In this episode of Radio Ranch, host Roger Sayles delves into the intricacies of the administrative state and its impact on personal freedom. He explains the difference between direct and indirect taxes, highlighting the significance of the income tax as a progressive head tax. Roger also discusses the importance of understanding the regulatory framework, particularly the distinction between substantive and interpretive regulations, and how these apply to individuals who have filed affidavits to reclaim their rights. The conversation touches on historical examples, such as the French Revolution's influence on the administrative state, and the role of the Administrative Procedures Act in shaping modern governance.
Listeners are encouraged to explore the concept of residency and its implications on legal status, with references to Vatel's "Law of Nations" and the historical context of residency as a legal term. The episode also features discussions on the Noahide laws, the significance of affidavits in asserting personal sovereignty, and the challenges of navigating the complex legal landscape. Roger emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal nuances to effectively challenge the administrative state and reclaim individual freedoms.
[00:00:14]
Unknown:
This Mirror Stream is brought to you in part by mymymyboost.com for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function with sluggish mitochondria is kinda like running an engine that's low on oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by PhatPhix, p h a t p h I x, dot com, and also iTero Planet for the terahertz frequency wand by Preif International. That's iTeroPlanet.com. Thank you, and welcome to the program. Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
[00:01:34] Unknown:
Well, we would too, Alvin, and we're trying, and we're gonna make another stab at it right here today on the Thursday edition. Jueves, that's in Spanish, j u e v e s. Jueves is Thursday, and, it is the April 10. Oh, five days away from real April Fool's Day. Roger Sales, your host, Radio Ranch, and we have our little get together, and, we generally, maybe with some rare exceptions, have some extra hands helping us offer out our offering of freedom. And the man that oversees that is mister Paul Beener. And so at this point, we always like to have him come out and recognize them and give them proper credit for helping us, don't we?
Yes, sir. Paul, I do use Yes. Okay. Good.
[00:02:32] Unknown:
We're we're actually on an abbreviated list of platforms today because I noticed that WDRN is now with us. So we're on radiosoapbox.com. Thanks to our buddy Paul across the drink.
[00:02:44] Unknown:
Our buddies. Eurofolkradio.com.
[00:02:48] Unknown:
Thanks to pastor Eli James, and we're on Global Voice Radio, radio dot global voice radio dot net. Our website is free and where you can find the links to free conference calls so you can join us live on the show is thematrixdocs,d0cs,.com. You can also find new student section interviews and fun stuff. So and that's it's a
[00:03:14] Unknown:
very abbreviated list. This Okay. Oh, yeah. Like I said, varies from day to day because of different circumstances. What is Alan still trying to do some engineering stuff or something out there?
[00:03:26] Unknown:
Yes. Yeah. You know, what he's what he's working on is he's working on an automation system because he's got multiple streams, and he's setting up automation systems that will rotate, podcasts that a system automatically downloads just to fill the broadcast day. You know, that thing you had trouble with when, People's Patriot Network, you know, you were trying to find programs to, like, fill out the broadcast day. That's
[00:03:58] Unknown:
that has been the quest of radio people since the beginning of the industry is to find programming.
[00:04:06] Unknown:
Right. Well, what d r what WDRN is doing is, trying to, grab from a selected list of podcasters, grabbing their most recent programs, and then inserting them into a schedule, a rotating schedule. So and, GVTV will be doing the same thing.
[00:04:32] Unknown:
Yeah.
[00:04:34] Unknown:
And, yeah, Radio Ranch will be going video.
[00:04:40] Unknown:
Oh my god. Because
[00:04:41] Unknown:
yeah. Because you'll have a channel on gvtv.net.
[00:04:46] Unknown:
I'm I'm I'm like Rince. I'm not a big video guy. I don't think you need to see me talking. I'd rather have your ears than your eyes.
[00:04:56] Unknown:
Right. Videosoapbox.com, I think, is,
[00:05:01] Unknown:
is in the woods. Little cartoon up there or something. We'll figure it out. That's cool. Okay. So we and, what did you were you gonna add something else about Allen, Allen's stuff? That's about it. Alright. Okay. Well, here we go. Do do you hear the squeal that you alluded to earlier? Do you hear it?
[00:05:23] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, I I was able to pull it out with equalization. So, Alright. It's it's not completely gone, but Okay. But it's passed
[00:05:33] Unknown:
now. Alright. I sent you a, very pretty short little, video I discovered this morning when I couldn't sleep very well last night, up and down for a few times. And, that's very interesting information. I've never heard it before. Actually, it's on our on our buddies. And, it's interesting because this is before Sabotize v. But at some point, if you'll go hunt that up, I'd love to play that for the audience.
[00:06:03] Unknown:
How did you send it to me?
[00:06:05] Unknown:
By email. I Yeah. You you gotta tell me how you sent it to me. Well, I understand that. I understand that. Last time we tried Skype, I don't know if it ever did show up. So I don't know. And don't forget here's where we get to deeper into the month, myself and several other people had voiced an interest in having you go over the transition from Skype as we've known it for many, many years to, Microsoft tools. Tools or tool shed or what is it? Tools? Teams. What other tool oh, Teams. Teams. What other stuff's in there?
[00:06:46] Unknown:
It it looks very similar to Skype. It does support, calls to real phones. But, I don't believe that, Skype to phone subscriptions are available. It's just like a general subscription for Teams. And,
[00:07:05] Unknown:
like, So that just goes into the $10 a month. Right?
[00:07:09] Unknown:
Right. But one thing with Teams that is, like, no fun is that if you have the free version of Teams, you can basically do everything, and you could talk one on one to somebody forever. You know? But Uh-huh. If you've got a conference call going on it, it limits you to sixty minutes and then hangs every hangs up on everyone.
[00:07:32] Unknown:
Okay. That's that's a problem. So Okay. Can you call 800 numbers with it?
[00:07:38] Unknown:
I don't know. I don't I don't know. I would assume you do. I would hope.
[00:07:45] Unknown:
Microsoft, you clowns. Okay. Well, at some point, because I imagine, I'm I'm a go ahead and switch over and do it. So, anyway, the the trials and tribulations of our technological age, ranch hands, cowboys, cowgirls, and little freedom seekers everywhere. That's what we're here for is for you people, if you choose. And if you're damn sick and tired of being under the command and voluntary servitude in a condition of, of what they call the English variety of slavery, to these, absolutely almost a subhuman or inhuman Zionist, Frankist, Sabbatean Jews, we can get you out from under their grip.
And it's a wonderful process, and it's very stimulating information, especially as they continue to get more and more and more exposed. It appears almost every day, and they fight back. And the more they fight back, the more people see who they are. And they're in a they're in a, it would appear they're in a downward death spiral. Oh, man. What a wonderful event to watch. So we can help. We're the ones that have got the, the mirror for the vampire, the silver stake in the heart, the cross for the vampire here. So, they they are they're they're they're pretty damn scared of us because nobody else and I've said this a few times, and I wish some of you other historically oriented people might correct me if I'm wrong.
I've never seen anybody get these guys in the condition we've got them in right here today in 2025. Never throughout all of history. He I'm gonna show you and play you this little, Paul will, hopefully, this little video here of what happened back in 12/2009 or so. No. It was Louis the ninth, and it was in the December. And, this is a very short couple minutes. Could did you find that and able to key it up there, Paul, for me?
[00:10:01] Unknown:
Yes. I'm
[00:10:03] Unknown:
I'm working on it. You're working on it. Right. Okay. Well, it's very interesting information. I'd never heard this before. This goes back on the historical view of these creeps and and, what has happened to them down throughout history. And this was in France, and, it was pretty interesting to me. So, just just say yay when you have got it ready to go, Paul, and the volume seemed a little low when I listened to it this morning. You can check all that stuff as we get going with it, but it's just a little interesting information. This goes on top recently, of course. We talked about it earlier this week or last week, whichever one it was, of the lady that's taken over the, command of the European Council, the EU Council, Vander whatever.
And, she's up there saying these are the Talmudic rules of Europe and starts laying out all of the, stuff that you'd see the Pharisees, or the Pharisees, actually. I should inform William and them about that label. The Pharisees, that's what we call these modern day bastards because they're really the Pharisees, but they've got much more technology and many years under their belt to perfect their trade. And we don't like them hiding behind the rest of the Jews. Because every time you try and go after them, oh, antisemite. No. No. Well, that then then to cure it, we got a label for them, and that is Phariseites. And that is, of course, Pharisees and parasites combined. So now that's a label that you can pin on them that they can't hide from.
They can't go anywhere. They're parasites, and they are. And this evidence is by Europe. By last week, I noticed one of them, Paul, was one of the rules was if you're traveling on Friday night before the Sabbath and you're away from home, the rules that you follow, that that kind of crap, the, the the same stuff they were doing in Jesus's time. They were very famous. I I bought a book on the Pharisees one time years ago at a patriot meeting and read it. And the one thing I took away from it was the Pharisees were always changing the rules, I e.
On on the Sabbath, you can't go more than a mile or, I will say, a mile from your house with your meat. Wow. That meat's your food. Although with these trans people, you don't know. So, anyway, what they would do is they'd leave the home and go nine tenths of a mile and sit down and say, well, this is my home now, and I'll get up and go another nine tenths of a mile. So they were always bending the rules, changing the definitions, whatever it is so they can get what they want. So, and we're gonna talk about that because I've forgotten about it. We got William and I hope some of his folks back today. And I wanna tell you what, we discovered one day with Brent years and years ago on a word called core band. But if we can remember, we'll get to that story for those of you who might not have heard it. In the interim, Paul, have you got that little thing queued up?
[00:13:22] Unknown:
Yeah. Yes. I, have it right here. Let's see if this works.
[00:13:30] Unknown:
Alright. Louis the sixteenth had his relationship with Marie Antoinette. Louis the fifteenth had his thing about furniture. But do you know about Louis the ninth, the king who tried to wipe out Judaism once and for all? Crowned in 12/26, Louis the ninth was the type of king who liked to take justice into his own hands. He'd often personally judge cases and deliver punishments in his great hall in Paris. And he also had a thing about the Jews. He forced Jews into manual labor with the ordinance of Malang in 12/30 and liked to debate Jews about their religion.
In December, pope Gregory the ninth received a letter claiming that the Talmud, the enormous Jewish text that had defined Jewish practice since being compiled in the fifth century, attacked the Catholic church at least 35 times and needed to be destroyed. If the pope agreed, there would be no more Talmud. And as an added bonus, no more Jewish practice. The pope announced that the Talmud was going to be put on trial and instructed all Catholic institutions in France, Italy, Spain, and Portugal to seize all copies in their midst. Officials burst into synagogues and confiscated precious handwritten volumes of the Talmud from synagogues across Europe.
2 Months later, the Talmud was put on trial. And can you guess who oversaw it? Yep. This guy. King Louis the ninth ordered four prominent rabbis to defend the Talmud. They faced off against Nicholas Donan, a Parisian Jew who had abandoned his faith and converted to Catholicism. Donan was not a fan of Judaism. He was also the one who'd written the damning letter to the pope that started this crisis. King Louis set the rules. Rule number one, the rabbis couldn't criticize Christianity in any way. And if rule number two could have been announced, it would have been that there's no way the Jews can win. The trial did not go well.
At one point, King Louie got so enraged, he shouted that a good Christian would plunge his sword into a Jew and not debate. One rabbi had to flee for his life. The remaining prominent rabbis argued all they could, but the Talmud was found guilty and condemned to burning. Two years later, officials searched all over France for any remaining volumes of Talmud and other Hebrew books. On 06/17/1242, '20 '4 wagons deposited close to 10,000 books at the Place De Greve near Notre Dame Cathedral where they were burned. After the trial, King Louis expelled the Jews from France and led crusades to The Holy Land that targeted Jewish communities along the way.
And even with his crimes against the Jews, they still named the city after him. How about that for
[00:16:36] Unknown:
St. Louis. Yikes,
[00:16:37] Unknown:
I've never heard any of that before. Did you ever heard that, Paul?
[00:16:41] Unknown:
No. Never heard it.
[00:16:44] Unknown:
So just to give you some perspective on how long this has been going on, of course, the Talmud, she referenced it correctly, was not written down until five hundred years after they crucified, our our lord and savior. And, it was before that, that's what Jesus railed on in the New Testament, as the oral tradition. The the the the, tradition of the elders is what they call it. And, it's what he called it because it was an oral tradition that even we I asked on here one day, how long was it from when the Israelites were released by Nebuchadnezzar before Jesus came on the scene. I think somebody said six hundred years. Do you remember that the other day, Paul?
[00:17:38] Unknown:
No.
[00:17:39] Unknown:
Don't remember. Well, it seems like that's what it was. I don't remember who who one of the gals, I think, chimed up an answer on that. If that's correct, then it was another five hundred years after they crucified him, murdered him, gave him up for Barabbas. That's another word for him. I call him occasionally the the Barabbasites. That pretty well nails them too. But there's eleven hundred years right there of when it was only passed down from father to son orally. I mentioned it the other day. I'm sure all of us played that game when we were young secret in a circle. You know, you get ten, twelve people in a circle and somebody would say something, he'd whisper it to the next one, he'd whisper it to the next one. And by the time it got back to you, it wasn't even anything close to what you originally said. Well, that's just in a circle of 10 or 12 people. Right? You know what I'm talking about, Paul? That phenomenon, I'm sure everybody experienced it. Well, what about eleven hundred years of passing it down from father to son? You don't think there's anything mixed up or added or or any vindictiveness or, anything else sewn in there, on this oral tradition. Do you? Of course, there was.
Yeah. So just to analyze it a little bit more, I was saying a minute ago, I guess I guess William's with us and maybe some of his crew, and we may have some newer folks with us. Maybe, Paul, there may be some people from the Jeff Rent shows here. Maybe. Maybe. And maybe. I wanted to tell Telvez is the word in Spanish that Telvez. I wanted to go over what we discovered in the some of the, well, this is was the most about the most significant, to me anyway, impactful, impressionable on me, incident that we've came come up with, and that was the fellow before my book was published back in 02/2011, there a a guy got I don't even still know how he got a hold of a copy of it, honestly.
But his name was Gary Kinghorn. At that time, he's still around. We reconnected here a while back. Gary was the, the head of marketing. Get this, Paul. He was the head of merchandising, not marketing, merchandising for Cisco. Okay? Pretty big time job internationally. And, so he was, very freedom oriented. He's part of pastor Gregory's flock out there on the West Coast. And, so he wrote a book review of my book, the first one that was written. It was a he put it on the Dollar Vigilante, Berwick's channel. That's when Berwick was still living down in Argentina, and Gary had a house. He came went down to Doug Casey's place and bought a lot and had a house built. He never brought his family down, unfortunately.
And then there was gonna be a nice school, homeschool. And when that didn't pan out, they had moved down and they moved back to The States. I think they're still up there. Regardless, Gary wrote that. And, when we announced it that night on on Bennett's show, it blew out the server for, like, a couple hours. People wanted to get at it. We'd been promoting the book and talking about this information for several months. So, anyway, then, Gary wrote another article after that, but it said Jesus was an anarchist. You probably still find that over on the Dollar Vigilante too if you want to read it.
And, in that, he was talking about a word called Corban, c o r b a n. And, that it was only mentioned twice in the Bible, and it was, they're violating the laws of Moses. And and then he went on with the article in his point that he was making. And, so I got curious about that word. I'd never seen it before, and you may not have heard it before. And, but it's C O R B A N, Corban. So I went on the Internet and tried to, gain some kind of understanding of it and, got pretty much what I'd gotten kind of out of the article. It was, Jesus used the word twice in the New Testament, Korban.
And, he was accusing the Pharisees of, violating the laws of Moses because they were using the laws of Korban and some of this stuff, but it really didn't give you a total picture of it still. I was still a little fuzzy on it. And so, we have these are the real early days of doing shows with Brent, which was probably twelve years ago maybe this happened, something like that. And so, Brent and I are on the show one day, and I asked him about it. And he goes, well, let me go to my study bible and, see what I wrote about it in the footnotes. Well, isn't that interesting?
So it turns out that in those days, you'll probably be be surprised to know that they would corrupt the youth. And so what, under the laws of Moses, as the parents got older, they moved in with the children or the children moved in with them, whatever, and they helped them in their old age. And and what they would do is they'd save up throughout their lives of things that had value and, that in in their older age, it would be the children that would take the things of the wealth and sell it to help support them in their older ages. They live their lives out. And so what was happening in Jesus's time was the Pharisees would use this Korban thing.
And it kind of like a self help remedy in Babylonian, like we talked about, lean, loving, garnishment, and seizure. Well, this be like seizure. Okay? And and and very similar. There's no process. The children would come back and tell the Pharisees at the temple that they had gold or silver or whatever it was. And so then the priests would declare it Corban, which meant it was their property. And they would go to the house, and they would seize it and carry it back to the temple. And then they would sell it to support the social system, which I didn't know existed, and I'd bet you didn't either.
They would sell it to support the social system of the day, the Social Security system of the day. Now you know the origins of where that came from. And, if, if you switched over and became a Christian like that Jew in the video we just heard a minute ago did, they would kick you out of the social system. So your children could would would steal all the wealth, and then they'd kick you out of anything else if you turned Christian. So that's a little bit of an insight into, I don't know, where into the shows with Brent and I and the depth of his study and understanding is, it still impresses the the pants off of me. What were you gonna say something there a second ago, Paul?
[00:25:38] Unknown:
No. No. It's but I know I know about that because I listen to all of these shows, and you've talked about this before. So Yes. That that's another morsel of brilliance that I have picked up from you.
[00:25:54] Unknown:
I mean, it's just like that little tidbit right there. You're not gonna get anywhere else on the face of this Earth to my knowledge.
[00:26:02] Unknown:
No. Absolutely not.
[00:26:04] Unknown:
K. So and what insight? I want to thank, and I was listening to it this morning while I was, taking a shower and stuff, so I didn't really get to hear it. I did go back and relisten to more of it. One of our listeners sent me a recent cliff high, interview, and he's talking about at the end of it that the, that our pals have got some real difficult years ahead for them. The exposure Israel's gonna go. Israel won't take Jews back. Jews his his information says they'll be leaving The US and other countries trying to get into Israel. Israel won't take them back, and everything they're gonna be going through is gonna last at least a decade, maybe longer.
So I'll I'll have to go back and relisten to that where I can really, pay attention to it because it was a bit distracting this morning. But, these guys, man, they're really lashing out. They're trying to do all everything to cover the things that are being exposed. And just like the snake eating its tail, the more they fight to overcome it, the more they get exposed themselves. And, that's what's happening that I see is, a joyful time. And, boy, would I hope to get them on the edge of the cliff and our information be at least part of pushing them over. You bastards, you're listening to this. We got your asses. K? And you got a lot of reason to be scared.
Because, to you, we are terrorists because we got the truth, and you're absolutely, totally, 100% exposed. And you can't do a damn thing about it except take the mask off. That's your only other option. And there's billions of us and a handful of you. And we sure do like those odds.
[00:27:58] Unknown:
Yes. We do.
[00:27:59] Unknown:
It's a matter of time, you slimy bastards. We gotcha. K? What's that noise in the background? Somebody at a sheet metal place or something?
[00:28:12] Unknown:
Some Is it Mike? You hear me, Roger?
[00:28:14] Unknown:
I hear you now. Yeah. Who's this?
[00:28:18] Unknown:
Oh, it's Larry. Hey, Larry. Can Morning. Is there too much noise?
[00:28:24] Unknown:
No. You're fine. How you doing? Okay.
[00:28:27] Unknown:
Good. How are you? No. I'm alright. Yeah. I was just Could be Okay. Go ahead.
[00:28:33] Unknown:
I was just gonna say could be better, but could be worse too. So go on.
[00:28:38] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. I was just gonna add that maybe it was twenty years ago. You said, has anyone ever, you know, offered an explanation behind Corban? And I think it was, like, twenty years ago, I was in a church, a Christian church, an independent fundamental Baptist church at that. And I did hear a preacher explain it just like you explained it. And, but that's the only time I ever heard that explanation. And the problem is most every Christian church in the world, they are promoting, and I know you know this, they're promoting what's known as Christian Zionism.
And, so they even if a if a preacher understands some of these things that you go over, like about Korban, the problem is they just think that was a thing of the past. And, you know, it was something that happened just before Jesus walked the earth and, you know, all of that's just, like, done done away with. They don't they don't obviously, their eyes aren't opened to see what's really going on in the world like we learn on on your radio ranch. So I just wanted to offer that comment.
[00:29:56] Unknown:
Thank you, Larry. It is some it's astounding to me that this doesn't have more a wider resonance, but after all these years, I just gotta accept that it doesn't and then try and narrow down and find ways to connect with folks like you. Find folks like William and his, his friends and associates. And and, there's a you know, there it doesn't apply but to a small percentage. That's the bad news. But the good news is that it only applies to a small percentage because that's all we really need. You know, we don't need to have everybody doing this. I we had 10% of the country, 30,000,000 people filed affidavits and pulled themselves out of the tax system.
Yeah, that's it. That'd do pretty good bit of damage right there. Those would be your more, conscientious and people that are hardworking and and build businesses and stuff. And you start pulling their contributions out of that system, and you got something. You know? So we'll see. I I this I could see the thing building, Larry, where the these people are being exposed, exposed, exposed. They're desperately trying to cover it up, get rid of Chuck Schumer, do anything we can do to keep it from unraveling here underneath us, all the crap that Netanyahu's got going on at home back over there in Satan's sandbox.
I I think I mentioned it to you guys the other day. I heard this last weekend on Judge Napolitano, one of his segments with, the guy from Grey Zone. I can't think of his name right now. He's a Jewish kid. You know, he's a journalist. But it was last week in in Israel, in Tel Aviv, I think. And Netanyahu was on the stand being questioned by the judges in the court. You know, he's been having all these big problems with all this corruption and these charges they've got him on. He's on the stand testifying, and the Israeli police bust into the courtroom and tell the judges they've gotta stop the proceedings because they're going to arrest Netanyahu or take him back for questioning because they just found two of his close aids taking money from Qatar.
Well, it turns out that Qatar is where they started Hamas twenty something years ago. And so Qatar has been trying to lace a public relations scheme in The US. They gave their money exchange, and they went in and took Netanyahu out of an open trial back to downtown police so they could interrogate him before he could talk to these other two guys where they could sync their stories. Open court. This is something else that came out a while back. I heard it on Harrison one morning. But it turns out it was an a ten year old story. And from about '9 2011 Paul, I don't even know if you've heard this.
In 2011, Netanyahu had the best known and best respected shrink in the country in a specialty area as his psychiatrist. Do you have you heard this? He had this psychiatrist, and the psychiatrist committed suicide. And in the suicide note, he blamed Netanyahu and his incessant lying for his suicide.
[00:33:41] Unknown:
Uh-huh. That's rich.
[00:33:47] Unknown:
I I mean, these people are wackos, folks.
[00:33:50] Unknown:
K? I don't know. It's So, anyway, they're out there screwed up to make you shrink.
[00:33:55] Unknown:
Commit suicide. I'm
[00:33:57] Unknown:
I mean, come on, man. That was a that's a true story. I'm glad that Harrison brought it back or it's after October 11 or whatever with a lot some stuff happened and somebody, like, brought that story back, and I had missed it totally and didn't hear it back in the in the day it happened. But anyway, that's who we're dealing with. They're getting exposed. We've got the ultimate exposure. Just keep learning. Keep growing. Keep being empowered. Keep telling others our time will come. Now who was trying to say something there? I think it's Joe. Just confirming your story, Roger.
Hey, Joe. I remember this same story. Yes.
[00:34:44] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:34:45] Unknown:
Good enough. So is there anybody that has any questions, or comments or anything? We can kinda ride in the show here. Those are the yes. There's a female right there. Which one of our gals is that? Nancy?
[00:34:59] Unknown:
This is Rochelle in Idaho.
[00:35:02] Unknown:
Okay, Rochelle. Talk right in your program. Okay. Well, it's an addict it's addicting information. And I promise you, you can't get it anywhere else. Okay? Now what can we do for you today? Talk right in your microphone there if you could, sweetie.
[00:35:18] Unknown:
Do you happen to know or anybody online here? Which of the states did not, legislate and verify the no hide laws?
[00:35:29] Unknown:
No. I have no idea.
[00:35:32] Unknown:
Oh,
[00:35:32] Unknown:
I was Roger High School. Just a yes. I I Julie may know. Julie, do you can you answer that question on these Noah Hyde laws that don't apply to us? All four all 50 all 50 governors have passed the Noah Hyde laws. Okay. Well, good for them. Gone through the legislature
[00:35:49] Unknown:
on all 50? I believe they have. I have die offered you can go to author diana ketterman dot com. I have her book. I read her whole book. She's got over 248 citations in the back of it to support her facts. Okay.
[00:36:05] Unknown:
Good. Thank you. You're welcome. Yeah. Well, the good news, Rochelle, is the the those NOAA high laws don't apply to nationals, so there's good news for you. Good.
[00:36:16] Unknown:
Okay. But Anybody else? The fact that they passed them.
[00:36:21] Unknown:
Well, George Bush did it with like executive orders. I don't I don't know about the legislature. That's how how I know they did it on the federal level. I didn't know it had gone through all 50 states, but okay. I mean, you know, they passed that law that said you can't Yeah. Be against diversify, sanction, and whatever, d DOB or whatever it was. He the states are trying to tell people you can't support them. Well, screw you. Roger? Excuse me. Yes.
[00:36:55] Unknown:
Yeah. They're passed in February under Trump under the first administration, but it goes all the way back to Carter. He passed them and it's called Education Day USA. They hit them underneath Education Day.
[00:37:11] Unknown:
Yeah. A big surprise there. Register.gov.
[00:37:13] Unknown:
It's on federalregister.gov, I believe, and whitehouse.gov and even congressgov. But I thought that was
[00:37:22] Unknown:
Alright. Well, the good news is if you churches. If you filed your affidavit that they don't apply to you and tell them to shove it up there Good.
[00:37:31] Unknown:
Whatever. Yeah. You can go to Alright. Well You can go to I gotta read that book by, yeah, Diana Ketterman, but you can go to Stu Peters, on Rumble. He just posted something. I sent it to you, Roger. Very damning about the Jews. So, I sent it to you in an email. Yeah. He's on them. He's got a lot of stuff on the Noahide lot, but forget that he's just got a lot of stuff about
[00:37:54] Unknown:
the about the Zionists on there. Yeah. Oh. They're getting really exposed, and my I tip my hat to Stu Peters. He's very spoken about it.
[00:38:04] Unknown:
Yeah. Roger. A lot of feedback from that too. Okay. Thank you. Alright. Alright, Rochelle. Okay. Yes. I heard Larry was,
[00:38:13] Unknown:
wanting to Yeah. Jam. So
[00:38:16] Unknown:
I think you were you were off the air already, and Julie was questioning, Brent about the Noahide laws. And I was kinda half listening at the time, so maybe Julie can tell the audience and you what what, Brent's explanation was.
[00:38:38] Unknown:
Well, that or we can ask him again tomorrow.
[00:38:43] Unknown:
No. I mean, Julie heard his explanation, so I was wondering if she can tell the audience
[00:38:47] Unknown:
what Brent's explanation was. Well, if if if she doesn't, and and we can ask him again tomorrow was my comment. So whatever Julie, you wanna inform us what Brent said? If you can remember all that, the pertinent
[00:39:01] Unknown:
Yeah. I can't I can't remember what Brent said, but, he maybe he should come on. But, I mean, they're all outlined in Diane Ketterman's book and they all sound really great on on the surface, but what is what's underlying them as to how evil they are? I mean, it's basically, I mean, if you're a Christian, you get beheaded, you can't worship more than one God and their God is Satan. You cannot do the father, the son, and the holy spirit. That's blasphemous. You cannot eat any animals. You the list just goes on and on, but they they do all of that, but we can't.
[00:39:38] Unknown:
Okay. Well, screw them. That's the message I've got for them. You're listening? Screw you, you wacko bastards. Okay. Chicken slingers. That's what somebody used to call them. I thought that was good. Chicken slingers. So, guys, that and that's a good one, isn't it?
[00:40:00] Unknown:
Yeah. That's a good one.
[00:40:01] Unknown:
So, alright. Who else has got something? There must be somebody in the audience. William, you with us today? Are you free? I mean, everybody's just Yeah. I'm here. I'm here. Hey, brother. How are you doing? Everybody's yeah. They're they're descending on you. All these period. Give me William's email.
[00:40:19] Unknown:
So Oh, yeah. Yeah. You're you're welcome. You're welcome to give out my email and number at any time to anybody. Alright?
[00:40:24] Unknown:
Yeah. Okay. That's fine.
[00:40:26] Unknown:
I had a quick question, though. I know we had a Yeah. We had stayed on yesterday. We had a a real interesting discussion yesterday, myself, Plary, that's Paul and Larry, and, Julie, I think. But I thought and and I really appreciate that discussion. But, I was asking yesterday, Roger, about the tariffs. Can you say any anything of you know, from a historical perspective to the present, about anything about these tariffs, that Trump is I can. Imposing? Do you think they're effective or no? Well, I'll I'll give you an example in our history.
[00:41:05] Unknown:
A little bit different time. Back in the eighteen seventies. From the eighteen seventies up till 1913, we were on this tariff program. And, in the the reason I say this is, do you ever see a book called Goodbye April 15? Have you run across that yet? You're a book guy. It was Yeah. Not happening. Not. Okay. Well, it was written back in the nineties, a guy. His nom de guerre was Boston Tea Party. That wasn't his real name, obviously. But, it was a good book on IRS back then for what people knew and understood. But in that book, there was a cartoon reproduction from the eighteen seventies, and it was the senate, William. It was the senate of the US. And in the well of the senate down there, it was full of alligators.
And and the it was about because the tariffs were working so well and they had so much excess cash, they were afraid it was gonna corrupt the senate. That's true. K?
[00:42:14] Unknown:
So yeah. Okay. I'm on I had to unmute and respond. Yeah.
[00:42:17] Unknown:
Uh-huh. So, so, yeah, that was it was very successful. And, of course, that's what the bankers wanted to get off because they wanted to get this new scheme where we were a piece of their property, and that gives them they don't even have to bring their own money out to play then because we provide all the credit by our birth certificate being attached to the bond in the bond market. Then that's sold, and that's the original credit spout of the entire financial system. That's why this is so important to them. K? And it's not that they wanna put you in slavery, make you go pick cotton.
It's they want this power over you and this property ownership, these property rights, so they can not only start the original credit spout of the credit system, so they don't have to spend their own money. They're just making layer upon layer of compound interest on bonds and on currency. Okay? And then because they've got a property right in you, now we can have agencies with unelected bureaucrats that can take past legislation and reinterpret it to apply it to the new serfs. So those are the two reasons that they did this, really, was so they could start a credit financial system with us as the credit, build the whole financial system is built on us, our backs as slaves.
K? And so they could invoke the agency and the bureaucrat system so that they could come in and control you with unelected bureaucrats, with man made laws. That's what I refer to them as. Are you familiar with the way that works, William? The way it's set up, either the house or the senate introduces a bill, and then the other body has to pass it. So both have to pass it, and the bill has to agree on both houses. And if it doesn't, they go into what's called a conference committee and try and hammer out an agreement deal. When that's done, it's signed by the president.
When that's done, just like, well, with Trump's executive orders, it goes over if it's legislation, it goes over into a group of law books called the statutes at large. You know, there's three different books, law groups of law books in the law library. You got these excuse me. My stomach's acting up a little. You got these organic statutes at large, which when they're put in there are considered to be constitutional. They may not be, but they're considered to be until they're challenged. So they're over there in the statutes at large. By the way, that's that group of books. William, it's over in the corner with all the dust on it because nobody ever goes over there. And if you go and open book number one of the statutes at large, here's what you find.
The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, and the Northwest Ordinance. Those are still law. They're at the inside cover of volume one of a whole set of very important law books called the organic statutes at large. Now from there, they take that law and they move it over to another group of law books called the United States Code. And if they move it over in whole cloth, it's called positive law. And if they only move it over partial cloth or not at all cloth, which title 26 is, it's called non positive law.
Basically, positive law is constitutional common law, and the other is part of the Roman code, such as title 26, the Internal Revenue Service code. It was never passed by the Senate. It was never signed by the president. It was never put into the organics, statutes at large, but it was inserted into the United States code as title 26 even though it's never been passed by the senate and signed by the president. The reason for that is because it was the federal bank, the government they bankrupted. And so that's who Washington DC is the federal government, and the speaker of the house basically runs Washington, DC.
So when they brought in the tax system, it only had to apply to the federal government, so they slipped it into The United States code as title 26. And then they came over and asked you, or but but you're presumed already, don't at birth to be a citizen of The United States, and then you're a resident. And they ask you those two questions, which means you're a citizen of Washington, DC, a federal citizen under the fourteenth amendment, which means title 26 applies to you. K? And it was never a this is that United States code, the middle group of these law books, is the same thing as what happened with the Roman code. Back I told the story the other day about how self help remedies, lien, levy, garnishment, and seizure, had helped has shown the the merchant way of remedy to the Romans, and they wanted it. And over a period of two hundred years of them going to the praetor and 200 different praetors, finally, they incorporated those remedies and a lot of the Babylonian merchant code into what was the common law of Rome, basically making the Roman civil code exactly the same as The United States code. We were on here one day and asked somebody to look it up, And, they these the United States code was started in nineteen twenties right before the bankruptcy.
So that's that that fits right into the timeline. Okay? Now the one we're really concerned with are these ones at the bottom, and they're called the Code of Federal Regulations. It's a whole another set of law books, and these are only from the agencies. And they take the 50 titles of the United States Code, and by determining the subject matter and assigning it to an agency, the code of federal regulations is underneath that subject matter United States code section and interprets many of those statutes. And so that's what happened with the bankruptcy.
But we'll just I guess we'll just get into this today, William. See, the the first time they used this administrative state, deep state structure, it they I believe they used it a little bit in Rome. But the first time it was really applied was after the French Revolution. And in fact, that's what happened is they got taken over by an administrative state. And the word bureaucrat comes from the after the French Revolution, the bureaucrats would identify themselves by having burlap on their desk coverings. Somehow their desks would would have a burlap covering like a desk thing.
And in French, the word for burlap is bureau, and that's where we get the word bureaucrat. Okay? So that's what we're dealing with is the resurrection of the French Revolution and the administrative state where these agencies just pop up, and they weren't there before because there weren't anybody for them to write regulations for because there weren't any serfs. They started after 1933, and the very first I just realized this recently. The very first regulations were in March the ninth of nineteen thirty three, and they were issued by the secretary of the treasury where they could reopen the banks with the new paper currency.
Those are the first regulations. There weren't any agencies yet. They started growing after '33, and it was a cause of some clashes from the old school folks wanting to fight the well, it depends on what you wanna call it, the Jew deal, the raw deal, or the new deal. But the ones that were fighting that switch over and that change, and they'd go and win battles at the Supreme Court. And so that's when Roosevelt went back and stacked the court. And, the last time it was done, they're trying to do it again, of course, talking about it. But, anyway, so that okayed a lot of the agencies. Now the important thing about this is they did not have their rule book. Here's this whole new faction of government.
All these administrative agencies, they weren't there before. They're supposed to promulgate these things called regulations or little laws, and there's no real way to guide them on what to do and what how to do it right and how to do it wrong, what they can do, necessarily what they can't do. So they didn't get that passed until 1946 after World War two. So you had thirteen years in there, and that came out and was passed as the Administrative Procedures Act. You'll hear it referred to as the APA. And, that is in title five of the United States Code, section five five two and following.
Now basically, it's the rule book that they've got to play by. Many of our patriots that have won court cases in the past, you know, you'll hear about some celebrated win by some patriot. Well, they don't win on law generally. They win on procedure. And it's something that these administrative people either didn't do that they had to do or they did it and did it wrong. And that's where you can trip them up right there, and that's the majority of wins we've had, not on law, on this procedural stuff. So part of the things that is, required of them, and we've got some recent examples of it. First of all, there's been some really important Supreme Court cases came down last session on the administrative state and their freewheeling attitude that they'd had for a number of decades.
It's called the Chevron deference. And supposedly, what they're supposed to do under this system is we go through that situation of House and the Senate agree on a law, President signs it, goes into the organic statutes at large, comes over here to the to the, United States code. And, I'll be damned. And and they put it in the law books. And at that point, it's transferred to the agency, like the EPA or whichever. There's there's hundreds of them up there. K? Whichever agency has responsibility over that subject matter. And the court's decision in the seventies on it was a Chevron case, including Chevron, and they came to the they said, well, you're the agency.
You're the experts on this subject matter, so we're gonna let you interpret the legislation that was passed and signed by the president any way you want to. And that's where they've been so freewheeling over all these decades and these ridiculous regulations that about the only way you can get a regulation out is to have president Trump yank them out, which he's done with a bunch already, or you have to go back to the original legislation and find out what was the intent of the legislators when they passed the law and just how far the agency has deviated from interpreting it correctly.
K? So we've been going through thirty, forty years of of rogue agency stuff. Well, that got curtailed a bit in the last session. But this is what I wanted to explain to you because this is this is pretty damn important. There are not very many people that really understand this well. Before I left The States to move down here, I had a attorney. My phone rang one day. I was still in Panama City. Phone rang and some attorney, and he had a client who had an IRS problem and had heard of me and had gotten my number somehow. And, anyway, he wanted to ask me about all this stuff. And so we spent a good time on the phone explaining all this administrative state stuff and about what I'm about to explain to especially the newer people here in just a minute.
And, at the end of that conversation, and he said, you know, Roger, he said, you know more about this than 98% of the attorneys in the country. That was his statement to me. Roger? I was yes. I was kinda shocked at that, but I had a guy drill it into my head. Yes, Julie?
[00:56:47] Unknown:
Yeah. I wanted to interject here and ask you a question if I can, please. Where are the organic statutes of large, found? Are they in the USC or they are are they No. They're separate. They're Code No. They're separate.
[00:57:00] Unknown:
They're separate set of law books. They're called the organic statutes at large. They're in the law library. Go ask the law librarian. She'll point them out to you.
[00:57:10] Unknown:
They're not online?
[00:57:12] Unknown:
Well, they probably are. I don't know. I haven't looked at them. I What's the difference between the website,
[00:57:19] Unknown:
But what's the difference between the website, uscode.health.gov, and then when we go to The US when we go to the title and then The US, you know, United States
[00:57:30] Unknown:
Well, there the other other is the 50 titles of The United States code, basically, the Roman civil law. What we're talking here is the original law books of the country, the organic statutes at large.
[00:57:44] Unknown:
Okay. For The US United States code, what's the difference between UScode.health.gov? Is that the same thing as The
[00:57:54] Unknown:
US code? Well, I I hadn't looked at that, but I'm sure that's what it is. They don't want you over there in the statutes large. They throw you to the code all the time.
[00:58:03] Unknown:
Hold on. Oh, okay. Yeah.
[00:58:05] Unknown:
Okay. So they throw you to the Who's the other female there? It's Myrco. Yeah. Myrco.
[00:58:14] Unknown:
I wanted to explain,
[00:58:16] Unknown:
to you to speak right in the phone, Myrka.
[00:58:18] Unknown:
You know what? I'm gonna change my headphones.
[00:58:22] Unknown:
I got to get my You got blue you got Bluetooth on or something?
[00:58:27] Unknown:
No. The regular, Apple phone thing. I'll I'll I'll switch, and I'll explain it to Julie right now. I'll be back.
[00:58:36] Unknown:
Alright. She's gonna she's gonna be back. Larry's here. Yes, sir.
[00:58:42] Unknown:
Yeah. The, the organic statutes at large, would they be considered the positive law of The United States code?
[00:58:50] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. As I said earlier, every bill law would be Everything else. Read that. Every law that goes through that sequence, house, senate, president signs it. First place it's put is in the statutes at large because it's considered to be at that point constitution. K? Is that alright? Does that explain it? Larry, go away? Roger. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
[00:59:22] Unknown:
Alright. Yes. Roger, I'm back. Okay. So the US code, the US House, unitedstateshouse.gov website follows the organic statues at large. And Okay. The the organic statues at large, positive or non positive, it's all on there. There's a hyperlink that you can connect to the, to the organic sectors at large at the bottom of all the definitions, and that's where you find your organic sectors at large. And sometimes the organic I mean, The US code house.gov, website, link adds a little bit to the wording. So that's why I always refer back to the organic sectors at large because it has, like, the first documented law.
And then
[01:00:27] Unknown:
That's true. The US So The US Health Dot healthcode.health.gov are the organic statutes at large. Is that correct, Margaret? It's it's The US code.
[01:00:39] Unknown:
It's different it's different from The US code because they change they add things to it. The organic statutes at large is just basically simple, you know, definition, what they put together,
[01:00:54] Unknown:
you know, whenever it came in. It it was passed by the house, passed by the senate, signed by the president, considered to be constitutional, and the first set of law books it lands in is the organic statutes at large. Okay. But Marco's saying it's house.gov for the organic statutes at large. Know about that. I don't look at that stuff online. I'm telling you how it is in the in the law library. K?
[01:01:20] Unknown:
Yeah. The first the the the official law organic structures at large are the first ones, and then the US code follows what the organic structures at large has. They add a little bit of wording to their information that they do connect to the organic statutes.
[01:01:41] Unknown:
So that is on So they're two different
[01:01:43] Unknown:
Yeah. Let me let me give you a a for instance, Julie. The nationality act of 1940, that's in the statutes at large.
[01:01:56] Unknown:
Okay. Thank you.
[01:01:58] Unknown:
Okay. Now let's go on. I wanna explain the administrative state. But but there's three sets of law books. The organic statutes at large, don't forget those are the ones with the Declaration of Independence, the articles of Confederation. They're still operable. There's veneered over the, Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution. Those are the first documents in volume one when you open the first cover. They're law. K? So they then take it over to The United States code. If it's taken in the like, in that title eight, if you went and looked at title eight, you'd probably find it to be positive law, immigration naturalization act and all that, and it came over from that nationality act in 1940.
And because it was brought over basically in whole substance, it's considered to be positive law. If they bring it over halfway or not even at all as in title 26, it's called nonpositive law. And you can look inside the front cover of The United States code. I think on volume one, it may be in all of them. But they give you all 50 titles, and there's a little check mark if it's positive law or nonpositive law. K? It took me years to figure this out. I could nonpositive law? What the hell are you talking about? Okay.
So, anyway, I'm just giving you the schematics of it and how it's set up. The concept, if you will. Now the third one are these code of federal regulations. That's where the unelected bureaucrats go in and get some legislation passed to them under subject matter authority, and then they reinterpret it and put it out in regulatory form. It's called promulgating a regulation. That's the bureaucratic term. Okay? Now there's different types of regulations, and this is where it gets really important. There's different types of regulations. There's one called a statement of policy.
There's another one called an interpretive regulation, And the last one that's got teeth and a really extra procedure they have to go through because of it is called a substantive regulation. So you've got statements of policy, interpretive regulations, and substantive regulations. Now the place that they place these, I heard it referred to a few times lately, is called the federal register. The federal register is what is identified as the legal organ of the federal government. That means go back to our due process. Due process underpins all of our law, notice and the right to be heard.
So now when they promulgate a regulation, it has to be put in the federal register. All of Trump's executive orders, I saw him sign a ton of them yesterday. All of those were put in the federal register. It's the legal organ. It's where you everybody gets notice. And then if it's a get the right to be heard in a minute. Okay? But this is the reg the illegal organ where people put notice. Like in your local county, if you're going bankrupt or if you got married or if you got divorced or whatever, then if it's a big enough city, they've got their own legal organ like the federal government has got the federal register. But in a smaller town, it'll be like in the where the Juannads are, the classifieds are in the back of the newspaper. And that's where they have all those things announced. Okay? And and sometimes they you can, get demand to be heard, but other times, it's just strictly notice adhering to due process.
So here's the difference, and this is important. And I'm gonna give you a recent example of how important it is and was that all of you will relate to and remember. I promise you. Okay? So the first one is a statement of policy, and a statement of policy is exactly what it says it is. It's an administrative agency putting out some statement on some policy it's got, and it only applies to the agency itself. It doesn't apply to you. Only to the agency. Statement of policy. The second one, interpretive, also like a statement of policy, it only applies internally to the agency.
And in a minute, you'll be able to understand how you identify these. So that's the middle one. And the important thing, again, interagency of application. The third one, the substantive regulation, that one is totally different from the other two. And it is considered to have what they call general applicability. General applicability. That means it applies to everybody. It's not just interagency. So on on on regulations that apply to everybody, they've gotta go through another specific process because of the importance of the agency overseeing and adhering to the constitutional, concept of due process.
Again, they're gonna give you due process even though you've already got it by putting it in the register. K? Now you're gonna get it by the fact that they have to send this substantive regulation through a specific pro protocol before it is legit. So you go to the federal register, and at the top of the regulation, you'll see in big bold letters, it'll say notice of proposed rulemaking notice of proposed rulemaking. And then it'll give the rule, and then it'll have somebody, either a post office box or phone number, a person's name you can contact. So if you want to answer to this proposed regulation, either pro or con, you can contact MIM and give your right to be heard. Notice and the right to be heard.
So here's the notice. If you got any wannabe heard, here's who you do it and who you do it with. And then what we're gonna do as the agency, or at least what they're supposed to do, is to take all the comments that come in, go back and rediscuss the regulation, repremolgate it with the important things changed, and then they reissue it in the federal register. And they reissue it under a heading that says notice of final rulemaking. So you had notice of proposed. You had a chance to inject what you wanted to do. They've reconsidered it and put it back out, and now it's called the notice of final rulemaking.
And then it'll go down that with the new regulation. I think it's got a time limitation. It can't take effect for thirty or sixty days or something. But it's this whole process that has to do with any regulation that's got general applicability to the, people at large. Now here's the importance of everything I've just told you, especially where you can apply it. First of all, let me tell you the example. That would be about couple of years ago when the the judge a female judge there in the Central District Of Florida, who was a Clarence Thomas clerk, overturned the CDC mask rule, and all of a sudden, we didn't have to wear masks anymore. Remember that?
I'm sure all of you. I know when you saw the picture of those those children in a elementary school, and the teacher said, we don't have to wear masks anymore, and they all went nuts. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I think you'd probably remember that. Well, the what happened with that was the CDC passed an intermediary regulation, interpretive. It was only applied to the CCC CDC. So if you worked at the CDC, you had to wear a mask. But if you didn't, you didn't have to wear one. And they buffaloed everybody on that in the whole damn world, didn't they? Yes. They did.
They took an interpretive regulation, put it out as if it was a substantive regulation, and nobody caught it. Some law firm finally for some client caught it and brought that case to that gal in Orlando, where I believe that Central District Of Florida is, and she overturned the whole thing. Now the Biden administration said we're gonna appeal it. Well, they can't appeal it. It's the Administrative Procedures Act. This thing's set in stone. Okay? And so if they they didn't appeal it and so, about last year or year before last, they were gonna try it again and pull something on us again with one of these things. And they were gonna use a MASCH requirement, but they passed the regulation, but it was only for TSA.
And that's when you saw on the airports, it was only the TSA agents that had the masks on. Because after they learned with the CDC example, when they passed the next one, which was also interpretive, it only applied to the TSA agents. K? So that's how you you see what they're doing here and how they're doing it. Now the important part is and the way I discovered this, get some rain, was when I was fighting the IRS. And, my teacher, my law teacher, Gary Bryant was his name, and he was hammering this stuff into my head. The whole time I was fighting the IRS in court and all that stuff, and he's firing, hiring, and and banging this this, these regulatory things and how this scheme worked into my head.
I had to go read a couple of court cases and stuff, but I finally grasped it. And then I started checking because the IRS was after me on a summons for books and records. I don't remember what the regulation is. But anyways, the summons for books and records. And I decided to fight them just like some of you get your hackles up and go, well, hell. I'm gonna fight them. Well, that's what I did. I was green. I had no no procedure. They they tried to, where I filed the brief and they scheduled a hearing, and then I had forgotten to serve one of the parties, you know, just as a pro say. And there's this is why I tell you there's so many procedural things you gotta learn how to do right. And that's one thing. I let somebody out on the service. When you send them the case and you service them, there's an affidavit in there. They sign and send back to you that they were served. Again, they all the parties know what's going on. Okay?
And so, they tried to get a motion to dismiss on that. And I I ran up to the Cobb County Library, and I found a case for you know, as Prose says, we're not expected to be a high level of an attorney. K? A trained attorney, a professional. So they give us a little deference, and, this case said that that a mistake like I had made was all form and no substance. And so I took that case and wrote a little, a little memorandum of law or something, got it back down there, and they said, well, the case has already been scheduled. We're gonna hear it. Well, I know it must have pissed the little Jew attorney off because if you got an IRS case, they don't let the US attorney handle it locally. It's like this thing with me. They fly in a tax specialist from the Treasury Department, DOJ, so he can harass you. So he had to come to Atlanta. I'm sure he was pissed off about that. I got that little the little IRS agent was this cute little old black gal, and I'm sure I'm sure her and I would have been good friends.
But, boy, I had her on the stand for four and a half hours, and she hated my guts. K? I'm a tell you right out front. So, anyway, that was the experience in this time frame, and I'm trying to learn all this regulatory stuff that Gary's banging in my head. And I take off down to, if you're gonna look at stuff like this, I I I don't I guess you can probably do it online today, Julie. But, we used to have to in those days. This was in the nineties. All this stuff wasn't on the Internet yet. And so we had to go to what's called a federal book depository. Now a federal book depository is different from a regular federal law library.
A federal book depository has all of these old things in the library, all the old regulations and the all this old stuff that you need to look at or want to occasionally. So I popped down to the, to Georgia State right downtown Atlanta, and they didn't have the room for all the books, so they had everything on microfiche. So here's what I learned. If you're looking at a regulation in the federal register, you can look at the bottom of it where it ends, and and there's if there's brackets, not parenthesis, but those brackets, and they'll have a previous regulation listed there, then this is a upgrade of a previous regulation.
So you can go to, for instance, the one that covered these books and records that they were after me for. I could go to that regulation and see at the bottom that it was an update of a previous regulation. And I can go with the microfiche, go find that one, and maybe it had brackets at the bottom, and it was a update of a previous regulation. So you can continue to trace these things back. So for one thing, you can find out if they're substantive regulations and went through notice and comment or whether they're interpretive and only apply interagency.
And so as I started tracing this back on this notice of books and records, I had stopped, and they always stopped at the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. There's our old friend again. The end of the series, sixty days after Brown versus Board of Education, which overturned Plessy and and made both statuses the same. How the hell it did that? I don't know. And then sixty days later, they put the internal revenue code of 1954 in place. Well, every time you trace back one of these regulations, that's where it ends. And if you trace it back and it's interpretive interpretive interpretive, then you know it wasn't substantive.
So if I would have known that in the head of that hearing and understood it, I could have brought up that that regulation only applied internally to the IRS because it was interpretive. Therefore, it had no applicability on me. Therefore, this whole thing is a fraud. Now I the the the other person that stumbled on this about the same time as I did is no longer with us, and his name was Ralph Winerout. Some of you have heard or are familiar with Ralph. Some of you not. Ralph was on our BN over there for over twenty years on Sunday nights for two hours. And after he passed away, Tom Dee, our buddy that visits us occasionally here, stuck me in that slot for a couple hours. That's how Mark and I finally crossed paths. Okay? And Mark used to be on the air with Ralph.
And after Ralph passed away, he said, well, I think I'll tune over there. So he took his place, and it was me. And, Mark and I have an old listener's, a mutual friend named Chuck Ward, who's a beekeeper there. And Chuck had been trying to get Mark to listen to my stuff for at least three or four years. And Mark never would pay any attention to it until he turned over there to hear who'd taken Ralph's spot. So that's how we got connected. But, I would love to see one of our patriots get armed with this information on these regulations and who they apply to that is under fire from the IRS and go in there with this information and and throw it down on them.
They can't go forward with it. Okay? Because the Administrative Procedures Act, as I said, it's pretty chiseled in stone. Okay? And the whole administrative state, which is the whole deep state, another way to say it, is built on it. Okay? And so that's why that CDC regulation well, don't tell me that it didn't apply because everybody didn't have to wear their masks anymore. So here's a little tidbit, a little insight into the administrative state. Not too many people really understand it very well. And neither Ralph, before he died, I think he was trying to get into court with this. And I've talked about it and just anybody that's in our circles and most of our people get rid of their IRS problems.
But if anybody does come up that you hear about or know of, this is some way to go in them. Well, I bet you they'd end up with big egg on their face with this one. K? So that's how the administrative works and operates, the administrative state. And once you file your affidavit, William and your friends that may be new today, the when you file this paperwork, if you do, the only two regulations out of all those agencies I've heard there's over 300. I've heard there's over 600 of them. K? But all those regulations that are promulgated by all those unelected bureaucrats, the only two that apply to you, the person that files his paperwork, are those listed in the IRS's jurisdictional statement, eight seventy one b and eight seventy seven b.
Those are the only two regulations, and one of them will never apply to you who would go through and get their god given rights back and go exchange that passport for another slave passport. There's no other country you can go to where you can get your god given rights back. So I'm assuming that one won't ever apply to any of our people. And if it if you wanna do that, you don't belong around us anyway. But the other one is this one on dividends of stocks and bonds, not on the capital gains, but on the dividends should you receive them.
Those are the only sections you'll, be responsible for out of the thousands, tens of thousands of pages of code of federal regulations. So that's the good news for you. So does anybody have any questions on all that part?
[01:22:35] Unknown:
Hey, Rod. This is William.
[01:22:37] Unknown:
Hey, William.
[01:22:38] Unknown:
Okay. Yeah. I was listening, and I was trying to get some paperwork done at the same time, but I did, hear hear what you said. One question. The Noahide laws, I heard that when I first when I got on, I got on a little late. I heard some some exchange back and forth about the Noahide laws. You say the Noahide laws will doesn't affect the national status.
[01:23:00] Unknown:
No. No no man made laws no man made laws come that go through this regulatory state that I've just described Mhmm. With the exception of those two, and those are both constitutional taxes, by the way. None of those, regulations apply to you anymore if you go through this. You totally shed the entire administrative state with the exception of those two regulations, constitutional taxes. Everybody everything else got nothing to do with you anymore. Does that sound good? Let me get William here. Does that sound good?
[01:23:45] Unknown:
Yeah. I just I'm just getting, I'm, you know, I'm talking to other people on other shows and stuff, and I hear them, of course, you know, dispute that. But, I just wanna hear Well what you your perspective.
[01:23:56] Unknown:
Well, that they they probably dispute a lot of stuff that I say, but I don't care about them. You know who I care about? Right. I care about the federal government, and the federal government's never disputed anything we've sent them.
[01:24:12] Unknown:
Okay. Okay. Good. Okay.
[01:24:14] Unknown:
Alright. I have a question. Alright. And the other people just don't understand. That's why I was so frustrated, William, with you and Tony last week because I want you to understand this so bad. And it just takes time. And you gotta work through a whole bunch of stuff, and you gotta realize that the information that you get exposed to here, you'll probably not get exposed to anywhere else. And the reason is because they didn't have John Benson as a law teacher. And they don't know the old law. If you if you go and ask my litmus test for patriots is what's the what's the concept behind the legal definition of the word person?
And if you can ever find anybody that can answer that correctly, listen to them. You'll die down if you'll ever find anybody that can answer it correctly. Hold on. Merkel, we had Larry in there. Okay. Larry, you were first a minute ago.
[01:25:10] Unknown:
Yeah. There's 441 agencies listed on the federal register, and it's up three agencies since last summer. And then, also, please explain to the audience that there is a difference between an agency and an and a bureaucracy or a bureau. A bureau is a subdivision of agency.
[01:25:35] Unknown:
Okay. I guess you could say that. They're called bureaucrats, and you and and they're under a lot of cabinet positions. You've got cabinet positions for Trump, like secretary of state, treasury exec. Those aren't agencies. I the way I understand that there's agencies underneath them. Anyway, there's a whole bunch of them, and and the only ones that apply and that's why that IRS regulation is so important because in that one, both of the statuses are covered. And the reason they've gotta cover both of them is because the two taxes are constitutional. And I think also because I bet at the top of these Jew bastards, the ones at the top probably have affidavits on file and aren't aren't paying taxes either. K?
My suspicion. There was another thing I was gonna address right there, and I forgot.
[01:26:34] Unknown:
Hold on, Erica. Let's see. IRS is a bureau of Oh. The Department of Treasury.
[01:26:40] Unknown:
Okay. They're they're under you know, secretary of the Treasury is their boss, and all that's the only one with both statuses in it because those two taxes are constitutional. The other 49 code of federal regulations apply to residents because they know you're a citizen of The United States and a resident, and there are residents they want under their control that aren't citizens of The United States. They're green card people, but they have to follow all of the regulations. So all the other 49 are for residents. That's what I wanted to say. Okay. Mirka, what you got?
[01:27:23] Unknown:
For for William and Roger, once you're putting your affidavit, you you remove yourself from that system. You're not a federal citizen. You're under natural law. And then you were saying that you were sharing, William said that he was, listening to other people that were questioning that. The the the point of the affidavit is they have no longer they they no they no longer have authority over you. The man made law has no authority. So you tell them you can put it on an affidavit or a a lawful legal notice. There you have no authority over me or my property.
[01:28:05] Unknown:
Yep. Well, they know when they get it. The clerk might not, but the people up the line do. William, what was your comment?
[01:28:12] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, no. That's that's on this show and other shows. Not just other shows, this show too.
[01:28:19] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:28:21] Unknown:
Well Yeah. There's that they have no the state this, corporation has no authority over you.
[01:28:27] Unknown:
Okay. But there might be people on this show that don't understand that as well then. That's interesting. Right. It take everybody on an individual level reaches that understanding when they get there.
[01:28:38] Unknown:
I gotcha. And listen. It just takes time, William. Because for one thing, this is it's not hard. It's just complex. And they've set it up complex to fool you so you'd never find it. It's a miracle we found this. Okay? They never thought anybody would figure it out. And the the the, colonel House said that in that little letter to William to, Woodrow Wilson. Right at the bottom, he said, well, if one or two people fall find figure it out, we've got plausible deniability. Well, we're gonna expose it to millions, man, and you ain't got no plausible deniability, you bastard. Okay?
[01:29:16] Unknown:
Another example, Roger, that you give is, you know, putting they if they think that they can correct you or say that they do have authority, then they have to rebut your affidavit. Right?
[01:29:28] Unknown:
You're saying that's why affidavit Thursday. Yeah. Yeah. And you might some folks might not understand how affidavits work. It's very good knowledge because you can, apply this to your regular life. If, you're going home this evening and drive traffic and somebody rear ends you, first thing you do is go home and write an affidavit and go get it notarized. If it ever does come to trial, you pull your affidavit out and the other party's there, where's yours? Well, we don't have one. Oh, well, I guess mine stands then, doesn't it? Because see, an affidavit is sworn court testimony.
And so what happens is for someone to overcome your sworn court testimony, they have to write an affidavit themselves contradicting your facts in yours, and then they gotta go get it signed under penalty of perjury. And that's why they'll never do it because they can't do it. So, basically, it's like king of the mountain, like we used to play when we were kids. If you've got an an an an affidavit properly formed, properly structured, properly notarized, presented to proper authority, and stands unrebutted, you've got the highest form of truth in law, period.
Roger? I have a question. Oh, I had okay. I'm sorry. Alright. Two or three. Well, in this instance in this instance, William, I'm gonna go to the female because my mama raised me right. Yes, ma'am. I got you.
[01:31:03] Unknown:
I
[01:31:06] Unknown:
Yes, ma'am?
[01:31:08] Unknown:
Hi, Roger. It's Lauren. Can you please hi. Can you please re reiterate what she said? Substantive regulations apply to
[01:31:19] Unknown:
General applicability.
[01:31:21] Unknown:
General applicability.
[01:31:23] Unknown:
Okay. Let me apply to everybody. K?
[01:31:26] Unknown:
Okay. Okay. And the interpretive regulations apply to?
[01:31:32] Unknown:
The the agency internally.
[01:31:36] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:31:37] Unknown:
Okay. And And I and you know what, Lauren? I may bet you a a a dollar to a doughnut, a Krispy Kreme doughnut, which we've got down here now, that any IRS regulation that you ever look at will be interpreted.
[01:31:55] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:31:56] Unknown:
Okay. And nobody ever figured it out, and no lawyer had either figured it out or got the balls to go in there and present it in front of the court for a client.
[01:32:08] Unknown:
Okay. And we verify that it's substantive. How?
[01:32:12] Unknown:
By going and looking at the regulation or tracing it back. And at the top of it, it'll have one of those two phrases.
[01:32:20] Unknown:
Notice of Oh, okay.
[01:32:22] Unknown:
Presumptive rulemaking and notice proposed rulemaking and notice of final rulemaking. And it'll be big bold letters at the top of that regulation with one of those two statements, and that is a substantive regulation.
[01:32:39] Unknown:
Okay. I was gonna ask you that too, Roger. Okay. So it was proposed. And what was the other one? Proposed? Final. Final. Those are fine. Okay.
[01:32:51] Unknown:
And, also, are these shows archived any place?
[01:32:55] Unknown:
Yes. Paul, tell it's on the website that Lauren can find them. Okay. Boy, Lauren. Okay. Fine. This cool we got this cool new thing on this podcast, the archives, is you can do AI, and it'll give you a whole description of the show, and I'll be damned if it is unbelievably accurate.
[01:33:15] Unknown:
Oh, good. That's good. And I also wanted to let Yeah. The lady who wanted to know where to find the statutes at large, o l r c, that's the Office of Law Revision Counsel, and you go under, on the left hand side, other OLRC tables, click that, and the second one down says table three statutes at large.
[01:33:42] Unknown:
Ah, there you go. This Did you get that? This is
[01:33:46] Unknown:
o l r c. And keep that tab, and it's it's fantastic.
[01:33:54] Unknown:
Okay. Great. Thank you, Lauren.
[01:33:56] Unknown:
Thank you. Thank you.
[01:33:58] Unknown:
You're welcome. Now there was a cup there was a couple of those old guys that were trying to get in at the same time. Was one of them Larry?
[01:34:05] Unknown:
Well, wait a minute. I just wanted to tell Oh, okay. Mike he Mike and his wife were or his wife was having apprehensions. I just wanted to tell people, especially new people, don't do this until you feel strongly in your soul that you know what you're doing and you have a full comprehension of the information so much so that you can very easily teach someone else.
[01:34:34] Unknown:
Yep. Or defend your position if challenged.
[01:34:37] Unknown:
Right. It took me I listened to Roger maybe for five or six years before I finally started re wrote my affidavit, and I read his book three times. And the only reason I read it three times was because he said that he had someone who read his book 10 times. And I thought, well, if he read it 10 times, I guess I should read it one more time because I had the thing riddled with note to Roger, note to Roger, note to, like, asking questions. Well, when I read it through the second and third time, guess what happened? All my questions got answered. Got answered. Yeah. We yes. So read through that book over and over and over again, and you it it the information will sink in and you will become comfortable with it eventually.
Don't try to rush it. Just Yeah. Take your time. Very often, if you procrastinate and you just keep listening, drops of information that you need to solidify what you already have acquired will happen. It will come. So just be patient, and I highly recommend getting a book on the slaughterhouse cases and read that book. There are a couple of them out there. That is a that really nailed it for me when I read that book.
[01:35:55] Unknown:
And and the book the I mean, they just come right out and say it in the Supreme Court. The Yes. They do. For black They do. I mean, just right front, you can't argue argue with it or misinterpret.
[01:36:08] Unknown:
K? No. So So that's all how you say.
[01:36:11] Unknown:
You're welcome. So thank you all for being there. Alright, Lauren. You're such a sweetie. We're glad to hear your voice and have you around again. Lady Linda Bye bye. We got, sorry, guys. We got more females here. Yes, ma'am. Thank you, Robert. Thank you, Roger, for acknowledging me. Thank you, Lauren. Lauren,
[01:36:28] Unknown:
I just text Julie, and I asked her to text me what you just said, and she said she has to relisten. So if I haven't gotten what you said, then I'm sure more than one listener hasn't gotten. Could you please repeat how to find the statutes at large, on the Internet in I yield?
[01:36:49] Unknown:
Lauren, you're gonna get called back here. Linda, you might have to go back and listen to the replay. I don't know coming back. It's Larry?
[01:37:01] Unknown:
Yeah. Hold hold on. Larry, did you catch it, Larry?
[01:37:05] Unknown:
I didn't cat well, I didn't catch it, but I was just gonna say when Laura does come back on, Roger, tell her that she can see a whole transcript of the show. So it's not really necessary to take notes. You could just look at the transcript and copy and paste what you want.
[01:37:22] Unknown:
I tell you this AI is pretty impressive in the bit a little bit I've messed with it so far. Okay. Lauren, did you come back with that information? Or Yeah. I'm back. I'm back. It's Okay. You repeat it very slowly.
[01:37:36] Unknown:
Okay. It's the office of law revision council, o l r c. If you just type in o l r c, that will come up, and it says office of law revision count revision counsel, United States code. And on the left hand side, there's a menu, and you read down till you see other o l r c tables. Click that, and the second selection is table three, statutes at large.
[01:38:10] Unknown:
That's a big volume of books too, by the way. Go ahead. Yes. I'm sorry. Yes.
[01:38:16] Unknown:
Yes. And you can so you wanna search title 26. You can click on title 26 and say if you just wanna search for a certain term, you can do that. And it will bring up all of the sections within the internal revenue code that have the certain term that you're looking for. So it can help your researching quite a bit. It's it's fascinating.
[01:38:38] Unknown:
Mhmm. No. Go ahead. Thank you, Laurie.
[01:38:41] Unknown:
Linda, before you run off, yesterday, you were asking me about those title 42 sections. Go in. We use the search function here. Go into the code and search title 42 for white citizens.
[01:38:58] Unknown:
Okay. That sounds great. Thank you. Okay. Okay. Alright.
[01:39:03] Unknown:
There's Paul. K. Well, I think all the ladies are done for a minute, Paul. So we'll turn to you Bye bye.
[01:39:10] Unknown:
Bye, Lou. I I See if we can I bought it in line? I'm sorry. Blow your, blow your dress up. Go ahead. I bought it in line. I'm sorry. But it's this is very quick. Go to the matrixstocks.com. You will find, Radio Ranch archives here, and and just click on the word here, and that will take you to the archive list. Then whatever show you're interested in listening to, click on the title of the show. That will bring up the show's, the that episode page, then you can go to the transcript. And down the left column in the transcript, there will be time offsets, time numbers.
So if you know that the information you're looking for was about an hour and a half into the program, Just go down that list to the hour and thirty minute mark, and then you will actually see every word that was spoken at that time. You can also go to the chapters tab, and the chapters will give you a list of where in the program different things were talked about. Title 42 will be at a certain time. Title 26 will be at a certain time. Non positive law will be at a certain time. It'll split the program into chapters. You just go down the list, look at what you're looking for, and then just go straight there. So it's all done for you. It's easy peasy, and, there is very little need to repeat anything on the show because it is right there, right in your face after a couple of mouse clicks. What a what a wonderful
[01:41:01] Unknown:
attribute of the AI for those show descriptions. Everyone that Paul's read to me, I've just been blown away with. Totally. Now a couple of minutes ago, we had all the gals. We had a couple of guys trying to say something. Larry would too much. Okay. Good. Let's hear. That's Dan. Hey, Dan.
[01:41:18] Unknown:
That's Dan. Yeah. Yeah. I've been, I've only been on listen mode for a few days. I had issues with my phone. Anyway, so I've been listening. But but Okay. Just a couple of things. So first, in the constitution, article one section one, whatever. It's like right at the beginning. The congress does have the power to create, impose, and lay taxes, and then it goes on to say, I'm paraphrasing, that they must be evenly applied. And then Yeah. Later on, it goes according to the rule of apportionment and Yes. Something about census or or population numbers. What the heck is apportionment and, like, a month? Like, tie it together why it doesn't apply to us. I know why. Well, well, it does apply to you after you file your affidavit.
[01:42:08] Unknown:
But this is the brilliance of the founding fathers. You know, everybody puts them down, all this stuff all the time. This is some of the brilliance they wrote into that document. There's two types of taxes, Dan. One's called a direct tax. One's called an indirect tax. What's your question?
[01:42:25] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, just I guess yeah. And they were they broke it up direct taxes is what they were referring to. And then Right. I just am still finding what what the rule of enforcement basically makes it this is proof, makes it so that it's like, well, little old Rhode Island that doesn't have many people, you don't gotta pay much taxes. And then big old New York City where you got a lot of people, you gotta pay but that doesn't make sense. So I've always been No. That that and that's not right. So I'm gonna straighten it out for you. Right. K? Please. So you got two types, direct and indirect.
[01:42:54] Unknown:
Direct taxes are called capitation taxes or head taxes because they're on your body. Okay? Indirect taxes are always e are always uniform is the word they use. So indirect taxes are uniform. Direct taxes are apportioned. K? And the reason they apportion them is because they want everybody paying the same amount. It's just the opposite of what you said. And so that's why the census one of the reasons the census was formed so that we could figure out how many people were in each state just in case there was a direct tax out of Congress. So here's the check and balance.
We're going along alright. Nothing's really screwed up over there in Gaza or whatever. And, the Congress apportions a direct tax and it equals out to $5 a head, so everybody in the country pays $5. Right? So that's not too bad. Okay? So they go along the next year, and we let our pals over there in Satan's sandbox get all antsy, and they gotta do another direct tax. And because of that situation, now that tax is $5,000, and everybody has to pay the same. And everybody turns to Washington and says, what the hell are you doing up there?
[01:44:21] Unknown:
Right.
[01:44:23] Unknown:
Capisce?
[01:44:26] Unknown:
That would be the direct tax, the capitation Yes. They that they avoid doing. No
[01:44:33] Unknown:
Well, they've substituted it with the per think that Well, they've they've slipped in, Dan, they slipped in the income tax on us. That's what's took the place of that. Wow. So, and and they did that because they had to have the income tax because that's what solidifies the whole system and makes it work, that they can extract funds from you and go back and pay that bondholder that originally bought the the bond and started the whole credit scheme. So they had to have the tax in because that's the critical part of the whole system, You have making that connection and starting that and reimbursing the guy for what he's paid. So that's why it's so key and important.
And they didn't wanna use tariffs anymore because they were too successful. They wanna put that progressive income tax on you because what is it? The first or the second plank of the communist manifesto? One of them.
[01:45:38] Unknown:
Acts of people.
[01:45:40] Unknown:
Dan, I got a question for you. How about that? Have you watched any of my brother, Kavner, yet?
[01:45:47] Unknown:
No.
[01:45:49] Unknown:
Dan, shame on you. You're gonna like this guy when you watch him, man. I'm telling you. I I I forget, I guess. What was what was I asked shame on you. You need to go back and watch. You know, you'll appreciate him. You, above all people, will appreciate brother Kammer. Okay? So did you have another question, Dan? I'm just Yeah. Real real is real Yeah. Realjuneews.com, I believe.
[01:46:17] Unknown:
I I did watch a little bit, but not enough. I did. I went to it that day. I remember it because real June news, stood out. Not enough, though.
[01:46:26] Unknown:
He's a hell of a guy. Last quest
[01:46:29] Unknown:
the other question I had was just as it when you get down to the bottom of it, one of the statutes that are, that are in you know, when you go to look it up at at the at the law, whatever,
[01:46:40] Unknown:
Cornell law You're talking about the the regulation
[01:46:43] Unknown:
the regulation thing I was talking about? It's not statute. Literally It's regulations. No. No. The regulations, and you go to US code, and you're looking up that stuff to get some No. No. Basic language to see something.
[01:46:55] Unknown:
At the bottom go to the code. Where all No. You wouldn't you wouldn't Yeah. Right. You wouldn't go to the code. You go to the code of federal regulations. They're different.
[01:47:08] Unknown:
Down at the bottom, they all there's the same format. You had said when it's in parenthesis, I just wanted to get it straight because it's confusing. Yeah. It'll take p Yeah. Pub pub l, and I know that's public law. And then it goes down a whole string of information, then it finally gets to a semicolon. That's a whole set of data. And I still get confused if they have to read that a little bit and Well might not be the time to
[01:47:33] Unknown:
What what where are you look? Are you looking in The US? There's three sets of law books, organic statutes, United States code, code of federal regulations.
[01:47:43] Unknown:
Which one are you looking go to US code. I'm always going to coordinate,
[01:47:47] Unknown:
US code. Just Okay. Well, that whatever. What is that plan? Okay. Well, that in I don't know that they have. They've got addendums to statutes. But if you go to the law library, there's a little pocket in the back of the book, and they'll send out these little pocket inserts that put in there that show you the addendums. If you look in the regulations specifically, not the statutes, regulations, that's where you'll find the bracket. It's not a parenthesis. It's that little bracket thing. And if there's a previous regulation that relates to that one, it'll be in those brackets at the bottom of the regulation so you know where to look back to.
[01:48:29] Unknown:
Copy that. Alright. Nope. That answers my question, Raj. Good. Okay. Love you, buddy. Get on to the next one. Amen. Well, okay. Who's next?
[01:48:39] Unknown:
Somebody? There's a couple. Oh, please. We're going so good. Weren't we? I thought we were going good. There's one. See there? Yes, sir.
[01:48:53] Unknown:
Yeah. This is William. Oh, William. Tony had a question. Yeah. Yeah. This is Tony had a question. I'm trying I'm trying to read it here, but he's he's he's, washing the car, and he's kinda noisy in the background. But let me see if I can find okay. He said he said, Will, ask him how does one break the contract. Does the national status do that for you?
[01:49:14] Unknown:
Yes. When you send in your affidavit, you're exposing their their hidden contract. You see, it's nothing that you entered into, like, consciously on the front end. They've just tricked you by asking you those two questions to get your agreement on the back end. Okay? And there's all kinds of fraud in there. Alright? So once you're going to tell them what you wanna be, what set of laws you wanna live under, you're gonna do it in a declaration or better yet, an affidavit. And once that hits the mail system, it's considered received, and you're free of these monsters.
Do they do you think that answered this question, William?
[01:50:04] Unknown:
Tony, if that, Tony, you're listening in, hopefully, just put in the text if that answered it. If you have another question, just text it to me, but I I don't wanna dominate the conversation.
[01:50:14] Unknown:
And the reason and they've got to recognize it because it's your choice. It's not their choice. They've tricked you with fraud into answering those two questions. Yes. Once you alert them that you wanna change over onto another set of laws, these other original ones, and you do it. And, honestly, if you take it to the post office and and get, like, a certified return receipt requested, that green thing where the postal clerk stamps it, take a stamp and they stamp it, when that is stamped in the post office, it's considered received at the secretary of state or the passport. So the minute that happens, you're free of these demons.
So I hope that got Tony's question. Roger.
[01:51:10] Unknown:
May I maybe leave a leave? May
[01:51:13] Unknown:
Yes. I'm gonna put Larry on the back burner for your sweet little voice, Linda. What have you got? Oh, thank you for me, Larry. Thank you for me.
[01:51:23] Unknown:
The, direct tax, the apportionment, that has not been executed. And is the income tax considered the indirect tax?
[01:51:33] Unknown:
No. Income tax is a progressive head tax. Okay. So what's an indirect It is a it is a direct tax, and it's not apportioned. That's the problem they've got with it. They've been able to pull this off in this bankruptcy.
[01:51:52] Unknown:
Okay. So They're very a tax a progressive a progressive tax. And so what's the example of an indirect tax? Is it like the gas tax? Gas tax. Well, there's a whole bunch of them they call sin taxes.
[01:52:07] Unknown:
Alcohol Okay. Tobacco. If you don't wanna pay the tax, don't do the sin. That kind of thing. Okay.
[01:52:15] Unknown:
Very good. Thank you for that clarity.
[01:52:18] Unknown:
I yield. You're welcome.
[01:52:19] Unknown:
Larry I yield to Larry.
[01:52:22] Unknown:
Okay. Thank you. I was just gonna say the proof that, it's received when when the, clerk stamps the, the envelope is everybody lines up. They get in line, on the due date for, you know, sending in their taxes, and so they wanna get that postmark because that's not considered late. It's considered received on that day. Correct. That's correct.
[01:52:49] Unknown:
That's correct. So, got a couple of minutes left here. Any, any dangling questions? Remember dangling participles? Remember things like that from when you're in school? Any dangling questions left here at the tail end of the show?
[01:53:06] Unknown:
No. Lady Linda Louise has a comment.
[01:53:09] Unknown:
Okay. Please do, sweetie. Yes. We got a couple of minutes here we need to fill.
[01:53:14] Unknown:
When my husband and I sent in our affidavit, we sent in a stamped self addressed envelope, and we asked them in our cover letter to please, stamp our documents and, send them back to us. And months later, four months later, we got a letter from the state department with the stamped self addressed envelope. And, the letter says the Department of State is in receipt of your correspondence. With your correspondence, you can close the self addressed stamped envelope. Your correspondence does not appear to request a service that this office provides. Please refer to http:travel.state.gov for services which you may be eligible.
We have enclosed the self addressed stamped envelope with this letter. Sincerely, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Passport Services, Office of Adjudication.
[01:54:22] Unknown:
And it's been a Kelly Robinson.
[01:54:25] Unknown:
Isn't that miss Robinson?
[01:54:28] Unknown:
I don't know. But the punchline is we have this beautiful letter that states clearly that they received our correspondence, which that's what we wanted. But but now we're gonna do a privacy act to, see if they'll reveal to us what is within our administrative file. Because we I know Dave Spring, he did that privacy act, and he did months later. But he did get a correspondence with his, affidavit stamped and so on and so forth. So, we were very excited when we received this letter, but it did take four months for them to acknowledge. And so, we're just delighted that they did receive our correspondence, which they didn't say affidavit of citizenship evidence. They were very ambiguous purposefully.
So, now and they didn't tell us which agency to connect with to get this privacy act, information. So, thank you, Roger. And, Lauren is correct. You know, she listened to you for five years. I've only listened to you for one year and a couple of months, and it's been a rich, beautiful
[01:55:44] Unknown:
ride. And I'm just very grateful. And I yield. Well, you're you're living in in freedom, and you're living in reality now. So, yes, it's quite rewarding, and it really makes you feel gives you warm fuzzies. At least it does for me. So, anybody else got something here before we, check out?
[01:56:06] Unknown:
No? Yeah. With Larry.
[01:56:10] Unknown:
Okay. Well, Larry, you're just alright. I'm a go with Larry. The other guy just hold it for a second. Larry, he's been shut out about five times today. Yeah. Go ahead, Larry.
[01:56:23] Unknown:
I was just gonna say, I kinda missed it, a little bit. I mean, I get it, like, 95% of everything you say. When you're explaining to Dan and lady Linda Louise who followed up with her question, is the income tax considered
[01:56:39] Unknown:
an indirect tax? No. It's a direct tax. That's why they had to get all this sixteenth amendment crap in there to try and make it legitimate. See, there was a case in the Supreme Court called Pollock versus Farmers Savings and Loan, I think. It was like in 1898. It was on a direct tax. They tried to do it and, without a portion of it, they said no. And so they came back and tried to revamp it, sixteenth amendment, all the in the the Federal Reserve Act, all that crap was to go back and overturn that so they could get a progressive income tax in because their scheme won't work without that taxing mechanism or some that will get the money out of your hide and pay those bondholders their coupon payment.
That's the way I understand it, Larry. Now who is the other fellow there?
[01:57:40] Unknown:
I'm gonna have a sketch. And, Sketch. I hope you're doing well. Yay. Hope you're doing well today. Pretty good. Alright. So it's about to come out a little bit. Yeah. Go ahead. Couple months ago, you wanted, me to try and research resident the word resident and how it came about in the lexicon of, the linchpin. And after a while, I just threw up my hands, but you requested me to do that, and I'm requesting anybody that has a a good handle on AI, chatbot, or whatever. And, to to maybe you could
[01:58:21] Unknown:
reiterate that question that you wanted answered about the word Well, I don't even I don't even remember what it was. I mean, I know I went back and looked online one time. Of course, John had told us all this already. But if you just do a cursory search, you won't find that that, ambassadorial stuff. You gotta dig down through a couple of layers, and you'll find it. It's there. But, boy, it's deep down there. So Okay. Anyway, that's what it is. It's a a a a a a resident means basically what set of laws that you wanna live under. Now I can tell you something along the lines that's that's very enlightening, sketch and audience, and that is if you go back to Vatel's law of nations, and listeners sent me copies of it one time on the areas where he talks about residency.
And every time in Vatel that he uses the word resident, he uses it resident alien. So in Vatel, it's a resident alien. If they ask you, Larry, are you a resident alien? Do you think you might question it a little more than are you a resident? See the word games they do here? So that's that Vatel is correct. You're a resident, but you're an alien because as a resident, another set of laws apply to you. So resident alien is the correct term. K? So, anyway, there you go, Sketch. Otherwise, folks, Thursday edition is about to be completed here. Nice, easygoing Thursday session.
Covered a lot of ground today. I hope you got something out of it. Great to see Lauren back, sweetie. Really good to hear your voice. And, we'll be back tomorrow, of course, with Brent, mister Brent Winters. And, there's no telling what he wants to talk about. I just wind him up and let him go, quite frankly, generally. But it may we may talk about law. We may talk about the Bible. I'm we sure will. But a wide gamut of things with, a wonderful individual, mister Brent Winters. So other than that, we're gonna go lay our bodies down here with Crosby, Sills, and Nash and be done today. And hope you have a wonderful remainder of Thursday, and we'll see you tomorrow with Brent.
Ciao. Okay. Gotta be off there. Okay. Now what somebody got for me? They always wait till we're off there. Forget Paul English Life at 3PM. Oh, that's right. And Paul English too. Tell them about it, Paul.
[02:01:12] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. Great program. PaulEnglishLife.com. You can catch it on Rumble. You can catch it on radiosoapbox.com, w b n 3 2 four, Talk Radio. Find it all in this place.
[02:01:29] Unknown:
Well, extend our usual invitation to mister English, for tomorrow. If you'd like to join us and feel so motivated and has the time and opportunity, we'd love to always have him. So, again, anybody else got anything for me? None. Okay. Well, I'm gonna go get out in the sunshine and go get some food and all those things that old men like to do. And so I will see you all tomorrow. Have a great day, and, we covered some really important information today. Hope you got, an something out of it. So we'll, see you tomorrow. Have a great day. And, Paul, good luck with mister Paul this afternoon.
[02:02:11] Unknown:
Thank you.
[02:02:12] Unknown:
Ciao.
[02:02:31] Unknown:
And being symbol minded, the symbol for bureaucracy is red tape. High yield.
[02:02:42] Unknown:
Okay.
[02:03:19] Unknown:
More skull and bones.
[02:04:46] Unknown:
K. I've got an unrelated question.
[02:04:56] Unknown:
Yeah, William. William?
[02:05:09] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:05:11] Unknown:
Your question?
[02:05:14] Unknown:
Okay. Thanks, Paul. Looking forward to, English show today. I've got some questions for mister Paul across the pond. But, meantime, if you've got a DOT plate and you go to the swap meet and you sell overstock personal items, are you considered to be in commerce?
[02:05:45] Unknown:
No. Not unless you're selling them out of not unless somebody else is paying you to transport their goods to the flea market and sell them.
[02:05:56] Unknown:
That's what I think is yeah. Okay. Cool.
[02:06:02] Unknown:
Yeah. Because you're not being paid to transport the product.
[02:06:10] Unknown:
They could presume that you're in commerce, though.
[02:06:15] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:06:21] Unknown:
Interpretation of law. Right?
[02:06:26] Unknown:
Presumption. Yeah.
[02:06:28] Unknown:
Yeah. Sticky workers.
[02:06:33] Unknown:
Mhmm. By the way, it's currently out of print and currently not available. But, if anybody's interested in looking for a copy of Goodbye April 15, a used paperback is $499 on Amazon.
[02:06:55] Unknown:
What?
[02:06:58] Unknown:
Yeah. No shit. And there is as far as I can tell, no digital copy available.
[02:07:07] Unknown:
And,
[02:07:09] Unknown:
basically, none of the book outlets have it. None of them. Not Amazon, Goodreads, Thriftbooks, Barnes and Noble. Nobody's got it.
[02:07:28] Unknown:
Who is it the author?
[02:07:31] Unknown:
Boston Tea Party. And that's Boston, capital t, with a period, not Boston Tea enclosed in quotes. That's the Boston transgender party. You don't want any books by them.
[02:07:52] Unknown:
I'll start looking at all the different Goodwills and whatnot.
[02:07:57] Unknown:
Yeah. It's called Goodbye April 15. And it well, the front cover, looks like, ten forty form that was ripped with, let's see. Where is it? That's Boston's gun bible. Goodbye April 15. It's a ten forty form that's ripped across the bottom, and goodbye April 15 is stamped in red. Here, let me see that image.
[02:08:48] Unknown:
Paul, it's $500 on Amazon.
[02:08:51] Unknown:
Yeah. I know. But it's but it's out of stock.
[02:08:56] Unknown:
Well, yeah. You just got a used one though.
[02:08:58] Unknown:
Oh, Paul? Yeah.
[02:09:03] Unknown:
The information on Roger's website allows you to say goodbye to the IRS, and it's free.
[02:09:11] Unknown:
I know that.
[02:09:16] Unknown:
Why would you want?
[02:09:26] Unknown:
Copy image. How do you spell goodbye?
[02:09:30] Unknown:
Because I collect, books. There you go. There's a picture of the cover in the chat in free conference call.
[02:09:44] Unknown:
Excellent.
[02:09:50] Unknown:
I collect a c I o s.
[02:10:01] Unknown:
Yeah. It's g o o d hyphen b y e. Boston Tea Party has, some other interesting books too. Oh, and Brent, I also have a link for you. Let's see. Brent, you there?
[02:11:04] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm here, but I'm going over to Gaddy's real quick.
[02:11:09] Unknown:
Alright. Just sent you a link, in the chat. Yeah. And and I don't agree with, I don't agree with the, the ultimate aim of that collection, but it is a source of, interesting books. Alright. Well, I'm gonna take the I'm gonna take the, stream down because I have another show to get ready for. So this has been the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales, the Thursday edition. Stay tuned to Global Voice Radio Network for Paul English Live. You could also go to paulenglishlive.com and join the chatters on Rumble and listen to the program using that platform while you interact with other listeners. Catch us here Monday through Saturday, 11AM to 1PM eastern on eurofolkradio.com and the Global Voice Radio Network. Our website is thematrixdocs.com.
You can, go there to, check out the backstory and other information on the topics discussed. Thanks so much for joining us today. We'll catch you back here tomorrow for the Friday edition with Brent Allen Winters. Bye now. Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
[02:14:09] Unknown:
Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.
This Mirror Stream is brought to you in part by mymymyboost.com for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function with sluggish mitochondria is kinda like running an engine that's low on oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by PhatPhix, p h a t p h I x, dot com, and also iTero Planet for the terahertz frequency wand by Preif International. That's iTeroPlanet.com. Thank you, and welcome to the program. Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
[00:01:34] Unknown:
Well, we would too, Alvin, and we're trying, and we're gonna make another stab at it right here today on the Thursday edition. Jueves, that's in Spanish, j u e v e s. Jueves is Thursday, and, it is the April 10. Oh, five days away from real April Fool's Day. Roger Sales, your host, Radio Ranch, and we have our little get together, and, we generally, maybe with some rare exceptions, have some extra hands helping us offer out our offering of freedom. And the man that oversees that is mister Paul Beener. And so at this point, we always like to have him come out and recognize them and give them proper credit for helping us, don't we?
Yes, sir. Paul, I do use Yes. Okay. Good.
[00:02:32] Unknown:
We're we're actually on an abbreviated list of platforms today because I noticed that WDRN is now with us. So we're on radiosoapbox.com. Thanks to our buddy Paul across the drink.
[00:02:44] Unknown:
Our buddies. Eurofolkradio.com.
[00:02:48] Unknown:
Thanks to pastor Eli James, and we're on Global Voice Radio, radio dot global voice radio dot net. Our website is free and where you can find the links to free conference calls so you can join us live on the show is thematrixdocs,d0cs,.com. You can also find new student section interviews and fun stuff. So and that's it's a
[00:03:14] Unknown:
very abbreviated list. This Okay. Oh, yeah. Like I said, varies from day to day because of different circumstances. What is Alan still trying to do some engineering stuff or something out there?
[00:03:26] Unknown:
Yes. Yeah. You know, what he's what he's working on is he's working on an automation system because he's got multiple streams, and he's setting up automation systems that will rotate, podcasts that a system automatically downloads just to fill the broadcast day. You know, that thing you had trouble with when, People's Patriot Network, you know, you were trying to find programs to, like, fill out the broadcast day. That's
[00:03:58] Unknown:
that has been the quest of radio people since the beginning of the industry is to find programming.
[00:04:06] Unknown:
Right. Well, what d r what WDRN is doing is, trying to, grab from a selected list of podcasters, grabbing their most recent programs, and then inserting them into a schedule, a rotating schedule. So and, GVTV will be doing the same thing.
[00:04:32] Unknown:
Yeah.
[00:04:34] Unknown:
And, yeah, Radio Ranch will be going video.
[00:04:40] Unknown:
Oh my god. Because
[00:04:41] Unknown:
yeah. Because you'll have a channel on gvtv.net.
[00:04:46] Unknown:
I'm I'm I'm like Rince. I'm not a big video guy. I don't think you need to see me talking. I'd rather have your ears than your eyes.
[00:04:56] Unknown:
Right. Videosoapbox.com, I think, is,
[00:05:01] Unknown:
is in the woods. Little cartoon up there or something. We'll figure it out. That's cool. Okay. So we and, what did you were you gonna add something else about Allen, Allen's stuff? That's about it. Alright. Okay. Well, here we go. Do do you hear the squeal that you alluded to earlier? Do you hear it?
[00:05:23] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, I I was able to pull it out with equalization. So, Alright. It's it's not completely gone, but Okay. But it's passed
[00:05:33] Unknown:
now. Alright. I sent you a, very pretty short little, video I discovered this morning when I couldn't sleep very well last night, up and down for a few times. And, that's very interesting information. I've never heard it before. Actually, it's on our on our buddies. And, it's interesting because this is before Sabotize v. But at some point, if you'll go hunt that up, I'd love to play that for the audience.
[00:06:03] Unknown:
How did you send it to me?
[00:06:05] Unknown:
By email. I Yeah. You you gotta tell me how you sent it to me. Well, I understand that. I understand that. Last time we tried Skype, I don't know if it ever did show up. So I don't know. And don't forget here's where we get to deeper into the month, myself and several other people had voiced an interest in having you go over the transition from Skype as we've known it for many, many years to, Microsoft tools. Tools or tool shed or what is it? Tools? Teams. What other tool oh, Teams. Teams. What other stuff's in there?
[00:06:46] Unknown:
It it looks very similar to Skype. It does support, calls to real phones. But, I don't believe that, Skype to phone subscriptions are available. It's just like a general subscription for Teams. And,
[00:07:05] Unknown:
like, So that just goes into the $10 a month. Right?
[00:07:09] Unknown:
Right. But one thing with Teams that is, like, no fun is that if you have the free version of Teams, you can basically do everything, and you could talk one on one to somebody forever. You know? But Uh-huh. If you've got a conference call going on it, it limits you to sixty minutes and then hangs every hangs up on everyone.
[00:07:32] Unknown:
Okay. That's that's a problem. So Okay. Can you call 800 numbers with it?
[00:07:38] Unknown:
I don't know. I don't I don't know. I would assume you do. I would hope.
[00:07:45] Unknown:
Microsoft, you clowns. Okay. Well, at some point, because I imagine, I'm I'm a go ahead and switch over and do it. So, anyway, the the trials and tribulations of our technological age, ranch hands, cowboys, cowgirls, and little freedom seekers everywhere. That's what we're here for is for you people, if you choose. And if you're damn sick and tired of being under the command and voluntary servitude in a condition of, of what they call the English variety of slavery, to these, absolutely almost a subhuman or inhuman Zionist, Frankist, Sabbatean Jews, we can get you out from under their grip.
And it's a wonderful process, and it's very stimulating information, especially as they continue to get more and more and more exposed. It appears almost every day, and they fight back. And the more they fight back, the more people see who they are. And they're in a they're in a, it would appear they're in a downward death spiral. Oh, man. What a wonderful event to watch. So we can help. We're the ones that have got the, the mirror for the vampire, the silver stake in the heart, the cross for the vampire here. So, they they are they're they're they're pretty damn scared of us because nobody else and I've said this a few times, and I wish some of you other historically oriented people might correct me if I'm wrong.
I've never seen anybody get these guys in the condition we've got them in right here today in 2025. Never throughout all of history. He I'm gonna show you and play you this little, Paul will, hopefully, this little video here of what happened back in 12/2009 or so. No. It was Louis the ninth, and it was in the December. And, this is a very short couple minutes. Could did you find that and able to key it up there, Paul, for me?
[00:10:01] Unknown:
Yes. I'm
[00:10:03] Unknown:
I'm working on it. You're working on it. Right. Okay. Well, it's very interesting information. I'd never heard this before. This goes back on the historical view of these creeps and and, what has happened to them down throughout history. And this was in France, and, it was pretty interesting to me. So, just just say yay when you have got it ready to go, Paul, and the volume seemed a little low when I listened to it this morning. You can check all that stuff as we get going with it, but it's just a little interesting information. This goes on top recently, of course. We talked about it earlier this week or last week, whichever one it was, of the lady that's taken over the, command of the European Council, the EU Council, Vander whatever.
And, she's up there saying these are the Talmudic rules of Europe and starts laying out all of the, stuff that you'd see the Pharisees, or the Pharisees, actually. I should inform William and them about that label. The Pharisees, that's what we call these modern day bastards because they're really the Pharisees, but they've got much more technology and many years under their belt to perfect their trade. And we don't like them hiding behind the rest of the Jews. Because every time you try and go after them, oh, antisemite. No. No. Well, that then then to cure it, we got a label for them, and that is Phariseites. And that is, of course, Pharisees and parasites combined. So now that's a label that you can pin on them that they can't hide from.
They can't go anywhere. They're parasites, and they are. And this evidence is by Europe. By last week, I noticed one of them, Paul, was one of the rules was if you're traveling on Friday night before the Sabbath and you're away from home, the rules that you follow, that that kind of crap, the, the the same stuff they were doing in Jesus's time. They were very famous. I I bought a book on the Pharisees one time years ago at a patriot meeting and read it. And the one thing I took away from it was the Pharisees were always changing the rules, I e.
On on the Sabbath, you can't go more than a mile or, I will say, a mile from your house with your meat. Wow. That meat's your food. Although with these trans people, you don't know. So, anyway, what they would do is they'd leave the home and go nine tenths of a mile and sit down and say, well, this is my home now, and I'll get up and go another nine tenths of a mile. So they were always bending the rules, changing the definitions, whatever it is so they can get what they want. So, and we're gonna talk about that because I've forgotten about it. We got William and I hope some of his folks back today. And I wanna tell you what, we discovered one day with Brent years and years ago on a word called core band. But if we can remember, we'll get to that story for those of you who might not have heard it. In the interim, Paul, have you got that little thing queued up?
[00:13:22] Unknown:
Yeah. Yes. I, have it right here. Let's see if this works.
[00:13:30] Unknown:
Alright. Louis the sixteenth had his relationship with Marie Antoinette. Louis the fifteenth had his thing about furniture. But do you know about Louis the ninth, the king who tried to wipe out Judaism once and for all? Crowned in 12/26, Louis the ninth was the type of king who liked to take justice into his own hands. He'd often personally judge cases and deliver punishments in his great hall in Paris. And he also had a thing about the Jews. He forced Jews into manual labor with the ordinance of Malang in 12/30 and liked to debate Jews about their religion.
In December, pope Gregory the ninth received a letter claiming that the Talmud, the enormous Jewish text that had defined Jewish practice since being compiled in the fifth century, attacked the Catholic church at least 35 times and needed to be destroyed. If the pope agreed, there would be no more Talmud. And as an added bonus, no more Jewish practice. The pope announced that the Talmud was going to be put on trial and instructed all Catholic institutions in France, Italy, Spain, and Portugal to seize all copies in their midst. Officials burst into synagogues and confiscated precious handwritten volumes of the Talmud from synagogues across Europe.
2 Months later, the Talmud was put on trial. And can you guess who oversaw it? Yep. This guy. King Louis the ninth ordered four prominent rabbis to defend the Talmud. They faced off against Nicholas Donan, a Parisian Jew who had abandoned his faith and converted to Catholicism. Donan was not a fan of Judaism. He was also the one who'd written the damning letter to the pope that started this crisis. King Louis set the rules. Rule number one, the rabbis couldn't criticize Christianity in any way. And if rule number two could have been announced, it would have been that there's no way the Jews can win. The trial did not go well.
At one point, King Louie got so enraged, he shouted that a good Christian would plunge his sword into a Jew and not debate. One rabbi had to flee for his life. The remaining prominent rabbis argued all they could, but the Talmud was found guilty and condemned to burning. Two years later, officials searched all over France for any remaining volumes of Talmud and other Hebrew books. On 06/17/1242, '20 '4 wagons deposited close to 10,000 books at the Place De Greve near Notre Dame Cathedral where they were burned. After the trial, King Louis expelled the Jews from France and led crusades to The Holy Land that targeted Jewish communities along the way.
And even with his crimes against the Jews, they still named the city after him. How about that for
[00:16:36] Unknown:
St. Louis. Yikes,
[00:16:37] Unknown:
I've never heard any of that before. Did you ever heard that, Paul?
[00:16:41] Unknown:
No. Never heard it.
[00:16:44] Unknown:
So just to give you some perspective on how long this has been going on, of course, the Talmud, she referenced it correctly, was not written down until five hundred years after they crucified, our our lord and savior. And, it was before that, that's what Jesus railed on in the New Testament, as the oral tradition. The the the the, tradition of the elders is what they call it. And, it's what he called it because it was an oral tradition that even we I asked on here one day, how long was it from when the Israelites were released by Nebuchadnezzar before Jesus came on the scene. I think somebody said six hundred years. Do you remember that the other day, Paul?
[00:17:38] Unknown:
No.
[00:17:39] Unknown:
Don't remember. Well, it seems like that's what it was. I don't remember who who one of the gals, I think, chimed up an answer on that. If that's correct, then it was another five hundred years after they crucified him, murdered him, gave him up for Barabbas. That's another word for him. I call him occasionally the the Barabbasites. That pretty well nails them too. But there's eleven hundred years right there of when it was only passed down from father to son orally. I mentioned it the other day. I'm sure all of us played that game when we were young secret in a circle. You know, you get ten, twelve people in a circle and somebody would say something, he'd whisper it to the next one, he'd whisper it to the next one. And by the time it got back to you, it wasn't even anything close to what you originally said. Well, that's just in a circle of 10 or 12 people. Right? You know what I'm talking about, Paul? That phenomenon, I'm sure everybody experienced it. Well, what about eleven hundred years of passing it down from father to son? You don't think there's anything mixed up or added or or any vindictiveness or, anything else sewn in there, on this oral tradition. Do you? Of course, there was.
Yeah. So just to analyze it a little bit more, I was saying a minute ago, I guess I guess William's with us and maybe some of his crew, and we may have some newer folks with us. Maybe, Paul, there may be some people from the Jeff Rent shows here. Maybe. Maybe. And maybe. I wanted to tell Telvez is the word in Spanish that Telvez. I wanted to go over what we discovered in the some of the, well, this is was the most about the most significant, to me anyway, impactful, impressionable on me, incident that we've came come up with, and that was the fellow before my book was published back in 02/2011, there a a guy got I don't even still know how he got a hold of a copy of it, honestly.
But his name was Gary Kinghorn. At that time, he's still around. We reconnected here a while back. Gary was the, the head of marketing. Get this, Paul. He was the head of merchandising, not marketing, merchandising for Cisco. Okay? Pretty big time job internationally. And, so he was, very freedom oriented. He's part of pastor Gregory's flock out there on the West Coast. And, so he wrote a book review of my book, the first one that was written. It was a he put it on the Dollar Vigilante, Berwick's channel. That's when Berwick was still living down in Argentina, and Gary had a house. He came went down to Doug Casey's place and bought a lot and had a house built. He never brought his family down, unfortunately.
And then there was gonna be a nice school, homeschool. And when that didn't pan out, they had moved down and they moved back to The States. I think they're still up there. Regardless, Gary wrote that. And, when we announced it that night on on Bennett's show, it blew out the server for, like, a couple hours. People wanted to get at it. We'd been promoting the book and talking about this information for several months. So, anyway, then, Gary wrote another article after that, but it said Jesus was an anarchist. You probably still find that over on the Dollar Vigilante too if you want to read it.
And, in that, he was talking about a word called Corban, c o r b a n. And, that it was only mentioned twice in the Bible, and it was, they're violating the laws of Moses. And and then he went on with the article in his point that he was making. And, so I got curious about that word. I'd never seen it before, and you may not have heard it before. And, but it's C O R B A N, Corban. So I went on the Internet and tried to, gain some kind of understanding of it and, got pretty much what I'd gotten kind of out of the article. It was, Jesus used the word twice in the New Testament, Korban.
And, he was accusing the Pharisees of, violating the laws of Moses because they were using the laws of Korban and some of this stuff, but it really didn't give you a total picture of it still. I was still a little fuzzy on it. And so, we have these are the real early days of doing shows with Brent, which was probably twelve years ago maybe this happened, something like that. And so, Brent and I are on the show one day, and I asked him about it. And he goes, well, let me go to my study bible and, see what I wrote about it in the footnotes. Well, isn't that interesting?
So it turns out that in those days, you'll probably be be surprised to know that they would corrupt the youth. And so what, under the laws of Moses, as the parents got older, they moved in with the children or the children moved in with them, whatever, and they helped them in their old age. And and what they would do is they'd save up throughout their lives of things that had value and, that in in their older age, it would be the children that would take the things of the wealth and sell it to help support them in their older ages. They live their lives out. And so what was happening in Jesus's time was the Pharisees would use this Korban thing.
And it kind of like a self help remedy in Babylonian, like we talked about, lean, loving, garnishment, and seizure. Well, this be like seizure. Okay? And and and very similar. There's no process. The children would come back and tell the Pharisees at the temple that they had gold or silver or whatever it was. And so then the priests would declare it Corban, which meant it was their property. And they would go to the house, and they would seize it and carry it back to the temple. And then they would sell it to support the social system, which I didn't know existed, and I'd bet you didn't either.
They would sell it to support the social system of the day, the Social Security system of the day. Now you know the origins of where that came from. And, if, if you switched over and became a Christian like that Jew in the video we just heard a minute ago did, they would kick you out of the social system. So your children could would would steal all the wealth, and then they'd kick you out of anything else if you turned Christian. So that's a little bit of an insight into, I don't know, where into the shows with Brent and I and the depth of his study and understanding is, it still impresses the the pants off of me. What were you gonna say something there a second ago, Paul?
[00:25:38] Unknown:
No. No. It's but I know I know about that because I listen to all of these shows, and you've talked about this before. So Yes. That that's another morsel of brilliance that I have picked up from you.
[00:25:54] Unknown:
I mean, it's just like that little tidbit right there. You're not gonna get anywhere else on the face of this Earth to my knowledge.
[00:26:02] Unknown:
No. Absolutely not.
[00:26:04] Unknown:
K. So and what insight? I want to thank, and I was listening to it this morning while I was, taking a shower and stuff, so I didn't really get to hear it. I did go back and relisten to more of it. One of our listeners sent me a recent cliff high, interview, and he's talking about at the end of it that the, that our pals have got some real difficult years ahead for them. The exposure Israel's gonna go. Israel won't take Jews back. Jews his his information says they'll be leaving The US and other countries trying to get into Israel. Israel won't take them back, and everything they're gonna be going through is gonna last at least a decade, maybe longer.
So I'll I'll have to go back and relisten to that where I can really, pay attention to it because it was a bit distracting this morning. But, these guys, man, they're really lashing out. They're trying to do all everything to cover the things that are being exposed. And just like the snake eating its tail, the more they fight to overcome it, the more they get exposed themselves. And, that's what's happening that I see is, a joyful time. And, boy, would I hope to get them on the edge of the cliff and our information be at least part of pushing them over. You bastards, you're listening to this. We got your asses. K? And you got a lot of reason to be scared.
Because, to you, we are terrorists because we got the truth, and you're absolutely, totally, 100% exposed. And you can't do a damn thing about it except take the mask off. That's your only other option. And there's billions of us and a handful of you. And we sure do like those odds.
[00:27:58] Unknown:
Yes. We do.
[00:27:59] Unknown:
It's a matter of time, you slimy bastards. We gotcha. K? What's that noise in the background? Somebody at a sheet metal place or something?
[00:28:12] Unknown:
Some Is it Mike? You hear me, Roger?
[00:28:14] Unknown:
I hear you now. Yeah. Who's this?
[00:28:18] Unknown:
Oh, it's Larry. Hey, Larry. Can Morning. Is there too much noise?
[00:28:24] Unknown:
No. You're fine. How you doing? Okay.
[00:28:27] Unknown:
Good. How are you? No. I'm alright. Yeah. I was just Could be Okay. Go ahead.
[00:28:33] Unknown:
I was just gonna say could be better, but could be worse too. So go on.
[00:28:38] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. I was just gonna add that maybe it was twenty years ago. You said, has anyone ever, you know, offered an explanation behind Corban? And I think it was, like, twenty years ago, I was in a church, a Christian church, an independent fundamental Baptist church at that. And I did hear a preacher explain it just like you explained it. And, but that's the only time I ever heard that explanation. And the problem is most every Christian church in the world, they are promoting, and I know you know this, they're promoting what's known as Christian Zionism.
And, so they even if a if a preacher understands some of these things that you go over, like about Korban, the problem is they just think that was a thing of the past. And, you know, it was something that happened just before Jesus walked the earth and, you know, all of that's just, like, done done away with. They don't they don't obviously, their eyes aren't opened to see what's really going on in the world like we learn on on your radio ranch. So I just wanted to offer that comment.
[00:29:56] Unknown:
Thank you, Larry. It is some it's astounding to me that this doesn't have more a wider resonance, but after all these years, I just gotta accept that it doesn't and then try and narrow down and find ways to connect with folks like you. Find folks like William and his, his friends and associates. And and, there's a you know, there it doesn't apply but to a small percentage. That's the bad news. But the good news is that it only applies to a small percentage because that's all we really need. You know, we don't need to have everybody doing this. I we had 10% of the country, 30,000,000 people filed affidavits and pulled themselves out of the tax system.
Yeah, that's it. That'd do pretty good bit of damage right there. Those would be your more, conscientious and people that are hardworking and and build businesses and stuff. And you start pulling their contributions out of that system, and you got something. You know? So we'll see. I I this I could see the thing building, Larry, where the these people are being exposed, exposed, exposed. They're desperately trying to cover it up, get rid of Chuck Schumer, do anything we can do to keep it from unraveling here underneath us, all the crap that Netanyahu's got going on at home back over there in Satan's sandbox.
I I think I mentioned it to you guys the other day. I heard this last weekend on Judge Napolitano, one of his segments with, the guy from Grey Zone. I can't think of his name right now. He's a Jewish kid. You know, he's a journalist. But it was last week in in Israel, in Tel Aviv, I think. And Netanyahu was on the stand being questioned by the judges in the court. You know, he's been having all these big problems with all this corruption and these charges they've got him on. He's on the stand testifying, and the Israeli police bust into the courtroom and tell the judges they've gotta stop the proceedings because they're going to arrest Netanyahu or take him back for questioning because they just found two of his close aids taking money from Qatar.
Well, it turns out that Qatar is where they started Hamas twenty something years ago. And so Qatar has been trying to lace a public relations scheme in The US. They gave their money exchange, and they went in and took Netanyahu out of an open trial back to downtown police so they could interrogate him before he could talk to these other two guys where they could sync their stories. Open court. This is something else that came out a while back. I heard it on Harrison one morning. But it turns out it was an a ten year old story. And from about '9 2011 Paul, I don't even know if you've heard this.
In 2011, Netanyahu had the best known and best respected shrink in the country in a specialty area as his psychiatrist. Do you have you heard this? He had this psychiatrist, and the psychiatrist committed suicide. And in the suicide note, he blamed Netanyahu and his incessant lying for his suicide.
[00:33:41] Unknown:
Uh-huh. That's rich.
[00:33:47] Unknown:
I I mean, these people are wackos, folks.
[00:33:50] Unknown:
K? I don't know. It's So, anyway, they're out there screwed up to make you shrink.
[00:33:55] Unknown:
Commit suicide. I'm
[00:33:57] Unknown:
I mean, come on, man. That was a that's a true story. I'm glad that Harrison brought it back or it's after October 11 or whatever with a lot some stuff happened and somebody, like, brought that story back, and I had missed it totally and didn't hear it back in the in the day it happened. But anyway, that's who we're dealing with. They're getting exposed. We've got the ultimate exposure. Just keep learning. Keep growing. Keep being empowered. Keep telling others our time will come. Now who was trying to say something there? I think it's Joe. Just confirming your story, Roger.
Hey, Joe. I remember this same story. Yes.
[00:34:44] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:34:45] Unknown:
Good enough. So is there anybody that has any questions, or comments or anything? We can kinda ride in the show here. Those are the yes. There's a female right there. Which one of our gals is that? Nancy?
[00:34:59] Unknown:
This is Rochelle in Idaho.
[00:35:02] Unknown:
Okay, Rochelle. Talk right in your program. Okay. Well, it's an addict it's addicting information. And I promise you, you can't get it anywhere else. Okay? Now what can we do for you today? Talk right in your microphone there if you could, sweetie.
[00:35:18] Unknown:
Do you happen to know or anybody online here? Which of the states did not, legislate and verify the no hide laws?
[00:35:29] Unknown:
No. I have no idea.
[00:35:32] Unknown:
Oh,
[00:35:32] Unknown:
I was Roger High School. Just a yes. I I Julie may know. Julie, do you can you answer that question on these Noah Hyde laws that don't apply to us? All four all 50 all 50 governors have passed the Noah Hyde laws. Okay. Well, good for them. Gone through the legislature
[00:35:49] Unknown:
on all 50? I believe they have. I have die offered you can go to author diana ketterman dot com. I have her book. I read her whole book. She's got over 248 citations in the back of it to support her facts. Okay.
[00:36:05] Unknown:
Good. Thank you. You're welcome. Yeah. Well, the good news, Rochelle, is the the those NOAA high laws don't apply to nationals, so there's good news for you. Good.
[00:36:16] Unknown:
Okay. But Anybody else? The fact that they passed them.
[00:36:21] Unknown:
Well, George Bush did it with like executive orders. I don't I don't know about the legislature. That's how how I know they did it on the federal level. I didn't know it had gone through all 50 states, but okay. I mean, you know, they passed that law that said you can't Yeah. Be against diversify, sanction, and whatever, d DOB or whatever it was. He the states are trying to tell people you can't support them. Well, screw you. Roger? Excuse me. Yes.
[00:36:55] Unknown:
Yeah. They're passed in February under Trump under the first administration, but it goes all the way back to Carter. He passed them and it's called Education Day USA. They hit them underneath Education Day.
[00:37:11] Unknown:
Yeah. A big surprise there. Register.gov.
[00:37:13] Unknown:
It's on federalregister.gov, I believe, and whitehouse.gov and even congressgov. But I thought that was
[00:37:22] Unknown:
Alright. Well, the good news is if you churches. If you filed your affidavit that they don't apply to you and tell them to shove it up there Good.
[00:37:31] Unknown:
Whatever. Yeah. You can go to Alright. Well You can go to I gotta read that book by, yeah, Diana Ketterman, but you can go to Stu Peters, on Rumble. He just posted something. I sent it to you, Roger. Very damning about the Jews. So, I sent it to you in an email. Yeah. He's on them. He's got a lot of stuff on the Noahide lot, but forget that he's just got a lot of stuff about
[00:37:54] Unknown:
the about the Zionists on there. Yeah. Oh. They're getting really exposed, and my I tip my hat to Stu Peters. He's very spoken about it.
[00:38:04] Unknown:
Yeah. Roger. A lot of feedback from that too. Okay. Thank you. Alright. Alright, Rochelle. Okay. Yes. I heard Larry was,
[00:38:13] Unknown:
wanting to Yeah. Jam. So
[00:38:16] Unknown:
I think you were you were off the air already, and Julie was questioning, Brent about the Noahide laws. And I was kinda half listening at the time, so maybe Julie can tell the audience and you what what, Brent's explanation was.
[00:38:38] Unknown:
Well, that or we can ask him again tomorrow.
[00:38:43] Unknown:
No. I mean, Julie heard his explanation, so I was wondering if she can tell the audience
[00:38:47] Unknown:
what Brent's explanation was. Well, if if if she doesn't, and and we can ask him again tomorrow was my comment. So whatever Julie, you wanna inform us what Brent said? If you can remember all that, the pertinent
[00:39:01] Unknown:
Yeah. I can't I can't remember what Brent said, but, he maybe he should come on. But, I mean, they're all outlined in Diane Ketterman's book and they all sound really great on on the surface, but what is what's underlying them as to how evil they are? I mean, it's basically, I mean, if you're a Christian, you get beheaded, you can't worship more than one God and their God is Satan. You cannot do the father, the son, and the holy spirit. That's blasphemous. You cannot eat any animals. You the list just goes on and on, but they they do all of that, but we can't.
[00:39:38] Unknown:
Okay. Well, screw them. That's the message I've got for them. You're listening? Screw you, you wacko bastards. Okay. Chicken slingers. That's what somebody used to call them. I thought that was good. Chicken slingers. So, guys, that and that's a good one, isn't it?
[00:40:00] Unknown:
Yeah. That's a good one.
[00:40:01] Unknown:
So, alright. Who else has got something? There must be somebody in the audience. William, you with us today? Are you free? I mean, everybody's just Yeah. I'm here. I'm here. Hey, brother. How are you doing? Everybody's yeah. They're they're descending on you. All these period. Give me William's email.
[00:40:19] Unknown:
So Oh, yeah. Yeah. You're you're welcome. You're welcome to give out my email and number at any time to anybody. Alright?
[00:40:24] Unknown:
Yeah. Okay. That's fine.
[00:40:26] Unknown:
I had a quick question, though. I know we had a Yeah. We had stayed on yesterday. We had a a real interesting discussion yesterday, myself, Plary, that's Paul and Larry, and, Julie, I think. But I thought and and I really appreciate that discussion. But, I was asking yesterday, Roger, about the tariffs. Can you say any anything of you know, from a historical perspective to the present, about anything about these tariffs, that Trump is I can. Imposing? Do you think they're effective or no? Well, I'll I'll give you an example in our history.
[00:41:05] Unknown:
A little bit different time. Back in the eighteen seventies. From the eighteen seventies up till 1913, we were on this tariff program. And, in the the reason I say this is, do you ever see a book called Goodbye April 15? Have you run across that yet? You're a book guy. It was Yeah. Not happening. Not. Okay. Well, it was written back in the nineties, a guy. His nom de guerre was Boston Tea Party. That wasn't his real name, obviously. But, it was a good book on IRS back then for what people knew and understood. But in that book, there was a cartoon reproduction from the eighteen seventies, and it was the senate, William. It was the senate of the US. And in the well of the senate down there, it was full of alligators.
And and the it was about because the tariffs were working so well and they had so much excess cash, they were afraid it was gonna corrupt the senate. That's true. K?
[00:42:14] Unknown:
So yeah. Okay. I'm on I had to unmute and respond. Yeah.
[00:42:17] Unknown:
Uh-huh. So, so, yeah, that was it was very successful. And, of course, that's what the bankers wanted to get off because they wanted to get this new scheme where we were a piece of their property, and that gives them they don't even have to bring their own money out to play then because we provide all the credit by our birth certificate being attached to the bond in the bond market. Then that's sold, and that's the original credit spout of the entire financial system. That's why this is so important to them. K? And it's not that they wanna put you in slavery, make you go pick cotton.
It's they want this power over you and this property ownership, these property rights, so they can not only start the original credit spout of the credit system, so they don't have to spend their own money. They're just making layer upon layer of compound interest on bonds and on currency. Okay? And then because they've got a property right in you, now we can have agencies with unelected bureaucrats that can take past legislation and reinterpret it to apply it to the new serfs. So those are the two reasons that they did this, really, was so they could start a credit financial system with us as the credit, build the whole financial system is built on us, our backs as slaves.
K? And so they could invoke the agency and the bureaucrat system so that they could come in and control you with unelected bureaucrats, with man made laws. That's what I refer to them as. Are you familiar with the way that works, William? The way it's set up, either the house or the senate introduces a bill, and then the other body has to pass it. So both have to pass it, and the bill has to agree on both houses. And if it doesn't, they go into what's called a conference committee and try and hammer out an agreement deal. When that's done, it's signed by the president.
When that's done, just like, well, with Trump's executive orders, it goes over if it's legislation, it goes over into a group of law books called the statutes at large. You know, there's three different books, law groups of law books in the law library. You got these excuse me. My stomach's acting up a little. You got these organic statutes at large, which when they're put in there are considered to be constitutional. They may not be, but they're considered to be until they're challenged. So they're over there in the statutes at large. By the way, that's that group of books. William, it's over in the corner with all the dust on it because nobody ever goes over there. And if you go and open book number one of the statutes at large, here's what you find.
The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, and the Northwest Ordinance. Those are still law. They're at the inside cover of volume one of a whole set of very important law books called the organic statutes at large. Now from there, they take that law and they move it over to another group of law books called the United States Code. And if they move it over in whole cloth, it's called positive law. And if they only move it over partial cloth or not at all cloth, which title 26 is, it's called non positive law.
Basically, positive law is constitutional common law, and the other is part of the Roman code, such as title 26, the Internal Revenue Service code. It was never passed by the Senate. It was never signed by the president. It was never put into the organics, statutes at large, but it was inserted into the United States code as title 26 even though it's never been passed by the senate and signed by the president. The reason for that is because it was the federal bank, the government they bankrupted. And so that's who Washington DC is the federal government, and the speaker of the house basically runs Washington, DC.
So when they brought in the tax system, it only had to apply to the federal government, so they slipped it into The United States code as title 26. And then they came over and asked you, or but but you're presumed already, don't at birth to be a citizen of The United States, and then you're a resident. And they ask you those two questions, which means you're a citizen of Washington, DC, a federal citizen under the fourteenth amendment, which means title 26 applies to you. K? And it was never a this is that United States code, the middle group of these law books, is the same thing as what happened with the Roman code. Back I told the story the other day about how self help remedies, lien, levy, garnishment, and seizure, had helped has shown the the merchant way of remedy to the Romans, and they wanted it. And over a period of two hundred years of them going to the praetor and 200 different praetors, finally, they incorporated those remedies and a lot of the Babylonian merchant code into what was the common law of Rome, basically making the Roman civil code exactly the same as The United States code. We were on here one day and asked somebody to look it up, And, they these the United States code was started in nineteen twenties right before the bankruptcy.
So that's that that fits right into the timeline. Okay? Now the one we're really concerned with are these ones at the bottom, and they're called the Code of Federal Regulations. It's a whole another set of law books, and these are only from the agencies. And they take the 50 titles of the United States Code, and by determining the subject matter and assigning it to an agency, the code of federal regulations is underneath that subject matter United States code section and interprets many of those statutes. And so that's what happened with the bankruptcy.
But we'll just I guess we'll just get into this today, William. See, the the first time they used this administrative state, deep state structure, it they I believe they used it a little bit in Rome. But the first time it was really applied was after the French Revolution. And in fact, that's what happened is they got taken over by an administrative state. And the word bureaucrat comes from the after the French Revolution, the bureaucrats would identify themselves by having burlap on their desk coverings. Somehow their desks would would have a burlap covering like a desk thing.
And in French, the word for burlap is bureau, and that's where we get the word bureaucrat. Okay? So that's what we're dealing with is the resurrection of the French Revolution and the administrative state where these agencies just pop up, and they weren't there before because there weren't anybody for them to write regulations for because there weren't any serfs. They started after 1933, and the very first I just realized this recently. The very first regulations were in March the ninth of nineteen thirty three, and they were issued by the secretary of the treasury where they could reopen the banks with the new paper currency.
Those are the first regulations. There weren't any agencies yet. They started growing after '33, and it was a cause of some clashes from the old school folks wanting to fight the well, it depends on what you wanna call it, the Jew deal, the raw deal, or the new deal. But the ones that were fighting that switch over and that change, and they'd go and win battles at the Supreme Court. And so that's when Roosevelt went back and stacked the court. And, the last time it was done, they're trying to do it again, of course, talking about it. But, anyway, so that okayed a lot of the agencies. Now the important thing about this is they did not have their rule book. Here's this whole new faction of government.
All these administrative agencies, they weren't there before. They're supposed to promulgate these things called regulations or little laws, and there's no real way to guide them on what to do and what how to do it right and how to do it wrong, what they can do, necessarily what they can't do. So they didn't get that passed until 1946 after World War two. So you had thirteen years in there, and that came out and was passed as the Administrative Procedures Act. You'll hear it referred to as the APA. And, that is in title five of the United States Code, section five five two and following.
Now basically, it's the rule book that they've got to play by. Many of our patriots that have won court cases in the past, you know, you'll hear about some celebrated win by some patriot. Well, they don't win on law generally. They win on procedure. And it's something that these administrative people either didn't do that they had to do or they did it and did it wrong. And that's where you can trip them up right there, and that's the majority of wins we've had, not on law, on this procedural stuff. So part of the things that is, required of them, and we've got some recent examples of it. First of all, there's been some really important Supreme Court cases came down last session on the administrative state and their freewheeling attitude that they'd had for a number of decades.
It's called the Chevron deference. And supposedly, what they're supposed to do under this system is we go through that situation of House and the Senate agree on a law, President signs it, goes into the organic statutes at large, comes over here to the to the, United States code. And, I'll be damned. And and they put it in the law books. And at that point, it's transferred to the agency, like the EPA or whichever. There's there's hundreds of them up there. K? Whichever agency has responsibility over that subject matter. And the court's decision in the seventies on it was a Chevron case, including Chevron, and they came to the they said, well, you're the agency.
You're the experts on this subject matter, so we're gonna let you interpret the legislation that was passed and signed by the president any way you want to. And that's where they've been so freewheeling over all these decades and these ridiculous regulations that about the only way you can get a regulation out is to have president Trump yank them out, which he's done with a bunch already, or you have to go back to the original legislation and find out what was the intent of the legislators when they passed the law and just how far the agency has deviated from interpreting it correctly.
K? So we've been going through thirty, forty years of of rogue agency stuff. Well, that got curtailed a bit in the last session. But this is what I wanted to explain to you because this is this is pretty damn important. There are not very many people that really understand this well. Before I left The States to move down here, I had a attorney. My phone rang one day. I was still in Panama City. Phone rang and some attorney, and he had a client who had an IRS problem and had heard of me and had gotten my number somehow. And, anyway, he wanted to ask me about all this stuff. And so we spent a good time on the phone explaining all this administrative state stuff and about what I'm about to explain to especially the newer people here in just a minute.
And, at the end of that conversation, and he said, you know, Roger, he said, you know more about this than 98% of the attorneys in the country. That was his statement to me. Roger? I was yes. I was kinda shocked at that, but I had a guy drill it into my head. Yes, Julie?
[00:56:47] Unknown:
Yeah. I wanted to interject here and ask you a question if I can, please. Where are the organic statutes of large, found? Are they in the USC or they are are they No. They're separate. They're Code No. They're separate.
[00:57:00] Unknown:
They're separate set of law books. They're called the organic statutes at large. They're in the law library. Go ask the law librarian. She'll point them out to you.
[00:57:10] Unknown:
They're not online?
[00:57:12] Unknown:
Well, they probably are. I don't know. I haven't looked at them. I What's the difference between the website,
[00:57:19] Unknown:
But what's the difference between the website, uscode.health.gov, and then when we go to The US when we go to the title and then The US, you know, United States
[00:57:30] Unknown:
Well, there the other other is the 50 titles of The United States code, basically, the Roman civil law. What we're talking here is the original law books of the country, the organic statutes at large.
[00:57:44] Unknown:
Okay. For The US United States code, what's the difference between UScode.health.gov? Is that the same thing as The
[00:57:54] Unknown:
US code? Well, I I hadn't looked at that, but I'm sure that's what it is. They don't want you over there in the statutes large. They throw you to the code all the time.
[00:58:03] Unknown:
Hold on. Oh, okay. Yeah.
[00:58:05] Unknown:
Okay. So they throw you to the Who's the other female there? It's Myrco. Yeah. Myrco.
[00:58:14] Unknown:
I wanted to explain,
[00:58:16] Unknown:
to you to speak right in the phone, Myrka.
[00:58:18] Unknown:
You know what? I'm gonna change my headphones.
[00:58:22] Unknown:
I got to get my You got blue you got Bluetooth on or something?
[00:58:27] Unknown:
No. The regular, Apple phone thing. I'll I'll I'll switch, and I'll explain it to Julie right now. I'll be back.
[00:58:36] Unknown:
Alright. She's gonna she's gonna be back. Larry's here. Yes, sir.
[00:58:42] Unknown:
Yeah. The, the organic statutes at large, would they be considered the positive law of The United States code?
[00:58:50] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. As I said earlier, every bill law would be Everything else. Read that. Every law that goes through that sequence, house, senate, president signs it. First place it's put is in the statutes at large because it's considered to be at that point constitution. K? Is that alright? Does that explain it? Larry, go away? Roger. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
[00:59:22] Unknown:
Alright. Yes. Roger, I'm back. Okay. So the US code, the US House, unitedstateshouse.gov website follows the organic statues at large. And Okay. The the organic statues at large, positive or non positive, it's all on there. There's a hyperlink that you can connect to the, to the organic sectors at large at the bottom of all the definitions, and that's where you find your organic sectors at large. And sometimes the organic I mean, The US code house.gov, website, link adds a little bit to the wording. So that's why I always refer back to the organic sectors at large because it has, like, the first documented law.
And then
[01:00:27] Unknown:
That's true. The US So The US Health Dot healthcode.health.gov are the organic statutes at large. Is that correct, Margaret? It's it's The US code.
[01:00:39] Unknown:
It's different it's different from The US code because they change they add things to it. The organic statutes at large is just basically simple, you know, definition, what they put together,
[01:00:54] Unknown:
you know, whenever it came in. It it was passed by the house, passed by the senate, signed by the president, considered to be constitutional, and the first set of law books it lands in is the organic statutes at large. Okay. But Marco's saying it's house.gov for the organic statutes at large. Know about that. I don't look at that stuff online. I'm telling you how it is in the in the law library. K?
[01:01:20] Unknown:
Yeah. The first the the the official law organic structures at large are the first ones, and then the US code follows what the organic structures at large has. They add a little bit of wording to their information that they do connect to the organic statutes.
[01:01:41] Unknown:
So that is on So they're two different
[01:01:43] Unknown:
Yeah. Let me let me give you a a for instance, Julie. The nationality act of 1940, that's in the statutes at large.
[01:01:56] Unknown:
Okay. Thank you.
[01:01:58] Unknown:
Okay. Now let's go on. I wanna explain the administrative state. But but there's three sets of law books. The organic statutes at large, don't forget those are the ones with the Declaration of Independence, the articles of Confederation. They're still operable. There's veneered over the, Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution. Those are the first documents in volume one when you open the first cover. They're law. K? So they then take it over to The United States code. If it's taken in the like, in that title eight, if you went and looked at title eight, you'd probably find it to be positive law, immigration naturalization act and all that, and it came over from that nationality act in 1940.
And because it was brought over basically in whole substance, it's considered to be positive law. If they bring it over halfway or not even at all as in title 26, it's called nonpositive law. And you can look inside the front cover of The United States code. I think on volume one, it may be in all of them. But they give you all 50 titles, and there's a little check mark if it's positive law or nonpositive law. K? It took me years to figure this out. I could nonpositive law? What the hell are you talking about? Okay.
So, anyway, I'm just giving you the schematics of it and how it's set up. The concept, if you will. Now the third one are these code of federal regulations. That's where the unelected bureaucrats go in and get some legislation passed to them under subject matter authority, and then they reinterpret it and put it out in regulatory form. It's called promulgating a regulation. That's the bureaucratic term. Okay? Now there's different types of regulations, and this is where it gets really important. There's different types of regulations. There's one called a statement of policy.
There's another one called an interpretive regulation, And the last one that's got teeth and a really extra procedure they have to go through because of it is called a substantive regulation. So you've got statements of policy, interpretive regulations, and substantive regulations. Now the place that they place these, I heard it referred to a few times lately, is called the federal register. The federal register is what is identified as the legal organ of the federal government. That means go back to our due process. Due process underpins all of our law, notice and the right to be heard.
So now when they promulgate a regulation, it has to be put in the federal register. All of Trump's executive orders, I saw him sign a ton of them yesterday. All of those were put in the federal register. It's the legal organ. It's where you everybody gets notice. And then if it's a get the right to be heard in a minute. Okay? But this is the reg the illegal organ where people put notice. Like in your local county, if you're going bankrupt or if you got married or if you got divorced or whatever, then if it's a big enough city, they've got their own legal organ like the federal government has got the federal register. But in a smaller town, it'll be like in the where the Juannads are, the classifieds are in the back of the newspaper. And that's where they have all those things announced. Okay? And and sometimes they you can, get demand to be heard, but other times, it's just strictly notice adhering to due process.
So here's the difference, and this is important. And I'm gonna give you a recent example of how important it is and was that all of you will relate to and remember. I promise you. Okay? So the first one is a statement of policy, and a statement of policy is exactly what it says it is. It's an administrative agency putting out some statement on some policy it's got, and it only applies to the agency itself. It doesn't apply to you. Only to the agency. Statement of policy. The second one, interpretive, also like a statement of policy, it only applies internally to the agency.
And in a minute, you'll be able to understand how you identify these. So that's the middle one. And the important thing, again, interagency of application. The third one, the substantive regulation, that one is totally different from the other two. And it is considered to have what they call general applicability. General applicability. That means it applies to everybody. It's not just interagency. So on on on regulations that apply to everybody, they've gotta go through another specific process because of the importance of the agency overseeing and adhering to the constitutional, concept of due process.
Again, they're gonna give you due process even though you've already got it by putting it in the register. K? Now you're gonna get it by the fact that they have to send this substantive regulation through a specific pro protocol before it is legit. So you go to the federal register, and at the top of the regulation, you'll see in big bold letters, it'll say notice of proposed rulemaking notice of proposed rulemaking. And then it'll give the rule, and then it'll have somebody, either a post office box or phone number, a person's name you can contact. So if you want to answer to this proposed regulation, either pro or con, you can contact MIM and give your right to be heard. Notice and the right to be heard.
So here's the notice. If you got any wannabe heard, here's who you do it and who you do it with. And then what we're gonna do as the agency, or at least what they're supposed to do, is to take all the comments that come in, go back and rediscuss the regulation, repremolgate it with the important things changed, and then they reissue it in the federal register. And they reissue it under a heading that says notice of final rulemaking. So you had notice of proposed. You had a chance to inject what you wanted to do. They've reconsidered it and put it back out, and now it's called the notice of final rulemaking.
And then it'll go down that with the new regulation. I think it's got a time limitation. It can't take effect for thirty or sixty days or something. But it's this whole process that has to do with any regulation that's got general applicability to the, people at large. Now here's the importance of everything I've just told you, especially where you can apply it. First of all, let me tell you the example. That would be about couple of years ago when the the judge a female judge there in the Central District Of Florida, who was a Clarence Thomas clerk, overturned the CDC mask rule, and all of a sudden, we didn't have to wear masks anymore. Remember that?
I'm sure all of you. I know when you saw the picture of those those children in a elementary school, and the teacher said, we don't have to wear masks anymore, and they all went nuts. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I think you'd probably remember that. Well, the what happened with that was the CDC passed an intermediary regulation, interpretive. It was only applied to the CCC CDC. So if you worked at the CDC, you had to wear a mask. But if you didn't, you didn't have to wear one. And they buffaloed everybody on that in the whole damn world, didn't they? Yes. They did.
They took an interpretive regulation, put it out as if it was a substantive regulation, and nobody caught it. Some law firm finally for some client caught it and brought that case to that gal in Orlando, where I believe that Central District Of Florida is, and she overturned the whole thing. Now the Biden administration said we're gonna appeal it. Well, they can't appeal it. It's the Administrative Procedures Act. This thing's set in stone. Okay? And so if they they didn't appeal it and so, about last year or year before last, they were gonna try it again and pull something on us again with one of these things. And they were gonna use a MASCH requirement, but they passed the regulation, but it was only for TSA.
And that's when you saw on the airports, it was only the TSA agents that had the masks on. Because after they learned with the CDC example, when they passed the next one, which was also interpretive, it only applied to the TSA agents. K? So that's how you you see what they're doing here and how they're doing it. Now the important part is and the way I discovered this, get some rain, was when I was fighting the IRS. And, my teacher, my law teacher, Gary Bryant was his name, and he was hammering this stuff into my head. The whole time I was fighting the IRS in court and all that stuff, and he's firing, hiring, and and banging this this, these regulatory things and how this scheme worked into my head.
I had to go read a couple of court cases and stuff, but I finally grasped it. And then I started checking because the IRS was after me on a summons for books and records. I don't remember what the regulation is. But anyways, the summons for books and records. And I decided to fight them just like some of you get your hackles up and go, well, hell. I'm gonna fight them. Well, that's what I did. I was green. I had no no procedure. They they tried to, where I filed the brief and they scheduled a hearing, and then I had forgotten to serve one of the parties, you know, just as a pro say. And there's this is why I tell you there's so many procedural things you gotta learn how to do right. And that's one thing. I let somebody out on the service. When you send them the case and you service them, there's an affidavit in there. They sign and send back to you that they were served. Again, they all the parties know what's going on. Okay?
And so, they tried to get a motion to dismiss on that. And I I ran up to the Cobb County Library, and I found a case for you know, as Prose says, we're not expected to be a high level of an attorney. K? A trained attorney, a professional. So they give us a little deference, and, this case said that that a mistake like I had made was all form and no substance. And so I took that case and wrote a little, a little memorandum of law or something, got it back down there, and they said, well, the case has already been scheduled. We're gonna hear it. Well, I know it must have pissed the little Jew attorney off because if you got an IRS case, they don't let the US attorney handle it locally. It's like this thing with me. They fly in a tax specialist from the Treasury Department, DOJ, so he can harass you. So he had to come to Atlanta. I'm sure he was pissed off about that. I got that little the little IRS agent was this cute little old black gal, and I'm sure I'm sure her and I would have been good friends.
But, boy, I had her on the stand for four and a half hours, and she hated my guts. K? I'm a tell you right out front. So, anyway, that was the experience in this time frame, and I'm trying to learn all this regulatory stuff that Gary's banging in my head. And I take off down to, if you're gonna look at stuff like this, I I I don't I guess you can probably do it online today, Julie. But, we used to have to in those days. This was in the nineties. All this stuff wasn't on the Internet yet. And so we had to go to what's called a federal book depository. Now a federal book depository is different from a regular federal law library.
A federal book depository has all of these old things in the library, all the old regulations and the all this old stuff that you need to look at or want to occasionally. So I popped down to the, to Georgia State right downtown Atlanta, and they didn't have the room for all the books, so they had everything on microfiche. So here's what I learned. If you're looking at a regulation in the federal register, you can look at the bottom of it where it ends, and and there's if there's brackets, not parenthesis, but those brackets, and they'll have a previous regulation listed there, then this is a upgrade of a previous regulation.
So you can go to, for instance, the one that covered these books and records that they were after me for. I could go to that regulation and see at the bottom that it was an update of a previous regulation. And I can go with the microfiche, go find that one, and maybe it had brackets at the bottom, and it was a update of a previous regulation. So you can continue to trace these things back. So for one thing, you can find out if they're substantive regulations and went through notice and comment or whether they're interpretive and only apply interagency.
And so as I started tracing this back on this notice of books and records, I had stopped, and they always stopped at the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. There's our old friend again. The end of the series, sixty days after Brown versus Board of Education, which overturned Plessy and and made both statuses the same. How the hell it did that? I don't know. And then sixty days later, they put the internal revenue code of 1954 in place. Well, every time you trace back one of these regulations, that's where it ends. And if you trace it back and it's interpretive interpretive interpretive, then you know it wasn't substantive.
So if I would have known that in the head of that hearing and understood it, I could have brought up that that regulation only applied internally to the IRS because it was interpretive. Therefore, it had no applicability on me. Therefore, this whole thing is a fraud. Now I the the the other person that stumbled on this about the same time as I did is no longer with us, and his name was Ralph Winerout. Some of you have heard or are familiar with Ralph. Some of you not. Ralph was on our BN over there for over twenty years on Sunday nights for two hours. And after he passed away, Tom Dee, our buddy that visits us occasionally here, stuck me in that slot for a couple hours. That's how Mark and I finally crossed paths. Okay? And Mark used to be on the air with Ralph.
And after Ralph passed away, he said, well, I think I'll tune over there. So he took his place, and it was me. And, Mark and I have an old listener's, a mutual friend named Chuck Ward, who's a beekeeper there. And Chuck had been trying to get Mark to listen to my stuff for at least three or four years. And Mark never would pay any attention to it until he turned over there to hear who'd taken Ralph's spot. So that's how we got connected. But, I would love to see one of our patriots get armed with this information on these regulations and who they apply to that is under fire from the IRS and go in there with this information and and throw it down on them.
They can't go forward with it. Okay? Because the Administrative Procedures Act, as I said, it's pretty chiseled in stone. Okay? And the whole administrative state, which is the whole deep state, another way to say it, is built on it. Okay? And so that's why that CDC regulation well, don't tell me that it didn't apply because everybody didn't have to wear their masks anymore. So here's a little tidbit, a little insight into the administrative state. Not too many people really understand it very well. And neither Ralph, before he died, I think he was trying to get into court with this. And I've talked about it and just anybody that's in our circles and most of our people get rid of their IRS problems.
But if anybody does come up that you hear about or know of, this is some way to go in them. Well, I bet you they'd end up with big egg on their face with this one. K? So that's how the administrative works and operates, the administrative state. And once you file your affidavit, William and your friends that may be new today, the when you file this paperwork, if you do, the only two regulations out of all those agencies I've heard there's over 300. I've heard there's over 600 of them. K? But all those regulations that are promulgated by all those unelected bureaucrats, the only two that apply to you, the person that files his paperwork, are those listed in the IRS's jurisdictional statement, eight seventy one b and eight seventy seven b.
Those are the only two regulations, and one of them will never apply to you who would go through and get their god given rights back and go exchange that passport for another slave passport. There's no other country you can go to where you can get your god given rights back. So I'm assuming that one won't ever apply to any of our people. And if it if you wanna do that, you don't belong around us anyway. But the other one is this one on dividends of stocks and bonds, not on the capital gains, but on the dividends should you receive them.
Those are the only sections you'll, be responsible for out of the thousands, tens of thousands of pages of code of federal regulations. So that's the good news for you. So does anybody have any questions on all that part?
[01:22:35] Unknown:
Hey, Rod. This is William.
[01:22:37] Unknown:
Hey, William.
[01:22:38] Unknown:
Okay. Yeah. I was listening, and I was trying to get some paperwork done at the same time, but I did, hear hear what you said. One question. The Noahide laws, I heard that when I first when I got on, I got on a little late. I heard some some exchange back and forth about the Noahide laws. You say the Noahide laws will doesn't affect the national status.
[01:23:00] Unknown:
No. No no man made laws no man made laws come that go through this regulatory state that I've just described Mhmm. With the exception of those two, and those are both constitutional taxes, by the way. None of those, regulations apply to you anymore if you go through this. You totally shed the entire administrative state with the exception of those two regulations, constitutional taxes. Everybody everything else got nothing to do with you anymore. Does that sound good? Let me get William here. Does that sound good?
[01:23:45] Unknown:
Yeah. I just I'm just getting, I'm, you know, I'm talking to other people on other shows and stuff, and I hear them, of course, you know, dispute that. But, I just wanna hear Well what you your perspective.
[01:23:56] Unknown:
Well, that they they probably dispute a lot of stuff that I say, but I don't care about them. You know who I care about? Right. I care about the federal government, and the federal government's never disputed anything we've sent them.
[01:24:12] Unknown:
Okay. Okay. Good. Okay.
[01:24:14] Unknown:
Alright. I have a question. Alright. And the other people just don't understand. That's why I was so frustrated, William, with you and Tony last week because I want you to understand this so bad. And it just takes time. And you gotta work through a whole bunch of stuff, and you gotta realize that the information that you get exposed to here, you'll probably not get exposed to anywhere else. And the reason is because they didn't have John Benson as a law teacher. And they don't know the old law. If you if you go and ask my litmus test for patriots is what's the what's the concept behind the legal definition of the word person?
And if you can ever find anybody that can answer that correctly, listen to them. You'll die down if you'll ever find anybody that can answer it correctly. Hold on. Merkel, we had Larry in there. Okay. Larry, you were first a minute ago.
[01:25:10] Unknown:
Yeah. There's 441 agencies listed on the federal register, and it's up three agencies since last summer. And then, also, please explain to the audience that there is a difference between an agency and an and a bureaucracy or a bureau. A bureau is a subdivision of agency.
[01:25:35] Unknown:
Okay. I guess you could say that. They're called bureaucrats, and you and and they're under a lot of cabinet positions. You've got cabinet positions for Trump, like secretary of state, treasury exec. Those aren't agencies. I the way I understand that there's agencies underneath them. Anyway, there's a whole bunch of them, and and the only ones that apply and that's why that IRS regulation is so important because in that one, both of the statuses are covered. And the reason they've gotta cover both of them is because the two taxes are constitutional. And I think also because I bet at the top of these Jew bastards, the ones at the top probably have affidavits on file and aren't aren't paying taxes either. K?
My suspicion. There was another thing I was gonna address right there, and I forgot.
[01:26:34] Unknown:
Hold on, Erica. Let's see. IRS is a bureau of Oh. The Department of Treasury.
[01:26:40] Unknown:
Okay. They're they're under you know, secretary of the Treasury is their boss, and all that's the only one with both statuses in it because those two taxes are constitutional. The other 49 code of federal regulations apply to residents because they know you're a citizen of The United States and a resident, and there are residents they want under their control that aren't citizens of The United States. They're green card people, but they have to follow all of the regulations. So all the other 49 are for residents. That's what I wanted to say. Okay. Mirka, what you got?
[01:27:23] Unknown:
For for William and Roger, once you're putting your affidavit, you you remove yourself from that system. You're not a federal citizen. You're under natural law. And then you were saying that you were sharing, William said that he was, listening to other people that were questioning that. The the the point of the affidavit is they have no longer they they no they no longer have authority over you. The man made law has no authority. So you tell them you can put it on an affidavit or a a lawful legal notice. There you have no authority over me or my property.
[01:28:05] Unknown:
Yep. Well, they know when they get it. The clerk might not, but the people up the line do. William, what was your comment?
[01:28:12] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, no. That's that's on this show and other shows. Not just other shows, this show too.
[01:28:19] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:28:21] Unknown:
Well Yeah. There's that they have no the state this, corporation has no authority over you.
[01:28:27] Unknown:
Okay. But there might be people on this show that don't understand that as well then. That's interesting. Right. It take everybody on an individual level reaches that understanding when they get there.
[01:28:38] Unknown:
I gotcha. And listen. It just takes time, William. Because for one thing, this is it's not hard. It's just complex. And they've set it up complex to fool you so you'd never find it. It's a miracle we found this. Okay? They never thought anybody would figure it out. And the the the, colonel House said that in that little letter to William to, Woodrow Wilson. Right at the bottom, he said, well, if one or two people fall find figure it out, we've got plausible deniability. Well, we're gonna expose it to millions, man, and you ain't got no plausible deniability, you bastard. Okay?
[01:29:16] Unknown:
Another example, Roger, that you give is, you know, putting they if they think that they can correct you or say that they do have authority, then they have to rebut your affidavit. Right?
[01:29:28] Unknown:
You're saying that's why affidavit Thursday. Yeah. Yeah. And you might some folks might not understand how affidavits work. It's very good knowledge because you can, apply this to your regular life. If, you're going home this evening and drive traffic and somebody rear ends you, first thing you do is go home and write an affidavit and go get it notarized. If it ever does come to trial, you pull your affidavit out and the other party's there, where's yours? Well, we don't have one. Oh, well, I guess mine stands then, doesn't it? Because see, an affidavit is sworn court testimony.
And so what happens is for someone to overcome your sworn court testimony, they have to write an affidavit themselves contradicting your facts in yours, and then they gotta go get it signed under penalty of perjury. And that's why they'll never do it because they can't do it. So, basically, it's like king of the mountain, like we used to play when we were kids. If you've got an an an an affidavit properly formed, properly structured, properly notarized, presented to proper authority, and stands unrebutted, you've got the highest form of truth in law, period.
Roger? I have a question. Oh, I had okay. I'm sorry. Alright. Two or three. Well, in this instance in this instance, William, I'm gonna go to the female because my mama raised me right. Yes, ma'am. I got you.
[01:31:03] Unknown:
I
[01:31:06] Unknown:
Yes, ma'am?
[01:31:08] Unknown:
Hi, Roger. It's Lauren. Can you please hi. Can you please re reiterate what she said? Substantive regulations apply to
[01:31:19] Unknown:
General applicability.
[01:31:21] Unknown:
General applicability.
[01:31:23] Unknown:
Okay. Let me apply to everybody. K?
[01:31:26] Unknown:
Okay. Okay. And the interpretive regulations apply to?
[01:31:32] Unknown:
The the agency internally.
[01:31:36] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:31:37] Unknown:
Okay. And And I and you know what, Lauren? I may bet you a a a dollar to a doughnut, a Krispy Kreme doughnut, which we've got down here now, that any IRS regulation that you ever look at will be interpreted.
[01:31:55] Unknown:
Okay.
[01:31:56] Unknown:
Okay. And nobody ever figured it out, and no lawyer had either figured it out or got the balls to go in there and present it in front of the court for a client.
[01:32:08] Unknown:
Okay. And we verify that it's substantive. How?
[01:32:12] Unknown:
By going and looking at the regulation or tracing it back. And at the top of it, it'll have one of those two phrases.
[01:32:20] Unknown:
Notice of Oh, okay.
[01:32:22] Unknown:
Presumptive rulemaking and notice proposed rulemaking and notice of final rulemaking. And it'll be big bold letters at the top of that regulation with one of those two statements, and that is a substantive regulation.
[01:32:39] Unknown:
Okay. I was gonna ask you that too, Roger. Okay. So it was proposed. And what was the other one? Proposed? Final. Final. Those are fine. Okay.
[01:32:51] Unknown:
And, also, are these shows archived any place?
[01:32:55] Unknown:
Yes. Paul, tell it's on the website that Lauren can find them. Okay. Boy, Lauren. Okay. Fine. This cool we got this cool new thing on this podcast, the archives, is you can do AI, and it'll give you a whole description of the show, and I'll be damned if it is unbelievably accurate.
[01:33:15] Unknown:
Oh, good. That's good. And I also wanted to let Yeah. The lady who wanted to know where to find the statutes at large, o l r c, that's the Office of Law Revision Counsel, and you go under, on the left hand side, other OLRC tables, click that, and the second one down says table three statutes at large.
[01:33:42] Unknown:
Ah, there you go. This Did you get that? This is
[01:33:46] Unknown:
o l r c. And keep that tab, and it's it's fantastic.
[01:33:54] Unknown:
Okay. Great. Thank you, Lauren.
[01:33:56] Unknown:
Thank you. Thank you.
[01:33:58] Unknown:
You're welcome. Now there was a cup there was a couple of those old guys that were trying to get in at the same time. Was one of them Larry?
[01:34:05] Unknown:
Well, wait a minute. I just wanted to tell Oh, okay. Mike he Mike and his wife were or his wife was having apprehensions. I just wanted to tell people, especially new people, don't do this until you feel strongly in your soul that you know what you're doing and you have a full comprehension of the information so much so that you can very easily teach someone else.
[01:34:34] Unknown:
Yep. Or defend your position if challenged.
[01:34:37] Unknown:
Right. It took me I listened to Roger maybe for five or six years before I finally started re wrote my affidavit, and I read his book three times. And the only reason I read it three times was because he said that he had someone who read his book 10 times. And I thought, well, if he read it 10 times, I guess I should read it one more time because I had the thing riddled with note to Roger, note to Roger, note to, like, asking questions. Well, when I read it through the second and third time, guess what happened? All my questions got answered. Got answered. Yeah. We yes. So read through that book over and over and over again, and you it it the information will sink in and you will become comfortable with it eventually.
Don't try to rush it. Just Yeah. Take your time. Very often, if you procrastinate and you just keep listening, drops of information that you need to solidify what you already have acquired will happen. It will come. So just be patient, and I highly recommend getting a book on the slaughterhouse cases and read that book. There are a couple of them out there. That is a that really nailed it for me when I read that book.
[01:35:55] Unknown:
And and the book the I mean, they just come right out and say it in the Supreme Court. The Yes. They do. For black They do. I mean, just right front, you can't argue argue with it or misinterpret.
[01:36:08] Unknown:
K? No. So So that's all how you say.
[01:36:11] Unknown:
You're welcome. So thank you all for being there. Alright, Lauren. You're such a sweetie. We're glad to hear your voice and have you around again. Lady Linda Bye bye. We got, sorry, guys. We got more females here. Yes, ma'am. Thank you, Robert. Thank you, Roger, for acknowledging me. Thank you, Lauren. Lauren,
[01:36:28] Unknown:
I just text Julie, and I asked her to text me what you just said, and she said she has to relisten. So if I haven't gotten what you said, then I'm sure more than one listener hasn't gotten. Could you please repeat how to find the statutes at large, on the Internet in I yield?
[01:36:49] Unknown:
Lauren, you're gonna get called back here. Linda, you might have to go back and listen to the replay. I don't know coming back. It's Larry?
[01:37:01] Unknown:
Yeah. Hold hold on. Larry, did you catch it, Larry?
[01:37:05] Unknown:
I didn't cat well, I didn't catch it, but I was just gonna say when Laura does come back on, Roger, tell her that she can see a whole transcript of the show. So it's not really necessary to take notes. You could just look at the transcript and copy and paste what you want.
[01:37:22] Unknown:
I tell you this AI is pretty impressive in the bit a little bit I've messed with it so far. Okay. Lauren, did you come back with that information? Or Yeah. I'm back. I'm back. It's Okay. You repeat it very slowly.
[01:37:36] Unknown:
Okay. It's the office of law revision council, o l r c. If you just type in o l r c, that will come up, and it says office of law revision count revision counsel, United States code. And on the left hand side, there's a menu, and you read down till you see other o l r c tables. Click that, and the second selection is table three, statutes at large.
[01:38:10] Unknown:
That's a big volume of books too, by the way. Go ahead. Yes. I'm sorry. Yes.
[01:38:16] Unknown:
Yes. And you can so you wanna search title 26. You can click on title 26 and say if you just wanna search for a certain term, you can do that. And it will bring up all of the sections within the internal revenue code that have the certain term that you're looking for. So it can help your researching quite a bit. It's it's fascinating.
[01:38:38] Unknown:
Mhmm. No. Go ahead. Thank you, Laurie.
[01:38:41] Unknown:
Linda, before you run off, yesterday, you were asking me about those title 42 sections. Go in. We use the search function here. Go into the code and search title 42 for white citizens.
[01:38:58] Unknown:
Okay. That sounds great. Thank you. Okay. Okay. Alright.
[01:39:03] Unknown:
There's Paul. K. Well, I think all the ladies are done for a minute, Paul. So we'll turn to you Bye bye.
[01:39:10] Unknown:
Bye, Lou. I I See if we can I bought it in line? I'm sorry. Blow your, blow your dress up. Go ahead. I bought it in line. I'm sorry. But it's this is very quick. Go to the matrixstocks.com. You will find, Radio Ranch archives here, and and just click on the word here, and that will take you to the archive list. Then whatever show you're interested in listening to, click on the title of the show. That will bring up the show's, the that episode page, then you can go to the transcript. And down the left column in the transcript, there will be time offsets, time numbers.
So if you know that the information you're looking for was about an hour and a half into the program, Just go down that list to the hour and thirty minute mark, and then you will actually see every word that was spoken at that time. You can also go to the chapters tab, and the chapters will give you a list of where in the program different things were talked about. Title 42 will be at a certain time. Title 26 will be at a certain time. Non positive law will be at a certain time. It'll split the program into chapters. You just go down the list, look at what you're looking for, and then just go straight there. So it's all done for you. It's easy peasy, and, there is very little need to repeat anything on the show because it is right there, right in your face after a couple of mouse clicks. What a what a wonderful
[01:41:01] Unknown:
attribute of the AI for those show descriptions. Everyone that Paul's read to me, I've just been blown away with. Totally. Now a couple of minutes ago, we had all the gals. We had a couple of guys trying to say something. Larry would too much. Okay. Good. Let's hear. That's Dan. Hey, Dan.
[01:41:18] Unknown:
That's Dan. Yeah. Yeah. I've been, I've only been on listen mode for a few days. I had issues with my phone. Anyway, so I've been listening. But but Okay. Just a couple of things. So first, in the constitution, article one section one, whatever. It's like right at the beginning. The congress does have the power to create, impose, and lay taxes, and then it goes on to say, I'm paraphrasing, that they must be evenly applied. And then Yeah. Later on, it goes according to the rule of apportionment and Yes. Something about census or or population numbers. What the heck is apportionment and, like, a month? Like, tie it together why it doesn't apply to us. I know why. Well, well, it does apply to you after you file your affidavit.
[01:42:08] Unknown:
But this is the brilliance of the founding fathers. You know, everybody puts them down, all this stuff all the time. This is some of the brilliance they wrote into that document. There's two types of taxes, Dan. One's called a direct tax. One's called an indirect tax. What's your question?
[01:42:25] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, just I guess yeah. And they were they broke it up direct taxes is what they were referring to. And then Right. I just am still finding what what the rule of enforcement basically makes it this is proof, makes it so that it's like, well, little old Rhode Island that doesn't have many people, you don't gotta pay much taxes. And then big old New York City where you got a lot of people, you gotta pay but that doesn't make sense. So I've always been No. That that and that's not right. So I'm gonna straighten it out for you. Right. K? Please. So you got two types, direct and indirect.
[01:42:54] Unknown:
Direct taxes are called capitation taxes or head taxes because they're on your body. Okay? Indirect taxes are always e are always uniform is the word they use. So indirect taxes are uniform. Direct taxes are apportioned. K? And the reason they apportion them is because they want everybody paying the same amount. It's just the opposite of what you said. And so that's why the census one of the reasons the census was formed so that we could figure out how many people were in each state just in case there was a direct tax out of Congress. So here's the check and balance.
We're going along alright. Nothing's really screwed up over there in Gaza or whatever. And, the Congress apportions a direct tax and it equals out to $5 a head, so everybody in the country pays $5. Right? So that's not too bad. Okay? So they go along the next year, and we let our pals over there in Satan's sandbox get all antsy, and they gotta do another direct tax. And because of that situation, now that tax is $5,000, and everybody has to pay the same. And everybody turns to Washington and says, what the hell are you doing up there?
[01:44:21] Unknown:
Right.
[01:44:23] Unknown:
Capisce?
[01:44:26] Unknown:
That would be the direct tax, the capitation Yes. They that they avoid doing. No
[01:44:33] Unknown:
Well, they've substituted it with the per think that Well, they've they've slipped in, Dan, they slipped in the income tax on us. That's what's took the place of that. Wow. So, and and they did that because they had to have the income tax because that's what solidifies the whole system and makes it work, that they can extract funds from you and go back and pay that bondholder that originally bought the the bond and started the whole credit scheme. So they had to have the tax in because that's the critical part of the whole system, You have making that connection and starting that and reimbursing the guy for what he's paid. So that's why it's so key and important.
And they didn't wanna use tariffs anymore because they were too successful. They wanna put that progressive income tax on you because what is it? The first or the second plank of the communist manifesto? One of them.
[01:45:38] Unknown:
Acts of people.
[01:45:40] Unknown:
Dan, I got a question for you. How about that? Have you watched any of my brother, Kavner, yet?
[01:45:47] Unknown:
No.
[01:45:49] Unknown:
Dan, shame on you. You're gonna like this guy when you watch him, man. I'm telling you. I I I forget, I guess. What was what was I asked shame on you. You need to go back and watch. You know, you'll appreciate him. You, above all people, will appreciate brother Kammer. Okay? So did you have another question, Dan? I'm just Yeah. Real real is real Yeah. Realjuneews.com, I believe.
[01:46:17] Unknown:
I I did watch a little bit, but not enough. I did. I went to it that day. I remember it because real June news, stood out. Not enough, though.
[01:46:26] Unknown:
He's a hell of a guy. Last quest
[01:46:29] Unknown:
the other question I had was just as it when you get down to the bottom of it, one of the statutes that are, that are in you know, when you go to look it up at at the at the law, whatever,
[01:46:40] Unknown:
Cornell law You're talking about the the regulation
[01:46:43] Unknown:
the regulation thing I was talking about? It's not statute. Literally It's regulations. No. No. The regulations, and you go to US code, and you're looking up that stuff to get some No. No. Basic language to see something.
[01:46:55] Unknown:
At the bottom go to the code. Where all No. You wouldn't you wouldn't Yeah. Right. You wouldn't go to the code. You go to the code of federal regulations. They're different.
[01:47:08] Unknown:
Down at the bottom, they all there's the same format. You had said when it's in parenthesis, I just wanted to get it straight because it's confusing. Yeah. It'll take p Yeah. Pub pub l, and I know that's public law. And then it goes down a whole string of information, then it finally gets to a semicolon. That's a whole set of data. And I still get confused if they have to read that a little bit and Well might not be the time to
[01:47:33] Unknown:
What what where are you look? Are you looking in The US? There's three sets of law books, organic statutes, United States code, code of federal regulations.
[01:47:43] Unknown:
Which one are you looking go to US code. I'm always going to coordinate,
[01:47:47] Unknown:
US code. Just Okay. Well, that whatever. What is that plan? Okay. Well, that in I don't know that they have. They've got addendums to statutes. But if you go to the law library, there's a little pocket in the back of the book, and they'll send out these little pocket inserts that put in there that show you the addendums. If you look in the regulations specifically, not the statutes, regulations, that's where you'll find the bracket. It's not a parenthesis. It's that little bracket thing. And if there's a previous regulation that relates to that one, it'll be in those brackets at the bottom of the regulation so you know where to look back to.
[01:48:29] Unknown:
Copy that. Alright. Nope. That answers my question, Raj. Good. Okay. Love you, buddy. Get on to the next one. Amen. Well, okay. Who's next?
[01:48:39] Unknown:
Somebody? There's a couple. Oh, please. We're going so good. Weren't we? I thought we were going good. There's one. See there? Yes, sir.
[01:48:53] Unknown:
Yeah. This is William. Oh, William. Tony had a question. Yeah. Yeah. This is Tony had a question. I'm trying I'm trying to read it here, but he's he's he's, washing the car, and he's kinda noisy in the background. But let me see if I can find okay. He said he said, Will, ask him how does one break the contract. Does the national status do that for you?
[01:49:14] Unknown:
Yes. When you send in your affidavit, you're exposing their their hidden contract. You see, it's nothing that you entered into, like, consciously on the front end. They've just tricked you by asking you those two questions to get your agreement on the back end. Okay? And there's all kinds of fraud in there. Alright? So once you're going to tell them what you wanna be, what set of laws you wanna live under, you're gonna do it in a declaration or better yet, an affidavit. And once that hits the mail system, it's considered received, and you're free of these monsters.
Do they do you think that answered this question, William?
[01:50:04] Unknown:
Tony, if that, Tony, you're listening in, hopefully, just put in the text if that answered it. If you have another question, just text it to me, but I I don't wanna dominate the conversation.
[01:50:14] Unknown:
And the reason and they've got to recognize it because it's your choice. It's not their choice. They've tricked you with fraud into answering those two questions. Yes. Once you alert them that you wanna change over onto another set of laws, these other original ones, and you do it. And, honestly, if you take it to the post office and and get, like, a certified return receipt requested, that green thing where the postal clerk stamps it, take a stamp and they stamp it, when that is stamped in the post office, it's considered received at the secretary of state or the passport. So the minute that happens, you're free of these demons.
So I hope that got Tony's question. Roger.
[01:51:10] Unknown:
May I maybe leave a leave? May
[01:51:13] Unknown:
Yes. I'm gonna put Larry on the back burner for your sweet little voice, Linda. What have you got? Oh, thank you for me, Larry. Thank you for me.
[01:51:23] Unknown:
The, direct tax, the apportionment, that has not been executed. And is the income tax considered the indirect tax?
[01:51:33] Unknown:
No. Income tax is a progressive head tax. Okay. So what's an indirect It is a it is a direct tax, and it's not apportioned. That's the problem they've got with it. They've been able to pull this off in this bankruptcy.
[01:51:52] Unknown:
Okay. So They're very a tax a progressive a progressive tax. And so what's the example of an indirect tax? Is it like the gas tax? Gas tax. Well, there's a whole bunch of them they call sin taxes.
[01:52:07] Unknown:
Alcohol Okay. Tobacco. If you don't wanna pay the tax, don't do the sin. That kind of thing. Okay.
[01:52:15] Unknown:
Very good. Thank you for that clarity.
[01:52:18] Unknown:
I yield. You're welcome.
[01:52:19] Unknown:
Larry I yield to Larry.
[01:52:22] Unknown:
Okay. Thank you. I was just gonna say the proof that, it's received when when the, clerk stamps the, the envelope is everybody lines up. They get in line, on the due date for, you know, sending in their taxes, and so they wanna get that postmark because that's not considered late. It's considered received on that day. Correct. That's correct.
[01:52:49] Unknown:
That's correct. So, got a couple of minutes left here. Any, any dangling questions? Remember dangling participles? Remember things like that from when you're in school? Any dangling questions left here at the tail end of the show?
[01:53:06] Unknown:
No. Lady Linda Louise has a comment.
[01:53:09] Unknown:
Okay. Please do, sweetie. Yes. We got a couple of minutes here we need to fill.
[01:53:14] Unknown:
When my husband and I sent in our affidavit, we sent in a stamped self addressed envelope, and we asked them in our cover letter to please, stamp our documents and, send them back to us. And months later, four months later, we got a letter from the state department with the stamped self addressed envelope. And, the letter says the Department of State is in receipt of your correspondence. With your correspondence, you can close the self addressed stamped envelope. Your correspondence does not appear to request a service that this office provides. Please refer to http:travel.state.gov for services which you may be eligible.
We have enclosed the self addressed stamped envelope with this letter. Sincerely, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Passport Services, Office of Adjudication.
[01:54:22] Unknown:
And it's been a Kelly Robinson.
[01:54:25] Unknown:
Isn't that miss Robinson?
[01:54:28] Unknown:
I don't know. But the punchline is we have this beautiful letter that states clearly that they received our correspondence, which that's what we wanted. But but now we're gonna do a privacy act to, see if they'll reveal to us what is within our administrative file. Because we I know Dave Spring, he did that privacy act, and he did months later. But he did get a correspondence with his, affidavit stamped and so on and so forth. So, we were very excited when we received this letter, but it did take four months for them to acknowledge. And so, we're just delighted that they did receive our correspondence, which they didn't say affidavit of citizenship evidence. They were very ambiguous purposefully.
So, now and they didn't tell us which agency to connect with to get this privacy act, information. So, thank you, Roger. And, Lauren is correct. You know, she listened to you for five years. I've only listened to you for one year and a couple of months, and it's been a rich, beautiful
[01:55:44] Unknown:
ride. And I'm just very grateful. And I yield. Well, you're you're living in in freedom, and you're living in reality now. So, yes, it's quite rewarding, and it really makes you feel gives you warm fuzzies. At least it does for me. So, anybody else got something here before we, check out?
[01:56:06] Unknown:
No? Yeah. With Larry.
[01:56:10] Unknown:
Okay. Well, Larry, you're just alright. I'm a go with Larry. The other guy just hold it for a second. Larry, he's been shut out about five times today. Yeah. Go ahead, Larry.
[01:56:23] Unknown:
I was just gonna say, I kinda missed it, a little bit. I mean, I get it, like, 95% of everything you say. When you're explaining to Dan and lady Linda Louise who followed up with her question, is the income tax considered
[01:56:39] Unknown:
an indirect tax? No. It's a direct tax. That's why they had to get all this sixteenth amendment crap in there to try and make it legitimate. See, there was a case in the Supreme Court called Pollock versus Farmers Savings and Loan, I think. It was like in 1898. It was on a direct tax. They tried to do it and, without a portion of it, they said no. And so they came back and tried to revamp it, sixteenth amendment, all the in the the Federal Reserve Act, all that crap was to go back and overturn that so they could get a progressive income tax in because their scheme won't work without that taxing mechanism or some that will get the money out of your hide and pay those bondholders their coupon payment.
That's the way I understand it, Larry. Now who is the other fellow there?
[01:57:40] Unknown:
I'm gonna have a sketch. And, Sketch. I hope you're doing well. Yay. Hope you're doing well today. Pretty good. Alright. So it's about to come out a little bit. Yeah. Go ahead. Couple months ago, you wanted, me to try and research resident the word resident and how it came about in the lexicon of, the linchpin. And after a while, I just threw up my hands, but you requested me to do that, and I'm requesting anybody that has a a good handle on AI, chatbot, or whatever. And, to to maybe you could
[01:58:21] Unknown:
reiterate that question that you wanted answered about the word Well, I don't even I don't even remember what it was. I mean, I know I went back and looked online one time. Of course, John had told us all this already. But if you just do a cursory search, you won't find that that, ambassadorial stuff. You gotta dig down through a couple of layers, and you'll find it. It's there. But, boy, it's deep down there. So Okay. Anyway, that's what it is. It's a a a a a a resident means basically what set of laws that you wanna live under. Now I can tell you something along the lines that's that's very enlightening, sketch and audience, and that is if you go back to Vatel's law of nations, and listeners sent me copies of it one time on the areas where he talks about residency.
And every time in Vatel that he uses the word resident, he uses it resident alien. So in Vatel, it's a resident alien. If they ask you, Larry, are you a resident alien? Do you think you might question it a little more than are you a resident? See the word games they do here? So that's that Vatel is correct. You're a resident, but you're an alien because as a resident, another set of laws apply to you. So resident alien is the correct term. K? So, anyway, there you go, Sketch. Otherwise, folks, Thursday edition is about to be completed here. Nice, easygoing Thursday session.
Covered a lot of ground today. I hope you got something out of it. Great to see Lauren back, sweetie. Really good to hear your voice. And, we'll be back tomorrow, of course, with Brent, mister Brent Winters. And, there's no telling what he wants to talk about. I just wind him up and let him go, quite frankly, generally. But it may we may talk about law. We may talk about the Bible. I'm we sure will. But a wide gamut of things with, a wonderful individual, mister Brent Winters. So other than that, we're gonna go lay our bodies down here with Crosby, Sills, and Nash and be done today. And hope you have a wonderful remainder of Thursday, and we'll see you tomorrow with Brent.
Ciao. Okay. Gotta be off there. Okay. Now what somebody got for me? They always wait till we're off there. Forget Paul English Life at 3PM. Oh, that's right. And Paul English too. Tell them about it, Paul.
[02:01:12] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. Great program. PaulEnglishLife.com. You can catch it on Rumble. You can catch it on radiosoapbox.com, w b n 3 2 four, Talk Radio. Find it all in this place.
[02:01:29] Unknown:
Well, extend our usual invitation to mister English, for tomorrow. If you'd like to join us and feel so motivated and has the time and opportunity, we'd love to always have him. So, again, anybody else got anything for me? None. Okay. Well, I'm gonna go get out in the sunshine and go get some food and all those things that old men like to do. And so I will see you all tomorrow. Have a great day, and, we covered some really important information today. Hope you got, an something out of it. So we'll, see you tomorrow. Have a great day. And, Paul, good luck with mister Paul this afternoon.
[02:02:11] Unknown:
Thank you.
[02:02:12] Unknown:
Ciao.
[02:02:31] Unknown:
And being symbol minded, the symbol for bureaucracy is red tape. High yield.
[02:02:42] Unknown:
Okay.
[02:03:19] Unknown:
More skull and bones.
[02:04:46] Unknown:
K. I've got an unrelated question.
[02:04:56] Unknown:
Yeah, William. William?
[02:05:09] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:05:11] Unknown:
Your question?
[02:05:14] Unknown:
Okay. Thanks, Paul. Looking forward to, English show today. I've got some questions for mister Paul across the pond. But, meantime, if you've got a DOT plate and you go to the swap meet and you sell overstock personal items, are you considered to be in commerce?
[02:05:45] Unknown:
No. Not unless you're selling them out of not unless somebody else is paying you to transport their goods to the flea market and sell them.
[02:05:56] Unknown:
That's what I think is yeah. Okay. Cool.
[02:06:02] Unknown:
Yeah. Because you're not being paid to transport the product.
[02:06:10] Unknown:
They could presume that you're in commerce, though.
[02:06:15] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:06:21] Unknown:
Interpretation of law. Right?
[02:06:26] Unknown:
Presumption. Yeah.
[02:06:28] Unknown:
Yeah. Sticky workers.
[02:06:33] Unknown:
Mhmm. By the way, it's currently out of print and currently not available. But, if anybody's interested in looking for a copy of Goodbye April 15, a used paperback is $499 on Amazon.
[02:06:55] Unknown:
What?
[02:06:58] Unknown:
Yeah. No shit. And there is as far as I can tell, no digital copy available.
[02:07:07] Unknown:
And,
[02:07:09] Unknown:
basically, none of the book outlets have it. None of them. Not Amazon, Goodreads, Thriftbooks, Barnes and Noble. Nobody's got it.
[02:07:28] Unknown:
Who is it the author?
[02:07:31] Unknown:
Boston Tea Party. And that's Boston, capital t, with a period, not Boston Tea enclosed in quotes. That's the Boston transgender party. You don't want any books by them.
[02:07:52] Unknown:
I'll start looking at all the different Goodwills and whatnot.
[02:07:57] Unknown:
Yeah. It's called Goodbye April 15. And it well, the front cover, looks like, ten forty form that was ripped with, let's see. Where is it? That's Boston's gun bible. Goodbye April 15. It's a ten forty form that's ripped across the bottom, and goodbye April 15 is stamped in red. Here, let me see that image.
[02:08:48] Unknown:
Paul, it's $500 on Amazon.
[02:08:51] Unknown:
Yeah. I know. But it's but it's out of stock.
[02:08:56] Unknown:
Well, yeah. You just got a used one though.
[02:08:58] Unknown:
Oh, Paul? Yeah.
[02:09:03] Unknown:
The information on Roger's website allows you to say goodbye to the IRS, and it's free.
[02:09:11] Unknown:
I know that.
[02:09:16] Unknown:
Why would you want?
[02:09:26] Unknown:
Copy image. How do you spell goodbye?
[02:09:30] Unknown:
Because I collect, books. There you go. There's a picture of the cover in the chat in free conference call.
[02:09:44] Unknown:
Excellent.
[02:09:50] Unknown:
I collect a c I o s.
[02:10:01] Unknown:
Yeah. It's g o o d hyphen b y e. Boston Tea Party has, some other interesting books too. Oh, and Brent, I also have a link for you. Let's see. Brent, you there?
[02:11:04] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm here, but I'm going over to Gaddy's real quick.
[02:11:09] Unknown:
Alright. Just sent you a link, in the chat. Yeah. And and I don't agree with, I don't agree with the, the ultimate aim of that collection, but it is a source of, interesting books. Alright. Well, I'm gonna take the I'm gonna take the, stream down because I have another show to get ready for. So this has been the Radio Ranch with Roger Sales, the Thursday edition. Stay tuned to Global Voice Radio Network for Paul English Live. You could also go to paulenglishlive.com and join the chatters on Rumble and listen to the program using that platform while you interact with other listeners. Catch us here Monday through Saturday, 11AM to 1PM eastern on eurofolkradio.com and the Global Voice Radio Network. Our website is thematrixdocs.com.
You can, go there to, check out the backstory and other information on the topics discussed. Thanks so much for joining us today. We'll catch you back here tomorrow for the Friday edition with Brent Allen Winters. Bye now. Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
[02:14:09] Unknown:
Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.
Introduction and Host Welcome
Acknowledging Contributors and Platforms
Discussion on Automation in Radio Broadcasting
Transition to Video Broadcasting
Critique of Zionist Influence
Historical Context of Pharisees and Modern Implications
The Story of Gary Kinghorn and Freedom Movements
Understanding the Concept of Korban
Exposure of Political Corruption
Administrative State and Regulatory Processes
Affidavit Process and Legal Implications
Listener Questions and Clarifications
Conclusion and Closing Remarks
