[01:09:02] Unknown:

What was that, Paul? Come on, Paul. Question. Wasn't   wasn't that movie,   wasn't that movie,   let's see,   prognostication,   what was it? The Blair Witch Project? Isn't that pretty much what you guys wound up with?  

[01:09:18] Unknown:

Yeah. We did. Really? Yeah. Good old Tony. So I I'm not into cross dressing myself,   Eric. I I don't think it's it's very good. Now, we're moving into   we're moving into that terrible new agenda that they've been pushing for the last few years,   which is very very bad.   And JK Rowling, bless her cotton socks,   has been fantastic. Whatever you may think about her books or whatever, you may love them. I don't really know. There's lots of we ought to probably do a Harry Potter special at some point about has it really been pushing satanism into children or whatever. It's a very interesting sort of thing. But her her attack upon,   well, actually it's not really an attack. Her defence   of the rights of women in the face of this transgender   illness, which is what it is. These people are ill.  

That would get, that's probably outrageous what I've just said. Is that extremist what I've just said? It's about to become that way anyway.   But yes, she's done a fantastic job in in defending   defending the rights of women. Although, I'm still puzzled by what rights actually are, but that's just me personally.   Yeah. What did you think of the song? I know I've played it before, but I don't know if you caught the lyrics. I just think it's I I was listening again today in the car and I thought, that's spot on. I like the word complacency.   I don't really like it actually. In fact, I'm a bit complacent about it, but   it was spot on. I thought there really has become this sort of this lethargy, this sort of spiritual lethargy among so many of our people. Although,   there is also this energizing process of which I hope this show is part of that, you know, to get people   well, ready to get a rocket up your ass, frankly, because, now's a good a time to get anything up there and might as well be a rocket, if you know what I mean.  



[01:11:01] Unknown:

So, yeah. Anyway, I mean, Eric, you're not you're not you're not thinking of becoming a cross dresser or anything like that, are you? That would be a bit worrying. I got I got a bit angry once when I got to accidentally put 2 legs down, 1 trouser leg. I don't know where that would be cross dressing, is it? I don't know.   I   think Yeah. Said a few words, you know, first thing in the morning, it fell over. So is is that what I'm I'm very innocently unlaid as you know. And, I guess, is that cross dressing? Is or you're very angry when you're getting dressed in the morning, you know. But,   I have this problem I'll share with the listeners   is that I dress as a mane   because   I am a mane, but I think that might be,   I I I don't know whether I'll be, sent to court for that because I'm you're not allowed to say that now because there's no no difference between male and female apparently now. We're all the same. We're all all sort of homogeneous or something. Well, that's what they would have as that would that's what they would have as accept  

[01:11:56] Unknown:

or internalize. I mean, this is part of the problem, you know. This thing about resisting their agenda is a big problem, I feel, because we end up becoming   smothered as it were, absorbing all the bilge that they're putting out and spend far too much time   sort of running around in their intellectual mire, which is exactly the purpose of it. This is why more and more outrageous things keep coming out to absorb your attention   about really stupid very very stupid things that nobody's interested   in. And and it's also indicative of this separation between   our rulers, who they now really do fancy themselves as, you know, and they're doing everything to ensure that they can maintain this   this ever increasing rule over us, as opposed to being our servants,   Which,   they would probably in public say, oh, yes. We are your servants. But you know, around the back of the bike sheds, they're all sniggering and having another fag.  

A cigarette for you people in America. Right? They're having another cigarette,   and doing all that kind of stuff. So it's,   you know, I'm not I I mentioned this before, I'm personally not into resistance of their ideas. I am into the restoration of ours though   And I think we are healthier when we do that. And it would break us out of, as Van Morrison says, our complacency   and our dreaming of things. While, I mean, the lyrics are pretty spot on there, I thought, you know. I never used to be a lyrics guy but they're really important these days, you know. So while we're sloping off   and had a pretty comfy time of it, you have to admit, it's been pretty comfy up until,   really this century. I think this century has not been comfortable at and I'm talking about the whole 24 years of it ever since it started off with, with 911.  

We've been permanently   disturbed   emotionally and intellectually, and no doubt that was needed. We actually needed that and we've had the tools to find things out. But but now the bad guys are,   using,   AI to just keep calling the cliche and all sorts of other things to effectively,   you know, keep pummeling our minds   that they really do know what they're doing. I mean, it's absolutely it's a nonsense.   I got another little clip for you all here as well. I came across this,   actually some, who sent this in? Oh, this was forwarded from Britain First. I don't really mind where it came from, and it appeared on the,   Paul English chat Telegram group earlier today. It's about 45,   seconds long. Let me just play this to you. Let's see if this comes across.  



[01:14:22] Unknown:

Do you know   that out of the 3, 300, 000   people who came, including the Indians and their dependents, who might have come on 6 month visas as students. So we're not talking about them having eligibility to a passport or that issue. They have a right to vote.   57   countries from the Commonwealth,   plus Zimbabwe that isn't even in the Commonwealth,   plus Ireland, which we have reciprocal agreement,   can vote in our elections.   These are people who so out of that just last year's intake, it's   250, 000 Indians, 250, 000   Nigerians,   150, 000 Pakistanis,   Bangladeshis,   and the list goes on.  



[01:15:10] Unknown:

Hey. That's great. All these lovely voters. Anybody aware of that 1? Have you heard that 1 before?  

[01:15:19] Unknown:

I heard similar.  

[01:15:22] Unknown:

That's, somebody may the only way to You may. Oh, look. There's another voice coming in on the ethers. Where's this voice, Paul? Clue us in. This is really good. What's going  

[01:15:32] Unknown:

on? He's coming from Michigan.  

[01:15:35] Unknown:

Hi. Hi. Person coming from Michigan. Dave and the thumb. How you guys doing?  

[01:15:39] Unknown:

We're having a good time. What's it like in Michigan? I was just listening to George.  

[01:15:44] Unknown:

I was just listening to George Galloway,   and he was just talking about the Bangladeshis,   and he's he's fighting for him over there. Is that right?  

[01:15:56] Unknown:

Probably.   I trust you, and I trust your imagination more than I would the mainstream media, so I'll give you a yes. Yeah. He probably is doing that. What what why? What he's just fighting for them. Is he they need fighting. What the Bangladeshis that are living in the UK, is that who he's fighting for?  

[01:16:17] Unknown:

Right.   He it sounded like he   he was trying to get a a debate   with,   Faraj   about   because I guess Faraj is saying now I'm just going by what I heard George say, and I don't hearted this to him. You know, I just catch him once in a while on a channel I pick up.   But he said that Farage is,   not happy with the black and brown people because they're, you know, they're not native to England, and they're they're trying to make up all these laws and stuff for them. Or, you know anyway,   it's kinda funny what's going on here too. You know?   But Farage wouldn't debate him,   and, I didn't know George was was,   was in your in the parliament there or something.  

I just thought he was some loud mouth, you know,   Scotch,   talk show host till I just heard him today.   I guess it was his Wednesday show, and he had Scott Ritter on,  

[01:17:23] Unknown:

who's an American. But anyway, I'll yield there and see what you gotta say about all that. A loud mouthed man in our parliament? Gosh, he'd want to have a word with you. I think you're right though.   Anybody out there emotionally attached to the future of George Galloway? The thing is all of these guys are a bit like broken clocks.   Most of the time they're wrong and then every now and again they say something that's true. Although what he's just said then. But you see he's a lefty, I believe. I don't all these labels and stuff. It's just nuts. The   the there is this sort of to me,   a completely   childish view about how you are supposed to help, if you can,   people outside of your race and nation. I'm not saying that we shouldn't do that if we've got the capacity to do it, but it seems to me that right now,   the people,   that need the most help are,   the English and the Scots and the Welsh and the people of Northern Ireland and the people of Ireland   whose governments, and it's the same with you guys in North America,   are it's not a euphemism, are literally our enemy.  

They're literally waging war on us   using all the power centers of the civilization that we are supposed to have received in good order,   and they're wrecking it because their allegiance,   and, Sir Keir Starmer is a prime example, their allegiance   is to their globalist   pals in the European Union or wherever they may hang out, you know, and going to dinner parties with Klaus Schwab and all those morons that gather around him who say we are the elite and we really know what we're doing. Well, they do know what they're doing it's just that we don't want what they've got. They didn't ask us whether we want to buy the goods and services that they're putting on offer.   And Galloway falls into that. You know, I guess my rule of thumb is if they're not addressing the banking issue, if they don't bring it up at all, what's the point of bringing anything else up? Because,   all of these arguments that they had even with Farage were along the lines of count, you know, can we afford this and can we afford that? We don't know.  

We have no idea because nobody says, oh, here's the accounts book. This is what we could do. But But I'm just coming back Paul to what you were saying a few minutes ago.   We can help people. We can help them in a way that we would want to help them if they wanted that help, but it's not in a way that the globalist agenda wants these people helping. They are using these people to weaken us, and they don't give a fig about the welfare of these so called migrants and refugees. They don't care. They're just being used as pawns on the chessboard   to go to the next phase of the game, where they're gonna get checkmate on everybody, or at least that seems to be the idea. I don't know what anybody thinks about that, but that's that's generally my take on it.  



[01:20:03] Unknown:

What party is he in? I see you lived out. That's brilliant.  

[01:20:06] Unknown:

You're exactly right.   And I yield.  

[01:20:10] Unknown:

Great. No. Thank thanks. And what's what's happening in in Michigan later? Have you got have you got your collection of fireworks? Are you gonna be loosing rockets off of vulnerable   US citizens everywhere and just going crazy? Is that what's gonna be happening or are you having a quiet 4th July?  

[01:20:28] Unknown:

It's quiet, and I'm saving my rockets for the war. Thank you.  

[01:20:35] Unknown:

I I think we all need to stock up on rockets, everybody. I think we all need to stock up on rockets. Paul. Yeah. Paul.  

[01:20:42] Unknown:

Yep. The the only rockets we'll be launching is if Biden's aboard 1 of them.  

[01:20:49] Unknown:

Oh, I I read something today. Go ahead.   Just you mentioned Biden. I was trying to remember what you're going to say. I wanted to ask you a question.   Is he   stepping down? I heard that his,   they use the word performance. I couldn't be bothered to watch it.   Apparently, he just it was like having vegetable on stage when he did this so called debate with Trump. We've got similar sort of piffle and nonsense taking place here. And apparently, the the great and the good of the Democratic party were very concerned and want him to basically, you know, go away. But I read somewhere today that he'd given it he'd given it careful thought, which is obviously a lie because he can't think about anything.   And he decided that he wasn't gonna go away at all, and that he's he's going to lead the Democrats to victory, whatever the hell that might mean, and it will be hell, I suppose.  

So   do do you know what's happening? I needed the shoe in. Yeah.  

[01:21:45] Unknown:

He's he's demented.  

[01:21:47] Unknown:

And the can't in. I mean, they've already imported enough votes that that they figured that   even if he was a complete blithering idiot instead of, like, a 3 quarters of a blithering idiot,   that he's gonna get elected anyway. And   the way it works in the United States is   when you vote for   a politician,   when you vote for someone for president,   you are,   according   to the   national committees,   you're voting for that party.   Right. So   if   they have somebody out there they're running   and people vote for him and he gets in,   the national   committee   still has the ability   to switch   and replace it   before the inauguration   because you're you're voting for the party and not for the person. And that's what the conventions are about.  

Right? Yeah. They have a Yeah. That's They have a party convention  

[01:22:49] Unknown:

every year or every, 4 years for the president. And it's usually just before within a few months of the actual presidential election that they have held the convention. And there,   they have delegates that decide who their nominee is going to be. So they could have a list of super delegates   that decide that they're gonna run Kamala Harris instead of Biden or, you know, someone else.   But Gavin Newsom of California has been talked about. Big Mike.   Big Big Mike. Isn't Gavin Newsom   top retard? Isn't he sort of 1 of the super crazies? What's interesting about him is he was married married to, I think it's Kimberly Guilfoyle, who's now,   fiance to Donald Trump junior.  



[01:23:36] Unknown:

So it's it's there's some inbreeding and politics going on here. Correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't she a Jew?  

[01:23:43] Unknown:

If I don't know I have no idea. I have no idea.  

[01:23:48] Unknown:

I've heard I've heard for so long that she was a Jew, and then, you know, and Donald Trump junior was, you know, bedding her. And and now they're saying she's a Catholic.   So I don't know. I mean, the mean the mainstream's all over her being a Catholic. Well, I think is that she's with Judaism. Anybody can become a Catholic.   Oh. But I guess. Yeah. Yeah. I know.  

[01:24:15] Unknown:

Yeah.   Well, it's thrilling. It's great. You know 1 thing that's always occurred to me about,   the terms   for a US president is   4 years.   It it seems to it's always struck me when I was younger. 2 terms? The permanent election cycle in the States.  

[01:24:32] Unknown:

It's just permanent. Yeah. They're limited to Yeah. It's nonstop. Well Yeah? They're they're limited to 2 2 terms. So a total of 8 years. And that was passed just after Roosevelt, who was their longest serving president,   FDR, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who who served 4 terms.   Yeah. I think he died in office. And and he wasn't Jew.  

[01:24:55] Unknown:

Yeah. Rosenfeld. He was.  

[01:24:57] Unknown:

Yeah. His wife was the his wife was the heiress to the to the   the dude who,   drugged up China and made all them, every hooked everybody on opium.  

[01:25:11] Unknown:

The Sassoon family. The Sassoon family. No. No. No. Yeah.  

[01:25:16] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. Right. Right. Okay.  

[01:25:19] Unknown:

Well, it's nice. Also, didn't,   president   Roosevelt, he's the guy as well, coming back to seniorage and coinage.   He's the guy that  

[01:25:29] Unknown:

kindly took everybody's gold away from them in the early 19 thirties, didn't he? Oh, they're Yeah. They were happy about that. Like you were not the gold standard.  

[01:25:37] Unknown:

Yeah. That's right. 13/30. He just said, we're gonna take all your gold for the economy.  

[01:25:42] Unknown:

Yeah. The enemy.  

[01:25:44] Unknown:

Yeah.   Yeah. Well, of course, he's only got your best interests at heart, you know, because he's exact   Yeah.   Yeah. It's non stop. Couple of comments here in the in the chat room here on Rumble. Soapbox,  

[01:25:58] Unknown:

by the way.  

[01:25:59] Unknown:

Pardon? Oh, okay. Soapbox.   Alright. Thanks. Why is it doing that? Very odd.   Stop doing that.   Let's back up again. I have no idea why it does that. We still got a few technical things with soapbox, so apologies if you're trying to become a regular listener. It's a bit arduous at times. We're we're trying to make it easy for you, but sometimes we fail a bit.   Comment here. You know, we were just talking a bit about,   how we could help people from other nations.   Exo writes, we can help a lot with just the £12, 000, 000, 000   given to Zelensky.  

Is is that what we've given? What did the US just give? 60, 000, 000, 000 was it or something?  

[01:26:38] Unknown:

Is that right? Likely? Oh, we've given that dude over a $100, 000, 000, 000   since since all that started.  

[01:26:45] Unknown:

And you've probably given it to him. And then he just bought his boyfriend.  

[01:26:49] Unknown:

Yep. He just bought his boyfriend a $5, 000, 000 Bugatti.  

[01:26:54] Unknown:

Wow. Nice. That's good. Maybe I can get his boyfriend on the show here, and we'll find out a few things. And, because, you know, I wouldn't mind a Bugatti. That would be quite good.   Yeah. So we so if we've given him to and, of course, they've given Zelensky this money because he's such a powerful world leader full of authority, insight, experience,   and tremendous leadership qualities.   I read that off the back of a complex package. Well He's not a what? He's a he's a complex judge. Player.  

[01:27:23] Unknown:

He's a dude. He would be better he would be better off just buying Bugattis than what they're actually doing with that money and buying weapons. That's the problem. I think he would, actually. Yeah. Yeah. What Ukraine needs is more Bugattis.  

[01:27:37] Unknown:

It almost sounds like you guys are surprised.   I mean, all of this all of this is,   for the purpose of destroying   any   any prosperous country   to make the entire planet dirt poor so they can take care of everybody.  

[01:27:56] Unknown:

They're giving Surprise. Surprise.  

[01:27:59] Unknown:

Surprise.   They're giving the people that are coming over the border.   They're giving them free phones. They're giving them the ability to vote. They're giving them jobs   as law enforcement.   That's really scary.   They're paying for their housing,   and they're giving them a debit card, like, with almost $3, 000   a month on it. With what they're spending to support those people here,   it could support   a 100 people   where they're coming from.   If they really, really were being benevolent and if they really, really, really wanted to help the people that were escaping tyranny, Why don't you get rid of the tyranny?  

[01:28:44] Unknown:

So they want to stay Wow. That's a brilliant idea.  

[01:28:47] Unknown:

It is. How do we do it? You see, the here's the thing. By the way, I've asked for people if you've got any thoughts of policies, there's a few comments coming on on Rumble, you can call   in like Eric has done. I Eric's still there. He's lurking. I think I can hear Eric changing clothes, so I didn't really wanna ask.   Paul. Yeah? I heard I heard you could comply your way out of tyranny and vote your way out of tyranny. Have you heard about that? No. I don't know whether you're rough. Is that what they're trying to do here tonight? Let's vote our way out of tyranny. Can we do that? I don't know. Social credit score.   Social credit score. Yeah. I have a question. Yeah. I have a question. Patrick, what   what's your question, Patrick?  



[01:29:29] Unknown:

Okay. So I'm looking at the the telegraphs website on the general election poll tracker and it looks like the the labor party is at 40% as of yesterday.   Conservatives 21 and then the reform is 15.   Now, it looks like the Reform party is going to take   the conservatives   over. They're going to intersect   really soon. Now, what does that mean that Nigel Farage is then   more important than   the the conservative   Sunak? Is is is that   because because   it what I mean, what what   I mean, of course, he is, but I'm just saying it's it's it's obvious that   the conservatives are just going downhill.  

No. No. You don't. But but you're gonna have you're gonna have Nigel Farage versus,   Keir Starmer. Alright? Those 2 will be   in the limelight if if that happens where Sunak tanks it and then Mhmm. You have these 2. So   tell me because I I understand that Farage has some history especially with the BMP and Nick Griffin  

[01:30:36] Unknown:

where Well, he did. He did specifically put in there to sabotage the the British National Park. Well, he was. And, you know, he he he did succeed in that. In fact, when he was on that,   when he was on that show on Friday night, just gone on, the venerable BBC,   You Can Trust Us,   that lot.   He made a big deal about this because during the first 10 or 15 minutes, you know, there were these questions like I've mentioned, like, why did why did your party attract all these races?   And then they gave him all these names of these people that were standing as candidates that shouldn't have been standing that had said naughty things. And maybe they were bad stupid dumb things. I don't know. I'm not here to sort of evaluate all that. I don't have all the detail, but,   he then, in in his defense said, look, I'm the guy that destroyed the BNP. I don't want any of this extremism. This word extremism,   there isn't any extremism.  

Is there? I'm not aware of it. I mean, the policies of the conservative party are AI Steve will get rid of extremism. AI Steve's gonna get rid of anybody.   Yeah. Somebody wrote in here, actually very good observation about AI Steve.   I I thought it was Could This is from   this is from, Rick in g a. G a, Georgia maybe? I don't know. Hi, Rick in g a. Could AI Steve be bribed with sex?   It's a very good question.   Cyber sex could be.   All the AI bots could be basically corrupted with techno,   sexual corruption.   They'll find a way of doing it. You won't be able to trust him very very soon. They'll have to get some dirt on AI, Steve. I don't know.  

[01:32:14] Unknown:

I have another question. By the way, has anybody, in the States  

[01:32:18] Unknown:

sorry. No. Okay. Paul first, then you, Eric. Just hold on, Eric. Yeah. Paul? Sorry. Okay.  

[01:32:25] Unknown:

Would AI Steve be there to divert votes away from whoever they don't want the people to vote for?  

[01:32:33] Unknown:

Unlikely. He's in Brighton.   So,   I think he you see the thing about those polls with with regards to the percentages,   Patrick,   is that it in the end it doesn't mean too much because   I mean it means something but it never comes it never actually comes in terms of any hard change. And, of course, they're always talking about change. I don't want any change. I want them kept in forever until they rot to death. I wouldn't let them out of the houses of parliament. This is me personally. So that we can see just how crap they are at everything.   Every time they change, everybody's eyes then goes over to the next puppet. Oh, it's all gonna be better, and it's just exactly the same.  

So, but it doesn't change irrespective of these things because   incumbent politicians are in seats that are like   guaranteed for life.   I'm serious. Where I live,   it's   a seasoned population. Let's put it that way. In fact, the average age in this town is reckoned to be the second or third   oldest in the whole of the UK. I think Harrogate in Yorkshire,   has got the the highest   age of anybody up there. And the older people get, they tend to vote conservative.   They just do. So the the politician here   has been the politician here ever since I got here and he'll be here until he drops dead and they will just vote for the Conservative Party no matter what. No matter what happens, even if they take us to war or anything, they're just going to kept it. It's like on autopilot,   and that's what's going to happen. So whether it actually leads to any change out there, I don't know. But Farage, Farage destroying the BNP is bad.  

Andy Hitchcock,   interviewed Nick Griffin, the head of the BNP at the time,   earlier in the week. And he's mentioned this before. And in fact,   the treatment that that is ironic in a way because Farage   did have a negative effect on the BNP and is very proud of it. And like I said, because they're all extremists, what? People actually love their own country. This is extreme. Well, of course, it's become that within the political   communication space.   But,   Griffin was on Nick Griffin was on question time maybe about 10 years or so ago. Maybe it's 2009, 10 or 11, I can't get the exact date but it's when the BNP was effectively   at its peak at that time.  

And, they did exactly the same thing to Nick Griffin when he got onto this show. The questions   were preloaded. It was a preloaded audience.   So   you can't speak with any clarity or sense to an audience that's already prejudged everything that you've done and is basically demonstrating   that this is not question   time, and it's a badly named show. I've   I've watched it on and off for years, and what passes for a question is nothing of the sort. It's basically political grandstanding with everybody pushing policies, nobody listening, hardly anybody listening at all. There's no sort of sensible acknowledgement   that some of what the other side said could be could have some truth in it. So, but that's the purpose of it. It's to keep this sort of the red side, the Labour side, and the blue side, and then you've got these other twitty sides, like the green 1, and the yellow 1, and reform. I don't know what colour they're gonna be,   and so on and so forth. And then people get drawn into that pantomime in that particular way. And it's, tragically, it's very effective, unfortunately. It really is. It's very effective. It's like voting.  

Yep. It's like voting.   Yeah. So,  

[01:35:53] Unknown:

and people have been out voting very hard today. Same as the old boss. So Eric wanted to say something. Yeah. Eric, let me bring you in. Sorry about that, Eric. Oh, it's just a just a quick thing. I don't know if anybody in the States have heard of this, but,   Biden, apparently,   he's, he had a break in in his house, and someone stole all his books. And he's particularly upset because he's just finished coloring 1 of them. Yes.   That that is a very funny joke, I don't think.  

[01:36:23] Unknown:

Eric, you can you can chime in with jokes about coloring books anytime you like. I'd just like to say we have another attendee in the in the call in space, Showtime.   You've joined us here. You're in with, the show. And, Eric, welcome to the show, if you care to unmute yourself.   Hi. Showtime. Welcome to the show.  

[01:36:42] Unknown:

Hey there, guys. I just had a, hopefully, you can hear me. I just had a We can hear you. For   the event.   Nice.   Yeah. Today is basically Juneteenth   for,   fat middle aged white men who love   their black   daughter's boyfriend.  

[01:37:00] Unknown:

I think I kinda What on earth does that mean? What's Juneteenth?   What is Juneteenth? I'm a thick o. I've seen it around, but I don't know exactly what it means. What is Juneteenth? What does that mean?  

[01:37:10] Unknown:

It's a made up holiday for blacks.   Something to do with the union freeing some slaves in Texas or something. And then just to be funny,   because, you know, it's probably a Jew who came up with that holiday. They they called it Juneteenth, which is kind of like   making fun of how black people talk   because they talk like they talk kinda like southerners, but, like, more retarded versions because they're like Gosh.  

[01:37:37] Unknown:

Okay.  

[01:37:39] Unknown:

And so that was my you. That was my whole joke.  

[01:37:44] Unknown:

Got it. Okay. But you said I I I need to I need to research for that. Brent.  

[01:37:50] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. That that must be Steven.   Steven, he he's down in, Georgia, Tennessee, down in that area.  

[01:37:58] Unknown:

Okay.  

[01:37:59] Unknown:

I I believe he his earlier appearance was his fast moving cheese, and I think he should've kept that moniker.  

[01:38:05] Unknown:

Alright. I've got you. Yeah. You maybe were fast we've done the cheese bit already in the show, though, I'm afraid afraid. We were talking about the cheese heads and cheese land out in Wisconsin. So we've gone through the cheese phase of the show. I don't really want to bring cheese back into it if we can avoid it,   possibly. I think that would be sensible. But,  

[01:38:22] Unknown:

yeah. But what about the new autobiography?   The   the the new autobiography   that talks all about the Biden presidency.   It talks all about it, and the the title of the book is Curious George Goes to Washington.  

[01:38:39] Unknown:

Oh, nice.   Nice.   Little comment here in Rumble,   from   you see these handles that you come up with? I'm supposed to read this stuff out.   How can I say this?   Dondario Palermo.   Dondario   Palermo. I don't know what that means. Maybe it means something. Is somebody from missing Enoch Powell.   Yeah.   We're all kind of missing Enoch Powell.   You know, the man who was right back in 1968,   And,   we're all sad that he was right. I mean, we're all sort of pleased that he was, but we're all sad that he because he was ignored. I was actually,   for our American audience, if you don't know who Enoch Powell was,   he was the last   He basically   stood up for the English   and the British properly.  

He stood up for them and was, of course,   destroyed by his own party for it.   Everybody in England would have voted for him as prime minister, but the the grandees of the Conservative Party enthralled to the money power, let's just say this straight off,   weren't going to allow him to gain power because he was a voice like our voice, which was not 1 of hating other people but saying, look the indigenous people of a nation, in this case England,   come first.   And, of course, that sounds awfully comical these days because really it's crystal clear that we don't or that the the great and the good have decided that we're not to come first. But Powell was an amazing guy, very gifted intellectually in all sorts of ways. Sometimes, you know,   pilloried for for things like that, for being a bit too bright.  

But he was certainly an honorable and decent man who had great,   intellectual   honesty   and far superior in every guard,   to the leader of the Conservative party at the time, 1 Ted Heath, who was a   probably a kiddie fiddler extraordinaire   of the foulest type and used to hang around with Jimmy Savile. Jimmy Savile being a man that Sir Keir Starmer did not prosecute or deal with properly,   which is,   1 of the reasons why he shouldn't be let anywhere near politics or power. But, of course, we're not in charge of that, The money power are. And they're appointing these perverts and useless bastards,   sorry about that, over us. That's exactly what they're doing.  



[01:41:01] Unknown:

Well, and Starmer was also 1 of the most vocal for the lockdowns during the whole COVID  

[01:41:07] Unknown:

era. Yeah. Wasn't he? Yeah. He was. He's a toady. He's in their pockets. Somebody wrote earlier as well. This is very bad news then that he's He's very bad news. And I think he's part of that,   somebody wrote earlier. I'm sorry. I can't remember who wrote this but thank you for putting this in. It's just come back to me now in the rumble chat that he was part of the same sort of crew   or generation as Blair. And Blair was completely,   their thing, their puppet. And Starmer is a similar sort of thing. I mean, he's honestly,   he's so tedious, flat, boring,   dull,   exactly what they want. He's exactly what they want and he's compliant and, he's up to his neck in all sorts of, you know, I can't point anything out but I distrust the guy   completely.  

But then again, I distrust nearly all of them because   you see, I it's this other point, maybe people do go into politics with good intentions but you've got to question their intellect at that point. Why would anybody that's reasonably intelligent look at politics as the way to transform the nation when there's a history of being incapable of doing that if you won't take on the money power, and none of them will. So what's the point of them? They're not going to take it on.   So it's that's what makes it descend into this sort of farce all the time. By golly, this show is flying by, you know. We're coming up to,   20 to 10 here in the UK. In fact, we've just gone past 20 to 10, And I understand the first exit polls. I'll try and bring up the BBC website because, you know, they can be trusted. They can probably on this, because they're part of the lying apparatus of the mainstream media. We might be able to have a look at that and see exactly what's going on, and see by how massive a margin   Labour have swamped all this,   or by less of a margin than they are anticipating.  

Not that any of us expect things to change   at all   at all except slowly and inexorably getting worse unless we can bring these people to book.   That's kind of it. So yeah.   Show's not ended, by the way. Is Eric still on?   Say that again.  

[01:43:13] Unknown:

Is Eric still with us? Yeah. Eric's always there. Yeah. Eric, hi. Yeah. Yeah. I'm here. You're so I'm I'm still here. Yes. When when's the last time if ever you voted and who did you vote  

[01:43:25] Unknown:

for and why? The last time I voted was over 14 years ago   And, please forgive me for this. I have to confess my sins. It was,   Tony Blair, I'm afraid.  

[01:43:37] Unknown:

I know. It's sad, isn't it? Oh, I'm just, I'm just lighting a cigarette here, Eric, and taking a very long drag on it and staring down at my feet, and looking off, and feeling slightly embarrassed for all of us.  

[01:43:49] Unknown:

Yes. No. No. Actually, no. It must be over 14 years because,   it was   19 nineties, wasn't it? 96, wasn't it?   96. Yeah. So it's not 19 90 6 as well. Don't you call them fags over there, Paul?  

[01:44:03] Unknown:

Yes. Cigarettes are called fags.   We call them fag. Having a fag, but it means several things. It means that. It also means   it's it's also got the same meaning that you have in the states, but we don't use it as much. We used to call them puffs instead.   Right?   I'm probably we're running right close-up to the censorship laws now. I'm getting into trouble.   So there was that but fags also comes from the public school world   because the bullies like Flashman,   right, in Tom Brown's school days,   they would pick on the new boys and bully them and make them do all their errands and go and get things for them. Anything apples, potatoes, this that and the other, cigarettes whatever. And to go and get something was to go and fag   something for someone. I'll go and and that's also another use of the word of it. I'll I'll I'll fag I'll go and fag that. I'll go and get it. It's not as common these days, but it's I certainly had it a lot when I was a kid.  

Did you hear that 1, Eric?  

[01:45:03] Unknown:

Well, yes. And, also, I think that we should capitalise   on the fact that,   Blair was caught in a public lavatory, and when she have a blue pack on the wall,   saying this is where Blair was caught, with his trousers down with another mane.   And, we could have Japanese tourists. They could have someone posing as Blair with his trousers down. You could have Japanese tourists   having their photos taken. So all along, we told Blair with his trousers down. They could have a a themed cafe   with a cape pliers on it, where you could have Blair's faggots.   I'm talking about a Victorian dish, of course. Yes. And you buy your fags in there. I think it'd be a marvelous idea to cut so it needs an enterprising person to, you know, go along with that. I think it would be, it bring   fantastic for tourism.  



[01:45:50] Unknown:

Eric, it's funny you mentioned that, you have to confess your sins because to me, voting is almost like confession confession, like a Catholic confession, where you go into the booth. The booth is like the confession booth. Yeah. And you write down who who who it is that you want to absolve you of your your sins, and then, you're absolved. Then you have no more responsibility   politically and for the rest of the time until the next time you go to the election.   That's the way it seems with most people. It's just it's a way to   to make them selves feel better and not be involved politically at all. It just totally disempowers anybody  

[01:46:26] Unknown:

to vote in my opinion. You're right and I actually, I've got 1 question for any politician that knocks on my door and I haven't had a politician knocking on my door at all,   and I don't know if I've hardly anybody else that's had a politician knocking on   on their door. And on question is, what are what is your what are you or your party   prepared to do to abolish usury?   And they're off your step quicker than a greyhound with a rocket up its backside.   Because,   the last time I saw a politician, I asked him that. He said, I don't speak to racists. Now what's that gotta do with race?  

[01:47:02] Unknown:

I don't know.  

[01:47:03] Unknown:

He said, I don't speak to racists and he ran run off. I thought, strange, you know. But isn't isn't it the case that that word, right, that  

[01:47:12] Unknown:

that attack of being called a racist is basically   shorthand for shut up. Isn't that what it is? Yes. That's really all it is. Shut up. Well,   I suppose He probably has Use  

[01:47:24] Unknown:

Usury with the 7th month evangelists.   Think about it.   7th month evangelists.   You gotta think about that 1.   Yeah. Nothing rude. I'm not being anti Semeleven or anything like that. You know? I'm I'm keeping within our laws.  

[01:47:42] Unknown:

Well, he he probably encountered someone else who used the word usury before and and probably   had a few things to say. Yeah. So that's likely  

[01:47:51] Unknown:

why. But there's only 1 party, just 1 political party   that advocated   the,   the,   outlawing newsery.   And they actually put a   candidate up. I know the candidate. I had 4 candidates, it's a very small party, and it's the English constitution   party.   And they want a separate rule for England,   and,   they're linked with Texas, believe it or not. They they they quite like Texas because apparently Texas has,   similar laws to to England.   And the chap who runs this party believes that the English, I'm not talking about British, the English   are,   are being kicked down the most.  

And we've actually had more prejudice than any other race   according to him,   which is quite interesting  

[01:48:43] Unknown:

because when he I tend to I think that that's a really interesting topic because I   without playing a victim card, and I can hear people in in other nations going, yeah, you Sassanax or whatever. You've caused all the problems. Not the actual base English people,   nor the base   Irish or Scots or Welsh or the people of Northern Ireland. None of us. The normal people, the people who do most of the living and working and dying,   in these nations are the people responsible   at all for the crimes committed by their so called leaders, which we can't seem to shake off. It's There is a parasite attached to us. There's no 2 ways about it and it's managed to get hold like of the central nervous system of the power centers of of all of our civilized countries. And, you know, we've mentioned here before,   in my view, there was no such thing as the British Empire.  

It didn't exist. There was an Empire of the City of London because that was the rapacious thing that was extracting all the profits   and laying in all the wars and using British manpower to do that. This is not to say that we haven't had people that have made great contributions in the form of railways and this that and the other, but overall,   you have to say, what was that rapid expansion, this colonialistic   thing that took place? It's off the charts. You know, I was watching something the other day   about the amount of nations   this country Britain has had a war with. It's absolutely it's preposterous. It's I don't think there's basically anywhere on earth that we haven't had a go at, and it was all because of extending this power. Now you could maybe   make some kind of plausible excuse to say, look, if it hadn't been the British, it would have been the French. Of course, we won't wish that on anybody. But actually, I don't I don't believe that at all now.  

I just see that we've all been played off and are continuing to be played off 1 against the other. And, of course, you feed the population say, oh, look you're a member of the British Empire. Oh, aren't we? Just and of course, people get all fluffed up about this and think it's amazing. Little realizing that they and their sons and their grandsons are the ones that are gonna go off and get their heads blown off in a war, killing some poor bastard on the other side of the world who didn't know anything about it. All for the benefit.   For the usurers.  

Yeah. This is the driving force.  

[01:50:53] Unknown:

And it's all about geography too. You'd think that race   being a geographical thing just as much as it is any cultural   and the city of London is such a key location for you with the river   running through it   and   just historically you know you to to trade you had to go through that area and if you can take back London, get rid of the usury out of it, you would have the problem solved   and there was a party down in South Africa that Stephen Mitford Goodson helped to to form which is the state bank and anti usury party.   And he was making some headway, from what I've read about it. And they were actually he was getting people involved in it that   you you probably wouldn't have considered,   to be, you know,   involved in a movement like that But they were they were And it wasn't just, you know, the Afrikaners It was people also that were, you know,   the the the people that looked like Mandela but not quite, you know, these didn't weren't commies. So   you need something like that. You need something where you could   take and and make   because usury   is something   that kind of transcends races. I think if every race understood what usury was,   they would want to do something about it within their own race. Yes.  

And especially, you know, the poorer poorer races.   Once they find out how it's done, where it happens, and then how it causes wars to occur because that's essentially what happens.   These these bankers demand too much usury, too much interest on loans that they give out through organizations like the IMF   and the World Bank. Mhmm. And they can't pay them back, so then the the resources and the labor force are demanded to, work for those bankers. And when they refuse to do so, then they send in the guns and the bombs, and it's   quite tragic. And you could break that.  

Yep. And  

[01:52:56] Unknown:

put this Well, I I agree with everything you said. Absolutely right. And I think, you know, it's not that I'm   it's funny with political parties because there immediately arises an expectation that they're supposed to get into power and do things.   But, there's something about laying the groundwork. We're talking about things here, which maybe many of the listeners on Rumble are familiar with. If you're on WBN 324 and a regular radio listener, maybe you've not heard these things before. I don't know. Maybe you have. It's difficult to tell from a distance and sort of just doing the audio side of things, but   we need we need to find a way   to build that up as a political movement, you know, and I'm using the word politics,   Patrick with regards to your observation that you shared from Aristotle, which is that politics is whatever you contemplate.  

Well, Eric I know contemplates usury a lot. I do. I contemplate the history of central banking a lot and from it you would say I mean I would say to anybody, if you want to study history, study banking and you'll find that it leaks into everything. Every activity, every event, every violent event, every conflict,   its root goes back to the bankers   because it couldn't go anywhere else because normal people don't want to wage war on people. We've created all these things, all this technology,   advanced farming techniques   to really make the earth thrive much more effectively and to distribute the produce from land, the food, and all this kind of stuff. We've done a brilliant brilliant job but the usurers can't have us benefit from the things that we've contributed   because that leads to their removal. That's what we're talking about.  

It it seems to me in great part, they must   be in a position to maintain their protection racket. Otherwise, I well, they might have to do something else,   and that's not even a thought that could occur to them. You and I couldn't persuade them or show them that they would be better off. It's just irrelevant   conversation.   It's it's not gonna happen. That they've been   they're a long line of inbreds basically for 1000 of years that have operated like this. They will not change.   They will not change. But the idea of us getting behind things   like a movement to get people clear about money and to parcel this up is much to me personally, it's much more stimulating because then we're not resisting. We're saying we do have a view of a better world. All I would say is it it won't be problem free, but it would have a lot less problems than this. There would be much less error in it.  

And also the transparency that we need to get would be stronger, but you also have to look at the race issue.   It's only an issue, as I've said before, because people mix them together   in huge quantities on the same bit of real estate intentionally   to divide them. And I think mentioned, you know, I think Goodson actually talks about this in his book. I was reading. I keep going back to that book regularly since I reread it a few a couple of months back.   He was talking that every dictatorship   gains its strength by having a mixed race population. That's how it rises to power. That's how it really gets strength.   There's a few exceptions to that and of course they've been bombed as we well know. Right? Because they get out of hand from a usury point of view. They don't like this. But it's definitely the thing to get across.  

So we've got right now everybody's voting for politicians today in this land and probably not 1 of them or very few of them have got any idea of this issue as we've mentioned before. They don't want to admit that the banker in charge, although Liz Truss did,   but she did it when she was out of power and had been sacked.   And,   and yeah, it's a key thing.   It's like,   it's absolutely bizarre from us applying logic and decency but we're not dealing with logical decent people. We're dealing with people that want power and they'll do anything   to retain it. Most of the reasoning, I guess, behind that is because many of them have come into it through a corrupted path. Someone   has got something on them and I'd say that's for probably 99% of the political class.  

That's why they're   they're dysfunctional.  

[01:56:58] Unknown:

They really are. I think people vote   I think people vote for whoever think think whoever they think will bring them the most happiness.   And I think that's an un underlooked thing is the the happiness of the people   and and what it depends on politically.   And that's kind of why they have to   change up definitions of things to where happiness then becomes a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance. You know, it gets mixed up with that word,   the English word for happy.   Mhmm. And, you know, we get all of these   these,   social things that are just disgusting that we don't want any business   in and that don't make us happy. That make it's   the way I look at it is when you go to vote or if you don't vote, like, is does it make you more happy not to vote? And and to me, it does. Looked looking at the choices of people we have here in America.  

And if I were over there, I I would be very happy not to vote because it's just like none of those people   make me feel good.   They don't they don't make me feel good about future that they have envisioned for No. People around them.  

[01:58:08] Unknown:

No. In Australia, though, it's it's illegal not to vote. You get fined if you don't vote. And they've had it for years.  

[01:58:15] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. Well, it needs to go.  

[01:58:18] Unknown:

Yeah. Well, as a friend, I was   yeah. Somebody I know that just pays the fine each time. I don't think it's very much, but you get fined.   And people, what they do, they just go in and just spill the ballot paper, just walk away.   But now they've   got, postal voting, which is the biggest fiddle out.   People just don't bother.   But really,   what going back to usury,   now Nick Griffin would be able to explain this better, but I did hear on 1 of the shows that he was on that,   his party, his   and their manifesto.   And he got a knock on the door 1 day from the, shall we say, the, dark suited brigade   and they said,   drop that from your   manifesto or we'll destroy you   and your   party, and the rest is history.  



[01:59:10] Unknown:

Wow. And Time, Paul, By the way.  

[01:59:13] Unknown:

Yeah.   Yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I know it's time. So we're just gonna we're gonna end this part of the show.   You've been listening to Paul English Live here on WBN   324   for the last couple of hours. We're just coming to the end of our slot. We close out here at 10 o'clock   on, WBN. That's, 5 PM US Eastern.   The show will carry on though, because we're gonna probably spend a little bit time looking at the UK polling results. So hang on, t hats. We've got a song to play after the break.   We'll just wind down here over the last minute. Thanks everybody who's been here up for now and we're gonna carry on. If you wanna keep on listening, go to paulenglishlive.com.   You'll find links over to the Rumble channel which is where most of the chat is taking place   and a shout out to everybody who's been putting some fantastic stuff into the chat. Thank you all for that so far, but we're gonna carry on a little bit more. We'll, round out with this little song and then we'll be carrying on.  

And we are clear,   from,   WBN. Great. Thanks, WBN, for hosting us. And we're still here rocking on Rumble. We're still going out on radio soapbox.com.   I'm here with a whole slew of reprobates. We've got Paul b and Patrick c. Hi, guys, who are here. Regulars and fantastic. Yep. Cool.   And, we're also joined, on the call in line by, Showtime, who was fast cheese at some point, and Eric, Eric von Essex who's here as a good   old,   managed to say a few things in between changing his clothes, which is tremendous.   What we're going to do now is I'm also going to run a little song. Someone, this is a complete change of pace. Right? There's a total change of pace. So give you all a little break for a few minutes, then we'll come back in. This is   called Forbidden Colours   and,   we got a 400 Paul, don't fit have you noticed, but somebody wrote into the chat right at the beginning. They said, would you play this?  

It's by,   Sakamoto,   fight Ryuichi Sakamoto. I think you'll recognize it. I think it was in some war film actually.   It's a beautiful piece of music. It's an instrumental and this is in 432 hertz. So somebody had already done a version of that. We're gonna play this. It runs for about 4 and a half minutes. So power do you know, everybody,   you know, and,   get ready and then we'll be back in about 4 minutes time. Here we go.   And that was,   Forbidden Colours   by,   Ryuchi Sakamoto.   Suggested early on in the chat, and I don't have a name, but brilliant. Fantastic. I've heard that a long time ago, and it's from the film. I had to look it up because while we were playing,   Merry Christmas, Mister Lawrence, which was made,   it says it's a 1983   song.  

How about that? So I don't know if the film came out in 1983, but there we go. Anyway, that was a beautiful interlude, a complete change of pace. Just to remind us that there is still beauty in the world, although you won't find any of it in the UK general election   or in the upcoming US general election. Anyway, gentlemen,   you're all unmuted and we're back on. We've got Eric in the in the call in room and we've got Patrick and Paul. And,   we're back here on the show for for running on. I wanted to ask you, Eric.   If you could make a policy,   what would your policy be? I'll put you in charge. I see on the BBC exit polls that it looks like you are going to win this general election. I'm just making this up, of course. Yes? Excellent.  

Excellent. I'll still charge you my clothes. Fantastic. It says the Fockem Hall party is is leading by landslide   for Eric von Essex and the Fockem Hallists, it says here.   And what's I just wonder what what 1 of your primary policies would be, Eric, if we're if, if you finally do, you know, land the land the victory here. Every politician  

[02:08:01] Unknown:

that has served in government   that is still alive going way way way back,   charged with treason   and arrested,   because So you're going for the popular vote, are you? You're going for the popular vote then. Yes. Yeah. And, of course, usury. Of course, we'll then go for the city of London and sort that out   and abolish usury. And they can we can tell the users, where they can shove their money, and we I'd actually introduce   a dual currency. So we'll have a an inland currency   and an international currency.   And,   that would not be, there would be inflation would go down,   and also   paid repatriation.  

And that would be very polite, you know, we'd be very nice to people. We wouldn't be people would never have anything to worry about, but it would cost a fortune.   But if people wanted to go back to their own lands   and make their lands good, that would be you know, we could have something like the transfer agreement where people can go back   and they've got an education,   and we'll assist them back. And it'll all be very   British and very smart, very nice, you know, very polite. And I think, it would work,   and I think this country would prosper again.  



[02:09:14] Unknown:

So how do I sign up to become,   you know, a party member of the Fockham Hall party?  

[02:09:21] Unknown:

You, get your wallet out and you then slap the bag behind.  

[02:09:28] Unknown:

Oh, here we go.  

[02:09:30] Unknown:

Proper politics. That's right. Now I'm comfy now. And and that's it. You see? And, well, someone accused my local council of honesty, and what a slur. Because my council, I'll defend them on this. They work tirelessly to maintain the level of corruption that people expect. So, you know, that's a terrible slur against counselors   saying that they're honest, isn't it? I mean, what Yeah. What what what you know, what are counselors for?   But now what he was saying about   user and things like that,   I was speaking to somebody who had a very good idea, and they said that   to stop   parties being infiltrated,   you have groups of 3.  

So you have 3 people who you can trust and they join with another 3 people, that makes 6, but you're like independent units which make form 1 party,   so that if the powers that be tried to infiltrate, it'd be extremely difficult because we're all working in groups of 3,   which is quite interesting.  

[02:10:32] Unknown:

It it is. You know, there's been documents written in the States, I can't about leaderless resistance and this cellular approach. We've got to find a way of galvanizing. But I suppose the galvanizers would be that'd be people like you and me possibly if we were able to galvanize ourselves and others. They would be got at and stuff. They don't want any of that galvanizing of people taking place. That makes things very difficult for them. And, of course, we live in a place   which is literally compartmentalised   in terms of all these control systems to disturb little groups to make sure they don't gain any traction right at the start.  

But we have to do something. I I like your policies. I mean,   I've mentioned here before the what I what I'm interested in is trying to find out   I'm gonna use the word fag again. Right?   Is how to get the fag packet presentation? So this is shorthand in in the UK vernacular.   If you've got a pen,   people would sometimes scribble down the idea on the back of a fag packet. That is a packet of cigarettes, right, which is not very big. The idea is, can you get it on a fag packet to communicate and get this idea across? And it's this kind of really simple direct stuff that we need. And I'm,   I gotta find a way of sort of, you know, abbreviating these things. We all do. And getting pithy language really working for us. And we've got plenty of it to use.  

But I want the people I want people of England to own the bank. That's what it's ownership of the bank. Now it doesn't mean much on itself. I accept all that. You've got to look at how it's going to operate.   But the main problem, it seems to me, is there are people who are owners   and it's not us.   And it needs to be us. If if we are a nation that is a tribe of people of the same race with a shared and received history, culture, and language, and we are,   then the first thing at the top of the list for the organizing principle of pragmatic life, I'm not talking about the spiritual realm here, but this would benefit, that would definitely benefit from it, is that we must be in charge   of, and we must all own the bank. That means little babies that get born today get a certificate of ownership in the bank for life and it's non transferable   and you get it and all the private banks would be subsumed   over say a 10 or 20 year period because they'd scream like mad, oh we can't make any money. No, you don't need to make any money. We're making wealth. Very different idea.  

And   they'd have to be subsumed into the National Bank.   And there's nothing wrong with nationalization,   if it's structured correctly. We've got so many private industries wrecking everything now. I'm not against the capitalist spirit and everything, but you see, it's kind of a game that's way past its sell by date. We can't actually implement the problems that we've solved because people go, no, I've got to keep making money out of this. So what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna keep producing crappy plastic goods that break down every 3 years, so that you have to buy a replacement. It's mad. There's a kind of   economic disease in the system because people go, we must make a profit. We must They're always saying, we're going to grow the economy. I've heard SUNAX say, well the economy is growing.  

What what are you talking about?   It's just nonsense.   Go and tell that to these people that are living in that are sleeping in street doorways   and and all this other stuff. It's none it's nonsense. It's an absolute nonsense, all that kind of stuff. I absolutely do. You know? And I'll tell you something else, also,  

[02:13:48] Unknown:

to put a lot of emphasis on the family unit   and avoid all this pride nonsense, all this colorful stuff on on on people showing off their sexuality.   I'd be very   I'm I'm very sort of, I wouldn't say what would the word be? It's not right wing, it's prudish, I think. I think we need to go back to the sort of 6 to early sixties or fifties. Not too far, but what I mean to say is Can't we go back to the 18 seventies, Eric? I really wanna go back there. I wanted I wanted that. I want  

[02:14:20] Unknown:

restraint.   I absolutely A man is a man. Yeah. That's right. A man is a man, a woman is a woman, and that's it. And I've got a fantastic quote, though. Patrick, let me just get this and then please don't forget your question. Got a fantastic this was sent to me by a good friend the other day, 1 of these little memes.   It's a quote from Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton. I don't know who she is. I haven't even had the time to look her up. But First American saint.   Really? Okay. First of Yeah. Listen to this. This absolutely nails it. Disorder in the society   is the result of disorder in the family   and the family is it. The family is absolutely bad families, bad civilization,   bad nation.  

Good healthy families and all the moral values and ethical   values that go with that. The Victorian ones. I mean it. I'm I'm dead serious. I'm not saying that Victorian times were great. If you're a peasant, you were treated like shit. That's what Dickens talked about. Right? All this stuff because you've got these aggressive capitalists moving people off the land into these cities and then they're living like pigs, you know, it's horrific.   But the family is it. It's absolutely it. And none of them, none of these parties have they mentioned it once?   No.  

Because all they ever talk about is the economy which they can't control because they're not in charge of the bank, because they take their orders from the bank, and the bank is a bunch of spiffs.  

[02:15:32] Unknown:

Hello? You know Paul, what's interesting about her it's it's very interesting you brought up her because her husband worked with Alexander Hamilton. And she saw the inside of what was going on at the time and she was against it.   She she was working with the poor and   and and downtrodden.   So, yeah, that makes sense. I just wanted to make a comment about,   what Eric was talking about.   Did you know that the Italian poet Dante in his his poem, the inferno, puts,   usurers and,   sodomites in the same circle of hell and the 7th circle of hell.   So I just they go hand in hand. It it's just the way it is. They do. They  

[02:16:13] Unknown:

Yeah. They do. They absolutely do. They end up  

[02:16:15] Unknown:

you you take something that should be fertile and you make make it infertile, which is sodomy. Or you take something that should be infertile   and you try to make it fertile, which is usury. You know, you put 2 coins in a in a drawer and you don't come out with more coins, but you take 2 mice and you put them in a drawer, and you   you walk around later. You know? Yep.  

[02:16:37] Unknown:

And you might have a lot of mice. And then it's mice sandwiches for a month or whatever it is you do with them.   Yeah. But it's interesting as well that you talk about that, about procreation with creatures, because   the word capital comes from cows and,   capita   and it was heads of cows. That's what it was. And why would you view cow? Because they produce so much stuff, don't they? They produce milk, and then we've get your neck of the woods, cheese land. Right? No cows. No no Wisconsin. Nothing. No cheddar cheese. Forget all that. Of course, they're waging a war now on cow farts or something. Right?   Because   they're unwell.  

But the the family is absolutely it. And, you know, I put that as the pivot point. And why would we want to get rid of usury? Because money lending   destroys families.   And I'd close down all the gambling establishments. I'd shut it down and you go, will it all go underground? Great. It'll go underground then but it's not gonna occur on the high street.   I mean, you get all these adverts saying how to deal with gambling addiction. Yes. It's simple. Just shut down all the bookies.   Shut it down. Of course, we get killed for that. The horse racing industry in this country is just colossal. It's absolutely huge.   And I'm not against people huge here. Yeah. It's just completely off the charts.  

So either that or you put some kind of colossal tax on the whole thing, which of course then means you've got bribery going on because human beings, when they get in contact with large amounts of money floating around in bank accounts, it somehow starts to go missing. Have you noticed that? Oh, we don't know what happened to that.   What was that what was that guy in your neck of the woods at 911? I've forgotten. I've a see his face now, the government guy, where they'd mislaid $2, 000, 000, 000, 000.   Donald Rumsfeld. Oh, Rumsfeld. Well, Rumsfeld. Yes. Oh, we don't know what's happened to it. We've kind of lost it. What, 2, 000, 000, 000, 000? Yeah. Sorry about that.  

Misplaced it somewhere in the office.  

[02:18:26] Unknown:

It's I tell you I tell you another policy, though. Shoot. You can chime in here, Paul. But another policy is to ban,   freemasonry   for public servants. So if you wanna be a public servant, you cannot be a freemason. If you if if someone wants to go to the dog and dog pub and, rub up their trouser leg and do funny,   What? Like, you were doing a bit earlier in the show. Yeah. I was doing a bit earlier in the in the show. Yes. Yeah.   You know, dub dub dub, dip dip dip. You know, that's what the scouts did and all that. That's entirely up to them. But if they're a public servant,   that is,   that should be illegal.  

So not due paying It's completely in interest. Freemasons.  

[02:19:06] Unknown:

They're Yeah. Anyone who pays dues to a masonic lodge is disqualified.  

[02:19:12] Unknown:

Somebody somebody sent me a really good clip on freemasonry. I know we've talked about freemasonry. It was a very good clip about the relationship of freemasonry as a protective ring against, let's call it the monarch or the power center. Right?   And,   a good analogy with the chessboard. Okay. So we are often referred to as pawns which is correct.   And then you've got   rooks.   Now, the rooks represent the police force.   I quite liked all this. It's made it quite memorable in the sense that, a new policeman is called a rookie. Yeah? Now I don't know where why why they are called a rookie, but maybe that's a masonic thing that's come down. Then we've got all the lords and ladies. We've got the knights, haven't we?   That bounce around protecting the king and the queen, supposedly.  

We've got the we've got bishops in charge of the religion to constrain people's   genuine,   thirst for a spiritual life and they basically organize it for you, all for your own good of course, and you get all those squabbles springing up around that. It was very interesting and the   the the thrust of this little 10 minute thing, it's a bit too long to play in the show actually,   was that they all these protective rings are in society, and that's why there are lodges everywhere   doing this kind of stuff. I just simply I'm averse to the whole concept or the whole thought of freemasonry for the simple reason   that why do you need a covert organisation that people have to be secret about? We don't like it. I'm I'm trying to echo JFK here, you know, when he said we are basically averse to secret societies   and dark dealings in the night and of course that's where they spring up from. So you've got in this country, we got the judiciary.  

It's actually riddled with them.   We we bumped into someone, I haven't seen him recently, I hope he comes out again to our meetings, a chap who had been a lawyer or a barrister most of his life and when he graduated about 1967,   he'd been studying with this other chap who said, well, now that we're through, I think it's about time I invited you to join my lodge.   And he I remember him telling us, he said, I took about 30 seconds to think about it. He said, no, I I don't think I will, but thank you very much for the offer.   And he had a good life and it wasn't interfered with, but he'd been in certain court cases where certain things had been said   between prosecution counsel and judge or whatever it was, or the defense probably and the judge,   where the sentences passed upon certain people were way way less than they ought to have been, and he knew this.  

And no doubt his career could have been greased and oiled in a more, you know,   stratospheric way. Not that he did badly. I mean, I don't know. I'm not trying to speak for the guy, but I I liked him a lot.  

[02:21:51] Unknown:

Those are the worst kind of judges, the ones that take bribes. Well They have to be.  

[02:21:56] Unknown:

They have to be. In what way, you know? It's it's so aren't we supposed to have juries? I mean, well, that's another thing. What about   truly the application of juries for everyone?   I really think jury duty should   be something that we should all be participating in. Now you go, well, that'd be really arduous and we can organize. Yeah, we could. Could. We could organize anything we want. We we because we'd have everything else like that because it won't be any usury floating around. Okay? Well, you know, there's a a separation of church and state which I find very odd And these judges should be informed by God's law and the ministers of God are the Yep. Church leaders. Mhmm. But at the same time, they try and usurp that authority. And who is it  

[02:22:36] Unknown:

that officiates marriages? Well, it's these judges. It's kind of, you know, a reversal of roles there, I think. Yes. I mean, I know I know it's a reversal of rules. So there there definitely needs to be less separation of church and state and more of God's law being   enforced   rather than these these little occult,   you know,  

[02:22:57] Unknown:

courts. We I mean, we've got a massive communications challenge with that, but I completely agree with you. I don't think there is a separation of church and state really in the true definitions of those words. As as far as I under what the original intention or meaning of the word church   is a gathering of the elders   to discuss the affairs of state,   I. E. The condition of our lives, I. E. The things that we're contemplating,   I. E. The value systems that are being employed, I. E. The value systems that are organised under the commandments,   which are laws not made up by men but directly address our nature the way that we actually are. They work for us at a fundamental level.  

I would get rid of all female priests. I can't have them.   All of this thing about   so called same sex marriage, I would simply make them all null and void overnight. You never ever got married. You can't do it. It's impossible. It's just it's a nonsense. You can't do it. You can't have a society without children and that has no point other than That's right. And everything that we're doing here, you know, we're all all of us here, I don't care what Within a 100 years, everybody listening to this show is gonna be dead.   Some of us well before that. I'm I'm not expecting to live another 100 years. Are you, Eric? You're expecting another 100 on you? Oh, yeah. A 100. Yeah. I'm just a young young guy here. Alright. Okay. Well, maybe I do need to join. Come over to Fockham Hall and breathe some of the air that you're breathing over there. It obviously sounds as though it's got life giving properties. But but we're not we're not gonna be around, are we? Now, that's been the same for everyone.  

So who is gonna be around and what condition are they gonna be in? And what's the point of acquiring all this knowledge and information, at least as best as we can, and keep improving   it and refining it and removing error as we go,   if we don't have anybody to hand it down to. And it seems to me   that, you know, part of this globalization   process is the destruction of this and we know that 1 of the tenets of   the, of international communism is the destruction of the family, something that we've all been   undergoing all of our lives, particularly since the end of World War 2. There's been an absolute onslaught on it in terms of promiscuity,   the   possibly are never going to experience their life. That sort of contented feeling of being with the ones that you love in a safe and strong space where you're building things together. I know it sounds like a story book, but really it's it is meant to be like that. That is what we're that's what we're yearning for and that's why we I guess we're in   rightful anger   about these people that are literally destroying everything that we want to build. We're we're just not interested in any of their crap useless ideas.  

And the thieving way that they're going about acquiring wealth and power for themselves at our expense, we have to stop them. They have to be stopped.  

[02:25:46] Unknown:

There is a theory though that   sorry.   Sorry.   I've I've chided in. I have to go. Sorry.  

[02:25:54] Unknown:

Go ahead.  

[02:25:55] Unknown:

Okay. Thank you. I've just Yeah. Go ahead.   We're battling with each other. Now what I was going to say is there is a theory   that   that before the industrial revolution, only the fittest and the strongest   survived.   And according to,   Edward Dutton, professor Dutton, that we reached our peak in   skills or IQ   in 18/70   and we've been declining since then.   Now,   when you look at it,   Karl Marx, he was around, was it 18 forties, 18 fifties, sixties, around about that time? Mhmm. He   wouldn't have survived   childbirth   because what happened   after the industrial revolution,   hygiene increased improved.  

And, of course, more people survive childbirth, and I'm not advocating,   the strongest of the fittest and all that type of thing, but what I'm at what I'm looking at is this theory   that these mutants   were born who wouldn't have normally been born and that's when communism was born   and we've got we're gaining now, we're getting more and more   people that around that are mutants   because I believe that communism   is a mental illness. I really do. They think completely different. They're completely bonkers.   And it's all theoretical.   They're   they're trying to take over our farms now.  

For example, look at what happened in the Soviet Union   when   the scientists try to tell farmers how to farm, mass starvation,   and that's the idea that I've got now. Yes. So I think there may be something in that theory that we've now got   mutants   that are coming along that wouldn't have survived childbirth before the industrial revolution.   But what I strongly believe in is before somebody become I don't believe in leaders either. But before somebody gets into an important position,   they've got to have a brain scan to see whether they're a psychopath because you can find out whether a person's a psychopath or not from a brain scan, and that should be for all to see. And if that person's a psycho, they can't take that senior position.   I think that would make for a better world.  



[02:28:12] Unknown:

I think you're right. How would we,   how would we invite people in for the scam?   It's a I I think everything you say is absolutely is spot I mean, communism is a mental disease. I mean, maybe we could have it classified as such. We have to build very large sanitariums. Oh, hang on. They've been building them for us. There are all these massive prison centers that they've been building. These FEMA camps in the States. So they can all go there. They're the ones that design these things and they're the ones that need to go in.   The thing I find,   all of their sentences are basically half cocked and half finished.  

They don't keep drilling down to the result of all these wonderful things that they want to do and Utopians are terrifying people because what they're saying is, hey, I'm a bloke or a blokeess.   I don't even know how my body works. I actually don't even really know what I am. I've got a few guesses, but I certainly know how to organize and run your life. Really? Yeah. I actually know better than nature. You do? Yeah. I do. Yeah. And if you disagree with that, I'm gonna kill you. That's really the part of it. We're gonna make everything wonderful and people that don't want things to be wonderful, we're gonna kill you. And you go, hang on just a minute. Don't you see there's a bit of a disconnect   between   making this great place and killing it? No. And the history of communism,   I bloody do gooders, which is what they are, is literally rivers of blood. It's seas of it. It just doesn't stop. And look at what they're angling for now. And I think the root of it is they will not bend the knee to God.  

Whatever you may think by that, they go, we know best. And anybody that starts talking like that, you're dealing with someone who's lost it.   They've they're so full of their and they've got a lot of evidence to suggest that they're better out there. They go they go to all the best universities. They go, look, look I've got an IQ of a 142. Yeah, but you can't tie your shoelaces, mate. There's really basic things   that they're clueless about and they now can only operate really with a bevy of slaves, you know, they have to have this lifestyle and they're terrified of losing that I think on some level.   And we we have to return we've just got to return to the law. If a church, as I believe it is, is a gathering   of the elders to discuss the affairs of state, what I'd like to inform you is that you might think you've been participating in a radio show, but you've not. This is a church right now. We are gathered here, right? We might not be physically in the same room and I think this whole thing with churches with a lot of the singing and all that kind of stuff, I'm not against that kind of stuff but it's taken over from the root gritty   truth of the whole thing. If we don't get the basics sorted out,   if we don't build the foundations right, the building falls down.  

It falls down and I often feel that, you know, like the thing with these political parties, it's a bit like just changing the curtains. Oh, well, we've had blue curtains for 14 years. It's time to have some red ones now. It's going to make everything different. And people like us are saying, no. The building that you're putting the curtains up, it's crap.   It's useless. We don't even want to live in this space with you red curtain people and you blue curtain people. And speaking of that, and this is a terrible segue, let's go and have a look at the BBC News and what they're predicting with the election poll results. We're at half past 10 here in the UK, so I've just gone over to the BBC News site. Yep.  

[02:31:32] Unknown:

Libs win.  

[02:31:33] Unknown:

And it says this, exit poll, most predicted seats. So an exit poll,   So an exit poll, yeah, they have a chat with the people coming out the voting bills and say, who do you vote for then? They go, I'm not telling or whatever it is, you know. They get some data and it's generally,   pretty accurate. So what they are   predicting is a Labour landslide is predicted,   so so it will be Starmageddon.   That, bespectacled   Dullard,   is gonna get   in, and, they need 326   seats for a majority. The projection is that they're going to get 410.   We will see. Okay? And the problem with that is that they would outnumber all the other parties   put together   and could then run roughshod   and introduce more globalist wokeness,   which I suspect will be part of Starmer's,   remit. That's what he will be told to do. War in Ukraine?  

He'll be for whatever he's told to be for.  

[02:32:30] Unknown:

Well, I just wonder if the motives behind calling the election to begin with. What was you know, because if they want a war   and they get someone who's in there that's ready to go to war, it's   apparent that that's what the purpose of it is. Or what what was his  

[02:32:45] Unknown:

I guess I don't know much about Starmer here. I don't think I don't think you're the lesser for not knowing much about it, Patrick. I I think even more highly of you. I don't think it's worth knowing. I know that they'd said that,   what was it? The, Andrew Bridgeman, the MP,   who has been saying certain things which appear to be truthful. We still don't know about all this kind of stuff, but he he comes across quite well. I quite like him.   He was saying that Sunak had told the higher ups that he didn't want to be a wartime president,   a wartime prime minister, I should say.  

So the idea that this is a if this develops, that there is a genuine war to be had,   is purely to wipe us out.   That's all it's for. I don't. It's just to wipe the little people out on all the sides whilst pretending them you need to go and fight the Russians. No, we don't. I quite like Russians. I don't live with them and they're free to do what they like. It's their country and they can do what they like. Why would I dislike Russians? What's what's it got to do with anything?   It's to do with the fact that they're,   they're gonna lose control. They want even more because they're,   hey ho.  



[02:33:50] Unknown:

Well, there's this thing called called the authoritarian   personality that Theodore Adorno came up with. You know, it wasn't just him, but,   basically getting getting rid of the patriarchy   and making it so that males   lack any sort of authoritarian   voice   in in matters of having to do with their lives day to day   and anything that   discredits   that that authority is   basically gonna   be to our detriment because we need men.   And if they're gonna send men not to die,   that's just gonna make our society all that much worse than it is now. And you're You're right.  

[02:34:33] Unknown:

We have, we have another attendee,   who's called in.   Sussex man, welcome to the show. How are you this fine summer evening?  

[02:34:41] Unknown:

Very well, Paul. Yeah.  

[02:34:44] Unknown:

Good to have you here. Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Yeah. I I guess you're a little bit late because she must have been out voting. Right?  

[02:34:51] Unknown:

No. No. Actually, I had,   I I was just ozing off this afternoon. The phone rang.   The lady said,   called, are you Christmas? Who are you? So Liz Taylor or somebody.   Yeah. She said, are you are you coming out to vote? And I said, oh, no. Thank you. You didn't say any questions. You just plonked the phone down.  

[02:35:15] Unknown:

But you dealt with them really well. I like that. No. I'm not. No.   Yeah.  

[02:35:22] Unknown:

Yeah. So,   yeah. All very interesting. And then as you say,   I'd   heard that, Andrew bridge and said,   well, she soon act   didn't want to be a war time prime minister. But the fact is, I don't know if you know,   war was declared   it officially became 3rd world   or 3,   in, I think it was,   2022   when Russia invaded,   the Ukraine.   And,   there was a lady I did post it,   who did all the numbers.   You add up the date of the beginning of the first world   or second world war.   And   this other date, and they all add up to the same number,   68.  

[02:36:20] Unknown:

So Right.   If that's anything to go by. Well, they do like their numbers, don't they? They do like their numbers.  

[02:36:29] Unknown:

But personally, I think   we've been in 1 long war. I don't think,   we've been in war ever since the start of   world war 1. Because   when   the I would call them hot spots, hot wars.   Because after the end of the war, we we were still at war. But on the financial,   trade basis and immigration,   This is all war going on in a different,   aspect.   So I think we've been in 1 long war, I would say.  

[02:37:05] Unknown:

I agree.   Yeah. I think we have.   It all fit when you, you know, we   the people of the time back at, you know, in the early 1900   and even for World War 2 and even really up through Vietnam,   and beyond that,   were basically malinformed   permanently by an all powerful media because there were no other places that the   the man in the street could go to to actually, you know,   begin to inquire   into those other historical accounts, you know, generally referred to as the accounts of the losers of these wars.   And it's not until you've actually read their accounts or got some sort of balance with it that you begin to see this patterning effect.   So   it's it's not that we don't have the tools or anything, although we don't have them. The tools are in the hands of these other people. The, and it's the media is that is still our our big challenge. We've got a little media going here. We have to, you know, what Eric was saying earlier about these little cells of 3 people is very interesting. If we can find some way to communicate that so that people act on it,   and we build this up,   because we have to, you know, it seems to me 1 of the things that we could do, and you don't know how successful it would be, is to effectively   repel these people on a local level. So we have to strengthen   our commitments on a local level,   and find ways of doing that. That's that's joyful, not too onerous because people will barely do anything, you know, but we've got to get people started. I mean, there's so much complacency around apart from maybe audiences like this. And I I do include everybody in the audience here that's you wouldn't be here otherwise. And that's why I'm here to sort of inquire into these things, you know. So yeah. Well, that's what I said. That's the only way  

[02:38:49] Unknown:

to do it,   to think local   and get your own area right, get a network of people around you,   and gradually   repel the system. The matrix,   you can't do that all in 1 go, but you can make a start.   Yeah.   Yeah. And that's what we want to decentralize.   Then they have no power because they've never been able to flood us with immigrants   if we're back in the days of   very old England where each parish was its own authority.   Yep. They wouldn't accept,   a load of people coming. They just   have them booted out.  

[02:39:31] Unknown:

And have communication between those parishes because, you know, you always have a visiting priest   going from 1 parish to the other or people going from, you know, parishioners going from 1 parish to the other to inform what's going on in the other parish. Because   we all we do need the unity too. We so we need the   decentralized nature of it and then be able come together when it the time is appropriate.   Mhmm. Because that's that's the only way it'll work because then we have organization, which is what we're lacking at the moment. We don't have people communicating.  

[02:40:03] Unknown:

It's quite right because   the people don't know   the church was the actual government. That was the center of the administration.   And the priests, I mean, they've changed the names around and given them   fancy dresses and things, but the priests were the civil servants. And the mayor   would pro or the would be the bishop. You know?   And, we still have,   remembrance of that. Well, up to, you know, to 9 middle 1900,   you had,   a post of aldermen in the local councils,   which, they only   need to be elected. I think,   to they they went,   elected,   only,   on the free yearly,   they went free elections without having to be elected because they were the men of experience,   and they kept them. And,   so   and then you had the counselors who were the new boys who eventually became.  



[02:41:16] Unknown:

Yeah. And it's a proper way to vet people too. You know? Yeah. I I kind of think of it like a laborer,   in the bible that talks a lot about, people laboring in a vineyard,   for instance. And if you're someone new   to, parish, you'd the best way would be to go to the parish and say, hey. I'm here. I have these skills.   I'll go out and pick grapes, you know, show me where your vineyards are.   It's it's a great way to network that way too.  

[02:41:45] Unknown:

Yep. It is. Work together. I mean, that word, someone's just written, Exo has just written in the chat, perish, such a nice word. It is.   It is. I think it's because it's it resonates   in an ancient way. We know that there'd be there's about 10 and a half, 11, 000 of them on the footprint of this land. You can find old maps. They're all there. Yeah. And it it may we need   I'm I wanna work on something like this, like a people's parish network.   As a as a movement, not as a political party, but as a movement   to give someone to give people a vision say, this is how it ought to be. This is how it used to be.  

That aspect of our lives used to work well,   and it was a natural way of rebuffing the centralization of power because everything we've talked about tonight   is about,   the central this election is about the centralization of power. They don't even want the power here. They want to run off and hang out with all their mates in Europe. And they want to centralize it in the world. They want to wage war all across the world because they want to   control all things.   We have to find, you know, it's a way of finding out how on a local level we repel that   And the parish, for us, certainly here in England, is absolutely the right word.  

Even though many young people might not know what it is, they'd know quick enough because there's so much evidence of it around. And it's historically rooted in the bones, almost, the parish. And it would be the way to go, you know. And then we make churches, And   then   And then everybody gets more involved in a more simple and direct and honorable way. That would be the aim anyway. I know it would be a bit it would be a little bit more difficult than that, but that would at least the the aim would be there.  

[02:43:31] Unknown:

And there would be no   I'm sorry.  

[02:43:36] Unknown:

Do go.  

[02:43:38] Unknown:

I was going to say   with the old system, there was no isms. It was just,   and they didn't   have elections,   you know.   It was all by recommendation,   and you had to be   a person of substance. In other words, you weren't   working for somebody else. You had to have your own land   and you had to have,   beyond.   That's why in the old meetings,   the wit and in the sack days,   you had when you felt you had to raise your hand with your sword to show you that you were armed. Otherwise, you   you were, you weren't allowed.  

[02:44:25] Unknown:

Yeah. I think there needs to be an emphasis too on the priesthood as far as people who are above and beyond just the the normal, laity   in in the sense that just like in the Bible you have Moses   and Aaron as the high priests that talk to god on behalf of the of the people   and and can   you know, they're extraordinary   people. They're not just your normal   person. You they because there there are differences in men and qualities of men. Like, some people are more suited to leadership and others are Yeah. More, you know, you have to take care of them, especially as people get older, the young people.   And so you need these strong leaders   also, and   that's something that's just been made a mockery of in our society today,   and it's kind of a pathetic pitiful thing,   situation we're in because our the people who should be the leaders,   they're they're kind of the laughing stock in the joke now and seen as weak and and leading people to destruction.  

I'd say a lot of the clergy, you know, that's a kind of   I I I would see it as that. I mean, what do you think over there?   What what do you think? I think they they  

[02:45:41] Unknown:

so I think they   they they, church as a whole has been infiltrated   and there's nothing like what it should be.   That's why in the biblical   days they had a certain tribe.   You had to be of that tribe, you know, to be   a priest or a civil servant.   And to be a ruler,   you you had to be with the tribe of Judah, which doesn't mean true. It was   an they were   a a tribe who held the scepter.   So you didn't have alien elements   entering into your   your   national structure,   which I think is a good thing.  

[02:46:27] Unknown:

Because all this fine detail of it, you can it it appears, you know,   it's challenging.   Because much of that natural momentum   in our people has been broken down. It's like trying to restore   an old way   that worked.   And I mean, the first point is to actually get people familiar with what we're talking about and why it's required. That might not be so difficult. I think the details   would take time.   But, you know, and you see leadership is a is a funny thing.   If we talk about   going back, say,   millennia or back to the times of King Arthur who did exist, 2 of them at least,   the idea of being called to serve your king   and defend your nation in battle   strikes me as an honorable 1. You go, yes. Right? No one's sitting around going, the king's horrible. I mean, they did, of course, as it got worse but you've got this infiltration. So you've you effectively got these worm tongues that arrive in the court and over a prolonged period of time,   peoples are undermined.  

Then you get the development of spying agencies. We've got, you know, all the guys over here, Walsingham and stuff like that, developing spying in courts.   And it just gets darker and darker as we move up to the modern day. Now it's an advanced sort of surveillance system   to undermine the authority of people. It's as if we can't just   next next 5 years. What do you say? Yeah. I think I could do that. And it's a bit like, you know, you we want farmers in charge of farming,   don't we? Not civil. Yeah. Not civil servants. Not civil servants. We don't want sort of planning committees in Westminster saying, we're gonna tell you how to organize   farming. No. You're not. You're going to shut up.  

And and it's that's what it's all of that nibbling away at the the people who've got the natural   mastery of a thing   are getting pushed out all the time to be replaced by bureaucrats which are in thrall to the money power.  

[02:48:29] Unknown:

Yeah. And we need the media back too. We we you know, these organizations   here in America like CBS, ABC, NBC, they're all reliant on these court reporting agencies that feed them information of what's going on in these courts   Mhmm. All the time.   I used to work for 1 where it was a big 1 on Wall Street dealing with JPMorgan   Chase. And,   I was told that you gotta watch out for people digging in our dumpster because,   you know, the they'll they'll sell that information to a a report or, you know, 1 of these networks.   And a lot of the things I would see in these depositions, I would hear about on the news the next day. It's Right. They're definitely tied   to the the courts,   and that's something we need to figure out because if we're gonna have a media organization that runs parallel and,   superior to these other ones,   we need to figure out how that ties into these laws that are being enforced and and the courts   because   right now, we're we have we have nothing that does that. You know, there's there's hardly anything. Paul.  



[02:49:35] Unknown:

Yeah. Paul. Hi.  

[02:49:38] Unknown:

Hasn't that been the problem all along, people that have absolutely no expertise or knowledge over things, sticking their noses in other people's business and expertise   screwing it all   up. Hasn't that been the problem for,   century  

[02:49:53] Unknown:

Yes. Or more? I think so. Yeah. I think it has. We've got it everywhere. Democratic  

[02:49:59] Unknown:

omblers.  

[02:50:00] Unknown:

And we've got a lot of ambitious people who don't recognize how mediocre they are.   There's no real humility about them. Well, they don't. It's like that   they go, I can do this. You know, well, you're actually not very good at it. And of course, because there's been this championing of equality   and everybody can do things and we don't want any competition at school because when the when the kids that are slow don't win the race, they cry. Let them cry. Good.   They need to cry. You're not good at running. Find someone else to do. It's just a natural teacher. It's a we want to save you from the pain of life. We never asked for that. We want the pain of life. It's a great teacher.   We want it. It's designed that way. It's I'm not arguing for pointless   hardship.  

That's what they provide us with. You know, the centralized powers provide us with pointless hardship by apparently always going to make it better. And I do think that the the sort of coverall statement is everything that they do is a protection racket. It's based on the fear of loss. They imbue the crowd with a sense of a fear of loss.   If you don't have a national health, you won't have any health. You need us. If you don't have a pharmaceutical   have any drugs to take, and then you need us. You got to pay for it, by the way. If you don't have a central bank, the economy will go completely bonkers so you need it, but you will have to pay interest on loans and stuff like that, but it's a small price to pay. If we don't have an army, you'll get overwhelmed, but you will be the ones that go from for fighting it and die and get your brains blown out, killing some other poor bugger that's doing the same thing because they got the same things going on. So, yeah.   That kind of stuff is a protection racket. I I can't think of a simpler way to describe it is they create a fear and anxiety. Look at what they did with COVID.  

You gotta put a mask on. I do. I've got to put 1 on.   You know?  

[02:51:51] Unknown:

Oh, no. We're doomed. We're all doomed.   Speaking of which Yep. Sketch has his hand up in VPN studio.   Okay. Sketch,   what do you got for us?  

[02:52:03] Unknown:

Yes.   Good day, Paul. I am 1 of those guys in the, far far across room   that, was streaming your   your your thing on Rumble while Paul got it together. And I had to say that,   on the election,   the, Boolean directory   says that the British are buying gold in wake of election   uncertainty.   And, also, you mentioned, mister Kennedy,   and he and his brother both   forced the American Zionist Council to register as a foreign agent blocking them from donating   to   US officials.   I put a link in the chat. Maybe, Paul can get those to you. But, I just wanted to say oh, 1 more last question.   Can I is it okay if I cuss or  

[02:52:58] Unknown:

not?   No no f words. Alright? Try and get leave out the f bomb. It's a family show. There are not many families awake at 11 o'clock at night, but we're trying to we're trying to be decent about this. I just  

[02:53:10] Unknown:

Okay.  

[02:53:12] Unknown:

So I guess it is fucking. It is fucking hall.  

[02:53:16] Unknown:

Right. It is. Oh, yeah. That's not cursing.   Yeah. Eric comes from Fockham Hall,   f o c k h a m. Okay. Yeah. That's right. He it's his little play on words and we like him. We like it a lot. Yeah. Absolutely. That's not cursing. That's, that's where Eric lives.  

[02:53:35] Unknown:

Yeah.   And and and and have a blessed, election day, and we'll have a blessed, 4th July. Thank you so much for today.  

[02:53:43] Unknown:

Fantastic. Thanks, Gretch. Brilliant. You have a cracking 4th July, whatever that might mean to you. I have no idea.   So yeah.   Wonderful.   So anyway,   I think we're we're we're covered here. We're just about done. We're down to the last few minutes. We're gonna wrap up at 11 here tonight,   because I'm I'm I'm sure   most listeners here be up all night waiting for the election results to come through.   So,   it looks as though it's gonna be starmageddon.   I've got to stop saying that. Nice little quote in here from XO in the chat.   As William Burrows said,   most problems in the world could be solved if people learn to mind their own business.  

Indeed.   But look at us, we can't.   I don't know why we can't go with that.   Yeah.  

[02:54:35] Unknown:

It's our job. Our job not to mind our own business.   Yes. It's our it's our job   to not mind our own business. Otherwise,   nobody would get the straight scoop.  

[02:54:46] Unknown:

Well, it's true. We gotta stick our noses somewhere. Apart from which, I think it's,   you know, in a in a more stable world, none of us probably would have   chosen to spend a a lot of the amount of time that we do paddling around   in the puke that is produced by these people in the sort of appalling behavior   and just and you can see it's a gradual sort of incremental increase in evil. There's no other way to describe it. They don't even realize they're doing it but after 10 or 20 or 30 years of behaving this way, they can't change And things just continue to go down the same old, you know, stupid train track towards the abyss. It's like I said, you know, we can't change the the scenery right now, but if we can find a way to turn the direction of it around, we'd at least go, right, now we've got part of it going in the right direction. And that's what we're looking for. I think parts of it are going in the right direction.   And just finding more effective ways is what we're looking for. There's no shortage of knowledge.  

There's no shortage of information. In fact, you could possibly say there's too much information. We've got to surf it of it and learning to thin it down so that we can get points across more rapidly to a wider audience as speedily and as effectively as we can is the great communications challenge.   It's not that the truth is hidden from people like us. It's how do we parcel   it and promote it and push it, so that more people go, yeah. Oh, I hadn't thought about that. What do you want me to do? That's what we're looking for. What do you want me to do? Can I help?   Yeah.  

Yeah. You can.   Yeah. What do I do? Yeah. Okay. I'm I'm fine. I figured that 1 out. But that's what we're looking for, I think. Yeah.  

[02:56:22] Unknown:

We need our own pop stars like Taylor Swift.  

[02:56:27] Unknown:

But we need our own, do you think? But not like Taylor Swift, surely. But we need our own. Well, I mean, in in the sense of,  

[02:56:33] Unknown:

yeah, someone who can lead the the youth   in in a positive way rather than the negative way that's being done through people like that. Yeah.  

[02:56:45] Unknown:

Yeah. There's a comment in here yeah. You're right. There's a comment here from from Billy Silver. Current politicians are the hopelessly   charisma charismaless   children at school who secretly wanted to be rock stars. I think there's something in that. I've always said that politics is show business for ugly people, and I think it is.   It's show business for ugly people. Yeah, they're all actors and they're very bad. They couldn't get on in a proper thing, so they have to manipulate it all.  

[02:57:11] Unknown:

And even their show business, the people that they put up there are ugly people with ugly souls in that sense.  

[02:57:18] Unknown:

They are.   They are. And they won't stop it is. There's something odd about them. Pay attention to me. Why? You're dull. Right? You haven't got any original ideas. You're a toady. You go along with what you're told. You'll do anything. This makes you dangerous, you know.   And, but you can't get that through to them. They're incapable,   you know, as I've said before, they go to all these education centers where they're indoctrinated, they come out, we're going to run the world. Hey, but there was no job advertisement for that.   Nature does that fine. Let's just get in line with nature, have happy families, seriously,   and, can you booger off, please? And they won't.  

It's a big problem.   It is a big big problem. Listen, we're towards the last few minutes, so final closing statements. Anybody want to say something as we as we wrap up? Chris, any final words?  

[02:58:10] Unknown:

Well, I say what horrors   arise,   when we hear the results of the election.  

[02:58:17] Unknown:

Mhmm.   Yeah.  

[02:58:18] Unknown:

So   for job, I don't have no, it was because I made it all 1 horror story anyway.   I don't think it the election has changed anything.   It's just people's perceptions.   You know?  

[02:58:32] Unknown:

Yes.   Yeah. It won't change anything. It's just we'll just we're gonna have to get on with our   galvanizing   and restoring the parish network, the people's parish networks, we it would be I don't even care if it didn't even   go that far. At least, it's a actually, I do care because you want to put things in. But it's a constructive step. It's a positive step to stay to take, I think. So Interestingly,  

[02:58:57] Unknown:

on that for,   1 of the folks. So he was interviewing   a mayor up in the north somewhere.   He brought up the fact that since he's retired,   there's all these different,   town,   councils,   parishes   that, you know, there's nobody go, puts up to stand for elections. So   they're just not advertised. So   if you find out where these are, you can usually   register to be a candidate.   And if nobody puts up, it's usually happens where you just form your accounts or, you know,   and I have quite a lot of influence. And he said, the 1 he set up, they're also able to get the council to reduce their tax by   32%.  

So they do have power.   So that might be the way to go.   Mhmm.  

[02:59:58] Unknown:

It might well be the way to go.   It might well be. I guess, there's so many good people around and I guess just some kind of little coordinating magic is what we need   to try and get   a certain type of person to sort of begin. And it's pulling together like this audience here for this show is fantastic.   I'm absolutely I love the comments that keep coming through. It's wonderful. So hope I mean, it it reassures and encourages me, and I hope if you're part of it, it encourages you. And, we're all searching for a for a way to get organized. Yeah. Patrick, yeah, you were you're about to say something.  

[03:00:34] Unknown:

Well, I say,   go go to your parish, you know, in whatever decrepit state it might be in. Just go there and and   and be the the 1 that changes things. Mhmm. Be the 1 that sparks that.   And it's like in the bible, the lame man waited for 32   years to go into the pool. He was blind   until Jesus finally came and asked him why he didn't. And he said he didn't have a man to help him. Mhmm. So   just don't give up and and   wait. You know, be patient. And and but at at the same time,   stay in that   parish, you know. Go there   and   make a difference in just being there and talking to  

[03:01:20] Unknown:

people. Yep. That's my statement. I know. Thanks for the show. Yeah. No. Thanks for being here. It's been great, actually. It's,   I'm never gonna forget   the 2, 024 UK general election.   God. Oh, gosh.   But the 4th July in America, it's proper home. I'm sorry that these stinking Brits have gone and hijacked your day, obviously, for some   foul stinking reason. But it's the the day is still young with you guys. What is it? Let's see. You're I've just gone 5 o'clock for you, Patrick, and 6 o'clock Eastern time.   So,   is it rockets at the ready? What's going on? Are you will you be getting covered in fireworks? What will the whole will much of the nation go bonkers with fireworks?  

Will there be a lot of that taking place now?  

[03:02:09] Unknown:

Probably not here because it's gonna rain.   So the weather the weather interrupts it.   Yeah. Can't do much about that.  

[03:02:20] Unknown:

Well Well I would like to leave on I would like to leave on a positive note.   Thank god for politics.   Mhmm. Because not a 1 of us has ever been forced   to see Nancy Pelosi   wearing something that only Britney Spears would wear on stage.  

[03:02:43] Unknown:

Yeah. Fantastic. Well, look, it's been a brilliant show. I've really enjoyed it.   It's fantastic. We can't inform you any more now than we could at the beginning about who has actually won the UK general election,   thankfully. But if the BBC are correct, it looks like it's a landslide   for the Labour   globalists   as opposed to the Conservative globalists or whichever 1 gets in.   The referendum party according to them Oh, no. Sorry. The reform party   are gonna get 13 seats and conservative will get a 131.   The Liberal Democrats   will get 61. The Scottish National Party,   10. Others get 25. Maybe we need to coordinate the others.  

We need an others party all of its own. I'm going to play out with a song. I played it before.   It's another Van Morrison song because I'm just in the mood for this. We're gonna play out with,   Where Have All the Rebels Gone?   And you lot are probably rebels, I guess, but in a constructive   way. We're not just rebelling pointlessly   but in a highly constructive way. It's Peasants Revolt 2.0 as far as I'm concerned.   So that's it. Thank, thanks to everybody in the chat who's contributed a lot of great stuff tonight. Thank you very much. We'll be back again,   of course, next Thursday at the same time,   with a 2 hour show, maybe a 3 hour show like this 1. I never quite know.  

And, if you didn't call in this week,   consider it for next time around because it's useful to hear different voices bringing in a different sound into the space and some different ideas. So wonderful. Thanks everyone for being here. Here's Van Morrison to play us out for, 4 or 5 minutes.   I wish you all the best and, hopefully, we'll all wake up tomorrow morning in a wonderful happy world.   Don't hold your breath.   Bye for now.  

[03:06:57] Unknown:

They're not saying very much, are they?   But where have all the rebels gone?  

[03:08:46] Unknown:

And that's it for this week. Thank you everyone for being here. As I said, we'll be back again next week. We just played out with Van Morrison.   And, we look forward to next week. And, think about songs you'd like to hear next week and let us know in the rumble chat. Keep good. See you soon. Bye for now.