support dispatch: https://citadeldispatch.com/donate
EPISODE: 92
BLOCK: 778126
PRICE: 4202 sats per dollar
TOPICS: Lionel Shriver is the author of The Mandibles - a book set in the United States in 2029 during a debt crisis that results in hyperinflation and economic collapse.
nostr live chat: https://citadeldispatch.com/stream
nostr account: https://primal.net/odell
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@citadeldispatch
podcast: https://www.podpage.com/citadeldispatch
stream sats to the show: https://www.fountain.fm/
(00:03:20) Introduction to the show and guest
(00:08:44) Discussion on the inspiration for the book and the 2008 financial crisis
(00:19:26) Concerns about the future and the impact of financial collapse
(00:30:26) Discussion on the role of bitcoin and government control
(00:40:00) The role of gold and gun control in the book
(00:48:59) The idea of utopia and the ending of the book
(00:54:46) Broken incentives in society
(00:55:30) Pros and cons of local governance
(00:57:47) Exodus from high tax states
(01:00:02) Bitcoin as a solution for convenience and accountability
(01:04:22) Bitcoin as a solution for lack of property rights and seizure resistance
[00:00:33]
ODELL:
Happy Bitcoin Friday, freaks. It's your host, Odell, here for another SIL dispatch. The show focused on actionable Bitcoin and Freedom Tech discussion. I have a very I have a very great guest, in the house today, for today's show. But before I get there, I'm just gonna do a really quick, intro to the show. As always, CITL dispatch is funded by you guys. We have no ads, no sponsors, purely funded by Bitcoin donations from our audience. I wanna thank everyone who continues to support the show. All the links are at cildispatch.com. If you wanna donate, with Bitcoin, you can go to sill dispatch.com/ donate.
Like I said, all stats are appreciated. Thank you for your support. You can also support the show on podcasting 2 point o apps by streaming stats directly to me as you listen to the show. You simply pick the value that you think the show provides on a sats per minute basis, and then it will stream me sats, as you listen directly to my Bitcoin node. We also at dispatch, we have a live audience. That live audience beams in from YouTube, Twitch, and Matrix. Huge shout out to all the freaks who join us in the live chat and make this show unique. You guys are also the hosts, and I do appreciate you joining.
Last but not least, I know it's a bear market. I know it's a recession. If you can't spare any Bitcoin, your support by sharing the show, subscribing to the show, sharing with friends and family, leaving reviews on all platforms that helps. It's available on all podcast apps. You simply search Cielo Dispatch. Before we get started and I introduce my fantastic guest today, I just wanna read a couple boostograms that people have left, for the previous episodes. A boostogram is when you support the show with Bitcoin, you can leave a message attached to it. We have at juicy disco with 80,000 stats saying, CIL dispatch is an invaluable source of learning. It's been extremely beneficial for my Bitcoin journey the last couple of years. Also, thanks for the response to my question regarding UTXO management from a fee perspective on Noster. Stay humble and stack sats. We have Eric 99 with 50,000 sats saying one sat equals one sat makes sense to me.
We have Oscar Merry of Fountain Podcasts with a 100,000 sat saying, great content this week, Matt. Excited for all these new lightning features. Bulk 12, async payments. Let's go. We have at Sourcewire with 21,000 sats saying absolute pleasure listening to the vast knowledge base Steve has. Love the show. Thanks you thanks to you both. Okay. With all that, let's get that out of the way. Thank you for for standing by with me, Lionel. We have Lionel Shriver on the show today, author of Mandibles. Lionel, welcome.
[00:03:28] Lionel Shriver:
Pleasure to talk to you. It's been a while since I talked about this book.
[00:03:33] ODELL:
This is all we talk about, Lionel. All we talk about is mandibles week in and week out. So, I don't know where we should start. I mean, you wrote mandibles in 2016. I'm curious
[00:03:49] Lionel Shriver:
Or I wrote it earlier than that because that's when it was published. Fair enough. Fair enough. I wanna get maximum credit for prescience.
[00:03:58] ODELL:
When did you when did you start writing it? In 2015.
[00:04:01] Lionel Shriver:
Probably started it in 2014.
[00:04:03] ODELL:
And what was the inspiration? 2008. 2008 was the inspiration.
[00:04:10] Lionel Shriver:
It's kind of obvious.
[00:04:11] ODELL:
Yeah. I mean, that's fair enough. It was my 2008 shaped my youth and was one of the reasons why I found Bitcoin in the first place.
[00:04:19] Lionel Shriver:
Well, it was, it changed my feeling about the whole world, and it made it made the world seem so much more fragile than it had before. I had and I I have to say that previous to the near collapse of the entire international fiscal system, I, was extremely bored by economics. I thought, you know, unemployment rates and and varying levels of currency in compared to each other, and it it just all put me to sleep. And I never read the business pages. I only used them to clean the window of my wood stove. And then suddenly, economics got very interesting indeed. And I'm always on the lookout for something new to be fascinated by, so I didn't resist it.
And, during this post nearapocalypse period, I bought a house in London, and that was really interesting because, of course, it entailed a big whack of my assets. And just even moving around money at that time felt extremely dangerous, and you weren't really advised to put more than the amount that the government guaranteed as if the government could actually guarantee that much money across the board. So that's an that's misguided and diluted to begin with, that the government will ever make you whole if this shit goes completely to hell.
Right. But, nevertheless, being careful, I, you know, I only put, like, £50,000 into into each account. And I had to establish all these different bank accounts with all these different banks because any of them could at any at any time simply collapse. So, I mean, it would I I can't tell you how much bother it was. I don't have a lot of patience with paperwork. Mhmm. And and just shipping the money around was a huge project. And, and when I remember that period, that's what I remember is is going from bank to bank along the the high street of my then neighborhood and establishing a new account at each one of them just in order to make one transaction.
And it Yeah. Shook me up. And and so when I got the idea for this book, I started doing, a lot of reading or what for me is a lot of reading in nonfiction because I have little appetite for or I used to have little appetite for nonfiction. I'm a spoiled fiction writer who likes to read made up fairy stories. And, and I discovered that the the the new nonfiction in the economics is anything but boring. It is it is apocalyptic. It is about the end of the world. And, I haven't completely kept up with what's out there most recently because I don't have the same motivation.
And, you know, I naturally moved on to other books that had other topics. But I don't have any time for climate change. Okay? I'm not worried about the temperature of the planet, which has only increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, barely over a degree centigrade. And then and, you know, I'm sorry that that just doesn't scare the shit out of me. And, and I don't confuse climate and weather, unlike the rest of the media. But, I am terrified of financial collapse, and that has not changed. Sometimes when I write a book, I kind of write myself out of my own anxieties.
I don't know. When I finished big brother, my obesity book, I think I stopped worrying about getting fat. Okay. I was done with that. But I'm afraid that the anxiety that man that motivated the mandibles has done nothing but accelerate because the big the big concern, of course, is burgeoning debt, and it just gets worse. Nothing nothing was learned from 2,008 at all. The overall debt burden worldwide is way bigger than it ever was. And at a certain point, the Ponzi scheme, like all Ponzi schemes, falls apart. And what's horrifying about the death of this Ponzi scheme is that, yes, it it entails the the almost theoretical loss of a lot of wealthy people who didn't really create anything or, you know, it's all numerical.
They're just lucky, and then they're unlucky. And that doesn't seem to matter that much morally. It's still systemically disturbing, but it's it's, you know, it's what comes around and goes around. But what we're all what we would also be looking at is the loss of life savings of people that did make something and believed in the system and believed it was possible to save for their retirement and and made sacrifices for that and didn't get the newest computer and didn't install a swimming pool or, you know, or didn't go out to eat every night. They they they embraced the idea that money has value and will continue to do so.
And I I just I just think that's the the threat is is across the board. First of all, disorder and violence and also just a complete collapse of of social faith and and and inevitably a a very dangerous Darwinian world in which you no longer have social co cooperation. Money is one of the main media that create that creates social cooperation. It makes us makes it possible for us to trade apples for oranges. You know? And every time every time I want to get groceries, I don't wanna have to write a short story. And I think I'd have to write a lot of short stories even to get a bag of apples. So, it's massively more important for social order and for the kind of complex systems we have constructed than than the temperature the temperature. It's just I'm sorry.
And I'm afraid that we more or less learned the wrong thing from 2,008. What what we seem to have learned is, oh, I see. Everything almost fell apart, but it didn't, so it won't. No? And I'm sorry, but that's not that's not the lesson. We were very lucky. Government stepped in, and things fell apart on a scale that government was was still capable of influencing the outcome. Right? So but when we're rapidly approaching a time when the problem is government. Right? Yes. It is the government that doesn't have any money. It is the government that is producing money that is completely worthless in vast quantity, you know, in order to cover its own backside.
And then government isn't the answer. So I you know, I'm very I have to say I'm very sympathetic with the cryptocurrency motivation, and, I love the idea of money that is taken away from government. I I love the idea of of of a world in which the government actually has to borrow from an external entity instead of from itself, which is a contradiction in terms. But I have been disappointed in the reality of of crypto, and I have have not personally invested in it. Out of a kind of well, natural distrust of the new, out of a distrust of what has proven very volatile in a way that I don't have a stomach for. I'm one of those people who doesn't like to, put a quarter into a a a one armed bandit because I might lose 25¢.
I'm I am really, like, protestant and safety, safety. And, if it were up to me, I wouldn't be in the, stock market at all. I would just be in a savings account that paid 5%, not that you can get that even now. But, I don't I don't like risk. And so far, Bitcoin is still seemingly very risky.
[00:14:31] ODELL:
No. A 100%. I mean, Lionel, there's a lot to unpack there. First of all, I I would like to say that I agree with pretty much everything you just said. You sound exactly like a Bitcoiner. I I mean, you sound you sound like pretty much everyone in the audience can relate to you right now. I think the first part that was really interesting to me is this idea of 2,008 being forgotten. I don't even know if it was the wrong lessons were learned. I almost feel like no lessons were learned. I I feel like people just swept it under the rug.
[00:15:08] Lionel Shriver:
Well, it was unpleasant. It's just like COVID. Nobody wants to think about COVID anymore. So we can't go we we we don't wish to go through the exercise of realizing that, idiotically, we shut down entire economies for month upon month, really the better part of 2 years in some places. I'm in the UK right now. It was horrific, and they did themselves incredible damage. But nobody even wants to review that because it was an icky time. Yep. Right? Oh, I don't remember I don't wanna remember the icky time. So let's just shove it under the carpet, and we won't we're not gonna contemplate the fact that, oh, it turns out that literally overnight, we were willing to sacrifice every civil liberty we ever had.
And I'm afraid that the near financial collapse of 2,008 and it's interesting. We have all different names for it. There's never been we've never arrived at a name for it, and I think that's telling. You know, it was a the great recession for a while, but you've noticed that hasn't stuck. Right. Nothing is stuck. It started out here as the credit crunch, which sounds like a candy bar. Oh, the credit crunch. Do you want a credit crunch? You want some with peanuts? And and and it was so trivializing. It was ludicrous. But, no, we do not revisit it.
It's just an icky time. And you're totally right. There were no lessons learned. Slightly more capitalization of banks. But when you're talking about funny money, what does it matter? Right. And I have to say, you know, Mike, I I I live with I live with this fear in a very real world day to day way. I have been, for a fiction writer, of all things, pretty successful, And there aren't very many of us out there. And for half of my career, I made practically no money, and was still working very hard. I'm not going to be apologetic here. I get tired of people apologizing for having any assets. I have some assets. I worked really hard for them, and most of my walk in the market or any other kind of investment has been very poor.
So, steadily, what assets I am managing to accrue, they don't grow in that way that that, you know, you're told that they're supposed to. It just hasn't happened. So and I'm getting older for fuck's sake, and I don't know how many books I've got more in me. Maybe I'll run out of ideas. I want I want to be able to buy a chicken and a bottle of wine until I'm 89. I don't ask much more. But when money becomes worthless, you can't even buy a chicken and a bottle of wine. And so, you know, I'm I'm completely baffled by what to do with my investments.
Right now, I've stuck some of it into, you know, 3% CDs, which is better than nothing. But I know perfectly well that I'm kidding myself because when you've got a a 10% inflation rate, you're losing 7%. And then you have to pay taxes on the 3%. So basically, you get dick. Right? And and my feel my feeling is, a, none of this is is fair, and, b, why do I have to live with this constant anxiety? I am constantly worried that the entire fiscal world on which my assets are built, most of them still in dollars, that it that it's just gonna collapse like a house of cards, and I will be left with nothing. And I wish I thought that this was neurotic, but I don't think it is neurotic.
I'm just curious. Did you happen to read the op ed? I hardly ever read op eds in the New York Times for obvious reasons. But this one was one of the guest essays, and it was in the last week about the entitlement programs in the US. Did not. Did you read it? It was fucking terrifying, And it's based on recent, you know, what office of whatever figures. They're not, you know, not some fringe group concocting scare stories. But by 2050, just in terms of, you know, looking at the way the entitlements are structured now, if nothing is done, we're going to be I think the figure is a $117,000,000,000,000 in debt, sovereign debt.
That boggles the mind. And and and meanwhile, you've got Biden talking about how, you know, both programs are safe and he's not going to make any changes to them. And everyone's going to get their Social Security and everyone's going to be able to lift to a 110 and be dependent on Medicare and get their knees replaced 3 times. And, it none of it adds up. The the age structure in the United States, it doesn't add up. And I don't I'm sorry. I don't care how many illiterates cross the border. That's not gonna change the big economic picture that you're gonna have way too many old people like me, depending on practically nobody working.
And, you know, this is not a long term future. It used to be that when you were talking about 2030 or 2050, it was just off in the distance. You know, who cares? Who cares? It was never going to happen to you. I mean, I'll tell you one of the things that motivated me to write The Mandibles because I've been reading many, many figures, environmental and economic figures that often, you know, stop at 2050. That's just because we're, you know, we're a society obsessed with base 10. Yeah. We like round numbers. Yeah. We love we love round numbers and base 10.
And and I I sat down one day and I calculated, if I lived, for example, as long as my paternal grandfather did, who's 2 generations behind me, so should really have a smaller life expectancy than my own generation. But if I lived to 96 as he did, I'd live to 22,052. Fuck me. And I'll tell you what, I was terrified and disappointed. I didn't think, oh, goody. I'm going to live to see, you know, many more technological miracles created, and and I'll find out what what happens to all these exciting human stories that I've been following. You know, I'm going to live much more much more into this century, than I expected.
No. I was filled with dread and horror. I don't wanna be alive in 2050, much less at the age of 53 or, I mean, 93, you know, barely able to walk or or string a sentence together. I I don't want to be, as we say so incessantly now, vulnerable Right. At that time. Because it's if you look at all the figures, that's by then, if not way before, is is when everything is going to fall apart.
[00:23:30] ODELL:
And Yeah. It might happen sooner. And and,
[00:23:33] Lionel Shriver:
again, I think the problem will be economic. Now the the other thing to bear in mind if you're apocalyptically inclined, is that Guilty. Most disasters do not occur in a vacuum. They interact with other disasters so that any economic collapse is inevitably going to entail huge political conflict and possibly military conflict.
[00:24:05] ODELL:
Always has.
[00:24:06] Lionel Shriver:
I mean, I it was I tried to cover the bases in the mandibles, but the truth is that the mandibles is much more modest in scale than I think the real threat is. For one thing, I just wasn't really up for writing a novel that was based on the experience of a single family.
[00:24:27] ODELL:
Right.
[00:24:28] Lionel Shriver:
Did also, entailed the collapse of the entire world. Right? So I kept, I kept the fiscal collapse to the United States.
[00:24:42] ODELL:
And specifically almost in New York.
[00:24:44] Lionel Shriver:
Right? Yes. Of course. And then we experienced that locally Yeah. As one would. But I would say that that's the one unrealistic thing about the plot, and I knew it at the time. I did this on purpose. It was to do myself a favor. I I just didn't wanna get into India and Africa and Europe and all that shit. Russia. It was, yeah, it was too much to take on. I'm not that ambitious a novelist. So, artificially, I kind of drew a a circle around the United States, and I allowed the US to operate in isolation. And the rest of the world sealed itself off from the US with this new currency, and nobody's dealing with dollars anymore. I mean, I tried to put it together in a credible way, but I actually believe it to be completely incredible. I do not believe that the way things are put together right now, the US can collapse economically and not bring everyone else with it.
[00:25:42] ODELL:
They were the reserve currency of the world.
[00:25:44] Lionel Shriver:
So if we and we're already kinda seeing that. Right? That is what that is what that's what the book begins with, and I think that that's what Americans, take for granted that the that the dollar is the international reserve currency. They don't even know what it means, most of them. But but in not knowing what it means, they also don't know how dependent they are on being the reserve currency and how much the US gets away with murder economically, and generates vastly more dollars than than it should possibly be be be able to without creating hyperinflation. That's Right. That's really the secret, is the is the reserve currency. So that all over the world, other countries and other banks are using dollars and therefore have dollars, to trade in things like commodities, oil, whatever, and to pay their own debts.
All all countries are not allowed to borrow in their own currency. A lot of them have to borrow in dollars. Right. Makes it possible for us to have generated vast numbers of dollars that are we are not using in the United States. If the US ever if the US dollar ever lost that position, then all of those dollars would flood our country because it's like, I'm sorry. We don't use these anymore. We don't need them. Take them back. Guess what that would do to the the value of the dollar? And yet and yet US authorities who who do nothing but abuse the dollar, think they can continue continue to do that infinitely because they are complacent and arrogant and stupid.
Yeah. And there's nothing to con there's nothing to prevent a consortium of other countries from coming along and saying, we don't wanna use the dollar anymore.
[00:27:44] ODELL:
Well, so the way I kind of look at it, currently, I'm, looking at everything unfolding is is what we're what we're kind of witnessing right now is is the US is exporting our inflation around the world to all these lesser economies. And so those economies, we're starting to see them falter first. Then after they falter, then it kind of comes home to roost here in America, and then you you see, like, a whole global crisis kind of happen at the same time. And so then the question is, when trust breaks down in that situation, where do financial markets move from that point forward? How do people do any kind of financial transaction, whether that's nation states doing, you know, 1,000,000,000 of dollars in trade or if that's a person going to buy chicken and wine?
[00:28:34] Lionel Shriver:
Well, the whole system is actually based on trust. I'm sure I'm not telling you anything you don't know. It's a kind of religious faith. Right. The value of money is created by everyone believing in the value of money. You know, I think that's in the mandibles that it's a belief in Tinker Bell. Right. And that's what keeps Tinker Bell on the air is that everyone believes it. And the other great binder, is is is self interest. So it's not in our interest for money to be worthless, so we're going to continue to behave as if it it it has value. And that that has worked after a fashion and, in fact, better than you would have ever expected. Most of these currencies should have gone to shed a long time ago, including the dollar. But it's but the that prospect is so horrifying.
Hold on.
[00:29:31] ODELL:
You're good.
[00:29:33] Lionel Shriver:
Just a second. I'm sorry. It's probably my husband. You're good. He didn't get my email.
[00:29:41] ODELL:
Family's important.
[00:29:42] Lionel Shriver:
Hey. Listen. You didn't get my email. No. I told you not to not to FaceTime me right now. Of course. I'm a podcast. You're on TV.
[00:29:57] ODELL:
I'm on
[00:29:58] Lionel Shriver:
when? When? Okay. I'm gonna give me 45 minutes.
[00:30:03] ODELL:
45 minutes. Okay. Bye. I can do that. My cohost on my other show, his dad always calls while we're recording, and he gives weather updates.
[00:30:17] Lionel Shriver:
Well, Jeff says hey.
[00:30:21] ODELL:
Thanks, Jeff. Sorry about that. You're good. Where were we? Yeah. I mean, trust. Every all our whole lives rely on different trust relationships, but especially money.
[00:30:37] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. I mean, that's that's what really hit me hard writing the book is how dependent we are on money. And everyone thinks in terms of, oh, we're dependent on having enough of it so that we can buy what we need. But that's not what I mean, obviously. We're dependent on the functionality of money, however much we have of it, that it still it still buys things. It is still accepted in trade for real things. And it's actually a kind of miracle that money works at all and that I can give you a piece of paper, much less a a a purely this and by theoretical set of digits with a little piece of plastic or by punching keys, and you'll you'll give me a car.
I mean, fucking hell. You'll give me a car. And that that is that's a miracle, And that's that's a great creation, but it's like any kind of creation. It's it's hard to create. It's easy to destroy. And, you know, ever since the advent of fiat currencies, governments in particular have been out to destroy it, to abuse it. Right.
[00:32:03] ODELL:
And, yeah, and people don't realize it's a relatively new phenomenon, this idea of just government issued fiat. Absolutely. Seventies. Yeah. Based on nothing.
[00:32:13] Lionel Shriver:
And, you know, the the threat initially was, of course, well, if it's based on nothing and governments are unconstrained from making up as much of it as they want, then what's to stop them from infinitely creating more until it's completely worthless? And it hasn't taken as long as you might expect, I. E. 5 minutes, but it's still happening.
[00:32:38] ODELL:
Right.
[00:32:39] Lionel Shriver:
And this debt thing, it's still I mean, who who thinks that the the US government is ever going to pay back the, what is it, 3 31 and a half $1,000,000,000,000 that, strictly speaking, we owe? Is it ever gonna Same. Does that number ever come down? No. Not with the entitlement situation we've got now. It's not ever gonna come down. If it's never gonna come down, it's never it's never being repaid.
[00:33:11] ODELL:
So, yeah, I mean, that's never gonna happen. And the only safe assumption is that, of course, governments are gonna abuse their power, and, of course, corrupt individual in individuals in those governments will abuse their power. And that's the only way you can operate is under that assumption, and that's what we're seeing play out in real time. So, I mean, in mandibles in the mandibles, gold plays a major I mean, you gave us one line on Bitcoin. You said Bitcoin. Remember what happened to Bitcoin? I do. The gold
[00:33:41] Lionel Shriver:
I I haven't read the book in years.
[00:33:43] ODELL:
You have a single line. It's like page 42 or something like that. It's just like, just just remember what happens to remember what happened to Bitcoin. You just kinda left us on that. But I I like to think that was If I may expand,
[00:33:58] Lionel Shriver:
If I were writing it today, I'd probably give it a little more time, a little more space. But the the danger that Bitcoin and any other rival currency has is that government does not want to give up money. Agree. And it won't. They won't. And they can take you over, and they can they can make trading in Bitcoin illegal and arrest you. They can do whatever they want. I mean, that's the other thing in my horrifying political maturity, I have had to realize. And we we we tend to be complacent about these things, but government can do anything. We want that's what we learned during the pandemic. Government can do anything. It seems constrained by all these little constitutional things, but that's just so much paper. In fact, they've got the military, and they can do anything.
And therefore, if you're doing something they don't like, they can make you stop. So if the only thing that Bitcoin's got going for it right now is failure, as long as it doesn't work, like it's too volatile, or it's too much trouble for for vendors to accept, or has failed to build the kind of trust we're talking about, then they'll leave you alone. But success would be deadly. The US government will not allow a rival currency outside of government to thrive. It will not. It will stop. That's what's all this digital currency nonsense from the Fed is all about.
It's like, no. No. We're gonna do it.
[00:35:46] ODELL:
No. They're definitely gonna try. Yep. So, I mean, I wanna unpack all of this. But where I was going at first of all, I just wanna be absolutely clear. You somehow wrote the single best Bitcoin book that exists, and you weren't a Bitcoiner. You only mentioned Bitcoin once in the whole in the in the whole book, but you somehow wrote the Bitcoin book. And when I was talking about 2,008, how people forget, the reason I always talk about the mandibles is because it's a really easy way for someone to to remember the the issues we had with 2008 and kind of put it in a forward kind of actionable kind of thought process, of of how they can think about these situations and these concerns, and these systemic failures in our society, they can conceptualize it in their own world, right, in their their own world going forward.
But so the the reason I think and I've noticed I've I've read a lot of commentary about the mandibles. It's a very provocative book as, especially since it's become more prescient lately, and people are starting to see the crumbling issues with our societies. People get very up in arms and and and they push back against it. And I think coming from a Bitcoin audience, we don't necessarily see it that way because you didn't really explore the Bitcoin side of things. And and in your scenario, Bitcoin has failed. But in our scenario, in our life today, Bitcoin is hope to us. Right? Like, I was I was a a young kid getting shaped by 2,008, getting shaped by the Snowden disclosures where I found out all the tech companies were also spying on us, and they were complicit in all this government surveillance.
And I was very disenfranchised. Like, I did not see a a situation where I could have children, that I could have a family, and that that that things would be alright. Right? But then I discovered the the open source movement. I discovered Bitcoin. And to me, that gives me hope. And and and that's why we're able to read the mandibles in a in a way that doesn't is not necessarily, I don't wanna say, like, doomer. Right? Not necessarily, like, a negative light, because we already see these systemic issues, And Bitcoin wasn't around in this in this storyline. Right? But maybe in in in this future storyline, in reality, Bitcoin actually lessens those blows. I don't think it will necessarily stop chaos from happening and stop financial collapse, but it will it will lessen the blow. It will allow the darkness to be shorter than it would have otherwise because we'd have a money that doesn't require trust, that isn't run by governments, that isn't run by corporations, that any individual can use to save, to spend without permission.
And maybe we haven't had the biggest target on our back yet, but the target has been growing, and Bitcoin continues to truck on and continues to grow. And Bitcoin is built in a way that is is adversarial to is built in a way that is is designed to survive in adversarial environments. And and and, you know, I wanted to you mentioned earlier about cryptocurrency hasn't lived up to its expectations and the hype and all this stuff. The overwhelming majority of cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are not designed to be robust and censorship resistant in an adversarial environment. They simply aren't. They are mostly there's a ton of Ponzi schemes, Get rich quick schemes. They're centrally controlled.
They're easy to regulate. We're seeing regulations pop up all over the place on centralized entities that exist in the industry. But Bitcoin is designed in a way that there is no central actor. So who do you pressure to stop it? I don't wanna go I I I kinda want you there's so much to unpack here and not that much
[00:39:59] Lionel Shriver:
time. But you mentioned Well, I mean, I have to say, look, I have not made a special study of Bitcoin. I'm not any kind of crypto expert. You kinda are. All I can do is is wish you well, with a certain skepticism and to warn you about what could happen if this client really starts to work.
[00:40:25] ODELL:
So I what I wanted to talk about be allowed. Go ahead. But then, you know, I've got
[00:40:30] Lionel Shriver:
I've got a paranoid streak.
[00:40:32] ODELL:
So let's let's talk about the lens of gold in mandibles. Right? So, obviously, gold was positioned as an alternative to the banker and the failing dollar. And you basically set up that exact scenario that we're just talking about now with Bitcoin. Right? That the first thing the US government did was they went after gold holders and gold economy.
[00:40:56] Lionel Shriver:
And you know that that that legislation from the 19 thirties is still on the books.
[00:41:03] ODELL:
Yes. Well aware. Executive order 6102.
[00:41:07] Lionel Shriver:
Good for you.
[00:41:09] ODELL:
It's one of our favorite executive orders here in in the Bitcoin space. Inhibits
[00:41:13] Lionel Shriver:
me personally from investing in gold appreciably.
[00:41:18] ODELL:
Right.
[00:41:19] Lionel Shriver:
The the government keeps track of gold very carefully, and they have the legal right to take it away from you. Yes. And that's not a good asset. Of course, as I was pointing out, since government can do anything, they have the right to take anything away from you. Everything you own is provisional. They can take your house. They can take they can commandeer all the money in your account, pass the law tomorrow, you know, take the clothes off their off your back. Doesn't bear thinking about all the time because who wants to live in that downer universe? But Yep.
All our rights, so called, are provisional. I mean, I I honestly came away from that book thinking there there was no resort. I envy you your your feeling that you found 1. Well, we have no choice. And I can see how that would make you feel more confident and powerful and independent of all these systems that are now so fragile. And I do nothing but encourage you. I don't I don't know whether crypto has the capacity crypto. Bitcoin. Bitcoin. Sorry. I can see you're touching on that point. I don't know whether you'd you'd effectively construct a a financial bunker for yourselves and and other Bitcoin investors if the world fell apart?
Personally, I came to the conclusion that what what I'm afraid of is on such a scale that there is no safe harbor. And the only thing that I would have to comfort myself is that I have already lived a really good life. And so if it goes to shit, I I still it it went better than most people's historically. And that's about all I would cling to because Rescuing even real things that you technically own in a situation of total chaos doesn't guarantee that you get to keep them. And that's what I tried to illustrate in the latter part of the mandibles before we get to the second part, which we I never discussed with anyone because I don't wanna blow the ending. So we maybe we can get to that. But, you know, technically, the family still owns the house. Right? Right. But it doesn't matter because they don't have a gun.
And someone with a gun can kick them out of their house. So much for owning a house. You know? So much, oh, I've got this asset worth so much. And if I'm really desperate, I can always downsize or something. Not necessarily. I mean, that's just one more system that can break down. So anything that you own, you know, even a pound of hamburger you're bringing home from the supermarket can be taken away from you by somebody who has a sock full of loose change with which he can wallop you over the head. In fact, that's an interesting scene. It's so small, but it's the first time that our hero, our stealth hero, as I like to think of him, does something bad.
[00:45:15] ODELL:
Willing.
[00:45:16] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. And, you know, he mugs a little kid, who's only about 10 years old, for his groceries, and it's unpleasant. But it's an illustration of, you know, no matter how virtuous your character, you're gonna cross these lines if it's a matter of survival. And that's where Welling crosses the line. And it's a it's a touching and depressing tiny scene, but I think it's it's morally and symbolically very important to the book.
[00:45:56] ODELL:
No. I mean, I felt that as well while I was reading it. I mean, there's it you know, ultimately, at the end of the day, Bitcoin is is a tool. Right? It is one tool in a toolbox. There's a very there's a lot of corollaries in the Bitcoin community on just sustainability, localism, self defense, right, the right to bear arms in America, at least, among the American Bitcoiners. And that's why I say, like, you kind of hit all the you hit all the pieces.
[00:46:39] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I should I should remark on that point in particular that, previously, I have been a, I would say, a trite liberal on, gun control issues. And, you know, I made my reputation on my 7th novel, We Need to Talk About Kevin, which is it's not about a school shooting, actually. Everyone often forgets that because they didn't wanna get into the gun control debate. Right. I was interested in looking at pure malice, without worrying about what the weapon was, so he uses a crossbow. Nevertheless, I I've inevitably got dragged into all kinds of gun control debates and generally fall on the control side partly out of sheer self interest because I don't wanna be shot Right. By some lunatic. And my main concern with the whole second amendment thing is that the proportion of insane people in the human race is simply too high. And in in the United States, it it's it's clearly about about twice the percentage of any other country.
So when When the mandibles. When I was writing the mandibles, I rather surprised myself because I didn't see how my family was gonna surprise without a survive without a gun. And Willing, being the savviest of the lot, is the one who goes and gets one. And this is actually contrary to my standard politics because I don't like the idea of necessarily encouraging people to arm themselves. But I thought that the the scenario that I had constructed, that's what you would do. That was what you would have to do unless you were a fucking idiot. So Yep.
So that's where they end up, and that gun ends up being rather important.
[00:48:39] ODELL:
Well, I don't know if it was intentional or not, but, I mean, it takes place in New York, which has, you know, very very strict gun control laws. Mhmm. And and to me, I mean, maybe it was my own bias reading into it. Right? But it's a clear perspective where, like, gun control laws, and you hear it all the time. It's, like, the most common narrative. Right? It's the most common messaging point on people like myself that are that are pro freedom in that regard is that gun control laws do not stop bad people from getting guns. Right?
And the only real protection you have is to learn how to use them yourself, get comfortable using them yourself, and use them in a safe way, of course. But, ultimately, it's just another tool to empower individuals. And, ultimately, I think, as a society, the more tools we have that empower individuals reduces power of these these small centralized entities that exert tons of power around the world and are very often corrupt. So maybe I I kind of tend to view that we have a lot of, you know, insane people in general. May I just maybe I shouldn't use the word insane, but just a a lot of crazy people. Along with the word insane. Yeah. But it's like isn't it like a clinical whatever. But that's not my point. My point is, yeah, that is true, but the alternative is a small group of people that are corrupt that are running things. Right? So my focus for the last 10 years or so has been tools that empower individuals because I think that brings the power back. And and just to talk about how, like, crazy the corollaries are with your book and our thinking, like, this show is called Citadel Dispatch.
I called it Citadel Dispatch because we have this idea of Bitcoin citadels, which is, like, extreme localism, self sustainability, small trade. Right? Trade between different localities, distributed power. Right? And, of course, as I'm reading your book, there is a farm that everyone thought he was crazy, and he named it Citadel. Right? So you're, yeah, you're 95% there on everything,
[00:50:57] Lionel Shriver:
except Bitcoin. One thing that this book rarely gets credit for is having a a happy ending. And the it was positively unlike me, but we can't forget that I fundamentally created a utopia in, Nevada. Yeah. And Nevada of all places. And, well, perfect place culturally, perfect place. And, of course, my my utopia doesn't have to do with everyone is in a community with everyone else, and and everyone contributes everything that they can. And then there are all these people who can't contribute anything and are totally dependent. You know, it's not a liberal utopia. It's a libertarian utopia.
And people take care of themselves, and they if they want to, they can take care of other people on an individual level. But, basically, it's there's no welfare state. You're on your own. And it's much more functional than a society that that says, well, you know what? You don't really have to work. And if you don't work, we're gonna support you, and you can have a house, and we'll give you a salary, and and then expects everybody work. It's just hilarious. Yep. So I, you know, I had, I had a I had fun putting that together. And then, of course, in, in my Nevada, which has seceded from the rest of the country, it has a 10% flat tax. And I'm big on flat taxes.
I But then you yeah. I think progressive progressive taxes are larceny and also unfair and discourage people from earning money and also encourage people to cheat. So a flat tax that you really can't escape, I I think it's brilliant. One of the countries that employs it is Estonia. It's not 10%. It's 20%, I think. 20 or 21. But it works great, and it means that everyone contributes to their communal requirements, and and and that's quite different from having half the country mooching off the other half. Right. And it's it's it's a better social relationship.
And it also means that if everyone is contributing something, then they care about how the money is spent. It's it's what government was supposed to be and hardly ever is. So that's my, you know, that's my little utopia. And, of course, the very last line of the book gives you the idea when the flat tax goes up to 11%,
[00:53:55] ODELL:
that this isn't gonna last. There's a crack in the utopia.
[00:53:58] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. The the utopias never last. But it was it was a it was fun after all the all the agro, all the loss, all the people dying, to have a more of a almost a fairy tale ending.
[00:54:19] ODELL:
Yeah. A little bit. I mean, so what do we unpack there? The the idea of people think I'm, like, anti government. Right? I'm anti large corrupt governments. Right? When you have smaller local governance, there's more accountability. Right? And that's kind of what you captured at the end there is as they got larger, as a result, the cycle starts to repeat itself again. And and it's and Bitcoin is is this idea that I constantly hone in on is this idea of broken incentives. That if you look throughout society, the majority of the issues we have are are based somewhere along the line on some broken incentive.
And how can we make those incentives stronger? How can we make them more aligned? How can we make them more robust, so that society actually can function properly and function fairly? And and so when you have smaller governance, in general, when the governance is more local, those incentives are much stronger. Those are stronger, cleaner incentives. And as a result, you have less corruption and you have more efficient governance. Do you agree on that?
[00:55:30] Lionel Shriver:
Up to a point, though. I see this in the UK a lot. There's another side to be argued in that, there's nothing, you never get worse petty tyranny than local government. UK go local government is, dictatorial and irrational and run by people who, are are poorly qualified for making the kind of decisions they're making. So You you see that in, like, HOAs in America a lot,
[00:56:08] ODELL:
where they're, like, tell you can't have a homeowners association, where they, like, tell you can't have a bird feeder out front. Exactly.
[00:56:16] Lionel Shriver:
No. You cannot paint paint your post box pink. This doesn't fit with our scheme. Right. And you get a lot of that. And, and I don't know a lot about local government in the US right now, so I will just vouch for the British ones. And they're they're they're tyrannical. They're always out to make money. Like, they they'll they'll give you a 100 quid ticket for littering if you if you drop the the wrapper around your chewing gum. They're, they they go after you for you know, they make it impossible to park anywhere. And so that if you even stop, you get another 100 quid ticket. I mean, they're just hideous and, and often quite corrupt, you giving planning permission for this, that, and the other thing only to their friends. So that's the other side of the whole localism thing. I'm of 2 minds about it. Theoretically, I like the idea of local government. In practice, I see it, I see it as petty tyranny all the time. Yeah. I mean, it's definitely not
[00:57:29] ODELL:
perfect. Everything has trade offs. And and it has something to do with competition, mobility. There's something there in terms of, like, account like, having proper accountability because those issues seem to stem from, you know, there's being no accountability there, no competition,
[00:57:46] Lionel Shriver:
or or little competition. People don't Oh, well, I think one of the one of the most exciting things that we've witnessed in the United States recently just because of the way things are set up, and we have, for now, freedom of movement, is is this huge, exodus from high tax states. Yep. And and and toward low tax states and also states that are more interested in liberty. So there's less regulation. So, obviously, you know, Texas and and Florida in particular and, watching California and New York lose population
[00:58:30] ODELL:
is Yeah. I did that myself. Very satisfying. I moved from New York to Tennessee.
[00:58:37] Lionel Shriver:
Did the same thing? The other state.
[00:58:39] ODELL:
Yeah. And I, good for you, and New York deserves it. Yeah. I mean, you nailed that part. I mean, that was very prescient. I mean, you also nailed the movement passes with the brain plant chip that they, like,
[00:58:54] Lionel Shriver:
pushed on everybody. Oh, yes. Coming to a theater theater near you.
[00:58:59] ODELL:
We saw that in 2020. I mean, they they were it was rudimentary at the time. Right? It's like paper passes. Right. But if they could if they could put it in an implant, they would have done it.
[00:59:10] Lionel Shriver:
Well, of course, this whole idea of chipping, I probably didn't make it up. It was already clearly on its way, But I thought my my innovation was an important one, and that's where it was forward looking. And that is that the chips could also be implanted with your assets, with your money, and therefore it's possible for the government to extract money from you, basically, from the air. So it's your money is in the back of your head, and the government can just reach in and take it. And it's so convenient. Isn't it?
In fact, a lot of a lot of the kind of top down tyranny that is being inflicted on us is in the name of convenience. Yep. And people are suckers for it.
[01:00:03] ODELL:
They really are. They really are. That's something I've noticed very much so. It's very obvious. And it's one of the things, like, with Bitcoin is that we're focused on is, you know, try and make it it'll never be more convenient than the, you know, centralized, surveilled, controlled bullshit, but, try and make it as convenient as possible, because, ultimately, as as long as there's friction there, less people will use it. We have 15 minutes left, Lionel. I wanna talk with you more about Bitcoin.
[01:00:41] Lionel Shriver:
Okay. Because That's why we need to do more of the the talking.
[01:00:46] ODELL:
Well, you're there. So let's let's so gold. First thing they did with gold was well, first thing in the book was cut off cut off the ability for Americans to move assets around the world. Right? Mhmm. They cut people off from doing that. The way I like to look yeah. Go on. You're saying they have done that? Or do you know In the mandibles, that's one of the first things they do. Capital controls. Right. Capital control. That's pretty easy to institute at a stroke. Right.
[01:01:17] Lionel Shriver:
And, by the way, it's already a little tricky to move American assets around the world. If you do anything with more than with $10,000 or more, you you have to report it to, you know,
[01:01:29] ODELL:
daddy. And it's getting automatically reported left and right. All of these systems are already surveilled and controlled. And,
[01:01:36] Lionel Shriver:
And over here, you know, I just did my US taxes. If you live abroad, you are legally obliged to report every single bank account. By the way, they don't want you to just mention it that you have bank accounts. You have to give the name of the bank, the address, the exact highest amount, even if it was only that high for 15 minutes, and the closing amount, and the and the account number. So, I mean, that's you don't even have to you don't have to do that with US assets yet. But with foreign ones, they have to know everything, and the fines for not reporting that are fantastically high.
So, you know and and and furthermore, there are a lot of countries where banks will no longer take American depositors. Right. Because it's not only the individual, account holder who has to repeat report to the US government, but so does the foreign bank who doesn't wanna have to mess with the fucking IRS.
[01:02:48] ODELL:
Right? Yeah. Too much liability.
[01:02:50] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. Well, it's huge amounts of paperwork. It's not worth it. I mean, they're just not gonna make enough money off of you to make up for the bother and irritation of having to report to a a foreign government. So they just tell you that they won't hold your money, And it puts a lot of, expats in, in a very awkward position to the point where, actually, there there are countries where Americans really can't function, can't live. And, by the way, the other issue is this business of the federal government, telling American expats who may not even set foot in the United States all year that regardless, they have to report their worldwide income to the American government and pay taxes on it. Thank you.
And the system by which you're not supposed to be double taxed is highly imperfect and perfect and patchy.
[01:03:47] ODELL:
So And if you renounce your citizenship, you have to pay an exit tax equivalent to selling all your assets at the time of exit.
[01:03:53] Lionel Shriver:
That's right. They've they've sewn that up too because the number of people who are Americans who are renouncing their citizenship is really starting to soar, and so they're gonna make you pay. And this is, again, this is government able to do anything? So they could also tell you, well, you can leave the country, but your assets can't. We're gonna keep them. So that's essentially what they're doing. It's impossible to get away from these people.
[01:04:22] ODELL:
Bitcoin fixes this.
[01:04:26] Lionel Shriver:
So I
[01:04:27] ODELL:
so you mentioned lack of property rights at the core of all of this. The way I like to look at Bitcoin is that it enforces property rights at the level of code. It's code that enforces property rights. At the core, that's what it is. We already see people using Bitcoin to escape capital controls. You know, China has has famously banned Bitcoin, 25, 30 times. Chinese nationals still to this day use to transfer money in and out of their country. You can send it as easy as a text message. That is a core value prop of Bitcoin is this this ability to send without permission. Another core property of Bitcoin is that no one can change the supply of Bitcoin.
So you talked about earlier, this idea that you work hard, and you don't wanna be a financial planner. You don't wanna study economics. You don't wanna watch CNBC. You don't wanna pick stocks. You know? You just wanna do what you love, work, and be with your family, and save up money for the future so that you're able to, you know, buy the things you need to live, the necessities you need to live, and the things you want to enjoy. Bitcoin, because no one can change the supply because it's ultimately a fixed supply asset, allows people to save in this save in this asset, save in Bitcoin, and long term hold that value without having to be a financial professional. Like, I hear that all the time. People like, oh, I don't, you know, Bitcoin doesn't interest me. I'm not interested in finance. Like, that's the point. The point is it's it's absolutely insane that people need to and feel the need to either be a financial planner or a higher one in order to save for their future. They should be able to just hold the money that increases in purchasing power over time.
And people think I'm crazy when I say that about Bitcoin, but, historically, that has been the case. Now, there is volatility. There's short term volatility, but it's a scarce asset going through an adoption phase. We have over 8,000,000,000 people on the planet. Maybe 50,000,000 own Bitcoin. Of course, it's gonna be volatile short term. The world is volatile. But on a longer term basis, Bitcoin's purchasing power has shown to increase. I expect it to continue that trend. So it's a it's a great savings vehicle. It's a great spending vehicle. And then now the third thing, and we saw this in the mandibles, is seizure resistance.
This idea that governments will come and they will try and take your money from you in times of chaos. We saw you had in the mandibles, you had police officers or military men come door to door and basically look for people's gold. They went that far. Mhmm. Now can they do that with Bitcoin? Yes. They can do that with Bitcoin. But you can use Bitcoin in a private way so that they, first of all, don't know you own Bitcoin. And second of all, do know you own Bitcoin? Because Bitcoin is code, we have this ability to essentially split up the keys that require that that that give you give you control of the Bitcoin. Right? So Bitcoin is crazy rabbit hole, Lionel, and I look forward to you going down, and I'm happy to answer any of your questions after the show. But, Bitcoin at at the core is is public key, private key cryptography.
So we have this ledger, the blockchain, that is that is is keeping track of people's Bitcoin ownership around the world. It's not attached to a name, specifically. It's attached to this public key, and the private key is what's required to spend it. Now without that private key, no one can take your money. So how do you protect that private key? Well, we have many different ways. A lot of people like putting it on steel, then it's water and fireproof. But, of course, you can have a military guy come in and and take take that steel from you. We have this concept called multisig, where instead of one private key, you have multiple private keys. You could have 5 private keys. It might require 3 of those private keys to spend. Those 3 could be located in different states. They could be located in different nations.
1 could be in a cloud drive. 1 could be on a piece of steel somewhere else. 1 could be buried in the backyard. So all of a sudden, the seizure capability of of these governments or other malicious individuals gets significantly reduced. So you have these three facets of Bitcoin, this ability to spend without permission, this ability to save in an asset that increases purchasing power over time, and this ability to secure the asset, cross borders with this asset in a way that has never been capable with any other money in our history.
And all those things combined lend itself to an adversarial environment where trust is eroded, where governments are going after their citizens. And to me, that is where this hope comes from when I read something like the mandibles, or I look on the news, or just see how the world is going right now.
[01:09:35] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I'm much better on what's wrong than how to fix it. Yes. So in a way, we've broken up the job, and you work on the positive side, and I'll just keep on coming up with doomsday scenarios. Deal. For my own part, for me, this is partially an entertainment because the narrative of collapse is is so transfixing, ask any film director. And, otherwise, I don't I'm I am leery of getting so anxious about this kind of thing that I that I exhaust my energy on it. And I don't wanna spend you know, I don't wanna be one of those people who ends up spending all her energy on a shelter in the backyard and making sure that it is full of, you know, 300 tens of baked beans. I mean, it it our lives are finite, and I don't wanna spend my life on that, digging a hole in the backyard. So Yeah. The only thing more scarce than Bitcoin is time.
Yeah. So I am I am careful about the way I spend my time, and that is the ultimate currency of our of our lives. And, I got a book out of it out of my own anxiety, which is a lot more than just a bunch more anxiety. And I'm very pleased that you seem to have got something out of it, And I'm also very pleased that the people listening to this seem to have enjoyed it and and certain scenes stuck in their minds. And, and you you you think you recognized my anxieties. And and there's a certain, you know, there's a certain community in that. There's a satisfaction in that. And, you know, so one of the fun things about being a novelist is sort of like putting a a a plug in your head while you're dreaming and being able to share it with other people, and that's what that is. And this happens to have been a nightmare, but, I had a lot of fun writing it. I should share with you before we go that, when I first submitted this book to my publisher, my editor absolutely hated it.
And, she showed it to the publisher, and he hated it. He spent he spent 45 minutes on the phone with me telling me all that what was wrong with it. He couldn't keep track of the characters, and he thought it was incredibly boring. When my editor did edit the book, I already had a contract, so it was harder for they could've got out of it, but they didn't wanna alienate me. So they figured they'd just get over this terrible book. And then when my editor edited it, she basically edited it down to a pamphlet. Right? There was nothing left. She hated it so much that she would just put these big x's through page after page. By the way, she was not interested in economics, so this was not a book for her. Right?
And, I was told to edit the Economics down to nothing, which I did not do. I did pare it down. I think you probably enjoy the original even more because it had more economics in it, Because that's really what makes the book special. There aren't any number of dystopic stories out there. A lot of them are set in New York. So, who cares an another, you know, society falls apart story. But this was very particular. It is an economic dystopia, and I tried as hard as I could to do my homework and therefore to put together a scenario that was genuinely credible, and I and I think it is. And that's not something that my publisher remotely appreciated.
So when I got this edit, I completely ignored it. I I I took none of none of the advice. And even still, you know, when it got when this book got the cover of the New York Times book review, the publisher refused to put any money behind it. It's never had any advertising. Nothing. It's you guys who have done the advertising and and enthusiasts like you. This is almost purely a word-of-mouth book because my publisher has refused to support it. And even through this, you know, the post Trump thing because, you know, it was earl later the same year that, Trump was elected.
Right. And everyone was buying these dystopic fictions. Did they put any behind it any money behind it then? No. Or have has there been any effort to readvertise the book now that we really are suffering serious levels of inflation, which has directly to do with the overproduction of money in the federal system. No. So, you know, it's it is incredible you know about this book because my publisher sure didn't go to any trouble that you would know about it. And Even to this day? It was not shoved down your throat, but it was something that you picked up on by by either accident or or having a sharp eye.
[01:15:33] ODELL:
I had a good friend that was a Bitcoiner who recommended it to me.
[01:15:37] Lionel Shriver:
Good. Well, that's that's how most people come across this book. And you know what? Truth is, most of my books have been popular because of word-of-mouth. I don't have publishers putting money behind them, but word-of-mouth means more to me than a pub publishing budget. Grassroots. And it it's it's real. It's not confected. And so I'm very heartened that you and your your colleagues and supporters have latched on to the book.
[01:16:15] ODELL:
I'm a proud owner of a first edition. My wife got it for me.
[01:16:19] Lionel Shriver:
Good. Well, if you if anything ever happens to it, come to me. I'll get you another one. I've got a lot of them in the attic. I appreciate that, Lionel.
[01:16:29] ODELL:
And, likewise, if, you know, you ever have any questions about Bitcoin, you know how to reach me now. I'll come right to you. I would love to, you know, at least get you set up with a Bitcoin wallet, maybe send you a little Bitcoin so you can play around with it.
[01:16:44] Lionel Shriver:
Sure.
[01:16:45] ODELL:
I'd be open to that. Great. I mean, I saw a bunch of people in the audience wants to send you some Bitcoin, so it'd be great. Awesome. Well, I don't wanna take up too much of your time. I know time is precious. Do you have any thank you for coming on. Do you have any final words, for the audience?
[01:17:10] Lionel Shriver:
I'd make one tiny plot apology Hit us. That in truth, the amount of gold that Nali puts on the back of Willing's bicycle would be so physically heavy that the bike would fall over.
[01:17:27] ODELL:
It's okay though because Bitcoin would fix that.
[01:17:30] Lionel Shriver:
Right. So, yeah, that's the one plot thing that I I think I I was guilty of using poetic license.
[01:17:41] ODELL:
I, I mean, I failed to mention this earlier, but in strictly adversarial scenarios when you're crossing borders or whatnot, you can store Bitcoin in a way where you just think it in your head as long as you remember the words in your head. When you get across the border, you can then access your Bitcoin. So it's as light as that. You could do a full strip search, and someone wouldn't even it could be $20. It could be a $100. It could be a $1,000,000,000, and no one would find it. No one could take it. Incredibly powerful.
[01:18:16] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I wish you luck.
[01:18:18] ODELL:
Thanks, Lionel. Likewise. I appreciate you. Thank you for joining. Huge shout out to everyone in the audience. Thank you guys for coming. Thank you guys for being a massive part of the show and joining us in the live chat. If for some reason you haven't bought mandibles yet, consider buying it. I will set up Lionel with a Bitcoin wallet, and I'll let you guys know her address if you wanna send her some money. Thank you all for supporting the show. Till next time. Stay on both StackSats. Thanks, Lionel.
[01:18:48] Lionel Shriver:
So long.
Happy Bitcoin Friday, freaks. It's your host, Odell, here for another SIL dispatch. The show focused on actionable Bitcoin and Freedom Tech discussion. I have a very I have a very great guest, in the house today, for today's show. But before I get there, I'm just gonna do a really quick, intro to the show. As always, CITL dispatch is funded by you guys. We have no ads, no sponsors, purely funded by Bitcoin donations from our audience. I wanna thank everyone who continues to support the show. All the links are at cildispatch.com. If you wanna donate, with Bitcoin, you can go to sill dispatch.com/ donate.
Like I said, all stats are appreciated. Thank you for your support. You can also support the show on podcasting 2 point o apps by streaming stats directly to me as you listen to the show. You simply pick the value that you think the show provides on a sats per minute basis, and then it will stream me sats, as you listen directly to my Bitcoin node. We also at dispatch, we have a live audience. That live audience beams in from YouTube, Twitch, and Matrix. Huge shout out to all the freaks who join us in the live chat and make this show unique. You guys are also the hosts, and I do appreciate you joining.
Last but not least, I know it's a bear market. I know it's a recession. If you can't spare any Bitcoin, your support by sharing the show, subscribing to the show, sharing with friends and family, leaving reviews on all platforms that helps. It's available on all podcast apps. You simply search Cielo Dispatch. Before we get started and I introduce my fantastic guest today, I just wanna read a couple boostograms that people have left, for the previous episodes. A boostogram is when you support the show with Bitcoin, you can leave a message attached to it. We have at juicy disco with 80,000 stats saying, CIL dispatch is an invaluable source of learning. It's been extremely beneficial for my Bitcoin journey the last couple of years. Also, thanks for the response to my question regarding UTXO management from a fee perspective on Noster. Stay humble and stack sats. We have Eric 99 with 50,000 sats saying one sat equals one sat makes sense to me.
We have Oscar Merry of Fountain Podcasts with a 100,000 sat saying, great content this week, Matt. Excited for all these new lightning features. Bulk 12, async payments. Let's go. We have at Sourcewire with 21,000 sats saying absolute pleasure listening to the vast knowledge base Steve has. Love the show. Thanks you thanks to you both. Okay. With all that, let's get that out of the way. Thank you for for standing by with me, Lionel. We have Lionel Shriver on the show today, author of Mandibles. Lionel, welcome.
[00:03:28] Lionel Shriver:
Pleasure to talk to you. It's been a while since I talked about this book.
[00:03:33] ODELL:
This is all we talk about, Lionel. All we talk about is mandibles week in and week out. So, I don't know where we should start. I mean, you wrote mandibles in 2016. I'm curious
[00:03:49] Lionel Shriver:
Or I wrote it earlier than that because that's when it was published. Fair enough. Fair enough. I wanna get maximum credit for prescience.
[00:03:58] ODELL:
When did you when did you start writing it? In 2015.
[00:04:01] Lionel Shriver:
Probably started it in 2014.
[00:04:03] ODELL:
And what was the inspiration? 2008. 2008 was the inspiration.
[00:04:10] Lionel Shriver:
It's kind of obvious.
[00:04:11] ODELL:
Yeah. I mean, that's fair enough. It was my 2008 shaped my youth and was one of the reasons why I found Bitcoin in the first place.
[00:04:19] Lionel Shriver:
Well, it was, it changed my feeling about the whole world, and it made it made the world seem so much more fragile than it had before. I had and I I have to say that previous to the near collapse of the entire international fiscal system, I, was extremely bored by economics. I thought, you know, unemployment rates and and varying levels of currency in compared to each other, and it it just all put me to sleep. And I never read the business pages. I only used them to clean the window of my wood stove. And then suddenly, economics got very interesting indeed. And I'm always on the lookout for something new to be fascinated by, so I didn't resist it.
And, during this post nearapocalypse period, I bought a house in London, and that was really interesting because, of course, it entailed a big whack of my assets. And just even moving around money at that time felt extremely dangerous, and you weren't really advised to put more than the amount that the government guaranteed as if the government could actually guarantee that much money across the board. So that's an that's misguided and diluted to begin with, that the government will ever make you whole if this shit goes completely to hell.
Right. But, nevertheless, being careful, I, you know, I only put, like, £50,000 into into each account. And I had to establish all these different bank accounts with all these different banks because any of them could at any at any time simply collapse. So, I mean, it would I I can't tell you how much bother it was. I don't have a lot of patience with paperwork. Mhmm. And and just shipping the money around was a huge project. And, and when I remember that period, that's what I remember is is going from bank to bank along the the high street of my then neighborhood and establishing a new account at each one of them just in order to make one transaction.
And it Yeah. Shook me up. And and so when I got the idea for this book, I started doing, a lot of reading or what for me is a lot of reading in nonfiction because I have little appetite for or I used to have little appetite for nonfiction. I'm a spoiled fiction writer who likes to read made up fairy stories. And, and I discovered that the the the new nonfiction in the economics is anything but boring. It is it is apocalyptic. It is about the end of the world. And, I haven't completely kept up with what's out there most recently because I don't have the same motivation.
And, you know, I naturally moved on to other books that had other topics. But I don't have any time for climate change. Okay? I'm not worried about the temperature of the planet, which has only increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, barely over a degree centigrade. And then and, you know, I'm sorry that that just doesn't scare the shit out of me. And, and I don't confuse climate and weather, unlike the rest of the media. But, I am terrified of financial collapse, and that has not changed. Sometimes when I write a book, I kind of write myself out of my own anxieties.
I don't know. When I finished big brother, my obesity book, I think I stopped worrying about getting fat. Okay. I was done with that. But I'm afraid that the anxiety that man that motivated the mandibles has done nothing but accelerate because the big the big concern, of course, is burgeoning debt, and it just gets worse. Nothing nothing was learned from 2,008 at all. The overall debt burden worldwide is way bigger than it ever was. And at a certain point, the Ponzi scheme, like all Ponzi schemes, falls apart. And what's horrifying about the death of this Ponzi scheme is that, yes, it it entails the the almost theoretical loss of a lot of wealthy people who didn't really create anything or, you know, it's all numerical.
They're just lucky, and then they're unlucky. And that doesn't seem to matter that much morally. It's still systemically disturbing, but it's it's, you know, it's what comes around and goes around. But what we're all what we would also be looking at is the loss of life savings of people that did make something and believed in the system and believed it was possible to save for their retirement and and made sacrifices for that and didn't get the newest computer and didn't install a swimming pool or, you know, or didn't go out to eat every night. They they they embraced the idea that money has value and will continue to do so.
And I I just I just think that's the the threat is is across the board. First of all, disorder and violence and also just a complete collapse of of social faith and and and inevitably a a very dangerous Darwinian world in which you no longer have social co cooperation. Money is one of the main media that create that creates social cooperation. It makes us makes it possible for us to trade apples for oranges. You know? And every time every time I want to get groceries, I don't wanna have to write a short story. And I think I'd have to write a lot of short stories even to get a bag of apples. So, it's massively more important for social order and for the kind of complex systems we have constructed than than the temperature the temperature. It's just I'm sorry.
And I'm afraid that we more or less learned the wrong thing from 2,008. What what we seem to have learned is, oh, I see. Everything almost fell apart, but it didn't, so it won't. No? And I'm sorry, but that's not that's not the lesson. We were very lucky. Government stepped in, and things fell apart on a scale that government was was still capable of influencing the outcome. Right? So but when we're rapidly approaching a time when the problem is government. Right? Yes. It is the government that doesn't have any money. It is the government that is producing money that is completely worthless in vast quantity, you know, in order to cover its own backside.
And then government isn't the answer. So I you know, I'm very I have to say I'm very sympathetic with the cryptocurrency motivation, and, I love the idea of money that is taken away from government. I I love the idea of of of a world in which the government actually has to borrow from an external entity instead of from itself, which is a contradiction in terms. But I have been disappointed in the reality of of crypto, and I have have not personally invested in it. Out of a kind of well, natural distrust of the new, out of a distrust of what has proven very volatile in a way that I don't have a stomach for. I'm one of those people who doesn't like to, put a quarter into a a a one armed bandit because I might lose 25¢.
I'm I am really, like, protestant and safety, safety. And, if it were up to me, I wouldn't be in the, stock market at all. I would just be in a savings account that paid 5%, not that you can get that even now. But, I don't I don't like risk. And so far, Bitcoin is still seemingly very risky.
[00:14:31] ODELL:
No. A 100%. I mean, Lionel, there's a lot to unpack there. First of all, I I would like to say that I agree with pretty much everything you just said. You sound exactly like a Bitcoiner. I I mean, you sound you sound like pretty much everyone in the audience can relate to you right now. I think the first part that was really interesting to me is this idea of 2,008 being forgotten. I don't even know if it was the wrong lessons were learned. I almost feel like no lessons were learned. I I feel like people just swept it under the rug.
[00:15:08] Lionel Shriver:
Well, it was unpleasant. It's just like COVID. Nobody wants to think about COVID anymore. So we can't go we we we don't wish to go through the exercise of realizing that, idiotically, we shut down entire economies for month upon month, really the better part of 2 years in some places. I'm in the UK right now. It was horrific, and they did themselves incredible damage. But nobody even wants to review that because it was an icky time. Yep. Right? Oh, I don't remember I don't wanna remember the icky time. So let's just shove it under the carpet, and we won't we're not gonna contemplate the fact that, oh, it turns out that literally overnight, we were willing to sacrifice every civil liberty we ever had.
And I'm afraid that the near financial collapse of 2,008 and it's interesting. We have all different names for it. There's never been we've never arrived at a name for it, and I think that's telling. You know, it was a the great recession for a while, but you've noticed that hasn't stuck. Right. Nothing is stuck. It started out here as the credit crunch, which sounds like a candy bar. Oh, the credit crunch. Do you want a credit crunch? You want some with peanuts? And and and it was so trivializing. It was ludicrous. But, no, we do not revisit it.
It's just an icky time. And you're totally right. There were no lessons learned. Slightly more capitalization of banks. But when you're talking about funny money, what does it matter? Right. And I have to say, you know, Mike, I I I live with I live with this fear in a very real world day to day way. I have been, for a fiction writer, of all things, pretty successful, And there aren't very many of us out there. And for half of my career, I made practically no money, and was still working very hard. I'm not going to be apologetic here. I get tired of people apologizing for having any assets. I have some assets. I worked really hard for them, and most of my walk in the market or any other kind of investment has been very poor.
So, steadily, what assets I am managing to accrue, they don't grow in that way that that, you know, you're told that they're supposed to. It just hasn't happened. So and I'm getting older for fuck's sake, and I don't know how many books I've got more in me. Maybe I'll run out of ideas. I want I want to be able to buy a chicken and a bottle of wine until I'm 89. I don't ask much more. But when money becomes worthless, you can't even buy a chicken and a bottle of wine. And so, you know, I'm I'm completely baffled by what to do with my investments.
Right now, I've stuck some of it into, you know, 3% CDs, which is better than nothing. But I know perfectly well that I'm kidding myself because when you've got a a 10% inflation rate, you're losing 7%. And then you have to pay taxes on the 3%. So basically, you get dick. Right? And and my feel my feeling is, a, none of this is is fair, and, b, why do I have to live with this constant anxiety? I am constantly worried that the entire fiscal world on which my assets are built, most of them still in dollars, that it that it's just gonna collapse like a house of cards, and I will be left with nothing. And I wish I thought that this was neurotic, but I don't think it is neurotic.
I'm just curious. Did you happen to read the op ed? I hardly ever read op eds in the New York Times for obvious reasons. But this one was one of the guest essays, and it was in the last week about the entitlement programs in the US. Did not. Did you read it? It was fucking terrifying, And it's based on recent, you know, what office of whatever figures. They're not, you know, not some fringe group concocting scare stories. But by 2050, just in terms of, you know, looking at the way the entitlements are structured now, if nothing is done, we're going to be I think the figure is a $117,000,000,000,000 in debt, sovereign debt.
That boggles the mind. And and and meanwhile, you've got Biden talking about how, you know, both programs are safe and he's not going to make any changes to them. And everyone's going to get their Social Security and everyone's going to be able to lift to a 110 and be dependent on Medicare and get their knees replaced 3 times. And, it none of it adds up. The the age structure in the United States, it doesn't add up. And I don't I'm sorry. I don't care how many illiterates cross the border. That's not gonna change the big economic picture that you're gonna have way too many old people like me, depending on practically nobody working.
And, you know, this is not a long term future. It used to be that when you were talking about 2030 or 2050, it was just off in the distance. You know, who cares? Who cares? It was never going to happen to you. I mean, I'll tell you one of the things that motivated me to write The Mandibles because I've been reading many, many figures, environmental and economic figures that often, you know, stop at 2050. That's just because we're, you know, we're a society obsessed with base 10. Yeah. We like round numbers. Yeah. We love we love round numbers and base 10.
And and I I sat down one day and I calculated, if I lived, for example, as long as my paternal grandfather did, who's 2 generations behind me, so should really have a smaller life expectancy than my own generation. But if I lived to 96 as he did, I'd live to 22,052. Fuck me. And I'll tell you what, I was terrified and disappointed. I didn't think, oh, goody. I'm going to live to see, you know, many more technological miracles created, and and I'll find out what what happens to all these exciting human stories that I've been following. You know, I'm going to live much more much more into this century, than I expected.
No. I was filled with dread and horror. I don't wanna be alive in 2050, much less at the age of 53 or, I mean, 93, you know, barely able to walk or or string a sentence together. I I don't want to be, as we say so incessantly now, vulnerable Right. At that time. Because it's if you look at all the figures, that's by then, if not way before, is is when everything is going to fall apart.
[00:23:30] ODELL:
And Yeah. It might happen sooner. And and,
[00:23:33] Lionel Shriver:
again, I think the problem will be economic. Now the the other thing to bear in mind if you're apocalyptically inclined, is that Guilty. Most disasters do not occur in a vacuum. They interact with other disasters so that any economic collapse is inevitably going to entail huge political conflict and possibly military conflict.
[00:24:05] ODELL:
Always has.
[00:24:06] Lionel Shriver:
I mean, I it was I tried to cover the bases in the mandibles, but the truth is that the mandibles is much more modest in scale than I think the real threat is. For one thing, I just wasn't really up for writing a novel that was based on the experience of a single family.
[00:24:27] ODELL:
Right.
[00:24:28] Lionel Shriver:
Did also, entailed the collapse of the entire world. Right? So I kept, I kept the fiscal collapse to the United States.
[00:24:42] ODELL:
And specifically almost in New York.
[00:24:44] Lionel Shriver:
Right? Yes. Of course. And then we experienced that locally Yeah. As one would. But I would say that that's the one unrealistic thing about the plot, and I knew it at the time. I did this on purpose. It was to do myself a favor. I I just didn't wanna get into India and Africa and Europe and all that shit. Russia. It was, yeah, it was too much to take on. I'm not that ambitious a novelist. So, artificially, I kind of drew a a circle around the United States, and I allowed the US to operate in isolation. And the rest of the world sealed itself off from the US with this new currency, and nobody's dealing with dollars anymore. I mean, I tried to put it together in a credible way, but I actually believe it to be completely incredible. I do not believe that the way things are put together right now, the US can collapse economically and not bring everyone else with it.
[00:25:42] ODELL:
They were the reserve currency of the world.
[00:25:44] Lionel Shriver:
So if we and we're already kinda seeing that. Right? That is what that is what that's what the book begins with, and I think that that's what Americans, take for granted that the that the dollar is the international reserve currency. They don't even know what it means, most of them. But but in not knowing what it means, they also don't know how dependent they are on being the reserve currency and how much the US gets away with murder economically, and generates vastly more dollars than than it should possibly be be be able to without creating hyperinflation. That's Right. That's really the secret, is the is the reserve currency. So that all over the world, other countries and other banks are using dollars and therefore have dollars, to trade in things like commodities, oil, whatever, and to pay their own debts.
All all countries are not allowed to borrow in their own currency. A lot of them have to borrow in dollars. Right. Makes it possible for us to have generated vast numbers of dollars that are we are not using in the United States. If the US ever if the US dollar ever lost that position, then all of those dollars would flood our country because it's like, I'm sorry. We don't use these anymore. We don't need them. Take them back. Guess what that would do to the the value of the dollar? And yet and yet US authorities who who do nothing but abuse the dollar, think they can continue continue to do that infinitely because they are complacent and arrogant and stupid.
Yeah. And there's nothing to con there's nothing to prevent a consortium of other countries from coming along and saying, we don't wanna use the dollar anymore.
[00:27:44] ODELL:
Well, so the way I kind of look at it, currently, I'm, looking at everything unfolding is is what we're what we're kind of witnessing right now is is the US is exporting our inflation around the world to all these lesser economies. And so those economies, we're starting to see them falter first. Then after they falter, then it kind of comes home to roost here in America, and then you you see, like, a whole global crisis kind of happen at the same time. And so then the question is, when trust breaks down in that situation, where do financial markets move from that point forward? How do people do any kind of financial transaction, whether that's nation states doing, you know, 1,000,000,000 of dollars in trade or if that's a person going to buy chicken and wine?
[00:28:34] Lionel Shriver:
Well, the whole system is actually based on trust. I'm sure I'm not telling you anything you don't know. It's a kind of religious faith. Right. The value of money is created by everyone believing in the value of money. You know, I think that's in the mandibles that it's a belief in Tinker Bell. Right. And that's what keeps Tinker Bell on the air is that everyone believes it. And the other great binder, is is is self interest. So it's not in our interest for money to be worthless, so we're going to continue to behave as if it it it has value. And that that has worked after a fashion and, in fact, better than you would have ever expected. Most of these currencies should have gone to shed a long time ago, including the dollar. But it's but the that prospect is so horrifying.
Hold on.
[00:29:31] ODELL:
You're good.
[00:29:33] Lionel Shriver:
Just a second. I'm sorry. It's probably my husband. You're good. He didn't get my email.
[00:29:41] ODELL:
Family's important.
[00:29:42] Lionel Shriver:
Hey. Listen. You didn't get my email. No. I told you not to not to FaceTime me right now. Of course. I'm a podcast. You're on TV.
[00:29:57] ODELL:
I'm on
[00:29:58] Lionel Shriver:
when? When? Okay. I'm gonna give me 45 minutes.
[00:30:03] ODELL:
45 minutes. Okay. Bye. I can do that. My cohost on my other show, his dad always calls while we're recording, and he gives weather updates.
[00:30:17] Lionel Shriver:
Well, Jeff says hey.
[00:30:21] ODELL:
Thanks, Jeff. Sorry about that. You're good. Where were we? Yeah. I mean, trust. Every all our whole lives rely on different trust relationships, but especially money.
[00:30:37] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. I mean, that's that's what really hit me hard writing the book is how dependent we are on money. And everyone thinks in terms of, oh, we're dependent on having enough of it so that we can buy what we need. But that's not what I mean, obviously. We're dependent on the functionality of money, however much we have of it, that it still it still buys things. It is still accepted in trade for real things. And it's actually a kind of miracle that money works at all and that I can give you a piece of paper, much less a a a purely this and by theoretical set of digits with a little piece of plastic or by punching keys, and you'll you'll give me a car.
I mean, fucking hell. You'll give me a car. And that that is that's a miracle, And that's that's a great creation, but it's like any kind of creation. It's it's hard to create. It's easy to destroy. And, you know, ever since the advent of fiat currencies, governments in particular have been out to destroy it, to abuse it. Right.
[00:32:03] ODELL:
And, yeah, and people don't realize it's a relatively new phenomenon, this idea of just government issued fiat. Absolutely. Seventies. Yeah. Based on nothing.
[00:32:13] Lionel Shriver:
And, you know, the the threat initially was, of course, well, if it's based on nothing and governments are unconstrained from making up as much of it as they want, then what's to stop them from infinitely creating more until it's completely worthless? And it hasn't taken as long as you might expect, I. E. 5 minutes, but it's still happening.
[00:32:38] ODELL:
Right.
[00:32:39] Lionel Shriver:
And this debt thing, it's still I mean, who who thinks that the the US government is ever going to pay back the, what is it, 3 31 and a half $1,000,000,000,000 that, strictly speaking, we owe? Is it ever gonna Same. Does that number ever come down? No. Not with the entitlement situation we've got now. It's not ever gonna come down. If it's never gonna come down, it's never it's never being repaid.
[00:33:11] ODELL:
So, yeah, I mean, that's never gonna happen. And the only safe assumption is that, of course, governments are gonna abuse their power, and, of course, corrupt individual in individuals in those governments will abuse their power. And that's the only way you can operate is under that assumption, and that's what we're seeing play out in real time. So, I mean, in mandibles in the mandibles, gold plays a major I mean, you gave us one line on Bitcoin. You said Bitcoin. Remember what happened to Bitcoin? I do. The gold
[00:33:41] Lionel Shriver:
I I haven't read the book in years.
[00:33:43] ODELL:
You have a single line. It's like page 42 or something like that. It's just like, just just remember what happens to remember what happened to Bitcoin. You just kinda left us on that. But I I like to think that was If I may expand,
[00:33:58] Lionel Shriver:
If I were writing it today, I'd probably give it a little more time, a little more space. But the the danger that Bitcoin and any other rival currency has is that government does not want to give up money. Agree. And it won't. They won't. And they can take you over, and they can they can make trading in Bitcoin illegal and arrest you. They can do whatever they want. I mean, that's the other thing in my horrifying political maturity, I have had to realize. And we we we tend to be complacent about these things, but government can do anything. We want that's what we learned during the pandemic. Government can do anything. It seems constrained by all these little constitutional things, but that's just so much paper. In fact, they've got the military, and they can do anything.
And therefore, if you're doing something they don't like, they can make you stop. So if the only thing that Bitcoin's got going for it right now is failure, as long as it doesn't work, like it's too volatile, or it's too much trouble for for vendors to accept, or has failed to build the kind of trust we're talking about, then they'll leave you alone. But success would be deadly. The US government will not allow a rival currency outside of government to thrive. It will not. It will stop. That's what's all this digital currency nonsense from the Fed is all about.
It's like, no. No. We're gonna do it.
[00:35:46] ODELL:
No. They're definitely gonna try. Yep. So, I mean, I wanna unpack all of this. But where I was going at first of all, I just wanna be absolutely clear. You somehow wrote the single best Bitcoin book that exists, and you weren't a Bitcoiner. You only mentioned Bitcoin once in the whole in the in the whole book, but you somehow wrote the Bitcoin book. And when I was talking about 2,008, how people forget, the reason I always talk about the mandibles is because it's a really easy way for someone to to remember the the issues we had with 2008 and kind of put it in a forward kind of actionable kind of thought process, of of how they can think about these situations and these concerns, and these systemic failures in our society, they can conceptualize it in their own world, right, in their their own world going forward.
But so the the reason I think and I've noticed I've I've read a lot of commentary about the mandibles. It's a very provocative book as, especially since it's become more prescient lately, and people are starting to see the crumbling issues with our societies. People get very up in arms and and and they push back against it. And I think coming from a Bitcoin audience, we don't necessarily see it that way because you didn't really explore the Bitcoin side of things. And and in your scenario, Bitcoin has failed. But in our scenario, in our life today, Bitcoin is hope to us. Right? Like, I was I was a a young kid getting shaped by 2,008, getting shaped by the Snowden disclosures where I found out all the tech companies were also spying on us, and they were complicit in all this government surveillance.
And I was very disenfranchised. Like, I did not see a a situation where I could have children, that I could have a family, and that that that things would be alright. Right? But then I discovered the the open source movement. I discovered Bitcoin. And to me, that gives me hope. And and and that's why we're able to read the mandibles in a in a way that doesn't is not necessarily, I don't wanna say, like, doomer. Right? Not necessarily, like, a negative light, because we already see these systemic issues, And Bitcoin wasn't around in this in this storyline. Right? But maybe in in in this future storyline, in reality, Bitcoin actually lessens those blows. I don't think it will necessarily stop chaos from happening and stop financial collapse, but it will it will lessen the blow. It will allow the darkness to be shorter than it would have otherwise because we'd have a money that doesn't require trust, that isn't run by governments, that isn't run by corporations, that any individual can use to save, to spend without permission.
And maybe we haven't had the biggest target on our back yet, but the target has been growing, and Bitcoin continues to truck on and continues to grow. And Bitcoin is built in a way that is is adversarial to is built in a way that is is designed to survive in adversarial environments. And and and, you know, I wanted to you mentioned earlier about cryptocurrency hasn't lived up to its expectations and the hype and all this stuff. The overwhelming majority of cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are not designed to be robust and censorship resistant in an adversarial environment. They simply aren't. They are mostly there's a ton of Ponzi schemes, Get rich quick schemes. They're centrally controlled.
They're easy to regulate. We're seeing regulations pop up all over the place on centralized entities that exist in the industry. But Bitcoin is designed in a way that there is no central actor. So who do you pressure to stop it? I don't wanna go I I I kinda want you there's so much to unpack here and not that much
[00:39:59] Lionel Shriver:
time. But you mentioned Well, I mean, I have to say, look, I have not made a special study of Bitcoin. I'm not any kind of crypto expert. You kinda are. All I can do is is wish you well, with a certain skepticism and to warn you about what could happen if this client really starts to work.
[00:40:25] ODELL:
So I what I wanted to talk about be allowed. Go ahead. But then, you know, I've got
[00:40:30] Lionel Shriver:
I've got a paranoid streak.
[00:40:32] ODELL:
So let's let's talk about the lens of gold in mandibles. Right? So, obviously, gold was positioned as an alternative to the banker and the failing dollar. And you basically set up that exact scenario that we're just talking about now with Bitcoin. Right? That the first thing the US government did was they went after gold holders and gold economy.
[00:40:56] Lionel Shriver:
And you know that that that legislation from the 19 thirties is still on the books.
[00:41:03] ODELL:
Yes. Well aware. Executive order 6102.
[00:41:07] Lionel Shriver:
Good for you.
[00:41:09] ODELL:
It's one of our favorite executive orders here in in the Bitcoin space. Inhibits
[00:41:13] Lionel Shriver:
me personally from investing in gold appreciably.
[00:41:18] ODELL:
Right.
[00:41:19] Lionel Shriver:
The the government keeps track of gold very carefully, and they have the legal right to take it away from you. Yes. And that's not a good asset. Of course, as I was pointing out, since government can do anything, they have the right to take anything away from you. Everything you own is provisional. They can take your house. They can take they can commandeer all the money in your account, pass the law tomorrow, you know, take the clothes off their off your back. Doesn't bear thinking about all the time because who wants to live in that downer universe? But Yep.
All our rights, so called, are provisional. I mean, I I honestly came away from that book thinking there there was no resort. I envy you your your feeling that you found 1. Well, we have no choice. And I can see how that would make you feel more confident and powerful and independent of all these systems that are now so fragile. And I do nothing but encourage you. I don't I don't know whether crypto has the capacity crypto. Bitcoin. Bitcoin. Sorry. I can see you're touching on that point. I don't know whether you'd you'd effectively construct a a financial bunker for yourselves and and other Bitcoin investors if the world fell apart?
Personally, I came to the conclusion that what what I'm afraid of is on such a scale that there is no safe harbor. And the only thing that I would have to comfort myself is that I have already lived a really good life. And so if it goes to shit, I I still it it went better than most people's historically. And that's about all I would cling to because Rescuing even real things that you technically own in a situation of total chaos doesn't guarantee that you get to keep them. And that's what I tried to illustrate in the latter part of the mandibles before we get to the second part, which we I never discussed with anyone because I don't wanna blow the ending. So we maybe we can get to that. But, you know, technically, the family still owns the house. Right? Right. But it doesn't matter because they don't have a gun.
And someone with a gun can kick them out of their house. So much for owning a house. You know? So much, oh, I've got this asset worth so much. And if I'm really desperate, I can always downsize or something. Not necessarily. I mean, that's just one more system that can break down. So anything that you own, you know, even a pound of hamburger you're bringing home from the supermarket can be taken away from you by somebody who has a sock full of loose change with which he can wallop you over the head. In fact, that's an interesting scene. It's so small, but it's the first time that our hero, our stealth hero, as I like to think of him, does something bad.
[00:45:15] ODELL:
Willing.
[00:45:16] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. And, you know, he mugs a little kid, who's only about 10 years old, for his groceries, and it's unpleasant. But it's an illustration of, you know, no matter how virtuous your character, you're gonna cross these lines if it's a matter of survival. And that's where Welling crosses the line. And it's a it's a touching and depressing tiny scene, but I think it's it's morally and symbolically very important to the book.
[00:45:56] ODELL:
No. I mean, I felt that as well while I was reading it. I mean, there's it you know, ultimately, at the end of the day, Bitcoin is is a tool. Right? It is one tool in a toolbox. There's a very there's a lot of corollaries in the Bitcoin community on just sustainability, localism, self defense, right, the right to bear arms in America, at least, among the American Bitcoiners. And that's why I say, like, you kind of hit all the you hit all the pieces.
[00:46:39] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I should I should remark on that point in particular that, previously, I have been a, I would say, a trite liberal on, gun control issues. And, you know, I made my reputation on my 7th novel, We Need to Talk About Kevin, which is it's not about a school shooting, actually. Everyone often forgets that because they didn't wanna get into the gun control debate. Right. I was interested in looking at pure malice, without worrying about what the weapon was, so he uses a crossbow. Nevertheless, I I've inevitably got dragged into all kinds of gun control debates and generally fall on the control side partly out of sheer self interest because I don't wanna be shot Right. By some lunatic. And my main concern with the whole second amendment thing is that the proportion of insane people in the human race is simply too high. And in in the United States, it it's it's clearly about about twice the percentage of any other country.
So when When the mandibles. When I was writing the mandibles, I rather surprised myself because I didn't see how my family was gonna surprise without a survive without a gun. And Willing, being the savviest of the lot, is the one who goes and gets one. And this is actually contrary to my standard politics because I don't like the idea of necessarily encouraging people to arm themselves. But I thought that the the scenario that I had constructed, that's what you would do. That was what you would have to do unless you were a fucking idiot. So Yep.
So that's where they end up, and that gun ends up being rather important.
[00:48:39] ODELL:
Well, I don't know if it was intentional or not, but, I mean, it takes place in New York, which has, you know, very very strict gun control laws. Mhmm. And and to me, I mean, maybe it was my own bias reading into it. Right? But it's a clear perspective where, like, gun control laws, and you hear it all the time. It's, like, the most common narrative. Right? It's the most common messaging point on people like myself that are that are pro freedom in that regard is that gun control laws do not stop bad people from getting guns. Right?
And the only real protection you have is to learn how to use them yourself, get comfortable using them yourself, and use them in a safe way, of course. But, ultimately, it's just another tool to empower individuals. And, ultimately, I think, as a society, the more tools we have that empower individuals reduces power of these these small centralized entities that exert tons of power around the world and are very often corrupt. So maybe I I kind of tend to view that we have a lot of, you know, insane people in general. May I just maybe I shouldn't use the word insane, but just a a lot of crazy people. Along with the word insane. Yeah. But it's like isn't it like a clinical whatever. But that's not my point. My point is, yeah, that is true, but the alternative is a small group of people that are corrupt that are running things. Right? So my focus for the last 10 years or so has been tools that empower individuals because I think that brings the power back. And and just to talk about how, like, crazy the corollaries are with your book and our thinking, like, this show is called Citadel Dispatch.
I called it Citadel Dispatch because we have this idea of Bitcoin citadels, which is, like, extreme localism, self sustainability, small trade. Right? Trade between different localities, distributed power. Right? And, of course, as I'm reading your book, there is a farm that everyone thought he was crazy, and he named it Citadel. Right? So you're, yeah, you're 95% there on everything,
[00:50:57] Lionel Shriver:
except Bitcoin. One thing that this book rarely gets credit for is having a a happy ending. And the it was positively unlike me, but we can't forget that I fundamentally created a utopia in, Nevada. Yeah. And Nevada of all places. And, well, perfect place culturally, perfect place. And, of course, my my utopia doesn't have to do with everyone is in a community with everyone else, and and everyone contributes everything that they can. And then there are all these people who can't contribute anything and are totally dependent. You know, it's not a liberal utopia. It's a libertarian utopia.
And people take care of themselves, and they if they want to, they can take care of other people on an individual level. But, basically, it's there's no welfare state. You're on your own. And it's much more functional than a society that that says, well, you know what? You don't really have to work. And if you don't work, we're gonna support you, and you can have a house, and we'll give you a salary, and and then expects everybody work. It's just hilarious. Yep. So I, you know, I had, I had a I had fun putting that together. And then, of course, in, in my Nevada, which has seceded from the rest of the country, it has a 10% flat tax. And I'm big on flat taxes.
I But then you yeah. I think progressive progressive taxes are larceny and also unfair and discourage people from earning money and also encourage people to cheat. So a flat tax that you really can't escape, I I think it's brilliant. One of the countries that employs it is Estonia. It's not 10%. It's 20%, I think. 20 or 21. But it works great, and it means that everyone contributes to their communal requirements, and and and that's quite different from having half the country mooching off the other half. Right. And it's it's it's a better social relationship.
And it also means that if everyone is contributing something, then they care about how the money is spent. It's it's what government was supposed to be and hardly ever is. So that's my, you know, that's my little utopia. And, of course, the very last line of the book gives you the idea when the flat tax goes up to 11%,
[00:53:55] ODELL:
that this isn't gonna last. There's a crack in the utopia.
[00:53:58] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. The the utopias never last. But it was it was a it was fun after all the all the agro, all the loss, all the people dying, to have a more of a almost a fairy tale ending.
[00:54:19] ODELL:
Yeah. A little bit. I mean, so what do we unpack there? The the idea of people think I'm, like, anti government. Right? I'm anti large corrupt governments. Right? When you have smaller local governance, there's more accountability. Right? And that's kind of what you captured at the end there is as they got larger, as a result, the cycle starts to repeat itself again. And and it's and Bitcoin is is this idea that I constantly hone in on is this idea of broken incentives. That if you look throughout society, the majority of the issues we have are are based somewhere along the line on some broken incentive.
And how can we make those incentives stronger? How can we make them more aligned? How can we make them more robust, so that society actually can function properly and function fairly? And and so when you have smaller governance, in general, when the governance is more local, those incentives are much stronger. Those are stronger, cleaner incentives. And as a result, you have less corruption and you have more efficient governance. Do you agree on that?
[00:55:30] Lionel Shriver:
Up to a point, though. I see this in the UK a lot. There's another side to be argued in that, there's nothing, you never get worse petty tyranny than local government. UK go local government is, dictatorial and irrational and run by people who, are are poorly qualified for making the kind of decisions they're making. So You you see that in, like, HOAs in America a lot,
[00:56:08] ODELL:
where they're, like, tell you can't have a homeowners association, where they, like, tell you can't have a bird feeder out front. Exactly.
[00:56:16] Lionel Shriver:
No. You cannot paint paint your post box pink. This doesn't fit with our scheme. Right. And you get a lot of that. And, and I don't know a lot about local government in the US right now, so I will just vouch for the British ones. And they're they're they're tyrannical. They're always out to make money. Like, they they'll they'll give you a 100 quid ticket for littering if you if you drop the the wrapper around your chewing gum. They're, they they go after you for you know, they make it impossible to park anywhere. And so that if you even stop, you get another 100 quid ticket. I mean, they're just hideous and, and often quite corrupt, you giving planning permission for this, that, and the other thing only to their friends. So that's the other side of the whole localism thing. I'm of 2 minds about it. Theoretically, I like the idea of local government. In practice, I see it, I see it as petty tyranny all the time. Yeah. I mean, it's definitely not
[00:57:29] ODELL:
perfect. Everything has trade offs. And and it has something to do with competition, mobility. There's something there in terms of, like, account like, having proper accountability because those issues seem to stem from, you know, there's being no accountability there, no competition,
[00:57:46] Lionel Shriver:
or or little competition. People don't Oh, well, I think one of the one of the most exciting things that we've witnessed in the United States recently just because of the way things are set up, and we have, for now, freedom of movement, is is this huge, exodus from high tax states. Yep. And and and toward low tax states and also states that are more interested in liberty. So there's less regulation. So, obviously, you know, Texas and and Florida in particular and, watching California and New York lose population
[00:58:30] ODELL:
is Yeah. I did that myself. Very satisfying. I moved from New York to Tennessee.
[00:58:37] Lionel Shriver:
Did the same thing? The other state.
[00:58:39] ODELL:
Yeah. And I, good for you, and New York deserves it. Yeah. I mean, you nailed that part. I mean, that was very prescient. I mean, you also nailed the movement passes with the brain plant chip that they, like,
[00:58:54] Lionel Shriver:
pushed on everybody. Oh, yes. Coming to a theater theater near you.
[00:58:59] ODELL:
We saw that in 2020. I mean, they they were it was rudimentary at the time. Right? It's like paper passes. Right. But if they could if they could put it in an implant, they would have done it.
[00:59:10] Lionel Shriver:
Well, of course, this whole idea of chipping, I probably didn't make it up. It was already clearly on its way, But I thought my my innovation was an important one, and that's where it was forward looking. And that is that the chips could also be implanted with your assets, with your money, and therefore it's possible for the government to extract money from you, basically, from the air. So it's your money is in the back of your head, and the government can just reach in and take it. And it's so convenient. Isn't it?
In fact, a lot of a lot of the kind of top down tyranny that is being inflicted on us is in the name of convenience. Yep. And people are suckers for it.
[01:00:03] ODELL:
They really are. They really are. That's something I've noticed very much so. It's very obvious. And it's one of the things, like, with Bitcoin is that we're focused on is, you know, try and make it it'll never be more convenient than the, you know, centralized, surveilled, controlled bullshit, but, try and make it as convenient as possible, because, ultimately, as as long as there's friction there, less people will use it. We have 15 minutes left, Lionel. I wanna talk with you more about Bitcoin.
[01:00:41] Lionel Shriver:
Okay. Because That's why we need to do more of the the talking.
[01:00:46] ODELL:
Well, you're there. So let's let's so gold. First thing they did with gold was well, first thing in the book was cut off cut off the ability for Americans to move assets around the world. Right? Mhmm. They cut people off from doing that. The way I like to look yeah. Go on. You're saying they have done that? Or do you know In the mandibles, that's one of the first things they do. Capital controls. Right. Capital control. That's pretty easy to institute at a stroke. Right.
[01:01:17] Lionel Shriver:
And, by the way, it's already a little tricky to move American assets around the world. If you do anything with more than with $10,000 or more, you you have to report it to, you know,
[01:01:29] ODELL:
daddy. And it's getting automatically reported left and right. All of these systems are already surveilled and controlled. And,
[01:01:36] Lionel Shriver:
And over here, you know, I just did my US taxes. If you live abroad, you are legally obliged to report every single bank account. By the way, they don't want you to just mention it that you have bank accounts. You have to give the name of the bank, the address, the exact highest amount, even if it was only that high for 15 minutes, and the closing amount, and the and the account number. So, I mean, that's you don't even have to you don't have to do that with US assets yet. But with foreign ones, they have to know everything, and the fines for not reporting that are fantastically high.
So, you know and and and furthermore, there are a lot of countries where banks will no longer take American depositors. Right. Because it's not only the individual, account holder who has to repeat report to the US government, but so does the foreign bank who doesn't wanna have to mess with the fucking IRS.
[01:02:48] ODELL:
Right? Yeah. Too much liability.
[01:02:50] Lionel Shriver:
Yeah. Well, it's huge amounts of paperwork. It's not worth it. I mean, they're just not gonna make enough money off of you to make up for the bother and irritation of having to report to a a foreign government. So they just tell you that they won't hold your money, And it puts a lot of, expats in, in a very awkward position to the point where, actually, there there are countries where Americans really can't function, can't live. And, by the way, the other issue is this business of the federal government, telling American expats who may not even set foot in the United States all year that regardless, they have to report their worldwide income to the American government and pay taxes on it. Thank you.
And the system by which you're not supposed to be double taxed is highly imperfect and perfect and patchy.
[01:03:47] ODELL:
So And if you renounce your citizenship, you have to pay an exit tax equivalent to selling all your assets at the time of exit.
[01:03:53] Lionel Shriver:
That's right. They've they've sewn that up too because the number of people who are Americans who are renouncing their citizenship is really starting to soar, and so they're gonna make you pay. And this is, again, this is government able to do anything? So they could also tell you, well, you can leave the country, but your assets can't. We're gonna keep them. So that's essentially what they're doing. It's impossible to get away from these people.
[01:04:22] ODELL:
Bitcoin fixes this.
[01:04:26] Lionel Shriver:
So I
[01:04:27] ODELL:
so you mentioned lack of property rights at the core of all of this. The way I like to look at Bitcoin is that it enforces property rights at the level of code. It's code that enforces property rights. At the core, that's what it is. We already see people using Bitcoin to escape capital controls. You know, China has has famously banned Bitcoin, 25, 30 times. Chinese nationals still to this day use to transfer money in and out of their country. You can send it as easy as a text message. That is a core value prop of Bitcoin is this this ability to send without permission. Another core property of Bitcoin is that no one can change the supply of Bitcoin.
So you talked about earlier, this idea that you work hard, and you don't wanna be a financial planner. You don't wanna study economics. You don't wanna watch CNBC. You don't wanna pick stocks. You know? You just wanna do what you love, work, and be with your family, and save up money for the future so that you're able to, you know, buy the things you need to live, the necessities you need to live, and the things you want to enjoy. Bitcoin, because no one can change the supply because it's ultimately a fixed supply asset, allows people to save in this save in this asset, save in Bitcoin, and long term hold that value without having to be a financial professional. Like, I hear that all the time. People like, oh, I don't, you know, Bitcoin doesn't interest me. I'm not interested in finance. Like, that's the point. The point is it's it's absolutely insane that people need to and feel the need to either be a financial planner or a higher one in order to save for their future. They should be able to just hold the money that increases in purchasing power over time.
And people think I'm crazy when I say that about Bitcoin, but, historically, that has been the case. Now, there is volatility. There's short term volatility, but it's a scarce asset going through an adoption phase. We have over 8,000,000,000 people on the planet. Maybe 50,000,000 own Bitcoin. Of course, it's gonna be volatile short term. The world is volatile. But on a longer term basis, Bitcoin's purchasing power has shown to increase. I expect it to continue that trend. So it's a it's a great savings vehicle. It's a great spending vehicle. And then now the third thing, and we saw this in the mandibles, is seizure resistance.
This idea that governments will come and they will try and take your money from you in times of chaos. We saw you had in the mandibles, you had police officers or military men come door to door and basically look for people's gold. They went that far. Mhmm. Now can they do that with Bitcoin? Yes. They can do that with Bitcoin. But you can use Bitcoin in a private way so that they, first of all, don't know you own Bitcoin. And second of all, do know you own Bitcoin? Because Bitcoin is code, we have this ability to essentially split up the keys that require that that that give you give you control of the Bitcoin. Right? So Bitcoin is crazy rabbit hole, Lionel, and I look forward to you going down, and I'm happy to answer any of your questions after the show. But, Bitcoin at at the core is is public key, private key cryptography.
So we have this ledger, the blockchain, that is that is is keeping track of people's Bitcoin ownership around the world. It's not attached to a name, specifically. It's attached to this public key, and the private key is what's required to spend it. Now without that private key, no one can take your money. So how do you protect that private key? Well, we have many different ways. A lot of people like putting it on steel, then it's water and fireproof. But, of course, you can have a military guy come in and and take take that steel from you. We have this concept called multisig, where instead of one private key, you have multiple private keys. You could have 5 private keys. It might require 3 of those private keys to spend. Those 3 could be located in different states. They could be located in different nations.
1 could be in a cloud drive. 1 could be on a piece of steel somewhere else. 1 could be buried in the backyard. So all of a sudden, the seizure capability of of these governments or other malicious individuals gets significantly reduced. So you have these three facets of Bitcoin, this ability to spend without permission, this ability to save in an asset that increases purchasing power over time, and this ability to secure the asset, cross borders with this asset in a way that has never been capable with any other money in our history.
And all those things combined lend itself to an adversarial environment where trust is eroded, where governments are going after their citizens. And to me, that is where this hope comes from when I read something like the mandibles, or I look on the news, or just see how the world is going right now.
[01:09:35] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I'm much better on what's wrong than how to fix it. Yes. So in a way, we've broken up the job, and you work on the positive side, and I'll just keep on coming up with doomsday scenarios. Deal. For my own part, for me, this is partially an entertainment because the narrative of collapse is is so transfixing, ask any film director. And, otherwise, I don't I'm I am leery of getting so anxious about this kind of thing that I that I exhaust my energy on it. And I don't wanna spend you know, I don't wanna be one of those people who ends up spending all her energy on a shelter in the backyard and making sure that it is full of, you know, 300 tens of baked beans. I mean, it it our lives are finite, and I don't wanna spend my life on that, digging a hole in the backyard. So Yeah. The only thing more scarce than Bitcoin is time.
Yeah. So I am I am careful about the way I spend my time, and that is the ultimate currency of our of our lives. And, I got a book out of it out of my own anxiety, which is a lot more than just a bunch more anxiety. And I'm very pleased that you seem to have got something out of it, And I'm also very pleased that the people listening to this seem to have enjoyed it and and certain scenes stuck in their minds. And, and you you you think you recognized my anxieties. And and there's a certain, you know, there's a certain community in that. There's a satisfaction in that. And, you know, so one of the fun things about being a novelist is sort of like putting a a a plug in your head while you're dreaming and being able to share it with other people, and that's what that is. And this happens to have been a nightmare, but, I had a lot of fun writing it. I should share with you before we go that, when I first submitted this book to my publisher, my editor absolutely hated it.
And, she showed it to the publisher, and he hated it. He spent he spent 45 minutes on the phone with me telling me all that what was wrong with it. He couldn't keep track of the characters, and he thought it was incredibly boring. When my editor did edit the book, I already had a contract, so it was harder for they could've got out of it, but they didn't wanna alienate me. So they figured they'd just get over this terrible book. And then when my editor edited it, she basically edited it down to a pamphlet. Right? There was nothing left. She hated it so much that she would just put these big x's through page after page. By the way, she was not interested in economics, so this was not a book for her. Right?
And, I was told to edit the Economics down to nothing, which I did not do. I did pare it down. I think you probably enjoy the original even more because it had more economics in it, Because that's really what makes the book special. There aren't any number of dystopic stories out there. A lot of them are set in New York. So, who cares an another, you know, society falls apart story. But this was very particular. It is an economic dystopia, and I tried as hard as I could to do my homework and therefore to put together a scenario that was genuinely credible, and I and I think it is. And that's not something that my publisher remotely appreciated.
So when I got this edit, I completely ignored it. I I I took none of none of the advice. And even still, you know, when it got when this book got the cover of the New York Times book review, the publisher refused to put any money behind it. It's never had any advertising. Nothing. It's you guys who have done the advertising and and enthusiasts like you. This is almost purely a word-of-mouth book because my publisher has refused to support it. And even through this, you know, the post Trump thing because, you know, it was earl later the same year that, Trump was elected.
Right. And everyone was buying these dystopic fictions. Did they put any behind it any money behind it then? No. Or have has there been any effort to readvertise the book now that we really are suffering serious levels of inflation, which has directly to do with the overproduction of money in the federal system. No. So, you know, it's it is incredible you know about this book because my publisher sure didn't go to any trouble that you would know about it. And Even to this day? It was not shoved down your throat, but it was something that you picked up on by by either accident or or having a sharp eye.
[01:15:33] ODELL:
I had a good friend that was a Bitcoiner who recommended it to me.
[01:15:37] Lionel Shriver:
Good. Well, that's that's how most people come across this book. And you know what? Truth is, most of my books have been popular because of word-of-mouth. I don't have publishers putting money behind them, but word-of-mouth means more to me than a pub publishing budget. Grassroots. And it it's it's real. It's not confected. And so I'm very heartened that you and your your colleagues and supporters have latched on to the book.
[01:16:15] ODELL:
I'm a proud owner of a first edition. My wife got it for me.
[01:16:19] Lionel Shriver:
Good. Well, if you if anything ever happens to it, come to me. I'll get you another one. I've got a lot of them in the attic. I appreciate that, Lionel.
[01:16:29] ODELL:
And, likewise, if, you know, you ever have any questions about Bitcoin, you know how to reach me now. I'll come right to you. I would love to, you know, at least get you set up with a Bitcoin wallet, maybe send you a little Bitcoin so you can play around with it.
[01:16:44] Lionel Shriver:
Sure.
[01:16:45] ODELL:
I'd be open to that. Great. I mean, I saw a bunch of people in the audience wants to send you some Bitcoin, so it'd be great. Awesome. Well, I don't wanna take up too much of your time. I know time is precious. Do you have any thank you for coming on. Do you have any final words, for the audience?
[01:17:10] Lionel Shriver:
I'd make one tiny plot apology Hit us. That in truth, the amount of gold that Nali puts on the back of Willing's bicycle would be so physically heavy that the bike would fall over.
[01:17:27] ODELL:
It's okay though because Bitcoin would fix that.
[01:17:30] Lionel Shriver:
Right. So, yeah, that's the one plot thing that I I think I I was guilty of using poetic license.
[01:17:41] ODELL:
I, I mean, I failed to mention this earlier, but in strictly adversarial scenarios when you're crossing borders or whatnot, you can store Bitcoin in a way where you just think it in your head as long as you remember the words in your head. When you get across the border, you can then access your Bitcoin. So it's as light as that. You could do a full strip search, and someone wouldn't even it could be $20. It could be a $100. It could be a $1,000,000,000, and no one would find it. No one could take it. Incredibly powerful.
[01:18:16] Lionel Shriver:
Well, I wish you luck.
[01:18:18] ODELL:
Thanks, Lionel. Likewise. I appreciate you. Thank you for joining. Huge shout out to everyone in the audience. Thank you guys for coming. Thank you guys for being a massive part of the show and joining us in the live chat. If for some reason you haven't bought mandibles yet, consider buying it. I will set up Lionel with a Bitcoin wallet, and I'll let you guys know her address if you wanna send her some money. Thank you all for supporting the show. Till next time. Stay on both StackSats. Thanks, Lionel.
[01:18:48] Lionel Shriver:
So long.
Introduction to the show and guest
Discussion on the inspiration for the book and the 2008 financial crisis
Concerns about the future and the impact of financial collapse
Discussion on the role of bitcoin and government control
The role of gold and gun control in the book
The idea of utopia and the ending of the book
Broken incentives in society
Pros and cons of local governance
Exodus from high tax states
Bitcoin as a solution for convenience and accountability
Bitcoin as a solution for lack of property rights and seizure resistance
