Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

Share on social media:

Unveiling the 13th and 14th Amendments: Hidden Histories and Modern Implications
Judah P. Benjamin, Rothschilds, and the Civil War: The Untold Stories Behind U.S. Constitutional Changes

In this episode of the Radio Ranch, host Roger Sayles delves into the intricate history and implications of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Sales explores the historical context leading up to these amendments, including the role of international bankers and the Civil War. He shares a lesser-known story about John Tyler Jr. and his opposition to banking interests, which set the stage for future financial control mechanisms. The discussion also touches on the controversial Dred Scott decision and its impact on citizenship and civil rights. Sales further examines the legal nuances and implications of the 13th and 14th Amendments, highlighting the concept of voluntary servitude and the shift from state to federal citizenship. He explains how these amendments laid the groundwork for modern financial systems and federal control, drawing connections to historical figures like Judah P. Benjamin and the Rothschild family. The episode concludes with a reflection on the ongoing influence of these constitutional changes and their relevance to contemporary issues of freedom and sovereignty.

[00:00:20] Unknown:

This mirror stream is brought to you in part by mymymyboost.com   for support of the mitochondria   like never before. A body trying to function with sluggish mitochondria   is kinda like running an engine that's low on oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by PhatPhix,   p h a t p h I x   dot com. And also iTero Planet for the terahertz frequency wand by Preif International.   That's iTeroPlanet.com.   Thank you, and welcome to the program.   Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.  

[00:01:41] Unknown:

Alrighty.   As would we, and we'll take another stab at it. At least educating some people where maybe somebody can put the shoulder to the wheel here and understand it, and that's what we're gonna do today on the twenty   ninth of,   April. Just about,   just about a day. Let's see. Tomorrow's the thirtieth and Wednesday's the first. Right?   Oh, man. Tomorrow's Wednesday, the first.   With  

[00:02:05] Unknown:

I I don't know. Thirty days after Anyway, we'll get it straight in a minute.  

[00:02:10] Unknown:

We'll get it straight in a minute. Anyway, we're pretty close to Mayday. The first.   Thursday   is the first. Okay. Thank you, Dave.   Anyway, Roger Sales here on the Radio Ranch, and, of course, we've got people that help,   extend our reach. Paul, in the middle of all this confusion this morning, Paul is the keeper of said platforms. If you would give them proper  

[00:02:33] Unknown:

recognition and their credit due, please, mister Paul. I would be happy to do that. Yeah. The listeners don't know any   fragment of the confusion that's been going on this morning. So,  

[00:02:47] Unknown:

we're lucky to be here. Revolves around Microsoft. Always. Go ahead. Absolutely.  

[00:02:52] Unknown:

Okay.   We are on one zero six point nine WVOU FM Chicago   today   for the first hour.   And because it's Tuesday, we're also on,   radiosoapbox.com.   Thanks to our buddy Paul across the drink.   We're on our flagship station. Thanks to pastor Eli James. That would be eurofolkradio.com.   We are also on Global Voice Radio Network. Link for that is radio.globalvoiceradio.net.   We are   also, this morning,   on the NET family of broadcast services headlined by WDRN   production support, Collins, Colorado.   That is homenetwork.tv,   freedom nation Tv, go live tv, and streamlife.tube.   Thanks to Stream Life Networks   of Hawaii,   the big island.  

And I keep trying to talk him into flying me out there to tour the studios, but, you know, he hasn't sent me a ticket yet. But I but I remain hopeful.   I do.  

[00:03:55] Unknown:

Mhmm. Our website Tell them you're an illegal alien, and they'll send you out there.  

[00:04:00] Unknown:

Yeah. Really.  

[00:04:03] Unknown:

I'm not nothing.   Yeah. Our website is thematrixdocs.com,   where you can find links to radio streams, interviews,   downloadables,   exhibits,   resources for your freedom. You can also find the links to free conference calls so you can join us here live on the show.   Today, we have,   1,000,   and 964   open spots. So come on down.  

[00:04:41] Unknown:

We got plenty of room for you. Yeah. Good morning, Paul, I think.   Okay. Yesterday, Mark, at the end of the show,   requested that we do   a thirteenth and fourteenth amendment thing.   Go into some background and describe all of that and,   show you what I've been able to figure out on this over the years.   And we're gonna do that. But as I was thinking about it,   setting up on how to do this,   I wanted to relate a story first that kinda set up the thirteenth and the fourteenth amendment, I think.   Certainly   seems to be as you look at history.   And, I heard this on, actually, on Jeff Rentz one night. Well, he's got a   a historical guy that comes on there, I don't know, once a month or something. And he I was listening a while back, maybe a year, year and a half ago, and this, this guy was on with this story. I'd never heard it before.  

And, it makes a lot of sense, and it kinda   set up the urgency for them to get control   of The United States. Now they tried it at first. Of course, we had the First Bank of the United States   shortly after the founding.   And,   its charter expired,   and then they tried to get the second bank of the United States in. And,   that was after the war of eighteen twelve. And,   they got it through except that Andrew Jackson, of course, vetoed it. And then that was a situation where   somewhat like right now with the judiciary,   the Supreme Court of that day,   passed said,   ruled against Andrew Jackson,   and he said, well, let him enforce it.  

And so this is kind of the situation we're in with Trump and the administration   today with this judiciary   that's gone rogue   and, gone commie.   Well, they were commie when they put them in there. They were latently commie for a while, and then they had to come out and start throwing their label around their true self, and that's what's going on right now. But, then after that, that was in '18   I think it was about in 1837,   if I'm not correct.   Paul, somebody in the audience might look that up, but I think that was when Andrew Jackson vetoed it. Well,   then they went into the early fifties.  

And in the early fifties, in the presidential election, this came to bear.   A fellow named John Tyler senior.   His son was John Tyler junior, who was the vice president in that eighteen fifties race.   And what led up to that is an extremely interesting   set of circumstances.   As I said, I'd never heard any of this before this guy on the radio on rent. So one night went over it. Well, John Tyler senior   was Thomas Jefferson's   roommate   in college,   And they were very, very dear friends and throughout their lives interacted with the families, ate dinners together and stuff like that.   John Tyler senior   had a son, John Tyler junior.  

And junior, as he was growing up, you know, it was like uncle Tom, you know, uncle Thomas Jefferson.   And, that was the kind of relationship he had.   And so one night at dinner, he asked Thomas Jefferson, he said, what what do you foresee is the worst thing that could happen to the country?   And Thomas Jefferson said the international   bankers,   trying to take control and no not enough people with good,   with good backbones and morals to stand up to him in the congress.   And so, he always remembered that.   He goes along and will be some very studious young man, junior, John Tyler Junior. He studies a lot of Greek and a lot of Roman and a lot of that very, very well studied in those areas and quite a bright young man evidently.   And so, as they went forward,   Thomas Jefferson   died.  

And, so they were going to have a eulogy for him in Washington DC.   It's about 3,000 people or more there, I believe.   And so it came time for John Tyler senior to give the,   the   whatever the soliloquy, the talk at this,   celebration of Thomas Jefferson's life probably really.   And when that time came, he was so distraught   over the death of his lifelong friend   that, that he couldn't get up and give the talk.   And so John Tyler Junior is right there, and so he got tapped to do that talk totally spontaneously.   And, he got up and gave   evidently a spontaneous speech that was just fantastic.  

The the the newspaper accounts and all the stories of it just raced across the country, and   he became virtually an overnight success   or a recognition   from the country.   And so,   a little while later, there was a guy named Harrison.   He was a general. Remember the Tippecanoe   and Tyler too?   Well, Tippecanoe   was Harrison,   and he was a general political animal. He,   wanted to run for president,   and he came because of the notoriety to John Tyler Junior.   He came and tapped him as his vice president.   And,   Tyler had no political ambitions, but he he accepted. I'm not sure under what all circumstances or whatever, but he accepted   and they ran and they won.  

Well, Harrison was the only president. I think he died thirty days in the office of a heart attack.   I believe he's the only president that's died in office like that.   Anyway, that's what happened. And because he was the vice president, he got elevated to the presidency real   quick. Well, the bankers were trying to push together,   push through another banking deal.   And so they got it through the congress. They got it through the senate,   and they got it up to Tyler's desk, and he vetoed it remembering what Thomas Jefferson had said at dinner that night.   And the,   the repercussions   were unreal. They had riots all through DC   for three or four days of paid instigators, obviously.  

The White House didn't have any protection or anything. It didn't have any   military there. It was just Tyler and his family and the butler.   And the they   cowered back in a room while these riots would go on at night, surprised they didn't burn it down.   And, all all the rest of that stuff. And it got so bad, even his party,   his party, sitting president, and the party   kicked him out of the party because he vetoed this banker's bill.   And so he stood his ground, and, they did not get the, the banking bill through.   And, that is why according to this guy that was telling the story that night,   this why you never hear anything about John Tyler Junior is because they were the people that really stopped the bank   until   the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.  

They didn't have any more. Of course, they went in and set that up. That's what we're gonna take and transition this story into.   But, that is,   a period of history that, I've never heard of before. K? So that was in the early fifties, '18 fifties. So we get up to the sixties, the aggravation of this of the northern   and the southern tiers of states and the issue of slavery and and,   the jet Dred Scott decision came in that period of time also,   still controversial,   actually, all these years later. And,   so this was the setup   that led up to the civil war and the,   passage of the thirteenth and the   supposed passage and ratification of the fourteenth amendment.  

So, I thought that story was very appropriate. Probably many of you,   like myself, had never heard that either. Pretty   stunning history.   So,   the,   the thirteenth amendment   was, we had this civil war led up to it. You know, there was a lot of tariffs.   Basically, what was happening was they they were taxing tariff tariffs again,   the Southern states on all their cotton exports and then taxing   the finished goods that came back in. And, the North was   benefiting from this, and the South was burdened by it.   I've heard,   the boys over at Abbeville   Institute, which is a wonderful resource if you're into   history.  

It's a b b e v I l l e. That's where our Bruce that comes on here. That's where he's from.   Abbeville Institute. It was,   one of the, incubator   areas and cities of the what we call the   the war between the states, the war of northern aggression. There's a lot of different   labels.   You know, one day, Daryl came on here, I think, very accurately, and he said the it shouldn't be called the civil war. It should be called the war to bring in the civil   law   because that really is more accurate. What came out of that is bringing the civil law instead of the constitutional law.   And now until you go through our process, you're all under it. You've agreed to it every time they've ever asked you. So these are the things that kinda led up to it. One of the conclusions that I've come to,   you know, in the last year and a half or so,   is,   that I'm a southern boy, obviously, not raised there all the time because my daddy was air force, but,   certainly born and influenced by the South throughout my whole life. And,   we've always   worn this,   what do you call it, a burden of the civil war and all the things that are the erroneous   information that's behind it.  

I've come to the conclusion here that I think the this this war was instigated   so that they could pass the thirteenth and the fourteenth amendments   so that they could set up the slavery to control the world eighty years later, which is throwing us   all in   servitude   thereafter that bankruptcy.   And, then that is the basis of the world's reserve currency, the dollar.   And it's through the dollar that they've   controlled and terrorized the world.   Basically, ever since, I think they saw this a hundred and fifty years ago when they were setting this up. I don't believe everything that's happened here is is, by any way just coincidental.   And,   these guys got long vision. They also got some powerful associates like Satan   and,   this slavery,   plan, which is biblical.  

Mystery Babylon, all that, a beast of revelations,   was set up way back then   so they could accomplish what they've almost accomplished now. K?   So anyway, that's just a a little bit of background. After the civil war, the thirteenth amendment was passed in December   1865,   I believe.   And,   they let   ironically enough,   they let all of the state legislatures   from the Southern states, which had just tried to secede,   they let them back into Congress to vote on this. So the thirteenth amendment   is totally constitutional.   K?  

Then   six months went by.   The   states that would not pass or didn't look like they were gonna pass the fourteenth amendment,   they went into those states and they took over the legislatures   with the   oh, what do they call them? They're carpetbaggers   and former slaves and people like that. And if and they would go and burn the law libraries.   So if a state objected, they would go in and torch the law library and take over the congress. And so you had a six month   law   between when the thirteenth amendment was passed, supposedly freeing the slaves. We're gonna get into it a little deeper here in a minute.   Freeing the slaves supposedly, but it was six months later before they passed the fourteenth amendment. So there was no   there was no status for them to instantly   step into.  

They evidently   got rid of slavery with the thirteenth amendment, which is,   what, just something I've never concentrated on before. You know, I looked at other parts of it, but it clearly,   did that.   But then after they were free,   they didn't have a status to step into for six months until they, quote, unquote,   supposedly ratified the fourteenth amendment, which   is still questionable.   Now there's a piece in the, congressional record   was put in there, I think, back in the nineteen sixties   by a congressman from Louisiana named John Rerick.   And it's all on the,   supposedly   no legitimate ratification of the fourteenth amendment. So you can go in there and read that. He was probably a John Bircher.  

So,   that's kind of the setup to it. Now I'm gonna go I'm gonna read this myself, and I've got I'm challenged to eyesight. So I had to go through some steps here to get this set up. So if I sound stumbly, just bear with me.   Neither slavery   nor involuntary   servitude   except   as a punishment   for   a   crime,  

[00:18:58] Unknown:

whereas,  

[00:19:01] Unknown:

wherefore where of the person   I I I shouldn't try and do this. It's too difficult with my eyesight. Paul, could you drag up the thirteenth amendment and read it for us,  

[00:19:13] Unknown:

please, completely? Yes. I can.   Okay.  

[00:19:16] Unknown:

Let's see. Part of my problems. You know?  

[00:19:20] Unknown:

Google don't fail me now.   Yeah. Thirteenth amendment to the constitution.  

[00:19:25] Unknown:

Yep.   Slowly.  

[00:19:32] Unknown:

Okay.   Roberts. You get there we go. Yes. Okay. Hold hold on. Larry's  

[00:19:42] Unknown:

yes, Larry.  

[00:19:44] Unknown:

Yeah. While he's looking that up, I just wanna go back to what you said,   earlier.   The Supreme Court was opposing Jefferson,   and No. He said let them force Jackson.   Jackson. Or Jackson. I'm sorry. Jackson. And and he said, well, let them enforce it. And,   this this latest news story goes right along with that because this is something that Brent talked about last Friday.   He said the only jurisdiction that federal judges have because federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.   Yep. Whereas state courts are unlimited jurisdiction. He talked about that a few Fridays ago.   So this past Friday, he said that the only   the only thing that the federal court can hear   is the case that's before them. They only have jurisdiction over the parties before them. They can't go issuing these   national injunctions and orders. Do you remember Brent saying that?  



[00:20:41] Unknown:

Yeah. Oh, well, why should a district judge somewhere,   in DC affect the whole damn country?  

[00:20:48] Unknown:

Exactly. Well, the,   the house just this is, April 9.   This is a new story. Republican led house passes bill to limit   nationwide orders from federal district judges.   The house passed legislation Wednesday mostly along party lines that limits the authority of federal district judges   to issue nationwide orders   as republicans   react to several court rulings against the Trump administration.   The pace of nationwide injunctions has certainly increased during Donald Trump's presidency. That's ridiculous. Republicans are arguing   that the increase is the result of activist liberal judges.  

Democrats counter that the courts are simply striking down illegal executive orders and actions from the Trump administration. No. They also note that some of the judges issuing the injunctions   were nominated by Republican presidents. And then lastly, it says the bill passed   by a vote of two nineteen to two thirteen.   It limits the scope of injunctive relief ordered by a district judge to those parties. This is just exactly what Brent said to those parties before the court rather than applying the relief nationally.   But the bill is unlikely to advance through the senate where at least some Democrat   Democratic   support would be needed.  



[00:22:08] Unknown:

Okay.   Let's get back to thank you.   It's gonna be it's gonna continue in the future. They're, you know, they're it's a big problem. Anyway, let's go back to where we were if we could. Paul, would you please read the thirteenth amendment there for me and us? Neither slavery  

[00:22:24] Unknown:

nor involuntary   servitude,   except as a punishment for crime,   whereof,   the party shall have been duly   convicted,   shall exist within The United States or any place   subject to their jurisdiction.  

[00:22:42] Unknown:

Okay. Interesting. There's a lot of legal landmines in there. Well, there is. And first of all, let's go to the slavery thing. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude   shall exist except for person for any place in The United States. Notice it doesn't say United States Of America   and their jurisdiction.   Right?  

[00:23:02] Unknown:

Mhmm.  

[00:23:03] Unknown:

Well, what's their jurisdiction? For its arsenals and needful buildings?   The District Of Columbia?  

[00:23:11] Unknown:

No. Post post,   reconstruction,   it's not only The United States, DC, it's the whole damn country under the state of moniker.  

[00:23:21] Unknown:

Alright. So they put that in there.   And,   it it it but then it says we're anywhere subject to their   jurisdiction. So there's the plural   and there's the singular.   And I've never noticed this before. I'm just kind of exploring it right now. I've never looked at that middle part.   Always kind of gloss over it,   but it says subject to The United States or their jurisdiction.   Or it doesn't say it's it's subject to The United States.   What it what is the the modifier for jurisdiction there?   Their jurisdiction.   Okay. So it is the states. Alright. We'll notice   that for one thing, the fourteenth amendment wasn't passed for if it was passed, there's a lot of dissension on that still,   because they wouldn't let the Southern states back into the Congress to pass it. And two of the states which had ratified it,   state back then, but Oregon was one of them   and the other was New Jersey. So Oregon and New Jersey had both ratified it and then they came back and unratified it and the Congress wouldn't accept it. And they wouldn't let the states that hadn't ratified it in to vote. So that's why there's a lot of contention on the fourteenth amendment still.  

So if it was freeing the   the slaves in The States,   Well, they   what happened for six months?   They they didn't have any status. They didn't have a citizenship yet because the fourteenth amendment wasn't passed. And I guess were they just in limbo? And I've never seen anybody comment on this before or explore it. What happened to those people   legally   with with status, etcetera, in those six months?   Well, evidently, nothing.   Okay. So what what were they? They were freed slaves. They weren't a citizen.   There was no citizenship for them. They weren't going to give them the same citizenship as the white   state citizens.  

And so this is one of those little voids of history. I honestly do not know what went on in this period of time. And the more you think about it, the more perplexed you're gonna get about it, I think. At least I have.   So we'll go over what we do know. K? So it says neither slavery nor involuntary   servitude   shall exist unless a person been duly convicted of a crime. But what did they leave out?   There, they left out voluntary   servitude.   So   was the thirteenth amendment written to free the slaves where they didn't have a status yet for six months, or was it written   to make voluntary servitude legal by omission?  

And,   again, I don't know the answer to that.   I think there's nefarious things going on behind the scenes here throughout this whole time period. And I believe that, as I said earlier, I believe the civil war was started   to get these two amendments into the constitution so they could overcome this. We can't get a bank in, and we can use it to not only eighty years flip The US,   but also then use the collateral of this of the new surfs   as the collateral for the new world reserve currency,   which will come into effect after World War two with Bretton Woods.   So I think they have these things all kind of pictured way ahead of time myself. That's the conclusion I've come to. You don't have to believe that if you don't want to.  

Right. But,   yes.   Paul?  

[00:26:58] Unknown:

I think   that not only did the thirteenth amendment,   legalized   slavery   or voluntary   servitude   by omission,   but it also   set up   the,   being duly convicted   of crime because they knew the fourteenth amendment was going to make every citizen enemies of the state and engaged in interstate commerce   and in rebellion to their local state.  

[00:27:29] Unknown:

Oh, well, I can't say that they knew that eighty years before as they were setting this up. This may have been something that came together afterwards in that eighty years or sixty years till they passed Federal Reserve Act. I don't know that for sure. K?   But I do know that legal by omission and it was also there. I mean, it's pretty standard   legal understanding   for the people that are well educated is everything's gotta be voluntary. And the the earlier in the constitution, it said you can't impair the ability to contract.   But but going into bond servant is a contract.  

So there, it's legal by omission too, but you've gotta understand all of that stuff because it's not stated.   And then here again, it's hidden,   but it's legal by omission and hidden.   It's never mentioned   that it's lawful.   It's just implied   and legal by omission.   Okay?   So these guys are very, very slick.   It's, the deeper I get into this, the more impressed I am with this stuff we're covering here and how they had set this up so many years in advance.   The other interesting thing there   in the thirteenth amendment that Paul read to us is the their jurisdiction at the last because it's plainly for the states.   And there was no   federal citizenship   or federal   status or any of that   for another six months.  

So isn't that interesting if any of you wanna go out and   do some,   research? That's a real good time. What happened   with the six months between the passage of the thirteenth and the   somewhat   dubious passage,   ratification of the fourteenth?   So, anyway, there's your two holes right there. You've got voluntary   servitude   legal by omission,   and later down there, they've got   their jurisdiction cleanly for the states.   Now   if you go to the fourteenth amendment,   we always just use the first sentence. That's all you need to use. And   I don't know. We've gone into this,   deeply for some of the newer folks, but,   this is a   this is crafty stuff right here. K?  

Because there it is at the end of the thirteenth amendment with their jurisdiction, plural for the states.   And then the first sentence of the fourteenth amendment says subject to the   jurisdiction thereof.   Singular.   So you got plural at the end and singular   at the start of the next one. Okay?   So plainly,   that's their two governments right there.   Okay?   They control them, the states, after the civil war, after this, horrible   conflagration   we had were   brother killed, brother. 600,000   or so people killed in that   just so you could get these damn things through so the bankers could control.   There's a there's a sentence. There was a,   a single Rothschild   that came over before the civil war, and I don't remember the dates.  

He was from the French side of the family,   and he died young. He never married, never had children, but he came over to tour the,   North America. And his letters are in the national archives.   K? And,   in one of his letters, he's writing back to the family   or whoever in France,   and he's talking about something. And then just out of nowhere,   this sentence is in that letter. It said, Judah p Benjamin   must have the most brilliant mind on the continent.   Totally out of context what else he was talking about. Okay? Well, when I heard that the first time, it just really perked my ears. And I thought, is Judah p Benjamin the one that came up with this plan?   And and I don't know, but it's very interesting to look back and see that comment in the letter of the Rothschilds.  

Judah p Benjamin, who some of you may not know of,   was a, a Jew in Louisiana. He owned a plantation.   He was,   married. He married one of his former slaves.   And,   the, generals   of,   of the Confederacy   called him   Jefferson Davis's   pet Jew.   And,   there very well may be some, at least, circumstantial   evidence that said that this plane was,   was, the brainchild   of Judah p Benjamin. It had been floated around before.   We've talked about how you can go to BitChute   and put in parentheses fifteen seventy seven,   parentheses,   and then,   voluntary servitude in parenthesis. And we found a book on there, an audiobook,   believe it or not, written in 1577   about this very thing.  

So this was not a new idea. It had floated around for   a couple hundred years. K?   Don't know how the influence was about that. Don't know if Benjamin was the one that put it together for the final plan, but the Rothschild,   guy put that statement in one of his letters. I think that's   indicative of   something.   Okay?   So, anyway, Judah p Benjamin.   By the way, he,   his statue still stands in New Orleans where down there, I believe it was,   Andrew Jackson. Was it Andrew Jackson or Robert e Lee that was in the square right there by   if any of you have been to New Orleans, it's right down there by the river and by a very famous   spot in New Orleans called the Cafe du Monde,   where you go and after your night in the quarter, you go and get beignets,   French beignets, and coffee with chicory. It's   quite a customary experience if you're in New Orleans. It's right down there that,   square right across the street from Cafe du Monde.  

And in the middle of the night,   who is the   Landro, I think, was the mayor in New Orleans came and got that   that Robert e Lee, I believe, the statue,   taken down, lifted out, and gone.   Yet two, three blocks away, the statue of Judah p Benjamin   still stands.   Is that somebody trying to get into something that square.   Park   it's Jackson Square. Okay.   So it was Andrew Jackson.   Anyway, that's what they took out in the middle of the night. But the point being, not that statue, but they left the   Judah p Benjamin statue still standing, and it still stands today,   unfortunately.  

Judah p Benjamin went on.   He's the one, you know, the South could have won that first battle and probably   almost won the war. They I think it was a battle of Manassas,   and the union army had not been gathered too well yet. And they literally could've walked right into Washington DC. It was totally undefended.   And Judah p Benjamin got with,   with Dumahichi and got him to call back,   call back the troops from that battle.   And that's why   the generals hated him. Okay?   The generals of the South hated Judah p Benjamin because of that.   Now later on at the awards, the end of the war,   Judah p Benjamin was going to Richmond with,   oh, I keep forgetting his name, the guy that was the president of the of the South.  

And, they were going up to Richmond.   And in Georgia, down somewhere close to Savannah,   Judah p Benjamin said, listen. I'm gonna go do this over here. I gotta do this. I'll meet you in Richmond.   And,   oh, boy. Somebody give me the proof of this. Davis.   Thank you, Joe. Jeff Davis   said   who who was a West Point graduate, by the way, said, okay. Judah p Benjamin went to Savannah.   There was a ship waiting for him. By the way, he grabbed all the South's gold and took it with him. He, went down there, hopped a a quick little whatever ship down to the Caribbean. There was a high speed, British,   ship waiting for him somewhere in the Caribbean. And,   him and the gold went to England, and he presented it to the queen. And he ended up as her head judge   all the way to his death. He was appointed to the judiciary,   and he was the counsel to the queen or something till her death. This is a guy named Judah p Benjamin who many of you probably never heard of before.  

Very instrumental in these times.   So, anyway,   the thirteenth and the fourteenth amendment tied together right there from the plural   their jurisdictions   at the end of the thirteenth   to the subject to the jurisdiction thereof   at the first of the fourteenth amendment.   Now I'm gonna read this, I'm not reading. I quote this one from memory.   Neither   all persons born or naturalized   in The United States,   comma,   and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,   comma,   are citizens of The United States and the state wherein they   reside.  

So you got a two pronged legal test there and then a statement as to a conclusion.   You know, if you study law at all, you'll see that   different things   are,   approached with these, what they call tests, legal tests.   They'll say,   this is this   if it meets these four tests or these four requirements or these five requirements or whatever.   Well,   in this one,   you've got a two pronged test here.   All persons born or naturalized in The United States. That's the first test.   And   subject to the jurisdiction thereof, that's the second test. And if you pass both tests,   then you are a citizen of The United States and a state citizen   only if you reside.  

K?   So I'm gonna tell the newer folks because I know we've got some of you on here.   There are eight   legal   landmines in that sentence.   You'd never know that looking at it, and unless you know some of this old law stuff that they don't teach in law schools for the most part anymore,   you would totally misunderstand what you're reading because we're talking   technical definitions,   not colloquial   definitions.   So let's go through those. Okay?   All a l l persons.   Well, is that a person for us? I saw a,   graph Grassley was in a, town hall meeting, and is   they loading up the town hall meetings and harassing the Republicans now. And some guy, well, this is against the constitution. It says right here, all persons are protected. Blah blah blah blah. Well, he doesn't understand that they're not using the same definition as persons that he is.  

They're talking about legal persons,   not persons persons.   In the law,   whenever you're talking about human persons,   they'll use the word   individual.   And the reason,   well, let's just say for right now, that's off on another rabbit trail.   Whenever they're talking about human persons, they use the word individual. There's a reason for that. You can see it in application   at 26   CFR   1.1   dash one a. An income tax is owed by all individuals   who are citizens of The United States or residents.   And they use that word individuals there because it specifically means human persons. And this is schedule one of your income tax, not whatever the schedule is for corporations.   If they would have wanted to do corporations or partnerships or leave it wide open, they would have put the word person in there. K? Because the person,   it it it can be a number of different things, but an individual can only be a human. So that's why it's in there. And,   we'll explain in a later lesson on the formula why that's like that. So,   the short answer is   because the rights and the duties are contained within the same entity. As a human being and a body, we've got both rights and duties. The other person's quote, unquote, like corporations   and partnerships,   trusts, etcetera,   they don't have that attribute, at least corporations.  

With corporations, the right are vested in the corporation.   But the duty,   you you can throw you can find a corporation, but you can't throw it in jail. So if it's an egregious enough situation,   you can do what they call piercing the corporate veil, which means that you can pierce this corporation   veil because of the heinousness of whatever the offense was, and you go to the people who are responsible, and that's the board of directors.   So that's the difference. The board of directors has the duties. The corporation has the rights of a person.   Okay? So it's all these little technical legal things in there that that make a difference, but that word is extremely important.  

Go to Black's Law Dictionary, one of the newer ones, and look in there. It's gonna say, this term has,   has meanings because of its inclusion in the fourteenth amendment, something to that effect,   all persons.   So it's talking about legal persons here, not persons persons.   K? So now you're talking about what's a person. I guess I'm gonna have to get into this anyway, aren't I?   A person is an entity   an entity   to whom the law ascribes   rights and duties.   That's the legal definition   of this word person,   not you and me and and everybody down on our street. Not all those persons.   We're all individuals.  

It's these persons here,   an entity to whom the law ascribes rights and duties. So when they use that word person in the fourteenth amendment,   that's what they're talking about.   All fourteenth amendment persons that are under this jurisdiction   that get their rights, small r capital,   small r rights, civil rights from the fourteenth amendment,   and owe their duties, therefore, to the federal government,   like paying your income tax and avoiding   adhering to regulations,   etcetera, put out by unelected bureaucrats.   So there's a whole lot that revolves around that word person right there.  

K? All persons   born.   Okay. Well, what's this? It's born. That's the second one. What's born? Well, this is where they set up bringing in the feudal system   because they know what they're gonna do is assign you a political status, a new federal status according to where you're born, not who your parents were. K? So all persons born   or naturalized.   So born is two, person's one, born is two, naturalized   is three. Because before the fourteenth amendment, they used to naturalize citizens in the states.   Now everything after that goes through the federal government.   So all persons born or naturalized   in The United States will notice it doesn't say The United States Of America.  

It didn't say United States Of America in the thirteenth amendment that Paul read us either. It just said United States.   K? So there's another gotcha. If you go back to Black's Law Dictionary again,   I believe it's the after the sixth,   editions when they changed this.   The sixth is a good edition for you to acquire if you can find one.   If there are any such things left as used bookstores,   you can probably go into those and find they've got a legal section. They've got them usually sectioned out. And, you might can find one of those for $15.20   bucks, really.  

But the the green sixth edition's a good one. And and and one of the reasons is because they started changing stuff in the next one. And one of the things they changed is this United States. So if you go to the sixth edition of blacks and you look at United States,   you'll say it'll say, well, this term has several meanings.   Oh, really?   Yeah. And then it lists a, site from a Supreme Court case given you all of them.   K?   So it could be a nation like in the United Nations. It can be a this. It could be a that. So   in The United States, well, which one?  

Comma.   So there's four of the nine and the right there in the first phrase.   And then there's a comma, and this is and.   Well, there's another one right there. That's a conjunctive word. It means and. So if subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Well, if there's some that are are and subject,   don't there have to be some that are and not subject?   Notice it doesn't say are. It doesn't say all persons born or naturalized in The United States are subject to the jurisdiction thereof.   It says and.   So you've got to do something   to trigger the jurisdiction.  

So let's go into those words. Hands, another one. That's five.   Subject,   another one, six.   To the jurisdiction,   another one, seven.   And then the other one are citizens of The United States and in the state wherein they reside resident. There's nine legal landmines in that sentence. And if you didn't know some of this stuff, because like I said, they just don't teach it very much in law school again anymore. Occasionally, maybe, but not often, certainly not in a regular curriculum.   Those law students that's why if you go to your attorney and you hear people on here go, well, I tried to go to this attorney. Explain this to me. He couldn't understand it. Well, that's because they've never been exposed to what I'm telling exposing you to right here.   Yeah. Go ask an attorney, William. We've had our, our our buddy William from Augusta who's flying this magistrate judge around, and he's asking him. He says, can you give me the legal definition of the word person? And a sitting magistrate judge in the state of Georgia couldn't do it.  

And I guarantee if you go ask judges you know or lawyers you know,   the great majority of them, if if any, are not gonna know it any either   because they're not exposed to it in law school anymore.   Oh, okay. Bruce, what do you got? Go ahead.  

[00:46:11] Unknown:

Robert Clarkston's deal   with the University of South Carolina Law School.   Yes. He sued he sued   the,   college for not teaching him law,   and he won his case in the Supreme Court of South Carolina.  

[00:46:25] Unknown:

Yes. That's true. Y'all, I'm trying to get through this. So if we could we're gonna hold it, and then you got comments and stuff. We'll have an open forum when I get finished this. Otherwise, you throw me off track. Okay?   So if we could adhere to that for just a little while longer. Okay?   So you've got and.   It doesn't say r,   and that's one of the responses when we get a bluff letter back from either the sec missus Robinson, cuckoo, cuckoo, or, the passport office or whatever. And you just write back and say, well, yeah. They quote the fourteenth amendment in the letter they're sending you there, but it doesn't say are subject to the jurisdiction thereof. It says and.   And if you got and, there's gotta be some that are and not. That one point right there is sufficient to squash one of their bluff letters.  

Okay? So very important. I'd never seen it before. I'm sitting here on the show one day years ago and, bam, it hit me like out of left field. Well, it doesn't say r.   It it's not,   I don't but the English word is not commanding that that's what it is. It says and.   That's the second part of the legal test. That is the two questions.   If you hadn't put it together yet, there's the two questions   that they knew they were gonna ask you   eighty plus years ahead of time, and our enemies   knew how you were gonna answer it. That's how well they know us.   We don't know them worth a crap. We're learning.  

But, boy, they know us like the back of their hands. K? And this is evidence of it again.   And   subject. Well, a queen and king have subjects, don't they? Well, yes. That same subject? You bet it is. Okay.   And to the jurisdiction, there's another legal word, very important. What gives that man over there, an unelected bureaucrat in a federal agency,   the power to reinterpret   legislation   passed by congress into something totally foreign from what was passed by Congress and come and not only attach it but enforce it on me? What gives him that power? That's jurisdiction.   K? Now if you meet all of those so there's a couple more on the, on the nine legal landmines.  

And then if you meet that and you answer those questions yes and sign something, well, then it says if you meet these two prongs of this test, you're a citizen of The United States, that's a federal citizen,   and a state wherein   you reside.   You're a state citizen   if and only if you reside.   So there it is. So they take and left open in the thirteenth amendment voluntary servitude,   and then the fourteenth amendment triggered the Jim Crow laws.   So now we had black restrooms and white restrooms and black drinking fountains and white drinking fountains.   And if you go back and read the old cases all the way from the slaughterhouse case in 1871,   all the way up to the cases that dealt with this,   and, they're gonna pretty much paint paint the brush   that this was all for former black slaves.  

Well, when when you really understand it, it couldn't have been just for former black slaves.   The problem was   DC and the territories   had never had a political structure over them before.   All they did was have people that would take care of the combined needs of the states. We mentioned it a little bit earlier this week, I think, maybe yesterday.   Every state couldn't have an ambassador to France, Ambassador to England, Ambassador to Spain.   So they would combine all those activities and do it collectively,   but there was no organized political force there in DC yet. There was no citizenship.  

There was no political status.   Best I can tell,   these people were stateless.   They didn't have a state over them. They were working for states, and they were working for a nation   who where our word national comes from. All those states that were independent   and collective formed a nation. I this is where they got the word national. Okay?   And so,   that's that's what was going on, but I'm sure there were other people there, people that for whatever reason had been in DC probably maybe for multiple generations.   And,   they they weren't all black slaves, folks. So there were some people that weren't black   and that   were,   affected by this, but you never hear anybody talk about it. It was   predominantly   90   whatever percent   for the blacks lives. Okay?  

And so they passed this fourteenth amendment,   and then we've got this situation here.   And,   but they were still obviously state citizens.   There were state citizens according to, well, the slaughterhouse cases.   And I know Lauren Orrin was with us here a couple weeks ago, and one of her Lauren's a a very knowledgeable, has done a really good job on all this. And one of the things that she told the audience the first day was go read a book on the slaughterhouse cases   and and   and find out what happened here. It's a very important case. Okay?   And and it came back, and I guess I should go into it a little bit if I'm gonna open the can of worms on that and explain the background to you. It's because some of you may not know this.  

And there's a section in there,   which if I had could do better reading, I'd read for you. But there's a section in there that starts out with,   with Dred Scott.   And and it says according to Dred Scott well, the Dred Scott decision is still controversial today.   For a slave got away from a slave state, got up to Illinois, I believe, a non slave state, and wanted to be free. And they came back in the supreme court. It was,   the,   supreme court was headed for twenty years by a guy who never even went to law school. Roger Taney was his name. I believe Bruce, he was from South Carolina.   And, this was Taney's decision, the Dred Scott decision.  

So he was probably influenced by the fact he was from South Carolina   and influenced by that culture down there. But regardless, he,   he came back and ruled on Dred Scott, and and and it was   that. They they said a   a black man could not become a citizen   by anything short of an amendment to the constitution.   K? And then there was some more language right there in that part of the slaughterhouse cases, and it said this was a an area of much discussion   in the in in political circles, in law journals, and in the newspapers   on whether a man of African descent or someone,   born in The United States could be a citizen by anything short of the instant a passage of a new amendment to the constitution. So these are the things that set up the fourteenth amendment where they could drive this 18 wheeler through this loophole.  

K?   So   that that's what they've got is this little situation   where   everything works together. They've got written on the thirteenth amendment to the state citizens.   Well, it says it   for slavery,   but it opens it for state citizens and voluntary servitude   because that's not stated. It's legal by omission.   So that works with their jurisdiction   right into the juror subject to the jurisdiction thereof   that that qualifying   second test of the fourteenth amendment.   And,   that's how they connect the two. See? And so now they knew down the line   that they were going to   bankrupt the country.  

They're very skilled at this. They'd already taken over a number of countries around the world this way.   And so they went in and bankrupted the country. They had to get the thirteenth amendment passed first, the third 1913,   the sixteenth amendment, and all the other setup things that led up to it. But when they bankrupted the country, and you can go read this   right in, I believe it's on the website somewhere,   it it leads right into that statement from Colonel House that was found in Woodrow Wilson's personal effects after he died. And he just lays the scam out right there.   And and he starts it out by saying,   we will make them sureties. I'm just paraphrasing here. We'll make them sureties   by invoking the ancient pledge.  

And then he goes on to describe what they're gonna do in a little more detail. And at the   bottom, he says, well,   if one or two people figure it out, we've got plausible deniability.   Well,   when 20 or 30 plus million people figured out mister House   and have it pointed out to them and react, you ain't got no plausible deniability.   You're guilty as hell. Okay? And our enemies know this, why they won't touch me with a 10 foot pole. You'll never see my name on any of their hate lists. I beg them. I beg them to do it. They won't do it. I call them ugly names on here and beg them, and they still won't do it because this information scares the hell out of them. It literally strips them of their power, and it exposes them for who and what they are while simultaneously   freeing us at the same time. Okay?  

So that little phrase, that catchphrase,   and subject   to the jurisdiction   thereof.   The best I can find has only been dealt with one time. Now that may be changing right now   because we got all these birthright citizenship cases in front of the civil war, civil court, or supreme court, and all that stuff. These these issues hadn't been addressed by them   for decades,   if not longer. Okay? So this may change. But up to this point, in the 1878   case called Elk v Wilkins,   which is a story about an Indian.   Elk was an Indian.   It was out in   Nebraska,   somewhere in the Midwest.  

And,   Elk, after the passage of the fourteenth amendment, wanted to vote in the next election   or subsequent one. And so he went into town and tried to register. Wilkins was the registrar.   He said, I can't register you vote. You're you're an Indian, and shoot him away.   Well, then, the election day came, and Elk came back to the polls.   Well,   Wilkins was, on the polls   as the as the registrar there.   And so he said, no. I'm not gonna let you vote. I won't register you.   And so Elk took him to court and went all the way to the Supreme Court, and that's the only case   where this phrase and subject to the jurisdiction thereof has been adjudicated   by the court.  

And it's been repeated. That finding's been repeated over, I believe, in Wonkim Arc and some other ones,   but it's the only time it's been visited. So if it is visited again by the current bunch up there, it'll be real interesting to see what they come up with. The statement in Elk versus Wilkins was   subject to the political   jurisdiction   thereof.   So they just added an adjective, political.   K?   So the if you're a citizen of The United States   and you're subject to the jurisdiction, you're subject   to the political jurisdiction   of the federal government   no matter where you may be. You may remember that for many years, the US was the only country in the world   that taxed its citizens on their worldwide income. There's a couple of others that have joined up in there now, Uruguay being one of them. But still, that shows you the long reach of the feudal lord.  

And the reason they can do that is because they have a property right in you. And the reason all that has happened is because you answered the two questions yes and signed something.   I   I don't know if you would answer them know what woulda happened. I've often thought about that Back when I was doing that, and I remember those being addressed with those questions,   I was almost scared to say no. That they'd like come and want to port you or something. K? But, anyway, that's the whole sequence. They they've got these two in there. They've got subject to the political jurisdiction thereof. They've got, they're gonna take care of the first clause for you when they bankrupt the country. They bankrupted the country. They brought in this new federal status.   And so   from then on, everybody that's been born of parents   that were in that situation have been born into a condition   of   servitude. Now we're gonna   take that and put it on pause and let Paul say goodbye   to the folks that only join us in the first hour. So if you would, Paul, please.  



[00:59:22] Unknown:

And do. Thank you, Roger.   Radiosoapbox.com,   thank you, Paul e, our buddy across the pond, and thank you one zero six point nine WVOU   FM Chicago, part of the Pulse   network of broadcast services.   We really, really want you to follow us into the second hour. Go to the matrixstocks.com.   Click on either the eurofolkradio.com   link, the globalvoiceradio.com   link, or the globalvoiceradio.net   link,   or just the FCC links. Join us live on the show. You don't wanna miss what's coming next.  

[00:59:57] Unknown:

I guess. Let's hope so.   So as we dig deeper in into this,   and we see the way this was set up and executed,   got a big question on that six months. What was this? What was the situation   on the former slaves that were no longer slaves according to the thirteenth amendment? But what were they?   What were they for six months? They they had no status. They got no they they they they didn't give them the same rights that the white guy had. They didn't come in and naturalize them in The States.   And and so what what rights and duties did they have for six months? And I don't know the answer to the question. K?   But I think it's a very provocative question   as you start to dig into this stuff,   and you ask some of these questions when you understand it well enough, and you can ask some of these questions.  

Like, what about the other people that were in DC and the territories that weren't former black slaves?   Were were they citizens of The United States? Well, if so, and you bring in the Jim Crow laws,   then then they would be over with Whitey and Jim Crow, wouldn't they? But they weren't Whitey. They were citizens of The United States. They were new federal citizens.   So my point here is that all these years, we've looked and the Jim Crow laws have been totally described as a black versus white deal because of the difference in the separation of the ethnicities,   but it wasn't.  

It was a political question,   and that may be in Plessy versus Ferguson.   Okay? They may have covered that in Plessy versus Ferguson. I've never read it. I just know about the case, and I know what happened. I don't know the details if it was in the decision,   but he these the white people were the old state citizens. They had constitutional   protections.   They had god given capital r rights, and they gave god their capital d duties. Well, after the fourteenth amendment, now we got the civil rights.   So you're getting your civil rights from the federal government. That's why they're small r, not capital r. They're just the rights among they give you among the other people in the society.   Now this is interesting if you're new   that under the great heading of rights,   there's two subheadings.  

One is civil rights and the other is political rights. And you see, you don't get political rights with the fourteenth amendment. You only get civil rights.   That's why they call voting a franchise.   They have to give you permission to do it because the fourteenth amendment doesn't.   By the way, I hate these things.   So,   anyway, that's   another interesting   aside   right there.   But the whole thing was set up and nurtured along many, many years evidently   so that they could get you into this condition,   turn the world in an upside down condition with all these opposite definitions   where you,   can be easily confused,   and then stick everybody into this condition of servitude.  

And underneath that lies the feudal system. Well, in the feudal system, if mom and dad were serfs   and they had a child, the child came out as a serf   because the lord of the manor had a property right in them, so they didn't have a property right in their child. The child was born as a subject to the lord of the manor. K? And I guess if the had a good lord of the manor, that's probably a pretty good situation for you. It's very akin   to,   in our culture,   sharecroppers in the South, 40 acres and a mule, very much akin to that.   And, if there was a good lord of the manor, you may stay on there for   four, five, six, eight, 10 generations.  

Okay?   And and but when you got ready to leave,   because it was voluntary servitude that you're like,   Colonel House said, by invoking the ancient pledge   What's the ancient pledge?   That's the oath of fealty,   o a t h of f e a l t y. You can go look it up. It's how you volunteered into the feudal system as a voluntary serve.   And what they would do,   you can see a an example of this in Monty Python's Holy Grail.   You can go read about it online. There's   nothing I'm pulling out of left field here. It's an established history.   The the feudal system had a thousand years of legal precedent, folks.  

A thousand years. Okay?   So this didn't chop chicken liver. That's four times longer than our country's been around. Alright?   And so,   what they would do is you'd go in and cut your deal with the lord of the manor. You'd go in and they went through a ceremony, which was a contract,   and the lord of the manor would stand over the incoming serf.   The incoming serf would kneel on both knees.   Very important.   Both knees. You only kneel on both knees to god.   K? And so you're acknowledging   the property rights from the lord of the manor and that he's your new god because he owns you. K? And so you put your hands above your head   as if you're praying.  

The lord of the manor standing over you puts his hands on your hands,   and you say an oath   where you pledge your body   as property   and all of your worldly goods,   because property can't own property,   to the lord of the manor.   Now that ceremony   was witnessed   contract   again.   It was witnessed by all the other serfs on the manor.   So you have an oral contract that's recognized   and witnessed by all the other serfs, and you volunteer yourself into a condition of servitude.   And so that's why you can't own anything. It's because you're his property.   So   anything you own, you can't own because somebody has a property right in you. So anything you did own previously   to that becomes his.  

Okay?   And that's what's going on right now, and that's why you have a certificate of title for your car. That's why you feel you might have your house paid off, but if you don't pay it,   they can still come and and sell it on the courthouse steps if you don't pay the property tax. But you don't own those things. You have an illusion of ownership.   So that's what all is going on here. It's they've got you and then down the line after they got rid of Plessy versus Ferguson,   which was, for those of you who may not know, these cases were thrown around, not too many of them. I I but these are important. Plessy versus Ferguson.   That was a case that went to the Supreme Court with a guy that was nine tenths   white and one tenth black.  

Nine tenths white and one tenth black. They found him. They took up this newspaper in New Orleans, took up a contribution.   They wanted to test the Jim Crow laws. They raised about $3.   They went out and found Plessy. I say found him because he was nine tenths white, one tenth black. This is where the irony of what we've talked about before was there had to be white people than other ethnicities that were affected by this. But here down the line in 1894,   we get Plessy v Ferguson.   They take Plessy. They find him. They dress him up in his Sunday best. They take him to the train station of an intrastate   railroad in Louisiana,   not interstate. Didn't go to Mississippi.  

Didn't go to Arkansas, didn't go to Texas.   Just right there in Louisiana.   And so Louisiana had total jurisdiction.   They go and get Plessy, and they run him onto the train and put him in the white only railroad car. And then they had detectives they'd hired   to arrest him. So and they had other newspapers, including theirs there at the station so they could document it. Well, they did all that and and they,   got to the first,   court level there in Louisiana.   And,   the judge ruled against them on this issue,   and so they enjoined him in the case, and his name was Ferguson.   So here's Plessy v Ferguson. Here are the complainants, and that's the backup to it. Now it went all the way to the Supreme Court,   and they came back with the thumbnail of separate but equal.  

And, see, this is where I kind of finally drew the conclusion that this was political status. Will you tell me how somebody with god given rights and constitutional protections   can be equal to somebody who's   under the scope and purview of the fourteenth amendment and subject to the jurisdiction thereof   and gets their rights,   small r, from the federal government and owes them their duties. Well, how in the world can those two things be equal?   See, I don't see any way except that they both had a political status.   One had the old  

[01:08:59] Unknown:

That's right. But one had federal  

[01:09:01] Unknown:

political status.  

[01:09:03] Unknown:

Well, no. The other was state.   Yep. They were state political. Whitey was generally   state citizens.   So they had god given rights to god given duties and constitutional protections. The new, mainly black citizens of The United States, federal citizens,   didn't have that. They only had civil rights. They had no political rights, and they only had,   protections and duties that they owe to the federal government. So the question is not a color question.   It's a political status question.   How can those two things be equal?   Well, I under some kind of tortured legal reasoning, maybe.  

But equality for sure and the fact that they both had a political status. We're heretofore.   Only the whitey had the political status because there wasn't one for DC.   We didn't have a fourteenth amendment yet.   So here these are just some of the interesting questions as you get into this information and get an understanding of it to where you can look at it objectively   and go, well, hold it. There's some just doesn't ring true here. K? And I don't know the answer to some of these questions. I've never seen it discussed   before.  

So, anyway, what they did eventually, of course, is set up the situation where they bankrupted the country in the bond market.   It wasn't the stock market crash at '29. It was a bond market crash.   And they took, of course, completely   controlled because they control the Federal Reserve. Well, the Federal Reserve now had control over all the bonds.   So, obviously, they got in there, monkeyed with the bonds,   and and and bankrupted the country, and that was their excuse to come in and change the system.   You can go to one one of the best places, I guess, is Black's Law Dictionary again,   and go look under the bank holiday of 1933.  

And it tells you pretty succinctly, well, the bank's closed for five days and gives you some other information. And then at the end, it says they reopened under   regulations issued by the secretary of the treasury.   Well, the problem with that is there weren't regulations   before that because we were free people.   We didn't have administrative   agencies.   So what I'm showing you here   is the absolute inception of the administrative state. They didn't have any of,   administrative procedures act. That went for another fourteen years or something. They didn't have any other regulations floating out there, but they were issued by the secretary of the treasury. Well, they don't tell you that before that, there never there wasn't a secretary of the treasury. There was a treasurer of The United States Of America, but there wasn't a secretary of the Treasury.   And so there's an indication on the change of the systems right there that we got regulations. Well, we never had them before, and they're issued by this person in charge that we never had one of those before either.  

So these are indications of the bankruptcy.   K?   And, if you wanna   yes, Paul?  

[01:12:17] Unknown:

May   may I,   read a paragraph from the Justice Field,   dissenting opinion on the slaughterhouse cases.   It's about the only place that I specifically was able to find the rights of the white   citizens.  

[01:12:34] Unknown:

Mhmm.  

[01:12:36] Unknown:

Okay.   This from justice Field. It is not necessary in my judgment   for the disposition of the present case in favor of the plaintiffs in error   to accept as entirely   correct this conclusion of counsel.   It, however, finds support in the act of congress known as the Civil Rights Act, which was framed and adopted upon   a construction of the thirteenth amendment,   giving to its language a similar breadth.   That amendment was ratified on the 12/18/1865,   and in April of the following year, the Civil Rights Act was passed.   Its first section declares that all persons born in The United States and not subject to   any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are citizens of The United States, and that such citizens   of every race and color,   without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary   servitude   except as punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,   shall have the same right in every state and territory in The United States   to make and enforce contracts,   to sue,   be parties,   and to give evidence,   to inherit purchase. Yes.  



[01:13:59] Unknown:

Yes. All the new federal citizens is covering right here.   There That that what they can do, the rights it gave them, contract, etcetera.  

[01:14:10] Unknown:

To sue,   be parties,   and give evidence. To inherit,   purchase,   lease,   sell,   hold, and convey   real and personal property,   and to the full and equal benefit of all laws   and proceedings   for the security of person   and property   as enjoyed by white   citizens.   Right. This legislation   was supported upon the theory that citizens of The United States,   as such, were entitled to the rights and privileges   enumerated   and that to deny to any such citizen equality in these rights   and privileges with others was to the extent   of the denial subjecting him to an involuntary   servitude.  

So it's just those rights enumerated,   not rights in general.  

[01:15:08] Unknown:

Well, yeah. Okay. They're not capital r rights or small r rights. K?   So, anyway, that's the situation, and we had that going along. And,   I used to have a great,   audio   presentation   by,   a guy that was the one of the founders of League of the South. His name escapes me at the moment.   And, we I've lost that. I'm sorry to say. It was a lot he was there's some very interesting information   on how even the the federal government was trying to do things even that the new federal citizens didn't like and were against in the states.   So there's a lot of contention in this area. We're we're not looking at it from that time   frame specifically, just to give you a little background of all of the things that we know of, at least, that have gone along in the background that   apply to us today as we   go back and explain these situations to people and how we develop to get where we are.  

But, they got it situated to a point where then they had the bankruptcy.   K? Now they go over and put everybody   in whole   even though there are no notification, and here's part of it. There are no notice. See? There's another part of the fraud. Well, we got this thing sitting over here, this federal citizenship, where we get, unbeknownst to them, a property right in these folks. And since we got a bankruptcy and somebody owes us a bunch of funds, we're just gonna stick them in the sureties for the debt. Well, they didn't inform them to my knowledge.  

[01:16:37] Unknown:

K.  

[01:16:39] Unknown:

And so they didn't weren't read up they weren't finished with Plessy yet.   Plessy doesn't get overturned. This separate but equal doctrine doesn't get overturned   until 1954   with Brown versus Board of Education.   And we went from separate but equal to equal in the classroom, equal in the society,   and they merged and overcame   Plessy.   And you'll hear people, if you ever hear this being brought up, and you may as we go into these debates on this birthright stuff as we go forward,   and and and they'll talk about the fact,   that oh, hell, I lost my train of thought.  

Anyway, there's gonna be much,   much discussion on this as we go forward. And what   Brown versus Board did was overturn Plessy. And in essence, in the background, the way I understand it is they made them both equal.   Now how and and what tortured   legal reasoning   that you can take and make somebody with God given capital r rights and duties equal to somebody with federal citizenship, civil rights, small r rights and duties, How they equate those two as equal?   I just flat don't know. Never gone back and rid the case, but I can tell in the timeline   of this that this was right close to the end of when they buttoned this whole thing up. It started   probably with Tyler back there in that story I told at the first in this thinking of we're gonna get them into some sort of a situation   that they're never gonna get out of and they won't even know they're in. And we're gonna use   our little trick with, remember, it was defined in 1828   Webster's dictionary   as a technique by non Christians to fool Christians. We're gonna use our little word trick here, and we're gonna turn everything around   so we can ask them if there are these things. In the amount of time under the bridge, nobody's gonna understand this anymore.  

We know because we know these these Goyim so well that they'll answer it yes and sign something. And but they had to overcome Plessy.   They had to overcome this Jim Crow thing, and that wasn't done until 1954.   K?   So, Samuel was bringing something up at Erie Railroad. The guy's a fourteenth amendment citizen. We don't know that. They still had state citizens back then. Plessy had not been overcome yet. Okay?   So regardless, they overcame Plessy v Ferguson   into Brown.   And as I started figuring this out, because I used to think it was either   I used to think it was a different scenario.  

I didn't realize they had made them both the same. Okay? And so,   as I came to understand that   through that state department statement, all US citizens are US nationals. That's what triggered all this thought here.   And so I I kept my mind. It was your subconscious bugs you. You know? Nineteen fifty four, 19 50 four, 19 50 four. And then it came to me, and I went and looked. And to the day,   after Brown v Board,   sixty days to the day,   they put the nineteen fifty four internal revenue code in place.   That's the code we're still under.   So they started not with the civil war part. They started it with that to set up because they had to get the position in place.  

But, actually, when 1913,   when they really started the end run,   what was the first thing they did? Well, they didn't pass the Federal Reserve Act first.   They passed the sixteenth amendment first, the taxing amendment.   Seventeenth was after that. And then at Christmas,   they fraudulently   passed the Federal Reserve Act and got Wilson to sign it. So the first action of the in run   was set up the taxing system.   And the last action after they overcome Plessy versus Ferguson   was to put the 1954   revenue code in place. Now that should tell you,   even if you don't know too much about this and you're still green,   it should tell you that the taxing mechanism is the most important part to them. Because if they don't have the taxing mechanism passed first   let's say, for instance, that instead of the sixteenth amendment   that they passed the Federal Reserve Act first in the spring,   and then they get down to Christmas to try and pass the taxing act, and they don't get it passed.  

Well, if they don't get the taxing act passed, they're gonna have instant hyperinflation   with the fiat paper, and everybody's gonna know who's doing it.   So they've got to get the tax thing passed because if they don't get it passed, they don't pass the fiat currency mechanism.   So first and last, income tax.   It's the key part of this whole system   because that's where they extract the payments from your rear end that they go and pay the bondholders   their coupon payments with that started the entire financial chain of credit anyway. That's where it starts. Your birth certificate   acting as a warehouse receipt   attached to the bonds   that are issued and sold to investors worldwide.  

That's the start of the credit tap. Everything else is built on that. There is no money. There's only credit from this action right here. That's why they wanted to do this. They didn't wanna take over the world and spend their own money.   They wanna put it in this credit system with all these layers of compound interest   where they can get, as colonel House said, incredibly wealthy.   And nobody will understand, and that's what's going on. Now the country was run from the eighteen seventies   to the   1913   passage of these pieces of legislation,   it was all run off tariffs.  

If that's what Trump's trying to take us back to right now, it's this tariff based system.   They got rid of the tariffs. The the country was incredibly wealthy   back in those years. Okay? Well, they got rid of that, and they put us on this where they got this taxing mechanism.   And now instead of the country getting wealthy, they're the ones that are getting wealthy, and they're getting wealthy off your back, and it's a back of slavery. You can call it in you can call it anything you want. It's still slavery. Somebody has a property right in you. K?   And so if you answer yes to those questions and sign something, was the fourteenth amendment say, well, we're gonna take care of the first part. We're gonna make you a fourteenth amendment person, and we're gonna make you born in in somewhere jurisdictionally to The United States. And then we're gonna ask you these two questions because we've turned everything around, and you're gonna sign something. And then according to the fourteenth amendment, that means you are a citizen of The United States and a state citizen resident.  

And you did it.   K? So you gave them the commission.   You gave them the permission.   It's voluntary.   Take it back.   Take it away.   Their power is our collective   agreement to this scheme.   K?   So   I don't know how many people will ever do this. It doesn't appeal to everybody.   K? Scares the crap out of some people. Some people, they can't think about it. Some people don't wanna think about it. But my job, the way I see it here, is to not only inform you, but I want you to at least be exposed to the to the fact that you've got an option, a second chance   at this life   that you didn't know you had more than likely.  

You you don't have to take it. I'm not gonna force you or anybody else to ever do this. It's your decision because your freedom. But if you do choose to either inquire further into it or go through with it, we'll be right here as our responsibility   to help you navigate through all these landmines and these little legal   nine damn legal landmines in the fourteenth amendment in one sentence.   Nine.   Because even lawyers don't know this, folks.   K?   So, anyway, that's, I guess, about the end of what I can think of that, ties all this together. We were gonna try and do this in two days, but I think we've kinda crammed it into one. So let's open any questions or any comments from the audience. I have your questions. Are muted, and they can unmute themselves. With a 9 Thank you, Paul.   Number nine. Who's that?  



[01:25:21] Unknown:

That was Dan. I was just curious if you could Hey.   Sort of enumerate the 9. How are love you. How are you? Well, yeah. I just did. Person,  

[01:25:29] Unknown:

person,   born,   naturalized,   United States,   and,   subject,   jurisdiction,   citizen of The United States, and resident.  

[01:25:43] Unknown:

And one of them was a single was a singular instead of a plural.  

[01:25:48] Unknown:

Yeah. And,   and. Right?   No. Say  

[01:25:53] Unknown:

no. It's The or their.  

[01:25:57] Unknown:

The. Subject to the instead of their. The was singular. Well, yeah, that represents   singular. We're in the thirteenth amendment at the end. It was their jurisdiction, the states.   So there's your two governments right there. One there and one its or the.  

[01:26:15] Unknown:

What a mess.  

[01:26:18] Unknown:

I I I've seen What an understatement. I I and the way these work together, when you see how they work together,   I truly believe these are the reasons behind the scenes that civil war was started and fought. Of course. So they could get these two amendments in the constitution. It's the only thing that makes sense. These things just didn't evolve by natural evolution past that to all work together to enslave the whole world. These people are brilliant, Dan. You know it. You know it very well. Brilliant, dude. Yes. I lived it. They they are. They're so good at it.  

[01:26:50] Unknown:

Why are there three constitutions   that read the same way, Roger?  

[01:26:54] Unknown:

Well yeah. And, you know, people go, oh, it sounds constitutional. I go, well, is the constitution you're reading, does it have the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments in there?   Because if it does, it's not unconstitutional.   Now there's fraud. There's a whole bunch of layers of fraud. I'll agree with you on that. It's contract and fraud fraud,   negates any contract ab initio from the beginning.   So there's another reason that these people have got to recognize this because their whole deal is built on fraud.   But it's not unconstitutional.  

It's as Bob Morgan came on here one day   and said, it's extra   constitutional   because it's a country in bankruptcy,   and every country in the world has bankruptcy laws.  

[01:27:46] Unknown:

Extra constitutional.   That makes sense. Why did the municipal government,   DC and the territorial   government, which I think is belongs sort of to to,   England,   and then, of course, where we started, they they adopted our constitution   on basically word for word, and   but they but because I've heard the Supreme Court refer to the constitutions,   plural.   And we all know it's like there's there's the constitution of seventeen eighty seven, eighty nine, and '91.   Do you know anything about that, Raj?  

[01:28:25] Unknown:

No.   I know there's one before and one after the fourteenth, the thirteenth, the fourteenth amendment.   Oh, Oh, there's a But now everything is run under this fourteenth amendment and this federalism thing. They've   sucked everything in except for the state citizens.   See, they knew that they had to eventually get the big net over the state citizens.   They already had everybody that was formally a slave or people that lived in DC and the territories,   but they really want the state citizens who are under God, and they wanna bring them over under this subject to the jurisdiction thereof.   And so that's  

[01:29:05] Unknown:

go ahead. When the when the fourteenth amendment says,   is a citizen of The United States and of the state wherein they reside.   Correct. Each time I when I first read that, I was always assuming   that and maybe it is true that that was referring strictly to the actual state citizen like the Supreme Court is constantly talking about.   Yes. But,   it's a small estate. Are are we sure they're not referring? I think so. I'm sure they're not referring to the territorial  

[01:29:37] Unknown:

states under Well, we are, but but let's go back to the   to the definition of resonant, which we got some new people on here may not have been exposed to this. Let's do it again. I don't know if it gets just it's Sesame Street. We can't say it enough. Well, you can't you can't be exposed to these things enough. I agree with you, Dan. So the definition that they're using of ResMed   is the, I guess, the original,   way it was used,   which is,   when countries sign a treaty and exchange ambassadors.   Now if you dig deep enough on the web on ResNet, you're gonna find that. You've gotta go down a layer or two to get to it. K?   And so the illustration that I like to use, of course, is if, because I'm in Ecuador here. If I'm in Ecuador and they've got a,   an ambassador to The US, which they do, and the Ecuadorian   ambassador gets caught out there at Dulles with a kilo cocaine in his diplomatic pouch, what do they do to him? Well, they don't throw him in jail for trafficking.  

They send him back to Ecuador   because he's in residence,   which means that the laws of Ecuador   apply to him and not the laws of The United States.   So that's what they would do in that instance is stick him on a plane back home and let them deal with him here. So when they're asking you, are you in a resident?   What they're really asking you is, are you a federal   citizen living in a state under the laws of the fourteenth amendment in DC?   That's what they're asking you.   So that smallest state that they referred right? It's small s, isn't it? In the fourteenth amendment. Volunteering into the capital s because you're saying, no. These laws in Florida don't apply to me. It's these federal laws.   I thought the I thought that it would be a capital s state because I saw the Supreme Court before these decisions. So we refer Well, it may they may have they may have messed it up there. You know, they've gotten show you several examples in history where where they did mix those two up. But I'm just telling you what I know and understand about this. Okay?  

So notice that they don't ever say, are you a resident of your Massachusetts?   Didn't say you're a resident of Massachusetts. Doesn't. Didn't say, are you a resident of Colorado or Michigan or Texas? All they say is, are you a resident?   Now if you go into Vittel's law of nations,   Dan, which you probably heard us talk about here.   Early on when I was talking about this, I had a listener that   had Vittel's and went to that section on residency and sent me the pages.   And   in Vatel,   wherever he uses the word resident, it's always resident alien.   So you see that tells the story a little bit better, doesn't it? If it was a question, are you a resident alien,   what would you think?  



[01:32:34] Unknown:

I would say no.  

[01:32:38] Unknown:

I'd say no. No alien?  

[01:32:41] Unknown:

Okay. So this is what it is. All the way back to the seventeen fifties when Vatel wrote the Law of Nations,   if you were a resident, you were an alien. It meant that the laws of the alien replied to you.   So   and and I've maintained state citizen.  

[01:32:58] Unknown:

They they're not talking state citizen.  

[01:33:01] Unknown:

Well, you're talking about a state citizen who resides.   That's why they ask you a question   in that way.   K?   You're saying, are you a federal citizen residing in one of the states   seeking protection from the federal government   against any kind of, intrusion by the state on you?   Because, see, there's a lot of that after the passage of the fourteenth amendment. A lot of people resented the new federal citizens. There was altercation, so the federal government gave them protection.   If they had that situation, they could call on the federal government's powers to say, come protect us from these these state citizen bullies.   K? So the and and what does that bring in? Protection for allegiance. Allegiance for protection.  

So now there's your jurisdictional nexus.  

[01:33:51] Unknown:

Question.  

[01:33:53] Unknown:

Yes.  

[01:33:54] Unknown:

Under ambassadorial   law, when somebody is considered   in residence,   their country of origin   is the laws that apply to them. Correct. Correct. Now   if,   fourteenth amendment citizens are   presumed to be citizens of The United States   in   residence   in a state. Doesn't that mean   that the federal law applies to them?  

[01:34:24] Unknown:

Yes.  

[01:34:26] Unknown:

But the problem with that is   federal law forgot about the old protection for allegiance thing,   and they've they've just been enjoying the allegiance.  

[01:34:37] Unknown:

Yes. Well, they're gonna give   you some protection if you're trying to   drive into the post office to file your income tax returns late, and somebody beat you up. They're gonna go come to your aid, I guess, Paul.   Anyway, that's the formula. And, see, that's our power. When we file this affidavit,   what we're doing, our choice, they can't say no. We're switching our allegiance   back to the smallest state   away from the   capital s federal government. And so when we file in this thing, we need to explore and expand on because, really, this is our teeth. Okay?   Honestly,   yes, now that formula switches,   You switched your allegiance   as it says in the Immigration Naturalization   Act and the Nationality Act of 1940,   a nationalized   total allegiance to a small s state.  

So now you've switched your allegiance. You didn't know it. You had given it to the federal government before unbeknownst to you. Well, now you're consciously switching it. You're gonna file this affidavit and say, no.   My allegiance doesn't depend on you. My allegiance is now with my state. And so now that automatically   invokes the state's duty   obligation   of protection.   So filing the affidavit   switches this relationship,   protection for allegiance, allegiance for protection.   Unbeknownst to you, every time you answered those questions yes and signed something, you affirmed it, that you were given them your allegiance. And now you've switched it, and now the state owes you protection. Protection from who?   Well, protection from an intrusive federal government maybe with traffic laws   and other stuff, the state income tax and all these other stuff. Isn't that supposed to protect you from intrusions   on you like that? Because you don't owe them those duties anymore.  

You've switched your allegiance.   Now the state owes you protection, and they're supposed to protect you against that.   Most of them don't know this. I doubt if any of them do.   Maybe Ken Paxton over in Texas might.   But regardless, now you've switched that relationship,   and now the state is supposed to be protecting you instead of allowing their sheriffs and state patrols to persecute you like driving.   So the the the this is where our power lies. And,   Mar we've talked about this for a while. We hadn't jumped into the deep end of the pool and done it yet. Mark's got a real good case on this relationship.   Protection happens, sad, or something. He was talking about it the other day, but the whole thing revolves around that relationship right there. And when you file the affidavit and tell them I'm not one of these people here, I'm not this I'm not this person is what you're telling them. I'm this person over here, and you file that paperwork   to make that official.  

There was a site, probably still is, over a court site over on, Copper Moonshine still,   which, I found very interesting. It was an appellate level site, I believe.   And it said, unless a person can prove   they're not a citizen of The United States,   the IRS can move on to assessment and collection something. But the important part was, how do you prove you're not a citizen of The United States?   There's only one way. You've got to inform the secretary of state in this federal feudal system.   He's the lord of the manner that has all authority   over all matters concerning citizenship.  

He has that because he's always been   the guy that issues passports   in whatever form.   Because a passport under Patel's law of nations   is a document   that identifies you and introduces you to foreign powers.   And to be able to accurately do that in these   different political configurations,   the secretary of state's gotta know what your political status is, doesn't he?   Of course, he does. Or else he's not gonna really, totally, accurately represent you. So that's why he's got all this power. And that's when you file this, he's got to recognize it because this is a legitimate   status   that they've gone to unbelievable   unbelievable   lengths to hide.  

And you're just getting a   a taste. If you're new, you're just getting a taste of it today.   The depths they've gone through to hide this, change the name, hide it under layers and layers of obfuscation   like   non noncitizen   national, American Samoans,   and which we've seen   legal people bite on.   You know, there's this joker over on RBN, Ron   Avery. Is that his name? Yeah. Avery. Yeah. And we got on there one day, and he lied to his audience. We can't get through this information in an hour with   eight, ten minutes of spots for god's sakes.   Well, he agreed to be on my show. I was on RBN on Sunday night. But when it came to Sunday night, he didn't show up, and he wouldn't answer his phone. Finally, he answers his phone.  

He goes, nah. I'm not gonna appear. And then he tells Dave, because our our our listener, Dave, here has a personal relationship with this idiot.   Yeah. Oh, I just didn't wanna argue with him. No. And then he comes back on his show, and he goes, no. Roger's wrong. It's American Samoan. Well, here's a dumb shit idiot, illegal   pretend to be a legal guy that's feeding his audience a bunch of crap because he can't get out of his own ego.  

[01:40:15] Unknown:

Okay? He's an architect.  

[01:40:18] Unknown:

Okay.   I I wouldn't wanna live in what he builds.   Yeah. Anyway Alright. So yeah. We've had these things happen, and that's why I try and go in here and really hammer on. You've got to understand the specifics here. It's very easy to get confused.   It's very easy to get these things mixed up. That's what they started doing to set this up so they would confuse you. So you couldn't explain it to other people or understand it. All this totally intentional. Who's trying to say something there? I have a question. Hey. It's Jack.   Yep.  



[01:40:55] Unknown:

Go ahead, Paul.  

[01:40:57] Unknown:

Okay. My question is,   with respect to state sovereignty,   if,   all the legislators of the state, its public services,   or plug public servants, officers, etcetera,   If they have to swear an oath to not only the state constitution,   but   the constitution of The United States,   is that not,   is that fact not   supporting   the presumption that the state of entity where all of those guys work   is a political subdivision of the federal government?   Otherwise, if the state had individual   sovereignty,   the   state representatives   and public servants   would be under no obligation   to swear and uphold the constitution of The United States because it would be separate, And the Constitution of The United States would have been incorporated   into the state   constitution   to the extent the state decided   it wanted to, and then they would simply swear no to that.  



[01:42:05] Unknown:

Okay. Well, you lost me somewhere halfway in there. So, hey, I'm I'm a do Jack, what you got?  

[01:42:12] Unknown:

Hey.   Have you ever heard of the Black Codes?  

[01:42:16] Unknown:

The Black Code? I have not.  

[01:42:20] Unknown:

Yeah. Actually okay. But first, I just wanna say,   speaking of   the IRS can't   move to collect taxes unless they can prove you're   a citizen. I'm still waiting to hear back from the IRS. A couple weeks ago, I sent them my response from my privacy act request showing my   passport application with my affidavit attached saying I'm not a citizen nor a resident. So if they still assess me that privilege filing fee after seeing that, that's gonna be very They won't.  

[01:42:48] Unknown:

Well, if they do, they're stepping way outside of their line, and you can probably see their asses off if you choose to. I doubt if you'll hear from me again, but you may. I don't know.  

[01:42:58] Unknown:

If if I do, we'll all deal with that at that time together. But Yep.   Regarding the Black Codes.   So you mentioned earlier an interesting question about what happened to the Blacks between the thirteenth and fourteenth Amendment. In in 1865,   the South rolled out, they're called the Black Codes.   And the Black Codes basically made it illegal for blacks to gather into groups of three or to loiter.   And so essentially what was happening is with the blacks were slave anymore and they found them out lawyer loitering and gathering, they arrested them with and charged them with a crime, which allowed them to instantly put them back in the field.  

[01:43:36] Unknown:

Okay. What I'd say to you is that the thirteenth amendment was passed in December of sixty five, so this black code had to be enacted before that.  

[01:43:46] Unknown:

I think they were I think they enacted that in preparation for what they knew was coming.   And so basically what would happen is they would they would arrest these these black people and make them work for pennies, basically nothing,   and make them sign, an agreement to a year long labor agreement   that they couldn't get out of. And if they tried to, that was also illegal. So, essentially, they turned them all into criminals and put them back into slavery until the fourteenth and fifteenth and then they rolled out. So Well just wanna throw that in there.  

[01:44:16] Unknown:

Well, it certainly wasn't an, a a pretty   time in our country.   And, you know, the Southern plantations   didn't bring the black slaves to America. Those were almost predominantly brought by Jews.   Ninety percent of the ships were owned by Jews. Almost all the crews on the slave ships were Jews,   and they were under license from the queen, I think, to engage in that   activity.   And so, you know, then then you come to the situation where   the black person was very expensive, averaged $2,000,   average   $2,000   back a hundred and fifty years ago. How what would that be   equal to? Isn't I don't have any idea. It was a lot of money. So all the planners   didn't just have thousands of dollars they brought to the slave markets. They were more than likely financing   the slaves they were buying through Jew bankers too, weren't they?  



[01:45:13] Unknown:

I'm sure that's what it was. As soon as the black codes ended, that's when the Jim Crow  

[01:45:20] Unknown:

laws rolled out to continue in the Well, that would have been the fourth that would have been the passage of the fourteenth amendment. I'll have to look into that, Jack. I've never heard of that before. If it's an answer to that query, I would thank you very much for bringing it forward. K?  

[01:45:35] Unknown:

You're welcome.  

[01:45:37] Unknown:

Thanks. This is Chris. California.  

[01:45:39] Unknown:

Hey, Chris. Hey, man. How are you doing today? I haven't heard from you in a few days. You doing good?  

[01:45:44] Unknown:

Yeah. We're doing good. We're kinda busy right now. But, you know, for a while, I've been,  

[01:45:50] Unknown:

Talk right in the microphone, Chris. Could you, please? Yep. Can you hear me now? No. That's not the problem. He's too close to the microphone. He's he's popping.   So pull the mic just a little bit further away from your face. It should be fine. Okay. How is Okay. Let's try it. Well, I can hear we can hear you. Go ahead.  

[01:46:08] Unknown:

Okay. Great. I hear a lot of talk about the constitution of The United States, and I don't hear much talk about the constitution   for The United States Of America. Yeah. Yeah. The the original constitution   was for the government.   It put them in a box.  

[01:46:25] Unknown:

Yeah. You know?  

[01:46:26] Unknown:

You know, so   so the,   the jurisdiction was from the people over the government,   not the other way around.   Then later, when they changed that one word,   to the constitution of The United States Of America, that's the constitution   from the government   that,   presides over the people   or the citizenry.  

[01:46:48] Unknown:

With the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments in it.  

[01:46:52] Unknown:

Yes. So I believe we should be careful to refer to the constitution   for The United States Of America,   to establish that. We have jurisdiction over the government.  

[01:47:02] Unknown:

Okay. Well, there I admit there's a difference. Word means things. I I I understand what you're saying.   K.   So thank you. Thank you, Chris. Who else has got something to add here,   to what   we've covered today?   Nobody?   Yikes.   Oh, good. I would have thought, yes. Is that Larry?  

[01:47:34] Unknown:

No, Sheldon. I'll pull this up real quick.  

[01:47:37] Unknown:

Okay, Sheldon.  

[01:47:38] Unknown:

Sixty three.   Two thousand dollars today   is worth $50,761.75.  

[01:47:48] Unknown:

I'm done. Okay. Wow. Okay. So you got don't have 50,000   to throw around for   slaves.   Let's see. There was something else I was gonna mention there, and I forgot it   twice.   Maybe it'll come back to me.   So this is the way this was set up. That's   how to interpret those amendments. So this is what I was gonna say. Even today, I mentioned it the other day. Linda couldn't find it. I heard Barnes referred to it on the show the other night.   There's two places in title 42 in The United States code   Today, in title 42,   the civil rights   part,   where if you go in there   and it will say, I thought it was 1983   and 1986,   But Linda came on and said those weren't right, so I don't know.  

That's sure what I thought they were.   But regardless, there's two codes in that section of The United States code today   that start out the privileges and immunities   of the citizens of The United States   are the same as those of the white   citizens.   So that is lifted right from what   someone was talking about earlier, the civil rights code, and I it was eight eight   nine eighteen   sixty six, I believe,   and that was where they pulled the fourteenth amendment from.   Civil Rights Act of 1866,   I believe.   So, anyway, it's ancient history, but it sure,   weighs on us today,   especially if you don't understand it and, you're playing right into their hands.  

Their whole system   is designed   for   you to lose everything you've got.   It's like a a a lawnmower. They're the lawnmower, and you're the grass.   And every time you get assets built up and you grow up a little bit, the lawnmower comes over and cuts you down about half or more. And so what our information allows you to do, I think, is not only to live free   and stand on your own two feet and be able to defend yourself,   but also then to structure your life and your decisions   where they don't steal everything you got   because that's what they're designed   to do. Yes, Paul.  



[01:50:20] Unknown:

If you simply search Google for citizens,   for civil rights act,   There is the Civil Rights Act of 1866,   Civil Rights Act of 1965,   Civil Rights Act of 1957,   and the Civil Rights Act of 1968,   and,   one of 1964.   So it's like they've been playing with this thing all along.  

[01:50:49] Unknown:

Oh, yeah.   And the black Jew the slave owners that brought all of the the black Jew,   merchants that brought all the slaves over, they've been planning this, I believe, since way back then on pitting us against each other.   K? Yeah. And our job is to try and not let that happen.   And that's why I warmly extend our greetings to all of our black listeners   and just say, hey. Look. They've done fooled us all, but you folks should be the ones that are really pissed   because they've used you to enslave the whole world.   K?  

That's what's going on here.  

[01:51:28] Unknown:

Mass have been bad.   Really bad.  

[01:51:32] Unknown:

Well, listen. They're gonna get theirs one of these days. They're getting backed into the corner every day. More stuff's getting exposed on these people. I   every day, something's   is getting exposed on them, and they're freaking out. And, that that I think that's part of the pressure that's being asserted   on on   on all the the Zionist Jews inside,   Trump's   organization   is the regular Jews are seeing this come home.   And this is the big problem of all the there's two organizations   I know of.   One's called Nutrakarta,   n u t r a k a r t a dot org,   and the other is Jewsagainstzionism.org.  

And you can go to those sites and see   there was a at one point, 20 something years ago or more, there was a   demonstration in Downtown New York,   around Wall Street of twenty, twenty five thousand   of these, Orthodox Jews with signs like Jews   Zionism is not Judaism, etcetera, etcetera.   But you never saw any pictures of that. You'll see pictures of it on their website,   but you never heard anybody in the media cover it.   K?   Those people know what these peep who they are and what they're doing.   And that's why they're so against them because they know that was this develops   and becomes exposed and crashes,   they're the ones that are gonna get blamed for it. People like Dan here, our listener Dan,   they're the people that are gonna get blamed for all this. That's why they're so against the Zionists,   k, and have been for a while.  

So let's see. Couple of minutes left. Four, five, three   nobody's got any other comments?  

[01:53:20] Unknown:

Roger, how many people   what?  

[01:53:22] Unknown:

Okay, Dan. Go ahead. Did you learn something today, Dan?  

[01:53:26] Unknown:

Yeah. Yeah. I learned that I I need to go back and read and get these nine words and really just digest it again.   Thank God we know that our affidavit sets us free because if we had to do this as you know, anyways, I I just it's just a commentary.   Most Jews and even myself still to this day get confused on what even is Zionism,   who are Zionist, and are not all Jews are not all Zionists are Jews.  

[01:53:55] Unknown:

Correct.   And not all Jews are Zionists.  

[01:53:58] Unknown:

I think Zionist is sort of like a political designation of, like Well, that's what I was gonna say.  

[01:54:05] Unknown:

Well, these are this is one of the ways I differentiated, Dan. Judaism is a religious movement.   Zionism is a political movement that involves Jews, but not totally.  

[01:54:16] Unknown:

Gotcha. It's that simple. Yeah. Okay. I was there. I just want to Now I think that they're working off  

[01:54:24] Unknown:

Sabotize v,   Jacob Frank,   and those people that went before.   The   there's a guy, for those of you who may not know, have been exposed to this, you can go look him up on YouTube.   His name is Sabatai. It's spelled just like it sounds.   Sabatai,   and it's z v I.   I'm not sure how to pronounce it. That's how I pronounce it.   And you can go on to YouTube and find out some information on him.   And,   he was a Jew that was reading a hundred year earlier   redefinition of the Kabbalah   and an interpretation of the Kabbalah.   And he was reading I don't know if it's the Torah or the Talmud, Dan. He was reading, I thought the Torah. And it says in there that the,   Mishach, which is what they think Jesus is, is will not come until the world is either all good or all bad. And he said, well, I know the world will never be all good, probably because he knew him and his bunch was in it. So he said, let's make the world all bad.  

And what he did was went in and took all the 10 commandments and reversed them. Thou shall not kill became thou shalt kill. Thou shall not commit adultery became thou shall commit adultery. So he turned the whole world on. I think that's where this   equivocation   idea came from, was probably him. I'm just guessing.   Okay? But then he, had,   oh, some percentage of worldwide jewelry that followed him, not a huge   amount.   And because they did weird first of all, that was in 1666,   and he declared himself the Messiah.   Well, some of the Jewish community around the world bought it,   and they would do real weird stuff like night wife swapping, and they called it the night of the lights   and all kinds of other things that regular Jews didn't cotton to too much. And so he died.  

And so the next guy that picked up the mantle was a guy named Jacob Frank,   and he was in Constantinople.   He had a larger following of Jewry,   but the sultan of, whoever it is that was over Constantinople   came out and said, you either convert to Islam or I'm gonna separate you from your head.   And so he went in and did a marianano,   a closet Jew thing. Well, right then he lost about half of his followers around the world because he'd capitulated   to the, the sultan or the ruler.   And so he went ahead and lived that life. And when he retired,   Jacob Frank, he moved up outside of Frankfurt.  

And I believe this is he was involved in the founding of the Illuminati   with Rothschild and and and and Weiskopf.   So here is that influence   from Sabotage v,   Dan,   that it goes up and gets included in the formation of the Illuminati.   So,   you can go check out that history.   And,   it was there was something I wanted to say about that, and I've forgotten what it was.   Anyway, it was pretty pretty part had you were you familiar with that? Have you ever heard of Sabotage v and all this?   No.   Well, the guy that I saw the guy that had him on first was a guy named Barry Chalmey. She was a Canadian Jew. They'd been kicked out of Israel.   And Jeff Rentz got him on somehow.  

And that's where I heard about this. There's articles on it over there on Jeff Rentz in the archives.   And, I'd never heard of him before either. K?   So kinda freaky, but, these are the hidden things. Now Barry Chamish, when he was alive,   there used to be a,   where he was on talking to a group of Jews and telling them about this, and I don't think most of them knew about it either, Dan.   But,   he made the statement when he talked about Jacob Frank in that talk.   It struck me. He said, Jacob Frank is the worst Jew that's ever lived.   Now what do you have to do to achieve that kind of fame?  



[01:58:40] Unknown:

Stuff like what happens now.   I'm I'm I don't even know.  

[01:58:44] Unknown:

So, anyway, that's a lot of the background on this. There's is still waters run deep. And this is the other thing. You know what else they did in Sabbatazebi's   time was they switched the Khole Niedre oath   from the day of atonement where you ask for atonement for the previous year's sins,   and they switched it to the next year coming up. They give you a license to lie, cheat, steal, and murder.  

[01:59:09] Unknown:

Another example of the man keeping us down.  

[01:59:12] Unknown:

Hey, show, Brent.   So, anyway, there's a little information for you and covered a bunch of ground today. And,   I I I would like to have had more questions, but evidently, we must have done either a pretty good job or there wasn't anybody listening, one of the two, and I don't think the latter is the reason.   Brent, are you on your way home or are you back home already?  

[01:59:35] Unknown:

He is driving. That was,   Brent in a can. That was  

[01:59:41] Unknown:

Memorex. Okay. That one. Oh, it was. Okay.  

[01:59:44] Unknown:

Yeah.   Roger this. Memorex.  

[01:59:47] Unknown:

There he is now. That's live. Yeah. Brent.   I thought that was him. Okay. Brent, well, it was Larry.   It was Larry. Okay.   Larry, you got something real quick?  

[02:00:02] Unknown:

I'm gonna say it real quick.   Just a couple of interesting facts about Dred Scott.   He fought his court battle for twelve years until the Taney Supreme Court decision   ruled against him. He was 51 when he started his litigation,   and he was 63 when he lost his case.   Scott died from tuberculosis   eighteen months after   this decision on 09/17/1858.  

[02:00:28] Unknown:

Yep.   Yep. Very controversial   still today. Thank you, Larry. Thanks everybody that listen to this. I hope you got something out of it and didn't get confused. I try to keep these   teachings down as elementary and as simple as I can. Sometimes it's, difficult because   they've made it very complex so that you wouldn't understand it.   Fortunately, somebody understood it, and we're gonna spread this and   back these bastards into the corner with it, I hope.   And I hope to be part of it. So have a good day, and we'll see you tomorrow. And if you had questions, we can certainly,   talk about them then.  

So have a great day. Thanks for listening. Love you. Ciao.   Okay.   Got that in the can. Now are there any questions for me? And all and now a bunch of people are gonna come forward. I'm gonna whip you.   Anybody got any questions for me?  

[02:01:21] Unknown:

Come on in here, Brent. Give us the, the original. Give us the live.  

[02:01:28] Unknown:

Another example of a man. Keeping us down.  

[02:01:31] Unknown:

There you go. Brent. Thank you, buddy.  

[02:01:34] Unknown:

Well, not anymore, man. I like dandy down.  

[02:01:37] Unknown:

Brent actually has a interesting story about who he visited with last night.  

[02:01:44] Unknown:

Don't you, Brian? Is that right? Who'd you visit with last night, mister b?  

[02:01:50] Unknown:

I saw Harvey.  

[02:01:52] Unknown:

Oh, did you?  

[02:01:54] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[02:01:55] Unknown:

Cool. Did you drive up there to,   Tunnel Hill?  

[02:01:59] Unknown:

Yep.  

[02:02:01] Unknown:

Well, cool. What are you doing?   He's   doing well.   His brother has a health problem,   and they're resolving it   if you know about it.  

[02:02:17] Unknown:

Which is that? Well, I don't know which brother, Charlie or Gordon.  

[02:02:22] Unknown:

Charlie.  

[02:02:24] Unknown:

Oh, well, he's the oldest. Okay. What? You got some heart problems or what, Brent?  

[02:02:31] Unknown:

Glioblastoma.  

[02:02:34] Unknown:

Oh,   that's brain cancer.   Isn't it? Yep.   Yep. It's very aggressive.   Very fast growing.  

[02:02:45] Unknown:

Yep. But it's being resolved.  

[02:02:48] Unknown:

Oh, good. Good. Well, that's good news.   For the audience, Charlie is Harvey's oldest brother, the one that's been fighting abortion clinics for so many years.   And, he has 15   I don't think he's had any more children. He has 15 children.   He used to have 45 grandchildren. I think he's probably got more than that now.   A hell of a family. So Harvey's doing good though, Brent? That's good because I haven't spoken with him in quite some time. Think about him a lot.  

[02:03:20] Unknown:

Yep. Yep. He's doing well and   traveling all over the place.  

[02:03:27] Unknown:

With his what? With his yogurt?  

[02:03:31] Unknown:

Oh, with what?  

[02:03:33] Unknown:

With his yogurt?   He was doing all this yogurt. Yogurt?  

[02:03:38] Unknown:

Yogurt. Yogurt. It's Toyota.  

[02:03:42] Unknown:

No. No. Not Toyota. It's yogurt.  

[02:03:46] Unknown:

Oh, yeah. He's he's   he is making it.  

[02:03:50] Unknown:

Okay.   Yeah. Well, I'm I'm gonna reach out to him and touch up with him here shortly. I've been thinking about him.   So, well, Brent, where you're you're,   head back west, I take it. Right?  

[02:04:04] Unknown:

No. I'm going up to Pittsburgh and   taking my girlfriend's ashes up there   to her family   and, you know, do a ceremony or something. Right.   Right. If they wanna, you know, keep them,   that's good. If they don't, then she's buried with me.  

[02:04:26] Unknown:

Okay.   Fantastic, Brent. Well, listen. You're headed to a long trip then on top of a long trip already, so you drive real careful. Okay?  

[02:04:36] Unknown:

I'm trying.  

[02:04:37] Unknown:

K, buddy. Well, good to hear your voice, and   thanks for checking in. He's Okay. Anybody else  

[02:04:44] Unknown:

He is. Try this at home.  

[02:04:46] Unknown:

Anybody else got something for me today? It's lunch day at the Patriot. Hey, Roger. I got something you might find interesting.   Okay, Danny. What you got?  

[02:04:55] Unknown:

Okay. I know you've talked about how soon they they started setting this thing up, but, you know, how soon before the civil war they started setting   all this up. I don't it's not a definite thing, but it seemed like a clue   to being.   And I've been looking at the constitutions   of Tennessee through the years   and the original one was 1796.   And   there,   it had no mention of citizen of The United States, but new constitution   1834   had a provision   of,   any   any elected state   position   had to be by a had to be a citizen of The United States as well as Tennessee.   Even that's, you know, before there was a, like, technical legal definition of citizen of The United States.  



[02:05:52] Unknown:

Well, if they were a state citizen, according to justice story   and his commentaries on the constitution, a state citizen is hip to facto,   a citizen of The United States. Now he meant of America.   So they were synonymous.  

[02:06:07] Unknown:

Well, yeah.   But how how official was that? I mean,   is that a court decision you're saying?  

[02:06:15] Unknown:

Well, there was no other status for him to be.  

[02:06:20] Unknown:

Well, that's what I'm talking about. In 1834,   what would it mean?  

[02:06:24] Unknown:

It would mean a citizen of The United States Of America. They because everybody knew there wasn't a secondary citizenship   to confuse you at that point. If somebody said United States,   substituting it for United States Of America,   I believe everybody knew what it meant.  

[02:06:42] Unknown:

Well, that might be. I'm just wondering about it being stuck in the   Tennessee constitution that way. I I   And then what does it mean in eighteen eighteen seventy constitution   that says,   you know, the same thing being a citizen in United States? What does it mean then?  

[02:07:00] Unknown:

What's well, it means you're a national.  

[02:07:07] Unknown:

Citizen of The United States,   Eighteen Seventy?  

[02:07:11] Unknown:

Of America.  

[02:07:12] Unknown:

Oh, 18. Well, it doesn't say of America. It says of The United States.  

[02:07:16] Unknown:

Well, Danny, I know it's replete with these confusions in capitalization,   confusions in this equivocation right now. It's replete.   You can bring out a lot of examples for it.   So when justice Story said it as the chief as the chief justice of the Supreme Court, when justice Story on his commentaries on the constitution   used United States, everybody knew what he was talking about. There was no   subsequent confusion.   There wasn't a secondary status yet.   So Well I they they didn't know why it's back then is the conclusion I've come to. Okay?  

[02:07:58] Unknown:

Yeah. Well,   yeah. I can see that. It's just that why why was that   language added in if it already had a requirement to be a citizen of the state as well?  

[02:08:08] Unknown:

I have I have no idea, Danny. K? I have no idea. And,  

[02:08:12] Unknown:

talking about the capitalization, I noticed   in the 1896   constitution,   citizen and state was capitalized   everywhere.   And in the 1834   constitution,   citizen was lowercase, but state was still upper case.   Well I mean, what don't mean upper case mean capitalized?   And '18   in 1870,   constitution citizen and state are both lowercase.  

[02:08:44] Unknown:

Okay. Well, I got no answers, man, really.   Except there's a lot of confusion on this. It wasn't standardized back then.   But I do know that it's Tuesday,   and I I we got a lunch I gotta go to or I like to go to. I've been talking for almost two solid hours. I'm drained, and I got I gotta go to the bathroom. So all those things   combined to say I'll see y'all tomorrow.   Unless somebody's got something Enjoy yourself.   Thank you. I I hope you an addition.   Oh, go ahead, Samuel.  

[02:09:19] Unknown:

Yeah. All states,   when they came into the union,   had to do what was called the enabling act.   So that probably took care of a lot of those issues,   in general.   And that's where you probably get these definitions in your state governments   after they became part of the union.   Okay. The enabling acts. Everybody had to do one.  

[02:09:50] Unknown:

Alright.   All legislation has to have one too, I believe. Anyway, I'm gonna go do about my day. We got these kinda issues.   We'll discuss them tomorrow if you wanna bring them back. K?   It better be okay because that's the way it is. So I'll, see y'all tomorrow. Thanks. Hope you got something out of it. Reach out. Too late. Paul, you and I will get together on   the Skype crap later. Okay?  

[02:10:17] Unknown:

Roger, I gotta  

[02:10:20] Unknown:

Go ahead, Samuel.  

[02:10:23] Unknown:

I you mentioned you're in Railroad. I got a paragraph I can read from Brost about it, if you don't mind. No. Uh-uh. You can read it, but  

[02:10:32] Unknown:

I'm I'm gonna go. I'm drained. I've been talking   totally on I'm dead. Gas tank's on empty. Okay? So maybe bring it up tomorrow. Alright. Thank you. Bye.   Bye.  

[02:10:45] Unknown:

Thank you.  

[02:10:49] Unknown:

This is what Burrows has to say about the, you know, he says that   the Erie Railroad decision saying there is no general federal common law was based on the fact,   that the man who sued the railroad was an outlaw to the constitution.   That he that is he had no standing in absolute constitutional law   because he was a fourteenth amendment citizen and therefore he could not call on general federal   commercial common law   that still existed in The Republic for protection,   and then he cites a case,   k,   to prove that.   He had chosen   by the default of silence,   the private law of the fourteenth amendment trust for public purposes.  

He could not claim any rights based upon the Swift versus Tyson decision   nor could he   assess   access   article three,   section two courts of judicial power.   Instead, he could only be compelled   to resort to article one legislative   courts   that operate outside the US constitution.   I think it's pretty clear we can assume that he was born   in The United States.   And if he didn't   object   to the fourteenth amendment citizenship,   he was one,   and that's why Brose puts in there by silence.   And by the way, that the   the district court found   in his favor $30,000,   lot of money   in those days.  

And it went to the district or the circuit court in on appeal.   They upheld it because of Swift versus Tyson.   Now Brandeis spearheaded and wanted to overturn   Swift versus Tyson,   so he got the supreme court to take it on and overturn it.   And we all entered commerce.   We were protected from commerce   prior to that.   Well, and the fourteenth amendment, of course.  

[02:13:22] Unknown:

Good.  

[02:13:28] Unknown:

Is this coming through?  

[02:13:35] Unknown:

Yes.  

[02:13:37] Unknown:

Oh, great. Thank you.   I'm on the   Bluetooth   earbuds   as a boomer.   So, anyway, I was gonna try to ask Rogers, Roger, if he was related to George   O'Sales,   same spelling.   Is, not really   to   may be related to the study   of long history.   The court of the king's bench,   be covered in select cases in the court of king's bench under Edward the first.   Of   course,   story,   got into   Cook   and   quite a bit.   But,   it's tenacity of, as a tribute to Rogers' tenacity, the tenacity of this George O'Sells.   He spent three or four months a year for fifteen years at the public record office engaged   in studying,   what the circuit court how the king went around,   with the counsel   and then how that eventually separated.  

And he suggests there are two basic questions   which no one has attempted to answer. What judges sat in the court at King's Ranch before the death of Henry the third,   and at what time and for what reason this court tended to confine its main attention to felonies and trespasses?   And so,   anyway, I thought that was interesting. You mentioned a name you don't see that often in sales,   and this is from a book, a friend of Curie and Maitland on the history of English law.   It's reading about, of of course,   all that   Anglo Saxon   history as part of our law.  

So, anyway, I didn't get a chance to get a word in edgewise with   Roger, but if anybody knows, get a word to him who's related to George O'Sails.   He has that research heart in him through   that through that challenge history for sure.  

[02:15:42] Unknown:

I think sales came over on the Mayflower, if I'm not mistaken.  

[02:15:51] Unknown:

So there you go.  

[02:16:55] Unknown:

Hey, Brent.   Hey, b b.   Hey, Brent.   B.   I I was just wanting to know, did,   Harvey   did did you get to   have some Harvey's yogurt?   And also,   I wanted to ask,   what is this what is Harvey does Harvey know of about finbendazole?   And what does he think about it   for his brother?   His brother's condition.   Thank you.  

[02:17:43] Unknown:

No. I didn't try any of his yogurt,   and he likes when bentosol   and ivermectin,   and they're using,   the, whatchamacallit,   blue.   And I have a bunch of papers on it.  

[02:18:02] Unknown:

Wow.  

[02:18:03] Unknown:

And I'm not in a position   to   have them scanned yet.  

[02:18:11] Unknown:

Oh.  

[02:18:12] Unknown:

I'm trying to get through this small town   where there was an off ramp, and now I have to go all the way through town to get to an on ramp.  

[02:18:24] Unknown:

Uh-oh.   Okay. Well, be careful. And,   are you   so   he   so he Harvey likes methylene blue?  

[02:18:41] Unknown:

Yep.  

[02:18:42] Unknown:

Okay.   I hope he's helping his brother.   And,   okay.   Do you have   do you have even, like, one thing you can share from   Sunday's get together?  

[02:19:12] Unknown:

Pretty much everyone was there alive   except massage.  

[02:19:19] Unknown:

How about how many people were there about   approximate? About about  

[02:19:25] Unknown:

25.  

[02:19:28] Unknown:

That's what I guess. That's what I guess. How many people would be there?   So   did,  

[02:19:38] Unknown:

The amount of people that were there were the ones that were supposed to be there.  

[02:19:43] Unknown:

Yeah.   Good.   Right on.  

[02:19:52] Unknown:

Brett, are they using fenbendazole   for that blastoma?  

[02:20:00] Unknown:

I   believe   so.   You'd have to talk to Harvey,   you know, exactly. He was going through papers and stuff, but they're definitely using the Bethelman Blue.  

[02:20:14] Unknown:

So I would highly recommend him looking into the fenbendazole   for that.  

[02:20:21] Unknown:

Yeah.  

[02:20:23] Unknown:

If you might mention it to him if you get a chance?  

[02:20:26] Unknown:

He he knows all about it, and he knows about the combined use of Imbendazole   and ivermectin   also.   He told me about it.  

[02:20:38] Unknown:

Okay.   Does he know about cannabis?  

[02:20:44] Unknown:

Yeah.   Harvey had a year of medical school,   if you guys didn't know that.  

[02:20:59] Unknown:

Oh.  

[02:21:03] Unknown:

Was that before or after Vietnam?  

[02:21:07] Unknown:

After.  

[02:21:09] Unknown:

He probably got on the job training in Vietnam.   Probably.  

[02:21:19] Unknown:

Brent,   BB, did did Daryl actually get a video   of  

[02:21:25] Unknown:

Yeah. He he   videoed it.  

[02:21:30] Unknown:

Do you know how many is it, like, thirty minutes or an hour?  

[02:21:35] Unknown:

It's probably about three or so hours.  

[02:21:39] Unknown:

Woo.   And,   was anybody taking any pictures of everybody?  

[02:21:48] Unknown:

Yes.   There are some floating around.  

[02:21:56] Unknown:

Right. Alright. Alright.   Hey, Brett.  

[02:22:16] Unknown:

If anybody's interested,   it would take me a minute to to be able to share it and broadcast it.   However,   there is a YouTube video from   Navy Media,   and it is a detail   of   a precision   American response   to a   Houthi,   attack on a drone that obliterated it.   And because they   successfully   shot down the drone, they thought they were going to   knock down one of our fighters.   They found out different   because they got their asses handed to.   If anybody is interested in seeing that, I can share it to the room. It's eighteen minutes long,   and it is absolutely   devastating and a message to the entire world   what would happen if somebody messes with The US asset.  



[02:23:21] Unknown:

Woah.  

[02:23:23] Unknown:

Yes.  

[02:23:24] Unknown:

It is quite something.   Absolutely   quite something.   Oh, give me just a minute, and I will upload it as a,   broadcast   element,   and I will share it.   We'll play it to the whole room.  

[02:23:46] Unknown:

Well, maybe before you put that up there, while you're still recording, I think. Right? I just want to add a couple of things, things that were talked about.   Dred Scott, for instance.   Who paid for that? Follow the money. Why was that important to keep that like that and then release him free after all of that?   Probably the same ones that were pushing uncle Tom's cabin, keeping that in print and circulating. Okay? There's,   you know and I also sent to you and,   Roger   some different things, but the Nutriocarta   And,   their goal is they're waiting for the,   Mosiac,   not Jesus Christ to come back   supposedly.  

And   they want Israel then. It's gonna be their land then. Okay? So   and as far as that enormous protest in New York City, it was 2014, apparently.   And I do remember hearing about it. I think Ken in Texas just happened to be there, wandered out in the middle of it. But they were protesting   draft to the IDF.   Okay? Jews think individually   very much. Alright? They're not being altruistic and, you know, and okay. We don't like what they're doing over there. We really aren't gonna go fighting their wars, what they're saying now. I would like to see a lot of people do like that   here. No. I ain't go go fight your war. I don't care how big my toys are over your toys. But anyway so I'll hush.  



[02:25:16] Unknown:

Right.   Right.  

[02:25:20] Unknown:

Yeah. It's gonna take me a couple of minutes to,   to get that up there.   Oh,   you guys talk amongst yourselves while I   queue in.  

[02:25:35] Unknown:

Well, what I had,   Mert.   Oh, excuse me?  

[02:25:40] Unknown:

Mert, Samuel. Did did you get that Sun Tzu piece I sent you? Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. It's it's not it's only half as long as it says on that piece. It cuts Oh, okay. I didn't get into it yet. I see it's there, but yeah. It's fascinating.   I,   wanted to let more people know about it too. It's from Walter Weiss.   It's about Sun Sun Tzu and the Jesuits. It's a pretty amazing piece.  

[02:26:06] Unknown:

I I understand that probably, you know, we know Jesuits was started by Ignatius Loyola, a Jew,   who was a wounded veteran. But he,   apparently,   there was a a Jesuit that wrote San Su.  

[02:26:22] Unknown:

So that was There were there were there's also in in it's a rather confusing history because there's two Rickies.   The original Ricky,   was   was the first Jesuit   or first,   Westerner   to be allowed residence in Beijing.   That was in, like, the fifteen hundreds.   Lorenzo,   the general of the Jesuits,   is around 1770   when they supposedly throw him in jail,   and Veith says he secretly   anyways, it it's it's a it's a complicated story,   but man, does it make a lot of sense.   Mhmm. So there's a lot of hypothesis there, but it's pretty interesting.  

[02:27:13] Unknown:

Comment.   Shoot. Yes.   Back at that time, there was no Beijing.  

[02:27:21] Unknown:

Right.  

[02:27:23] Unknown:

And I think we should talk by its proper name at the time because   that's how history gets confused.  

[02:27:30] Unknown:

That's true. That's true. What was the name of it?  

[02:27:34] Unknown:

Peking.  

[02:27:36] Unknown:

Okay. Peking duck.   Peking at you. Mhmm.   Yeah. Well, they get flooded out and they move north a little bit. Right? So   and then they have Beijing.  

[02:27:49] Unknown:

He he he also said that in 1634   in that piece,   a man by the name of White came over here   and established   Maryland.   He was a Jesuit priest.   I'm a friend. Yep. He says that the whole reason the White House is called the White House is because it's named after White.  

[02:28:13] Unknown:

Yep. I've heard that too. The Jesuit priest. Anyways, it Of course, Virginia too for the virgin. Right? Mary and   Maryland and Virginia.   Yep.   And the and the brothers Carol. Right? The Catholic brothers are maybe the Jesuit influence in there too, but   this is where that property came from.   Yeah. The stuff I I forwarded to   to,   Paul, you, and,   Roger about the Nutrioc artery, and it goes into Noahide and stuff about their also believing in the Moshiach.   You know?   I was looking and it was to Stadt Miller Miller. So I forwarded it over to myself on my other email, and it was from July   I know.  

So July June. I think it was 06/15/2021.   And it was a week later when he blew up at me before he even let me say what I had to say   about nutrients.   Yeah. Being complete proteins and vegetables.   That is greens   and legumes.   You know? Mhmm. Body makes 11 of the essential, and the other nine are are there. Are you ready? I'll shut up.  

[02:29:23] Unknown:

I am ready.   Here we go. This is what happens when the Houthis attack the wrong US Fighter.  

[02:29:33] Unknown:

They thought they had the perfect shot.   It was 03/22/2025.   Somewhere above the Red Sea, the sky was clear,   visibility was near perfect,   and a US Air Force F-sixteen Fighting Falcon cruised on routine patrol.   Standard altitude,   nothing out of the ordinary.   Then   ping.   A warning light on the heads up display flashes red.   Radar lock. Another blip. Then another.   Missile launch. Brake. Brake. Brake.   The pilot slams his stick.   Instincts kick in. The F-sixteen rolls hard right, flares popping, countermeasures   deployed.   A heat signature slices through the air. An infrared guided Syed missile just fired from Houthi controlled territory in Yemen.  

Fast, silent, and meant to kill.   The jet dives, engines screaming.   Below, the radar jamming Growler team lights up the airwaves.   Above, an E-2D Hawkeye spins into overwatch.   From the deck of the USS Eisenhower,   operators are watching this unfold in real time.   The missile adjusts course in midair. It's tracking the engine's heat plume. Thirty seconds to impact.   The pilot pulls a tight nine gs turn,   every inch of aircraft groaning under the strain.   Fox three defensive, he shouts over comms. A final flare blooms from behind the jet.   Brilliant, hot, confusing the missile seeker.  

Boom.   The missile detonated in midair. Too far to matter, the jet lives.   But now the question isn't how the Houthis got a missile this close.   It's what happens when you fire one and miss.   Because this wasn't just a dogfight.   This was bait.   The missile didn't just come out of nowhere.   For weeks, the Red Sea had been heating up figuratively and literally.   Commercial tankers rerouted, US destroyers crisscrossing the waves, and the Houthi forces   getting bold,   real bold.   This wasn't the first time they tried something like this either.   Just a few days earlier, a US m q nine Reaper drone was shot down off the coast of Yemen. It didn't even get a chance to react. The Houthis claimed it on Telegram within minutes,   posting shaky footage of flaming wreckage tumbling into the sea like a trophy.  

That move, that didn't go unanswered either, but it emboldened them.   And that's when they made the next mistake,   thinking a drone and a fighter jet were the same kind of prey.   The US had already issued warnings.   Carrier strike groups had shifted formation.   Aegis destroyers were repositioned.   But the Houthis, backed by Iranian tech and training, believed that they could keep escalating without real consequence.   So when an American f 16 flew into their radar net, they fired.   Only this time, the jet fired back.   You see, that F 16 wasn't just randomly patrolling.  

It was part of a broader ISRNET,   intelligence surveillance reconnaissance,   designed to sniff out missile activity along the Yemeni coast. And what that pilot didn't know at that moment was that he was the final threat in a very dangerous game of bait and trap.   Because in recent weeks, the Pentagon had authorized a shift in posture.   No more waiting.   If a radar spiked on the wrong aircraft, it was now considered hostile.   If a launch occurred, retaliation would be automatic.   The rules of engagement had changed   quietly,   formally.  

And in this case, the Houthi launcher had made the ultimate mistake.   It lit up long enough to be seen,   fired once, and stayed in place just a few minutes too long.   That would be its last mistake.   Because back aboard the USS Eisenhower, the pilot's call wasn't just received. It was recorded,   analyzed, and turned into targeting data.   Live feed, thermal signature,   missile trajectory,   GPS lock.   The retaliation clock had already started ticking.   At 28,000 feet, the F-sixteen was still burning west, hugging the edge of Yemeni airspace.   The pilot had barely recovered from the evasive maneuver when its RWR,   or radar warning receiver lit up again.  

New contact, different angle.   The first missile had missed, but there was more.   This time, it wasn't just one signal. It was a burst.   Multiple radar locks staggered and fast.   The pilot's a n ALR 56 m system screamed in his headset.   Threat, SA six lock.   An SA six, classic cold war era Soviet Sam. But the Houthis have been seen using Iranian copies of the same tech.   Syed class systems upgraded with better seekers and mobile launchers,   slow to set up, even slower to hide. But when active, they were deadly,   and they were locked on.  

The pilot's left hand gripped the throttle after burners engaged.   His right hand toggled the countermeasure system, prepping for another flare dump.   Behind him, the exhaust glowed white hot against the cool desert night, a perfect infrared target for any heat seeking warhead.   Viper three defensive, multiple locks, repeat, multiple launch points, request support.   Overhead a growler from VAQ one forty, the Patriots was already jamming. Burst of electromagnetic   disruption poured into the air like invisible smoke,   scrambling Houthi radar systems.  

It gave that F-sixteen a sliver of time.   He dipped the nose and pushed it into a hard dive. The Gs pinned him to his seat. Blood drained, vision tunneled, but he held the vector, high speed, low drag evasive.   Flares burst in waves, like fireworks behind a ghost.   The pilot banked again and then yanked the jet into a barrel roll at 700 knots   just in time.   One of the incoming Syads missed by maybe 200 feet,   close enough to rattle the canopy.   But that was it. That was their chance.   Because what the Houthis didn't know is that they were being watched the entire time,   From way high above at nearly 60,000 feet,   a Navy MQ-4C   Triton drone had been circling in wide ISR loops.  

It wasn't armed, but it didn't need to be. Its job was eyes,   and its eyes saw everything.   Thermal spikes on the ground, electronic pulses,   precise coordinates,   all streamed back in real time to CENTCOM and, more importantly,   to the combat information center aboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.   The engagement had lasted less than two minutes, but the fallout would take hours to clean up.   When the pilot returned to a holding pattern above the Red Sea, 2 more aircraft joined the airspace.   First, second f 16 from the four twenty first fighter squadron pulled up on its wing, scanning for fresh threats.   Then came the call from command.  

Engagement confirmed. Target data locked. Hold position. Birds en route.   Translation,   strike package inbound.   But even before the jets launched, the Navy wasn't wasting time.   Deep in the belly of an Arleigh Burke class destroyer sailing nearby,   VLS cells were opening.   VLS,   vertical launch systems.   Inside,   Tomahawk cruise missiles, precision guided long range and ready for immediate launch.   The launch order came in less than five minutes after the missile threat ended.   Target alpha, fire one, confirmed trajectory.   One missile, then two, then four,   each screaming up into the night sky.  

Silent afterburn   curving east towards the Yemeni coast, and this was just the start.   On deck of the USS Truman, it was already spinning up for a second phase,   air   power. Pilots were being briefed, weapons loaded, jets fueled.   This wasn't improvisation. It was playbook stuff.   The moment that missile launched, the response was already in motion.   The missile had failed, but its data had succeeded.   It gave the US Navy a window, a confirmed location, a launch site, and a tactical footprint.   And in modern warfare,   that's all you need.  

Because retaliation wasn't just coming.   It was coordinated,   layered, and lethal.   While the Tomahawks flew low over the waves, the aircraft launched in sequence.   First out was an E-two d Hawkeye,   electronic overwatch.   Next, a pair of EA eighteen g Growlers, electronic warfare platforms armed to blind radar, and scramble comms.   And then the Hammers,   four FA 18 Super Hornets loaded with GBU 38 JDAMs and AGM 88 HARM missiles.   Target   package? Simple.   Missile launcher site? Primary.   Suspected command post? Secondary.   Mobile radar track spotted via drone thermal? Tertiary.  

One by one, the Hornet's cat launched into the sky. Wings loaded, flaps down, engines howling.   As the strike group closed in, the Growlers began their run. They broadcast wideband jamming, lighting up the spectrum.   The Houthis likely had no idea they were even being targeted   until the first explosion lit up the coast.   The tomahawks hit first.   The radar trailer, gone.   The launcher, fragmented and burning, then came the Hornets.   From 25,000   feet, JDMs fell silent and accurate.   Impact after impact,   secondary explosions confirmed.   Ammo, fuel, maybe more missiles hidden nearby.  

The final strike, a HARM missile   locked onto a last ditch radar pulse from a mountain top station.   By the time it hit, the air was already thick with smoke.   Back in the cockpit of the original f 16, the pilot listened to the comms with a quiet intensity.   No celebration, just confirmation.   Target neutralized.   Strike   successful. RTB, return to base.   The sky over the Red Sea was calm again, but this time, the silence was earned.   And the message was clear.   If you launch at a US jet, you better pray it hits because if it doesn't,   the next thing coming isn't another missile. It's everything.  

They say modern war is fast, but this,   this was surgical.   The moment the f sixteen's data feed locked into that missile trail before it even dodged the blast,   The US Navy already had what it needed,   time stamps, telemetry launch vector, GPS coordinates, and thermal spike signatures.   The strike group didn't just see it happen. They saw where it happened,   and that changed everything.   Inside the combat information center aboard the USS Eisenhower, the vibe shifted from defensive posture to offensive readiness.   No shouting, no scrambling, just crisp voices calling out status reports and targeting locks.  

Telemetry confirmed.   Launch grid locked. Target alpha hot.   The Eisenhower's commanding officer didn't even hesitate.   One phrase was all it took. Package bravo,   execute.   And with that, the retaliation protocol kicked in.   What is Package Bravo?   Well, in Navy terms, Package Bravo isn't a slap on the wrist. It's a hammer to the head.   It's the name for a multi domain strike sequence involving cruise missiles, air strikes, and coordinated EW or electronic warfare.   The targets are any confirmed defensive systems that fires on US aircraft   or dares to lock on. And the Houthis had just triggered it.  

And the plan unfolded in layers.   From the Anarly Bird class destroyer about 100 miles off the Yemeni coast, VLS cells began to open up like mechanical flowers.   These are 25 foot vertical tubes packed with Tomahawk missiles,   long range GPS guided, and brutally accurate.   They don't need pilots. They don't even need confirmation.   They just need a target. And now, they had several.   Four Tomahawks launched in sequence. Not in a rush. No fireworks. Just a quiet thrust in vanishing arcs.   Missile site Alpha confirmed Syed launcher, target one. Mobile radar vehicle, target two.   Suspected c two command and control hub near Ras Issa, target three,   ammo storage depot picked up via m q four c thermal scan, target four.  

Each one plotted, programmed, and en route within five minutes.   Meanwhile, 70 miles away aboard the USS Truman, the flight deck was coming alive.   Steam hissed across the catapults.   Red shirts locked in munitions,   GBU thirty eight JDAMs and AGM eighty eight harms,   while green shirts refuel jets with machine like precision.   Yellow shirts waved FA-eighteen Super Hornets into position.   The smell of jet fuel and salt air hit like adrenaline.   Above it all, an E-2D Hawkeye had already launched, spinning its radar dish painting a real time map of everything in the air and on the ground.   Moments later, two EA-eighteen   gs Growlers rowered into the sky.  

These aren't your average attack aircraft. They're flying blackout machines.   Armed with ALQ two eighteen receivers and jamming pods, the Growler's job is to turn Houthi radar into static.   No lock ons, no guidance, just confusion and chaos.   Following the Growlers,   the payload.   Four FA 18 Super Hornets each fully loaded.   Hardpoints packed with joint direct attack munitions and high speed anti radiation missiles.   Smart bombs and radar seekers designed to follow signals and blow them to hell.   High above all this, a Navy MQ-4C   Triton drone was still circling.  

Not a sound, just cold optics and warm targets.   It monitored everything post strike heat plumes, vehicle movements, and potential evacuations.   The second any Houthi unit tried to hide, it was flagged.   Data flowed in from the Triton to a relay satellite, then straight to Eisenhower's fire control team, and they were ready to redirect strike assets in real time if needed.   This wasn't revenge, it was architecture.   At   exactly 02:12 local time, the first Tomahawk hit.   Missile site Alpha, obliterated.   Surveillance drones confirmed secondary explosions   indicating a stockpile of ordinance.  

The heat signature stayed hot for over twenty minutes.   Two minutes later, target two, the radar truck, lit up the coast in a bloom of orange. Its emissions had pinged one last time, enough for a HARM missile to home in like a bloodhound.   Then came target three. The suspected command post had been buried into a hillside   covered with camo netting.   Didn't matter.   One JDAM from 20,000 feet blew the door off the bunker. A second collapsed it in on itself.   Target four, the ammo depot, was a fireworks show.   The FA-eighteen's had dropped in low, fast, and clean. Their bomb racks now empty, they climbed back into the clouds.   No losses, no alarms, just silence   and smoldering debris on the ground.  

While the physical strikes happened, the Growlers ran interference.   They jammed every known Houthi frequency,   scrambled early warning radars, and spoofed their detection systems into seeing ghost fleets.   In other words, while the Houthis tried to figure out what hit them, they couldn't even talk about it. No comms, no signals, just fear, smoke, and blank screens.   And that was that.   They fired at a fighter jet.   They got a war machine in return.   The Houthis, and by extension, their Iranian sponsors,   learned a brutal You might hit a slow drone with a lucky shot. But when you try   the same move on a fully loaded F 16 or FA 18,   the response won't be another drone.  

It will be a synchronized multi layered counter strike that leaves nothing standing.   And that matters.   Because warfare isn't just about weapons, it's about perception.   The Houthis lost equipment, but more importantly,   they lost face.   They showed their hand, and The US didn't just slap it away. It crushed it with precision and steel and electromagnetic   fury.   Now, every Houthi radar operator will think twice before flipping the switch.   Because they'll have to ask,  

[02:46:04] Unknown:

is this the one that gets me vaporized?  

[02:46:07] Unknown:

Even though The US didn't issue a single press release,   the world got the message.   Satellite intel leaked, analysts picked up the patterns,   news cycles caught whispers,   and every military power watching,   China,   Russia, Iran,   took notes.   The takeaway?   You don't mess with US airpower unless you're ready to play a different game,   One where The US doesn't just react,   it redefines the battlefield mid conflict.   Post strike, carrier airwing shifted into full combat air patrol mode.   That means at least two arm jets in the air twenty four seven.   Circling,   scanning,   ready to respond within seconds.  

The Houthis thought they could fire at an American fighter jet and get away with it. They were wrong,   dead wrong.   They didn't just lose a missile,   They lost a playbook.   They lost assets, and most importantly,   they lost momentum.   But here's the question I wanna throw to you.   If you were in command that night, would you have stopped after neutralizing the launcher or gone further and wiped out every radar site along the coast?   Be honest. Be strategic.   Drop your thoughts in the comments. We will read every single one.   And while you're there, if this video gave you chills,   clarity, or just a deeper respect for the precision of modern warfare,   do us a favor.  

Like the video so we know you're locked in. Subscribe if you wanna stay ahead of the next incident before it even hits the headlines   and hit the notification bell so you're the first in when the next mission drops.   But if you want to go one step further and support the channel directly,   join the fleet.   You'll get loyalty badges, priority replies, and help us bring more real naval stories to the surface.   Click join on our channel page and step aboard.   Until next time, stay sharp, stay safe, and remember,   one missile can start a war, but the response   ends   it. Thanks for watching.  



[02:48:14] Unknown:

A message from the current commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces   Up in just last month.  

[02:48:27] Unknown:

Why did it take them a month to get that out?  

[02:48:33] Unknown:

It had to make it purdy.   It had to make it purdy and and purdy convincing.  

[02:48:39] Unknown:

Hey. And we wrong.   And we know that just a few days ago, they they dumped an f 18 Hornet in the   in the drink along with the tug.   Mhmm. Off the side of the carrier. Oops. So, you know, how much of this is propaganda?  

[02:48:58] Unknown:

I think it's From what Andy was saying  

[02:49:01] Unknown:

from what Andy was saying this morning,   that   18   rolled off that deck because that ship was under attack by the Houthis.  

[02:49:12] Unknown:

Who am I is. My understanding is the only surveillance that we have are these m q nine drones. So   any of this,   they they have eyes on the ground and see things getting blown up. I mean, it if it takes them five minutes   to respond to a lock on, it's a mobile unit. We're who knows where it is by the time they send ordinance there.   And these Reaper drones, they've shot there's $30,000,000   each,   and they've shot down over two dozen of them.   And this is a nobody country from nowhere   who's been attacked by the Saudis for over ten years.  

[02:49:51] Unknown:

And who are the Houthis exactly?  

[02:49:54] Unknown:

The Houthis the Houthis are the less lethal counterfeit   or counterpart to the blowfish.   Those are the real guys you gotta watch out for.  

[02:50:04] Unknown:

Okay. Yeah. I'd like to make a comment. I've seen some pictures of it. I think you can  

[02:50:10] Unknown:

user small example of what we're gonna get if we attack Iran.  

[02:50:15] Unknown:

Can I make a comment?  

[02:50:20] Unknown:

Please?  

[02:50:21] Unknown:

Yeah.   Murr, I heard you yesterday on the Fetzer Show. I came on right after you. And, you know, we talked about Roger Sales.   So that was three people. Sorry. I didn't get to get on when Roger was here and let him know the three people talked about him on on the Fetzer Show, but said,   because they won't allow me to have more than one minute of talk time because I I am over the target on their butts so bad. It's not even funny. I've already caught a Jewish gatekeeper that guards   the things you can and can't say, and I know his name, and I know who that you know the companies fired him. Mike.  

[02:50:59] Unknown:

John Statham Why are you changing the paradigm that we're talking about?  

[02:51:04] Unknown:

Well Oh, no. Don't be there. One of the reasons why one of the reasons why I I did have something that co,   coincides with some of this, man, that you guys are talking you were talking about dates and and and a lot of older dates and stuff, and I did have one thing I wanted to inject.   On all these cases. And and one thing I just wanted to say, has anybody ever looked up   when the letter J was made? It was 1524.   So what did you call your messiah and the Jews before that? It was not Jewish. They were Hebrew, man. We need to get that straight. That were the Jews weren't in captivity with Hitler, and he was killing them. And then United States created Israel and allowed them to move in, and they're doing the same thing.  

[02:51:52] Unknown:

He was not killing them. Well,  

[02:51:55] Unknown:

you you know you know what I'm saying? He he was controlling him. How about we say that? We know that. But they still they lived with Hitler in Germany. They weren't the chosen ones, and they they, you know, they they left Germany and went right on into Israel after in 1948,   you know, after we did that. And I didn't know if you guys knew this,   but Washington DC sits on the seven hills in Maryland.   And one of the seven hills that was named, was Rome.   And the perch, person that purchased that land, his name was Pope Francis.   Okay, can you believe that?  

I have somebody that lives in Maryland and they can confirm that.  

[02:52:34] Unknown:

Pope, Pope Francine.  

[02:52:37] Unknown:

But, but anyways, that's the Gog and Magog war   that you read in your Scriptures,   you know.   The Gog is George Mario Bergoglio.   That's the pope.   And see, he's the one that bought that land and and helped create, and he's behind all that nefarious stuff in Washington DC. They're all the Vatican really   is the gatekeeper of this world.  

[02:53:02] Unknown:

The Vatican was bankrupted in 2022.  

[02:53:05] Unknown:

Yeah. And if you want me to inject on the kind of things you were talking about, I I know a lot of things about   that's getting blown up and when they're gonna be blown up because I do make missile parts here.   I I cry and pray over them, you know, but they're you know, it's a sad gig, and I'm I'm sorry I have to be somebody that's involved in that.   But I've made a lot of missile parts in my life, and I know exactly when it they're gonna do stuff.   I'll just put it to you like that.   Well, anyways, Murl, I'd like to get your contact info sometime because I might I'd like to share some really important things. I have a video clip of a gentleman who is being remotely controlled by the vaccine, and I got it on videotape and his confessions of everything. And it's it's it'll blow your mind. John Moore is not worthy of you giving that to him. That's why I did not send it to John Moore because John Moore is compromised.   Right paradigm thinking that they're, you know, that they're not a one party system. And I'm I can tell you now, I have proof for a hundred years that they're a hundred and one party system and nobody can prove any different. Ask Alex Jones. He he that's how he got everybody   on his hook because he he lied and said, yeah. It's a trap. Don't fall for the left and right system until Trump came along, and then he'd burn all of his listeners.  

I mean, it's a joke. We gotta stop this nonsense. I know it's too I'll be honest with you. It's way too late. It's way too late. I hate to say it, but trial is coming. And for those that don't know what trial is, that's when you that means you're gonna be here when Satan is here walking this earth, and he's cutting heads.   That's that's what trial is. And, see, there's an escape, not no rapture because you can't find that in the Bible. I read from the first generation removed from the Dead Sea Scrolls. That's how my information is so accurate.   I've been studying and training under real Hebrew Levites.  

Moses was Hebrew, not Jewish, man. This is breaking my heart, and it's just making me sick to my stomach that nobody can see this. You know, it's it's really hard. And I I I love this this radio program you got, though.   You you guys are about the best fight in this world, you know, doing the national thing and and just having a platform that talks about, you know, how we've been lied to and and all this stuff. But if you listen to anybody else's shows, they won't allow you to talk like this. They won't allow you to say things. They'll kick you off and ban you.   But, anyways, Murat, my name is John Seals. I'm also known as ex gentile,   and you can find me all over the place. And I'm gonna be making some devastating,   devastating,   kinda like live clips I'm gonna be putting out here this week and next week because, like I said, we're running out of time. The the Christians   I used to be a Christian for eleven years,   but when I realized that Christians were professionally trained by Catholics, that's whenever my spirit told me to go find some Hebrews. And so I did, and that's whenever I was revealed   all kinds of things.  

I just can't tell you right now.   It took it's taken me two years of studying and training under these guys to get this information,   and it's just not something that you think that a bunch of Hebrews like showing a white honky,   you know,   what the deal is. You know? They they   they don't have anything against white people,   but how do they you know, they're they're so nervous that I'm an infiltrator, gonna come in there and destroy them and set them up and get them killed because they know what's coming. They they read parables   like nobody's business, and they they see things way ahead of most of all of us   because they're led by the spirit and they're tied tight.  

The Messiah's real name is Yahushua Hamashiach,   and it's sad to see the Jews using the Mashiach,   you know, some kind of partial bullcrap   name, but, you know, and it's just like Jesus.   People say you know, I I get in fights with people all the time saying, we say Jesus because it's English. You know? We're not we're not Hebrew, but, oh, hallelujah. That's Hebrew. I mean, it's ridiculous, man.  

[02:57:01] Unknown:

Like, there's nothing wrong with being a Christian. Hebrew the definition of the word Hebrew means to cross over.   Abraham crossed over the floods, which was the Euphrates.   Listen. You think you're the only one that's been studying this stuff for years?  

[02:57:16] Unknown:

And you learned Nobody's talking about it.  

[02:57:19] Unknown:

Well, we're not all talking about it all the time because we're about talked out sometimes,   and it's more fun it's more fun to listen and see what's going on. Do you think I liked getting irate with Fetzer?   But he deserved it that time.   He's very rude and disrespectful. I know. But Well, I remember. He's he's all hot about going after Victor Hugo. He's putting out all these short videos,   you know,   dissing his friends and him and everything, and he's frightened everybody and all this stuff. But he went on like this about Judy Wood forever.   But  

[02:57:53] Unknown:

yet he  

[02:57:54] Unknown:

started out right after nineeleven  

[02:57:56] Unknown:

saying how wonderful her work and John Hutchison was. So there's something behind him, whether it's military or whatever. I know what it is. I already know what it is. I've been studying this for a while, and I've been I've been watching him for a while, and his he has a connection to Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook gig. Because, see, Alex Jones would not invite Fetzer on to to and to and say, hey. This you know, I didn't make this statement. This is the guy that made the statement. It's more than just it's more than just the two of them. Alright? And Alex Jones, his real name is Bill Hicks. He's 62 years old.  

[02:58:33] Unknown:

Do some more digging.  

[02:58:36] Unknown:

I've heard that too, but I don't I I don't I don't mess with Alex Jones. I gave up on him fifteen years ago, you know.   But but, you know, I do believe Fethr and and Alex Jones are working together to make it to where people can be sued for whenever you say something   about somebody or   in the case that, you know, about Sandy Hook. You know, they're they're setting it up, and I do believe they're working in conjunction because neither one of them will have each other on their programs whenever they are still whenever they both have the same issue.  

[02:59:07] Unknown:

Listen. There's a lot of that going on. But do you know I don't know if you've heard me say this, and I've said it to several different times, you know, when I didn't have a show and just on calls with him. And he always said, oh, yeah. That's good information. But he never repeats it himself.   Sandy Hook was act Sandy Hook was act two.   Act one was 07/20/2012.   It was the first event   staged event after Obama's administration   got through the Smith's month modernize   modernization   act. Right? Funny that it was in '48 when it was first put in that they couldn't lie to the American public, and now they can. But what happened there in the Aurora theory? Well, first, it was the first time ever that on a July 20, nobody talked about the moonwalk.   The moon nonsense. But, anyway,   the guys there It's a rough life, isn't it? Well, listen. The guy there, Robert Holmes, is who they were going after. Okay? And, apparently, he had a child out of wedlock, and that was a little orange haired   kid, James Holmes.  

And when he was born,   his birth mother appeared in court both times there was court held with him   and stood up for him and begged the judge, pleaded with the judge for mercy on him because she said when she gave him up for adoption, the FBI   took him.   So we've got organizations that take children, and I've just been looking into this, and it's crazy, man. They take babies even before birth, and they start working on them. Alright? I I have one here in Kansas City for you on that baby birth Let let me let me let me finish this little bit here so you get a grasp on it. Just so you know these two acts, whenever you hear about Sandy Hook and you don't hear about Aurora Theatre,   Robert Holmes, Aurora Theater in Colorado.  

Sandy Hook was about Peter Lanza and his real son, Ryan.   Adam never existed.   They worked for Capitol   and they were to testify.   Lanza and Holmes were to testify before the senate about the LIBOR scandal. The London interbank offered rate scandal.   The scandal rolls on and they change the acronym,   but that's why you never hear. You hear about, oh, this was about guns, taking our guns, and, oh, this was about, you know, SSRIs. And this was you know? But they never put those two together, and I have done it several times right in front of Fetzer as well as many other times. Uh-huh. You have to know that multi pronged. Yeah. Well, it's always about the money.   It's follow the money. It's the international Jew bankers.  

The world's foremost problem is as Henry Ford told us a hundred years ago.   They're not about to let up the curb seat. I'm just saying. I wanna share Right. These were too I wanna share with you about a baby that was You need to quit you need to quit interrupting her until she lets you go.  

[03:02:03] Unknown:

That's what you need to do. I thought she was getting ready to end. She was talking, and you were interrupting her.  

[03:02:10] Unknown:

So Okay. You know what? Exgentile yeah. Thanks, Paul. This is this is a good good little thing here because this is when I was yelling at Fetzer about not listening.   And on my show before, I'd played a part where I called in, and Tom wasn't listening.   It was about Adolf Hitler, and he died a natural death on 02/13/1962.   And Tom says, oh, and he's still alive. Well, no. He wasn't listening.   We need to listen to each other. Missus Cube does a lot of real good information about that. So let me test if you were listening. What did I just say? Can you summarize what I said   about those two things?  



[03:02:47] Unknown:

You you were just talking about how  

[03:02:49] Unknown:

somebody was telling you that Hitler didn't die, how he escaped the hear that. Okay. I just gave that example for not listening. What did I just tell you before that about the two? About Sandy Hook and what else? What was the other thing I told you about?  

[03:03:03] Unknown:

About Sandy Hook and, Aurora.   You you were talking about how how the shooter they how they're how they're connected.  

[03:03:11] Unknown:

I was listening. They're both  

[03:03:12] Unknown:

staged events,   but it's always follow the money.   That's what I'm saying. And and with these all these,   all these Jews that, protested in 2014 in New York you don't hear about, they were protesting the IDF draft. And so do we have? What? We have Americans   that go over there   for the IDF and come back. And like Brian Mast who has artificial legs   there in Florida,   wearing the IDF   costume, I'm gonna call it, uniform   in congress.   And every congress creator has a star of Rem fan flag except Thomas Massie.   We're occupied.   Go ahead. I yield.  



[03:03:59] Unknown:

This child that was born February   at 11PM was taken by the FBI and disappeared, and nobody said nothing.   Not even this family is even concerned or even tried to look. It's the craziest thing I ever seen in my life.   But I have a memory that's uncanny. I can remember back when I was six months old,   and and one of my family members in the Guinness Book of World Record for memory. That's why that's how I'm able to pull things   up that of of   that that are very difficult sometimes to remember. But, Murrah, I really appreciate you. Like I said, I'd like to get your contact information because I wanna share this video of this guy who's being remotely controlled by the vaccine,   and and they put something in his you know, they did some surgery and put something in his head, and they can communicate from him from the hospital to his house.  

You know? And Yeah. I mean, it it's the craziest thing I've ever seen. I got his testimony   on on video.  

[03:04:57] Unknown:

Mhmm. Yeah. They're doing all kind of stuff, and they're right for it. They keep advancing too. But, my host, you know, on the host schedule on republicbroadcasting.org,   I have a page there. And it's no secret. I only have two email accounts, but the one there is probably easiest to remember. It's mer bailey, m e r b a I l e y, at hot mail dot com.  

[03:05:18] Unknown:

Perfect.   I thank you guys, man. Thank you for allowing me to speak. You know, I I do have to get back to work, but I listen to you guys. I may not may not be able to talk all the time, but I'm I am in the background. I I know there are others just like us too, and most of the time, people are scared to come forward. I don't care if they wanna send me to the other side. I'm I'm prepared.  

[03:05:39] Unknown:

Hey, John. And I yeah. Can you post that roboted man in the FCC chat here?  

[03:05:48] Unknown:

You know? In   if I can figure out how to do that,   I'm not a tech genius by any means. I'm 54, and I just never really wanted to mess with it. I can do it, and and I will try.   But if it's, like, it's really complicated or something that it takes a little bit of figuring out, I'll be honest. I'm not the sharpest guy when it comes to tech, but I'll I can give it to Merr, and maybe Merr can do that.  

[03:06:11] Unknown:

Okay. Thank you.  

[03:06:12] Unknown:

Yes, ma'am.  

[03:06:15] Unknown:

Hey. Thank you, guys. I'm I'm just barely   go ahead. Go ahead, Brent.  

[03:06:20] Unknown:

I just wanna say something about the video that I might say something about the video that played.   Number one,   those aren't our planes.   Those aren't our men. They are not on our side.   They are theirs.   The Houthi.   Let's see here.   They're fighting the New World Order.   So I would say   they're freedom fighters for themselves.   Yeah. And then, also,   the   narrator went and said,   oh,   it tore the roof off,   and I'll sing you a little ditty   to the roof off the sock   or roof off the no. Fuck it. Roof off the fuck it. So roof off the sucker. You remember that song? I didn't wanna say   BMF.  

But Right.   And then also,   look at how they're   saying they're fighting,   the Houthi.   That's the way they're going to be fighting Us.   I yield.  

[03:07:48] Unknown:

You know, I was thinking when I was watching that video. Putting words in your mouth, Brent, but Us stands for The US.  

[03:07:59] Unknown:

And noticed that there were   numerous   photos   of   soldiers wearing masks.   You know, how long did it take them to put that together?  

[03:08:18] Unknown:

You know, I did get to I did get to thinking while I was watching that video   that   any   organized   insurrection   or uprising against   the corporate government   can expect to have their ass handed to them,   which is why   individuals   stepping out of the system   and regaining their nationality   as nationals of The United States Of America   is the only way   to peck away at this mountain.   Because if 10 people get together talking about doing something organized,   they will be infant infiltrated   or annihilated.   And they don't care what And  

[03:09:07] Unknown:

very often, it's the ones that are setting it up that are the ones that are actually the infiltrators,   trying to draw people in like a magnet. And if you look at these these these pictures, these Hooties, like I said, the pictures I've seen, they look like the usury suspects. I wouldn't be surprised surprised that it's not just war games and because they've been destroying Yemen for some time now. And, apparently, there's biblical history there.   Egyptian,   historian Ashraf,   Ezra   has written about this attack fairy culture.   And in that, he, also states how in '49,   the British and the Americans   airlifted 50,000   Yemenese Jews, real Jews,   to   Israel.  

Okay? And then and then the the babies would be taken for WellCare or whatever, and they're they would come back and tell their parents, oh, your baby died, but they would give them to an Ashkenazi   couple to raise.  

[03:10:08] Unknown:

Who amongst us does not feel that we are being   infiltrated   our small group from time to time?  

[03:10:17] Unknown:

Oh, I know it for a fact.   I don't think we are. I know we are.  

[03:10:27] Unknown:

You.   Yeah. You.  

[03:10:39] Unknown:

There's just there's just certain things that you that you can talk about,   and then people will jump in there to change the subject.   Now I'm not saying about anything about the last person,   but I don't know. It might be possible that they might cut him off after one minute because if they don't, he'll go on for fifteen,   and they just don't have the airtime for that.  

[03:11:11] Unknown:

I don't I don't know how many sorties we've flown over there now,   Probably a thousand,   and they're still launching missiles at shipping in in Israel.   So,   the only way you're gonna dislodge   these people   is with about 500,000   troops,   and that's just not gonna happen.  

[03:11:34] Unknown:

Well, Hegseth came out and said,   fit not fat. Right?   And Colonel Khan picked up on it, so, they're trying to get some kind of military in shape to, go over and be slaughtered.  

[03:11:53] Unknown:

Well, that was interesting. The show took an interesting turn   because   it's still on,   but now is as good a time as any to take it down. So   this has been the after show portion of the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales on eurofolkradio.com   and radio.globalvoiceradio.net.   Our website is thematrixdocs.com.   The matrix docs, d 0 c s, Com.   You will find   archives. You will find downloadables.   You will find links to the radio streams, to free conference calls so you can join us live on the show,   exhibits,   all kinds of information.   I'm serious. Pack a lunch, stay the day, baby, and don't spare the popcorn.  

We'll catch you here Monday through Saturday, 11AM to 1PM eastern time   on the platforms   previously mentioned.   On EuroFolk Radio, we have the first two hours of the program   on radiosoapbox.com,   1 0 6 point 9 WBOU   FM Chicago.   They catch the first hour,   Monday through Friday or Tuesday through Friday,   with respect to Radio Soapbox.   And Global Voice Radio Network catches the whole show plus after show   until this very moment right now. Thank you for being with us. We'll catch you right back here   the next time for the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales.   Bye.  

Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.   Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.