Unifying Physics: Luke's Divine Emission Theory
Exploring Quarternions and the Nature of Reality
Revisiting Maxwell: A New Approach to Unified Science
The Science of Light, Energy, and the Cosmos
From Quantum Mechanics to Spirituality: A New Scientific Paradigm
https://serve.podhome.fm/deliberatingdogfacedudes
https://serve.podhome.fm/episodepage/deliberatingdogfacedudes/47
More show stuff on https://allenmarcus.com/47-3d/
In this episode, we dive into the fascinating world of theoretical physics with our guest, Luke, who introduces us to his groundbreaking theory called Divine Emission Theory (DET). Luke explains how this theory unifies various scientific fields, including quantum mechanics, classical physics, and electromagnetism, by revisiting and expanding upon James Clerk Maxwell's original equations. He discusses the concept of quarter neons, which are fundamental building blocks of reality, and how they relate to phenomena like the lunar wave and the structure of the sun. Luke also touches on the historical context of scientific discoveries and the importance of ethical considerations in scientific advancements.
We explore the implications of DET on our understanding of the universe, including the nature of light, energy, and gravity. Luke shares insights into how this theory could potentially revolutionize our approach to energy and technology, while emphasizing the need for responsible use of scientific knowledge. The conversation also delves into the relationship between science and spirituality, the potential for levitation, and the role of coherence in the physical world. Join us for a mind-expanding discussion that challenges conventional scientific paradigms and opens up new possibilities for understanding the cosmos.
(00:01:25) Introduction of Guests and Topics
(00:03:04) Luke's Unified Theory and Lunar Wave
(00:04:48) Quarter Neons and Historical Context
(00:09:52) Light, Pressure, and Energy Transfer
(00:16:15) Flat Earth Discussion and Optical Effects
(00:21:17) Lunar Wave and Pressure Waves
(00:27:00) History of Quarter Neons and Maxwell
(00:35:01) Coherence, Quantum Mechanics, and Consciousness
(00:54:07) Photosynthesis and Classical Reduction
(01:02:00) Levitation and Acoustic Effects
(01:18:03) DMT, Consciousness, and Spirituality
(01:54:03) Sacred Geometry and Elemental Connections
(02:14:02) Fluid Dynamics and Energy Flow
(02:51:12) Scalar Sinks and Ethical Considerations
(03:11:05) Acknowledgments and Ethical Stance
[00:00:05]
Unknown:
Who are you guys? Where are you, dude? Go now, dude.
[00:00:09] Unknown:
Dude, deliberately.
[00:00:30] Unknown:
92.
[00:00:34] Unknown:
938734. 321, fight. Oh, you got it. For you, dude.
[00:01:05] Unknown:
We're live, dudes. We are. Tuesday, August 5. This is the forty seventh stream. For those who are counting, can we count 777?
[00:01:23] Unknown:
We got an excellent one for you guys tonight. We got, Rose from Crow seven seven seven has brought in Luke who's developing his own, theory and cosmology, and she's brought him in to, air that out and discuss it. So real excited for this one.
[00:01:44] Rose777:
Yeah. Thank you so much for allowing me to introduce you. I just love putting different minds together. And what really caught my attention was that Luke's unified, theory, which is very familiar to people who study field theory, it's adding in the scaler element and it explains or could provide a possible explanation for what the lunar wave actually is. And, I'm also interested in hearing him hash it out with you guys about how the luminaries would act given the new information we received with Jaren's trip to Antarctica with the twenty four hour sun and distances and and, sizes of these luminaries.
I previously thought that Jaren's trip to Antarctica solidified that the we the the small and local idea was debunked, and Luke says that he still has an explanation for that. So I'm really curious about that too. So lunar wave and That's when they can include the second a second sun, though. I don't know. Let's find out. I'll stop there. I'm I'm very curious.
[00:03:01] Unknown:
Hello, everybody. So yeah. So with this theory, there is some strange, like, optical geometrics that could happen because this implements something called, kinda harmonic shells. They're similar to what Schrodinger initially, like, provided whenever he was talking about probability probability density clouds and things like that. But this has more of a actual physical effect, so everything can end up having shells that kind of create not necessarily optical illusions, but definitely, different kinda optical effects that, can absolutely, you know, show a twenty four hour sun in Antarctica, in the Arctic Circle during, like, whenever it's all the way up north or all the way south, whether honestly, whether it's a globe or whether it's a flat earth.
I have let me get the document for the
[00:04:11] Rose777:
While you're getting that document, I just remembered another aspect of the theory that I never mentioned to Ben, which was what which is that there's, like, a sun within a sun, and that Crow's footage caught your eye. And then when we went to look at the original footage just to make sure that it didn't have something to do with the processing, this circular shape, we all kind of recognized it as being there. So you should also explain that as well. Okay. Absolutely.
[00:04:42] Unknown:
So have any of y'all ever heard of a quarter neon?
[00:04:49] Unknown:
Say it again.
[00:04:50] Unknown:
A quarter neon.
[00:04:52] Unknown:
A quarter neon?
[00:04:54] Unknown:
Right. No. So, essentially, in 1865, there was a gentleman named, James Maxwell that, presented the idea of quarter neon to basically being the pretty much the fundamental, like, building block of just reality in general. They start with atomic structures, go all the way across to what he described as the sea of tiny vortices, which is basically because this was way before, Einstein or anybody else was, you know, delivering their theories. It was still whenever the whole ether aspect was, like, still talked about, still thought about. That was still the going, field theory.
When he proposed that, he was proposing it as basically a field of quarter neons. What these are are three rotational aspect field functions with one scalar aspect. He at the time, he couldn't prove that they existed, basically, and they were kinda way, way advanced for the time. So what had happened was there were three gentlemen that basically broke his equations down, and they all kinda went their separate ways. So Einstein essentially took the structure or the what you could consider, like, the, the skeleton of the equation. And then, basically, the the rising quantum physicist at the time took the energy, the soul of the equation.
Both of them ended up leaving the body behind. This is, in my opinion, as to why quantum field theory and relativity have yet to be able to unify because neither one of them realized that, one, they're missing the original body of the equation, and two, they don't realize that they're already, you know, two halves of one whole, so they'll never be able to unify. Or, really, it's just thirds. But whenever I was going through all of this, I realized that I after tracking back all of the work that everybody's done, realized it went back to, the the whole quarter neons.
Then I realized that in the I think it was the late twenties, we got confirmation on one of the theories or, basically, one of the tests that light, transfers momentum. Right? So, like, as a photon is interacting with things, it will actually transfer momentum onto that object. Because of that, we came up with another theory, which was later proved that light also creates pressure. Well, when you understand that light is essentially just a, basically, a ball of energy. Right? It's excess energy that has been released from an electron when it is exited its, excitement stage.
That means that energy creates pressure, and that's something that we've never really addressed before. Basically, nobody in the scientific community from what I've seen so far. So this started the whole adventure of trying to assign these values to this quarter neon that was too confusing, too complicated at the time. So the scalar aspect of it, that is actually the the pressure. That is the pressure field. Right? So each of these individual balls, they pulse energy, and they actually send it out as pressure waves. This is, are any of y'all familiar with the, tests that, like, Tesla actually did in, like, for example, the Colorado Springs experiment.
So he was sending out basically these, you know, these EM pulses, and he was getting weird, like, non Hertzian waves that he was getting back. Those were actually pressure waves within the scalar field that he was getting back. That's why my pressure waves, I was I've named them Teslian pressure waves after him because he was the one that first discovered it. So you have pressure waves and you have rebound waves. These work together constructively. They may interfere or they may completely deconstruct. So through this whole method and my bigger theory, I was actually able to derive the entire periodic table all based off of these values without using any kind of atomic structure whatsoever.
Because of that, where these basically stabilize at, there are certain points, and those points are actually where the elements are. They actually continue all the way up to a 150. Once we get past a 118, using the Hadron Collider, in my opinion, is basically, you know, throwing whatever you might have show up into a furnace. So I I really don't think we can can go past one eighteen using that. After that, we have to use, like, just very surgical precision on doing these elements. But once we actually get past one thirty two, there's actually a weird thing that happens within the, the torsional aspect of the element.
When I first saw it, I originally thought, instead of it pulsing out, I wonder if it starts pulsing inward. And then that's what led into this whole idea about what it is because with these quarter neons, you have a core. Right? Bay because, basically, just imagine on the inside is a a more condensed version of this energy. As they send out pressure waves and they interact and they interfere and they, construct or deconstruct, it basically builds shell walls. These shell walls can be layered multiple, multiple times. In the photos from what or the videos from what Karo is showing, you can actually see a more condensed area inside of the sun, and that's what I believe is not not what you would consider, like, a a hydrogen core.
It's just what a core would look like if it was the size of the sun. What you're actually seeing with the sun is a if you and this is one of the things I've gotten hesitant about saying. If you wanna say it from a scientific aspect, you could say it's a mirage. If you wanna say it from a sci fi aspect, you could say it's a hologram or a projection. It it's real. It's just these shell interactions are causing it to magnify the actual size and look of the sun. One interesting thing is I think that the sun might actually be made out of element one forty four because it I haven't gotten too deep into it to say to say definitively yet, but I'm pretty sure it actually is one forty four. And that's where we start getting into weird coincidences with sacred geometry because as everybody knows, Metatron's cube, that is actually a perfect, slice of a quarter neon of what element one forty four would be.
And I just find it weird because there's a lot of talk behind, or there's a lot of, like, alternate names to Metatron's cube for it being, like, you know, SunCube or all these other different names like that. There's some different, rotational aspects I'm looking into. So far, it seems like the sun very much could be element one forty four due to the fact that its magnetic poles are actually reverse of what they should be because of the rotation of the sun itself. I don't know how, like, kinda like the right hand rule with electricity and how magnetic fields form around them. But as the light coming from the sun interacts with its own shell and then interacts with the Earth shell, whether it is round or whether it is flat.
This very much could cause a, like, for example, if it's flat, yes, it could cause a geometric interaction to make you see a twenty four hour sun in the South Pole if it just goes up. It'll always cause any kind of arcing path, stuff like that. It seeing a twenty four hour sun in the Arctic or the Antarctic does not really doesn't rule anything out, honestly, and it's actually very much expected in both models in my opinion.
[00:14:41] Unknown:
Explain why?
[00:14:45] Unknown:
I mean, obviously, if you if you have a heliocentric globe model, of course, you're gonna have the twenty four hour sun in the North and in the South. But with a like, where they say that the twenty four hour sun definitely, like, knocked out the flat Earth model, If the sun is a quarter neon, which is looking like it is, it it doesn't because there's always gonna be that spherical to spherical geometric, interaction between the way that the light works and how it curves and how it arcs.
[00:15:22] Unknown:
So you're kinda talking about that, Where the refraction is as it's going up and down makes a hot point.
[00:15:39] Unknown:
It could. I haven't a 100% nailed down exactly how focused it'll be, how like, if it'll lag behind. Because, I mean, as of right now, I think it's what? When the sun hits horizon, it's actually past the horizon by eight minutes already, just because of the time delay between the sun and the Earth. There's a lot of, yeah, there's a lot of optical effects that, we need to take account now. For example, in I am leaning actually more towards possibly having a flat earth just because the current model for predicting, like, red shift at the horizon does not account for as much red shift as there actually is, due to the way that these shells will layer, there's a very good possibility that being flat might actually be the only way it can be.
Because the current the standard model doesn't account for the amount of redshift that is actually there. Even whenever I did the original, calculations of it being sphere with the shells, even that didn't account for the amount of redshift that we actually measure. It would have to be flat so that way the scalar gradient is able to, knock down enough light to basically shift it red enough.
[00:17:22] Unknown:
So what we're talking about here then is, like, a basic molecule where you have a a core, nucleus, which would be your, protons and neutrons. And then there's, numerous outer shells that are, have specific effects. Your final shell being the valence shell telling you what other molecules it'll hook up with and whatnot, but the same basic concept that, the same basic setup. This goes smaller than that. This is Well, yeah. Yeah. I realize it's a smaller version as above so below. It's the same basic setup.
[00:18:03] Unknown:
Right. It's the I mean, we're talking about even the strong and weak, nuclear force that's holding together quartz, antiquarks, all of that. I mean, basically, a a regular atomic structure is just the quarter ionic version of the smaller field function that's going on. It's kinda like how, some people say that everything is just a toroid within the toroid within a toroid, and it just keeps going larger and larger and larger. But they missed the a little bit of the fact that toroids are just the magnetic field being created by quarter neons themselves.
You're missing the scalar gyroscope inside of it.
[00:18:57] Unknown:
And how go ahead, Rose.
[00:19:00] Rose777:
I really think that this sun, the it being like a macrocosm of the quarter neon. So there's the inside part of the sun and the outside part, and it, like a Taurus, has that expanding and contracting aspect to it with, like, the breath. So, like, there's the there's, like, the biblical idea of the breath and the spirit, and then there's the Taurus field idea with, like, the dielectric hyperboloid, and then there's the idea of, like, respiration in the lungs. Could you explain how to fit the sun in with that breathing component and how that translate to what the lunar wave is and why we would see it?
[00:19:41] Unknown:
So specifically with the lunar wave, this is actually just the interaction straight from the sun. So these pressure waves, as you have the original wave, you could imagine it as breathing out. When you have the rebound wave, you can imagine breathing it in, but an excess amount of pressure will escape out, and this continues traveling. This is basically what sets up the density of the gradients. As it, travels out, it will actually interact with the moon, which as of right now, I'm thinking that the moon very well could be element one thirty eight, which, needs that actual pressure in order to basically do its thing. This is why the relationship between the moon and the sun has more than just a straight line visual effect.
Because, I mean, if you look at a half moon, sometimes the the sun's not actually in the correct direction for it to be a half moon. When we're talking about the whole new moon, red moons, even lunar eclipses. Sometimes the sun's not actually in the correct position for it. But when we're talking about pressure waves, I mean, these are going out, multidirectional. So it actually takes that pressure wave and converts it to its own energy for the most part. But you can say that the the pressure wave going out and then essentially rebounding in, this is kinda like a breathing in and a breathing out.
The frequency is basically just the timing of the you could say the frequency is the heartbeat of the whole system. I mean, it works the same way whether we're talking about actual wave functions or not.
[00:21:49] Unknown:
And how does this tie into the, lunar wave?
[00:21:54] Unknown:
So the lunar wave you're actually seeing is a, just a pressure wave from the sun. This the moon completely relies on the pressure output from the sun. So the wave that you're seeing is a pressure wave traveling across the surface of the moon. It's crap it's traveling across the shell of the moon.
[00:22:30] Unknown:
So these, what are you calling these things again? These tiny little,
[00:22:38] Unknown:
The quarter neons.
[00:22:40] Unknown:
The quarter neons?
[00:22:41] Unknown:
Yeah.
[00:22:44] Unknown:
These quarter neons are then what pure you're you're saying pure energy?
[00:22:49] Unknown:
They are more a actual field function. What I mean by that is they are the geometric shape of the actual individual field functions. So, like, you know, everybody keeps trying to use geometry to find, like, the actual perfect shape to, like, show a vacuum where they have, like, the two pyramids and they invert them and then basically put them in the middle of each other to show, like, equal pull from each direction. Alright. The quarter neon did that from the very get go. That actual shape is with inside of the quarter neon to begin with. But it typically sits in a negative state unless it is excited, which it will then flip polarity to positive.
[00:23:52] Unknown:
Is there some kind of a cavitation that happens at that point then?
[00:24:00] Unknown:
Not that I have seen so far. It just seems to me that there is a flipping polarity. Eventually, there could be so if, like, it actually has a torsional aspect to it, which not all elements do have a torsional aspect, if it doesn't, it won't be affected by it. If it does, eventually, it could just turn its rotation to correct itself.
[00:24:30] Unknown:
I hear a side by side comment take over, Marcus.
[00:24:36] Unknown:
Yeah. So I think we're at the point where we're hearing this word, quarter neon, and we're like, haven't heard that before. Could you explain It's old. It's old. Yeah. Could you explain the history of that? Who who is writing about that? How did it fall out of fashion, and why haven't, high school graduates in The US Of A heard of this? Is it a mathematical thing specifically, a physics thing?
[00:25:03] Unknown:
Give me one second to pull up the document.
[00:25:07] Unknown:
Because you mentioned that James Clerk Maxwell. Is it Clerk or Clark? Clerk. C l e r k. James Clerk Maxwell.
[00:25:16] Unknown:
C yeah.
[00:25:18] Unknown:
And he's working in the eighteen fifties, writing about math and physics.
[00:25:22] Unknown:
Yes. He was so he is considered to be the father of electromagnetism. Okay. He's the one that made the connection between electricity and magnetism. But when he originally released his papers, they had the original quarter neon, equation in there, which got it was too complicated for the time. So then there was three individuals. I'm trying to find the actual there we go. So there were three individuals that ended up breaking it down. One was heavyside, one was Gibbs, and one was Hertz, which I'm sure, most people know of Hertz because of, obviously, Hertz whenever measuring electricity or just, sound. However, after that, we get to Bohr, Planck, and Einstein. This is basically the first, generation that uses the watered down, equations.
This is where we actually get the separation to where, basically, one's using the skeletal remains of the equation. One is using just the energy of the equation, and then the actual body of the equation itself was left over. But the so he originally developed it in the eighteen sixties. There might have been one gentleman that was working on it before him, but he's basically the main one that, formalized it the best at the time even though it was torn apart anyway. But then directly after that because, I mean, you gotta think it's the eighteen eighties, eighteen nineties. There was a lot of industrial revolution going on.
I don't necessarily blame them for, you know, tearing it down because they were just trying to move everything along as best they could. So they tried to simplify it the best that they could. And ever since then, nobody's ever gone back to try to rework his equations. But yet there's like, for example, in 2019, Golden Gate University did a very interesting test, which I would say at a even though they're accredited, I would say that this experiment would not have been done at MIT or anything like that because they would have never got funding for it. What they did was they put ferrofluid and a piezo crystal inside of a Faraday cage.
Then they put that inside of a vacuum chamber. Then they hit it with a, a pulse from, basically, a Tesla coil from a distance away. Under the standard model, there should have been nothing going on with inside of that Faraday cage. I mean, all of us know exactly what a Faraday cage does.
[00:28:26] Unknown:
Keeps Nicolas Cage away?
[00:28:28] Unknown:
Yes. Yeah. That's a, that's a, little side plus that it does.
[00:28:33] Unknown:
Beneficial. Important. Nobody likes his movies anymore. I mean, it's That's fair. That's fair. Mhmm. You heard us, Juan. You fucking heard us.
[00:28:48] Unknown:
So going back to the eighteen sixties, we're looking at figures like Hertz, Bohr, Planck, and then Einstein comes along and kinda just scrambles everybody's brain. He becomes the literal poster child for You can have the chat, Mark. Physics and everything.
[00:29:01] Unknown:
Yeah. He's out of the chat.
[00:29:03] Unknown:
And, you know, I so when I originally went into this adventure, I was trying to be as nonbiased as possible. And that's kinda what let me be able to see how it kinda all unraveled from the last generation we had, which, I mean, Hawkins was part of that generation.
[00:29:21] Unknown:
Then the generation before that before that Talking Stephen Hawkins, the guy with, that was Lou Gehrig's disease who should have lived to be 26 years old, and then that was it? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
[00:29:32] Unknown:
And then the first generation being Einstein. But what's interesting is is I started looking into, after I basically laid all of this out, I started looking into what Einstein did towards his later years. And if you look at his quotes and actually look at his attempt at the unified field theory Mhmm. He knew he was wrong. And in my opinion, if he could've, he probably would've pulled relativity back. He knew how fragile it was to begin with, and he even went as far as doing the ultimate taboo, which is redefining mass, which kinda made me feel a little bit better about the fact that I did that.
So I I can't hate him. I can't judge him for it because he, at least at the end, tried to go back around.
[00:30:29] Unknown:
Sure. So we're dealing with the his we're dealing with topics of history, the the topics of physics, math, and science, and all of these things. And with our limited education, we're hearing these things for the first time and wondering why why haven't I heard this before? And the answer might be that you'd have to study physics in college before you'd be looking at equations from Planck and this other guy. Who who wrote the plan who wrote the quarter nine equation? Maxwell. Maxwell.
[00:31:02] Unknown:
Okay. So once, his quarter neon equation was split apart, it really wasn't long after that that it was no longer taught in schools. I mean, most people now only hear about it whenever they actually look into his original treaty that he wrote. When you're taught about electricity in any kind of schooling or whether you go to actual, you know, college for physics itself and you're talking about, electromagnetism and everything that is completely combined within that, you will hear about his equations. You will not hear about his quarter neon equations because they were torn apart. They went to E and B fields.
[00:31:56] Unknown:
What are those fields? You said e
[00:31:59] Unknown:
e and b.
[00:32:00] Unknown:
M v. What does that stand for?
[00:32:04] Unknown:
E and and b. So, like, just the letter e and the letter b.
[00:32:09] Unknown:
Okay. Earth and beyond, what does what does e and b stand for?
[00:32:16] Unknown:
I don't actually think that the letters represent anything. I think they're just, part of how they tore down the equations. I don't think they have, like, an actual name for the e or b.
[00:32:28] Unknown:
It's like an x or a y sulfur or a b. Okay. Yeah. It's just a variable.
[00:32:33] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:32:39] Unknown:
You talked earlier about something that might appear like a mirage or holographic. Is that similar to driving down Route 66 through a hot Arizona,
[00:32:49] Unknown:
desert, and then you see kind of the rippling in the distance kinda looks like, a lot of people. Right. So what what you're seeing obviously isn't there. It's just an optical illusion going on. Okay. So, like, the sun isn't actually the size that it looks. It's there's a smaller actual part inside of it that is the the physical core.
[00:33:12] Unknown:
Okay. And that's sort of, like, the ground level thing that we see with our own eyes. And are you saying that's similar to what, Crow has captured on camera with, the so called lunar wave? I don't know. What what what is the, the term for that now. I it was released as lunar wave, and he might have said that he doesn't know that that's, a great title for it because he's seen it across other,
[00:33:39] Rose777:
bodies in the sky? We just recognize it's a total misnomer. So people can call it a space wave, a firmament wave, a plasma wave, whatever they want. It's just that it's not across the moon. It's across everything because it was captured in front of Saturn and Jupiter already.
[00:33:55] Unknown:
Okay. And, Luke, is that what you refer to it as? Or do you have a special term for that? I I call it you can either call it a pressure wave or a teslien wave. Okay.
[00:34:08] Unknown:
So why wouldn't this happen more often then?
[00:34:13] Unknown:
So in order
[00:34:14] Unknown:
to such a small duration because the lunar wave only happens, what, like, every three months or something?
[00:34:23] Unknown:
So there are variables that I have. One of the most important one is something called coherence, which in quantum mechanics, there is basically the opposite. It's called decoherence. It is the, basically, the rate of the particle either going quantum, going superposition, or it is the rate at which it might disappear into the quantum realm altogether. But under my theory, coherence really drives a lot of different things. It drives how structured something is. It drives how much memory it has. Like, imagine you smack Jell O. Right? Obviously, it wiggles around, but it maintains its structure. Right? That is basically the the memory that is encoded within the actual atomic structure of it itself.
So we got structure, memory. This can lower or raise during certain times. It might make it easier if it say if the sun's having some kind of other interaction or if it's just going through a normal cycle that it has. It could even be like a polarity flip. Like, we see a I think it's the polarity flip is every eleven years for it. It makes it easier to see scalar effects like this, but most of the time, scalar effects are only going to be going on in the background. You're not really going to see the the deeper structure that's going on. It's kinda like, you know, if relativity is understood, how much do you actually see in your daily life of things being bent by the mass of other objects?
[00:36:24] Unknown:
Never.
[00:36:25] Unknown:
Right.
[00:36:26] Unknown:
In fact, you can't make that happen scientifically in any way, shape, or form. That's why it's still a theory. Right. At least not in a safe way. So I I don't have a problem with the sun being structured this way. This is, like I said, the normal structure of any molecule. The only thing that has weight the whole reason that it's, the atomic, table of elements is because the only thing that has weight to it that we can actually see is the proton. You can't really see your electrons. People think for whatever reason when they say electron microscope, you could see an electron. No. They're firing electrons at things and then seeing how it bounces off and creating a shape off the bounce.
[00:37:09] Unknown:
Right. Man, I actually have electron shells. Yeah. So basically what Schrodinger models as his probably then probability density clouds, it's actual shells, which are interactions between neutrons, protons, and then the, the electron, which makes it basically in a shell shape instead of having the typical shape that we understand it as.
[00:37:35] Unknown:
Yeah. Where where my issue comes in is what's what's, what's drawing this energy being projected. And then number two, and this is something I have a problem with with everybody that, talks about light. Because very, very simply, I can create light. And and I understand how how it works. You can take, you know, a basic Edison bulb, and you, run a bunch of electricity through it, and you put, filament in there that can't take that much electricity. So that, excites the particles, and it makes them it makes them break apart. This is part of why you have to fill the light bulb with an inert gas because if there's oxygen in there, it'll burn apart and a blink.
But, if you have an inert gas in there, so it's got nothing to take them particles and float them away with, it'll maintain integrity integrity for quite a while.
[00:38:45] Unknown:
And and we still have, what, the first light bulb still blow still going right now?
[00:38:50] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Before the, before the agreement to make light bulbs that didn't last. Yeah. But when you look at that, what's going on there, and you can replicate that with just a torch and a piece of metal, is you just heat that piece of metal up, which is just pounding a whole bunch of electrons into it, and making it more and more excited. And then it'll end up glowing and turning into light and producing light. When that happens, the particles, you you are definitely losing particles. So those particles were the light. And some of that, it breaks away, goes and finds ground because that's what energy does. There's gotta be a negative side that directs that positive side. If you don't have a negative side, and this is where my question overall question on this comes from, if I if I don't have a negative side, that positive side's got nowhere to go.
If I have no voltage, it doesn't matter how many amperage I have, it's not gonna go anywhere. And so there's gotta be a negative to draw that positive. So whenever you're looking at a system holistically, it's like they're recognizing the energy source without realizing that without the the well, neutral is a a more accurate term as an electrician. Your neutral that's gonna send that back and do that trade off. This is no different than a galvanic cell battery. In order for that cathode in order for that cathode to produce power, the anode actually breaks down and creates a negative and then charges that negative over to the cathode.
And then the positive portion goes and trades where the two come back together, the particle becomes whole again. And this is what's happening with light. Light is finding its other half. It's going and finding the missing piece of itself. So what what is, creating that pull?
[00:41:00] Unknown:
Well, all quarter neons have a negative and a positive pull on them. The field itself has energy within it. I mean, that's what Tesla was saying all along. So when we're talking about so when as you're heating it, you are causing, entropy, basically. You are causing a destabilization of the entire molecular structure inside of there. If there is enough coherence with inside of it, it will remember its structure. And as it does remember its structure, it will then pull in whatever energy it has left over from the surrounding area because the entire surrounding area has energy. Everything is the quarter neons whether they are, which have the negative and positive polarities of them.
So it's just really pulling in energy from around it. I mean, this is, for the most part, no different than so the scalar field itself is not a 100% like the Higgs field, but it is basically the same purpose of the Higgs field. Like, this is where energy comes from. Once it's condensed by pressure, then it starts turning into the different particles, which have different purposes. Like, I mean, we can talk about, like we said before, quarks, antiquarks, protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, muons, muons. It's all just different energy at different sizes based off of different compressions from other interactions.
This is what causes quantum to begin with. Quantum can only be done in certain environments, and it is whenever there is no actual other interaction going on because all of these particles are putting off pressure. If they don't have anything to rebound that pressure from, then the energy just spreads out and the particle itself turns into what they would view as a probability density cloud. But it's it was kind of always a cloud to begin with. It was just pressurized because of rebound pressure. But there's always energy all around. So as long as you don't, cause incoherence, which is basically the point at which it's not gonna be able to retain its structure, it will always be pulling in energy to retain its structure.
So just because you sent out light doesn't mean that it's not gonna pull back energy after it's done because all of the quarter neons have positive and negative polarities to them.
[00:43:38] Unknown:
And this is based off of a mathematical equation?
[00:43:42] Unknown:
Yeah. I have everything laid out in the in the larger theory, which, at some point, I can give you all the link to it if you want. I have a couple other documents added up there as well with the larger theory.
[00:44:00] Rose777:
Is there anything that you would be helpful to see if you wanted to share your screen? Because you said that you that you had a 147 page paper that was published. Has it been published?
[00:44:14] Unknown:
Yes. It's published now. Give me one second.
[00:44:20] Unknown:
I don't know if we'll have, to build a screen share tonight. We're kinda doing an introduction to the topic. We have some, folks in chat. We're trying to catch up to some pretty heavy concepts. And have you had the opportunity to explain the explain this to blue collar, Minnesotans, you know, at the mechanic shop who wanna change your oil and, make sure your fluids are topped off?
[00:44:47] Unknown:
No. I haven't gotten to talk to many people about it yet. Like, I, just last Friday night, I did the first episode on this, which was with the cult of conspiracy. Rose and I have talked about it a couple times. I talked about it with Crow. But for the most part, just them and y'all are the only ones I've been able to, like, actual have a verbal conversation about this with.
[00:45:12] Unknown:
Well, thank you for for joining us tonight to talk about these very important concepts.
[00:45:18] Unknown:
Oh, no problem. This is,
[00:45:20] Unknown:
going back to college. It's a bit of a, one night summer school class. Will there be a test at the end? No. There will not. Okay. So, like, what is energy? You said the word energy a lot.
[00:45:35] Unknown:
I don't know if you can really put a definition on what energy is without kinda causing a, like, a little rotation. Like, you could say energy is life. You could say life is energy. You could say that energy is just I mean, I don't know. I don't know if you could actually put a definition on what energy is.
[00:45:56] Unknown:
Does the sun in your model create energy? Is it the source of energy?
[00:46:04] Unknown:
No. The field itself is the source of energy. The sun is just a large collection of it. So as waves go out, waves come in, it either loses a little bit of energy, gains a little bit of energy. It all happens at an extremely fast rate.
[00:46:23] Unknown:
And you haven't said anything about the moon yet beyond the the concept of the lunar wave, kind of a ripply, mirage effect going over it that's been captured by cameras. How does the moon fit into this?
[00:46:36] Unknown:
The moon is basically just a, it I wouldn't say it's a negative aspect. I would say it just solely relies on the sun's, interactions. With it being element one thirty eight, it so far from what I've seen, it doesn't seem like it carries any kind of luminous attributes naturally. It has to actually be, I'm not gonna say excited, but it needs the pressure waves from the sun in order to allow itself to illuminate. It's not based off of reflection.
[00:47:15] Unknown:
So the moon is not made of cheese?
[00:47:18] Unknown:
Sadly, no. It's not milk. Oh, but there is a lot in random caves around The US. Yes. The the Great Cheese Caves.
[00:47:26] Unknown:
Mostly in Missouri. Missouri has most of the cheese caves.
[00:47:35] Unknown:
That's good. If anything ever goes down, just know I'm gonna I'm gonna hit you up.
[00:47:40] Unknown:
Yeah. You gotta know where the cheese stash is. That will be the first place to hit. Yeah. The government keeps it there.
[00:47:51] Unknown:
I know I know they they messed up the craft recipe. I know that for sure. Now the now the only one that actually tastes decent is the deluxe version. Go figure.
[00:48:03] Unknown:
No. This is real cheese. It's, part of what the government does as the it's a price control and and emergency, quit picking on the cats, Bubba. The he's such an honorary little cuss. I was to chew on everything. As part they buy up a bunch of it, and then they put it in these storages. And, obviously, in case of emergency, then we have a store and cheese let you know, good cheese done right. You can sit there for fifty years. It doesn't matter. And it also keeps the price controls, in check.
[00:48:49] Unknown:
So we don't need to take notes because we're recording this. We're interacting with Chad a little bit tonight. We're recording this. We we can play it back, listen to it again and again as as much as we needed to. If you guys have, questions, put them in chat. We'll get we'll get to some questions. I have a question. I like cheese. I like my cheese to be melted. If I put my cheese, you know, in a glass container and I seal it up and I leave it out for an afternoon on a good sunny day and my cheese melts, what causes my cheese to melt?
[00:49:21] Unknown:
Say oh, okay. Say that again.
[00:49:23] Unknown:
I wanna melt some cheese. I put my cheese in a, like, a glass jar, and I seal the glass jar, and I leave it out on a sunshine filled evening, you know, when the sun is setting because I wanna have a warm cheese dinner. What causes the cheese to melt? Is it, the sun is the heat from the sun? Is it clear glass?
[00:49:41] Unknown:
Yeah. Yep. And, yes, a major part of it is the heat from the sun, but also you have compression with inside of the jar because of the it heating up in there and the air molecules expanding.
[00:49:51] Unknown:
Okay. Because sometimes I'll just leave it on my dashboard, drive west towards the sun, and then it'll heat up my cheese sandwich for me real nice. Yeah. That'll work. Okay. Yeah. I remember back in school, we, we did the whole,
[00:50:03] Unknown:
concave mirror to, like, make hot dogs.
[00:50:06] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. So how what is causing that to excite the cheese particles in a way that they kinda get nice and melted?
[00:50:17] Unknown:
Once the photons become coherent and start having interactions, that that'll be energy. So, yes, that'll cause a excess of energy with inside of the atomic structure of the cheese, and it'll just start heating up because it doesn't want that excess energy. That's what,
[00:50:42] Unknown:
Got a lot of cheese fans in chat. Tastes better when it's melted.
[00:50:46] Unknown:
Look. I 100% understand. Mhmm. I am a big fan of all types of cheese.
[00:50:57] Unknown:
We thought you were smart.
[00:50:59] Unknown:
Yeah. I dude, if look. If there are people out there that will put themselves through the worst types of experiences, you know, being lactose intolerant or whatever because cheese is that good. So if you're somebody that doesn't like cheese, there there might be something going on. I think a Mini Cooper just crashed to his to his house.
[00:51:25] Unknown:
No. Those are just the animals.
[00:51:28] Unknown:
Yeah. I there's shenanigans. That's part of why I mute and stuff. Some of the noises that happen over here. We're past the peacock screaming season.
[00:51:37] Unknown:
We're we're talking with Luke who's got some interesting ideas. We're asking him questions about this idea that light, puts out kind of a pressure thing that, the field around us contains the energy, the sun. What does the sun do in this model again?
[00:51:57] Unknown:
It sends out pressure waves Okay. Which causes a pressure gradient. That pressure gradient is actually what causes gravity as well.
[00:52:07] Unknown:
What is a gradient? I know in graphic design, it's like black on the top, white on the bottom, and then it goes gray in the middle.
[00:52:14] Unknown:
Basically. Yeah. So imagine, the more layers you get on top of them, so like each other, the more dense the gradient will be at the bottom, obviously, because it has more, layers of it on top. So it'll be basically more compressed.
[00:52:32] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:52:41] Unknown:
By gain coherence, you mean, interacts with material?
[00:52:46] Unknown:
Yes. So coherence can a 100% cause different interactions with other materials. Coherence absolutely has to deal with the entire light spectrum as it is. Also, if you basically go into a state of decoherence as your coherence is lowering, you will enter basically what they've what they've stated is like a quantum state. And if you I haven't mapped it out a 100%, but if you either get too low in coherence or become incoherent, you might end up in a different realm altogether. Basically, what they call the quantum realm, or it could be what they call the DMT realm. I haven't a 100% mapped it out yet.
Now that the actual scientific foundation of this theory is, set up the way that it is, Now I can start venturing out into other parts. So, like, this wouldn't be a unifying field theory if I couldn't unify spirituality, if I couldn't unify health, if I couldn't unify different dimensions. You know what I mean? Mhmm. I mean, like, I there is there's too many coincidences between spirituality aspects that line up with science, and I'm not going to be the one that ignores that.
[00:54:29] Unknown:
So how does this work with consciousness?
[00:54:35] Unknown:
Well,
[00:54:37] Unknown:
consciousness is almost, you could say, based off of coherence. It could be, like, parallel to each other. I think consciousness might be outside of it, though, because if we're talking about consciousness, like, if you if you die, for example, and you turn into whatever your spiritual body looks like afterwards, however you believe in it. I still believe that you would have consciousness, but I think that your coherence would be different. So now that I'm able to go more into the spiritual side of things, I'm interested to see where it's going to lead to. I think that there's obviously not a coincidence between what the quarter neons look like comparative to sacred geometry.
So I'm kinda looking into that a little bit more now, but also not, you know, losing my head underneath the, the the wave of spirituality.
[00:55:48] Unknown:
So I'm thinking of photosynthesis. How does photosynthesis work in this model? What is giving growth to the plants? Why do the flowers bloom in this model?
[00:56:00] Unknown:
So once the, once the photons travel through what you could say is open space and they lower incoherence to start entering into the visible spectrum. At that point in time, it can just kinda reduce back to the classical sense. So every part of this theory can reduce either to quantum if you wanted to. I wouldn't recommend it because their equations are, like, three miles long and mine are not. So, hopefully, I at least help them a little bit out with that. Relativity, it's kind of up in the air whether you wanna say it could reduce to that or not. I wouldn't recommend it because the interaction between how, like, gravity works and how, like, red shifting works is completely different. I mean, we're talking about more of a outward push than a inward pull.
But as far as anytime that coherence is in a stable state, it can reduce to classical sense, and everything can work solely based off of our current understanding with the, like, standard models of photosynthesis, of biology, all of that stuff.
[00:57:33] Unknown:
Fucking oh my god. Rose is over here wanting to bring avocado into the cheese conversation. I do like guacamole. It is good. But Yeah. That's part of the consciousness. I mean, I I I don't know if it's like a it's like a it cheese is its own food group, Rose.
[00:57:50] Unknown:
Right. The the castings and the cheese, it just it's they've knocked me out unconscious. I have had just the most incredible dreams after, a night of just eating, you know, really good melted cheese.
[00:58:03] Rose777:
Something about it being melted just is so special that you almost can't put into words what makes ooey gooey cheese in a cheese sandwich just different than a regular cheese sandwich. Although, I'm fine with eating a cold cheese sandwich. Perfectly happy. Something about the meltedness of it.
[00:58:21] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't even care about, like, the, the actual, like, condition of the cheese. Just that it's cheese. Like, I'm I'm down.
[00:58:29] Unknown:
Cheese cured decorating. Saying,
[00:58:31] Unknown:
avocados don't really go with cheese.
[00:58:34] Unknown:
You know? I mean, that's what do. How could you say that? Avocados don't go with cheese, but I would say it's it's fair to say that cheese goes with avocados. You get You eat plenty, don't you, Rose?
[00:58:45] Unknown:
I get what? You eat polenta, don't you?
[00:58:48] Rose777:
Polenta. No. I actually don't even know what that is, but I eat lots of avocados and I and I do think an avocado and cheese sandwich with maybe some shredded lettuce is just perfect with a little bit of seasonings. I think those go together, but I I'm weird. I'm willing to be the weird one and the wrong one in the equation.
[00:59:07] Unknown:
So in your model here, you you were fairly mainstream. You think that, in your model, there's space, which basically is a a vacuum or Yeah. At least at the very least a much lesser pressurized system than us? No? Go go ahead and explain then.
[00:59:33] Unknown:
So in a not typically, nonexcited state, the quarter neons are in a negative flare. So what we would understand as a vacuum is just a negative polarity where most everything else is typically in a positive polarity unless there's some other interaction going on. But as the pressure waves basically move through space, they could induce a flip in polarity as they're moving. This could explain, like, plasma and all that stuff that we notice in space. But I based off of my redshift models, I don't view them as being as far away or as large as what they currently understand them to be. So, like, for example, the actual size of the core of the sun, like, what we see in, CRO's hydrogen alpha three filter shots of it, The actual core itself is only about 500 miles wide, which makes it a dramatically less distance away.
It very well could be that it's about three to 4,000 miles away. Because it's not a if it's if it is made up of element one forty four, it does not work off of nuclear. It's not a nuclear furnace. So when we're talking about actual heat interactions, it is completely different.
[01:01:18] Unknown:
So it'll still warm up my skin. It'll still give me a tan and melt my cheese. Yeah.
[01:01:25] Unknown:
Yeah. I got it. I got you. That's important for me. Yeah. I got you. All cheese interactions are still the same.
[01:01:32] Unknown:
Right. Because we were talking about, oh, microwave will just remove the nutrition. Overcooking food removes the nutrition. I just like to leave things out. I put them in a window, and then they just warm up with the sun, and they're good to go.
[01:01:44] Unknown:
Yeah. So
[01:01:45] Unknown:
when we That's pretty style. Mark is upset.
[01:01:49] Unknown:
So one interesting thing is with this theory, levitation is possible.
[01:01:57] Unknown:
Right? I've been looking at my garden.
[01:02:01] Unknown:
Move along. Aflac.
[01:02:04] Unknown:
Yeah. They're trying to eat our tomatoes. And we have They're at they're at the edge. They're trying to poke through.
[01:02:13] Unknown:
It's all the other ducks. Yeah. All the ducks are here tonight.
[01:02:18] Unknown:
As long as they're in a row.
[01:02:21] Unknown:
They were. It's not the norm around here. Just when they're just when they're in mischief.
[01:02:31] Unknown:
So, let me see. I have a book on my shelf.
[01:02:37] Unknown:
What? You have a book?
[01:02:42] Unknown:
So I I can sort of tell you how to levitate. I can tell you how to do it, but
[01:02:50] Unknown:
Yeah. I love it from Chris Angel, the mind freak. Mind freak. He reveals the secret of levitation. You know, it's like the magician's code. I don't wanna really reveal it. But if you it was lentils.
[01:03:03] Unknown:
I'm not gonna lie. Like, when it comes to him, like, there's some there's some stuff that he does that kinda freaks me out a little bit. Yeah. Little bit little bit of a actual mind freak, I guess.
[01:03:13] Unknown:
Right. I've I've balanced it out with a little bit of Dave Thomas, so a little bit of positivity here. He's the guy who had the radical idea that hamburger should be in squares and not circles.
[01:03:28] Unknown:
I I I kinda have to agree. I I you know what? Back in the day when Little Caesar's was pizza pizza, it was two square pizzas, and they were better than the round pizzas. I liked it.
[01:03:40] Rose777:
Did you just say you liked the pizzas?
[01:03:42] Unknown:
Back in the day, now, you know, it's like nineteen eighty seven. What does gravity have to do with these? You know what? If you don't understand, then we can't make you understand.
[01:04:01] Unknown:
So for instance, under this model, sound and light sort of work the same, but sound doesn't have as much an effect on the scalar field. Right? But it does have an effect.
[01:04:18] Unknown:
So for example light are the same thing.
[01:04:22] Unknown:
Correct. Correct. But light has a much right? But light has a much stronger effect on the scalar field than sound does because we have a much higher and broader spectrum of sound. One one of the things that I found the most interesting is actually when I was looking into sound, once we get up to hypersonic, so, like, not ultrasonic, but hypersonic sounds, they actually start experiencing particle wave duality themselves, which is really weird. That's kinda what made me feel even more validated whenever I, I wouldn't say I combine the two under this model. I would say I just kind of put them on the same spectrum.
But the gradient that is pushing us down, right, this actually works off of certain frequencies depending on the materials themselves that they're actually pushing down on. So imagine if a wave is pushing down on an object. Standard acoustic theory states, well, you just have to push the object up with more force than it's being pushed down with. Right? Well, what if you just send a deconstructive wave on the wave that is pushing it down? This is called a a null, a harmonic null under my model. It just so happens that with the Pyramids in Egypt right?
So if the air blows into the king's chamber, it actually sets off a certain frequency. It's around, like, 400 something hertz. I don't remember exactly what it is. But when you have a frequency like that that starts resonating off of the quartz foundation, every single block of the pyramid becomes about 25 kilograms. If you look at the earlier accounts of whenever people still could climb on top of the, the pyramids before they, you know, outlawed it and all that, which is understandable to a certain extent. Like, I get it. It's historical. You don't want, you know, kids dropping sticky lollipops and shit on them. So I get it.
There are many, many, many accounts of people basically talking about, like, they felt weightless up there.
[01:06:58] Unknown:
So that's why you see Chris Angel doing the, thing in Vegas where he's like, oh, he's floating above the pyramid.
[01:07:05] Unknown:
It it could be. It could be. I don't know exactly how they do it. For all I know is they could be using a form of electrostatic levitation, which is a thing.
[01:07:18] Unknown:
Zach Zambala does does that at, Flattoberfest every year.
[01:07:24] Unknown:
The electrostatic? Yeah.
[01:07:26] Unknown:
Does a demonstration of that. It's very hear it. I fuck it up for him. But
[01:07:33] Unknown:
it's very interesting. Very interesting indeed. Actually, the layer where it's currently understood that, like, the ISS and a majority of the, satellites that we have, that's what I actually predict that that is where an electrostatic layer will be. And then there's also documents showing that the government has, entertained electrostatic levitation equipment or technologies.
[01:08:06] Unknown:
I'm pretty sure it's just lentils.
[01:08:12] Unknown:
The, the the the the gut health, the gut biome, the stuff that's happened with the food that you eat, affecting the consciousness. You're mentioning the the music, the sound and light, and I was thinking of, like, electronic dance music show where they have, you know, light shows combined with subwoofer. So you're feeling the bass and the lights are hitting you. The sound is hitting you, and then you're just like, woah. Wow.
[01:08:38] Unknown:
Yeah. I mean, it could have negative or positive effects. So when we're talking about higher frequencies, right Mhmm. These, it it kinda works in opposite. So higher frequencies affect smaller things, lower frequencies affect bigger things. So if you're at a concert where there is actually really high frequencies going on, you are probably having some kind of internal reactions to it, and it's probably not always gonna be the best. We're talking about, like, there for the most part, isn't any difference between you doing that and you opening your microwave while it's on.
[01:09:26] Unknown:
Right. So I'm thinking in terms of, I don't know if this is the official term, the brown note. You hear the note, you you drop your pants, and it's just it's all gone, and it's really very, very nice. It could yeah. That could definitely be a real thing. I mean, that's one of my effect people have from listening to certain music, some tones, and things.
[01:09:46] Unknown:
Yeah. Or a couple cigarettes and then coffee.
[01:09:48] Unknown:
Sure. That'll do it. Yeah. And then also, like, some cool stuff. Weapons. Yep. Yep.
[01:09:57] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. Acoustic weapons. Yeah. They could definitely work the same way. Same thing as, the direct energy weapons. Mhmm. I mean, realistically, there's not gonna be that much of a difference in
[01:10:10] Unknown:
effect when we're talking about acoustic weapons versus direct energy weapons. Yeah. I said I said brown note. Greg Dubs is asking if it's the shit your pants frequency. That's kind of what we're talking about at this point in the conversation.
[01:10:24] Unknown:
Yeah. It's probably gonna be low, but not, like, super low. I would say probably around, like, I would say probably around 800 hertz, maybe. Maybe a little bit. Maybe, actually yeah. It could be lower than that. Could definitely be lower than that. It'll be around 400 hertz.
[01:10:45] Unknown:
Is that why they call it Taco Bell?
[01:10:50] Unknown:
Yeah. Somebody somebody find what, what Well done, sir. Well done.
[01:10:56] Unknown:
Somebody find what frequency that bell emits so we can get a definitive answer on this?
[01:11:02] Unknown:
It's the diarrhea frequency.
[01:11:07] Unknown:
Yeah. They talk about as above, so below. How about as going in, as coming out?
[01:11:12] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. When I was young, they had the they still had the they call them cholitos. Yeah. They quit making those. They looked exactly the same on the way out as they went did on the way in.
[01:11:25] Unknown:
I could believe it. I could believe it. Mhmm.
[01:11:27] Unknown:
There is no food there.
[01:11:30] Unknown:
Sure. Sure. There there there are pleasure frequencies. I think it's a saxophone.
[01:11:37] Unknown:
Yeah. There are definitely, a ton of frequencies that will do, multiple different things. So, like, for example, the the right machines that are out, I've I've fully endorsed those. There's the amount of things that they can do for you, treatment wise is, is well beyond.
[01:12:03] Unknown:
I believe Rose has one that, Matt Rife, supposedly Royal Rife's nephew gave her.
[01:12:11] Rose777:
Yep. Yep. I got it, and it didn't help me, unfortunately, but maybe I didn't use it enough or the right way or pick the right frequency for what my problem is.
[01:12:21] Unknown:
Yes. So you're basically, every part of your body works off of a different frequency. So, another thing is if there can be interference. So I would probably do it in an area that doesn't have a lot of electromagnetic interference or even sound interference.
[01:12:42] Rose777:
Okay. That's good advice because I genuinely, I mean, I'm surrounded by electronics constantly between Jason's musical instruments and me being a computer addict. I probably sound like a beehive.
[01:12:54] Unknown:
What'd you say, Ben? Said her I said her house sounds like a beehive. Yeah. Like, for someone like Ben, it was noticeable, and he could feel it. I I live off grid, so my house does not sound like that. And I and their house is like, like, holy shit.
[01:13:11] Rose777:
And I tried to put flowers in your room and everything to, like, make it
[01:13:16] Unknown:
Oh, it was super nice. You have a super nice home. It was super nice, and and it's just I I have so little electronic stuff going on in my house. And half the day, it's not on at all. And then, you know, the difference, especially at night, like, at at night, I can hear every tiny little sound at my house. You know, I hear the trees shifting, all of that, and then you and then the difference between that and and it's not just your house. All city all city houses some kind of bugs underneath. But do you remember the petunias? I grew the
[01:13:51] Rose777:
I I grew the petunias from seed, and then I cut them before you arrived. And I put them in the room, and I don't know if you remember this, but they were purple. Okay? So purple, purple, purple, purple, months and months and months and months of purple. And then after you and Christy left, one of the flowers grew pink. Yeah. It's crazy, man. I was really sad when the when it died.
[01:14:21] Unknown:
Have you ever looked into organite?
[01:14:26] Unknown:
The, little things that people make that are, kind of a knockoff of, Wilhelm Reich's, Oregon energy accumulator?
[01:14:35] Unknown:
Yeah. If you if you have the the real one, not like the the knockoff one, they very much work.
[01:14:41] Unknown:
Yeah. I I always presumed I always wanted to build a orgo Oregon accumulator. I've put, I've put, quite a bit of thought into that. The, the ones that are basically a knockoff of the idea, they don't really put any thought into it at all. Where when you look at the actual Oregon accumulator, there was layers of organic and inorganic material that was differing, creating this effect. I think it was very similar probably to, like, if anybody's ever watched Cammy and Odell where you if you take a polarized sheet, and you put it up, it blocks off certain waves of light. You you take a second one and you turn it one eighty, it'll block out the other waves of light.
But then if you put a third one up to match the first one, it will let light through again, which makes real fucking sense because that should have all been blocked by that second sheet. Why would it start coming through now again by adding another blocker? That doesn't even make sense. And I think it's similar to, that type of thing is the way that's working. Well, what these guys are doing is just taking, crystal chunks, which I can appreciate. They're getting, use out of, basically trash because, like, all them little chunks like that are just, like, from people like me that make, and jewelry and whatnot. It's just the excess shit that we cut off with our, saws and grinders and whatnot and throw it in there with some metal shavings and then some epoxy, which the epoxy would basically be an insulator. So I don't even understand that, why they use that. But there isn't really a lot of thought and there's I mean, I understand that they're putting different materials in there. But other than that, it's not anything even remotely close to what they're we're gonna keep Well, the
[01:16:39] Unknown:
the scattered metal flakes actually can help a lot because you're essentially deflecting, refracting, and scattering, organized waveforms. So now they're not organized anymore. They're not really anything anymore. So I kinda that's basically the same way that, like, the coding that is on, like, fighter jets, stuff like that to help, avoid, like, locking on and radar and all that stuff. It's the same thing. It just scatters it.
[01:17:14] Unknown:
Interesting.
[01:17:15] Unknown:
Yeah. I always thought about painting my car in that, but, Who's that benefit of the person? For for legal reasons, I never did.
[01:17:24] Unknown:
Gotta keep it street legal.
[01:17:27] Unknown:
Define street legal.
[01:17:30] Unknown:
Not attracting
[01:17:32] Unknown:
attention from officers of law who wanna pull you up. They'll never they'll never know until, I guess, they hit me with radar, and then they're like, why is this acting like the way it is?
[01:17:42] Unknown:
Okay. I have some questions about the the DMT realm. So the idea that using a combination of light and maybe binaural beats or of some kind can induce a state of consciousness where a person might feel like they're out of body.
[01:18:04] Unknown:
Yes. Absolutely. So your imagine your coherence and consciousness is being modulated to where your brainwaves are acting differently. So now your perception of this world is going to be different. Now we can get in the weeds of whether that is a perception of a different realm or whether it is just a hallucination. I don't necessarily believe it's a hallucination because there's too much, there's too much consistency throughout individual people to say that it is just a hallucination. I will tell anybody. I have not mapped out how all of that works. So I I would recommend not to do it so that way you don't get locked there, basically.
Depending on how much of a psychonaut individuals are, I mean, you might already be halfway in this world and halfway out. Mhmm. But I have yet to map out exactly where the lines are. I mean, for all I know, like, you know, if we look at biblical wise, we look at, disembodied spirits. Right? What the Nephilim turned into. They are on this plane, but not necessarily in this realm. Right? I do not know how many layers there are between where we are and where they are. So venture at your own risk.
[01:19:49] Unknown:
That's, those are wise words, certainly.
[01:19:53] Unknown:
DMT doesn't bother me, but that Iboga is a little scary for me. I only hear one for way too fucking long.
[01:20:01] Rose777:
I don't I was not affected by DMT. Nothing happened to me. I was not affected by LSD. Nothing happened to me. I was not affected by a BOGA. Nothing happened to me. But one time and after a whole bunch of times of mushrooms not working, I think it was Ben that said, just getting it stuck in your teeth, make sure you nibble it with your front teeth. And I did that with some, like, leftover stuff that someone left in my house. And, like, for two seconds, I thought I felt something. So if I ever get a hold of that same drug, I'll just remember what Ben told me, which is to chew it with my two front teeth only and then make sure I swallow it. But why wouldn't I be affected by psychedelics like LSD or DMT and a BOGO, Luke? Does it do you think I could my I'm just so mentally strong that I block it out from doing what it's supposed to do. Could be your metabolism.
Absorbent issue.
[01:20:59] Unknown:
Yeah. It could be either either you don't absorb it properly or maybe your body processes it too quickly. Like, for me, I
[01:21:11] Unknown:
It wasn't used in the chat. It's like you should try PCP, and that made me laugh. I'm sorry.
[01:21:17] Rose777:
I
[01:21:18] Unknown:
That made me fucking laugh.
[01:21:20] Unknown:
P PCP. Yeah. You know me. I know. That's hilarious. So The the metabolism thing certainly factors into it. That's why I I jokingly talk about cheats all the time and saying, you know, I've had religious experiences on some really good cheese. I've also been offered other things and I've just had the most, interesting experiences. And then people look at me to think I'm joking around and I'm just playing and pull pranking and pulling a leg, but no. I mean, I've I've I've been to all other worlds that have been parallel to this one and just weird imaginative things, and I've had a lot of fun with this. So I haven't had any, like, fearful, you know, demonic thing. It's all been, like, weird dark, but it hasn't been evil. Right. What about the timid grappler?
Oh, we'll get to that in a minute.
[01:22:09] Unknown:
Right. So you may not have crossed that threshold. And, I mean, this could be, like, a individual case by case basis of, like, how much you take compared to what it actually does to your individual brain and how your brain, like, changes its own, you know, waveforms in order to interpret what's going on to see what's going on. So, like, if you gave the same dose to two different people, one of them may go all the way down to fucking floor level while the other one is, you know, still at level one. But, yeah, I have the similar, like, metabolism for specifically Novocaine. Like, I had to get stitches in my forehead one time, and by stitch two, she was, already, like, halfway through the vial. And I was like, just do the rest. I would the needle from you giving me the Novocaine hurts worse than the stitches that you do. So just do the stitches.
Because, because, honestly, I think she kept doing it in the same spot. So Mhmm. Yeah. Your individual metabolism has a a 100% to deal with it. It's like I know a lot of people, that have that kinda, like, hit that max, and instead of them going further, they'll do, like, the deprivation tanks and stuff like that. Mhmm. I I would recommend doing that because my my mind goes all over the place to begin with, but there are many different ways to do many different things. Right. And, I mean, when we're talking about a individual level, there's there's a lot of varying factors.
But like I said, I I haven't started mapping out exactly how many layers there possibly could be. And that's, like, that's one thing that gets me about, like, modern science is they they don't want to entertain something like that because they wanted to get away from, philosophical ideas, but yet, currently, we're using quantum foam and virtual particles. That's that sounds like we just did a full circle back to philosophy, and we're just using different words. It it is getting a little philosophic philo
[01:24:42] Unknown:
philosophic. How do you say that? Philosophical. Philosophical.
[01:24:46] Unknown:
Philosophical.
[01:24:49] Unknown:
Philosophising. It's a tomato tomato argument. Right. Is that fruit, or is it a vegetable? Is it wave? Is it a particle? It's a fruit.
[01:24:58] Unknown:
Right. And that's that's one thing that gets me the most is, like so imagine you have a particle of energy, right, that has no interactions around it. Energy, pretty much, for the most part, always wants to expand. Right? Mhmm. So if it has no interactions around it, what is it going to look like when it hits a target?
[01:25:21] Unknown:
I shop at Walmart,
[01:25:23] Unknown:
so I don't know. It's gonna look spread out. It's gonna look like it's in waveform. It's not actually a waveform. It's not a different form. It's just a expansion of the energy.
[01:25:35] Unknown:
But I still have a problem with what's choosing the directionality.
[01:25:41] Unknown:
What do you mean?
[01:25:42] Unknown:
What what is choosing the directionality of this energy?
[01:25:46] Unknown:
Just wherever it's emitted.
[01:25:48] Unknown:
I mean, there is active Why is it emitted? Why is it emitting?
[01:25:53] Unknown:
Because that pressure builds up, so it has to release that buildup. It's kinda the same as the electron excitation. So once it returns to the normal state, it releases that energy. These energy naturally pulses. That's what creates this pressure wave.
[01:26:18] Unknown:
You're using the word pulse. I've heard heartbeat, this type of thing.
[01:26:23] Unknown:
It would be similar, same thing. A heartbeat, a pulse, just measured as a frequency, really.
[01:26:34] Unknown:
K. So your heart is up now. What is your favorite Christian band?
[01:26:38] Unknown:
Nickelback.
[01:26:40] Unknown:
Good answer. Did he just fucking whip out an answer like nothing?
[01:26:47] Rose777:
I didn't even know they were Christian.
[01:26:49] Unknown:
He has an answer for everything. I don't know if they are. I just went and done.
[01:26:57] Unknown:
So you understand how, do you understand how a galvanic cell battery works?
[01:27:03] Unknown:
Not off top.
[01:27:05] Unknown:
So you've got a cathode, which is a positive, and an anode, which is a negative. And then really, inside the there's a bunch of plates, and the plates go cathode to anode, cathode to anode. So by the end of it, you've got the least stable galvanically going all the way up to the most stable bet galvanically. And these sell these, plates and then the anode are all just borrowing to the next guy until it feeds into the cathode. But in order for that to happen, for any energy exchanges to happen, and what creates the the conditions is the anode being less stable than the cathode, it starts breaking down.
And when it breaks down, the molecule splits apart, and the negative will jump over to the cathode, the negative side of that element. And the positive side will get oxygenated. So the oxygen will grab on to that positive side and and card it off. Okay. Now when that happens, because the negative side has jumped over to the cathode, it's now given a negative charge to the cathode. Where before it was fairly balanced, now it's at a negative, so it's gonna draw a positive. So this positive part of the particle that's floating around is now getting is gonna now get sucked over to that negative part of the particle.
And so then when those two come back together is where you're gonna get this surplus of energy. And, also, this is how you're picking your directionality. This this over here typically has a negative charge. This over here typically has a positive charge. That energy won't flow or release at all unless both those things exist. Unless there's a, you've got a positive part and a negative part has to be over here and in between is what what we would typically call the field. And I don't understand why in particle fit physics, they don't have a recognition of that. I know. There's still there's still gotta be a a negative There's gotta be something choosing the directionality because if there wasn't something put putting a negative pull, then no matter how much energy you had in a hot spot, it's gonna sit right fucking there. It's not gonna go nowhere.
[01:29:33] Unknown:
Yeah. So now that you've laid it out like that, so remember, the variable I have called coherence? Yep. So decoherence is basically coherent in a decay. So as you were talking about it decaying. Right? So this is actually very similar to copper. Have you ever looked at the atomic structure of copper? So they do not currently have a reason whether we're talking about classical or whether we are talking about quantum as to why its outer electron will drop into a inner orbit. Right? I do. It is because that outer shell has lost coherence so much that the inner shell actually pulls that electron in.
[01:30:20] Unknown:
So it loses an electron wall. So you're saying that the inner that the set the second inner shell becomes a valence shell?
[01:30:27] Unknown:
Yes. So it's a similar process to what you're talking about. So as that decoheres, it loses its ability to maintain the structure of the charge or particles with inside of it. These particles now venture out and just go with the flow to the negative side.
[01:30:54] Unknown:
So then with that said, is that would there be something on because I I I I'm from what I'm gathering, although you you you swing both ways, no joke, is that you're you're leaning more toward the flat model, would then there be a a negative source, a negative hot spot that matches the matches what the, sun would be, and that's what's creating the flow between.
[01:31:30] Unknown:
Well, when we're talking about Yeah. Two quarter neons, whether one of them is a, like, a a one plain object. So, like, the horizontal part. The best way to describe I should have said this from the very get go. The best way to actually describe the way a quarter neon works is to imagine a gyroscope. So you have three rotational aspects. These three rotational aspects end up causing a a polarity. They have a positive and a negative polarity. So there will always be a negative return for whatever energy, and then it just continues to go. This is what the toroidal shape that a lot of people talk about is. It is an expression of the scalar gyroscope being shown as a magnetic field. This is something that quarter neons, the scalar gyroscopes naturally do if they have a rotation for it. So for example, helium and hydrogen do not have a rotational aspect to them. They do not have a torsional aspect to them. We only get that once lithium comes in and it gives the extra proton and electron. This actually causes an imbalance, forcing the particle to spin because of the extra torsional aspect it now has.
[01:33:07] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. You were impressed by that?
[01:33:10] Unknown:
Yeah. I I like the the three-dimensional aspect of this. Did did you ever, use a joystick and, play a game where you're flying around in three direct three-dimensional space? Yes. Okay. And then they have, like, the the gimbal, and you're trying to find a balance. But, really, it's you could flip yourself over. Up could be down and down could be up. But to you, it's like you're just fine. One thing that's interesting is that
[01:33:36] Unknown:
when we're talking about, Euler integers, we never have a gimbal lock under a quarter neon.
[01:33:44] Unknown:
Yeah. I was just gonna ask you about the the gimbal lock and, like, dividing by zero. Yeah. It never happens in a quarter neon. Okay.
[01:33:52] Unknown:
What the hell?
[01:33:58] Unknown:
I did not put a comment in chat. There's actually memes about it too. If you look up, Euler Energies and, quarter neon gyroscopes, there's there's literal scientific memes about it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'm
[01:34:14] Unknown:
my mind is going, like, all the different directions at once, and I'm trying to cohere my thoughts into a linear fashion. I was gonna bring up, like, Terrence Howard. Remember that guy? He had he had said some weird things a couple of times, like he was born and knew math in the womb and this sort of thing.
[01:34:32] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't I don't I don't know about all that. Well, what he was showing,
[01:34:37] Unknown:
I don't know what he was saying. It was kind of a a funny theatrical thing. I don't know what that was about. The product he was showing was like, like a three-dimensional thing, and I was trying to find his balance. It was basically like a drone that could turn on three different axes. Okay. And then he had this little physical object toy that he was kinda playing with, and then we kinda No. He was saying that that toy was supposed to be basically the void spaces on the,
[01:35:06] Unknown:
in the power of life.
[01:35:09] Unknown:
Something to that effect. Right. So he's gone and done a bunch of podcasts for a while, and people talked about him, laughed at him, and then completely didn't consider the theories and the math and the stuff he was talking about, which wasn't his own. He was working with other people. He was trying to push a product to market.
[01:35:26] Unknown:
Right. And one thing that's interesting is, like, when we're talking about, like, vacuum geometry or really just any kind of geometric aspect in general, it it's interesting how it is already implemented with inside of the quarter neon. So for example, let me see if I can find it here. So inside of the quarter neon to begin with, you already have a tetrahedron. You have a icoschedron, whatever that word is, a cube, the, octahedron, the dodecahedron. There's multiple shapes already inside of this quarter neon. All of the vacuum geometry that they've been searching for forever is already with inside of the quarter neon.
They've all been it's quite interesting to see how it slowly come, like, full circle back to quarter neon without them acknowledging quarter neon. So, for example, when we're talking about virtual particles and how they are described, how they look, all of that, it is literally just a quarter neon. It is the scalar aspect of the quarter neon. When we're talking about, quantum foam, it just goes back to Maxwell's sea of tiny vortices, which is just a sea of quarter neons. We're basically going full circle, and everybody is dancing around the same terminology without going back to the original name of it.
[01:37:21] Unknown:
Do you have an answer for why that might be?
[01:37:25] Unknown:
Yes. So Newton's laws transcend actual physical ideas. When I say that so for every action, there's an opposite and equal reaction. Right? When Maxwell's equations were separated or his equation was separated, when quantum took the energy aspect of it, right, they had no structure anymore. They only had energy. Well, in order to try to understand and explain energy without structure, you have to rely on probability. If you insert probability, that means that you have to take something out. That something that was taken out is called determinism, meaning that there is a actual purpose. There is an actual function.
There is an actual expected outcome for what is going to happen. So because they had didn't have the structure, determinism was taken out, and the only thing that they could rely on was probability. So they're still looking at it from a probability aspect. They can't look at it as a deterministic structure like Maxwell did. And what's interesting is, like, so have you all heard of modified Newtonian? I think it's modified Newtonian dynamics and then modified relativity. Yeah. Both of these are essentially stating that there are field interaction. One thing that I absolutely love about Einstein is just his absolute refusal to accept the probability aspect of quantum.
Because you have to remember, he still had the structure. So, of course, he's not gonna wanna look at quantum as a probability thing. They had no choice, but he wasn't gonna look at it that way. So that's one of the main reasons why he went back because he knew that there was a deeper field. There was a deeper field interactions going on that neither one of them was seeing. There's even a possibility. One of his quotes is can loosely be stated as him admitting we need to go back to Maxwell's equation. I fucking I lost where I was going now.
[01:40:19] Unknown:
Yeah. We're we're getting a little bit lost here too. I can go back to maybe, determinism, probability. I would ask you maybe about synchronicity and how that kind of ties into this with consciousness.
[01:40:34] Unknown:
You could if you it it depends on how you view it. So, like, I would say that synchronicity probably wouldn't actually arise within a probability world, like a probabilistic state. If we have determinism, then I would say that synchronicity double definitely, like, exists within that world.
[01:41:09] Unknown:
Just let it sink in a little bit. This is a heavy heavy topic, or maybe it's a light topic. I don't know.
[01:41:17] Unknown:
That's one of the, Okay. Actually, what, Ben was talking about before, that is one of the well, pretty much the only way that I met conservation of energy, is that anything that is lost is returned to the field. But if it retains structure, if it has a high coherence, then it will actually pull back from the field.
[01:41:48] Unknown:
I just had a flash of David Ike wearing a teal jumpsuit like his tracksuit and having his experiences. Do you get into any of David Ike's material?
[01:41:58] Unknown:
No. I have not looked into a lot of, a lot of his stuff. I know the name. I vaguely know, like, Yep. Actually, I might not even know, like, any of the, the interactions that he had. Okay.
[01:42:11] Unknown:
He's most well known for being the the reptilian guy.
[01:42:15] Unknown:
Right. Right. That's why I remembered it. I remembered it was some kind of extraterrestrial type experience or interdimensional
[01:42:24] Unknown:
type experience, something like that. He's explored a lot of different ideas, and people get hung up on one of his more interesting ideas. More recently, he was kind of putting together this idea of the waves and the functions and how we have a consensus reality and this type of thing. So in that research, I think he's approaching a little bit about what we're talking about here, trying to get to this idea of, how we experience our consensus reality and maybe tying that into and concepts of what people are saying is, like, a simulation theory.
[01:43:07] Unknown:
So have you ever heard about the Copenhagen interpretation? So within that, there was basically, it kinda set out rules that you had to follow if you wanted to, basically make any kind of additions, any kind of new theories, or anything like that. There is a so every part of the here. We'll just go over to the whole theory real quick. There is every essentially, every single field of science is unified inside of this theory, whether we're talking about liquid theory, whether we're talking about atmospheric, whether we're talking about, which I mean, those two are kinda the same anyway, but a little bit different.
Whether we're talking about atomic structures, whether we're talking about electricity, whether we're talking about, just any any part of classical physics. Relativity is in there as well. Quantum field theory, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, all of that is in there as well. I was able to derive every single law and constant within science based off of first principle values. I was able to derive the entire periodic table plus the extra that I, got as well from first principal values. I was able to predict all, particle masses that are currently in the particle zoo.
Not only that, but also identify which ones were probably, misidentified. So, for example, when we're talking about there is a mass for a photon in motion, and there is a mass for a photon at rest. When a photon is in motion, it creates pressure waves, which the regular photon at rest does as well. The issue is is that, obviously, because the photon that is traveling, these waves are going to act different. The waves that are being put off are what we currently understand as gravitons, which is quantum's, attempt at unifying gravity, and it is also the Higgs boson.
Right? So these ripples going through is what helps matter accumulate. It's what basically sets every continues everything in motion. Dark matter, dark energy, they're misidentified as well.
[01:45:55] Unknown:
One thing that's interesting is that Under the under the typical model currently, wouldn't Higgs the Higgs boson be what's, causing coherence?
[01:46:05] Unknown:
It is essentially the god particle, the particle that, I don't know if they say it creates
[01:46:12] Unknown:
matter. It's what gives weight to matter.
[01:46:15] Unknown:
Right. And it gets its matter from the Higgs field itself.
[01:46:25] Unknown:
Because this is under the same idea that, your your electron and your neutron don't have anything, any matter to them, so we can't see them or really do anything with or really, weigh and measure them in a conventional sense.
[01:46:43] Unknown:
I say that we can. So I did, there is a relationship. There is a weight relationship between protons and electrons that has been, like, it's one of the constants. So I think it's a a relationship of eighteen twenty or something like that. It's a 1,820, whatever the unit is that they actually use for it, that stays consistent throughout.
[01:47:11] Unknown:
I don't disagree with this. I I talk about this actually that electricity has weight. People just don't realize it. Like a dead battery in a in a full battery, like a c battery. If you take a dead one and you drop it flat on the floor, that fucking thing will bounce up six inches. You take a full one and do it, that thing drops deader than shit. Just doop.
[01:47:32] Unknown:
Well, yes. So if we look at Einstein's equation of e equals m c squared, there's a direct relationship, obviously, between energy and matter. Matter is just a condensed form of energy. Energy does have weight to it. So if you do have a battery that is charged compared to one that is not, yes, you will have an increased weight in the charged battery.
[01:48:01] Unknown:
I'd like to take it back to nickel real quick. Nickel back to nickel cadmium batteries. Nickel being the fifth most most frequently seen element on Earth, I think. Fifth most common element on Earth. And getting back to battery talk, and the weight of the batteries and weight of electricity, You were saying, how your model ties into the the elements, the table of the elements. Right. Could you speak more on that?
[01:48:40] Unknown:
Yeah. Let me go to that part in the paper.
[01:48:45] Unknown:
So what are the the most, most frequent occurrences of these elements? Do you have explanations why, you know, nickel is so common?
[01:48:56] Unknown:
It depends on what is, what is basically friendly and the most stable in order to basically keep combining into other elements? What's the most accepted to, protons or electrons depending on if we're talking about, ions or not? As to why nickel is the most plentiful, I don't actually have an answer. It could be just because maybe it's very easy for other things to combine into it. Maybe there are other interactions that cause it to be easier to be made.
[01:49:45] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't have an answer either. I'm just kinda ask asking myself some questions. I have some facts here. Doing some Internet searches to figure out what I can find and, some trivia for you. It says the element of nickel was first isolated and classified as an element in 1751 by a Swedish chemist, an Axel Frederick Constead. I'm a Minnesotan. I don't know if I speak Swedish very well. So he extracted it from There's still the cities all over the place. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm just, just a little bit ashamed right now. I'm trying to figure out how, they they mistook it for copper, so they were confused with this element of nickel. They thought it was copper. So then the German word kumfernikkel, meaning devil's copper, was used. So the to get the word nickel from a German word, kumfernikkel meaning devil's copper because copper is not nickel, but they resemble each other.
[01:50:44] Unknown:
Yeah. I could I could kinda see that.
[01:50:46] Unknown:
And then the the copper top thing, you know, the batteries commercials, I have the Yeah. The sound memory of the commercial being, some certain tones, and it associates it with copper and the copper top batteries. And the Energizer Bunny comes along. What brand of batteries do you recommend?
[01:51:06] Unknown:
There could be a very good possibility in the future that batteries are obsolete.
[01:51:17] Unknown:
Why would they be obsolete? Because I have Everything has a battery, and we we recharge them. Because Sometimes, like, rail backs. Is that okay?
[01:51:27] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. So far, I have not found a single part where Tesla was wrong. I think that's, the safest way I can say that.
[01:51:52] Unknown:
I'm picking up what you're putting down through the ether here.
[01:51:56] Unknown:
Through the scalar field. Scalar field. Okay. The Maxwell field. Because I I named it the Maxwell Field because of him being the one to, to implement the idea of it or to first introduce the idea of it. So, like, for example, in the experiment done by Golden Gate University, inside of that Faraday cage that was inside of the vacuum chamber, they detected movement and current.
[01:52:34] Unknown:
What tools are they using to detect this?
[01:52:37] Unknown:
I I don't know what kind of very, very sensitive, voltmeter that they were using for the piezo, and I assume just a very, very sensitive motion detector for the ferrofluid.
[01:52:57] Unknown:
For anybody that doesn't know, ferrofluid just has little iron particles in it. It reacts to magnet and reacts to fields.
[01:53:05] Unknown:
It's very cool looking fluid.
[01:53:07] Unknown:
Yeah. Ferro's iron.
[01:53:09] Unknown:
Sounds like an Egyptian pharaoh, but it's spelled differently?
[01:53:14] Unknown:
Yes. Spelled the the iron that way. Yeah.
[01:53:23] Unknown:
We got a little bit into talking about trees, structures, branching, this type of thing. Have you seen, Ben's model here, Balderson's model of the the tree of life that he's put together and the structure.
[01:53:38] Unknown:
So I watched a video, that he had posted on YouTube Okay. A while back, earlier today. Mhmm. I'm gonna look over it a couple more times, because I think I think is your cell is one of the sacred geometry, isn't it? Okay. So, yeah, I'm definitely that is going to be part of what I'm going to be looking into.
[01:54:03] Unknown:
Yeah. In in my opinion, the, Yggdrasil is the mass human side, and then what people recognize is the the flower of life, the circles. That's the that's the feminine side. So if you take, you know, the each center of the each one of them circles has a dot and all them dots connect together, that's basically the tree of life right there. You can lay So the feminine side and just lay it directly over top of it.
[01:54:28] Unknown:
So oddly enough, there's probably a atomic number or, basically, an atom that actually corresponds with, the flower of life and with Idrisil. So that is actually something that I wanna look into. For example, like we talked about before, Metatron's cube looks to be a one to one to element one forty four. Vesica Pisces looks like it might be relatively close to element one thirty eight. Now when we're talking about these elements wondering
[01:55:12] Unknown:
are theoretical elements. They aren't something that has ever been seen or produced at this point.
[01:55:21] Unknown:
They might have been seen, but they haven't been notated down.
[01:55:26] Unknown:
Well, yeah, that's, that's one of the problems with some of these elements is they only exist for a fraction of a second, just like you you
[01:55:37] Unknown:
Well, when they're totally right. When they're made inside of an electromagnetic furnace, it is only natural for them to only exist for a couple seconds.
[01:55:51] Unknown:
But some some a lot of these elements, they just they change and degrade so damn quickly. You don't even ever have time. It's, you know, at at that elemental structure because people don't understand also that, like, most people have never looked at decay chains and realize that a lot of these elements are the same fucking thing. You know? And it's too They're all just,
[01:56:15] Unknown:
essentially energy and different stacks and different forms. That's all it is. It's just different accumulations of energy.
[01:56:23] Unknown:
But we Like, you look at uranium. Uranium's the top end of that decay chain leads the bottom end. This one's negative. This one's positive. This sucks in energy. This is chucking excess energy. They're actually the exact same thing. Uranium would eventually decay down into lead and even bismuth, which most people know what it is and have it at their house. That's the pretty much stable part of that chain. That's about as stable as it gets as bismuth. But that's all all of the exact same thing.
[01:56:56] Unknown:
If I remember correctly so I did do a little bit of looking into to with the sacred geometry and the elements. If I remember right, I think Idrisil was related to Bismuth.
[01:57:17] Unknown:
Makes sense. Makes sense. Because that's where, again, that's where that that particular chain, reaches stability. You know, at at least as much stability as it's gonna have. Right. So what you're seeing as the
[01:57:30] Unknown:
straight lines, I actually attribute to torsional values. What you would typically see as a circle, I would view as electron shells.
[01:57:43] Unknown:
Yeah. I understand what you're saying.
[01:57:45] Unknown:
Duh. There's definitely a, I mean, Metatron's cube was a literal almost one hundred percent one to one. Some of the other ones, there may be a little bit of interpretation into it, but it's really not that much. It's just as long as you're understanding that straight lines represent torsional values and curved lines or circles represent, electron shells. But, yeah, no. A 100% with, like, decay times and all that. So, for example, when we're talking about lithium ion, when it gains that extra electron, my decay timing that I have set for that or calculated for that is sixty eight seconds.
The empirical data on it is around, I think it's sixty sixty five to seventy seconds. So yes. So everything
[01:58:56] Unknown:
Which anything for anybody that doesn't know, And I've actually have a series with Emily Moyer. If you guys wanna go check that out, where we're going through the different elements, anything out of that first row of elements, that shit is unstable as fuck. This is part of why, like, you can't even put lithium fires out with water because it the lithium will grab the fucking rip the oxygen right out of the water and break the molecule apart and take the oxygen right out of it. Just keep on going, baby. Like, dude, that lithium's beast.
[01:59:32] Unknown:
Yeah. Because it's essentially it started out as a unstable structure. That's whenever we first get the torsional aspect within the elements. Like, literally yeah. The the torsional value that I have set for it is basically 0.01. We don't actually get up to so for example, hydrogen and helium have zero torsional aspects to them. Once we get up to element six, you start getting, 0.02. Then when we get to, for example I can't remember off the top of my head. What is, what's the atomic number for uranium?
[02:00:15] Unknown:
That's two thirty eight. Is that the normal one?
[02:00:22] Unknown:
That is the 92? Yeah. There we go. I was about to say I think it's 90 something.
[02:00:29] Unknown:
So for that, we have a code green room? Yeah. You're talking enriched. That's what that Yeah. I was talking enriched uranium. I that's why I was spitting off right away, I guess. So Yeah. Two thirty eight is the most common isotope of of uranium.
[02:00:45] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. 93%
[02:00:47] Unknown:
of of natural uranium is two thirty eight. Yeah.
[02:00:53] Unknown:
So as far as, like, emission pressure, what I was talking about with the Tesla and waves, coherent, the emission pressure, the scalar potential, the, torsional value, they're all varying, and they kind of all depend on each other. I mean, we're talking about a very dynamic system. This is basically why, like, older, older theories, for example, Newtonian gravity, it works in very special scenarios. But if we he he never accounted for going on top of a mountain. He never accounted for going under the ocean, stuff like that. Gravity changes when you change your position.
But for where he was, he was, for the most part, correct. But when we're talking about element 92, so it has a coherence factor of 0.52. This is about the middle because coherence only goes from zero to one. Four right now.
[02:02:04] Unknown:
When we're talking about This is not why they enrich it to use it. They get the enriched uranium, the two thirty eight because it's it's it's not that's much more unstable.
[02:02:15] Unknown:
Correct. Correct. So it's and it's a original coherence is still going to be the same. But as it gets, further enriched, its torsional values are going to increase. So its emission pressure is going to be or the pressure is going to be is 3.3 times 10 to the negative five. Then the radial dispersion, which is essentially how far out this emission pressure goes before it completely dissipates, this is going to be, 0.25, which is a kind of medium base for the torsional value. Then when we go to the scalar potential, it is going to be 6.34 to 10 or times 10 to the negative five.
But then the torsional value itself is going to be 1.69. So realistically speaking, uranium itself is kind of a stable ish element. But as you enrich it, right, you are going to extremely raise that torsional value. If its coherence cannot overcome that torsional value, you are going to have energy being spread out. Now if you have energy being spread out, what does that look like? Radiation. And there are definitely some elements that their emission pressure and their coherence cannot keep up with their torsional values. Their torsional values are way too high. So, for example, when we talk about, the very last element as of right now, which is one eighteen, so it has a coherence of 0.45.
I hate saying the name of it, so I'm just gonna say element one eighteen. So 0.45 is a relatively medium coherence again, but the radial dispersion is much higher. It is at 0.3. The torsional value of it is almost I think it's actually over twice the amount of uranium. So we're talking about a lower coherence, a higher radial dispersion, and a higher torsional value. So as soon as this element exists, it is already starting to tear itself apart.
[02:05:09] Unknown:
Yeah. I was I was that that was my thought on it right away because it's it's gonna burn right through itself. That's gonna be the bigger problem right there is why it makes it unusable because just like with a like like with a light bulb where you put pump inert gas in there to keep it from oxidizing so that way it'll maintain coherence. You know, it's the same thing for any energy source. You don't want it to burn itself up in two seconds. But Like that. It's not pan much. You can't make such a thick ton of heat. Oh, yeah. Because it's right. Because
[02:05:43] Unknown:
thermal radiation, thermal heat is just entropy. It is the energy becoming disorganized. It is Yeah. It is decoherence. Entropy and decoherence are essentially the same thing, except it is a matter of whether the object is able to maintain its structure after this happens, if it's able to bounce back based off of the memory of its structure.
[02:06:09] Unknown:
So I I I understand spirit of the age. So this is just something people don't really understand. There the re the periodic table of elements is the atomic table of elements, and the only thing that's chain that is really measured on that is how many protons are in a molecule. So just just understand that when they say one eighteen, that means there's a 118 protons. If it's a stable element, unlike where you're talking about uranium two thirty eight, the uranium 92, that's gonna have approximately the same number of electrons as it does protons, which is where you're talking about stability. And it's not gonna go bleeding in one side off really badly. So the radioactive ones, they just have the more protons, but a lot of times they're they're more unstable.
So they're they're more quickly gonna chuck off that positive end. Like, when I was talking about the decay chain, it's gonna try and get down to where it reaches a stable element where it's able to hold its structure and not wanna throw or gain anything, which in the uranium decay chain, it's bismuth is what we were talking about, is that's a fairly stable structure, and it won't really wanna do either grab or or dump. In more layman's terms, I don't, I understand everything Luke's saying. I that's just not how I talk because I I learned a long time ago that people get really irritated. I'm not which isn't me talking to you at all, Luke. No. You're good. Yeah.
When I was younger and I would talk like that, people get real pissed off at me, and they think you're just trying to talk above their heads and being dickheads. Obviously, we invited him for this conversation, so he should be talking like this. But I still learn to speak like I I'm I'm a damn So the the best way that I can explain the periodic table
[02:08:09] Unknown:
is take a LEGO. Right? A LEGO is a proton. A LEGO is a neutron. Add more LEGOs to it. Continue adding more LEGOs and you go up the periodic table. But understand that at a certain point, you start getting a spin. Now objects that are smaller can spin faster and still be stable. Objects that are larger cannot spin as fast because they start ripping themselves apart. This is the same thing. So you add more Legos onto it, but you're turning it faster. So now LEGOs start flying off of it. These LEGOs that are flying off of it is radiation.
[02:08:59] Unknown:
Like a sumo wrestler and a hula hoop?
[02:09:03] Unknown:
Yeah. But I guess the radiation will be sweat beads.
[02:09:06] Unknown:
Shaking those hips. Everything's going out. So I got a question here. We'll clarify. Spirit of the age made a statement saying all radioactive compounds do not belong in the periodic table. They're clearly compounds, and the periodic table is for elements. Now we can maybe stop for a moment and discuss compounds. My theory of compound is that a compound is where a man takes his wife to create a nuclear family.
[02:09:35] Unknown:
Alright. Alright. Understand that realistically speaking, hydrogen is a compound. It is a combination of protons and neutrons. Helium is a compound. You can actually look at the entire periodic table as just compounds. There is no actual pure element. If we talk about pure elements, we're just talking about protons, neutrons, and electrons. We're just talking about energy itself.
[02:10:05] Unknown:
This is this is why there's a entire group. They call it the cult of hydrogen, which says everything starts with hydrogen. It's one proton, one electron. Actually, no neutron. And then it starts building up from there. And everything is just adding on another one, adding on another one.
[02:10:30] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm not expecting pure elements when we're going to pound town. You know what I mean? Yeah.
[02:10:37] Unknown:
Yeah. Things get weird with the neutrons because then that's that's where you get your allotrobes because then you get, like, deuterium. It's just adding a neutron to hydrogen.
[02:10:48] Unknown:
Yes.
[02:10:52] Unknown:
And that's not on the periodic table of elements because it still only got one proton. So it's still the same thing as hydrogen. That's why it's an allotrope of hydrogen. It it's not really. And then that whole thing doesn't really work the way a person thinks it would because, like, some of the things that that degrade, like, fuck like, deuterium will degrade is it deuterium degrades down down into hydrogen? Or, I mean, into helium? So it actually jumps it up. Yeah. Yeah. It degrades into helium, which that's just why and why did it gain it? Why did it gain a proton by dumping a neutron?
[02:11:33] Unknown:
It takes a diagonal step. And then once it loses it, it just steps sideways to where it just becomes helium.
[02:11:41] Unknown:
Yeah. And so and so instead of just becoming hydrogen with no neutron, now it's now fucking helium. Right.
[02:11:49] Unknown:
And that is because it Wild. Gains a torsion because of that. It's off balance. So in order to fix that balance, it has to start turning. It returns to basically a a neutral state once it loses it because, helium has no torsion to it. One thing that's interesting, if you want to say, a pure element, then you so I saw somebody in the comment talking about ether. If anybody remembers in the original Mendeleev periodic table, ether was the first element. A lot of people understood that as light. I actually agree with Mendeleev, but I would not say it is light. I would say it is energy.
[02:12:44] Unknown:
I disagree both, and I think it's fluid.
[02:12:52] Unknown:
So when we're talking about the scalar field, you could represent it as fluid like. Yes. Yeah. It's it is the field.
[02:13:00] Unknown:
Right. Like, there's again, just like with a battery, to me, the the to me, we everything is a battery, including you and me. Every we're just biochemical batteries, and everything's an anode and a cathode. So it's a three part system, positive, negative, and then the field, which is the the fluid in between that's allowing the transition of power to have Right. And energy flows.
[02:13:24] Unknown:
Yeah. So, yes, you you are you are right, but it is also that the first element is just energy in general. And that liquid, what you would say, is just pressurized more and more and more to where it becomes other particles, becomes other elements. So you could easily say that, yes, it is it is fluid like. Yes.
[02:13:58] Unknown:
Yeah. Fluid's the only thing that allows that transition to happen. Yeah. It is it is definitely fluid. Even even when you're say People don't realize it, but even when you're talking about normal electricity, the reason that we use metals is because they turn into fluids. That's just a fluid that's that temperature is solid.
[02:14:18] Unknown:
Right. That's why we say a flow of current, a flow of electricity. Yes. It is fluid like.
[02:14:25] Unknown:
Well, it's the the the the transition piece is fluid. What's making the the the the what's the field? Because when you're looking at it, you've got the the typical copper wire. That is your that is your field. And down here, you have to set up a negative. And over here, you throw in positive, and it will it will swim its way through that through that, field, and it will stay in that approximate area. This is why when you're looking at, mythological stories, Mercury is the the messenger of the gods. It's he's the the communication.
He's the the trade. Anything that includes going from one to the other, Mercury controls that whole thing. That's the fluid in between the the positive and the negative. It's all it's all a three part system. This is what this is where I was getting at with not understanding what's picking directionality, and I understand what you're saying that these
[02:15:28] Unknown:
So you're so understand that that same thing that you're seeing going through that solid, that is happening outside of that solid as well. It's just the amount of energy, the amount of energy that has already collected there is what we are seeing the expression of through that object. So, like, when Tesla is still in the your field.
[02:15:51] Unknown:
I understand that it's in a little tunnel around the outside. I'm real well aware of that. Right. I'm an electrician. Hey. Yeah. I'm real well aware of it. But the but it's still setting the field. I won't have electricity. If my wires over here, that that field is, like, right here and right on top of it. We have little fucking meters that we can just stick right there and, yeah, there's power there. Working. But it's not out here. It's Yes. It is. Right? It follows that wire. That wire is is setting the the field. It's it's a it's the fluid that's allowing this transaction to happen.
[02:16:30] Unknown:
So that experiment done by Golden Gate University and all of the experiments done by Tesla state that you're wrong. That field is actually going outside of it. It's just not expressed until you have that materialistic object that then you you you can then detect it from. So, essentially, you're you're viewing an effect of a current inside of an ocean.
[02:17:01] Unknown:
Let me back to back it.
[02:17:04] Unknown:
It's all about the motion of the ocean. Ocean. Yeah. Yeah. We're getting seminal. We're talking origins. How is baby made?
[02:17:13] Unknown:
I'm not disagreeing with the I'm not disagreeing with the waves in the ocean, metaphor in in any way, shape, or form. Once again, we have a positive. We have a the the water in this the liquid in this always is the liquid that picks up the energetic energy and does that transfer. And the thicker lick the liquid, the the better it transfers. We that that's just basic science. As soon as you don't have the liquid, which we live in a vapor system, which is liquid, as soon as you lose that, sound doesn't travel, light doesn't travel. None of that kind of thing wants to happen. The the everything is the scalar field.
[02:17:56] Unknown:
Right. Because the scalar field makes up what we observe as reality.
[02:18:01] Unknown:
So so the ether then is the field in and of itself and it's liquid, and then you have a positive. And my problem with your system, and I understand you're saying that, that these have a positive and negative with but everything does. Even if you take even if you take just water, water as a positive and positive and negative as bill as above so below, no matter how big or small you take it, it's always gonna be able to, if you isolate something, have a positive side and a negative side. It's just the way it works. And so I get that. But there's still gotta be something that's on in that system, an overall negative. Something equal to this overall positive that you're saying because it's projecting.
So it's obviously then gonna be the positive side. The the same thing with electricity. If I don't have voltage to go out, that amperage, no matter how positive and strong it is, is not gonna come to me.
[02:19:00] Unknown:
So the overall negative may be below what we can see. If we're talking about the That's what I was asking you. Somewhat of a plane of inertia type of situation to where because if the plan is not
[02:19:15] Unknown:
of inertia where the two meet?
[02:19:17] Unknown:
Correct. So below us, what we see is the ground would be The negative. Beginning of the negative. Yes.
[02:19:24] Unknown:
Yes. Now we're on the same page.
[02:19:28] Unknown:
Alright. Alright. So say what you just said again so the rest of the class can catch up.
[02:19:34] Unknown:
The earth is a ground.
[02:19:36] Unknown:
Uh-huh. I'm standing on the ground. No. Not not not the earth where we're standing underneath us because we would be on the plane of inertia where this positive and negative are balanced out, basically, which is the center of the toroid, which is the the plane of inertia. That's what we're living on. I call it the carbon plane.
[02:20:00] Unknown:
Right. So, yeah, if so kinda like what I was talking about before to where every quarter neon has a, negative and positive polarity. So for example, if our positive polarity is up or north or whatever you wanna consider it, the opposite would be more than likely where we can't see.
[02:20:25] Unknown:
Now we're on the same page. This is what I've been digging at the whole time.
[02:20:30] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:20:33] Unknown:
So the two This is what I'm missing out of your story was missing out of your story. And, unfortunately, most people, that's missing, period. They don't understand that everything's a dissension from positive without understanding the way energy works at all. Because if there was with the positive, then with no negative, then that would never project out. It would stay it would stay to its fucking self because it's got nowhere to go. Right.
[02:20:58] Unknown:
So the plane of inertia, the carbon plane, that's the place where the baby's getting made?
[02:21:03] Unknown:
Yeah. Babies Yeah. Forever. I think, That's actually so speaking of water, that's one thing that's interesting. Water or just liquid in general is, its coherence actually fluctuates. Yeah. It it Yeah. Because it's Mercury.
[02:21:23] Unknown:
Mercury doesn't really have a positive or a negative. It can be either. Like, that's, you know, that's the whole, the the whole where they kind of put give the mercurial figure a feminine aspect. Like, that's that's why. Because, again, like, when you look at it in a battery aspect, as as I was talking about, like, the transactions between the anode and the cathode, the mercury itself at one point in time is negative, and then at another point in time is positive just depending on which particles it's transitioning. Is it transitioning things from the anode to the cathode or the cathode to the anode? And so and the mercury don't give a fuck either way. So, Ben Ben, did you so now from your Odinist perspective, did you find Thor in Luke's?
Yes. Just now. Okay. This whole time I've been digging and digging at it, and and I finally got it. I'm sorry. I thought see, whenever I was talking about the,
[02:22:24] Unknown:
the Earth being a, quarter neon. So, yes, the the negative part of it would be underneath us.
[02:22:32] Unknown:
Yes. That's what's that's why the energy is transitioning this direction. That's what's creating the directionality of it because underneath us, there's a negative, and that's pulling that in, which is also part of why you could you can charge your seeds with a bet with a magnet by putting a on top of a magnet and turning the south side up. So that way, it pulls that down and more thoroughly kinda, like, gets it to aim the.
[02:22:59] Unknown:
Yes. It focuses it. Yeah.
[02:23:02] Unknown:
So where was Thor hiding all night?
[02:23:08] Unknown:
Not in his not in his not in his, presentation. It was high it was hiding from his presentation, but he but he found him. So, apparently, it's there. He just didn't explain it.
[02:23:25] Unknown:
Yeah. It's the I guess I didn't, go over it entirely. But yes. So in inside of any quarter neon I don't think I'm giving you a hard time. No. You're good. You're good. Yeah. Yeah. But the pre the the presentation portion of things,
[02:23:40] Unknown:
like, if I could get a quarter out of what goes on in my head, and I've got some fairly elaborate presentations. I had, like, 15 of them on crow. And, like, the one I'd like you to see is, my, my, presentation from Flattoberfest, where I laid out the the whole system electrically, even better and tied it to the planets. Excellent stuff. But, yeah, that putting the presentation together and trying to make what's going on coherent for other people, fucking hard.
[02:24:16] Unknown:
Oh, trust me. I I just unified physics, and I'm trying to express terminology that nobody's ever heard of before.
[02:24:25] Unknown:
Yeah. You gotta learn to use smaller words if you're gonna try and, get at the, mainstream crowd. I don't know if you were watching the chat in any way, shape, or form, but you could see quite a few people are like, yeah. I there there's a whole bunch of words I've never heard here, and this is part of why I speak the way I do where I just kinda hillbilly it down. That way people can kinda understand the mechanics of it. Sure. Because there's no And I mean, certainly, I I enjoyed it, and Marcus enjoyed it. But but I'm a fucking nerd, and I I work on things like this. So Oh, really?
People won't ever have wanted to look at chemistry or the fucking valence shells of atoms or the fucking anything like that. Alright. So if anybody's if anybody's still here
[02:25:16] Unknown:
that had a question about a word, put it in the chat right now, and I will try to go over them each by each. Yeah. They're still listening.
[02:25:26] Unknown:
Question of the pronunciation and the spelling of the word.
[02:25:31] Unknown:
No. We've got we've got an excellent crowd. It's like You don't normally hear it out this hard on him. You guys are gonna have to put up with it. This is the kind of shit. And the best part is, Christy will list have me Well well, I'll sit here for, like, two hours and listen to shit like this and all about chemistry and things like that. And then I'll I'll turn around and I'll watch, like, you know, farting with eye contact. And Kristen, what the fuck? What
[02:25:59] Rose777:
is that?
[02:26:00] Unknown:
Oh, dude. Dude. It's like my eye dominance. Low low brow humor is the only good humor. Like, there's whole videos where dudes walk around with those, like, fart machines, and they'll, like, walk over at people, like, stare them in the eye and then hit the fart button. It just, like, stare them right in the face. And it's hilarious because 99% of people will just look away and just turn their head away. Like, it's fucking hilarious. Like, yeah. And one of my favorite ones, the dude went to go do it to, like, a 10 year old. And this 10 year old, like, leaned into it and just kept staring at him, and you could see him trying to grunt one out. I was waiting to see if he shit himself. I was like, don't push that hard kid. You'll learn the wrong lesson. You'll lose this war.
[02:26:46] Unknown:
Oh my god.
[02:26:48] Unknown:
Yeah. That's what she says. She's like, how did you go from that to this? Like, it's balance, baby. It's balance.
[02:26:57] Unknown:
I think somebody said what's the theory. So the theory is called divine emission theory. It's gonna be short. Lentil theory? D e t.
[02:27:07] Unknown:
The lentil theory?
[02:27:09] Unknown:
Divine emission theory.
[02:27:12] Unknown:
Oh, fuck. It it's a joke, brother. It's a joke. D e t. No. I I hear people all the time. My the people that listen to me know that they I've only eaten lentils, like, one time. My wife made me lentils, and I don't know what it is. They're they're like a they're like a they're a legume of some kind, and it's something that Greek people eat or something. It's not for it's Eastern. Middle Eastern people. It's not for white people. Like, they gave me the most horrifying gas I've ever had in my life, and that's why Levitation was a problem. Levitation. That's why when you were talking about levitating and stuff, I was like, oh, no. It's lentils. Because I mean, I had, like, a twelve hour continuous fart after eating lentils. Like, I've never had anything like it. I thought I was gonna explode. Holy shit.
[02:28:03] Unknown:
That's that's why our introduction music features burps and farts.
[02:28:08] Unknown:
Yeah. She did that to me. And then occasionally, I eat too much hot cheese when she's gone because I make then I do the cooking and then gotta use all the peppers.
[02:28:18] Unknown:
Yeah. That's I think that's, like, two of my main food groups is just hot and cheese.
[02:28:23] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. You would love eating here. That is our that is two of our food groups too.
[02:28:30] Unknown:
So you guys are already planning a dinner date together? Apparently,
[02:28:34] Rose777:
yes. Beautiful. Cheese tour.
[02:28:38] Unknown:
Dude, I have a whole cheese I have a whole cheese drawer in my in my fridge that's all just different kinds of cheese.
[02:28:46] Rose777:
Yes too. That's there's, like, the good cheese, the the the better cheese, and the best cheese. And the best cheese always goes so much faster, but you've gotta have the backup cheese for when the good cheese Yeah. Out. That Tillemook's good for bulky shit,
[02:29:00] Unknown:
but then you gotta have the nice cheeses. Like, I like that Boar's Head four four pepper. Oh, that one's good. Yeah. That one's great. And there's they're, Chipotle gouda.
[02:29:11] Unknown:
That one's excellent. That one we like in our our broccoli powder. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. If we're so have y'all had the I I assume since we're all cheese connoisseurs here, have you had the grilled cheese cheese, I've already? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Havarti. Dude, I
[02:29:30] Unknown:
My wife's Danish.
[02:29:32] Unknown:
Yeah. I would I would
[02:29:34] Rose777:
I don't know what I'd do for some Havarti. You know? Thin sliced from the deli. You ask them to slice it thin, but then you use a lot of slices.
[02:29:45] Unknown:
Yeah. Oh, dude. We got there's a there's so I live in Northern California, so we have small dairy is, like, amazing small local dairy stuff around here. And these one guys have a four alarm ghost pepper freaking cheese. It's a cheddar's it's a it's a a sharp cheddar and just full of ghost peppers. Oh my god. It's only available, like, six months a year, but so good. Yeah. I see great white pulp. You're white too. You you you that lentils are not for white peoples. Yeah. That's pain. Pain.
[02:30:26] Unknown:
I think did somebody say something about the spelling of quarter neons? Yeah. Yeah. So it's just quarter, just like normal, and then n I o n s.
[02:30:46] Unknown:
This is just this is just basic hermetics. You know that. Right? Outside outside of the even the even like the Kovalium doesn't put the negative side into things, but, basically, this is just hermetics and everything. Just small to big is just one thing.
[02:31:02] Unknown:
Right.
[02:31:03] Unknown:
I mean, it's not this is where the new agers get all weird about it. They don't understand that everything's a car. That doesn't mean the transmission is the engine because at some point, fractally in there, you're not exactly the same as this other piece over here, but you're part of a system which matches the smaller system and the smaller system and the bigger system and the bigger system. And you're it's all the same, and it all functions the fucking same.
[02:31:29] Unknown:
Right. So just because energy is energy, that doesn't mean that we would like, there's certain occasions where we would use direct current over alternating current even though they're both energy.
[02:31:40] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:31:41] Unknown:
ACDC.
[02:31:42] Unknown:
Yeah. It's a little rock. I actually go And you don't get no Hertz in in in in DC. So Hertz only applies to the AC. Right. No. We're talking DC talking talk. PC. No. I never talk about your gay black dude.
[02:31:59] Unknown:
You wanna talk about him anymore either.
[02:32:05] Unknown:
I they they tell me that Christianity is supposed to be anti gay, but Marcus bust bust out a lot of real gay stuff.
[02:32:12] Unknown:
That's Hey. We're all just
[02:32:15] Unknown:
men with three stripping on stripper poles to Jesus.
[02:32:18] Unknown:
Yeah. It's the the private Christian school experiences.
[02:32:23] Unknown:
Is this strange? So I'm It'll do something to you. I'm sharing some of those stories a little bit. Yeah. Mhmm. And that's what I I think that's my overall thing that I've loved the most about this theory is, like, when I set out on this, I I had my own conversation with God. I was like, look. You know how I think. You know how I do. Point me in the right direction, and I will figure it out, and it all just came into this.
[02:32:52] Unknown:
It's dedicating your life to
[02:32:56] Unknown:
figuring it out. Yeah. And then to like, one of my main goals was even though, like, I have my own faith, let me figure out what is actually going on without, like, without putting a bias on it. You know what I mean? Mhmm.
[02:33:12] Unknown:
Yeah. A whole conversation about, you know, religion versus science and, you know, that false tagline. They both used to be the same. I really like the part where the shape of the of the,
[02:33:24] Unknown:
void is in the center of each one. I like that part a lot. Yeah. The cavitation. That's that's good shit. That's that's where the life source is. That's the feminine. That's that's the life source of the whole fucking deal.
[02:33:38] Unknown:
Yes. So that is essentially the like, when we're talking about, sacred geometry, that is the source of the field itself.
[02:33:48] Unknown:
Yeah. The field's the feminine. Yeah.
[02:33:51] Unknown:
You were talking about was it coherence having a zero to one measurement?
[02:33:57] Unknown:
Right. So in quantum, there is a factor called decoherence, and it is essentially the opposite of coherence. And, I mean, if you think about that logically, if something can decohere, obviously, it can be coherent.
[02:34:13] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[02:34:14] Unknown:
They use the same scaling factor. It is a unitless number between and when I say unitless, it means, like, it's not one millimeter. It's not one, you know, jewel. It's it's just one. And they use it the same way from a zero to one. There is a possibility that at some point, like, when I start getting into different dimensions, I mean, there may be a time to where I have a, like, negative 0.5, or there may be a time to where I have a 1.5. It is open, but as of right now, it is just zero two one.
[02:35:04] Unknown:
How does that work with fiber optics delivering high speed Internet to my computer?
[02:35:11] Unknown:
It's about the same. Okay. It has a, it has a low coherence, actually. But all it is is just Morse code created by light. That's all fiber optics is.
[02:35:29] Unknown:
On and off, in and out, one zero. Yeah. Yeah. In and out. How was baby made? You haven't answered my question. I've asked you three times. How was baby formed with the spark of life giving it consciousness?
[02:35:44] Unknown:
That would be the void part in the material.
[02:35:49] Unknown:
By a pulse. Talking about.
[02:35:52] Unknown:
So That that's the spark. That's the the good stuff right there. That's that's the magic. It was just created by a pulse. You know what I mean? Just, just however you wanna take that. It's the divine emission theory. Well, that you understand that that void is what's causing the positive and negative to come together, and that's what's creating the life. Right? Right. So so because without that field, that field, even though it's liquid, is actually a void. It's representing a void. The original in the in the origins of the the universe, the all splits into the positive and negative, but the it but then that's the pure masculine and the pure feminine. They just balance each other out. So what happens is is the masculine splits into a positive and negative.
And so that's why there's always gotta be that two, that duality. And then the feminine comes in, which is the void because the masculine side is material and the feminine side is immaterial, and it pulls them two sides of the masculine together. That's why that little void's in the center of that. Because if you don't have that feature, the two the two wanna go away from each other. The positive wants to rise and the negative wants to sink. It's fire and ice. And so
[02:37:06] Unknown:
I call it a null.
[02:37:09] Unknown:
Right. Yeah. That's the zero. The the the the feminine.
[02:37:16] Unknown:
So a null is a null can be I mean, it's essentially the same thing, but it can be created through multiple different ways. For example, in Tesla's Colorado Springs experiment, he noticed, basically, plasma balls being created at these interference points of these rebound waves and the initial pressure waves. It is a cancellation. Now depending on Yeah. The effects, depending on the
[02:37:48] Unknown:
amp like Plane of inertia.
[02:37:50] Unknown:
Depending on the amplitude of the interaction of, like, how much deconstructive it is depends on the size of the null. This is also how you levitate. But I would recommend levitating objects and not yourself because if you go into a null, you will probably eventually come out, and there will be nothing left if you don't get torn apart inside of there to begin with.
[02:38:26] Unknown:
But Yeah. No. That's where cavitation happens.
[02:38:29] Unknown:
Time stops inside of the null as well. Yeah. Whether you wanna say it speeds up all the way or it stops, I mean, it's like the say saying the same thing. So
[02:38:41] Unknown:
So it's it's stillness. Yeah. But we know that they aren't humans, great white pope, so you can't count them. Those aren't people.
[02:38:55] Unknown:
Plasma balls, orbs, etcetera, though. Right? Yes. Actually, ball lightning itself is a pure scalar aspect. It is a pure scalar, phenomena. This is why they have multiple accounts of viewing it, basically going through walls, things like that. Yeah. Okay. Inside of a null
[02:39:18] Unknown:
Let's let's go there. Yeah. Materials
[02:39:21] Unknown:
do not interact with each other the same because of difference of coherence values.
[02:39:26] Unknown:
Okay. So there's this idea of, close encounters of the third kind. There's a movie. Now there's this idea of human initiated. It's a close encounter of the fifth kind where human initiates contact and makes contact with
[02:39:41] Unknown:
something that Are you mentioning that with Steven Greer again?
[02:39:47] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:39:48] Unknown:
A little bit. You're not getting the fuck off. Fight over my head.
[02:39:56] Unknown:
Nick Roth. It's the motion, the ocean there. Animal instincts, fighting for attention. Are the ducks still in a row?
[02:40:08] Unknown:
Yeah. I know. The ducks are in the duck the duck house. They go in first. When the crepuscular animals start coming out, like, right now, they are they call it a sitting duck for a reason.
[02:40:20] Unknown:
But are they still in a row?
[02:40:22] Unknown:
No. They're they're they're usually in they're usually in their bickering right now because there's three of them that are sitting on eggs even though there's no males out there. They they've decided they're gonna go broody, and there's not their them eggs aren't fertilized. Right? But whatever. So they so they the older ones that are doing that are bickering at the younger ones, and we can hear them bickering out there chasing the the older ones chasing the younger ones, like, get out of here.
[02:40:55] Unknown:
So these, seemingly, conscious plasmids, these orbs, these, lights in the sky.
[02:41:04] Unknown:
I would not say that those are the same as ball lightning.
[02:41:08] Unknown:
Okay. Visually, appearing similar. I'm asking you directly with your work and experimentation and spirituality and consciousness and all of this. Have you attempted to summon orbs in the night sky? No. I have not. Why not?
[02:41:27] Unknown:
I haven't mapped out what all that looks like. So for example, I wizardly.
[02:41:37] Unknown:
That's what it would look it would look real wizardly. That's what it would look like.
[02:41:41] Unknown:
Now I have gone over, like, some UFO, like, videos and stuff like that, and I will say that most of them actually seem to be working off of, advanced or what you could say capped out, electromagnetism, if you were to create something similar that works off of scalar effects. So, for example, electromagnetism or magnetism and electricity separated, these are side effects from scalar interactions. So when we're talking about an actual scalar craft
[02:42:31] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[02:42:32] Unknown:
It can change its shape, which I know some UFOs do, but a majority of them do not. It can like, speed is not an object or it's not a a thing. It doesn't really matter. So when we're talking about null manipulation inside of scalar, you know, technology, you don't have inertia. You don't have, what's it called, fucking g force. You don't have things like that. So the very few of them like, you have some that travel fast. You have some that travel insanely fast Mhmm. That do some type of maneuvers that if there is something biological in there, they're they're obviously getting torn to shreds. It's just a matter of looking at it and seeing whether it is doing scalar type maneuvers or whether it is doing just electromagnetic maneuvers.
[02:43:40] Unknown:
I know the, GeForce is a brand of NVIDIA video cards.
[02:43:44] Unknown:
I have one on my computer right now. Yes. Okay. I was gonna ask that,
[02:43:48] Unknown:
you know, Intel or what's the other chip manufacturer?
[02:43:53] Unknown:
Ryzen. Ryzen.
[02:43:55] Unknown:
Yep. So I have a, 27 I always wondered if I was able to find some type of a non Euclidean wave. Yes. So these basically, what Tesla was doing You know what I'm saying? If it gets inside of a bubble in a non Euclidean wave, fucking you know, even though for us in a u in a Euclidean system, that it looks like it jumped a giant space in no time in a in a in a non Euclidean system. The the that distance was actually, like, right next to each other. You know what I mean? So Mhmm.
[02:44:37] Unknown:
Is this, I'm trying to think. Does this have to do with space time?
[02:44:42] Unknown:
Oh, it's fair. We've stretched your brain as as far as it can go.
[02:44:47] Unknown:
No. It's structuring. Like, it it's just the way things are structured. Non Euclidean, like point a or point b. NinjaCat?
[02:45:00] Unknown:
Mhmm. Yeah. I was about to say I I'm fully expect a fully drove Ninja Cat to just, like, slowly rise up behind you now. Yeah. It's happened. This quarter, it'll happen again.
[02:45:15] Unknown:
It's crazy over here. I I live off grid on a farm.
[02:45:21] Unknown:
Check out the Colorado locust when Tesla was doing his experiments. I'm curious. What is that? Colorado locust. Yeah.
[02:45:37] Unknown:
Nacho chi that's nacho cheese. That's my cheese.
[02:45:43] Unknown:
Chips and dip. Hip dip. Think so we finally figured out how babies are made. That's good for queso cheese.
[02:45:57] Unknown:
Kinda look. I Am I not able to scroll up in the chat?
[02:46:06] Unknown:
Well, we've got I'm not on that thing in the screen. You can't. Steve, I think, is the only one who has access to that. Steve went wasn't feeling good and went to bed right away.
[02:46:16] Unknown:
So video overlay of a of a combined number of chats. There's a number of chats that are combined into one little visual overlay.
[02:46:25] Unknown:
Yeah. Like, our our our Rumbles are biggest one by far. And then we're on mine, and then I'm deliberating dog face dudes.
[02:46:37] Unknown:
Yeah. Send me an email. Thankful1l@AlanMarcus,2l's.com. [email protected]. Send me the diagrams, pictures, the descriptions, the questions, that sort of thing. Right now we're just doing a radio show. Just talking. To produce a video show recurs a lot more, and we don't have all the visual aids prepared yet. So that's kind of where we are in the process. Did that insect.
[02:47:09] Unknown:
Interesting. See, I I I assumed that there had to have been some kind of,
[02:47:15] Unknown:
damage caused by some of the things he was doing. I am. When we're when we're talking about Tesla, if there was ever an individual that said, just send it, that was Tesla.
[02:47:28] Unknown:
Yeah. He killed himself, like, three times and not, like, suicide type. Like, oops. Had an oops in the in the lab, like, three different times, and I think once he he it was for quite a duration, and that's actually where he, when he came back from that little episode, I believe, was when he, said that he had spoken to the Black Knight. He said that there was a ship called Black Knight and that, it was basically falling down above our atmosphere. Yeah. The Black Knight satellite. Yeah. The Black Knight satellite. And he said he communicated with it, but, you know, he was he was dead. So, like, just for a little while. Just a little while.
But, yeah, anytime you're and this is always one of my concerns. This is also one of my concerns with the the wind towers for generating energy and even water turbines. Anytime you start fucking around with that field and disrupting it, like, there's a reason that rivers, they don't flow straight. If you ever watch Wilhelm Reich's work, he sat and looked at the way rivers naturally flow, and they have an oscillation back and forth. And if you disrupt that whole system, it just kills the water. And so the same thing's gonna apply with air. The the reason that's why it's called air currents. Even though it's not in its liquid form, that's still liquid, basically. It's just vaporized liquid, and it still flows in the theory. Yeah. Yeah. And if you go, fucking that up, then you're definitely gonna kill things in that system. Well, Tesla was drawing energy, similar to the way when you're putting a magnet and I'm putting seeds on top of it and you're pulling more you're getting that energy to focus. He was doing it in a in a much more significant fashion, and some life forms are not gonna be cool with that, with that kind of gray
[02:49:29] Unknown:
holes. He was blowing holes in the field. I will full out admit this. Yeah. That's why in this theory, there are actually ethical, like, standards that I have implemented in the theory because I know exactly what can be done and what might be done. That's why in the part where we're talking about nulls, there has to be dampening factors. There has to be, basically, emergency shutoffs. There has to be some kind of containment. Because if you if you think about it, if you create a null, which is essentially a scalar sync, what is going to happen?
[02:50:27] Unknown:
Sink as in s I n k, like the thing in the kitchen?
[02:50:31] Unknown:
Yes. So what does the sink do?
[02:50:34] Unknown:
Well, then the the the the all mother does two things. She gives life and she takes life away. Right? So there there's a destruction aspect to it and a life giving aspect to it. And and which one are you dealing with?
[02:50:52] Unknown:
So the sink drains. So if you create a sailor string a sailor sink scaler sink before I have a stroke, if you create a scaler sink, you are going to have a surge of energy draining. Mhmm. Now you have created a hole. If you created a hole, well, now everything else around it is going to rush in. If you do not stabilize and equalize, you will have the Bermuda Triangle. You will have the Devil's Triangle. You will have a similar event that is proposed to have happened to Atlantis. You are affecting your local gravity.
[02:51:48] Unknown:
Well, you're creating a cavitation.
[02:51:51] Unknown:
Yes. If that so, yes, the null and the cavitation from what you're saying, they're the same thing.
[02:51:57] Unknown:
Well, you know, when you look at any like, that's one of the problems that you get in, like, different, like, pumps and things like that. Like, if you don't have your flow set up right, it creates a cavitation where it's literally a void, and that will create an explosion. Right?
[02:52:15] Unknown:
Yes. It's
[02:52:16] Unknown:
For example Like, in a motor, you're literally creating a cavitation between the electrical and the what the field that it creates with the magnetism, and you're creating a cavitation between them between them. You're just harnessing that shit.
[02:52:31] Unknown:
Right. So, actually, what you're talking about is directly the reason why, for example, crystals grow in the shape that they do. It is because of null interactions between the elements that make up the quartz crystal and the pressure waves that they give out. Geometrically, they create natural nulls. This is why we have the shape of crystals being the way that they are.
[02:53:02] Unknown:
Yeah. And this is when you're talking about, so, like, in different cultures, I I had a fascinating talk. I think it was with Emily Moyer. It might have been with Cheney, though. But, they were talking about, Indian, healing. And he had the story was pretty complex, but he had to go do something with, like, a scorpion because the energy of the the wound that she had was to this specific goddess. Well, the idea then is is, like I was talking about with uranium and lead, everything in that chain is the same thing. So if you called, like, the overall head of that, gave it a name, everything in that would be in its in its, purview.
And so the same thing, applies to, like, different things in your body and whatnot. And so what what are you what is your illness? What what is the imbalance in? And so that's what they're looking, and they have an understanding for this. They just listed as gods and goddesses names. And I think all and I think most all of them do. Super fascinating. That. Yeah.
[02:54:25] Unknown:
Just realized, we got layers of layers of layers of jokes and humor and seriousness, and we're getting a little bit silly, getting a little bit serious. We're talking about graphics cards. The NVIDIA cards are called the GeForce.
[02:54:38] Unknown:
We were talking about graphics cards When the fuck did that happen? When we when we discussed the GeForce, I said Nvidia's
[02:54:45] Unknown:
brand of graphics cards are the GeForce cards, and then there are the Ryzen's
[02:54:51] Unknown:
Well, the Ryzen's are the processors.
[02:54:53] Unknown:
And someone asked if Ryzen Well, actually, yeah, they got Ryzen. Yeah. They got Ryzen graphic card too. I forgot about Radeon. Yep. Radeon's. What is you know, Radeon, graphics cards, GeForce, a lot of the brand names are are using some of these names to
[02:55:08] Unknown:
to sell their with Emily also, Sherry. I have to say that was my initial, thought on it was it was with Emily.
[02:55:19] Unknown:
Could be. We have we have the transcripts. We can go back and review the transcripts to see where the conversation happens. But a lot of times, the conversations will start one place and then move to another channel another time, and then we'll just keep talking about the same things again and further develop them and look at them from different perspectives. So thank you, Luke, for for giving us all this time. I don't know Yeah. We appreciate it. Right? How much time you you have tonight.
[02:55:49] Unknown:
I would say I got
[02:55:51] Unknown:
probably just a little bit more time. Okay. I mean, there's some nights we've gotten six or seven or eight hours, so we're not gonna keep it that long unless
[02:55:58] Unknown:
No. You've don't don't let us don't let us hold you. You've two hours is what we hopefully expect out of guests. You've given us, you know, almost three now. So don't feel beholden like you like you, need to get more if you're if you're pooped out. Well, the main the main thing is to make sure that I answer
[02:56:19] Unknown:
all of the questions,
[02:56:21] Unknown:
all the questions that you need. Problem is I'm coming up with, questions I never thought to ask before. And I don't know if you're having fun coming with answers to to nonsense questions I'm asking, but you've been a great sport.
[02:56:33] Unknown:
Once we got to the place of, understanding the the that there's a negative below us, you know, that that's then we're we're on the same page fully. That's about all I was digging at the whole time, because that's creating the directionality of the whole thing. And then the field is what's in between.
[02:56:57] Unknown:
Absolutely. Absolutely.
[02:56:58] Unknown:
That's And and we are we are
[02:57:01] Unknown:
condensed versions of that energy transferring. And as we break apart, it'll keep on moving on.
[02:57:10] Unknown:
Yeah. So some people pronounce Washington as Washington. We're having, this r issue in the, quadrenons, quadrenions? Quarterneons. Okay. Say it again.
[02:57:29] Rose777:
Quarter Neons, q u a r t e r n I o n.
[02:57:36] Unknown:
And Chad is upset that this is the first time for many that they've ever heard of this.
[02:57:41] Unknown:
This is the kind of stuff I talk about regularly. The funny thing is is, if it's just me and people are and I'm a guest on somebody else's show, I talk about a lot of stuff like this or, like, my presentation in, Flattoberfest, things like that. But if I'm doing stuff like this, it's you know, people only to a limited extent wanna hear a person talk like this. Like, most people that's, they they it's it's surprising. We've got such a good a good crowd that we've maintained most of our people through most of the night. And a lot of them will come back and, rewatch it like Christie Kringle. Think hand wave. She she watches it probably an hour hour a day or something and leaves comments, like, every other day.
She's very helpful with stuff. But, yeah, that's a lot of crowds wouldn't even hang for this kind of thing, usually a lot.
[02:58:35] Unknown:
Yeah. So the if if you want to visualize a quarter neon, and the best way, it is just to visualize it as a gyroscope. Just three rotational aspects with one scalar aspect.
[02:59:08] Unknown:
So I have, a camera mount. They call it, like, a steady cam when the whole Ah. It's on a gimbal. So it tries to find its level. So when you're walking and moving with the camera, it keeps the camera steady. They call it a steady cam. Just kinda what we're talking about with the gyroscopes and the gimbals.
[02:59:25] Unknown:
Psycryption. That's clever. I can't highlight it, but I would. 25¢ neons, 5 for a buck. That's fair. That's fair.
[02:59:39] Unknown:
So it doesn't it doesn't have that lock. This is why it pretty much encompasses all of the geometric shapes that they've been trying to circle back to for forever. I mean, arguably, like, the past well, over a hundred years at this point in time.
[03:00:06] Unknown:
So it doesn't lock itself on a level where has up and down and it just stays steady with the the plane of I guess, the one we're standing on?
[03:00:15] Unknown:
Correct.
[03:00:16] Unknown:
Okay.
[03:00:18] Unknown:
Oh, we lost Rose. Alright, Rose. So we lost Rose. Thank you, Rose.
[03:00:24] Unknown:
Good night.
[03:00:29] Unknown:
So you've written a paper, published it, made it public.
[03:00:34] Unknown:
So it's on I mean, I refuse to do latex formatting Right.
[03:00:42] Unknown:
Which is what Nerd nerd talk. I'm into the nerd talk. I love the the latex.
[03:00:47] Unknown:
Yeah. So I I refuse to do that. So the theory is on OSF, and it is on GitHub.
[03:00:58] Unknown:
Okay. So GitHub is where all the cool computer nerds hang out and share code with each other. And the l a t x format is how you publish text with numbers and, you know, lowercase, highercase, you know, to the third degree and all the all the weird symbols and things that people use in mathematics. Parentheses
[03:01:20] Unknown:
and Yes. Underscores. Yes. Oh, yeah. So I'm I I would rather not do that. Mhmm. And then also, like, it's kinda like a weird area because most of the time, they require, I guess, Lagarian vector formatting or equations, which I bypass that. If anybody's wondering what that means, it's basically, like, just angular formatting of how things work. Mhmm. Quarter Neons themselves do not need that.
[03:01:59] Unknown:
Do you get into VIM or eMax?
[03:02:02] Unknown:
No. Okay.
[03:02:05] Unknown:
Computer and stuff.
[03:02:06] Unknown:
Yeah.
[03:02:10] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know any of that stuff.
[03:02:12] Unknown:
It's just all I'm doing it the original way where, you know, back in the day, people records. Yeah. They just wrote it out. Yeah. That's what I did. You can see the equations. So I do have a an entire section for definitions. I have an entire equation layout. So as of right now, there are in the the larger theory, there are a 158 equations. There's the definition that goes through all of them. I tried originally to, like, make a linear path to go through the paper. But, realistically, when we're talking about a unifying field theory, it's very hard to be linear. Mhmm. It just kinda, like I start you out with, the field, the variables, and then you can just branch out to whatever part you want to look at. Then you can go to a different section. You can go to a different section.
So, like, as of right now, I'm gonna just start throwing out words. So if anybody is listening, just know that I'm gonna be throwing out words. So I have, of course, the abstract and the introduction. I have a introduction to the power of light. I have revisiting Newtonian, dynamics and field equations and all that, implement the DTE framework. Then going after that, we get into time. We get into scalar memory. After that, we go into scalar electromagnetism. Continuing with magnetism, going into the magnetic twist, going into electromagnet magnetic dynamics, which means fields, flow, and emission pressure, going into electromagnetism and scalar emission, basically rebuilding Maxwell's work from field causality.
The official revival of Maxwell's quarter neons, then go into Tesla rebound, magnetic curl, coherence nulls, going into fluid mechanics, going into thermal pressure, the nature of heat, what exactly makes it, what exactly it is, even going into black body radiation, going into thermal pressure and heat transfer, which is entropy, radiation, and scalar flow, going deeper into fluid mechanics, so where we're talking about vortices, buoyancy, lift, and atmospheric flow, then going into acoustic and pressure wave reinterpretation through sound compression and coherence travel, going into echo, Doppler, and shifts as memory delay, going into nuclear field dynamics, going into fission and fusion about what is actually happening there.
There is field ethics and containment in there. Then we get to quantum reinterpretation between coherence, collapse, and wave particle logic going into AC and DC currents, going in directly, no pun intended, to do DC currents going directly into AC currents, fluid mechanics as far as scalar compression, vorticity, and pressure displacement, going further into thermodynamics with emission gradients, scalar decay, and rebound decay. Then we get to actual particle masses and, deriving all of the particle masses as well as going into the periodic table.
Then I go into, basically historical glimpses of scalar fields where we're talking about Faraday, Heaviside, Hertz, Lawrence, Ampere, Joule, Henry, Bayotte, and I don't know how to say his name. Jean Baptiste Bayotte, Felix Savant, Paul Dirac going into Michael Michael Tupin, Augustine Jean Fresnel, Ernest Mach, Richard Feynman, John Tindall, even giving out a shout out to their wives because a lot of their wives actually did help with them. I provide five falsifiable experiments. It was very difficult to do this because most of the empirical data already lined up with this theory pretty close to where I didn't feel like it was fair to use that as a falsifiable experiment. So we go into delay in light propagation.
Yes. It's pretty much already aiming in this theory's favor. We go into null levitation. We go into delay quantum collapse via coherence reinforcement. Sadly, this is already leaning in my favor. Scalar field perception during the MT exposure. I decided to throw a little bit of a left curve in there. Go into radioactive decay drift in scalar null zones. Then we finally get to the citations, and then we get into the DET terms and definitions, then the DET index, the equation index. And then I get to the very end where I give, like, a little outro, which basically says, do not turn me into Oppenheimer, please.
If there's a little quote at the end.
[03:08:16] Unknown:
Did you watch Barbenheimer?
[03:08:18] Unknown:
I have not, actually.
[03:08:22] Unknown:
So I think everything you just covered there, we've talked about tonight. We didn't really get into echo or Doppler or fission or fusion. May have to save that for a a second date.
[03:08:34] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. There's, so I have made fusion and fission a lot lot less energy dependent and a lot easier. This is exactly why I gave my Oppenheimer quote. Yeah. I can so I it's like a little personal message from me at the end where I go, the true implications of DET are still yet to be fully explored. I have hoped that many will explore everything that it has to offer. The beauty and balance that DET bring to the world will be one of its most powerful tools. I would personally like to thank some of the inspirations that led me on this amazing adventure, my fiance, family, and close friends, while always being or will always be a very deep inspiration behind anything that I embark on.
Their guidance and support will always be a deep well of strength and determination behind anything that I do. I would like to thank, the guys over at Cult of Conspiracy because they were the first ones to give me a voice, basically. And then as well as Joe and his group over at Legit Bat, stating What? Gay though? You guys
[03:10:02] Unknown:
He's gay though.
[03:10:05] Unknown:
Total homo.
[03:10:07] Unknown:
Total homo. Mhmm.
[03:10:11] Unknown:
Basically, going on, and then y'all are involved as this
[03:10:17] Unknown:
wife. I love Joe. I Oh, yeah. We hang out we hang out in person.
[03:10:26] Unknown:
Yeah. I I love Joe. He's a he's a he's a great guy. Yeah.
[03:10:31] Unknown:
We all honesty. He's a great guy. Yeah. I go over to writing fairly often, so, like, we hang out occasionally.
[03:10:38] Unknown:
Right. So a cult of conspiracy with Jonathan and Jacob? Yeah. Okay. They have a great podcast. Oh, yeah. Yeah. What episode were you on? Is it released?
[03:10:50] Unknown:
So I yes. So the one one we just released, which was 71?
[03:10:56] Unknown:
I think so. Can a new science emerge by combining conventional quantum and classic science with Luke from August 5?
[03:11:05] Unknown:
Yes.
[03:11:07] Unknown:
Yeah. Recent eight number eight seventy one
[03:11:10] Unknown:
called Global Institute. That, I was also on for four different episodes where we and this was a while back to where we go through, basically, all the things that are wrong with the current models. K. All the way from the edge of the universe to here. But then I and y'all are encompassed in this next part, which is, you know, individuals like these, what most would call fringe conspiracy or skeptics, are the ones that push beyond the standard, ones that will not ex not accept a default as definitive. I encourage more out there, especially ones that carry significance, to embrace this kind of mentality. Do not accept what is easiest. Rather, search for the truth even when it is difficult. I would also like to thank God for guiding me on this journey. I truly could not have done it without his guidance and help. He has always and will always be an inspiration and blessing to me.
Before this ends, there is a possibility the most are there is possibly the most important topic to discuss. DEC, under no circumstances, should or will in its entirety be weaponized or used as a weapon. We are we as humans have seen wondrous discoveries and inventions turned into nightmares. This is what DAT stands or this is not what DAT stands for nor will it, ever. DET aims for the opposite. Lastly, I will leave you with a quote, one that I recommend all to remember and hold each other accountable for. Now I am death, the destroyer of worlds, Jay Oppenheimer.
[03:13:03] Unknown:
Yeah. This is,
[03:13:06] Unknown:
it's never the purpose of this theory. It is actually quite the opposite.
[03:13:15] Unknown:
That's that's a good theory. I think we could workshop the name a little bit. D e t. Sounds like bug spray I spray on me. Keeps mosquitoes away.
[03:13:25] Unknown:
Hey. It you could use it as that too. Who knows what, new technology will, will come out? Yeah. We'll have to workshop a a really good title.
[03:13:35] Unknown:
You know, GeForce is already taken, and NVIDIA uses
[03:13:42] Unknown:
that. Thank you. Coming on and explaining and explaining your theory for us. Oh, absolutely. No problem.
[03:13:50] Unknown:
Absolutely. No problem. I'm I'm working through trying to like, obviously, I had to word this theory in order to get the attention of the, you know, the institutional world, the academic world, the scientific world. I am now trying to figure out ways to, translate it to
[03:14:18] Unknown:
everybody else. The one that down for the podcast world, bro.
[03:14:23] Unknown:
Yeah. I I so I'm trying
[03:14:28] Unknown:
to simplify I'm in a little bit of shock that Crow agreed to let you do this. Well, well, what told me to my face that I'm too smart to talk to people because he didn't think I was dumbing down what I say enough.
[03:14:42] Unknown:
Yeah. Me and me and Rose are, working on ways to translate it. That's what,
[03:14:51] Unknown:
Yeah. Talk about cheese and baby making.
[03:14:54] Unknown:
I know. Maybe add some beer into it, and people will be listening real close to it. And so I think some of the best ways to describe it is just think of a pond, and you have ripples in the pond. Mhmm.
[03:15:07] Unknown:
These are thinking of a seed spreader I have. I got some, patches in my lawn I need to fill with the seed spreader I got. Wanna hear about your seed spreader, Marcus.
[03:15:16] Unknown:
Don't get pervy.
[03:15:20] Unknown:
So we're not gonna talk about Steven Greer anymore tonight?
[03:15:27] Unknown:
That's what he did. He just wants to have sex with an alien.
[03:15:31] Unknown:
I will I will say this, and I will continue to say this. After looking over everything, right, like, after being a part of the what you could call the, like, conspiracy community, right, And then trying to take a nonbiased lens to science, to physics, whether we're talking about quantum, whether we're talking about relativity, whether we're talking about classical. I would say that for the scientific community, they need to interact more. They need to talk to people, especially among this community. They need to come up with actual, like, I wouldn't say definitive answers. But if you don't know, then just say you don't know. You know what I mean?
I would say to entertain different ideas, work through it, see what could work, what couldn't work. On the other side, I will wholeheartedly tell the conspiracy community that I can completely see why science has gotten in the direction that it is currently at. After looking through, basically, the the history, the generations, I can see how five generations back, there was the split, and this is why we have the I wouldn't say inconsistency with science. I would say this is why we have the direction that science went. For example, when we're talking about, quantum, they had to rely on probability because they did not have any structure.
Relativity, they had to rely on geometry because they did not have energy. I see why they went in the direction that they did. And to them and I'll agree, they're math, math. And and the simplest way to say it, they're math, math. But when you circle back around and look at the bigger picture, you can see why their math does math correctly. You can see why they came to the conclusions that they did. I wouldn't say that they are I mean, for the most part, the individual scientists, right, they are not, I mean, obviously, not evil people. They are not people that are trying to necessarily defend the narrative. They just they have the data in front of them, and they have what they've worked out.
So to them, yes. This is the this is the truth. But this is where it takes the relationship between both communities of them understanding, yes. You could be wrong. Your interpretation was wrong. You could really say that all I did here was just put together the pieces of the puzzle. I mean, you could honestly say that that's all I really did.
[03:18:44] Unknown:
But then it's So you are Satoshi Nakamoto and you invented Bitcoin?
[03:18:49] Unknown:
A carat is a is a actually a weight of metal. And when they're saying 24 carats in that one gram, then it's inside one gram, there's gonna be more carrots. And then grains also.
[03:19:10] Unknown:
Put it together. You're on the diamond puzzle, the carrots, the piezoelectric, the, Atlantis bit was really fascinating. That's really interesting to get into maybe further. You have a whole section of the history of this in on your GitHub page in your paper?
[03:19:30] Unknown:
Yes. So in the major paper, there is the, the scalar history. There is not the, the break the breakdown lineage of, like, how everything got separated. It's there. It's just not, like, grouped together, I guess you could say. It is a separate paper that I kinda made for, like, a a introduction to talking and all that stuff.
[03:19:59] Unknown:
Yeah. That that seems to be, like, if when I'm trying to get into this further, I would wanna dive into more of the history and researching the other figures that we talked about, Hertz and Maxwell and a little bit more plank and some of the science and the philosophy just to understand that a little bit to to kinda catch up to where we are now and and having that information. You put some pieces together and things seem to make a little bit more sense. Right. Now you're having the the technology and the Internet access to to do this call and and share this with everyone who's listening, and now we're recording and making the archive available for people to play back and listen.
[03:20:41] Unknown:
Right. Yeah. That's why, on this theory, they're I, like, I I could have patented the shit out of anything that I wanted to. I didn't, and I'm not going to. There is, like, just ethical, rules put into the paper to make sure that, nobody,
[03:21:03] Unknown:
you know, destroys everything. But, Abandoning it is how you get how you get suicided.
[03:21:10] Unknown:
Yeah. That was one of the that was that was probably the second main reason that I didn't do anything like that.
[03:21:17] Unknown:
So are you acting pseudo anonymously right now? Just sort of anonymous using No. I have my name on it. Okay. That was a that was a question we had. Like, Luke who? Does he have a last name? Does he have a middle name? Does he have identification? You know, who is this guy? This mysterious Luke figure? Sounds biblical. Is it an apostle?
[03:21:36] Unknown:
A John? I think it's a Mares. Yes. So Maxwell currently is considered to be the father of electromagnetism. And in his original treaty in 1865, that was whenever he introduced his quarter neon equation.
[03:22:01] Unknown:
James Clerk Maxwell, a Scottish physicist. Yeah. So there's a there's a whole lot of names here. I know we have some listeners who are into, like, homeschooling and and, unschooling and this type of thing, getting in young people interested in all these ideas, researching these these guys like James c Maxwell, and their wives are important too. You mentioned their wives, so that's the whole interesting thing. There's a whole, a whole story here that we're just scratching at the surface of.
[03:22:33] Unknown:
Yeah. That's what I, I've I mean, with how how large this theory is, like, I I wanted to put the entire story in there. Like, for example, the the wives that did help out. Like, I, obviously, I wanted to give them credit where where credit is due. I mean, even, I think, so, like, Faraday's wife, it was noted that she didn't necessarily help with any of the experiments themselves, but she basically kept his, his what you could consider his lab or whatever. She kept that clean and kept all of his notes and his papers organized. Like, that's for somebody that has a chaotic mind like mine, I know that, you know, if she didn't do what she did, we might have never gotten Faraday's work.
Mhmm. Like, it might have just been a bunch of balled up papers on a floor somewhere that eventually just got lost to time. So in my opinion, she's just as important as anybody else.
[03:23:41] Unknown:
So I just in my brief research that I've had between, you know, questions and listening, I find that James Clerk Maxwell did work on color vision, finding the theory of human eye perception with three types of receptors, red, green, and blue light, which eventually led to color photography and video and everything we're looking at right now?
[03:24:04] Unknown:
I wouldn't doubt it.
[03:24:06] Unknown:
Detachable penis.
[03:24:11] Unknown:
Oh, I had the lyrics to click click. Boom. Saliva. Hey. Flying the Oh, dude.
[03:24:18] Unknown:
I don't know why, but for some reason, I thought you were gonna say boom boom Tel Aviv. I don't know.
[03:24:25] Unknown:
Oh, I was about to sing a boom boom Tel Aviv, but, I, exercised some restraint. It's like click click boom, like a camera, like click click click. The shutter on the camera, a photographer.
[03:24:40] Unknown:
Oh, the older one. I mean, there was a boom at the end.
[03:24:43] Unknown:
Boom boom teleview.
[03:24:45] Unknown:
Oh, fuck. It's so bad. Mhmm. That's hilarious. That's immediately where my mind went.
[03:24:57] Unknown:
Alright. So is there any other questions that y'all have? We're just trying to goof around a little bit. It's kinda online. Good. Good.
[03:25:06] Unknown:
No. We definitely like to talk to you again and pepper you with some more questions, but, I think, we probably burnt, most everybody out for, for the highly intelligent stuff. I think Duck ducked out, like, within, like, two minutes probably. He's like, nope.
[03:25:25] Unknown:
That's what these guys talk about. Fuck that. Yeah. And peeping over in Chuck's channel. I think he was asking the questions. He's always asking about presidentials and politics and stuff.
[03:25:38] Unknown:
Yeah. He's he's we wanna debate this guy. Marcus wants to debate this guy, Duck, and he's always but the guy's very into politics. That's what he talks about. So this was definitely not in his wheelhouse.
[03:25:52] Unknown:
Right. Talking about two failed presidencies of a guy who eats a lot of McDonald's, I think.
[03:25:58] Unknown:
It's like full of He's like he's like super into tea cheering for one side of the pay PDF files. Like, don't let me make this team. Like, you like one of them teams?
[03:26:11] Unknown:
Weird. At this point, Tom. Things things are a lot different these days.
[03:26:19] Unknown:
Yeah. Getting into these hard sciences and ferrofluids and mercury and all these all these things can just, take up your time in a good way, and some politics take up your time in a bad way. So we're getting into this era of wanting to have more fun and more joy and, you know, find out how babies are made and get people making babies and having fun and dancing. And Marcus is very curious about this. He's a he's a gutting young man.
[03:26:52] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[03:26:53] Unknown:
That's alright. That's alright. I mean, basically, the way I see it, the more people that know about this theory in general, the better off it is.
[03:27:03] Unknown:
I like it. I said you need to work into there, that there is a negative side that's drawing it. You know? Because I think well, I'm probably about the only person that was gonna catch that.
[03:27:14] Unknown:
Yeah. So anytime the quarter neon has a torsional aspect to it, there will always be so it's the it's the toroid. So every toroid that you see has a scalar gyroscope inside of it to where there is a positive and there is a negative. Okay. It is how magnetism naturally forms due to the energetic curl or the energetic torsion. It's the magnetic curl that follows with it.
[03:27:43] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't know how many other people were gonna catch that problem in the presentation. But like like, for me, it was specific because, it left Thor out of the equation specifically. I'm like, well, you can't leave Thor out. He's the he's the negative. Odin's the in between.
[03:28:03] Unknown:
He's the thing. What I, He's the nut said that, but maybe I maybe I got sidetracked with something else whenever I was saying it.
[03:28:12] Unknown:
It's okay when the when the sidetracked portion of this of the show where we're just trying to find tangents to go on and make jokes of all things. And Yeah. He's the thing that's binding the two things together. That's why Odin is the king of the Aseer and the Vanir because he's binding those two things together.
[03:28:29] Unknown:
Right.
[03:28:30] Unknown:
You know, he's doing the Mercury action, the the void action.
[03:28:35] Unknown:
This is this is the type of thing that I really enjoy. Have you thought of starting, like, an only fans to get this word out? I gotta figure out people are making a lot of money from this Patreon OnlyFans and
[03:28:50] Unknown:
I gotta figure out how see, because of the way quarter neons work, they're very even on all sides. So I gotta figure out, like, how to get a good side of it. Get a good angle? Yeah.
[03:29:03] Unknown:
How you feeling? Not great?
[03:29:06] Unknown:
Build some so we we need to, get some more marshmallows and toothpicks and build some some trees with branches and show people that stuff for the visual learners, the tactile learners, different learning styles need to be accommodated. We did a lot of radio and talking tonight so long as we can, spell the words properly and and put the r in the right place. Quadonine.
[03:29:30] Unknown:
And quarter neon.
[03:29:32] Unknown:
Nar. I'm from Australia. I I'm gonna No. Quadonine.
[03:29:37] Unknown:
Quadonine. I I so I Quadonine, mate. Quarter nine. In a very small town in Virginia that, like, I I graduated with 86 people. Okay. So, like, I say a lot of words weird too, like, like, mirror.
[03:29:54] Unknown:
Mhmm. Where where is where is the Slater where is your Slater onesie?
[03:30:01] Unknown:
You know, I was making fun of Manas for Men, Mystery and and they were both wearing, like, you know, t shirts with their sleeves cut off. And I'm like, you know, I don't wanna show people my armpits all of the time for free. That's what the only fans is for.
[03:30:19] Unknown:
Gotta get gotta give him something to pay for if you give him the whole show for free, then, you know, nobody pays for the milk, takes care of the cow if they can get the milk for free. That's fact. Mhmm. Big market on Marcus' armpit air.
[03:30:36] Unknown:
Alright.
[03:30:38] Unknown:
He's like, I cannot hear it that. Yeah.
[03:30:44] Unknown:
I'll I'll I'll probably send the
[03:30:48] Unknown:
You got the email there on the screen? Send send an email with some of the information so we can throw it in the the show notes.
[03:30:54] Unknown:
If you're gonna look at that appreciate your time, Luke. Oh, absolutely. Nice talking to you. No problem at all. Let me get this email down real quick, and then I'll I'll give you the link to,
[03:31:05] Unknown:
all of it. Sure. When your crow episode goes live, we'll be sure to let everybody know and promote that so people can hear that. You've been on other shows, Cult of Conspiracy. We'll have to connect with those guys. We've, talked with the legit bat crew on a different stream before. Mhmm. Of course, Crow, we've talked with. Rose, we've talked with Jason as well. Yeah. Click click. Boom.
[03:31:42] Unknown:
Alright. Yeah. So whenever I I got your email down now. Whenever I get the chance, I will, I'll send you the link to the theory and all that stuff. I'll probably send it to you for the the OSF just because it's a little bit easier to navigate unless you just like navigating GitHub.
[03:32:00] Unknown:
Oh, I love GitHub. I lose hours on GitHub. I don't know what any of it means, but I just keep clicking and browsing and reading. Wow. My computer can do this? Yeah. Right. Lot of lot of good code there.
[03:32:13] Unknown:
Yeah. Alright. Well, everybody, thank you all, thank you all for having me, and thank everybody else for listening. Thank you so much. No problem. Y'all have a good one.
[03:32:24] Unknown:
Yeah. Good luck. Good luck, brother. Yeah. You too. No. I I don't got overalls on right now. I wasn't scooping shit today. My shirt is purple, though. It looks very blue in me. Yeah. Looks very blue in the camera.
[03:32:44] Unknown:
It's the optical illusion. There's the ninja cat. So, yeah, Duck, I saw started a stream. He's jumped into chat, said, hey, and then left and started his own stream and then ended his stream, and we're still streaming. So if Duck has checked back in, you know, send me an email. We need a confirmation. We need more than a a sure. We need a be assured with the confirmation email to say, so we can set you on a date. Because we have a guest next week. So, I think we have to we have to confirm that. We're always trying to confirm guests.
[03:33:26] Unknown:
Confirmed. Confirmed. Confirmed. Yep.
[03:33:32] Unknown:
It's like the, the the baptismal water is free. You can just go and refill your
[03:33:37] Unknown:
your water jugs. That would be great. Yep. Thank you, guys.
[03:33:45] Unknown:
I think we'll keep the rumble chat open a little bit longer, but I think we're gonna say goodnight to the YouTubes.
[03:33:51] Unknown:
Yeah. It's about that time, guys. That was a heavy one. That was real good stuff. Next week, we're talking Danny Katz, so that's gonna be a good time. Animal show and tell time. Well, the one sitting on me right now is I call him I call him Scar. I think he looks like Scar from the Lion King. Then cutest has always got it. Bub Bubba's on the floor over here with Freya. Him and Freya have friends. Freya is like the she is the wildest little pit bull. She is she's always off running off, getting into trouble somewhere. And Bubba is so Bubba gets along with everybody. We gotta keep our two big males that were both that, you know, both of them had their nuts. So we had to keep those guys separated, and then the two females separated.
And, but Bubba gets along with everybody. Well, Bubba starts out the morning with Frey and Lickas, and he runs them ragged. And then they go up at lunchtime, and they take a nap for the for, from about noon till eight. And then it flips around, and during from noon to eight, he runs tier and he's a ragged.
[03:35:14] Unknown:
Quit trying to get in front of the camera. Stop. Stop. Stop. Good night. Delivering Doc Face Tube's YouTube channel. We're gonna be on Yeah. Channel for a little while longer.
[03:35:25] Unknown:
And then, we go
Who are you guys? Where are you, dude? Go now, dude.
[00:00:09] Unknown:
Dude, deliberately.
[00:00:30] Unknown:
92.
[00:00:34] Unknown:
938734. 321, fight. Oh, you got it. For you, dude.
[00:01:05] Unknown:
We're live, dudes. We are. Tuesday, August 5. This is the forty seventh stream. For those who are counting, can we count 777?
[00:01:23] Unknown:
We got an excellent one for you guys tonight. We got, Rose from Crow seven seven seven has brought in Luke who's developing his own, theory and cosmology, and she's brought him in to, air that out and discuss it. So real excited for this one.
[00:01:44] Rose777:
Yeah. Thank you so much for allowing me to introduce you. I just love putting different minds together. And what really caught my attention was that Luke's unified, theory, which is very familiar to people who study field theory, it's adding in the scaler element and it explains or could provide a possible explanation for what the lunar wave actually is. And, I'm also interested in hearing him hash it out with you guys about how the luminaries would act given the new information we received with Jaren's trip to Antarctica with the twenty four hour sun and distances and and, sizes of these luminaries.
I previously thought that Jaren's trip to Antarctica solidified that the we the the small and local idea was debunked, and Luke says that he still has an explanation for that. So I'm really curious about that too. So lunar wave and That's when they can include the second a second sun, though. I don't know. Let's find out. I'll stop there. I'm I'm very curious.
[00:03:01] Unknown:
Hello, everybody. So yeah. So with this theory, there is some strange, like, optical geometrics that could happen because this implements something called, kinda harmonic shells. They're similar to what Schrodinger initially, like, provided whenever he was talking about probability probability density clouds and things like that. But this has more of a actual physical effect, so everything can end up having shells that kind of create not necessarily optical illusions, but definitely, different kinda optical effects that, can absolutely, you know, show a twenty four hour sun in Antarctica, in the Arctic Circle during, like, whenever it's all the way up north or all the way south, whether honestly, whether it's a globe or whether it's a flat earth.
I have let me get the document for the
[00:04:11] Rose777:
While you're getting that document, I just remembered another aspect of the theory that I never mentioned to Ben, which was what which is that there's, like, a sun within a sun, and that Crow's footage caught your eye. And then when we went to look at the original footage just to make sure that it didn't have something to do with the processing, this circular shape, we all kind of recognized it as being there. So you should also explain that as well. Okay. Absolutely.
[00:04:42] Unknown:
So have any of y'all ever heard of a quarter neon?
[00:04:49] Unknown:
Say it again.
[00:04:50] Unknown:
A quarter neon.
[00:04:52] Unknown:
A quarter neon?
[00:04:54] Unknown:
Right. No. So, essentially, in 1865, there was a gentleman named, James Maxwell that, presented the idea of quarter neon to basically being the pretty much the fundamental, like, building block of just reality in general. They start with atomic structures, go all the way across to what he described as the sea of tiny vortices, which is basically because this was way before, Einstein or anybody else was, you know, delivering their theories. It was still whenever the whole ether aspect was, like, still talked about, still thought about. That was still the going, field theory.
When he proposed that, he was proposing it as basically a field of quarter neons. What these are are three rotational aspect field functions with one scalar aspect. He at the time, he couldn't prove that they existed, basically, and they were kinda way, way advanced for the time. So what had happened was there were three gentlemen that basically broke his equations down, and they all kinda went their separate ways. So Einstein essentially took the structure or the what you could consider, like, the, the skeleton of the equation. And then, basically, the the rising quantum physicist at the time took the energy, the soul of the equation.
Both of them ended up leaving the body behind. This is, in my opinion, as to why quantum field theory and relativity have yet to be able to unify because neither one of them realized that, one, they're missing the original body of the equation, and two, they don't realize that they're already, you know, two halves of one whole, so they'll never be able to unify. Or, really, it's just thirds. But whenever I was going through all of this, I realized that I after tracking back all of the work that everybody's done, realized it went back to, the the whole quarter neons.
Then I realized that in the I think it was the late twenties, we got confirmation on one of the theories or, basically, one of the tests that light, transfers momentum. Right? So, like, as a photon is interacting with things, it will actually transfer momentum onto that object. Because of that, we came up with another theory, which was later proved that light also creates pressure. Well, when you understand that light is essentially just a, basically, a ball of energy. Right? It's excess energy that has been released from an electron when it is exited its, excitement stage.
That means that energy creates pressure, and that's something that we've never really addressed before. Basically, nobody in the scientific community from what I've seen so far. So this started the whole adventure of trying to assign these values to this quarter neon that was too confusing, too complicated at the time. So the scalar aspect of it, that is actually the the pressure. That is the pressure field. Right? So each of these individual balls, they pulse energy, and they actually send it out as pressure waves. This is, are any of y'all familiar with the, tests that, like, Tesla actually did in, like, for example, the Colorado Springs experiment.
So he was sending out basically these, you know, these EM pulses, and he was getting weird, like, non Hertzian waves that he was getting back. Those were actually pressure waves within the scalar field that he was getting back. That's why my pressure waves, I was I've named them Teslian pressure waves after him because he was the one that first discovered it. So you have pressure waves and you have rebound waves. These work together constructively. They may interfere or they may completely deconstruct. So through this whole method and my bigger theory, I was actually able to derive the entire periodic table all based off of these values without using any kind of atomic structure whatsoever.
Because of that, where these basically stabilize at, there are certain points, and those points are actually where the elements are. They actually continue all the way up to a 150. Once we get past a 118, using the Hadron Collider, in my opinion, is basically, you know, throwing whatever you might have show up into a furnace. So I I really don't think we can can go past one eighteen using that. After that, we have to use, like, just very surgical precision on doing these elements. But once we actually get past one thirty two, there's actually a weird thing that happens within the, the torsional aspect of the element.
When I first saw it, I originally thought, instead of it pulsing out, I wonder if it starts pulsing inward. And then that's what led into this whole idea about what it is because with these quarter neons, you have a core. Right? Bay because, basically, just imagine on the inside is a a more condensed version of this energy. As they send out pressure waves and they interact and they interfere and they, construct or deconstruct, it basically builds shell walls. These shell walls can be layered multiple, multiple times. In the photos from what or the videos from what Karo is showing, you can actually see a more condensed area inside of the sun, and that's what I believe is not not what you would consider, like, a a hydrogen core.
It's just what a core would look like if it was the size of the sun. What you're actually seeing with the sun is a if you and this is one of the things I've gotten hesitant about saying. If you wanna say it from a scientific aspect, you could say it's a mirage. If you wanna say it from a sci fi aspect, you could say it's a hologram or a projection. It it's real. It's just these shell interactions are causing it to magnify the actual size and look of the sun. One interesting thing is I think that the sun might actually be made out of element one forty four because it I haven't gotten too deep into it to say to say definitively yet, but I'm pretty sure it actually is one forty four. And that's where we start getting into weird coincidences with sacred geometry because as everybody knows, Metatron's cube, that is actually a perfect, slice of a quarter neon of what element one forty four would be.
And I just find it weird because there's a lot of talk behind, or there's a lot of, like, alternate names to Metatron's cube for it being, like, you know, SunCube or all these other different names like that. There's some different, rotational aspects I'm looking into. So far, it seems like the sun very much could be element one forty four due to the fact that its magnetic poles are actually reverse of what they should be because of the rotation of the sun itself. I don't know how, like, kinda like the right hand rule with electricity and how magnetic fields form around them. But as the light coming from the sun interacts with its own shell and then interacts with the Earth shell, whether it is round or whether it is flat.
This very much could cause a, like, for example, if it's flat, yes, it could cause a geometric interaction to make you see a twenty four hour sun in the South Pole if it just goes up. It'll always cause any kind of arcing path, stuff like that. It seeing a twenty four hour sun in the Arctic or the Antarctic does not really doesn't rule anything out, honestly, and it's actually very much expected in both models in my opinion.
[00:14:41] Unknown:
Explain why?
[00:14:45] Unknown:
I mean, obviously, if you if you have a heliocentric globe model, of course, you're gonna have the twenty four hour sun in the North and in the South. But with a like, where they say that the twenty four hour sun definitely, like, knocked out the flat Earth model, If the sun is a quarter neon, which is looking like it is, it it doesn't because there's always gonna be that spherical to spherical geometric, interaction between the way that the light works and how it curves and how it arcs.
[00:15:22] Unknown:
So you're kinda talking about that, Where the refraction is as it's going up and down makes a hot point.
[00:15:39] Unknown:
It could. I haven't a 100% nailed down exactly how focused it'll be, how like, if it'll lag behind. Because, I mean, as of right now, I think it's what? When the sun hits horizon, it's actually past the horizon by eight minutes already, just because of the time delay between the sun and the Earth. There's a lot of, yeah, there's a lot of optical effects that, we need to take account now. For example, in I am leaning actually more towards possibly having a flat earth just because the current model for predicting, like, red shift at the horizon does not account for as much red shift as there actually is, due to the way that these shells will layer, there's a very good possibility that being flat might actually be the only way it can be.
Because the current the standard model doesn't account for the amount of redshift that is actually there. Even whenever I did the original, calculations of it being sphere with the shells, even that didn't account for the amount of redshift that we actually measure. It would have to be flat so that way the scalar gradient is able to, knock down enough light to basically shift it red enough.
[00:17:22] Unknown:
So what we're talking about here then is, like, a basic molecule where you have a a core, nucleus, which would be your, protons and neutrons. And then there's, numerous outer shells that are, have specific effects. Your final shell being the valence shell telling you what other molecules it'll hook up with and whatnot, but the same basic concept that, the same basic setup. This goes smaller than that. This is Well, yeah. Yeah. I realize it's a smaller version as above so below. It's the same basic setup.
[00:18:03] Unknown:
Right. It's the I mean, we're talking about even the strong and weak, nuclear force that's holding together quartz, antiquarks, all of that. I mean, basically, a a regular atomic structure is just the quarter ionic version of the smaller field function that's going on. It's kinda like how, some people say that everything is just a toroid within the toroid within a toroid, and it just keeps going larger and larger and larger. But they missed the a little bit of the fact that toroids are just the magnetic field being created by quarter neons themselves.
You're missing the scalar gyroscope inside of it.
[00:18:57] Unknown:
And how go ahead, Rose.
[00:19:00] Rose777:
I really think that this sun, the it being like a macrocosm of the quarter neon. So there's the inside part of the sun and the outside part, and it, like a Taurus, has that expanding and contracting aspect to it with, like, the breath. So, like, there's the there's, like, the biblical idea of the breath and the spirit, and then there's the Taurus field idea with, like, the dielectric hyperboloid, and then there's the idea of, like, respiration in the lungs. Could you explain how to fit the sun in with that breathing component and how that translate to what the lunar wave is and why we would see it?
[00:19:41] Unknown:
So specifically with the lunar wave, this is actually just the interaction straight from the sun. So these pressure waves, as you have the original wave, you could imagine it as breathing out. When you have the rebound wave, you can imagine breathing it in, but an excess amount of pressure will escape out, and this continues traveling. This is basically what sets up the density of the gradients. As it, travels out, it will actually interact with the moon, which as of right now, I'm thinking that the moon very well could be element one thirty eight, which, needs that actual pressure in order to basically do its thing. This is why the relationship between the moon and the sun has more than just a straight line visual effect.
Because, I mean, if you look at a half moon, sometimes the the sun's not actually in the correct direction for it to be a half moon. When we're talking about the whole new moon, red moons, even lunar eclipses. Sometimes the sun's not actually in the correct position for it. But when we're talking about pressure waves, I mean, these are going out, multidirectional. So it actually takes that pressure wave and converts it to its own energy for the most part. But you can say that the the pressure wave going out and then essentially rebounding in, this is kinda like a breathing in and a breathing out.
The frequency is basically just the timing of the you could say the frequency is the heartbeat of the whole system. I mean, it works the same way whether we're talking about actual wave functions or not.
[00:21:49] Unknown:
And how does this tie into the, lunar wave?
[00:21:54] Unknown:
So the lunar wave you're actually seeing is a, just a pressure wave from the sun. This the moon completely relies on the pressure output from the sun. So the wave that you're seeing is a pressure wave traveling across the surface of the moon. It's crap it's traveling across the shell of the moon.
[00:22:30] Unknown:
So these, what are you calling these things again? These tiny little,
[00:22:38] Unknown:
The quarter neons.
[00:22:40] Unknown:
The quarter neons?
[00:22:41] Unknown:
Yeah.
[00:22:44] Unknown:
These quarter neons are then what pure you're you're saying pure energy?
[00:22:49] Unknown:
They are more a actual field function. What I mean by that is they are the geometric shape of the actual individual field functions. So, like, you know, everybody keeps trying to use geometry to find, like, the actual perfect shape to, like, show a vacuum where they have, like, the two pyramids and they invert them and then basically put them in the middle of each other to show, like, equal pull from each direction. Alright. The quarter neon did that from the very get go. That actual shape is with inside of the quarter neon to begin with. But it typically sits in a negative state unless it is excited, which it will then flip polarity to positive.
[00:23:52] Unknown:
Is there some kind of a cavitation that happens at that point then?
[00:24:00] Unknown:
Not that I have seen so far. It just seems to me that there is a flipping polarity. Eventually, there could be so if, like, it actually has a torsional aspect to it, which not all elements do have a torsional aspect, if it doesn't, it won't be affected by it. If it does, eventually, it could just turn its rotation to correct itself.
[00:24:30] Unknown:
I hear a side by side comment take over, Marcus.
[00:24:36] Unknown:
Yeah. So I think we're at the point where we're hearing this word, quarter neon, and we're like, haven't heard that before. Could you explain It's old. It's old. Yeah. Could you explain the history of that? Who who is writing about that? How did it fall out of fashion, and why haven't, high school graduates in The US Of A heard of this? Is it a mathematical thing specifically, a physics thing?
[00:25:03] Unknown:
Give me one second to pull up the document.
[00:25:07] Unknown:
Because you mentioned that James Clerk Maxwell. Is it Clerk or Clark? Clerk. C l e r k. James Clerk Maxwell.
[00:25:16] Unknown:
C yeah.
[00:25:18] Unknown:
And he's working in the eighteen fifties, writing about math and physics.
[00:25:22] Unknown:
Yes. He was so he is considered to be the father of electromagnetism. Okay. He's the one that made the connection between electricity and magnetism. But when he originally released his papers, they had the original quarter neon, equation in there, which got it was too complicated for the time. So then there was three individuals. I'm trying to find the actual there we go. So there were three individuals that ended up breaking it down. One was heavyside, one was Gibbs, and one was Hertz, which I'm sure, most people know of Hertz because of, obviously, Hertz whenever measuring electricity or just, sound. However, after that, we get to Bohr, Planck, and Einstein. This is basically the first, generation that uses the watered down, equations.
This is where we actually get the separation to where, basically, one's using the skeletal remains of the equation. One is using just the energy of the equation, and then the actual body of the equation itself was left over. But the so he originally developed it in the eighteen sixties. There might have been one gentleman that was working on it before him, but he's basically the main one that, formalized it the best at the time even though it was torn apart anyway. But then directly after that because, I mean, you gotta think it's the eighteen eighties, eighteen nineties. There was a lot of industrial revolution going on.
I don't necessarily blame them for, you know, tearing it down because they were just trying to move everything along as best they could. So they tried to simplify it the best that they could. And ever since then, nobody's ever gone back to try to rework his equations. But yet there's like, for example, in 2019, Golden Gate University did a very interesting test, which I would say at a even though they're accredited, I would say that this experiment would not have been done at MIT or anything like that because they would have never got funding for it. What they did was they put ferrofluid and a piezo crystal inside of a Faraday cage.
Then they put that inside of a vacuum chamber. Then they hit it with a, a pulse from, basically, a Tesla coil from a distance away. Under the standard model, there should have been nothing going on with inside of that Faraday cage. I mean, all of us know exactly what a Faraday cage does.
[00:28:26] Unknown:
Keeps Nicolas Cage away?
[00:28:28] Unknown:
Yes. Yeah. That's a, that's a, little side plus that it does.
[00:28:33] Unknown:
Beneficial. Important. Nobody likes his movies anymore. I mean, it's That's fair. That's fair. Mhmm. You heard us, Juan. You fucking heard us.
[00:28:48] Unknown:
So going back to the eighteen sixties, we're looking at figures like Hertz, Bohr, Planck, and then Einstein comes along and kinda just scrambles everybody's brain. He becomes the literal poster child for You can have the chat, Mark. Physics and everything.
[00:29:01] Unknown:
Yeah. He's out of the chat.
[00:29:03] Unknown:
And, you know, I so when I originally went into this adventure, I was trying to be as nonbiased as possible. And that's kinda what let me be able to see how it kinda all unraveled from the last generation we had, which, I mean, Hawkins was part of that generation.
[00:29:21] Unknown:
Then the generation before that before that Talking Stephen Hawkins, the guy with, that was Lou Gehrig's disease who should have lived to be 26 years old, and then that was it? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
[00:29:32] Unknown:
And then the first generation being Einstein. But what's interesting is is I started looking into, after I basically laid all of this out, I started looking into what Einstein did towards his later years. And if you look at his quotes and actually look at his attempt at the unified field theory Mhmm. He knew he was wrong. And in my opinion, if he could've, he probably would've pulled relativity back. He knew how fragile it was to begin with, and he even went as far as doing the ultimate taboo, which is redefining mass, which kinda made me feel a little bit better about the fact that I did that.
So I I can't hate him. I can't judge him for it because he, at least at the end, tried to go back around.
[00:30:29] Unknown:
Sure. So we're dealing with the his we're dealing with topics of history, the the topics of physics, math, and science, and all of these things. And with our limited education, we're hearing these things for the first time and wondering why why haven't I heard this before? And the answer might be that you'd have to study physics in college before you'd be looking at equations from Planck and this other guy. Who who wrote the plan who wrote the quarter nine equation? Maxwell. Maxwell.
[00:31:02] Unknown:
Okay. So once, his quarter neon equation was split apart, it really wasn't long after that that it was no longer taught in schools. I mean, most people now only hear about it whenever they actually look into his original treaty that he wrote. When you're taught about electricity in any kind of schooling or whether you go to actual, you know, college for physics itself and you're talking about, electromagnetism and everything that is completely combined within that, you will hear about his equations. You will not hear about his quarter neon equations because they were torn apart. They went to E and B fields.
[00:31:56] Unknown:
What are those fields? You said e
[00:31:59] Unknown:
e and b.
[00:32:00] Unknown:
M v. What does that stand for?
[00:32:04] Unknown:
E and and b. So, like, just the letter e and the letter b.
[00:32:09] Unknown:
Okay. Earth and beyond, what does what does e and b stand for?
[00:32:16] Unknown:
I don't actually think that the letters represent anything. I think they're just, part of how they tore down the equations. I don't think they have, like, an actual name for the e or b.
[00:32:28] Unknown:
It's like an x or a y sulfur or a b. Okay. Yeah. It's just a variable.
[00:32:33] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:32:39] Unknown:
You talked earlier about something that might appear like a mirage or holographic. Is that similar to driving down Route 66 through a hot Arizona,
[00:32:49] Unknown:
desert, and then you see kind of the rippling in the distance kinda looks like, a lot of people. Right. So what what you're seeing obviously isn't there. It's just an optical illusion going on. Okay. So, like, the sun isn't actually the size that it looks. It's there's a smaller actual part inside of it that is the the physical core.
[00:33:12] Unknown:
Okay. And that's sort of, like, the ground level thing that we see with our own eyes. And are you saying that's similar to what, Crow has captured on camera with, the so called lunar wave? I don't know. What what what is the, the term for that now. I it was released as lunar wave, and he might have said that he doesn't know that that's, a great title for it because he's seen it across other,
[00:33:39] Rose777:
bodies in the sky? We just recognize it's a total misnomer. So people can call it a space wave, a firmament wave, a plasma wave, whatever they want. It's just that it's not across the moon. It's across everything because it was captured in front of Saturn and Jupiter already.
[00:33:55] Unknown:
Okay. And, Luke, is that what you refer to it as? Or do you have a special term for that? I I call it you can either call it a pressure wave or a teslien wave. Okay.
[00:34:08] Unknown:
So why wouldn't this happen more often then?
[00:34:13] Unknown:
So in order
[00:34:14] Unknown:
to such a small duration because the lunar wave only happens, what, like, every three months or something?
[00:34:23] Unknown:
So there are variables that I have. One of the most important one is something called coherence, which in quantum mechanics, there is basically the opposite. It's called decoherence. It is the, basically, the rate of the particle either going quantum, going superposition, or it is the rate at which it might disappear into the quantum realm altogether. But under my theory, coherence really drives a lot of different things. It drives how structured something is. It drives how much memory it has. Like, imagine you smack Jell O. Right? Obviously, it wiggles around, but it maintains its structure. Right? That is basically the the memory that is encoded within the actual atomic structure of it itself.
So we got structure, memory. This can lower or raise during certain times. It might make it easier if it say if the sun's having some kind of other interaction or if it's just going through a normal cycle that it has. It could even be like a polarity flip. Like, we see a I think it's the polarity flip is every eleven years for it. It makes it easier to see scalar effects like this, but most of the time, scalar effects are only going to be going on in the background. You're not really going to see the the deeper structure that's going on. It's kinda like, you know, if relativity is understood, how much do you actually see in your daily life of things being bent by the mass of other objects?
[00:36:24] Unknown:
Never.
[00:36:25] Unknown:
Right.
[00:36:26] Unknown:
In fact, you can't make that happen scientifically in any way, shape, or form. That's why it's still a theory. Right. At least not in a safe way. So I I don't have a problem with the sun being structured this way. This is, like I said, the normal structure of any molecule. The only thing that has weight the whole reason that it's, the atomic, table of elements is because the only thing that has weight to it that we can actually see is the proton. You can't really see your electrons. People think for whatever reason when they say electron microscope, you could see an electron. No. They're firing electrons at things and then seeing how it bounces off and creating a shape off the bounce.
[00:37:09] Unknown:
Right. Man, I actually have electron shells. Yeah. So basically what Schrodinger models as his probably then probability density clouds, it's actual shells, which are interactions between neutrons, protons, and then the, the electron, which makes it basically in a shell shape instead of having the typical shape that we understand it as.
[00:37:35] Unknown:
Yeah. Where where my issue comes in is what's what's, what's drawing this energy being projected. And then number two, and this is something I have a problem with with everybody that, talks about light. Because very, very simply, I can create light. And and I understand how how it works. You can take, you know, a basic Edison bulb, and you, run a bunch of electricity through it, and you put, filament in there that can't take that much electricity. So that, excites the particles, and it makes them it makes them break apart. This is part of why you have to fill the light bulb with an inert gas because if there's oxygen in there, it'll burn apart and a blink.
But, if you have an inert gas in there, so it's got nothing to take them particles and float them away with, it'll maintain integrity integrity for quite a while.
[00:38:45] Unknown:
And and we still have, what, the first light bulb still blow still going right now?
[00:38:50] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Before the, before the agreement to make light bulbs that didn't last. Yeah. But when you look at that, what's going on there, and you can replicate that with just a torch and a piece of metal, is you just heat that piece of metal up, which is just pounding a whole bunch of electrons into it, and making it more and more excited. And then it'll end up glowing and turning into light and producing light. When that happens, the particles, you you are definitely losing particles. So those particles were the light. And some of that, it breaks away, goes and finds ground because that's what energy does. There's gotta be a negative side that directs that positive side. If you don't have a negative side, and this is where my question overall question on this comes from, if I if I don't have a negative side, that positive side's got nowhere to go.
If I have no voltage, it doesn't matter how many amperage I have, it's not gonna go anywhere. And so there's gotta be a negative to draw that positive. So whenever you're looking at a system holistically, it's like they're recognizing the energy source without realizing that without the the well, neutral is a a more accurate term as an electrician. Your neutral that's gonna send that back and do that trade off. This is no different than a galvanic cell battery. In order for that cathode in order for that cathode to produce power, the anode actually breaks down and creates a negative and then charges that negative over to the cathode.
And then the positive portion goes and trades where the two come back together, the particle becomes whole again. And this is what's happening with light. Light is finding its other half. It's going and finding the missing piece of itself. So what what is, creating that pull?
[00:41:00] Unknown:
Well, all quarter neons have a negative and a positive pull on them. The field itself has energy within it. I mean, that's what Tesla was saying all along. So when we're talking about so when as you're heating it, you are causing, entropy, basically. You are causing a destabilization of the entire molecular structure inside of there. If there is enough coherence with inside of it, it will remember its structure. And as it does remember its structure, it will then pull in whatever energy it has left over from the surrounding area because the entire surrounding area has energy. Everything is the quarter neons whether they are, which have the negative and positive polarities of them.
So it's just really pulling in energy from around it. I mean, this is, for the most part, no different than so the scalar field itself is not a 100% like the Higgs field, but it is basically the same purpose of the Higgs field. Like, this is where energy comes from. Once it's condensed by pressure, then it starts turning into the different particles, which have different purposes. Like, I mean, we can talk about, like we said before, quarks, antiquarks, protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, muons, muons. It's all just different energy at different sizes based off of different compressions from other interactions.
This is what causes quantum to begin with. Quantum can only be done in certain environments, and it is whenever there is no actual other interaction going on because all of these particles are putting off pressure. If they don't have anything to rebound that pressure from, then the energy just spreads out and the particle itself turns into what they would view as a probability density cloud. But it's it was kind of always a cloud to begin with. It was just pressurized because of rebound pressure. But there's always energy all around. So as long as you don't, cause incoherence, which is basically the point at which it's not gonna be able to retain its structure, it will always be pulling in energy to retain its structure.
So just because you sent out light doesn't mean that it's not gonna pull back energy after it's done because all of the quarter neons have positive and negative polarities to them.
[00:43:38] Unknown:
And this is based off of a mathematical equation?
[00:43:42] Unknown:
Yeah. I have everything laid out in the in the larger theory, which, at some point, I can give you all the link to it if you want. I have a couple other documents added up there as well with the larger theory.
[00:44:00] Rose777:
Is there anything that you would be helpful to see if you wanted to share your screen? Because you said that you that you had a 147 page paper that was published. Has it been published?
[00:44:14] Unknown:
Yes. It's published now. Give me one second.
[00:44:20] Unknown:
I don't know if we'll have, to build a screen share tonight. We're kinda doing an introduction to the topic. We have some, folks in chat. We're trying to catch up to some pretty heavy concepts. And have you had the opportunity to explain the explain this to blue collar, Minnesotans, you know, at the mechanic shop who wanna change your oil and, make sure your fluids are topped off?
[00:44:47] Unknown:
No. I haven't gotten to talk to many people about it yet. Like, I, just last Friday night, I did the first episode on this, which was with the cult of conspiracy. Rose and I have talked about it a couple times. I talked about it with Crow. But for the most part, just them and y'all are the only ones I've been able to, like, actual have a verbal conversation about this with.
[00:45:12] Unknown:
Well, thank you for for joining us tonight to talk about these very important concepts.
[00:45:18] Unknown:
Oh, no problem. This is,
[00:45:20] Unknown:
going back to college. It's a bit of a, one night summer school class. Will there be a test at the end? No. There will not. Okay. So, like, what is energy? You said the word energy a lot.
[00:45:35] Unknown:
I don't know if you can really put a definition on what energy is without kinda causing a, like, a little rotation. Like, you could say energy is life. You could say life is energy. You could say that energy is just I mean, I don't know. I don't know if you could actually put a definition on what energy is.
[00:45:56] Unknown:
Does the sun in your model create energy? Is it the source of energy?
[00:46:04] Unknown:
No. The field itself is the source of energy. The sun is just a large collection of it. So as waves go out, waves come in, it either loses a little bit of energy, gains a little bit of energy. It all happens at an extremely fast rate.
[00:46:23] Unknown:
And you haven't said anything about the moon yet beyond the the concept of the lunar wave, kind of a ripply, mirage effect going over it that's been captured by cameras. How does the moon fit into this?
[00:46:36] Unknown:
The moon is basically just a, it I wouldn't say it's a negative aspect. I would say it just solely relies on the sun's, interactions. With it being element one thirty eight, it so far from what I've seen, it doesn't seem like it carries any kind of luminous attributes naturally. It has to actually be, I'm not gonna say excited, but it needs the pressure waves from the sun in order to allow itself to illuminate. It's not based off of reflection.
[00:47:15] Unknown:
So the moon is not made of cheese?
[00:47:18] Unknown:
Sadly, no. It's not milk. Oh, but there is a lot in random caves around The US. Yes. The the Great Cheese Caves.
[00:47:26] Unknown:
Mostly in Missouri. Missouri has most of the cheese caves.
[00:47:35] Unknown:
That's good. If anything ever goes down, just know I'm gonna I'm gonna hit you up.
[00:47:40] Unknown:
Yeah. You gotta know where the cheese stash is. That will be the first place to hit. Yeah. The government keeps it there.
[00:47:51] Unknown:
I know I know they they messed up the craft recipe. I know that for sure. Now the now the only one that actually tastes decent is the deluxe version. Go figure.
[00:48:03] Unknown:
No. This is real cheese. It's, part of what the government does as the it's a price control and and emergency, quit picking on the cats, Bubba. The he's such an honorary little cuss. I was to chew on everything. As part they buy up a bunch of it, and then they put it in these storages. And, obviously, in case of emergency, then we have a store and cheese let you know, good cheese done right. You can sit there for fifty years. It doesn't matter. And it also keeps the price controls, in check.
[00:48:49] Unknown:
So we don't need to take notes because we're recording this. We're interacting with Chad a little bit tonight. We're recording this. We we can play it back, listen to it again and again as as much as we needed to. If you guys have, questions, put them in chat. We'll get we'll get to some questions. I have a question. I like cheese. I like my cheese to be melted. If I put my cheese, you know, in a glass container and I seal it up and I leave it out for an afternoon on a good sunny day and my cheese melts, what causes my cheese to melt?
[00:49:21] Unknown:
Say oh, okay. Say that again.
[00:49:23] Unknown:
I wanna melt some cheese. I put my cheese in a, like, a glass jar, and I seal the glass jar, and I leave it out on a sunshine filled evening, you know, when the sun is setting because I wanna have a warm cheese dinner. What causes the cheese to melt? Is it, the sun is the heat from the sun? Is it clear glass?
[00:49:41] Unknown:
Yeah. Yep. And, yes, a major part of it is the heat from the sun, but also you have compression with inside of the jar because of the it heating up in there and the air molecules expanding.
[00:49:51] Unknown:
Okay. Because sometimes I'll just leave it on my dashboard, drive west towards the sun, and then it'll heat up my cheese sandwich for me real nice. Yeah. That'll work. Okay. Yeah. I remember back in school, we, we did the whole,
[00:50:03] Unknown:
concave mirror to, like, make hot dogs.
[00:50:06] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. So how what is causing that to excite the cheese particles in a way that they kinda get nice and melted?
[00:50:17] Unknown:
Once the photons become coherent and start having interactions, that that'll be energy. So, yes, that'll cause a excess of energy with inside of the atomic structure of the cheese, and it'll just start heating up because it doesn't want that excess energy. That's what,
[00:50:42] Unknown:
Got a lot of cheese fans in chat. Tastes better when it's melted.
[00:50:46] Unknown:
Look. I 100% understand. Mhmm. I am a big fan of all types of cheese.
[00:50:57] Unknown:
We thought you were smart.
[00:50:59] Unknown:
Yeah. I dude, if look. If there are people out there that will put themselves through the worst types of experiences, you know, being lactose intolerant or whatever because cheese is that good. So if you're somebody that doesn't like cheese, there there might be something going on. I think a Mini Cooper just crashed to his to his house.
[00:51:25] Unknown:
No. Those are just the animals.
[00:51:28] Unknown:
Yeah. I there's shenanigans. That's part of why I mute and stuff. Some of the noises that happen over here. We're past the peacock screaming season.
[00:51:37] Unknown:
We're we're talking with Luke who's got some interesting ideas. We're asking him questions about this idea that light, puts out kind of a pressure thing that, the field around us contains the energy, the sun. What does the sun do in this model again?
[00:51:57] Unknown:
It sends out pressure waves Okay. Which causes a pressure gradient. That pressure gradient is actually what causes gravity as well.
[00:52:07] Unknown:
What is a gradient? I know in graphic design, it's like black on the top, white on the bottom, and then it goes gray in the middle.
[00:52:14] Unknown:
Basically. Yeah. So imagine, the more layers you get on top of them, so like each other, the more dense the gradient will be at the bottom, obviously, because it has more, layers of it on top. So it'll be basically more compressed.
[00:52:32] Unknown:
Okay.
[00:52:41] Unknown:
By gain coherence, you mean, interacts with material?
[00:52:46] Unknown:
Yes. So coherence can a 100% cause different interactions with other materials. Coherence absolutely has to deal with the entire light spectrum as it is. Also, if you basically go into a state of decoherence as your coherence is lowering, you will enter basically what they've what they've stated is like a quantum state. And if you I haven't mapped it out a 100%, but if you either get too low in coherence or become incoherent, you might end up in a different realm altogether. Basically, what they call the quantum realm, or it could be what they call the DMT realm. I haven't a 100% mapped it out yet.
Now that the actual scientific foundation of this theory is, set up the way that it is, Now I can start venturing out into other parts. So, like, this wouldn't be a unifying field theory if I couldn't unify spirituality, if I couldn't unify health, if I couldn't unify different dimensions. You know what I mean? Mhmm. I mean, like, I there is there's too many coincidences between spirituality aspects that line up with science, and I'm not going to be the one that ignores that.
[00:54:29] Unknown:
So how does this work with consciousness?
[00:54:35] Unknown:
Well,
[00:54:37] Unknown:
consciousness is almost, you could say, based off of coherence. It could be, like, parallel to each other. I think consciousness might be outside of it, though, because if we're talking about consciousness, like, if you if you die, for example, and you turn into whatever your spiritual body looks like afterwards, however you believe in it. I still believe that you would have consciousness, but I think that your coherence would be different. So now that I'm able to go more into the spiritual side of things, I'm interested to see where it's going to lead to. I think that there's obviously not a coincidence between what the quarter neons look like comparative to sacred geometry.
So I'm kinda looking into that a little bit more now, but also not, you know, losing my head underneath the, the the wave of spirituality.
[00:55:48] Unknown:
So I'm thinking of photosynthesis. How does photosynthesis work in this model? What is giving growth to the plants? Why do the flowers bloom in this model?
[00:56:00] Unknown:
So once the, once the photons travel through what you could say is open space and they lower incoherence to start entering into the visible spectrum. At that point in time, it can just kinda reduce back to the classical sense. So every part of this theory can reduce either to quantum if you wanted to. I wouldn't recommend it because their equations are, like, three miles long and mine are not. So, hopefully, I at least help them a little bit out with that. Relativity, it's kind of up in the air whether you wanna say it could reduce to that or not. I wouldn't recommend it because the interaction between how, like, gravity works and how, like, red shifting works is completely different. I mean, we're talking about more of a outward push than a inward pull.
But as far as anytime that coherence is in a stable state, it can reduce to classical sense, and everything can work solely based off of our current understanding with the, like, standard models of photosynthesis, of biology, all of that stuff.
[00:57:33] Unknown:
Fucking oh my god. Rose is over here wanting to bring avocado into the cheese conversation. I do like guacamole. It is good. But Yeah. That's part of the consciousness. I mean, I I I don't know if it's like a it's like a it cheese is its own food group, Rose.
[00:57:50] Unknown:
Right. The the castings and the cheese, it just it's they've knocked me out unconscious. I have had just the most incredible dreams after, a night of just eating, you know, really good melted cheese.
[00:58:03] Rose777:
Something about it being melted just is so special that you almost can't put into words what makes ooey gooey cheese in a cheese sandwich just different than a regular cheese sandwich. Although, I'm fine with eating a cold cheese sandwich. Perfectly happy. Something about the meltedness of it.
[00:58:21] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't even care about, like, the, the actual, like, condition of the cheese. Just that it's cheese. Like, I'm I'm down.
[00:58:29] Unknown:
Cheese cured decorating. Saying,
[00:58:31] Unknown:
avocados don't really go with cheese.
[00:58:34] Unknown:
You know? I mean, that's what do. How could you say that? Avocados don't go with cheese, but I would say it's it's fair to say that cheese goes with avocados. You get You eat plenty, don't you, Rose?
[00:58:45] Unknown:
I get what? You eat polenta, don't you?
[00:58:48] Rose777:
Polenta. No. I actually don't even know what that is, but I eat lots of avocados and I and I do think an avocado and cheese sandwich with maybe some shredded lettuce is just perfect with a little bit of seasonings. I think those go together, but I I'm weird. I'm willing to be the weird one and the wrong one in the equation.
[00:59:07] Unknown:
So in your model here, you you were fairly mainstream. You think that, in your model, there's space, which basically is a a vacuum or Yeah. At least at the very least a much lesser pressurized system than us? No? Go go ahead and explain then.
[00:59:33] Unknown:
So in a not typically, nonexcited state, the quarter neons are in a negative flare. So what we would understand as a vacuum is just a negative polarity where most everything else is typically in a positive polarity unless there's some other interaction going on. But as the pressure waves basically move through space, they could induce a flip in polarity as they're moving. This could explain, like, plasma and all that stuff that we notice in space. But I based off of my redshift models, I don't view them as being as far away or as large as what they currently understand them to be. So, like, for example, the actual size of the core of the sun, like, what we see in, CRO's hydrogen alpha three filter shots of it, The actual core itself is only about 500 miles wide, which makes it a dramatically less distance away.
It very well could be that it's about three to 4,000 miles away. Because it's not a if it's if it is made up of element one forty four, it does not work off of nuclear. It's not a nuclear furnace. So when we're talking about actual heat interactions, it is completely different.
[01:01:18] Unknown:
So it'll still warm up my skin. It'll still give me a tan and melt my cheese. Yeah.
[01:01:25] Unknown:
Yeah. I got it. I got you. That's important for me. Yeah. I got you. All cheese interactions are still the same.
[01:01:32] Unknown:
Right. Because we were talking about, oh, microwave will just remove the nutrition. Overcooking food removes the nutrition. I just like to leave things out. I put them in a window, and then they just warm up with the sun, and they're good to go.
[01:01:44] Unknown:
Yeah. So
[01:01:45] Unknown:
when we That's pretty style. Mark is upset.
[01:01:49] Unknown:
So one interesting thing is with this theory, levitation is possible.
[01:01:57] Unknown:
Right? I've been looking at my garden.
[01:02:01] Unknown:
Move along. Aflac.
[01:02:04] Unknown:
Yeah. They're trying to eat our tomatoes. And we have They're at they're at the edge. They're trying to poke through.
[01:02:13] Unknown:
It's all the other ducks. Yeah. All the ducks are here tonight.
[01:02:18] Unknown:
As long as they're in a row.
[01:02:21] Unknown:
They were. It's not the norm around here. Just when they're just when they're in mischief.
[01:02:31] Unknown:
So, let me see. I have a book on my shelf.
[01:02:37] Unknown:
What? You have a book?
[01:02:42] Unknown:
So I I can sort of tell you how to levitate. I can tell you how to do it, but
[01:02:50] Unknown:
Yeah. I love it from Chris Angel, the mind freak. Mind freak. He reveals the secret of levitation. You know, it's like the magician's code. I don't wanna really reveal it. But if you it was lentils.
[01:03:03] Unknown:
I'm not gonna lie. Like, when it comes to him, like, there's some there's some stuff that he does that kinda freaks me out a little bit. Yeah. Little bit little bit of a actual mind freak, I guess.
[01:03:13] Unknown:
Right. I've I've balanced it out with a little bit of Dave Thomas, so a little bit of positivity here. He's the guy who had the radical idea that hamburger should be in squares and not circles.
[01:03:28] Unknown:
I I I kinda have to agree. I I you know what? Back in the day when Little Caesar's was pizza pizza, it was two square pizzas, and they were better than the round pizzas. I liked it.
[01:03:40] Rose777:
Did you just say you liked the pizzas?
[01:03:42] Unknown:
Back in the day, now, you know, it's like nineteen eighty seven. What does gravity have to do with these? You know what? If you don't understand, then we can't make you understand.
[01:04:01] Unknown:
So for instance, under this model, sound and light sort of work the same, but sound doesn't have as much an effect on the scalar field. Right? But it does have an effect.
[01:04:18] Unknown:
So for example light are the same thing.
[01:04:22] Unknown:
Correct. Correct. But light has a much right? But light has a much stronger effect on the scalar field than sound does because we have a much higher and broader spectrum of sound. One one of the things that I found the most interesting is actually when I was looking into sound, once we get up to hypersonic, so, like, not ultrasonic, but hypersonic sounds, they actually start experiencing particle wave duality themselves, which is really weird. That's kinda what made me feel even more validated whenever I, I wouldn't say I combine the two under this model. I would say I just kind of put them on the same spectrum.
But the gradient that is pushing us down, right, this actually works off of certain frequencies depending on the materials themselves that they're actually pushing down on. So imagine if a wave is pushing down on an object. Standard acoustic theory states, well, you just have to push the object up with more force than it's being pushed down with. Right? Well, what if you just send a deconstructive wave on the wave that is pushing it down? This is called a a null, a harmonic null under my model. It just so happens that with the Pyramids in Egypt right?
So if the air blows into the king's chamber, it actually sets off a certain frequency. It's around, like, 400 something hertz. I don't remember exactly what it is. But when you have a frequency like that that starts resonating off of the quartz foundation, every single block of the pyramid becomes about 25 kilograms. If you look at the earlier accounts of whenever people still could climb on top of the, the pyramids before they, you know, outlawed it and all that, which is understandable to a certain extent. Like, I get it. It's historical. You don't want, you know, kids dropping sticky lollipops and shit on them. So I get it.
There are many, many, many accounts of people basically talking about, like, they felt weightless up there.
[01:06:58] Unknown:
So that's why you see Chris Angel doing the, thing in Vegas where he's like, oh, he's floating above the pyramid.
[01:07:05] Unknown:
It it could be. It could be. I don't know exactly how they do it. For all I know is they could be using a form of electrostatic levitation, which is a thing.
[01:07:18] Unknown:
Zach Zambala does does that at, Flattoberfest every year.
[01:07:24] Unknown:
The electrostatic? Yeah.
[01:07:26] Unknown:
Does a demonstration of that. It's very hear it. I fuck it up for him. But
[01:07:33] Unknown:
it's very interesting. Very interesting indeed. Actually, the layer where it's currently understood that, like, the ISS and a majority of the, satellites that we have, that's what I actually predict that that is where an electrostatic layer will be. And then there's also documents showing that the government has, entertained electrostatic levitation equipment or technologies.
[01:08:06] Unknown:
I'm pretty sure it's just lentils.
[01:08:12] Unknown:
The, the the the the gut health, the gut biome, the stuff that's happened with the food that you eat, affecting the consciousness. You're mentioning the the music, the sound and light, and I was thinking of, like, electronic dance music show where they have, you know, light shows combined with subwoofer. So you're feeling the bass and the lights are hitting you. The sound is hitting you, and then you're just like, woah. Wow.
[01:08:38] Unknown:
Yeah. I mean, it could have negative or positive effects. So when we're talking about higher frequencies, right Mhmm. These, it it kinda works in opposite. So higher frequencies affect smaller things, lower frequencies affect bigger things. So if you're at a concert where there is actually really high frequencies going on, you are probably having some kind of internal reactions to it, and it's probably not always gonna be the best. We're talking about, like, there for the most part, isn't any difference between you doing that and you opening your microwave while it's on.
[01:09:26] Unknown:
Right. So I'm thinking in terms of, I don't know if this is the official term, the brown note. You hear the note, you you drop your pants, and it's just it's all gone, and it's really very, very nice. It could yeah. That could definitely be a real thing. I mean, that's one of my effect people have from listening to certain music, some tones, and things.
[01:09:46] Unknown:
Yeah. Or a couple cigarettes and then coffee.
[01:09:48] Unknown:
Sure. That'll do it. Yeah. And then also, like, some cool stuff. Weapons. Yep. Yep.
[01:09:57] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. Acoustic weapons. Yeah. They could definitely work the same way. Same thing as, the direct energy weapons. Mhmm. I mean, realistically, there's not gonna be that much of a difference in
[01:10:10] Unknown:
effect when we're talking about acoustic weapons versus direct energy weapons. Yeah. I said I said brown note. Greg Dubs is asking if it's the shit your pants frequency. That's kind of what we're talking about at this point in the conversation.
[01:10:24] Unknown:
Yeah. It's probably gonna be low, but not, like, super low. I would say probably around, like, I would say probably around 800 hertz, maybe. Maybe a little bit. Maybe, actually yeah. It could be lower than that. Could definitely be lower than that. It'll be around 400 hertz.
[01:10:45] Unknown:
Is that why they call it Taco Bell?
[01:10:50] Unknown:
Yeah. Somebody somebody find what, what Well done, sir. Well done.
[01:10:56] Unknown:
Somebody find what frequency that bell emits so we can get a definitive answer on this?
[01:11:02] Unknown:
It's the diarrhea frequency.
[01:11:07] Unknown:
Yeah. They talk about as above, so below. How about as going in, as coming out?
[01:11:12] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. When I was young, they had the they still had the they call them cholitos. Yeah. They quit making those. They looked exactly the same on the way out as they went did on the way in.
[01:11:25] Unknown:
I could believe it. I could believe it. Mhmm.
[01:11:27] Unknown:
There is no food there.
[01:11:30] Unknown:
Sure. Sure. There there there are pleasure frequencies. I think it's a saxophone.
[01:11:37] Unknown:
Yeah. There are definitely, a ton of frequencies that will do, multiple different things. So, like, for example, the the right machines that are out, I've I've fully endorsed those. There's the amount of things that they can do for you, treatment wise is, is well beyond.
[01:12:03] Unknown:
I believe Rose has one that, Matt Rife, supposedly Royal Rife's nephew gave her.
[01:12:11] Rose777:
Yep. Yep. I got it, and it didn't help me, unfortunately, but maybe I didn't use it enough or the right way or pick the right frequency for what my problem is.
[01:12:21] Unknown:
Yes. So you're basically, every part of your body works off of a different frequency. So, another thing is if there can be interference. So I would probably do it in an area that doesn't have a lot of electromagnetic interference or even sound interference.
[01:12:42] Rose777:
Okay. That's good advice because I genuinely, I mean, I'm surrounded by electronics constantly between Jason's musical instruments and me being a computer addict. I probably sound like a beehive.
[01:12:54] Unknown:
What'd you say, Ben? Said her I said her house sounds like a beehive. Yeah. Like, for someone like Ben, it was noticeable, and he could feel it. I I live off grid, so my house does not sound like that. And I and their house is like, like, holy shit.
[01:13:11] Rose777:
And I tried to put flowers in your room and everything to, like, make it
[01:13:16] Unknown:
Oh, it was super nice. You have a super nice home. It was super nice, and and it's just I I have so little electronic stuff going on in my house. And half the day, it's not on at all. And then, you know, the difference, especially at night, like, at at night, I can hear every tiny little sound at my house. You know, I hear the trees shifting, all of that, and then you and then the difference between that and and it's not just your house. All city all city houses some kind of bugs underneath. But do you remember the petunias? I grew the
[01:13:51] Rose777:
I I grew the petunias from seed, and then I cut them before you arrived. And I put them in the room, and I don't know if you remember this, but they were purple. Okay? So purple, purple, purple, purple, months and months and months and months of purple. And then after you and Christy left, one of the flowers grew pink. Yeah. It's crazy, man. I was really sad when the when it died.
[01:14:21] Unknown:
Have you ever looked into organite?
[01:14:26] Unknown:
The, little things that people make that are, kind of a knockoff of, Wilhelm Reich's, Oregon energy accumulator?
[01:14:35] Unknown:
Yeah. If you if you have the the real one, not like the the knockoff one, they very much work.
[01:14:41] Unknown:
Yeah. I I always presumed I always wanted to build a orgo Oregon accumulator. I've put, I've put, quite a bit of thought into that. The, the ones that are basically a knockoff of the idea, they don't really put any thought into it at all. Where when you look at the actual Oregon accumulator, there was layers of organic and inorganic material that was differing, creating this effect. I think it was very similar probably to, like, if anybody's ever watched Cammy and Odell where you if you take a polarized sheet, and you put it up, it blocks off certain waves of light. You you take a second one and you turn it one eighty, it'll block out the other waves of light.
But then if you put a third one up to match the first one, it will let light through again, which makes real fucking sense because that should have all been blocked by that second sheet. Why would it start coming through now again by adding another blocker? That doesn't even make sense. And I think it's similar to, that type of thing is the way that's working. Well, what these guys are doing is just taking, crystal chunks, which I can appreciate. They're getting, use out of, basically trash because, like, all them little chunks like that are just, like, from people like me that make, and jewelry and whatnot. It's just the excess shit that we cut off with our, saws and grinders and whatnot and throw it in there with some metal shavings and then some epoxy, which the epoxy would basically be an insulator. So I don't even understand that, why they use that. But there isn't really a lot of thought and there's I mean, I understand that they're putting different materials in there. But other than that, it's not anything even remotely close to what they're we're gonna keep Well, the
[01:16:39] Unknown:
the scattered metal flakes actually can help a lot because you're essentially deflecting, refracting, and scattering, organized waveforms. So now they're not organized anymore. They're not really anything anymore. So I kinda that's basically the same way that, like, the coding that is on, like, fighter jets, stuff like that to help, avoid, like, locking on and radar and all that stuff. It's the same thing. It just scatters it.
[01:17:14] Unknown:
Interesting.
[01:17:15] Unknown:
Yeah. I always thought about painting my car in that, but, Who's that benefit of the person? For for legal reasons, I never did.
[01:17:24] Unknown:
Gotta keep it street legal.
[01:17:27] Unknown:
Define street legal.
[01:17:30] Unknown:
Not attracting
[01:17:32] Unknown:
attention from officers of law who wanna pull you up. They'll never they'll never know until, I guess, they hit me with radar, and then they're like, why is this acting like the way it is?
[01:17:42] Unknown:
Okay. I have some questions about the the DMT realm. So the idea that using a combination of light and maybe binaural beats or of some kind can induce a state of consciousness where a person might feel like they're out of body.
[01:18:04] Unknown:
Yes. Absolutely. So your imagine your coherence and consciousness is being modulated to where your brainwaves are acting differently. So now your perception of this world is going to be different. Now we can get in the weeds of whether that is a perception of a different realm or whether it is just a hallucination. I don't necessarily believe it's a hallucination because there's too much, there's too much consistency throughout individual people to say that it is just a hallucination. I will tell anybody. I have not mapped out how all of that works. So I I would recommend not to do it so that way you don't get locked there, basically.
Depending on how much of a psychonaut individuals are, I mean, you might already be halfway in this world and halfway out. Mhmm. But I have yet to map out exactly where the lines are. I mean, for all I know, like, you know, if we look at biblical wise, we look at, disembodied spirits. Right? What the Nephilim turned into. They are on this plane, but not necessarily in this realm. Right? I do not know how many layers there are between where we are and where they are. So venture at your own risk.
[01:19:49] Unknown:
That's, those are wise words, certainly.
[01:19:53] Unknown:
DMT doesn't bother me, but that Iboga is a little scary for me. I only hear one for way too fucking long.
[01:20:01] Rose777:
I don't I was not affected by DMT. Nothing happened to me. I was not affected by LSD. Nothing happened to me. I was not affected by a BOGA. Nothing happened to me. But one time and after a whole bunch of times of mushrooms not working, I think it was Ben that said, just getting it stuck in your teeth, make sure you nibble it with your front teeth. And I did that with some, like, leftover stuff that someone left in my house. And, like, for two seconds, I thought I felt something. So if I ever get a hold of that same drug, I'll just remember what Ben told me, which is to chew it with my two front teeth only and then make sure I swallow it. But why wouldn't I be affected by psychedelics like LSD or DMT and a BOGO, Luke? Does it do you think I could my I'm just so mentally strong that I block it out from doing what it's supposed to do. Could be your metabolism.
Absorbent issue.
[01:20:59] Unknown:
Yeah. It could be either either you don't absorb it properly or maybe your body processes it too quickly. Like, for me, I
[01:21:11] Unknown:
It wasn't used in the chat. It's like you should try PCP, and that made me laugh. I'm sorry.
[01:21:17] Rose777:
I
[01:21:18] Unknown:
That made me fucking laugh.
[01:21:20] Unknown:
P PCP. Yeah. You know me. I know. That's hilarious. So The the metabolism thing certainly factors into it. That's why I I jokingly talk about cheats all the time and saying, you know, I've had religious experiences on some really good cheese. I've also been offered other things and I've just had the most, interesting experiences. And then people look at me to think I'm joking around and I'm just playing and pull pranking and pulling a leg, but no. I mean, I've I've I've been to all other worlds that have been parallel to this one and just weird imaginative things, and I've had a lot of fun with this. So I haven't had any, like, fearful, you know, demonic thing. It's all been, like, weird dark, but it hasn't been evil. Right. What about the timid grappler?
Oh, we'll get to that in a minute.
[01:22:09] Unknown:
Right. So you may not have crossed that threshold. And, I mean, this could be, like, a individual case by case basis of, like, how much you take compared to what it actually does to your individual brain and how your brain, like, changes its own, you know, waveforms in order to interpret what's going on to see what's going on. So, like, if you gave the same dose to two different people, one of them may go all the way down to fucking floor level while the other one is, you know, still at level one. But, yeah, I have the similar, like, metabolism for specifically Novocaine. Like, I had to get stitches in my forehead one time, and by stitch two, she was, already, like, halfway through the vial. And I was like, just do the rest. I would the needle from you giving me the Novocaine hurts worse than the stitches that you do. So just do the stitches.
Because, because, honestly, I think she kept doing it in the same spot. So Mhmm. Yeah. Your individual metabolism has a a 100% to deal with it. It's like I know a lot of people, that have that kinda, like, hit that max, and instead of them going further, they'll do, like, the deprivation tanks and stuff like that. Mhmm. I I would recommend doing that because my my mind goes all over the place to begin with, but there are many different ways to do many different things. Right. And, I mean, when we're talking about a individual level, there's there's a lot of varying factors.
But like I said, I I haven't started mapping out exactly how many layers there possibly could be. And that's, like, that's one thing that gets me about, like, modern science is they they don't want to entertain something like that because they wanted to get away from, philosophical ideas, but yet, currently, we're using quantum foam and virtual particles. That's that sounds like we just did a full circle back to philosophy, and we're just using different words. It it is getting a little philosophic philo
[01:24:42] Unknown:
philosophic. How do you say that? Philosophical. Philosophical.
[01:24:46] Unknown:
Philosophical.
[01:24:49] Unknown:
Philosophising. It's a tomato tomato argument. Right. Is that fruit, or is it a vegetable? Is it wave? Is it a particle? It's a fruit.
[01:24:58] Unknown:
Right. And that's that's one thing that gets me the most is, like so imagine you have a particle of energy, right, that has no interactions around it. Energy, pretty much, for the most part, always wants to expand. Right? Mhmm. So if it has no interactions around it, what is it going to look like when it hits a target?
[01:25:21] Unknown:
I shop at Walmart,
[01:25:23] Unknown:
so I don't know. It's gonna look spread out. It's gonna look like it's in waveform. It's not actually a waveform. It's not a different form. It's just a expansion of the energy.
[01:25:35] Unknown:
But I still have a problem with what's choosing the directionality.
[01:25:41] Unknown:
What do you mean?
[01:25:42] Unknown:
What what is choosing the directionality of this energy?
[01:25:46] Unknown:
Just wherever it's emitted.
[01:25:48] Unknown:
I mean, there is active Why is it emitted? Why is it emitting?
[01:25:53] Unknown:
Because that pressure builds up, so it has to release that buildup. It's kinda the same as the electron excitation. So once it returns to the normal state, it releases that energy. These energy naturally pulses. That's what creates this pressure wave.
[01:26:18] Unknown:
You're using the word pulse. I've heard heartbeat, this type of thing.
[01:26:23] Unknown:
It would be similar, same thing. A heartbeat, a pulse, just measured as a frequency, really.
[01:26:34] Unknown:
K. So your heart is up now. What is your favorite Christian band?
[01:26:38] Unknown:
Nickelback.
[01:26:40] Unknown:
Good answer. Did he just fucking whip out an answer like nothing?
[01:26:47] Rose777:
I didn't even know they were Christian.
[01:26:49] Unknown:
He has an answer for everything. I don't know if they are. I just went and done.
[01:26:57] Unknown:
So you understand how, do you understand how a galvanic cell battery works?
[01:27:03] Unknown:
Not off top.
[01:27:05] Unknown:
So you've got a cathode, which is a positive, and an anode, which is a negative. And then really, inside the there's a bunch of plates, and the plates go cathode to anode, cathode to anode. So by the end of it, you've got the least stable galvanically going all the way up to the most stable bet galvanically. And these sell these, plates and then the anode are all just borrowing to the next guy until it feeds into the cathode. But in order for that to happen, for any energy exchanges to happen, and what creates the the conditions is the anode being less stable than the cathode, it starts breaking down.
And when it breaks down, the molecule splits apart, and the negative will jump over to the cathode, the negative side of that element. And the positive side will get oxygenated. So the oxygen will grab on to that positive side and and card it off. Okay. Now when that happens, because the negative side has jumped over to the cathode, it's now given a negative charge to the cathode. Where before it was fairly balanced, now it's at a negative, so it's gonna draw a positive. So this positive part of the particle that's floating around is now getting is gonna now get sucked over to that negative part of the particle.
And so then when those two come back together is where you're gonna get this surplus of energy. And, also, this is how you're picking your directionality. This this over here typically has a negative charge. This over here typically has a positive charge. That energy won't flow or release at all unless both those things exist. Unless there's a, you've got a positive part and a negative part has to be over here and in between is what what we would typically call the field. And I don't understand why in particle fit physics, they don't have a recognition of that. I know. There's still there's still gotta be a a negative There's gotta be something choosing the directionality because if there wasn't something put putting a negative pull, then no matter how much energy you had in a hot spot, it's gonna sit right fucking there. It's not gonna go nowhere.
[01:29:33] Unknown:
Yeah. So now that you've laid it out like that, so remember, the variable I have called coherence? Yep. So decoherence is basically coherent in a decay. So as you were talking about it decaying. Right? So this is actually very similar to copper. Have you ever looked at the atomic structure of copper? So they do not currently have a reason whether we're talking about classical or whether we are talking about quantum as to why its outer electron will drop into a inner orbit. Right? I do. It is because that outer shell has lost coherence so much that the inner shell actually pulls that electron in.
[01:30:20] Unknown:
So it loses an electron wall. So you're saying that the inner that the set the second inner shell becomes a valence shell?
[01:30:27] Unknown:
Yes. So it's a similar process to what you're talking about. So as that decoheres, it loses its ability to maintain the structure of the charge or particles with inside of it. These particles now venture out and just go with the flow to the negative side.
[01:30:54] Unknown:
So then with that said, is that would there be something on because I I I I'm from what I'm gathering, although you you you swing both ways, no joke, is that you're you're leaning more toward the flat model, would then there be a a negative source, a negative hot spot that matches the matches what the, sun would be, and that's what's creating the flow between.
[01:31:30] Unknown:
Well, when we're talking about Yeah. Two quarter neons, whether one of them is a, like, a a one plain object. So, like, the horizontal part. The best way to describe I should have said this from the very get go. The best way to actually describe the way a quarter neon works is to imagine a gyroscope. So you have three rotational aspects. These three rotational aspects end up causing a a polarity. They have a positive and a negative polarity. So there will always be a negative return for whatever energy, and then it just continues to go. This is what the toroidal shape that a lot of people talk about is. It is an expression of the scalar gyroscope being shown as a magnetic field. This is something that quarter neons, the scalar gyroscopes naturally do if they have a rotation for it. So for example, helium and hydrogen do not have a rotational aspect to them. They do not have a torsional aspect to them. We only get that once lithium comes in and it gives the extra proton and electron. This actually causes an imbalance, forcing the particle to spin because of the extra torsional aspect it now has.
[01:33:07] Unknown:
Oh, yeah. You were impressed by that?
[01:33:10] Unknown:
Yeah. I I like the the three-dimensional aspect of this. Did did you ever, use a joystick and, play a game where you're flying around in three direct three-dimensional space? Yes. Okay. And then they have, like, the the gimbal, and you're trying to find a balance. But, really, it's you could flip yourself over. Up could be down and down could be up. But to you, it's like you're just fine. One thing that's interesting is that
[01:33:36] Unknown:
when we're talking about, Euler integers, we never have a gimbal lock under a quarter neon.
[01:33:44] Unknown:
Yeah. I was just gonna ask you about the the gimbal lock and, like, dividing by zero. Yeah. It never happens in a quarter neon. Okay.
[01:33:52] Unknown:
What the hell?
[01:33:58] Unknown:
I did not put a comment in chat. There's actually memes about it too. If you look up, Euler Energies and, quarter neon gyroscopes, there's there's literal scientific memes about it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'm
[01:34:14] Unknown:
my mind is going, like, all the different directions at once, and I'm trying to cohere my thoughts into a linear fashion. I was gonna bring up, like, Terrence Howard. Remember that guy? He had he had said some weird things a couple of times, like he was born and knew math in the womb and this sort of thing.
[01:34:32] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't I don't I don't know about all that. Well, what he was showing,
[01:34:37] Unknown:
I don't know what he was saying. It was kind of a a funny theatrical thing. I don't know what that was about. The product he was showing was like, like a three-dimensional thing, and I was trying to find his balance. It was basically like a drone that could turn on three different axes. Okay. And then he had this little physical object toy that he was kinda playing with, and then we kinda No. He was saying that that toy was supposed to be basically the void spaces on the,
[01:35:06] Unknown:
in the power of life.
[01:35:09] Unknown:
Something to that effect. Right. So he's gone and done a bunch of podcasts for a while, and people talked about him, laughed at him, and then completely didn't consider the theories and the math and the stuff he was talking about, which wasn't his own. He was working with other people. He was trying to push a product to market.
[01:35:26] Unknown:
Right. And one thing that's interesting is, like, when we're talking about, like, vacuum geometry or really just any kind of geometric aspect in general, it it's interesting how it is already implemented with inside of the quarter neon. So for example, let me see if I can find it here. So inside of the quarter neon to begin with, you already have a tetrahedron. You have a icoschedron, whatever that word is, a cube, the, octahedron, the dodecahedron. There's multiple shapes already inside of this quarter neon. All of the vacuum geometry that they've been searching for forever is already with inside of the quarter neon.
They've all been it's quite interesting to see how it slowly come, like, full circle back to quarter neon without them acknowledging quarter neon. So, for example, when we're talking about virtual particles and how they are described, how they look, all of that, it is literally just a quarter neon. It is the scalar aspect of the quarter neon. When we're talking about, quantum foam, it just goes back to Maxwell's sea of tiny vortices, which is just a sea of quarter neons. We're basically going full circle, and everybody is dancing around the same terminology without going back to the original name of it.
[01:37:21] Unknown:
Do you have an answer for why that might be?
[01:37:25] Unknown:
Yes. So Newton's laws transcend actual physical ideas. When I say that so for every action, there's an opposite and equal reaction. Right? When Maxwell's equations were separated or his equation was separated, when quantum took the energy aspect of it, right, they had no structure anymore. They only had energy. Well, in order to try to understand and explain energy without structure, you have to rely on probability. If you insert probability, that means that you have to take something out. That something that was taken out is called determinism, meaning that there is a actual purpose. There is an actual function.
There is an actual expected outcome for what is going to happen. So because they had didn't have the structure, determinism was taken out, and the only thing that they could rely on was probability. So they're still looking at it from a probability aspect. They can't look at it as a deterministic structure like Maxwell did. And what's interesting is, like, so have you all heard of modified Newtonian? I think it's modified Newtonian dynamics and then modified relativity. Yeah. Both of these are essentially stating that there are field interaction. One thing that I absolutely love about Einstein is just his absolute refusal to accept the probability aspect of quantum.
Because you have to remember, he still had the structure. So, of course, he's not gonna wanna look at quantum as a probability thing. They had no choice, but he wasn't gonna look at it that way. So that's one of the main reasons why he went back because he knew that there was a deeper field. There was a deeper field interactions going on that neither one of them was seeing. There's even a possibility. One of his quotes is can loosely be stated as him admitting we need to go back to Maxwell's equation. I fucking I lost where I was going now.
[01:40:19] Unknown:
Yeah. We're we're getting a little bit lost here too. I can go back to maybe, determinism, probability. I would ask you maybe about synchronicity and how that kind of ties into this with consciousness.
[01:40:34] Unknown:
You could if you it it depends on how you view it. So, like, I would say that synchronicity probably wouldn't actually arise within a probability world, like a probabilistic state. If we have determinism, then I would say that synchronicity double definitely, like, exists within that world.
[01:41:09] Unknown:
Just let it sink in a little bit. This is a heavy heavy topic, or maybe it's a light topic. I don't know.
[01:41:17] Unknown:
That's one of the, Okay. Actually, what, Ben was talking about before, that is one of the well, pretty much the only way that I met conservation of energy, is that anything that is lost is returned to the field. But if it retains structure, if it has a high coherence, then it will actually pull back from the field.
[01:41:48] Unknown:
I just had a flash of David Ike wearing a teal jumpsuit like his tracksuit and having his experiences. Do you get into any of David Ike's material?
[01:41:58] Unknown:
No. I have not looked into a lot of, a lot of his stuff. I know the name. I vaguely know, like, Yep. Actually, I might not even know, like, any of the, the interactions that he had. Okay.
[01:42:11] Unknown:
He's most well known for being the the reptilian guy.
[01:42:15] Unknown:
Right. Right. That's why I remembered it. I remembered it was some kind of extraterrestrial type experience or interdimensional
[01:42:24] Unknown:
type experience, something like that. He's explored a lot of different ideas, and people get hung up on one of his more interesting ideas. More recently, he was kind of putting together this idea of the waves and the functions and how we have a consensus reality and this type of thing. So in that research, I think he's approaching a little bit about what we're talking about here, trying to get to this idea of, how we experience our consensus reality and maybe tying that into and concepts of what people are saying is, like, a simulation theory.
[01:43:07] Unknown:
So have you ever heard about the Copenhagen interpretation? So within that, there was basically, it kinda set out rules that you had to follow if you wanted to, basically make any kind of additions, any kind of new theories, or anything like that. There is a so every part of the here. We'll just go over to the whole theory real quick. There is every essentially, every single field of science is unified inside of this theory, whether we're talking about liquid theory, whether we're talking about atmospheric, whether we're talking about, which I mean, those two are kinda the same anyway, but a little bit different.
Whether we're talking about atomic structures, whether we're talking about electricity, whether we're talking about, just any any part of classical physics. Relativity is in there as well. Quantum field theory, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, all of that is in there as well. I was able to derive every single law and constant within science based off of first principle values. I was able to derive the entire periodic table plus the extra that I, got as well from first principal values. I was able to predict all, particle masses that are currently in the particle zoo.
Not only that, but also identify which ones were probably, misidentified. So, for example, when we're talking about there is a mass for a photon in motion, and there is a mass for a photon at rest. When a photon is in motion, it creates pressure waves, which the regular photon at rest does as well. The issue is is that, obviously, because the photon that is traveling, these waves are going to act different. The waves that are being put off are what we currently understand as gravitons, which is quantum's, attempt at unifying gravity, and it is also the Higgs boson.
Right? So these ripples going through is what helps matter accumulate. It's what basically sets every continues everything in motion. Dark matter, dark energy, they're misidentified as well.
[01:45:55] Unknown:
One thing that's interesting is that Under the under the typical model currently, wouldn't Higgs the Higgs boson be what's, causing coherence?
[01:46:05] Unknown:
It is essentially the god particle, the particle that, I don't know if they say it creates
[01:46:12] Unknown:
matter. It's what gives weight to matter.
[01:46:15] Unknown:
Right. And it gets its matter from the Higgs field itself.
[01:46:25] Unknown:
Because this is under the same idea that, your your electron and your neutron don't have anything, any matter to them, so we can't see them or really do anything with or really, weigh and measure them in a conventional sense.
[01:46:43] Unknown:
I say that we can. So I did, there is a relationship. There is a weight relationship between protons and electrons that has been, like, it's one of the constants. So I think it's a a relationship of eighteen twenty or something like that. It's a 1,820, whatever the unit is that they actually use for it, that stays consistent throughout.
[01:47:11] Unknown:
I don't disagree with this. I I talk about this actually that electricity has weight. People just don't realize it. Like a dead battery in a in a full battery, like a c battery. If you take a dead one and you drop it flat on the floor, that fucking thing will bounce up six inches. You take a full one and do it, that thing drops deader than shit. Just doop.
[01:47:32] Unknown:
Well, yes. So if we look at Einstein's equation of e equals m c squared, there's a direct relationship, obviously, between energy and matter. Matter is just a condensed form of energy. Energy does have weight to it. So if you do have a battery that is charged compared to one that is not, yes, you will have an increased weight in the charged battery.
[01:48:01] Unknown:
I'd like to take it back to nickel real quick. Nickel back to nickel cadmium batteries. Nickel being the fifth most most frequently seen element on Earth, I think. Fifth most common element on Earth. And getting back to battery talk, and the weight of the batteries and weight of electricity, You were saying, how your model ties into the the elements, the table of the elements. Right. Could you speak more on that?
[01:48:40] Unknown:
Yeah. Let me go to that part in the paper.
[01:48:45] Unknown:
So what are the the most, most frequent occurrences of these elements? Do you have explanations why, you know, nickel is so common?
[01:48:56] Unknown:
It depends on what is, what is basically friendly and the most stable in order to basically keep combining into other elements? What's the most accepted to, protons or electrons depending on if we're talking about, ions or not? As to why nickel is the most plentiful, I don't actually have an answer. It could be just because maybe it's very easy for other things to combine into it. Maybe there are other interactions that cause it to be easier to be made.
[01:49:45] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't have an answer either. I'm just kinda ask asking myself some questions. I have some facts here. Doing some Internet searches to figure out what I can find and, some trivia for you. It says the element of nickel was first isolated and classified as an element in 1751 by a Swedish chemist, an Axel Frederick Constead. I'm a Minnesotan. I don't know if I speak Swedish very well. So he extracted it from There's still the cities all over the place. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm just, just a little bit ashamed right now. I'm trying to figure out how, they they mistook it for copper, so they were confused with this element of nickel. They thought it was copper. So then the German word kumfernikkel, meaning devil's copper, was used. So the to get the word nickel from a German word, kumfernikkel meaning devil's copper because copper is not nickel, but they resemble each other.
[01:50:44] Unknown:
Yeah. I could I could kinda see that.
[01:50:46] Unknown:
And then the the copper top thing, you know, the batteries commercials, I have the Yeah. The sound memory of the commercial being, some certain tones, and it associates it with copper and the copper top batteries. And the Energizer Bunny comes along. What brand of batteries do you recommend?
[01:51:06] Unknown:
There could be a very good possibility in the future that batteries are obsolete.
[01:51:17] Unknown:
Why would they be obsolete? Because I have Everything has a battery, and we we recharge them. Because Sometimes, like, rail backs. Is that okay?
[01:51:27] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. So far, I have not found a single part where Tesla was wrong. I think that's, the safest way I can say that.
[01:51:52] Unknown:
I'm picking up what you're putting down through the ether here.
[01:51:56] Unknown:
Through the scalar field. Scalar field. Okay. The Maxwell field. Because I I named it the Maxwell Field because of him being the one to, to implement the idea of it or to first introduce the idea of it. So, like, for example, in the experiment done by Golden Gate University, inside of that Faraday cage that was inside of the vacuum chamber, they detected movement and current.
[01:52:34] Unknown:
What tools are they using to detect this?
[01:52:37] Unknown:
I I don't know what kind of very, very sensitive, voltmeter that they were using for the piezo, and I assume just a very, very sensitive motion detector for the ferrofluid.
[01:52:57] Unknown:
For anybody that doesn't know, ferrofluid just has little iron particles in it. It reacts to magnet and reacts to fields.
[01:53:05] Unknown:
It's very cool looking fluid.
[01:53:07] Unknown:
Yeah. Ferro's iron.
[01:53:09] Unknown:
Sounds like an Egyptian pharaoh, but it's spelled differently?
[01:53:14] Unknown:
Yes. Spelled the the iron that way. Yeah.
[01:53:23] Unknown:
We got a little bit into talking about trees, structures, branching, this type of thing. Have you seen, Ben's model here, Balderson's model of the the tree of life that he's put together and the structure.
[01:53:38] Unknown:
So I watched a video, that he had posted on YouTube Okay. A while back, earlier today. Mhmm. I'm gonna look over it a couple more times, because I think I think is your cell is one of the sacred geometry, isn't it? Okay. So, yeah, I'm definitely that is going to be part of what I'm going to be looking into.
[01:54:03] Unknown:
Yeah. In in my opinion, the, Yggdrasil is the mass human side, and then what people recognize is the the flower of life, the circles. That's the that's the feminine side. So if you take, you know, the each center of the each one of them circles has a dot and all them dots connect together, that's basically the tree of life right there. You can lay So the feminine side and just lay it directly over top of it.
[01:54:28] Unknown:
So oddly enough, there's probably a atomic number or, basically, an atom that actually corresponds with, the flower of life and with Idrisil. So that is actually something that I wanna look into. For example, like we talked about before, Metatron's cube looks to be a one to one to element one forty four. Vesica Pisces looks like it might be relatively close to element one thirty eight. Now when we're talking about these elements wondering
[01:55:12] Unknown:
are theoretical elements. They aren't something that has ever been seen or produced at this point.
[01:55:21] Unknown:
They might have been seen, but they haven't been notated down.
[01:55:26] Unknown:
Well, yeah, that's, that's one of the problems with some of these elements is they only exist for a fraction of a second, just like you you
[01:55:37] Unknown:
Well, when they're totally right. When they're made inside of an electromagnetic furnace, it is only natural for them to only exist for a couple seconds.
[01:55:51] Unknown:
But some some a lot of these elements, they just they change and degrade so damn quickly. You don't even ever have time. It's, you know, at at that elemental structure because people don't understand also that, like, most people have never looked at decay chains and realize that a lot of these elements are the same fucking thing. You know? And it's too They're all just,
[01:56:15] Unknown:
essentially energy and different stacks and different forms. That's all it is. It's just different accumulations of energy.
[01:56:23] Unknown:
But we Like, you look at uranium. Uranium's the top end of that decay chain leads the bottom end. This one's negative. This one's positive. This sucks in energy. This is chucking excess energy. They're actually the exact same thing. Uranium would eventually decay down into lead and even bismuth, which most people know what it is and have it at their house. That's the pretty much stable part of that chain. That's about as stable as it gets as bismuth. But that's all all of the exact same thing.
[01:56:56] Unknown:
If I remember correctly so I did do a little bit of looking into to with the sacred geometry and the elements. If I remember right, I think Idrisil was related to Bismuth.
[01:57:17] Unknown:
Makes sense. Makes sense. Because that's where, again, that's where that that particular chain, reaches stability. You know, at at least as much stability as it's gonna have. Right. So what you're seeing as the
[01:57:30] Unknown:
straight lines, I actually attribute to torsional values. What you would typically see as a circle, I would view as electron shells.
[01:57:43] Unknown:
Yeah. I understand what you're saying.
[01:57:45] Unknown:
Duh. There's definitely a, I mean, Metatron's cube was a literal almost one hundred percent one to one. Some of the other ones, there may be a little bit of interpretation into it, but it's really not that much. It's just as long as you're understanding that straight lines represent torsional values and curved lines or circles represent, electron shells. But, yeah, no. A 100% with, like, decay times and all that. So, for example, when we're talking about lithium ion, when it gains that extra electron, my decay timing that I have set for that or calculated for that is sixty eight seconds.
The empirical data on it is around, I think it's sixty sixty five to seventy seconds. So yes. So everything
[01:58:56] Unknown:
Which anything for anybody that doesn't know, And I've actually have a series with Emily Moyer. If you guys wanna go check that out, where we're going through the different elements, anything out of that first row of elements, that shit is unstable as fuck. This is part of why, like, you can't even put lithium fires out with water because it the lithium will grab the fucking rip the oxygen right out of the water and break the molecule apart and take the oxygen right out of it. Just keep on going, baby. Like, dude, that lithium's beast.
[01:59:32] Unknown:
Yeah. Because it's essentially it started out as a unstable structure. That's whenever we first get the torsional aspect within the elements. Like, literally yeah. The the torsional value that I have set for it is basically 0.01. We don't actually get up to so for example, hydrogen and helium have zero torsional aspects to them. Once we get up to element six, you start getting, 0.02. Then when we get to, for example I can't remember off the top of my head. What is, what's the atomic number for uranium?
[02:00:15] Unknown:
That's two thirty eight. Is that the normal one?
[02:00:22] Unknown:
That is the 92? Yeah. There we go. I was about to say I think it's 90 something.
[02:00:29] Unknown:
So for that, we have a code green room? Yeah. You're talking enriched. That's what that Yeah. I was talking enriched uranium. I that's why I was spitting off right away, I guess. So Yeah. Two thirty eight is the most common isotope of of uranium.
[02:00:45] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. 93%
[02:00:47] Unknown:
of of natural uranium is two thirty eight. Yeah.
[02:00:53] Unknown:
So as far as, like, emission pressure, what I was talking about with the Tesla and waves, coherent, the emission pressure, the scalar potential, the, torsional value, they're all varying, and they kind of all depend on each other. I mean, we're talking about a very dynamic system. This is basically why, like, older, older theories, for example, Newtonian gravity, it works in very special scenarios. But if we he he never accounted for going on top of a mountain. He never accounted for going under the ocean, stuff like that. Gravity changes when you change your position.
But for where he was, he was, for the most part, correct. But when we're talking about element 92, so it has a coherence factor of 0.52. This is about the middle because coherence only goes from zero to one. Four right now.
[02:02:04] Unknown:
When we're talking about This is not why they enrich it to use it. They get the enriched uranium, the two thirty eight because it's it's it's not that's much more unstable.
[02:02:15] Unknown:
Correct. Correct. So it's and it's a original coherence is still going to be the same. But as it gets, further enriched, its torsional values are going to increase. So its emission pressure is going to be or the pressure is going to be is 3.3 times 10 to the negative five. Then the radial dispersion, which is essentially how far out this emission pressure goes before it completely dissipates, this is going to be, 0.25, which is a kind of medium base for the torsional value. Then when we go to the scalar potential, it is going to be 6.34 to 10 or times 10 to the negative five.
But then the torsional value itself is going to be 1.69. So realistically speaking, uranium itself is kind of a stable ish element. But as you enrich it, right, you are going to extremely raise that torsional value. If its coherence cannot overcome that torsional value, you are going to have energy being spread out. Now if you have energy being spread out, what does that look like? Radiation. And there are definitely some elements that their emission pressure and their coherence cannot keep up with their torsional values. Their torsional values are way too high. So, for example, when we talk about, the very last element as of right now, which is one eighteen, so it has a coherence of 0.45.
I hate saying the name of it, so I'm just gonna say element one eighteen. So 0.45 is a relatively medium coherence again, but the radial dispersion is much higher. It is at 0.3. The torsional value of it is almost I think it's actually over twice the amount of uranium. So we're talking about a lower coherence, a higher radial dispersion, and a higher torsional value. So as soon as this element exists, it is already starting to tear itself apart.
[02:05:09] Unknown:
Yeah. I was I was that that was my thought on it right away because it's it's gonna burn right through itself. That's gonna be the bigger problem right there is why it makes it unusable because just like with a like like with a light bulb where you put pump inert gas in there to keep it from oxidizing so that way it'll maintain coherence. You know, it's the same thing for any energy source. You don't want it to burn itself up in two seconds. But Like that. It's not pan much. You can't make such a thick ton of heat. Oh, yeah. Because it's right. Because
[02:05:43] Unknown:
thermal radiation, thermal heat is just entropy. It is the energy becoming disorganized. It is Yeah. It is decoherence. Entropy and decoherence are essentially the same thing, except it is a matter of whether the object is able to maintain its structure after this happens, if it's able to bounce back based off of the memory of its structure.
[02:06:09] Unknown:
So I I I understand spirit of the age. So this is just something people don't really understand. There the re the periodic table of elements is the atomic table of elements, and the only thing that's chain that is really measured on that is how many protons are in a molecule. So just just understand that when they say one eighteen, that means there's a 118 protons. If it's a stable element, unlike where you're talking about uranium two thirty eight, the uranium 92, that's gonna have approximately the same number of electrons as it does protons, which is where you're talking about stability. And it's not gonna go bleeding in one side off really badly. So the radioactive ones, they just have the more protons, but a lot of times they're they're more unstable.
So they're they're more quickly gonna chuck off that positive end. Like, when I was talking about the decay chain, it's gonna try and get down to where it reaches a stable element where it's able to hold its structure and not wanna throw or gain anything, which in the uranium decay chain, it's bismuth is what we were talking about, is that's a fairly stable structure, and it won't really wanna do either grab or or dump. In more layman's terms, I don't, I understand everything Luke's saying. I that's just not how I talk because I I learned a long time ago that people get really irritated. I'm not which isn't me talking to you at all, Luke. No. You're good. Yeah.
When I was younger and I would talk like that, people get real pissed off at me, and they think you're just trying to talk above their heads and being dickheads. Obviously, we invited him for this conversation, so he should be talking like this. But I still learn to speak like I I'm I'm a damn So the the best way that I can explain the periodic table
[02:08:09] Unknown:
is take a LEGO. Right? A LEGO is a proton. A LEGO is a neutron. Add more LEGOs to it. Continue adding more LEGOs and you go up the periodic table. But understand that at a certain point, you start getting a spin. Now objects that are smaller can spin faster and still be stable. Objects that are larger cannot spin as fast because they start ripping themselves apart. This is the same thing. So you add more Legos onto it, but you're turning it faster. So now LEGOs start flying off of it. These LEGOs that are flying off of it is radiation.
[02:08:59] Unknown:
Like a sumo wrestler and a hula hoop?
[02:09:03] Unknown:
Yeah. But I guess the radiation will be sweat beads.
[02:09:06] Unknown:
Shaking those hips. Everything's going out. So I got a question here. We'll clarify. Spirit of the age made a statement saying all radioactive compounds do not belong in the periodic table. They're clearly compounds, and the periodic table is for elements. Now we can maybe stop for a moment and discuss compounds. My theory of compound is that a compound is where a man takes his wife to create a nuclear family.
[02:09:35] Unknown:
Alright. Alright. Understand that realistically speaking, hydrogen is a compound. It is a combination of protons and neutrons. Helium is a compound. You can actually look at the entire periodic table as just compounds. There is no actual pure element. If we talk about pure elements, we're just talking about protons, neutrons, and electrons. We're just talking about energy itself.
[02:10:05] Unknown:
This is this is why there's a entire group. They call it the cult of hydrogen, which says everything starts with hydrogen. It's one proton, one electron. Actually, no neutron. And then it starts building up from there. And everything is just adding on another one, adding on another one.
[02:10:30] Unknown:
Yeah. I'm not expecting pure elements when we're going to pound town. You know what I mean? Yeah.
[02:10:37] Unknown:
Yeah. Things get weird with the neutrons because then that's that's where you get your allotrobes because then you get, like, deuterium. It's just adding a neutron to hydrogen.
[02:10:48] Unknown:
Yes.
[02:10:52] Unknown:
And that's not on the periodic table of elements because it still only got one proton. So it's still the same thing as hydrogen. That's why it's an allotrope of hydrogen. It it's not really. And then that whole thing doesn't really work the way a person thinks it would because, like, some of the things that that degrade, like, fuck like, deuterium will degrade is it deuterium degrades down down into hydrogen? Or, I mean, into helium? So it actually jumps it up. Yeah. Yeah. It degrades into helium, which that's just why and why did it gain it? Why did it gain a proton by dumping a neutron?
[02:11:33] Unknown:
It takes a diagonal step. And then once it loses it, it just steps sideways to where it just becomes helium.
[02:11:41] Unknown:
Yeah. And so and so instead of just becoming hydrogen with no neutron, now it's now fucking helium. Right.
[02:11:49] Unknown:
And that is because it Wild. Gains a torsion because of that. It's off balance. So in order to fix that balance, it has to start turning. It returns to basically a a neutral state once it loses it because, helium has no torsion to it. One thing that's interesting, if you want to say, a pure element, then you so I saw somebody in the comment talking about ether. If anybody remembers in the original Mendeleev periodic table, ether was the first element. A lot of people understood that as light. I actually agree with Mendeleev, but I would not say it is light. I would say it is energy.
[02:12:44] Unknown:
I disagree both, and I think it's fluid.
[02:12:52] Unknown:
So when we're talking about the scalar field, you could represent it as fluid like. Yes. Yeah. It's it is the field.
[02:13:00] Unknown:
Right. Like, there's again, just like with a battery, to me, the the to me, we everything is a battery, including you and me. Every we're just biochemical batteries, and everything's an anode and a cathode. So it's a three part system, positive, negative, and then the field, which is the the fluid in between that's allowing the transition of power to have Right. And energy flows.
[02:13:24] Unknown:
Yeah. So, yes, you you are you are right, but it is also that the first element is just energy in general. And that liquid, what you would say, is just pressurized more and more and more to where it becomes other particles, becomes other elements. So you could easily say that, yes, it is it is fluid like. Yes.
[02:13:58] Unknown:
Yeah. Fluid's the only thing that allows that transition to happen. Yeah. It is it is definitely fluid. Even even when you're say People don't realize it, but even when you're talking about normal electricity, the reason that we use metals is because they turn into fluids. That's just a fluid that's that temperature is solid.
[02:14:18] Unknown:
Right. That's why we say a flow of current, a flow of electricity. Yes. It is fluid like.
[02:14:25] Unknown:
Well, it's the the the the transition piece is fluid. What's making the the the the what's the field? Because when you're looking at it, you've got the the typical copper wire. That is your that is your field. And down here, you have to set up a negative. And over here, you throw in positive, and it will it will swim its way through that through that, field, and it will stay in that approximate area. This is why when you're looking at, mythological stories, Mercury is the the messenger of the gods. It's he's the the communication.
He's the the trade. Anything that includes going from one to the other, Mercury controls that whole thing. That's the fluid in between the the positive and the negative. It's all it's all a three part system. This is what this is where I was getting at with not understanding what's picking directionality, and I understand what you're saying that these
[02:15:28] Unknown:
So you're so understand that that same thing that you're seeing going through that solid, that is happening outside of that solid as well. It's just the amount of energy, the amount of energy that has already collected there is what we are seeing the expression of through that object. So, like, when Tesla is still in the your field.
[02:15:51] Unknown:
I understand that it's in a little tunnel around the outside. I'm real well aware of that. Right. I'm an electrician. Hey. Yeah. I'm real well aware of it. But the but it's still setting the field. I won't have electricity. If my wires over here, that that field is, like, right here and right on top of it. We have little fucking meters that we can just stick right there and, yeah, there's power there. Working. But it's not out here. It's Yes. It is. Right? It follows that wire. That wire is is setting the the field. It's it's a it's the fluid that's allowing this transaction to happen.
[02:16:30] Unknown:
So that experiment done by Golden Gate University and all of the experiments done by Tesla state that you're wrong. That field is actually going outside of it. It's just not expressed until you have that materialistic object that then you you you can then detect it from. So, essentially, you're you're viewing an effect of a current inside of an ocean.
[02:17:01] Unknown:
Let me back to back it.
[02:17:04] Unknown:
It's all about the motion of the ocean. Ocean. Yeah. Yeah. We're getting seminal. We're talking origins. How is baby made?
[02:17:13] Unknown:
I'm not disagreeing with the I'm not disagreeing with the waves in the ocean, metaphor in in any way, shape, or form. Once again, we have a positive. We have a the the water in this the liquid in this always is the liquid that picks up the energetic energy and does that transfer. And the thicker lick the liquid, the the better it transfers. We that that's just basic science. As soon as you don't have the liquid, which we live in a vapor system, which is liquid, as soon as you lose that, sound doesn't travel, light doesn't travel. None of that kind of thing wants to happen. The the everything is the scalar field.
[02:17:56] Unknown:
Right. Because the scalar field makes up what we observe as reality.
[02:18:01] Unknown:
So so the ether then is the field in and of itself and it's liquid, and then you have a positive. And my problem with your system, and I understand you're saying that, that these have a positive and negative with but everything does. Even if you take even if you take just water, water as a positive and positive and negative as bill as above so below, no matter how big or small you take it, it's always gonna be able to, if you isolate something, have a positive side and a negative side. It's just the way it works. And so I get that. But there's still gotta be something that's on in that system, an overall negative. Something equal to this overall positive that you're saying because it's projecting.
So it's obviously then gonna be the positive side. The the same thing with electricity. If I don't have voltage to go out, that amperage, no matter how positive and strong it is, is not gonna come to me.
[02:19:00] Unknown:
So the overall negative may be below what we can see. If we're talking about the That's what I was asking you. Somewhat of a plane of inertia type of situation to where because if the plan is not
[02:19:15] Unknown:
of inertia where the two meet?
[02:19:17] Unknown:
Correct. So below us, what we see is the ground would be The negative. Beginning of the negative. Yes.
[02:19:24] Unknown:
Yes. Now we're on the same page.
[02:19:28] Unknown:
Alright. Alright. So say what you just said again so the rest of the class can catch up.
[02:19:34] Unknown:
The earth is a ground.
[02:19:36] Unknown:
Uh-huh. I'm standing on the ground. No. Not not not the earth where we're standing underneath us because we would be on the plane of inertia where this positive and negative are balanced out, basically, which is the center of the toroid, which is the the plane of inertia. That's what we're living on. I call it the carbon plane.
[02:20:00] Unknown:
Right. So, yeah, if so kinda like what I was talking about before to where every quarter neon has a, negative and positive polarity. So for example, if our positive polarity is up or north or whatever you wanna consider it, the opposite would be more than likely where we can't see.
[02:20:25] Unknown:
Now we're on the same page. This is what I've been digging at the whole time.
[02:20:30] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:20:33] Unknown:
So the two This is what I'm missing out of your story was missing out of your story. And, unfortunately, most people, that's missing, period. They don't understand that everything's a dissension from positive without understanding the way energy works at all. Because if there was with the positive, then with no negative, then that would never project out. It would stay it would stay to its fucking self because it's got nowhere to go. Right.
[02:20:58] Unknown:
So the plane of inertia, the carbon plane, that's the place where the baby's getting made?
[02:21:03] Unknown:
Yeah. Babies Yeah. Forever. I think, That's actually so speaking of water, that's one thing that's interesting. Water or just liquid in general is, its coherence actually fluctuates. Yeah. It it Yeah. Because it's Mercury.
[02:21:23] Unknown:
Mercury doesn't really have a positive or a negative. It can be either. Like, that's, you know, that's the whole, the the whole where they kind of put give the mercurial figure a feminine aspect. Like, that's that's why. Because, again, like, when you look at it in a battery aspect, as as I was talking about, like, the transactions between the anode and the cathode, the mercury itself at one point in time is negative, and then at another point in time is positive just depending on which particles it's transitioning. Is it transitioning things from the anode to the cathode or the cathode to the anode? And so and the mercury don't give a fuck either way. So, Ben Ben, did you so now from your Odinist perspective, did you find Thor in Luke's?
Yes. Just now. Okay. This whole time I've been digging and digging at it, and and I finally got it. I'm sorry. I thought see, whenever I was talking about the,
[02:22:24] Unknown:
the Earth being a, quarter neon. So, yes, the the negative part of it would be underneath us.
[02:22:32] Unknown:
Yes. That's what's that's why the energy is transitioning this direction. That's what's creating the directionality of it because underneath us, there's a negative, and that's pulling that in, which is also part of why you could you can charge your seeds with a bet with a magnet by putting a on top of a magnet and turning the south side up. So that way, it pulls that down and more thoroughly kinda, like, gets it to aim the.
[02:22:59] Unknown:
Yes. It focuses it. Yeah.
[02:23:02] Unknown:
So where was Thor hiding all night?
[02:23:08] Unknown:
Not in his not in his not in his, presentation. It was high it was hiding from his presentation, but he but he found him. So, apparently, it's there. He just didn't explain it.
[02:23:25] Unknown:
Yeah. It's the I guess I didn't, go over it entirely. But yes. So in inside of any quarter neon I don't think I'm giving you a hard time. No. You're good. You're good. Yeah. Yeah. But the pre the the presentation portion of things,
[02:23:40] Unknown:
like, if I could get a quarter out of what goes on in my head, and I've got some fairly elaborate presentations. I had, like, 15 of them on crow. And, like, the one I'd like you to see is, my, my, presentation from Flattoberfest, where I laid out the the whole system electrically, even better and tied it to the planets. Excellent stuff. But, yeah, that putting the presentation together and trying to make what's going on coherent for other people, fucking hard.
[02:24:16] Unknown:
Oh, trust me. I I just unified physics, and I'm trying to express terminology that nobody's ever heard of before.
[02:24:25] Unknown:
Yeah. You gotta learn to use smaller words if you're gonna try and, get at the, mainstream crowd. I don't know if you were watching the chat in any way, shape, or form, but you could see quite a few people are like, yeah. I there there's a whole bunch of words I've never heard here, and this is part of why I speak the way I do where I just kinda hillbilly it down. That way people can kinda understand the mechanics of it. Sure. Because there's no And I mean, certainly, I I enjoyed it, and Marcus enjoyed it. But but I'm a fucking nerd, and I I work on things like this. So Oh, really?
People won't ever have wanted to look at chemistry or the fucking valence shells of atoms or the fucking anything like that. Alright. So if anybody's if anybody's still here
[02:25:16] Unknown:
that had a question about a word, put it in the chat right now, and I will try to go over them each by each. Yeah. They're still listening.
[02:25:26] Unknown:
Question of the pronunciation and the spelling of the word.
[02:25:31] Unknown:
No. We've got we've got an excellent crowd. It's like You don't normally hear it out this hard on him. You guys are gonna have to put up with it. This is the kind of shit. And the best part is, Christy will list have me Well well, I'll sit here for, like, two hours and listen to shit like this and all about chemistry and things like that. And then I'll I'll turn around and I'll watch, like, you know, farting with eye contact. And Kristen, what the fuck? What
[02:25:59] Rose777:
is that?
[02:26:00] Unknown:
Oh, dude. Dude. It's like my eye dominance. Low low brow humor is the only good humor. Like, there's whole videos where dudes walk around with those, like, fart machines, and they'll, like, walk over at people, like, stare them in the eye and then hit the fart button. It just, like, stare them right in the face. And it's hilarious because 99% of people will just look away and just turn their head away. Like, it's fucking hilarious. Like, yeah. And one of my favorite ones, the dude went to go do it to, like, a 10 year old. And this 10 year old, like, leaned into it and just kept staring at him, and you could see him trying to grunt one out. I was waiting to see if he shit himself. I was like, don't push that hard kid. You'll learn the wrong lesson. You'll lose this war.
[02:26:46] Unknown:
Oh my god.
[02:26:48] Unknown:
Yeah. That's what she says. She's like, how did you go from that to this? Like, it's balance, baby. It's balance.
[02:26:57] Unknown:
I think somebody said what's the theory. So the theory is called divine emission theory. It's gonna be short. Lentil theory? D e t.
[02:27:07] Unknown:
The lentil theory?
[02:27:09] Unknown:
Divine emission theory.
[02:27:12] Unknown:
Oh, fuck. It it's a joke, brother. It's a joke. D e t. No. I I hear people all the time. My the people that listen to me know that they I've only eaten lentils, like, one time. My wife made me lentils, and I don't know what it is. They're they're like a they're like a they're a legume of some kind, and it's something that Greek people eat or something. It's not for it's Eastern. Middle Eastern people. It's not for white people. Like, they gave me the most horrifying gas I've ever had in my life, and that's why Levitation was a problem. Levitation. That's why when you were talking about levitating and stuff, I was like, oh, no. It's lentils. Because I mean, I had, like, a twelve hour continuous fart after eating lentils. Like, I've never had anything like it. I thought I was gonna explode. Holy shit.
[02:28:03] Unknown:
That's that's why our introduction music features burps and farts.
[02:28:08] Unknown:
Yeah. She did that to me. And then occasionally, I eat too much hot cheese when she's gone because I make then I do the cooking and then gotta use all the peppers.
[02:28:18] Unknown:
Yeah. That's I think that's, like, two of my main food groups is just hot and cheese.
[02:28:23] Unknown:
Yes. Yes. You would love eating here. That is our that is two of our food groups too.
[02:28:30] Unknown:
So you guys are already planning a dinner date together? Apparently,
[02:28:34] Rose777:
yes. Beautiful. Cheese tour.
[02:28:38] Unknown:
Dude, I have a whole cheese I have a whole cheese drawer in my in my fridge that's all just different kinds of cheese.
[02:28:46] Rose777:
Yes too. That's there's, like, the good cheese, the the the better cheese, and the best cheese. And the best cheese always goes so much faster, but you've gotta have the backup cheese for when the good cheese Yeah. Out. That Tillemook's good for bulky shit,
[02:29:00] Unknown:
but then you gotta have the nice cheeses. Like, I like that Boar's Head four four pepper. Oh, that one's good. Yeah. That one's great. And there's they're, Chipotle gouda.
[02:29:11] Unknown:
That one's excellent. That one we like in our our broccoli powder. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. If we're so have y'all had the I I assume since we're all cheese connoisseurs here, have you had the grilled cheese cheese, I've already? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Havarti. Dude, I
[02:29:30] Unknown:
My wife's Danish.
[02:29:32] Unknown:
Yeah. I would I would
[02:29:34] Rose777:
I don't know what I'd do for some Havarti. You know? Thin sliced from the deli. You ask them to slice it thin, but then you use a lot of slices.
[02:29:45] Unknown:
Yeah. Oh, dude. We got there's a there's so I live in Northern California, so we have small dairy is, like, amazing small local dairy stuff around here. And these one guys have a four alarm ghost pepper freaking cheese. It's a cheddar's it's a it's a a sharp cheddar and just full of ghost peppers. Oh my god. It's only available, like, six months a year, but so good. Yeah. I see great white pulp. You're white too. You you you that lentils are not for white peoples. Yeah. That's pain. Pain.
[02:30:26] Unknown:
I think did somebody say something about the spelling of quarter neons? Yeah. Yeah. So it's just quarter, just like normal, and then n I o n s.
[02:30:46] Unknown:
This is just this is just basic hermetics. You know that. Right? Outside outside of the even the even like the Kovalium doesn't put the negative side into things, but, basically, this is just hermetics and everything. Just small to big is just one thing.
[02:31:02] Unknown:
Right.
[02:31:03] Unknown:
I mean, it's not this is where the new agers get all weird about it. They don't understand that everything's a car. That doesn't mean the transmission is the engine because at some point, fractally in there, you're not exactly the same as this other piece over here, but you're part of a system which matches the smaller system and the smaller system and the bigger system and the bigger system. And you're it's all the same, and it all functions the fucking same.
[02:31:29] Unknown:
Right. So just because energy is energy, that doesn't mean that we would like, there's certain occasions where we would use direct current over alternating current even though they're both energy.
[02:31:40] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:31:41] Unknown:
ACDC.
[02:31:42] Unknown:
Yeah. It's a little rock. I actually go And you don't get no Hertz in in in in DC. So Hertz only applies to the AC. Right. No. We're talking DC talking talk. PC. No. I never talk about your gay black dude.
[02:31:59] Unknown:
You wanna talk about him anymore either.
[02:32:05] Unknown:
I they they tell me that Christianity is supposed to be anti gay, but Marcus bust bust out a lot of real gay stuff.
[02:32:12] Unknown:
That's Hey. We're all just
[02:32:15] Unknown:
men with three stripping on stripper poles to Jesus.
[02:32:18] Unknown:
Yeah. It's the the private Christian school experiences.
[02:32:23] Unknown:
Is this strange? So I'm It'll do something to you. I'm sharing some of those stories a little bit. Yeah. Mhmm. And that's what I I think that's my overall thing that I've loved the most about this theory is, like, when I set out on this, I I had my own conversation with God. I was like, look. You know how I think. You know how I do. Point me in the right direction, and I will figure it out, and it all just came into this.
[02:32:52] Unknown:
It's dedicating your life to
[02:32:56] Unknown:
figuring it out. Yeah. And then to like, one of my main goals was even though, like, I have my own faith, let me figure out what is actually going on without, like, without putting a bias on it. You know what I mean? Mhmm.
[02:33:12] Unknown:
Yeah. A whole conversation about, you know, religion versus science and, you know, that false tagline. They both used to be the same. I really like the part where the shape of the of the,
[02:33:24] Unknown:
void is in the center of each one. I like that part a lot. Yeah. The cavitation. That's that's good shit. That's that's where the life source is. That's the feminine. That's that's the life source of the whole fucking deal.
[02:33:38] Unknown:
Yes. So that is essentially the like, when we're talking about, sacred geometry, that is the source of the field itself.
[02:33:48] Unknown:
Yeah. The field's the feminine. Yeah.
[02:33:51] Unknown:
You were talking about was it coherence having a zero to one measurement?
[02:33:57] Unknown:
Right. So in quantum, there is a factor called decoherence, and it is essentially the opposite of coherence. And, I mean, if you think about that logically, if something can decohere, obviously, it can be coherent.
[02:34:13] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[02:34:14] Unknown:
They use the same scaling factor. It is a unitless number between and when I say unitless, it means, like, it's not one millimeter. It's not one, you know, jewel. It's it's just one. And they use it the same way from a zero to one. There is a possibility that at some point, like, when I start getting into different dimensions, I mean, there may be a time to where I have a, like, negative 0.5, or there may be a time to where I have a 1.5. It is open, but as of right now, it is just zero two one.
[02:35:04] Unknown:
How does that work with fiber optics delivering high speed Internet to my computer?
[02:35:11] Unknown:
It's about the same. Okay. It has a, it has a low coherence, actually. But all it is is just Morse code created by light. That's all fiber optics is.
[02:35:29] Unknown:
On and off, in and out, one zero. Yeah. Yeah. In and out. How was baby made? You haven't answered my question. I've asked you three times. How was baby formed with the spark of life giving it consciousness?
[02:35:44] Unknown:
That would be the void part in the material.
[02:35:49] Unknown:
By a pulse. Talking about.
[02:35:52] Unknown:
So That that's the spark. That's the the good stuff right there. That's that's the magic. It was just created by a pulse. You know what I mean? Just, just however you wanna take that. It's the divine emission theory. Well, that you understand that that void is what's causing the positive and negative to come together, and that's what's creating the life. Right? Right. So so because without that field, that field, even though it's liquid, is actually a void. It's representing a void. The original in the in the origins of the the universe, the all splits into the positive and negative, but the it but then that's the pure masculine and the pure feminine. They just balance each other out. So what happens is is the masculine splits into a positive and negative.
And so that's why there's always gotta be that two, that duality. And then the feminine comes in, which is the void because the masculine side is material and the feminine side is immaterial, and it pulls them two sides of the masculine together. That's why that little void's in the center of that. Because if you don't have that feature, the two the two wanna go away from each other. The positive wants to rise and the negative wants to sink. It's fire and ice. And so
[02:37:06] Unknown:
I call it a null.
[02:37:09] Unknown:
Right. Yeah. That's the zero. The the the the feminine.
[02:37:16] Unknown:
So a null is a null can be I mean, it's essentially the same thing, but it can be created through multiple different ways. For example, in Tesla's Colorado Springs experiment, he noticed, basically, plasma balls being created at these interference points of these rebound waves and the initial pressure waves. It is a cancellation. Now depending on Yeah. The effects, depending on the
[02:37:48] Unknown:
amp like Plane of inertia.
[02:37:50] Unknown:
Depending on the amplitude of the interaction of, like, how much deconstructive it is depends on the size of the null. This is also how you levitate. But I would recommend levitating objects and not yourself because if you go into a null, you will probably eventually come out, and there will be nothing left if you don't get torn apart inside of there to begin with.
[02:38:26] Unknown:
But Yeah. No. That's where cavitation happens.
[02:38:29] Unknown:
Time stops inside of the null as well. Yeah. Whether you wanna say it speeds up all the way or it stops, I mean, it's like the say saying the same thing. So
[02:38:41] Unknown:
So it's it's stillness. Yeah. But we know that they aren't humans, great white pope, so you can't count them. Those aren't people.
[02:38:55] Unknown:
Plasma balls, orbs, etcetera, though. Right? Yes. Actually, ball lightning itself is a pure scalar aspect. It is a pure scalar, phenomena. This is why they have multiple accounts of viewing it, basically going through walls, things like that. Yeah. Okay. Inside of a null
[02:39:18] Unknown:
Let's let's go there. Yeah. Materials
[02:39:21] Unknown:
do not interact with each other the same because of difference of coherence values.
[02:39:26] Unknown:
Okay. So there's this idea of, close encounters of the third kind. There's a movie. Now there's this idea of human initiated. It's a close encounter of the fifth kind where human initiates contact and makes contact with
[02:39:41] Unknown:
something that Are you mentioning that with Steven Greer again?
[02:39:47] Unknown:
Yeah.
[02:39:48] Unknown:
A little bit. You're not getting the fuck off. Fight over my head.
[02:39:56] Unknown:
Nick Roth. It's the motion, the ocean there. Animal instincts, fighting for attention. Are the ducks still in a row?
[02:40:08] Unknown:
Yeah. I know. The ducks are in the duck the duck house. They go in first. When the crepuscular animals start coming out, like, right now, they are they call it a sitting duck for a reason.
[02:40:20] Unknown:
But are they still in a row?
[02:40:22] Unknown:
No. They're they're they're usually in they're usually in their bickering right now because there's three of them that are sitting on eggs even though there's no males out there. They they've decided they're gonna go broody, and there's not their them eggs aren't fertilized. Right? But whatever. So they so they the older ones that are doing that are bickering at the younger ones, and we can hear them bickering out there chasing the the older ones chasing the younger ones, like, get out of here.
[02:40:55] Unknown:
So these, seemingly, conscious plasmids, these orbs, these, lights in the sky.
[02:41:04] Unknown:
I would not say that those are the same as ball lightning.
[02:41:08] Unknown:
Okay. Visually, appearing similar. I'm asking you directly with your work and experimentation and spirituality and consciousness and all of this. Have you attempted to summon orbs in the night sky? No. I have not. Why not?
[02:41:27] Unknown:
I haven't mapped out what all that looks like. So for example, I wizardly.
[02:41:37] Unknown:
That's what it would look it would look real wizardly. That's what it would look like.
[02:41:41] Unknown:
Now I have gone over, like, some UFO, like, videos and stuff like that, and I will say that most of them actually seem to be working off of, advanced or what you could say capped out, electromagnetism, if you were to create something similar that works off of scalar effects. So, for example, electromagnetism or magnetism and electricity separated, these are side effects from scalar interactions. So when we're talking about an actual scalar craft
[02:42:31] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[02:42:32] Unknown:
It can change its shape, which I know some UFOs do, but a majority of them do not. It can like, speed is not an object or it's not a a thing. It doesn't really matter. So when we're talking about null manipulation inside of scalar, you know, technology, you don't have inertia. You don't have, what's it called, fucking g force. You don't have things like that. So the very few of them like, you have some that travel fast. You have some that travel insanely fast Mhmm. That do some type of maneuvers that if there is something biological in there, they're they're obviously getting torn to shreds. It's just a matter of looking at it and seeing whether it is doing scalar type maneuvers or whether it is doing just electromagnetic maneuvers.
[02:43:40] Unknown:
I know the, GeForce is a brand of NVIDIA video cards.
[02:43:44] Unknown:
I have one on my computer right now. Yes. Okay. I was gonna ask that,
[02:43:48] Unknown:
you know, Intel or what's the other chip manufacturer?
[02:43:53] Unknown:
Ryzen. Ryzen.
[02:43:55] Unknown:
Yep. So I have a, 27 I always wondered if I was able to find some type of a non Euclidean wave. Yes. So these basically, what Tesla was doing You know what I'm saying? If it gets inside of a bubble in a non Euclidean wave, fucking you know, even though for us in a u in a Euclidean system, that it looks like it jumped a giant space in no time in a in a in a non Euclidean system. The the that distance was actually, like, right next to each other. You know what I mean? So Mhmm.
[02:44:37] Unknown:
Is this, I'm trying to think. Does this have to do with space time?
[02:44:42] Unknown:
Oh, it's fair. We've stretched your brain as as far as it can go.
[02:44:47] Unknown:
No. It's structuring. Like, it it's just the way things are structured. Non Euclidean, like point a or point b. NinjaCat?
[02:45:00] Unknown:
Mhmm. Yeah. I was about to say I I'm fully expect a fully drove Ninja Cat to just, like, slowly rise up behind you now. Yeah. It's happened. This quarter, it'll happen again.
[02:45:15] Unknown:
It's crazy over here. I I live off grid on a farm.
[02:45:21] Unknown:
Check out the Colorado locust when Tesla was doing his experiments. I'm curious. What is that? Colorado locust. Yeah.
[02:45:37] Unknown:
Nacho chi that's nacho cheese. That's my cheese.
[02:45:43] Unknown:
Chips and dip. Hip dip. Think so we finally figured out how babies are made. That's good for queso cheese.
[02:45:57] Unknown:
Kinda look. I Am I not able to scroll up in the chat?
[02:46:06] Unknown:
Well, we've got I'm not on that thing in the screen. You can't. Steve, I think, is the only one who has access to that. Steve went wasn't feeling good and went to bed right away.
[02:46:16] Unknown:
So video overlay of a of a combined number of chats. There's a number of chats that are combined into one little visual overlay.
[02:46:25] Unknown:
Yeah. Like, our our our Rumbles are biggest one by far. And then we're on mine, and then I'm deliberating dog face dudes.
[02:46:37] Unknown:
Yeah. Send me an email. Thankful1l@AlanMarcus,2l's.com. [email protected]. Send me the diagrams, pictures, the descriptions, the questions, that sort of thing. Right now we're just doing a radio show. Just talking. To produce a video show recurs a lot more, and we don't have all the visual aids prepared yet. So that's kind of where we are in the process. Did that insect.
[02:47:09] Unknown:
Interesting. See, I I I assumed that there had to have been some kind of,
[02:47:15] Unknown:
damage caused by some of the things he was doing. I am. When we're when we're talking about Tesla, if there was ever an individual that said, just send it, that was Tesla.
[02:47:28] Unknown:
Yeah. He killed himself, like, three times and not, like, suicide type. Like, oops. Had an oops in the in the lab, like, three different times, and I think once he he it was for quite a duration, and that's actually where he, when he came back from that little episode, I believe, was when he, said that he had spoken to the Black Knight. He said that there was a ship called Black Knight and that, it was basically falling down above our atmosphere. Yeah. The Black Knight satellite. Yeah. The Black Knight satellite. And he said he communicated with it, but, you know, he was he was dead. So, like, just for a little while. Just a little while.
But, yeah, anytime you're and this is always one of my concerns. This is also one of my concerns with the the wind towers for generating energy and even water turbines. Anytime you start fucking around with that field and disrupting it, like, there's a reason that rivers, they don't flow straight. If you ever watch Wilhelm Reich's work, he sat and looked at the way rivers naturally flow, and they have an oscillation back and forth. And if you disrupt that whole system, it just kills the water. And so the same thing's gonna apply with air. The the reason that's why it's called air currents. Even though it's not in its liquid form, that's still liquid, basically. It's just vaporized liquid, and it still flows in the theory. Yeah. Yeah. And if you go, fucking that up, then you're definitely gonna kill things in that system. Well, Tesla was drawing energy, similar to the way when you're putting a magnet and I'm putting seeds on top of it and you're pulling more you're getting that energy to focus. He was doing it in a in a much more significant fashion, and some life forms are not gonna be cool with that, with that kind of gray
[02:49:29] Unknown:
holes. He was blowing holes in the field. I will full out admit this. Yeah. That's why in this theory, there are actually ethical, like, standards that I have implemented in the theory because I know exactly what can be done and what might be done. That's why in the part where we're talking about nulls, there has to be dampening factors. There has to be, basically, emergency shutoffs. There has to be some kind of containment. Because if you if you think about it, if you create a null, which is essentially a scalar sync, what is going to happen?
[02:50:27] Unknown:
Sink as in s I n k, like the thing in the kitchen?
[02:50:31] Unknown:
Yes. So what does the sink do?
[02:50:34] Unknown:
Well, then the the the the all mother does two things. She gives life and she takes life away. Right? So there there's a destruction aspect to it and a life giving aspect to it. And and which one are you dealing with?
[02:50:52] Unknown:
So the sink drains. So if you create a sailor string a sailor sink scaler sink before I have a stroke, if you create a scaler sink, you are going to have a surge of energy draining. Mhmm. Now you have created a hole. If you created a hole, well, now everything else around it is going to rush in. If you do not stabilize and equalize, you will have the Bermuda Triangle. You will have the Devil's Triangle. You will have a similar event that is proposed to have happened to Atlantis. You are affecting your local gravity.
[02:51:48] Unknown:
Well, you're creating a cavitation.
[02:51:51] Unknown:
Yes. If that so, yes, the null and the cavitation from what you're saying, they're the same thing.
[02:51:57] Unknown:
Well, you know, when you look at any like, that's one of the problems that you get in, like, different, like, pumps and things like that. Like, if you don't have your flow set up right, it creates a cavitation where it's literally a void, and that will create an explosion. Right?
[02:52:15] Unknown:
Yes. It's
[02:52:16] Unknown:
For example Like, in a motor, you're literally creating a cavitation between the electrical and the what the field that it creates with the magnetism, and you're creating a cavitation between them between them. You're just harnessing that shit.
[02:52:31] Unknown:
Right. So, actually, what you're talking about is directly the reason why, for example, crystals grow in the shape that they do. It is because of null interactions between the elements that make up the quartz crystal and the pressure waves that they give out. Geometrically, they create natural nulls. This is why we have the shape of crystals being the way that they are.
[02:53:02] Unknown:
Yeah. And this is when you're talking about, so, like, in different cultures, I I had a fascinating talk. I think it was with Emily Moyer. It might have been with Cheney, though. But, they were talking about, Indian, healing. And he had the story was pretty complex, but he had to go do something with, like, a scorpion because the energy of the the wound that she had was to this specific goddess. Well, the idea then is is, like I was talking about with uranium and lead, everything in that chain is the same thing. So if you called, like, the overall head of that, gave it a name, everything in that would be in its in its, purview.
And so the same thing, applies to, like, different things in your body and whatnot. And so what what are you what is your illness? What what is the imbalance in? And so that's what they're looking, and they have an understanding for this. They just listed as gods and goddesses names. And I think all and I think most all of them do. Super fascinating. That. Yeah.
[02:54:25] Unknown:
Just realized, we got layers of layers of layers of jokes and humor and seriousness, and we're getting a little bit silly, getting a little bit serious. We're talking about graphics cards. The NVIDIA cards are called the GeForce.
[02:54:38] Unknown:
We were talking about graphics cards When the fuck did that happen? When we when we discussed the GeForce, I said Nvidia's
[02:54:45] Unknown:
brand of graphics cards are the GeForce cards, and then there are the Ryzen's
[02:54:51] Unknown:
Well, the Ryzen's are the processors.
[02:54:53] Unknown:
And someone asked if Ryzen Well, actually, yeah, they got Ryzen. Yeah. They got Ryzen graphic card too. I forgot about Radeon. Yep. Radeon's. What is you know, Radeon, graphics cards, GeForce, a lot of the brand names are are using some of these names to
[02:55:08] Unknown:
to sell their with Emily also, Sherry. I have to say that was my initial, thought on it was it was with Emily.
[02:55:19] Unknown:
Could be. We have we have the transcripts. We can go back and review the transcripts to see where the conversation happens. But a lot of times, the conversations will start one place and then move to another channel another time, and then we'll just keep talking about the same things again and further develop them and look at them from different perspectives. So thank you, Luke, for for giving us all this time. I don't know Yeah. We appreciate it. Right? How much time you you have tonight.
[02:55:49] Unknown:
I would say I got
[02:55:51] Unknown:
probably just a little bit more time. Okay. I mean, there's some nights we've gotten six or seven or eight hours, so we're not gonna keep it that long unless
[02:55:58] Unknown:
No. You've don't don't let us don't let us hold you. You've two hours is what we hopefully expect out of guests. You've given us, you know, almost three now. So don't feel beholden like you like you, need to get more if you're if you're pooped out. Well, the main the main thing is to make sure that I answer
[02:56:19] Unknown:
all of the questions,
[02:56:21] Unknown:
all the questions that you need. Problem is I'm coming up with, questions I never thought to ask before. And I don't know if you're having fun coming with answers to to nonsense questions I'm asking, but you've been a great sport.
[02:56:33] Unknown:
Once we got to the place of, understanding the the that there's a negative below us, you know, that that's then we're we're on the same page fully. That's about all I was digging at the whole time, because that's creating the directionality of the whole thing. And then the field is what's in between.
[02:56:57] Unknown:
Absolutely. Absolutely.
[02:56:58] Unknown:
That's And and we are we are
[02:57:01] Unknown:
condensed versions of that energy transferring. And as we break apart, it'll keep on moving on.
[02:57:10] Unknown:
Yeah. So some people pronounce Washington as Washington. We're having, this r issue in the, quadrenons, quadrenions? Quarterneons. Okay. Say it again.
[02:57:29] Rose777:
Quarter Neons, q u a r t e r n I o n.
[02:57:36] Unknown:
And Chad is upset that this is the first time for many that they've ever heard of this.
[02:57:41] Unknown:
This is the kind of stuff I talk about regularly. The funny thing is is, if it's just me and people are and I'm a guest on somebody else's show, I talk about a lot of stuff like this or, like, my presentation in, Flattoberfest, things like that. But if I'm doing stuff like this, it's you know, people only to a limited extent wanna hear a person talk like this. Like, most people that's, they they it's it's surprising. We've got such a good a good crowd that we've maintained most of our people through most of the night. And a lot of them will come back and, rewatch it like Christie Kringle. Think hand wave. She she watches it probably an hour hour a day or something and leaves comments, like, every other day.
She's very helpful with stuff. But, yeah, that's a lot of crowds wouldn't even hang for this kind of thing, usually a lot.
[02:58:35] Unknown:
Yeah. So the if if you want to visualize a quarter neon, and the best way, it is just to visualize it as a gyroscope. Just three rotational aspects with one scalar aspect.
[02:59:08] Unknown:
So I have, a camera mount. They call it, like, a steady cam when the whole Ah. It's on a gimbal. So it tries to find its level. So when you're walking and moving with the camera, it keeps the camera steady. They call it a steady cam. Just kinda what we're talking about with the gyroscopes and the gimbals.
[02:59:25] Unknown:
Psycryption. That's clever. I can't highlight it, but I would. 25¢ neons, 5 for a buck. That's fair. That's fair.
[02:59:39] Unknown:
So it doesn't it doesn't have that lock. This is why it pretty much encompasses all of the geometric shapes that they've been trying to circle back to for forever. I mean, arguably, like, the past well, over a hundred years at this point in time.
[03:00:06] Unknown:
So it doesn't lock itself on a level where has up and down and it just stays steady with the the plane of I guess, the one we're standing on?
[03:00:15] Unknown:
Correct.
[03:00:16] Unknown:
Okay.
[03:00:18] Unknown:
Oh, we lost Rose. Alright, Rose. So we lost Rose. Thank you, Rose.
[03:00:24] Unknown:
Good night.
[03:00:29] Unknown:
So you've written a paper, published it, made it public.
[03:00:34] Unknown:
So it's on I mean, I refuse to do latex formatting Right.
[03:00:42] Unknown:
Which is what Nerd nerd talk. I'm into the nerd talk. I love the the latex.
[03:00:47] Unknown:
Yeah. So I I refuse to do that. So the theory is on OSF, and it is on GitHub.
[03:00:58] Unknown:
Okay. So GitHub is where all the cool computer nerds hang out and share code with each other. And the l a t x format is how you publish text with numbers and, you know, lowercase, highercase, you know, to the third degree and all the all the weird symbols and things that people use in mathematics. Parentheses
[03:01:20] Unknown:
and Yes. Underscores. Yes. Oh, yeah. So I'm I I would rather not do that. Mhmm. And then also, like, it's kinda like a weird area because most of the time, they require, I guess, Lagarian vector formatting or equations, which I bypass that. If anybody's wondering what that means, it's basically, like, just angular formatting of how things work. Mhmm. Quarter Neons themselves do not need that.
[03:01:59] Unknown:
Do you get into VIM or eMax?
[03:02:02] Unknown:
No. Okay.
[03:02:05] Unknown:
Computer and stuff.
[03:02:06] Unknown:
Yeah.
[03:02:10] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know any of that stuff.
[03:02:12] Unknown:
It's just all I'm doing it the original way where, you know, back in the day, people records. Yeah. They just wrote it out. Yeah. That's what I did. You can see the equations. So I do have a an entire section for definitions. I have an entire equation layout. So as of right now, there are in the the larger theory, there are a 158 equations. There's the definition that goes through all of them. I tried originally to, like, make a linear path to go through the paper. But, realistically, when we're talking about a unifying field theory, it's very hard to be linear. Mhmm. It just kinda, like I start you out with, the field, the variables, and then you can just branch out to whatever part you want to look at. Then you can go to a different section. You can go to a different section.
So, like, as of right now, I'm gonna just start throwing out words. So if anybody is listening, just know that I'm gonna be throwing out words. So I have, of course, the abstract and the introduction. I have a introduction to the power of light. I have revisiting Newtonian, dynamics and field equations and all that, implement the DTE framework. Then going after that, we get into time. We get into scalar memory. After that, we go into scalar electromagnetism. Continuing with magnetism, going into the magnetic twist, going into electromagnet magnetic dynamics, which means fields, flow, and emission pressure, going into electromagnetism and scalar emission, basically rebuilding Maxwell's work from field causality.
The official revival of Maxwell's quarter neons, then go into Tesla rebound, magnetic curl, coherence nulls, going into fluid mechanics, going into thermal pressure, the nature of heat, what exactly makes it, what exactly it is, even going into black body radiation, going into thermal pressure and heat transfer, which is entropy, radiation, and scalar flow, going deeper into fluid mechanics, so where we're talking about vortices, buoyancy, lift, and atmospheric flow, then going into acoustic and pressure wave reinterpretation through sound compression and coherence travel, going into echo, Doppler, and shifts as memory delay, going into nuclear field dynamics, going into fission and fusion about what is actually happening there.
There is field ethics and containment in there. Then we get to quantum reinterpretation between coherence, collapse, and wave particle logic going into AC and DC currents, going in directly, no pun intended, to do DC currents going directly into AC currents, fluid mechanics as far as scalar compression, vorticity, and pressure displacement, going further into thermodynamics with emission gradients, scalar decay, and rebound decay. Then we get to actual particle masses and, deriving all of the particle masses as well as going into the periodic table.
Then I go into, basically historical glimpses of scalar fields where we're talking about Faraday, Heaviside, Hertz, Lawrence, Ampere, Joule, Henry, Bayotte, and I don't know how to say his name. Jean Baptiste Bayotte, Felix Savant, Paul Dirac going into Michael Michael Tupin, Augustine Jean Fresnel, Ernest Mach, Richard Feynman, John Tindall, even giving out a shout out to their wives because a lot of their wives actually did help with them. I provide five falsifiable experiments. It was very difficult to do this because most of the empirical data already lined up with this theory pretty close to where I didn't feel like it was fair to use that as a falsifiable experiment. So we go into delay in light propagation.
Yes. It's pretty much already aiming in this theory's favor. We go into null levitation. We go into delay quantum collapse via coherence reinforcement. Sadly, this is already leaning in my favor. Scalar field perception during the MT exposure. I decided to throw a little bit of a left curve in there. Go into radioactive decay drift in scalar null zones. Then we finally get to the citations, and then we get into the DET terms and definitions, then the DET index, the equation index. And then I get to the very end where I give, like, a little outro, which basically says, do not turn me into Oppenheimer, please.
If there's a little quote at the end.
[03:08:16] Unknown:
Did you watch Barbenheimer?
[03:08:18] Unknown:
I have not, actually.
[03:08:22] Unknown:
So I think everything you just covered there, we've talked about tonight. We didn't really get into echo or Doppler or fission or fusion. May have to save that for a a second date.
[03:08:34] Unknown:
Yeah. Yeah. There's, so I have made fusion and fission a lot lot less energy dependent and a lot easier. This is exactly why I gave my Oppenheimer quote. Yeah. I can so I it's like a little personal message from me at the end where I go, the true implications of DET are still yet to be fully explored. I have hoped that many will explore everything that it has to offer. The beauty and balance that DET bring to the world will be one of its most powerful tools. I would personally like to thank some of the inspirations that led me on this amazing adventure, my fiance, family, and close friends, while always being or will always be a very deep inspiration behind anything that I embark on.
Their guidance and support will always be a deep well of strength and determination behind anything that I do. I would like to thank, the guys over at Cult of Conspiracy because they were the first ones to give me a voice, basically. And then as well as Joe and his group over at Legit Bat, stating What? Gay though? You guys
[03:10:02] Unknown:
He's gay though.
[03:10:05] Unknown:
Total homo.
[03:10:07] Unknown:
Total homo. Mhmm.
[03:10:11] Unknown:
Basically, going on, and then y'all are involved as this
[03:10:17] Unknown:
wife. I love Joe. I Oh, yeah. We hang out we hang out in person.
[03:10:26] Unknown:
Yeah. I I love Joe. He's a he's a he's a great guy. Yeah.
[03:10:31] Unknown:
We all honesty. He's a great guy. Yeah. I go over to writing fairly often, so, like, we hang out occasionally.
[03:10:38] Unknown:
Right. So a cult of conspiracy with Jonathan and Jacob? Yeah. Okay. They have a great podcast. Oh, yeah. Yeah. What episode were you on? Is it released?
[03:10:50] Unknown:
So I yes. So the one one we just released, which was 71?
[03:10:56] Unknown:
I think so. Can a new science emerge by combining conventional quantum and classic science with Luke from August 5?
[03:11:05] Unknown:
Yes.
[03:11:07] Unknown:
Yeah. Recent eight number eight seventy one
[03:11:10] Unknown:
called Global Institute. That, I was also on for four different episodes where we and this was a while back to where we go through, basically, all the things that are wrong with the current models. K. All the way from the edge of the universe to here. But then I and y'all are encompassed in this next part, which is, you know, individuals like these, what most would call fringe conspiracy or skeptics, are the ones that push beyond the standard, ones that will not ex not accept a default as definitive. I encourage more out there, especially ones that carry significance, to embrace this kind of mentality. Do not accept what is easiest. Rather, search for the truth even when it is difficult. I would also like to thank God for guiding me on this journey. I truly could not have done it without his guidance and help. He has always and will always be an inspiration and blessing to me.
Before this ends, there is a possibility the most are there is possibly the most important topic to discuss. DEC, under no circumstances, should or will in its entirety be weaponized or used as a weapon. We are we as humans have seen wondrous discoveries and inventions turned into nightmares. This is what DAT stands or this is not what DAT stands for nor will it, ever. DET aims for the opposite. Lastly, I will leave you with a quote, one that I recommend all to remember and hold each other accountable for. Now I am death, the destroyer of worlds, Jay Oppenheimer.
[03:13:03] Unknown:
Yeah. This is,
[03:13:06] Unknown:
it's never the purpose of this theory. It is actually quite the opposite.
[03:13:15] Unknown:
That's that's a good theory. I think we could workshop the name a little bit. D e t. Sounds like bug spray I spray on me. Keeps mosquitoes away.
[03:13:25] Unknown:
Hey. It you could use it as that too. Who knows what, new technology will, will come out? Yeah. We'll have to workshop a a really good title.
[03:13:35] Unknown:
You know, GeForce is already taken, and NVIDIA uses
[03:13:42] Unknown:
that. Thank you. Coming on and explaining and explaining your theory for us. Oh, absolutely. No problem.
[03:13:50] Unknown:
Absolutely. No problem. I'm I'm working through trying to like, obviously, I had to word this theory in order to get the attention of the, you know, the institutional world, the academic world, the scientific world. I am now trying to figure out ways to, translate it to
[03:14:18] Unknown:
everybody else. The one that down for the podcast world, bro.
[03:14:23] Unknown:
Yeah. I I so I'm trying
[03:14:28] Unknown:
to simplify I'm in a little bit of shock that Crow agreed to let you do this. Well, well, what told me to my face that I'm too smart to talk to people because he didn't think I was dumbing down what I say enough.
[03:14:42] Unknown:
Yeah. Me and me and Rose are, working on ways to translate it. That's what,
[03:14:51] Unknown:
Yeah. Talk about cheese and baby making.
[03:14:54] Unknown:
I know. Maybe add some beer into it, and people will be listening real close to it. And so I think some of the best ways to describe it is just think of a pond, and you have ripples in the pond. Mhmm.
[03:15:07] Unknown:
These are thinking of a seed spreader I have. I got some, patches in my lawn I need to fill with the seed spreader I got. Wanna hear about your seed spreader, Marcus.
[03:15:16] Unknown:
Don't get pervy.
[03:15:20] Unknown:
So we're not gonna talk about Steven Greer anymore tonight?
[03:15:27] Unknown:
That's what he did. He just wants to have sex with an alien.
[03:15:31] Unknown:
I will I will say this, and I will continue to say this. After looking over everything, right, like, after being a part of the what you could call the, like, conspiracy community, right, And then trying to take a nonbiased lens to science, to physics, whether we're talking about quantum, whether we're talking about relativity, whether we're talking about classical. I would say that for the scientific community, they need to interact more. They need to talk to people, especially among this community. They need to come up with actual, like, I wouldn't say definitive answers. But if you don't know, then just say you don't know. You know what I mean?
I would say to entertain different ideas, work through it, see what could work, what couldn't work. On the other side, I will wholeheartedly tell the conspiracy community that I can completely see why science has gotten in the direction that it is currently at. After looking through, basically, the the history, the generations, I can see how five generations back, there was the split, and this is why we have the I wouldn't say inconsistency with science. I would say this is why we have the direction that science went. For example, when we're talking about, quantum, they had to rely on probability because they did not have any structure.
Relativity, they had to rely on geometry because they did not have energy. I see why they went in the direction that they did. And to them and I'll agree, they're math, math. And and the simplest way to say it, they're math, math. But when you circle back around and look at the bigger picture, you can see why their math does math correctly. You can see why they came to the conclusions that they did. I wouldn't say that they are I mean, for the most part, the individual scientists, right, they are not, I mean, obviously, not evil people. They are not people that are trying to necessarily defend the narrative. They just they have the data in front of them, and they have what they've worked out.
So to them, yes. This is the this is the truth. But this is where it takes the relationship between both communities of them understanding, yes. You could be wrong. Your interpretation was wrong. You could really say that all I did here was just put together the pieces of the puzzle. I mean, you could honestly say that that's all I really did.
[03:18:44] Unknown:
But then it's So you are Satoshi Nakamoto and you invented Bitcoin?
[03:18:49] Unknown:
A carat is a is a actually a weight of metal. And when they're saying 24 carats in that one gram, then it's inside one gram, there's gonna be more carrots. And then grains also.
[03:19:10] Unknown:
Put it together. You're on the diamond puzzle, the carrots, the piezoelectric, the, Atlantis bit was really fascinating. That's really interesting to get into maybe further. You have a whole section of the history of this in on your GitHub page in your paper?
[03:19:30] Unknown:
Yes. So in the major paper, there is the, the scalar history. There is not the, the break the breakdown lineage of, like, how everything got separated. It's there. It's just not, like, grouped together, I guess you could say. It is a separate paper that I kinda made for, like, a a introduction to talking and all that stuff.
[03:19:59] Unknown:
Yeah. That that seems to be, like, if when I'm trying to get into this further, I would wanna dive into more of the history and researching the other figures that we talked about, Hertz and Maxwell and a little bit more plank and some of the science and the philosophy just to understand that a little bit to to kinda catch up to where we are now and and having that information. You put some pieces together and things seem to make a little bit more sense. Right. Now you're having the the technology and the Internet access to to do this call and and share this with everyone who's listening, and now we're recording and making the archive available for people to play back and listen.
[03:20:41] Unknown:
Right. Yeah. That's why, on this theory, they're I, like, I I could have patented the shit out of anything that I wanted to. I didn't, and I'm not going to. There is, like, just ethical, rules put into the paper to make sure that, nobody,
[03:21:03] Unknown:
you know, destroys everything. But, Abandoning it is how you get how you get suicided.
[03:21:10] Unknown:
Yeah. That was one of the that was that was probably the second main reason that I didn't do anything like that.
[03:21:17] Unknown:
So are you acting pseudo anonymously right now? Just sort of anonymous using No. I have my name on it. Okay. That was a that was a question we had. Like, Luke who? Does he have a last name? Does he have a middle name? Does he have identification? You know, who is this guy? This mysterious Luke figure? Sounds biblical. Is it an apostle?
[03:21:36] Unknown:
A John? I think it's a Mares. Yes. So Maxwell currently is considered to be the father of electromagnetism. And in his original treaty in 1865, that was whenever he introduced his quarter neon equation.
[03:22:01] Unknown:
James Clerk Maxwell, a Scottish physicist. Yeah. So there's a there's a whole lot of names here. I know we have some listeners who are into, like, homeschooling and and, unschooling and this type of thing, getting in young people interested in all these ideas, researching these these guys like James c Maxwell, and their wives are important too. You mentioned their wives, so that's the whole interesting thing. There's a whole, a whole story here that we're just scratching at the surface of.
[03:22:33] Unknown:
Yeah. That's what I, I've I mean, with how how large this theory is, like, I I wanted to put the entire story in there. Like, for example, the the wives that did help out. Like, I, obviously, I wanted to give them credit where where credit is due. I mean, even, I think, so, like, Faraday's wife, it was noted that she didn't necessarily help with any of the experiments themselves, but she basically kept his, his what you could consider his lab or whatever. She kept that clean and kept all of his notes and his papers organized. Like, that's for somebody that has a chaotic mind like mine, I know that, you know, if she didn't do what she did, we might have never gotten Faraday's work.
Mhmm. Like, it might have just been a bunch of balled up papers on a floor somewhere that eventually just got lost to time. So in my opinion, she's just as important as anybody else.
[03:23:41] Unknown:
So I just in my brief research that I've had between, you know, questions and listening, I find that James Clerk Maxwell did work on color vision, finding the theory of human eye perception with three types of receptors, red, green, and blue light, which eventually led to color photography and video and everything we're looking at right now?
[03:24:04] Unknown:
I wouldn't doubt it.
[03:24:06] Unknown:
Detachable penis.
[03:24:11] Unknown:
Oh, I had the lyrics to click click. Boom. Saliva. Hey. Flying the Oh, dude.
[03:24:18] Unknown:
I don't know why, but for some reason, I thought you were gonna say boom boom Tel Aviv. I don't know.
[03:24:25] Unknown:
Oh, I was about to sing a boom boom Tel Aviv, but, I, exercised some restraint. It's like click click boom, like a camera, like click click click. The shutter on the camera, a photographer.
[03:24:40] Unknown:
Oh, the older one. I mean, there was a boom at the end.
[03:24:43] Unknown:
Boom boom teleview.
[03:24:45] Unknown:
Oh, fuck. It's so bad. Mhmm. That's hilarious. That's immediately where my mind went.
[03:24:57] Unknown:
Alright. So is there any other questions that y'all have? We're just trying to goof around a little bit. It's kinda online. Good. Good.
[03:25:06] Unknown:
No. We definitely like to talk to you again and pepper you with some more questions, but, I think, we probably burnt, most everybody out for, for the highly intelligent stuff. I think Duck ducked out, like, within, like, two minutes probably. He's like, nope.
[03:25:25] Unknown:
That's what these guys talk about. Fuck that. Yeah. And peeping over in Chuck's channel. I think he was asking the questions. He's always asking about presidentials and politics and stuff.
[03:25:38] Unknown:
Yeah. He's he's we wanna debate this guy. Marcus wants to debate this guy, Duck, and he's always but the guy's very into politics. That's what he talks about. So this was definitely not in his wheelhouse.
[03:25:52] Unknown:
Right. Talking about two failed presidencies of a guy who eats a lot of McDonald's, I think.
[03:25:58] Unknown:
It's like full of He's like he's like super into tea cheering for one side of the pay PDF files. Like, don't let me make this team. Like, you like one of them teams?
[03:26:11] Unknown:
Weird. At this point, Tom. Things things are a lot different these days.
[03:26:19] Unknown:
Yeah. Getting into these hard sciences and ferrofluids and mercury and all these all these things can just, take up your time in a good way, and some politics take up your time in a bad way. So we're getting into this era of wanting to have more fun and more joy and, you know, find out how babies are made and get people making babies and having fun and dancing. And Marcus is very curious about this. He's a he's a gutting young man.
[03:26:52] Unknown:
Mhmm.
[03:26:53] Unknown:
That's alright. That's alright. I mean, basically, the way I see it, the more people that know about this theory in general, the better off it is.
[03:27:03] Unknown:
I like it. I said you need to work into there, that there is a negative side that's drawing it. You know? Because I think well, I'm probably about the only person that was gonna catch that.
[03:27:14] Unknown:
Yeah. So anytime the quarter neon has a torsional aspect to it, there will always be so it's the it's the toroid. So every toroid that you see has a scalar gyroscope inside of it to where there is a positive and there is a negative. Okay. It is how magnetism naturally forms due to the energetic curl or the energetic torsion. It's the magnetic curl that follows with it.
[03:27:43] Unknown:
Yeah. I don't know how many other people were gonna catch that problem in the presentation. But like like, for me, it was specific because, it left Thor out of the equation specifically. I'm like, well, you can't leave Thor out. He's the he's the negative. Odin's the in between.
[03:28:03] Unknown:
He's the thing. What I, He's the nut said that, but maybe I maybe I got sidetracked with something else whenever I was saying it.
[03:28:12] Unknown:
It's okay when the when the sidetracked portion of this of the show where we're just trying to find tangents to go on and make jokes of all things. And Yeah. He's the thing that's binding the two things together. That's why Odin is the king of the Aseer and the Vanir because he's binding those two things together.
[03:28:29] Unknown:
Right.
[03:28:30] Unknown:
You know, he's doing the Mercury action, the the void action.
[03:28:35] Unknown:
This is this is the type of thing that I really enjoy. Have you thought of starting, like, an only fans to get this word out? I gotta figure out people are making a lot of money from this Patreon OnlyFans and
[03:28:50] Unknown:
I gotta figure out how see, because of the way quarter neons work, they're very even on all sides. So I gotta figure out, like, how to get a good side of it. Get a good angle? Yeah.
[03:29:03] Unknown:
How you feeling? Not great?
[03:29:06] Unknown:
Build some so we we need to, get some more marshmallows and toothpicks and build some some trees with branches and show people that stuff for the visual learners, the tactile learners, different learning styles need to be accommodated. We did a lot of radio and talking tonight so long as we can, spell the words properly and and put the r in the right place. Quadonine.
[03:29:30] Unknown:
And quarter neon.
[03:29:32] Unknown:
Nar. I'm from Australia. I I'm gonna No. Quadonine.
[03:29:37] Unknown:
Quadonine. I I so I Quadonine, mate. Quarter nine. In a very small town in Virginia that, like, I I graduated with 86 people. Okay. So, like, I say a lot of words weird too, like, like, mirror.
[03:29:54] Unknown:
Mhmm. Where where is where is the Slater where is your Slater onesie?
[03:30:01] Unknown:
You know, I was making fun of Manas for Men, Mystery and and they were both wearing, like, you know, t shirts with their sleeves cut off. And I'm like, you know, I don't wanna show people my armpits all of the time for free. That's what the only fans is for.
[03:30:19] Unknown:
Gotta get gotta give him something to pay for if you give him the whole show for free, then, you know, nobody pays for the milk, takes care of the cow if they can get the milk for free. That's fact. Mhmm. Big market on Marcus' armpit air.
[03:30:36] Unknown:
Alright.
[03:30:38] Unknown:
He's like, I cannot hear it that. Yeah.
[03:30:44] Unknown:
I'll I'll I'll probably send the
[03:30:48] Unknown:
You got the email there on the screen? Send send an email with some of the information so we can throw it in the the show notes.
[03:30:54] Unknown:
If you're gonna look at that appreciate your time, Luke. Oh, absolutely. Nice talking to you. No problem at all. Let me get this email down real quick, and then I'll I'll give you the link to,
[03:31:05] Unknown:
all of it. Sure. When your crow episode goes live, we'll be sure to let everybody know and promote that so people can hear that. You've been on other shows, Cult of Conspiracy. We'll have to connect with those guys. We've, talked with the legit bat crew on a different stream before. Mhmm. Of course, Crow, we've talked with. Rose, we've talked with Jason as well. Yeah. Click click. Boom.
[03:31:42] Unknown:
Alright. Yeah. So whenever I I got your email down now. Whenever I get the chance, I will, I'll send you the link to the theory and all that stuff. I'll probably send it to you for the the OSF just because it's a little bit easier to navigate unless you just like navigating GitHub.
[03:32:00] Unknown:
Oh, I love GitHub. I lose hours on GitHub. I don't know what any of it means, but I just keep clicking and browsing and reading. Wow. My computer can do this? Yeah. Right. Lot of lot of good code there.
[03:32:13] Unknown:
Yeah. Alright. Well, everybody, thank you all, thank you all for having me, and thank everybody else for listening. Thank you so much. No problem. Y'all have a good one.
[03:32:24] Unknown:
Yeah. Good luck. Good luck, brother. Yeah. You too. No. I I don't got overalls on right now. I wasn't scooping shit today. My shirt is purple, though. It looks very blue in me. Yeah. Looks very blue in the camera.
[03:32:44] Unknown:
It's the optical illusion. There's the ninja cat. So, yeah, Duck, I saw started a stream. He's jumped into chat, said, hey, and then left and started his own stream and then ended his stream, and we're still streaming. So if Duck has checked back in, you know, send me an email. We need a confirmation. We need more than a a sure. We need a be assured with the confirmation email to say, so we can set you on a date. Because we have a guest next week. So, I think we have to we have to confirm that. We're always trying to confirm guests.
[03:33:26] Unknown:
Confirmed. Confirmed. Confirmed. Yep.
[03:33:32] Unknown:
It's like the, the the baptismal water is free. You can just go and refill your
[03:33:37] Unknown:
your water jugs. That would be great. Yep. Thank you, guys.
[03:33:45] Unknown:
I think we'll keep the rumble chat open a little bit longer, but I think we're gonna say goodnight to the YouTubes.
[03:33:51] Unknown:
Yeah. It's about that time, guys. That was a heavy one. That was real good stuff. Next week, we're talking Danny Katz, so that's gonna be a good time. Animal show and tell time. Well, the one sitting on me right now is I call him I call him Scar. I think he looks like Scar from the Lion King. Then cutest has always got it. Bub Bubba's on the floor over here with Freya. Him and Freya have friends. Freya is like the she is the wildest little pit bull. She is she's always off running off, getting into trouble somewhere. And Bubba is so Bubba gets along with everybody. We gotta keep our two big males that were both that, you know, both of them had their nuts. So we had to keep those guys separated, and then the two females separated.
And, but Bubba gets along with everybody. Well, Bubba starts out the morning with Frey and Lickas, and he runs them ragged. And then they go up at lunchtime, and they take a nap for the for, from about noon till eight. And then it flips around, and during from noon to eight, he runs tier and he's a ragged.
[03:35:14] Unknown:
Quit trying to get in front of the camera. Stop. Stop. Stop. Good night. Delivering Doc Face Tube's YouTube channel. We're gonna be on Yeah. Channel for a little while longer.
[03:35:25] Unknown:
And then, we go
Introduction of Guests and Topics
Luke's Unified Theory and Lunar Wave
Quarter Neons and Historical Context
Light, Pressure, and Energy Transfer
Flat Earth Discussion and Optical Effects
Lunar Wave and Pressure Waves
History of Quarter Neons and Maxwell
Coherence, Quantum Mechanics, and Consciousness
Photosynthesis and Classical Reduction
Levitation and Acoustic Effects
DMT, Consciousness, and Spirituality
Sacred Geometry and Elemental Connections
Fluid Dynamics and Energy Flow
Scalar Sinks and Ethical Considerations
Acknowledgments and Ethical Stance
