On this Friday edition of the Radio Ranch, I open with quick shout‑outs to the many platforms mirroring the show and preview our experimental multi‑host Saturday block we’re building with Paul English. Then we wade into the week’s dominant story—the shooting of Charlie Kirk—fielding callers, weighing competing claims and videos, and warning against letting media hype eclipse deeper issues like who benefits, funding networks, and the spiritual battle beneath the headlines. From there, Brent Allen Winters joins to continue our running series on America’s founding law. We contrast the laws of nature and of nature’s God with Rome’s civil/canon systems; unpack common law as due process (jury, Magna Carta, Blackstone, Locke); and begin a clause‑by‑clause pass through the Declaration of Independence—laying groundwork for next week’s requested deep dive on usury. Along the way we touch Wörgl’s stamp scrip, monetary sovereignty, gold‑standard history, and how nations rise or rot depending on who commands money and law. It’s a brisk, unscripted ride—equal parts current events, legal history, and straight talk about faith, freedom, and first principles.
Programming notes: we’re testing a rotating, impromptu Saturday format (multiple hosts/guests in 20–25 minute segments with an after‑show). Watch our usual streaming outlets for the launch window and bring your questions for the usury episode next Friday.
- Declaration of Independence (Founding Docs): https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration
- Magna Carta (British Library overview and manuscripts): https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta
- William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Avalon Project): https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/blackstone.asp
- John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Liberty Fund/Online Library of Liberty): https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/locke-two-treatises-of-government
- Bank of North Dakota (public bank model mentioned): https://bnd.nd.gov
- Wörgl “stamp scrip” experiment (Austrian local currency case): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%B6rgl#Stamp_scrip_experiment
- Ron Paul Institute: https://ronpaulinstitute.org
- Tucker Carlson (official site): https://www.tuckercarlson.com
- Candace Owens (official site): https://www.candaceowens.com
- Max Blumenthal (The Grayzone author page): https://thegrayzone.com/author/maxblumenthal/
- Ezra Pound (Poetry Foundation profile): https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/ezra-pound
- Frederick Soddy (Nobel Prize profile): https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1921/soddy/facts/
- Yuri Bezmenov (background on ideological subversion theme): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Bezmenov
- Liz Truss (official site): https://www.elizabethtruss.com
- Turning Point USA (organization associated with Charlie Kirk): https://www.tpusa.com
- Shroud of Turin (Archdiocese/Cathedral of Turin info): https://www.duomo.torino.it/en/holy-shroud/
- CommonLawyer (Brent Allen Winters’ site): https://commonlawyer.com
- Seventeenth Amendment (U.S. Constitution Annotated): https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-17/
- Federal Reserve History: End of Gold Convertibility (1971): https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold-convertibility-ends
- Nixon’s 1971 address on the dollar and gold (UCSB Pres. Project): https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-nation-outlining-new-economic-policy-the-challenge-peace
- Rockefeller Foundation: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org
- American Cancer Society: https://www.cancer.org
- Anti-Defamation League (ADL): https://www.adl.org
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS): https://www.irs.gov
- Federal Reserve (Board of Governors): https://www.federalreserve.gov
- Rumble (platform mentioned): https://rumble.com
- DLive (platform mentioned): https://dlive.tv
- Twitch (platform mentioned): https://www.twitch.tv
This Mirror Stream is brought to you in part by mymitoboost.com for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial function is kinda like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapphat.com. That is snapphat.com. It's also brought to you by the Price International terahertz frequency wand through iteraplanet.com. Thank you so much for joining us and welcome to the program.
[00:01:31] Unknown:
So here we go, Alvin. Another stab at it on the Friday edition of the Radio Ranch. It's, date stamped September of the year and the nineteenth day of that ninth month. So, welcome. Roger Sales, your host. Gonna be Brent Winters cohosting along, but he's not here yet, but he's he'll pull up here pretty quick. Pretty sure we need to have Paul come out and, engineer, wiz wizard extraordinaire Paul Beaner come out and, wave his wand and tell us who all is helping us today so we can give them their proper recognition and credit for assisting us in spreading this this, this word of freedom. It's what we do, if you would, Paul.
[00:02:20] Unknown:
I think you give me too much credit, Raj. That that engineer extraordinaire that had a terrible time getting the, radio stream to start this morning. It is running, though, and so is rumble and,
[00:02:33] Unknown:
you know, people are finally extraordinaire. I said extraordinaire, and it fits.
[00:02:38] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, I'd you know, I think the beginning of the program was a little shaky, but, we do that. So we start the program at one minute after just to, facilitate other people picking up picking up the program. They can do their top of the hour bumpers and their station IDs and stuff and cut right into us at one minute after. So, the some of those, platforms, that I just mentioned are radiosoapbox.com. Thanks to Paul, our buddy across the pond. A great Paul English live yesterday. It was amazing, all the different things we talked about. It was just just amazing. And, we're on eurofolkradio.com.
Thanks to pastor Eli James. We're on Global Voice Radio Network. We're mirrored on Global Voice. GVN also picks up the the after show a little bit. I usually go about an hour after that. We're on Rumble, d live, and Twitch, through Global Voice Network, and we're on the net family of broadcast services that brings us five platforms, five radio platforms and video. Actually, about seven. Homenetwork.tv, freedomnation.tv, golivetv, and stream life.tube. WDRN production support, Collins, Colorado also brings us one zero six point nine WVOU FM Chicago, our terrestrial radio station, and we are very thankful to have those guys too. Hey. Hey. Chicago.
Doc. Alright. WDRN also mirrors us on, a number of video platforms like Rumble, Twitch, and d Live, I believe. So, we're literally all over the place.
[00:04:30] Unknown:
Is there a a site out there called Scratch or Itch?
[00:04:39] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't know. Itchy and scratchy might be, you know, might be like a codeine or something like that. Potential good labels for a new new platform somewhere scratching. Yeah. Yeah. You wanna scratch your itch? Go to scratchyitch.tv. Yeah. Okay. And, just give you an update on the Saturday, program change. There's still tomorrow tomorrow. No. We're still working on the moving pieces of that. What Paul wants to do is he wants to promote it. He wants to get the marketing in place so we can make a big splash when we show up. So it'll either go really, really well, and we'll have a huge audience right out of the gate, or it'll be an absolute cluster bomb.
And, we'll just have a bunch of people show up going, well, this is bloody rotten. I'm not paying any attention to these guys. I'll never come back. Good day.
[00:05:33] Unknown:
Could be a flop. Could be a flop. Yeah. It could be a flop. It is, man.
[00:05:37] Unknown:
It'll it'll either be really big or it'll really bomb. One of the two.
[00:05:42] Unknown:
Yeah. It's Now it's gonna be it's gonna be, like, two hours, our two hour Saturday slot, and then an extra hour on the back end. Is that what for, like, after show stuff? Is that kinda what I gather?
[00:05:54] Unknown:
Right. And what's gonna happen is there will be multiple guests, multiple hosts, for the programs. Each host will, like, basically drive for, like, twenty or twenty five minutes, then it'll switch to somebody else, and and then there will be just this this free flowing, mishmash of conversations covering many topics. Absolutely no way anybody could get bored or tired of it, and no two shows will ever be the same because they'll be impromptu. They will be, unscripted, uncanned,
[00:06:36] Unknown:
and always enjoyable. So Always fun. That's what we're shooting for. So who did he have a guest yesterday while we're wait kinda waiting for Brent to show up here? Did you, did he have a guest yesterday? I'll just,
[00:06:49] Unknown:
get that wrapped up for a little bit. Around.
[00:06:52] Unknown:
Yeah. Elon? Oh. Eli or Elon?
[00:06:56] Unknown:
Eli. Eli rocked up for a little bit. I don't think Elon would give us the time and day.
[00:07:01] Unknown:
I'm sure he'd stop by and say hello to his old buddy, Paul.
[00:07:06] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. I'm sure. I'm sure. Let me see. I can actually, give you the AI description of yesterday's show. So Oh my gosh. People can actually figure out figure out, what the show is about. The title of the show is Paul English live, Pound Power and the Price of Money, Unmasking the Real War of the Twentieth Century. And it was in this rollicking live broadcast. We open with some tech hiccups, shout outs across multiple platforms, and then dive into a big theme, the economic miracle of Germany from 1933 to 1942 and why monetary sovereignty matters.
Using a dynamic GDP chart as a spine, we walk year by year through Germany's rapid rise, contrasting Weimar hyperinflation with National Societe socialist credit and issuance, barter mechanisms, and full employment public works. While emphasizing that these points are about finance, not endorsing wartime atrocities, we reference Ezra Pound's anti usury stance and radio addresses, Archibald Mull's Ramsey's Nameless War, the Rykovsky interrogation, and quotes from Gaili Simpson and Frederick Soddy to argue that control of money creation, not gold, drives national prosperity and political power. We also play SharpClips, God flew from Godfrey Bloom and Liz Truss, illustrating how central banks and unaccountable bureaucracies outrank elected leaders. Callers join in to share firsthand family accounts, liberation era experiences, Bergen Belsen narratives, Libyari students funded under Gaddafi, etcetera.
And we discuss why mass persuasion on banking is so hard, the psychology of group belief propaganda, and the and the demoralization strategies described by Besanoff. We contrast spectacle driven activism with structural reform, brainstorm local parish level organizing, nonvoting as a protest, and the Bank of North Dakota model and float a new Saturday multi guest show to broaden reach. The through line end usury, restore honest money, reject spectacle politics, and build a practical local and resilient networks that can resist digital control and reclaim economic life for real people.
[00:09:52] Unknown:
Those are the shows that you did the show yesterday. How'd you get all that in in three hours is my question?
[00:09:58] Unknown:
It it was Did you have time to cover any of it or or what? It was it was it was pretty it was pretty fast paced, and and it was fun. And, honestly, we we went to a whole hour and eight minutes into the program before, the first potty humor instance, so I think we did pretty well.
[00:10:17] Unknown:
Cool. Well, that's something I'd like to listen to. Of course, that's a, a real, interest of mine, always has been since I got into this, and Paul too. And he's got some knowledge on this that I don't have. He's covered it a couple of times on this show about how the the little town over there somewhere in Europe started that whole new monetary system on the discounting of circulating notes. And so the incentive was to pass that before you got hit with the discount that was scheduled. And what that does is it goes into the velocity of money. I don't know if they understood this back then. They just saw the results. They were all very positive.
That all comes from the velocity of money. If you've ever seen any of Mike Malloy's, Maloney, what what I can't remember. Yeah. One of those two, the silver guy has got a little chart on that. And if you had 10 people in a room and every he had a dollar and it went around the circle of 10 in one day, you'd have a 10 times one. K? But if you circulate it more, like, two or three times, there there's what your gross domestic product is. So you increase the volume of money by the circulation and the incentives to circulate it, and it allows more, functional trading for for for wealth for goods in in the locale. And it was tremendously successful for them, this little town.
And, it was in Austria, I believe. And, another another town came, Mercy, can we do it? And and and they said, sure. And they they experienced the same results. And it got to the point where they took it to Vienna, and they said, if this is ever instituted, it'll crash the bond market. All of our bonds are done. So, it's a extremely interesting story. I'd never heard, I'd never heard it before Paul brought it to us. So that's the kind of stuff maybe we'll discuss whenever we do kick in these, these Saturday shows. Was that you, Marica?
[00:12:24] Unknown:
This is Robbie. Excuse me. But, Paul, did you say that Paul English is starting a new show on Saturdays? I'm sorry. I missed out on that. We've we've been talking about it for about a week, Robbie. Oh, my. Go ahead, Paul. I'm sorry.
[00:12:40] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. We're, we're talking about a it was kind of like a slapdash radio hour that's a few hours long with, multiple multiple guests, multiple hosts, and will be kind of, in the, kind of melting the Sabado Radio Ranch with that Saturday program with Paul English because, of course, they'll be opposite each other. So the first two hours, it'll be from eleven to 2PM eastern on Saturdays. So when it comes together, we're just all gonna jump in together and, you know, throw it up run it up the flagpole and see who salutes. You know?
[00:13:25] Unknown:
We're trying to experiment. Yeah. We're trying experiment, Robbie. Plow, push the envelope on traditional broadcasting. Yes. So, hopefully, that'll start next week. We'll find out more as things become firmer. Oh, we Yeah. That's what the plan is, Robbie. We don't know how it's gonna go. Maybe a big, just maybe a big disaster. We don't know. It's hard to think it any show would be a disaster with Paul, English on it, but you never know. So that's what we're talking about. Now, while we're waiting for Brent, I guess we're still waiting for Brent, aren't we? Looks like it. He might have gotten Who knows? Who knows with mister Brent today? I'm hearing some things that are kind of making me start to question this, and I would god, we've only talked about it for a week every day, this Charlie Kirk assassination.
I there's somebody on TikTok had done a deep dive into that. The, university there, the, what Mountain Valley University or whatever it is, has got some retired CIA people that are in there, and and establishing programs inside the university. I think he was enrolled in one of them, and it looks like he was very susceptible, possibly, the speculation, of course, susceptible to their, ways and means of, bringing people over to this other side and radicalizing them, and just speculation. But I didn't know. And he what he went one year, I think, and then very, very varied over off into all this.
It's weirdo stuff, man. It's just weird. So, anyway, that, something else that we're gonna get see more and more, but, there's just just an interesting situation and why and where for. And, I think, well, probably the one of the most exciting things here, Paul, I think we're gonna hear the results today. Trump is going to name Antifa as a international terrorist organization, and that brings to bear an awful lot of, law enforcement techniques and tactics that they don't have at their disposal if they're not officially named a terrorist. So that's gonna be a big deal. I I I love to see them go back and what, start tracing the money, the funds back to, young young Soros, old Soros, whoever all these, juke billionaires are that are financing all this stuff. I'd love to see that investigation go back and start nailing some of those guys.
But we'll see. We'll see. It's a day by day deal. Right. So does yes, sir. There's Dave, I think. Yes or Dave, you got something to add to that? Hey. Good morning.
[00:16:24] Unknown:
Well, not quite that. Just did you guys talk about the this alleged shooter's uncle that lived next door to him?
[00:16:31] Unknown:
No. I hadn't even heard about it.
[00:16:34] Unknown:
He he trains ROTC, and he's been taking young people to the Ukraine for years. And I don't know if he's selling weapons, but they say that there's many, many photos of him with the the kid holding RPGs and, you know, all kinds of crazy rifles and k. And, yeah, lives right next door. Now
[00:17:05] Unknown:
now you're talking about to the family or to where he was living with his little boyfriend?
[00:17:10] Unknown:
Nope. To I'm pretty sure he grew up next to this uncle. And, he'd be 250
[00:17:18] Unknown:
miles away south of Salt Lake City. Orem is evidently like a suburb of Salt Lake City, kinda up in the mountains. Have you ever been to Salt Lake,
[00:17:27] Unknown:
Dave? No, sir.
[00:17:29] Unknown:
Well, it's right at the base of the mountain range called the Wasatch Mountain Range. Very famous for their powder skiing, but it's right there at the base of those mountains and the Great Salt Lakes out out in front of them and all that valley. So it's evidently up above Salt Lake, in in a valley somewhere in those Wasatch Mountains. But it's very close to Salt Lake. And the family home was 250 miles south, and they were a, LDS family.
[00:18:01] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[00:18:03] Unknown:
Well, the uncle is tied to the Ukraine big time.
[00:18:06] Unknown:
Okay. Don't know that. That's what I'd share. Information. Okay. Have heard that. John
[00:18:12] Unknown:
b was Well well, okay. Came out on John b last night with this l Todd I can't think of his last name. L Todd somebody. He's a investigative journalist. And he does some pretty good work, and he's pulling stuff out of the woodwork. So,
[00:18:30] Unknown:
check out more things are, well, more things are gonna come out. Was that you, Alan, trying to get in?
[00:18:38] Unknown:
Yeah. You could. Here's here's my problem. Okay? And I I I'm gonna quote Charlie Kirk right here. Okay? Hitler owned a dog. So that means everyone that owns a dog is Hitler. Right? Okay. It's just an impossibility. It was not a 30 yard six. It would have left nothing but a vapor trail of his head. If it's truck, anything, in in the top torso, it would have removed it. That's a 30 yacht six. We're talking about something equivalent to an m one, okay, being literally hit with a cannon. The second part of it is it was not from the front. There's no way that that was a front. That is an exit wound. Not an exit, entrance. It's an exit. Entry wounds pucker.
They turn into little assholes. Excuse my language. But that's what happens. A little bit comes out. That's it. We have this on video. It shows him being struck in the back of the head, all of the, distortion of his skull, his face, and then the exit wound appears. Alright? Meaning that he was shot in the back of the head. That means that it did not come from stage center. Now this kid, Taylor, he may have been, you know, what they wanted to have shoot him, but that didn't happen. There's no rifle there. The kid was on the roof, but we have no image of a rifle at all. Nothing.
And then, the problem is, again, regardless of what you wanna do, you wanna follow Taylor? You're gonna follow Taylor Robinson and find out all sorts of things. Maybe he he was, found caught in a Burger King bathroom or something. I don't know. But you wanna know something? It has nothing to do with Charlie Kirk or the shooting. The actual shot came from stage left and above, and we have the vapor trail of the bullet on film.
[00:20:37] Unknown:
K. There's no you know. I you weren't here the other day, but Alex Jones, was talking about something going on behind the tent also. They thought they had a vision of the barrel now. That's that's correct. He didn't confirm anything. He just mentioned it, Alan. Well, I know that. But just beside yourself.
[00:20:57] Unknown:
Now to the actual drone. There was a drone overhead just above the tent to the left when the shot rang out, And we're tracking it down to that drone. We we we have all but got the drone, close-up with a gun actually attached to it. That's the only thing we're looking for now is some good shot of that drone, but it was a fast mover. Okay? Okay. Well, as I said, things are gonna develop and become uncovered in the next couple of weeks. And everyone of I tend to, you know, this Taylor kid. Oh, well, Taylor was a bad guy. Oh, well, he was attending this. Oh, he was doing that. And he's a patsy.
It's pulling us 200 yards away from what actually happened. And everyone keeps saying, Taylor, I it wasn't Taylor. Taylor didn't make that shot. I I I you. Allen's Allen's got very strong opinions on that, obviously.
[00:21:48] Unknown:
We'll see as we go forward. So does every sniper out there and anybody that's know it. Somehow well, I heard some professional snipers, Allen, identified as a 30 aught six before they ever even found the weapon. Okay? These are professionals. They're some of the best in the world.
[00:22:07] Unknown:
There wasn't paid professionals out there that are gonna pick up the narration before it's ever even spoken. And that that's what we'd expected. We had, Osama bin Laden that within ten minutes, they already knew, oh, Osama bin Laden. There he is. There he is. And we go chafing off after Osama bin Laden. How'd they know that within ten minutes?
[00:22:29] Unknown:
No. I'm a tell you. I've got every everyone's got every reason to question the information and question the federal government here. There are no no argument about that. We will see as we go forward just like you. I didn't know it was a big CIA,
[00:22:45] Unknown:
being Hang on, Joe. Before I I wanna jump in there and respond to Alan. Go ahead. Go ahead. Alan, I just I I'm just reporting what I heard on John b Wells. Don't get me wrong. I don't think that kid had anything to do with shooting Charlie Kirk, so I yield. Thanks.
[00:23:01] Unknown:
Brent, you see what happens when you don't get here?
[00:23:04] Unknown:
So thank you. The thing of it is, I just put the actual video where you actually can see the entry wound and the exit wound happen in order. Okay? And, I just posted that in the, internal, for, stream or Zoom. So, Paul, if you can grab that and put it in the regular chat, that'll help.
[00:23:27] Unknown:
Alright. Roger. Brent, I think you show. Yeah. Let me welcome Brent, Larry. Brent, you look. You stepped right into what we've been what we you stepped right into what's been going on for a week now. Go ahead, Larry.
[00:23:42] Unknown:
Yeah. I was gonna say that there's Hey, Joe.
[00:23:45] Unknown:
Oh, no. Hold on. I just recognize Larry. Go ahead, Larry.
[00:23:52] Unknown:
Yeah. I was just gonna say that, there's reports that, first of all, that the the whole crime scene, not it's not even a week out, and the whole crime scene has been dug up and are sticking pavers down right where the tent was. And the second thing is there's video footage that's been released, where they're showing this alleged assassin already running before the crowd even acknowledged the bullet being fired. So you hear the you hear the report of the bullet, and there's video showing that he was already running before the reports of the bullet.
Just some interesting facts.
[00:24:35] Unknown:
Okay. I know they took the tent down immediately. She's y'all continue. Let me answer my phone here. Oh, pain in the butt. Morning. How can I help you, please? Hello? Hello? Our duty call?
[00:25:17] Unknown:
Roger?
[00:25:18] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm I'm just about back here, Brent. Let me get my other earplug in. Yeah. I had to see if there was a phone call there in my new improved magicJack. How are you doing, Brent?
[00:25:28] Unknown:
Oh, we're alright. I I, am amazed, frankly, the attention that's given to this Charlie Kirk shooting. Oh, boy. It's shocking to me that people don't have more in their lives than that. That's really the truth. There's gotta be more in a man's life to be worrying about that kind of stuff. People dying every day. People getting shot every day. Yeah. People in our own families, our own our own, children having troubles, our wives, our nephews, our nieces, and neighbors. And and one guy gets shot who's funded by who? We don't know who he was funded by, but somebody sent me a You're clipping, Brent.
[00:26:10] Unknown:
I'm clipping. Clipping. Funded by who? The Jew Jew billionaires?
[00:26:14] Unknown:
Well, obviously, he was funded by somebody. I know one fellow he was funded by was Foster Friess. And the reason that caught my eye was because I'd met Foster on two or three occasions years ago, twenty, thirty, thirty years ago. And, I don't know what part he had in it, but if you take that much money and you don't carry water, they're gonna get you as though that's a mystery.
[00:26:43] Unknown:
That's part of the real the the, the part of this that really inspires investigation on from my opinion. Go ahead.
[00:26:52] Unknown:
Yeah. But it it's the way the world works. The world has always worked that way. Sure. If you get involved with organized crime, they're not gonna let you loose. That that's the empire of evil. Yeah. They're gonna get you, and you don't take a benefit from them and not, and not go turn well, as we say, crawdad on them. You don't do that. Somebody sent me a video of Charlie Kirk, and he, he was traveling. I had it here somewhere. He was traveling with a flaming fag,
[00:27:24] Unknown:
and promoting the idea. Yeah. Well, he was looking to build coalitions. It was different ways of what I've heard. Yeah. And I we watched,
[00:27:33] Unknown:
Rush Limbaugh did that. There's a couple other famous people that did that. It never works. It comes to nothing. And what they're trying to do is, of course, get money. Yeah. I just keep speak from personal experience. When you get in the public eye, all the perverts want you on their side, and they'll come to you and offer you a lot of money. Yeah. I mean, a lot of money. But if you don't then follow through with them all the way, they'll either throw you in jail, ruin your reputation, kill you, all three, whatever they gotta do. But Charlie Kirk was worth more to those that funded him as a martyr than he was continuing to do what he was gonna do. Once they pay for you, they're gonna get out of you what they want and more.
And there's nothing you can do one way or the other to get out of it. You can turn evil like them. That's not getting out of it. Then they're done with you. They'll kick you to the curb. You can turn good like them, or good against them, and they're gonna kick you to the curb and kill you and make you a martyr. And so the whole world is, is were is, well, following this. While, The United States is bombing countries that, or no. Not The United States. Israel is invading countries and bombing them, and nobody's noticed them.
[00:28:51] Unknown:
Well, well, the Bushmen media won't carry those stories. A lot of them, unfortunately. This is the interesting part of this is that and an observation and somewhat of an analysis on him. Uh-huh. Because you can see, if you look at the course of his life, he's 18. He gets touched with some in some situation where he really wakes up and becomes a real devoted Christian. He's 18. Even as smart as he is, you don't 18 year olds don't know what they're doing. I mean, they think they do. Obviously, they don't. And so it's easy to for me to understand how he would be exposed to and corrupted by dispensationalism at that early stage. And in those early formative years in his twenties, even though he's very bright, he still continued to eat that up and see it until Jeffrey Epstein.
And evidently, he's Jeffrey Epstein in that situation. He may have had some indications before that, but that was what evidently really woke him up. And, so and there's some stories. I know you don't keep up with all this stuff. I've just we can't avoid it. You listen to anything hardly. But have you heard about the meeting with this guy, Ackman, Brent? No. Uh-uh. So it's being this is talked about basically. Well, Ackman is a big billionaire Israeli supporter up in the Northeast somewhere and had a meeting of all their little, conservative troglodytes that they finance.
Evidently, there were several of them in the room. I don't know. Four or five, whatever. And, he had a a a lawyer, a English lawyer named Hogspeth or something, some Jewish name. And she was in the room too, and she evidently read him the riot act from what's come out of that meeting. And, so there there's a lot of talk about that around on on the periphery of this if you're following it. But but it looks like they were really coming down on him because he was getting out, and it was becoming known. For example, the evidently, the in the message that he was afraid Israel was gonna kill him came out of Harrison Smith, who's an Infowars guy. And he was, Ron Paul had his ninetieth birthday about a month ago down in Austin. I don't know if you were invited. I wasn't.
Anyway, they were there, and somebody at that gathering told Harrison that they knew Charlie personally and that he was extremely concerned that his Israel's gonna assassinate him. And and Harrison put that out, and then now comes as this event gets closer, another person saying the same thing, and that was a source of a fellow named Max Blumenthal. I don't know if you know who he is and pretty respected guy. And so they checked. Harrison called Blumenthal and said, is this the guy that you got your information from? He said, no. So this is pretty prevalent evidently in those circles that he was extremely afraid he was gonna get assassinated.
Okay? So that that's lurking in the background to the point that, get this, Netanyahu has come out twice. He was the first one that reported his death, by the way, three minutes half, after the death. Netanyahu reported it, and he's come out twice and try and distance himself from this, information I just covered, this flowing around everywhere. So, anyway, just some very interesting implications potentially of it. And, well, we all kinda learn in how the grass grows and where the rows are. You know? Mhmm. So, that's some of the peripheral things. I mean, I don't know if you heard me saying I saw a gal on a little clip of a gal on TikTok. There's a lot of people digging into this deep who's, this, mountain university out there is a well known CIA nest.
And evidently, he was in one of those classes for the first year. So there's an awful lot of very suspicious things, surrounding it. And, boy, if it could go back to expose Israel,
[00:33:14] Unknown:
man, I'm all for it by digging in that direction. K? Mhmm. Yeah. Well, I don't know that it's gonna be possible, Roger, to expose I don't either. I don't either. A matter of fact, when I read the Bible, I see no. That's not the method here. The method is not to go after them. The method is to stay away from them.
[00:33:33] Unknown:
No. I just wanna expose them.
[00:33:35] Unknown:
Yeah. But according to what Jesus Christ says, frontal attack won't work. And don't do it. And don't, just stay away and they die of their own cedar. The evil empire, of course, operates on money, and they want my money and your money. And the Christian community is stupid enough to give it to them. They bag it up, take it back. But Charlie, yeah, he was awful young. And, I mean, people 50, sixties, and 70 years old, if they haven't been and they haven't organized crime of cold politics, hasn't touched their lives, how could they know it? I've observed with DJ Trump. He grew up in New York City. He thought he's pretty rough and tumble, thought he understood what was going on. I don't think he did till that bullet went by his head and clipped his ear. I think that woke him up quite a bit, and he looked into it a little deeper, but I thought I think he was kind of pollyannish before during his first term. There's no question. You know, when Harry Truman was going getting ready to run for president, he wanted to run for president in the US Senate. And the man that his controller, his handler, was a organized crime boss in Kansas City named Pendergast.
Pendergast ran Kansas City. Kansas City was a wide open town. That means anything goes and a lot of graft and corruption, illegal liquor and prostitution, and Pendergast ran the whole caboodle on a a flat land, bottom land. They call it the bottom between the confluence of the Missouri River and that other river that comes in there at Kansas City. And, Harry kept saying, I wanna run for president. I wanna he said, you're not ready to run for president. Well, I've been in World War one, and I was an artillery officer, and I've been in local government, and I've been in a US senator now for a long time. He said, you still ain't ready. You don't understand what's running things. That's what he told him. And he had to wait till Pendergast said he was ready because Pendergast, the one that could pull the strings and make it happen. That's the way it works.
And how and that's, of course, purposely hidden. Who's really running things here? Well, the Bible tells us. Who's paying any attention to that? And then if you take the Bible and apply it, it becomes pretty obvious. If you're willing to if your eyes are opened, your eyes have to be opened and enlightened to the truth. But looking around yourself, you're not gonna get very far because the devil's cleverer, more clever than all the governments in the world. And he runs them, by the way. He's and the ones he isn't running, he's He is clever. On. And that goes for all the universities and other institutions. He operates on a he can't the devil can't, control people from within like the spirit of God can. So he must control them from without, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the vainglory of life. And he does that by getting control of large organizations, governments, and institutions.
Control one man or a group of men or useful idiots, we call them, at the top. You control the whole thing, and that's the way he controls humanity. When I see the hype that's going on with Charlie Kirk that is obliterating and blurry and everything else in the world, I say that's the work of the devil himself. He's the one that had Charlie killed, and now he's using the whole thing to his advantage. That's the way it works. And if you're not enlightened to take your mind out of the stupidity of all that and be sucked in by it, well, you're just gonna get sucked in further and you become more part of the problem than the solution. That's what the Bible teaches clearly and ambiguously. That's what it teaches.
So, yeah, that's what we're seeing happen. I don't think I'm gonna change it. I hope that somebody has ears to hear and they say, well, yeah, I think that Brent may have a point. It's not that I'm the smartest man in the world. I just know what the Bible says, and I'm not resting on my own intelligence. I'm resting on the thoughts of the sentences of God himself. He's got it. He's right there for us. Let's get to it and find out what it says. And the few that will, their lives won't their lives won't be wasted and and the the hype that goes along with this kind of thing. And we've how long have been people how long have people been arguing fighting, scratching, and biting, weeping, gnashing the teeth about the Kennedy assassination.
And what's the result? Nothing. Just wasted decades. That's all. Over what? Over a man that got shot. Me men getting shot all over the world. I had a neighbor got shot. Got shot, well, I've had two or three neighbors get shot. Some of them get shot over, on the other side of the world where they hadn't ought to be because the government sent them there, and others get shot right around home. They get shot and die. It's a tragic thing. That's worth paying attention to. Stop and murder where you can. But why it's like, what was that crazy gal used to be on TV?
Her name is Grace. Something Grace, and she was a lawyer. And she would hype a murder that nobody ever thought about. She would hype it until it became worldwide famous, and she made a million dollars. Again, she just picked one out that she thought she could hype and Nancy Nancy Grace. Yeah. That is popular. People loved it. But that's being controlled, and that's what's happening here. The the martyrdom, Charlie Kirk, is being used to control people. That's what I see, and martyrdoms always are. The only question is, is it being used to control people from right or wrong?
[00:38:51] Unknown:
Well, that's the battle afterwards. Who's gonna get control of the turning point? The Israelites are trying to, obviously. Uh-huh. And, is the other faction going to expose that and not allow them to? And that we don't know yet. So we'll see. Just a lot of very influential people. Have a comment, Brian? Oh, okay. Hold on, Boris. A lot of influential people, Tucker Carlson and and and Candace Owens, who was his best friend. Yeah. And a lot of people are are very outspoken about it. We'll see which, which side gets control. We know which side's got the There it goes. The influence.
[00:39:27] Unknown:
They're getting notoriety too and making money. I'm not saying they had bought to, but this is based back to reality. They can capitalize on this more than anybody. He had a pretty good war chest. I mean, millions of dollars.
[00:39:40] Unknown:
Boris, what do you got here, Bory? Bory?
[00:39:47] Unknown:
Roger. Roger. I'm here. Yeah. A judge was passing by. Yes. I have a comment. Brent says about, Donut Trail shooting. Did anybody see, Holly Spear ear when Mike Tyson bite it? It never grow bad. And Donald Trump got shot in the ear, and he don't got nothing in the ear. It's impossible the ear grows back like that in just one week. And I just you know, I that was my comment.
[00:40:14] Unknown:
Okay. Thank you, Boris. So, Mike Tyson. Yeah. You know, I remember Mike Tyson. So everybody's got a plan till they get punched in the mouth. Right? Yeah. Oh, boy.
[00:40:26] Unknown:
That makes sense.
[00:40:28] Unknown:
So, anyway, that's been the big topic around here. You can hardly get away from it. It's what's on all of the stations and all this continuing discussion and new things being brought in and, all this stuff. And unlike you, we've been talking about John f Kennedy for sixty years now.
[00:40:45] Unknown:
And Jeffrey Epstein, that's finally fit with no conclusion there. Just wasted time. That fizzles out. Then they shoot another fella, and they start over again. Now the question is, for with Epstein, was he shot at all, or was he killed, or did he hang himself? Well, nobody knows. It seems obvious. Yeah. But it was a it was a planned opt. It was a plan. Most in the most secure prison in the country. Yeah. And so, again, the same people are involved. Is there a mystery here? No. What we need to do is keep get moving. And the distractions of these things, if people are at war, they don't they don't get distracted by that kind of stuff. Are we at war? Yeah. Well, then let's do what we're supposed to do. Let's fight the battle and quit getting sucked in to what they want us to be sucked into.
And even if Charlie Kirk was a good guy or a bad whatever he was, they're using it to the advantage of evil by distracting the whole world with it. No distracting the whole world with it. No. I'll tell you one thing he was, and he deserves to be,
[00:41:41] Unknown:
given the accommodation is he was super intelligent. He's a real talented guy. I didn't ever watch him. You know, I'd heard his name. I kinda knew what he was about, but I never watched him. And if I never watched him and he was spouting that Zionist crap, I'd turned it off immediately. K? But now that all that has come out, what a talented individual he was.
[00:42:04] Unknown:
Well,
[00:42:07] Unknown:
seems to me 31 years old. Yeah. 31 yeah. A lot of composure for 31 years old, man.
[00:42:14] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. When you got a lot of money behind you, you can have a lot of composure. I guess so. I mean, yeah, well, you
[00:42:21] Unknown:
Rest in peace, and I hope whatever remains of what you built and spent your life, erecting, is used for good and not, commandeered and, by, our enemies and used to make you a martyr of Zionism. Mhmm.
[00:42:38] Unknown:
And Charlie appealed to young minds and minds that wanted to be logical. Yes. When men are young, they logic plays a bigger role in your desires. And then when you get older, if you have any sense, fact overshadows all that. And logic isn't, the trumping point. But with young people, they want to think that they're intellectual and logical. And so Charlie Kirk has a that's why he went to universities because Mhmm. That's where you get that re that positive response, and he Mhmm. He got it. But, when he gets older, if he did, well, I don't know what he's not gonna get older now, I don't suppose. Mhmm. But that's it's so insidious. It's so wrong. It's so egregious what the evil empire does in situations like this. The only thing I can do, but that's doing a lot, is just not get caught up in it. And I don't want that. I thought his, his wife
[00:43:30] Unknown:
a lot of composure there. She told the four year old daughter that daddy was on vacation with Jesus.
[00:43:40] Unknown:
Yeah. I thought that's a pretty good pretty good way to handle it. Only a woman could, be that clever with that kind of stuff. But we don't of course, we we we, reject all murder. This is murder. How it happened? I don't know. We reject the people that did it. I want them to come to justice, but I'm not gonna I don't wanna get caught up in the hype. That's the problem. Well, here's one thing that's kind of an outgrowth of it. You may or may not know. It looks like it's gonna happen today.
[00:44:11] Unknown:
Trump is about to, name Antifa, at least domestic, maybe international terrorist. That's gonna throw a different light on dealing with those people. So they're really wanting to go after the financiers of all this stuff. We'll see how far that gets with Blondie Bondie up there. But, anyway, it's a interesting event. Nobody would have anticipated it. I can't yet I've never seen a clip that represents the accusations the lift has made about him on being hateful and all the other stuff, the fascists and everything they agree, they they accuse him of. I haven't heard him do appear that way at any clip I've seen.
So, anyway, sad is sad. Hell of a guy. I would have loved to have seen him turn and and go more into investigating, questioning Israel. And but one thing for sure, they don't want that at all above anything. Go ahead, Brent.
[00:45:11] Unknown:
Oh, no. It goes along with that. I don't wanna support anybody, anybody that supports pedophilia. And that's getting real hard because most people do today. Yeah. But I don't want to. I don't I ain't going along with that, and I'll say publicly support a pedophile or people support it, then, I don't support you. Yeah. Pedophile you're
[00:45:36] Unknown:
real real sick to be participating in that. You gotta be real sick to be participating in that kind of stuff. People that do it that are that are hailed as the leaders of the conservative. Oh, yes. I understand that. And that's my point. Yeah. I don't I don't wanna do that. Well, Roger, what what have we got on agenda beside Charlie? I Well, I think we were gonna continue with the con with the declaration of independence breakdown that we've been covering kind of the last couple weeks with the, suggestion of one of our listeners out there speaking of Utah. I believe you identified them as being Oh, yeah. Yeah. In
[00:46:10] Unknown:
Utah. Mormon fellow. I had a long discussion with him, and he's very accepting of me. And, I of course, he knows what I teach and what I think. And he's the one though. He said, Brent, I I wish you would talk about the declaration of 76 and go through it. He said that I would I would want that. And I said, I'll try it and see, what people think.
[00:46:34] Unknown:
So I'm gonna start right now. No sense talking anymore. I'm right into it. I agree. I've been doing it for a week. Let go move on something.
[00:46:42] Unknown:
Alright. This is, like, this is from, I'm what I'm going through the book called the declaration of '76 and constitution of The United States, a common lawyer comments clause by clause, by yours truly. And so I'm just going through the book, and it's, 200 and some pages. And I go through it in order, each of the documents, and show the organization, do the best I can. That book is available, I think, at Amazon or commonlayer.com commonlayer.com. You can find that book. We're in the first the first, paragraph says when in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them to with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's god entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We went through some things, and I this was just the comment because there's a clause or a paragraph like that or a sentence, then I put a a comment. Sometimes the comments are long, sometimes they're short. This one's a little longer. Let me read from some of it. It says, congress, at its first meeting two years before the declaration of '76, resolved that British American rights were the unchangeable, immutable laws of nature, the principles of the English constitution. Now keep in mind, the constitution of The United States wouldn't be written for another eleven years or drafted at least.
And, they're talking about, they want, principles of the the English constitution. What's that? Well, that's our common law and government. It's, according to our common law. Our common law is the processes and the relationships between government. Our common law is not about the result. It's not about the standards of result. The result is about due process. Our common law is due process. It doesn't include due process. That's what it is. And it is also called the law of the land. That's an older name for our common law. That's Magna Carta, law of the land. And, then also the laws of Edward the confessor. It's been called different things down through the ages.
But right now, we call it our common law, and, we use that term here for case of ease. But to define what that is, it is the English constitution. That's what it is. The constitution
[00:49:18] Unknown:
Come back to the come back to the microphone. You Oh, I turn.
[00:49:22] Unknown:
I just spilled something on myself, and I turned around. Thank you. Okay. Okay. Well, you're forgiven then. Go ahead. Telling me. Yeah. But the you go to England today and they'll tell you, yeah, we have a constitution. It's the most important thing in our country, and they call it their unwritten constitution. What does that mean? Again, that means they're common law. Because all common law and all of the world, a few countries that are common law countries came from England. Every common law country in the world is either England or its colonies or former colonies of its empire. That's the only that's the only influence of common law. Not that much.
Not that many common law countries. Most countries are under the law of the city, the civil civil law instead of the law of the land. And all those countries are innumerable. They outnumber us by far, but they don't outgun us at all. And they live in squalor, most of them. Various levels of squalor. They don't have what we have at all. And when it comes to being an engine of wealth and prosperity, of course, England has gone backwards a lot compared to us. We're the most common law country in the world. And I don't mean a little bit. I mean, we still got the grand jury. It's important to us. They don't even have England or Canada anymore.
Go ahead, Roger. Go ahead. No. I was gonna say you're right. Yeah. I'm agreeing with you. This is important that we discuss this for that reason, our freedom and our wealth and our prosperity. I'm just thinking, Roger, I go to bed at night. I drink a half a glass of milk with a honey in it, and I warm it up and drink it. Yes. I eat I eat fresh eggs. Yes. I got plenty of meat to eat if I want it. I eat good bread with lots of butter. I eat lots of butter, and I eat that stuff, and I think how fortunate I am. Yeah. I can get what I want to eat here. I can stay warm. I can pursue things. I can be I can say what I want to say that I think is important to be said. You can't do that in Sweden and South America or Israel, the state Israel.
Oh, you say something's there, they'll jail you. Fine you and jail you or both. Well, our laws of nature's God, English constitution and laws of nature. Our constitution of The United States is a brief of common law government. It's still common law even though we put it to right. We say, well, we have a written constitution. We do. But our written constitution is very narrow. It only applies to the federal government, the the general government in Washington, DC. And it's it it only addresses the people in government and how they're supposed to act. Our constitution of The United States does not rule our country. It rules the government, the government in Washington, DC. Our common law rules our country, every state, every county, everything we do, everything we say, it's our culture. We don't stop to consider how different we are. The things we say, what we understand, how we understand reality. I was talking to a immigrant from Russia about twenty years ago.
And, yeah, twenty years ago. Exactly. Almost. And, this immigrant had married an American. And he said to me, well, I said to him, how do you we're having a discussion about things that I'm interested in? Hassett, how do you know who has authority in Russia? How do you know who has authority to govern in Russia? He said, well, that's easy. They not only have power and they they exercise it. Once they exercise power, we know they have authority. That's what he said to me. Now do we stop to consider that most people don't say really what they think and on all the world, they think that constantly. They can't think anything else. That's all they understand. That power comes before authority. In other words, might comes before right only in common law countries. Do we think well wait a minute. Do you have the right to do that right come before might with us quo warranto. By what right are you doing? What you're doing?
Do you have have you taken the oath? Do you have the right to to serve in government? Have you taken the oath? Have you, have you have you been duly appointed by proper appointment and chain of authority? We ask those kind of questions. Then we say, okay. Now you can use the power we give you, mister sheriff, mister president. We don't want a president in office that is not a natural born citizen. He has not the right to do anything. We've had that. Well, how how does he establish an ex civil law, law of the city mindset, how do you establish your right? By exercising the power you have Nazi Germany was built on that point. Hitler said, of course he had the passed out copies of the writings of Nietzsche.
Nietzsche. Nietzsche. I don't care what you call him. I'm not German and I can't pronounce it. All I know was he said that the state is God walking on earth. Power proves authority unless not America and that's not our common law traditions. The point I'm making. Well, the ever menacing antagonist of the laws of nature's God is the law of the city of Rome. The civil canon laws of Rome. First spawned says Maitland at Babylon. Now this is the foremost, authority on English legal history. Sir Frederick Maitland, about a hundred hundred well, a hundred, hundred and twenty five years ago or more at this point. Time, time flies.
He said that the law of the city is rooted in Rome and grew groping tentacles that now by ever multiplying limbs grip the globe. Now he didn't say that. He says that, but he didn't say it the way, that I'm, this is a a common lawyer comments. I got all fired up. Let me read that again. I thought, wow. Did I write that? Yeah. Yes. I did. The civil law respond in Babylon, Genesis chapter 11. It rooted in Rome and grew groping tentacles that now by ever multiplying limbs grip the globe. That's fact. Right.
[00:55:37] Unknown:
Very descriptive.
[00:55:39] Unknown:
Yeah. Our declaration complains of the King and his cronies used of this of civil law, the law of the city, and four of its forms. The king, king George the third, our declaration of '76 says, here's what he's doing. We want our common law back. That's why we had the war. Why? Because we they were denying that they can't deny us our common law. To deny the common law would be to stop God. That's not what they did. This is an important distinction in our common law tradition because as a declaration of '76 says that the the responsibilities, the duties called rights that God bestows upon the individual directly from himself are inextricable from our being.
Inextricable. That means they're wound up and bound up with our person. They are who we are. No man can take them from us. No man can take them from us. And that includes us. We cannot take them from ourselves. God made us that way. He made us responsible. He's the one he's our creator and we are his creatures. Just like I got a dog. The dog's my dog. I decided what's good for my dog. That's my business. Well, that's the way it is with God and his creatures. He made us. We're the crowning of his creation. We're not dogs, but he is in charge of our duties, and he gave them to us called rights, and they're inextricable. Well, what can government do, though? What can the evil empire do? Can it take our rights away? No. Absolutely not. That's why the declaration of '76 says they are
[00:57:15] Unknown:
inalienable.
[00:57:17] Unknown:
Oh, people say no, that's unalienable. That means they can't be liened. Well, they can't be liened. That's true. Oh, Oh, no, no. That's not even true. No, they can be lean, but they can't, but they can't be separated from you. That word does not have to do by the way with liens. That's alien. The word alien, it's a Latin word. It means stranger. Alien in Latin means stranger. It doesn't mean a lien as you'd put at the courthouse. That's popular in Patriot mythology. It's hogwash. Let's just get real with the words here. Unalienable or inalienable are both mean the same thing.
Means that it is not possible to make a stranger of your rights to you to estrange your rights from you to take them away from you. That what can governments do? Well, they can block your enjoyment of them.
[00:58:08] Unknown:
Roger, go ahead. Did you hear, and I'm sure you didn't, about this what's his name, guys? Dent? He's a senator from Florida. Oh, what do you do? He's in a wheelchair or something. Some had had some accident with his legs years ago. Oh. And he was in the senate Yeah. Trying to say if you speak up, he's the one that wears an IDF uniform into the senate.
[00:58:32] Unknown:
Oh,
[00:58:33] Unknown:
they're they're saying they can take away your rights if you criticize Israel. That's what they're trying to float anyway. Well, they can't do that. No. They can't do it. It's unconstitutional. He shouldn't even be saying it. It shows his ignorance right there. They can't take away anything. You've got to give them away.
[00:58:48] Unknown:
Well, I'd say this too, Roger. You can't give it away. You cannot give it away. God put it in you. That's the end of it. But what you what the evil empire can do, and you and I have had this discussion since the beginning. What the evil empire can do is block your enjoyment of your right that you have. They can.
[00:59:06] Unknown:
Back off just a second. Let Paul tell everybody goodbye. We got hung up with this discussion earlier on our time sync. But go ahead, Paul, if you would, please.
[00:59:15] Unknown:
Yeah. If you're on a platform that's dropping the program at the top of the hour, go to the matrixstocks.com and follow us into the second hour using either the free conference call link, the Global Voice Radio link, or the eurofolkradio.com link. For more information and more stuff on Brent Allen Winters, go to commonlawyer.com. Check out all the stuff that he's doing over there, all of the books he's written, very learned and very, very, very prolific.
[00:59:46] Unknown:
Thank you so much for joining us. Ciao. He's everywhere. Seven days a week, the man works. Go ahead, Brent.
[00:59:52] Unknown:
Oh, thank you, Paul. Thank you, Roger. I'll have to look up that word prolific. He said prolific. I hope it's a good thing. I'll find out. Yeah. Yeah. It's nothing like prophylactic or anything. It's prolific. I hope not. Okay. Let's get back to it here. Our declaration complains of the king and his cronies, King George the third, use of civil law, the law of the city, and four of its forms. Our declaration references all of these and the four four forms among men of the law of the city are administrative law, admiralty law, martial law, and canon law.
And our declaration specifically complains of King George and his cronies use of of all of these. But all of these are fundamentally, administrative law, admiral law, martial law, and canon law of the church of Rome, specifically in this instance. Our declaration complains about that. All of these are fundamentally martial law. Martial, military law. What's military law? Military law is result oriented. Common law is process oriented. We're to pay a pension attention to the process. I've often said I said it to one of my boys the other day. I never remember going into court ever, ever, ever, and doing anything, but screaming and hollering. Wait a minute, judge. That ain't fair.
Filing motions and pleading and saying, wait a minute. Hold up the machinery. That ain't fair. No. That that you should. My my client has an opportunity to say something here. That's all lawyers do, and that's what they're supposed to do because our jurisdiction as mere mortals is process, not result. But the law of the city usurps the place of God and makes result result their jurisdiction. They're gonna make it happen the way they want to make it happen. That's what they want to do. That's what canon law is all about. Listen, if you're it's all martial kind of a law. It's a martial law principles. If you're a a company commander and you're in Vietnam or Korea or wherever you are, officer above you gets his orders from on up above him, right on back to the president of The United States who the people of The United States have elected. But right down to the bottom line and the details, commanding officer of the battalion or the brigade will say to the company commander with his boys say, I want you to take that hill.
How you do it isn't his concern. He didn't care. Kill as many people as you gotta kill. And, by the way, you're gonna have some killed too. Some of our boys are gonna get killed, but it's so important. I'm result oriented. That's what martial law is. It is result oriented. And in the proper context, that's a good thing. In, armies on fields of battle, ships at war at sea, you just want the result. And, how you go about it is important to some degree, of course. There are limits to evil warfare. You don't torture people, stuff like that. That's in the Bible, but it's much more result oriented. You see the difference, administrative law. Have you ever been up against a bureaucracy?
Yeah. You don't fight city hall. The the saying is you don't fight city hall. You do what they say, or they'll fine you, tell you, tell you, tell you're, dead. They'll come after you. They'll get your number. They'll bring the feds against you, the state against you. Pretty soon, you're in jail because they're result oriented. Admiralty law, martial law. Of course, those are that way too. By the way, canon law is that way. The church of Rome has the canon laws. The Eastern Orthodox church has the canon laws. The only country in the world that I know of that has canon law as its fundamental law of the country is Ethiopia. And we had a fellow come on here. Maybe he's listening to this. He's probably listening today, his honor. He came on and, and affirmed some of those things and even said, which was true, that for a thousand years, Ethiopia, followed Babylonian Judaism, Judaism.
And that we discussed, and that explained why in the book of Acts, then Philip, Philip, one of the 12 empaneled jurors that Jesus Christ empaneled to witness the evidence of his identity. He was out on the road and he met an Ethiopian driving a chariot who had been to Jerusalem worshiping. You remember the story? The Ethiopian was written, reading, read, not written, reading from Isaiah chapter 53, I believe. And he said, I don't understand what this means. Is he talking about himself or somebody else? And Philip, then it says, opened up the scriptures to him and he and and unpacked the person of Jesus Christ, from the old testament, of course.
Well, this fellow had been to Jerusalem because he was following Babylonian Judaism as all people in Ethiopia did. And he called in, was explaining some of that. But Ethiopia has taken on the canon law of Babylon as their law of their country. The only country in the world that has, again, as far as I know. Of course, the other country would be, if you called it a country, the Vatican. It's governed by and it's result oriented. What does that mean? That means you do what the pope says or or else you go to hell. And when he speaks at cathedral and got his haunches parked on that throne of the old Roman empire, emperors and the latter in palace, he says that that's idolatry, but he said that throne, when his haunches are parked on it, preserves him from speaking any error.
Now you say that's silly. Yeah. But you may be a Roman Catholic and following that. That that is silly, of course. And some people complain and say, well, Brent, you're just dart on the Roman Catholics. I grew up that way. Well, I grew up in ways that weren't right too, and I've, I've rejected some of those doctrines. And by the way, my ancestors, no doubt, some place back in the old countries where they're from were, following the Roman church.
[01:06:03] Unknown:
I don't
[01:06:04] Unknown:
What? Go ahead. The rumored Charlie Kirk was about to convert to Catholicism.
[01:06:08] Unknown:
Well, probably true because that's where the power is. That's why Tony Blair, that's why Tony Blair, who's Irish, he left the Roman church so he could be prime minister. And then when he was, his prime minister term was over, then he went back to being a Roman Catholic. That's why Newt Gingrich joined the Roman church because he wanted the to be in more connected to power of the evil empire. I did not know that. Well, it's all you see it often. It's happening more often now than ever, by the way, because there is power there. There's money there. You know there is. The canon law. The canon law is result oriented. The Pope speaks. That's it. We don't care how he came to his conclusion. He doesn't off offer or owe us any explanation.
That's the law of the city, result oriented.
[01:07:02] Unknown:
Civil law Brent, years ago, I was thinking about the the evolution of this agenda and the central banks and and and all that stuff. I thought, well, you know, when they started, like, the central banks in the eighteen hundreds of Europe, I guess, there was only couple of central banks in the world. Right? Oh, well There's a there's a there's a Catholic church in every city of the world, and they always got the best pieces of property.
[01:07:30] Unknown:
Yeah. We know. Yes, Roger. And we know too, of course, the Knights Templar and, how they became the most powerful banking institution in the world. And Yeah. Course before that, though, there Babylon had it sewed up, and so did Rome. And all the scions of this law of the city built cities and ruled territories. And that's why we call a territory, a territory because the territory during the days of the city states was the area of land over which the city extended its terror. Uh-huh. It's terror. You talk about terrorism. Forget this law. No, we got terrorism right here in America. It's the cities and the result oriented, the result minded people extending their terror over the productive parts of the country that fly over America, as we say. They've changed it now, but in the Oxford,
[01:08:23] Unknown:
unabridged English dictionary, finest dictionary in the world, it's about thirteen, fourteen volumes. Under terrorism, it was the whole time I was in this until last few years. The number one definition of terrorism was intimidation by government as in the French revolution. Number one. Yeah. It's changed now. They got something else out there.
[01:08:45] Unknown:
Uh-huh. Ain't it funny? I just pulled it up here. Now terror, t e r r o r, is, according to the French, old French is terror. Same word. It's a Latin based tongue. Latin terroer, t e r r o r. Right. But it's spelled the same word the same letters as land. For example, Magna Carta written in Latin. Stephen Langton was the chief drafter, and he wrote it in Latin so that, the priesthood would read it Uh-huh. Such as the pope. And Stephen Langton was archbishop of Canterbury. And he knew, he knew that if he wrote it, Magna Carta, because he's setting forth the application of common law principles, to specific instances.
And that's contrary to the canon civil laws of Rome. But when he wrote it, he got to that part that says that, chapter 39, the most famous part of Magna Carta property, says no man's property, will be taken or or the king won't move upon him except by the law of the land. Law of the land. Well, it's in Latin, so there are no definite articles. It doesn't say the law of the land. That's not Latin. It just says land law. Lex, well, law, terram, land. There's that word again, terram. See? It's about land. It's about territory.
[01:10:17] Unknown:
And originally, it was No. Are you using the word t I e r r a, tiara? That's So I would I would pronounce that. T e r r o r. Oh. French. Okay.
[01:10:28] Unknown:
E e r r o u r in Norman French. Uh-huh. Okay. It has to do with being frightened, but it has to do with land. It's inextricably bound to the Latin, Roman Latin system, land, because of the terror that cities, the city law extended over,
[01:10:45] Unknown:
over the land and the people that lived on it. Go ahead. Paul Paul was trying to get in a second ago. Paul, would you have?
[01:10:51] Unknown:
Well, yeah. I I just had a couple of a couple of things to add that are not actually, like, completely, related to this. Let me, help you out with the definition of prolific, of a plant, animal, or person producing much fruit or foliage or many offspring. However, in the context in which I intended, it was of an artist, author, or composer producing many works. Yeah. Awesome. That was the definition that I wanted. Now there was one thing because you guys are talking about, like, the Well, he adhered to the first part too. He's done pretty prolific in the family area, don't he? Yeah. Well, present in large numbers or quantities were plentiful, you know, plentiful works, on commonlawyer.com.
I came across a YouTube short this morning. It was absolute it absolutely blew me away. And, this is this is right where you guys are talking about, law, the land law, the city, and and how things went horribly, horribly wrong. This is 1913 was the year that we lost our country, and this is why this guy says this. You guys know that 1913
[01:12:06] Unknown:
was the year we actually lost control of our country. Right? Oh, and just for historical context, World War one started in 1914. I mean, look, I'm sure that was a coincidence, but let me just tell you all the things that were created in 1913. First, the Federal Reserve, which is neither federal nor has any reserves. It's basically a private bank that just controls all of our money. Second thing created in 1913 was the IRS, and I'm sure it's just a coincidence that it was created the exact same year that a private bank took over all of our money. Yeah. I'm sure it's a coincidence that that was the year they started taxing you. Like, you work, they print, and then you pay them back with interest.
Yeah. That makes sense. The next thing created was the Rockefeller Foundation. Yeah. And let's be real. That was all about philanthropy. It's not like they took control of medicine, education, science, and basically the health of the world. I mean, let's be real. All they were doing was donating money. Yeah. It's not like they were buying control of everything. Oh, and that worked out so well. Right? Because people are healthier and more self sufficient than ever. Right? Oh, yeah. Also in 1913 was, the American Cancer Society. I mean, that sounds like a good thing. Right? That can't possibly be bad, except it was completely funded by extremely wealthy people. But even though it was a charity, they never really gave to anyone. No. They just took their money and invested in pharmaceutical drugs. Oh, and chemo. Yeah. Instead of taking that money and investing in companies that were trying to find a cure, no. We'll just invest in companies that use chemicals from the military that were later banned. Yeah. That that's a good thing to keep fucking putting into people. Then also created in 1913, the ADL, the Anti Defamation League, which, sure, yeah, it's about civil rights. Yeah. Totally. It's not about censoring people or, you know, silencing critics. And then in 1914, we had World War one, and that became the first war ever that private industry profited from war. The private industry that's owned by the same families that created the Fed, the IRS, the Rockefeller Foundation, the American Cancer Society, the ADL. Again, just a coincidence. Oh, I'd also like to point out that a year prior to 1913, 1912, yeah, that was when the Titanic sank. And it's funny how three of the wealthiest individuals on that ship were the loudest voices opposed to central banking. Oh, and there's also the little tidbit that JPMorgan was supposed to be on that boat, but he canceled at the last second. But, yeah, that that's conspir that's tinfoil hat talk. So what's happened since 1913?
Well, the dollar has lost 99% of its value. Our debt has just become like a number that we ignore. Middle class getting fucked daily. War is now an industry instead of a conflict. Oh, yeah. And your money isn't real anymore. Like, it's just not real. It's not backed by anything. It's just numbers on a paper that that that private bank prints. So guys, like, look, if you're worried about America being conquered or, you know, a rebellion or being taken over, I just want you to recognize
[01:15:06] Unknown:
that we lost America in 1913. And I think that would have been even more impactful if he would have dropped out the you know, left out the two f bombs that he did. I mean, that was absolutely dynamite. But, the fact that he used those words or that word, it's just just kind of let some of the air out of the message he was saying, which was very, very good, I thought.
[01:15:30] Unknown:
Yeah. They left out the seventeenth amendment too and the senators being not appointed by the state, and that takes the state's rights element out of Washington and the senate. So things changed a lot since then too. Go ahead. Right. Brent, we're talking about the, the laws attached back to the land and the erection of cities and the terror. Now I've never heard that word used in relationship to land. It's in Spanish. It's t I e, double r, a, I think. But, anyway, just as a comment and get back on track here. Yeah. It's a Latin based word, and it refers to land.
[01:16:10] Unknown:
But it also, refers now to terror, and the reason is because from ancient times forward, cities exercised their empire powers by extending terror over land. That's what we say still in in in law. We talk about long arm statues. Yes. The long arm of the law, that all comes from Rome. And the idea is from the city of Rome, its long arm will reach everywhere and control everything. It's a centralized idea, but without the city, the law of the city can't work. There has to be cities, and they have to be central locations of government. Well, civil law, the law of the city, the canon civil laws of Rome, we call them today, the Code of Justinian of the Roman Empire, in that law, men must do only as government commands.
And where government command is silent, men must never act. Where government command is silent. Where government is silent, men must never act. Our common law, by distinction, says government must do only as law commands, and where law is silent, government must never act. But men, by right, always can act. That's the difference. That's one way to describe the difference. The foundation of a country's law and government lies in its sense of deity. Deity, d e I t y. That's an old Latin word that means law giver, godhood, final arbiter of right and wrong in individual instances from whose decision there is no appeal.
That's the most powerful power in God's created order in any particular bailiwick. Of course, the creator of all things, heaven and earth and all that in the midst, has that power of lawgiver, final arbiter of right and wrong, in individual instances from whose decision there is no appeal. He has that on in all heaven and all earth. The rest of mankind is delegated to mankind in general to do that down here on land using the 12 man jury. That's what the Bible says. That's what the Bible teaches. That's the example the Bible gives. The 12 man jury is arbiter. The 12 man jury is not obligated by any law, any duty to provide reasons for its decision.
Can't it wants, but no law obligates it. It is arbiter, and its decision, as long as the course of the common law is followed, fairness, its decision is beyond appeal. Our common law says that, our cases still say that. The only way you can challenge a jury, a jury decision is if you can prove that structurally some process wasn't followed, like how the jury's impaneled, where the jurors came from, etcetera. That that's our common law. That's how. Not result oriented, but how you go about doing things. Well, the phrase natural law pops up in these kind of discussions about common law.
Natural law signifies standards of conduct inherent in any given relationship among men and women. Discoverable. Discoverable, of course, in particular application by the jury if there's a dispute. That's our common law tradition. Natural law is the inborn knack to sense right from wrong. Our our, declaration of '76 calls natural law the laws of nature. The laws of nature. The laws that govern creation around you. They're not written down. It's just the way things are. It's the way God made this world in the heavens. Everything moves according to laws. For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction.
That's a law. You can't change it. That's the way it works. Falling objects fall in a vacuum at the rate of 32 feet per second per second. They accelerate at the rate of 32 feet per second per second regardless of how big or heavy or how light or small they are. That's a law of nature. God made that law. But then there is the laws of nature's god, says the declaration of 76. What's that? That's the Bible. That's lex scripta, law written. That's what that phrase has all had always meant. We find that phrase in the writings of William Blackstone on his commentaries on the laws of England.
The laws of nature, that's our common law tradition, our recognition of the laws that govern the objects and the things and the living and dead in the creation where we live. And then there's the laws of nature's God written specific. That's the Bible. Now the reformers went on to point out that the laws of nature around us in creation that we watch, the laws of perpetual motion. I use the example that I don't step out in front of Greyhound buses going 60 mile an hour. Why? Well, I didn't read that in the book. That's just a law of nature. I know it. I don't jump off, grain bins that are real tall like we used to have or I used to climb up on. I don't do that. Why? I'm not that well, I learned that I could get hurt, because I'd fallen down and hurt myself before. Law of nature, I learned it. Laws of nature, said the reformers, and they were right as the Bible says this. The law of nature is important that we follow it. You plant in the spring, harvest in the summer. You go to bed at night. You go with the rhythm the of the sun, the moon, the stars because we we sleep at night generally. We get up and work when we can see during the day. Those are laws of nature. We can't change them.
But the laws of nature are laws of condemnation, not laws of salvation. It condemns us. When we look at nature, we see as the says in Romans one, as it says in Psalm 19, we see that there is a maker of all of this. And this making that he made is orderly according to specific laws, and everything in this creation that he has made operates according to the laws that he has put in motion. That's that condemns us, but it doesn't doesn't pull us out of hell. I meet peep I meet meet people constantly have, and we'll meet more, that will say, me, well, I don't have to I go out in the woods and worship God in the woods. Can you do that? Oh, yeah. You can do that. But if that's all you got, you're not, you're not, you're not saved from God himself.
God himself says he will hurl men into hell. He wants to save you from himself. And he gives you the directions how that happens in that laws of nature's God, the Bible. That's what the reformer said. That's what the men in the Scottish enlightenment said. That was a hallmark of the Scottish enlightenment. They said, wait a minute. We've established the authority of the Bible. That's good. But there are laws that God has revealed himself in creation. And it's important that we recognize and understand that authority. And through that understanding, the Scottish Enlightenment spread to England, and then it spread to America, and it overtook this continent.
And that explains a lot of why we are that nation of wealth and prosperity of an engine of it, an engine of wealth and prosperity more than the world has ever known. Because we were, by the providence of God, nothing in us, and we're not smarter than other people. But we, by the providence of God, he worked it so that we accepted that idea, laws of nature. In creation, laws of nature's God. In the Bible, the laws of nature's God. If the laws of nature are a revelation from God of condemnation, it does condemn us because it it magnifies the difference between creator and creature like us.
But then there is the laws of nature's God. That's a law not of condemnation, but of salvation. It's in writing, it's specific, and it tells us exactly and gives us a record of the it's a evidence of the messiah of God who has power to snatch men from the jaws of death and has so and done has done so. The phrase natural law signifies standards of conduct. I'd made that point. And also to make the point, the law of the city, primarily Rome, says that natural law is logic. They say that natural law is logic. The Bible doesn't say that. Reality doesn't teach us that.
It's more of that humanism, more of that intellectualism, more of that intellectual arrogance. The Jesuits, pride themselves on education. They have universities all over the world and all over America. I have high standards. Logic trumps fact in those institutions. They train men to be logical? Oh, yeah. Saint Thomas Aquinas is the official doctrine of the Roman Roman church. Do they tend train men to be logical? Yes. But that doesn't get you to the truth, friends. There's there's evidence has to come first, in fact, before logic. And as silly as that sounds, the they would put logic first, put the cart before the horse, as we used to say. William Blackstone, in his commentaries on the common law of England, makes that point. He said they've got it upside down. They got it backwards. It doesn't work.
And they take great pride in the beauty of their thought and the the elegance of their law and the balance of it. And and, they take pray great pride in that, but they live in poverty all over the world and take their pride in their intellectual arrogance. We don't do that in our common law country. We don't really care. Logic is good. It's a good tool. We can use it. But bottom line is we wanna know what the facts are first, and we do that on evidence, and that's what the Bible teaches too. Listen to John Locke. John Locke, according to Tom Jefferson, in his mind, John Locke was one of the three greatest mortals that ever lived.
John Locke was a Puritan, by the way. His father was a Puritan common lawyer in England. John Locke became the foremost fan and promoter of the Scottish Enlightenment. The The fundamental of the Scottish Enlightenment, again, was that God has revealed himself to men in two volumes, the laws of nature unwritten and the nature of creation. And the laws of nature's God written in the Bible. That's the Scottish Enlightenment. John Locke was a fan of those ideas, and he became a chief proponent of the Scottish enlightenment. And our declaration of '76 is riddled with his phrases.
Listen to what he says. He says, God has furnished men with faculties sufficient to direct them in the way they should take, if they will but seriously employ them. What's he talking about? Oh, God's furnished men. No idea. The context is and this is John Locke all the way. He's furnished men with the with the power of observation of his surroundings to learn the laws of nature. The inventions that have arisen out of the Scottish enlightenment, and that's why we've been so big on inventions here in America, is the mindset that what goes on in nature is consistent. We can depend upon those laws, and we can build our future independence on those laws.
The farmer depends on those laws. He plants in the spring, and he harvests in the fall, and he depends upon the seasons keeping going, just like the Bible says that God will never change that. God will never change that. That's why he put the rainbow in the cloud. Go back and read it in Genesis. He tells our the second father of Adam's race, I'm putting this bow in the cloud with all these colors to remind you I'm not gonna destroy the world with water again. The next time I do it, it'll be by fire. That's what he says. And, of course, we read that throughout the Bible. Well, the natural law is the inborn knack to sense right from wrong as as I'd said.
But it comes through experience. It doesn't it's just not a it's a knack to learn. It's not a it's not something God puts in you and you just know. No. No. No. And that is one of the great fallacies of American Christianity. I read a book not many years ago by a professor down in Austin, Texas who was hailed as a big time conservative. I don't remember his name. I think it started with a b, and it had a ski on the end. It was a Polish name. But clever the way he titled the book, he said here's the title of the book, What We Cannot Not Know.
What We Cannot Not Know. And his argument was that as Christian men and women, we just know right from wrong. The Bible never says that. It's amazing. People say that Bible says it in in Romans chapter 12, and that's where he focused. I think it's verses twelve and four no. Five. But maybe it's five. Romans five twelve twelve through 14. But he misunderstands what it says there as I've noticed most everybody does. And it sound like a great idea, but it's just simply not true. If you don't know what the Bible says, I talked to a Christian lady not too many years ago, and I've talked to other people like this too. And she was a nice lady. I've known her for years. And And she said, Brent, I know this sounds crazy.
Right? I know I've been a Christian, and I go to church, and I want to learn the Bible, and I trusted the preacher to tell us teach the Bible to us. And I read it when I could, but it never dawned on me that I wasn't supposed to sleep with, men that weren't I wasn't married to. Nobody ever told me. Preacher never said nothing about it. I said, well, that's makes the point. Was she a Christian woman? I believe she was. Listen, Christianity, once the spirit of God lives in your body and in the organ called your brain, it enlightens you. You want to know what the Bible says and you begin to learn it. But just like a little child being born of the spirit, you you come, you enter as a newborn babe. You don't know beans from sour apple butter.
About nothing. You begin to learn. And God puts it in you to want to learn the laws of nature. And the laws of nature is God. Of course, the laws of nature, you learn. Little children learn a lot of things. You know? The parents tell them, don't touch that lamp. What are they gonna do? I need I tell you what will happen next. Of course, the child will try to knock it over on the floor and bust it. And then dad applies the board education to the seed of knowledge two or three times, children, old men, or hard cases. Or he may get the idea and say, well, I don't wanna do that anymore. Well, nature is the mountain.
Nature is the mountain from which blocks of facts are hewn. Facts are the foundation stones upon which the frame of reason sets. What good is logic? Well, it's good. It's a good tool, but if it isn't properly used, it's nothing but a whore, w h o r e. That's a quote from Martin Luther. I I don't like to quote Luther because people begin to say, oh, he's a Lutheran. No. I'm not a Lutheran. Don't wanna be a Lutheran and won't be a Lutheran for a lot of good reasons. But Luther had that point right. I'll quote him and give him credit. Logic is a whore, and nobody would have known better than him. He was a doctor of the church. He was educated in logic to the absolute hilt, about twenty years of higher education. And when I say he was a doctor of the church, that means he was the top. See, you had in the Roman system, you got the apostles, then you got the church fathers, then you got the doctors.
And all three of those groups have the same authority as the Bible. That's why I said a while ago, Saint Thomas Aquinas, he's no more a saint than you or I, but nice guy, by the way. Nice guy. Matter of fact, great admiral admirable, and his logic is impeccable. But he's looked upon as a prophet equal to the Bible. His writings are official and equal to the Bible. And if they say they aren't, that's not what that's not how they're treated. Just like the book of Mormon is equal to the Bible. Of course, when the when anything is equated with a Bible, the Bible has a way of receding from consideration.
The Bible has a way of receding from consideration. The Bible is a book of evidence about fact. Old logic can come into it. Yes. And so in the Bible, sometimes that's stressed, but never, never above the fact of the matter and the evidence presents the facts. In short, natural law depends upon the facts of nature. I'm talking about this because it's the phrase is in the declaration of 76. What did he mean? Laws of nature and laws of nature's god. Nature depends upon nature's god. We lose Brent. Roger, go ahead. No. You clipped out for a minute. Oh, sorry. You said, well, that's okay. What did you mean? And then you just came back. So I'll depend on you to tell me. I appreciate that. That helps everybody. Natural law is so called because its discovery depends upon nature in two ways.
Number one, one discovers nature's facts by digging and looking. Number two, then by using one's natural ability to reason, that's logic, based upon those facts dug from nature's mountain, one comes to conclusions. You see, the facts have to come first. Logic always has to rest on a fact that you don't prove, a self proving fact, we hope. That's why that's why, the declaration of 76 says, we hold these truths to be, I can hear some of you saying it, self evident. Self evident. What's self evident mean? That means a fact that I don't have to prove because it speaks for itself.
There are those kinds of facts that speak for themselves. That's where logic ought to start. If the evidence for the fact is so strong that it's undeniable, well, then it speaks for itself. If the evidence if if the fact itself is the evidence for itself, it's called self evident. And that's what Tom Jefferson is talking about. We'll we'll get to that. But he builds the whole declaration of 76 upon those self evident facts that he did not prove. He just accepted without proof because the without, I should say, external, extrinsic proof.
These things are internally proved. You know, when you come to the Bible, for example, people that have been trying to show the reliability of the manuscripts we call the Bible say there's two kinds of proof. There's internal evidence of reliability that you find in the manuscripts themselves, and then there is external evidence that proves reliability from without. The Bible proves itself both ways by internal, intrinsic evidence and by external extrinsic evidence. Some things do. The Bible does overwhelmingly, by the way. Though the phrase natural law is not from the Bible, it's sometimes used with reference to Romans chapter two verses fourteen and fifteen as though these verses teach that everyone knows right from wrong.
These verses, however, teach that each person, a member of Adam's race, is endowed, watch this, with a natural ability to to discover and distinguish right from wrong. It doesn't teach that men just know. You become a Christian. God gives you the spirit. Now you know. Most of Christodom, d u m b, believes that. And that's why the Bible is ignored. And if the if the Bible's not ignored, most of fundamental and conservative Christodom ignores the law of God entirely and says that doesn't matter anymore. Listen, friends. The law of God is not all repeated in the New Testament. In fact, very little of it.
70 just just short of 70% of God talking to man is the Old Testament's 39 books. Jesus Christ quotes from the law of God, the book of Deuteronomy, the second statement of the law of God, restatement, more than any other writing. He said, I did not came. Do not think I came to to tear down, to loosen away, to dissolve the law. The word the Greek word there in the text, the most oft appearing verb in the New Testament, Louo. Louo. We get our word loose in the Indo European tongues. Loose. Loosen. Latches of our common law tradition is the French Norman way to say it. I did not came to loose loosen. I did not came to or I did not come to ignore, to tear down, to break down, to dissolve. That's what the word means, loosen, to slacken the law of God. No. He says, I came to establish it, to plump it out full, to show you what it means and how it applies. And when you read the New Testament, you see that that is what is stressed. Not the law of God quoted, but how we are to understand the Old Testament. The hermeneutic principles we are to use when we interpret and apply the law of God from the Old Testament. The 10 principles.
The 10 standards. The 10 davarims. The 10 commandments people know it as. The New Testament tells us how to do that. We don't know it by nature. We are endowed as Christian men and women with the ability to discover and learn it. Thus, it is said that natural law is not law that every person knows from being born human, but is that law that each person is able to discover, learn, and know through his natural potential to find it from his natural surroundings by direct discovery or by indirect inference from facts discovered. Thus, for example, our common law tradition lays claim for its juries the ability to find the law's application by inferring from evidence presented to the jury.
The Bible's description of natural law remains clear. I'm gonna try to this is Romans two fourteen and fifteen, and this is the winterized translation. I'm gonna go over it again. It's hard to get this straight. That's why it's it's that's why it's misunderstood to say that we all know when we are born of the spirit, we just know right from wrong. I heard John MacArthur, a great Bible teacher, arguably the greatest expositor of the Bible of our time. But he never taught the Old Testament. He spent his whole life teaching the New Testament. Nothing wrong with teaching the New Testament, of course. And I learned a lot from him, but I heard him say one time
[01:39:57] Unknown:
that
[01:40:00] Unknown:
no Christian man needs a note with a magnet stuck to his refrigerator that says, do not beat your wife. He said, no man needs that because he has the spirit of God. That is not true, friends. That is not true. Men that are born of the spirit start as newborn babes. They have to learn. They that that's why the Bible commands to learn the law of God. Deuteronomy chapter four. Learn it. Safeguard it from addition or subtraction. What's the natural result? You will do it, but you gotta learn it first. Why do we have these 39 books of the Old Testament? Well, we've got the law of God, and then we got the prophets.
The prophets show us give us examples of how it applies and the consequences the consequences of the law for good or evil. That's what the prophets are. 17 prophetical books. That's what they are. Then you have the writings of the law, the writings of Moses. They give us statutes, commands. Statutes, commands, how to apply, and then the power, the New Testament, provides the ultimate revelation of how to get the power and the desire to wanna do that. For when the nations I'm reading here from Romans. When the nations having not the law now the all the translations say Gentiles.
That's silly. Israel in the Bible, the Hebrew Old New Testament, includes Israel in the the word goyim. You see, they call today in Jew Judaism calls everybody that isn't following Judaism goyim, the nations. But the Bible includes Israel and all the nations of the earth and calls them goyim. So I don't translate gentile. That's a hackneyed word that has lost a proper meaning. For when the nations, having not law, by nature from time to time knew the things contained in the law, these not having law are a law for themselves, proving that the law's imprint is written in their yearning, in their yearning.
Their conscience testifying with their desires. Also, between one another, they have thoughts of legal accusations and legal defenses. What he's saying here is men, all men, Christian or non Christian, pagan saint or ain't, have this yearning desire for what is right. Oh, yeah. They do. And they they know they see injustice. Charlie Kirk got murdered. Well, the indignation is over the top. Why? Because God did make them, and he made them out of his imagination. We say his image. He imagined what each of us would look like, what we would be, and he fashioned us just that way.
Whatever you are is what God saw you in his imagination. I call it his image a nation. He imagined us, and he, by the way, commands us to never return that compliment. That's called idolatry. We're not to do that. What we imagine God to be no. No. No. The Bible tells us what God is. He he doesn't show us pictures and statues. He gives us the word of God. Well, the foregoing translation enlarges the letter of the original, but remains within the scope of Paul's words. Paul, the apostle, taking the role of prosecutor, says that whether or not all have heard or read, all men are capable, even able, to learn and know what God requires of them. Why?
Because God, using nature, has written the sense in their yearnings to learn it. It is inborn. Roger, you there? Yes. I'm right here. Now I was coughing and taking a drink of water, though. Oh, okay. Alright. Well, nature means by your physical existence. Christianity, dispensationalism, Zionism, Babylonianism, all minimize the importance of the physical. But I remind you that the Bible, in the most famous event of all human history, stresses the physical above all things. And what is that? The bodily the bodily gibbetting of Jesus Christ on a wooden post, naked for the world to gawk at, and then the bodily, burying of his body. And then three days later, he himself raised that body from the dead.
This body, friends, don't spiritualize things too much in the Bible. God knows we live in the physical world, and that's what we understand. We do not. We cannot identify even what the spirit is except to say it's true. It exists. We can't touch it. We can't taste it. We can't smell the spirit of God or the spirit of man, evil spirits. As the Bible says and Jesus Christ says, we only know of their reality because of what they do. Just like the wind, I can't see the wind. But when I see the the branches of the trees bending and leaning over and swishing about, I know a storm's coming.
I know the wind is there by what it does. I feel it. I see it. I know there's air there. And it is no accident that the New Testament uses the Greek word for air for air to signify spirit. The word is pneuma, as in pneumatic. Pneumatic tires, what's that? Well, that's a tire that has air in it. The word pneuma, Jesus Christ said nobody knows when the pneuma blows from whence it has come or from whence it is going. But we know that and he said in the same way, we know the spirit of God. We don't know where it comes from always or where it's going, but we see what it does. And that is the proof of the reality of the spirit. Have you ever seen something happen or a series of events overwhelming you maybe with evil, and you say, how can how could this have happened?
Everything is going wrong all at once. The whole world is against me. If you haven't had that, you're not a Christian man or woman, or you have no evidence of it yet because that will happen to you if you're a Christian man or woman. Roger, are you are you giving me an amen or what? No. I'm I am amaming from here to sundown. Go ahead. You're let's let's camp for just a minute. This is this is testimony time. You're giving us evidence. You're saying, yeah. I've had that experience. Is that true? I'm having it. Yeah. Having it down here for the last month or two months or so and probably the foreseeable future.
[01:47:11] Unknown:
And you'd had it before. Right? I have had it before. Yes.
[01:47:15] Unknown:
And you say there's no way there's no way that all these people involved that are coming against me even know each other.
[01:47:22] Unknown:
How could this No. I guess, yeah, that's probably true. And I know they don't know what they're talking about. No. They don't even know it. No. They're functionally illiterate. Okay? Yeah. Yeah. So I don't in the end analysis, that's fine with me. I just soon not sit down and break bread with them anyway.
[01:47:39] Unknown:
Oh, Roger. Yeah. And I know what you're talking about. Yeah. And and the devil himself and this by the spirit, evil spirits. And God allows this to happen. No question. Go read the book of Job. Mhmm. God knows what they're doing, and he can stop them anytime they want. He doesn't do that. Mm-mm. Oh, the evil comes, and it we could realize finally, we say no man could ever put this much evil together and orchestrate it like this. This has to be something beyond the physical. It's out there.
[01:48:09] Unknown:
It is. Well, it's so biblical. It's just you know, now that I'm kind of very aware of all these principles and stuff after all these years of living in a truthful life. And now I get confronted with this over there, and I just don't wanna live a lie anymore. No. These people consciously do. Not not all of them, but the head guy consciously does wanna live a lie. And we had that discussion. Okay? I mean, that that blunt and straightforward. So and that's his choice, and that's fine. I'll take my choice and go the other way. That's part of being,
[01:48:43] Unknown:
well, just doing what a man's supposed to do, but God will infuse fuse us with that courage in the face of the madness. Yay, though I walk through the valley of the death shadow. I fear no evil, for thou art with me. Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me. And then he says, thou preparest a table for me in the faces. This is by the by the letter of the Hebrew text says, in the faces of my enemies. He sets you down. He lays out a board of a of a meal like you can't describe, and they're all right right in their faces. They're looking at you. They're slobbering. They're foaming at the mouth, and they wanna kill you and steal it all. And he does this for you. That's what David is saying there. David was a warrior, never defeated. David was never ever defeated in military encounter. And he had a lot of military encounters starting with Goliath.
God blessed him. He understood warfare. And when he is talking about being a shepherd, of course, that's warfare too when he was a boy, He is my shepherd. I shall not want. He keeps going through and he describes himself as being under the care of Yahoa. By the way, Yahoa, some people say Jehovah, they anglicize it. Some people mispronounce it and say Yahweh. The King Jame Jamers, they followed the rabbis and said the Lord. But that person of the old testament, clearly a second member of the Godhead is Jesus Christ. Don't ever forget that. Jesus Christ is Yahuah.
And his name even means savior, Yahuah. That's what it means. Well, let's get back to the back to what we were saying here. So you have to learn, even Christian folk, but what a Christian man or woman does have that the non Christian man or woman doesn't have, he wants deeper than anything in the world to please his father and learn. How do you do that? You learn your father's will. That's what the Bible is. It is a record of what God likes and what he doesn't like. And for us Christian folk, his wish is our very command. We don't live in a world of sultans. No. No. The sultan. You know, sultan, it means God. It means, untouchable.
That's what the Arabic word means. Mohammed was a sultan. He was untouchable. That word, by the way, appears in the Bible. It's a a loan word in the Hebrew language from Arabic. Aramaic and Arabic, Chaldean, as they say. Well, what's the I'm I'm writing an example we've used here before. In fact, to say that everyone knows right from wrong because such knowledge is the law of nature is as absurd, as silly as saying that all people know nature's laws of electricity. No one knows the laws of electricity by natural birth. Note, however, that once a fellow feels the bite of an electric fence or the jolt of a frayed appliance cord, he, by nature, will understand enough of the laws of nature to avoid such pain or death.
So also by nature, the same fellow will take an interest in the laws governing human relationships when his actions bring him pain or loss or bring him gain or comfort. Very dangerous, of course. You want that money, it makes you feel better. What does it do? Well, it puts you in the evil empire. We talked about that a while ago. Well, I'm gonna stop there, Roger. I've been Less is more. Less is more is what I've learned, Brent. Less is more. But as they we used to sing, little as much when God is in it. Labor not for wealth or wealth or gain.
There's a crown and you can win it if you go in Jesus' name. Well, I wish we had more time for questions, but I'm gonna stop because I'm tired and I'll Yeah. Start here next time. Okay. Well, then we're pretty got got a couple of minutes left here. Not many.
[01:52:57] Unknown:
I don't know what your schedule's like today. I had a question I wanted to ask you, though, if I could. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Did you ever get around to watching the, Tucker Carlson program on the, Shroud of Tern? I did. I did. Uh-huh. Yeah. Do you have any thoughts on that?
[01:53:13] Unknown:
Yeah. As I've said before, it's, idolatry, and it's a distraction from the truth because it doesn't number one, I don't believe it's true because I don't think that anything my experience with linen is it can't last, but just a few decades at most. And I you can look that up too. But then beyond that, even if it's true, all it is is a distraction from the word of God. The word of God is the great evidence that governs all things. There's nothing that is greater evidence than the word of God. And all of Europe for centuries has been inundated with the kind things like the Shroud Of Turin, a finger of bones from the finger of John, the apostle, hair from the saints, body dead body parts all over Europe that they claim are this or that, pieces off of the cross. Well, if there were a piece off the cross, or the body of Moses, whatever, the bodies of the saints, that's just all death. It means nothing. What means something is what God says.
External evidence like that has anytime you have that, the Bible has a way, as I've said a while ago, a way of receding receding from consideration. And without the Bible, there is no salvation. The shroud doesn't prove the Bible. No. No. No. The the people say sometimes, for example, the, that somebody wrote a book that sheds some light on the Bible. And I say, no, no, no. The Bible is clear. The Bible is the light that sheds light on all other books. It's hard to get away from our flesh and say, no. No. We got this upside down. Most all what we think in the flesh is upside down. That's why we need the Bible to pervade our brains so that we can touch start turning things right side up as to us individually. We can't do it for anybody else, but God can do it for you. And the more you bathe your brain in the Bible, the more your blood becomes bibbling, the more you'll see things as God sees them and not as the world sees them.
That's that's my conclusion for what it's worth, Roger. It's a distraction. Okay.
[01:55:23] Unknown:
We got let's see. We don't have much time. Couple of minutes. Anybody got a quick question for Brent or myself? Doesn't sound like so, Brent. That's unusual for this bunch. Was that somebody who was wanna say something?
[01:55:40] Unknown:
They did this last week.
[01:55:43] Unknown:
I'll tell you, you never you never know. We're going to, try and experiment. It may start next week. I'm not sure. We're going to take and combine our Saturday show with Paul English and him a Saturday show and do it towards the same time, you know, same platforms. Yeah. And and and open to anybody that wants to come and do whatever. So it's kind of an experiment, in our little radio experience here, but we'll, find out more. And just wanna let you know, I'm sure you have the show opposite ours, tomorrow. So Right. Now if you wanna pop over, but we'll be doing three hours, and there'll be an after show. Who was trying to say something there?
[01:56:33] Unknown:
It's Gary. I wanna know Gary. Brent's take Brent's take on interest or usury. If, if he would like to cover that next Friday, it would be much appreciated.
[01:56:45] Unknown:
Okay. Great. There you go. There's a topic for next week, Brent.
[01:56:49] Unknown:
Well, if somebody can help me remember, I'll say something now if it makes any difference. Bible, clearly, bars, usury. Usury was barred in Europe because of the, the influence of the Bible for many centuries. All of Europe called it the scourge of all mankind, The Bible forgive forbids it. That's enough to know. Then it has reasons. But it will destroy any country if men charge usury to their countrymen. Yep. For the Bible. Boy, does it do an efficient job.
[01:57:26] Unknown:
Hey. Brent, that's all We must define it properly. We'll do that next week. Alright. Maybe we can work on it next week, Gary. Thanks for bringing that up. It is a super important subject. And evidently, what mostly the Paul English show was on Thursday, if you missed that earlier. You you may wanna go back and listen to that too, Gary. Anyways, the end of our time together with Brent publicly here today, and I always wanna thank him for taking time out of his busy incredibly busy schedule to come spend it with us and go over some of these spiritual anchors and that are so important. We're in a spiritual war. It man it's manifests itself on a different plane, but in the big picture, it's a spiritual war. And if you don't believe it, look at Charlie Kirk's assassination.
A lot of spiritual inflections in there. Totally. So, Brent, as always, thank you, my friend. You go have a good week, and we'll look, forward to seeing you next Friday. And, otherwise, you'll be on tomorrow, and we will be too. And the listener can listen to either one they want live and then go check the archives of the other one if you choose. Thank you, Brent. Always a pleasure, man.
[01:58:42] Unknown:
Well, thank you, Roger. Appreciate you and all those folks listening. Appreciate all of you. Well, we assume somebody's listening. So I was thinking, Roger. We hope. We're hoping. We said we're talking and we ask a question, but I wanna ask make a comment or ask a question,
[01:58:57] Unknown:
and nobody said anything, and maybe nobody's out there listening. We don't know. You know what I like in that too is, and you'd probably relate to this, dropping a a rock down a well, and then you never hear it hit bottom. Roger. There's Joan that hit the bottom. Yes, ma'am. Well, I'm not inferring you're on the bottom, Joan. Go ahead, please.
[01:59:19] Unknown:
Okay. So about forty five minute hey, Brent. So about forty five minutes ago, you said something about the senators represent the state. And so therefore then I can't remember the rest of it, but sound like you said, so they represent the state, which is the government. Is that the federal government, or can you tell me more about that? Thank you. Seventeenth amendment. Roger,
[01:59:46] Unknown:
my ear. You talking about me?
[01:59:48] Unknown:
Go ahead.
[01:59:49] Unknown:
Joan?
[01:59:51] Unknown:
Yeah. You, Roger. Well, the seventeenth amendment in the year 1913 that that guy was laying all that stuff on, the one thing he didn't mention was the seventeenth amendment, which previous to that point, senators were elected and appointed by the state legislatures. And that way, that was the state's influence into Washington DC and the higher chamber of the senate. And in the seventeenth amendment, that changed to popularly elected. Okay? And that's why now they can, it just depends on who wants to give the senator enough money to run. You know, it's interesting though, Brent.
If you go over to Wikipedia and look up citizenship of The United States Uh-huh. In the first couple of paragraphs from fourteenth amendment, and then it quotes the fourteenth amendment, the first part. And then underneath that, there's a paragraph on nationals. To remind me, honestly, it's right there. And at it says, wells may have some, impact on your taxing situation. And the only thing that you're prohibited from by being a national is running for senator.
[02:01:05] Unknown:
Now where where's that come from?
[02:01:07] Unknown:
Well, I think it comes from seventeenth amendment and this difference in that's, anyway, it's in Wikipedia. Take that for what it's worth. Okay? Okay. That's the only restriction I've seen on national status anywhere, and it's very specific right there, quite brief, but says it right in there. So, anyway, I don't know what your schedule is today. Are you a a gallivanting? I know you're always busy, but we sure I'm overwhelmed more than I've ever been in my whole life, Roger. Wow. That's great, Brent. I said to I don't know. I said to my mother and father,
[02:01:42] Unknown:
and I keep saying dad 99, mom's 94. I said my experience of course, here I am an old man talking to old people. You know? I'm Yeah. Not in which and I can kinda relate to some of their their things. And I said that my experience is that, the older I get, the more burdens I have and the heavier they are. Yeah. And, I said, is that the way it is? Is that the way your experience is? And he said, absolutely. It does there is no retirement. The burdens get heavier and they multiply, but you know how to handle them better. So you just keep working and we're here for a purpose and we're supposed to be doing things and handling problems. And so that's what happens. And we are at war and it won't stop. No. And the only safety that's available to us Christian folk is in battle. There is no other place. Yep. To be out of the battle is to be destroyed. Yep. Come out of her. My people come out of her. It says it twice. Emphasis, if nothing else.
Yep. And it doesn't mean come out of the battle. That means come out on the wrong side and come over the other side. Yeah. There is neutrality is not an option among mankind.
[02:02:51] Unknown:
It's not an option. No. You can't. There there's no neutrality in this fight. I can tell you that.
[02:02:57] Unknown:
Yeah. Question Was that you? Was that you, Rick? Yes, sir. I question question for Brent. Brent, I sent you by email to, on your contact page, and you had asked for a copy of a portion of, Jefferson's letter to Washington. I just wanna know if you got it.
[02:03:17] Unknown:
Oh, wow. I'll tell you what. I'm gonna pick up my computer and walk downstairs, I'm still here, and, talk to my faithful assistant and see if it's pulled up. No. That'd be the oh, that that was from the, from the, website. You emailed it. Right?
[02:03:40] Unknown:
I
[02:03:42] Unknown:
think I created a PDF and just sent you that portion. It was off of a website and out of a book, but you asked for those. I read, like, eight eight things or something, different items that Jefferson was saying that were being violated
[02:04:00] Unknown:
with the, I can't. Yeah. I can't. I can't respond, but I can't It was a while back.
[02:04:08] Unknown:
It was about three weeks ago.
[02:04:10] Unknown:
Oh, it was a couple weeks ago, Brent. But here's what I'm gonna do. I'll I'll make this commitment. First thing I do, I'm gonna get off of here. I'll go get it. And then maybe next week, we can talk about it. Okay. If it's yeah. I'm I'm anxious to read it, and I I'd forgotten who you'd sent it, and I I don't do my own email. I don't handle that stuff anymore. Other people do, and they send me things or let me know I've got something.
[02:04:36] Unknown:
Well, I do. That's why I I know it's not your personal email. It was just off your contact, off your website. Mhmm.
[02:04:43] Unknown:
Okay. That that'll work. Yeah. I get it. And, I'll look and remind me again, and we'll talk about it.
[02:04:51] Unknown:
Alright? Okay. Well, I appreciate it. You asked for it, so I just wanted to let you know I sent it. And, actually, it's not great for you.
[02:04:58] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm I'm glad I remember.
[02:05:00] Unknown:
Fantastic. Thanks, Rick. Anybody else got anything for Brent or myself? I'm gonna take that as a no. Brent, thank you, buddy. Go on. I know you got stuff to do, myself also, and, we'll look forward to seeing you next week.
[02:05:19] Unknown:
Thank you.
[02:05:20] Unknown:
That's Roger. Alright. Thank you, Roger. Thank you, Brian. Yeah. Roger. Hey, guys and girls. We'll be back tomorrow. Was this dancing, Julie?
[02:05:31] Unknown:
No. It's, sitting Robbie. Yeah. Okay. At the beginning, Paul, Alan mentioned that he was gonna post something, and Paul was gonna post it in FCC about the, Kirk assassination. I haven't seen anything.
[02:05:50] Unknown:
Paul? Okay, Paul. I'll have to let you take care of that. Paul, are you there? You off chasing the kitty? What's going on? Well, if he's not here, he'll be right right back soon, Robbie, and I don't know anything about it. So, I will look forward to seeing you guys. Forward to you. Okay. Yeah. I'm looking forward to this new Saturday show. Okay. Well, you got don't don't expect it tomorrow. We'll find out. We'll probably talk about Charlie Kirk again tomorrow. I only knows what comes up today. I'll, I'll see y'all. Maybe we'll have a new student or two. Don't know. See y'all. Love you. Be careful. Have a great day.
[02:06:31] Unknown:
Bless you, Roger.
[02:06:35] Unknown:
Bye, Roger. Have a good day and a good week.
[02:06:42] Unknown:
Baldridge? Are you there, Baldridge? Anybody have a title for the short video Baldrige played today?
[02:07:11] Unknown:
Doesn't mean it's stuck.
[02:07:45] Unknown:
Can you put a link in the chat and let's shorten the whole thing? Thanks. Appreciate it.
[02:12:13] Unknown:
So nobody has anything to say?
[02:12:21] Unknown:
Yes. I have a request for this short YouTube you played today in the chat. That'd be nice. Thank you.
[02:12:35] Unknown:
Oh, the, yeah. I can do that.
[02:12:41] Unknown:
Yeah. Appreciate it. Appreciate it. And I'll be glad to talk. Good day there. How are you today?
[02:12:48] Unknown:
I'm good. How are you doing? Okay. I'm dropping a chat right now. Thank you. This guy, I don't know. This guy, he nails it. So there is there is actually one other one that I wanna play that that's funny, but, I think that I wanna play it because the guy is just brilliant, and he has, command of the, he has command of language, and he's, he's very articulate. And Paul? Yeah.
[02:13:34] Unknown:
Yes. Could you drop into the chat what, Alan, was posting regarding the, assassination of Kirk Place?
[02:13:47] Unknown:
If as long as he put it in a Zoom chat.
[02:13:52] Unknown:
Thank you.
[02:13:53] Unknown:
Yes.
[02:13:56] Unknown:
Copy link.
[02:14:04] Unknown:
And,
[02:14:06] Unknown:
Charlie Kirk shot from the left. Not the front. Proof. Okay. I don't know if that's the video he did, but that is in the chat. Oops. Oh, okay. Yeah. The link is in there. Okay. Here's a guy. He is, southern guy, and he's very bright. His name is Jerry Wayne. He looks high forties, high forties, low fifties, beard, mustache, mole cap on his head backwards, and an open letter to Cadillac. And I think this is, very interesting. How the dude can do this without expletives is beyond me.
[02:15:12] Unknown:
Dear General Motors, sons of I hope this letter finds you well so that you'll forever have a sneak suspicion that everything bad that happens to you from now on is a result of this interaction. I pissed in a jar at midnight, whispered an old Appalachian curse my papa taught me under the full September moon with seven June bugs in my left pocket. Then I injected my printer cartridge with that cursed urine before printing this message out for y'all. I've loved Cadillac my whole life ever since I first rode in a '65 DeVille at the tender age of eight. I bragged on your designers. I treated Cadillac like royalty. Few years back when I moved my family to the city, I bought a 2012 SRX for my wife. She loved it. Still does.
I didn't expect a car 4464 miles to be trouble free, so I did the upkeep gladly. I even made peace with the endless dash lights that flare up every time a ladybug farts within a mile of this place. But then came the oxygen sensor. Oxygen sensor didn't even exist. After replacing the ones that do exist, the computer was still convinced there's another one hiding somewhere, maybe under the seat cushions, maybe taped to the owner's manual. One new battery later, the computer forgot about its imaginary sensor. But by then, the AC compressor had blown its guts across the highway in the middle of summer. It's amazing that a part that won't last a 100,000 miles cost like it's made of platinum.
Then the EBCM failed. I went to the dealer. I saw the part in their system. They still told me it's discontinued. Discontinued on a car not yet 15 old. That ain't service. It's organized theft with a polo shirt on. I reached out to module repair shops. Not one of them would touch it. Every last one said they'd rather sit on a fire ant, ma'am, after a honey in a mud than take on Cadillac's liability. So thank you. Thank you for ensuring I now own a 4,400 pound paperweight, a monument to disappointment wrapped in leather and plastic. Scrap value is questionable too since they'd have to peel 2,000 pounds of Tupperware off of it just to find a steal.
In closing, it's my most fervent hope that until the end of your days, there's a itchy spot in the middle of your backs that cannot be reached, that every chair you sit in has one any even leg, that your Wi Fi dies during the best part of every movie, that your pillows are always humid on both sides, that your fitted sheets pop off one corner every night, that your neighbors mow each time you fall asleep, that every restaurant you visit is out of that one thing you like, that your socks twist and bunch inside your shoes, your smoke alarm batteries die only at three in the morning, that every Steve's vanishes before the moment of release, that your windshield washer fluid always has just enough left to smear dirt across the glass, that your biscuits burn on the bottom and stay raw on the top, and your dogs bark at everything except thieves. If you had one ounce of self respect, you'd quit your jobs, go work for the government where this level of incompetence is not just tolerated, but encouraged. With all the love I can muster, Jerry Wayne Longmire junior.
Dear
[02:18:16] Unknown:
Jerry Wayne Longmire junior.
[02:18:19] Unknown:
That's funny as hell.
[02:18:24] Unknown:
Dude knows how to speak his mind.
[02:18:27] Unknown:
And he's absolutely right.
[02:18:30] Unknown:
Yes. He is. Not sure about the, scrap metal, what it's worth for scrap metal because somebody'd have to peel 2,000 pounds of Tupperware off of it just to find the steel. There it is. Jerry Wayne Longmire in the chat.
[02:18:48] Unknown:
By the way, General Motors no longer exist. It was sold about ten years ago. It it is it don't exist anymore.
[02:18:59] Unknown:
Who owns it? Who's making the cars?
[02:19:09] Unknown:
Pontiac. Incorporated
[02:19:11] Unknown:
somewhere. Pontiac and Saturn leave it, man. Pontiac and Saturn were shut down. They quit making them about ten years ago, didn't they?
[02:19:23] Unknown:
That was a long time ago. That was fifteen or 20 or one.
[02:19:28] Unknown:
Oh my god. Paul? Must be old. What?
[02:19:32] Unknown:
Can you check the link, from Alan? Because I tried it, and it didn't work.
[02:19:39] Unknown:
Well, if it ain't the if it ain't the right link Let's
[02:19:50] Unknown:
see.
[02:19:57] Unknown:
Let's see.
[02:20:10] Unknown:
Alright. Because the Is is that link twenty one minutes and fifty two seconds also? Is that the one? Because, Jimmy put one in there.
[02:20:22] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. It's twenty one minutes and fifty two seconds.
[02:20:26] Unknown:
Yeah. If you change the link, the link is fixed.
[02:20:31] Unknown:
Yep.
[02:20:33] Unknown:
Robbie, Jimmy, the link works.
[02:20:37] Unknown:
I'll drop the link in there again.
[02:20:41] Unknown:
Did you drop the link of what you just played in there? Or I don't wanna send that to someone.
[02:20:46] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. I did. That link was the one ending in the one ending in EBBY, I believe.
[02:21:02] Unknown:
E8BY?
[02:21:04] Unknown:
E8BY. Okay. Alright. It's a open letter to Cadillac. Okay. Well, if nobody's got anything else to say, I might as well just take the streams down. So,
[02:21:25] Unknown:
let's do that. Hold up. Hold up. I got one more thing.
[02:21:30] Unknown:
Well, it could've waited afterwards. I can wait for afterwards. Sure. That's fine.
[02:21:36] Unknown:
Well, what? What?
[02:21:38] Unknown:
I since you did put one about the monetary system in and played it on the show today, I did send you a private message last night or yesterday about, a old man talking to his his son about the gold standard, which was very good. It was very short, but it's on the same topic. And I think it was a Twitter link. But I don't know if I can get it find it again today, but it is in there. And I did say if you're ever talking about the monetary system or the gold standard, this would be a short
[02:22:21] Unknown:
good short video to play. Anyway. Okay. So did you well, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Tell me when you sent it and to what chat you sent it to. Did you send it to this room or another one?
[02:22:35] Unknown:
I think it was,
[02:22:41] Unknown:
another room, but it might have been turned to yesterday.
[02:22:46] Unknown:
It was about 04:52PM, laughing on Ludes Short.
[02:22:52] Unknown:
You too short? No. No. No. I I I premise that, play it for the show, save this for whether we talk about,
[02:23:03] Unknown:
gold or the monetary system. Okay. So it was the Citizen Watch report. No. No. I don't think so. It says great clip on the gold standard.
[02:23:14] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. That's it. Yep. There's a sent it at 06:12PM.
[02:23:19] Unknown:
Yep. That's it. 03:12 03:12 your time.
[02:23:23] Unknown:
Yeah. And there's a there's a Twitter linked video in that that, article that is very good and short. What?
[02:23:32] Unknown:
Oh, for crying out loud. Good grief. I'm
[02:23:37] Unknown:
I'm sorry. I should have put the Twitter link.
[02:23:40] Unknown:
What what? The, the twitter.com, a conscientious objector or, the effects of leaving the gold standard. Okay. There we go. A society in decline. Is that it?
[02:23:53] Unknown:
I think so. It's a it's a old man talking to his young son about what things used to be like. And sitting on the porch. And it's pretty good.
[02:24:14] Unknown:
Anyway, I'll America's gold was supposed to back the dollar. Leaving the gold standard was the most costly mistake we ever made.
[02:24:27] Unknown:
What was so bad about gold?
[02:24:29] Unknown:
It kept them honest, but they wanted power. You know, kid, folks today think this is just how life's supposed to be. What do you mean? Back in my day, one job could feed a family. My mother stayed home, father worked, and we ate together every night. Didn't realize how good we had it. After the World War, they promised gold backed dollars, but they broke that promise. They printed paper backed by nothing, funded wars we couldn't afford and shouldn't have been involved in. But France caught on and sent a warship to get back their gold. Truth is, if more countries followed, our vaults would be empty and game over.
[02:25:12] Unknown:
I have directed the secretary of the treasury to take the action necessary to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar
[02:25:21] Unknown:
into gold. Turns out, when you fake the money, everything else follows, and you screw the next generation over. And it snowballs, kid. Prices shot up, paychecks didn't, life got tougher, and nobody knew why. We tried raising our kids the old way, but we didn't have the time or the money. So you outsource parenting? Yeah. I guess you could say we did. Government schools raised them, and the TV taught them bad morals. They learned debt, not savings, bought houses they couldn't afford, played video games, gambling, antidepressants, and crimes, families fractured, divorce rates doubled, birth rates plummeted, things got so bad people started financing Chipotle.
[02:26:06] Unknown:
Financing a burrito?
[02:26:08] Unknown:
Yeah. It's getting bad. Obesity. People eating cheap slop instead of real food. We got softer, sicker, and lazier. A nation in decline, but it didn't happen overnight. When Nixon left the gold standard, we traded sound money for a lifetime of debt. How will they ever pay it back? I don't think they plan to. Both sides keep spending like there's no tomorrow and leaving the bill to your generation. We didn't get it right, but you still got a chance. So take the reins, kid. Hold your ground, and don't give up on sound
[02:26:51] Unknown:
money.
[02:27:01] Unknown:
It's pretty damn good.
[02:27:04] Unknown:
I thought so. Mhmm.
[02:27:09] Unknown:
Well, I just jumped on. What's the source of that one?
[02:27:13] Unknown:
It's, Twitter,
[02:27:17] Unknown:
x,
[02:27:23] Unknown:
and society in decline, the effects of leaving standard, and it's downloading. There we go. The 83.6 megabytes.
[02:27:44] Unknown:
I think that was in '71. Was that '71 when he did that? Yeah. I believe so. Yep. Okay. I saw a couple of charts. One of them was, well, the value of the dollar, of course, the other was debt. And it it went up since 1913, but 71 was when it just took off. And the, debt versus the median income and all that kind of stuff, and that graph just is shocking when you look at it.
[02:28:26] Unknown:
K. So They're on YouTube? No. It's on, Twitter. X copy, and I will paste it into, into the chat. So alright. But I'm absolutely gonna take the radio stream down after I paste it in the chat. So this has been the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales and Brent Allen Winters, the Friday edition. Monday through Saturday, you will find us right here 11AM to 1PM eastern on eurofolkradio.com, Global Voice Radio Network, and at the kind of other platforms that we talk about at the beginning of each show. Thanks so much for joining us. Looks like the Sabato edition will be the last program this week, so pencil it in.
Rod, big old circle on tomorrow's date for the Radio Ranch with Rogers sales Sabadeau edition on Global Voice Network and eurofolkradio.com. Ciao. And don't forget, our website is thematrixstocks.com. Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network. Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.
Kicking off: Radio Ranch intros, tech hiccups, and syndication roll call
New Saturday format: multi-host rotating segments and aftershow plans
Recap of Paul English Live: money power, usury, and monetary sovereignty
Debating the Charlie Kirk shooting: theories, evidence, and skepticism
Brent joins: media hype, martyrdom, and priorities beyond spectacle
Deep dive begins: Declaration of ’76 and common law foundations
Four faces of the law of the city: admin, admiralty, martial, and canon law
Terra and terror: cities, civil law, and the reach of centralized power
Natural law vs. laws of nature’s God: facts, evidence, and juries
Spiritual warfare in daily life: Psalms, trials, and perseverance
Shroud of Turin question: evidence vs. idolatry and scriptural primacy
Q&A: 17th Amendment, nationals, and burdens of age
Listener clips: Cadillac rant, gold standard, and post-show chatter