Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

Share on social media:

In today's episode, we navigate through a myriad of topics, starting with the technical challenges faced during the broadcast due to unexpected roof leaks. We then delve into the platforms that host our show, highlighting our presence on various networks and expressing gratitude for their support.

We discuss the intriguing dynamics of global politics, focusing on the recent developments in Romania and the arrest of a prominent political figure. This leads us into a broader conversation about the influence of oligarchs and globalists, and the power dynamics at play on the world stage.

The conversation shifts to the intricacies of U.S. law, exploring the differences between lawful and legal actions, and the significance of operational law. We touch on historical jurisprudence and the Babylonian merchant code, providing insights into the foundational aspects of current legal systems.

We also address the challenges of navigating the U.S. judicial system, discussing the role of federal judges and the implications of recent legislative proposals aimed at curbing judicial overreach.

Throughout the episode, we emphasize the importance of individual empowerment and understanding one's rights within the legal framework, encouraging listeners to educate themselves and take control of their legal status.

[00:00:25] Unknown:

This mirror stream is brought to you in part by mymymyboost.com   for support   body trying to function with sluggish mitochondria is   kinda like running an engine that's low on oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by PhatPhix,   p h a t p h   I x,   dot com.   Visceral fat   is weighing your body down. It's causing sluggish response of your organs, and it's gotta go. It's gotta go. It's gotta get rid of it. You just gotta. And, also, iTero Planet for the terahertz frequency wand by Preif International.   That's iTeroPlanet.com.  

Thank you, and welcome to the program.   Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.   And see if we've got that going on. Yes. We do. Alright.   We'd love to change the world one step at a time, and it looks like,   oh, somebody else changing it leaps and bounds.   Roger is connected. He's unmuted at the moment or or he is muted at the moment. He probably stepped away for just a second.   I'm gonna jump in here real quick and let you know what platforms we're on, of course.   We're on EurofolksRadio.com.  

That, of course, is our flagship station. Thanks to pastor Eli James.   And we're also on Global Voice Radio Network.   The links to Eurofolks and Global Voice   are   on the matrixdogs.com   as well as the link to join us live   on free conference call.   The,   other platforms we're on are radiosoapbox.com.   Thanks to Paul, our buddy across the drink,   and one zero six point nine w b o u f m Chicago.   We're also on homenetwork.tv   and freedomnation.tv,   go live TV,   and stream life.tube.   Streamlife, very, very, very popular network, 12 plus million   visitors a month to that to that platform,   and we are just so thankful and glad to be there.  

Those platforms, of course, are brought to us   through the NET family of broadcast services   through WDRN   production sport, Collins,   Colorado.   And as E. Rogers joined us this morning, I kind of got caught with my pants down. I had a I had a late   start getting some of the, systems up and running because I'm actually dealing with roof leaks. So  

[00:03:42] Unknown:

more than once,  

[00:03:43] Unknown:

take over. You're dealing with what?  

[00:03:46] Unknown:

Roof leaks.   Rough leaks. I I had a really serious leak less than two less than two feet away from the computer I'm using right now. My goodness. Had a serious roof leak appear at 03:00 in the morning. So I woke up until I'm dealing with that. Now this is is this the same leak that's been leaking on, or does it spring a new one? Those people hadn't been over there to fix it. What's   Same leak.   I my building is, like,   80 feet deep,   and there is an ice dam   on each side,   a foot tall,   three feet back on the roof, and it hangs out a foot over the edge.   So   it's so there's all kinds of water pooling up there, and we're trying to melt the ice dams is what we're trying to do. You need you need to get down to Georgia, me, amigo.  



[00:04:40] Unknown:

You can't I'm sorry you're having to deal with all that. I I I I went and went through the regular routine like we do, and you didn't come the you didn't punch it in and   pretty close to the top of the hour. I thought, well, Paul's got some kinda   thing going on. We may not have a show today. And then I had to go in and and visit Albania for a minute and, came back in your room. So, anyway, well, I guess we're gonna do a show after all.   Good morning. We're gonna reverse order on things here a bit. Yes, sir?  

[00:05:09] Unknown:

I caught I got caught with my pants down and forgot to start the Zoom conference.  

[00:05:13] Unknown:

Your technical trousers.  

[00:05:15] Unknown:

Yes. Your technical trousers. They had a rip right up there. Yeah. Okay.  

[00:05:20] Unknown:

Yeah. Well, I know about that.   Okay. Well, I guess we're gonna get going. It's the Wednesday edition here at the Radio Ranch. Roger Sills, you're a little bit belated host. Not bad.   The informality   of our little get together here is   is quite evident. It's the twenty   sixth   today, I believe.   And, Roger Sale is your host, so you've already given did you give the platforms before I got them on here or what?   Paul?   I guess he did. Okay.   Well, anyway, we're on a whole bunch of platforms, and we really like to give them proper recognition   for their contributions and their help. And,   normally, we get it done pretty seamlessly, but this morning, we're a little discombobulated.  

So   like the butcher who's a little behind in his work.   So   here we'll go. Gosh.   Hope everybody's doing good this morning here. Twenty six. We're couple of days away from the shortest end of the shortest month of the year.   And I think that's Friday.   Our buddy Jack is about to get his first Social Security check if Elon didn't steal it.   So, I know he's excited about that.   What has happened? I guess the most interesting thing   was the NSA   revelation on the secret chat. Do you know about that, Paul? Are you with us? Are you able to be with us? Are you out doing things?   Okay. Well, I guess that answers that question.  

He's out doing  

[00:06:59] Unknown:

things. This is Mark.  

[00:07:01] Unknown:

Hey, Mark. Afternoon. Good. Well, good. Yeah. I'm glad you're with me. Well, I can ask you. Days, though.  

[00:07:08] Unknown:

Yeah. Well, I'll be here on Wednesdays and Saturdays if possible.  

[00:07:12] Unknown:

Okay. Well, we're always happy to have you whenever you pop in.   Good to be here. I guess Paul's out. Yeah. Well, Paul's out   fixing,   you know. See if you remember this lyric, Mark.   Yes. Pulling up his technical trousers.   See if this   because you're a music guy. You don't like old music.   Yep.   I'm fixing a hole where the rain gets in,   Paul,   and stops my mind from wandering   where it will go.   You remember that lyric?  

[00:07:48] Unknown:

Wow. No. I don't.  

[00:07:49] Unknown:

I'm fixing a hole where the rain gets in   and stops my mind from wondering   where it will go.   It's off of Sergeant Pepper's. It's one of those Little Beatles songs. Beatles. Okay.   But that lyric is about smoking pot.   I'm fixing a hole where the rain gets   in and stops my mind from wandering.   Brilliant.   So,   anyway, Paul's fixing a hole, I think. Hopefully, he'll get it done.   Did you hear about the NSA,   thing? We've we've got our first Volley from,   new DNI director, Tulsa Gabbard, who I particularly have always liked. I don't know what I it's just her style, her her style and who she is, and she's very sharp gal. I mean, I really, have always liked her even when even when she was a Democrat, Mark.  

[00:08:43] Unknown:

Yeah. She, have you heard about this? Rogers, she seems more independent, you know, because she doesn't mind ruffling the Democrats' feathers, you know, especially when it comes to the war machine.   Yeah. She's against war. So Yep.  

[00:08:57] Unknown:

Yep.  

[00:08:58] Unknown:

And, And over the big middle of it too. I mean, she was, what, a officer  

[00:09:03] Unknown:

in the She's a lieutenant colonel.   She's a lieutenant colonel in the, reserves. I know. I don't know about her specialty there.  

[00:09:12] Unknown:

Interestingly enough I believe she was in medical and she served over in Iraq, like, I think,  

[00:09:18] Unknown:

at least one Twice. At least twice. Two tours. Yeah.  

[00:09:22] Unknown:

Two tours. So she got to see the carnage upfront. You know, it's one thing to be   back in behind your desk. It's another thing to be out on the front line, and and she's as close to being on the front line as you could get, and she saw all the casualties and injuries coming through. So Yeah. She, she's seen it. You I don't think you can  

[00:09:43] Unknown:

experience that, and I never have. Okay? I don't think you can experience that without being,   really affected by it. Regardless, here's a little tidbit. You know where she was born?  

[00:09:54] Unknown:

No. I don't.  

[00:09:55] Unknown:

American Samoa.   Well And, she's a Hindi.   She's not Christian. She's Hindi as is Kash Patel.   So, anyway, Sharp Gau. I heard   Roger Stone say he's pretty savvy operator.   I heard Roger Stone say that she, will be the first female president.   We shall see. It looks like this ticket that they're already shaping up and talking about,   for four years from now is JD Vance and, Tulsa. So we'll see. That'd be a good ticket.  

[00:10:29] Unknown:

Yeah. Well Anyway,  

[00:10:31] Unknown:

she, she got her first Volley off yesterday, and I don't know if you heard about this.   There's a internal chat among   all of the intelligence agencies.   And for years,   it's been taken over by the transvestites.   And all they do is talk about   oh, god. I hate castration, circumcision,   doing something with your with your sphincter muscle with a laser.   Just all this really   Oh, I heard a little bit about this on Oh, it's just I I even hate to repeat it. I mean, I really hate to repeat it. I didn't realize it to that extent.   Oh, yeah. I didn't For over years.  



[00:11:13] Unknown:

Yeah. I'd like to watch Greg, Greg Gutfeld in the evening on on Fox News just as Yeah. Some comedy relief, and and they really throw it hard. Well, he's the number one late night show now.   He's crushing all the, the mainline or mainstream   comedy shows, you know, the 10:30 shows.   Uh-huh. So he was he was on his they have his picture on the on the front page of Variety this month.   And, so he was kinda showing that off. And,   but yeah. Because they were talking about it. It's like,   think about it. These guys   are at work,  

[00:11:48] Unknown:

l b LGBQT,  

[00:11:50] Unknown:

x y z, whatever they're called now,   and plus. Oh, you put plus on the end of that.   And so   it shows the sexual perversion.   They're at work discussing this via email and text messages.  

[00:12:06] Unknown:

No. It's on a a confidential chat.   Well, still In the secured a securitized   private chat that hooks up evidently the insurance people or the, intelligence people from all these different intelligence agencies. Well Right. Tulsi fired a hundred of them yesterday.  

[00:12:25] Unknown:

Wow. Good for her.  

[00:12:27] Unknown:

K.  

[00:12:28] Unknown:

Good for her.  

[00:12:30] Unknown:

Yep. She is she I I don't see her. I don't see any of these people that Trump's putting in these key positions taking any CRAP.   Okay?   I I mean, they're all just really strong,   self   empowered   people that are just I'm at the pleasure of the president, and we're gonna do his bidding. Bam.   Here we come.   Strap yourselves in.   So, good for him. You know?   Kind of perversion that these   creeps bring, they infect everything they touch.   They literally infect everything they touch. It was reminding me yesterday,   I was talking with some of the guys about,   liberalism being a social a,   what they call a social disease   when that it?  

And it is.   Yeah.   Some of these people that that, governor for Maine, you see that last week, Mark, when Trump bounced on her?   No. I did not see that. Well, they had a go a governor's meeting, and he's up there talking to all the governors. And he's talking about the,   the executive order he signed about no men and women's sports.   And, the, and he was talking about he says, well, I guess Maine is not going to follow   this. Maine, are you here? And, of course, female governor a female governor.   Yes. Right. We're here.   Well, we follow state and federal law. Well, I am federal law.  

Well, this, that, and the other. She says she says, well, we'll see you in court. And Trump goes, well, that's good. That ought to be an easy win. That ought to be an easy one.   I think it's what he said.   The arrogance of these people  

[00:14:15] Unknown:

Oh, no.  

[00:14:16] Unknown:

Is just stunning to me.  

[00:14:19] Unknown:

Really. Did I didn't catch this. Whatever came of the   mayors that were supposed to meet in New York City to talk about how to thwart   the immigration   deportation,   you know, the ICE. They were talking about how to thwart ICE and and, interfere with the deportation  

[00:14:38] Unknown:

process. I I have I have not heard about that meeting   or anything that came out of it, but I do believe I've heard that the guy that's running and setting up all this,   opposition crap is one little Jew bastard attorney named Norm Eisen. Are you familiar with him?  

[00:14:55] Unknown:

No. I'm not.  

[00:14:56] Unknown:

Well, he's one of these guys like, Elias and these big time Jew creeps up there in DC that have amassed way too much power.   And he's coordinating all this for the Dems, I guess.   Well, Trump's gonna mow them like a   like a lawn.   I mean, he's totally within   everything   constitutional.   And no matter what roadblocks they put up there, he's gonna overcome them. And to Trump's,   to Trump's,   credit,   he,   he is,   minding whatever the courts, no matter how crooked they are, say.   And he came out and said that. He said, yep. I'll I'll follow the court's decision.   And we got another up there and,  

[00:15:42] Unknown:

Roger, if you're gonna get up there and say we're gonna follow the rule of law,   you can't get up there and then just ignore the courts no matter Yeah. If you disagree with them or not. You're gonna have to figure out another way around things. Yep. Well, he's got he's got, yeah, well, he's got the advantage of being constitutional  

[00:15:59] Unknown:

and totally right on. And the funny thing, the ironic thing about all this is Doge was set up by Obama.   Oh, how fitting.   How fitting.   And also, when I was talking about this yesterday, the guy that's on,   Infowars all the time, Matt Baker. Are you familiar with him? Guy with, like, the dreadlocks.   Well, he's a he's a just a common worker guy. I don't know what you know, he's just common worker guy, but he's,   he's always he'll work a whole day and then go to these council meetings and stuff.   And, man, he let loose on them. They're in season San Diego,   last week, week before or something.  

And,   so his idea is you bring Doge down to the local level.  

[00:16:48] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah.  

[00:16:50] Unknown:

K.   Good idea.   So we'll see. It's just interesting. I it's we've kinda hit a lull here,   after the month of very brisk activity from up there.   And,   and we've we've hit, it seems, might not I might be wrong, a little bit of a lull here. Did you see what these bastards are doing   to Tesla?   No.   There the activists are going to all the Tesla dealers.   If you've got a Tesla and you park it in a parking lot,   you may come out of the store and find, swastikas   painted on it. They're, going into facing all the Tesla dealerships they can get to,   doing painting swastikas   and stuff on the cars in the lot. Wow.  

I don't know if they're keying them.   Somebody said if you got a Tesla, we're gonna key you.   Don't expect to be keyed.   And,   I I just wish they take catch some of these little   SOBs and make a real good example of them.   They're they're we've got to have examples   made, not only from inside the administration   and the people that have been doing all this stuff to us for no telling how long for from the inside,   but also outside with some of these civilians that are picking up the banner and pulling this crap. Look at Barbara Boxer.   Oh, that bitch.  



[00:18:18] Unknown:

She she was out there saying, get in their face. Push back. You know? So That was Maxine. No. Maxine Waters was that one. Waters. That's right. That's right. Maxine Waters.   So, you know, she was rallying people to to be violent, really. I mean, she didn't come out and directly say it. No. But you could tell all her implications.   And that was about the time when,   Sarah   Huckabee Smith was the spokes   I think she was the spokeswoman for the,   for   Trump for a while, wasn't she? And,   her family went out to a restaurant and next thing you know,   you know, we got servers saying, we're not going to serve you and they had to leave. It was, you know, it was getting rough.  

People were yelling at them and so, in Washington, DC, they couldn't just sit down as a family and have a nice dinner. They ended up having to leave.  

[00:19:11] Unknown:

Roger. It is it's a pitiful state of affairs. Like that is Yes. It's,   emotionally upsetting. I would say that. It's a pitiful state of affairs. Dave has got something to bring,   for us. Hey, Dave. Good morning.  

[00:19:25] Unknown:

Hey.   Good morning.   I I know three people that own Teslas.   Two of them are Libtards.  

[00:19:34] Unknown:

Really? I can't wait till that happens to them. I think it'll be great. Yeah. They'll go.   It's just it's just senseless and pitiful what these people do there.   Liberalism is a mental disorder.   I don't I don't know any other way to put it. Well, there's Paul. He's back. Yes, sir.  

[00:19:52] Unknown:

Yeah. I I had to go out and throw some,   calcium chloride bombs up on the roof.   Oh, I see. Okay. I have an idea if they're gonna be, like, painting swastikas   on cars and stuff like that. I mean, if they're gonna treat this like Berlin   Nineteen Thirty or '40,   just post signs at the dealerships.   Vandals will be shocked.  

[00:20:15] Unknown:

That'd be good. What they're doing, they're putting out a little meme, that says,   a   Tesla Nazi car or something, whatever they call it. It goes zero to to nineteen thirty nine in three seconds.   Wow. Yeah. That's pretty funny, really. Wow. That is funny.  

[00:20:36] Unknown:

Liberalism   is a disease, and it It is. From the TV set. Well, it's like, antisemitism.  

[00:20:43] Unknown:

You've heard that, haven't you, Mark? Antisemitism   is a disease.   You catch it from Jews.  

[00:20:51] Unknown:

Right?  

[00:20:52] Unknown:

Hey. Just as a disclaimer   just as a disclaimer real quick before the comment.   You know, when we   talk about Jews in a negative sense, we're not talking about in general the people. No. Yeah. We're not talking about in general the people.   We're talking about the group of Zionists that are basically like the cabal around the world. So Well there's there's your Orthodox Jews, and then you've got Talmudic Jews, and   the ones who study and practice the Talmud   are the my understanding, and I could be wrong, but my understanding is they're they're Zionist, and, you know, their thing is is they think they have the right to rule the world.   So Well, they have you ever read Whenever Have you wait. I'm sorry. Yeah. Just say whenever we talk about Jews in in that manner,  

[00:21:41] Unknown:

that's what we mean. So It's not a broad brush. It's Jesus told us who the hell they were in Revelation two and three nine. Those are red letter Bibles in red. He tells us exactly who they are.   And there's a fine a lot of fine Jewish people, and I use that term   probably too often in a general sense. And and and but,   that was you know, where that line came from was Joseph Sobran. I I know you're there, Tom. We'll get you in a second. Are you familiar with Joseph Sobran, Mark? Do you remember him? I remember the name. Wasn't he a journalist?   He was. He used to work for, oh, the guy that had that vocabulary   up on the Northeast,   the the show, the National Review, and I can't think of his name.  

Anyway, he used to work for them and he broke away and got real,   real anti Zionist and,   pointed fingers in his articles. He's a big Catholic,   he was a brilliant writer.   God was just brilliant.   And, he what what else did he say?   That one,   and I can't remember. He he had a couple of real good quips, but that was one of them.  

[00:22:53] Unknown:

But you said he went for William f Buckley. Right? Yes. That's correct. That's that's the guy. If you said the English or the way he spoke, it's  

[00:23:01] Unknown:

the that's who came to mind. So yeah. He is a brilliant writer. If you ever wanna go back and read some really well written stuff,   Joseph Sobran, he's not with us anymore, unfortunately, but Oh. He was quite brilliant.   Tom, you were trying to insert something a minute ago, and we couldn't get to you, but you're there now. Hi.  

[00:23:21] Unknown:

Hey. Good morning, everybody. Glad you're, feeling better, Mark.   Thank you. It's good to be feeling better. Yeah. Boy, I know. Hey. Anybody any any any Republicans that own a Tesla,   just just find a Biden's,   Biden hair sticker and put it on the bumper.   Maybe that'll keep them from,  

[00:23:40] Unknown:

from sabotaging your vehicle. But I don't think, those bumper stickers don't don't stick to a Tesla, do they?  

[00:23:50] Unknown:

Hey. You know, I'm gonna tell you the,   I used to, you know, I I told y'all I used to do electronic surveillance for law enforcement stuff. And I was doing I was doing a favor for the chief,   the chief police,   and his niece's   car was being vandalized. She they think by an old boy, you know, boy ex boyfriend or something.   So   I put up some surveillance video,   to try to catch him in the act because he was, like, cutting tires and stuff.   Oh. And I called a bank I called a bank robber.   The guy robbed the guy robbed the this kid, the doctor's son, robbed the local bank, and he thought he was gonna be smart, and he was gonna he was he was gonna walk, you know, several hundred feet and park in another park. Well, he he just happened to park right under my camera.  

[00:24:39] Unknown:

How about this? And,  

[00:24:41] Unknown:

yep. Yep. And, they caught him at the airport,   with a one way ticket going somewhere and   nailed him. Well, I'll tell you, that was that was what a what a coincidence,   Just something like that happened.   But, you know,   they need to they need to bump up their surveillance. You know, the this crap where you can see the whole parking lot, but you can't see any details.   No good. I mean, it's just, you know  

[00:25:06] Unknown:

Well, those cameras have gotten so damn sophisticated. They can pick up a dime from 22,000   miles out and read the damn date on it, I guess.  

[00:25:16] Unknown:

Yeah. But you have to you know, if you let's say you have a let's say you have a big car parking lot, and you just put one camera in and you can see the whole parking lot. I mean, you know, maybe for a thousand cars. You you can see the parking lot. You have you have no details. So you need multiple cameras chopped up in a little bit. Now they do make cameras that will   if they see motion, they'll zoom in on it, and do, like, an autofocus to try to do it. And they even have cameras that will follow you around. So if you're in a in a secure area and you walk you know, you go through a gate, the camera will literally follow you. It will turn and follow you until you come into view of the next camera that they wanna pick up, and then it'll follow you. Yep. Mhmm. That sounds like giant. You're not gonna get any you're not gonna get any details and figure out who somebody is from, you know, if it's if it's several hundred feet away and you only got one camera, you're you're gonna get a vague idea. Maybe   if it's a, you know, a man or a woman, but,   or one of the other alphabet,   soup Right.  

Identities.  

[00:26:18] Unknown:

Well, you might not be you might not be able to tell the difference these days.  

[00:26:24] Unknown:

That's right. You know?  

[00:26:25] Unknown:

So, anyway, just thought I'd throw it out. So I it came to me while Tom was talking. So Brand's other favorite,   or famous   saying was   antisemitism   is not someone   who hates Jews.   Antisemitism   is someone who Jews hate.  

[00:26:49] Unknown:

You know, you were talking   a few days ago about John Stadtmiller and,  

[00:26:55] Unknown:

somebody else. Oh, yeah. Estes. Russell Estes, the guy from the Southern Poverty Law Center. Yeah.  

[00:27:02] Unknown:

Yeah.   The aid the, any ADL came down on John,   and they, you know, they threatened John with all the stuff, and he said, well, great. Yeah. He says, come on my show then. You know, we'd love to hear from you. And they Right. Well, you know, he would he would get on there. He would get Rabbi Weiss. I believe he had him on at least once, maybe more,  

[00:27:23] Unknown:

who is the guy that's the head of, Jews against Zionism.   And that's how he combated the ADL was to get that guy on.   Now this is something I've thought about. You're gonna report me or you're gonna sue me? Go ahead. Yeah. We'll see if that's great advertising. We'd love it. Well, this this is something I've I've thought about quite a bit. I don't think I've ever brought it to the air. Do you know,   do you remember the game that we used to play when we were kids called secret in the circle?   Did y'all ever play that game when you were children?   Well, you get, kids and you get a circle. Our people are adults. And you have one person who tells the next person a secret, and then they pass it around the whole circle. And then the last person   comes out and says what it is, and it's always something totally different. Right?  

So, that's just a secret in a circle.   Now what about the the these people that that were released, taken into Babylonian captivity for seventy years? And there's some dissension about what happened there. They,   it appears that maybe they only took the,   hierarchical families, the big families, and they left everybody else there in Jerusalem,   and and, that those people were then schooled in the Babylonian   ways before they were released back when Nebuchadnezzar   let them go.   I don't know the time frame. I was gonna ask Brent this last week because I'm curious on this.   How long was it after they were released from Babylonian captivity before Jesus showed up?  

And I don't know how how long that was. Maybe I can remember to ask Brent again. Don't know if you'll know or not. But, anyway, whatever that time frame was, remember they brought back this information from Babylon,   and it was back then   called the oral tradition or the tradition of the elders. That's how Jesus referred to it.   As we said, don't know the time length of time between the release and when   Jesus said those words, the   the oral tradition or the tradition of the elders. And that's them passing down the Babylonian   Talmud,   person to person, father to son.  

It was never written down. So   and then it was five hundred years after   they crucified Jesus   before it was written down for the first time. And that's called the Babylonian,   Talmud's Sonoco, s o n o c o, I believe, Sonoco edition.   So there's at least five hundred and however many years it was between the the release and when Jesus showed up.   I I would be interesting to get that blank right there, but let's just say it was just five hundred.   How how how off do you think that book is is   passed down orally father to son over five hundred years? How far have they deviated from the original meanings of that?   And then whatever the other   gap is and add those years in there. It just seems to me it would be very, very difficult   to pass that down orally and have it anywhere near what it was originally.  

Comment. Have any of you ever thought about have you ever thought Linda, have you ever thought about that? Yes, sweetie. You can comment.  

[00:30:37] Unknown:

Yeah. It was six hundred and five years from the Babylonian  

[00:30:41] Unknown:

captivity to the birth of our lord. Okay. So we're talking over a thousand years of oral tradition. How accurate do you think that thing is?  

[00:30:50] Unknown:

Not very. We called the game telephone   telephone   because it was, like, whispering in someone's ear, the message Yes. When you go around this   I yelled.  

[00:31:01] Unknown:

Right. And you remember it.   Obviously, you you played that little game.   The person at the end never has the exact thing that was said at the first is my recollection.  

[00:31:13] Unknown:

Correct. Correct.  

[00:31:16] Unknown:

And that's just a circle. That's not eleven hundred years. So there's got to be something that's cattywampus in there.   But the whole thing's cattywampus.   Okay? And who knows what at some point in eleven hundred years, when somebody said, well, we'll just deviate it a little bit here, and I'm gonna teach it this way.   We we have no idea, no earthly way to know, and they don't either.   I remember,   this was I don't remember how many years ago, fifteen years ago or so.   There was an incident in Australia   where one of the guys inside the synagogue was,   was   was doing pedophile stuff.  

And somebody within the synagogue   went to the police, got wired   and went in and the cops busted him if I remember right.   And they hired one of their own attorneys,   I can't Silverstein or something was his name.   And he was being interviewed in a newspaper.   And he said, they shouldn't have gone outside of the congregation.   We have traditions.   And I thought, boy, you sure do. The traditions of the elders. And they go back couple thousand years.   K? No. We don't wanna let this out of the synagogue. Do what, Mark?  

[00:32:32] Unknown:

The elders of Zion.  

[00:32:34] Unknown:

Yeah. Of course. He said the elders of the And he said it.   He said it right there in the article. We we he shouldn't have done this. We have traditions. Well, there it is right there. Right in front of you. K?   So, anyway,   just popped up. So brand thing just   came to me.   I used to my buddy Harvey,   was originally Catholic, and him and his family   split away and became,   protestants and but the   the other part of the family stayed Catholic.   And that was Chris's, being, Harvey's cousin I talk about occasionally, Chris,   who was a spitting image of the Marlboro man.  

Handlebar, mustache, and everything.   And he's the one that well, he's real intellectual   and had a television thirty years. All he does is read.   And,   he,   was the one that would pass those show brand articles around. So that's kinda how I got exposed to it. But, boy, he was a great writer. I sure did like reading his stuff.   And he had these guys fingered pretty good. I remember him saying one time he was walking through Dulles Airport   to go catch a flight from somewhere or something, and   somebody he knew,   was walking on the other side of the concourse or something. Hey, Joe. When did you come off the reservation on Israel?  

So, anyway, he was quite a controversial figure, but, boy, he he had them,   these folks finger pretty good.   So I I hope some of y'all, are familiar with Joseph Sobran. If not, you might wanna go back and his articles are never long. They're about one page, but, boy, he was a great writer. He could pack a punch in one page.   So, anyway, enough of that. Who else has got something they'd like to bring forward today or comment?  

[00:34:26] Unknown:

I saw Sherry had her hand up earlier, but then she lowered it. So Sherry, come on. She might Well, she usually just interrupts.  

[00:34:33] Unknown:

She usually just interrupts, so she must be on good behavior today.  

[00:34:37] Unknown:

But but I do have a topic. If we don't have anything   domain   streams   and I I do have a topic I'd like to ask you about,   Rodney. Okay. Great. When we get it get there. Okay. If we get there Alright. I'm here.  

[00:34:51] Unknown:

There's Sherry right there. She made it. Yeah, girl.  

[00:34:55] Unknown:

Hey. I was wondering what Mark thought about,   the house putting forth a bill   regarding federal judges.   And  

[00:35:07] Unknown:

What was it about? Sure. I mean, what were they what was their what are they trying to do to federal judges?  

[00:35:12] Unknown:

To where they have to adhere to that the president   is the executive branch, and they can't,   that would be the executive orders. It's called NORRA, n o r r a is the acronym,   and I   can't remember what it stands for.  

[00:35:32] Unknown:

That's really peculiar   because, I mean,   they're Well, can you tell me supposed to be a third branch.   So here's what I don't understand   is   how if if the judiciary   is is the third branch of government,   How does the administrative branch, which is the president of The United States,   how do how do they in Congress   get to,   you know, control it? Now, I think they should have the right to   select judges and so forth.   You know, because they go through a confirmation that's part of our checks and balances.   But I don't know quite what this bill   is trying to do outside of just   confirming them and being able to put them in place or take them take them out. Because there's certain   positions as Federal judges that are really   they're they're not confirmed. They're they're just appointed and they could be They're floaters.  



[00:36:31] Unknown:

Yeah. They're floaters.   And and, you know, if you may, just a second. Let me add something here, is that the judges that are confirmed have lifetime tenure. The ones that are just appointed and floating around out there don't, but they act like they do. Now, Paul, what were you trying to add?  

[00:36:48] Unknown:

I think it's disclosure.  

[00:36:51] Unknown:

It's called I think it's disclosure. What what they're doing is that one second, Sherry. One second, Sherry. What they're doing is they're bringing to light the fact that the judiciary   doesn't have any obligation to the executive or administrative   branch to do their bidding.   And   every time we have a liberal   in the executive branch, they use the judiciary   as a weapon.   So I think it's just bringing that to light that they can't do that. So when that other stuff where the other   administrations   did that   is brought out, then  

[00:37:28] Unknown:

you know what I mean? You know what I'm trying to say? Were you talking about the five or seven judges that have tried to stop Trump's initiatives that are all found to have NGOs   backing them where they're making millions of dollars? You're talking about that?  

[00:37:41] Unknown:

Yeah.   And every literally everything Biden did.  

[00:37:46] Unknown:

Well,   they they several of these guys have been brought up for impeachment already. I believe it was supposed to be this week, maybe last week. Don't remember.   At least two of them and maybe more,   conflict of interest stuff.   Sherry, what what were you gonna add? We were stepping all over you there.  

[00:38:06] Unknown:

Do you think that we should distinguish between article three   constitutional   judges   and federal judges   who are under,   the house.  

[00:38:21] Unknown:

Well, you know, the only court   the only court that's in the Constitution is the Supreme Court.   None of these other judicial offices  

[00:38:30] Unknown:

are enumerated.  

[00:38:33] Unknown:

Correct. But article one under the house, the representatives   gets to set up   the,   federal judges.   And so, therefore, they can   control the federal judges,   which is separate and distinct from the article three in I yield.  

[00:38:51] Unknown:

Yeah. Correct. It's the judiciary that's set up by Congress. It's not in the constitution.   They could totally dismantle it. And I'll tell you one area they need to dismantle right now, and I I'm in complete agreement with Robert Barnes.   There should be no DC Circuit anything. They shouldn't have federal courts there. They shouldn't have anything there.  

[00:39:12] Unknown:

May I? It's  

[00:39:13] Unknown:

notoriously   corrupt,   and Julie   has to fight it all the time, don't you?  

[00:39:23] Unknown:

No. I just was saying that Nora is the No Rogue Rulings Act,   and it's basically to stop the federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions that derail a president's   agenda.   So   with all of what Trump went through during his first,  

[00:39:41] Unknown:

round. Uh-huh.   I meant I I neglected to mention when we were discussing push code o nine here last was it last week, I think,   that   after that case was ruled against in the ninth circuit   that the DOJ   issued a national injunction,   Julie,   about anyone bringing up a against anyone bringing up push code oh nine at any district court in The United States. Do you know that Mark?  

[00:40:12] Unknown:

Wow.   No, I didn't know that they did that. That was recently then?  

[00:40:16] Unknown:

No, this is a few years ago.  

[00:40:19] Unknown:

Okay.   Okay. I remember you telling the story about it, but I didn't know anything about push code o nine until you brought it up.   I know that we were looking at different codes from the individual master file   back in the day before we knew anything about being a national or  

[00:40:36] Unknown:

how to acquire  

[00:40:37] Unknown:

national status because   one of my mentors, Dan Meador, back in   prior to his death, I'll say between February and 02/2003,   he wrote a few different   papers,   memorandums of law if you will, and they would, he would touch all around being a national. He would talk about being a national. This seems to be the solution.   And, but we didn't know how to officially declare it until Roger came along with his materials. So Yep.   And prior to that what  

[00:41:07] Unknown:

I it's what Jim Prince   told me. I just let me get that in there. Jim Prince is one of Medders Yep. Research team leaders, guy that crossed my path after the book was out, and that's what he told me. He said, we had everything you've got except we didn't have the affidavit.  

[00:41:23] Unknown:

Yeah. Pretty close to it.   Dan was still I mean, you can go back and read his his,   law articles if you will. They're not really I don't know if I would call them a memorandum of law because   he doesn't really cite much law. He just   gives you the summary of his research basically. A brief. That's what he right. Exactly.   So,   but he would still talk about, you know, he thought we were still under amalty law.   So, you know, I read several of those articles where he's, you know, still kinda  

[00:41:57] Unknown:

thinking that we're still under amalty law. Hey. See, you know what I you know what I think You know where I think the disconnect there is?   Is people see they're looking at IRS. That's most of our Patriot Groups focus over all the years looking at IRS.   And they see them come out and they see them start grabbing stuff.   You know, I had a female student   and she called me at 07:00   one morning. Roger. Roger. They're taking my car. You know, that kind of thing. Just the terror in her voice.   And they don't know anything about the uniform commercial code and self help remedies.   So they come and see a taking like that and automatically   impute Admiralty to it because they don't know any other thing to assign it to. Wow. Right. Right.  

Does that make sense to you, Mark? Yes. Yes. It's not the Babylonian  

[00:42:47] Unknown:

law.   It's   they don't yeah. They don't recognize it as that. The UCC.   Now Yeah. That doesn't make sense.  

[00:42:55] Unknown:

Okay. Paul, you have something to add and I'm gonna come back to the UCC and admiralty in a second here. Paul? They may not necessarily attribute it to admiralty law. What they attribute it to is the,  

[00:43:07] Unknown:

the all powerful   overreach,   almighty   power of government.   And Okay. And that that further cements the mindset   that you can't fight city hall Well or you cannot   fight the IRS.  

[00:43:23] Unknown:

Mhmm. As I thought this through wanna do. So. As I've thought this through over the years, it's come to me that, and I've come to understand these self help self help remedies much more   is that it seems like when tyrants take over, that's one of the first things they want to install is the UCC   and these self help remedies because the people don't understand them as a whole, and they consider their imputing power into the government entity when they come grab your stuff.   So I often think of the self help remedies as the first engine of tyranny.   Now   I want to and I've mentioned this before, Paul. Paul put it on our page the other day,   and if you're new and you're a newer student,   to get basics and stuff and foundational   understandings,   this is really important, okay, for that aspect especially.  

Is the book historical   no. Historical Jurisprudence. Historical Jurisprudence.   Yeah. Okay. Very important. Okay. Now that is a history of jurisprudence   in the world.   Mark, have you looked at that yet?  

[00:44:31] Unknown:

No. I haven't. I did download it, so I'm really kinda curious to scan over it. And how many pages was it? Because there's sometimes Well, it's not.  

[00:44:39] Unknown:

I no. You don't have to read you don't have to read the whole book unless you want to. Just the first ninety pages are on the Babylonian merchant code here. And it's easy reading. Okay?   So,   but you'll have if you read that, you'll have a foundation   on the UCC that very few people in the country have. K?   Now this is a point that I found very interesting in that   90 pages   is that even at Babylon,   they recognize   god.   And the way they did that, you know, Babylon's,   as the book starts out, Babylon's great contribution to the world was the fact that they reduced everything in the society down to the abstract form of contract.   So this is where contracts came from. Okay? K. And,   as, as and they were with the great trading society, you know, the great merchants of the earth, Babylon.  

Right. And so what they had when they were doing trade,   trade caravans.   If you   borrowed money to do a trade caravan and it was over sea   and something happened,   you didn't have to pay the loan back.   The family wasn't held responsible for it because it could have been an act of God. K?   But if it was over land   and something happened and you didn't come back,   they were responsible for paying back the loan.   So even in the Babylonian   merchant code, there was a differentiation   as it was to overwater.   And interestingly enough, they had to recognize God.  

[00:46:18] Unknown:

Interesting.  

[00:46:19] Unknown:

It is. Okay.   So for whatever that's were   very interesting when I read it. It also talks about how   you as a goy and call the goyim cattle and how you can volunteer into servitude and this, that, and the other. And there are just some interesting things in there. I think it would be time well spent for you, especially if you're new and you're looking for a foundation because you got a couple of pillars here that are very important for you to learn about. Well, I'm sure if I asked a new person, well, tell me everything you know about the UCC, its background,   and and some of the things you're gonna go, duh.  

Okay. So that's an area you need to learn something about because it's foundational.   Okay. The feudal system.   You absolutely you don't have to know it like the back of your hand with every little nuance, but you need to know something about it. If you don't understand what it is or we're in it, you're you're out you're you're s h I t out of luck. Okay?   Just look at all these other people out there for all these decades   trying to fight this monster, and they don't even know what system of laws being used against   them, and they don't know the system they're in. Well, how do you think those guys are ever gonna get anything done?  



[00:47:31] Unknown:

I agree. I agree. Okay. I still I I mean still has their hand up.  

[00:47:36] Unknown:

Okay. Well, I'll get you in a second. I'm on a roll here. Okay. And just what Glenn said.   Okay. It's like Glenn said, if you don't know that you're dealing with the feudal system, you'll never  

[00:47:46] Unknown:

do anything but shadow box with it. Oh. Okay. Roger, that's what I've said. When you explained the feudal system, it changed my life.  

[00:47:53] Unknown:

Yep.   And and and government, most of us don't know how government works, or they don't know how law is made, and they they don't know the difference between positive and non positive law. They don't know any of that stuff. Well, if you don't know any of that, you're never gonna arrive at a conclusion, and you're never gonna be able to defend your position.  

[00:48:11] Unknown:

Period. Yep. Yep. I've even recently heard an attorney   who said that when you were born, you were a national. I'm like, nope.   If you're born in the 50 states, you are a US citizen. I used to believe that. I'm like,   I'm thinking, well I was   a citizen of The US Of A.   Right. They used to go around saying that. Yeah. Didn't know about the state citizen Let correlation.   But,  

[00:48:38] Unknown:

there Let me pick a nip with you on that.   You are a national   until your feet exit mama's birth canal.   From that happens, yours yours is The United States   because you're not born yet.  

[00:48:54] Unknown:

Hello?  

[00:48:55] Unknown:

Maybe. Yes.   Joan?  

[00:48:58] Unknown:

The other day in the after class after Brent Winters was on   Friday,   in the after in the after show,   he said somebody was asking him about,   well, I can't remember the exact question, but it had to do with being a national.   And   Brent said   something like,   well,   if you   you're a everyone's a national   from the time they're born or I I don't remember if he said from the time they're born. It might not have been any worse, but he said, you're a national. He said, you don't have to turn in a piece of paper to say you're a national. Well, well, Brent's just wrong, you know, and I'm sorry. Brent's wrong about a lot of this stuff. Yeah. Thank you. When I was talking about bankruptcy  

[00:49:41] Unknown:

couple years ago,   Brenda go, no. There was never was a bankruptcy.   And and and I pull up the page from Louis t McFadden   where where he says the   where The United States is bankrupt. The English are in in the office of the treasury, and there's 21 French limousines waiting outside. And Brent's response was, oh, he's just a politician.   Well, that's not true. You know? He was a really concerted, dedicated patriot   who and I would remind y'all the last time because I did some research on the guy, astounding American.   Okay?  

Great statesman.   Probably one of the better congresspeople   who's ever sat up there in the whole history of the country. Okay? And,   the last time he ran,   he was nominated   in his district by the Republicans and the Democrats and the Populists.   All three parties nominated him for the House seat. I I've I've never heard of that happening before.  

[00:50:36] Unknown:

That was good.  

[00:50:38] Unknown:

Okay. So so and, Brent, do you know what I think it is, Joan? I think Brent has a hard time   admitting that the devil got the best of him.  

[00:50:48] Unknown:

He's a lawyer.  

[00:50:52] Unknown:

So,   but,   but regardless, it doesn't make any difference.  

[00:50:58] Unknown:

Yeah. No kidding. Like Larry B. Craft. I mean,   I know showed him all kinds of things. And you showed him your material. And it's just he can't fathom that. You know, John,  

[00:51:09] Unknown:

when they got out of jail, John had a three hour conversation with him about the book,   Taxation Without   Representation.   And at the end of it, I remember what John said. It was really classic.   He said,   Larry's been lawyering too long.  

[00:51:28] Unknown:

Yeah. Mhmm. Yeah. And I've met Larry Beecraft in person. Oh, yeah. Super nice guy.  

[00:51:34] Unknown:

A great guy.  

[00:51:35] Unknown:

I learned a couple of things from him that they didn't teach me in school and I was like, oh man,   that's serious because we had   Patriots trying to take things up on appeal and they were setting back precedent for everybody else.   Yes.   That's the bad part. John   Benson, who wrote the book The Law That Never Was about the sixteenth amendment, he was at that dinner too.  

[00:51:58] Unknown:

That was Bill Benson.  

[00:52:00] Unknown:

I'm sorry, Bill Benson. What'd I say?   John. But I'm sorry. Bill Benson.   Bill, there were him and Larry were talking about   Bill was taking,   an IRS case up through the federal court.   Another guy,   who I think they had been   arrested,   and lost his case,   he took it up and   he heard about Bill Benson and then he told   the Federal Court, the Appellate Court,   that his appeal was based on John Benson's,   materials   and so Bill Benson, excuse me.   And so, they ruled against this guy and it just shot Bill Benson right out of the water.   Maybe that was by design,   you know, because in the past, I've learned this from   Oklahoma Senator or US Senator James Lankford   and it just kind of blew my mind that people are this evil.  

But, the Liberals were going into court like the Green parties   and they would go into a favorable Federal court that was also liberal.   The DOJ,   under   Clinton and Biden,   I'm sorry, Clinton,   Obama and Biden,   the DOJ would come in   and if the one of these green parties who were trying to quote protect the environment   or do whatever,   they would basically settle with them and now that became law.   They would have the court   issue an order   that was in favor of this liberal,  

[00:53:35] Unknown:

Environmental  

[00:53:37] Unknown:

group. Yeah, environmental agenda and Environmental Groups is primarily what that was about.   And the DOJ was favorable to that because of who was in the administration   and then they would issue a joint order   and the judge would sign off of it and now it become law.   Making it very difficult for anybody else to ever overcome that.  

[00:53:59] Unknown:

They're very, very sneaky.   I I met Bill Benson several times. We used to have these conventions. The guy that ran our group there, Rick Tyler, had a whole bunch of these connections, and he'd get these really,   you know, influential   known people in. And we'd have a convention over the weekend. And because he lived about 60 miles out of town there, Atlanta,   up in Blue Ridge. He'd call me as the assistant guy and go, can you go to the airport and pick these guys up? So   I was running down to the airport and picking up all these guys. So I had chance to talk to him and meet him and all that stuff. Well, Bill told me, and I I don't remember if he told me personally, he told the group, but this will shock you if you've never heard this before.   Bill Benson there was three Bensons in the patriot movement. None of them are related. Bill Benson, who's in the Illinois that wrote the the law that never was volume one and two about the sixteenth amendment mainly.  

Then there was John Benson, my mentor, and there was a guy in Arizona named Wayne Benson who was all into this stuff too. And and then none of them were related, so it's easily confused.   Anyway, Bill Benson was up there, and I'm gonna ask you a question mark.   And he said he was approached by the chief of staff   of a sitting United States Senator   and was told if you'll give us because he and I I should give a background for some people that don't know. He was in the Illinois tax   division, and he   smelled the rat, if you will, back when he was still employed. And when he got out, he started pursuing it. And he got hooked up with Red Red Beckman, who some of you may not know. Red's gone now, unfortunately.   He was one of the real patriarchs of our movement, especially in the tax field.  

And he also founded FEJA, by the way, Red Beckman.   And,   so a benefactor   got them or they got a hold of a benefactor,   and they flew   from to every state that was a state in the union in 1913,   '14,   those years.   And they went into the archives of every state,   and they went back and got certified and notarized copies of the archives.   And what they found out was that not one state legally ratified the sixteenth amendment.   Yeah. K. It's a very specific process   for it has to be passed in the congress, then it's set out to the states,   and they have to not only pass the exact bill.  

There can't be an I that's not dotted. There can't be a semicolon that's not in there. It's got to be an exact replica of what was passed by congress.   And it's got to then be read in that state legislature   out loud three times   before it's officially ratified   by the state. And they got all that information.   And and there was a guy, boy, is this a good name here? The secretary of state at that time was named Philander.   Philander?   You little Philander?   Philander Knox was his name. And he got up and he was the, deciding person on, amendments and got up in front of the senate and said it appears   the sixteenth amendment's been ratified. Well, hell, not one state properly passed it. Two that had passed it, now that was fourteenth amendment.  

Okay? So, anyway, a seventeenth amendment, same thing. Alright? They found that too. While they were out there, they researched that also.   But   the important thing is, is they came back and this was what I remember from it, Marks, many years ago.   They came back. They put those books out, The Law That Never Was. There's two volumes.   And, with all these authorized   documents in there. Okay? And,   somebody took it to court and the original district court ruled in their favor.   And they came quickly and appealed it, and the appellate level turn overturned the district court decision, and they came back and said, this is a   political decision.  

And so then they threw it to the congress. Well, the congress takes it, the hot potato, and said, well, this is a legal decision, throws it back to them. And so they've been tossing this hot potato around for a long time. Okay?   So what Bill Benson told me   was that the chief of staff   of a very influential   US Senator   came to him and said, if you'll give us all those documentation,   your family will never have another financial problem   the rest of your generations.   And he turned them down.   So the question,   which senator?  

[00:58:45] Unknown:

Well, I have no idea.  

[00:58:46] Unknown:

Anybody got a wild ass guess?  

[00:58:49] Unknown:

Orion Hatch.  

[00:58:51] Unknown:

Orrin Hatch.   Jones heard me tell this before. Owen Hatch,   who was a big senator from Utah, by the way, supposedly real conservative.   So,   anyway, that's just a little tidbit I picked up along the way.   Very interesting.   And as I said, it they they found out the seventeenth amendment wasn't properly done either. What's the seventeenth amendment?   That's where they   didn't let the states appoint   senators.   They put them up for popular vote,   which is why the senate   if you're if you're a national, Mark, the only office you can't run for is US senate.   Paul's gonna tell our folks in Chicago and maybe across the pond bye bye,  

[00:59:37] Unknown:

if you want to, Paul. Radio soapbox dot radio soapbox dot com and +1 069   0   Please join us for the second hour. Go to the matrixdocs,d0cs,.com.   Click on the free conference call links there,   the Eurofolk radio link, or the Global Voice Radio link. We'll see you after the top of the hour.   Don't be late.  

[01:00:03] Unknown:

Bye, Chicago.   Where else where else can you get this kind of information? Where else?  

[01:00:09] Unknown:

See you later. I know. Yeah, Mark. I know.   Bye, Chicago.   Alright.   What I was thinking about,   one of our listeners, Preeti, sent me a video.   Oh, yeah. She's yeah. She's part of our our   legacy,   trust club.   And so she sent me a video from a gentleman who   was using   AI to do some legal research and,   it's quite interesting because he was really showing about most of these agencies are just strictly administrative agencies.   That's all they are. And so, yeah, and so,   even to the point of the judicial system,   you know, the municipal courts, county courts, they're they're all part of the administrative   system   and even to the point where   the law enforcement   was really not law enforcement.  

And the way he laid it out was   proving   that statutes and codes are not law. We've discussed that before but basically,   unless   your legislative   group,   your legislators   codify   the statutes   or codes for your state   as law. There's a couple of states that do that   But outside of those couple of states,   your statutes and codes for your state   that they enforce   is only administrative   law because   the real law   is   a session law that the legislators pass on their floors   and it goes to the governor   and he signs it. That's the real law.   But, they have a private group like Westlaw   will come in, they take the session law that was passed,   they convert it into codes and statutes   which makes it a private compilation   of the session law   and   it's copyrighted, right? Because it's their work. They summarize   the session law into these codes   and into the   statutes that states have   And, you know, back when   I was working with Dan Meador, we had a conference and a gentleman from Seattle   came in and he explained how statutes and codes weren't law and about fell out of my chair because, of course, they don't tell you that in your law school stuff. Right? So, they never taught me that in in college.  

So,   what it boils down to is when you look at that book, at least they were using up on the statutes,   which we had copies of there,   And at the top of most of those pages, at the very beginning, it says   court rules   and procedures   precede   the statutes. And you're like,   well, how could court rules have a higher precedent   over these statutes? If the statutes are law, how in the world could court rule? So, of course, that's another area people thought, must be the Admiralty law.   No.   It's it's that you're not dealing with real law. Statutes and codes for the most part, unless your your   your legislators   codify it and say, okay. Here's the latest updated,   codes for our state and the legislators   say, this is the law and they pass   a codification   statement or codification, I don't know which way you say that.  

And   they   codify that   as being law.   Again, there's only a couple states that do that. Most of them don't.  

[01:03:52] Unknown:

Do you know which ones, Mark?   And I will just say that I'm only familiar with Missouri and Arkansas.   Arkansas's   are annotated.   Missouri's are revised.   What is the difference? Annotated.  

[01:04:10] Unknown:

Annotated   simply means they're adding something on to it. Revised would be they go in and revise it. Mark, could this be the difference on the federal level? You're talking about the states of positive and non positive law?   Again, that  

[01:04:24] Unknown:

okay. That's what I thought. Okay. Go ahead. Yeah. Same same difference. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. I don't I don't know which states. I just have to do a Google search and find it. You know?  

[01:04:34] Unknown:

Fair enough. But would you say that codified and annotated   are   synonymous   or not?  

[01:04:42] Unknown:

No. They're different. Okay. Well, no. No. Annotated is something totally different. Annotated, and this is what I learned from Richard Cornforth and   really this is like the cheat code if you wanna know part of the cheat code of of,   you know, fighting a case, which I would recommend staying out of court.   But, annotated   is where they take the statute or the code   and they show a court case   that references   that particular code.   In other words, it's where you can go look at the law,   what we call the common law passed by the courts   and you'll see that   here's a court case that you can use in your documents   that supports,   you know, for or against   that that,   that particular code or statute.  

Does that make sense?  

[01:05:32] Unknown:

Let me give you another example, Sherry.   On the law books in the back, they'll have a little pocket there.   And I'm gonna give you a specific example, the title 26.   When before Alaska and Hawaii were states,   they were in the state federal states.   But after they were achieved statehood, they pulled them out of the federal states, and they annotated   that move   by changing the statute to read that they're not in there anymore. And they put a little addendum   in the back of the law book there as to that effect. I believe that's called an annotation.  

[01:06:16] Unknown:

Yeah. My understanding, if you read it, you'll you'll see a court case that supports that.  

[01:06:21] Unknown:

Mhmm. Well, could we just say then,   that they are just   usurping the power   and No. They have their   their,   minions   supporting it and putting it into   doctrine,   so to speak?  

[01:06:42] Unknown:

No. There's gotta be there's something legitimate has to change for them to annotate a statute.  

[01:06:51] Unknown:

Oh, you're talking about amending.   Well,  

[01:06:55] Unknown:

no. I thought it was called I thought it was refer  

[01:06:57] Unknown:

I thought it was, Sherry, hold on. I thought it was referred to as annotation.   I may be wrong. Okay. I mean, I'm going back many years here. You guys go ahead. Go ahead, Sherry.  

[01:07:07] Unknown:

Well, I was just gonna say this is how they changed   the meanings of words. You know, they just changed definition.   And you've got the statutes,   the legislature, and then it being buttressed   by the,   their minion courts, so to speak.  

[01:07:25] Unknown:

Let Let me read the definition of the annotated statute.   It says that it's a version of the statute that includes commentary,   notes, and other information.   Annotated statutes are useful for understanding how cases   have interpreted   that statute.   Mhmm. So it usually gives you a court case   that explains that particular statute that you're reading.  

[01:07:49] Unknown:

Okay.   Paul just lit a cigarette with that Zippo.   Yeah. I love  

[01:07:57] Unknown:

Again, I'm just saying that, you know,   it's two branches of government that really aren't legitimate   under the scripture,   because that's   where contract law actually originated from.   And they have perverted it, and they've got two branches saying, well done.  

[01:08:17] Unknown:

Yeah.   Hey, Raj. Well, this kinda comes around and leads   go ahead.  

[01:08:25] Unknown:

How you Well, I just,   don't don't forget where you are, Mark. Don't forget what you were gonna say. I do wanna circle back for a second. I gotta you know, in defense of Brent Winters, I do believe that what he meant was   that you don't have to   declare yourself a national. You don't have to tell anybody   what you are,   because you're a national at birth.   And but I think the component that he missed was rebutting the presumption of citizenship. Yeah. Exactly.  

[01:08:54] Unknown:

What the affidavit is for. And and you can go and he's right. When you just Dane Fish said this one time, Paul, came in with you here. Said when I was a national when I made up my mind that I was.   The other thing is just a formality.   Unfortunately, you've got to notify the feds because the presumption   is in effect, which, by the way, you've always agreed with whenever they ask you. You've gotta tell him that that's in effect. And that's where Brent is right and wrong in that. K?  

[01:09:24] Unknown:

Yeah. Well, he was he was right on board. He was right on point with the fact that people are nationals at birth,   but he just  

[01:09:33] Unknown:

missed that one little thing of rebutting the presumption. But no. But they're not nationals at birth. They're nationals until your feet come out of mama's birth canal.   Then you're a citizen of The United States because you've been born. All persons born  

[01:09:48] Unknown:

or natural. But I'm   right. But I'm gonna have to   respectfully   disagree with you because   the INA   says   that   all US citizens   are US nationals,   but not all nationals   are US citizens.  

[01:10:07] Unknown:

I I can see that point of view. I've always looked at it a little different perspective, but I can see that point of view. But here's the thing. You've still got to notify them that you're not the one that you've agreed to erroneously throughout your whole life.  

[01:10:22] Unknown:

Exactly.  

[01:10:23] Unknown:

Okay. I have a question. Still got to notify   some person in some capacity   in some method that that presumption is broken, you've changed.   Otherwise,   you're you know, you're not I don't think you're gonna get very far. Okay.   So Sherry,   what was your comment?  

[01:10:44] Unknown:

Is Paul finished?  

[01:10:46] Unknown:

I think he is. And we gotta go back to we gotta go back to Mark too. To Mark. Okay. Alright. Well, you're back to Mark. Sorry, Sherry. Thank you, Paul. Mark, what where were you, buddy?  

[01:10:56] Unknown:

Unpin that thing. You know, we talked about I was talking about,   our listener, Priddy, that sent me the   the,   email with the video link and the gentleman was talking about administrative law and so forth. And it made me think about   go back to what you've always said about or by operation of law.   And I was wondering   if you could kind of expand on that   and   and kinda, you know, tell the differences like when you see something that says blah blah blah or by operation of law.  

[01:11:29] Unknown:

Okay, well there's that little difference there and maybe  

[01:11:33] Unknown:

I   can take a stab at it. I can take a stab at it.   Let's speak on it for a few minutes and give us a little background and a little, you know, class  

[01:11:42] Unknown:

and then we could open it up for questions on that particular topic. Well well, that's a good that's a good issue. You know, there's a difference between lawful and legal.   And the first time it really that I remember taking note of it   was in some of the early bluff letters that were sent by the passport office.   And, of course, those letters, some of you have received them. The first paragraph is always the same. The other paragraphs can be different depending upon, I guess, who's doing it. Anyway, it's gotta be some cut and paste thing they got set up.   So the first paragraph says it appears by what you've submitted   that you're a citizen of The United States,   And then it quotes only the first part of the fourteenth amendment, all persons born and naturalized   in The United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.  

I I don't remember if it goes into the last part of that or just stops there. Anyway,   it it it quotes the fourteenth amendment, and it says this cannot be unilaterally   waived,   yada blah blah blah, as you're saying to Mark. I don't remember all the crap they put in there. And and then all of a sudden at the last, it says except   by operational   law. Well, one thing that I've learned over all these years of doing this and research and stuff   is whenever you find an exception,   you need to investigate it.   K?   Because there's a reason it's an exception,   and you wanna know why.  

And you'll always here here here's,   I think that the only common law court   left in the federal government is the US Court of Claims, Mark. I don't have any proof on that. It's a very strong suspicion, but I know that that court has a lot of exceptions.   When you're looking at things to do with different courts in the federal system,   that court's   always out there on the side   hanging out as an exception.   There's got some other very important things. That's the vaccine court. And do you know that the government pays for both sides of an argument   at the vaccine court and they pay the remedy?  

Do you know that? No.  

[01:13:50] Unknown:

I didn't.  

[01:13:52] Unknown:

Okay. So it's an exception. So except by operational law. Well, then I was looking one time at h   j r. It came up the other day. H j r one ninety   two. Right. Which was passed in,   April of nineteen thirty three by the senate, I think. House house joint resolution by both houses.   Excuse me. And it says, basically, all the property in the country is ours.   It's a month after the bankruptcy. And, of course, you don't know when you're reading that that they mean you too.   Okay? But anyway, at the end of that paragraph,   boom, there it is again. Oh, except by operational law. So everything's not their property if there's something done that's lawful.  

Not legal,   lawful.   Because they can't argue with the law. They got a lot of power, but the reason they want to get us over in this UCC stuff is because they can control that all day long. They can't control the natural law. They don't want to appear for you to think they do.   They want that power imputed to them, but they don't have that. Okay?   And recently shown by this election and everything posted, they weren't the great powerful laws.   Okay? They somebody pulled the curtain back and there he is with the levers and pedals.   So this law thing is important. Well, that hit me. I started thinking about it. And in those early days, the one thing that we'd retort back to the passport office was, well, how about Mattel's Law of Nations? Is that lawful enough for you? And then I'd have him quote the every man has the right of personal political self determination as echo echoed verbatim   in the United Nations Charter. Well, is that lawful enough for you there, passport boy?  

Everybody got their documents.   Okay?   So this is the differential to me is the things they can affect. Oh, they'll put all the smokescreen up there, but except by operational law, there's an out. You just gotta find it.  

[01:15:56] Unknown:

Hey, Raj?   Yes. Quick question. Quick question. Because   the Senate ratified   the   UN charter,   the universal declaration of human rights,   would that be considered a treaty?  

[01:16:14] Unknown:

Well, if the Senate okayed it by the proper margins, that's the only way, of course, the treaty is,   ratified.   Now the treaty can't be, my understanding, it can't be against the constitution.   They've got to take that into effect. But, well, in the fourteenth amendment in the constitution they're adhering to, you bet it is. Okay?   So but what do we do? That's how we're able to get around it. On all this vaccine stuff that they were trying to pass just under the wire last year.   Man, giving all your health of every country over to the WHO so they could do vaccine   mandates.  

Well, how do they do those vaccine mandates?   Well, they have to do it administratively,   don't they? Yeah. They gotta go through some agency   all the way down to put that needle in your arm. Well, we bypass all that.  

[01:17:08] Unknown:

Right. But the but the point I was trying to make is don't   treaties   by and large   I don't   treaties,   particularly international ones, which that certainly would be,   don't they actually,   supersede the constitution?  

[01:17:26] Unknown:

If they're constitutional.   It's my understanding.   They've got it out here. I always understand. They can't they can't override it. And, Paul, I'm not an expert in this area. Okay? But,   I do think that this is one of the reasons   that they changed the seventeenth amendment. That's something I've never heard anybody else even float. Oh, the senators are very important, but it's the senate that ratifies treaties.   Yeah. Is that what they were aiming at when they did that?  

[01:18:01] Unknown:

Right. Yeah. And the senate   the senate is an instrument of the states. The  

[01:18:08] Unknown:

is the the several state presence in the government. Well, well, it should be if they especially if the senators were appointed by the legislature   and the people of the state where he could have some input up there. And if he's not doing what they want him to do, they can yank his ass back and change. We can't do that with an elected guy. Okay?  

[01:18:28] Unknown:

This is this is Chris from California.  

[01:18:31] Unknown:

Yeah. Hey, Chris. One second, Chris. One second, Chris. The and the point I was trying to make is I think the treaties   I think the treaties constitute international law. And because they are ratified by   representative bodies of the states,   then they would supersede the federal government. They would supersede certainly administrative   law.  

[01:18:51] Unknown:

Okay. Well, it's either interstate or hold on. You see   go ahead.  

[01:18:57] Unknown:

They supersede the constitution.   I use treaty law all the time in land use issues,   regarding the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo   and the Protocol of Queretaro   which settled the Mexican American War. And   the Congress did not like the terms   that the Mexicans insisted upon but the terms are very favorable to us,   the people,   because it gave us the free use of the land forever   and our heirs and assigns.   And that phrase is in every land patent and I use this to back off the county   every time.  

[01:19:35] Unknown:

Okay. And,  

[01:19:36] Unknown:

and I believe it says in the constitution   correct me if I'm wrong. I have to go back and check. I believe it says that this constitution   is the highest law of the land except for international treaties.  

[01:19:50] Unknown:

Okay. Well, I've never heard that except for part.  

[01:19:53] Unknown:

Let's go back and check that out.  

[01:19:56] Unknown:

Okay.  

[01:19:58] Unknown:

Roger.  

[01:20:00] Unknown:

Yes. There's Larry. He's gonna contribute something. Good morning.  

[01:20:05] Unknown:

Good afternoon.   We're in the Eastern time zone, right?  

[01:20:08] Unknown:

Oh, yeah, I am for another   week or so. Go ahead.  

[01:20:13] Unknown:

Yeah.   Getting back to operation of lot.   Is there some type of requirement, have you found that there's some type of requirement   whereby   that statement has to be   in a bluff letterresponse   letter   that the government   sends you, especially at the federal level?   And have you ever heard a student calling in   who said, hey. I received a bluff letter, Roger. It didn't have that except by operation of law statement in it. No. No. Everyone I've ever seen over since they've been sending them is the same first paragraph, and it's there every time, Larry.  

[01:20:51] Unknown:

And the the the result is everybody that's ever   answered back with any kind of a concerted   basis like how about Vatel's Law of Nations, they all get their documents. I don't believe we've ever had anybody that got one of those that responded to it that didn't get their documents. Now I can't speak for Anavon Wright's or David Strait's students,   but I know about  

[01:21:16] Unknown:

ours.  

[01:21:22] Unknown:

Okay? Yeah. So they they have to acknowledge the legal and the lawful and that there's a difference.   They have to do that just  

[01:21:30] Unknown:

for whatever you need.   Well, because that's the   they can't overturn   those things. They don't have that power.   They can't overturn   the common law. All they can do is veneer over it   and trick you.   Roger That's why I say these guys are I can't yeah. Hold on a second, Sherry. These guys are paper tigers, man.   They're just bluff.   They don't have all this power. They've stolen it.   And that's why they intimidate you so much so that these people, when they get presented with our material, they go, oh, no. I I could never do that. I'm too scared.   Well, hold it. You've got the power.  

What settled laws you wanna live under is your   decision. If they're trying to tell you which ones you're going to live under, then they're open tyrants, aren't they, Larry?  

[01:22:26] Unknown:

Yeah. They are. I've got one more question.  

[01:22:29] Unknown:

There's your answer right there.  

[01:22:32] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[01:22:32] Unknown:

We don't listen, just like Sun Tzu said, if you don't know who you are and you don't know who the enemy is, you got no chance of winning any battle. And that's exactly where they've got us.   Now we're learning how we got the power and what happens? They recognize it every time, don't they, Larry?   Every time.  

[01:22:54] Unknown:

Okay? I'd like to go back in in time a little bit. Earlier,   you're discussing,   you're talking about how   out of respect Trump is respectfully   following the orders of the courts and   there's three branches.   Yeah, there's three branches of government obviously.   And I remember Brent made   the comment a few months ago that there is no requirement anywhere   that one branch of government has to follow the legal decrees of another branch. That's true. They're all separate. Technically   Technically, Trump does not have to follow those orders.  

[01:23:31] Unknown:

Well,   I would hearken you back to the passage or the   failure to veto.   No. The veto. He did   veto, the second bank of the United States in about 1835   with Andrew Jackson.   You you remember that story?   And and this they the bankers ran a case through the court system, and it got to the Supreme Court, and they ruled against,   Jackson. You remember what he said?   Let's see him enforce it.   Let's see him enforce it.   So Trump could barge ahead and so to hell with that and take that attitude,   But I think he's very conscious   of taking too much of a dictatorial   position at this stage   when he can work within the meets and bounds   of this old agency that Obama set up and was on the shelf that he just pulled off the shelf and renamed,   and he's got the authority   and the constitutional   authority backing him to do whatever he wants   with the administrative   state.  

He has got them by the proverbial shorthairs.   And, Larry, I know you've heard it. What do you have when you got one green ball in one hand and another green ball in the other hand?   You got the jolly green giant right where you want him.  

[01:24:53] Unknown:

And that's what's going on. No more.  

[01:24:56] Unknown:

Well, he ain't no jolly at all.   K?  

[01:25:02] Unknown:

Hey, Roger. I just wanna thank you. And if you had set up a board today,   I didn't hear it. But that that even the Babylonian   code   even recognized   the almighty.   Yeah. And that's what we need to get back to.  

[01:25:19] Unknown:

Oh, of course. Well, of course. And we're getting back to it. There's a revival in the country. A lot of libs are even moving over to the Trump side, realizing it's had gone so far   that it was unsalvageable   going the other way and have come over to the populist side. It's quite refreshing to see at least some of them   are able to rain, rub two brain cells together.   So who else has got something to add to that discussion or you wanna bring something new or is there breaking news we don't know about? Any of those things?   Did you see, happen to anybody see the president, the guy from Romania interviewed on Alex yesterday? This is the reason I promote Alex, folks.  

I don't think that guy's been interviewed on any other network anywhere. He's been on Alex twice.   The guy in Romania, they,   stole the election from a month or so ago. Remember that?   I can't remember his name.   Does anybody remember that?  

[01:26:23] Unknown:

Yeah. I remember it. But I didn't see the interview. I don't remember his name, but I know that they just basically outright said, well, we're not gonna accept the results of this election. It was it was influenced by the Russians, so you're a Russian president. We're not gonna recognize you, basically.  

[01:26:38] Unknown:

Yeah. Well, they, he he was on Alex in the third hour yesterday. You can go back to one of those   places that segments up the hours with no spots.   Good interview. He this guy is a big heavy. I mean, he ain't no lightweight little country president.   He was a big UN guy. He was one of the head guys from the Club of Rome   on setting up everything coming out of the Club of Rome. He's got an extensive background with the globalists. Okay? So he runs for president over there. Romania   evidently borders Ukraine.   I didn't know that. I don't know the geography specifically over there. Anyway, that's part of it. And so they said we're not gonna recognize you as president, and then they gave another date for another election.  

And this morning, he was going to register,   and the cops pulled him out of traffic and arrested him.  

[01:27:32] Unknown:

Wow.  

[01:27:33] Unknown:

So that was going on this morning. It was talked about on Harrison this morning and,   very sharp guy. I mean, really sharp.   So for whatever that's worth is something I   May I? Wanted to mention? Yes, ma'am. You may, miss Julie.  

[01:27:50] Unknown:

He,   I think he said,   when he was interviewed that NATO is split into   two parts. Yeah. One part where Trump wants peace and the other part under the EU wants war. And so Out of Sweden. Out of Sweden. It's called NATO North.   Yep. And it's France and England and Sweden. His name is Alan.   Yeah. I think his name is Kalen. I don't know how to pronounce his last name, but he says that NATO   NATO is using Romania as a tool to start World War three with Russia.  

[01:28:22] Unknown:

Yeah. They're trying because NATO's   Romania's a NATO member   and and is right in that part of the country. I'm not sure if they have a a common border with Russia or not, but they're real close right there. And they wanna try Ukraine   ain't gonna work. We're gonna come over here and try this.   And that's what's going on. And that's why they arrested him this morning. And,   he's a very sharp guy. Did you happen to see that interview on Alex yesterday, Julie?  

[01:28:48] Unknown:

Yeah. I saw it. And so it was very, very interesting. And, you know, basically, he basically they canceled the vote illegally and unconstitutionally   and stolen the vote. So they got the same thing going on in the other countries that we have going on here in our own country.  

[01:29:03] Unknown:

Yep.   Yep. It's true.   So, thank you, dear.   Thank you. I So, yep. Yep. Yep. Who else has got something this morning? Roger.   There's somebody. Is that sketch?  

[01:29:18] Unknown:

Yeah.   Kaelin,   the guy   who ran for president   in Romania, he was a former   UN official.  

[01:29:28] Unknown:

Oh, yeah. He's a big high ranking guy.  

[01:29:31] Unknown:

Yes. And he did an interview with,   Rainier   full Fulmich,   the guy who's been, was In the lawsuit. The,   COVID,  

[01:29:43] Unknown:

investigation committee. Yeah. The lawsuit.   Yeah. They threw his ass in jail.  

[01:29:48] Unknown:

Yeah. And he he did an interview with,   the Romanian, and it's very good. And he   he said he came out with that in that interview saying that   the world is controlled   by pedophiles.   And it's very interesting that he he was so forthright with,   doctor Rainier Fomich,   and, just I'm gonna put it in the chat for anybody who needs it. It's, quite an interview.  

[01:30:19] Unknown:

Okay. And I got thanks for sending that Eastman interview.   I got through about half of it,   and and I I would   if it's good enough, the problem with the interview is whoever mic'd it did a terrible job   of not putting the mic close enough to him.   But we'll I'll I'll try and get to the rest of it maybe today or tonight. And if it's good enough, we'll play it. It's John Eastman. He's a   constitutional law instructor   at some college, and   I think he,   helped Trump in the last election or something. I know they don't like him worth a crap because they're trying to go after his law license.   But if that's good enough and that audio is overcomeable, we'll maybe put it's only sixteen, seventeen minutes long.  

But thanks, Scott, for that. It it was  

[01:31:09] Unknown:

it was very informative.   And, also, I just, by half happened chance, watched C SPAN last night and came across the house judiciary   committee   on investigating   birthright citizenship   and, limited government.   And,   it was,   pretty   interesting also,   about some of the professors were saying, well, there is no legislation   or statutes that actually   you know, this was this birthright citizenship   was actually, you know, kinda just It adopted  

[01:31:46] Unknown:

and not It was it was kinda conjured it was kinda conjured up is what I that's the point of the Eastman interview I'm at, where he said it kind of seemed to develop in the sixties.   So I'm anxious to hear the rest of it. And but nobody's even mentioned the feudal connection, though, have they, Skedje?  

[01:32:05] Unknown:

No. They sure haven't.  

[01:32:07] Unknown:

Nobody got it but John Benson. And the only reason John Benson got it was because all obviously, all his studies   and the fact that we finally had the end game. When you got the end game, you can make the connection.   If you don't have the end game like these guys don't,   the the finest attorneys in the country,   then you can't see it.   Interesting,   Remember,   power always puts what they're doing to you   right in front of you. I also heard a guy, go into the difference between oligarchs   and globalists. Isn't that interesting? Any of y'all wanna take a stab at that, the difference between oligarchs and globalists? I think it was this same Romanian guy that spelled it out yesterday.   Anybody got a a stab at  

[01:32:58] Unknown:

I have a Yes, ma'am. Stab at something else, and it was what Trump said in the last day or two   about,   Adam Schiff putting forth,   to congress   about the,   his   talk with Putin on the phone,   and he totally   changed   it. And Trump used the phrase.   They he changed the definitions.   And I thought that that was interesting that  

[01:33:33] Unknown:

that's what we have to be careful of. Well, that's what the Pharisees do. That's what the Pharisees were doing in the back of Jesus.   Same thing. Here's another example.   Pre COVID, they changed the vaccine definition.  

[01:33:48] Unknown:

Correct.  

[01:33:49] Unknown:

This is what they do. They change the definitions.   Oh, they're just rampant little bastards.  

[01:33:58] Unknown:

I know. I just thought it was interesting that Trump put that forth. Okay. Well, I don't remember. Okay. That is good, Trump.  

[01:34:05] Unknown:

And,   alrighty. What, who else is   out there with somebody? Roger. You're dying to say. I think that's a name. What's the difference? The difference between Pharisees.  

[01:34:17] Unknown:

And   what was the other words you used, please? Globalists  

[01:34:23] Unknown:

and oligarchs.   Annette, you got a stab at that, the difference between globalists and oligarchs?  

[01:34:29] Unknown:

Well, maybe the globalists are are looking for   complete control in the oligarch or oh my goodness. I'm butchering the word. Is more self self beneficiary.  

[01:34:41] Unknown:

You know, looking to benefit itself, maybe. Okay. Alright. I'll let's see. Anybody else got a a stab at it?   Difference between an oligarch and a globalist.  

[01:34:55] Unknown:

The oligarchs are bankers  

[01:34:57] Unknown:

Mhmm.  

[01:34:58] Unknown:

And solar money. It's the oligarchs are the money guys, and the globalists are their minions that   that carry it out. But there is a different of art.  

[01:35:10] Unknown:

Because they got this long nose that's sticking that's sucking coinage out of your pocket just like Oy vey.  

[01:35:21] Unknown:

They can't select this. It's like the the scorpion and the frog. I you knew what I was.   Yeah.  

[01:35:30] Unknown:

Well, hey. So you you can distinguish them   through   their nose?   Just curious.  

[01:35:38] Unknown:

Of course. Well, actually, kinda. You know, they got this ski ramp going on.  

[01:35:43] Unknown:

Just look at, oh, who's my favorite? And the bunny ramp. Raskin. Just go look at finding a clip of Jamie Raskin. You tell me.  

[01:35:54] Unknown:

So, Roger,   And then? Would it would it be fair would it be fair to say kinda like,   the the go globalists are the servants  

[01:36:05] Unknown:

of the The oligarchs.  

[01:36:08] Unknown:

Oligarchs?  

[01:36:09] Unknown:

Yeah. They're their gophers. Go go fetch. Do this. Do that. Yep. That's them.   And it's the oligarchs that get together,   oh, about every ten years probably in Zurich.   I think Zurich maybe.  

[01:36:23] Unknown:

I wonder if   this is could also apply. Maybe   the,   oligarchs   are the private side and the,   globalist is the public.   Could that  

[01:36:36] Unknown:

be maybe? Yeah. Yeah. No. That's that's very, very good. Yeah. I like that. Because  

[01:36:44] Unknown:

remember, the money guys that was great.  

[01:36:46] Unknown:

The money guys are always in the background. They wanna stay in the shadows.   They don't wanna be brought out. They want you to go ahead and say, Oh, yeah. Elon Musk is the richest guy in the world. Oh, yeah. Sure. Right. Okay. They wanna stay completely hidden   as they put the globalist out as the public puppets. Yes.  

[01:37:08] Unknown:

You know, there was   there was a guy named Bernard,   and he came out and did an interview where  

[01:37:15] Unknown:

he was doing Oh, I know I know I know I know you're talking about the Swiss   banker. Guy that started calling in the middle of the interview. Yep.  

[01:37:23] Unknown:

Yes.   And,  

[01:37:26] Unknown:

Go tell the audience. They might not have seen it. Go ahead and finish it.  

[01:37:30] Unknown:

Well, he he was approached. You know, we see you're doing very good in business.   If you don't have a conscience,   we would like you to come work for us.   And, basically, he was saying he he saw so much cash. It was ridiculous,   like, mounds of cash, if I remember his quote right.   But,   and, but he they started inviting him to private sessions where, at first, he was just laughing at it, you know,   They're they're they're,   it was almost like they're,   rituals.   And then they brought a child out and that disturbed him greatly where he had a breakdown.  

[01:38:07] Unknown:

Anyway, I killed kill the child. They wanted him to kill the child to advance in his position.  

[01:38:13] Unknown:

Yeah. Yes. I do.  

[01:38:15] Unknown:

Hey. I was, over in Europe somewhere. I don't remember all the specifics. That was about   fifteen years ago, wasn't it, Annette?  

[01:38:23] Unknown:

I'm not sure. I'm not sure. Yeah.  

[01:38:26] Unknown:

Something like that. It was a while back.   Hey, Marcello. Which which good? Landlord.   Pardon me?  

[01:38:33] Unknown:

I yield. Well, it kinda goes towards the oligarchs   and and the money and the what you're saying now. It kinda goes to people doing their bidding and the amount of money they you know, anyways, I Oh, well, they're not gonna put you in that position unless they can control you. That's what the problem they got with Trump.  

[01:38:52] Unknown:

K? Yeah.   And you've got to go through these hoops and do these things before they   will recognize you and put you in those positions. And and we're about to I guess, we're maybe about to see some of that here,   very shortly if these,   Epstein files are gonna be released.   Everybody's fighting them. You know,  

[01:39:13] Unknown:

there's one more thing. We always got to keep them on the back of the dollar or the pyramid.  

[01:39:18] Unknown:

You know, the system.   There was, when they were changing over to the currency, I don't remember if I heard this or read this,   probably heard it recently,   that where somebody like Harry Dexter White, probably not him, but   somebody inside Roosevelt's cabinet there that made the suggestion that they put the great seal on the back.   Yep.   And as again, power puts what they're doing to you right in front of you.   I mean, you pretty much handle it may not be every day, but   most days you handle a $1 bill, don't you?   Some capacity   is right there in front of you. You handle it every day.  



[01:39:59] Unknown:

Mhmm.  

[01:40:01] Unknown:

Yep. They get a real so bad. This is how hold on, Sherry. This is how they rationalize to themselves.   And they go, yeah, Annette. Look at she's looking at that thing. She don't know jack crap about it. See there, she's so dumb that they need us and to look over them and guide them. This is a rationalization.   Go ahead, Sherry.  

[01:40:22] Unknown:

Could you go back to where they meet in Missouri and who are they?  

[01:40:28] Unknown:

The what?  

[01:40:29] Unknown:

You said that they meet in Missouri.  

[01:40:33] Unknown:

No. I no. I did not say that. Sorry. Oh, okay. You misunderstood.  

[01:40:39] Unknown:

Munich. Fair enough. Munich? Munich.   Oh, Munich.  

[01:40:43] Unknown:

Okay. I don't even remember mentioning Munich, but they just had a conference over there.   Oh, Basils.   Basil.   Switzerland.   Yeah. Okay. Despite Every ten years. Every ten years, the international   communist   committee meets in Basel, Switzerland, I'm pretty sure,   and, has since 1919.   And that's I'm pretty sure that's you're gonna see a bunch of room full of oligarchs right there.  

[01:41:14] Unknown:

And and the lower level ones meet at Bilderberg.  

[01:41:18] Unknown:

Probably. The Zionist Congress. You look at those, and   man couldn't,   a,   a, Davos Davos, Switzerland.   Some of them meet there.  

[01:41:29] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[01:41:31] Unknown:

Mhmm. But, the World   International,   the 19   Communist Internationale   is what it's called.   They meet every ten years and have since,   over a hundred years ago.  

[01:41:45] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[01:41:46] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[01:41:49] Unknown:

I don't think Missouri is too close to basil, though.  

[01:41:53] Unknown:

No. It's not. I But it is might grow. The Southern State.  

[01:41:58] Unknown:

Oh, you may grow some basil there, but it's not very close, I don't think.   I had some basil yesterday in my lunch. Yeah.   Basil.   Okay. Who else is, who's got some? Let's see what   Okay. We got about twenty five minutes left.  

[01:42:18] Unknown:

Was there anybody on there?  

[01:42:20] Unknown:

Oh, go ahead. There's I yield I might let's go ahead, and then I'm gonna go to the guy. I'll come back to you. Yes? Dave, is that you? Hey. Yeah. This is Paul from Kentucky.   Oh, it's Paul. Okay.  

[01:42:32] Unknown:

Hey, I just wanted to edify what you were saying about the power in the people.   I've mentioned briefly about several of my cases that are currently in court.   And I guarantee   if I didn't have the knowledge of the power and the people,   they would have slid these cases under the carpet. They're trying to do everything they can as it is to throw roadblocks up.   But with the power in the people, they can't seem to get rid of them.  

[01:43:03] Unknown:

I wasn't really referring to the power in the people. I was referring to the power in the individual.  

[01:43:11] Unknown:

Oh, okay. Well, yeah. I see your point of view.   Okay. I yield.  

[01:43:16] Unknown:

Uh-huh. Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. Yes.  

[01:43:19] Unknown:

If I could buttress that a little bit, the power of the people is the people as a collective, and that's that's like the citizenry.   But the power of the individual   supersedes that.  

[01:43:31] Unknown:

So it goes to the individual Well, the power of the people right now is that they're a bunch of sheep. And even when you put the facts in front of them, they don't want to or can't recognize them. I I that's why Antebon Reitzes meets with her assemblies.   You're never gonna get people that's this has got to be an individual effort. Now we can get a group of strong individuals   who've been through this, and that's a horse of a different color. But ordinarily,   just like Anna's, you know, and I've asked some of her students. I go, oh, well, the the state assembly leader makes me take this test and do all that stuff. And I go, well, is there any political infighting in an organization like that? They go, oh god. It's unbelievable. Well, that's the reason you can't do it. They're not all on the same page. Anna doesn't know what she's teaching them. They most of them don't understand what they're being taught. At least that's what they tell me.   You gotta go back and do this on an individual basis, then we can have strong groups. You can't do it the other way.  



[01:44:34] Unknown:

I think I can I can, encapsulate that and clarify   it very quickly with a simple statement?   The groups, the patriot groups that are out there, they have a few leaders, but they have a lot of sheep. They have a lot of followers that are incapable of making decisions for themselves or stepping outside the lines because they're scared.   What we have is a group of individuals   who are leaders,   who have taken control of their lives and their existence   and their citizenship and their patriotism.   We are a band of leaders   gathering together,   not a band of sheep being led to slaughter by a crew of people. That's why I try and insist  

[01:45:19] Unknown:

on everybody   learn the information   because I've come to understand that that's where the power is. You've got the power, but unless you've got the information and the mindset, you don't know you've got it or you don't know how to exercise it. Once you've got the information in there, it's a total different story.   That's why the education aspect of this is so important. It's like I told that guy in an email a couple weeks ago. I said, you know, he's going, what do I do next? What do I do next? I said, you know,   we've spent over a hundred years getting this information myself, personally, half of my adult life messing with it. We're not in the condition we're in from a lack of people filing paper.  

We're in the position we're in because of a lack of education and understanding, and you're never gonna get to the end of maybe trying to affect change by having people file copious amounts of paper. It just doesn't make sense.  

[01:46:15] Unknown:

Well, what the what the people that are that are in those groups are doing is they are looking to the leadership and the power of the group to give them authority to get their life back. And they're never gonna get it back because they didn't take the authority upon themselves to do that very thing.  

[01:46:34] Unknown:

Right.   Right. So I had somebody write me an email last night. So can you please I'm real hesitant in this and the other even though I've been listening to your stuff for years. I bought your book, read it twice,   etcetera. Can you put me in some touch with somebody that can help me, especially a female?   She was female.   And and I did that. K? I put her in touch with Myrka.   So, Myrca is very maternal,   and she grabs folks, women like this, and she will walk her right down the path and hopefully get that confidence instilled in her and the the power regenerated. That's the biggest problem   I see, Paul, is that people can't believe they've got this power. They don't know how to express it like that, but they can't believe that it's them that has the power to live under any set of laws they want to.  

And they've been so intimidated by all the IRS and SWAT teams and Ruby Ridge and Waco and all these other dastardly things these bastards have done that they cower in a quarter.   All by design. In my case, that's a good point. Okay.  

[01:47:45] Unknown:

You said it very well, Roger. Thank you.  

[01:47:48] Unknown:

Oh, well, you just got it. You've got the power. See, here's the here's the basic difference.   If you don't have the power to do that, then you're living in tyranny, and there are no other options.   Either I'm gonna decide what I am or you're gonna tell me what I am and demand that I do something. And if you do that, you're an open tyrant, and they'll never be open tyrants. That's why they've designed this thing so cattywompus   with everything upside down where they can ask you those two questions   and get you to sign something and agree with them.   That's the end game   right there.  



[01:48:29] Unknown:

Hey, Roger. I've got a couple of I've got a public service announcement before the end of the show. Okay.  

[01:48:34] Unknown:

Okay. Good.  

[01:48:36] Unknown:

Well, in historical jurisprudence, which is not on the website, but it is now.  

[01:48:41] Unknown:

Okay. Amera, which oh, historical jurisprudence.   Folks have   easy reading. Read 90 pages. It'll give you the foundation that probably 99.9%   of the rest of the people in the country don't have.  

[01:48:56] Unknown:

Right.   Well, the collective speeches of as Federal Reserve exposed the collective speeches of Lewis t McFadden,   That's on the website.   And below that is   historical jurisprudence.   And on a completely unrelated issue, a   a a non this is not promoted   or, you know, no one's paying me to say this.   It's been brought to my attention that people are having problems with printers, particularly with paper jams and blurs and smudges and and,   just problems printing some of the things that they want to print, like putting their little booklets to bring with them so they have paperwork and documentation to back up what they're claiming.   I had a printer that was doing the same thing. I I went to Amazon. I got the KIC   team   cleaning sheets for inkjet printers and copiers.  

Five sheets is $15.   I just ran one of the sheets through my printer and it is working slicker   than   literally   liquor literally slicker than snot on a doorknob.   I saved my the life of my printer by spending $5.  

[01:50:04] Unknown:

I got some slicker than I got something slicker than that, Paul.  

[01:50:08] Unknown:

Hand poop on a bump handle?  

[01:50:10] Unknown:

No. No. Bus station chili.  

[01:50:13] Unknown:

Ah, there you go. Yeah.   Okay. That works. K I C team. One word, K I C T E a m cleaning sheets. Just search Google for it if you don't want to go to Amazon.  

[01:50:27] Unknown:

Okay.  

[01:50:28] Unknown:

Alright. Oh, man. That's good.  

[01:50:31] Unknown:

Tom, please comment for us. Would you please?  

[01:50:35] Unknown:

One of the biggest problems with inkjet printers is they're not used enough. The the heads themselves, the the little jets inside of them will clog up.   And sometimes no matter   how much you try to,   clean them or run the cleaning   software in the printer,   they just they're just so bogged down and dried up. So if you got an inkjet printer,   print at least one page a week   just to keep those jets from drying up. And if you do a, you know, if you do a lot of if you do a lot of printing,   even though the printer is more expensive,   if you get a laser color printer,   but the difference between an inkjet and a laser is an inkjet is about 10¢ a page.  

A laser is about a penny a page.   Oh, wow. Lasers don't clog up. Lasers don't clog up like inkjets do, you know.   Mhmm. Okay.   Because, I've used, you know printers were my nemesis   in all the all the work that I've ever done, medical offices.   And I'll tell you what, you know, when you get a call, the printer's not working. I just, like, wanna run the other way,   because they're just such a pain in the neck.   Just   but those cleaning sheets, yeah, they do work good. I've used them before.   But internally in the printer, if those heads get clogged up, you know, you just   it's cheaper to just throw it away and go buy a new one, and you get some more ink with it. But   and if you have a bunch of extra ink left over,   just try to buy this buy a compatible printer that uses the same cartridges and that way   you don't throw the ink away either.  

It's it's it's game. That's all it is, you know. But if you do a lot of printing, laser laser color is the way to go. And,   you know, they they give you the least amount of grief.  

[01:52:34] Unknown:

So If if you don't print in color add that to your   If you if you don't print in color, actually, the monochrome the the monochrome,   laser printers,   they are basically,   comparably priced   to ink jets.   And like you said, the toner is much cheaper than the laser, and they are a lot a lot less trouble. The problem with mine is I've got this Yeah. This printer   that I bought as,   last year's model,   like eight years ago. I paid $50   for it, brand new,   and it started jamming paper.   So all I did was spend $5 on a cleaning sheet, and now the paper jam went away.   So  

[01:53:22] Unknown:

Yeah. The little the little wheels in there, like, we used to go in and have to replace the, you know, do a service on   printers to replace the little wheels,   the little rubber wheels   will get a buildup of ink on them and then they'll slip. They get cleaned. So go in, clean   the wheels if you can, the little wheels that spin around that move the paper   with alcohol and all that. And then, you know, especially on laser printers, you can get you can get service kits for them, HPs and stuff. We used to do dozens of them in a year.   And,   but, you know, they and if anybody needs toner or wants a good price on toner or ink,   just just send me an email, and I'll send you a guy that I've been using for years and years   who has some of the best   aftermarket ink and toner, and I've never had a problem with them. And it's,   just, like, half the price of OEM stuff, especially things like,   Epson and,   at Kodak.  

HP. Just throw throw that into you.  

[01:54:28] Unknown:

[email protected].  

[01:54:32] Unknown:

Yeah. That's correct. So  

[01:54:34] Unknown:

see.   Yes. Is your printer operating correctly,   Annette?  

[01:54:39] Unknown:

Oh,   I'm not using a printer at this time. But,   were you done with the operation of law? Was there any more to add?  

[01:54:48] Unknown:

Yeah. It's about as much as I can add. It's just a separate between lawful and legal.   So anytime you see that, all you gotta do is confront whatever you're trying to get through with something lawful, and they cave because they've got to. It's written into what they're doing.  

[01:55:06] Unknown:

Unmute.  

[01:55:11] Unknown:

Yes. Is that sketch again?  

[01:55:13] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. It's going back kind of the birthright   citizenship.   I got a definition   of part definition of the state I'd like to read, and then I have a question. The state means the whole people united   into one body body   politic, and the state and the people of the state are   equivalent   expressions. Now the question is,   how does   and when does one become   part of the body body politic?   Is it when you're born   or is it when you vote?  

[01:55:49] Unknown:

When is it? Oh, it should be when you're born, I think, because that assigns your hereditament there, and that's,   everything to do with voting from that standpoint where you get your rights and to whom you owe your duties. I would say it's at birth.   But you can't vote until 18. Right? So Well, they they don't want you All the things are kind of out of the out of the question until you can vote. Right? You're a minor. You can't sign a contract. You can't do anything. You can't buy cigarettes. You can't buy alcohol. You can't do a whole bunch of stuff.  

[01:56:20] Unknown:

My my point is, how can you be a part of the body politic if you can't vote?  

[01:56:26] Unknown:

Well, you're a body politic in the waiting.   You're waiting for the age of majority so you can participate   in the body politic   because until you get to the age of majority, you you know, you remember how when you were that age, Sketch, and you thought you knew damn everything under the sun?   And how stupid my dad was? Okay. Well, that's fine.  

[01:56:48] Unknown:

That's fine. 13.  

[01:56:52] Unknown:

Okay. Okay. Alright. Well,  

[01:56:54] Unknown:

I just thought I'd Our citizens of The United States and the state in which they reside Wherein? Wherein? Goes to residence. If they live there, they're part of the state.  

[01:57:06] Unknown:

Well,   well Is body politic,   included in that statement?  

[01:57:13] Unknown:

Well, it it was included in your definition.   Your definition  

[01:57:19] Unknown:

said it. Form one body politics. Body politics, and the state and the people of the state are equivalent expressions?  

[01:57:30] Unknown:

Yeah.   Okay. It's kind of a confusing definition.  

[01:57:36] Unknown:

It depends on how you see the world, how you see the world. I think it depends on how you see the world. Some of these guys think that they got through your agreement in a state and they can hoodwink you, then the the state isn't the people, is it? It's some guy who's hijacked everything, and that's what we're dealing with.  

[01:57:56] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[01:57:56] Unknown:

Chris Rocker, I have one about a minute and a half. I have one follow-up, Pete, whenever you're ready.  

[01:58:02] Unknown:

Okay. Do it quickly because we got about a minute and a half, and we might get a cherry in here.  

[01:58:06] Unknown:

Okay.   We deal with fraud every day here, and, there's a hierarchy of the fraud, which is the first   top fraud that we can prove that vividates all other fraud? Lack of lack of full disclosure on those two questions.  

[01:58:25] Unknown:

They didn't say are you a citizen of The United States or a national, did they? No. They just said citizen of The United States. That's lack of full disclosure.   They know it's there. They're doing that intentionally to trick you. That's the first layer. It goes down from there. Who is the female? Thank you.  

[01:58:41] Unknown:

Sherry. And,   speaking of   signing a contract when you're not the age of majority,   don't we sign the first two   when we're 16,   social security card  

[01:58:54] Unknown:

and driver's license? No. Well, I didn't. You might have. I don't know. Social Security numbers are issued at birth now from the GATT treaty in the nineties. So they don't generally, people don't wait until they're 16 or 18. Well, I was 16, I guess, something along in there. And my dad went down and got it for me. I never signed crap.   K? He just knew he wanted my ass to be at work at the officers club in the Clipper Room, and they could wouldn't hire me without Social Security number.   So he went and got it.  

[01:59:27] Unknown:

Could you speak to me? Those at 16? 16 year old.   Sherry. Sherry. You can sign those at 16, but your parent better be with you because they have to sign it too.  

[01:59:39] Unknown:

Oh, I don't recall that. My dad was with me, but  

[01:59:44] Unknown:

I don't recall him having to sign anything. I do. Okay. I don't know. Roger. Oh, but you can join the military and put your life on the line at 17, though. Right? Well, you can with your parents' permission, I think. Go ahead, Larry.  

[02:00:00] Unknown:

Yeah. So it's your understanding that the state wherein they reside, that state is representing Washington, DC, not the several states. Correct? No. You're residing there. That means you're under the laws of DC.  

[02:00:14] Unknown:

You're a resident. They Larry,   do they ever ask you, are you a resident of Florida?   They don't ever ask you that, do they? No. They don't ask that.   They just ask, are you a resident, don't they?   Yes. Where you reside.  

[02:00:34] Unknown:

State where you reside is You're the state of us.  

[02:00:39] Unknown:

Well, it's the state. You're a resident of the state, which means that the laws of DC apply to you.  

[02:00:47] Unknown:

Probably. We have not reconciled today. There's a whole bunch of because the laws of the because the laws of DC   apply to the state of.  

[02:00:56] Unknown:

Yeah. They're all political subdivisions.   So anyway, good. Glad to talk to you folks every day. You, like, make my day, and we get to talk about some of these topics that are   frustrating   sometimes,   in-depth,   complex, and all that.   But, anyway, we, cover some good ground here occasionally. I think we did that today. So thanks for participating, and I hope you walked away with something out of it today.   Otherwise, than that, I'm starving.   And as soon as this is over, I'm gonna go   hunt hunt hunt up some   some Almorso.   That's   that's lunch. It was over twenty seconds ago, Rog. It was? Okay. Well, good. Alright. Anybody else got anything for me today?  



[02:01:42] Unknown:

Well, this is Chris from California.   Yeah, Chris. I think maybe tomorrow we might be able to look into the supremacy clause a little bit to get a little clearer understanding   of exactly what the power of treaties are,   in our   law system   and, and how they're ratified.  

[02:02:01] Unknown:

Well, they're ratified with two thirds of the senate, I believe, or three I think it's two thirds, right?  

[02:02:07] Unknown:

Correct. Yes.   And according to the supremacy clause, they're equal with the constitution   as long as they don't,   contravert it.  

[02:02:17] Unknown:

Yeah. They can't bring in anything that overturns the constitution was my point a minute ago.   Larry Beecraft  

[02:02:26] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[02:02:27] Unknown:

You say a lot of things about Beecraft, but he's a great researcher.   And he's got a,   what's his website? Highway something?   And and he's got a wonderful brief on treaties over there. And the example he uses   is the migrating bird treaty between Canada and The US. Okay? That's one of them that he uses in that. And now one year, the guys in Arkansas and Missouri could go out there and and hunt them duck,   and the next year, they couldn't because of that treaty.   K? So, anyway, we can discuss it tomorrow, Chris. Bring what you got.   Okay.  

Well, anybody else wants to contribute,   feel free, and you can come to the party too. So,   anyway, we'll see y'all tomorrow. Unless somebody's got something for me, I'm gonna go.   I will see you then. Ciao. Ciao. Love y'all. Love y'all. Bye. I'll do what? Have a good day, Roger.   Thank you, Tom. Good to hear your voice always. Okay. See you all tomorrow. Ciao.  

[02:03:32] Unknown:

Adios, Raj.   And that does it for the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales   on eurofolkradio.com   and radio.globalvoiceradio.net.   For more information on the topics discussed, please go to the matrixdocs.com.   That's the matrix,d0cs,.com,   where you can find,   downloadable resources. You can find exhibits.   You can also find interviews   and   other research materials   to guide you along your path to personal freedom and self determination.   Yeah, Patel? He knew what he was talking about. We'll catch you right back here tomorrow for the Thursday edition   of the Radio Ranch with Roger Tails, eleven am to 1PM Eastern, Monday through Saturday.  

Thank you for joining us.   Bye now. Have a great day.   Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.  

[02:04:32] Unknown:

Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.  

[02:04:39] Unknown:

Forward moving and focused on freedom, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.