Welcome to another episode of Paul English Live, where we delve into the complex topic of women's roles in society and the historical and cultural shifts that have influenced these roles. Our guest, Monica Schaefer, joins us for a lively discussion on the impact of feminism, the historical context of women's suffrage, and the societal changes that have resulted from these movements.
We explore the origins of the suffragette movement, its initial intentions, and how it has been perceived and altered over time. Eric von Essex provides insights into the historical background, while Monica shares her personal experiences and reflections on the feminist movement's impact on her life.
The conversation takes a deeper dive into the societal implications of women's liberation, referencing the work of JD Unwin and the cultural consequences of loosening sexual morality. We discuss the potential irreversible decline of Western civilization due to these shifts and the challenges of returning to more traditional values.
Throughout the episode, we touch on the importance of family, the roles of men and women, and the need for a societal shift towards valuing family life and traditional roles. We also address the influence of media and social engineering in shaping perceptions and behaviors.
Join us as we navigate these complex topics, seeking to understand the past and envision a future where family and traditional values are once again at the forefront of society.
Alright. Actually, I'm thinking about no. No. You better stay quiet because you'll go out on YouTube otherwise and things like that. So you'll just have to you'll have to. Here we go, anyway.
[00:00:12] Unknown:
This
[00:00:18] Unknown:
is brought to you in part by my my my boost Com for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function with sluggish mitochondria is kinda like running an engine that's low on oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by Fatfix, p h a t p h I x dot com. Visceral fat is weighing your body down. It's causing sluggish response of your organs, and it's gotta go. It's gotta go. It's gotta get rid of it. You just gotta. And, also, iTero Planet for the terahertz frequency wand by Preif International. That's iTeroPlanet.com.
Thank you, and welcome to the program. Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
[00:01:33] Unknown:
Hi, everyone, and welcome back. It's, Thursday, February 2025. This is Paul English Live. Just gone 8PM here in Jolly old England. Just gone 3PM US eastern. We're here on WBN for the next couple of hours and a bit longer elsewhere. Welcome to the show. And we have the returning Monica Schaeffer tonight, and we're gonna be talking about women. Lots of them on film and in the studio, and we're gonna be talking well, we're gonna start off talking about suffragettes and suffragism. Is there such a word? I don't know. We're about to find out. And we got some good clips lined up for you in the show, which should get everybody's teeth on edge and brains wearing, I hope.
Hi everyone and welcome back. It's, a jolly old cool cold Thursday evening here. I've decided to have toothache again for some reason, but it's not playing up right now. So if you hear me shout out in the middle of the show, you'll know it struck back. I have no idea why. I'm cursed by the toothache gods. But it came back a couple of days ago. Always fun to let everybody know about such things. And somebody kindly gave me a cold the other day, so I sound slightly sniffly. But I don't think this is gonna be too much of a problem for the next two or three hours as we roll through on things. As I said there in the intro, what we, what I've tried to do today is to go with a slightly contentious title. It's not really. It's rather tame. You know, how are we going to take the vote off of women? And, if you are a woman, and you're a bit cross about all this, and you might be, you know, who knows, You probably understand that to some degree, it's slightly tongue in cheek, but there is a very, very serious point behind it, which is to do with our decline as a people.
And this is not pointing the finger at women per se. It's pointing the finger at well, what are we gonna point it out? We're about to find out, I think. And, hopefully, we'll we'll share a few bits of knowledge that we have, but I suspect we're probably gonna be asking far more questions than we've got answers. I certainly feel like that. Anyway, I'm gonna throw it over to the studio. Welcome to, welcome to the show, chaps and chapesses. Monica, ladies first. How have you been since you were here the last couple of weeks?
[00:04:31] Unknown:
Oh, I am doing very well. Thank you very much. I look forward to this discussion. It's rather a momentous discussion, and I've had a terrific last couple of weeks. I was away for a few days, went snowshoeing in in more snow than you can imagine, And it yes. I've I've been doing well. Thank you so much.
[00:04:53] Unknown:
You've been out in the snow.
[00:04:55] Unknown:
Yes. Lot lots of it. This little little tiny hamlet I went to where I have a friend whom I visited. The graders have piled the snow from the roads and and the driveway people have to do their own, but it's so high. It's, like, twice as high as you or me. These snow piles on every corner of everybody's lot. It's amazing.
[00:05:22] Unknown:
Alright. We haven't seen snow. I haven't seen snow since I was a young lad. Actually, that's not true. We're down here on the South Coast, so we rarely get it. But we got some about fifteen years ago. It was very exciting, particularly for my lads who were sort of infants at the time and had never seen it before. But that's it. It lasted two days and it disappeared. So we barely get it down here. It's far too warm and balmy and wet, really, most of the time. So and how long will the snow last for? When will you be shoveling away your last piles of it? Does it go on for some time?
[00:05:52] Unknown:
Well, not here where I am. I mean, I came back home. That was a three hour drive away, and where my friend lives is really in a snow belt. We had a lot less snow where I live, although it was beautiful, a beautiful snowpack. But the last few days have been so warm and even rained last night, and I just see little piles of snow here and there where we had shoveled it up, but mostly it's gone from the fields. So I'm kind of lamenting that because I figure it should stay at least till the February. And in March, okay, that's fine if it disappears. But I do enjoy the the winters. I I really like Canadian real winter with snow and ice for skating, that kind of thing.
Wow. And then when spring comes, you see, if it comes too early, it's a gray time because you don't have the leaves budding out yet. And in fact, they shouldn't bud out yet. Sometimes they get fooled if there's a really warm spell and then they get fooled, it's budding out. And then we get another dozer of a of a deep frost, which can really set them back quite a lot. So then, you know, we end up with gray and mud and for a while until maybe sometime in April, May, and then it really gets beautiful with all the new growth coming. So that's kind of this scene around here.
[00:07:13] Unknown:
Oh, yours sounds so much more grandiose than ours does, although we've had a few hints of spring the last couple of days. And the really nice thing at the moment, I go I go walking at the end of the afternoon, and I'm going later and later because I my body tells me to go when it's getting to a certain level of, darkness when I can feel the gloom coming in. And I keep looking at my watch and went, oh, I'm going later and later. It was quite exciting. And then we're getting all the blackbirds singing, which is always always a bit keen to get off. They they can sense that the light's coming. So we're getting the little chirping birds, as the, the evening as the last remaining rays of the wonderful sunset. So it's not it's always a nice time of the year, this. It is quite exciting. I think we've got about a month we've got about a month to go before the clocks go forward. Yeah. Forward, isn't it? To give us a little bit more sunlight. But I think for you guys over there, it's a little bit early. You always get more of everything, so it starts early for you.
You do. I think I think your summers are about eight months long, and ours are seven
[00:08:12] Unknown:
or something like that. Yeah. On the summer times. Nobody. I have never met anybody. You might be the first if indeed you like this time change twice a year, but I have never met anybody who enjoys changing the clocks twice a year. And I figured we should just stay on the standard time. And then you just, you know, you just do what you do whenever you do it according to the daylight. And, you know, when they first brought this in, this thing called daylight savings time, I mean, that's a deception right there. Is it not?
[00:08:42] Unknown:
It is. Yeah. It's it's incredibly vexing. It really is. It's very irritating. I don't know why they just don't sell it to summertime and leave it, but there's always these implausible reasons that they offer up. I mean, I can't I were the people in the world all cross about the lack of light back in 1482 or something like that? I'm not aware that they were. But I would So somebody vets clocks, and now they start adjusting them all the time. Yeah. I mean, I would've thought for airlines as well. It's a complete madness. You think about all these schedules that have to shift twice a year, and then we don't even if we're gonna do that, we don't even change at the same time as you guys. It's mad. Northern Hemisphere should all change at the same time. Shouldn't it? Or am I just being
[00:09:20] Unknown:
completely tedious and boring and No. No. You are absolutely right. And in fact, Canada used to be switching it more along the lines of when Europe would switch, and then we aligned ourselves with the Americans because they were doing the longer time on the summertime. And so, you know, the powers that be, they switched it to align with the Americans. But, you know, I I vote for staying on the standard time, the winter time. That's just my vote, but that doesn't really matter now. I I don't set an alarm these days anyway. But, you know, for the school children, especially the teenagers, to get up earlier for school, that's actually kinda hard on them. That that that that it yeah. I've I've read stuff and seen stuff about the biological clock of young people, especially in those teen years, that they actually
[00:10:10] Unknown:
do better to have a little extra sleep in the morning. So, anyway, that's To just lie in. Two bits. To just lie in for a long time, a big lazy oaf as my parents. Get out of bed, you lazy oaf, is what I was you know you know, you can't stay in bed all day, can't I? No. And, and all that kind of stuff. Oh, well, but we've all got that. I I'm spending more and more time sleeping recently. I think it's still that coming out the winter thing. It's always, it's always that way. Anyway, that's a really good rundown of Canadian weather systems. I like that. And maybe we can have some time wars. Maybe we can get a big time war going, you know, for people that wanna change the clocks and people that don't. But it is absurd. It's just another way of confusing us and knocking us slightly off beam, I think. Can't understand it at all. Two. Yeah. Absolutely. Cool. Eric, how are things out there on the sunny, beautiful East Side Of England? How are things going for you? Oh, they're excellent. But, of course, as it's Fockham Hall, we're one hour ahead anyway. So, you know,
[00:11:09] Unknown:
but I'm I'm old as yeah. Oh, yes. It's You're on European time, are you? Yes. We're summertime all year round. But the thing that gets me is that they did an experiment in the early late sixties, early seventies where they kept the clocks all the the same all the time. And, it was great because, I mean, I was very, very young at the time. But, you get up and it would be dark when you went to school. And then, you'd have a you know, it's people didn't get depressed. But there's this strange campaign that started where, they said that children are getting run over in the mornings because it's dark. But they didn't worry about them coming home in the dark, which is a bit weird.
So they worried about them in the mornings, but not in the in the evenings. And then they, said that there was, some schoolchildren that got killed in Wales when, a bus careered off the road in the dark, you know, in the darkness and, run them over. And many years later, there's a television show on that used to investigate things like this. And they went along to this place in Wales, and they couldn't find a shred of evidence for it happening. It was invented. It never happened. Then there was a hidden hand involved in turning the clock backwards and forwards.
Now who that hidden hand was? I don't know, but it was definitely a hidden hand that was up to it. So any guesses out there who wants all and I think it might be something to do with money. Because when they change the clocks around, it costs a lot of money, doesn't it? So someone's cashing it in somewhere.
[00:12:49] Unknown:
It might be they can make use of this extra missing hour or this extra gained hour in some kind of way. Who would know? I can't see that the advantages would be offset by the I mean, I just don't see what the benefits would be compared to the it's a big thorny issue. I mean, you know, it is. It's the issue of our times. Pun intended. But it it's,
[00:13:10] Unknown:
it's yeah. Yeah. Well, maybe. Probably usually bankers anyway, isn't it? It's usually It is. Yes. But during World War two, we're doubles we're double son of time. And, apparently, some of my parents told me. So they went two hours ahead, because of production to for workers and things like that. So, but I'd like it to be on summertime on European time all the time. I mean, it'd be great because, alright. It's a bit dark in the mornings, but it'd be nice and light in the evenings and much better.
[00:13:42] Unknown:
I know. I just don't know why you just don't get up earlier. If we live like bears, I don't I'm not mean hibernating. Although, you know, the winter hibernation looks more and more appealing the older I get. I'm beginning to think that these bears are onto a thing by, you know, hunkering down for five or six months or however long it is. But, yeah, if we just live naturally by the light rhythms of the Earth, the flat Earth for those that like that sort of thing, the globe Earth for those that like that. So whatever whatever your, proclivities are, maybe we'd all be better off. And then, you know, you just get up later.
But, of course, much of this is to do with clockism, of course, with the requirements of industry to have you turning up and clocking in, which is all part of the regimentation and the management of your life, isn't it, to a great degree? Spot on. Seems to me that it is. Absolutely. Great. Okay. Eric, Eric, anyway, fantastic. Look at me getting all my emphasis wrong. Patrick, how are things in Wisconsin?
[00:14:37] Unknown:
Oh, they're good. It's about 42 degrees Fahrenheit, five degrees Celsius. I'm reminded of, that Simon and Garfunkel song, hazy shade of winter. All the snow's pretty much melted except some patches. Yeah. But the maple sap isn't running in from our, tree. So I'm kinda wondering what's going on with that.
[00:15:03] Unknown:
It's not it's not good. But, I'm supposed to run at this time of year?
[00:15:08] Unknown:
Well, usually, when we get this kind of weather where it warms up, usually, it starts flowing, but it hasn't in the lot. But then again, it's only been a few days since weather changed like this. I mean, last week, I think we were getting down to negative 25 Celsius. So we we kind of jumped quite a bit in our temperature. I was gonna say about the, daylight savings time. I think it used to be called wartime, and and since they never declared an end to World War two, they never declared an end to using wartime, which is, daylight savings time. The way I look at it and reckon it, it should be when the apex of the sun is at its highest peak, that should be noon, which should be standard time.
Yep. Now,
[00:15:57] Unknown:
you can argue with me and say, no. But I I really think that should be just the standard. I'd like to argue with you because I like a good argument. Yeah. Well But, are you are you saying, Patrick, that prior to the war prior to, say, what, World War two or World War one, we didn't have World War two. Summit. World War two that they they called it wartime. I I listened to those old broadcasts
[00:16:18] Unknown:
of the BBT in different places in in America. They'd they'd call it wartime, Like, Eastern wartime would be the Eastern American time. And it was they meant daylight now they call it daylight savings time. That sounds a lot nicer. But Yeah. They never really dropped it after World War two. They just kept it going.
[00:16:39] Unknown:
I don't know. What are they like? I can't even get their finger out to to sort that out. I don't know. They. You know? The, the veritable they. Alright. Cool. It is Paul, are you here? Do you wanna say anything, or are you just lurking and picking up signals and firing them out into the universe? Absolutely. I'm here. Hi. How how's your how's the ice in the guttering pool? How's all the ice doing in the guttering?
[00:17:04] Unknown:
Well, it's melting. The leaks have slowed way down, so I think we might be making headway. One thing I did wanna mention is I wanted to thank you so very, very much for having a radio show on my birthday. I, turned 18 today, so I'm I'm very happy to be to be of the age of majority. Or or I guess because it's 18 Celsius, I would say that's extra majority, but whatever.
[00:17:38] Unknown:
Well, happy birth happy birthday to Paul. Well done. So you've got a great name as well. So, you know, I think he's always good when when people call Paul to have a birthday. That's fantastic. Well done. Well done for arranging it. I thought it was average. That's excellent.
[00:17:51] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. It's it's quite good. I'm not I'm I'm not, suffering from Chinese water torture at the moment, and, it's my birthday. No. So it's all good. And I've got I've got I've got So does this mean you're you're old enough to go out and buy a beer now? Can you do that? No. I actually have quite snacks in the refrigerator. I'll be popping those open a little later on. But I'll I'll try During the show, it's now it's it's lower in the time around here.
[00:18:21] Unknown:
Cool. Fantastic. Well, it's kind of Well, intro introductions all made. Welcome, yeah, welcome everyone to the studio. And to tonight's, wonderful topic, I think, anyway. I've been thinking about this actually on and off years. There were loads of stuff I read about ten or twelve years ago. And I just called this show women to lose the vote question mark, not because I expect them to lose it, but it throws up all sorts of little questions. I just think it's a good place to start really, because it actually does naturally move into, pretty heavy topics about where we're going as a as a civilization if we still consider ourselves to be one.
Where we're going as a, you know, with a western man, that kind of thing. And, Eric, I saw some comments of yours earlier today on Telegram about the early days of the of what the suffragettes I don't wanna stick on the suffragettes all night long because they're just the starting point. But some of the early goals of the suffragettes were not quite what necessarily everybody thinks. I saw you write something about that a little bit earlier today. That's right. Yes. What's happened is the suffragette movement,
[00:19:28] Unknown:
was actually started by, men. It was, Emily Pankhurst. I think it was her husband that, started it. And it's been corrupted, our view of it, because there's two major things, and I won't go on too long about it. One is that in those days, and I'm talking about eighteen nineties, '18 eighties, men sometimes had, two votes or several votes. And they thought that, the idea was if, a woman, if their wife could get the vote, then that extends their power. So that was what was really behind it. Not Mhmm. And the they said it would only be women of, shall we say, of no tie of of of shall we of the upper classes and the upper middle classes that would get the vote, not the working class.
Then, in the sixties, the communist corrupted our view of it to say that, oh, they fought for all women to get the vote. No. They didn't. And the reason they gave women the vote in 1918 is this country was on the verge of a revolution at that time. So but only women over the age of 30 were given the vote, and they had to own property. And it was any much later that every woman could get the vote. And so in 1918 when we got the vote, in 1921, very strict gun laws came in with the 1920 I think it was 1920, firearms act came in. Yep. So a lot of changes happened in just after the first World War, to, shall I say, offset a revolution because men were coming back from the front line, realizing they've been conned, totally conned, and they were extremely angry and extremely fit, the ones that weren't injured.
And they knew exactly how to handle weapons, which was very worrying for the, government at the time. So this idea that women, you know, chain themselves to railings and things like that so that everyone could get get the vote, I'm sorry. That myth has been peddled since the nineteen sixties. Just have to look. When you look right into it, it was only some women could get the vote, not all women. So that's a corruption of the suffragette movement. That's so I hope that I I I've actually should we say that that is I could go on further about it, but I think that's about as much as I can waffle on about tonight.
[00:22:07] Unknown:
No. It's good. It's really good. I'm trying to think about what years we're talking about. I mean, when I think of is it Emily? Is it? Emmeline Pankhurst? What what years are we talking about? The eighteen eighties, '18 nineties, '19 hundreds. There was that woman that threw herself under a racehorse. Yeah. I remember.
[00:22:24] Unknown:
'7. Around two. Yeah. I'm not old I'm not as old as you, so I don't remember that in my Oh, I was I was actually out. I was at the race. My horse came in, actually. Each way bet. Eight to one. Brilliant. Yeah. We had a good day out. Out that day. It was great. Luckily, the horse was okay. I mean, the people were very worried about the horse. You know? But, yeah, it survived, I think. Yeah. It didn't have to be put down. Yeah. No. But no. Seriously, they don't know whether she was mentally ill or not. So, you know, who knows why she did it. Is that is that what's referred to as first wave feminism? I've seen these phrases. I'm gonna be asking as many questions. It's not as if I'm knowledgeable about this, which is why I'm kinda look really looking forward to it. They were terrorists. They were they were early terrorists because they actually planted bombs in places. Seriously.
They wanted to vote that much. They wanted to put votes. Seriously, they planted bombs in different places to go off. And quite a few of them, they were so badly done. They were found out, luckily, and they didn't injure anybody. But I don't I think they're I'm not too sure about this. There may have been some injuries or deaths from these bombs, but they were actual terrorists. Believe it or not. If you look into it, they they they planted bombs.
[00:23:33] Unknown:
Yeah. Paul. Yeah.
[00:23:35] Unknown:
I think over to you, Paul. The reason. Hiring hiring. I think probably the reason that the vote changed was voting originally. I mean, way back when, that was property owners, people with the stake in in the country and because they had ownership of part of the land. And then they were only allowed to vote. And then the women's vote, it was, like Eric said, only women of stature, women of, that own property could vote. But between the between the nineteen hundreds and 1930, they were putting this whole, de facto system together, and they knew that eventually nobody's vote would matter, and nobody was going to truly own property. They were only gonna have beneficial ownership of it through registration of their their property deeds, warranty deeds, their vehicle titles, all that happy stuff.
Nobody was actually going to own a lodium in any property, so they just open the vote to everybody. Now that being said, the vote really doesn't matter because if it did, they wouldn't let you do it. So Yeah. I really don't see what the big deal is.
[00:24:59] Unknown:
I don't know. Spot on. Spot on. Absolutely spot on there. Yeah.
[00:25:04] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, I've got yeah. Because there's kind of a there's a there's there's a few little subtexts in this line, women to lose the vote, because it assumes that actually having it is something of value, which, of course, you've just said it isn't. And I would agree with you. I don't think it is. I mean, it's but it's valuable to the the would be controllers in the sense I think we touched on this last week. We're talking about this common law stuff. Everybody thinks that they're participating in democracy by casting their vote every x years. Four for you guys over there seems to be a permanent voting sort of thing. I think it's about five or six over here. Who cares, really? But that's part of the deception. Oh, I voted. Therefore, I'm participating in democracy. Therefore, I'm responsible for the outcome, or at least they'll very well try and make you responsible for it when all their decisions go bad, which is all the time because all their decisions are bad. And so you get the blame for it, so people end up being cowed.
[00:25:56] Unknown:
What? I vote, therefore I am.
[00:26:02] Unknown:
I think that's it. Whereas the idea of qualified voters seems to make sense to me. I mean, is this me being a sort of elitist? Why would you allow you wouldn't allow an idiot, not that irony, of course, left these days, but you wouldn't allow somebody unqualified, a carpenter, for example, who would be brilliant working on your tables and things, but you wouldn't allow him to service your car engine if he just said he was a mechanic but knew nothing about it. In other words, qualifications are there to convince the customer that you're actually good at what you're doing. And is it possible I hate to quote Winston Churchill.
You know me. We don't like it. But the problem is he he came out with all these tremendous aphorisms. One of them was the argument for democracy seems good until you spend half an hour talking I'm paraphrasing my man. And if unless you spend half an hour talking to the average voter, and then you realize that it's doomed because people are mal and misinformed, of course, intentionally by the systems that are in place. So it's not I mean, even though even though we've got the vote type thing is just a sort of Pyrrhic victory. Is that right? I think it is, really. It sort of seems to be so meaningful, but it I can understand why they were doing certain things back then. And I've I've read sort of essays and the like that suggests that this was kind of needed.
I mean, I don't know. I wasn't although Eric knows I'm quite old, I actually wasn't a young man in the eighteen eighties. So I just don't know how hard done by women were. Although, if you read, of the plight of the poor in the cities, courtesy of Dickens and other writers, you can see that it was not a particularly pleasant life. It was incredibly tough and horrible. But then these weren't the people who were being targeted to acquire the vote given what Eric's just said, which makes complete sense as well. So, it's almost as if there's a genuine need for it in a hundred years ago.
But as we know, it's morphed into something far more deadly. And I do mean that. I think it's deadly, what what's what's being built upon, you know, by this, emancipation of women. Yeah, Monica. I have
[00:28:08] Unknown:
really enjoyed listening to you guys. This has been so good. And that one sentence by the young Paul, I'll just distinguish the the Pauls since he's having a birthday, if if it really is your eighteenth birthday. I don't know if that was serious or or not. But, anyway, the young Paul, the one sentence you said that they were giving everybody the vote because they knew that in the end, nobody's vote would count because they want us all without property, owning nothing, which is in today's age. We all know that phrase that, you know, you will own nothing and you will be happy not. And this is so true. But, yes, that that is the history. The the boat used to belong to property owners, but I learned lots of new things just in listening to you guys, describing some of the history of, you know, the the vote and when it was changed and who it was given to when and and this kind of thing. And and it was different in different places. I remember, I think it was in the nineteen eighties learning with with, like, just great shock at that time that, oh, the last Canton to give the vote to women in in Switzerland just gave, you know, there was a Canton in Switzerland who hadn't yet given a vote to women. And that was in the late eighties, I think. And I remember being so shocked because at that time, that was just such a foreign concept to me that that women didn't have the vote. You know?
Yeah. So anyway, when when you were, discussing this topic that that you're going to focus on this and and I wanted to join you all, and I really gave this a lot of thought, this whole talk, because I'm telling you, being in on this discussion, it is almost as momentous for me as back in 02/2016 when I put that fateful video out on the Internet, you know, the one that got me in trouble and that but this is not a topic I'll be going to jail for at all, but it is I'm just saying that it is big because as a woman, and and I was born in 1959, and so I was, I grew up in a a time when, at that time, most mothers were at home. My mother was an at home mother, didn't have outside work, and she raised a family of five children. And and that was quite normal at that time. However, then I grew right into that era where the, you know, the feminist movement just really, really seeped into our everyday consciousness.
And it then began to really shape me, but I would say not as a child, but as a young adult. And I would say I made many life mistakes based on, you know, the influences of the feminist movement in my life, as well as other influences, you know, with all the lies and deceptions that we have at other times talked about. But the feminist movement, I would put that as one of the most destructive elements of, you know, the those who wish to destroy us, that tool that's a Trojan horse, really. And and how is this related to the whole topic at hand, you know, women's vote? And I would say, Paul, that when you said, oh, it's a good starting point, I was gonna say the other way around that, okay, it definitely is a good cook to bring us into this discussion, but I would, want to say that we need a, to create a context for why would we we even discuss something that I can't believe. You know, two years ago, I wouldn't have entered into this conversation.
I would have thought it was absurd, but now I am in entering into this conversation. I've, you know, had more time to start to think about what has been done to us and the ramifications of, you know, the whole feminist movement. And I guess that was, you know, the suffragettes was, like you say, was that you were saying the first wave of feminism and all this stuff. But, yeah, in my personal life, I would say I have come full circle to where I was as a child instinctually. Because as a child and well into my teens, teen years, that's an artificial construct, by the way, from those who don't like us very much.
This teenager concept, but that's an aside. But all through my childhood and youth, I wanted nothing more than to do exactly what my mother did, and that was to get married, have children, and be at home with my children. That is what I desired. And then it was well, my life didn't quite turn out that way. You know, it just took different directions, and I'm not gonna get into, you know, laying out all my personal mistakes and everything I did in my life, but that's not what this is about. But just to realize what influences I had suffered under, And I'm I'm not I'm using that word as just that we all suffered under. I'm not saying, you know, oh, poor me. No. We all had suffered under these influences with the degenerative forces upon us. And, you know, when we were talking earlier about the daylight savings time and and I really liked your explanations. I I didn't know that about the war thing. And and but, you know, to get us off balance and whatnot and who is doing this to us, perhaps it's the bankers.
And I would say the same thing, of course, with the the, feminist movement. I know that you're you like to be careful about naming our who this is, but we could just call them the bankers or those who were kicked out of the temple even in in the time of Jesus Christ. You know? So those ones, the ones that impose Yes. Confusory on us. Right? So so those ones. Yes. Those ones. They are the ones who invented this very degenerative thing called feminism. And when we discuss this, it is extremely important for us to understand at the core of this, that it is not a competition between men and women, which is what the feminist movement somehow instilled that notion into us as was demonstrated by my nephew, who said to me, Monica, I'm so surprised that you're you're becoming this and that. And the other thing, he used all these weaponized words that I never used those words. They were just weaponized words that he thought were associated with being a Holocaust denier or whatever that is, you know. And and then, and then he said, you being I'm so surprised you're anti feminist. You're the one who stands to lose. And I thought about that afterwards. What? Stands to lose?
So he obviously was raised to believe that it's a competition. Life is the competition between men and women. That is at the core of what has been done to us with this feminist movement, that we're competing with each other. And, really, that is well, I'm sort of I wanna go in a million directions here right now with this discussion. It is just so critical and crucial. I'm so happy to be here to discuss this because, really, that is behind what we're, you know, the hook is women to lose the vote question mark. And most people will hear that and go and just be they'll they'll run for the hills. They'll shriek. They'll say, what? Are you kidding me? But but we have to put this into this context of women and men that they do have different roles in life, that they are different.
We are not that's all equal like they tried to tell us. And in trying to tell us that we're all equal, they try to make us think that that's all about, making us be fair with each other or that, you know, that this is supposed to be good for us. But in actual fact, it is the most divisive divisive tactic. That's what they're doing. And and so to divide us all up and with the feminist movement, you know, they say, oh, it's to raise women up to where men are. In the meantime, it's to divide us between the sexes and make us compete with each other when in in actual fact, it's not about one sex being higher than the other or lower than the other. It's about us fulfilling different roles. And this is a very natural thing that we have different roles.
The last time I checked, women can have babies and men can't, although they're trying to play, you know, trying to play havoc with that too these days with the insanity of, you know, the the the tranny stuff and and whatnot, but that's an absurdity that's just beyond the the pale. It's I don't even know. We don't even need to go there, but the natural order, women have babies, women can nurture and breastfeed those babies. The natural low, role is for women to be in the home and raise the families. And it went all through my, you know, young adult years.
I remember just having this message come at me from all around. You can't pinpoint where it comes from. It comes from all around, you know, whether it's the movies, whether it's the the the just everything. The news cycles, the schooling, the university courses, everything. They're always defining us by, oh, what do you do for a living? What do you do? And and thereby lowering, oh, you're just a housewife? You're just a housewife implying that this is just sort of a no. You don't need any intelligence, don't need any skills, you don't need anything. Whereas in actual fact, that is, a role that you become everything. You become, you know, a doctor, a nurse, a nurturer, a care you're you're everything. And you it it's the most important thing.
It's not to be diminished as in you're only a housewife or your it it is unbelievable how that was done to us. And the other aspect about it, they they tried to make the women think that they were somehow oppressed being in the home, somehow just oppressed and and slave being home. And I can think of nothing more freeing than if your role is to take care and nurture and be the homemaker and the the care you know, the carer for your children, how free you are. You can decide the course of your day. Oh, instead, it's much better to get out of that oppression and go to work and clock in, as you used that word earlier, Paul, to clock in and, you know, press that that time button and and then, you know, be away from your children, put them in a daycare, somebody else cares for them, then you're a slave and you're working. Then if they are trying to tell us, oh, you're being oppressed by the man, the husband. Oh, but now you're gonna go to work for some man in a factory? Like the whole thing is absurd.
Anyway, I've kind of talked enough for now, and I'll take a pause, but there's just some context to put out there. Oh, one more thing I'll say is that when we have this discussion about the vote for women, and and I know this will will come up that, okay, ever since women got the vote, then things went downhill. And it's kind of we have to be very careful not to be scapegoating women for things that have happened. It could be that these things happened, you know, when women got the vote because women tend with they tend to be, bamboozled much more easily into, you know, being all, what what would you call it? Like, just, oh, yeah. We're gonna we have to take care of everybody. And and so now, you know, we're gonna feel sorry for this this the all these other people.
And women, I think, are more easily pulled into that that way of thinking. And and so we're gonna be voting more, you know, libtarded. But Yeah. We we have to be careful not to scapegoat women, thereby deflecting from where the war is really at. And it's a war against our people, our all our people. I'll leave it at that for now.
[00:41:11] Unknown:
Yeah. Spot on with everything. I mean, I think our roles are complimentary when it works right. And I think you we have a sense that it used to work right. I have more than a sense of it of it. I was part of it as a small boy in the nineteen sixties, and my parents were slightly older than the parents of most of the people I went to school with. I don't know why. I always ask them. They said, oh, we just wanted to wait a bit before we had children, which was slightly different for those days as well because most people used to get married at 19 and 20 and be in the family way by '23, '20 '4. And, obviously, we know from a, I think, from a biological point of view, women are ideally suited for childbirth. I think around about the age of 18 to 25 are the prime years for it.
But we I mean, we can just look at the data as well. Whatever we might think about all the aspects of of its ruinous effects, we don't need to speculate too much because if we just look at the birth rates and the, reduction in the number of people in so called stable marriages, at least this is what we are told, and I guess I have a sense that that's the case, then we see that this is this is the bitter fruit of this, that it's it's harnessed on something that was always there that we were able to control properly through ethical, moral, civilized behavior, which we had in abundance. And this is, I think, to a great degree, to do with controlling the sex drives of women and men. They have to be mastered.
And if you look at the porn industry, that's designed to, assist people to lose their mastery of that and to give into more baser instincts and to think that this is this is the high point of your life is to hop in the sack with someone as many times as you possibly can. And this means your life will be great. And, of course, it doesn't mean that at all. It just means that you might have a wild time in your twenties or something or whatever. But if you don't sort yourself out, that won't carry on, and then you ended up, you know, with these cliches of the lone cat ladies in the '50, sixties, and seventies bitter about things without any children withering away. And, see, this is the bitter fruit that comes down the line. It looks great when the party's on. Yay. Who wouldn't wanna go to that? Well, are you mad? But if without some kind of ethical and moral moral guideline in there, a compass, which used to exist, It absolutely used to. This is why I suppose I tend to hark back to the Victorians simply because they are viewed as this staid, completely sexually repressed people, which is not entirely true, of course, because if it were, we wouldn't be here. But, I quite like that. I quite like the fact. This is just my my personal sort of view at the moment.
The people were supposedly repressed or were focused on something, their duty, as it were, to the nation. And that starts with your duty to the family. And you can't have a family, it seems to me, without a male and a female coming together in the bonds of love, ideally. You you hope for that. And in most cases, that is the key case, not just the bonds of lust. And developing the space in which you can raise children, the aim of which is to make them better than their parents in every regard. So it's a bit of a highfalutin thing to say because I know many people don't have the resources to do that. And, also, there's this thing about reproduction cycles as a as a tribe as it were. Our tribe tends to want to really nurture children as best it can. And so that's another part of this reduction in the scope and health of families or family life, certainly here, which is economically, the vice has been on for a long time. It's tightening with every single day, all sorts of things. So that young people think, I can't afford a house.
We've both got to go out and work. How are we supposed to get together? The goal of becoming the head of my own family is reducing shrinking as an option in my life because of all these other pressures, pressures which didn't exist a hundred and twenty years ago because we've mentioned it here before. A farmhand over here without any credit cards or a bank loan could go out and work and support his wife and his two children, and they're all ate okay. Right? They just did. I don't think that's true these days. I keep hearing stories of everybody's on sort of, like, government welfare, which, of course, was looked down upon, but they've designed the system to move over to that. So these these are this is not at the heart of what we're talking about, but these are the end results at the moment. These are the symptoms of a of a very strong disease in the heart of it, I think. So, and and the whole, yeah, the whole what is it? I know it's opening a can of worms is one analogy, but I think the is is the camel got its nose under the tent, and it's just been coming in ever since. You know? And you go, oh, yeah. Well, a little bit of this, and it's okay. And then we had miniskirts in the sixties and all these things, which are great fun. I'm not I'm not a prude. That's not what I'm saying. But you see an ulterior motive with all of this stuff. It's to it's to lower the kind of sexual restraint, which is we'll come to this later on in some clips I've got, which appears to be absolutely vital if you want to build a civilization.
If there's no sexual restraint or self mastery in that department, you're done for because it just becomes a sort of basically a knocking shop for the whole country. And that's kinda where it's going. You see there's something very low quality and low grade, I think, he said as a middle aged fuddy duddy, about the nature of the bulk of the so called relationships, particularly like the ones that are paraded on TV these days. You know, in the soaps and stuff. They're just programming, that makes life even worse for the people that consume it. So All those movements
[00:46:42] Unknown:
all those movements and spot on, Paula. I've I've I'm sitting here nodding vigorously
[00:46:48] Unknown:
And when you can't see that, but I'm telling you, nodding I can feel the waft all the way from Canada with all that nodding motion, Monica.
[00:46:56] Unknown:
Anyway, all these movements that what you just described, some of them, they we thought they were just organic. You know, we just thought these things were just natural and normal to happen with, you know, a youthful rebelliousness and this and that. But, no, they were driven, the movements to, first of all, the the styles and clothing to become a little bit, less modest, shall we say. And then the drive to oh, the free love movement, that whole thing, you know, just sex with anyone. That's just fine. So there goes the restraint, you know, and that we just thought, oh, that's just normal that young people, you know, just normal. Well, no. It was driven. These things were were, I guess, social engineering was at play that we weren't aware of at the time. At least I wasn't.
[00:47:49] Unknown:
Me neither.
[00:47:50] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. And it was all designed to, lower our fertility rate. And also we were guilted into that, you know, with Paul Ehrlich, his book with the population bomb, and that was of that certain, group of people that are also the bankers. Right? And it was to make us conscientious people think, oh my goodness. We better have less children. Meanwhile, then you go fast forward a few decades and, oh, we need workers. We have to bring them in from other countries, from the third world. We need these workers. Right? So that was all by design. We little did we know that there was all this engineering going on behind the scenes.
And, we're getting we're kind of broadening out the scope here, but it then back to the the whole thing about families and women and men and their roles. And, you know, if you convince women at that certain age when they're 18, 19, 20, that really they gotta get a career, they gotta do this and do that, and they're just as good as men as men implying that if they were staying home having children, they're not just as good as men. Right? There's always that implication. So you're driving these women into getting their careers. Well, then you're gonna pass by that ideal, fertile time of her life.
Yes. Mhmm. Women can have children still in their thirties. I mean, I did. I have one child, and I was a mature mother, you could say. And I knew I knew when I was giving birth to her that, oh, this would have been easier ten years earlier. I can tell you that. But, anyway, yeah, like I said earlier, my life turned out very differently from what my childhood dream was, and that was to be an at home mom and and raise children. And I remember thinking to myself, divorce is not in my vocabulary. It is not even anywhere near my vocabulary. Okay. Later that changed. Right? But it's just so many influences, and I've I have, you know, forgiven myself for some of the errors I made, but this is I I I have looked and thought deeply about these subjects that we're talking about today, and I'll pass it back over to you.
[00:50:14] Unknown:
Great stuff. No. Really good stuff. Eric, Paul, Patrick, any comments?
[00:50:25] Unknown:
Hello? Did you know? Oh, sure. Yeah. I can hear you now. Oh, that's We can hear you. I think that Monica is spot on about these social engineers because, it's like what I was saying the other night. For example, now I've got no interest in football at all. But remember what we were saying that, there's a referee that lives, opposite where I live, and he's, you know, a bit now. And he said in the early sixties, all the pamphlets showed there was friendship between rival teams. You know? We welcome our friends over from wherever to play, you know, please welcome them, and everything was fine. Then suddenly, they turned it around about the mid sixties to, an aggressive way. You know? Our bitter rivals will be along today, and let's give them hell on the football pitch and things like that. And then the violence started.
So it's all socially engineered. And you look at these soaps, they are all social engineering. I mean, over here, Coronation Street started, I think, in 1959. All to do with social engineering. And people follow these and believe that's how you're supposed to live. And there was a thing that the Labour Party had in the sixties called, the Permissive Society. Did you have that over in Canada, Monica, and, Patrick in America? Permissive Society, big talk about it. Are you talking about is that, name of a a TV show, or or do you mean No. No. No. No. No. It it it was nothing to do with television. It it what it was is there was a a party political thing of how they were, making it easy to get a divorce.
[00:52:16] Unknown:
Oh, yes. Yes. Yes. Yeah. It was
[00:52:18] Unknown:
called the permissive society. In fact, it
[00:52:22] Unknown:
was child rearing too. You know? The permissive Yes. Child rearing, which then the pendulum swung the other way into hyper control and all this stuff. But but the permissive child rearing was basically to let your children do anything they want, like bring their boyfriend home and or or the girlfriend home and right under your roof to to, you know, sleep with and this kinda thing? It doesn't matter, though. Yeah. The peak of that was in, like, 1969,
[00:52:45] Unknown:
the sexual revolution with Woodstock,
[00:52:48] Unknown:
a big concert in Woodstock, New York City or New near New York. And Well, that was the big advert for it, wasn't it? The big promotional campaign. Take all your clothes off, run around in the field, smoke pot. It's all gonna turn out great.
[00:53:03] Unknown:
Yeah. Yes. Yeah. Was it something about tripping out or something, wasn't it? Yes. But, I I think that also they had free expression schools as well. And what that was is you they didn't discipline the child. If the kid wanted to go absolutely do lally, they just let it. And I believe we've got the results of that in positions of, power today. Because when you look at these people, look at, the prime minister sorry, minister, here, he's not right in the head. I don't know what childhood he had, but I won't be at all surprised if he had a free expression childhood where, I mean, I was brought up Victorian strict.
And if I'd stepped out online, I'll get a clap around the ear, and that would be it. You know, I won't step out online. And I I'd get a clap around the ear, not only from my dad, but I get it from my mom and my sister who was much older than me. So, you know, it put me in line. But the thing is, there's a generation, that parents just did not discipline their their children at all. And, I've had this from Neighbors from Hell where you're especially your your kids are driving me mad. And they say, well, what can I do about it? Well, you're the parent, aren't you? Yeah. But what can I do about it? Because the kids are just not not being told right from wrong. They're just finding out for themselves. And that was all from, I think it was Spock, not as in Star Trek, but that doctor Spock. Doctor Spock.
And, apparently, I don't know how true this is. I don't think it is true. Someone told me that, Spock in Star Trek is a kind of taking the rise out of doctor Spock. I don't know. I doubt it. But, you know, with no expressions and things like that. But people are reading these books by these loonies that have never brought up built children up, and people people have been built bringing children up for thousands of years. And suddenly, look what we've got now. We've got the results, as I say, of that.
[00:55:02] Unknown:
Well, I I think you're right. I mean, Monica, I'm I'm born a year after I'm 1960, so I reckon we had a similar sort of cultural overlay taking place. I felt as though I was my parents were from the old world, but I was surrounded by a lot of younger parents of my friends who were from the new one as it were, and they were a lot younger. These were people born, I guess, after the war, parents in their, mid to late twenties when, in the early seventies. That's that's when they were. And and my friends were, you know, obviously, their sons and daughters and stuff like that. And there's this the whole culture forces you. This is, you know, we are a herd animal. You're and you don't even realize it's going on. You've gotta fit in. You can't survive otherwise, and you don't want to be pushed out of your peer group and all this sort of stuff. So you can't even see these things. It's a you know, we mentioned it here before. It's the fish in water. You don't even realize that you are a fish in water. It takes a long time for you to kind of understand the medium in which you've been floating around most of your life and to see it for what it is. I think it's resulted in arrested development, of which I include myself. I'm quite serious. I was talking to someone about it the other day. It's as if we take forever to grow up.
Mhmm. I don't know what I I felt like that all the time. I thought, am I just gonna be a permanent juvenile in certain tastes and emotional reactions of things? Like, I think I might be doomed that way. Not that I'm trying to be immature here all the time, although sometimes it's inescapable. Right? But there's definitely something about that.
[00:56:32] Unknown:
Did you did you experience conflicts with your parents due to what we would now recognize as the social engineering of our generation after, you know, our parents, yours and mine, were of the older generation who still did have those, you know, strict values and morals and ethical guidelines and how to be and how to then subsequently raise a family. Like, we did. Alfred and I have talked about this. In fact, one of the the, broadcasts we did together on on my show on Republic Broadcasting Network was about that. Like, what are some of the the things that our we we fought with our parents about that we now realize they were right about?
Did you experience that?
[00:57:21] Unknown:
I didn't really. No. I mean, I think I had a friend who used to literally have fights with his father in the garden. And, they would have stand up fights. They just couldn't agree on anything. He was pushing the boundaries of what was acceptable to his father. He was a quite a strict disciplinarian and didn't take too kindly to he would come to school and tell us, oh, yeah. I was out in the garden. Me and my dad were actually hitting one another with a lot of it. Because we'd find this very amusing. Although there was a bit I'd go off and think that's very bad. It never came to that. My parents were definitely would have been classed as old fashioned, and I was awkward about it at first. I thought, why are my mom and dad different to all these other parents? So at the time, they didn't appear to be cool.
In retrospect, they actually were. Right? I I think the old fashioned values are the coolest values you can have. They're the ones where you're really much more in control, and they gave me a lot of free rein, as I grew up. But I was also overwhelmed by girls. I don't mean they were chasing me. Although, of course, they did, Monica. You know? That's that's what I totally thought. They they did. They did. They did. But I didn't know what to do with them. I'm like, what are they for? You know? When you're 17 and 18, I'm serious. So I went to an all boys school. I was just much more interested in reading history and literature and stuff like that. What what's all this? And then they all wanted to listen to disco music and that was just a complete no no. I just couldn't even tolerate any of that nonsense.
And then, you know, and the girls in the group that I run with, let's go to a nightclub and dance. I went to one twice. I left on both occasions after twenty minutes. I couldn't abide it. And they said, why do you go home? I said, look. Even if even if the I was to spot an attractive young lady I did speak like that at the time, of course. But if I was to spot or see an attractive young lady, I I was very unsure of them because I didn't know what they were going to sound like. You can't hear anybody in those places. Do I sound like an old fart or what? But I actually felt like one and was quite pleased about it. And in fact, I went back up there, to see some old friend, somebody's sixtieth about five years ago, four or five years back.
And one of the girls that was part of this group, they're all married and settled down and seemed to be reasonably competent. I didn't bother prying because I've not been up there for, like, forty years, but it was a really fun sort of night out. And she came up to me. She said, I always liked it that way that you used to just leave and go home. I said, really? She said, yeah. It just seemed that you really knew what you were doing. I said, well, I didn't. But I knew that I didn't wanna be there. It's not that I didn't like the PU. I just didn't wanna be doing that thing. I found it goofy and insincere and a bit daft, to be quite honest. I wanna look back at yeah. When I look back at the my mom and dad took photographs in these tearooms with all their pals. When they first met, they met in these tea rooms after the war, the Astoria tea rooms in Leeds in Yorkshire. Okay?
And they took photographs. Someone obviously had a camera, and they'd taken half a dozen of these things in black and white, you know, with the edges all curled up because that was the way photographs were those days. And I I remember looking at them later on in life thinking, wow. Everybody's so sharply dressed. No one was drinking booze. They were all drinking tea. They wanted to dance, and all the men were holding the ladies around the waist. These things, these are symptoms of quality in civilization, and we don't so look at what dancing morphed into. Yes. It morphed into this egotistical thing where I'm strutting my stuff, really. Like John revolting in that, thing which we as lads, that film, what was it, Saturday Night Fever? We used to just fall about laughing at that. Oh, me. Oh, my. We just thought it was the most hilarious, noncy bit of junk we ever saw in our lives. We thought it was pathetic. All the girls, they're all in love with John Travolta, which of course made us laugh even more. We thought it was just hilarious.
Completely nincompoop stuff. So but I of course, I couldn't go ballroom dancing back then, and I wouldn't have done, and I didn't know how to do it. But there's something in it. It's why I mentioned these sorts of things throughout the show regularly and go back to them. It's not some sort of nostalgia for something I had. It's a yearning for something that I think we all need because it's a hallmark of graceful, dignified, strong people. And that's what we've currently moved away from big time, courtesy of these social engineering projects that we're talking about. Anyway, we're just halfway through the show, and I'm going to take a ludicrous inter interlude now, if I can just dig it up. Where is it? Because normally, we play a song here. If I can just find it. Where has it gone? Dum, dum, dum, dum, dum. I I will have it here somewhere. It's have you heard of a chap called Jack Hodges? I thought I'd pick out something that was that was very old. We played a song the other week, from 1921.
And, this is not from, 1921. But, Eric, this is especially for you, this song. That's very kind. It's Thank you. It's it is. When I heard this song, I immediately thought of you. You'll know why. Okay? It's very quaint and odd and oldie world. It's from 1933. It's by somebody called Jack Hodges. Okay? And it's called the raspberry king, And you will understand why when I play it. This is three minutes. We'll be back after see? He's off already. We'll be we'll be back. A slight change of pace to lighten the mood, then we're gonna go into some even chunkier stuff after the break. Back after this.
Every Friday night when work is done, he never wastes a bit. To the village hall, he hurries around where he seems just like a livid. And they don't write them like that anymore.
[01:05:55] Unknown:
Spike Milligan did a send up of that. Go on to YouTube and put Spike Milligan eat more fruit. You'll be off your seat with laughter.
[01:06:03] Unknown:
I've I've seen it, and I went off and I went down the original recording. And, honestly, they don't write songs about raspberries anymore, do they? That's right. The world is is the poorer for it. And, also, it reminds me of, like, those Monty Python songs where they all stand around as a barbershop quartet and sing something very formally, but with very lewd lyrics, and I quite like that a lot. So that's top.
[01:06:32] Unknown:
I thought you might quite like that, Eric. Yeah. Yes. Oh, very much. So thank you so much for playing that. I really enjoyed it. Otherwise, I'll for safe it laughed. But it's good. It's brilliant.
[01:06:44] Unknown:
It's good. I don't want anybody to accuse us of playing modern popular music. We don't want to do that around here. We're trying to find things pre 1940 all the time. It's it's good. I don't know why. It is good. It's fun, actually. My my granddad,
[01:06:57] Unknown:
he was a blind greengrocer. He unfortunately, he died my father's died, he died, about two or three years before I was born. But he told my father, he written that all the problems with the country starts started from dance halls because I come from a long line of male dancers, you see. My father would never have danced with my mother, and I'm a non dancer as well. My feet are firmly on the ground. And as for disco music, it looks like someone's got survived as dance. I mean, what is it about discos? I hate them. I think they're horrible. And I did when I was in my teens. Couldn't stand it. I'm glad there was somebody else that don't like it either.
[01:07:40] Unknown:
Oh, no. It's not manly. I I just never liked it. I just thought it was not manly. It's as simple as that. So not interested at all. I've got the thing interesting about ballroom dancing, you could lay the same accusation, particularly when you see them and they're all floridated up on TV with all those preening around with their perfume and stuff. My dad used to laugh like mad. But when you see normal people just doing it, there's something great about it. I just think there is because it's not even about the dancing. It's about again, it's like a good marriage. You have to serve your partner when you've got your hand around her waist, and and you have to do that because you don't want to stand stand on the dear lady's toes. And it used to happen, of course, much to the end of the relationship almost immediately, I suppose.
[01:08:22] Unknown:
Yeah. Ballroom dancing is absolutely the greatest thing, and you're absolutely right. It it is so a a wonderful thing that couples can do together. And and I think that if a couple actually is a good dancing couple, like, with ballroom dancing, it absolutely strengthens their relationship, their marriage, everything. There are so many components to it. There's the physical together with the music that the vibrations of that, but there is this role too for the men and women back to this thing about men's and women's role, and it is up encapsulated in the ballroom dance where the man leads and the woman must be led.
And it is when done well, I I'm telling you, it is just absolutely magnificent to behold, or if you are lucky enough to have a good dance partner to be involved in. Back to you.
[01:09:24] Unknown:
No. I I look you see, although we're talking about something like dancing, we're touching on something else, something really important that's really fundamental to us as as people. Paul, you are saying something. When it's done well,
[01:09:37] Unknown:
it's an it's amazing to see. But when it's done very poorly, it's hilarious. So they've got both ends of the spectrum.
[01:09:47] Unknown:
Yes. Well Yeah. It's true. It is true. It can be very hilarious. It can. In fact, some of the best comedy sketches are people completely cocking up ballroom dancing. It's because you're striving to actually create something beautiful, and most of us actually can't actually. I'll do or intermittently. Maybe two or three times in your life, you might do it. But most of us are moderately skilled in that department, particularly Right. Given the way that we've been raised. You know? And, you're you're actually spot on. I was dragged along to dancing classes Not everybody. By an ex girlfriend.
[01:10:18] Unknown:
Not everybody. No. Well, I was dragged along to dancing classes by a girlfriend who later became my ex. And, when I told my dad that I was being dragged along to dancing classes, he said, you're not one of them, son, are you? I mean, you're not did you always thought that dancing was for, women and puffs and nothing in between? So he puffed us. He said so I got dragged along to this dance class, and, we've danced to a record. I've never heard of it before because I asked her, and it's called Get Off My Bloody Foot. Does anybody else know that record? I've just never heard it before.
[01:10:55] Unknown:
I would never taken ballroom dancing, Eric. That's one of the big gaps in my life. I never was. She said that dancing with me was like dancing with a panzer tank with a dodgy gearbox.
[01:11:08] Unknown:
She said, I've got no sense of direction whatsoever.
[01:11:12] Unknown:
There's a girl with some verb imagination. I quite like the sound of this. She sounds grounded to me.
[01:11:19] Unknown:
The the thing is, not everyone as well, which I don't
[01:11:24] Unknown:
The thing is not everyone can be Fred Astaire. But then again, I think he was given entirely too much credit because Ginger Rogers had to do everything he did backwards and in heels. I'm just saying.
[01:11:40] Unknown:
Yeah. No. Yeah. It takes two to tango as they say, really. Actually, my mom and dad used to have disputes over dancers. My mom loved Jean Kelly, and my father looked Fred Astaire. It was the only point of contention that I can ever remember. It never came to a sort of vicious argument about it. My dad would just go, no. I'm a Fred Astaire man, really. And my mom would go, oh, he's too slow, and she wanted all that dynamic jumping around by Gene Kelly in the rain and all that kind of stuff. So, yeah, great times. Really, really good stuff, actually. I think it's just worth reminding ourselves of this because, actually, not that long ago, everything has has its era, and I guess that one has definitely gone. But, it's just it's this thing about the dancing. And, you know, what you were saying, Monica, it's a very refined thing, and it's a high tide watermark in your life if you ever get to do it. I do think, Eric, like I was saying, the Fockham the Fockham Hall Festival should have the foxtrot, the Fockham Foxtrot or something. I don't know what that is. I know it's a dance.
[01:12:34] Unknown:
Yeah. Well, someone in in chat has suggested that, what you've just played, was it this must be the Fockem Hall national anthem. Well, I think it should be. I I think we can you imagine we could all stand and salute to to to that? I think I think that'd be quite good, actually.
[01:12:52] Unknown:
The raspberry king. Yeah. It's a it's a tremendous song. Absolutely. Yeah. Right. Let's I'm gonna I'm gonna change pace a bit. We're gonna go into something a little bit more serious now. About I don't know if he's still producing videos. I don't know if you ever come across him. An American chap, very softly spoken, quickly spoken, and very articulate. You're about to hear him, who went under the name, probably still does, a black pigeon. Black black pigeon speaks or talks, I think it was. And, about February '16, he did a a video called, brace yourselves, why women destroy nations.
Okay? And, I I'm not gonna play the whole eighteen minutes because it would absorb as we go somewhere else, but I'll put the link into chat for for those that wanna go off and listen to it. But I've I've pulled a few clips from the first one's four minutes long. It's quite chunky, this. But it lays out the groundwork. And I think the other week, I mentioned this this is where I found out about it. This English chap called JD Unwinner wrote this book, sex and culture, and his findings are very serious. They are. There's definitely a serious side to this. We know that we're dealing with a serious thing. That's why we have to have some silly raspberry king music every now and again to alleviate the tension. But But this this clip's four minutes long, so I'm gonna play it. And your responses afterwards,
[01:14:11] Unknown:
should prove to be quite interesting, I think. Vote. And in a democratic society, they vote their biological imperative. Now what do I mean by this? Well, recent genetic research has shown that before the modern era, eighty percent of women managed to reproduce while only forty percent of men did. The obvious conclusion from this is that a few top men had access to multiple women while the bottom 60% of men had no mating prospects at all. Women clearly didn't mind sharing the top man with a dozen other women, ultimately deciding that being one of many women sharing a man who leads was still more preferable than having the undivided attention of a man who serves. Commenting on this, Roy Baumeister, a prominent social psychologist who teaches at Florida State University, had this to stay.
It would be shocking if these vastly different reproductive odds for men and women failed to produce some personality differences. He went on, for women, the optimal thing to do is to go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that a man will come along and offer sex, and you'll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. Were descended from women who played it safe? For men, the outlook was radically different. If you go along with the crowd and play it safe, the odds are you won't have children. Most men who ever lived did not have any descendants who are alive today.
Their lines were dead ends. Hence, it was necessary to take chances, try new things, be creative, explore other possibilities. Many societies, including the West, long ago devised a simple plan to stop the inherent infighting that occurs because a large majority of men in the in group don't have sexual access to women or the ability to reproduce legitimate children. The entire basis of Western society was the male agreement to keep only one woman in public so that every male has near equal chance at reproduction. It's for this reason that organized and advanced civilizations have always needed to agree on the equitable distribution of women so as to incentivize its men to produce and have a stake in the society's health and security.
But this, like other cultural arrangements that held the West together for centuries, is breaking down and can be observed in something as basic as the fact there are no western countries that are even at replacement levels in their birth rates. This, again, can be laid at the feet of loosening of sexual morality and the dating habits of young women. Colloquially called the 8020 rule, what it basically means is that the vast majority, the 80%, are sexually pursuing the top 20% of men. This is highly damaging to the formation of monogamous couples and the successful formation families and the children that will be the next generation of any given country. And we'll be talking about this more later in the video. But if you're interested, see Google for more information on this. Also, one thing to understand is that female psychology has always been about adaptation.
In our tribal past, if women of conquered tribes didn't submit to their new masters, they faced death along with their husbands, brothers, sons, fathers. Even today, many women seek out aggressive men whether consciously or not, as it seems that this psychology has been ground into women after countless years of our species evolution. That means criminals, gangsters, and mass murderers are always going to be more attractive to women than hardworking, honest men. They always have been. They always will be. Think of how many women throw themselves at drug dealers versus, for example, math teachers.
Sexual attraction is based on this reality for many women regardless of whether they admit it or not. And the feminization of men in the West adhering to the repetitive and decades long diatribe that vilifies anything and all things masculine are no longer, for many women, attractive potential mates, especially for women in their critical prime childhood bearing years. But I do add this may and does change for many with age. The culture of the sensitive man, the emotional man, the compassionate man is at odds with what women are biologically predisposed to desire.
[01:18:29] Unknown:
So quite a lot in that. I don't expect you to remember it all because it's packed with, engaging, let's call it that, engaging points, which we may, at first hearing, not necessarily agree or even disagree with. The one that let out of me or what yeah. It's absolutely it's brilliant, brilliant stuff. The one that really let out of me is only 40% of men ever
[01:18:51] Unknown:
reproduced. That I This is had no idea.
[01:18:54] Unknown:
Staggering, isn't it? Absolutely staggering. I suppose many got slaughtered in wars before they even got around doing that. I know that in ancient Greece, certainly in Sparta, you were allowed to go into the army until you got a son. They won't let you in. Wow. That was that was purely for logistical reasons. There's no army left. You keep going if you were to go off and get beat, where's the next army gonna come from? And, of course, they wanted the fittest warriors to produce the fittest sons who were gonna be the best warriors in the subsequent generation. But he unpacks in just those four minutes. There's so much stuff. I'll I'll just give you a story Yeah. That illustrates what he said about women desiring
[01:19:33] Unknown:
masculine men, strong men, and all that. It was when I was in prison, and I was asking these German women. This is in prison in Germany and, you know, a very Aryan looking German woman, and I wanted to share something with them in English. And I asked each of them, do you speak English? Oh, yes. Of course. I I go with a man from Morocco and we speak English together. That's how we communicate. The next one, oh, yes. Of course. I I go with a man from Turkey. We communicate in English together. And then I just looked at them sideways. I said, what's wrong with German men? Because it was completely off topic of what we were talking about, but I just said that. What's wrong with German men? And did they ever give me an earful about that they wanted masculine men, and they wanted to feel protected?
They did not want a man that was gonna say how high when they say jump or something to that effect. And then I then we had a nice discussion because these things were not new ideas to me. But then we had a nice discussion after I said, you do know that the weakness currently, visible in German men is not genetic. Right? This is through social engineering and and decades of of, you know, this reeducation program and and programming, basically. And they they did know. They understood that, but they said, but we want masculine men here and now. I mean, not here in jail, but you know what I mean? Just Yes. You know? So that was the story that illustrates that. And what do we see in all the adverts or the movies? We see very clumsy, weak, white men while we see very masculine, dark men everywhere.
[01:21:12] Unknown:
Everywhere. Yeah. Yeah. We do. We do. And I I mean, I grew up with very masculine men when I was young, but not as masculine as they were in the nineteen thirties. I'm quite clear about that. And it's something to do with self discipline and restraint. And, also, I suppose, back then, the hardships of life earlier on. This is when I was saying earlier, you know, about feeling like I'm undergoing permanent adolescent arrested development with things. I think there's definitely an aspect of that. We've had an awful lot of fun, but it we're kind of we're not as strong, and it's a concern. You can feel it in a way.
So, yeah, I mean, that whole thing of the of of females wanting the rebel, wanting the slight edgy maniac. It's absolutely true. And to be protected
[01:22:04] Unknown:
to feel protected.
[01:22:06] Unknown:
Yes. Well, they want to know you would beat off anybody, you know, beat them up if things go out of hand. And in fact, women, I noticed when I've been in situations like that, mainly in my youth, three or four times in pubs and things, the women would get very excited about that in all sorts of ways. I couldn't have analyzed it and told you at the time, but looking back on it, I remember these sorts of moments very much. There's a great deal of natural sort of vital female energy comes into the whole scenario. And, of course, they they wanna defend their man, and there's all sorts of stuff goes on like that. And we're not this sophisticated creature all the time that we think we are, thankfully. But, of course, we we've definitely been softened up, and the advertising bombardment is a key part of that. It really is. You know? It's everywhere you look. The agreement has been set for the soft, sensitive man. It was basically a complete waste of space, particularly these ones that are continually emoting with feminism and wanna back it up. You just go, what? What are you talking about? Because it doesn't produce any strong relationships. If it did, I'd be all for it, but it clearly doesn't because it's not nature doesn't want it that way. We we're anchored into Yeah. You just hit on a very important
[01:23:16] Unknown:
point about, you know, having this sensitive man type being pushed, and the feminist movement, you know, pushing that narrative for women to be attracted to the man who would be, you know, the soft sensitive type. And if he wasn't, then he wasn't any good. But that's part of it, isn't it, Paul? It's pushing that narrative further to try to artificially, create what should the woman be attracted to and that it doesn't work out in the end.
[01:23:49] Unknown:
No. It doesn't. And I mean, I'm not making an argument for the so called mythical Philistine bloke, the great brute. I mean, they do exist. I've worked with brutes, two or three that I can think of, who were unflinchingly so male. It's just almost it was difficult to be around them. I've often thought that, you know, males are are basically 80% masculine and 20 feminine, and it's the opposite for women. This is just me making stuff up right. I thought every you know, there there's got to be a bit of the other side in you, so that you can see the feminine and so that you can see the masculine. Because someone who is completely insensitive to things, which, of course, I suppose, is the archetypical picture of the dense male, Isabore. And they are the it's like, I said, what would you call it? A jock, a sports jock, just continually drowning on and drinking beer all the time. That's how it got to be portrayed.
I don't necessarily remember it being like that a hundred years ago, but that's certainly the way it ended up being portrayed in popular culture. And, yeah, it's a it's a it's a challenge because the more you look at it, the the more you see that every single aspect of the sort of behavior patterns that we are subjected to courtesy of the TV are reinforcing these stereotypes. And monkey see, monkey do. There's no point blaming people for that because we're all like that. The only difference is you suddenly go, hang on. I'm being hacked. Some of us just go, I'm being hacked here. This isn't right. There's an instinct that hopefully kicks in. We want it to kick in with everybody, but it doesn't always do that. So I think his points are I mean, the other point, you know, that women basically in ancient tribal situations, and maybe we're still in one just with the veneer of civilization, you know, over it.
If things went bad for the tribe, they would be raped and or killed. Therefore, it's understandable why they would develop certain survival behaviors to deal with that, which would be being overcome by the enemies purely to live. I completely understand that. And, of course, it's develop you know, that conversation that you're just mentioning, that's an aspect of it. The the tough outsider will get will get the women irrespective of what race they are. And this is, you know, it's worth looking at this purely because we know that our race is being chewed up, and this is a part of it. It really is. Something that my neighbor said, which was quite interesting, she said to me, she said, if you're looking
[01:26:18] Unknown:
for a partner, she said, wear a suit. She said women will always fit wear always fall for a suit. She said because it's like it's like a uniform, and it shows masculinity. And she had a good point.
[01:26:33] Unknown:
And Self discipline, isn't it? Yes. Isn't it self dis isn't that why military uniforms have the same effect? It says a man of vigor and self control, who can at times be uncontrolled, and I want that as well.
[01:26:50] Unknown:
You know? There's a plea policeman who's moved away now. He used to live opposite me. And he said that, he was on Palace Guard, police, and he said that you could be Quasimodo. He says and women would be all over you in a uniform. He he he knows it. He says as as a mate of his, it was absolutely he said, you know, one of the most ugliest bloch he'd ever wished to meet. Yet, when they're all over him and he had his uniform on, he said it's quite quite amazing. Do, does the Fuckingham Hall haberdashery sell uniforms, Eric? I might need to order it. I might need to order one. Yes. It's funny you should say that. But I do something else I've noticed. Peep what you're talking about immaturity.
Now you go to one of these, I mean, I don't like groups and clubs and things like that. But you go to one of these, truth movements, the people are often very, very immature because, as you gain wisdom, you, judge people's character for yourself and not rely upon what other people tell you. Children always rely upon what other people tell them. And I found that, not only do they become cults, these all those edges, but the people are extremely immature, very immature. And I think the reason why is because they were spoiled kids. And this is a big trouble because I think in the last, what, fifty, sixty years, people have been brought up more spoiled.
And my parents used to say that after World War two, people would say, my kids are gonna have what I never had. And he said and my dad said, he said, they've actually reared a spoilt generation.
[01:28:35] Unknown:
I know. But I don't know how you actually would sort of divert that. It's completely understandable. If you've just been through hell and back Yeah. And you're gonna have children, you are gonna be you go I've just seen a lot of life blown apart in front of me. It's not gonna happen to my family no matter what. And you would go over the top. I often felt that my dad protected us too much. He used to clean my shoes as I was getting older, and I used to have little arguments with him about it. My dad, why are you apologizing? And I said, dad, can I do that? This is when I'm seven, eight, nine. I wanted to polish the shoes. He said, no. I I do it quicker in bed. I said, yeah. But I wanna do it. I wanted to learn how to get covered in polish and cocky cocky cocky cocky cocky. My dad was an You know what I'm My dad was an absolute angel. He'd wait on your hand and foot. Absolutely. Yeah. My dad did too. So that's that's part of it. They both come out of the war. They did I'm not saying it's necessarily just of a war generation, but my dad was like that. It was like he was the most helpful, contributive guy, and he was still masculine because I I mentioned him the other week. You know, he used to come home and he'd say that he'd hit people.
He didn't do it that often. And, you know, he'd hang around with my uncles. They go see Leeds United football matches. And, of course, we were the most polite football team in the world in the late sixties and early seventies, which is where my dad went. Of course, that's I'm mocking, but all those sorts of things. So that element was always there. I don't know what you're supposed to do about that. I mean, we're building civilizations to try and improve the quality of life. And one of the things to guard for is is raising soft children. And I always thought of myself as being softer than my dad, you know, by temperament Oh, yeah. By decision much more. All of these things. Yeah. Always. And I'd you know, maybe he thought that with regards to his dad. I don't know. Maybe this is a a continuum. Oh, you should've seen the guys in 1815 at the Battle of Waterloo. They were made out of nails. Well, I think they probably were in comparison to us. You know? Hearts of pig iron. You don't know where it all you look at some of the things that they did. Oh, we'll just get in a boat and go to Antarctica with a pair of mittens and some long shots on, and they go.
Because they just do that. We go, we can possibly do that. I'll get frostbite. And, of course, I don't wanna go and get frostbite. I'm just drawing it up as a silly analogy, but it's quite obvious, I think. I mean, I said to, my dad's funeral,
[01:30:41] Unknown:
if I was half as brave as my dad, I'd be an exceptionally brave person. And that's it. He he really, was I mean, after he had a stroke, he was very still, shall we say, kept self respect, still, you know, he didn't whimper a tour or anything like that. Otherwise, he had a stroke like that. Character.
[01:31:05] Unknown:
It used to be called that thing called character. That's what it was called. It's not about being clever or anything. I think it's it's a component of beauty and ethics and moral behavior, and they all come together. And it takes a long time to grow good human beings like that. That's why they're very valuable, I think. Anyway, let's move on to the next clip. This is this is not so long as the other one. Excuse me. This is still three minutes. And I think this one, I haven't labeled them. I just labeled one, two, three, and four. We might not get through all of them. It's from the same video a little bit later. And I think this refers to, to this book or the author of this book and and certain discoveries there. The half century long experiment of women's liberation and political enfranchisement
[01:31:44] Unknown:
has ended in disaster for the West. When you begin to start connecting the dots, you realize that since women have been given the vote, the entire center of politics and thus Western society has shifted ever more to the left. Women have also used their political enfranchisement to further the cause of the aptly named women's liberation. Liberation socially, liberation financially, liberation from family, from motherhood, liberation from religious dogma, and most importantly, sexual liberation. Once women were given equal say in the sphere of politics, it was only a matter of time until our civilization was swept up by the event horizon of its own collapse.
All kinds of studies have been done on this subject as this one from Columbia University, and they all, without exception, note that as women become more, quote, unquote, emancipated, the decline of the family is further accelerated. And as the family disintegrates and women move politically further and further to the left in their voting, many then begin to use the government as a surrogate husband and provider. Women are thus even more liberated from their traditional roles within the family and society at large. In one of the most comprehensive studies of civilizational decline, JD Unwin postulates in his book, Sex and Culture, written in 1934, that the main driver for the rise of a civilization is the degree of chastity of the said civilization's women.
Unwink, a British social anthropologist at Oxford and Cambridge universities, studied 86 different cultures through five thousand years of history and found a positive correlation between the cultural achievement of a people and the sexual restraint they observed. Unwin's impetus for the project was to test the Freudian theory that civilizational progress was the product of repressed sexuality. He found that discipline in sexual matters appropriated social energy to more civilizational ends. It's very complicated, but for Unwin, the fabric of society was primarily sexual, and heterosexual monogamy was the optimal arrangement for the planning, building, protecting, and nurturing of the family.
If enough heterosexual partners made a monogamous commitment, civilizational energy was directed toward promoting the finest societal foundation possible. Without exception, each civilization he studied allowed its success to alter its moral code. According to Unwin, after a nation becomes increasingly liberal with regards to its sexual morality, it loses its cohesion, its impetus, and its purpose. From a chaste moral code, societies gained what he called expansive energy, and this energy allowed these cultures to expand into other weaker cultures. Now when you compare the modern western world with the Islamic one, you see exactly the results that Unwin's theory would predict. By allowing women to fuck freely, the West has de facto entered a matriarchy that disincentivizes young men. Islam, on the other hand, keeps their women chased, and their expansive energy as Anwyd's theory predicts is manifested in what we're observing today. The Islamic culture is the one who's expanding into the West, and it was only recently that the West was able to dominate all other cultures on the planet.
[01:35:03] Unknown:
So this is not a suggestion for you to become Muslim, but the point's well made, I think. Comments, anyone?
[01:35:11] Unknown:
Another excellent clip. I have to watch that whole video for sure, so gonna look for it after this show. But excellent. It's almost like yeah. He's explaining some some movements, some directions that society takes because, yes, women will tend to be more leftist. And it can all stem from, good intentions, but it's misdirected. It's like in my life, I had good intentions all along when I was running, for example, in the green party, which later it turns out I learned was the watermelon party, red on, sort of green on the outside, red on the inside, the worst. Like, it's communist party. I just didn't recognize it. I was well intentioned when I was involved in the green party, but I was misdirected. So with the the indoctrination that we've all been subjected to, but this this guy, he's really laying it out. That was excellent. Excellent. Another good clip there. Thank you, Paul.
[01:36:11] Unknown:
No. It's it's great stuff. I put the link, by the way, in the Rumble chat room. But if you don't find it, I'll send it to you after the show, Monica, or anybody else that wants it. Yeah. I I think it's really rather brilliant stuff. And the fact that this was known back in 1935, some of the research that these older researchers did is phenomenal stuff. But, of course, they're all men, so they're to be dismissed, you see, because there's a lot of old world bias in it according to modern commentators. But, well, it's just true. Every oh, he's a fuddy duddy. He's a fogey from England, and then he went to Oxford. What would you expect from something like that? Well, that something accurate, generally, and it generally was, you know, at least certain independent researchers like him. The I mean, the core thing there, not that this is will be new to anybody, is that the fund fundamental foundation of a healthy civilization that has a sense of purpose and direction is, sexual chastity and monogamous heterosexual relations. And everything that we're talking about with regards to the advertising and the mainstream media of the last forty or fifty years is to destroy that from the arrival of the pill, which, of course, has had an indirect, effect on the physiology of both men and women because of the estrogen or whatever that keeps going into the water producing a lot of pipe cleaner armed, very soft males if if they don't watch it. This is why I think there's been such a a big sort of surge possibly, with all this sort of online fitness and guys building muscles upon muscles in the gym. I don't know if you're familiar with all this, but it's definitely a massive part of the sort of Internet culture of men's health.
Of course, they can separate it from women in this. It kind of goes too far for me the other way. It's slightly self obsessive. There's a sort of there's a balancing point. There's a midpoint where it works. But I can understand it's like, a reaction against the softening of masculinity. I also think if you look at films, certainly modern ones, the males are excessively masculine. It's like ridiculous. They're like comic book versions. They're not they're not believable either. And I've often wondered whether this is to make normal males feel even more inadequate because, you know, I'm not like that bloke in the action movie who killed 15 people by, you know, just standing still or he's just got fists of all this kind of stuff. It's been so amplified and ridiculous. Whereas if you go back and look at, say, the male if you think of someone like, say, Gary Cooper, particularly in, was it high noon?
That's such a fantastic depiction of, I think, of what men actually feel when they're faced with pressure. I know it's a cartoonized version of it. I know it's a filmized version of it, and therefore, it has to have its dramatic impact. But yet again, he's just a normal guy faced with a very, very bad situation. He has to do something about it, and he's nervous as most men are. It's not all sort of like running around, and I'm impervious to bullets. That's not what happens at all. So it's much more relatable by normal people, whereas stuff today in the films is well, it's just comic book nonsense. And it's like, I hope it's had its time. I'm getting a I keep on getting told that it has, and we might get back to films where somebody actually sat down and wrote a script that contained characters that you actually cared for. My problem is sort of like with modern films, which have got an element of all this nonsense in them. I want most of the good guys dead after twenty minutes because they're so incredibly smug, smarmy, and self confident, and it's just exhaustingly dull. It really is. But, I mean, I've slightly gone off off the track there, but, I think it's all part of it. You you see all these other things.
Of course, we could say I mean, it started before this, but it started with this release of the vote. It's been built upon. I mean, back then as well, when we go back to the nineteen twenties in The States, every many people will be aware that Edward Bernays, Freud's nephew, was head of a lot of PR. He headed up a public relations firm. He kind of invented it. Public relations is basically social engineering conducted via mass media. And, he was the guy that ended up getting women to smoke a lot more. Remember that in the nineteen twenties? I was there because I'm quite old. Were you there, Eric, in New York in the nineteen twenties? Monica was probably there too. Of course I was. Yes. Yes. You know? Yeah. We were there down there on Fifth Avenue. We got all those we got all those beautiful models all dressed out with their bonnets and everything looking all swish in the nineteen twenties girl type things. What did he call it? Smoking cigarettes. Freedom freedom something. What did he call it? Torches of freedom. That's it. Torches of freedom. Thank you.
[01:40:41] Unknown:
Is that what he called him? Right. What was that name you're saying, Patrick, about his, his relative? What was that you said the other day? About Bernard's relative? Who's He was you mentioned something very no. No. Edward Bernays. You mentioned something about Netflix.
[01:40:57] Unknown:
Oh. Fuck on margin. Yeah. Yeah. I think it's his, his grandson. Heads up Netflix. It's it's one of his, progeny that that run Netflix now.
[01:41:10] Unknown:
So it's just
[01:41:11] Unknown:
it's it's yeah. Well, he wrote a book called Propaganda. It's one of the only books I've read by him, but by Edward Bernays. And in the prologue, he mentions that he didn't really come up with a lot of the methods that he used. What he did is he looked to the Catholic church because they had perfected propaganda, and they actually had an office of propaganda as one of the, one of the offices of of the Vatican. And that they were using it as an effective means again as a counter reformation type organization where it was very sophisticated in the way that they would, get the get the Christian, the Catholic idea, spread of of morality and and other things. And he twisted it to conform with, kind of like a corrupted capitalism type thing.
A continuation of Sigmund Freud trying to pervert society into just becoming atom automaton robots, sex robots Yeah. We've got now. It's it's a long going thing. I mean, all this stuff goes back to Adam and Eve. I was listening to listening to everybody speak. It's it's like you you go to the original story of Adam and Eve where the devil didn't go to Adam because he knew that it would be easier to deceive Eve first and then get her to manipulate Adam into eating the forbidden fruit and then getting cast out of paradise as a consequence and all the all the punishments that came along with it afterwards of going into labor and the man having to work by the sweat of his brow, and then their children grow up murdering each other. You know, Cain murders Abel.
[01:43:08] Unknown:
It's, Right. Yeah. Well So maybe giving women the vote has been the modern equivalent of that two thousand years on. I'm teasing, of course. Say there's there's something It's an echo of it. Well, it's it's kinda like in Christian
[01:43:20] Unknown:
tradition. The priesthood is men. It's not women as a as a rule because of just the way that we're created. We're created different. We're created with unique it's unique. Each one is unique and and special. But at the same time, we're different, and there's a reason for that. And that's procreation. The man and and when God made him made man, he he made man, and then he made a woman, and he made both of them. And they're both good, but then we've hit this perverted notion nowadays where the the whole sexual thing has gotten perverted to the point where it's like you don't even know if, you know, a man isn't a man or a woman is a woman when you look at somebody you meet in public even. It's just it's gotten to that point, and it but it's a gradual process.
And and I think in America's history, it's been with us from the beginning of our country.
[01:44:19] Unknown:
It's not something that, you know, just suddenly happened when they gave women the right to vote. It it was a gradual erosion. Yeah. There was obviously, there was something that was happening before that, before that became an idea that was worth investing energy in, although I thought it was gonna yield up some some foul fruit or whatever. I I think I might have mentioned before the other week. I think this was on Henry Mackow's site, an apocryphal tale of a conversation between Freud and Bernays when they were arriving in New York, I believe, in the early nineteen twenties.
And Freud turned to his nephew, Bernays, and said, they don't know it yet, but we're bringing them the plague, I. E. The sexual revolution, which is what he wanted to plant in people's minds. And it is the plague because it it's created this dysfunction. It's amplified differences which naturally are there, and it's used them obviously from the various and civilization shattering goals, which is what it's achieving. Yeah. And and it was really I don't know how I supposed to turn it around, by the way. I don't know what the solution to all this, but I suppose at least understanding the problem more fully is a start. Otherwise, we won't be bothering discussing it, would we? Sorry, Patrick. Well, Freud had
[01:45:31] Unknown:
Freud was there more or less to make it seem okay to get divorces. Mhmm. It it justified it by saying that, oh, well, you're you can't help your your sexual appetites and all these things. It's it's part of the psychology of man. And it also coincided with evolution, the idea of Charles Darwin and the evolution idea that, well, you can change. Humanity's evolving. And that's kind of we've got the extreme of that. I mean, a lot of these things like Malthusian ideology, where you have, you know, this the the governments and these scientists can that can look at population charts and and dictate that industry will grow better if we we have a boom in the population here and a bust in the population there. And and we're the deciders of man's future.
It becomes kind of like that, and then we became Yes. Genetics.
[01:46:30] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[01:46:31] Unknown:
And Yeah. And that some some men aren't, worthy of breeding. It's like it all came about good breeding and and these sorts of notions that then made it justified to bring in the pill and the contraceptions and then abortions and make it so that it we have it where it is now. It's like, we've got women that don't want children. They wanna have career because it's somehow gonna gain them something. So I don't know. Fame. A lot a lot of women are I mean, this has been a thing in the church too that it's the theater has always been frowned upon and that you didn't want your your daughter aspiring to be a a theater performer because you more or less it's like, you know, being brought brought around by a pimp, you know, more or less is what it seems.
So but nowadays, it's like everybody aspires to this. Oh, I'm gonna be an actress or an actor or whatever it is. And
[01:47:32] Unknown:
it Hollywood Yeah. Because there's a shortage of actors and actresses. We need a lot more, don't we? Yeah. To appear in more mind numbingly pointless, vacuous films. We really do. We just need tons of it. I mean, one of the things with all the TV channels and all these series is the sheer onslaught. These literally rivers of so called entertainment. And I think people are obviously now sitting in this space. They always did to an unhealthy degree, but it's just gone mad. I mean, Eric mentioned earlier about the soaps over here, Coronation Street, training people how to whine about their lives all the time. Eastenders then moved that down to London, and now you whine about your life in London. Everybody's just whining in these things all the time. The idea of anybody saying something positive and uplifting and even imbued with some spiritual sensitivity of life would be simply written out by the writers. The idea is to create this permanent wall of kind of indifference to the finer things in life and to amplify all the puke. And that's exactly what it does, which is why I've never ever watched one. And if anyone ever comes on in a room, if I can't turn the TV off, I'm out of the room. I did have some relations. I don't know if you mentioned it before. This is about ten years back.
They were from Canada, I have to say. Monica, I'm terribly sorry about this. Although they were British in origin, but they'd spent an awful long time in, Can they were addicted to watching Coronation Stream. We went out for a walk, and they just stayed at home. And when I came back into my house, they were watching it. So without even asking them, I just immediately turned it off. They were very upset. Oh, that's pretty funny. Funny. I said, I'm sorry. I don't allow pornography to be played in my house. That's that. Good to hear you. And if you don't like if you don't like it, you can leave. I didn't say that, but I would have said it. That there's no way I'm having puke coming into my ears. Right? You you can fill your ears full of puke if you want to, but I choose not to. Thank you very much. Because it's just junk. It is. It's absolute junk, the whole thing, and it's terrible. I've only seen two or three episodes my whole entire life, so I don't really know what it's about. It's depressing.
[01:49:32] Unknown:
It's depressing, and my sister was addict addicted to soaps. And I actually think it changed her mind. I really do. But Of course it would. Wanna say, it it would kind of brainwashed her. Yeah. But the thing is, I think miss Patrick was mentioning about Eugenics earlier. Did you know that the head of the Eugenic Society in this country in the nineteen thirties was neither than Winston Churchill? And the deputy of the Eugenic Society was, William Beveridge. William Beveridge was the chap who designed the National Health Service. Need I say more?
[01:50:10] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. All of this All of these these benign acts by government turn out they look benign, don't they, on the surface? And who could possibly argue against people caring for one another? But that used to happen in families. If you were to use all these budgets to support families and the structures of families in towns and villages to do that, you would nail most of it. Like, my wife has carers come in, and we've had community nurses come in. And the community nurses are fantastic. I'm serious. They're absolutely brilliant. They're they just reminded me of when I was looked after in hospital in the sixties because I used to get I used to ride my bike into things a lot or get smashed up. I I went in about half a dozen times from about the age of six to 12 or 14. I was just always getting stitched up and getting banged up. And, they were great, and it's that same sort of energy.
All of these things, of course, have been taken over for the centralized control of everything for our own good, including the centralized control of childbirth, apparently, which is all part of it. You know, it's definitely led to that.
[01:51:11] Unknown:
Well, I just wanna say oh, sorry. Go ahead. No. No. Please go ahead. No. You're you're you're a guest. Yeah. I just wanna say that, because, Paul, you were wondering, you know, where do we go from here solutions to this. Probably the number one thing, and it maybe it's too obvious to even state it after especially after this discussion. But to encourage in however we can encourage it to make it more desirable for young people to make families, have babies. I mean, that's sort of a no brainer, but yet, I guess, we really have to think about how do we do that, you know, in various ways to do that. Make it cool. Make it make it desirable. Make it, something that young
[01:51:57] Unknown:
people, so men and women, that they aspire to is to have families. I mean, really, that's what this is all about, isn't it? Yeah. And that's kind of what the church was about in the propaganda because you were you had an institution and which is what you need. You need institutional protection. That's what we're talking about. And this idea of the right to vote and all this stuff that deals with an institution. And if you don't have that, it's not gonna work. But what you need is that protection of society where you say, these this is the law that God set down. This is God. This isn't this isn't just some man making up statutes. It's it's something God given where you have a monogamous relationship between one man and one woman. And the the idea of that is to procreate. That's the whole goal of it And to raise a family in a in a solid family structure where the children know who their father is, they know who their mother is, and they have reverence for them.
And then all of the rest of it, the the reverence for the state and the clergy, follow as a consequence of that. But we need propaganda on our side, and that it it's gotten out of control.
[01:53:08] Unknown:
And role models, You see, the thing is role models have gone down the drain because people are uglifying themselves now. And have you noticed the amount of girls or young girls that will be attractive, but I have, I don't know, pink and green hair, and tattoos, piercings all over the place. Now piercings make me feel sick actually. They really do. And I saw an attractive girl the other day, young girl, and she was covered in tattoos. Now to me, I find that very unattractive. Why are they ugly find themselves? And it seems you would be going work. Work. Well, the you're spot on. And also, they're becoming more tribal because you notice that some unsophisticated tribes, or our sophisticated ones, their music is very basic. When they dance, they just jump up and down, and this is what we're getting to. It's becoming very it's going back to a kind of primeval time.
[01:54:10] Unknown:
Very primitive. Very primitive, isn't it? It's actions without much forethought.
[01:54:15] Unknown:
It it really is. I was I don't know if I'd mentioned, but I was out on Friday night. Someone said, I'm in town. Let's go to the pub. So I went, okay. So we go to this pub down here, and it's actually the hot part of the town. There are two pubs on either side of the road. They both put bands on, which is actually, I think, fantastic. It used to be like that in England a lot. And then they passed these laws. You can put bands in pubs. Well, these guys have got around it. Anyway, we went into we were in one, and there was a band on, and it was a bit too noisy because I'm old. And I wanted to no. I just wanted to talk, and you can't you can't do it. They weren't too loud. They were pretty good, actually, but I just you know, we wanted it on talk. We go to the pub over the other side of the road. We're the only guys in there because it was about half ten, and, they were gonna lock up at 11:00 or something like that. And there were two barmaids there. Prob one was 19, as she told us, and the other one would probably mid twenties. They were great. They were fantastic.
And the '19 year old was very pretty, very pretty girl, and really articulate and nice. But she had she had this, met bits of metal through her nose. And I was thinking and you know what the sort of optics on something like this. There I am. You know? A middle aged gent. And I wanted to really say to her, just get rid of the junk out of your face, or I would have tried to phrase it a little bit lighter than that because she would have been so much more improved. But you see, I think they're doing this. There's other reasons. I think it's it's to distance men. We don't need you. There's all sorts of other stuff going on that they've imbibed, that's part of it. And she wants to go off and start swimming with sharks.
I said, what? She said, yeah. I don't really wanna be a barman. I want to go and study sharks. I said, oh, that's pretty dangerous, isn't it? Said, no. No. I really like sharks. I said, well, where are you gonna go and do that? She said, New Zealand. I said, do you have to get a sort of degree in oceanography or something? Or is there a degree in sharks? I don't know. So she has to go and study somewhere. And apparently, Newsy if you really wanna swim around with sharks and study them, that's where you go. I couldn't see the point in it myself. When I came home, I read this story of a, I thought this was kind of apocryphal in a way, a story of a a woman in South Africa feeding sharks One had leaped out and bit both her hands off, both of them. Right?
And I thought, should I call her up and tell her to not hang around with you? You can't you know? I do sound like an old fart saying these things, and she may hopefully, she doesn't come to any harm. And I said, I hope you don't come to any harm because I think you're going to a harmful place. You know? It's their place, and I'd leave them alone if I were you. You know? The ocean's for them. And, you know, the high streets for us are all the That's that's when I told us to, we're like, what good is it gonna do you? Or is it I know. But you obviously, they're not thinking it. When you're 19, you're gonna take on the world. Right? You remember what it's like at 19? It's brilliant in a way. You're complete as a bloke, you're bulletproof at 19. You're not, but you think you are. And you're so full of that conviction. It's a wonderful time to be alive, sort of 19 into your early twenties. When you think you know everything and you're about to get a very rude awakening that you know nothing. It's quite a it's quite a little adventure. You go from a high to a, oh my god. I'm completely out of my depth. I don't really know what's going on. And that's, that's part of the sobering up process. But it's, yeah. And they were great. They were really pretty good. Not too many tattoos, but I I take I just think all this purple hair stuff and all this stuff, it's just all part of it. If they had that same attitude of of I'm gonna go jump in with with sharks as they do with marriage. I'm gonna go jump into a marriage.
[01:57:39] Unknown:
It would be a better place, wouldn't you say? Because it which is more beneficial to to, the greater good, which is there's nothing wrong with looking toward the greater good. We get we we kind of got a perverted version of this. I mean, look at the whole COVID scam. It was all for the greater good. And and these are the people that grow grow up thinking that. They're not gonna wear a mask for the greater good. Absolutely. It doesn't do any good. What the the priorities need to be shown to the the children. Hey.
[01:58:12] Unknown:
Don't you wanna have a family? Don't you don't you wanna have children? Babies of your It does really need it needs to be resold to them because it's not being sold to them by their parents because their parents are they, you know, they're that next generation down from me. I'm old enough to be a granddad. You know? And I thought, you're old enough to be a granddad. You can't tell her that. So it wouldn't work. I wasn't expect although we got on really well. You know? It was really quite it was a wonderful thing. Anyway, we're we're coming to the end of our time slot here on WBN. You've been listening to Paul English Live and to Monica Schafer and Eric von Essex and to Patrick Chanel and to Paul Beiner and myself, Paul English, for the last couple of hours. I hope you have anyway. We'll be back again at the same time on WBN. But if you want more of this, we're not gonna stop now. We're gonna carry on on Rumble and elsewhere and on Radio Soapbox and other places. We're gonna carry on for a little longer. I've got a couple more clips to play. I'm gonna play this out with a tune by a wonderful female instrumentalist, Catherine Ashcroft. I may have played this about a year back, and it's just the second half of a tune. She plays the Ullian pipes, which are absolutely, indescribably beautiful, I think. Anyway, we'll play you out with this. We'll be back again same time next week. And as I said, we're gonna carry on after the break over on Rumble and elsewhere. You wanna tune in, go to paulenglishliar.com, and, we'll see you on the other side.
Oh, that gives me goosebumps, that one. That's, Catherine Ashcroft. Absolutely amazing stuff. Absolutely love that. On the Eulian pipes, if I pronounce them correctly. Wonderful stuff. Does it give anybody else goosebumps, or is it just me? What's going on?
[02:03:16] Unknown:
Maybe it's just me. Yes. Yes. Just had to unmute there.
[02:03:21] Unknown:
Beautiful.
[02:03:22] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. It really is fantastic. She's still out gigging and doing things. She's a young lass. I think she's in her thirties or something, and she plays. And I'd love to go and see that. I'd love to go and see her play one day. And, who knows? Maybe it will happen. Actually, Monarchy very upsetting. Yeah. I I do too. I do. I I get all goosebumpy. I just find it so there's a that really quick passage in there is just it's tremendous. Anyway, love stuff like that. Alfred loves that too. Remember when you wanted us to pick music, he picked music that was along those lines, bagpipes. Did he? Yeah. Well, we'll we'll have a chat. We'll get Alfred back at at at one point, but you're gonna have to give him plenty of rum before he comes on so that we can get him slowed down a bit. I'm only teasing. I'm only teasing.
I'm only teasing. He would resent that bitterly and rightly so. So, but that no. That would be good. You mentioned that Monica, before the break, you mentioned something about and Patrick was obviously, coming in on that, about, getting young people to have families again. And I think all the points we were raising that are absolutely true in terms of, it's gotta be almost like from a government agency. I hate to use such a thing, but it's gotta come from an established power centers as it were. But I am, of course, reminded of, what they did in Germany in the nineteen thirties when they were faced with effectively a shortfall in little babies.
And it it would be so, you know, I know I always come back to this, but the number one thing at the top of the list that would sort this out is, first of all, we subdue and utterly extirpate, a great word, meaning to tear out by the roots so that it never grows back. We need to extirpate the current central banking system because, were we then in charge of the, direction of expenditure, which we should be in our own nation, then we would be able to come up with, and amplify and echo similar economic policies. And these were the same policies that were employed in Libya. You get married, you get a lot of money for nothing, to buy your house for nothing. Why? Because we want you to raise good children. If you look at houses and the way they go up, these things were built hundred years ago. They've been bought and sold loads, and all they do in the buying and selling is pump up the profits of the middleman. It's got nothing to do with actually creating soundness of civilization. It's ridiculous. But, of course, everybody's used to it just like, which is completely understandable in the sense that we've grown up with this, so you gotta work hard. But, you know, I've mentioned here before, they haven't sold them yet. There are two detached houses being built about 200 yards from where I'm sat. And they're on the market. These are three bedroom detached houses. When I say detached, they're detached by a matter of four feet.
There's a four foot gap between the wall of one and the wall of another. That's how detached they are, not much. These are £670,000 each, these houses. I have no idea how anybody is supposed to buy them. You would need to be married, and you would both need to be earning, what, 40 or £50,000 a year. Even that wouldn't be enough. You're supposed to be able to borrow three times the amount of your combined salaries. So they'd have to be on £220,000, their combined salaries, to buy one. So who's gonna buy it? They're not. So they can't have a family. So there's nowhere to live. And it's these pressures that are coming down.
[02:06:46] Unknown:
Alright. Pauline. You know
[02:06:48] Unknown:
oh, somebody else wants to stop there. Okay. When it when it comes to helping, make more babies, I it I know it's a dirty job, but I'm up to the task.
[02:07:02] Unknown:
Yeah. It's not the making before you. Although, I I it's not the making of them that's a problem. It's it's it's not. That's honestly you're in a you're probably gonna be in a long queue if one were formed under government control, of course. Alright? And then you'd get people people would be doing deals to get higher up the queue. It would just turn into another black market in baby production. Like I said It's not the making of them, is it? It's the main it's the raising of them and the maintenance of the And then Like I said, it's a dirty job that I'll do.
[02:07:34] Unknown:
That's great. So the housing Oh, thanks. The price of housing, which is, of course, that in Canada too, it's unbelievable. I mean, I heard somebody say the other day that it used to be in our parents' generation, it took maybe three to three and a half years of the annual salary of just the single, wage earner, the the father of the household to actually pay off a a whole entire house. And that's just a stand alone house with a yard and everything. And now it's completely un unattainable for most most people. They you know? But anyway, why why the housing crisis? Nobody ever well, in in the mainstream media, nobody ever addresses the real crux of the matter, and that is all these new invaders into our countries, and they all gotta be housed. And it driving up the prices of our our homes for our people. So that would be the one number one thing is close the the borders first, and then last in first out, and continue from there. And then alongside with this encouragement for young people to have babies, just put an absolute stop to all this advertising miscegenation, you know, miscegenation advertising. That's just a big, big, big, big no no. Of course, everybody here knows that. But just in general, you know, getting at the root of some of these problems that are that are at the, you know oh, and the other thing, stop the lies that that fill the the young people with fear. Every generation has something that fills them with fear so that they fear for a future and today's lies that fill the children with, you know, they even sign pledges. Oh, they're never gonna have babies so they could save the planet from climate change.
This, you know, this whole carbon footprint lie. So there are young people who are avoiding having children just to save the planet because they're wanna do the right thing. And it's only our race of people that feel enough, conscientiousness to do that. So based on these lies, they are conscientious enough
[02:09:34] Unknown:
to say, okay. We better not make the problem worse. You know? So all these things the birth control thing too. It's like the Yeah. It's the first world, you could say, people that get sucked into that, and and then they then they regret it because it's it's like, well, why then why are we bringing all these other people in because the population's declined so much? It's like, well, you practice contraception. You or you aborted all of your generation of people that
[02:10:02] Unknown:
would have taken place there. And Yeah. But I think that argument, Patrick, that the government puts out that this is the reason we have to bring people in is a complete load of rubbish. We don't need any of them. Never have. Not one ever. They're not needed now. Ever needed, to fulfill what? A need by industry. Forget it. Industries can go bust. I'm not trying to justify it. I'm I'm just saying I know you know. That's how it is.
[02:10:27] Unknown:
Whether we like it or not, it's the same thing with the wars and weaponizing these other places where we have no business being. Those things create the instability that then drive that where they're coming over, and then that's their justification. Well, what you you know, our our countries have all been bombed out. Who wants to live in Syria? Who wants to live in these places? Afghanistan, any of these
[02:10:51] Unknown:
I think that word justification is key because if you look at much of the narratives concocted by the social engineers, they are long burn. They take many decades, and then they've got the justification in everybody's heads for why that you should follow this decision. Of course, we need more people. Our industry will go bust. Nobody ever says, what industry? What are you talking about? Why do we even need any of this? There's a whole body of questions that are not even asked, that most people are not even aware that there's this body of questions that could be asked that shift the perception rapidly and could be acted upon, but probably can't be acted upon from a practical point of view because these ideas are not insufficient number of people's heads. Not enough people know that this sort of conversation is going on. They do a a way, way more than they used to be. But the idea that you can even question these sorts of things never even occurs to people. They're just bumbling along, really. I think that's the best description for it as we all do for huge chunks of our life, slightly in a cloud until we get to some point of clarity with it. So we don't need any migrants here, never have, ever. They've never ever been required. It's just a complete lie. And I had someone say to me the other day, a woman, and it's this is to do with this leftist stuff. All the time, they always go liberal.
And they said, well, you know, we invaded all those countries. So, you know, we've got to take them in. Okay. So you wanna die then? Is that what you're saying? You just want to see your people wiped out because that's what's gonna happen because we will forego things for the future. To. How is it? How is it we that that, caused these, wars to occur? It it Oh, again. I and I didn't I know it isn't. Right. I know, but it's in her head. It's in many people's heads. This is a line that we're gonna hear again and again and again. You just hear it and see it everywhere. I'll give you an example. We're talking about women having the right to vote. And here in America, that came about as a constitutional amendment,
[02:12:51] Unknown:
which if you look at the constitutional amendments, they all line up in certain eras in our history, like right at the beginning right after the revolution in America. And then this civil war, the civil war brought about three amendments. And then after that, it was it was I think it was, like, nineteen o eight. They had the sixteenth amendment. What was the sixteenth amendment? Income taxes. So a man working, supporting his family then had to support other families by paying income tax to the government to then distribute it. Right? The this the communist distribution of wealth and all of that that occurs.
And shortly after that, it was like, well, then we gotta have a popular vote for the senate. We got a we got a, prohibition. No no more alcohol. You you know, you you foolish men going out and getting drunk. And then after that, it was like, vote for women. It was I think it was the nineteenth amendment, eighteenth or nineteenth, where that came about. And it Yep. It it seems like those things, you know, go hand in hand. Getting get taking away the man the man's ability to support himself. The same with the civil war. It was all about slavery. Right? And that kind of goes hand in hand with the feminism thing too because, oh, I'm I'm a you know, women shouldn't be, subservient to their husbands. What what good is that gonna do when God, they should. Right. Well, but well, no. I mean, slavery is wrong, Paul. Come on. You can't enslave someone else. They can't
[02:14:27] Unknown:
I know. I know. It's wrong. I could I keep on wanting to run an ad, though. The notion that you can't do is you can't do it for a birthday.
[02:14:34] Unknown:
Because there's always gonna be a master slave relationship. We have it today with the wage slave. Like, I I can't I'm not the boss at work. I gotta do what the boss tells me. I can't just I'm not independent in that regard. And everybody's that way to one extent or another. It's just they'll that's where Freud and all these these Edward Bernays public relations all become important because it's all based on public perception of of of these things. The the definitions get skewed so that then they can be manipulated by the powerful oligarch type people that really have the power. And then it's the truth becomes the opinion of the powerful. It's not the truth. Truth is no defense.
Just like in the the whole holocaust denial type thing. It's like truth is no defense because, the oligarchs say so. It's a it all comes down to
[02:15:27] Unknown:
money controlling things and corruption. Mhmm. And and and, like, I'm I'm totally with you. Get a state bank. I know you are. I'm not disagreeing with anything you're saying. I was just sort of trying to prise open that there's there's sort of two or three narratives going on. There's the one that the mass public consume, and that is therefore the power even though it's complete manure and won't solve anything. But most people go along with it because they most other people are going along with it. Well, yeah. We're
[02:15:56] Unknown:
we're we're we're we're we're we're fooled into feeling that guilt. Like, oh, I'm responsible for slavery, or I'm responsible for women not having the right to to, you know, be be free. It it it's all shame, and and that's how people are controlled. It's easy to control a dog, let's say, for instance, by shaming him. Oh, you shouldn't have done that, you dirty dog. And they, you know, they cower away, and It's it's a manipulation trick of of gaining power. And somehow, we need to do that in a just way to shame people for the shame the real shameful things that occur, the murdering, the the torture, and all all these things that go along with a war.
And Mhmm. I I look at this thing in Ukraine. Oh, we're gonna get minerals out of the deal. It's like, is that what it's all about? It's all about, you know, we we just went through all of this Doing a deal. Yeah. Just to do a deal. Just to do you know? Just so some some group of people could get revenge on another group of people for some perceived wrong that happened a hundred years ago.
[02:17:08] Unknown:
Yeah. No. You're absolutely right. I just I keep thinking, you know, in terms of of trying to solve what we're addressing here, this the revitalization of our people. There are so many aspects to it. I I put the money power at the top because that's they're all getting paid. The guys in the media, they get paid at the end of the month. They won't get paid if I was in charge, which means they'd kill me. Right? They would. You know? That's what I would or whoever started to do that. If you start to push in that direction of really making society an equitable proposition so that people really do have a stake in the outcome of their own lives in real tangible terms, not in terms of having the vote and all this other stuff, then you've got a major enemy. And it's a major enemy purely because the amount of power it's been able to accrue to itself over the recent centuries. And it's always existed in one form or another, but its power now is considerable, obviously.
Our great hope, I guess, or the the area that we're plowing, where a part of it here in this conversation is to get these communications increased in frequency and intensity and clarity so that they transmit to more and more people, and they go, yeah. This is this is fundamentally not right. I mean, when I, you know, whenever I read about what they did in Germany in the thirties and paying, giving people interest free loans to buy their houses, it's an extremely exciting proposition, isn't it? I think it is. Because you you'd in my mind, I'm seeing not overnight, but over a period of five to ten years, it might be even quicker than that, revitalizing of little towns and villages and the sound of English children running up and down the street. I know this is poetic, and people would laugh at that kind of thing, but that's really what it's all about in our case. It's actually about this joy of family life. Did Churchill say that it didn't matter to him whether Germany was run by Adolf Hitler or by a Jesuit priest, but they had to get rid of the German That's right. Competition with He did. It was the strength of the German people as a whole.
It wasn't National Socialism or Adolf Hitler. He didn't care who ran it as long as they were subdued and could no longer provide stiff competition to the money spivs in the city of London who we worked for. It's as simple as that. It's always that. It's never been anything else. And I think, you know, the mentality of the people on the other side, not that people like you and I are necessarily gonna fully understand it, thankfully. I don't want to. But from what what I've seen is that they are, behaviorally conditioned to retain power at any cost, literally any cost. And, they will literally drive the nation into the ground. Sun Tzu said something like this, you know, the the the Japanese or the Chinese, war guy, the art of war. He said, you know, an evil ruler will literally run his country into the ground to retain power and we'll be quite happy to rule over the ashes.
And that's who we're governed by because they can't behave any other way. Not now, most of them. I think there are good signs on the horizon, but, also, we have to, you know, keep your enemies close. Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer still really is a byword. You know? They're definitely playing good cop, bad cop, I think, out there in the communication space. It's definitely going on. And keep your all the time. Yeah. Keep your powder dry. So I fancy another clip. Very good idea. Yes. Another clip. And then,
[02:20:39] Unknown:
just before you do that clip, I have to just tell you while I have the chance to do so that I I have been I mean, I was thinking about this a lot before, obviously, because I agreed to con to this show, but, you know, I'm convinced about this basic premise of this to women losing the vote. Yeah. So there you go. I'm I'm just telling you.
[02:21:05] Unknown:
Well well, I think there are I I know you are, and my mum was. And most of the women that I've respected have always been like when that women's lib thing was kicking off, my mum used to just sort of scoff at it and go, what are they on about? I mean, she just it's thought it was absolutely ridiculous. And I remember her saying I was kind of embarrassed. She said there's just too much obsession with sex these days. And she's right. Oh, yes. And Eric mentioned Eric mentioned earlier on the permissive society. And we've mentioned this, warrior woman over here who was mocked mercilessly at the time called Mary White house.
And she became she started off as a one woman campaign. It grew massively against the permissive society, and she was therefore ridiculed. She had these sort of librarian horn rimmed glasses. She looked like a sort of slightly overweight, middle aged, middle class English person who was completely out of touch with everything, you see, because you can tell she's wearing those funny glasses. But she wasn't. She was spot on. So it's almost as if what we really want is not a women's movement to give up the vote because it's not worth anything, but a women's movement to support men, and it needs to be phrased best than that. It is let's get together with the men and rebuild it. And that's the thing. What this has done is it has separated us or separated a lot of us. And also, those young people that get together and have still got that running through them are isolated from their peer group because most of their peer group are donkey brains who haven't worked it out yet. And we've got some very bright young people, but they get hived off into the system and end up working against the rest of their of their generation all the time. And when Eric was saying, you know, you look at the people that are governing us now, they are people with adolescent arrested development.
It's been going on for years. They've just got no substance. They think their ideas are genuinely creative and good. And they're I don't they're not even laughable. They they shouldn't even be written down. They're that plain stupid and counterproductive, but there's no way that you and I could convince these people that what they think, like Keir Starmer, who is just the new ultimate low tide watermark in human evolution in terms of political leadership, he can't listen to us. He's literally incapable of it. It's not gonna happen. We'll just handle your communication like you don't know anything because, you know, I studied Marxism or something goofy like that. Anyway, let's have a thirty second clip from Black Pigeon again. I can't remember what's in this one. This one's just a mere thirty seconds, so maybe it's cracking. I don't know.
[02:23:33] Unknown:
Terrifyingly, Unwin also noted that there was no case in any of the studies he'd made in which the culture managed to restrict the sexual freedom of women once they've been loosened. A feminist society and future is an oxymoron as it's unsustainable in the long run. Based just on past history, the civilization that embraces feminist values will cease to exist in a very short time. This is why we've never seen a feminist civilization aside from very short spans at the end of great empires.
[02:24:06] Unknown:
Isn't that what we're living through right now? At the end of a very great span of empires, a feminist civilization.
[02:24:13] Unknown:
But then it's just calm. Yeah. Yes. Yeah. But who who actually built the cities and towns? Mhmm. And I think it was Fred Dibner. He was a chap that used to demolish chimneys. He was a steeplejack. You probably never heard of him in America or Canada. And he said it was, men in boiler suits who built civilization and built these towns. There's men in, business suits that destroyed them.
[02:24:43] Unknown:
Yeah. He used to collect steam engines. That's right. That guy.
[02:24:46] Unknown:
Yeah. He did. I remember when I was He was one of those guys with a heart of pig iron and absolutely fearless. Have you ever seen any of his videos of him just going up the side of a chimney? It's just off the charts. Yeah. No safety equipment. Like I was saying, I was I was in Russia, and I saw chimneys like that where it's just like an entire industrial zone, and it's amazing.
[02:25:07] Unknown:
I was just in in awe of this of of what was built.
[02:25:11] Unknown:
And did you notice there was very few housing estates in Russia? They seem to be detached houses with sort of big fences around them.
[02:25:20] Unknown:
Yeah. That's true. They have fences. That's one thing that's different from from, say, in America here, is everybody's got a a gate and a fence because they're used to invasion, whether it's by wild animals or warring factions of people. Whereas here, they're just astonished when you see little children out trick or treating for Halloween going door to door. It's like you can't do that over there.
[02:25:46] Unknown:
Yeah. And something else is that, the how they have plenty of space. The houses are large. They're huge. Whereas in Britain, you know, it Yeah. That's all the things for a little bit of space.
[02:25:57] Unknown:
They're built built out of, strong material, thick walls. And then when they see the devastation from a tornado here, they're like, what are your buildings made of? It's just like your walls are so thin. You know, the plasterboard you put up is, you know, thin compared to what what it should be. But,
[02:26:17] Unknown:
you know Well, you have well, since, I know that in New England, my, relative had shingles on her roof. Now shingles in this country is something that you suffer from, which you you go to the doctor for, you know, but you got you got a disease on your roof. You know? No. It's, actual shingles. But the roofs, I mean, I was quite surprised because they sell shingles in this country for shed roofs, but not for housing. You don't have you know, you you gotta have sort of proper tiles on your roof, and that type of thing. It's but I think probably timber may be cheaper where you are in The States than here because our timber mostly has to be imported, whereas you've got it readily coming through from Canada and vast areas of California or communist, just come called now. Yeah.
Yep. But,
[02:27:10] Unknown:
That point he just made in the clip, the sobering point in that brief clip, that Unwin discovered that once a civilization had gone down this emancipation of women route, that not one of them ever reversed the tragic decline. Not one. What would happen? And the well, it just builds up, I guess, as a behavioral pattern and and everything goes out of whack. I mean, you know, what happens to them is what's happening to us. Like, you get women in politics, which they shouldn't be allowed in. Seriously. Women in the minorities.
[02:27:44] Unknown:
They they end up being Absolutely not. Because there's a compensation there that that takes place. So, well, it's only fair that we have to compensate them. So we pay them equal with them so they can be equality becomes the thing. But the problem is they're never gonna be equal, so it's a it's a deception. It's a it's a plot.
[02:28:05] Unknown:
Yeah. I mean, equality, the pursuit of it is is a behavioral
[02:28:08] Unknown:
habit of someone who's not well. It it's unachievable. It's a completely vacuous, idiotic, comedy goal and deception Right. To the mind. We don't even want to idiotic comedy goal and deception Right. For the mind. We don't even want it men pretending to be women because they get more benefit by being a woman than they do by being a man, and especially if they're a trainee man. You know? It becomes
[02:28:24] Unknown:
this is not a phrase with them. Yeah. But it's disrespectful to women, isn't it? Of course. It's it's completely disrespectful to women. Point you make there. I remember my friend
[02:28:35] Unknown:
making that point. You know, there's all these tranny shows or whatever the drag queen shows, that's what they're called, men dressing up, but they do a caricature of women making themselves actually quite ugly. Like, it it's not even portraying a beautiful image of a woman. It's portraying a very caricature
[02:28:56] Unknown:
Disgusting.
[02:28:57] Unknown:
Disgusting. You're absolutely right. Like, they exaggerate everything to the point of total ugliness. They're not trying to make themselves beautiful. It's a disgusting display of perversion. Reveling in filthiness.
[02:29:11] Unknown:
Yes. It is. I mean, I've often thought a bloke with five o'clock shadow is a bit challenged to make himself look beautiful as a woman, which, of course, is why you shouldn't dress up as the lady. It's ridiculous, isn't it? The the other thing with women in no. I never have. I can't stand anything that goes in that direction at all or people that are trying to get a laugh out of it or anything. I never liked the python sketches where they're all dressed up as women. Actually, they were slightly different. Well, there was one where they were housewives, and it's the one that's got the word nigger baiter in it. Do you remember that one? Shouldn't say that on there. Where it's hilarious sketch where his, her best friend just explodes on the settee. That was really rather funny. But overall, I never really liked it. It's as if they were enjoying it a bit too much. Stop that. It's ridiculous. I don't know. Just do that in the theater. Cut it out. Yeah.
Yeah. But, I mean, that thing about women in politics as well and about, what you were saying, Patrick. I've often thought that the natural mothering instinct to care for the young is warped in politics, and they extend that to everyone. Apparently, according to the women, we can just look after everybody forever. We, the men, that is. We're the ones who are gonna do most of the work and have their pockets plundered and then become emasculated because of it because they won't be able to hold themselves together to become strong to attract women. It literally destroys everything. It's just a massive domino effect, which really kind of supports Freud's thing that we brought them the plague. It is. It's a transmissible disease, and it infects men and women.
[02:30:43] Unknown:
We all get infected by it. The other thing with this country, I think, that that the rot sort of started is that, during World War two, Russia conscripted women into, the armed forces, and they was women in fighter pilots. There's one woman fighter pilot when I when she was pregnant and, building tough over there. And Britain was, was as far as I know, Germany was quite out quite horrified by it, was one of very few countries that did actually that wasn't communist that conscripted women. People don't realize that. That, the Conscription Act, or the draft as you call it in America, came in in 1939, and my dad was 20 years of age, just the right age at the wrong time, to be conscripted.
And then I believe it was either 1940 or '41, I'm doing this from memory, that it was brought in for women. And it was, and that's why lots of women, had, fake marriages to elderly men, to get them out of going in the forces. And they say, these modern historians say, oh, yes. The divorce rate rate went through the roof in 1945 because the troops coming back were very altered men. No. The divorce rate went through the roof because the women that had married men to get out of going in the forces divorced them afterwards, and that was all part of the deal. So, I can't say this is a hundred and true, but I think the my auntie may have done to get out of going in the forces.
And, but the women didn't go into combat. They were they were doing a supporting role, mostly repairing vehicles, Paycor, and that type of thing. But even so,
[02:32:33] Unknown:
it There was a big push in World War two to get women involved in it, whether it was just for support or and, you know, as nurses and and morale boosting or supply Yeah. It was compulsory.
[02:32:46] Unknown:
But in this country, it's compulsory. And it's also compulsory. You were not allowed to leave your job. And my mother was, working in Well
[02:32:53] Unknown:
in a factory, and she hated it. And she but she couldn't leave it because it was against the law. Rosie the Riveter, the whole Edward Bernays thing, we're back to him again, propaganda to get women into the workforce. Like, we're you know, we need the war effort. We're gonna win the war. We need women to participate. In America, it wasn't compulsory. In this country, it's compulsory. You you had you had to go into this It would be hard to enforce it here because it's there's such an expanse of land where it it really would be tough to that's why we don't have another civil war going on because and we haven't since because it's it's such an expanse. You don't have to live in a urban area if you don't want to. You can go out in the country. And I think that's a good thing and has protected us as having the rustic as well as the urban because you you have the ability if you don't wanna be around a bunch of people to just go out and live in a a rural suburb of it. It's brilliant. But but my my what what happened,
[02:33:52] Unknown:
the conscription was, women it was 18 to 30, and the only women that were exempt were if they were married or had a child to look after. And that was it. So they had to go in the army, and they did all the marching. They learned how to use guns and everything like that, like men.
[02:34:10] Unknown:
And that is communism. In in Vietnam, they had a similar thing because that's kinda when it teetered off having a conscription. We start here was the Vietnam War. That's right. And the men the men that were married were exempt from it. So there were a lot of men getting married. And and eventually, they took that exemption. Yeah. And I think in the, like, '64, '60 '5. Uh-huh. And if you're going enrolled in a school, you were exempt because you're you're you're coming, you know, in intellect you know, you're in a higher education. And if you weren't, you were more likely to be drafted as a consequence. And
[02:34:50] Unknown:
Or Trump, actually, he was medically discharged. He's he got a medical exemption because he had problems with his heels. But, unfortunately, he bribed the doctor or his mom did it. Yeah. Yeah. And he played badminton. Isn't that strange? Amazing. That was weird. And, and, also, Bush Junior got into the National Guard, and it's mainly the rich kid rich people's kids that go into the National Guard because I think there's only one unit ever went to Vietnam. They stayed they stayed in America. Strange, isn't it? And, Clinton, he studied law, and he came to Britain. That's how he got out of it as well. A Rhodes Scholar.
[02:35:27] Unknown:
Yeah. Wasn't he? Yeah. Yeah. So
[02:35:30] Unknown:
it's quite amazing, isn't it? And when you look at him, he's he's as thick as two short planks, isn't he?
[02:35:36] Unknown:
He's not exactly the sharpest knife in a box. Yeah. Well, he also was a a victim of and and I wouldn't say a victim, but, I mean, in a way, he was of the whole sexual revolution thing because Mhmm. They don't look what happened with Monica Lewinsky thing and the Epstein type stuff that goes on to this day where you have politicians who get involved that you know, they they they can't control their lusts. So they get involved with these blackmailing operations, and they become in these they get it's like they're promoted after that because they know they can trust them because they're blackmailable.
And and then when it comes time to go to war, those people are easily manipulated. And that's Freud was part of that whole thing. That's the whole Illuminati type thing where it's like, instead of confessing to your sins to a Catholic priest, you're confessing it to a psychologist who then can use what the knowledge he's gained from that to manipulate you and and to hold a leverage over you so that you pay him more money or however it is. And it's more sophisticated in the military, I'm sure,
[02:36:46] Unknown:
where they where they manipulate people into into these things. I love this. Isn't it that that old little saying, anybody that wants to go see a psychiatrist needs his head exam examine as well. That's what I think is the one. Is a good one. We've got another clip here. One and a half minutes. It's the last one I I managed to clip out of the a t. There's probably other good stuff in there as well, but let's listen to this one through. Last little clip for the show.
[02:37:13] Unknown:
Signs of decline are already observable. While many countries are sliding into social decline, the canary in the coal mine is the self described humanitarian superpower that pursues a feminist foreign policy. When looking at Sweden, it's one of the most gender equal countries on Earth. And while they've become the rape capital of Europe, they're flushing their culture and country down the toilet and pressing forward in their civilizational suicide at an ever accelerating pace. The total and complete feminization of Sweden and its men have allowed their women to invite their country's own destruction through the importation of millions of unassimilatable and aggressive people from completely alien cultures.
Not only are they borrowing money to fund the colonization of their country, but they are now even creating gender imbalances that will have severe and lasting repercussions on their society's future. And they await their doom with smiles of tolerance and passivity, calm as Hindu cows. Looking again at Unwin's work, he leaves us with a stark dilemma. It may not be possible to save the West. According to his model, this process is irreversible, and the only way to do so would be to restrict the sexual freedom of western women and move back to a more patriarchal society. And as things stand, this is probably an impossibility.
[02:38:41] Unknown:
Why? Why is it an impossibility? It probably is. It's one of the reasons that why I bang on about being becoming a neo Victorian because I just associate it within recent history as being a period of strong males building things and doing stuff, the sorts of things that we wanna get back to in a way. My my sort of tenuous little hope with all of this is that the previous civilizations that went down the toilet because of it, and it may be too strong a force, to cope with, sort of like a disturbed wave. You just can't stop it like a tidal wave or something. But my little hope is that because of the communications capacity that we now have, which we've never had before, if we can continue to improve our organization and reach and and make things more concise, more impactful, and draw people over to this understanding, then there is an opportunity to create a counter movement as it were, which is about the restoration of these traditional values, which I suspect everybody wants. It's just that they've become so distant from them because they don't see them in front of their eyes.
I, a good friend of mine returned back. Helen, if you hear this another Helen. I I know quite a few Hellens, actually. Three, I think it is. Helen had returned to England, probably at Heathrow or Gatwick or some place like that, and took a photograph of photographs that were up there in the airport. Pictures of English people. Pictures of English people. There was not one English man in it. And the English woman that they put in there was overweight, covered in tattoos, and sat in a deck chair looking like a beach ball done wrong. That's what's being broadcast back at us. So, certainly, one of the roles that this communication space has, and I'm talking not just about those, but everybody that's involved in this conscious understanding of of where things are going, is to reinforce the positive and not just dwell all the time on analyzing the negative. We have to do that, and I want to do it. And we have we must keep on doing it. But, hopefully, it'll lead us to more constructive sort of behavior patterns where we can bring it back, like organizing country dances. I'm serious.
I actually I think that these connective communal spaces need to be done. And this is a matter for all of us of getting off our asses and organizing things on a local level and to be inspired by others that can do that. Of course, a big drawback to that is that the really great organizers on that, the social organizers, are the women. They're brilliant at it, and we need them back to do that again. I'm quite happy. I mean, whenever we had parties and stuff, my mom and all her sisters organized the whole thing. And the men said, what do you want me to do? And we're happy to do whatever they were asked to do, as I would be as well under circumstances.
Absolutely the right. You're in charge now. This is the thing about women's power. Monica was mentioning earlier about home building. They've got all the power, and the men want them to have it in the home. I absolutely wanted. My dad did. Things were running a particular way, and I don't think there was anything untypical or weird about that. It's just completely natural. The woman's the woman's kingdom is in the home. She's raising the children. She's the primary You know? And it's fan it's phenomenal. We can't do it. We can't do that. When we don't have that skill set, we don't want it. I don't want it. I don't want men going around pretending to be women because you've got this really disgusting situation where Sodomites are getting together and getting little boys, and then half of them get raped. This is not exact this is not excessive what I'm saying. This is true. You will have seen reports about this. Grooming gangs.
[02:42:27] Unknown:
It's sick. It's grooming. It's and and the thing of it is, these government schools are nothing more than orphanages, if you think about it. The of willingly giving up your child to go to a public school Yep. So that you can go to work You're right. And be a wage slave to some boss who doesn't really care about you or your children because they can't. It's not their responsibility. It's you. You're you're responsible for your family, for your children, for raising them in a in a way that they grow up and be moral people who have a purpose.
And these government schools make them seem like you don't have a purpose. You're just an orphan. Your parents don't care for you. They don't love you or respect you enough to want to be with you, especially in your formative years where it's so important that you have someone who cares about you looking after you and not neglecting you because you'll be you you'll be put in dangerous positions as a company. When they
[02:43:30] Unknown:
now in schools I mean, this is another solution we can talk about is to encourage young parents or parents of young children. Do not send your children to the the public school system Because now it's gotten to the point where they will the teachers will say to the children, oh, we'll keep your secret. You can tell us and don't worry. We won't tell your parents. In other words, even by whatever whatever that's for, whether it's for this extreme thing of, you know, let's cut off let's mutilate your body or turn you into the other sex or whatever. It's grooming, getting them to the Then it also even if it was about something very trivial, if even if it was about something else that was very trivial, with that message of we'll we'll keep your secret, whatever it is, whether you wanna just, you know, comb your hair or part your hair the other way or something, doesn't matter. It's giving the children the message that, oh, the parents are kinda like their adversary. They're and the teachers are gonna be their their friend. They're they're gonna keep a secret against the parents. It's kinda like, oh, the parents are the enemy. Like, what a message to give the parent to give the child. It's that's very Mhmm. Communistic, isn't it?
So I was just gonna say that feminism is ultimately a war on men. I mean, it's that's what it is. It's a war on men. And this has been such a wonderful discussion. I've learned a lot and whatnot, but I I always still come back to this that we have to keep our eye on the ball and that being who has pushed feminism on us. Now these creatures, they brag about it. But when we name them, they do call us anti Semitic. Funny that. Mhmm. So we have to keep our eye on that and and make sure that the awareness because we need to guard against, even in this discussion, you know, that, yeah, women in politics, that has been a disaster.
We always have to remember who has pushed this on us, and it's not because women are the enemy of humanity. It's because we have different qualities that do not make us suitable for getting into a life politics, and I fully agree with that. And we tend to be more leftist and all this stuff. I I can attest to that just for my own participation in politics during my life when I was not yet awake to what is going on. Right? So I fully agree with that, but always keeping our eye on the ball that we don't accidentally get into a situation where it's, thinking, oh, it's it's because women are bad somehow that they have done this. No. It's like, no. We have different qualities and are definitely, more suited to be in the role of running the home, which, like you said, just now, Paul, yeah, you wouldn't some of those things, you wouldn't wanna do that. Right? And it's just like, I wouldn't wanna do some of the things that men are really good at.
And those are my natural instincts is when I was young. Like, I didn't wanna do some of those things that men naturally do better. And yet women, we are good at some other things that that maybe you don't wanna do, that the men don't wanna do. So this is all very, very good. I've just enjoyed this discussion so much. But I guess my I know we're running up against the end of it, I think. So I just wanted to make that point. We always have to be very, very clear that it is this eternal enemy of mankind that has pushed us in this direction, this feminist agenda onto us.
So there you go.
[02:47:21] Unknown:
I think that's true. Maybe to try and put a positive spin on it is that it's required for us to be taken apart in this way so that we can get conscious about what it is that really works. Much of it, I suppose, in the past was simply taken for granted as it ought to be in a stable, civilized space, which it used to be, or at least our perception of it is that. Although, I'm not so naive as to think that certainly this nation wasn't at war all the time because it was. Ever since we got the Bank of England, this country's been at war every year since apart from three years since 1694. It's ridiculous.
It's absolutely ridiculous. And it's not that Englishmen and Scotsmen wanna go off and start fighting wars everywhere, but somebody does and has made use of us to do it. Of course, that duty has transferred over to America recently in recent times after World War two. Yeah. Yeah. You've be you've been made the manpower and muscle power to carry out the threat of the economic masters. So but there is a positive. Actually, Aunt Sally makes some pretty good points about Black Pigeon, which I tend to agree with. She says, and hi, Aunt Sally. She says, I believe he is a a doom monger. Yes. I think there's definitely an element of, serious doom in all of this. And a hyper race mixer, I don't know about that, but you might be right. If he is, then he's clueless on that thing. But I guess I view it like clocks. Even if they're broken, they're right twice a day. And when you come across a good thing, I'll even take good stuff from the other side when I hear it if I think it chimes in with what we need to hear. So I don't really sort of think that any one person is gonna be right or on point all the time. I've not got any experience of that apart from God, in terms of getting back to God's laws, which is, of course, you know, one of the another aspects of the condition that we're living under is that we've been parted from them. Slowly but surely, inexorably, over a long period of time, we've been shifted away from these things. And it was a bit like that, document I was mentioning last week on the common law that since 12/15, they spent eight hundred years shifting this nation away from trial by jury, the real trial by jury where the jury can actually decide on the law itself and is therefore the highest law power in the land when it's sitting and doing things.
All of in other all the ways of operating cleanly and honorably have been practiced around here at some point, and we've been parted from them. And, of course, Monica, you're absolutely right. An enemy hath done this, hath sown the tares amongst the wheat. Absolutely hath. And, that's kind of what we're dealing with all the time with all of these things. But I think this topic, even though we've covered a lot, it's kind of opens it up that there's so much more to cover with it. There's so many more aspects. I'm The idea of a a British family movement is very appealing to me, but it's got to be robust. It's not some sort of mincing thing when it's all lovely dovey dovey all the time. It's to understand exactly what the strength of them are because without them, we're not a people. No people can be, it seems to me, without, resilient families. And they've done everything they can, courtesy, you know, it's in the communist manifesto, is it not, to destroy the family.
And, the creation of the teenager was after the creation of the emancipation of women, and these have been massive blows to fracturing natural, cohesive, good quality family relations, it seems to me. Although, so I'm not pointing the finger at women. It's the process. Look at it. The enemy has picked the weakest point. It went for the women. It got them smoking, did all these things, filled their head full of silly ideas. I'm doing that on purpose. Right? About power Yeah. And all this kind of stuff. And we can be in charge without realizing that they don't want to be in charge, that they are reduced in power, that they haven't been empowered, they've been disempowered, and that they've been distanced from that naturally supreme feminine power that men want in the world. We need we need it to become men. We need to be around feminine, beautiful women. Even if we can't get one, we love it that they exist in the world. Well, that's what We really do. We love it. Men have gone to war for is to protect their women and children. Right? That's what men have fought through the ages to protect.
[02:51:33] Unknown:
Exactly that.
[02:51:36] Unknown:
Also, look at the high So all the treasures here. But not only the high divorce rate, the huge amount of single people now that can't find someone. And, I was talking to a neighbor, and she said, where her child goes to school, her child and another one are the only two children whose parents are together. All the rest of the class, their children have are are divorced.
[02:52:00] Unknown:
What a change. What a change from when I was in school because it would have been the opposite ratio. Maybe there were a couple of children in a class of 30 who came from divorced parents. Maybe. Maybe if not. But it was opposite opposite ratio.
[02:52:16] Unknown:
It was actually on the opposite.
[02:52:17] Unknown:
There was a hidden social pressure that you didn't do that and for good reasons. And, of course, people go, oh, well, I just couldn't live with him anymore. I couldn't live with her. Well, you chose it. Tough. I I would make it virtually impossible to get divorced. I don't care. It'd have to be acceptable circumstances. Jesus talked about this, and he basically said that divorce was set up by, you know, the the the followers of Moses. Moses allowed it because of the stubbornness of the people. Mhmm. And you get stubborn people, and this is what you get. And we've got a nation of that. If you get divorced, you lose the vote. Right? You should lose things. And it's like I felt the only people that should have the vote, are men in a marriage with children. Until you've got a child, you don't get the vote ever. Why should the why should it be governed by single men?
They haven't fulfilled their role. The role of men is to become fathers, and the role of women is to become mothers. And when you do that, then you get the vote. You're responsible. You're doing that. If you get divorced, you lose everything. It's up to you. You don't get a say in the management of the nation when you can't even manage your own family. I would say if they're single, they would have without
[02:53:24] Unknown:
children, I would say they'd have to take some sort of vow
[02:53:28] Unknown:
to to of seriousness. You trust that thing? I wouldn't trust it. I wouldn't I wouldn't wanna scoundrel someone who goes around, you know, sleeping with whoever. You know? I wouldn't want them, of course. I'm not talking about them, though. I'm talking about so you can control their passions. Yeah. But how would you ever know that? They all say they do right now, don't they? They don't. I think you just need something blunt and simple. It's like the light switch is either on or off. We need simple plain things in my view that children and everybody understands. If you do this, you lose that. Got it? That's how it works. Why? What about
[02:54:00] Unknown:
taxing sex? It could be p a y f, pay as you fornicate. Sorry. I'm just trying to be joking. Some people thought
[02:54:10] Unknown:
What was it?
[02:54:12] Unknown:
Yes. You know, these tax inspectors looking through binoculars, you know, up ladders. Well, they become sex inspectors, wouldn't they? Yes. That's right. They become sex inspectors. Here it goes.
[02:54:21] Unknown:
But I've mentioned before this thing about I mentioned this thing in a back in 1381, the peasant's revolt kicked off because they were going around checking young men and women for like, teenage boys and girls for pubic hair. And if they found some, they paid this tax. And the mothers in fobbing, particularly where it kicked off, which is why we have this word called fobbing off people, putting them off, They resented this bitterly. So these, pubic hair inspectors, they got killed, some of them. They just got killed. You don't do that. That would come back when everybody's clear about why we have these laws and why they strengthen us as a people. And you let them go, we just get weak immediately. We're just getting weakened all the time.
[02:55:07] Unknown:
So I am learning so much on this show today. This is just amazing.
[02:55:12] Unknown:
I've never heard of such a thing that Oh, you stick around with those Monica. It's like this every week. It's it's not. This has been a really juicy one, actually, this week. I'm really glad we we set it up this way way. I mean, there are other really, yeah, really concrete. I I love this topic because I think it's right at the heart of our problem, and it also shows a way through if we can get back together again. You know? It's not that I feel separate from women. I don't. But, the idea of rebuilding how it used to be is an extremely enticing prospect. How we do that, of course, is a massive challenge. But By practicing the virtues that we want to I think. Yes.
[02:55:48] Unknown:
And what about that idea that in Germany during World War two, where grandmothers, voluntarily, they didn't have to have qualifications, but they must had must have had a family, actually went to a government run university to teach young women how to become mothers, about how to run a home, home budgeting, how to cook, because the elderly women had all that experience. And afterwards, the young girls would actually get a certificate to show that they've been through this course so that so when they were dating a fella, she'd show the certificate, and the bloke would think, yes. So I'm gonna be looked after. Well, aren't I? Because she she she knows how to sew. She knows how to cook. She knows how how to run a home. There is something to that, though, Eric. Yeah. The women don't seem to be into that sort of thing, like learning how to sew,
[02:56:39] Unknown:
staying home, and being at the loom to We got a minute here, guys. Yeah. A minute to talk. So just to wrap up. So It just seems like those things are then passed off into the culture where it becomes about fashion, and we then we get all these people who, you know, the whole we're back to the whole celebrity thing. What's the celebrity wearing? That kind of thing. We have to make it desirable again, this lifestyle of being a homemaker. We have to really
[02:57:06] Unknown:
find ways to make that desirable and that young women would aspire to do that.
[02:57:11] Unknown:
Well, Monica, I'd love to have you back on the show, and we can discuss this further in a few weeks' time because I think it's an ongoing theme. I think it's, it's a it's a cracking theme. I wanna thank you all for being here this evening. We'll be back again same time next week. Eric's on at the weekend, I believe. This is Sunday. Fockhamont, this Sunday, 08:00. Check out Radio Soapbox for that and, your channels. Yep. Yes, sir. We'll we'll be back again same time next week, and so keep good until then. Bye for now. When it's cold and damp in New York City, and all the girls don't look so pretty.
And you can't find a job. And you're looking like a slob. But go west, but realize your dreams go west. Eat fucking beans go west. Wagons home to go west. It's all a rage. Go west. Get living rage go west. And we're clear.
[03:00:38] Unknown:
Okay. That was really great. Focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
Introduction and Welcome
Discussion on Suffragettes and Women's Vote
Daylight Savings Time Debate
Monica Schaeffer's Perspective on Feminism
Impact of Feminism on Society
The Role of Sexual Restraint in Civilization
Black Pigeon Speaks on Women and Society
Challenges in Reversing Feminist Societal Changes
Solutions for Revitalizing Family Values
Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks